Paul Tomlinson - Romance - How To Write A Romantic Novel-Paul Tomlinson (2022)
Paul Tomlinson - Romance - How To Write A Romantic Novel-Paul Tomlinson (2022)
Introduction
1 | Story Choices & Subplots
2 | Development of a Romantic Relationship
3 | Setting
4 | Iconography
5 | Theme
6 | Tone & Style
Individual Style or ‘Voice’
7 | Character & Personality Type
8 | The Character Development Arc
9 | The Heroine
10 | The Hero
11 | Seducers & Charmers
12 | Bad Boys, Rebels & Byronic Heroes
13 | Secondary Characters
The Confidante
Other Secondary Characters
14 | Point of View
First-Person Point of View
Second-Person Point of View
Third-Person Point of View
15 | The Modern Romance Plot: Eight Sequences
Act I: Girl Meets Boy
Act II (Part 1): Sexual Tension
Act II (Part 2): Being in Love & Fighting for Love
Act III: Climax & Resolution
16 | The Plot Thickens
Introducing the Heroine
The Heroine’s Ordinary World
The Meet Cute or First Encounter
The Lock-in
Sexual Tension or Romantic Tension
Denial – Refusing the Call to Romance
17 | The Break-Up & After
18 | Subplots
19 | Romantic Dialogue: Banter & Witty Repartee
20 | Flirting & Body Language
21 | Romantic Dates & Dating
22 | Kissing Scenes
23 | Sex Scenes
24 | How to Get Over Your Ex
25 | How to Say You’re Sorry
26 | Rape & Sexual Violence
27 | Romance Categories & Sub-Genres
28 | Romantic Suspense
29 | Marriage of Convenience & Mail Order Brides
30 | Paranormal Romance
31 | The Love Triangle
32 | Forbidden Love
33 | Second Chances & Secret Babies
34 | Enemies to Lovers & Friends to Lovers
35 | More Sub-Genres & Plots
Appendix 1 | Plot Checklist
Bibliography
Also by Paul Tomlinson
Copyright © 2022 by Paul Tomlinson
The content of this book is provided for educational purposes. Every effort
has been made to ensure the accuracy of the information presented.
However, the information is sold without warranty, either express or
implied, and the author shall not be liable for any loss or damage caused –
directly or indirectly – by its use.
www.paultomlinson.org/how-to
If you’re reading this, you know what a romance novel is. But to keep us on
track through the pages ahead, I wanted to have a definition, so we’ll know
what is – and is not – a romance novel. I looked at definitions from
romance writers, how-to books, and academic texts and came up with this:
A romantic novel is a work of fiction depicting the development of the
loving relationship and eventual commitment of two (or more) characters.
I’ve excluded any reference to gender and included the possibility of
polyamory or stories that feature the relationships of two or more couples.
I’ve used ‘commitment’ instead of marriage to indicate the importance of
the ‘happy ever after’ (or ‘happy for now’). And the ‘development of a
loving relationship’ part is what the main part of a romance novel is about.
Stories featuring romance have been around for as long as humans have
been telling stories and various stories have been suggested as being the
first romance novel. From my reading, I would say that some of the early
titles suggested are almost-but-not-quite. The first novel that I feel fits the
definition is Jane Austen’s 1813 novel Pride and Prejudice. It is the first
novel by a female writer with a female protagonist and told from that
character’s point of view. Austen also allowed us access to her character’s
thoughts, something we take for granted today but which was relatively
uncommon back then.
Pride and Prejudice includes most of the conventions or ‘tropes’ readers
expect to see in romance novels today. I wouldn’t recommend using it as a
model for your novel – it runs to something like 120,000 words and modern
readers want things to move a little more rapidly these days. But after I’d
set down my structure for a romance novel plot, I went back to see if Pride
and Prejudice fitted the template. It did. More or less. Phew!
This book is concerned with the plots of romance novels. Other books in
this series have covered the plots of genre novels and screenplays. In terms
of plot structure and plot conventions, the two are usually very similar. This
is not true for romance novels and ‘romance movies.’ For a start, ‘romance’
isn’t really a genre in Hollywood. Movies are typically ‘romantic
comedies.’ You will find a few films adapted from romance novels, but
these are often made for specific television channels.
One of the main differences between a romance novel and a romantic
comedy movie is that even though both are typically about a heterosexual
couple, the movie usually presents the story from the point of view of the
male character. Billy Crystal’s character in When Harry Met Sally, Richard
Gere’s character in Pretty Woman, Tom Hanks’ character in Sleepless in
Seattle, Patrick Swayze’s character in Dirty Dancing... This reflects a
tradition of male heroes that dates back to at least the theatre of Ancient
Greece, being continued into the works of William Shakespeare, and on into
the screenplays of Nora Ephron. Romantic comedy novels are told from the
heroine’s point of view, romantic comedy movies not so much. I’m sure
there are good reasons for this difference, but they don’t concern us here.
While much of what is included in this book could be applied to writing a
romantic comedy screenplay, I think there are too many differences for me
to feel comfortable promoting this book as being for screenwriters.
Hollywood romantic comedy is a separate genre in its own right.
Having said that, I will refer to some of these movies in the pages ahead
as examples of some of the things I discuss. Old movies are much easier to
track down than older romance novels and you can watch them in ninety
minutes or less. Plus, in things like dialogue, the modern romance novel
was influenced by the Hollywood romantic or ‘screwball’ comedy.
The romance novel plot I write about in this book is primarily intended for
a story featuring one couple. It is suitable for a novel of 50,000 to 60,000
words and with a strong subplot it works fine for 90,000 words or so. It’s
not intended for multi-generation family sagas or epic romances with
multiple intertwining subplots – I’m not brave enough to try and tell you
how to write one of those!
The romance genre has been divided into different categories or sub-genres
for decades. Examples of the broadest categories include contemporary
romance, paranormal romance, romantic suspense, Western romance,
medical romance, erotic romance, and romance with religious/spiritual
elements (including Christian romance). Some of these overlap, so you can
have a Christian Western romance or an erotic paranormal romance, to pick
two examples.
With the advent of online bookstores, eBooks, and self-publishing, we
have seen a rise in more specific sub-sub-genres. On Amazon, for example,
paranormal romance is subdivided into angels, devils and demons, ghosts,
psychics, vampires, werewolves and shifters, and witches and wizards. It is
possible for a book to be in an even more specific niche, targeting readers
whose preference is for stories where the hero ‘shifts’ into a dragon.
I am not going to try and cover every single sub-sub-genre of romance
fiction because (a) there are too many, and (b) they don’t all feature
different plot structures. Virtually all of them use variations on the same
handful of plots. The plots feature specific conventions or tropes – such as
the secret baby or the marriage of convenience. These are not sub-genre
specific.
Each sub-genre does have some additional genre conventions (or tropes)
that readers expect you to know and use. I think this is what people really
mean when they say, ‘Write what you know.’ You need to know the
conventions of any romance sub-genre you choose to write in. The best way
to do that is to write in a sub-genre that you already love. I’ll give some tips
on writing specific sub-genres, including romantic suspense and paranormal
romance, and a few pointers when considering others. For the most part, I’ll
be covering plots that can be used in (almost) any sub-genre.
From Pride and Prejudice in 1813 until sometime in the late 1980s or early
1990s, most romance novels were told exclusively from the heroine’s point
of view. We only had access to her thoughts. But feedback to publishers and
responses to surveys in the mid-1980s said that readers also wanted to know
what the hero was thinking. This led to a significant shift in the way that
romances were written. Anything published before that change, including
the erotic historical romances or ‘bodice rippers’ of the 1970s and the
traditional ‘Regency romance,’ I am referring to as ‘old-school’ romance
novels. Anything after that is ‘modern’ – at least until the next major
development in the genre comes along.
Character Archetypes
For creating characters, I use a model based on three basic archetypes –
Carer/heart, Warrior/gut, and Thinker/head – plus five ‘hybrid’ archetypes –
Artist, Crusader, and Adventurer. This uses ideas that you will be familiar
with, including Carl Jung’s work on personality (which was the basis for the
Meyers-Briggs personality type test) and a simplified version of the
Enneagram. If none of that means anything to you, I’ll explain it in the
following chapters.
One reason I use these six archetypes is that it enables me to think of
characters as individual personalities without getting hung up on gender
stereotypes. A female character can have a personality dominated by the
qualities of the Warrior and a beta male hero could have a predominantly
Carer personality. This gets us away from the idea that men are from Mars
and women are from Venus. And it means that we can create LGBTQ+
characters with individual personalities without being constrained by
stereotypes, biological gender, or gender identity.
In my view, there is no such thing as a ‘gay character,’ there is only a
character who happens to be gay. I’ve created a number of characters who
are gay or bisexual and none of them chooses to define themselves by their
sexuality. The extent to which gender, sexuality, or gender identity affects a
person’s life is determined by the society they live in. In my science fiction
and fantasy novels, I have created worlds where sexuality is just accepted
and not even commented upon. As a writer, I don’t choose to define myself
by my sexuality.
Plot Archetypes
In her book A Natural History of the Romance, Pamela Regis lists eight
essential ingredients for a romance plot. I’ve adapted her list for my own
purposes and used it to help me plan the contents of this book. Here is my
version of the list:
Genre Conventions
Readers of genre fiction are seeking a story that is ‘the same only different.’
They want to see familiar genre elements presented in a fresh way. As
writers, we have to identify the elements our readers want to see and ensure
that we include them. In this series of books, I attempt to set down the
conventions of a genre – including its tropes and typical plot structures –
and highlight ways in which you can use them to create something new. For
consistency, I use a standard set of genre conventions:
I’ll cover all of these in the following pages, but my emphasis will be on
creating plot and character.
Beginnings are easy, you have two characters meet in an interesting way
and show there is a spark of attraction between them. Endings aren’t too
difficult – after a break-up caused by some sort of misunderstanding, they
kiss and make-up and live happily ever after. But what about the bit in the
middle, the stuff that makes up half of your novel, if not more?
That long stretch in the middle is the hardest part to write. Somewhere I
saw it compared to a bed sheet hanging on a washing line with a peg at each
end, with the bit in the middle hanging down. If you don’t want your story –
or your washing – to sag, you need to add more pegs. Knowing how to
create a plot structure – like the one I discuss in this book – helps you figure
out where to put those extra pegs.
Understanding plot structure also helps you avoid starting a story and
then running out of steam after ten thousand or twenty thousand words. I’m
sure many writers have a folder full of great openings that fizzled out
because they didn’t know where to take the story next. I know I have
dozens of them.
Sagging middles and false starts are often caused by the same problem –
you don’t know what should go where in a plot. Before I discovered the
eight-sequence structure, I had a habit of trying to make too much happen
too soon. I wasn’t able to space out the key events in my story properly – I
used up all the exciting stuff in those first twenty thousand words and the
story just ground to a halt. Doing this meant that I didn’t spend enough time
developing my characters, so they seemed flat and uninteresting. And I
couldn’t create the suspense that keeps a reader turning the pages because
I’d answered all the intriguing questions too soon.
To keep a reader’s interest in the middle of a story, you have to create
questions in the reader’s mind. In the romance novel you do this in the first
half by making the reader wonder, ‘Will they, won’t they?’ Kiss or have sex,
depending on how spicy your story is. At the midpoint they do. And then in
the second half of the story, you make the reader wonder, ‘Can they make
this a forever thing?’ And you put a major obstacle in the way that makes
the reader doubt the outcome. Even though we know there’s going to be a
happy ending, we’re intrigued to know how these two characters are going
to get there.
The eight-sequence plot model I explore in this book shows you what to
put where – where to place your pegs – to keep a story moving and to create
the kind of suspense that keeps a reader turning the pages.
What Do I Know?
Something you’re probably wondering is, has this guy ever written a
romance? Yes, I have. The first one I wrote is called Fandango (2022) and I
published it under the pen name Lina Plumston, which is almost an
anagram of my name (Lina’s middle initial must be ‘O’). I wrote that book
to help me test and refine the advice I give in this book. I can’t tell you
whether it’s a good romance novel, you’ll have to check the reviews on
Amazon or Goodreads to find out what readers think of it. But I’m fairly
happy with the finished book. Lina’s second romance has the working title
Treasured and will probably be available (under that title) by the time you
read this. I have a couple more in progress, but I don’t want to jinx them by
saying too much about them.
This is the fourth book in the Genre Writer series – following Mystery
(2017), Suspense Thriller (2018), and Crime Thriller (2019). I’ve written a
dozen novels or so in various genres, including some science fiction and
fantasy. Back when I used to have a proper job, I wrote in-house ‘how to’
manuals for library management software – it was never my childhood
dream to do that, but I think it helped me sit down and figure out how
things work so I could then explain this to other people. If I didn’t hate
standing up in front of a room full of people, I might have become a
teacher. Creating these ‘how to’ books for writers is the next best thing.
For Example?
Romance is a living genre and it reflects the contemporary lives and views
of its readers. As the world changes, the stories in romance novels change
too. Mostly this change is gradual, affecting some sub-genres more than
others or seeing new sub-genres introduced, but sometimes there are major
shifts. I’ll mention a few of these as we go along, but I’m not going to try
and cover the whole history of the genre, that would be a complete book in
itself. I’m going to concentrate on romance as it is being written now. I’ll
occasionally refer to ‘old-school’ romance novels, but I don’t think there’s
much point in me telling you how to write one. I’m also not going to
provide lots of extracts from published novels or recommend titles in the
various sub-genres. You need to choose writers whose work resonates with
you and you should be reading works that readers are buying now, not what
was popular two or three years go.
I’m also not going to attempt to stay within the guidelines given by
particular publishers or particular ‘lines’ or categories from publishers.
These change over time, and I don’t want the advice I give here to date too
quickly. I’m also someone who embraces the field of self-publishing –
where you can find sub-genres and sub-sub-genres of romance that the main
publishers don’t handle.
Caveat Emptor
(1) The hero and heroine meet. They are both happy, well-adjusted human
beings, they are a perfect match, and they live happily ever after. This
option isn’t going to make a good romance novel. Where’s the drama?
Where’s the conflict? Where’s the humour? Boring, boring, boring.
Romance novels are not stories about people being in love. They are about
characters falling in love, encountering obstacles that threaten their budding
relationship, and learning about each other and themselves as they
overcome these obstacles together.
With this in mind, let’s look at the other three options.
(2) He is flawed or ‘wounded’ and her love changes him for the better.
(3) She is flawed or ‘wounded’ and his love changes her for the better.
(4) They are both flawed or ‘wounded’ and their love changes them both for
the better.
To some extent, all love stories involve change (or character growth or
character development) in the heroine and the hero. The experience of
falling in love and being in love changes them. But in some stories, more
emphasis is placed on how the heroine’s personality and life are altered by
love. And in some stories, it is the hero who is changed by his relationship
with the heroine.
Examples (2) and (3) above are often referred to by referencing classic
fairy stories or folk takes.
The ‘she changes him’ story is Beauty and the Beast.
The ‘he changes her’ story is The Frog Prince.
A story in which both characters change each other (4) may be referred to
as The Virgin and the Rake, and it combines elements of both of the above.
You will also see references to a Cinderella or rags-to-riches story.
Let’s take a look at these in a little more detail and pick out their main
features. I’ll refer to ‘he changes her’ or ‘she changes him’ stories a few
times in later chapters.
In this version of the story, the hero – the beast – is an outcast living under a
curse. In this sense, he is an example of the unhappy ‘tortured hero’ or
Byronic hero. We’ll look at this type of hero in more detail in a later
chapter.
A central theme of the beauty and the beast story is that she changes or
redeems him. She changes him.
This folktale is thought to have originated in Germany and was first written
down by the Brothers Grimm in two versions in 1810 (The Frog Prince)
and 1812 (The Frog King). The second of these is also referred to as ‘Iron
Henry’ or ‘Iron Heinrich’ because the prince who was turned into a frog had
a loyal servant who had iron bands around his heart to stop it from breaking
when his master was turned into a frog. When the curse on the prince is
lifted, the iron bands break and his heart is free. The story we are most
familiar with comes from an English translation that took the beginning of
The Frog King and combined it with the ending of The Frog Prince, with
Iron Henry omitted. In The Frog King, the curse on the frog is broken after
the princess throws the frog against a wall – good luck figuring out what
that was meant to symbolise! Reading the two versions of the story, I can’t
help thinking that the Frog King version is incomplete and may even
contain elements from two separate stories because the part with the iron
bands doesn’t seem to fit. Maybe I’m missing something.
In The Frog King, the princess is selfish and lies to the frog to get what
she wants – until her father forces her to keep the promise she made. In The
Frog Prince, the princess again lies to the frog but relents, grudgingly, of
her own accord. In both cases, it seems to be the princess’s promise to
befriend him and take him home that breaks the spell on the frog. In neither
case does she kiss the frog.
Modern retellings of the tale emphasise that the selfish princess learns to
be a better person by honouring her promise to the frog, who she initially
finds repulsive. She proves her new-found integrity by kissing the frog. It is
the kiss that breaks the spell and frees the handsome prince. He changes
her. And the two live happily ever after.
This version of the story has given rise to the modern saying, ‘You have
to kiss a lot of frogs before you find your prince.’
The Disney film The Princess and the Frog (2009) is loosely based on
E.D. Baker’s 2002 young adult novel The Frog Princess, a humorous
retelling of the folk tale.
Around the world, there are similar tales of non-human characters turning
out to have been humans who were cursed – in many of them, it is a female
who is cursed.
A variation of the beauty and the beast story is sometimes referred to as ‘the
virgin and the rake’ or the virgin and the rogue. Here, the ‘beast’ is not an
unhappy Byronic hero, he is an alpha male bad boy – he enjoys drinking
and womanising, though he is beginning to find this lifestyle unfulfilling.
His opposite is the virginal heroine – pure in heart, unsullied, she is aware
of her worth and is waiting for a worthy man who will become her husband.
She is beautiful but modestly unaware of her charms. Having lived in
relative isolation and safety in a protective family home, she is somewhat
naïve and lacks self-confidence. She is not familiar with the outside world.
The roguish hero is entranced by the heroine, but she is initially repelled
by his reputation as a rake. Their relationship often follows the ‘enemies to
lovers’ pattern. As love blossoms between them, her moral values cause him
to behave in a better way so he can prove himself worthy of her. She
redeems him. At the same time, his love of live enables her to relax more in
the outside world. In challenging him, she also grows in self-confidence.
The hero and heroine effectively bring out the best in each other. They
change each other.
In Victorian times, there was an old adage that said ‘reformed rakes make
the best husbands.’ Writing about the reformed rake on her website, author
Mimi Matthews says, “Not only was a rake more sexually experienced and
(presumably) a better lover, but – after having sown his wild oats – a rake
was believed to be more attentive to his business and more indulgent
toward his wife.” We’ll look at creating this kind of bad boy hero later in
the book.
Rags to Riches – Cinderella
Cinderella is one of the most popular stories in the world – there are
thousands of variations of this folktale in many cultures and languages. The
earliest may date to around 7 BC. The ‘rags to riches’ story features in
Christopher Booker’s The Seven Basic Plots: Why We Tell Stories (2004).
It’s a story of neglect or obscurity replaced by unexpected recognition and
success.
The basic events in the Cinderella version of the story are these:
A young woman is persecuted by her adoptive family and forced to do
dirty and menial work in the house. A prince invites the people to a ball at
the palace. The girl’s stepsisters taunt her, saying they will go but she can’t
because she is only a lowly maid. Distraught, the girl wishes that she could
go – and her wish is granted. Her Fairy Godmother gives her a beautiful
gown and other accessories. She is the most beautiful woman at the ball and
the prince is entranced by her. The magic that allows the girl to attend the
ball stipulates that she must be home by midnight when the spell will fade.
Two further balls are held and each time the girl attends and attracts
attention, though no one knows who she is. The prince has become
infatuated with her and vows to discover her identity and marry her. A quest
for the mystery woman leads the girl’s stepsisters to try and pretend that
they are her, but eventually, the young woman’s identity is revealed. She is
married to the prince and lives happily ever after.
Christopher Booker notes that this ‘rags to riches’ plot is the basis for
many famous stories including The Ugly Duckling, Pygmalion/My Fair
Lady, Aladdin, Charles Dickens’ David Copperfield (1850), Dick
Whittington/Puss in Boots, and Charlotte Brontë’s Jane Eyre (1847).
Booker gives the key stages in the plot, which I will summarise:
Another story choice you have to make is who is attracted to who in the
early stages of your story. You have a few options:
(a) One character is attracted to the other, but the other is disinterested or
even antagonistic.
(b) They are both attracted to each other.
(c) The love triangle – A is attracted to B, but B is attracted to C.
(d) Neither of them is attracted to the other – you might see this in the
early stages of a ‘marriage of convenience/fake fiancé’ or ‘enemies to
lovers’ story.
In the first stage, the couple found out a little bit about each other, but this
was at a fairly superficial level. Often they only shared the sort of thing they
might share with a work colleague, keeping it safe and not revealing
anything private. Now they begin to explore more deeply, discovering
personal interests and the values of the other person. This is where they try
to discover if they are compatible. A certain level of trust has been
established and they now feel comfortable sharing things that are normally
only revealed to close friends.
Politics and religion may be discussed in fairly general terms. A past
relationship or marriage may be mentioned, without going into too much
detail. Hopes and fears may be revealed, again without delving too deeply.
Talk about families may now include issues in family relationships –
estrangement from a parent or sibling, for example – whether parents were
divorced or remarried. And perhaps a hint about any emotional trauma that
the person doesn’t want to talk about.
Although people share more at this stage, there is still a wariness about
oversharing. If someone reveals too many private details about their life too
soon, this can cause the other person to take a step back. There is such a
thing as too much information.
3. Falling in Love
At this point, there is a move from being two people who are dating to
being a couple. A single unit. Us. Family and friends officially accept the
status of the couple as a pair and invitations and gifts are regarded as being
for ‘both of you.’ The couple begins integrating their lives, creating shared
routines. ‘Staying over’ moves much closer to ‘moving in together,’ and
some couples make the choice to begin living together.
Sharing living space as a couple allows people to really get to know each
other. The relationship moves from an unrealistic infatuation phase to an
awareness of a person’s good and bad points and a decision to accept them
‘warts and all.’ Not everyone moves in together, but at this stage in their
relationship, there is a maturing of attitudes. Not all relationships survive
this stage – for some people, the end of the honeymoon phase signals the
end of the relationship.
5. Uncertainty
Falling in love is easy, staying in love takes work. When people start to
consider a permanent commitment, doubt can creep in. ‘Forever’ can be a
scary thing to contemplate. People may begin to question if this is The One
and wonder if their values and lifestyles really are compatible. They may
worry about what they have to give up in order to make the relationship a
permanent part of their lives.
These fears are perfectly natural but overcoming them depends on being
able to communicate openly with a partner. Self-knowledge is also
important – you have to know what values are important to you and how
you want to live your own life before you can explore whether your needs
and wants are compatible with your partner’s. And both partners have to
want to do the work that is necessary to make the relationship work. They
have to decide that, for them, it is worth the effort.
Often cracks may begin to appear in a relationship if the couple faces
some form of external problem or threat. The added stress of a new
difficulty puts pressure on their relationship. Handled correctly, challenges
can be good for a relationship. Good communication and a willingness to
work together can show them that they have what it takes to make the
relationship work in the long-term.
6. Power Struggle
This is a challenge that a couple might face before they have made a
permanent commitment to each other or it may take place after – that is,
after number 8 below. It can result in the end of a relationship and the end
of a marriage. Feelings or romantic love are replaced by disappointment
and anger. This is almost the opposite of the infatuation stage – instead of
seeing only a person’s positive traits, you can now see only their faults. If a
power struggle goes on for any length of time, the couple can reach a point
where small disagreements get blown up into huge arguments.
One reason for a power struggle is the fact that a partner is not the person
you thought they were, or they are not the person you think they should be.
You have formed an idealised image of them in your mind and they are
failing to live up to it. This can lead you to try and change them, so they fit
this ideal image. Or you might end up punishing them for disappointing
you. It is unreasonable for you to expect them to fit into a mould you have
created. In a genuinely loving relationship, we encourage each other to be
our true, authentic selves.
If you try to change or control your partner, your partner may withdraw.
Frustrated by this, you may pursue them and demand their attention.
The cause of a power struggle is often a feeling in one or both partners
that their needs are not being met (feeling abandoned) or that they feel their
individual identity is being lost and they need to assert themselves (feeling
trapped).
These feelings are related to a person’s deeper fears, arising from their
past experiences and their personality archetype. Commonly, the Warrior
type and its variations fear being trapped or controlled. The Carer archetype
and its variations fear being rejected or abandoned.
The way to deal successfully with this kind of problem is through
opening up and being honest, which brings us to...
