100% (1) 100% found this document useful (1 vote) 262 views 53 pages Cyril of Alexandria's Teaching On The Priesthood, by George Dion. Dragas
This document is a foreword and introduction to a book on the Priesthood, particularly focusing on the teachings of St. Cyril of Alexandria. It emphasizes the significance of the priesthood in the Orthodox Church, drawing connections between the Old Testament and the New Testament priesthood, and highlights the importance of divine calling for priests. The text aims to serve as an instructional resource for clergy and seminarians, exploring the spiritual and theological foundations of the priesthood.
AI-enhanced title and description
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here .
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Go to previous items Go to next items
Save Cyril of Alexandria's Teaching on the Priesthood,... For Later Aree se ee
et it be said, then, to Paco e CU
Bey ee cco coe a Piyush
Me a IL To eae
l n
aot Ae (ein ae eas
aT cmos 5:14) 8 ° ,
jen aT cr aT eLOye|
Ra gl moe aecL
Te a am ere aeForeword
am very pleased to recommend this book on the
Priesthood to all Orthodox Clergy and most especially
jo Seminarians at Holy Cross Greek Orthodox School of
Theology and other Seminaries in America and through-
out the English-speaking world. Ihave no doubt that this
feaimkes acute esas instructional text will be helpful to those preparing to
20 Silver Lane Peete! enter the holy Priesthood. The book draws from the inex-
Rolnsford, NH 03869 haustible treasures of the Holy Tradition of our Church,
es treasures yet to be discovered by most. As our Lord and
Savior Jesus Christ says in the Gospel, “The scribe, wh has
© 2003 Protopresbyter Geo
‘er George Dion. Dragas
om reserved. No part of this publication } been trained for the kingdom of heaven, is like the master of @
Eouine ono household, who brings out of his treasure what is new and what
I sfstem is old” (Matt. 1352).
publisher
Methodios of Boston
ISBN 0.9745618-1.9 +Metropolitan\&
a AY \
iv St. Cyril of Alexandria's Teaching o
M the Priesthood
fo
The ey to. Cyrils exposition isthe Work of Chg
who, athe tue High Priest, fulfils the Old and gran
the New Priesthood. This interconnection of the Priest.
el leaves
tolerate an,
*ospel, of Old and
New Testament, of the old, Hebraic dis,
the new dispensation of the
Cyril calsit
hood of the Law with the Priesthood of the Gosp
no doubt that the Patristic approach does not
Marcionite separation of Law and (
Pensation ang
Church of the Nations, as St
"know that thereis alot more to St. Cyril text than
{have presented here. [offer it to my fellow-priests, to
ieeanSs Who study for the Priesthood, and to all
interested Christians, as a fo
retaste of a full translation
of the whole text of St. Cyril
Profound writing on “Wor.
Ship in Spitt and in Truth (0,
'e Adorati i -
tains this teaching as well = ee
GDD.
Ws Ya ae
y
Introduction
is known to most theologians
‘ei azing contribution to the Orthodox, Chris-
ios bata sama, Most historians and even theologians
eae ae the Church Father that confessed the unity
stout Lord's person (and hypostasis) against An heresy
of Nestorius (early 5% century), which ae an
into two persons because of his two natures — his
and his manhood. ;
arenes this dogmatic contribution of St. Cyril
is extremely important and goes much further, si <
it dominated not only the Third (anti-Nestoria i
Ecumenical Council of Ephesus (431/3), over ie
St. Cyril himself presided, but also, and in a need
sense, all subsequent Ecumenical Councis, ih
Were summoned after his death to deal with 7 i 7
©gy —I mean, of course, the Fourth (as, “a
and Sixth (860/1) Ecumenical Councils — I bel ean
his Biblical expositions are at least equally sign i
and most profound. They constitute the ba
dogmatic teaching.10's Teaching om the Priesthogg
ee
ighty, Biblical theotogian,:
gmatic, before the eme,
gence of the Nestor cl —
. ; f the Nestorian crisis (av 428) and his decisive
involvement in resolving t]
sment in resolving this crisis. This is most clearty
ly
St. Cyril was already a
indeed as much Biblical as di
demonstrated in his early, exe;
Sst d in his early, exegetical works, which pro.
ide a most consistent and profound interpretation of
the Bible a
Its in this early, exe
is early, exegetical context th .
velops a very interes sues
seopse vey nteresting account on the Cheatan priest
sis ofthe Jewish priesthood and the trans.
\derwent under the ct is
evelation. This Biblical account cae ere
likely his earlies oie
lest, exegetical work, On Worship in Spat
rit
is the relation of the
e
Testament, or of the Jewish
Sificance ofthis account,
vison fo the well known pa-
'y the Theologian,* St. John
and in Truth in wl
Oi Teste
tothe Chistian religion, The
ae Priesthood, in comp:
ie accounts of St, Gregor
CEP. K. Chris i
“lates Fe
tury Byzantine histori cept
a won,” The Interpretat Holy sae
larepa), vol ie Ton ty Exe
wm, MA 1979, N°
“CE. Oration Ik: An tos, PG.
I An Apology for His Flight to Pony
+ PG 35,
SOs (Eckel He
'eneutics of the
408-515,
vit
pe
and St. Gregory the Great (Dialogos), is
imly Biblical basis and discusses aspects of
‘which are not presented as clearly in any
count. Before I turn to it, should
Chrysostom?
that it has a fir
the priesthood,
patristic a
‘e book, in which it is found.
k On Worship in Spirit and in Truth con-
hhich deal with three general themes.”
d restoration through Christ, which
jon of the doctrine of
other, early
introduce thi
St. Cyril's worl
sists of 17 books, w
1) Man’s Fall an
includes a most profound expositi
justification by faith (1-8);
2) The Church and the
as compared to the Old Testam«
Priests (9-13); and,
3) The Christian sacraments compared and
ed to the Jewish sacrifices (14-17).
It is written in the form of a dialogue between
St. Cyril and a certain (student) Palladius. Palladius asks
the questions, and St. Cyril provides the answers.
‘The basic thrust of the entire book is well represented
by its title, the Christian “worship in Spirit and in truth,”
as distinguished from the Jewish “worship in tYPe and
Priesthood, which is in Christ
ent Tabernacle and its
contrast-
~and Post Nicene
For an English translation, see Library of Ni
Fathers, Second Series, vol.7-
SG 16” 623-682, For an English translation, see Library of Nicwne
aaa Pest Nicone Fathers, Fist Series, vol 9: of St John Chgssron
Hare esta, SPCK London 1964, reprinted by St: Via
imir's Seminary Press, New York 1977.
Senay Pres Ne on ace ibraryof Neen and Post
Sovies vol. 12; or Ancient Christian Writers
1k, see the Appendix.
Nicene Fathers, Second
No. 11, Paulist Press 1994.
7For a table of contents of this Worvit St Cyril of Alexandria's Teaching on the Priesthont
shadow.” The former is based on the Christi
and the latter on the Jewish Law. In St, Cyn pees :
there is no antithesis between Gospel and Law. This £
because the Gospel is the fulfillment of the Lavy, inas.
much as it reveals its deeper (spiritual) meaning and
intention, whereas the Law is the preparation for the
Gospel and looks forward to it in the expectation that
it will bring about its completion. St. Cyril's thought on
this is firmly focused on the Lord Jesus Christ. Christ is
indeed the One, who reveals it all and brings it about.
But then, it must also be said that for St. Cyril, Christ isa
focus, which has an expansive and wholesome (holistic)
character, inasmuch as it embraces all mankind and the
entire cosmos, their life and communion with each other
and with God Himself. Thus, Christ is presented as the
key to life, spiritual and true life, the Christian life, which
saves and restores mankind and the whole of creation.
In light of this, the three most general parts, into which
St. Cyril's entire work is subdivided, can also be summed
up as follows:
@) Christ as the Savior of fallen mankind;
b) Christ's saving activity is in operation in the
Church and through Christ’s agents, the Priests; and,
©) Christ’s holy sacraments are the means of salvation.
The soteriological character of the entire work is
characteristic of St. Cyril and can clearly be traced back to
his predecessor, St. Athanasius, whom St. Cyril calls “the
all-great” (rajséyac). From this angle, the three parts of
the work could also be given the following titles:
‘hrist and ourselves;
ion: CI
ea f our salvation: the
sis of O
sasis 0 2
aim and ministers
and the Priests; and,
omy The means of our sal
.craments. _- ;
oy a oviesthood and priests is a major com
il hhristian,
Cyril on the Cl
rly work of St. c
on Oa et actually covers three entire ee
M8) Th resent essay represents an eae
rine. In all three of them, St. Cyril
eeenin hat is said in the Old Testament about the
starts with withe Law and then goes on to show how all
jesthood of the Law and the au
this is translated into the Christian priesthood, which is
tle of
is i Jearly revealed in the ti
the Spirit. This is most cl i
aoe 11, "On the Priesthood and that the ed of
the Law was a type of the Priesthood, which is according
to Christ.”*
1) The bi
2) The re:
vation: Christ’s and his
church's Bi
Church's
“The subject of priest
pon
religio
(11, 12and 13). The p'
ize their doc!—— a
Table of Contents
Foreword
Preface
Introduction
Part I. THe Priest
que PRIESTHOOD,
(Dr Aporatrone XD
‘The Divine Basis of the Priesthood
The Meaning of the Priestly Vestments
‘The Meaning of Priestly Ordination
‘The Meaning of the Priestly Offerings
‘The Meaning of the Priestly Blessing
6. The Constant Self-Purification of Priests
Parr II. IMPEDIMENTS TO THE PRIESTHOOD
AND ACCEPTABLE PRIESTLY CELEBRATIONS
(De Avoranione XW)
1. Physical Blemishes as Impediments
to the Priesthood
2. The Spiritual Meaning of the Old
Testament Physical Blemishess
3. Priests, Who Falter after Ordination
4, The Priest's Daughter
5. The Marriage of Priests
THOOD OF THE LAW AND
Warcn Is “IN Crist”
iit
2B
18
21
24
27
27
SeesWSYAMAT
Mi St. Cyrito se
gabe of COP Property 72
6 A ec arate Priestly Celebrations property of the SOM and the PPP
9 No Self-projection, but Hum Deis i 74
D) The Sacrifice of Wher prin 8 the Sern ceof the a
©) The Sacrifice of Grain Offering ® 6 6. The Mioenty jerusalem > GLoRy OF 76
@) The Sacrifice for Sin ot. Tre ecessity UNITY AN!
©) The Sacrifice of Praise i 3 Te pasesr409? Unity of the Priesthood 76
Conclusion The Necessity 4!
Panr IL, Prtests ano Levires, or 5 me One Suir Greatness and Glory of ue
Puirstty Orvers (De Aporanovt XII) 5 2. The Divine oe a
A. Priests aNp Levies 5 the Priest 83
1. The Levites and Their Witness to oe 89
the Mystery of Christ Ea Inpex
2. The Levites and the Distinction between Anour tie AUTHOR
Clergy and Laity 56
3. The Distinction of Priests and Levites and
the Church's Order 8
4. The Enrollment of the Levites and
the Clergy/Laity Distinction B
5. The Spiritual Meaning of the Covers of
the Holy Vessels a
6. The Spiritual Meaning of the Distinctions
among Levites 63
B. Prestty AutHortry AND Priviteces 6
1. The Divine Calling as the Basis of Priestly
Authority and the Sin of Opposing a Divinely
Appointed Leader 66
2. The Privileges and “Remuneration” of
Priests and Levites 7
3. The Particular Commitments of the Levites |
4. The Secure Property of the Levites
‘and its Deeper Meaning 70ESA EE
Part I
The Priesthood of the Law and
the Priesthood, Which Is “in Christ”
(De Adoratione Book XI)
Tue Divine Basis OF THE PriestHoopD, AARONIC
il ize Cuistian. The opening statement of this Book
oveals St, Cyril's general perspective on the subject. He
ivrites: “Having previously spoken quite fully and elabo-
rately about the spiritual meaning of the Tabernacle and
on what God had ordered for it, it is now important to
turn to the dignity of the Priesthood and especially to at-
tempt to explain how the Priesthood, which was in type
and according to the Law, points to the true Priesthood,
which is in Christ and through Christ sanctifies the holy
brightened by faith and enriched
taking of
people, who have been
with their communion with God through pat
the Holy Spirit’
‘Two basic themes form here St. Cyril's perspective:
1) the dignity of the priesthood and 2) the transposition
from the Priesthood of the Law to ‘the Priesthood in Christ.
“The former is the type of the latter, and the later the truth
of the former. For St. Cyril, the dignity of the Priesthood isi of Alexandria’s Teaching on the Priesthoog
“ ——eethood
first and foremost seen in the fact that it was raised up by
is in Exodus 28:1,
near fo you your brother Aaron, and his sons with
Jimself. The Biblical basis for thi
Israelites, to serve me as priests — Aaron
and Aaron's sons, Nebad and Abid, Eleazar and Ithamar.”
a) The first important point here is,
to StCyril, that “it was God, who called by name
(ovopaori) the first priests that were selected.” This
means that all priests are, of should be, called by God.
St. Cyril reinforces this point from St. Paul's statement in
Hebrews 5:4: “And one does not presume to take this honor,
but takes i only eon called by God, just as Aaron was.’
Putting it in other words, we may say with St. Cyril
thatthe calling tothe Priesthood has a divine and not
a human basis. In St. Cyril's words: “No one should be
seltalled tobe priest (offer priestly services) 0 God,
betshould wat forthe calling*+And St Cyril warms: t0
do cthervise and “to ater oseize the priesthood by
force without having he approval from above” (it the
eres _means tobe subjected tothe punish
the eat (ae Numbers ch 16, copanas naw bY
Thus, St. Cyril writes, none sho feet ee
ing is out of play ee a
place and unseemly, when §
thatthe same thing applied even to Chet nex oe ties
rist, Hebr. 5:5. “So
according
bid. 728A, —
bid
“tb.
