DIFFERENT SHAPES OF THE HUMAN PINEAL
GLAND – A STUDY ON 60 AUTOPSY CASES
AFROZ H1, NURUNNABI ASM2, RAHMAN M3, NAHAR N4, ARA S5
            Abstract
            Context: The pineal gland has been described as an endocrine or neuroendocrine gland;
            however, its functions in humans are still to be defined. Different shapes of the human pineal
            gland have been identified. Due to its small size and different shapes recognition of this gland
            is much critical. Besides, due to its cellularity it may be mistaken for a neoplasm. Hence, a
            sound knowledge on different shapes of the pineal gland is essential for neurosurgeons,
            radiologists and pathologists for better diagnosis and management of pineal disorders.
            Methods: A descriptive study was done in the Department of Anatomy, Dhaka Medical College,
            Dhaka, from July 2009 to June 2010, to see the morphological shape of the human pineal
            gland. The present study was performed on 60 human pineal glands collected from whole
            human brains of unclaimed dead bodies that were under postmortem examination in the
            Department of Forensic Medicine, Dhaka Medical College, Dhaka. The pineal gland was collected
            from the brain by meticulous dissection. Then, the shape of the pineal gland was observed
            under the magnifying glass.
            Results: In the present study, pea-shaped pineal glands were found 60% in group A, 30% in
            group B, 5% in both group C and D, while pine cone shaped were found 25% in group A, 37.5%
            in group B, 25% in group C and 12.5% in group D. Besides, fusiform shaped glands were found
            18.2% in group A, 63.6% in group B, 9.1% in both group C and D, where as piriform shaped
            found 66.7% in group B, and 16.7% in both group C and D. Moreover, cone-shaped glands were
            found 28.6% in group B, 57.1% in group C and 14.3% in group D.
            Key words: Human pineal gland, Shape of pineal gland, Autopsy.
                                                               J Dhaka Med Coll. 2014; 23(2) : 211-214.
Introduction:                                                 recognition of normal pineal structure in the
The pineal gland (or pineal body) has been                    cerebral hemisphere. However, sometimes
described as an endocrine or neuroendocrine                   small tumours, cysts or even brain matter can
gland; however, its functions in humans are                   be mistaken for localization of the pineal gland.
still to be defined1. Researchers also stated that            Hence, due to its small size and different
the pineal gland is a small endocrine gland in                shapes recognition of this gland is much
the vertebrate brain. It produces the serotonin               critical 4. Besides, due to its cellularity (in
derivative melatonin, a hormone that affects                  relation to the cortex and white matter), it may
the modulation of wake/sleep patterns in the                  be mistaken for a neoplasm 5 . It is also
circadian rhythms and seasonal functions2.                    important for radiologists and pathologists to
Pineal pathology especially pineal tumours                    differentiate the normal pineal from any
(pineocytomas/ pineoblastomas) may manifest                   neoplastic growth, secondary metastasis, cyst
as consequence of their pressure effects and                  or even aneurysm whenever investigating the
consist of visual disturbances, headache,                     diseases of the pineal gland or of any other
mental deterioration, and sometimes                           related structure in the cerabral region 5-7.
dementia-like behaviour etc. 3. One of the                    Therefore, sound knowledge on different
important goals of the neurosurgery is                        shapes of the pineal gland is essential for
1. Dr. Halima Afroz, Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Green Life Medical College, Dhaka.
2. Dr. Abu Sadat Mohammad Nurunnabi, Assistant Professor, Department of Anatomy, OSD, Directorate General
   of Health Services (DGHS), Dhaka.
3. Dr. Mushfika Rahman, Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Dr. Sirajul Islam Medical College, Dhaka.
4. Dr. Nurun Nahar, Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Marks Medical College, Dhaka.
5. Prof. Shamim Ara, Professor and Head, Department of Anatomy, Dhaka Medical College, Dhaka.
Correspondence: Dr. Halima Afroz, Associate Professor, Department of Anatomy, Green Life Medical College,
Dhaka.
J Dhaka Med Coll.                                                          Vol. 23, No. 2. October, 2014
neurosurgeons, radiologists and pathologists for     border of the cerebellum was picked up by using
better diagnosis and management of pineal            a blunt forceps. Exposing the superior cerebellar
disorders. The present study was aimed to see        peduncles, the pineal gland was identified in
the variations in shape of the pineal gland and      between the depression of the superior colliculi
compare with the previous studies and                and observed that it was attached to the dorsal
available text references.                           surface of the brain, at the junction of the
                                                     midbrain and the diencephalon and inferior to
Methods:
                                                     the splenium of the corpus callosum8 . An
A descriptive study was done in the Department       incision of about 1-2 cm was given through the
of Anatomy, Dhaka Medical College, Dhaka,            splenium of the corpus callosum to approach
from July 2009 to June 2010, to see the              the pineal region. The pineal gland was taken
morphological shape of the human pineal              out from the diencephalon with a careful
gland. The present study was performed on 60         semilunar cut9. The pineal gland was cleared
human pineal glands collected from whole             up from other tissues. Then, the shape of the
human brains of unclaimed dead bodies that           pineal gland was observed under the
were under postmortem examination in the             magnifying glass (Fig.1) and noted down.
