Antimicrobial-Resistant Genes Associated With Salmonella Spp. Isolated From Human, Poultry, and Seafood Sources
Antimicrobial-Resistant Genes Associated With Salmonella Spp. Isolated From Human, Poultry, and Seafood Sources
Keywords Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance, India, Nigeria,
resistant genes, Salmonella Antimicrobial-resistant salmonellosis is a significant public health concern glob-
ally. A study was conducted to screen for Salmonella species from a total of 120
Correspondence samples, of which 50 were retail meat samples purchased from five randomly
Yemisi O. Adesiji, Department of Fisheries selected sales outlets in the city of Mangalore, India. Twenty poultry fecal mate-
Microbiology, Karnataka Veterinary, Animal rials freshly voided before slaughter were obtained with sterile spatula and
and Fisheries Sciences University, College of
placed in sterile sealable polythene envelopes, and 20 clams were purchased
Fisheries, Mangalore 575002, India.
Tel: +2348032948270; Fax: 038-720225;
from the estuaries of Nethravathi and Kankarnady market. In addition, 30 clini-
E-mail: [email protected] cal isolates from Nigeria suspected to be Salmonella by only cultural character-
ization were also included in the study. In all, 30 samples—6 poultry, 8
Present address seafood, and 16 Salmonella isolates from clinical samples—were confirmed
Yemisi O. Adesiji, Department of Medical positive by PCR and used in this study. The disk-diffusion test was performed
Microbiology and Parasitology, College of to determine the zone of inhibition, and detection of resistance genes was tested
Health Sciences, LadokeAkintola University of
by PCR targeting various antimicrobial genes. Resistance to tetracycline (TET),
Technology, PMB 4000, Nigeria
cotrimoxazole, nalidixic acid, nitrofurantion, and piperacillin/tazobactin was
found in 66.7%, 60%, 53.3%, 50% and 50% of the isolates, respectively. About
Funding Information 60–100% of MDR isolates possessed antibiotic-resistant genes, of the tetracy-
Laboratory support and mentorship from Prof. clines resistant isolates, 20 (100%) 6 (30%), 7 (35%), and 10 (50%) carried
Indrani Karunasagar of College of Fisheries, tetA, tetB, tetC, and tetG genes, respectively. Of 18 cotrimoxazole-resistant
Karnataka Veterinary, Animal And Fisheries strains, 18 (100%), 14 (77.7%), and 4 (22.2%) had sul1, sul2, and sul3 genes,
Sciences University, Mangalore, India, is respectively. Of the 14 multidrug-resistant isolates tested, 8 (61%) and 9 (69%)
appreciated. One-year Research Training
were positive for cmlA and cmlB genes, respectively, 10 (1.4%) tested positive
Fellowship for Developing Country Scientists
support was provided by CICS, India.
for aph(3)11a genes, 8 (57%) tested positive for aac(3)lla, while none was posi-
tive for the aac6 gene. The results show the presence of antibiotic-resistant Sal-
Received: 27 December 2013; Revised: 31 monella spp. in food samples from India and in human samples from Nigeria.
March 2014; Accepted: 6 April 2014
doi: 10.1002/fsn3.119
436 ª 2014 The Authors. Food Science & Nutrition published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of
the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly cited.
20487177, 2014, 4, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fsn3.119 by Egyptian National Sti. Network (Enstinet), Wiley Online Library on [27/01/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
Y. O. Adesiji et al. Antimicrobial-Resistant Genes in Salmonella
ª 2014 The Authors. Food Science & Nutrition published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 437
20487177, 2014, 4, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fsn3.119 by Egyptian National Sti. Network (Enstinet), Wiley Online Library on [27/01/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
Antimicrobial-Resistant Genes in Salmonella Y. O. Adesiji et al.
(1966). Overnight-grown cultures in Luria–Bertani broth carried tetA gene and 30% (6), 35% (7), and 50% (10) of
(HiMedia Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India) were the isolates carried tetB, tetC, and tetG genes, respectively.
prepared in a lawn on Mueller Hinton agar. The antibiot- Figs 3 and 4 shows the plate of representative sample of
ics disks were placed aseptically on it and incubated at tetA and tetB genes recovered from the isolates. Of 18 co-
37°C for 16–18 h. Clinical and Laboratory Standards trimoxazole-resistant strains, 18(100%), 14 (77.8%), 4
Institute (CLSI) guidelines were used to interpret results (22.2%) had sul1, sul2, and sul3 genes, respectively.