*lbid.
vjeatnoo of te Law and Priesthood “In Christ”
ify himself in becoming a High priest,
he One, who said to him ... You area
to the order of Melchisedek.”*
In light of all this, St. Cyril goes on to conclude that
s an icon of Christ's calling to the
raws here various parallels, which,
in distinctions. For example, God
“Aaron, but he did it through Moses, but in the case
me directly from God. Aaron had
his calling to serve the Hebrew
his disciples participate in his
1 to minister to the whole world. St, Paul acknowl-
inthians 3:9. “We are God's collaborators
Know that the disciples rum all over the
the Gospel of Christ.” And
jon,
also Christ did not glor
hut was appointed by th
wriest forever according,
‘Aaron's calling wa
Priesthood. He also di
however, imply certai
called
of Christ, the calling ca
his sons participate in
nation, but Christ had
callin
‘edges this in 1 Cori
(ovvegyot) and we
world to minister to the nations
1 adds: Christ called the apostles to this missi
St. Cyril
much as the Son is the
but the Father did so as well, inast
Father's thought and wisdom and will. Aaron, then, is a
type of Christ and a sort of prefiguration of the true and
spiritual priesthood emerging out of the shadows that
are still obscure?
1) A second point that St. Cyril underlines here with
good reason is that “Moses was ordered to call Aaron
hear to him.”* For St. Cytil, this detail contains another,
important, spiritual meaning. Its the fact that the Law
(represented by Moses) is weak and imperfect ane cannot
bid
“Ibid. 728C.
Ibid. 729A.ied a: \ ees
p \\se
of Alexandria’
Teaching on the Priesthogg
a
fulfill its mission by itself except with the hel
(represented by Aaron). In other words, the Ta ies
draw near to Christin order to fulfill its mission,
St. Cyril explains this point further by recalling som,
details from the book of Exodus. Moses “had never been
eloquent in the past, not now ... He wns slow of speech and
slow of tongue” (Ex. 4:10)? God, however, told him not to
worry but to go, keeping in mind that He would be with
him, and that He would be his mouth and teach him what
Yet, Moses still begged for someone else!
he was to s
‘And, so, God appointed Aaron to undertake this task, as a
type of the Lord (of Christ), who can easily accomplish all
things. In other words, as St. Cyril writes, Israel could not
have been redeemed from Egypt if Moses, who was slow
of speech and weak overall, had not been given Christ as
his assistant through the icon of Aaron. God's granting of
Aaron to Moses is for St. Cyril a type of the truth that “the
eee of the Law is perfected through Christ!” The
Z re cones does not have the power to redeem nor
a fy completly those, who are redeemed from sin.
es iS i = om says, who is naturally our
Sra ene sanctification with the synergy of the
oe ie ail nis natly Prefigured by Aaron and his
in Baap ney hi side and collaborated with Moses
Point of fact, Aaron’s sons pre-figured the
disciples of Christ, who collaborated with him, High
hrist, who collaborate
disc at im, the Hig!
Ibid. -
Ibid. 7298,
hod ofthe Law and Priesthood “In Christ” 5
priesthood 9
ical basis for the above point is
nipossible for the blood of bulls
vats to take away sins.” On the contrary, how-
crrendered perfect those, who are sanctified
ing one sacrifice for the sake of
sae rally, therefore, those, who continue fo love
ee hadiow an ter and to have an attachment
should know that unless
h Priest and Apostle of
fence in
st. Cyril's exeget
Hebrews 10:4. “It is in
and 8
ever, Chri
through him, by offer!
the shadow and the Te
fo the Mosaic regulations,
ey bring near them the Hig!
th, Jesus Christ, the Lord, their persist
ont geal for the worship of types would lead them
re. What boast could the life, which is in accor-
dance with the Law, project before God, who honors
tues? This is why the wise Paul, who knew the
Christ, says that he re-
t
our Fai
nowhet
the vi
superiority of the knowledge o
gards as refuse all the things of the world and prefers
to gain Christ (Phil. 3:8).7
‘There is yet another point, at!
to the order God gave to Moses to “call near him Aaron his
brother” (Ex. 28:1). God gave this order, St. Cyril writes,
when Moses complained to God that he was not able to
lead the Israelites out of their sufferings in Egypt, be-
cause, as he said, he could not achieve all things by him-
self. Christ's disciples, however, run along with him not
because of his weakness, but because they had been se-
ready to gain from him the power
by the most ex-
hird spiritual meaning,
lected as excellent and
to do all things. This is clearly confessed
“bid.
"Ibid. 727C.aha 4 eae
MW he he k
il of Alexandria's Teaching on the Priesthoog
caalaeee " i the Priesthood
ceptional Paul, who said, “I can do all things through Christ
empowering me" (Phil. 4:13).!3
On the above basis, itis clear that St. Cyril thinks of
the Christian priesthood in terms not so much of Aaron
and his sonsas of Christ and his holy disciples. Inasmuch
as he does this, he thinks in a brighter and superior way,
because the context is no longer the type and shadow of
the Old Testament but the light of the truth of the Gos-
pel. The priesthood of the New Testament is based on
‘Christ and his disciples and, as such, has a basis in the
truth of the Gospel that has already been accomplished
and is in force. The Chri High Priest is the Bishop,
who is “a type and sits in the place” of Christ, while his col-
laborators, the Priests (presbyters) are his collaborators
as the holy disciples were Christ
Thus, what was said about Christ's and his disciples’
calling is also applicable to the Bishop’s and his Priests’
calling. Christ calls the Bishop, but Christ and the Bishop
call the priests. The Bishop derives his power directly
from Christ, while the Priests derive it from Christ
twp we ban ae mpi ft. ya
actually the true basis of Chris-
tian Priesthood as found in the Chu
rch
Holy Orthodox Church, ere
ty VESTMENTS. After
Dist Messe or me Pais
Ming as the basis of
speaking about the divine cal
"Ibid. 729ABC.
Mtb,
priesthood of the Law and Priesthood “In Christ”
riesthood and its divine power to redeem and
Pivify, St. Cyril turns to the priestly vestments as
to sary dered in the case of Aaron and attempts to
ey we their spiritual (Christian) meaning, Cleary, his
Pion is to provide a Christian, Biblical basis for what
: plies to Christian priests in this case.
Exodus 28:2ff serves as his starting point, but as be-
he quotes several, relevant texts from the
the
fore, so here, ret
New Testament that help bring out the spiritual meaning
he is searching for. Exodus stipulates this: “You shall make
sacred vestments for the glorious adornment of your brother
‘Aaron, and you shall speak to all, who have ability, whom 1
have endowed with skill, that they make Aaron's vestments to
consecrate him for my priesthood." ;
Straight away, St. Cyril turns to the most wise
Paul's advice that those, who were saved by faith,
should be expected to put on the truly holy and heav-
“Put on as your vestment our Lord Jesus
serves that
enly vestments: n
Christ” (Rom, 13:14) Actually St Cyril observes that
this apostolic expectation also has prophetic founda,
tion, Isaiah had spoken about it as well: “My sow
ifor he has vested me with the robe of
rejoices in the Lord, Seni
i" soy” (I
salvation and the garment of joy” ( }
ostolic and prophetic basis, then, St. Cyril states that
the truly honorable and glorious an eS = ely
i is to us the robe of :
Ie is Christ himself, who is :
tion andthe garment of oy. He is indeed a brilliant and
surpassing ornament for the souls of the Saints. As itis; aa
St. Cyril of Alexandria's Teaching on
the Priestogg
written, “Those, who are
Christ” (Gal. 3:27).16
It is important to note hi
iah is what Orthodox ee Soe
first vestment, the sticharion, because it offers a
——— its original tradition and Se
, liturgical traditions go back to th h
and have been shaped by the old, Heb i
s they were ‘ ar
os they ae fulfilled and reshaped in Christ. ree
ae he priestly vestments of the Law, and how
Soule relate to Christ and to Christian, priestly
ents? It is to this that St. Cyril turns next and thus
eee further, important elucidation concert ;
hristian Priesthood me
a Cori el ae perception is that the Law adorned
Azo wih pele that refer to and depict Christ's Glo-
ae aoe a mystical, but exact, logic (A6yos)
eee eee eee which denotes in a mys~
fevous way the glory of the Savior.!” These vestments,
oe aa oe 283, are the following: the
aes vi tov), the shoulder-piece (éropuc),
ae ngs (xeteov Kooup Borde), the tire
be purple sat and ena Tessa the ie
rth he
Christ” (x0 a
(0 KAAAOS tod XeLatOo
sipa.782———— rob). The gold revealed his
"ibid p To0), The gold revealed his
baptized into Christ, have p
, "ut on
office; the linen his being,
al
sear nd the blue his
scarlet his flesh; a!
heaven).
the fabric of the Tabernacle,
cerning the identity
Person and Work.
jeclare their assimi-
repre-
e purple hi
Word; the
ove (from
then, like
5 truths con!
his blessed
on, they d
Godhead: th
the podiless
coming from al
vestments,
The
evariou!
symbolize the
orine Lord Jesus Christ
e them
When the priests put U <
qriron to Christ, the fact that they are tied to him,
ent him, depict him as icons that imitate him.”*
Gt. Cyril goes through the various vestments,
one, specifying their particular meaning. :
4) He first writes about the Ephod (the shoulder piece)
on the basis of Exodus 28:6~8. The materials point to the
dignity and sancti sthood. The two onyx
Stones of emerald (the Urim and Thumim) inscribed
with the names of the tribes of Israel signify heaven, the
diwelling place of the Glory of God that fills . This is es-
tablished on the basis of Exodus 24:9-10, which, in tury
is based on a Theophany. The fact that they are worn on
the priests’ shoulders typifies the truth that Christ cor
ries the Christians in a similar way. The same notion
is also linked with the imagery of the eagle that spreads
its wings and takes up its young (Deut. 32:11)” Further
more, it is reminiscent of Psalm 11:3 and Hosea 11:3, as
well as of the statement of Christ to his disciples that
“their names have been written in the heavens” (Luke
one by
ty of the pries
ibid, 732.
Ibid. 736AB.
Ibid. 7368.eee, Y\
0 Cyril of Alexandria's Teaching
OM the Presthong
20). Fir hese stones remind us of our.
10:20). Finally, these Us of our ace;
lance
by God in Christ.
b) The next item of the ves
o vestments is the B;
(axequot0t0v) with the twelve stones that hee
names of the twelve tribes inscribed on them aeoe®
ing to Exodus 28:13-21. The description of this en
Exodus is not very clear, and St. Cyril admits it bat in
spite ofthat, he tries to explain it. He concludes that on
Son signifies the fact that in the person of the na
riest, the Lord sees all the Israelites as if he carries the
Iso explains that it is called “oracle of judg-
ry ss a Kegiaewv), because it was placed over
where the rational power resi ;
sia resides, and whe
ght judgment is worked out St. Cyril establishes these
ns ings on the basis of the Psalms 105:3, 98:4, 44:14."
be rv applies to the names inscribed on the stones,
amily the Saints, and to the chains, which
conr2e mumerous virtues of the Saints and the
rory of Christ accordin, i
Chis hms, who sou pate that wanes ha
one accor, a : wo
ne according to Ephesians 2:14.25 “ines the twain
the St. Cyril finds in Ezekiel other
Precious stones, but he alway
Provides the ultimate focus,
hood and the people. This is n
Ibid. 736¢.
ibid
bi. 7378,
bid 74088,
bid, 7000-7414,
Particular meanings of
ys ends with Christ, who
for he upholds the priest-
most el ea
ost eloquently brought out
\
A \\\ie
Law and Priesthood “D il
in Christ”
jestirood of HE
P
odus 28:26, which stipulates:
aterpretation of EX :
pon invould wave this ‘oracle of judgment’ with the
vpavon SIO prast when he goes into the Holy Place
aes on 2 These, says St. Cyril were symbols of
before
Christ and the
hold Lam with yo
the manifestation an
God. In his person,
Saints according to Matthew 28:20 ("Be-
1a to the end of this age”).” Christ is
‘d truth of Aaron’s appearance before
we come to know the Father, and
he Father's good and perfect will, which
sing to him” (Rom. 12:2 and Jn.
Christ as Emmanuel, because
‘od of God, the only holy One,
ws reas we become what he is only by participation and
vertation (weber wai kart piurow). “We” here sig.
sven the Saints, and the Breastplate symbolizes Christ's
mediatorial work for us before God the Father together
with the Saints.
c) St. Cyril describes next tl
which corresponds to the Chi
basis of Exodus 28:31-35. Its bl
corruptibility, i.e. Christ, and this is in accordanc
Psalm 131:16 (“I will put on salvation”) and Romans
13:12-14 ("Put on our Lord Jesus Christ”). Inasmuch
as blue also symbolizes heaven, as we have noted, the
blue color of the tunic indicates heavenly incorrupt:
ibility. Here, Aaron symbolizes Christ, who put on the
a
wwe also learn t!
is perfect and well plea
16:15). This also refers to
he is the Son by nature, G
the Hebrew Tunic (xiv),
ristian Sticharion, on the
jue color symbolizes in-
re with:
ibid. 741 AB.
"Ibid. 741C.
Ibid, 741D.NR, NY AN ee a. tel
Si. Cyril of Alexandria’s Teaching on the P,
of Alexandria's Teaching on the Py
iesthoog
body and rendered it incorruptible ace
ee) es ¢ ; : a has life in himself mda
leon apa for the bells under the frinse
c, these symbolize the salvation and brillant
nt
pomegranates refer to the cities ae
ee we cities, in which the Gospel is
oe e rosette with the engraving “Hol
ee 28:32-34) symbolizes the mystery -
his according to John 1034-26, ie. the fact that
nina nt 7 for us by the Father. It also refers to
pete pee both natural and by participation
es Pes), or to the heavenly kingdom,
Exodus 28:34 indi
aoe icates the High Priestly function
economy, which is preached
the sins of
fen cies a ins the people every time he of-
through whom vedhave ance en Bains to Christ
eerie etree to God and forgiveness: of
cates that Christ's ing 7 an Seer
: lom will hav 2
d) The Tire and the Girdle ee
They refer t
y to Christ’s righ
ah ight arm and to his b:
res, Aaron's. oe i
oe res Sons are to have it also, = ; a
=e =a irhad in the same mission, St. oye
cpt ee na ety
Ta sap OMA Con oS
: ee 7440-7458, - -
"ibid. 7468C. i
hav
have a military meaning.
Kes
thood “In Christ” B
the Law and Pri
hood of
ries
ic understanding of the Hebrew
‘the Christocentti
in Priesthood is
‘is the basis for the Christia
tained in St. Cyril's typological exposition
priesthood
¢ of ordination and consecration of
further eXP!
of the Hebrew rit
the Priests.
ic OF Priestly CONSECRATION OR
Cyril's discussion on the Old
ment priesthood turns next from the vestments
riestly consecration. The vestments, he
‘d to beautify the holy people, but their
another way.
of course, the world
Tie MEANIN
Oxpination. St.