7. Intimacy
We’re not talking about sex here, that can occur at any stage in a
relationship (or not). More important at this stage of a relationship is the
willingness to let the other person know your vulnerabilities. You have to be
able to share your deepest fears and the aspects of yourself that you may
feel ashamed of. You have to be willing to allow the other person to know
your true self, rather than just see the mask, the persona or false self that
you present to the rest of the world. You have to let down the walls you
have erected to protect yourself from emotional or psychological harm. And
the other person has to do the same. Being able to do this requires high
levels of trust.
Ideally, the other person has already seen glimpses of your true self, and
this is one of the things that attracted them to you. Knowing that someone is
vulnerable causes us to experience sympathy and empathy, and these help
draw us closer to someone. It also lets us feel comfortable about revealing
our own insecurities.
It is only after we are able to reveal and be our true selves in a
relationship that genuine commitment can be made. Some couples try to
make this commitment too soon and it may mean that their relationships
may not last. In something like an arranged marriage, however,
commitment comes early and then the couple may move through the
different stages to this kind of intimacy.
8. Commitment
When two people have reached a stage where they are both lovers and best
friends, when they have a deep knowledge and understanding of each
other’s fears and secret shame, they are ready to make a commitment to a
lifelong partnership. How long it takes to reach this stage varies from
couple to couple.
Ideally, this is similar to the falling in love stage but based on a stronger and
more mature foundation. Each trusts the other enough to be their true,
authentic self and accepts and supports the other in being their authentic
self. As a couple, they have developed good communication skills and have
no fear of expressing themselves honestly. And through experience, they
have ways of working together to overcome challenges.
Couples who have reached this level in their relationship are able to
support and encourage others – either their own children or people at earlier
stages in their relationships.
We will see the stages of the development of a relationship reflected in
the stages of an individual’s character development arc in Chapter 8.
1. Drifting Apart
In this phase, we begin to feel that we have less in common than was the
case previously. We do fewer things together. Rather than seeing things that
we have in common, we tend to see differences. There is a tendency to draw
away from the other person and to create boundaries, perhaps rebuilding
some of the defensive walls we had in place before we became a couple. We
no longer feel able to communicate freely and openly. Trust falters and we
feel less comfortable allowing ourselves to be vulnerable in front of the
other person. All of these things can lead to resentment and blaming by one
person or by both. If you are in a relationship and you begin to feel alone,
this is a warning sign.
2. Stagnation
People learn and grow throughout their lives. If we find ourselves stuck in a
situation which presents no new challenges or opportunities for growth, we
get itchy feet, feel depressed, or become resentful of anyone we feel is
holding us back or holding us down. You may have had this feeling in
school or college if the lessons weren’t sufficiently challenging for you or
in a job where you didn’t have any opportunity to progress. Relationships
can lead to the same problems.
After a permanent commitment has been made, there is a risk that people
might think that the job is done. But it takes work to keep a relationship
alive. Complacency or apathy can be very damaging.
3. Avoidance
When relationships begin to fail, many people ignore the warning signs and
deny that there is a problem. Rather than tackling the issue, they avoid it.
And this may mean that they end up avoiding their partner. They may still
share living space, but conversation is limited to the bare necessities. They
live more like roommates than lovers. Outside of the home they may
engage in more activities alone and they might begin to associate with
separate groups of friends.
4. The End
Finally, one or both makes the decision that the relationship is over.
Typically, one person moves out of the shared living space and sets up their
own home. If the couple is married, formal proceedings may be started to
obtain a divorce. Sometimes this stage begins with a trial separation, which
is an extended form of avoidance.
The relationship phases in the above lists should be familiar to you from
your own life or from observing the relationships of others. They are
probably common to most relationships from about 1920, when Victorian
patriarchal attitudes to women’s lives started to change, with relationships
being based on mutual love rather than being arranged for economic
reasons.
Many old-school romances, inspired by Jane Austen’s Pride and
Prejudice, featured relationships based on a model of male-female
relationships that began about 10,000 years ago and lasted until the
emancipation of women in the early twentieth century.
Modern romance novels are based on the type of relationship outlined
above. As we will see when we come to examine the plot in detail, romance
novels emphasise certain phases in the development of a relationship. The
order in which phases are presented in a story varies in different sub-genres
and we’ll explore this too. The sections above on failing relationships are
included because they may help you in thinking about how a character’s
previous relationship ended. We’ll look at this backstory element in later
chapters on character creation.
3 | Setting
What is the Setting?
You might think that the setting of a romance novel is like the painted
backdrop on a theatre stage for the actors to perform in front of. But setting
– and the description of setting – can add so much more to your story.
Setting consists of a mix of components that interact. There is the
physical geography of a place – the rocks, seas, rivers, and earth that
naturally occur. There is human geography, the man-made aspects of our
environment – the buildings, the railways and roads. There are the human
societies, the groups of people who make their homes in natural and man-
made environments. We share the world with flora and fauna, plants and
animals that originated in the natural world but which may have adapted
themselves to living in man-made spaces or which may have been adapted
to meet the needs of humans – crops and cattle, for example. And finally,
there is the weather, the atmosphere that surrounds all aspects of our world
and can have a dramatic impact – either positive or negative – upon it.
As well as the physical and social aspects of a setting, you should also be
aware of temporal ones. When does your story occur? This can be a
historical period or a season of the year.
In this chapter, we’ll explore the ways in which some of these things can
play roles in the world of the romance novel. The one thing I hope you’ll
take away from it is that you shouldn’t pick a setting for your story simply
because it seems exotic or glitzy or romantic or whatever. You can use that
setting and have it make an impact on the story.
Setting – and the way you describe it – can help you quickly establish the
sub-genre of your romance novel. The location for a romantic comedy will
be very different to the one for romantic suspense. Or it could be the same
location but described in a very different way.
Some sub-genres of romance are defined by their location. A Gothic
romance features an isolated house that almost functions as a character in
the story, being a source of mystery and menace. Highlander romances take
place in a particular place – the highlands of Scotland – often at an earlier
moment in history. The same with Viking romances. Regency romances are
set during a specific period of British history – the Regency era lasted from
1811 to 1820, though writers sometimes adopt a looser definition that
covers the first quarter or the first third of the nineteenth century. You will
need to use description to establish the place and time in a historical
romance. ‘Chick lit’ romances tend to feature urban locations – Sex and the
City includes the location in its title. Some readers prefer a ‘small-town
romance.’ While others seek out stories set in exotic locations around the
world, perhaps attracted by the idea of a holiday romance. Western or
cowboy romances can be contemporary or historical, but they’re all set in
the American West – though you could set a similar story in the Australian
equivalent. Medical romances take place in hospitals, so you would need to
find a place where a hospital of that size might exist.
Another sub-genre – or sub-sub-genre – is the Christmas romance.
Obviously, these are going to sell only during two or three months of the
year, but like Christmas songs, they have the potential to make money every
year.
And then there’s the ‘trapped together in an isolated place’ sub-genre,
which may or may not include winter snow. The dangers of climate change
offer you the alternatives of floods, mudslides, and wildfires as a cause of
the trapping. A plague of zombies is another option. Maybe.
The choice of setting and the way in which it is presented can also help
establish the tone of the story. The description in a romantic comedy must
be handled with a light touch. In a romantic suspense story, you may need
to create a feeling of menace or danger. You can describe the same place in
very different ways depending on the tone or mood you want to
communicate to the reader. It can be a useful practice exercise to do this. In
romantic suspense, a location that the heroine finds sunny and familiar
during the daytime could become creepy and mysterious after dark. It is a
feature of the thriller that what was once safe and known suddenly feels
unsafe and unknown. This is true for urban cityscapes and for rural
landscapes.
You can also use aspects of the setting to foreshadow something that is
going to happen later in the story. You could introduce a fairly innocuous
part of a location in a fairly offhand manner and then have it play a
significant role towards the end of the story. Or you can show something
occurring in the setting that is a small-scale version of some action that will
occur in the story later.
Setting as Metaphor
Setting can symbolise different themes or ideas in your story. If your hero is
a loner, you might first introduce him in a wide-open space with no one else
around. Perhaps he’s riding his motorcycle along an empty stretch of road,
or his pick-up truck is stopped at the side of a dirt track in the middle of
nowhere. If your heroine is struggling with issues of identity and who she is
as an individual, you might introduce her lost in the middle of a crowded
street. If she’s feeling smothered by a situation in her life, you might have
her in a claustrophobic place where it’s difficult to breath.
You don’t need to tell your reader that the place is mirroring something in
the character’s life – this sort of symbolism works best if you let is seep
unnoticed into the reader’s subconscious.
Social Milieu
What is the ‘world’ or sphere of activity in which your story takes place?
The Fast and the Furious introduced us to the world of modified cars and
illegal street racing. Point Break was set in the world of adrenaline-junkie
surfers. And both also included the world of undercover cops. Jackie
Collins took us to the world of Hollywood glitz. Mario Puzo showed us
inside the world of a mafia family in The Godfather. TV shows have taken
us into the worlds of biker gangs, undertakers, country music, computer
hackers, competitive sports, and the lives of thirty-somethings. In these
stories we didn’t just get to see a place that was new to us, we were allowed
to enter a different world. There were different types of characters, a social
structure, knowledge and experience, and a complex set of rules related to
behaviour. Even in a familiar setting like New York or a small rural town,
you get a feel for the place and how it works, rather than just a static
photographic image.
Just as a character should have a life before we meet them on the page, a
location should have its own history and backstory. This will be closely
linked to the people who first established it and who have lived in it over
the years. Humans alter their environment to suit their needs, creating
farmland or building skyscrapers. The way a place looks and operates says
something about the people who live in it. Even natural spaces are given
significance by the stories people make up about them or by events which
have occurred in them. Local legends, myths, and half-remembered
historical incidents all contribute to the history of a place. Including a little
bit of this in your description of a place can make it feel more real to the
reader.
Different sections of a town or city become associated with different
levels of society. There is always an uptown and a downtown. Different
layers of society – from the wealthiest to the poorest – have their own
places. The bad boy hero is always born ‘on the wrong side of the tracks.’
In large cities, different cultures tend to congregate, creating a Chinatown or
some other ethnic centre within a city. Some places are associated with
particular trades or types of stores or restaurants.
Should you use a real place as the setting for your story or make one up?
And if you use a real place, should you give its real name? The advantage
of a real place is that you don’t have to make everything up. Disadvantages
include the fact that if you name a place, you’re going to have to get the
details right – people who live there will know whether you can turn left off
Long Street into Short Street – and real places change over time, which can
make your story seem dated. There’s also a danger in using real places, such
as the local bakery, that you could offend the people who own and operate
them.
For genre fiction, my advice would be to create a fictionalised version of
a real place and give it a made-up name. You get the best of both worlds.
You could even use a combination of a couple of places. If you’re writing
about a town or city, find a comparable one and look it up on Wikipedia.
You’ll find notes on its history, population, local industries, transport links,
geography, and maybe even one or two quirky bits of local history or
legend. You can use these as inspiration for your own setting. You could
also use something like Google street view to take a virtual walk along the
streets of your location or use aerial images to get a bird’s-eye view.
Different rules apply if you’re using a real place in a historical novel.
Depending on how far back in time you’re planning to go, you can consult a
local history library or website or you may need to dig into history books.
There are quite a view good popular history titles now that tell you what
live was like in medieval Europe, Victorian times, or even Ancient Greece
or Rome. Knowing some details about what daily life was like will give a
better sense of place than referring to the sweep of historical events or the
goings on in a king’s palace, which most ordinary people would not have
been aware of.
If you do make up a location, you need to be aware of any factors that
would still apply to it. If, for example, you create a town and mention that it
is located in a particular state in the USA, you should check things like
seasonal temperatures, rainfall, what time of year trees bud or flowers
bloom, when grain or other crops are harvested, typical wildlife, and sunrise
and sunset times. Obviously, you can try and avoid mentioning any of these
things, but the more things you avoid mentioning, the vaguer your setting
becomes. Even if I make up the name of a place, I Google it to make sure I
haven’t accidentally used a real name, or something similar to a real one.
Maps and Street Plans – Robert Louis Stevenson said that a map was the
inspiration for his novel Treasure Island. He drew a map of the island and
then wrote about it. Do you need to create a map or a street plan of your
imaginary location? Only if you think it will help you. If the movements of
characters in the location are complicated and different things are
happening at different times, you might find it helps you keep things
straight in your head. It makes more sense if you are going to use the setting
in a series of novels. A rough sketch map that you can keep updating will
help you remember that in book one you said there was a veterinarian’s
practice opposite the coffee shop. If you later put a lawyer’s office opposite
the coffee shop, without explaining the change, eagle-eyed readers may
notice and inform you of the slip. You may write your books a year or more
apart, but readers may binge on the series in the space of a couple of weeks.
Different characters will view the scene in different ways. One character
may concentrate more on the people in the scene – their appearance and/or
their relationships with one another; another may pay more attention to the
décor. While another may be more concerned with the actions occurring in
the scene. I cover some of this later in the chapter on point of view.
When you change the point of view in a story it is important to establish
the new point of view – who is ‘speaking’ or whose thoughts we are sharing
– before detailing a change of location. Until we know the who, the where
isn’t that important. There are exceptions to this, but it’s hard to go wrong if
you think of people before places.
Also, how a viewpoint character is feeling at a particular moment will
affect how they view the setting, which in turn affects the mood you can
evoke in the reader.
Road Trips
Changing Locations
Contrasting Settings
A story will often have more than one setting or may show different sides of
the same setting. The hero is typically associated with a tough or hard-
edged sort of setting, whether that be a corporate boardroom or a cattle
ranch or a dangerous wilderness. The heroine is more likely to be associated
with a social setting – a workplace with several colleagues, a circle who
share a hobby, or an extended family. Where we see the hero working alone,
we see the heroine as a team player or a member of a group. There is
contrast, and maybe conflict, when one of them crosses into the realm of the
other. The hero may be uncomfortable in a family or social setting, or the
heroine may not know how to behave or look after herself in the hero’s
world.
Contrasting settings also help keep a story fresh and interesting. If you
have several scenes of your heroine and hero sitting at a table talking,
walking and talking, or driving and talking, try to mix things up by
choosing a new setting. Have the characters working together on a task
while they’re talking – picking blackberries or painting the side of a barn or
catching an escaped pet – and you have the potential for movement and,
perhaps, humour. Or danger.
Setting & Plot
If you have an idea for a plot, it may dictate the sort of place you can select
for your setting. You have to choose a location where the events of that plot
can plausibly take place. Leslie Wainger points out, for example, that a
number of American locations come under the heading ‘the West,’ but not
all of them are suitable for a story that involves cattle rustling. You need to
choose a location where there are cattle ranches.
If you want your story to feature a tornado or its aftermath, your location
must be one where tornadoes occur. And you have to know what season of
the year they occur. If you want to have your heroine and hero trapped by
heavy snowfall, you have to choose a location and a time of year when this
is possible. Well, duh.
Approaching things from the other direction, your location may give you
possibilities for things you can do with your plot.
In the structure I have proposed for a romance novel, I have said that
showing the heroine in her ordinary world is one of the early parts of the
plot. In part, this is to do with establishing the who and the where of the
story. In terms of a plot function, it establishes a world in equilibrium. We
then upset this equilibrium by introducing a new factor – the hero. His
arrival on the scene is an incident that upsets the balance of the heroine’s
life, and it requires her to take action if she wants to try and restore the
equilibrium. Her world remains out of balance until the end of the story
when the ‘ordinary world’ or a new version of it is re-established in the
form of a ‘happy ever after’ or ‘happy for now’.
In describing the heroine’s ordinary world at the beginning of the story,
we learn something about her as a person and see a hint of her inner fears in
the things she has chosen to surround herself with. In this ordinary world,
there is also a suggestion that she is dissatisfied with the life she has created
for herself, something is missing and she is not feeling entirely fulfilled. In
plot terms, this is sometimes referred to as a character’s ‘lack’.
With the heroine being the main character in a romance, the hero’s
ordinary world may or may not feature in the story. In some genres his
world is more important – in a billionaire romance or a paranormal
romance, it is often the hero’s world that the heroine must enter. In a
romantic suspense story, the world where the conspiracy or the action take
place is typically the hero’s world. What seems extraordinary to the heroine
is ordinary for him.
In the Hollywood romantic comedy, the situation is reversed and we see
the hero’s ordinary world disrupted by the arrival of the heroine. To take
Bringing Up Baby as an example, Cary Grant’s character is a mild-
mannered palaeontologist reconstructing the skeleton of a dinosaur until
Katharine Hepburn appears. He spends the rest of the movie chasing around
the countryside with a leopard. And falling in love. With Hepburn, not the
leopard.
The setting may play a role in the incident which upsets the balance of the
heroine’s world. We’ve already seen that Bella’s story begins when she is
moved to a new location. And in romantic suspense novels, the heroine
finds herself in the dangerous world that the hero inhabits. Think of Joan
Wilder (Kathleen Turner) in Romancing the Stone. In other stories, the
heroine and hero are trapped together in a remote cabin due to a blizzard. In
stories of this kind, the location is very much a part of the plot, setting it in
motion and providing additional obstacles as the adventure continues.
Raymond Chandler famously said that if you don’t know what to write
next, have a man walk in with a gun in his hand. In the world of the private
eye story, that works fine but it’s not appropriate for most kinds of romance.
Another alternative is to have your setting provide a new challenge or
obstacle for your characters. A sudden change in weather can upset things.
Animals, wild or domestic, may be a feature of your setting and they can be
used to add an unexpected complication. A flat tyre isn’t a huge deal in a
suburban area, but in a remote place with no cell phone reception, it can
become a major issue.
When you are looking to move your plot forwards, look at your setting
and think about the possibilities it holds. If there aren’t any, you may have
picked the wrong location.
Writers who want to create their own series of romances – there are
financial and marketing benefits in doing so – often tie them together with
the location. All of the novels take place in the same small town or feature
characters who visit the same coffeeshop or tearoom. Or the characters all
work for the same company or agency.
Situation comedies are often set in a family home and feature multiple
generations of a family. This provides a good mix of people and allows for
the required ‘situations’ to develop. Comedies that don’t take place in a
family home often feature a family-like group of people in an enclosed
environment or another form of hierarchical environment such as a
workplace.
Television dramas use familiar locations such as hospitals, police
stations, offices, shops, restaurants, and other business premises. Again,
these are chosen because of the mix of characters – both the permanent cast
and guest stars – and the potential for dramatic situations.
In both comedy and drama, a setting is chosen that offers the potential for
multiple stories. If a show is running for thirteen or twenty-odd episodes a
year for several years, that’s a lot of stories to set in one place. But it is
done, and it is often done incredibly well. If you want to write a series of
books, you need to create a setting with ‘series potential’.
As I write these words, the twenty-ninth novel in Janet Evanovich’s
Stephanie Plum series has been published and the thirtieth is due in a few
months. The setting for her stories is a relatively small patch of Trenton,
New Jersey and within that, we see Stephanie’s apartment, her parent’s
home, and the bail bondsman’s office where she works. The choice of
location has served the author well – though I suspect she didn’t expect to
write more than half-a-dozen stories set there. The characters Evanovich
placed in that setting, and the relationships between them meant that readers
kept demanding more. I read each new book as it’s published – it’s like
watching a favourite tv show.
In series stories with a single main character or a duo, the setting has to
be somewhere that people come to them. A private detective like Jim
Rockford or Philip Marlowe has clients who bring them cases and each new
case is a new story (actually, most PI stories combine two cases). A cosy
mystery series will take place in a milieu that offers potential for ‘guest
stars’ to appear and be murdered or be suspects – this can include diners at a
restaurant, readers at a bookshop or library, or people engaged in some
other craft or activity.
A series location should be relatively specific but not too restricting. If
your series proves popular you will want to expand the setting and draw in
new characters. Some series do this by having a group of core characters
that people can join or leave – a hospital, a police precinct, a fire station, or
whatever.
If you do create a location for a series, you will want to keep track of the
places you use and perhaps even draw a map (see above) that you can keep
adding to. Readers who really enjoy your stories and read them multiple
times may come to know the setting better than you do – and they’ll notice
if details are inconsistent between books.
The settings I mentioned above for television shows are pretty generic –
how many hospital shows or cop shows are there? Dozens, maybe
hundreds. If you are going to create a setting, you will need to make it
unique in some way. Use the features of generic series locations as a guide
for the kind of thing you need to create, but then spend time making it into
something original and visual – a place that readers will enjoy seeing for the
first time and that they will want to revisit. The town of Cicely, Alaska was
that sort of place in Northern Exposure and so was the quirkier northern
town of Twin Peaks. Many tv towns and suburban settings have an element
of Peyton Place about them – a combination of location and characters
makes them work. Wisteria Lane in Desperate Housewives is another
example, as are Sunnydale in Buffy the Vampire Slayer and Bon Temps,
Louisiana in True Blood.
In later books in a series, you will want to refer to familiar town
landmarks and hint at previous stories – without including spoilers, as some
readers read out of sequence – to reacquaint the reader with your setting.
For some series, romantic fantasy or science fiction say, you might want
to go as far as constructing your own story world, but ‘worldbuilding’ is
beyond the scope of this book.
Describing Setting
You may find it helpful to collect images of places, buildings, and other
things that can go into locations. Make a scrapbook of images cut from
magazines or create folders of images collected from the internet. You
might want to use an online resource such as Pinterest to store and
categorise your images.
Setting Description and Pace
Generally speaking, static description slows the pace of your story. You
might want to do this to give the reader (and your characters) time to breath
after an emotionally charged or action-packed scene. Or you might use it at
the beginning of a scene as the calm before the storm before you ramp up
the drama and/or action.
The longer a piece of static description, the more it will slow the pace. As
a rough guide, you probably don’t want a piece of description to be longer
than a paragraph of four or five lines. As an absolute maximum, you might
get away with two such paragraphs one after the other. You can break up
description with dialogue between characters or a bit of internal monologue
giving your character’s thoughts. This gives the impression that the scene is
still moving even when there isn’t much going on.
If you don’t want to slow the pace too much, you can describe something
moving within a scene. Often the best way to describe a scene is to show
something happening in it. The movement you describe needn’t be directly
connected to your story, but you could make it symbolise events in the story
or reflect a character’s mood or thoughts.
The description of an action involving your characters, and including
their point of view feelings about it, is the most fast-paced form of
description. But remember that dialogue, especially in short bursts, moves
things on more quickly than any sort of description.
Whatever location you choose for your story, don’t let it overwhelm the
plot. Remember that the most important element in this genre is the
development of a romantic relationship.
This is a particular danger with historical romance – the emphasis should
be on the romance part, you are not writing deeply researched historical
fiction. That is why most historical romances are set in one of a few
relatively well-known periods and locations.
4 | Iconography
What do we see that makes us think ‘romance’? I don’t think I’m being too
harsh when I say that romance iconography is pretty clichéd. Do a Google
search for ‘Romance’ and select the ‘Images’ option and you’ll see the kind
of thing I mean. The upside of this is that these symbols are instantly
recognised by everyone, at least in the West, I can’t speak for other cultures.
The downside is that we’ve seen these things so often that we think ‘Oh,
yeah, romance’ without really thinking about what the images actually
represent. In this episode of Stating the Obvious, we’ll remind ourselves of
the ideas behind the icons, beginning with the most famous one of all.
The heart has been the symbol of love and romance for centuries. Perhaps
because we feel a change in blood pressure as our physical response to love
(and let’s not be coy, to lust as well) involves a shifting around of our blood.
The surface of our skin can become rosy and blood rushes to other parts of
the anatomy as well. If you get my meaning. Nudge, nudge wink, wink. The
idea of swelling caused by engorgement with blood is reflected in the way
‘love hearts’ are depicted in images. The same is true of those bright red
disembodied lips that are meant to symbolise kisses (unless they’re
supposed to represent swollen lady parts, but I don’t want to go there).
Whatever the origins of the term, we talk about someone ‘stealing’ our
heart. Or ‘breaking’ it. We say that seeing them makes our heart beat faster.
In talking about the Thinker, Carer, and Warrior archetypes, we often say
that the head symbolises the Thinker, the gut or viscera symbolise the
Warrior, and the heart symbolises the Carer. The heart represents that part of
our personality.
In terms of the heart being used in the romance industry, we see heart-
shaped boxes of chocolates. People making a heart shape with their fingers.
Heart-shaped cakes, confetti, tattoos, balloons, cushions, and any other bit
of merchandise that can be made heart-shaped and shipped in time for
Valentine’s Day.
The arrow that is often shown piercing a heart is a representation of
Cupid’s arrow – more on him below.