(CLSI 2010). The following antimicrobials were used: Table 2 shows the summary of resistant pattern and genes
ampicillin (AMP, 20 lg), cefotaxime (CTX, 300 lg), chl- from all isolates. Six isolates were resistant to chloram-
oramphenicol (C, 30 lg), tetracycline (TET, 30 lg), cip- phenicol, but more isolates (10 of 14 multidrug resistant)
rofloxacin (CIP, 5 lg), gentamicin (GEN, 10 lg), were positive for floR and cat 2 genes, while 2 (30%) was
nalidixic acid (NA, 30 lg), cotrimazole (COT, 25 lg), positive for cat 3 genes. Of 14 multidrug-resistant isolates
tetracycline (TET), nitrofurantion (NIT, 30 lg), imepe- tested 8 (61%) and 9 (69%) were positive for cmlA and
nem (IPM, 10 lg), meropanem (MRP, 10 lg), piperaci- cmlB genes, respectively.
lin/tazobactin (PIT, 100/10). Antibiotics were
manufactured by Himedia (Mumbai, India).
Discussion
Monitoring antimicrobial resistance trends among bacte-
Antimicrobial resistance gene detection
ria isolated from food, animals, and humans is necessary
For detecting antimicrobial-resistant genes in 30 Salmo- to inform public policy regarding the appropriate use of
nella isolates, target genes conferring resistance to tetracy- antimicrobial agents in veterinary and human medicine
clines (tetA, tetB, tetC, tetD, tetE, and tetG), sulfonamides (Cummings et al. 2013). Some studies conducted in Nige-
(sul1, sul2, and sul3), chloramphenicol (cat1, cat2, and ria also indicated considerable prevalence of Salmonella
cat3, cmlA, cmlB, floR) and aminoglycosides (aph(3)11a, both in veterinary and clinical samples (Fasure et al.
aac(3)11a and aac6) were screened by PCR with their 2012; Ogunleye et al. 2013).
respective primers. The cycling conditions and primer In this study, high levels of resistance were found to
sequences were as described by Ma et al. (2007). The trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, TET, and GEN; 66.7%,
PCR was performed in 30 lL volumes containing 3 lL of 60%, 53.3%, and 50%, respectively. A comparative study
109 buffer (100 mmol/L Tris-HCl [pH 9], 1.5 mmol/L in Ibadan, Nigeria, reported a high frequency (87%) of
MgCl2, 500 mmol/L KCl, 0.1% gelatin), 100 lmol/L con- reduced susceptibility to CIP among the chicken isolates
centrations each of dATP, dTTP, dGTP, and dCTP, and a high frequency of resistance to TET (93%), NA
10 pmol of each primer, and 0.9 U of Taq DNA polymer- (81%), and sulfamethoxazole (87%), while resistance to
ase (Bangalore Genei, Bangalore, India), with 2.0 lL of chloramphenicol, sulfamethoxazole, trimethoprim, and
template DNA. The reactions were carried out using a AMP ranged from 36% to 59% for the human isolates
thermal cycler (MJ Research, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Pri- (Fashae et al. 2010). In another study, 100% resistance to
mer sequence and cycling conditions are summarized in fluoroquinolones from clinical isolates from northern
Table 1. part of Nigeria was reported (Akyala et al. 2013). Only
one poultry isolate from chicken was resistant to CIP in
the present study, but reduced susceptibility was observed
Results
for clinical isolates; and all clam isolates from India were
All the isolates used in the study were confirmed as Sal- resistant to NA while in contrast Fashae et al. (2010) in
monella by PCR amplification of the hns and invA genes, his previous study reported that four Salmonella Derby
which generated amplicons of 152 and 284 bp, respec- isolates from their chickens showed reduced susceptibility
tively (Figs. 1 and 2). A total of 30 samples were con- to CIP and high susceptibility to NA. High level of resis-
firmed positive for Salmonella by conventional as well as tance to NA 16 (53%) as observed in this study particu-