Test
of priests to p
says, were USE
consecration was effected i
This matter, says St. Cyril, is,
of the shadows, but we come to it with Christ I is in
the light of Christ that we are able to understand the
sncient, Hebrew rite of consecration as a sort of "prepa"
ratory consecration” (mQ0ayW7H9s), OF a8 3 IYPE of the
trae conseeration” of the Christian rite, although it is
arly perceived when one
brew) types to the new
different in manner. This is cles
actually compares the old (Hel
(Christian) prototypes.
The Old Testament priests were firs
then vested, Then, after vesting, they receives
of the Spirit through Chrismation on
only then that they could proceed to #
propriate sacrifices.
t washed and
.d the grace
their head. It was
he offering of ap-
“Ibid. 74908.
Ibid. 7528.
“Ibid.14 Sh. Cyril of Alexandria's Teaching on the Priest
— me
Something, similar, says St. Cyril, occurs in
New Testament, The Christian priests are first a
through Baptism and then, having been delivered f mn
mpurity, put on the bright vestments, ie. the Lord Jeous
Christ according to Romans 13:14 ("Put on our Lord Jesus
aan This is followed by the joyful visitation from
a a the grace of the Holy Spirit, who anoints their
" Sou anointed the heads of the Old Testament
priests. Only then, do they
, do they appear bef
the spiritual sacrifices paristore We ford x
Both cases, say:
Pee ays St. Cyril, are reminiscent of Psalm
eae speaks of “innocent hands and a pure heart” as
eases for “standing at the Lord’s holy place.”3?
oe Beale to which the Hebrew priests came
nos a and chrismated in Old Testament
, were offered for the 5 i
description of these sari Serer are
es, which St. Cyril cites, and
then proce relate to tl is-
en proceeds to show
fen nes w how they all relate to the Chri
St. Cyril
rificial regulations seem to be coy
ause, as he notes, it is through
10 God, bec h him
d, because of his death and hie ioe Bain access
id ac. 7 e
> bid. 7520759) -
ied :ABCD. =
od of the Law and Priesthood “In Christ” ic
jestho0
Indeed, St. Cyril says that it is not just Christ's death
igh which our corruption and sin have been
Body and his very Blood, which lead
stitute real clues for understand-
he pro-
and life, throug
healed, but his very
us to perfection and cons!
Old ‘Testament sacrifices. On this basis,
several, typological meanings.”
“The young bull of the Old Testamentisa type of Christ.
Like the bull, Christ i also “fee from the yoke and under the
tke” — "free from the yoke” as God by nature and “under the
.e Law, because of the human nature,
yoko as being under the
vhich he assumed. Indeed, a young bull is not unfamiliar
swith the yoke, but it is unnatural for it to be yoked.*
St. Cyril explains that Christ can be likened to “#
young, sacrificial bull by economy.” This re ids us of his
naturally unyoked Godhead and his naturally yoked
manhood. Being such, Christ is sacrificed in the Holy
Tabernacle for those, who, like the Old Testament Lev-
ites, place their hands on him, ic. the Church, who take
hold of him by faith and are thereby sanctified.
Emmanuel’s death is most holy, and the manner of
his sacrifice is most acceptable to God, says St. Cyril. His
Passion is parallel to the shedding of the bull's blood on
the altar and toall the rest of the details that apply to this
sacrifice, including the detail that this sacrifice took place
outside the gate, as St, Paul points out in Hebrews 15:12.°
ing the
ceeds to point out
Ibid.
“Ibid. 7568.
Ibid, 756C.
Ibid. 7560.6 SL Cyril of Alexandria's Teaching on the p
a
riesthoog
1e fire that consumes the bi
s the body has to do wi
Glory f Christ, which was revealed at his glorie
urrection following his dee fa
following his death. The burning of the ne
signifies the burning of human sin and the purify
of man.* * ce
St. Cyril goes on to show
| Suunto show that he 0 rams that
assis on his ozasion of Ol Testament ies
consecration O y Christ rh ,
cost ao pty Christ The ram without bier,
ish is the type of Christ as one, wh ly
as one, who led a completel
eB The offering, then, of this rams blood a rife a
oferig of Chit hoy eto the Father srnesite
nt tl ta his am ras offered whole but also
ae its member, typifies the Christians, who are
of ist, each of them si ; it
sora caien hem separately but constitut-
The was
hing of the intestines typifies holiness and
y..The he
me the feet typify the offering of the
ai life of God-pleasing work after-
! says St. Cyril, everything is pure, both
thought
ights and acts,
'd acts, because he committed no sin. This is
why his offer
y ing is typi
ing of holocaust ified by the complete, burnt offer-
——-
Law and Priesthood “In Christ” 7
priesthood of the
wed to him but were unable to offer This meant
St, Paul expressed it most aptly:
1e man the fall passed on
ill shall be reckoned
2, aS
the disobedience of om
shedience of the one al
complet
qs through
so through the ol
r (Rom. 5:18-19)-7
to Palladius that at this point, we can
f Christ with complete transparency
the eighth day that Moses ceased
r 0 act then. Yet,
all
justife
st. Cyril says
see the mystery of
(ouepavéc)-* It was on
to be a priest, because Aaron started t
Moses did not remain silent but continued to teach. This
clearly typifies Christ, wl after the Law,
i.e. on the Eighth Day, wl
and with it the beginning of
declared by the Apostle, who says,
creation” (2 Cor. 5:17)-?
For St. Cyril, Christ’s appearance on the Eighth Day
¢ the works of Moses to an end. In other words, the
ind shadows is no longer permis-
f the Law has not passed away,
who are spiritual and
ynose priesthood is
hhen the Resurrection occurred
f the new age. This is clearly
“in Christ there isa new
brought
worship of God in types a
sible, Yet, the pedagogy ©!
because the Law is spiritual to those,
's declares the mystery of Christ
+ that the Eighth Day was
that the people would see
a sort of pre-announce-
rth.
always
St. Cyril focuses on the fac
connected with Moses’ promise #
the Lord's Glory. This, he says,
of the time of the coming of the Lord on the ea
ment
757D- 760A,
“Ibid. 765D.
Ibid. 768,
"Ibid.ny MQ Sy nee teereereerrereerretectcee
18 St. Cyril of Alexandri
Teaching on th
5 te Priesthy
ood
He also focuses on Moses’ comm.
shoul sae fi for himself ond then for ea
ommand, says St. Cyril, is very fnapareaiess ies
itshows that thse, who wer called o be priest and had
oe C psicaton by th, wer expected tobe a
s was a necessary presupposition to ofering
priestly services."
Tue Meanine or Pxiestty Orrerines. St. Cyril turns
a eens of priestly offerings on the basis
wee —— a (9:8ff). He briefly mentions the
serio series “ \ey are presented in Leviticus and
Stren lessing of the people and the appear-
oe ry of the Lord to the people on the Eighth
se eu s the main focus of his teaching.*?
oon oe tthe appearance of the Divine Glory on
ee in fact a manifestation of the Son of
eee eee the Father. All this was in
m wet wna on of God would do for us in
jow that everything has ¢
nein Gal Sateen whom speed
: fas wt he young bull had been in Old pete
= capes through forgiving our wanaprssions
icine Ad the stain of our condemn ae
* who Was sacrificed like th eae
le ram to shed a
Sid 768 =
Ibid. 7688 :
Tbid. 7680,
~~
sot of te Leno ancl Priesthood “In Christ” 19
riestlo
who became “sacrifice for
fied us with his own
in offering” mixed
to God the
ygrance;” the one,
‘asmuch as he sancti
ho became the “grai
fn as he presented himself
rent, holy lifes*
spiritual fray
salvation” in
blood; the one, wi
with oil, inasmucl
Father for us through a ferv
The two sets of sacrifices of Leviticus, those for Aaron
1s St. Cyril, were offered for
and those for the people, 52Y'
aiming access to the Lord. Now, however since Emman-
or has appeared, and we have been called to sanctifica-
tion, we have access through Him to the Father and are
like “sweet fragrance to him.
In the days of old, Chi
aa
offered himself in vari-
7s through the various sacrifices. Now that the
come, however, and the Glory of Christ
ittes more brilliantly, and death and corruption have
sun abolished, priests and people offer gifts to the
Cod, honoring, him not externally or outwardly as the
Teracl of the flesh did, but by making themselves fra-
grant sacrifices.*
The ancient sacrifices were types of the
tions of souls that Christians offer to God. Th
death to the world and to the mind of the flesh, morti-
‘crucifixion, as it were, with Christ,
nd blameless life, or to the |
what St. Paul
ous wa
Eighth Day has
fication of passions,
transposition to the holy a
thatis in accordance with God's will. This is
means, when he refers to the manifestation in the Chris-
ae
S Ibid, 769A.
“Ibid. 7698,PONS ee carr
20 St. Cyril of Alexandria’s Teaching on th
Sh he Pri
. a
tians’ body of the life of the Risen Lord (2 Cor. 4
S ir patience, w hich leads to their rei ning w aa ag
he future (2 Tim. 2:12), or their becom sae
oming conformed
to
his passion in order that they
at they may also become
Partakers
of his resurrection and glory.”
If Christ died outside th
cae Jied outside the gate for us, as the blessed
Pal sa Ob, 18:2, then we Christians too, s
S.Cyr- oughta goo bearing Christ’s reproach being
sacrificed like a bull, becomin, ee
: | becoming a full-bu i
ram shedding Christ’ fragrance." ade
3. Cyril believes f
i. ya believes that these sacrifices are most a
promi fo pists, tease they are given fst place
i fering pureations and sanctification. On theater
aan = is quick to pot out that the magnitude of the
Play scries a ompared to those offered fo the
People inthe Ol Testaent show the superonity of
arate tof pists a such tis this
eae uality that demands greater sacri
nro leaders ofthe peopl, say St aa
le sacri Sea
coe a on the other hand, indicate
sactifice wit dies :
Fea engin as well as meckness. The grain
Seen the olindiate the bright hope of fein a
ce pitt of Ch
fe neither sorrow! Eat ist
sre nih sorrowful nor teal, ut pai a
in lowing Chest. When this ha Midian
; 1e mystery of the Eighth Dey {hen people ar-
oe the Fighth Day, when the Lord's
ibid. 769.
Ibid. 7
Christ” 21
preston of the Law and Priesthood “In
ke a fire and completes the sacrifice.
1, is a mystical one! Indeed, since
fakes place inthe altar of the mind and does
the Glory of the Lord is not actually re-
tas the Holy Spirit, who vivifies those,
comes down Iil
Glory :
says St. Cyril
This fire,
this sacrifice
not entail t¥PeS
vealed as fire, but
who partake of him
oF PriestLy BLESSING. Aaron's bless-
more generally, the blessing
fact Christ's blessing, says
alm 113:20-21 and
‘Tae MeaNING
1g of the people (and,
of the people by priests) is in
Cyril. This is in accordance with Ps
sives the descent of the Holy Spirit
Tis important to observe, says St- Cyril, that before
‘Aaron's consecration, there was no laying on of hands,
sano blessing. The Holy Spirit had not yet been given,
because Christ had not yet been glorified (Jn 7:39)! Now,
however, that Christ's Glory shines forth in heaven, the
gift of the Holy Spirit is readily available.
‘Another important matter that St. Cyril raises here
has to do with the manner of blessings, which priests
aoe bound to follow. This manner is specified in Num
bers 6:22-27, which St. Cyril fully cites. Its clear 19 him
that, on this basis, it is not a human hand that blesses,
but God's, as it were. Priestly blessing is a demonstra-
tion of James 1:17, namely, that every perfect gift is from
inv
Sid. 790-772,
iid 728.
ii
Sibi. 72H5 Cyril of Alexandria's Teaching on the Priest
tod
above and comes down from th i
ee e Father of lights, As
Christ is the way of blessing. He is also the disper
to us of all heavenly goods, and all that comes from the
Father is through him. This is why St. Paul says: Gra
and peace to you from God out Father and our Lord Jesus
Christ” (Rom. 1:7). The blessing that priests offer to .
ple is in God's name. The best way to convey this a
is given, acording to St. Cyril, in Numbers 623-25.
- Ee Lord spoke to Moses, saying: Speak to Aaron and his
ae ‘sy et shall bless the Israelites: You shall say
pn eee and keep you, the Lord may make
ioe sien oa and be gracious to you, the Lord may
1h 4 ounteane pony and give you pence. So they
ee eae ee Israelites, and I will bless them.”88
pena lessing actually do? St. Cyril explains
ins, destroys the curse, transforms th
ea makes him boast in Chis. St, Pau isthe withese to
hs, when he writs tothe Ephesane (3-3), “bine
God ad Father of our Lord J ae es
intend ttl essing ashe ease us in Him be
of the world to be holy and blameless before
Him, having destined His love to divine adoption
ing destined us throu,
co rough His love to divine
And St. Cys
pelled because:
and peace t
il goes on to comment:
of his transgression, but b
Sibi. 77D. ~
lbid. 773A.
“Ibid
“Man was ex-
but became accepted
sethoo ofthe Law and Priesthood “In Christ” 23
adoption, when he was blessed through
ook of the Holy Spirit. Actually, Christ
‘ed out, the Spirit on all Christians, not
the saints with partiality but placing
again through
Christ and part
has richly pour’
‘The manifestation
the manifestation of his mercy,
sre knowledge of God is granted together with participa:
tron in eternal life. The Savior himself says this (Jn. 17:3):
is is eternal life, Hhat they may know You, the only true
God, and whom You sent, Jesus Christ.”*
St. Cyril goes on to explain that the face of God the
rather is undoubtedly the Son, who appeared to us. The
Gon is his character, likeness and icon, through whom
ee know the Father, and so, we learn together with
this knowledge that we need to be merciful. This is the
meaning of our justification by faith and not by works of
righteousness that we have done. It is God's great Mercy,
says St. Cyril, that made it possible for us to shake off cor:
ruption and to receive a new form that is appropriate for
the new life in Christ.
St. Cyril stresses here that the Jews were the first to
receive this great and true Mercy, when the Only Begot-
ten shown upon them, They were under a heavy burden,
because the Law, which convicted and punished the
sinner without mercy, had condemned them. But they
ce it is true that
cause
STbid. 7738.