Another symbol you may see is a heart with a keyhole accompanied by a
key. Not a particularly subtle bit of imagery, but the idea of someone having
the key to your heart and unlocking your feelings of love kind of makes
sense. Locks without keys have also been used to symbolise the
permanence of love – couples inscribe their names or initials on a padlock
and affix it to a bridge as a symbol of love. A bridge suggests a meeting or
uniting of two sides. The first ‘love bridge’ is thought to be Most Ljubavi in
Vrnjačka Banja, Serbia and the most famous is probably the Pont des Artes
in Paris – at least it was until the weight of the locks threatened the stability
of the structure and the locks and railings were removed and replaced with
glass panels.
In Ancient Greece, the rose was closely associated with Aphrodite, the
goddess of love and lust, and headdresses containing roses may have been
worn by priestesses attending her temples during celebrations.
Traditionally, the red rose is associated with true love and the white rose
with purity and virginity. The tradition of presenting a lover with a dozen
red roses combines the idea of the red rose meaning true love with the
symbolism of the number twelve. It has been suggested that twelve
represents completeness – it is the number of months in a year and the
number of hours on a clock face. Twelve red roses can thus be taken to
suggest ‘I will love you all the hours of the day and all the months of the
year.’ A dozen red roses is a dramatic gesture – and an expensive one! A
single red rose is often presented to a lover as a more subtle expression of
love.
Meanings have been given to different types of flowers for centuries and
the symbolic meanings of flowers have been used by artists and writers. In
Victorian times a great deal of thought went into the ‘meanings’ of different
kinds of flowers and whole books were written about the subject. Men sent
nosegays or bouquets to their lovers with secret messages encoded in the
choice of flowers. The ‘language of flowers’ was known as floriography.
You can find various lists of the meanings of flowers online and Wikipedia
has an article titled ‘Language of Flowers’ which is a good place to start if
you’re interested.
Bridal bouquets may have originated in Ancient Rome to symbolise
fertility, fidelity, and new beginnings. In the Middle Ages, the flowers
chosen were intended to discourage evil spirits. The modern bridal bouquet,
and the meanings of the flowers within it, date back to Victorian traditions
inspired by the flowers carried by Queen Victoria for her wedding to Prince
Albert.
Forbidden Fruits
In the Garden of Eden, Adam and Eve were forbidden to eat the fruit of one
tree. Going against God's wishes, they ate the fruit and gained forbidden
knowledge. God then punished them and exiled them from Eden. The type
of fruit which the tree bore is not named and various fruits have been
suggested including grapes (possibly made into wine), figs, the lemon-like
citron, pears, quince, carob, bananas, and even mushrooms (possibly
psychedelic). You have to think that some of these were suggested because
of their phallic associations – mushrooms were regarded as phallic symbols
in some cultures. One of the reasons the pomegranate was suggested is
because the first pomegranate tree is said to have been planted by Aphrodite
and it has been linked with fertility and sex – and temptation – ever since.
Other Greek myths make reference to pomegranates and their seeds, often
with sexual connotations. Even today, pomegranate juice is said to be good
for male and female fertility, though it has to be said that some of the
people saying it are pomegranate growers.
In the West, the forbidden fruit in the Garden of Eden is often said to be
an apple, possibly because of the similarity between Latin words for apple
and evil. Shiny red apples have come to symbolise Adam and Eve’s original
sin and have also become associated with love. Another reason for the
association may be that red apples resemble (if you squint) the shape of a
heart.
The cherry is another red, ‘heart-shaped’ fruit that has become linked
with love and romance. The most obvious link is to ‘losing your cherry.’
The Oxford English Dictionary reports the first known instance of the
cherry being related to virginity as occurring in 1889. But there are earlier
texts linking the Virgin Mary with the fruit, at least in translations of the
story – in the original, the reference is to dates.
Strawberries too fulfil the criteria of being bright red and vaguely heart-
shaped. The strawberry is the only fruit with seeds on the outside of the
fruit. I’m pretty sure that this isn’t traditionally associated with premature
ejaculation. The sweetness of strawberries pairs nicely with the dryness of
champagne, and they are often featured together in romance stories.
But not the things you’re thinking of right now. Shame on you. Pictures of
couples in love show varying degrees of physical intimacy and may also
symbolise rituals related to love and marriage. The least amount of contact
is shown in images where two people are just happy to be in each other’s
company, doing things like riding a bike and ice-skating. But not
simultaneously. Couples bicycling together must have begun in the
Victorian era and the movie Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid used a
single bicycle in a romantic sequence that was accompanied by the song
‘Raindrops Keep Falling on My Head.’
A couple sitting on a bench in the park is another romantic image –
there’s a bit more contact if the guy has his arm around the girl’s shoulders.
Walking arm-in-arm in the park, along the bank of a river, and/or in the
moonlight is another. Then there’s dancing, which can include varying
degrees of physical contact depending on how ‘dirty’ it is. Latin dances can
be pretty sexy. Typically a ‘slow dance’ is for romantic couples to shuffle
around the dance floor in what is effectively an embrace.
Sharing an umbrella is another intimate pose. Kissing in the rain also
features in many movies. I think the suggestion there is that it doesn’t
matter what is happening in the outside world, these two people are happy
and in love.
Holding hands is an expression of friendship and love. It involves skin-
to-skin contact and so is a more intimate gesture than placing an arm around
someone’s shoulder. It’s probably more intimate than walking arm-in-arm
because of the skin contact. Shaking hands or kissing someone’s hand in
greeting is less intimate than hand-holding because of the length of the skin
contact.
Some actions or poses have symbolic meaning. Men are depicted
carrying women in a pose that suggests he’s carrying her ‘across the
threshold’ – a tradition related to marriage. Various theories have been put
forward as to why the groom carries the bride across the threshold. One is
related to the idea of men carrying women off as the spoils after a raid on a
village or it denotes the idea of any woman married against her will and
carried off. In later generations, it was thought that the bride should not
appear too eager to enter the bedchamber, so some pretence at reluctance
was maintained if her husband had to carry her in. Another idea is that
married couples who have not yet consummated their marriage are
susceptible to evil spirits and by keeping the bride’s feet up off the floor, the
groom is protecting her from contact with them. Also, if she is carried in
that first time, any demons following her cannot enter then or later. Petals
are also strewn in the path of the bride on the way to the altar to stop evil
spirits from entering her through the ground. And another suggestion is that
if the bride trips on her way into the marital home it will bring bad luck, so
carrying her reduces the risk.
A man on his knee proposing to his lover is another symbolic image.
Putting oneself in a position that is lower than another person is an age-old
sign of respect. People bow, kneel, or grovel in front of kings and religious
leaders as a sign that they are inferior to that exalted individual. In western
society, this traditional sign of respect continues in the nod of the head we
sometimes give in greeting. The idea of a suitor going down on one knee in
front of a woman is thought to date to the era of medieval knights and the
adoption of the chivalric code. Ideas about this chivalric code have been
romanticised by later generations, especially the Victorians, but romance is
what we’re about here, so we needn’t get into the sorts of things knights
really got up to.
The greatest amount of physical contact comes in the embrace or hug –
referred to as ‘the clinch’ when it was used on the covers of old-school
romance novels. It is still seen on modern romances, but not as frequently
as it was before the 1990s. The clinch is the closest you can get to
portraying sex on a book cover – especially if the guy is looking lustful and
the woman’s expression suggests she’s having an orgasm.
More erotic than the clinch is the kiss. Book covers often show the
heroine standing on tiptoe to kiss the hero. Sometimes you only see the
lower half of their bodies as they stand barefoot in the sand. Of course, he’s
taller than her, it’s a sign of his strength and masculinity.
In all of these couple-only activities, you almost never see anyone else
around. The implication is that these two people are together, lost in their
own private world, unaware that anything or anyone else exists.
Another pose you will see on the covers of romantic suspense novels is
the hero standing protectively in front of the heroine, ready to fight off
anyone who might attack her. Did you know that the bride traditionally
stands on the groom’s left to leave his sword arm free, in case he needs to
take out his weapon (stop sniggering!) and fend off anyone who might try
to steal her away from him?
Romantic Locations
I’ve already mentioned moonlit walks. It has long been believed that the
phases of the moon and its closeness to the Earth at different points may
have an effect on people and animals. The full moon is believed to be
associated with emotions ‘running high’ such that it may affect the
behaviour of the ‘lunatics’ who are named after the moon. This is why
werewolves are associated with full moons. The full moon is also said to
affect moods and make a person feel more romantic. You can make your
own mind up about what this suggests about the association between
romance and lunacy!
In Greek mythology, the sun and the moon are associated with Zeus and
his wife Hera who was the goddess of marriage (among many other things).
The pair of them had a pretty stormy relationship, if you believe the gossip.
In Ancient Egyptian mythology, Osiris was the sun and Isis was the moon
she was the goddess of motherhood and fertility. She was also Osiris’s sister
and later his wife. The idea of the sun and the moon being a couple in these
and other cultures may account for the association between the moon and
romance. Walking in the dark also allows a couple to sneak a kiss with less
risk of being seen.
Sunset is also regarded as a romantic time of day. A tropical beach with
the sun setting over the ocean is a romantic ideal that has graced the cover
of many a romance novel. Again there is the idea of a couple getting away
to a secluded place where they can be together. Plus there’s the twentieth-
century association with honeymoons in exotic locations, made possible by
the availability of international air travel.
Carrying on the theme of romantic evenings, we have the sharing of a
meal in a candlelit restaurant. A man and a woman lean towards each other
across a table to whisper and to be closer. Traditionally, the sharing of food
is something done among family members or as part of a social celebration
with friends or honoured guests. It becomes more intimate if a couple
shares food from the same plate or if they feed each other, eating from the
same fork.
Finally, the most romantic place in the world is Paris. Many marriage
proposals are made in front of the Eiffel Tower or along the banks of the
Seine. Why? I’m not sure. Paris has attracted poets and artists for hundreds
of years and they have helped to romanticise the city’s image. In 2000 the
‘Wall of Love’ (Le Mur des Je t’aime) was unveiled, a monument that
shows the words ‘I Love You’ in 250 languages. There is also the Musée de
la vie Romantique – the Museum of Romantic Life – which opened in 1987.
The Temple de la Sybille, built in 1778 in the Roman style, is also known as
the Temple of Love and is supposed to be one of the best places to kiss in
Paris. Paris knows how to promote itself as the city of love, but how did it
originally gain that reputation?
Paris gained its reputation toward the end of the nineteenth century
during France’s Third Empire. It was celebrated as a centre for sex tourism
with over 2,600 prostitutes registered in 1878 and 6,000 in 1900.
Guidebooks were published so that male visitors could find the so-called
‘places of pleasure’ that they sought. This rather seedy past evolved into the
more romantic version of Paris that we know today.
Perhaps one of the reasons why modern Paris was and is regarded as a
romantic city is that the French are much more comfortable with public
displays of affection such as holding hands or kissing. French bistros also
have the atmosphere for two people to meet and share some food and a
drink.
Engagement Rings
Old school romance novel covers became clichéd. They showed pale-
skinned women in big dresses with tight bodices. The lacing of her bodice
was so tight that her bosom was squeezed up and swelled over like the top
of a muffin. The guy she was embracing had muscular arms, long flowing
hair, and his shirt was open to show his pecs. The guy was often portrayed
by the model Fabio Lanzoni, often referred to simply as Fabio. From 1990
he could pose for more than a dozen book covers a day and he appeared on
thousands of romance novels.
In their book Beyond Heaving Bosoms, Sarah Wendell and Candy Tan
mock these covers, pointing out that the hero’s shirt is always unbuttoned
but still tucked into whatever he’s wearing on the lower part of his body.
They also refer to these types of illustrations as ‘mantitty’ covers.
You still occasionally see those ‘bodice ripper’ covers today, but there
has been a trend away from cover images showing men and women
embracing – and the embraces that do appear aren’t quite as desperate
looking. ‘Mantitty’ covers, portraying just the hero, usually without
showing his face, appear on many romance novels, particularly those at the
spicier end of the market.
A love song is a song about falling in love, being in love, unrequited love,
breaking-up, or heartbreak. They have existed for thousands of years, the
earliest known one being the love song of Shu-Sin (or Shu-Suen) recorded
on a cuneiform tablet created in about 2,030 BC. The modern love song
probably owes its origins to songs performed by bards in the Middle Ages,
which tended to be a bit racier than the ideas about love put forward by the
Christian church.
Love Potions
There are a few romantic images and symbols that I couldn’t shoehorn into
any of the previous categories. Balloons among the clouds sometimes
feature in romance illustrations. This may be because being in love gives
you that lighter-than-air feeling. It is also another activity where a couple
can do something together with no one else around – and they can look
down on those poor unfortunates who might not be riding high on feelings
of love. Or maybe its just that hot air balloons are pretty.
Butterflies sometimes make an appearance. Maybe this is another
suggestion that being in love makes you feel like you can fly. A bit like Red
Bull. See also the reference to butterflies and Psyche.
You’ll occasionally see Cinderella’s glass slipper because obviously
she’s a romance story icon. I’m not really sure about that whole drinking
champagne from a woman’s shoe thing, but if that kind of thing floats your
boat, go for it.
Cupcakes have also come to symbolise love in recent times, especially
the ones smothered in pink butter cream. Because nothing says ‘I love you’
like high levels of saturated fat. But again, they look pretty. And I do like
butter cream.
Cuddly toys such as teddy bears are also used to symbolise love, probably
because they are given as gifts to lovers and perhaps because of their
association with cuddling, a kind of human contact we received as a child.
Linked male and female symbols, based on ancient symbols for Mars and
Venus, are now used to indicate a heterosexual couple and linked male-male
or female-female symbols are used for same-sex couples. The symbol for
Mercury was used for intersex people, but a symbol that combines the male
and female symbols is now in use.
Does any of this help us when it comes to writing romance fiction?
Maybe. I think it’s helpful to know what these images symbolise because
many of these things appear in stories. The engagement ring as a symbol of
commitment is an obvious one. Taking lovers on a date to a romantic
location is another. And the notion of a couple doing things together without
any thought of anyone else is something that typically appears after the
midpoint of the novel when the couple are in the ‘in love’ phase of their
relationship. You can include other things – hearts, forbidden fruits, or
whatever – knowing that readers will understand their significance.
As I write these words, I’m not sure which of the above images will end
up on the cover of this book, but it’s bound to be one of them. Probably not
the condom though.
5 | Theme
Some sources define theme as a story’s ‘central idea’ and say that the theme
of Shakespeare’s Othello, for example, is ‘jealousy.’ I much prefer the idea
that theme is stated in the form of an argument or thesis that a story seeks to
prove, usually in the form of ‘virtuous behaviour leads to positive
consequences’ or ‘immoral or wicked behaviour leads to negative
consequences.’ The theme of Othello then becomes ‘jealousy leads to the
destruction of love and the person loved,’ or something along those lines.
In some places, you’ll see the theme of a story being confused with its
subject matter. ‘Secret baby’ is not a theme in the romance genre, it is a
convention, a trope, or even a sub-genre.
Typically, the theme of romantic fiction is quoted as being ‘love conquers
all.’ The phrase is thought to originate in the Eclogues by the Roman poet
Virgil, where he says (in Latin originally), “Love conquers all things, so we
too shall yield to love.” It is generally thought to mean that there is no
obstacle that cannot be overcome by love. Virgil probably wasn’t thinking
of romantic love specifically, but the phrase is now generally associated
with it.
If you look at the plots of romantic novels, with their guaranteed happy
ending, it does seem that they are saying that when two people love each
other, they can overcome all obstacles in order to be together. ‘Love
conquers’ all is a theme that pretty much applies to everything published in
this genre. But many stories have at least one additional theme.
It would be wrong to suggest that all romances are written in the same style
or that they all have the same overall tone. As I’ve already suggested,
different sub-genres have different styles – and I keep referring to romantic
suspense and romantic comedy as examples. You can also write humorous
romantic suspense, but let’s not complicate things unnecessarily.
Broadly speaking, there are three different styles you can use in writing
romance fiction. The first is a plain, almost journalistic style that doesn’t
draw attention to itself with any sort of ornamentation. It is not quite the
simplicity that Ernest Hemingway proposed but is straightforward and
clean. The second is similar but it adopts a humorous tone. It is light and
friendly and includes funny observations and bits of slapstick comedy.
Finally, there is the more baroque or gothic style of the traditional romance.
There is more ornamentation here. This third style of writing romance isn’t
quite purple prose, but it is dark red with black lace edging. It is hard to
describe, being much richer or more voluptuous. You know it when you see
it. Although primarily associated with the old school romance, you still see
it in modern stories influenced by gothic romance.
Many writers use one of these three styles, adding their own personalities
and idiosyncrasies to them. By definition, the first is the simplest and the
safest to adopt. It’s the one that style guides and grammar software
encourage you to use. If you use it, your personality is likely to shine
through without you being aware of it. Don’t try and plump up your
vocabulary by using a thesaurus, use everyday words. Keep your sentence
structures simple.
I don’t know if you can teach someone to write humorously. I think your
head needs to be wired a certain way. Or we pick it up from spending a
lifetime among humorous friends and relatives and reading humour and
watching comedy on television and in movies. There are techniques you can
learn to create different kinds of humour, but I suspect thinking humorously
is innate. If you are the kind of person who regularly makes humorous
observations in daily life or posts – rather than reposts – humorous titbits on
social media, then you may want to give this style a try in your romance
writing. I’m sure you have an idea already of whether or not you’re a
humorous writer. If you can do it well, there’s a good chance you’ll be able
to build a readership. But be aware that if your humour falls flat, it ruins
your novel – it’s either funny or it’s a failure. This is why the plain and
simple style is safer.
The more baroque or gothic style of writing is another one that you have
to be very familiar with if you want to use it. You need to have read
hundreds, if not thousands, of novels written in this style. If you don’t catch
the feel of it just right, your prose will just come across as bad writing. I
don’t think it’s something you should try and fake – there’s a danger it
would tip over into parody. But some writers like writing it and some
readers enjoy reading it. My comments here are intended to be
observations, not criticisms.
Linda Barlow and Jayne Ann Krentz, in an essay titled ‘Beneath the
Surface: The Hidden Codes of Romance,’ write that, “Outsiders tend to be
unable to interpret the conventional language of the genre or to recognize in
that language the symbols, images, and allusions that are the fundamental
stuff of romance.” Romance writers employ “...rich, evocative diction that
is heavy-laden with familiar symbols, images, metaphors, paradoxes, and
allusions to the great mythical traditions...” but because these are so
familiar, romance writers are often criticised for being unoriginal and for
the “...excessive lushness or lack of subtlety...” of their language.
Barlow and Krentz also note that “...stock phrases and literary figures are
regularly used to evoke emotion...” and that readers of romantic fiction,
based on past reading experiences, “...have a keyed-in response to certain
words and phrases (the sardonic lift of the eyebrows, the thundering of the
heart, the penetrating glance, the low murmur or sigh).” Readers associate
particular emotions with these phrases and know how to respond to them.
And while their emotional response can be ‘quite intense,’ the coded
language used also results in a certain distance – required by the ‘decoding’
– reminding them that what they are reading is an illusion. The suspension
of disbelief is not unlike that we experience when we see a play in the
theatre, which has its own conventions for creating an illusion.
An example that Barlow and Krentz give is the description of characters
where writers choose from a “lexicon of common descriptive codes” those
phrases which best type describe the archetypal character they are
constructing. Heroes are often compared to “...demons, the devil, the dark
gods, and vampires [and] tend to be dark-haired, with eyes that are
luminous, piercing, penetrating, fierce, fiery, and so forth.”
As I said above, this type of romantic language is more typically found in
the old-school romance. If you want to further explore the kinds of words
and phrases that Barlow and Krentz refer to, Jean Kent and Candace
Shelton’s The Romance Writers’ Phrasebook (1984) contains many
examples.
Sometimes we have emotional responses that are at odds with the situation
we find ourselves in. During moments of stress or in highly emotional
situations, such as a funeral, we may feel an irrational desire to laugh. This
is almost certainly an attempt to release stress. But what about crying when
we are in joyous situations?
In a paper titled ‘Dimorphous Expressions of Positive Emotion,’ Oriana
R. Aragón et al. suggest that these confusing expressions of emotion may
also act as a sort of safety valve to help us regulate our emotions,
particularly since we have less experience in trying to suppress positive
emotions.
Oren Hasson, in a paper titled ‘Emotional Tears as Biological Signals,’
has suggested that tears are a form of communication and that they signal to
others that we are experiencing intense emotion and may need support. Or
we may wish to share what we are feeling in a way that helps us to
understand it better and deal with it. While laughter allows us to express
happiness and joy, it does not express to others that we are experiencing
intense feelings of happiness and may need support or may wish to share
what we are feeling. It’s possible that ‘tears of joy’ fulfil this role.
A standard explanation for why we enjoy stories of any kind is that they
offer a form of catharsis, a purging of emotions. The Ancient Greek
philosopher Aristotle first suggested this in Poetics. There’s some debate
about whether people have emotions and stories help to release them, or
whether stories create heightened levels of emotion and then release them. I
suspect there’s an element of both.
When we choose what type of story we want to read or what movie to
watch, our choice is based on how we’re feeling at that moment. If we’re in
a happy mood, we probably want something that increases those feelings
and if we’re feeling down, we choose something to help is deal with those
feelings and hopefully overcome them. And it appears that some kinds of
stories, including romances, help us in both of those situations. They show
us that being unhappy during some periods of our lives is a normal thing –
this validates our feelings. But the optimistic happy ending of the story
gives us hope that things will get better. Horror movies and stories are a
special case and we’ll dip into the pleasure of being scared in the chapter on
paranormal romance.
Is there any scientific evidence to support the fact that crying is good for
us? A review of scientific studies by Asmir Gračanin et al. (‘Is Crying a
Self-Soothing Behavior?’) mentions a number of ways in which crying may
make us feel better. One suggestion is that the release of endorphins and
oxytocin when we cry may soothe us. These hormones help relieve pain and
improve mood, making you feel better. When you cry with happiness, the
release of these hormones may magnify positive feelings and increase the
enjoyment of the experience.
The same review says that no physical evidence has been found to
support the idea that crying has some sort of ‘cleansing’ experience, at least
not in a biological sense.
Carlos A. González Velázquez put forward another possibility (‘Why We
Enjoy Sad Stories and Identify with Immoral Characters: The Role of
Compassion’), suggesting that “...enjoyment of sad stories ... can be
explained by compassion (i.e., sympathy or empathic concern). By serving
as a guide to our affective dispositions, compassion incentivizes narrative
engagement as a way to acquire information regarding the welfare of a
character in need or distress.” We have learned – or it is inherent in us – that
behaving compassionately is a good thing. Fictional stories that cause us to
feel compassion make us feel good about ourselves.
Much of the ‘emotional rollercoaster’ ride that we experience in romance
novels is created from the proper positioning and emphasis of particular
elements in the plot. These include the use of romantic or sexual tension,
the break-up and the dark moment that follows it, and the reconciliation that
heralds the happy ever after (or happy for now). We’ll explore each of these
in more detail later in the book.
7 | Character & Personality Type
Before we look in detail at how to create the heroine and hero in a romance, I
want to introduce some concepts related to character creation in general. These
will help us later when we come to consider things like character growth in a
character’s development arc.
It is often said that, among many other things, a writer needs an
understanding of human psychology. I spent several years researching this
topic, trying to put together ideas from various schools of thought – Freudian,
Jungian, modern medicine, and popular psychology – with theories about
different types of human personality and behaviour. I was trying to find a
model of character similar to the model of plot that I use in this series of books.
I ended up using a model with six personality archetypes and I wrote about it in
considerable detail in Character Creation (2018). That book is pretty heavy
going, so in this chapter (and the one on character development arcs) I’m going
to summarise some of the key ideas that I think are relevant to romance novels.
And I’ll also try and dispel one of the old myths about heroines and heroes
coming from different planets. You know the one I mean.
If we are faced with a challenging situation, there are really only three actions
or behaviours we can choose: fight, submit, or run away. The psychoanalyst
Karen Horney has described these behaviours as ‘moving against’ or
aggressive; ‘moving toward’ or compliant, and ‘moving away from’ or
withdrawn. Every individual has these three behaviours to draw on, and in any
particular situation, one of them will be the appropriate response.
But a person’s life experience can lead them to adopt one type of behaviour
over the others, even when that behaviour might not be the best one in a given
situation. We’ll look at how this preference comes about when we look at the
concept of ‘emotional wounding’ below.
Related to these behaviours are three things that can motivate a person to
take action. In literature, we sometimes refer to these motivations as a ‘ruling
passion’:
One of these ‘passions’ – power, love, fear – comes to rule a character’s life
and, along with the nature and circumstances of their wounding, is responsible
for that person’s attitude to life.
