0% found this document useful (0 votes)
84 views6 pages

Shri Ram Gen Insurance Vs Bhagat Singh Rawat 20945 - 2020 - 2 - 29 - 43240 - Order - 27-Mar-2023

The Supreme Court of India ruled on Civil Appeal Nos. 2410-2412/2023, allowing the appeal of Shri Ram General Insurance Co. Ltd. regarding compensation amounts for loss of love and affection and loss of consortium, confirming a total amount of Rs.90,000 to be distributed among the legal heirs. The court also stated that this amount is subject to a 10% increase every three years as per previous judgments. Additionally, the Special Leave Petitions SLP(C) No. 1185-1186/2021 were dismissed without interference.

Uploaded by

Tummala Madhu
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
84 views6 pages

Shri Ram Gen Insurance Vs Bhagat Singh Rawat 20945 - 2020 - 2 - 29 - 43240 - Order - 27-Mar-2023

The Supreme Court of India ruled on Civil Appeal Nos. 2410-2412/2023, allowing the appeal of Shri Ram General Insurance Co. Ltd. regarding compensation amounts for loss of love and affection and loss of consortium, confirming a total amount of Rs.90,000 to be distributed among the legal heirs. The court also stated that this amount is subject to a 10% increase every three years as per previous judgments. Additionally, the Special Leave Petitions SLP(C) No. 1185-1186/2021 were dismissed without interference.

Uploaded by

Tummala Madhu
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

1

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

CIVIL APPEAL NOS.2410-2412/2023

[@ SLP [C] NOS.11669-11671/2020]

SHRI RAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Appellant(s)

VERSUS

BHAGAT SINGH RAWAT & ORS. Respondent(s)

WITH

SLP(C) Nos.1185-1186/2021 (XIV)

O R D E R

Leave granted.

Heard learned counsel for parties.

The notice in terms of the order dated

13.10.2020 was confined only to two aspects i.e. the

Signature Not Verified


sum for loss of love and affection being Rs.50,000/-
Digitally signed by
ASHA SUNDRIYAL
Date: 2023.04.05
10:23:56 IST
and for loss of consortium for Rs.40,000/- could not
Reason:

have been granted to each of the three dependents

separately but in toto and that would be the amount


2

quantified. This was in terms of the judgment in

National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Pranay Sethi &

Ors. - (2017) 16 SCC 680.

We have heard learned counsel for parties.

Learned counsel for the respondents did

endeavour to persuade us that it should be per the

legal heir by relying on Magma General Insurance

Company Ltd. v. Nanu Ram Alias Chuhru Ram & Ors. -

2018 SCC OnLine SC 1546.

We are, however, of the view that the total

amount has to be assigned under a particular heading

and that will go depending on the number of legal

heirs present.

The amounts fixed in terms of Pranay Sethi’s

case (supra) are Rs.50,000/- and Rs.40,000/-

respectively under the two heads and that should be

the total amount payable.

Having said so, learned counsel for the

respondent points out that this amount so determined

by us is liable to be enhanced by a percentage of 10

per cent every three years as opined in para 61

(viii) of the judgment in Pranay Sethi’s case

(supra) which reads as under:


3

“61(viii) Reasonable figures on


conventional heads, namely, loss of estate,
loss of consortium and funeral expenses
should be Rs.15,000/- Rs.40,000/- and
Rs.15,000/- respectively. The aforesaid
amounts should be enhanced at the rate of
10% in every three years.”

The aforesaid position is not disputed by

learned counsel for the appellant.

Thus, this escalation on account of interest

would also to be admissible for the benefit of the

respondents from the date of the Award which will

mean that in the present case there will be two

escalations of 10 per cent each.

The impugned judgment is modified to the

aforesaid extent.

The appellant to deposit the balance amount

within four weeks from today with the Tribunal.

The appeals stand allowed.


4

SLP(C) No. 1185-1186/2021

We are not inclined to interfere with the

impugned order(s) on ground raised.

The Special Leave Petitions are dismissed.

……………………………………………..J.
[SANJAY KISHAN KAUL]

……………………………………………..J.
[ARAVIND KUMAR]

NEW DELHI;
MARCH 27, 2023.
5

ITEM NO.29 COURT NO.2 SECTION XIV

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition(s) for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No(s). 11669-


11671/2020

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 16-01-2020


in MACAPP No. 567/2016 25-02-2020 in REVP No. 32/2020 21-08-2020 in
REVP No. 32/2020 passed by the High Court Of Delhi At New Delhi)

SHRI RAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. Petitioner(s)

VERSUS

BHAGAT SINGH RAWAT & ORS. Respondent(s)


WITH
SLP(C) No. 1185-1186/2021 (XIV)
([MACT MATTER])

Date : 27-03-2023 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARAVIND KUMAR

For Petitioner(s) Mr. Sameer Nandwani, Adv.


Mr. Mohd. Parvez Dabas, Adv.
Uzmi Jameel Husain, Adv.
Mr. Aquib Baig, Adv.
Mr. Mohd. Sahib, Adv.
M/S. Shakil Ahmad Syed, AOR

Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR


Mr. Mantu Kumar Singh, Adv.

For Respondent(s) Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Goyal, AOR


Mr. Mantu Kumar Singh, Adv.

M/S. Shakil Ahmad Syed, AOR

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following


O R D E R
SLP [C] NOS.11669-11671/2020

Leave granted.

The appeals are allowed in terms of the signed order.

Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.


6

SLP(C) No. 1185-1186/2021

The Special Leave Petitions are dismissed in

terms of the signed order.

Pending application, if any, stands disposed of.

(ASHA SUNDRIYAL) (POONAM VAID)


ASTT. REGISTRAR-cum-PS COURT MASTER (NSH)
[Signed order is placed on the file]

You might also like