“Ibid.
bid. 773BC.SN aly,
‘Alexandria’s Teachin; P;
18 0M the Priesthogg
received Merey with the saving Grace given throy
hrist, whose coming had been prayed for +
a
Cl hs ccording to
It was the entire mankind, however, St. Cyril
n to stress, that received God's Mercy through the
manifestation of Christ. Peace was granted by the ap.
penance of God's face in Christ to everyone, who Be
aes ae declared peace to all, as John 14:27 states,
i ie ascended into heaven and received the Name
= isaboveevery name and sat at the right hand of the
‘ather, Christ abolis! e i
oo ished the enmity that divided man-
The peace grante is
cha Pees ranted by Chis is appropriated through
a aS His commandments and walking with
the Sir, ho makes us partakers of the divine natu
ist unites us in this unity. He rayed
ee prayed to the Father that
ee Scripture says that we all are
that whosoever is united with the
Lord, becomes one
: le spirit with Him; tl is
alted, He attracts all to himself ieiiiiainl
Ibid. 73.
"bid. 7730,
"Ibid. 7730-768,
«ofthe Law and Priesthood “In Christ” 25
priesttoo
sanctify themselves in order to fulfill their liturgy.”
sa ctually turns to Numbers 86-15, which refers to
tha purification ofthe Levites and opens up its deeper
meaning, for Christians.
jere again, St. Cyril is totally Christ-centered. The
whole text, he says; refers to Christ. He is our purifca:
vom, our cleansing, the giver of our sanctification”
Christ's Blood cleanses more effectively than that of bulls
sind rams, ete, as the all-wise Paul declares in the Epistle
in the Hebrews (9:13). If the types have saving power,
how much more does Christ true Blood, he remarks!
“The water and the ashes, St. Cyril explains, refer to
tion in Christ, which takes place through
This is what the divine Paul explains
“We have been buried with
the mottifical
faith at Baptism.
in Romans 6:4, when he says,
Christ, and as God raised him, so we may live a new life.” Else-
where, the same Apostle puts it like this: “We participate
in his death by suffering in the body. So thatthe life of the Risen
Jesus may appear in our mortal body” (2 Cor. 41011)
What is this mortification in Christ? To be dead to the
world, to sin, says St. Cyril: to live a holy and pure life.
To live as Paul says in Galatians 2:19-20:“...being dend to
the world and living to God in Christ.”
St. Cyril goes on to explain various details of the
Ola Testament regulations. The shaving of the Levites
_
Ibid. 7768.
"Ibid. 776D.
2Sbid, 776D-777A.
| 777A., 5) Cyril of Alexandria's Teaching on the Priestagg
eth
>recisely aenotes this mortification?” Tt has to do with
the deliverance of the mind from the uncleanness of the
flesh, from the law of sin with the power and energy of
the Holy Spirit, Hair represents desire that is not rooted
out except when itis shaved off at the moment it beging
to grow.
The washing of the clothes denotes external cleanli-
ness, which is explained with reference to the manner of
life indicated in Romans 12:17 and Matthew 5:1678
‘The two young bulls to be sacrificed at these purifi-
cations typify Christ and the life in Christ? The on
offered as a whole-burnt offering and the other as an of-
fering for sin
‘The placing of the hands of the Israelites on the heads
of the Levites has to do with ordination.®” It corresponds to
what is done today at the ordination of priests, when the
people say Axios,
An important detail that St. Cyril stresses here is the
requirement that the ordination of Levites should take
Place at the Church and in the presence of the people.
Others, itis against God's will and outside the holy
'ws. It is on completion of their purification and ordi-
nation that Levites assume
aol assume full and effective responsi-
ibid. 78C,
Ibid. 770.
Ibid. 780A,
tid. 780CD.
"Ibid. 7800.
ail Impediments to the Priesthood and
‘Acceptable Priestly Celebrations
(De Adoratione Book XII)
Puysica, Buenustes as IMPEDIMENTS TO THE
PrrestHoop. In Book 12 of his great treatise [e
Worship in Spirit and in Truth, St. Cyril turns to Bo
Testament stipulations conceming the persons,
chould not become priests and to the reasons that pertain
to these decisions.” His intention is to elucidate La be
in which these stipulations are applicable to the Christ a
priesthood, which, ashe has stated, is theultimate reality
that the former typifies. ;
In the Old Testament, it was the tribe of
and no other that was chosen for providing priests
‘The stipulations pertaining to this provision SPST
fied certain, detailed examinations that were req
for Levites, for not all of them could becom, PIT
These examinations mainly focused on c aig Bens
ishes. The key text on this, which St. Cyril cites,
yh Moses
viticus 21:6~23. Here, the Lord speaks though Moves
to Aaron, saying that any man of his tribe
10 Aaron, ughout
f the Levites
‘®]bid. 781BF.pi of Alexandria's Teaching onthe Priestegg
1 generations, who would have a blemish on him
should not draw nigh to serve as priest and to offer
sacrifices fo the Lord. Indeed, it is explained that ¢
man with a blemish is “a man that és lame, blind, with
his nose disfigured, or his ears cut, a man, who has a broken
hand or a broken foot, or hump-backed, or blear-eyed, or one
‘hat has lost his eye-lashes, or a man, zoho has a malignang
ulcer, or tetter, or one that las lst a testicle. ... The gift of
God are most holy, and he shall ent of the holy things. Only
he shall not approach the veil, and he shall not draw nigh to
the altar, because he has a blemish, and he shall not profane
the sanctuary of his God, for I am the Lord that sanctifies
them” (Lev. 21:18~20).
Palladius, St. Cyril's interlocutor, asks the obvious. Is
ita crime, then, if one has a physical (inherited) blemish?
St. Cyril finds this question understandable and congrat-
ulates Palladius. His answer, however, is a negative one.
He is certain, he says, that God would not accuse anyone
for physical blemishes. Thus, he points out that the basis
for prohibiting Levites with physical blemishes from be-
coming priests must be sought elsewhere,
mince acm sehen a emanet
ich the Old Testament, bodily
concerns are used as types that lead people's mn
to more refined thoughls, thoughts thar eng, ens
soul God's concem then, he BS rae ° Hie
ifferent kinds of psychological passione o4° With the
diferent kinds of psychological passions, which hereally
Ibid. 781C-784A, a
“Ibid. 7848,
oN AN NYY adie
y
ents to Priesthood and Acceptable Celebrations 29
intents
Impedit
to speak, because they deprive human beings
reir real possibilities. That this is the case, says
Fro ee learn from the divine Paul, who tells us that
St CIF We selected to be priests, ought to stand out
those, Wil red for their works. Thus, in Timothy 3:24,
and oe anne ’a Bishop should be without blemish... and
- oer eproech” and that exactitude (dxgiBeia) on this
bey ected.
rt peel and introductory clarifications,
St. eal turns to the various cases of physical eae
Leviticus that prohibit one from becoming a priest. His
in ation, of course, is to find the real logic that lies be-
sey or points beyond, such prohibitions. He is certain,
fs he says, that these severe stipulations ultimately have
to do with spiritual blemishes, which are unaceptabe
to God, because they inhibit man’s communion with him
and, therefore, man’s capability to serve im, Putting this
more positively, St. Cyril states that what God expects
of persons that would be priests is perfect vite and
unwavering sanctity Le. patient cultivation of character
leading to thriving virtues and undiminished conssten
cy of prudence. Ths, then i ultimately the purpose of
the bodily stipulations, the promotion of genuine
riestly race. .
eral Testament prety race ss St.Cye,
ime Aaron’s descendants and the Levites.
cluded at that time onelhee e
Today, however, it includes those,
hates, 8
Ibid. 784
“Ibid. 785A.MNS
ni.
51. Cyr of Alexandria's Teaching on the Priesthong
ee elt
lied in Christ, the great and true High Priest, through
sion and communion with him or participation in hig
divine nature (2 Pet. 1:4), These are the people, who have
boon justified by faith and are recognized as children
born of God (Is. 8:18).
‘Tue SriniTuat MEANING OF THE OLD Testament
Puysicat Buemisnes. 1) The first case of bodily
blemishes, which excludes one from entering the ranks
of priests, is that of being blind or lame." St. Cyril tells,
Palladius that he should look at these cases spiritually,
i.e. bypassing the “material or corporeal aspects of the
sacred history,” so that he may discover their “spiri-
tual meaning.”
On this basis, St. Cyril finds that a “blind person”
corresponds toa “mindless person,” since the “mind” is
often said to be the “eye of the soul.” A mindless person
is one, whose mind is not enlightened by the divine light
and, therefore, cannot see the “immortal beauty,” says
St. Cyril. Such a spiritually blind person cannot “engage
in flexible thought movements,” i.e. is not capable to
think, so as to attain exact knowledge and, therefore,
cannot avoid making mistakes concerning the right (ot
thodox) dogma
Clearly, St. Cyril thinks here of a person that has not
experienced deification, or has not seen God’s glory and,
ibid.
Ibid. 7856,
Ibid. 785C.
woo
timents (0 Priesthood and Acceptable Celebrations 31
Impediments (0 Pries ie ee
jus, cannot grasp revealed truth, Ibis to such a person,
ce Cyril, that Proverbs 4:25 refers, when it says:
arr your eyes look directly forward and your gaze be straight
yi * Similarly, it is such a person that Jeremiah
worry describes: "But your eyes and Keart are only on your
Jrchonest gan, for shedding innocent blood and for practc-
si oppresion ved violence.” This last verse suggests that
ipinitual blindness incurs dishonesty, murderous at
tude, oppression and violence towards others. In this
light, we can understand why a spiritually blind person
is unworthy of the priesthood.” /
2) The case of a “lame person” is similar. Looking at
this spiritually, St. Cyril finds that such a person indi-
cates “one that cannot walk straight” or “one that lacks
the power to lead a perfect life.” Lameness, he says, is
actually a sign of idleness, laziness, lack of readiness to
respond to what needs to be done. It is to such a person,
says St. Cyril, that Isaiah 35:3 refers: "..confirm the feeble
knees”; and also Psalm 17:45: “The strange children ... fell
coay from their paths through lameness.” The first verse
speaks of “feebleness” or “lack of firmness,” and the
second, of “falling away from the right path.” It is such
spiritual conditions that inhibit a person from becoming,
a worthy priest
In light of the above, St. Cyril concludes that blind-
ness of mind and lameness or feebleness of life are par-
allel passions, the one being more inward and the other
before you.
‘eTbid. 785CD.
Ibid. 788A.
met32. St. Cyril of Alexandria's Teaching om the Priest
aaa 004
more outward, and that, understandably, both of the
make a person unworthy of the priesthood.% i
5) A person with a "mutilated nose or ears” imple
Sa
;person, who cannot use his senses correctly” and, there.
fore, deprives the mind from making right decisions and
taking right actions. The mutilated ear also implies a
“person, who is not ready to listen” and is, therefore, “ij.
able to fall into deceit and error."
4) A person with a “broken hand or leg” is not a per-
son that is sick in everything, but “one that cannot work
or walk blamelessly.” A person with a broken leg is also
one that cannot act.*
5) A “hunchback or cripple” person, and persons
with “eye-blemishes,” denote “useless persons.” The
cripple is “one, who turns downward towards fleshly
concems, a person that loves matter, who does not lead
a clean life."*S The person with an eye-blemish is “one,
who does not choose rightly but chooses what is unac-
ceptable; such a person lacks dogmatic correctness and
has a propensity towards heresy."%
6) A “person with an itching disease” denotes “one
that has a bodily passion that cannot be Gd
This disease begi oie
‘gins with pleasure and ends with bitter-
ness. It can be both limited id i i
and unlimited, like every
ibid.
"Ibid. 7888CD,
bid. 7880-7894,
Ibid. 7898C,
Ibid. 7890-7922,
"Ibid. 7928C,
Ampediments to Priesthood and Acceptable Celebrations 33
session of the flesh that can be balanced or unbalanced.
pevwing scabs,” then, means “having a passion that can-
hot be controlled but spreads its energy gradually and
without stopping.”
7) Finally, a “person with a crushed testicle” is “one,
who is half a man, a person with sexual problems, either
3 fornicator or a male prostitute.” Such a person basi-
folly lacks in firmness, oF in ability to respond decisively
to challenges.
‘The main point made in all these cases is that a person
that yields to passions and fails to acquire the virtues is
not acceptable to become a priest. Such a person may re-
ceive communion, as a sick person that repents and needs
to receive medicine in order to fight the disease, but not as
a person that can serve others with communion.!”
Christ, says St. Cyril, is the new creation according to
the Scriptures, and we can properly approach him only
when we deny the old man in us, who is corruptible with
the desires of deceit. No one that has remained indeci-
sive in embracing the new life in Christ in all its integrity
ty is worthy of the Lord and, therefore,
101
worthy to serve him.
Priests, Wxo Fater ArreR OxpINation. St. Cyril
{turns next to the case of those ordained priests, who
Ibid, 7920.
Ibid. 798A.
spbid, 7988.
ver pbid. 798C.pWO yy Lan
Ne
34 Si. Cyril of Alexandria's Teaching on the Priestiogg
— — ted
fall into the passions that constitute impediments to
the priesthood.!® He examines this case on the basis of
Leviticus 22:1-9, which deals with liturgical uncleanness,
which profanes the name of God. His point is that those,
who offer to God the sacred oblations that are brought
to them by the people, should take care to be themselves
cleansed before they engage in this service.
“And the Lord spoke to Moses, saying, Speak to Aaron and
fo his sons, and let them take heed concerning the holy things
of the children of Israel, so that they shall not profane my holy
name in any of the things, which they consecrate to me: I am
the Lord. Say to them, Every man throughout your genera-
tions tohoever ofall your seed shall approach to the holy things,
whatsoever the children of Israel shall consecrate to the Lord,
while his uncleanness is upon him, that soul shall be cut off
{from me: Lam the Lord your God. And the man of the seed of
‘Aaron the priest, fhe should have leprosy or issue of the reins,
shall not eat of the holy things, until he be cleansed; and he that
touches any uncleanness of a dead body, or the man, whose
seed of copulation shall have gone out of him, or whosoever
shall touch any unclean reptile, which will defile him, or who
shall touch a man, whereby he shall defile him: according to all
hhis uncleanness, whatsoever soul shall touch them shall be un-
clean until evening; he shall not eat of the holy things, unless
hhe bathe his body in water, and the sun go down, and then he
shall be clean; and then shall he eat of all the holy things, for
they are his breed. He shall not eat of that which dies of itself,
cor is taken of beasts, so that he should be polluted by thent. I amt
i [bid 793D-796ABC. a —
inpatients to Priesthood and Acceptable Celbrations 35
impediments 0 erations 35
tne Lord, And they shall keep my ordinances, tat they donot
hear iniquity because of them, and die because of then, if they
shit profane them. Tam the Lord that sanctifes them.”
