ORGANIC PRODUCTS PRODUCED
WITH SSFT (Solid Substrate Fermentation Technology)
Benefits of Adya fertilizers
100 % Nutrients available to plants
No any residual effects on soil & plants
Improve soil health in each square meter
Ensures Soil richness
Increase productivity by 20%
Higher Per capita income in the tribal area
Healthier crop
Better quality produce
Success stories of Adya Fertilizer
Cotton
Summary of Trial and observation on NCS Trials on Cotton Crops
Plant Av. Height IN CM Nos of Leaves No of Branches No of Bolls
Organic Organic Organic
Adya Adya Adya
Phosphate Chemical Phosphate Chemical Phosphate Chemical Chemical
Name of Company / & Adya DAP & % & Adya DAP & % & Adya DAP & % Adya DAP & %
Farmers Variety Trail Period Potash MOP Increse Potash MOP Increse Potash MOP Increse Phosphate MOP Increse
Ambhuja Cotton
Trial
Sawan Maroti
Bhoyar- Lakhmapur - June to July 80 62 29% 55 43 27% 10 6 66% - - -
Dist Chandrapur
Arivind Organics
Model Farm Malika June to Sep 151.32 117.3 29% 179 137 30% 20 14 42% 13 3 333%
ASA, Rajapur (MP)
Anita Santosh JK-4 June to Sep 59.2 33.7 75% 58.6 39.2 49% 9.7 6.3 53% - - -
Ajit-155 June to Sep 111.2 78.4 41% 153.8 91.2 68% 16.4 11 49% 7.8 4 95%
Dr. Brent June to Sep 105.4 71.9 46% 156.6 144.4 8% 20.2 9.8 106% 11.2 3.1 261%
Mishri Lal /
Tulasiram US4776 June to Sep 96.78 74.36 30% 122.23 87.45 39% 22.12 18.96 16% 11.32 7.4 52%
Mohan Lal- Pidiya Ajit-199 June to Sep 108.7 83.1 30% 166.7 94.6 76% 19.8 12.3 60% 10.3 5.9 74%
Ravindra Solanki JK-4 June to Sep 116.7 79.8 46% 164.2 101.3 62% 21.2 15.03 41% 22.02 11.02 98%
Plant Av. Height IN CM Nos of Leaves No of Branches No of Bolls
Organic Organic Organic Organic
Adya Adya Adya Adya
Phosphate Chemical Phosphate Chemical Phosphate Phosphate Chemical
Name of Company / Trail & Adya DAP & % & Adya DAP & % & Adya % & Adya DAP &
Farmers Variety Period Potash MOP Increse Potash MOP Increse Potash Chemical Increse Potash MOP % Increse
BioRe India Ltd
kasarwad (MP)
June to
Demonstration -1 7R-113 Sep 91.99 64.51 42% 84.8 48 76% 14.2 5.4 162% - - -
June to
Demonstration-2 Anjali Sep 72.64 62.10 16% 84.8 60.8 39% 13.2 6.6 100% - - -
June to
Demonstration -3 D-81 Sep 93.82 83.74 12% 105 101.6 3% 15 6.4 134% - - -
June to
Demonstration-4 JKH-1 Sep 91.99 72.51 26% 84.8 58.8 44% 14.2 5.8 144% - - -
June to
Demonstration-5 N-996 Sep 90.79 74.51 21% 113.88 98.8 15% 15.2 12.4 22% - - -
Deoli Final Data
June to
Ashokrao kale Kaweri Sep 115.8 104.6 10% 106.08 105.2 0.80% 23.1 22.2 4% 20.4 15.4 32%
June to
Umesh Vakil Jadu Sep 158.56 148.66 6% 147.4 149.1 -1% 25.25 23.6 6% 37 31 19%
Summary of the Report on Cotton
The data clearly establishes the significant difference on the performance of the
crop on 4 important growth parameters in
Organic Adya Phosphate / Potash Vs Chemical DAP / MOP
1 Height of Plant
2 Nos of leaves
3 Nos of Branches
4 Nos of Bolls
The organic Adya fields shows better performance in all the said parameters
Potato
Root Development at 15 Day old Crop Development on 25th Day
(Adya Phosphate Treated) (Adya Phosphate Treated)
Root Development at 30 Day Plant growth at 45 days
DAP Treated v/s Adya Phosphate Adya phosphate Treated v/s DAP
Treated Treated
Potato Development at 45 Days
20 Potato & 6 Shoots from one 12 Potato & 4 Shoots from one
piece of potato piece of potato
Adya Phosphate Treated DAP Treated
Per Acre Yield Analysis
Farmers Name
Per Acre Yield of Potato (in KG)
Adya Phosphate DAP/SSP
Vachansingh Waghela 11008 8256
Jabbarsingh Waghela 14023 11986
Bhagwansingh Waghela 10037 9875
Mofabhai Modi 51262 37772
TOTAL 86330 67889
Average Yield (in Kg) 21583 16972
Average Yield (in MT) 21.6 17.0
4.6
Difference (in MT)
27
% Increase over the DAP/SSP
Quantitative Yield of Potato
• Trial plot : Ave 21.5 MT per acre
• Control plot : Ave 17 MT per acre
• Difference : 4.6 MT
• Average Yield increase due to Adya Phosphate over DAP/SSP is
27 %
Big Size Potato (45 Medium Size (35 mm Small Size (less than
mm & Above) to 45 mm) 15 mm)
Qualitative Yield of Potato
Average % increase of Potato of Adya Phosphate over DAP/SSP
Parameter Big Size Medium Size Small Size
On number
35 % 12 % -1 %
basis
On weight
37 % 15 % -23 %
basis
Tea
Sr. NAME OF TEA ESTATES Trials Number Increase in average Increase in Average Lesser Average Lesser
No taken of yield per bush over Average wt of number of green leaf Fertilizer cost over
on Plucking the control (in %) one green leaf plucked in one kg Control (in %)
Plucked over the harvest over
Control (in %) Control (in %)
1 HARRISONS NK 5 23 28 14 12.5
MALAYALAM
LTD, MEPPADI, NPK 5 19 29 14 9.87
WYANAD
(DIST), KERALA.
