0% found this document useful (0 votes)
31 views24 pages

Vap Prevention Best Practices

Uploaded by

Feyissa Bacha
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
31 views24 pages

Vap Prevention Best Practices

Uploaded by

Feyissa Bacha
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 24

Ventilator-Associated

Pneumonia: What can we do


to prevent it?
Elevation of the Head of the Bed
Elevation of HOB: Evidence

• Semi-recumbent position decreases gastro-


esophageal reflux and subsequent aspiration
– Study with radioactively-labeled gastric contents
demonstrated reflux and aspiration reduced when HOB at
45°
– Various degrees of HOB elevation have not been
compared, but some degree of elevation appears
warranted

• Prospective cohort study of 277 patients requiring


mechanical ventilation
– Supine head position associated with 3-fold increase in risk
of VAP
Torres A, et al. Ann Intern Med. 1992;116:540. Kollef M, et al. JAMA. 1993;270:1965.
Elevation of HOB: Evidence

• RCT in 2 ICUs

• 3 of 39 (8%) pts in semi-


recumbent group (45°)
vs. 16/47 (34%) in supine
group (0°) developed
VAP (p=0.003)

• Study terminated early


at interim analysis

Drakulovic M, et al. Lancet. 1999;354:1851.


Elevation of HOB: Recommendation

• HOB should be elevated ≥30°


– Exceptions
• 15-30° < 1 year of age
• ECMO
• Oscillator
• Premature neonates (<30 wks gestational age) during
first month of life
• Patients for whom attending physician is concerned
there is a contraindication (must document reason)
• Procedures during which elevated HOB is prohibitive
Chlorhexidine Oral Care
CHG Oral Care: Evidence

• Gingival and dental plaque rapidly becomes


colonized with bacteria in intubated patients due to
poor oral hygiene and lack of mechanical
elimination

• Meticulous oral care reduces microbial burden in


upper airway

• Safety and feasibility of CHG oral care appear


favorable

DeRiso A, et al. Chest. 1996;109:1556. Chan E, et al. BMJ. 2007;10:1136. Chlebicki M,


et al. 2007. 35:595.
CHG Oral Care: Evidence

• Oral decontamination for prevention of VAP in


mechanically ventilated patients: meta-analysis
– 7 RCTs with 2144 patients found that oral antiseptics
significantly reduced incidence of VAP by 44% (RR 0.56,
0.39-0.81)

• Topical CHG for prevention of VAP: meta-analysis


– 7 RCTs with 1650 patients found a trend towards decreased
VAP with use of oral CHG care (RR 0.70; 0.47-1.04)
CHG Oral Care: Recommendations

• Chorhexidine 0.12% oral solution (15 ml bid until 24


hours after extubation) for all intubated patients
– Exceptions
• Hypersensitivity to component of solution
• <18 years of age

• Brush patients’ teeth bid with soft toothbrush to


remove dental plaque prior to using CHG

• Continue routine q4-6 hr routine oral care: cleaning


and moistening mouth using oral swabs or sterile
water and gauze
Subglottic Suctioning
Subglottic Suctioning: Evidence

• Drainage of subglottic secretions lessens the risk of


aspiration

• Specially designed endotracheal tubes have been


developed to provide continuous or intermittent
subglottic secretion removal

Kollef M, et al. Chest. 1999;116:1339. Smulders K, et al. Chest 2002;121:858.


Device for Continuous Aspiration of Subglottic Secretions

Valles J, et al. Ann Intern Med. 1995;122:179.


Subglottic Suctioning: Evidence

• Subglottic secretion drainage for the prevention of


VAP: meta-analysis
– 13 RCTs with 2442 patients
– 12/13 studies reported reduction in VAP rates in subglottic
secretion arm
– Overall reduction in VAP rates was 45%
– Subglottic secretion drainage also associated with
reduced duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU LOS

Muscedere J, et al. Crit Care Med. 2011;39:1985.


Subglottic Suctioning:
Recommendations
• Continuous subglottic suctioning system
recommended for patients expected to be
mechanically ventilated for >72 hours
– Exceptions
• Units that do not use cuffed ETTs: continue routine q1-2
hr and prn suctioning
Sedation Vacation
Sedation Vacation: Definition

• Daily scheduled interruptions of sedation based on


criteria
– If candidate for sedation interruption, sedation decreased
or turned off to determine if extubation criteria met
– If extubation criteria met, patient is extubated
Sedation Vacation: Evidence

• Weaning patients from ventilator easier when


patients able to assist with extubation by coughing
and controlling secretions

• Lightening sedation decreases amount of time


patients remain mechanically ventilated
– RCT of 128 mechanically ventilated pts: >2 day reduction in
duration of mechanical ventilation in arm with scheduled
interruption of sedation(~7 to 5 days, p<0.01)

Schewickert W, et al. Crit Care Med. 2004;32;1272.


Sedation Vacation:
Recommendations
• Lighten or discontinue sedation at least once daily
until patient is awake, can follow commands, or
until he/she becomes uncomfortable or agitated
– Use validated sedation scale (i.e., RASS)
– Usually performed by nursing and RT, but will leave to
discretion of individual units
– Caution: Patients not sedated as deeply have potential for
self-extubation and associated risks
– Exception
• Patients for whom attending physician is concerned
there is a contraindication (must document reason)
Curtis N, et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166:1338.
Assessment of Readiness to Extubate
Assessment of Readiness to
Extubate: Evidence
• Decreased time on ventilator = decreased risk of
VAP

• Before-and-after study of standardized nurse and


RT-driven ventilator weaning protocol
– Reduced VAP rates by 10%

Dries D, et al. J Trauma. 2004;56:943.


Assessment of Readiness to
Extubate: Recommendation
• Daily spontaneous awakening and breathing trials
when sedation is weaned
– Assess adequate hemodynamic and respiratory status as
well as ability to manage secretions
– Usually performed by nursing and RT, but will leave to
discretion of individual units
– Patients deemed candidates for extubation should be
discussed with ICU physicians
– Exception
• Patients for whom attending physician is concerned
there is a contraindication (must document reason)
Summary
1- HOB ≥30°

2- Chlorhexidine oral care

3- Subglottic suctioning

4- Sedation vacation

5- Assessment of Readiness to extubate

You might also like