‘At the heart of this Leviticus text, which St. Cyril
«ites in full, we have a warning about the severity of the
punishment that such a person may suffer from the Lord
himself: “Every man throughout your generations whoever
fall your seed shall approach to the holy things, whatsoever
the children of Israel shall consecrate to the Lord, while his
tuncleaness is upon him, that soul shall be cutoff from me.”
But we also have a solution. “Whosoever among the sons
of Aaron (the priests) touches anything tat makes im un
clean he shall not eat from the sacred oblations}
has washed his body in water.” The Law providl
remedies to bodily passions, says St. Cyril. In the Gospel,
however, alll this is transferred to the soul and especially
to the mind, If the mind turns to spiritual corruption, it
yields no fruit and does not understand what is neces-
sary for salvation. It resembles the mind of Hymenaeos
and Alexander, who swerved away from the truth by
claiming (falsely) that the final resurrection had already
taken place (2 Tim, 2:18). It also resembles, says St. Cyril,
the mind of those, who run in an unbridled way to all
directions, mindlessly, proving that they have no sense
of direction whatsoever.
St. Cyril is clear about the right remedy for this case.
Such a person should be kept apart from serving until
‘Ibid.
4Ibid. 796D~797A.
aREL REE
St. Cyril of Alexandria’s Teachin,
il of Alexandria’ Ng On the Priesth
oe od
he has been cleansed. He needs to deliver himself
thal, which led him to deadly deeds. Once reston
could resume his place in the Lord's service. In line
from
ds he
this, St Cyril cites the words of St. Paul in 1 Corinthna®
ans
28: "But let a man examine himself, and so
that bread, and drink of that cup. eae dane
shily, eats and drinks damnation to himself, not discern,
ing the Lord’s body." ;
Itis interesting to note that St. Cyril identifies here
those, who do not discern the Body of Christ, not only
with those, who fall into unclean deeds, i.e. contract
leprosy or gonorrhea, but also with those, who associ-
ate, or are in touch with such?®* He cites the following
as evidence: 1 Corinthians 15:33, “Do not be deceived,
evil contacts corrupt good manners;" 2 Corinthians 6:
“What accord has Christ with Belial? And what part has the
believer with the unbeliever? What agreement has the temple
of God with idols” Psalm 17:25-26, “With the holy you
will be holy, and with the innocent man you will be innocent,
and with the excellent man you will be excellent, but with
the perverse you will change your behavior;” 1 Corinthians
|, which warns us not to eat with unclean people,
“But rather I wrote to you with anyone, who bears the name
of brother, if he is guilty of immorality or greed, or is an
idolater, reviler, drunkard, or robber — not even to eat with
such one,” etc.”
iWbid. 797A.
bid. 7978.
bid. 797CD-800A.p
, tr,
t priesthood and Acceptable Celebrations 37
nents to Priesth
; J tuens to Christ asthe ultimate and true reme-
Ee fans the light of day that delivers us from the
dy. Christ Pr Christ has come, ands therefore, there is
darko ses us, restores us to
Por darkness. Baptism clean:
19 plac liye Holy Bucharist sustains us. It is by our re-
Fi ari, then, and by abiding in him, that we get rid
Sa Or am yd the darkness of sin and enter into the
i point, St. Cyril turns to Exodus
jay, To stress this
fers to the Passover lamb that should be
of uncle
light of d
1241-6, which
nin the evening.'®
‘The whole issue, of being clean or unclean and par-
taking of or abstaining from the oblations raises the issue
at who is worthy to celebrate oF to receive communion.
Leviticus 22:10K provides the basis for St. Cyril's answer.
No foreigner (d-\Aoyevtjs) and no hireling (ju0@«t6s)
are allowed to partake. These two characters represent
the unbelievers; those, who have not found and have
not joined Christ. These are not allowed to eat from his
Table.” St. Cyril recalls here the Lord’s very words, “Do
not give what is holy to the dogs,” or “do not throw your
pearls before swine” (Matt. 7:6). To the foreigners and
the hirelings, he also adds the alien residents (nAQoUKou),
who represent those worldly people, who believe in
Christ but have not come to love him."”°
rue nae to partake of communion
or as communicants)? The answer
"id 9000-a0TA
‘Ibid, 801BCD,
“bid 6048,Sete ASA
h
Curil of Alexandria's Teachi
Hg On the Pri
TE Pt
se that belong to or dwell in the
re the genuine Christians, who a
a
th Christ and abide with him in his houses
4 ie 's Daucnrer, Leviticus 22:12 and 13 proys,
;wo additional, interesting cases, which St. Cyril 9,
up and elaborates. Both of these cases have to eae
“priests daughter The first case states, “Ifa priest's daugh,
ter marries a foreigner, she shall not eat from the sacred oblations*
According, to St. Cyril, the priest's daughter represents a
person, who was reborn in Christ through holy Baptism,
but subsequently became an unbeliever! Indeed, St. Cyril
describes this person as having departed from the orthodox
faith, having run after the flesh, having followed deceitful
spirits and having acquired an unclean conscience."
The second case, Leviticus 22:13, indicates that a
priest's daughter, who became widowed or divorced
and, then, being childless, returned to her father's house,
she may partake of the holy gifts. The inner or hidden
meaning of these two cases, says St. Cyril, is that people,
who have gone astray through wrong relations, should
be accepted when they return to their original home. In
other words, true repentance should not be despised, be-
cause it truly leads to restoration.
Particularly interesting here is St. Cyril's identifica
tion of the priest’s daughter with the Jewish people, oF
ae
ibid.
1 Phd. BOABC.
aid. BO5AB.
—— the priest being
Moses’ instruct
ns; worse still,
traditio
ther ‘owed
) himself and foll
io not partake of
after ot
a "Nevertheless, St. Cyril ol
Be etait Wie lene erate
4 then, they will serve him as priests,
id feed others with them."
further about purity as the
nd communicating in the
Crist hims
basis of Hosea
Iast days, an
dat rom the oblations an
st Cyril goes on to sped
Suc ae cebating and com nt
rr pst who ignore this resupPesion
and allows unworthy participation, is severely punished
jecording to Leviticus 22:14-16. The case of the sons of
Eli(1 Kings/1 Sam. 2:15) is recalled here as an illustration
if the severity of the punishment. This case shows that
neither ignorance nor arrogance and high-handed action
are excused.
That purity and sanctity are necessary is further
illustrated on the basis of Leviticus 21:1-4, which
stipulates that priests should not contaminate them-
selves by touching dead people, except their own dead
relatives: father, mother, sons and daughters, brothers
iced sisters. This regulation, says St. Cyril,
(0 the inner condition of the soul, because the
inthe
Ee
"ibid, 8B,
“Ibid c8CD-g0A,N
40 St.
Cyril of Alexandria's Teaching on the
Pristhog
mortality of the body is a type of the i
nner mo;
the soul.” ity
the soul po people represent dead deed, wy 7
priests should not touch lest a
they are =
contami
by association throu
y igh will or act, TI pe
relatives, on the other hand, is connect] tt he
suffering and typifies the suffer wnat
sulin ing and death of Che
of those, who are sanctified in him. This ct
the Old Law has a different stipulation about th
of the relatives. 1 Thessalonians 4:13-14 ex ra
New Testament perspective of this point: “Buf ween”
nol have you ignorant, brethren, concerning those, a
asleep, that you may not grieve as others do who a
hope. For since we believe that Jesus died and rose opt
even so through Jesus, Got will ring hin thse, who he
fallen asleep.”
is why
5m Maxrrace oF Prresrs. Yet, another case stressing
the same point of priestly purity is that of the regula-
tions for the marriage of priests (Lev. 21:14-14). A priest
“shall not marry a widow, or a woman that is put atony, or
profaned, or a harlot, because he is sanctified (dedicated) to his
Lord and God, and he will sanctify him. A priest offers the gifts
to the Lord and God of tke people, and, therefore, he has tobe
holy, because God is Holy.” Here, too, uncleanness, oF
impurity, appears to be transmitted through association
‘irybid. 8O9CD-
us]bid. 812A
ve bid. 8128.
vejbid. 8120.
5h «and Acceptable Celebrations 41
jesthio0
asto do with the condemna-
such associations. AN
it cyt i the Synagogue of the
oF with other shepherds (Scribes and
jos, wo OF erefore, Christ did ot accept her as his
parses) ane eyed in the stipulation relating
1s daughter that fornicates
‘words of Isaiah 1:21 (Zion
ah 11:16F (the olive tree
jains, ith
Cyril exPh
and 856 that result from
and il repute
tion @
nie of this, 5
example
fornicate
ries This €282 i
ve punishment of @ Priest
want te prophetic
teat) and Jem
was cutoff and burned)" ; ;
ches the summit, as it were, of his exposi-
rn details concerning “the Priest that is chief among
iespthren,” the Hierarch, on the basis of Leviticus
y1t0-15." Thus, he explains the followin}
pret is not supposed to take off his miter indicates his
connection with Christ's priesthood," which is com-
pletely perfect (naveéActov) and Melchisedekian (eter-
nal) and cannot be removed." That a High Priest will
not mourn at the death of others is a sign of his belief
in Christ as the common life of all and of the fact that
believers fall “asleep and do not die.” That the High
Priest should not touch any dead persons, even relatives,
indicates that there is total absence of impurity by con-
"ibid 813A, =
"Ubi. B13BC,
"Ibid. 813D-815A,
bid. 8158,
"Ibid. 8154,
“bi,
thal42 St. Cyrilof Alexandria's Teaching on the Priesth
—— '00d
tamination or association in Christ, for Christ defers fro
all other human beings in that he was totally. tuncontamn
nated and sinless.”
Finally that the High Priest was to marty a virgin
signifies Christ's union with the Church of the Nationg
(cxxAnoiay Tv EOVav), as a pure virgin, blameless
and without wrinkle, or holy and immaculate” (2 Cor,
11:2), as opposed to the Synagogue of the Jews. Indeed,
says St. Cyril, going spiritually deeper into the meaning
of the type, the marriage of the High Priest to a pure
rgin signifies the union of Christ to human souls that
are pure and immaculate, which he renders fruitful and
calls them his own generation: “Whosoever does the will of
sen, he is my brother and sister and mother"
my Father in heav
(Matt. 1
How Priests SHouLD Cetesrate tN OnveR 10 Be
|Accerrabte. Having, discussed a) those, who do, or
rather those, who do not become priests, and b) what
priests should not do, and how they should remedy
themselves when they ert, St. Cyril now turns to how
priests should celebrate and who the communicants
should be so that their services may be acceptable." He
recalls the stipulations given in the book of Leviticus for
the various kinds of sacrifices and draws out their spit
tual meaning and application in the Christian economy.
Ibid.
Ibid. BI7AB.
Ibid. B17CH
ee
ee
to Priesthood and Acceptable Celebrations 43
0
pei
Geur-PROJeCTION, BUT Hummury. First of
ils Exodus 20:26, which provides St. Cyril
may be called the first general, principle
for th t celebration: “You shall not go up by steps
so pala, so Hat your nakedness may not be exposed on
ve hig means, as St. Cyril explains, that priests
44 not imitate the pagans, who built high altars
only about their appearance or self-projec-
an they should rather approach their service with
eility” and avoid “self-projection,” thinking that
the altar belongs to the Lord and not to the priests
This, St. Cyril says, is also spelled out in Ecclesiastes
4220, which states: “The greater you are, the more you
Fuld humble yourself and you will find grace before the
Lori.” St. Cyril also recalls James 1:10, which, in the
some spirit, stipulates that “the humble brother must
boast in his height and the rich in his lowliness.” The
liturgist, he says, should be rid of all “self-boasting”
(aAAacoveiaw), “pomposity” (ykos) and “superior-
ity complex” (bnegotpia)."3!
5) Te Sacririce or Waoe-BurNtT OFFERING.
St. Cyril turns next to the stipulations for the sacrifice
of the whole-burnt offering given in Leviticus 68-13,
which provide him with a second, general principle that
should guide a priest’s service: the realization “that the
fire on the altar is unceasing” or “that the Lord's glory
(presence) is always there”:
a) No
all, he rece
with what
correc
it
shoul
and cared
Ibid. 817D__ OO
Ibid, AB,44 St. Cyril of Alexandria's Teaching. On the
i re Priest
100d
a
“And the Lord spoke to Moses sayi
and his sons, saying, This i the ieee arse Acro
ee This is the whole burnt pao fer.
burnin hei all the night fl the morning: andy
altar shall burn om it, it shall not be put Sar ehe
| And the
priest shall put or e ic
mi a pet on the linen tunic, and he shall put the ji
ae body: and shall ake away tha, which net
rg burt which the fre shall have consumed, ent
whole-burnt offering from the liput ine
ing from the altar and he shall put it new ie
e
altar, And he shall put off his
Z put off his vestments and put on another,
I take forth the offer
al te x fering that has been burnt outside the
Plece: And the freon th altar shal be kept
rng {shall not be extinguished."
oe explains that the fire of the altar is unceasing,
2 ees but internal, to it’; “itis fire
, from heaven.” This “fire” n
Sn This “fire” is nothing else but
fie glory of a hich fills the altar. The figure of the
tire bul theresa depen move tea
urning on it
this. "The divine altar it ', More mystical meaning to all
fragrance of our virtues tionally as a sacrifice the
This is why the Apostie saya o)cecation of our lite
why "Lappe te
ercies of God, fo present gone ee 12 BO, therefore by
ee sent your Dodie as et
iach eee
r lose sight of the
the
2bid. 8208C.
Ibid. 8200.
priesthood and Acceptable Celebrations 45
rents 10
he altar from heaven and
re comes down on tl
tt and goes up constantly.
ut remains on it
5 Emmanuel, this fire, St. Cyril
cording to the
“1 sau the Spirit
ing on hmm. I
that the altar i
rected with the Holy Spirit,
hat St. John the Baptist gave:
nt heaven and remainit
but he was the one, who sent me
ie cyater and tld me Hat on tohom the Spirit de-
rhe will baptize with the Holy Spirit” On.
he same John associates the Spirit
at Christ will baptize with both,
Spirit and fire (1:26f). This, St Cyril says, was also fore-
told by Malachi, who prophesied that “he (the Lord) will
se the workd as the fire ofa furnace and as the herb of
rs; he shall sit to melt and purify as it were silver, and as it
were gold” (3:2f).1
Thus, St. Cyril concludes: the
unceasing is the Holy Spirit that has come down and
remains on Christ (who is the reality that the altar typi-
fies) although he was always in him by nature, since he
is understood to be and is God. This means that whoever
believes in Christ and becomes Christ's is also a recipient
of the Holy Spirit and becomes himself a divine altar!
