Scribd
Upload
21 views3 pages

Supreme Court Grants Bail in Vinay Kant Ameta Case

The Supreme Court of India granted bail to Vinay Kant Ameta, contingent upon his undertaking to deposit a total of Rs.200 crores in installments over 24 weeks. The appellant has already deposited Rs.100 crores and is required to ensure the remaining amount is deposited as stipulated. The appeal has been disposed of accordingly.

Uploaded by

kinshuk007
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
21 views3 pages

Supreme Court Grants Bail in Vinay Kant Ameta Case

The Supreme Court of India granted bail to Vinay Kant Ameta, contingent upon his undertaking to deposit a total of Rs.200 crores in installments over 24 weeks. The appellant has already deposited Rs.100 crores and is required to ensure the remaining amount is deposited as stipulated. The appeal has been disposed of accordingly.

Uploaded by

kinshuk007
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CRIMINAL APPEALLATE JURISDICTION

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 60 /2022


[@ SLP [CRL.] NO. 9564/2021

VINAY KANT AMETA Appellant(s)

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA Respondent(s)

O R D E R

Leave granted.

Learned counsel for the appellant, on

instructions states that after the initial deposit of

Rs.60 crores, Rs.40 more crores have been deposited

totaling to Rs.100 crores.

He submits that the appellant will make

arrangements to ensure that Rs.50 more crores is

deposited in 12 weeks and another Rs.50 more crores

within 12 weeks thereafter, totaling to Rs.200 crores.

The aforesaid undertaking on behalf of the

appellant is taken on record.

Subject to the aforesaid undertaking being

complied, we grant bail to the appellant on terms and

conditions to the satisfaction of the trial Court apart

from what we have already stipulated.


2

The appeal stands disposed of accordingly.

....................J.
[SANJAY KISHAN KAUL]

....................J.
[M.M. SUNDRESH]

NEW DELHI;
JANUARY 10, 2022.
3

ITEM NO.34 Court 6 (Video Conferencing) SECTION II

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s). 9564/2021

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 07-12-2021


in SBCRMBA No. 18243/2021 passed by the High Court Of Judicature
For Rajasthan At Jaipur)

VINAY KANT AMETA Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

UNION OF INDIA Respondent(s)

Date : 10-01-2022 This petition was called on for hearing today.

CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.M. SUNDRESH

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, Sr. Adv.


Mr. Siddharth Dave, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Rishabh Sancheti, Adv.
Ms. Padma Priya, Adv.
Mr. Anchint Bhandari, Adv.
Mr. Sushant Rao, Adv.
Mr. Shubhankar Singh, Adv.
Mr. K. Paari Vendhan, AOR

For Respondent(s) Mr. S.V. Raju, Ld. ASG


Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tyagi, Adv.
Mr. Harish Pandey, Adv.
Mr. Navanjay Mahapatra, Adv.
Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following


O R D E R
Leave granted.

The appeal is disposed of in terms of the signed order.

Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

(ASHA SUNDRIYAL) (DIPTI KHURANA)


ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)
[Signed order is placed on the file]

You might also like