Department of Forensic Medicine, Dhaka
Medical College, Dhaka. After the legal
formalities, whole of the human brain was
collected within 24-36 hours of death. During
collection of the samples, appropriate age, sex
and the cause of death were noted from the
morgue’s record book. The samples were
brought to the Department of Anatomy, Dhaka
Medical College, Dhaka. The samples were
tagged immediately bearing code numbers for
subsequent identification. Soon after
collection, each sample was gently washed with
tap water on a dissection tray. Blood and blood
clots were removed as far as possible.
Preservation of brains: After collection of whole
brain, 100ml of 40% formaldehyde solution was        Fig.-1: Different shapes of the pineal gland seen
injected by using a 50cc syringe into the brain      through magnifying glass (1. pea shaped, 2. pine-
through the surfaces (superolateral and              cone shaped, 3. fusiform shaped, 4. cone shaped,
inferior surfaces). Then it was preserved in         5. piriform shaped).
40% formaldehyde solution for 15 days. After
15 days the pineal glands were collected from        Common exclusion criteria: i) Decomposed body,
the preserved brains and the pineal gland fixed      ii) any history of injury to the head, iii) any
in 10% formol saline solution.                       suspected pathology of the pineal gland seen
Procedure of collection of pineal gland from         by naked eyes, and iv) if the whole of the pineal
preserved brain: After fixation of the whole of      gland is not available during dissection.
the human brain, the pineal gland was                Grouping of the sample: For convenience, all the
collected by the following steps:                    samples were categorized in four age-groups
At first, the fingers were placed in the medial      including A (15-30 years), B (31-40 years), C
part of the horizontal fissure of the left half of   (41-50 years) and D (>50 years), according to
the cerebellum and it was separated. Thus the        Golan et al. (2002)10 (Table-I).
total of the superior and parts of the middle and    Ethical clearance: This study was approved by
inferior cerebellar peduncles were exposed. The      the Ethical Review Committee of Dhaka
thin layer of the white matter near the posterior    Medical College, Dhaka.
212
Different Shapes of The Human Pineal Gland – A Study On 60 Autopsy Cases                      Afroz H et al
Results:                                                                     Table-I
In the present study, pea-shaped pineal glands             Grouping of the sample of the present study
were found 60% in group A, 30% in group B, 5%                                (n = 60)
in both group C and D, while pine cone shaped
were found 25% in group A, 37.5% in group B,           Group     Age limit          Number of samples
25% in group C and 12.5% in group D. Besides,
                                                                                    Male         Female
fusiform shaped glands were found 18.2% in
group A, 63.6% in group B, 9.1% in both group          A         15-30 years         09              09
C and D, where as piriform shaped found 66.7%          B         31-40 years         17              08
in group B, and 16.7% in both group C and D.
                                                       C         41-50 years         08              03
Moreover, cone-shaped glands were found
28.6% in group B, 57.1% in group C and 14.3%           D         >50 years           06              00
in group D (Table-II, Fig. 2).
                                               Table-II
                           Shape of the pineal gland in different age group
Age group        Pea          Pine-cone              Fusiform        Piriform        Cone)          P
               (n=20)           (n=16)                (n=11)          (n=6)          (n=7         value
A(n=18)       12 (60%)          4(25%)               2(18.2%)            -             -         <0.05*
B(n=25)       6 (30%)          6(37.5%)              7(63.6%)        4(66.7%)      2(28.6%)
C(n=11)        1 (5%)           4(25%)               1(9.1%)         1(16.7%)      4(57.1%)
D(n=6)         1 (5%)          2(12.5%)              1(9.1%)         1(16.7%)       1(14.3)
Figures in parentheses indicate percentage. Statistical analysis done by Chi-square (c2) test,
* = significant.
                                                       Williams et al. (1989)13, the pineal gland is a
                                                       small, piriform, reddish-grey organ. Rogers &
                                                       Jacob (1992)14 stated that it is a pea-shaped
                                                       structure. Fawcett (1994)15 noted that it is a
                                                       conical grey body. Reiters (2001)16, Docherty
                                                       (2007)17 and Nolte (2009)18 found the pineal
                                                       gland to be a small pine-cone shaped structure.
                                                       Mescher (2013)19 stated that the pineal gland
                                                       is a flattened conical organ. According to Ross
                                                       & Pawlina (2011)1 and Gartner & Hiatt (2014)20,
                                                       the pineal body is a small pine-cone shaped
Fig. 2: Shape of the pineal gland in different age
                                                       endocrine gland. The results of the present
group.
                                                       study are more or less similar with the
                                                       previous studies and text references. Similar
Discussion:                                            studies were done on human parathyroid
Different shapes of different morphologic              glands21 and adrenal glands22 based on autopsy
characteristics of the pineal gland were found         findings in the same teaching institution &
depending on age in the present study. Kelly,          hospital.