by molecular methods. Six Salmonella isolates from poul- larly from food animal reaffirms the importance of the
try, eight from seafood, and 16 from clinical samples were need for strengthening collaboration between veterinary
used in this study. Resistance to TET, cotrimoxazole, NA, and public health sectors on appropriate detection and
NIT, and piperacillin/tazobactin was found in 20 (66.7%), reporting of zoonotic foodborne pathogens (Adesiji and
18 (60%), 16 (53.3%), 15 (50%) and 15 (50%) of the iso- Fagbami 2006). In addition, the result obtained from this
lates, respectively. Resistance to chloramphenicol, CTX, study is of high significance because treatment with anti-
AMP, and GEN was also detected in 20–10% of the iso- microbials is crucial for the proper management of severe
lates. About half (50.5%) of the isolates were resistant to or invasive human salmonellosis. Fluoroquinolones and
at least one antibiotic. All of the 20 TET-resistant isolates third-generation cephalosporins are now commonly used
438 ª 2014 The Authors. Food Science & Nutrition published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
20487177, 2014, 4, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fsn3.119 by Egyptian National Sti. Network (Enstinet), Wiley Online Library on [27/01/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
Y. O. Adesiji et al. Antimicrobial-Resistant Genes in Salmonella
Table 1. Primer sequences and their annealing temperatures used in this study.
in adults for treatment due to widespread resistance to limitation of this study was its inability to compare
chloramphenicol, AMP, and cotrimoxazole. Fluoroquinol- human and clinical isolates from the same country set-
ones are often the last resort for treatment of children ting due to the fact that all veterinary samples suspected
and are listed by the World Health Organization as criti- to be Salmonella were not confirmed positive by PCR.
cally important antimicrobials for human health (Colli- Resistance to traditional antibiotics (AMP, TET, and
gnon et al. 2009). Prescription pattern, availability, and SUL) was high in Salmonella isolates from animals and
cost-effectiveness of quinolones as drugs that are usually foods of animals as observed in this study, previously
prescribed in the management of most resistant bacterial reported by Deekshit et al. (2012). It is apparent that
infections were suggested as factors that could be respon- resistance to traditional antibiotics such as TETs, AMPs,
sible for continued rapid evolution of fluoroquinolone- and cotrimoxazole and detection of their genes in micro-
resistant bacteria in Nigeria (Lamikanra et al. 2011). The bial populations of both countries constitute a public
ª 2014 The Authors. Food Science & Nutrition published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 439
20487177, 2014, 4, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fsn3.119 by Egyptian National Sti. Network (Enstinet), Wiley Online Library on [27/01/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
Antimicrobial-Resistant Genes in Salmonella Y. O. Adesiji et al.
M 1 2 3 4 5 M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
M 1 2 3 4 5
M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
440 ª 2014 The Authors. Food Science & Nutrition published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
20487177, 2014, 4, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fsn3.119 by Egyptian National Sti. Network (Enstinet), Wiley Online Library on [27/01/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
Y. O. Adesiji et al. Antimicrobial-Resistant Genes in Salmonella
Table 2. Antimicrobial resistance and resistant gene profiles of Salmonella isolates from retail raw food obtained from India and clinical isolates
from Nigeria.