Based on the above, we can suggest three types of personality and assign them
names.
The aggressive person denies love and idealises power, they are the
Warrior.
The compliant person denies power and idealises love, they are the Carer.
The withdrawn person denies love and power and idealises thought, they
are the Thinker.
You will also see these three types associated symbolically with three
fundamental body parts:
The model of character I use takes the Warrior, Carer, and Thinker as the three
primary character personality types. Think of them as the red (hot-tempered
Warrior), yellow (sunny, friendly Carer), and blue (cool-headed Thinker) of
your character palette.
Nobody’s parents are perfect, and no-one has a perfect childhood. Some are
less perfect than others. In her book Children of Trauma (1989), Jane
Middleton-Moz writes that all children experience some form of traumatic
even or wounding of the psyche before reaching adulthood and that parents
cannot protect them from this. Unresolved trauma can cause lasting damage
and parents can protect their child from this by providing four things to help
them overcome it: validation of the event, support of an adult, validation of
emotions, and time to heal. If these are not provided, a traumatic even in
childhood can affect someone for the rest of their lives.
Carol S. Pearson in Awakening the Heroes Within (1991), says that while a
traumatic or ‘orphaning’ experience is ‘dysfunctional in excess,’ it is also ‘a
crucial part of growth and development.’
As writers, this is a concept we can use in creating characters. ‘Wounded’
people embark on journeys – literal or metaphorical – in order to heal their
wounds. In a ‘she changes him’ story, the heroine helps the hero heal his
wound. In a ‘he changes her’ story, he helps her heal.
Pearson notes that in our culture, being wounded is considered to be ‘not
okay.’ To be wounded is to be considered weak or defective. One of the
pleasures to be derived from reading a romance novel is seeing a character
acknowledging that they are wounded and receiving validation and support
from another person.
You can pair any two different archetypes or two of the same archetype, it
depends on how much conflict – and what type of conflict – you want to create
in your story. Generally speaking, romance novels have a hero who is a Warrior
or one of the Warrior hybrids and the heroine is either a Carer or a Carer hybrid
– but see the note below on Thinker heroines and heroes.
One thing to remember is that there is no villain or opposition character in a
romance. The hero and hero act as both co-protagonist and antagonist for each
other. It is the hero that represents a challenge to the heroine and/or the heroine
that challenges the hero. This is different to all other kinds of genre fiction.
There is a rival in a love triangle story, but they don’t function in quite the
same way as a villain, as we’ll see later.
You want there to be some conflict between your heroine and hero, and the
best way to create that is to have some differences in their personalities. For
this reason, I would avoid putting two characters with the same personality
archetype together. Though two Warriors in something like a superhero
romance would certainly clash!
Alpha male heroes are almost certainly going to have Warrior personalities or
perhaps be Crusaders (Warrior + Thinker). The biggest challenge to this type of
hero is going to be provided by a pure Carer heroine. And she is going to have
to develop her own inner Warrior to stand up to him. This, coupled with the
fact that men are traditionally ‘supposed’ to be from Mars and women are
‘supposed’ to be from Venus, means that many romances feature a Warrior-
Carer romance.
Beta male heroes are more likely to be either Thinkers or one of the hybrids
that include the Carer – the Artist (Carer + Thinker) or the Adventurer (Carer +
Warrior). The Michael Douglas character in Romancing the Stone is an
Adventurer. Adventurer heroes have often buried the Carer aspects of their
personalities because of a painful previous relationship. Cynics are often
wounded Adventurers or Artists.
The Shadow
The concept of the shadow is borrowed from psychology and is used here to
refer to the dark side of a character’s personality. It is the thing within
themselves of which they are afraid. Because the shadow is perceived as
negative, people do not want to admit that it exists in them. They repress it.
And sometimes they project it outward onto other people. Often, the
characteristics we most dislike in other people and ones that we are afraid to
admit exist within us.
In most genre fiction there is usually an antagonist or villain. This
character serves as the hero’s opponent, and he also represents the hero’s
shadow self. The villain typically has the same personality archetype as the
hero but exists at the extreme negative end of that personality. The hero is
able to defeat the villain when he recognises the similarity between himself
and the villain. He gains insight into the villain’s behaviour by comparing it
to his own and as a result, can see a way to defeat him. The hero undergoes
character growth as he accepts that this negative aspect or shadow exists
within him. He cannot get rid of it, and it is unhealthy to deny it or repress
it, so all he can do is integrate it and learn to live with it. Other aspects of
his personality will help him maintain a healthy balance within.
The main plot of a romance novel does not feature a villain – though
there may be a villainous character in a subplot, especially in romantic
suspense stories. In the romance novel, where the development of a
romantic relationship is the main plot, the heroine and hero are co-
protagonists and also serve as an antagonist for each other. Each represents
a challenge to the other.
In a romance novel, the hero doesn’t represent the heroine’s shadow self.
Though the heroine may fear that he will cause her to exhibit behaviours
arising from the darker side of her personality archetype.
Romance stories are less interested in exploring how a hero or heroine
integrates their shadow and more focused on how they integrate other parts
of their personality that they deny.
The Denied Self
These three personality types are ‘hybrids’ combining traits of two of the
three primary archetypes. Their denied self is based on qualities of the
archetype that is ‘missing’ from their make-up.
The Adventurer (Carer + Warrior) – Denies qualities relating to the
Thinker, so avoids logical thought and introspection. They feel that they
should be a fun-lover without a care in the world.
The Crusader (Warrior + Thinker) – Denies qualities related to the Carer,
so has no time for emotional involvement and feelings. They think they
should be an objective judge and a paragon of virtue.
The Artist (Carer + Thinker) – Denies qualities related to the Warrior, so
denies feelings related to power and self-assertiveness. Having a Thinker
element, the Artist also tends to withdraw and work in isolation. They reject
the physical competitiveness of the Warrior, thinking that their identity and
success should come from within themselves – that they should be a unique
creative genius.
In effect, each archetype denies that they have within them the positive
quality or qualities that belong to their opposite. Remember that everyone,
real or fictional, has all of the aspects of personality to draw on and can
make use of all three types of behaviour – to move against (aggression), to
move towards (compliance), and to move away from (withdrawal). The
Warrior denies that compliance or withdrawal are possible choices,
believing them to be signs of weakness, and so always responds with some
form of aggressive behaviour, even when that is not appropriate. The other
archetypes make similar choices when it comes to responding to
challenging situations.
In very broad terms, in a ‘she changes him’ story, the heroine sees a glimpse
of the hero’s denied self and is attracted to him partly as a result of this
hidden part. During the course of the story, she encourages him to accept
this side of his nature and integrate it into his personality. In a majority of
romance novels, the hero is a Warrior or one of the Warrior hybrids and
needs to integrate the sensitive and caring elements into his personality.
In a ‘he changes her’ story, the hero sees something of the heroine’s
denied self and is attracted to her partly as a result of this. Typically, the
heroine is a Carer or one of the hybrids without a Warrior element and she
needs to discover her own inner power and self-confidence. The hero helps
her do this as the story progresses.
And in a ‘they change each other’ story, both of the above occur.
Although many romance novels – especially old-school ones – tend to
adopt the male-Warrior and female-Carer binary relationship, as we’ve seen
in this chapter and the previous one, there are variations and alternatives to
this.
In my book Character Creation (2018), I presented a model for a
character development arc that could be used in any genre of fiction. It
focused on the interaction between a protagonist (hero or heroine) and an
antagonist (villain), which is less relevant in romance novels, so I will
include a variation here that concentrates on the relationship between
heroine and hero, and on overcoming secret shame and integrating the
denied self.
I have structured the arc below in terms of the eight sequences that make
up a romance novel plot. We will explore this eight-sequence romance plot
in detail in later chapters. Here I wanted to show how the plot and the
character development arc parallel each other and can intersect at key
points.
As a brief overview in terms of the four quarters of a story, a character
development arc looks something like this:
(2) Character denies flaw – but flawed behaviour causes problems in their
life and possibly the lives of others.
(3) Character attempts to overcome their flaw, but it is difficult; they fall
back into old behaviours, with catastrophic results
I have written a brief guide, Plotting the Flawed Hero Story (2017) which
you can download for free in PDF format from
www.paultomlinson.org/how-to
Now let’s look at the character development arc as it applies to the
modern romance novel.
Sequence 1
Sequence 2
Sequence 3
Sequence 4
ACT II – Part 2: Being in Love & Descent Towards the Dark Moment
Sequence 5
Sequence 6
Act III: Alone Again, Resolution & Happy Ever After (or Happy for
Now)
Sequence 7
The character is alone, feeling crushed and defeated. They feel angry
at the love interest but also miss them deeply
Perhaps the character discovers further evidence of the love interest’s
betrayal or dishonesty, seeming to strengthen the idea that there cannot
be a reconciliation. Or the love interest may find further proof of the
character’s betrayal/dishonesty
The ‘love interest’ (or the character) may try and make peace and save
the relationship, but this attempt is dismissed by the other
The character wants to retreat and hide, building up their defensive
walls and engage in defensive behaviours. But they are no longer the
same person and these things do not feel right. They have had a taste
of what it feels like to be their true self, and they don’t want to lose
that
The character faces a choice – do they give up and try to go back to
what they were before or should they find the strength to go on? They
decide that they won’t allow the love interest’s ‘betrayal’ to take away
the positive steps they have made. The will try and go on alone. But
they feel depressed and sad doing this
Turning Point 7 – The character has gained a victory in that they have
faced their worst fear and survived. It was a painful lesson, but the
love interest’s ‘betrayal’ has taught them an important lesson – they are
stronger than they thought, and they are happier being their true self.
It’s a bittersweet realisation, but perhaps the best they can hope for
Sequence 8
The character finally abandons their false self completely – they have
faced and survived their deepest fear and accepted and integrated their
denied self. They are finally able to show their authentic self to the
world and feel confident in doing it
Either the character or the love interest (or both) will have a sort of
‘epiphany,’ realising that they can forgive (or are ready to apologise
and be forgiven) and that they do not want to be alone. The
relationship is more important to them than any other personal or
external considerations
The character demonstrates their true self by forgiving or gaining
forgiveness. They demonstrate the qualities of their true self and their
commitment to the relationship by making some sort of symbolic
sacrifice – often giving up one last symbol of their old, false self or by
demonstrating that they have overcome their greatest fear
The character and the love interest are reconciled
They may demonstrate their commitment to each other with a
symbolic gesture, typically a marriage proposal or some other external
act that signifies permanent togetherness in the context of the story
situation
A new everyday world and equilibrium are established for the
character and their partner – this is sometimes shown in a months later
or year later epilogue.
The above model of a character development arc makes dry reading in this
abstract form, but I wanted to keep it generic so it could be used either for
the heroine, the hero, or both. Or for any protagonist or co-protagonist in a
non-heterosexual relationship.
I dislike the term ‘love interest’ intensely but use it here simply for
brevity – it avoids repetition of ‘protagonist or co-protagonist.’
In the sequence above, hopefully you can see the coming together of the
development of a character relationship and the changes a character
undergoes as a result of this experience. In the later chapters, we will look
at how this can be developed fully into the plot for a novel and at how it can
be combined with an external subplot – ‘external’ as in events that take
place outside the relationship but have an impact on it.
You should be able to see this pattern of character development in stories
that you read.
Now – finally! – let’s get on to creating our heroine and our hero...
9 | The Heroine
The heroine is your main viewpoint character in a romance novel. In an old-
school romance, the story was told exclusively from the heroine’s point of
view. In the modern romance, we often experience the story from both the
heroine’s and hero’s viewpoints, but even here, more than fifty per cent of
the story is from the heroine’s point of view. In some stories, we’re in the
hero’s head only twenty per cent of the time, or perhaps even less.
The fact that most of the story is told from the heroine’s point of view
means that the bulk of the text is concerned with what she sees and feels.
And a large part of what she is seeing and feeling concerns the hero. This
means, for example, that when it comes to character description, the ratio is
something like two-thirds for the hero and one-third for the heroine. These
numbers aren’t hard and fast rules, but they should give you a feeling for
the relative volume of words that will be dedicated to each. As we’ll see
below, there are other reasons why the heroine is less distinctly portrayed
than the hero.
While the heroine is the main viewpoint character, some have argued that
the hero is the most significant character in the story. This may cause some
writers and readers to mutter and shake their heads, saying, ‘It’s not always
about the man.’ And this is true. But in a romance novel, the hero isn’t just a
man – he represents the ‘masculine’ aspects that exist inside every woman.
Aspects of her true self that she must successfully recognise and integrate
into her personality to achieve wholeness and enjoy a fulfilled life. Carl
Jung referred to a woman’s ‘inner masculine’ as the animus, which we’ll
explore later.
Except in the love triangle story, there is typically no villain in a romance
novel. At least not in the main romantic plotline. In the development of the
romantic relationship, the hero and the heroine serve as antagonists to each
other. As well as being a ‘love interest,’ each is also an opponent. Part of the
fun of reading a romance is seeing how the two main characters challenge
each other, especially in dialogue.
Let’s move on to look at some of the things you need to consider when
creating a heroine for a romance novel.
The ‘Generic’ Modern Heroine
Sarah Wendell and Candy Tan, in Beyond Heaving Bosoms: The Smart
Bitches’ Guide to Romance Novels, acknowledge that creating a romance
heroine is tricky because she must meet a number of criteria, some of which
are contradictory. She must be:
Attractive, but not too beautiful. And she should be modest and
unaware of her beauty – readers don’t want to see a vain character who
tries to use her looks to get what she wants, because they cannot
identify with that. She cannot be too tall or too short, too fat or too thin
– she must be a sort of average that allows the widest range of readers
to identify with her. A little overweight is fine, most of us can identify
with that, and she is almost always shorter than the hero. Her physical
appearance will probably be the first thing that attracts the attention of
the hero. We’ll cover this in more detail under Describing Your
Heroine below.
Intelligent, but not an intellectual who makes the reader feel inferior.
Although we see examples of the ‘Thinker’ heroine in characters like a
librarian, common sense is valued by readers over book learning. A
heroine’s intelligence is often depicted in her expressing carefully
considered opinions of her own and demonstrating her own values and
beliefs.
Independent, but not a loner. Readers want to see a character who can
take care of herself but not someone who is an outsider who shuns
contact with other people. The heroine must value relationships with
others, and she will often have a least one best friend or confidante and
perhaps a circle of friends, colleagues, and/or family members who
feature in some scenes of the story. This is not to say that a heroine
cannot feel isolated – in traditional historical romances she almost
always is – but she does not choose to be alone. The heroine’s ability
to look out for herself is often portrayed as feistiness, especially in old-
school romances where the hero may even have to ‘tame’ her wildness
to some degree.
Passionate/Sexual, but not promiscuous. Even in a sweet romance with
no sex scenes, the reader should be aware that the heroine is sexually
attracted to the hero – she’s not looking for a purely platonic
relationship. Virginal heroines are less common than they were in most
romantic sub-genres, but it is not unusual for her to be sexually
inexperienced or to have been in a relationship where she was unable
to fully experience her sexuality. The dual standard of the hero having
had several sexual partners but the heroine being relatively chaste still
exists to some extent. In part, this is because the romance novel sees
committed, monogamous relationships as being a prize worth fighting
for.
Flawed, but not to the point of being unattractive or overly annoying.
Readers find it difficult to identify with a character who is too perfect
because they know they have faults themselves. Part of the appeal of a
romance story is seeing the heroine overcoming her own flaws –
usually expressed in the form of behaviours she has put in place to
protect herself from emotional or physical harm – and gaining the
confidence to trust the hero. See the discussion in the chapter on
character development arcs.
Motivated. The heroine is not sitting around waiting for a man to
sweep her off her feet. There should be things she wants to achieve,
and she will take action to try and achieve them. Remember that she is
living her life before the story opens and before she meets the hero.
Meeting the hero may get in the way of her ambitions and lead to
conflict. Approaching it from the opposite direction, every decision the
heroine makes and every action she takes should be motivated. She
should not just do things because the plot requires her to, she should
have her own reasons. Actions or behaviours are often the results of
character flaws – we do things to protect ourselves from whatever it is
that we are afraid of. The reader should always have some clue as to
why the heroine does what she does.
Vulnerable, but not neurotic or hysterical.
Consistent. Once you have established your heroine’s character,
everything she does – each decision or action – must be believable. If
she does something that is ‘out of character,’ you make your story less
believable – you don’t want your reader saying, ‘Lizzie would never
do that!’ Her responses to events in the story must be realistic in terms
of the character and situation you have created.
Emotional, but not over-emotional. Just as her decisions and actions
must be appropriate and ‘in character,’ so must her emotional
responses.
Characteristics to Avoid
There are some characteristics that readers do not want to see in heroines:
Having given some thought to the features common to all heroines, you
should then consider how to make her a unique individual.
In Kate Walker’s 12-Point Guide to Writing Romance, the author says that
interest in a romance is created when “...two strong, determined
personalities clash over something that is important to them.” This means
that your heroine has to be a match for your hero and strong enough to
stand up to him, particularly if he is the alpha male type. Your heroine may
need to experience growth to attain her power, but the potential needs to be
there.
Unlike the old-school heroine, the modern heroine doesn’t need a man.
She is capable of surviving on her own. She may even have decided that, at
this point in her life, she doesn’t want a relationship because she has other
priorities. If the hero tries to woo her, she has to be strong enough to tell
him, ‘No.’
At the same time, the heroine must have the right sort of character to
attract the attention of the hero you are creating. She must be the type of
woman he would be attracted too. Or, if she is not his usual ‘type,’ there
must be something about her that intrigues him.
There has to be a plausible reason why the heroine is currently single at this
moment in her life. If she is an intelligent, attractive, self-reliant woman
who wants to be in a relationship, you have to explain why she is alone.
You don’t want the reader to start wondering if there is something wrong
with her! Typically, the heroine has recently ended an unsatisfactory
relationship with someone else. That relationship is likely to have ended six
to twelve months ago – she’s beyond the stage where a relationship with the
hero could be classed as a rebound relationship. If she’s been single for a
year, you will probably have her say that she’s not interested in a
relationship currently because she wants to concentrate on other priorities in
her life.
The nature of her previous relationship and why it ended forms an aspect
of the heroine’s backstory. Her negative feelings about it will be related to
her deepest fear and her secret shame – two things she will need to face and
deal with in order to have a fulfilling relationship with the hero.
There are two theories regarding the relationship between the reader and the
heroine of a romance – the identification theory and the placeholder theory.
The identification theory suggests that the reader must identify with the
heroine so that she can imagine herself in the heroine’s place and
experience the story vicariously through her. The heroine must be someone
that the reader likes, feels empathy with, and may wish to be. The heroine is
the reader’s avatar in the world of the story – the reader is the heroine.
Critics outside the genre have used this theory as a stick to beat romance
fiction. Germain Greer (The Female Eunuch, 1970), for example, describes
the traditional romance heroine as an ‘utterly ineffectual’ woman who falls
in love with a man who is older, more experienced, and physically and
morally superior. Romance fiction, she implies, encourages women readers
to cherish the ‘chains of their bondage.’ Romance fiction tells women that
their ambition in life should be to find a husband, make a home, and raise
children.
Greer based her argument on readings of Regency romances by
Georgette Heyer and Barbara Cartland. Romance fiction has certainly
evolved since those novels of the late 1960s, but there are those who argue
that the relationships and the ‘happy ever after’ that are portrayed in modern
romance fiction still promote the patriarchal status quo. More recently,
theorists have put forward an alternative reading of the function of the
romance heroine.
Reader Identification
A key characteristic of the romance heroine is that she is feisty. She takes
action and she faces up to the problems she faces. This quality is
demonstrated in the way she stands up to the hero and challenges him. She
is not a victim, she demonstrates determination and she fights back. During
the course of the story, she faces a number of challenges and in defeating
them discovers and accepts that she has power of her own. Power, in
whatever way it is symbolised in the story, is not just something that
belongs to males. The heroine shows female readers what it is like to face
their own challenges and fears by integrating those qualities that are
typically judged to be masculine, including anger and sexual feelings.
Creating Identification
We’ll talk about introducing the heroine in a later section of the book where
I’ll treat it as one of the first things you have to do in the plot of a romance
novel. Here I’ll briefly introduce some things you can use to encourage
your reader to like and identify with your heroine. In some genres you can
create anti-heroines who the reader doesn’t have to like, we are intrigued by
them but we wouldn’t want to meet them socially. In romantic fiction, you
really have to create a likeable heroine. You can create a character who
seems selfish or in some other way monstrous, and who learns to be a better
person during the course of the story, but you will still want to use one or
more of the following techniques to get the reader to accept her as a
heroine. These ideas are summarised from my book Plot Basics (2017)
from the section titled ‘How to Make People Like You.’
Make the reader feel sorry for the heroine. Creating sympathy for the
heroine is a widely used technique and it’s simple and effective. Most
readers will side with an underdog or someone who is the victim of
undeserved misfortune or suffering. Her misfortune can be the result of a
specific incident – her car breaks down – or from her situation at the start of
the story – she has a boss who is mean to her. ‘The Heroine’s Everyday
Life’ is a part of the plot that we’ll explore in more detail later. Her life
circumstances help to characterise her – her job and her home reveal
something about who she is – and they also show us that something is
missing in her life. If you show your heroine suffering, even in a small way,
the reader will hopefully side with her and see her want to escape or turn
the tables on whoever is causing her suffering. The only thing to be careful
about here is not to make your heroine behave like a doormat that no one
can have sympathy for.
Make the reader worry about the heroine. Place the heroine in a situation
where there is some sort of threat, and again the reader will want to see her
escape. The threat might be physical injury or death (in a romantic suspense
story, for example), the risk of being captured or found out, or the danger of
some kind of exposure, embarrassment, or defeat.
Look at the opening chapters of a selection of novels in your chosen
subgenre and see what sort of situations the writers use to get readers on the
heroine’s side. We are likely to have sympathy for anyone who is having a
bad day – we’ve all been there.
I’ve already listed some of the key qualities of a heroine, but there are
some additional ones that can make a character more likeable. If you can
show some action that demonstrates the heroine has one or more of these
qualities, the reader is likely to view her as a nice person.
Self-confidence – This is something most of us wish we had more of, and
we find it attractive in a fictional character. This may be shown in the sort
of friendliness and communication skills that make someone confident in
dealing with people. Or it could be the sort of confidence that allows
someone to take action when a difficult situation arises. Another example is
the confidence to express one’s feelings or opinions publicly without
worrying about the social consequences of doing this. This is admired by
those of us who always worry about ‘making a scene.’
Competence – Show that the heroine is good at her job or at some other
activity.
Dependability – A likeable heroine always keeps her promises. But if she
isn’t able to do something she said she’d do, she has a good reason,
apologises, and makes up for it later. Promises kept or broken are a key
element in storytelling. Accusing someone of breaking their word is still a
significant action in fiction. And being prevented from keeping their
promise – via external obstacles or the deliberate or accidental actions of
others – can be a misfortune that the heroine suffers.
Enthusiasm and Positive Attitude – The heroine’s attitude reveals
something about her character. If she cheerfully engages in a job that she
hates and deals with awkward customers, we can’t help but admire her.
Again, assuming she isn’t behaving like a doormat. The way she responds
when something goes wrong can also lead us to think well of her. She
should take responsibility for her own mistakes and not blame others. And
if she responds to worsening circumstances with humour and fortitude, the
reader will cheer her on. Most readers would much rather see a heroine
respond with cheeky sarcasm than with passive-aggression.
Fair Play – While others may treat the heroine unfairly, she never does
anything immoral or underhand to succeed. If the heroine cheats or does
something cowardly, she loses reader sympathy. That’s not to say she can’t
use cunning to bring about a preferred outcome, but her actions should
always demonstrate her deeply held moral code. This means that for the
romance heroine, using her sexuality to get what she wants and employing
emotional blackmail are both out. Except for those rare occasions when she
slips and makes a mistake – and knows almost immediately that it was a
mistake.
Volunteering – Many people are forced to do things they don’t want to
do, and we may admire their fortitude in doing them. But we feel differently
about someone who volunteers to do an unpleasant, dangerous, or difficult
task. A key element in the use of volunteering is to make sure that it doesn’t
bring the heroine any form of fame or reward. She chooses to do it simply
because it needs to be done.
Self-sacrifice – A heroine is someone who willingly sacrifices her own
wishes or needs to help others. She is prepared to give up something of
value for the benefit of others. Again, she does this with no thought of fame
or reward. In romantic fiction, if the heroine and/or hero undergo character
growth, there will be an element of sacrifice involved. They have to give up
comfortable defensive behaviours to become their true selves and enjoy a
fulfilling relationship with another person.