Wood & Enders (1984)11 noted the pineal gland
as a cone-shaped appendage of the brain.               Conclusion:
Berkovitz & Moxham (1988)12 stated that the            Age related changes were found in
pineal gland is a fusiform organ. According to         morphological features of pineal gland. In young
                                                                                                      213
J Dhaka Med Coll.                                                                     Vol. 23, No. 2. October, 2014
adults, the shape of the pineal gland usually               10.   Golan J, Torres K, Staœkiewicz GJ, Opielak G,
remains pea shaped. With increasing age, it                       Maciejewski R. Morphometric parameters of the
                                                                  human pineal gland in relation to age, body weight
becomes irregular and fusiform, piriform or
                                                                  and height. Folia Morphol 2002; 61(2): 111-3.
cone/pine-cone shaped. To the best of our
                                                            11.   Kelly DE, Wood RL, Enders AC. eds. Bailey’s
knowledge, this was the first ever experiment
                                                                  textbook of microscopic anatomy. 18 th ed.
done in our country on pineal gland. The                          Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1984: p.816-20.
results of the present study can be used as a
                                                            12.   Berkovitz BKB, Moxham BJ. A textbook of head
standard reference for the shape of the pineal                    and neck anatomy. Chicago: Year Book Medical
gland of Bangladeshi people and to determine                      Publishers; 1988: p.534-5.
the abnormal evidences in forensic and
                                                            13.   Williams PL, Warwick R, Dyson M, Bannister LH.
pathological cases.                                               eds. Gray’s anatomy. 37th ed. Edinburgh: Churchill
                                                                  Livingstone; 1989: p.1456-9.
References:
1.    Ross MH, Pawlina W. Histology: a text and atlas       14.   Rogers AW, Jacob S. Textbook of anatomy. 1st ed.
      with correlated cell and molecular biology. 6th ed.         Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 1992: p.320-1.
      Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2011:       15.   Fawcett DW. Bloom & Fawcett – a textbook of
      p.752-5.                                                    histology. 12th ed. New York: Chapman & Hall;
                                                                  1994: p.516-24.
2.    Macchi M, Bruce J. Human pineal physiology and
      functional significance of melatonin. Front           16.   Reiter RJ. Pineal gland. In: Becker KL, Bilezikian
      Neuroendocrinol 2004; 25(3-4): 177-95.                      JP, Bremner WJ, Hung W, Kahn CR, Loriaux DL,
                                                                  et al. eds. Principles and practice of endocrinology
3.    Hirato J, Nakazato Y. Pathology of pineal region
                                                                  and metabolism. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott
      tumors. J Neurooncol 2001; 54(3): 239-49.
                                                                  Williams & Wilkins; 2001: p.98-102.
4.    Erlich SS, Apuzzo ML. The pineal gland: anatomy,
                                                            17.   Docherty B. Endocrine system: part two - the
      physiology, and clinical significance. J Neurosurg
                                                                  thyroid, pineal and parathyroid gland. Nurs Times
      1985; 63(3): 321-41.
                                                                  2007; 103(22): 26-7.
5.    Kleinschmidt-DeMasters BK, Prayson RA. An
                                                            18.   Nolte J. The human brain: an introduction to its
      algorithmic approach to the brain biopsy - Part I.
                                                                  functional anatomy. 6 th ed. Philadelphia: Mosby
      Arch Pathol Lab Med 2006; 130(11): 1630-8.
                                                                  Elsevier; 2009: p.391-3.
6.    Todo T, Kondo T, Shinoura N, Yamada R. Large
                                                            19.   Mescher AL. ed. Junqueira’s basic histology: text
      cysts of the pineal gland: report of two cases.
                                                                  and atlas. 13th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2013:
      Neurosurgery 1991; 29(1): 101-5.                            p.425-6.
7.    Gokhale S, Laskowitz DT. Teaching neuroimages:        20.   Gartner LP, Hiatt JL. Color atlas and text of
      vein of Galen aneurysm mimicking pineal mass                histology. 6th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams
      in a young adult. Neurology 2013; 80(22): e240.             & Wilkins; 2014: p.248-9.
8.    Romanes GJ. ed. Cunningham’s manual of                21.   Mahbub S, Ara S, Alim A, Nurunnabi ASM, Ahmed
      practical anatomy. Vol.3. 15th ed. New York: Oxford         R, Begum M. Different shapes of the human
      University Press; 2000: p.244-5.                            parathyroid glands – a postmortem study. J Dhaka
9.    Antiæ S, Javanoviæ I, Stefanoviæ N, Pavloviæ S,             Med Coll 2009; 18(1): 44-6.
      Ranèiæ G, Ugrenoviæ S. Morphology and                 22.    Siddiqua D, Nurunnabi ASM, Ara S, Perven HA.
      histochemical characteristics human pineal gland            Cadaveric study of different shapes of the human
      acervuli during the aging. Facta Universitatis: Med         adrenal glands. J Dhaka Med Coll 2012; 21(2):
      Biol 2004; 11(2): 63-8.                                     140-2.
214