Sample
Isolates Antimicrobial resistance profile Antimicrobial-resistant gene(s) source Country
Sal 6 TET-PIT-NIT tet A, tetD, tetG, sul 1, cat2, cat 3, cmlB Clinical Nigeria
Sal 8 TET-COT-C-CTX-AMP Tet A, tetB, tetC, tet G, Sul1, sul2, Cat1, Cat2, Cat 3, floR, aac(3)11a, aph(3)11a Clinical Nigeria
Sal 10 TET-COT-C-AMP tet A, tet B, tet C, tet C, sul1, sul2, cat1, cat2, floR, aac(3)11a, aph(3)11a Clinical Nigeria
Sal 14 TET-COT-C-CTX-AMP Tet A, tet B, tet C, sul1, cat1, cat 2, cmlA, cmlB, floR, aac(3)11a, aph(3)11a Clinical Nigeria
Sal 15 TET-COT-GEN-NA-C-CTX-AMP tet A, tet B, sul1 cat1, cat2, cmlA, cmlB, floR, aac(3)11a, aph(3)11a Clinical Nigeria
Sal 16 TET-COT-GEN-CTX-AMP tet A, tet B, tet C, Sul 1, Sul2, Cat2, cmlA, cmlB, floR, aac(3)11a, aph(3)11a Clinical Nigeria
Sal 17 TET-NA-NIT tet A, TetD, floR Poultry India
Sal 18 MRP-TET-COT-NA-NIT tet A, Tet C, sul1, Cat2 cmlA, floR, aac(3)11a, aph(3)11a Poultry India
Sal 19 TET-COT-NIT tet A, Tet C, tetD, Sul1, floR Cat2 Poultry India
Sal 20 TET-COT-NA-NIT tet A, tetD, tetG, sul 1, Sul2, cat2, cmlB Poultry India
Sal 21 MRP-TET-CIP-PIT-GEN-NA, tet A, tet C, Tet D, Sul 1, cat1, cat3, aac(3)11a, aph(3)11a Poultry India
CTX-AMP-NIT
Sal 22 MRP-TET-NA-CTX-AMP-NIT tet A, sul1, cat1, cat3, aac(3)11a, aph(3)11a Poultry India
Sal 25 TET-COT, PIT, NA, NIT tet A, sul1, sul2, sul3, cat1, cmlA, cmlB, floR Clam India
Sal 30 TET, COT, PIT, NA, NIT tet A, Sul 1, sul2, cat1, cmlA, cmlB, floR Clam India
Amp, ampicillin; CTX, cefotaxime; TET, tetracycline; CIP, ciprofloxacin; GEN, gentamicin; NA, nalidixic acid; COT, cotrimazole; NIT, nitrofurantion;
IPM, imepenem; MRP, meropanem; PIT, piperacilin/tazobactin.
ª 2014 The Authors. Food Science & Nutrition published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 441
20487177, 2014, 4, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fsn3.119 by Egyptian National Sti. Network (Enstinet), Wiley Online Library on [27/01/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
Antimicrobial-Resistant Genes in Salmonella Y. O. Adesiji et al.
document M100-S20. Clinical and Laboratory Standards fluoroquinolone-resistant E. coli in Nigeria temporally
Institute, Wayne, PA. associated with fluoroquinolone use. BMC Infect. Dis.
Collignon, P., J. H. Powers, T. M. Chiller, A. Aidara-Kane, and 11:312.
F. M. Aarestrup. 2009. World Health Organization ranking Ma, M., H. I. Wang, Yu Y Yong, D. Zhang, and S. Liu. 2007.
of antimicrobials according to their importance in human Detection of antimicrobial resistance genes of pathogenic
medicine: a critical step for developing risk management Salmonella from swine with DNA microarray. J. Vet. Diagn.
strategies for the use of antimicrobials in food production Invest. 19:161–167.
animals. Clin. Infect. Dis. 49:132–141. Mann, S., J. D. Siler, D. Jordan, and L. D. Warnick. 2011.
Cummings, K. J., G. A. Perkins, S. M. Khatibzadeh, L. D. Antimicrobial susceptibility of fecal Escherichia coli isolates
Warnick, and C. Altier. 2013. Antimicrobial resistance in dairy cows following systemic treatment with ceftiofur or
trends among Salmonella isolates obtained from dairy cattle penicillin. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 8:861–867.
in the northeastern United States, 2004–2011. Foodborne Maynard, C., J. M. Fairbrother, S. Bekal, F. Sanschagrin, R. C.
Pathog. Dis. 10:353–361. Levesque, R. Brousseau, et al. 2003. Antimicrobial resistance
Davis, M. A., D. D. Hancock, and T. E. Besser. 2002. genes in enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli O149:K91 isolates
Multiresistant clones of Salmonella enterica: the importance obtained over a 23-year period from pigs. Antimicrob.
of dissemination. J. Lab. Clin. Med. 140:135–141. Agents Chemother. 47:3214–3221.
Deekshit, V. K., B. K. Kumar, P. Rai, S. Srikumar, I. Morley, P. S., D. A. Dargatz, D. R. Hyatt, G. A. Dewell, J. G.