Ambition and Motivation – I have already said that a heroine should have
a life and ambitions beyond the romantic relationship. The nature of the
heroine’s ambitions in life says something about her as a person. Those
ambitions – her overall goals in life – should be something that a reader will
see as admirable. Often it is not the stated goal but her reasons for wanting
to achieve it – her motivation – that gives acceptable value to the ambition.
Wanting to earn a stack of cash isn’t going to get the reader on side – we
associate the desire for cash with greed and shallowness. But if the heroine
is a single mother who needs to obtain money to pay for her daughter’s
college education or for her mother’s medical treatment, the reader is more
likely to support her.
Physical Appearance
Wendell and Tan identify three types of heroine. The swan whose beauty
attracts several suitors and who may be self-centred and vain. Perhaps the
hero is indifferent to her charms and ignores her, thinking her shallow and
empty-headed, even though she expresses an interest in him. He may help
her to overcome he flaws of selfishness and vanity. The swan is typically
only found in old-school romances.
The ugly duckling is a heroine who does not initially appear beautiful,
usually because of ‘something superficial and fixable.’ In some stories the
hero recognises her beauty before the change, in others, he is surprised by
her beauty after her make-over. There is an element of the Cinderella story
in the heroine’s transformation from ugly duckling to swan. In something
like a romantic suspense story, it may be circumstances that mean the
heroine is disguised or covered in mud or concealing her beauty in some
other way. Shakespeare played with this idea more than once, disguising a
female character as a man who causes all kinds of confusion, particularly in
the poor man who is attracted to him/her.
The plain Jane is a more recent variant. She is not beautiful in the
traditional sense, but there is something about her that the hero finds
attractive. These characters are often quirky and unconventional, with the
hero being the only person to recognise her inner beauty. There is no
physical makeover for this heroine, it is less like a fairy tale, and this makes
it more realistic and less superficial. Instead of being changed into
something beautiful, the hero recognises qualities that have been there all
along. This type of heroine is appreciated for who she truly is, rather than
being remade into something that a man will find attractive.
Both the ugly duckling and the plain Jane have proved popular with
modern romance readers.
When we see and use the word ‘strength,’ we tend to think of it in terms of
physical strength. But there are other kinds of strength.
Courage or fortitude – The strength to face physical, emotional, moral, or
social adversity. To act despite the presence of fear. You don’t need physical
strength in order to be brave. To be courageous is to choose to face physical
danger or pain, hardship, intimidation, or the risk of death. Or to face
psychological or emotional equivalents such as shame, loss of public face
or support, scandal, or personal loss. Fortitude refers to bravery over an
extended period and so includes an element of patience or perseverance (see
below).
Wiliness or Wit – The ability to out-think a physically superior opponent.
In Ancient Greek and Viking cultures, there was recognition of a kind of
intelligence that we today call cunning or wiliness. In some contexts, it is
regarded as negative in that it is associated with tricking or deceiving
people. But when faced with an opponent that you can’t possibly overcome
by force, you have to come up with a way to out-wit them. In Aesop’s
fables and similar folkloric tales, a smaller or weaker character often tricks
a larger or stronger one and gains the prize. As the ‘weaker sex,’ women
sometimes have to out-think their menfolk.
Persuasion – The power of argument. The art of rhetoric – the ability to
present and ‘win’ an argument or debate – was highly prized in Ancient
Greece and skills and rules relating to it are still taught today. In more
modern times, psychological methods have been developed to try and
influence the opinion and behaviour of others, notably in the fields of
commercial advertising and politics. At the positive end of the scale we see
a sound, factually supported argument that demonstrates one choice is
superior to another. At the other end, we see emotional blackmail. You see a
lot of the latter on social media.
Resolution – To be resolute is to decide or resolve to do something – or
believe something – in the face of opposition or danger.
Perseverance or Willpower – Having made a decision to act or formed a
particular opinion, a person sticks with it despite obstacles or active
opposition. To persevere is to continue with a difficult task or through a
trying situation. It is the mental strength of not giving up.
Determination – A positive emotion or mental attitude that serves to
motivate someone and encourage them to achieve a goal. It involves
elements of enthusiasm and anticipation of success. It means to focus on the
end result.
Endurance – Often referred to as stamina, endurance is a person’s ability
to exert themselves over a long period of time. When people say that
something is a marathon not a sprint, they are referring to an activity that
requires sustained physical or mental activity, requiring endurance. It also
refers to the ability to resist, endure, and/or recover from trauma, wounds,
or fatigue. Again, these don’t have to be physical, they can be emotional or
psychological. Both physical and mental endurance can be increased
through training and experience. It is often said that while men are
physically stronger, women have more stamina. Some studies have
suggested this may be true, but there have been no conclusive scientific or
medical studies. The experience of childbirth is often raised as an example
of female endurance.
Values and beliefs – When a character has their own moral code, they can
draw strength from the belief that a particular decision or action is the right
one.
Values – A strong female character will have her own moral code and will
make decisions and take actions based on this value system. Yes, she will
make mistakes and occasionally break her own rules, but she will be aware
of the mistake and seek to learn from it. She may occasionally fall under the
influence of someone who persuades her to act against her instincts, but she
will eventually return to her own true north. Each of the six character
archetypes mentioned previously has a basic set of values that you can use
as the basis for an individual character. What will make your character
unique will be the specific life circumstances that shaped her personality.
Positive values are also referred to as virtues.
Opinions and Beliefs – Heroines are often described as strong-willed.
They believe in something or have an opinion about something and they
stick to it. Through a process of character growth, they may come to revise
their opinions or discover that some of their beliefs are wrong, but there
will be a core based on their moral values that remains unchanged.
Individuality – You don’t have to be alone to be an individual. But you do
need to have a strong sense of your own identity. A character who hasn’t
completed their character development arc lacks a sense of their true self
because they are still clinging to the image of a false self – someone they
think they ‘should’ be. It is possible to be a strong individual if you are in a
relationship or a member of a group, but someone who doesn’t yet have a
strong sense of their true self risks falling into co-dependent or abusive
relationships.
Ambitions – Strong female characters have dreams and make plans to
achieve them. They set goals as steppingstones towards reaching their
ultimate objective. They want to do something with their lives. As your
story opens, your heroine will be someway along the journey towards
achieving her objective. There will have been wrong steps and detours
along the way, but she is on a journey towards personal fulfilment. She may
have had an unsuccessful relationship with someone who didn’t respect and
value her ambitions. The hero of a romance will prove himself to be ‘the
one’ by learning about her objective, respecting it, and seeking to help her
achieve it.
The stereotype was that a woman ‘should’ want a husband, home, and
family. This is a perfectly acceptable ambition for someone whose
personality matches the Carer archetype. Though in the modern world there
are many other opportunities for Carers to nurture others and the definition
of what a ‘family’ is has been broadened. Characters who fit the other
personality archetypes will still want to share their lives with a loving
partner – in the romance genre this is a given – but they may not want a
suburban home and children. Their ambitions in life will be symbolised by
different goals.
Flaws and Fears – Everyone has flaws and weaknesses. Strength is
demonstrated in how we deal with these things. It takes courage to trust
someone enough to let them see you are vulnerable. Trust and vulnerability
play a large part in a romance story, both for the heroine and the hero. As
we saw in the chapter on personality archetypes, each type of character has
a particular form of fear (symbolised by their shadow) and a particular form
of shame (symbolised by their denied self). These fears and shame give rise
to character flaws and weaknesses that are recognised and overcome during
the course of a story as the heroine and/or hero progresses along their
character development arc. A character is not strong if she has no fear, she
demonstrates strength when she has fear and chooses to face it.
Female Allies – Heroines can draw strength and support from people they
choose to surround themselves with. In male-dominated societies, where
males are also physically stronger, women have typically had to rely on
each other for advice and help. In Western society, females and males are
still segregated to some extent in childhood encouraging homosociality –
the forming of same-sex friendship groups. There is probably also a
biological component to this since girls and women tend to learn about their
bodies and the changes that their bodies undergo from their peers.
Being aware that you need help and being able to ask for it are both
strengths. Males are taught that they ‘should’ be self-reliant and that to ask
for help is to admit weakness or defeat. The old cliché is that a man would
rather drive around for hours than stop and ask for directions. Again, this
relates to vulnerability and part of the hero’s character growth is to
overcome his social conditioning in relation to asking for or accepting help.
In a modern romance, you will have two types of description of the heroine
– from the heroine’s point of view we will see how she describes herself
and from the hero’s point of view we will see how he describes her. How
you handle this will depend on whether you are writing the story from a
first-person or third-person viewpoint. Do we receive the description in the
character’s own words, tinged with her or his own personality?
I write about description and point of view in Chapter 14 and don’t want
to repeat myself here, but I will make a few additional observations.
What a person refers to in a description will be influenced by what they
are feeling at that particular moment. If your heroine is having a bad day,
she may describe her ‘bad hair’ in a way that reflects this. If the hero and
heroine are enjoying a romantic moment together, his description of her will
demonstrate his attraction to her – bother her physical appearance and her
character. If they have just had an argument, he’s likely to highlight aspects
of her personality or behaviour that infuriate him. But he might still allow
that in that dress she looks pretty sexy.
I mentioned earlier that there are some advantages to keeping your
heroine’s appearance relatively generic because this makes it easier for the
reader to substitute herself into the story. If you create a colourful, larger-
than-life heroine, the reader may feel intimidated by her and feel ‘she’s not
me.’ This shouldn’t stop you from creating idiosyncratic characters if that’s
what your story calls for, or if that type of character has invaded your skull
and won’t let you go until you’ve written her story. But you do need to be
aware of the downside.
When describing themselves, heroines tend to focus on negative
characteristics or to compare themselves unfavourably with others. This is
in line with her being modest and unaware of how attractive she is. When
the hero describes the heroine he tends to concentrate on her eyes, her lips,
and her hair. Then there are her shapely curves and her legs. And boobies.
Guys always notice boobies. Some are also really into that inverted heart-
shape of her butt. Lips are especially important in any description that leads
up to a first kiss. The earliest bits of description will tend to concentrate on
physical features and the first impression the heroine makes. Later, as the
hero gets to know her better, it will be more internal qualities of personality
that he refers to. Imagine his first impression of her being a long shot in a
movie. He notices her whole body almost as a silhouette and the way she
moves her limbs. As he gets closer to speak to her, we move to a more
waist-up kind of shot and he can hear her voice and note the colour of her
eyes and the shape of her lips. Finally, in close-up, during the most intimate
scenes, he is aware of the texture of her skin, the scent of her hair, and
perhaps the beat of her heart. These different levels of description
symbolise the growing closeness of their relationship. After they break up,
he has to back off and only see her from afar, but he can recall the other
more intimate details that he is now unable to see or feel or smell.
Another aspect of the heroine that should make her unique is her style of
speech and use of language. We’ll look at these in the chapter on dialogue,
where we’ll explore creating the snappy banter and flirting that romances
are famous for.
The names you use for your heroine and hero won’t just appear in your
story, they will also be used on the back cover of a paperback and on the
description that appears in a publisher’s catalogue or on a bookseller’s
website. If you give your heroine a unisex name like Chris or Cary or Noel,
a potential reader may be confused, and this confusion might lead them to
buy someone else’s book instead of yours. You don’t want that.
It’s also worth remembering that many romance readers read incredibly
quickly and you don’t want to cause them to have to slow down to figure
out who’s who. This applies to secondary characters too – you don’t want
your reader stopping to try and remember whether Stevie is your heroine’s
female friend, her gay male confidant, or the guy she met at the coffee
shop.
Obviously, I’m referring to heterosexual romance here. But even in a
homosexual romance, you might want to choose two obviously male or
obviously female names. In stories with transgender or non-binary
characters, gender-neutral names may be exactly what you do want.
No matter what type of hero you choose, there are some qualities that all
romance heroes must have. They must have these qualities – perhaps hidden
or nascent initially – to demonstrate that they are worthy of the heroine’s
(and the reader’s) love. Some of these qualities are common to all heroes in
genre fiction, but there are a few that carry extra significance in romance
novels.
Courage – the hero should demonstrate bravery in the face of physical
and emotional challenges.
Forgiveness – he should find it in himself to forgive people who have
caused him harm or shown disrespect; he should not allow himself to
become bitter and resentful.
Generosity – he should share whatever he has and be charitable towards
those who are less fortunate. He will be a volunteer, rather than waiting to
be called on.
Honesty – the hero should tell the truth, especially to the heroine. If he
doesn’t, he’d better have a good reason.
Humility – he should be modest about his qualities and achievements.
When he performs a good deed, he should not seek to draw attention or
profit from it.
Industry – he won’t be afraid of hard work and when faced with a task he
won’t give up. He should also believe that people should be properly
acknowledged and compensated for the work they do.
Justice – he should be fair in his dealings with others and treat people
equally, without prejudice. He should not speak against those who are
innocent and should speak up if people are accused or treated unjustly. He
seeks to right wrongs and is prepared to sacrifice his own comfort (and
perhaps even his life) to see justice done.
Love – the hero should care for others, show kindness, value
relationships, respect elders and children, and be a friend. Obviously, this is
an important one in this genre and I’ll include some more specific examples
below.
Playfulness – He should be able to find happiness and joy in the things he
does, taking pleasure in new things and in sharing them. Ideally, he will
also have a sense of humour and not take himself too seriously.
Respect for life and property – this includes the obvious rules of do not
kill, do not injure, do not steal. It includes having respect for other people
and for himself. He should avoid violence and protect those who are
weaker. He should also take care of his own body and health.
Responsibility – a hero will accept responsibility for his own actions and
their consequences. He will seek to be independent and take responsibility
for his own wellbeing. And he will perform whatever actions it is his duty
to perform.
Self-control – he will exercise moderation in all things, avoiding excess.
He will avoid overreacting in response to trifling issues or accidents, and he
will value his own dignity and that of others.
Trust – he will believe that there is good in the world and act accordingly,
avoiding doubt and cynicism. This is another key one in romance fiction
and it may be something that the hero has to work at. The hero will also be
trustworthy, being reliable and a man of his word.
Wisdom – He will value education, applying the knowledge he has gained
and helping to teach others. He will also know when it is appropriate for
him to be a leader and when to be a supportive follower.
Some of these virtues have a darker side which can manifest as a
character flaw or weakness. Industry and hard work, for example, can tip
over into ruthless ambition or workaholism. A hero may seek justice for
someone else to the extent of neglecting his own needs or wellbeing – this
is a particular weakness of the Crusader archetype.
If you’re going to give your hero a character flaw, one thing to consider
is how a positive quality of his personality archetype can be taken to such
an extreme that it becomes negative. This sort of flaw is much easier for the
reader and the heroine to accept and presents a behaviour that the hero has
to tone done or balance, rather than overcome completely.
There is a tendency in Western society for emotions like anger and lust to
be regarded as masculine and other emotions as feminine. Boys don’t cry,
we are taught. ‘Feminine’ emotions are a sign of weakness. Men are not
encouraged to talk about their feelings. These attitudes are changing slowly,
but this binary view of emotions still has a detrimental effect on individuals
and on communication in relationships.
On the surface, a romance hero – especially an alpha male – will be
reluctant to acknowledge his emotions. In the modern romance, we have the
advantage of access to his thoughts – to feelings that he is uncomfortable
expressing in words.
During the course of their relationship, the hero grows to trust the heroine
and to feel more comfortable showing his emotions – even if he doesn’t like
to talk about them. Often this begins with humour in dialogue and physical
closeness and touching.
A key moment in the old school and the modern romance is when the
hero finally expresses his feelings for the heroine.
As well as being able to express his emotions, the romance hero needs to be
able to admit his vulnerability. All the character archetypes, including the
Warrior, have an inherent weakness – caused by the fact that they are
denying and repressing some aspects of their personality.
Vulnerability in a character helps make them more relatable. It is much
easier for a reader to feel sympathy for someone and to like them if they can
see their vulnerable side.
Vulnerability can be the result of emotional trauma in the hero’s past,
linked to either an earlier romantic relationship or to family relationships.
Or he may have emotional scars from some incident that he suffered or
witnessed in the past. The hero’s fears can be reawakened when events in
the current story mirror or echo things that happened to him previously.
The hero’s vulnerability shows the heroine that there is more to him than
the macho posturing he uses as a defence. She gets a glimpse of the
sensitive soul within, and this is one of the factors that cause her to be
attracted to him. Initially, she only has a vague sense of it, but in time she
learns his backstory – either from him or from people around him. Her
sensitivity to this allows her to understand him and reach him in a way that
no one else has managed to do.
Emotional trauma in his past is what causes the hero to put in place
defensive behaviours. He builds a wall to protect himself. This need for
protection motivates some of his decisions and actions, making them
believable within the context of his story. The exact nature of the wound his
psyche suffered may not be revealed until after the midpoint in the story. In
Sequence 5 or 6 of a romance novel, the hero and heroine often share
stories about things that have occurred in their lives. Until this point, the
hero remains enigmatic. He has a secret in his past that the heroine (and the
reader) is curious about. What is he hiding? Why does he behave that way?
What is he trying to protect himself from?
The hero’s wish to hide his vulnerability coupled with his inability to
express his emotions can be a major obstacle in the development of his
relationship with the heroine. Kate Walker writes, “There can be little that is
more poignant than the struggle of a macho man to reach the woman he
loves when he just doesn’t know how to communicate his feelings for her.”
When faced with this, the hero may resort to more macho posturing in order
to hide his vulnerability, adding to the conflict in your story.
The alpha male or Warrior archetype believes that emotional attachment
– love – is a weakness that can be used against him. By his way of thinking,
a woman who affects him emotionally may use her power to betray him.
And even a genuinely innocent woman could be taken by a ruthless enemy
and held captive to force the hero to surrender. It is part of the heroine’s role
to help him see past these fears. As Elizabeth Lowell writes, it takes “... an
unusual heroine to get past this warrior’s defences long enough to show him
that love strengthens rather than weakens a man.”
During the course of the story, the hero comes to trust the heroine and
feels able to reveal to her – and her alone – his vulnerability.
Romance novels, Janice Radway suggests, fill a need female readers feel
for nurturance. In the readers she interviewed, gentleness and tenderness
were often cited as being necessary attributes for the ideal hero. They
described this hero using pairs of contrasting words: strong but gentle,
masculine but caring, protective but tender. The ideal hero will support the
heroine and believe in her, especially when her own confidence is failing.
The hero may have had previous sexual relationships, but as soon as he
begins a relationship with the heroine, he only has eyes for her. Monogamy
and fidelity are important themes in romantic fiction – with appropriate
allowances being made for stories that centre on polyamory.
A key turning point in the romance story is the moment when the hero
admits to himself that he needs the heroine. He has an ‘epiphany.’ He can’t
live without her because without her his life will have no meaning.
Different heroes in different stories may respond to this realisation in a
variety of ways. This is not just about sex – it’s about sharing everything.
Her happiness is important to him – more important to him than his own. To
prove himself, he has to reach a point where he would let her go rather than
make her miserable. This may be the darkest point in the story for him, a
moment when he really could lose her forever.
Another important turning point is when the hero finally tells the heroine
that he needs her. He makes a commitment to her – they will be equal
partners in a life together. At this point, he is at his most vulnerable, because
she could say no. And in some stories she does – until he is able to prove his
commitment to her.
Many of the qualities listed above are shared by heroes in other genres,
but sensitivity, vulnerability, and commitment are particularly important in
the romance hero.
The use of the alpha male hero in romance novels is often criticised on the
assumption that readers must want to be dominated by a prime example of
the patriarchal male. But some writers have looked deeper into the appeal of
the character of the hero and offered alternative explanations of his function
within the story. We’ll explore some of these below. But first, we should
start with the hero’s simplest function.
Laura Kinsale, in her essay ‘The Androgynous Reader: Point of View in the
Romance,’ notes the most obvious appeal of the hero in a romance novel:
Women like men. Romance readers experience “... a simple, erotic, and
free-hearted female joy in the very existence of desirable maleness.” We
shouldn’t lose sight of this obvious joy as we delve more deeply into the
place the hero holds in romance fiction.
Phyllis Taylor Pianka writes that the hero “... must exude masculinity.”
That doesn’t mean he has to have the face of a movie star and the body of
an athlete, but he must have something, some quality, that triggers the
heroine’s sexual interest. And hopefully that of the reader.
There has been a great deal of speculation about what creates that spark
of attraction between two people. But no one really knows. It’s magic. But I
think it must involve a combination of three things. Physical characteristics
– we’ll look at those under the ‘Describing Your Hero’ heading below.
Personality – which we’ll explore here in terms of the qualities of a
romance hero. And something within the other person which recognises a
need for a certain type of partner. Often this is described in terms of
‘opposites attract.’ I wrote about this in the chapter on personality
archetypes and will consider some additional ideas here.
The Hero is a Challenge for the Heroine
“Every good romance heroine must have a hero who is worthy of her,”
Robyn Donald writes in her essay ‘Mean, Moody, and Magnificent: The
Hero in Romance Literature.’ The hero must “...present a suitable challenge
to the heroine. His strength is a measure of her power. For it is she who
must conquer him.”
Doreen Owens Malek (‘Mad, Bad, and Dangerous to Know: The Hero as
Challenge’) says that “...the more obdurate the hero, the greater the triumph
when the heroine brings him to his knees.” At the end of the story, she
writes, the heroine has won. And the tougher the hero the better: “Winning
against a wimp is no triumph...”
Penelope Williamson (‘By Honor Bound: The Heroine as Hero’)
describes the romance hero as a ‘panther stalking his prey,’ “...little
suspecting that he will be the one caught in the end, that the savage beast
will be tamed.” He is “...literally brought to his knees to propose marriage
and declare his undying love.”
I’m entirely comfortable with the idea of a hero being a challenge to the
heroine and with Malek’s description of “...a strong, dominant, aggressive
male brought to the point of surrender by a woman.” I’m also okay with the
idea of ‘taming.’ But I’m less sure about the use of words like ‘conquest’
and ‘winning.’ These are Warrior words, even when used metaphorically. A
loving relationship isn’t a battle where one side is victorious, defeating the
other.
Malek’s suggestion that a romance novel dramatises a ‘battle of the
sexes’ in which women always win is probably part of the appeal of the
old-school romance. In her book Love with a Vengeance: Mass Produced
Fantasies for Women, Tania Modleski goes as far as to say that these
romances are revenge fantasies, so this may also be part of the reason why
women enjoy reading them.
I have a couple of problems with treating romances as a reaction to, or a
symptom of, a patriarchal society. Firstly, not all romances feature a female
heroine and a male hero. Secondly, biological sex and socially constructed
definitions of masculinity and femininity are not simple binary categories. I
don’t think it’s helpful to think of these stories in terms of a battle of the
sexes – because I’m not sure what ‘winning’ is supposed to look like. I’m
much more interested in the idea that all humans of whatever biological sex
have within them the capacity to experience all aspects of human emotion.
The boundary between what is masculine and what is feminine is artificial
and it is no longer in humankind’s best interests to maintain this boundary.
Forcing people into the binary categories of male and female and forcing
them to deny or be ashamed of certain aspects of their personalities is not
healthy.
In the modern romance, I think the challenge that the hero represents is
of a different nature from the one provided by the old-school hero. Old-
school romances allowed women to explore their feelings – both positive
and negative – about dominant males. They were concerned with males as
something external and ‘other.’ Modern romances also allow women to
explore their own inner ‘masculinity’ – what Jung called the animus – those
aspects of their personalities that society has traditionally labelled as
‘belonging’ to males. A key difference between old-school and modern
romances, as mentioned previously, is that modern ones allow the reader to
experience events from the point of view of both the female and male
characters. Women want to know what the hero is thinking and what
motivates his actions. They can then compare this with their own thoughts
and feelings. In the modern romance, the hero represents a challenge for the
heroine to accept and integrate those aspects of her personality that she has
been taught to believe are ‘masculine.’ By integrating them, she achieves a
degree of wholeness and authenticity – and discovers her own inner power.
Power, she learns, is not something that only men have. In a small way,
modern romance novels allow readers to make the same discovery.
I think stories featuring non-heterosexual romances contain the same
challenge to achieve wholeness. Everyone has one or two of the archetypes
– Carer, Thinker, Warrior – dominant in their own personality and must be
challenged to discover and integrate the ‘missing’ or weaker aspects. We
also have to deal with the darker side of these archetypes – our shadow
selves. None of this is to do with biological gender or sexual orientation, it
is a matter of being an authentic human being. Societal ‘norms’ and
conditioning are obstacles to wholeness that have to be negotiated as part of
an individual’s journey or character arc. A romance novel isn’t a battle, it’s
a journey of discovery.
Physical Appearance
Personality Archetype
In terms of the six character archetypes, the alpha male hero is either a pure
Warrior or one of the Warrior hybrids: a Crusader (Warrior + Thinker) or
Adventurer (Warrior + Carer).