This is why those, who have dedicated their lives to
Christ, should never lose the fire of the Holy Spirit, but
says, is conn’
explanation t
vseneding Hike a dove from
did not know who he was,
to baptize
scends and remains,
1:32-33).° Indeed, th
with fire and foretells th
fire at the altar that is
bid.
Ibid, 821,
bid, 8218,46 St. Cyril of Alexandric
$ Tenching on the Priesthagg
preserve this fire inside them uncea
ngly. They shoutg
ites to exti
it. Rather, they should rekindle this gift constant
ly in
their mind seth metfeation, {hough love for God and
ner of spiritual wor.
s expected of all Christians and especially of
tests cannot function properly unless they are
mystical altars in themselves where Christ and the Spirit
dwell unceasingly.”
Another detail from the Leviticus stipulations on
Whole-burnt offerings, which St. Cyril also notes and
elaborates, has to do with the ashes of the altar. The
stipulations of the Law required that the priests should
throw these ashes outside the Tabernacle, and to do this,
they should change their clothes. St. Cyril recalls Ezekiel
40:45ff, which refers to the same point and concludes that
this stipulation shows the sanctity of the altar and of the
priests, who serve there. Sanctity is the third principle
(prerequisite) for acceptable priestly service. Thus, no
unsanctified (&varyvos) person should enter the holy of
holies for service to God, This is why even the clothes
(vestments) used by the priests at the service of the altar
should be used exclusively there and should not even be
not allow the coldness of secular desi
desire for
touched by anybody else.
Finally, St. Cyril adds that the whole-burnt offer-
ing has to burn on the altar night and day, because it
signifies Chris’s fragrance that never ends. This fra-
Br ybid B2ICD.
Debi. 824AB,
eto Priesthood and Acceptable Celebrations 47
nts to Pries
peti
is also connected with the lives of the
like whole-burnt offerings that shed
as they offer the trophies of thei
f life as a sacrifice to God. So, the
grance of Christ i:
saints, which are
Christ’ fragrance
vangelical manner
exante ofthe whole-burnt offering, says St. Cyell, also
sactce total dedication of “the exceptional saints”
i ), which should be the model of all
wi ceaupirers AYO! VoF
(ne The fact is, however, that only a few fall in line
priests
‘wth this model.)
ty Tue Sacrteice OF GRAIN OFFERING. Thus, St. Cyril
tums next to the sacrifice of the “grain offering” (Lev.
‘c1t_18), which denotes a partial life of dedication, based
nthe commandments of God. This partial dedication,
which characterizes most of the Christians, should also
be fragrant and should be fed with rich and good hopes
about what lies beyond, namely, full commitment to ho-
liness or full commitment to the life in Christ. But what
exaclly is “partial dedication,” Palladius asks?
“Partial dedication,” St. Cyril explains, is the life
that never reaches the heights of the life of the saints,
because it fails to follow the way uphill, which John or
the Apostles indicated, but is always defeated by the life
that lies lower. It is a “life divided between God and the
world,” a life in between, a life, however, that retains the
“memory of being with God.” The parti
signified by the “unleavened bread,” which is used
Bain sacrifice. The leaven in this case is the desire to be
bid. 824CD,
"bid 8254,48 St. Cyril of Alexandria's Teaching
On the Pristhogg
liked by our fellow-human beings (v0, ,
which leads one to compromise his dedication
St. Cyril notes that this is more unavoidable fe A
people, who, as St. Paul the Apostle rie aed
dress the concerns of their partners and ane to
7:33). Basically, however, it is the concerns for i ioe
that divide people's allegiance and make them mrt
dedicated to God. Yet, even the pa dedication ha a
place and its fragrance and its benefits, Those, who are)
it, areallowed to partake of a part of it (ofthe unle: anal
bread), because the rest of it is given to the cae a
thus, the greater mystery of the sacrifice is pecans
If the grain offering is generally for the people, there
E > ee grain offering (actually a “tithe of grain”),
sea coed) for the priests. This is described in
as 6:19-23, and the distinctive feature that dis-
inguishes it from the previous one is that it should be
es burnt offering, i.e. entirely consumed by fire.
Cy ril explains that the reason why the people's grain
otering isnot enely consumed by fire is that those, for
ee do Pe live a totally sanctified life.
re *! i we clave been chosen to serve
paraeael oblige (expected) to be totally dedicated
Pa Ea sacrifice should be totally
es t. Cyril recalls here the verse Ga-
leans 219-20 in order to illustrate what this means for
7 erve as priests in Christ. “I have been crucified
"Ibid. 825BCD. —
16 [bid, 828A.
dand Acceptable Celebrations 49
nents to Priesthood
ini
sat and [no Tonge Hie to myself ut Christ Hes
2 cor te fried pan, on which this offering is made,
bea vghe life of the saints,” which is “full of trials
seni the grain and the oil, on the other hand,
snd sufferings”?
the "brokenness and tenderness of the heart of
d of
«This sacrifice specifies exactly the
im pie of dedication that priests should pursue, But
1 can this be achieved? St, Cyril says that for some, the
ey way t avoid contamination and escape from sin
through Christ” because “itis in him and through him
that the perfect purification has been accomplished by
ans of his crucifixion for our sake.” They have to cling
., whereby they can be
signify
the saints.”
me
to him and to his offering for si
constantly forgiven and restored.'®
») Tue Sacetrice FOR SiN. The “sacrifice for sin,”
which is described in Leviticus 6:25~30, serves as the ba~
sis (or developing this point." The sacred victim offered
forsin, St. Cyril says, is none other than Emmanuel, who
is, according to the Gospel (Jn. 1:29), the true lamb that
lakes away the sins of the world. He is sacrificed in the
place of the whole-burnt offering, because Christ is not
partially holy like us — since he committed no sin (1 Pet.
2:22) but he is totally fragrant and sacred and sancti-
fies all the others. Although “he was included among
the lawless and was counted with those convicted,” “the
Father knew that the death of the Son was perfectly holy
and sacred.” This is why, St. Cyril says, it is said in the
"Ibid, 828CD 829A.
"ibid 8298,
eeon the Priesthogg
"In the place where they slay the whole-burnt
of
there they will also slay
Iso slay the sin of
are the holy of holies” (Lev. cone ins rete
The Son, who is God of gods,
the Holy One of the saints,
ngs,
Lord; they
WS St Cyril says, is als
of creation with his Spirit, a ide!
Father and is truly God. The Law stipulates tha ae
is offered in the “sacrifice for sin” will be eate aire
priest. This is a priest’s primary prerogative, as e i
first to share in the fruit of his labor. Then, the rest of the
sacrifice is eaten in holy places and in the court of the
sacred Tabernacle. The holy mysteries (sacraments) are
offered in the churches and to the holy people from the
Holy Table of Christ. Wherever a lawful priest serves,
there the place is sanctified. The sacrifice he serves sanc-
tifies him, who touches it, and those, who are sprinkled
with the blood. We come to the saints not for anything
else, St. Cyril says, but in order that we too may become
partakers of Christ through the ineffable and mystical
sacrifice of the sacred Eucharist." The vessels too that
are used for the sacrifice are cleansed and protected lest
they fall into someone else's hands, or be used for other
purposes beyond the lawful ones. The law that pertains
to all these things, St. Cyril notes, has been preser
tn the Churches. As for the stipulation that “Every male
” (Lev. 6:29), this refers:
who are brave or manly
ong the priests shall eat it
il explains, to those,
am
as St. C}
ie tbid. 829C.
Me tbid. 8290-8324.
1s to Priesthood and ‘Acceptable Celebrations 51
conévous) against sin and, therefore, includes
copévovs)
ind women.”
roves next t0 the stipulations for this most
sin,” especially those for the “sacrifice
(Quota rAnpHeA€ia), and into what
rive ad what is totally consumed a fragrance."
mi the ram are whole-burnt offering to the
‘tue (ager), which is manifold, but
fo Christ, “who offered himself up
+ fragrant offering to God the Father” Eph. 5:2)
tr peaby, secured our salvation. The priest takes the
any te animal that was sacrificed. Indeed, he takes
sa hing from every sacrifice he offers, and so do the
vther press for their offerings. This provision of com
pensating the priests for their services, St Cyril says,
is presorved in the churches according to the apostolic
commandment (cf. 1 Cor. 9:13 and 10:18)."”
+) Tite SACRIFICE OF Praise. The “sacrifice of praise”
(ova aivece«s) is cited next (Lev. 7:1-5) and com-
mented on in some detail.!® St. Cyril says that David
calls this “cup of salvation” (Ps. 115:4) and notes that
Chiistins offer such sacrifices daily, both in church and
inother places in the presence of baptized Christians and
catechumens. The “bread offered” in this case is both
leavened” (in spite of Ley. 2:11) and “unleavened.”
(avto!
poth men a
st. Cyril
holy “sacrifice for
for transgression
the intestines o
Lord. They typify ¥
uikimately they point t
for us as
‘ih, SDA
Swi $328
bik 8320-833
the oei, :|
52
St. Cyril of Atexandria’s Teaching on the
the Pri
hood
The “leavened bread” is
a not yet been cee ae i
have not been perfectly delivered from se
anor bread” denotes the life that hae bo
already ansed for Christ through faith, ie. the ee”
‘Perfect believers (1 Cor. 5:8 and 5:7)."5| The “goed,
grain” refer individually to those, who offe ee
of praise.!® The “oil” denotes the joy of the oft ings
of God's mercy. The “eating of the lamb,” whose gan
tines are used for the sacrifice on the same day, dens
Who
Y baptism any
‘cular impu
that in the world to come another way of praising God
will be applied. This is obvious in the way praise of God
changed from the Old to the New Testament. In the for-
mer, the praise was based on the delivery of Israel in the
Red Sea. In the latter, the praise is based on the delivery
of humanity from Hades. In the future age, when proph-
ecy and knowledge will cease (1 Cor, 13:9-10), Christ
will speak clearly about the Father (Jn. 16:25), and this
will be the basis for a higher praise."*
Finally, St. Cyril cites the general stipulations that
make the priests sharers in the first-fruit of any kind that
are offered on the altar (Num. 18:1, 8-19) and specify that
only those, who are worthy of the altar ie. those, who
are sanctified, who believe, who respect and love God,
may also partake of the remainders of these gifts
iBifbid, 833-8364.
12 }bid. 836B.
ssIbid,
1st bid, 837A.
ss]bid, 837BCD-841A,
so priesthood and Acceptable Celebrations 53
rl concludes this homily with the
admonitions: Priests, who have
best of callings in life, ought to
“oimtercourse and worldly cares, lest they get
'd rush to unlawful pleasures."
tin Leviticus 10:9-11: “You shall
rink, you and your sons with you,
ernacle of Witness, or when you
wu may not die; This is a perpetual
to distinguish between sacred and
rr ejetveen clean and unclean, and to teach the chi
jerael all the statutes, which the Lord spoke to them by
teing alert, then, he adds, is absolutely necessary
st their mind and heart become darkened by
drunkenness, and death strikes them
who get
wt. Cy!
onc ustor
allowing, general
essed with the
heir mind an‘
spelled ou
rv wine or stron
en ore enue ito the Ta
¥ altar, so that yor
agpronel the
re for your generations,
stati
pf
Mose
to priests, les
cares and worldly
town. Indeed, there are priests, St. Cyril notes,
drunk not with alcohol, but with lack of decency, or with
falling away from the right path through indolence.'”
That priests need to be in a state of alertness, shaking
oif all drunkenness of worldly cares, St. Cyril adds, is
also stipulated by the Lord himself: “But take heed to your-
lst your hearts be weighed down with dissipation and
inkenness and cares of this life, and that day come upon you
ea snare” (Lk. 21 }). The way that we can do
ths St Cyril explains, is specified in the book of Leviti-
‘es, namely by “distinguishing between sacred and profane,
tn between clean andl unclean, and by teaching the children of
“ibid. SAB,
Ibid. S1BC:54 r
St. Cyril of Alexandria's Teaching on th P
te Priesthog
—- —_——__ id
ot
the Lord spoke t
This clearly means that priests should te
people, who are unholy, impious and imy
piety and purity and associate with th
same. They should also be wise
advising. Above all, they should teach othe
stand that the Law isa preparation and decla:
mystery of Christ.!5*
Israel all the statutes, whi
Mm by Moses.»
Rot associate with
Pure, but pursue
tose, who do the
and edifying, sober ang
TS to under.
ration of the
Ibid. 841CD.
ant a Priests and Levites,
or Priestly Orders
(De Adoratione Book XIII)
Priests AND LEVITES
que Levires ano THerr Witness To THE MysTERY OF
Cunssr In Book 13 of his great treatise On Worship in
j in Truth, St. Cyril turns to an examination of
the Old Testament stipulations for the Levites, which he
hau left out in his earlier examination of Aaron, the High
Priest and his sons, the priests. He cites the relevant text
from Numbers (18:25-32) and embarks on his profound,
spiritual exposition.' Briefly stated, this text stipulates
that the Levites are to take a tithe (40) from the people for
their services at the Tabernacle, and they, in turn, should
offera tithe of their portion to the Lord. Itis further stipu-
lated that this tithe, comprising wheat and wine, was to
te offered to God through Aaron the High Priest, and
that it would be taken from the first-fruits, i.e. from the
best portion.
bid, 8448,
bid 8448,St. Cyril
statement referred to
of Moses, it ret Melchisedek,
ferred to Aat
: iron. Bott
i are types, accordi 18 to St. Cyril,
of Priests, the Leader of the Tal mera a
bernacle, whi
Church, the Holy One of the Saints, the God eee i"
whom we owe al fruit-bearing, It is to Him that all ois
sits
- offered (Ps. 75:11). The stipulations of Moses reveal
this truth through the types, but now the types no longer
apply, because the true guardians of the evangelical in-
stitutions (the Christian priests) please their Savior with
spiritual fruit bearing.™#
whereas at the time
h of these references
Tite Levires AND THE Distinction petween Cuercy
AND Lary. St. Cyril turns next to the fact that the Le
vitical generation (tribe) is selected (amoAeKtov evo)
and separated (¢Engnpévov) from all others.! This be-
comes obvious in the stipulations concerning the census
(aroyeadn) of the tribes of Israel, which, incidentally,
was indicative of God’s care for every particular human
being and symbolized their being recorded in the Book of
Life. According to these stipulations, a distinction was to
be made between the ordinary lay people (to dnpowxov
ieiTbid. 845A.
1 bid. 8450.