2 POABS ENTERPRISES NK 6 32 18 12 12.5
PVT
LTD, Vandiperiyar,
NPK 1 39 27 9 8
Iddukki
Dist, Kerala
3 Parry Agro Industries NK 6 16 17 12 12.5
Ltd,
Valparai, Polllachi
(Dist.),
Tamilnadu
4 Tyford Tea Ltd, NPK 6 19 19 11 12.5
Ellapara,
Iddukki (Dist.), Kerala
5 AVT- Carady Goody, NK 3 18 19 10 12.5
IDUKKI
DIST, KERALA
6 SILVER CLOUDE NK 1 36 15 9 12.5
ESTATE,
GUDALUR, NILGIRI
HILLS,
TAMILNADU
Conclusions
• In treated plots, average weight of green leaf harvested is more than control
plot besides the less number of green leaves plucked from treatment for the
equal weight over the control.
• Fertilizer cost of Adya phosphate & Adya potash is comparatively less than
DAP & MOP used in Control plot
Note
• Applied equal quantity of Adya Phosphate in treatment plot against DAP in
control plot.
• Applied equal quantity of Adya potash in treatment plot against MOP in
control plot.
TRIAL REPORT ON PADDY IN TAMILNADU ON ORGANIC ADYA PHOSPHATE / POTASH VS CHEMICAL DAP / MOP
Area Yield Yield Extra SAVINGI
Under No of Organic Chemica Yield Cost Cost NIn Put Additionl Total
Name of Cultiv Seaso Bags/ l Bags/ in KG Organic Chemica Cost / inome Due to Benefit Value of
Farmer Town ation n Acre Acre /Acre /Acre / Acre Acre Extra Yield s Additional Yiled Remark
Redhilis-
Mr. Sirdharan Chennai
Manoharan Good quality 83Kg
Magager 37 4 31 22 747 4200 6200 2000 8964 10964 grains bags
Good grains and
only his field got
Muthuchaman Cumbum this yeild in that 63 kgs
di Theni TN 1.5 1 29 21 504 4500 6100 1900 6048 7948 area Bags
Kuchanoor 63 kgs
Mr.Suruli Theni TN 2 1 30 24 378 4200 6500 2300 4536 6836 additional yeild Bags
ony his field gave
Chinnaman additional yeild 63 kgs
Mr. Thirupathi nur - Theni 3.5 2 30 24 378 4500 6100 1600 4536 6136 that area Bags
Good grains &
omly he got
Pudupatti additional yeild in 63 kgs
Mr. Rubesh Cumbum TN 10 1 34 24 630 4500 6500 2000 7560 9560 that area Bags
Good grains and
Mr. Kuchanoor only he got that 63 kgs
Raghunathan Theni TN 2 1 27 20 444 4500 6500 2000 5328 7328 yeid in that area Bags
Sugarcane
Effects of Organic Fertilizers
• Improves soil porosity
• Ensure root development
• Triggers
• Stronger cane
• Longer internode
• Taller cane growth
• Better weight
VALSAD SUGARS
REPORT ON ORGANIC CANE PROGRAM
2015-16
VALSAD SUGARS
MILL TEST REPORT
Mangubhai Bhanabhai-Atgam Pankajbhai Patel,Palan,Valsad
Yield/Acre : 69 MT Yield/Acre: 65 MT
Summary Of Cane Development Program 2015-16
Organic Vs Inorganic
Ratoon Acres 305 2403
Tonnage 5533 31287
MT / Per acre 18.14 13.02
Organic has
Difference Yielded more 5.12
Summary Of Cane Development Program 2015-16
Organic Vs Inorganic
Plant 636 844
MT 12810 12833
MT / Per
Acre 20.14 15.20
Organic has
Difference Yielded more 4.94
Mango
Ramesh Padiyar-Valsad
Jasavantbhai Mittalbhai-Valsad Vinaykant Fulchand Sheth
(South Gujarat) Taluka-Umargam
Arvindbhai Ukabhai Patel, Valsad