The alpha male hero is arrogant and self-assured – until he meets the
heroine. She throws him off-balance. He likes to be in control but he cannot
control her or his feelings about her. The heroine opposes him, determined
to do what she believes is the right thing in her current situation. She
challenges him in a way that only men normally do and again this confuses
him.
The hero’s confusion causes him to respond to her on two levels. As a
challenge, he responds to her in the same way as he would a man who
challenges him – he is tough and ruthless. He treats her in a way that a
gentleman would never treat a woman. He probably even goes against his
own values and principles in doing this. The challenge she represents causes
him frustration and makes him angry – for reasons he doesn’t yet
understand. The heroine and the reader will initially see this simply as
cruelty on his part.
But the hero also responds to her as a woman, seeing her as someone
who is not behaving in the way that women are supposed to behave. Since
she is an opponent, he may compare her to women who have hurt him in
the past, assigning to her the characteristics of these previous ‘bad’ women.
He may think of the heroine as being a betrayer and see her behaviour as
treacherous.
His apparent brutality confuses the heroine because she too is
experiencing contrasting feelings – she is both repelled by and attracted to
this man. Even during the early stages of their encounters, she can sense
that he is trustworthy. She probably sees him showing compassion to other
(weaker) people or animals which contrasts with the way he initially treats
her. She can see that he has a gentler side. She is likely to dismiss her
attraction to him as being something purely sexual – and she wants more
than just a physical relationship. Her attitude towards him will change later
when she gets to know him better.
The heroine’s intuition will also allow her to recognise his confusion –
that he is both repelled by and attracted to her. She may reject this to begin
with, afraid that she is projecting her own feelings onto him.
The hero’s typical alpha male attributes make it difficult for the heroine
to get close to him and discover what he is really like when his defences are
down.
In romance stories, and virtually all other genre fiction, the alpha male hero
hasn’t quite achieved a state of wholeness or authenticity. There are events
in his past and/or present situation which frustrate his ambitions and as a
result, he sometimes behaves like an alpha-hole. He may regard a woman as
a prize, like the heroes in the fairy tales who win the hand of the princess, or
he may regard them as just another pretty possession or status symbol,
something to hang on his arm. During the course of the story, the hero’s
character arc takes him from alpha-hole to authentic male hero and he can
only make that journey with the heroine’s help. The heroine helps the alpha
male hero discover his authentic self.
The alpha male’s greatest flaw or weakness is his inability to let anyone
get close to him emotionally. He was brought up to believe that real men
don’t express their emotions – they’re not meant to feel anything. And the
‘ghost’ in his past is often a relationship that went bad – he was deeply hurt
by a woman who he allowed himself to have feelings for. Think of
Humphrey Bogart in Casablanca whose heart was broken when he was
‘betrayed’ by Ilsa (Ingrid Bergman) after their romance in Paris. The alpha
hero has promised himself that he will never allow a woman to hurt him
this way again. No more relationships for him. Ever.
Either that or he has always looked down on women as being weaker and
overly emotional. A wife is just another thing that a man has to gain, like
something you collect in a quest in a video game. He has never been
challenged by a woman or found one to be his equal – until he meets the
heroine.
The alpha male is someone who takes action – sometimes without
considering the consequences. And he’s often not bothered about whose
feelings he upsets. He typically has difficulty admitting he’s made a mistake
– and sees being wrong as a sign of weakness. This means that he’s not very
good at apologising or saying he’s sorry.
The nature of the patriarchy is such that, until relatively recently, men held
all the power and wealth. In order to survive, a woman needed a husband.
And the better the husband, the more secure her life would be and the better
chance her children would have of surviving and thriving. The opening of
Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice is a half-joking reference to this fact:
Mister Darcy is a prime example of the alpha male hero as he was defined
during the Regency period. He is intelligent, physically healthy, and in
possession of a good fortune. Attractiveness is an added bonus, but not
essential in these circumstances.
Times have changed and women are no longer entirely dependent on men
to provide food and shelter, but the appeal of a strong male who can take
care of a woman is still there – though it has to be tempered with a much
stronger sense of being in an equal partnership.
Variations on the Alpha Male
There are a number of variations on the alpha male hero. The hero of the
old-school romance was an alpha male and you still find him in modern and
historical fiction. Here are a few common examples...
The Billionaire Playboy – It used to be that being a millionaire was
enough but now heroes have to be billionaires – but their stories are still the
same. The playboy lifestyle is lived by a man who is so wealthy that he
doesn’t have to spend all of his hours working and so has plenty of time for
leisure. He likes socialising and especially enjoys the company of women.
The association with ‘womanizing’ is probably what led Hugh Hefner to
choose Playboy as the title for his magazine.
The term ‘playboy’ came to mean ‘a person with money out to enjoy
themselves’ in the late 1800s and so it shouldn’t be used in historical
romances set before that time (see below for some earlier historical terms).
In its earliest usage, it seems to have been associated with gambling and by
1907, when J. M. Synge’s play The Playboy of the Western World was
produced, it was also associated with womanizing. The playboy as we know
him didn’t really come into existence until the years between the two World
Wars, and really entered the public imagination after the Second World War
when international flight was available to those who could afford it, leading
to the coining of the term ‘jet set’. Back when international air travel was
only available to the wealthy, playboys could travel to places like the
French Riviera, drink and gamble in nightclubs, play polo, race cars, and
chase women.
A billionaire’s money means that he can buy anything – or anyone – he
wants. As a result, he has become jaded and nothing seems to hold any real
value for him. Until he meets the heroine, the one woman his money cannot
buy. Of course, he’s intrigued by her and wants to possess her. And she has
no intention of being possessed.
Café Society & The Bright Young Things – The playboys were preceded
by café society, a term coined in 1915 to describe the Bohemian young
aristocrats and socialites who met in fashionable cafés and restaurants in
London, Paris, and New York in the late nineteenth and early twentieth
centuries. In the 1920s these people came to be known as ‘bright young
things.’ Prohibition impacted café society in the United States but it
returned after its abolition in 1933. One feature of this society was the rise
of photojournalism, columns were written about the ‘beautiful people’ and
photographers captured images of their semi-public partying. These
photographers were an early form of what we now know as paparazzi,
though that term only came into existence in 1960, being taken from the
name of the character of a photographer in Federico Fellini’s film La Dolce
Vita.
Rakes & Libertines – The rake was a stock character in plays from the
Restoration era (1660-1668), and the term is still used sometimes in
historical romances. The term ‘rake’ comes from ‘rakehell’ which means
hellraiser. Other terms for men who live similar lives include roué, a man
who lives an immoral life, and a cad who behaves without honour,
especially towards women.
Stereotypes
The double standard says that if a man has had a number of sexual partners,
he is just ‘sowing his wild oats’ or he is praised for being a ‘stud.’ If a
woman has had several sexual partners, she is a slut or ‘damaged goods.’
These attitudes still exist in the twenty-first century.
In old-school romance novels, it was a given that the hero was older than
the heroine – sometimes twice her age – and that he would have had a
number of sexual encounters. The heroine was expected to be a virgin.
Janice Radway argues that the hero’s promiscuity was excused by the
heroine and the reader by the fact that he was never ‘in love’ with any of his
sexual partners. He is not viewed as denigrating women by using them for
sex, it is just accepted as a sign of his virility. Perhaps the reader takes
comfort from the fact that he knows what goes where and won’t be
fumbling around like an amateur on his wedding night.
The fact that the hero does fall in love with the heroine, without having
had sex with her, is taken as an indication of how special the heroine is and
how important their relationship becomes to him. When he only has eyes
for her, he stops behaving like a hound dog and the value of commitment
and sexual fidelity is affirmed.
To create a high degree of drama and emotion in a story, you need to have a
high degree of contrast. For many romance readers, it isn’t enough for the
hero to be masculine, he has to be hyper-masculine. Only when we see how
tough he is are we ready to see his gentler side. It also means that when we
see him ‘tamed’ by the heroine, he remains macho enough that he doesn’t
seem emasculated.
In her essay ‘Mean, Moody, and Magnificent: The Hero in Romance
Literature,’ Robyn Donald writes that alpha male heroes are difficult to live
with and may seem unlovable initially, being arrogant, ruthless, short-
tempered and even cruel. But his “...faults are likely to be manifestations of
strength and power.” He’s a man who is in control of his life, whether that’s
a modern-day boardroom, a cattle ranch, or managing an estate and various
‘business interests’ during the Regency period.
A physically strong and dominant male makes the heroine feel safe and
protected. She knows he won’t allow anything to happen to her. But he is
also a potential source of physical and emotional danger to her. While she
feels attracted to him, she also feels she must protect herself from him.
The alpha male hero creates contrast and conflict which make for a more
dramatic story than page after page of blissful togetherness. We enjoy
seeing the two main characters having to work to achieve their happy ever
after.
The alpha male hero has a couple of advantages for the romance reader
and writer: first, he presents a strong adversary against whom the heroine
must prove herself, demonstrating her own strengths. And second, he
represents the kind of man that the reader might aspire to be. If a woman, as
Jung suggested, has an inner male – the animus – then the alpha male is
probably the sort of male she imagines or wishes this animus to be.
Elizabeth Lowell writes about the appeal of the alpha male hero in her
essay ‘Love Conquers All: The Warrior Hero and the Affirmation of Love.’
She says that romance readers, like the readers of murder mysteries, know
how the story will end. The pleasure in the story comes from the journey
rather than the outcome. Part of the appeal of the journey in a romance
novel is the feeling that the two lovers might not achieve their happy ever
after. Making the failure of the couple’s love seem a believable possibility is
difficult. The alpha male hero’s behaviour is one way to create it. It is this
that puts their love to the test. It is he that provides an element of danger.
According to Lowell, this “...is why romance heroes often are not only
capable of violence, they are specifically trained for it. They are warriors,
the paradigm of the formidable male.”
The warrior (small ‘w’ here) is not a dangerous, amoral psychopath. He is
trained by society to be its protector. And he has learned skills that make
him good at it. His lethal skills lie just beneath the surface. But he is also an
honourable man. Lowell: “The heroine senses this, just as she senses that
the warrior’s profession often has the effect of excluding him from the same
society he protects. It is the beginning of her understanding that this
formidable man might be capable of love.”
In romances published in previous decades, the hero was almost always
an alpha male and writers created an obvious imbalance between hero and
heroine in terms of social position, wealth, lifestyle, and even age. With the
heroine being inferior to the hero in every way throughout most of the story,
her ‘victory’ is all the greater at the end when she forces him to bow to her
and admit that he can’t live without her. This model is still found in
historical and paranormal romances, but in contemporary stories, the alpha
hero and the heroine are much more closely matched in all things.
For many readers, the alpha male is the only type of hero they want to
see in their romances, but in the contemporary romance, we also see many
examples of the beta male hero.
You may also come across references to the omega male and there seems to
be some confusion about how an omega differs from a beta male, with
different people using it to mean different things. Many of the
characteristics of an omega male that you’ll find listed online match those
of the beta male I discuss below. The definition of an omega male is given
as being ‘the opposite of an alpha,’ which doesn’t tell us a lot.
Since omega is the last letter of the Greek alphabet, an omega is
technically at the bottom of the hierarchy. You may also see references to a
bunch of other Greek letters for types of male – deltas and sigmas and all
the rest between alpha and omega – but I don’t think any of these are
particularly helpful to us in creating romantic heroes. I’m going to stick
with alpha and beta.
Note that ‘omega’ has a particular meaning in omegaverse fanfiction and
some writers have written and published romance novels based on the
conventions of that universe, but I’m not going to tackle that in this book.
Sincere and friendly. He typically has one or more close female friends and
enjoys interacting with them. Although he is comfortable in social situations
where he knows people, he may be introverted and shy around strangers.
He is comfortable being on his own and is self-reliant. In addition, he is:
In her book Hard Bodies: Hollywood Masculinity in the Reagan Era, Susan
Jeffords wrote that the dominant form of masculinity in the 1980s was
symbolised by the muscular, ‘hard’ bodies of actors such as Arnold
Schwarzenegger and Sylvester Stallone, and this was reflected in the
attitude and image of Ronald Reagan’s presidency. In White Guys (1995),
Fred Pfeil suggested this era came to an end in 1991, which he termed ‘The
Year of Living Sensitively.’ In contrast with the ‘hard’ masculinity of the
1980s, the sensitive masculinity of the 1990s was regarded as ‘soft.’
The problem is that, in a patriarchy, being ‘soft’ is not considered to be a
good thing. A soft penis is no good to anyone. And a man’s personality is
expected to be hard too. In The Male Body: A New Look at Men in Public
and Private, Susan Bordo writes, “To be exposed as ‘soft’ at the core is one
of the worst things a man can suffer in this culture.” Boys and men do not
want to be seen as 'soft,' because they will constantly have to prove
themselves.
Fortunately, the ‘new man’ made some impact on the male psyche, so
that ‘softer’ traits and behaviours are no longer shunned in the way that they
used to be. And the beta male now lives more comfortably alongside the
alpha as a – more or less – acceptable model for males.
This gives us two possibilities for our romance beta male – the ‘pure’
beta male, often portrayed as a geek, and the tougher beta male who looks
like a typical hero on the outside but who is a beta on the inside.
Some guys are hard on the outside and soft on the inside. They look like an
alpha male, with typical tough guy hard muscles and wolfish grins, but in
terms of personality, they are beta. They are sensitive to their partner’s
feelings and needs, and they are comfortable when she takes the lead – in
life and in bed.
This kind of beta hero isn’t a wimp. In other circumstances, he can be a
leader and a warrior. But in his personal relationships, he’s not an alpha
male. The only time he’ll assert himself with the heroine is (a) if she’s
putting herself down and saying she’s worthless, or (b) if she is about to do
something that puts her in danger physically. He will do whatever is
necessary to protect her physically and emotionally – but only when she
needs it. He never seeks to control or dominate her otherwise, except
perhaps in fun.
As mentioned above, a healthy beta male is happy with who he is. He
doesn’t feel that he is a failed alpha. And when someone else takes the lead
– including the heroine – he doesn’t feel unappreciated or neglected. He
knows that other people value him and his abilities. And he knows that he’s
good at what he does.
Your beta male will disappoint readers if he comes across as being a
doormat. Readers don’t want to see the heroine used or abused and they feel
the same way about beta heroes. He can’t allow himself to be treated like a
servant or a slave. Of course, it could be part of his character development
arc that he needs to become more self-confident and assertive as the story
progresses – and he may learn how to do this from a strong heroine.
Character Archetypes
The beta male is less likely to have the Warrior as a key part of his
personality, and more likely to be a Thinker or a Carer, or a hybrid of the
two, the Artist (Thinker + Carer). Sometimes an Adventurer (Warrior +
Carer) can be a beta male.
The beta male is much more sociable than the alpha and is likely to come
from a larger family and have a circle of friends who are his support
network. He probably has (or had) close relationships with his parents and
siblings. He may have been married previously – if so, it’s likely his
separation from his ex-wife was amicable, they may still be friends, and he
has good relationships with any children they had together.
The beta hero is more likely to be a ‘guy next door’ than the heroic fantasy
of the alpha hero. If he is very handsome, part of his charm is that he isn’t
overly aware of the fact and doesn’t take it for granted. He has a ‘quiet
strength’ based on a steely determination to do the right thing and stand up
for what he believes is right, rather than relying on muscles.
He might also be more of an intellectual type, dressing like a college
lecturer or even a mad scientist.
Occupations
Beta males can be found in almost any occupation but are less likely to be
in a top leadership position. They are more likely to be found in ‘caring’
professions such as medicine or teaching. Other ‘caring’ professions include
‘protectors’ such as firefighters and policemen. Service industries such as
the hotel trade or retail may also be appropriate for a beta male. In the work
environment, he probably has a number of friends and is likely to be
regarded as ‘one of the guys’ and a ‘nice guy’ who is not competitive or
overbearing.
Beta males can also be found in creative occupations including artists,
writers, and musicians. And in jobs such as teaching, librarianship, and
other areas that appeal to the Thinker personality type.
Depending on the sort of beta hero you create, he may have one of several
flaws to overcome as part of his character development arc.
Like the alpha hero, the beta male may have a ‘ghost’ in his past, but
where the alpha will never speak about it or admit the emotional pain it
causes him, the beta male will tell his backstory – bit by bit – to the heroine
as their relationship progresses. And he will admit how it impacted, and
continues to impact, on him emotionally. He will also be honest about the
fact that he finds it difficult to trust people – perhaps especially women –
because of this past emotional trauma.
In many ways, the beta hero is like the heroine – his personality traits
have a lot in common with hers, and he suffers many of the same
weaknesses. Except he didn’t grow up as a female in a patriarchal society.
He still had the advantage of male privilege.
A beta hero with a strong Carer element in his personality may become
dependent on someone with a stronger personality, instead of becoming
self-reliant, and may need to overcome this. Or he may have a need to
become more assertive so that people stop taking advantage of him.
A beta male with a strong Thinker element in his personality may be
extremely introverted and spend much of his time living inside his own
head, either dealing with factual information or – in artistic types – having a
rich imagination. He may need to overcome this fear of engaging with the
external world. Or he may need to develop trust in other people and/or in
his own abilities to live in the ‘real world.’
A beta male who is more of an Adventurer may have been wounded by a
personal relationship and have become cynical. He needs to overcome his
disappointment and learn to trust and find pleasure in relationships again.
Or an Adventurer may spend his time thrill-seeking and need to find a more
fulfilling purpose in life.
I give more in-depth details about the flaws and character development
arcs of these personality types in Character Creation (2018).
Another problem the beta hero may have is that everyone thinks he’s just
a ‘nice guy’. They may take advantage of his generosity, or they may
underestimate his abilities. He may be overlooked when it comes to
promotion because he isn’t seen as competitive. But when the situation
demands it, he can be tough and defend the values that he regards as being
important. The reader needs to see that he’s not just a wimp.
The fact that he is a nice person can make it more difficult for the writer
to create conflict between the heroine and hero. There has to be some
significant difference in their present circumstances that serves to keep
them apart for a large section of the story, preventing them from being able
to commit to each other.
What many romance readers want is a hero with many of the traits of an
alpha male but with a good dose of the sensitivity of the beta male. Many
writers create this sort of hero in their fiction. If there is a character arc for
the hero – if the heroine changes him – then his journey is from alpha to
part-beta or from beta to part-alpha. In other words, the heroine helps him
to become a more whole and authentic person by integrating his shadow
self and his denied self.
The beta hero is very different to the old-school romantic hero.
1. Intelligence
2. Tenderness
3. Sense of humour
4. Strength
5. Protectiveness
6. Attractiveness
7. Bravery
8. A good body
The first two, intelligence and tenderness, were ranked significantly higher
than the third, indicating their importance to the readers surveyed.
I’ve written a chapter on point of view in the romance, but here I want to
point out that readers of the modern romance like to have access to the
hero’s point of view. They want to see at least some of the events in the
story from his viewpoint and discover what he thinks and feels about them.
And know what he feels for the heroine. Having this access means that the
reader can understand why the hero is doing what he’s doing or saying what
he’s saying. We can see why he holds particular beliefs or why he makes a
wrong assumption about the heroine or her actions.
Telling the story – at least in part – from his point of view means that it is
his love story as well as the heroine’s. We see her falling in love with him,
but we also see him falling in love with her. And we see why he falls in love
with her. And understand better his role in the break-up that occurs three-
quarters of the way through the story.
In the modern romance, access to the hero’s viewpoint also gives us a
much better understanding of why the hero changes after the break-up and
decides that he cannot live without the heroine. Janice Radway noted that
the old school romance did “...not provide a logical explanation for the
personality transformation...” of the hero, but that it was understood by the
‘experienced reader.’ To prevent this change in the hero seeming
unmotivated or unbelievable, the traditional romance has to plant a seed
much earlier in the story, usually in a scene where the hero demonstrates his
ability to be caring and nurturing. His transformation towards the end of the
novel then becomes a revelation rather than a complete character change.
Radway suggests that the old-school romance depicts heroes who already
have the capacity for gentleness and nurturing that readers would like to see
in a man. He is presented as a fait accompli, offering no suggestion as to
how a man in real life could achieve this ideal status.
The modern romance gives us access to the hero’s thoughts and feelings
and so we are much better able to understand how his ‘epiphany’ comes
about and what effect it has on him.
Your hero has a life before your story opens. He has dreams and ambitions
that he is working towards. These things are important to him, and they do
not go away when he meets the heroine. Goals give a character direction,
and they motivate him to take action. They can also be a source of conflict
if the hero has a goal that clashes with a goal of the heroine’s. In ‘enemies
to lovers’ stories, the heroine and hero typically have goals that bring them
into conflict.
Height
Heroes in romance novels tend to be tall, though a beta male hero may be
closer to average height. Alpha males are always taller than average, at least
in fiction. Swami et al. (2006) note that many studies – which they
reference – have considered height an important component of physical
attractiveness. “Tallness is generally considered a socially desirable
attribute, and is associated with improved social status, persuasiveness and
leadership skills. Among men, tallness is further associated with greater
reproductive success, dating history, higher lifetime number of cohabiting
partners and decreased probabilities of childlessness.” Based on these
findings, it has been suggested that human women have evolved a
preference for men who are taller than them.
It isn’t clear whether being physically taller provides real advantages. It
could just be that social bias in favour of tall men provides an advantage,
effectively becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy. Either way, it doesn’t really
matter – heroines like tall heroes.
Hugh Morris in The Art of Kissing, published in 1936, explains why the
male lover must be taller than the female: “The psychological reason for
this is that he must always give the impression of being his woman’s
superior, both mentally and especially physically. The physical reason, with
which we are more concerned, is that if he is taller than his woman, he is
better able to kiss her. He must be able to sweep her into his strong arms,
and tower over her, and look down into her eyes, and cup her chin in his
fingers and then, bend over her face and plant his eager, virile lips on her
moist, slightly parted, inviting ones. All of this he must do with the vigour
of an assertive male. And, all of these are impossible where the woman is
the taller of the-two.” Whether Morris had his tongue in his cheek as he
wrote that, we don’t know. Possibly not. Times change. We hope.
Leg length is a feature related to height. Studies of preferences among
women suggest that the ideal is a leg length that is equal to body length.
Legs visibly longer than body length were viewed as less attractive, as were
shorter legs. Men expressed a preference for women whose legs were
slightly longer than their body length. The reasons why longer legs are not
(typically) regarded attractive in males are less clear. In part, it is the fact
that if long legs are considered feminine, then men shouldn’t have long
legs. Swami et al. suggest that if a man’s legs appear long in relation to the
length of his body, then this is at odds with the male ideal of a muscular
upper body. It could also be that longer legs appear less strong in
comparison to sturdy-looking average-sized legs.
Legs of any size are more likely to be considered attractive if they taper
to a relatively narrow ankle. This also applies to men to some extent – a
narrower ankle enhances the appearance of a muscular calf.
A 1993 study by Siminoski and Bain concluded that – ‘Height and foot
size would not serve as practical estimators of penis length.’ In case you
were wondering.
Ectomorph – thin build, long limbs, small wrist and ankle joints, narrow
hips and shoulders
Mesomorph – wide shoulders, narrow waist, thin ankle and wrist joints,
even weight distribution, ability to gain muscle through training
Endomorph – heavier build with hips as wide or wider than the shoulders,
shorter limbs, thicker wrist and ankle joints, has difficulty losing weight
I don’t particularly like the idea of somatotypes, and wouldn’t ever use the
three terms above when describing a character, but I think it is helpful to
have a reminder of the different body shapes available to us when creating
male characters.
Alpha male heroes in romance novels are more likely to be mesomorphs,
having a V-shaped torso and maybe even muscular shoulders. Beta male
heroes can have any of these body shapes, ranging from a stereotyped
‘skinny geek’ through the more common ‘rectangular’ body shape to the
softer and cuddlier ‘dad bod.’ If you’re writing a love triangle story or a
romantic suspense novel, you might want your hero to be something of an
underdog, pitting an ectomorph or an endomorph against a rival or villain
who is a muscular mesomorph.
Mackenzie Pearson was one of the first to write about the ‘dad bod’ in a
2015 article on The Odyssey Online, but the term had been around for a
while at that point. She said that the dad bod was “a nice balance between a
beer gut and working out ... It's not an overweight guy, but it isn’t one with
washboard abs, either.” She also identified the factors that made this body
type attractive to women, saying it made guys seem more human and
natural. This type of body doesn't intimidate women by making them feel
insecure about their own bodies – women want to be the pretty one. And
they’re better for cuddling. Deposits of excess fat at the sides of the waist
are commonly referred to as ‘love handles.’