57
sevites, or Priestly Orders
ils,
i sawov yévos), the latter be-
yan ree 7 be a Numbers 1:49 is the
ied and et tion, which St. Cys cites. st Cyril
Ll ee ee the above distinction was ae
sods 0 PIA“ rjgas) of the saints is excePHON
au ce hon {hat belongs to them exceeds all
we er ites were recorded inaseparale Book.
is Tse il continues, Daniel speaks of ‘Books
Ts i ¢ (Dan. 7:10)
.e last judgment
Cyril, the
ad laity (the ordinary people) was
wction with th
incoaection distinction between
recording to St
ray tthe Levites) rary p 5
: aha because it had to do with the ‘sacred ser-
tino elas iegoveyiac), which made the former
) and “superior” (avaKeiHevov)
fender But what exactly were these sacred services,
phic the Levites were set apart from the rest of the
people? To answer this, St. Cyril digs further into the rich
and involved text of the book of Numbers and especially
to the passage 3:6-10, which he cites and expounds."
‘These sacred services, he says, were assisting services
to Aaron the High Priest and his sons, the priests. They
were also services of guardianship and care of the Tab-
emacle of Witness, since this Tabernacle was under the
iurisdiction (responsibility) of Aaron and his sons.'*”
a distinct” (ExveHNOEY)
id = oe
“ibid 845
“bid
tbl 85D,
oid. S488
aine altar." All this Services of
is, St. Cyril 7 the
to Ch ‘yril notes, primari
pe hist, Because he is the One that God meee
the whole House; but it Placed over
also refers to us
are God's household.
It is not difficult to see, St
Priests, who escorted Aaron in tl
sacred and marvelous chorus
who coll:
because we too
Cyril notes, that the
the liturgy, denote the
of the Holy Apostles
orate: vith
rele laborated and concelebrated, as it were, with
rist! The Apostles were indeed God :
(cov ovvegyoi, 1 Cor. 3:9),
“stewards”
(5 “collaborators”
L “treasurers” (raytiat) and
(0ixcov6y101) of the mysteries of God (1 Cor
4:1) and, certainly, “ministers” (S1ixovo1) of the Word,
through whom we have believed." It is clear, St. Cyril
contends, that a detailed examination of “church order”
(rig éxrAnoias thy téktv) would easily discover its ex:
'@ bid. 844811.
bid, 848A10-1.
"UIbid. 84812,
59
To the
pmcgus) in the Lave” TOUT
goavasMyeaders, and, of COTS
igh Priests tne apyters (priests) God en-
jesser order Re Pre of the veil (our Pres”
ee riestly liturgy iS
‘here the sacred, P
where Mrowever, God granted the
po the deacons, ; ereavels ‘and all
“Tabernacle of all its
oF Ae etat to supply: The deacons are
ople ough ons are
Fer rein the Church, concerning the
Should offer, or silence in prayer, oF the
peor which they bring forth the pros-
| the necessary vessels." ;
Jeaders of the ancient lit-
their assistants according,
tein letter of the Law. The laity, however, was strictly
pried from engaging in anything that is priestly or
telongs to the honor of the priests. Indeed, it is stipulated
thatif anyone comes forth on his own (abt6p0A0c) to the
ine election (ov), he
ected:
quardianshiP
thse that the
those, who Biv
hymns people
bloodless sacri
piora and supply all
‘The priests were the true
urgy, and the Levites were
priestly service without the
should be put to death.!7*
Tite ENROLLMENT OF THE LevITES AND THE CLERGY!
Larry Disrincrion. There are other, important de-
tails concerning the enrollment of the Levites, which
Si Cyril finds in the Book of Numbers and which are
i BBS,
bid. 848B8-1,
Ibid. 888B19Cs,
bid. 8887-14,° St. Cyril of Alexa 7
eee a mi ;
E'S Teaching on
indicative of truths that are importa
frst one is the method of enrollment so
archal families and other tribal a
The long text of Numbers 3:14~:
gives details about this
es 20, which st. Cy ten
attracts St. Cyril attenti mie dat ea
frais ion is the differentiation 5
age of enrollment for ordinary lay people and for Lane”
es ary people were enrolled at the age of Dana i
evites, howe re eI ;
Levies however, were enrolled at the age of one moa
The first case, St. Cyril notes, indicates that the se-
verity of the Law did not deem worthy of enrollment
in God's Book of Life of any immature person, ie. of
any person that lacked in physical strength, According
to St. Cyril, this physical provision points typologically
to a spiritual one: the saints, who were worthy to have
themselves enrolled in God's service, had to be spiritu-
ally mature.!77
The case of the Levites points to something else: that
the Lord equally accepts those, who are babes in Christ
(mv Ev Xetor@ vty ra), and those, who are mind-
ful (To eucoov). Levites had to have both “prudence”
(ovveow) and “generosity” (¢nAdtyta). This two-fold
standard, St. Cyril says, is exactly what the divine Apos-
tle expects of the Christians.” “Brethren, do not be like
Ibid, 848-899,
Ibid. 84948,
i
"Ibid. 849A.p
4 —_
61
es in evil, but in thinking be
Christ himself said, “Be
¥” (Matt. 10:16). The sim-
Je believer, is acceptable
thinking; be bal
44:20). Similarly,
and meek as doves
then, or the simp!
yuildren in your
sept” (IOOE
Peas serpents
of faith,
a and subdivisions of the en-
‘and gender,
Y onding to each person, BTOUP ,
according ar and exact is God's care for his
like that saying of the Sav-
re of more value than many
the divisions
indicates how Pa
ple Tiss, St Cyril SAYS,
Poti holy Apostles, “you @
varrnos” (Matt. 10:31). -
Pe er important detail, underlined by St. Cyril in
whic context, isthe second enrollment, which the Law
inered forthe Levites. This enrollment had to do with
the liturgical function that was specified for each Lev-
‘ie Tho relevant and highly elaborate text, cited here, is
Numbers 4:2 In contrast to the first enrollment,
which was at the age of one month, this one was at the
ageof twenty five and over, up to fifty. The first, St. Cyril
says, points fo the “innocence” (Axarxia) of the saints,
which is both most pleasing (&vdavouca) and most ac-
eplable (cinagdd_xtos) to God. The latter points to the
maturity of mindfulness (to EUgov) and strength (to
aes w as is required for the best (é£aigetot)
Stns " less (ad laBArjteos Exovcay), liturgical service
© one, St. Cyril notes, who is unwise (Gaocpos)
id "
"hid 895¢ _
"i 8890-9576,62 _ St Cyril of Alexandria's Teaching on the p
and powerless (ivAKic), can offer Ii
paras : liturgical i
coat blameless, because itis proves, that
evements presuppose works of strength oe
‘ Petfec.
sve ‘SririTuaL MEANING OF THE Covi
ie ; js alling the secondary aes
ecneen that of the priests and the a
aa by God, St. Cyril further disctson
te meaning ofthe covers, which the Law specifies fo
ibs holy wesc, which ore entrusted to the care of :
5, sons of Caath.!8? ofthe
The azure, blue
ekere blue color oF hyacinth (GaxivOqvos) of
Wecovers ofthe Arc ofthe Covenant and ofthe Golden
{tuUble 2s well asthe Seven-branched Lamp and of
Peres liturgical vessels, denotes what is above
ae the blue sky that lies above us and
ain oe span of the heavens. The
ae rist, who came from above, as
The other color,
(inom SS ete fs the ed or royal purple
holocaust and the Fowutate igen the Altar of the
\ovttig). The Table, St. Cyril
, with which we
ebid, 852C —
"Ibid, 8520-853, ==.
ibid. “
i
63
pris aed Levit: OF Priestly Orders
ists
ig, the heavenly Bread, that is Christ,
es up ove form, but was ais, even in this form,
from above from the Father and above all
rd of the universe. The spreading of the royal
1 the Table of Oblations is a concealed
85
ayo blessed by eatin
wh
God coming
king and Lor
purple color ove!
petery of the kingdom of Christ
rhe purple, red cover of the Altar is clearly a tYPE of
the Blood of Christ, since itis Christ, who was sacrificed
for our sake and ascended to the altar like a Lamb
aceeva fragrant offering and sacrifice to God the Father
(Eph. 5:2). Finally, the purple, red cover of the Fountain
ics prefiguration of the holy Baptism, which washes us
wh sanctified waters for our putting off of sin and our
transposition into the kingdom of heaven.”
owe Levires. Another detail that St. Cyril notices
ips of the Levites
has to do with the way the different grout
carried out their specific duties in connection the
ieee ech fab of te Peta eck rear
‘The Caathites carried the vessels and their covers on foot,
rarites carried the covers
whereas the Gedsonites and M
Uf the Tabernacle and the pillars and other structural
items of the Tabernacle on carriages, 25"
Numbers 7:2-9.
6a Spinrruat MEANING OF THE DISTINCTIONS
itis explained in
TIbid. S55AB.
‘wetbid, 853B.
Ibid. 853BC.
ls]pid. 853CD- 8564.|
G4 Sh Cyril of Alexandria's Teach,
x 18 OM the Pring
hoo
Clearly, the Caathites had a much more di
laborious task. But this, says St. Cyril, wee
reason, Itis always the case th
ficult ang
NOt With,
Nout.
8° ahead ang
have to she
'ore than the
al with the others, inasmuch ge
they have to be more holy and to stand closer to God,
St. Cyril believes that this provision
a mystery. This mystery has to do wi
and the Christians. The Caathites,
sential vessels, si
at those, who
Perform the primary and more sacred task,
more sweat, to labor and even to suffer m
others. These are not equi
IS type of
ith the Israelites
Who cartied the es.
nify those, who have been by faith
confirmed in the faith of Christ. The others, Gedsonite
and Merarites, who had to carry the additional (second,
ary) items of the Tabernacle, signify the People of the
Law, the Israelites."8° Indeed, the Caathites carried those
primary vessels, which denoted Christ in different ways
(the Ark, the Altar, the Golden Lamp and the Golden
Thurible), since, although he is simple in his nature
as God, he performs different functions that are made
known in various ways. The “living and active Word
Of the Father” (Heb, 4:12) is indeed life and light and
aroma of spiritual fragrance,
Thus, according to St. Cyril, those, who are near God,
through Moses’ commandmer
‘nts, are in possession of the
external or secondary (t& mequoot) items of the Taber.
nacle, and, as such, they bear witness to the fact that the
Law is of no use if it is not understood in a spiritual way.
On the other hand, those, who undertook with com
bid. 8568p inane
65
iestly Orders
or Priestly
i Le
— lolies (vax Byte TOV
the Holies of the Hi
ist and
f ce of Christ an
= service Of ly by the gra nist
age the TY emselves holy Yor secondary, since in a
10) ng that exter OFS alll
60 thi them F
ess Manner ey caFty on THO Ted the holes of
vertain me
tes had no carriages,
190
a their shoulders.’
| further observes
aathil
The C -_ hat the externals of the
the holies oF a use they were
St ON ransported on carriages, because SY TN
caw were anspor general WAS ean, esa
Fe acts 15:10, which presents the position
in Acts 15:10, of the Law for
e status t
w as a heavy yoke, which
ians, si n
thristians, since ever
ad .d impossible
thrist himself
7
dit
ine Apostles ont
yy saw the La
on the m
had found it heavy an
ist’s yoke, as e :
is burden lig) .
‘ Hi "that draws St. Cyril's
between the first enroll-
f the Levites.'” In the
(four fatherhoods),
dle
of the
The
Christians.
yuld not be loaded
the ws:
jhe Fathers of the Je u
ta bear, On the contrary, Chri
‘ated (Matt. 11:30), is easy and
Another, interesting. detail
attention here is the eee :
; \d enrollment of
ment and the secon:
first one, the order was Gedsonites doe nest
Caathites (two fatherhoods) and Merarites UNO Me
he cds), In the second enrollment, howe i
cat 25 years of age, the Caathites van pl ae
ont laces, says St. Cyril i a ofthe
change eye between Israelites and the a a
the Nations, which curred inthe Chistian
1e Nations,
wwibid. &
ibid. 857A.
bid. 8578,66
When the first came last and the last
the word of the Savior. Indeed, even the Dumbe
reversed, and this occurred a .
A rs
‘ccording to the pred
of Exodus 32:10, which foretells th Prediction,
syna;
© destruction of
Bogue and the rise of a new Israel, greater any
J a
than the first.% = ‘eee
B. Priestiy AUTHORITY AND PRIVILEGES
eee Divine CALLING as Tite Basis oF
OF THE PRIESTHOOD AND THE SiN
Divinety Arromntep Leaver. Returnin,
Numbers, St. Cyril observes that the entire tribe of the
Levites was called to the sacred ministry, but the ordes
Of this ministry (6 gos tis iegoveyias), ie. how each
Levite family was to serve, was strictly specified by God,
and no one was allowed to disregard it without suffering
Severe consequences. This is clearly demonstrated in the
case of Kora which is described in Numbers 16. t. Cyril
cites and expounds the first ten verses, which describe
the distress of Moses over the claims of Korah.!™
Korah had claimed that the whole synagogue of the
People was holy and that the Lord dwelt in all of them,
and, consequently, all should have the right to become
Priests. These claims, St. Cyril notes, brought dishonor
to the measure (to éxveynBev jtétQov) that had been
ordered by the Lord and stood in direct contradiction
Ibid. 857C. * Sic
"Ibid. 8570-8608,
THE AutuoRmy
OF Orrosine
8 to the Book of
St. Cyril of Alexandria’ Teaching on the p
a eth
004
67
or Priestly Orders
ut eves o7 Pty
it joses’
divine legislator. In spite of M 7
section tre oth and his sons by indicating
, i rah y ae
emp pac Be rvileges (Nur. 169), they isis
entrees ered a terrible
their Goer and consequently su 7
u Led ee “Il alive” as Psalm 54(55):1
ed on went down to Hel
tes, is
pail der, who
gai the leader, an
slo 880 passing of the measure tat hh
es Sextremely dangerous, because it ae
ee vonlshnent of death. Thus, a ae
ee Pie should not strive to gain wha ae
ae thinking that what is determined ony
peor given t0 US, ais eerie
from above and by divine fiat is
IoallThere isan order (tA) fi
riains to the sacred ministry, says
pertains
not be ignored.!%
free from confusion that
z St. Cyril, which can-
Tue Priviteces AND “REMUNERATION” OF THE
Ri TION”
Paesrs ano THe Levires. The divinely ins ie
®
ny the sacred ministry distinguishes the roles of
order of the s
—we might
rest of the people—We
priests and Levites from the vest or =P
ney Ape tithes) and the corre
re ordered differently.