Karunasagar, and I. Karunasagar. 2012. Detection of class 1 Patterson, B. A. Burgess, et al. 2011. Effects of restricted
integrons in Salmonella Weltevreden and silent antibiotic antimicrobial exposure on antimicrobial resistance in fecal
resistance genes in some seafood-associated nontyphoidal Escherichia coli from feedlot cattle. Foodborne Pathog. Dis.
isolates of Salmonella in south-west coast of India. J. Appl. 8:87–98.
Microbiol. 112:1113–1122 doi: 10.1111/j.13652672.2012. Ogunleye, A. O., A. T. P. AjuwapeA. I. Adetosoye, and S. A.
05290 Carlson. 2013. Characterization of Salmonella enterica Ituri
Dione, M. M., U. Ikumapayi, D. Saha, N. I. Mohammed, R. isolated from diseased poultry in Nigeria. Afr. J. Biotechnol.
A. Adegbola, S. Geerts, et al. 2011. Antimicrobial resistance 12:21–25.
and virulence genes of non-typhoidal Salmonella isolates Rahn, K., S. A. De-Grandis, R. C. Clarke, S. A. McEwen, J. E
in The Gambia and Senegal. J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 5:765– Gala0 n, C Ginocchio, et al. 1992. Amplification of an invA
775. gene sequence of Salmonella typhimurium by polymerase
Fashae, K., F. Ogunsola, F. M. Aarestrup, and R. S. chain reaction as a specific method of detection of
Hendriksen. 2010. Antimicrobial susceptibility and serovars Salmonella. Mol. Cell. Probes 6:271–279.
of Salmonella from chickens and humans in Ibadan, Nigeria. Smith, S. I., M. A. Fowora, H. A. Goodluck, F. O. Nwaokorie,
J. Infect. Dev. Ctries. 4:484–494. O. O. Aboaba, and B. Opere. 2011. Molecular typing of
Fasure, A. K., A. M. DejiAgboola, and K. Akinyemi. 2012. Salmonella spp. isolated from food handlers and animals in
Antimicrobial resistance patterns and emerging Nigeria. Int. J. Mol. Epidemiol. Genet. 2:73–77.
fluoroquinolone resistant Salmonella isolates from poultry Van, T. T., G. Moutafis, T. Istivan, L. T. Tran, and P. J. Coloe.
and asymptomatic poultry workers. Afr. J. Microbiol. Res. 2007. Detection of Salmonella spp. in retail raw food
6:2610–26152. samples from Vietnam and characterization of their
Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and Andrew, W. H. antibiotic resistance. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73: 6885–
1996. AOAC INTERNATIONAL’s three validation programs 6890.
for methods used in the microbiological analysis of foods. Wannaprasat, W., P. Padungtod, and R. Chuanchuen. 2011.
Trends Food. Sci. Technol. 7:147–151. In Bacteriological Class 1 integrons and virulence genes in Salmonella enterica
analytical annual 8th ed. Pp. 25–35. isolates from pork and humans. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents
Heider, L. C., J. A. Funk, A. E. Hoet, R. W. Meiring, W. A. 37:457–461.
Gebreyes, and T. E. Wittum. 2009. Identification of Yaqoob, E., I. Hussain, and I. U. Rahman. 2007. Molecular
Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica organisms with characterization by using random amplified polymorphic
reduced susceptibility to ceftriaxone from fecal samples of DNA (RAPD) analysis of Salmonella enteritidis isolates
cows in dairy herds. Am. J. Vet. Res. 70:389–393. recovered from avian and human sources. Pakistan Vet. J.
Jones, D. D., R. Law, and A. K. Bej. 1993. Detection of 27:102–104.
Salmonella spp. in oysters using polymerase chain reaction Zhao, S., D. G. White, B. Ge, S. Ayers, S. Friedman, L.
(PCR) and gene probes. J. Food Sci. 58:1191–1197 doi:10. English, et al. 2001. Identification and characterization of
1089/fpd.2012.1285. integron-mediated antibiotic resistance among Shiga toxin
Lamikanra, A., J. L. Crowe, R. S. Lijek, B. W. Odetoyin, J. producing Escherichia coli isolates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
Wain, A. O. Aboderion, et al. 2011. Rapid evolution of 67:1558–1564.
442 ª 2014 The Authors. Food Science & Nutrition published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.