The main muscles of the chest are the pectoralis major and pectoralis
minor, commonly referred to as the pectoral muscles or ‘pecs.’ Their main
function is the movement of the shoulder joint and arm. These muscles are
more visible in the male body as they lie beneath breast tissue in females.
Large pectoral muscles are often regarded as attractive in men and weight
training exercises are used to develop them. Men who are particularly proud
of their pecs will often ‘bounce’ them – individually or together – to draw
attention to them. This is actually a technique that anyone can learn (with
practice) – search ‘how to bounce your pecs’ on YouTube. Women can flex
their pectoral muscles to do this too. The parts of the breast include the
nipple and the surrounding areola. Male and female breasts are identical
until puberty when female sex hormones and growth hormones cause the
breasts to develop. In both men and women, the breast – especially the
nipples – are an erogenous zone. They are sensitive to the touch due to a
large number of nerve endings.
The human back is the area from the top of the buttocks to the back of
the neck. The spine (or vertebral column) runs down the centre of the back
for its whole length and creates a groove in the lower back and can often be
seen as a line of bumps in the upper back between the shoulder blades.
There are many muscles in the back, lying in three layers, but the ones most
often referred to – especially by body builders – are the trapezius (or traps)
and the latissimus dorsi (or lats). The back muscles support the head and
trunk of the body as well as providing the flexibility to bend forwards and
backwards and from side to side. The skin of the back is thicker and has
fewer nerve endings than that of any other part of the body. With some
exceptions, men also tend to have less hair on their backs than on their
chests.
The ‘ideal’ male body shape of broad shoulders and narrow waist can
often be seen to best effect from a back view. The broad, smooth expanse of
skin provided by the back makes it an ideal canvas for body art such as
tattooing. The back is also the site where flogging or whipping is
administered.
The abdominal muscles (the rectus abdominis muscles or ‘abs’) consist
of parallel straight muscles that extend along the whole length of the front
of the abdomen, from the sternum to the pubis. The two muscles are
separated by the linea alba (literally ‘white line’) which consists of whitish
connective tissue. Bands of connective tissue across the muscle divide it
into distinct sections – ranging from two to twelve sections – commonly
known as a ‘six pack.’ In the late twentieth and early twenty-first centuries,
a defined six-pack became fashionable for males, particularly as people
began posting ‘selfies’ on social media. The term ‘six pack’ was originally
used for bottles and cans of beer, and then in relation to muscle cars, thanks
to the Chrysler 440 Six Pack engine. It was first used in the 1990s to refer
to a flat, muscular stomach, the term being adopted from African American
slang. Prior to this, the term ‘washboard stomach’ or ‘washboard abs’ was
commonly used, referring to the corrugated washboard used for hand
washing laundry – and now more commonly seen being used as a
percussion instrument.
The navel (or belly button or umbilicus) is a prominent scar on the
abdomen where the umbilical cord was attached. The navel consists of three
parts, the scar that is the remnant of the umbilical cord and around this a
collar or ring of fibrous tissue. Around the umbilical collar is the
periumbilical skin. These parts can form a variety of shapes, but two
distinct types are commonly referred to – the ‘innie’ and the ‘outie.’
An innie is any navel that curves inwards, meaning that the scar or tip of
the umbilical does not protrude past the periumbilical skin. The shape of an
innie can be round, oval, horizontal, vertical, or T-shaped. Some innies have
a fold or hood of skin at the top, some have it at the bottom, and some have
no hood. An outie is a navel where the umbilical tip protrudes outwards past
the periumbilical skin. An outie can be shaped like a spiral or swirl. The
protruding scar can be split so that it looks a bit like a coffee bean. It can
stick out in a sort of bowl shape. And a protruding umbilical scar can also
have a deeper centre spot making it look a bit like a doughnut.
Arms
Buttocks
The buttocks consist of the three gluteal muscles (maximus, medius, and
minimus) covered by a layer of subcutaneous fat which gives the
characteristic rounded shape. The ‘glutes’ are among the largest and most
powerful muscles in the body - if they are well-developed, they are
regarded as an indication of strength. Since good muscle tone and a certain
degree of body fat are indicative of health and strength, it isn't surprising
that for both men and women, a shapely butt is considered attractive.
The Apollo’s belt (or Adonis’ belt or iliac furrow) is/are two shallow
grooves running from the hip bone (iliac crest) to the pubis, creating a V-
shape. It is typically visible in people with low levels of body fat and the
term is often used in bodybuilding. It is more visible in men due to the fact
that women tend to have higher levels of body fat in this area.
The dimples of Venus are two indentations sometimes visible on the
lower back just above the gluteal cleft (or butt crack). In men, they are
sometimes referred to as the dimples of Apollo. The sacral dimple is a
single small depression located just above the buttocks. It takes its name
from the sacrum, the bone at the end of the spine.
The term ‘callipygian’ (from the Greek kallipygos) is used to describe
someone with particularly attractive buttocks. A more recent term is ‘bubble
butt’ – applied to both men and women – presumably likening the buttocks
to a pair of round soap bubbles or maybe it’s pink bubble-gum bubbles.
It has been suggested that more attention was drawn to the shape of the
buttocks when advertisements for jeans began to appear in magazines.
The seducer has a number of aliases – babe magnet, Casanova, Don Juan,
heartbreaker, ladies’ man, ladykiller, Lothario, philanderer, rake, Romeo,
roué, womaniser... He is regarded as someone disreputable but also
attractive. Seductive. Women are drawn to him, and men are envious of him
and wish they could be more like him.
It has been suggested that when women meet a seducer, they see in him
the potential to meet desires that are currently unmet. To some extent, they
may project their ‘forbidden impulses and secret wishes’ onto him, in effect
making him more attractive to them.
The seducer is somehow sexier than other men. He is charismatic and
women find him enchanting. He has a certain something, ‘it,’ the x-factor.
And whatever ‘it’ is, it doesn’t depend on good looks, wealth, or power.
Many real-life seducers seem quite ordinary. At least on the surface. Their
secret, according to Betsy Prioleau, is that they know what women really
want and they know how to deliver it. We’ll explore this in more detail in
the following pages.
Real-Life Seducers
If many famous seducers lacked looks, wealth, and status, what was it about
them that made them so attractive to women? What qualities did they
possess? The entries below are based on chapters from Betsy Prioleau’s
Swoon, but I’ve combined and chosen some different headings to suit my
purposes.
Charisma
Vitality
The seducer has a lust for life. Joie de vivre. Other terms applied include
élan, ebullience, brio, exuberance, and ‘animated and high spirited.’
In life, we find ourselves drawn to people who are enthusiastic,
especially if we have been brought up in a culture where expression of
emotion is frowned upon. The seducer’s zest or vitality is one of the things
that makes him attractive.
Passion
Intense passion is also found in the seducer. And as the item above suggests,
he isn’t just passionate when it comes to love. Emotional intensity is one of
the elements of charisma. It is also referred to as ardour or ‘burning
passion.’
It’s not enough for a man to show an interest in a woman. She needs to
know he’s serious. He needs to put some effort into his pursuit of her. And
he needs to personalise his approach so that she feels he is interested in her
specifically and – at that moment – only her.
Women want to feel that they are desired. A seducer makes them feel that
they are sexually irresistible. And, if this is what she desires, they are ready
to ‘ravish’ her. He is an ardent admirer, making passionate advances so that
the woman will want to choose him. In prehistoric times, passion and
persistence may have been used to convince the female that he would be
faithful to her and meet her needs in the long term.
In romance novels too, readers prefer heroes who are intense and
determined. If the heroine doesn’t respond to him initially, the hero doesn’t
give up. He uses a variety of subtle ways to try and convince her of his
desire. And in fiction, he has to demonstrate that he is a one-woman guy,
unlike the seducer.
Sex Drive
Seducers are at the high end of the sex drive spectrum. Their sensuality and
‘carnal appetite’ account for what has been called their ‘unbridled animal
magnetism.’ They enjoy sex and are able to communicate their enthusiasm
for it.
Love of Women
This almost seems too obvious. But a genuine love for women isn’t that
common. As children, boys are taught to be ‘masculine’ and to be disdainful
of anything feminine or effeminate. As they grow older, this can become
ingrained as misogyny. The seducer has no such feelings. It is thought that
many seducers grow up around women – their mother, older sisters, or
wider family or community members – and so come to appreciate that
which is regarded as feminine. They don’t learn to despise women. And it is
also possible that they have their first sexual experiences at a younger age,
often with an older or more experienced female.
The seducer is not typically a macho man’s man. By definition, he is a
ladies’ man. He may excel in manly pursuits such as horse riding,
swordsmanship, duelling, and being a knight or soldier. But he is also able
to appreciate more ‘feminine’ interests and pursuits and to enjoy the
company of women.
Androgyny
Although a romantic hero is often an alpha male, exuding masculinity and
engaging in behaviours that demonstrate his machismo, it is also true that
many women are attracted to less masculine men. Gender ambiguity is
attractive. Women are drawn to men who are in touch with their anima,
their inner feminine. This may be seen in interest in things normally thought
of as feminine, but it can also be expressed in physical appearance and
choice of clothing. Throughout history, seducers have often worn their hair
unfashionable long or curled and it is frequently described as being
‘scented.’ In the Goth subculture, slender young men often with feminine
facial features wear stylised makeup and paint their nails. In Japanese
manga (comic books) there is a sub-genre featuring bishōnen, literally
beautiful youth or boy, portrayed with androgynous beauty. And the
attraction of performers such as David Bowie is based, at least in part, on
their androgyny.
Creativity
Rebelliousness
Vulnerability
In her book, Betsy Prioleau refers to this as ‘flawed masculinity,’ but I have
been referring to it as vulnerability both here and in Character Creation
(2018). This vulnerability may be physical – a limp, an injury, a scar – or
psychological (the ‘tortured soul’). As mentioned above, a seducer’s
attractiveness arises from opposing traits and another pair of these is
strength and vulnerability.
A flaw makes a man seem more approachable and less threatening.
Imperfections and fallibility can be attractive. Perhaps it is a ‘maternal
impulse,’ or the personality of the Carer, that causes a woman to want to
nurture the wounded male. Or perhaps his vulnerability lessens the
imbalance of power between the genders in a patriarchal society. A
vulnerable male may also be seen as less likely to resort to physical
violence. As we’ve explored elsewhere, vulnerability is a glimpse of the
hero’s true self and shows what he is really like beneath his protective
armour.
Morality or Virtue
Although some women do fall for genuine bad boys, many more are
attracted to the combination of good and bad that the seducer represents.
Seducers are not angels, but they’re not devils either. A seducer typically
has a strong moral code, but the values he upholds don’t necessarily match
those of the society around him. Many seducers have a sense of honour and
are prepared to defend it.
Genuine seducers do not regard a woman as someone to be used and then
cast aside. They typically love her deeply and treat her with courtesy and
respect. A seducer will also be faithful to her, in his own fashion. And most
women understand and accept that if they have a relationship with him, it
will not be an exclusive one. There will be other women in his life. Genuine
seducers do not ruin the reputation of women and leave them with nothing.
Many of their lovers gain genuine material benefits from the relationship
and receive real support from the seducer for their endeavours.
Seducers are the perfect blend of integrity and deviltry. They also tend to
be generous and charitable, even when they cannot afford to be. Their
kindness also leads them open to being taken advantage of.
A genuine seducer displays his honesty in that he is true to himself, he
doesn’t pretend to be other than he is. Except when he is engaged in some
small-scale confidence trick that involves taking on the role of a nobleman,
a psychic, or some other role.
Courage
Intelligence
It has been said that the brain is an erogenous zone and that intelligence is
the ultimate aphrodisiac. Smart is sexy. Women are not just looking for a
physical experience with their lovers. They want to be intellectually
stimulated as well. They want a man who can hold his side of a
conversation. And, ideally, they want a man who can entertain them.
Prehistoric women may have looked for signs of intelligence when
choosing a mate. Smart men learned new things and learned from
experience. In the long-term, they had an advantage in terms of being a
provider for a woman and her children.
Emotional Intelligence & Empathy
Book learning and street smarts are not enough. A man also needs to have
an understanding of his own emotions and be able to ‘read’ the emotions of
others. A seducer is a master at understanding other people’s feelings. They
demonstrate empathy, being able to feel what another person is feeling, and
can use this to develop a rapport with them. Women are drawn to a man
who seems to share their ‘female intuition.’
It is hardly surprising that charismatic men with these qualities succeed
in politics as well as with women.
Pleasure
Self-Realization
Having acknowledged and integrated his anima, his ‘female side,’ the
seducer is closer to being a whole and authentic person than most men. He
has embraced his denied self and is less troubled by his shadow. He is still
flawed and engages in activities that many consider immoral, but he tends
to be at peace with himself. His relaxed, diffident nature and absence of
anxiety – at least in terms of knowing who he is and what he wants – can be
very attractive.
If a seducer embodies only some of the qualities listed above, he is a
much rounder character than many and has a great deal to offer a partner.
And he acts as a model, encouraging others to embrace the whole of their
selves, overcoming the shame they feel for the traits of their denied self.
The seducer appeals to women because he does not feel threatened by their
desire to improve themselves – he actively supports and encourages them.
This is unusual for males in a patriarchal culture.
The seducer has the ability to understand the needs of others, and this is
not limited to their romantic needs. He is aware of an individual’s desire for
personal growth and he will help them achieve it where he can.
To some extent the seducer defines and creates himself, continually
improving and reinventing himself in order to have the knowledge and
experience to please women. He has an awareness of social trends and
fashions. He keeps up with both news and gossip.
Unpredictability
The seducer has mastered the art of spontaneity – he loves to surprise and
delight. He takes pleasure in seeing the joy on the face of the person he is
with.
Falling in love, the part of a relationship we explore in romantic novels,
is relatively short-lived. Estimates suggest it can last from six months to
two years before being replaced by a less heady companionate love. But the
seducer doesn’t want to see his relationships settle down in this way. He
wants to keep the passion and joy of being in love going as long as possible.
He continues to seduce his lover for as long as they are together. Many
seducers have relationships that last longer than most marriages, even if
these relationships are not strictly monogamous.
Unpredictability adds excitement to a relationship. Secrets and surprises
are the seducer’s tools for achieving this. He seeks to intrigue or puzzle his
lover, keep her guessing. Honoré de Balzac said that a man must provide his
lover with variety, curiosity, and surprise – and if he didn’t, someone else
would.
While we don’t want our romance heroes to have multiple partners like
the seducer, we do want him to challenge and surprise the heroine.
Playfulness
Conversation
Listening
The seducer makes a woman feel heard and appreciated. He adopts a pose
that shows he is listening and uses body language to show interest, to
encourage, and to support. He is skilled at creating rapport. Women like to
feel that they have a man’s undivided attention – and they rarely receive it.
A genuine seducer is an active listener, taking in the spoken words and
seeking to understand what lies beneath them. He listens to what is said and
tries to figure out what is unsaid, reading body language and also putting
himself in the woman’s position and understanding things from her point of
view. He provides feedback to demonstrate his understanding. His interest
and encouragement must be sincere – women are incredibly good at
detecting insincerity.
Humour
The seducer is not only a great conversationalist, but he is also a witty one.
And he is not afraid to laugh at himself. Many women find a sense of
humour extremely attractive in men. It demonstrates self-confidence,
creativity, intelligence, and is just plain entertaining. Humour is often
rebellious or transgressive and it can also be sensual and sexual. Or just
smutty. It helps to lower protective barriers and shrug off societal
constraints concerning what is and is not acceptable. And it has an element
of surprise that enlivens conversation.
Music
Many seducers know how to use music as part of their seduction. They may
play an instrument, sing, or just choose the right song for the moment. One
reason why we may associate music with romance is that music can affect
our emotions directly. There’s a reason why armies and sports teams
employ marching bands. They stir up feelings. And a slow, romantic song
can set the mood for a perfect evening in.
It is possible that prehistoric men sang, whistled, and used drums or
sticks for percussion when they serenaded a potential mate. The word
‘enchant’ comes from the Latin incantare, to sing.
Intimacy
Women seek emotional intimacy with a lover and, unlike most men, the
seducer is not afraid of this. It is thought that the female desire for
empathetic bonding may be biological and influenced by hormones. There
is a dark side to this desire by women to connect with their ‘other half,’
which manifests as co-dependency or dissatisfaction. The seducer manages
the tension between attachment and separation, togetherness and apartness,
and keeps the relationship alive and healthy.
Setting
A seducer knows how to use setting to create the right mood for a romantic
encounter. He doesn’t go for the usual clichés of candles and red roses, he
fills a space with sensual details – things to see, touch, taste, smell, and hear
– in the way that a set dresser will create a scene on a stage. He will create a
place where a woman can relax, something that suggests a safe nest, but
also that contains objects that reflect his personality and the breadth of his
interests.
Or he may take the best of what nature has to offer, selecting a clearing in
the woods or a blue lagoon as his backdrop.
Sex
It goes without saying that the seducer has to be good in bed. After all the
effort he puts into seduction, he’d better have something to back it up. And
it needs to be the kind of sex that women enjoy, not just a quick knee-
trembler where he gets an orgasm and she doesn’t. In Swoon, Betsy
Prioleau includes a quote from The Secret Laughter of Women: “Banging,
nailing, and screwing isn’t sex; it’s carpentry.” Women don’t want carpentry
in the bedroom, they want a slow and sensual experience that is focused on
their needs.
Surveys suggest that between thirty-five and fifty per cent of women
have difficulty becoming aroused or achieving orgasm during sex. That’s a
lot of bad sex. Women don’t reach climax as quickly or as easily as men –
estimates suggest it takes her fifteen minutes and him about two-and-a-half.
Men can become aroused almost instantly but it can take women half an
hour to get warmed up. Foreplay is much more important to women and
seducers have the skill and the patience to do it right. Casanova said three-
quarters of his enjoyment in sex came from giving his partner pleasure –
multiple times. A seducer is aware of his partner’s needs and her responses
to his touch. He also seeks feedback from her in order to discover what will
create the most intense experience at that moment.
Gifts
Gifts are a tricky area to navigate. There are women – gold-diggers – who
are willing to exchange sex for expensive gifts, but the majority of women
don’t want to feel that they are selling themselves. A gift should not be
given in a way that creates an obligation or debt that must be repaid in some
way.
Gift-giving should include an element of surprise – the unpredictability
mentioned earlier. And it should make the recipient feel that the man is
thinking of her even when he is not with her. The choice of gift is also
important. A woman wants to feel that it has been carefully selected for her
and no one else. Generic love tokens are appreciated less than a small gift
that indicates an understanding of a woman’s personality and interests. A
gift should show that a man understands a woman. And it should
demonstrate that some effort has gone into its choice or creation – off-the-
shelf gifts are less valued than personalised ones.
Prehistoric men probably gave gifts to their women as a way of proving
that they were good providers. A good provider could give her meat from
the hunt, but he could also give her handmade decorative items that
demonstrated his skill and the fact that he was such a good hunter that he
had free time for gift-making.
Seducers are often generous gift-givers. Some are extravagant, even
when they cannot afford to be.
A gift doesn’t have to be a physical object, it can be a unique experience
such as a picnic in the desert under the stars. But again, the experience must
be chosen to suit the woman it is given to.
Food
Compliments
Compliments are the gift of words and as such must also be carefully
chosen. Flattery requires imagination, subtlety, and wit. And it draws on the
seducer’s ability to understand a woman’s personality and needs.
Flattery is designed to make someone feel special. It strokes the ego and
boosts self-confidence. It is especially effective when a woman has low
self-esteem, though care must be taken to choose the right words and
deliver them sincerely.
In a patriarchal society where women are treated as inferiors and
‘femininity’ is denigrated, there is little wonder that many women feel
starved of praise. Compliments make them feel good. Both seducers and
romance novel heroes excel at making women feel desired.
Conflict
Romance has been described as a form of combat and we see this best in the
witty dialogue exchanged in Hollywood screwball and romantic comedies.
A classic example is Adam’s Rib (1949) starring Katharine Hepburn and
Spencer Tracy as a couple who battle it out at home and as lawyers on
opposing sides of the trial of a woman accused of shooting her cheating
husband. A man needs to be a worthy sparring partner to win the love of a
woman.
The balance of power in a relationship plays a part in the way conflict is
expressed. If a couple is equally matched in a quarrel, it can help a woman
feel that she is on more equal footing with a male partner who traditionally
has a more powerful position outside the home.
Some people are better able to deal with the stress of conflict than others.
Some women are extremely sensitive in this regard and feel extremely
uncomfortable when faced with discord. Others thrive on the adrenaline
rush that comes with open conflict with a partner. Rows provide a valve to
let off steam, allowing frustrations or disappointments to surface. This can
be much healthier than suppressing grievances and repressing emotions.
In all cases, it is important to be able to see the situation from the other
person’s point of view and to be able to come to some mutually acceptable
resolution when the storm blows over. Great make-up sex helps too.
The seducer typically has sufficient positive traits that a lover is willing
to forgive him and return to his arms. Though he might be involved in
conflict, he never resorts to violence and is unlikely to become embroiled in
a dispute that he feels is cause to end a relationship.
In any strong relationship, there are going to be disagreements and
differences. For the relationship to be successful in the longer term, couples
have to be able to deal with conflict. Ignoring it and pretending it doesn’t
exist will undermine the relationship eventually. Honesty and openness in
all things are required, including dissatisfaction and disagreement. It is
important for people to realise that no relationship can be 100% happy and
stress-free. And if it was, like any form of utopia, it might end up feeling
pretty boring. Conflict tests a relationship – and if the couple survives it,
their commitment to each other is likely to be stronger.
Betsy Prioleau says of the seducer: “Instead of gagging adverse
emotions, they convert them to erotic excitement through a delicate play of
combat and truce, pain and pleasure. Love, for ladies’ men, is an ongoing
duel and duet.”
Someone who is attracted to a seducer may suffer from the same sort of
flaws or wounds that he does: damaged self-esteem and/or a need to rebel
against a controlling parent.
If someone feels that they are not good enough, they will seek a man who
bolsters their self-esteem. A seducer attracts multiple women, so he must be
a ‘valuable commodity.’ He’s in demand. And he has his choice of partners.
If a heroine gains his attention, she can feel that she has beaten the other
women to the prize. She may even put up with his constant flirting with
other women, or even his sexual infidelity because she feels good about the
fact that other women want her man. She is especially vulnerable to this
way of thinking if her father was a philanderer, cheating on her mother.
A serial seducer is exactly the sort of man a mother warns her daughter
against. He’s the sort of man whose intentions are not honourable. He
‘spoils’ virtuous young women, turning them into ‘damaged goods.’ The
good old double standard raises its head again. Women are not supposed to
seek sexual experiences in their own right, they must ‘save themselves’ for
marriage. The more someone is told that good girls don’t, the more likely
they are to want to rebel. Within limits.
A heroine can usually see through a flawed seducer’s bravado and see the
insecurity in him. This makes him less of a danger to her than a genuine bad
boy. He’s just dangerous enough.
Can a heroine help a wounded seducer overcome his insecurities and enter
into a committed relationship with him? Before embarking on a project of
trying to help him, a heroine has to determine whether he wants to be
helped.
A young seducer may not be mature enough to settle down – he wants to
sow his wild oats before committing to an adult relationship. A heroine
encountering him must judge how close he is to achieving that maturity and
decide if she wants to put up with his antics until it happens. This may be
one reason why many women still prefer older men.
A more mature man may be behaving like a philanderer if he has just
ended a longer-term relationship or if he’s going through a midlife crisis.
He is flirting, and perhaps sleeping around, to get back into the swing of
dating and to prove to himself that he is still attractive to women. If he
wasn’t cheating on his ex-partner throughout their relationship, he may just
be going through a phase which will eventually pass. Especially if he meets
the right woman for a new long-term romance.
Another reason why a man might go through a hound dog phase is if he’s
just recovered from a serious injury or illness, or suffered some other kind
of traumatic experience – war, a disaster, a mugging, unemployment – that
has made him reassess his priorities in life. And probably a need to prove
his masculinity and/or his control over his own destiny.
It’s worth mentioning here that sex addiction is something very different
to the sort of behaviours we’re describing for the seducer. Sex addiction is
something that needs professional help to overcome.
Any heroine hoping to have a serious relationship with a seducer must
have realistic expectations and set some concrete limits, both in terms of his
behaviour and how long she is prepared to tolerate the worst of that
behaviour.
Chances are that his flirty personality is part of his charm and something
that makes him attractive to a partner. Does she want that to go away
completely? Probably not. Seeing him make eye contact with women, smile
at them, and even flirt verbally is likely to be okay, as long as everyone
concerned – especially him – knows it’s not going to go any further.