93 and Deuteronomy
fy the tithes ordered
say, clergy from laity. ie
their offerings to eee i
i i
sponding services and priviles¢
ae Cyril cites Numbers 18: a
181-5, which respectively 5P*
=1bid, OCD.
‘elbid, 860-861.yril of Al 0's Teaching on the Pri
andria’s Teaching on the py.
— rte
for Levites
here, says St. Cy;
Separated from the r
and for the Lord.” The
Til, is that the sacred race
rest of the
‘d not only to the service
future they hope for. A:
do with the holy
relate
Ss St. Cyril i
and blamelevs hie ene
which entails: a) observance of c
(“Do not kill.” “Do not commit adultery.” 7
ctc,); b) distribution of one's possessions to the
order to follow the Lord (Matt. 19:19-21), and’ tare
<) total disengagement from earthly things and total 2
tachment to the Lord as Psalm 36:4—5 specifies (“Make ty
Lord your delight, put all your hope on him and he will satisfy
your needs”).18
oF the “eternal life"
0d’S commandments
It is because of this kind of separation, or dedication,
or labor of service, says St. Cyril, that Levites receive
tithes. Indeed, the labor of the saints, he says, is not
without reward. They enjoy both exceptional honor and
bright trophies. This is why the Savior said, “Do not care
{for your life, zohat you shall eat, or for your body, what you
shiall put on ... but seek first the kingdom of God and his
teousness, and all these things will be added to you (Matt.
. ees the Levites are to eat a ees
(sacri, whieh enc for vs ane mond
types of Christ,
ibid. B6IBC.
wa bid. 861D-864A.
bid. 864B,
—, mi Hen sf.
69
Id. Indeed, only the sepa-
ao em partake of the holy Body of
reonaing,t St. Cyril, the statement of
cori "you are an elect race, a royal
TE eo be cared for."#® The Law specified
paso, 47 eat the front leg, the jaws and the
st Leitso St. Cyril explains, they symbolize
2030 acy toact, to speak out and to bear fruit.
pact piles, he asks, the true characteristics of
spe ot these
ihosetruly known to God??""
apolsh the $
ure pe
fo them, accor
29 primarily applies,
‘sda
tue Paavicutak COMMITMENTS OF THE LEVITES.
3a Cyril observes that, in general, the Levites were
separated from the rest of the people in two ways: a) as
Javing no earthly lot (possessions) and b) as having the
Lord himself as their lot (possession)!
Nevertheless, the Levites were not completel
pletely
deprived of earthly possessions. The Lord gave them
‘nough for their needs. Sufficiency (éndgKeta) was to be
‘sic earthly lot. St. Cyril explained this on the basis of
Numbers 35:1-6, which specifies land and six cities for
‘heLevites a2
a saints, says St. Cyril, need to have sufficient re-
Ane | their lives in this world and for the needs of
i jade Tinathy 68 expresses the same point: “Hav-
$ (raiment), let us be content with them.”
= ew_ $a
"i Boke, 7
“I 8 865,70 SCY
yril of Alexandria's Teaching on the Py
tg
Indeed, to go beyond this is not wi
“ ith
observes. Indeed, to acquire more thin se St Or
han you need
easily lead to comfort a i ai hae
omfort and avarice (rou), j _
‘Udy, just as
have
less than you need easily leads to discomfort
a poe the Levites, the Lord, ee
ee iency (abvtagKeta) commensurate serif
re cia The reason for this is that Levites ee
be a measure ‘ype and a living example to the others
who ar ia 'o or driven by bodily passions. Indeed,
eared oe for the others as “prisoners” according
'3—“Rememiber those that are prisoners, af
Yyou were prisoners with them, whi
hem, who su
too are in the body."204 te cee
since you
qe Secure Prorenry or THe Levites AND ri
eEreR Means Leviticus
R MEANING. St. Cyril cites next Leviticus
25:8— 9
‘8-13 and 25:29-34, which deal with “sabbatical rest”
fs the land (capfatiopés), the “Day of Atonement”
{ise Aaoy00) and the “5 year of emancipation and
Leviton 25 Levey anda Aoding
1 , Levite city and country proy
enioy full protection. It could not be a acetic
+ properties, but reverted to their owner on the 50*
year of emancipation. Such a provision, St Cral vote
denotes the arsine othe hope of essa en
Perseverance of what has been alloted to them
BBTbid, BOSAB,
20 bid, 8650,
= Ibid, 865CD-868A,
2s, or Priestly Orders
goes even deeper into the
f the Law for buying and selling
tus, he says, that the distinction between
PoP nd city property implies two tYPes of people:
those, who are weak in defending themselves from the
se eof theirenemy, and those, who are able fo fight
rnd valiantly for theit salvation. The former can
vey forgiven for their mistakes, but the later not so,
J iney sold their property unwisely and carelessly2™
st, Cyril sees those with country property as a type of
ihe nations and those with city property asa type of the
people of God, because according to Zachariah 29,
the Lord is like a city toall around the holy city and besides,
se people ofthe city have a God-given law for their protection
snd knoco zohat is pleasing to God” (Baruch 4:4) 2°
On this basis, St. Cyril says that the Nations can be
forgiven by God’s mercy for their weakness, but the in’
who sold the gift allotted to them, will not
f Atonement, when the Savior
fates the case
of the
wisely
elect
dolent Jews,
be restored on the Day of
brings deliverance. Isaiah 50:1 explicitly st
of the Jews: "Behold, for your iniquities you have sold your:
selves, and for your transgressions your mother (Zion) is Put
away.” Colossians 2:13—14 states the case of the Nations,
Who were delivered on the Day of Deliverance, when
ind granted to all believers the great
trespasses and the un-
Christ appeared at
mercy. “And you, who were dead in
circumcision of your flesh, God made alive with him, having
6Tbid. 868)
Ibid. 868D-B69ABC.St. Cyril of Alexandria's Teaching on th
i the Pri
thong
ss
forgiven us all our tre
passes, having cancel
stood against us with its leg a
ma nit its legal demands; this he seta
‘he Levites then, bei
inthe sense that they had thei proper
the type of the saints, who di ie va
the Lord and did not sell their rights ee “~
cramp of this is Mary of whom Christ aaa An
tes pe, hic shall not be taken aay from her fae
ros cee people, priestly or lay, ie
a eae oe through Christ. Putin
the Day of Redemption and Sarees
1 whereas,
1¢ Nations retained their hope and regained the natur
-gained the natural
the Jey
5m ae oye Sons AND THE Prorenty oF
elaborate further he or Sate
oe interpretation This text refers to the
in ttn prtesto he son one and hier Suche
ee rope wil ten vy from eon bl
eriker ee the servants will return it to the
(0 the property of the servants, that of
the sons’ will be retained
ned and even a
ing later on the Master's renee by inherit
ibd B72AB, — —
2 Ibid. 8728. —
eid 8720,
73
1 Priestly Orders
the Master's son here is for St. Cyril the High Priest,
wis of the Master's son are he priests. The point
° that property that belongs to priests W i
pat what was given to their servants will
he Day of Atonement. It is also said,
hhat the Master will not take
noty any of the property of the people, but he will keep
yay forever. The point here is that what is given
permanent, but what is given t0
fe
and the
: de, then, is
1 be lost,
revert to them on tl
rwever, St Cyril adds, #
what is hi
tom father to children is
crotants is not SO, for iti ultimately Tos
itil of us Christians, says St. Cyril, who have been
saved by faith, have Christ as our Master, He is the Son,
see sae the inheritance of God his Father, but we too
retead of servants through him. Thus, he said:
‘and what are yours are mine, and
/" (Jn. 17:10). The Psalmist put
high and captured captivity and
‘The Apostle added: “He gave
Some to the Church to be first as Apostles, then as Prophets,
sit hind as Teachers” (1 Cor. 12:28); and elsewhere, “T?
ane he gives a charisma to speak with wisdom, 19 another to
spenk with divine knowledge” (1 Cor. 128). Christ then,
trie the souls of those, who love him, with goods that
are theirs forever?
Thus, St. Cyril concludes, all that has been given to
priests and freemen js secure. To those, however, that
have a servile spirit and are descendants, as it were, of
pid, 7 —
ibid. 873CD.
are sons i
“All that are mine are yours,
Ihave been glorified in them’
it like this: “He ascended on
{gave gifts to men” (Ps. 67:19).
th.74
E Ire, who did not accept th
us, but remained yoked to abominay eh that de
grace that was given to them throushng ee a ct
e
exact knowledge of the Lam a oy rns
w, whi 7 ely,
allotment withthe saints wil be wea Ot
partake of Christ. As Matthew 1342 puns "
Fras, more wil bi ee
ins mori began thin on pane
is i hes sl baker ony”, he ie
confir ta
confirmed tha ral ost her inheritance, ae
not bse and dd not regain her freedom: “Ament
fed ie he, who commits sin, is a pee =
erent dos no remtin inte hws forever. He, oe
Cn the we rece ithe on. then, the Son deli,
er be truly free” (Jn. 8: 34-36). The inhe eee
its those, who are free, and : Soe
:, and not those, who carry the
yoke of slavery. The sons, and not the servants, remain in
"The sons, and ni
the house.2*>
3 Will th
“Tohim, wi,
-
sesame. mn yu
Tas Seer Sats: Tae Heaventy
Dtausates, St Cyl also explains another deta
Beneteau he Master wll not take from then
heroes fs pepe sit as an inertness”
Seren re oe refers to Christ, our Master,
eee fis Saints what is not theirs. Ie
ir life completely to God, will
not inherit a different
not ies lot than the fullness of the glory
20 Tbid. 8730-876. —
Ibid. 876A6.p re
ee
75
is that the saints would
-the point herer says St. Cyril, i
nero expect 10 receive from Christ what befits
pot ask oF XPT orld and those, who do not PASE
he gave to his
sople 0
n pee ‘The Lord's Prayer, which
» ells us what the saints ‘would ask for. To those,
yond these, itcan only be said, “You ask and do
Fonmuse you ask in a evil way” Jam 43). The
Fealmist too is absolutely right in saying, “You will sive
(Ps. 61:13). We cannot
pe vact one according t0 is works”
hat we deserve in return for our WOFKS:
it makes no sense if those, who
hnat belongs to those in the
porary and of the flesh
apostles:
uh ask Be!
not receiver
receive beyond
yy case, says St. Cyril,
fied, desire wl
that are tem
like shadows."
tes is the special gift that
Inan}
have been sancti
world, namely, things
things that pass away
‘The inheritance of the Levit
God bestows on his servants, which is commen to them
stipulation, that without Levites no offerings
‘indicates, according to St. Cyril, the need
approach to God, and this, in turn,
see to Christ, of whom the Levites were imitators.
stipulation, that only in the one Tabemacle
iferings of the Levites could be made, points tothe
‘of Christ and the Church, which is indeed
Ore. tn the words of St. Cyril, “The Church is One, and
\hemystery of Christ is One, and there is no sacrifice that
cel worthy not to be rejected and well-plessing (0
offered in the One Tabernacle, which is
citi
the first sti
could be made,
ofa mediator in man’s
poit
The secon
the
other mystery
isk
God, unless
the Church.’
‘The importance ofthese points is seen in another Pro-
vision, which Deuteronomy 14:22~27 made and which
SL Cyril cites and expounds. Those in far away cities,
veho had to travel Tong distances to come to Jerusalem
to offer their tithes, were allowed to sell their tithes for
money, and they would purchase new ones in Jerusalem
which would serve their desires and needs. tis lear then
that the Law would not allow any offering to be made in
any other way except in the way already specified. The
ey Fok the services of Levites was absolutely universal
(BoA nccotéem) 2 says St. Cyril in answering Palladius,
his interlocutor.
Bi [pid B80AB.
2» Tid. 8808.
2o[bid, 880CD-881A.. IQS ee
78 St. Cyril of Alexandria's Teachin
1808 the Prieto
The necessity of the Law at this point, 5
on to explain, rests on the fact that “a priece
(w0moc) and impr Chi
Cyt goes
Zz h was a
ssion (éxptayeiov) of Christ,"
ture, St, Cyril continues, has clearly snow than
th
‘manuel is the mediator between God and hum: in
the Apostle and High Priest of our confession ame
im,
and Heb. 3:1), who entered i i
not wth the lod of ams an bulls bution
many times, but once for all, accomplishing rea
redemption ee it was with the one sacrifice that he
eee eondne ss the Scriptures (Heb. 9:12-13),
he madeteraly ese those, a he sanctified. That
‘rowned priestly cel i
sons cyt aes opr
cto judges no one, but has given all judgment to the
7 tha may honor the Son, even as they honor the Father”
On 5 2S The following holy utterance confirms the
eoereee lowsiver and judge” (Jam. 4:12), and
sings, “And God is the judge” (Ps.
Tre Divi
om pine Aurnority, Greatness AND GLORY OF
— oe St. Cyril also cites here Deuter-
ae fea « re ae how the priests in Israel
ges, whose judgm«
vere punishment. The reason for this priestly authority,
Biibid, 881,
881C.
priests and Levites, OF Priestly Orders 9
st. Cyril ested not on the priests themselves, but
pe lawgiver. Indeed, a8 Malachl put it “tq priests lips
* Fao incaedge and people shu sok the Lat fom
pao because he isthe messenger ofthe Lord Almighty”
rr). A priest does not produce his own law but he
(ar by duty to lead other tothe right application of
the law that is God’s2*
2. cyt stresses here the greatness of the priest
sod, which consists of the priests’ standing before God
voy etac) and offering service to him (Aecrovgyia)-
cae he finds the opportunity also to emphasize the
duty of the people to listen to and obey the priests In-
‘lend, the Lord himself asked for this in speaking about
the Scribes and the Pharisees in spite of the unworthi-
ness of their works. “The Scribes and the Pharisees sat on
Hoses’ sent so practice and observe tohatever they tll you
hat aot aokat they do; for they preach but do not practice”
(Matt. 23:2-3). No one then, says St. Cyril, should judge
a priest, even if the latter seems to be careless and indo-
lent in his life concerning the law. One, however should
obey a priest, when he interprets the law. In other words,
the divine institutions are one thing and human inad-
equacies another?
Finally, St. Cyril emphasize
hood.” The priesthood, he say
had t
15 the glory of the priest-
jis like a lamp that has
2ijpid. 8S1D-B84A.
Ibid, 8848,
ReIpid. 884C.
= Ibid, 8840.
Th