Whether things like hugging or kissing another woman on the cheek are
okay depends on the individual partner. It may be better to have a strict
policy against this early on, relaxing it later as he adjusts to his new lifestyle
and trust has developed between the two partners. Sex with another woman
– any form of erotic contact – should be a definite no. Always. Especially in
a romance story.
While it is important to set clear limits, the partner of a seducer must be
careful not to get into a power struggle. This would trigger his defences.
He’s a man who is insecure in his masculinity, so will see any attempt to
control him as a threat to be fought head-on. This will be a major problem if
he’s also rebelling against a controlling mother – his partner doesn’t want to
end up in a position where he regards her with the same feelings of
rebellion he has for his mother.
The best way to tackle his behaviour is for his partner to let him know
how it makes her feel. This requires that the partner make herself vulnerable
by being honest about her feelings, but this is the only way to begin
building trust with him. ‘Seeing you with Kate on your lap made me feel
jealous. I wanted to be the one sitting there.’ This is open an honest, rather
than confronting him with a question like, ‘How do you think it made me
feel?’ He’ll just become defensive in his answer.
The main challenge will be to help him overcome his low self-esteem.
His partner needs to make him feel that he is good enough for her – that she
appreciates and loves him for his true self. He wants to feel that he is a
hero. In creating a character, you will need to come up with stepping stones
towards self-esteem that make sense for your hero and his life
circumstances. Does he need to overcome his feelings about a father who
was tougher and more successful than him? Or a mother who sought to
control and possess him? Or an unhealthy relationship that left him feeling
worthless? Or a traumatic experience such as military action or a serious
road traffic accident? You can find a lot of resources online and in books for
dealing with self-esteem issues. Use these to help you create your
character’s development arc.
The seducer’s flirting is a protective behaviour that has become a habit
for him. He uses it to massage his fragile self-esteem. When he’s at a low
ebb, it's reasonable that he will relapse or backslide and begin flirting again.
It’s his safe place. It’s important to accept this as a stage in his development
arc and not regard it as a failure or as a deliberate attempt to hurt his
supportive partner.
If the man is still misbehaving after three months, maybe she could give
him a little longer. At six months, she has to doubt whether this ‘phase’ is
indeed passing. And at twelve months (at the latest) she should be out of
there. She must also make her limits clear to the seducer and genuinely be
prepared to walk away if he doesn’t mend his ways.
Confident
Smiling
Well-groomed
Humorous
Able to connect with people
The social centre of a room
One of the gurus quoted in Neil Strauss’s book is David DeAngelo, he says
that “...seduction implies tricking, being dishonest, and hiding your
motives. That is not what I am teaching. I'm teaching something called
attraction. Attraction is working on yourself and improving yourself to the
point where women are magnetically attracted to you and want to be around
you.” And how do you make someone want something? “You give it value.
You show that others like it. You make it scarce. And you make them work
for it.” That last sentence is a clue to the player’s attitude. He aims to give
the impression that he is not that interested in the beautiful woman he is
talking to. He’s definitely not intimidated by her. And he wants her to
believe that he’s something special, something of higher value, that she
must earn the right to have.
The basic format of the player’s technique is known as FMAC – find,
meet, attract, close. A ‘close’ is either a woman’s telephone number, a date,
or sex. The FMAC approach was developed by a seduction guru who called
himself ‘Mystery’ and was shared on a private MSN group. It looks
something like this. He refers to the woman he has an interest in as ‘the
target.’
1. Walk into a room with confidence and smile. Scan the room and locate
the group containing the target. Without hesitation, approach the group
she’s in. The ‘three-second rule’ says that a man has three seconds to
talk to a woman after he’s spotted her. No hesitation.
2. Join the conversation by reciting a memorized ‘opener,’ and perhaps
follow this with one or two more. Openers are not typical chat-up
lines, they are conversation starters, something like, ‘I just read this
online and I need a female opinion...’
3. The opener should be directed at the whole group, not just the target.
In fact, when talking, ignore the target as much as possible. If there are
men in the group, seek to engage them first.
4. Use ‘negs’ on the target. Negs are negative comments designed to
show that the player is not overwhelmed by a woman’s beauty. They
are typically little criticisms or back-handed compliments. A neg often
points out some physical feature or behaviour and encourages others in
the group to notice and laugh about it.
5. Demonstrate that you have personality. Use anecdotes, humour, or the
kind of magic tricks that work in a bar or club setting. Mystery writes
that you should, “Pay particular attention to the men and the less
attractive women.” The aim is to become the centre of attention and
make sure the target is aware of this.
6. Use more negative comments on the target based on her reaction to the
performance being given by the player. Ask others in the group
questions like, ‘How do you put up with her?’
7. Ask members of the group how they know each other. If the target is
with a boyfriend, ask how long they’ve been together. If they’re in a
long-term relationship, back out gracefully and move on to another
target.
8. Having ignored and been rude to the target, say to the group, “I’ve
been neglecting your friend. Is it okay if I talk to her for a while?”
They’ll agree and she will (possibly) be pleased to finally receive some
attention.
9. Isolate the target from the group by taking her to sit somewhere else.
Tell her you want to show her something cool. Start looking for
indicators of interest (IOIs). As you’re walking across the room, put
your arm around her or take her hand and see how she responds.
10. Sit with the target and perform a cold reading, a card trick, or
something else that you have practised and that you think will intrigue
her.
11. Ask her to tell you about her own positive qualities – what makes her
more than a pretty face? If she lists some qualities, this is an indicator
of interest. She wants to impress.
12. Stop talking. If she seeks to restart the conversation, this is another
indicator of interest. Once you have seen three clear IOS, you can...
13. Close. This may be a kiss or a phone number or a suggestion to go on
somewhere else. Mystery suggests getting a kiss by asking, out of the
blue, ‘Would you like to kiss me?’ If your aim is to get her phone
number, give the impression that your time is in short supply (a
scarcity technique borrowed from advertising) by saying, ‘I have to go,
but I’d like to talk to you again.’ Then ask for her number and walk
away as soon as you have it.
Players use skills borrowed from fortune tellers and conmen – the ‘cold
reading’ technique of making broad statements that apply to a majority of
people but phrased in a way that makes them seem directed at the listener
and deeply insightful. Examples include phrases like, ‘People don’t
understand how sensitive you really are.’ They may also use voice
techniques taken from hypnotism and vocabulary skills from neuro-
linguistic programming (NLP). And, as mentioned above, they have also
taken ideas from the advertising industry, a professional body of persuaders.
A player also has techniques for dealing with AMOGs, the alpha male of
the group, by making them look like ‘tools’ without provoking violent
responses.
But, despite all these techniques, Neil Strauss notes that “...the man never
chooses the woman. All he can do is give her an opportunity to choose
him.”
Narcissism
Machiavellianism
Psychopathy
As you can see, there is a great deal of overlap between psychopathy and
narcissism and Machiavellianism. Key factors here are an absence of
empathy and an inability to experience guilt or remorse. It is these
characteristics that, in extreme cases, allow a person to become a serial
killer, the type of character we typically think of when we hear the term
‘psychopath.’ A complete absence of empathy with other human beings in
this extreme form is relatively rare, but other traits listed here are more
common and may even prove beneficial in some circumstances.
Another theory of psychopathy, the triarchic model, suggests there are
three observable characteristics:
Boldness – Assertiveness and self-confidence along with high stress-
tolerance and an ability to handle unfamiliarity and danger.
Disinhibition – Poor control of impulses and urges, a desire for
immediate gratification, and problems with planning and foresight.
Meanness – Lacking empathy and close attachments to others, a disdain
for close relationships, defiance of authority, using cruelty to gain power
over others and a willingness to exploit them.
Aspects of these characteristics that could prove beneficial and might be
considered admirable or attractive include fearlessness or low levels of
anxiety, which might appear as a sort of bravado. An absence of shame or
guilt can also boost a person’s apparent lack of fear. Arrogance we’ve
already covered under narcissism above. Impulsiveness and a desire for
immediate gratification are qualities that we often see in the attractive bad
boy or rebel character. This is the rule-breaker or the rock ‘n’ roll hero.
Sadism
Until the 1994 revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental
Disorders (DSM), sadistic personality disorder was classed as a mental
health condition. Reasons why this stopped being the case included an
inability to clearly distinguish it from other disorders and a fear that if it
was classed as a mental disorder, sadistic behaviour might be classed as
something requiring treatment rather than being a punishable crime.
Characteristics associated with sadism include:
This behaviour must be directed towards more than a single person. Note
that sexual sadism disorder is a separate condition, where pain and/or
humiliation of others are required for sexual excitement, and which is
recognised in the current edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of
Mental Disorders.
Sadists cause physical or mental suffering because they enjoy it. They
can be dangerous people. And some people are drawn to the thrill of that
danger.
12 | Bad Boys, Rebels & Byronic
Heroes
Bad Boys & Rebels
There have been tricksters and rebels throughout history, but the modern
bad boy first appeared in Hollywood in the late 1930s. Writing in Rebels:
The Rebel Hero in Films, Joe Morella and Edward Z. Epstein pinpoint the
1938 film Four Daughters as a point of origin. Actor John Garfield – better
known for his role in the 1946 film noir The Postman Always Rings Twice –
played Mickey Borden, a role which brought him a best supporting actor
Oscar nomination. Morella and Epstein wrote that this character “...began a
new trend in which qualities of good and evil were not so clearly drawn; he
was a complex individual who felt society had wronged him; there was a
glimmer of hope for his reformation, but not a guarantee. He was the first
hero (leading man) who fought forces both within and without.”
Garfield’s character is described as ‘oppressed, lost, uncommunicative
malcontent’ but with an underlying ‘goodness and sensitivity.’ Women were
attracted to the character’s ‘sultry magnetism and rare combination of
sensitivity and toughness’ and ‘felt that love could reform him.’ The
character also appealed to young people at a time when teenagers as a
generation were, for the first time, frustrated by parents’ materialistic values
and engaged in an idealistic search for meaning of their own. Garfield went
on to star in They Made Me a Criminal (1939) and played a number of other
bad boys in his career.
Marlon Brando played another famous bad boy in The Wild One in 1953,
as did James Dean in Rebel Without a Cause (1955). The rebellious ‘drop-
out’ was again popular in the sixties in films like The Hustler (1961) with
Paul Newman, and The Wild Angels (1966) and Easy Rider (1969), both
starring Peter Fonda. In all these films and in more recent ones, the rebel-
hero reflects the disillusionment young people feel with the values of their
parents’ generation.
Traits of a Bad Boy
Why do we love a bad boy? Why are rebels like Han Solo in Star Wars and
the Chris Pratt character in Guardians of the Galaxy so appealing? Or Tom
Cruise’s Maverick in Top Gun? Or Joe Morelli in Janet Evanovich’s
Stephanie Plum series? Why are they so sexy?
In their book He’s Got Potential, Belisa Vranich and Ariane Marder have
a chapter on bad boys. They highlight a number of reasons why heroines are
attracted to bad boys.
Charisma – There is something attractive and charming about a bad boy
that draws other people to him. He is self-confident to the point of being
cocky, and this is especially attractive to people who lack self-confidence.
He is so sure of himself that he really doesn’t give a damn what other
people think of him. It shows in the way he walks, in the tone of his voice,
and in the look in his eye.
Machismo – The bad boy has a potent form of masculinity. His aura of
dangerousness is a very physical thing. He gives the impression that he
could explode into violence that would leave him the only man standing.
It’s the whole alpha male thing with an added edge of unpredictability. Any
heroine who is looking for a protector is going to be attracted to this. She
would want him to be on her side. Often the bad boy is never engaged in
any form of violence, but it is obvious that the potential is there. This can
make some heroines feel tough and dangerous by association.
Excitement – Anyone who is bored with their everyday life is going to
find the bad boy fresh and exciting. When he’s around, there is never a dull
moment. He lives life at speed and when he slows down, he indulges in
whatever pleasures he craves at that moment in time. Anyone who has been
brought up to be polite and deferential to authority figures – which is most
‘good’ girls – is going to be thrilled by the fact that the bad boy doesn’t
show respect for anyone and is prepared to say what he thinks in any
situation, no matter who this might upset. Who wouldn’t like to have the
courage to speak what’s on their mind, at least once in a while?
A heroine who feels constrained or smothered in her own life may
experience rebellion vicariously through the bad boy. The thrill of this may
soon wear off, and the consequences may be sobering, but at least initially,
being around him is thrilling.
Unpredictability – A bad boy is a man of intense emotions and strong
mood swings. One moment he can be loving and tender, and the next he is
angry and dangerous. A combination of sensitivity and anger (from his
strong Warrior aspect) can make him volatile. He may be quick to take
offence and violent in his reactions. This is another aspect of his personality
that makes him interesting to be around.
Another side of his unpredictability is the fact that a heroine never knows
if he is going to stick around. On a whim, he could climb onto his
motorcycle and ride off into the sunset. Some heroines accept this constant
threat of rejection because they have experienced it as normal in their
relationships with other men, including their fathers. This threat, coupled
with the possibility of violence, keeps his partner seeking to soothe and
comfort him to prevent violence or abandonment. Vranich and Marder refer
here to the concept of intermittent reinforcement, where someone receives a
reward – tenderness and caring – just often enough to keep them coming
back.
Connection – Romantic bad boys have a way of making the heroine feel
that the two of them share a unique connection. He makes her feel that he
trusts her and allows her to see a side of him – his sensitive and vulnerable
side – that he doesn’t let anyone else see. Some bad boys may be doing this
truthfully, but some may be doing it as a way of manipulating her. Either
way, having seen this hidden side of him, she believes that no one else
understands him as she does. And she starts defending him when other
people – who do not know the real him – criticise him.
When a bad boy lets down his protective walls and begins confiding in
the heroine, sharing deeply personal details about his life, it makes her feel
special. And it creates a bond between them. This kind of sharing is part of
a healthy relationship, but it has to be a two-way thing. If he doesn’t show
any interest in learning the heroine’s deepest fears and dreams, this is a
warning sign that he is manipulating her and using his woundedness as an
excuse for his negative behaviours.
Redemption – Part of the appeal of the bad boy for many heroines is that
they think they can reform or redeem him. They think that he needs her
calming influence, and it makes them good to feel that they can take on this
mission to save him from himself. Some heroines want the best of both
worlds – the sexy, rebellious bad boy and the reliable, thoughtful long-term
lover. And they believe they can create this paradoxical superman by
turning a bad boy into a better man. Beauty believes she can tame the beast.
Many women stay with bad boys even when all the evidence points to the
fact that he’s not going to change. Why? They still believe that they can
work a miracle on him. And they’re afraid that if they give up on him,
someone else will come along and succeed where they failed.
There are dangers in dating a bad boy. If we accept that the bad boy is a
damaged soul who needs saving, there is a danger that he will gravitate
towards women he feels can rescue him or who can prevent him from going
too far in his destructive and/or self-destructive moments. He may be using
women for this purpose alone and have no interest in or use for them
otherwise.
Some bad boys will use their woundedness as an excuse for their
outrageous behaviour – including their mistreatment of the woman in their
life. He’ll claim that his unacceptable behaviour isn’t his fault because he’s
damaged. He can’t help it. He is simply refusing to take responsibility for
his own actions. If his partner is someone with low self-esteem, she may
continue to accept his mistreatment – even rationalising or excusing it –
because she feels she doesn’t deserve better than this. Or she may feel that
if she leaves her bad boy, she will never find another man who ‘appreciates’
her as he does.
All relationships require a certain degree of compromise, but it should be
one person doing all the compromising.
When she’s dating a bad boy, a heroine can find herself doing things that
she would never normally do. Or she may find herself ‘addicted’ to the
extreme highs and lows of her boyfriend’s mood because it is much more
exciting than her old humdrum life. But she needs to stop and take an
objective look at the impact this is having on her life – particularly her
family relationships and friendships and her job. If she is putting her
employment at risk by being out partying with her irresponsible lover, she
has to decide whether this is in her long-term interests. If being with a bad
boy is causing her to make decisions that negatively impact her life, she
needs to do something to put an end to this – either by getting him to
change (if this is possible) or by ending their relationship.
Sometimes walking away is the best option. It may even be the wake-up
call the bad boy needs to rethink his own life and decide what is important
to him.
Warning Signs
Vranich and Marder write that your only chance of getting a bad boy to
settle down is if he’s halfway there already. There must be strong evidence
that he can be reformed. In writing romances, we prepare the ground for a
bad boy’s reform by demonstrating early on in the story that he can be
caring and considerate of others. We show that he has the potential to
become a long-term partner for the right woman.
The bad boy’s potential partner has to show him that she is the right
woman for him. She needs to persuade him to modify his behaviour so
there is a permanent place for her in his life. But she has to do this without
erasing all of the qualities that attracted her to him in the first place – his
masculinity, spontaneity, and rebelliousness.
Rebelliousness can be a temporary phase that a man is going through,
due to circumstances in his life. The death of someone close to him or the
end of a long-term relationship may have upset the balance of his life and
left him feeling angry and nihilistic. Or perhaps he’s experienced some
other traumatic experience such as an accident, illness, or fighting in a
warzone that has caused him to reassess what is valuable to him. If a partner
helps him overcome the initial anger relating to his experience, he may
settle down into a less dangerous form of rebel who is also capable of
tenderness and commitment.
In some men, the bad boy image is more of a front. A mask that they
present to the world as a way of protecting themselves. It is like a suit of
armour. Often, the heroine is able to see the wounded true self inside the
armour and wants to try and reach him and support him. This is where the
bad boy and the tortured hero often overlap. Again, there is usually some
traumatic, wounding experience in his past that he needs to deal with so that
he can move on with his life and engage in a fulfilling relationship.
Writing about the Byronic hero in Character Creation (2018), I said that his
negative qualities include being: cynical, arrogant, nihilistic, sullen, proud,
secretive, sardonic, narcissistic, brooding, mysterious, disrespectful cruel,
emotional, melancholy, impulsive, world-weary, hyper-sensitive, self-
destructive, filled with self-doubt, defeatist, a loner, misanthropic, defiant,
contemptuous, rebellious, unrepentant... We could also add angry to that
list.
His positive characteristics include being intelligent, sophisticated,
sensitive, passionate, individualistic, and self-sufficient.
The fact that the Byronic hero is a loner who is exiled from a society that
doesn’t understand him, coupled with his intense introspection and self-
awareness, makes him the model for the ‘tortured hero.’
In their book Bad Boys: Why We Love Them, How to Live with Them, and
When to Leave Them, Carole Lieberman and Lisa Collier Cool refer to the
tortured hero as both a Brooding Beast and a Wounded Poet. Characteristics
they identify for this character are moodiness, sensitivity, an artistic soul, a
yearning to be rescued, and being ‘highly attuned to his inner state.’ He
complains about his talents not being recognised and appreciated, but his
inner conflict regarding success and failure mean that he may sabotage
himself. He is extremely sensitive to criticism, taking it as a judgment of
him personally. And his belief that he is judged by others and treated as an
outcast can make him see criticism where there is none which means he
seems paranoid. The rejection he feels can cause him to lash out angrily.
The unpredictability of his moods means that some people are afraid of him
– particularly if they are the type of person who avoids conflict.
The tortured hero has a tendency to blame other people for his situation
in life, often referring back to the fact that he wasn’t understood or
encouraged by his father.
While he has a keen awareness of his own emotions and needs, this hero
is unlikely to be aware of how another person is feeling. As an Artist
personality type, his empathy (from the Carer) enables him to embody
emotion in his work, but his empathy with others is less well-developed.
The other half of his personality, the Thinker, causes him to be more
introspective and self-absorbed. But when he is in the mood, his
imagination and Carer side can result in him being very romantic. His
imagination may also mean that he’s creative in bed. Women may also find
him attractive because his aloofness means that he doesn’t pursue the
opposite sex, which sets him out from a crowd of typical men and also
makes him a bit of a mystery and a challenge.
The tortured hero is conflicted. On one side, he sees what other people –
his parents, teachers, society or whoever – want him to do and who they
want him to be. And on the other side is his dream of being creative. If he
rebels and pursues his dream, he feels he will lose the love of people who
are important to him. This conflict, along with a fear of criticism, explains
why creative types are often so good at procrastination.
People with a strong Carer element in their personalities are often drawn
to the tortured hero. They want to take care of this wounded soul. They may
even want to take on the role of rescuer. Taking responsibility for someone
else’s hurt makes them feel needed. And by concentrating their thoughts
and efforts on someone else’s problems, they can avoid facing their own.
Someone who is afraid of success in their own right may seek to help a
suffering artist achieve his goals, at the expense of realising their own.
Moody, unhappy men often attract happy, upbeat partners because they
see making him happy as a challenge. They may also feel that their own
character lacks depth and so seek out someone who is dark and interesting.
The partner of a tortured hero needs to be able to support and encourage
him without losing sight of their own needs and dreams. There is a danger
of a co-dependent relationship being formed with this type of man, with
each partner enabling the flawed behaviour of the other, preventing both of
them from completing their needed character development.
13 | Secondary Characters
Who are the Secondary Characters?
The primary characters in a romance novel are the heroine and the hero.
And in a love triangle story, the rival or antagonist is also a primary
character. All the other fictional people are secondary characters.
Some secondary characters will be tiny ‘walk on’ parts that are little more
than part of the setting and others will have major roles to play in the story.
In romance, the most important secondary character is likely to be the
heroine’s confidante, the best friend she talks to about what is happening in
her life. Not every heroine has a confidante, but many do. The hero may
also have a confidant to talk to, but not every hero has one. Other secondary
characters include friends, family members, or work colleagues of the
heroine and/or hero. An antagonist or rival can also have a righthand man or
henchman (or woman) who acts as a confidant.
The Confidante
If the confidante has a fairly minor role in your novel, they can be created
in the same way as a secondary character as shown later in this chapter. But
if they have a more significant role, you might need to develop them using
the advice provided in the chapter on creating a heroine. In most cases, the
confidante will not have a character development arc in a romance novel.
Character change is experienced by the heroine and/or hero and you don’t
want to draw attention away from these main characters. In rare cases, a
confidante may undergo growth in a way that contrasts with or mirrors the
heroine’s (or hero’s), but this is only possible in a longer novel.
Creating Conflict
All stories need conflict. A character wants to achieve a particular goal and
comes up against obstacles that must be overcome. Those obstacles may be
external and physical – a difficult road journey, a raging storm, a car with a
flat tyre – or they can be external and human. A person who deliberately or
accidentally gets in the main character’s way. We’ll come on to internal
obstacles below.
Some of the person-to-person conflict in a romance novel occurs between
the heroine and the hero, as we have seen. But as well as being antagonists,
the heroine and hero are co-protagonists who jointly want their relationship
to be successful. Together, they may face opposition (deliberate or
accidental) from secondary characters.
For example, the hero’s best friend (or the heroine’s) may be afraid that
the romantic relationship means that their friendship with the hero (or
heroine) is in jeopardy. Out of jealousy, they try to sabotage the
relationship. This action may be overt and deliberate, or it may occur at a
level that the best friends is hardly aware of – their subconscious fears
directing their actions.
Or two secondary characters may be in conflict about something and a
consequence of their disagreement serves as an obstacle to the heroine and
hero’s romance. The issue between the two secondary characters must be
resolved so that the heroine and hero can resume their relationship
unimpeded.
Any two characters may end up in conflict because they are pursuing a
particular goal or simply because their personalities are so different. More
on this later. Two people may seek the same goal, making their conflict an
all-or-nothing battle – if one succeeds, the other must fail. Or they may be
seeking different goals but using actions that affect the goal-seeking of
another person.
When you are creating a cast of characters for a story, you should
develop characters with different goals and different personalities to give
you plenty of potential for conflict at different points in your plot. There’s
an old storytelling rule of thumb that says never put two characters in a
scene who agree with each other. The bigger the disagreement between the
two characters, the higher the stakes, the more dramatic the conflict will
become.
We’ll explore relationships between characters in more detail later, but
one significant form of conflict in a relationship-based story is to have
someone give an ultimatum along the lines of ‘either she goes, or I go’ –
forcing someone to choose between one relationship or another.
Symbolic Characters
Protagonist of a Subplot
Your romance novel will have a plot (the romantic relationship) and a main
subplot (external events that impact the relationship) featuring the heroine
and the hero. There may also be smaller subplots. The length of a novel
determines whether it can support another significant subplot without
drawing too much attention away from the main plot and subplot. In a novel
of 60,000 words or less, you have limited scope for subplots. In 90,000
words or more you have more room.
A subplot will normally explore another aspect of your novels main
theme. In the case of a romance, that will mean exploring another couple’s
attempt to have a long-term committed relationship. Their subplot can then
be compared and contrasted with the development of the relationship in the
main plot. It might show what could happen to the heroine and hero if their
relationship goes wrong or it could show what might happen if they get
things right. Or it could just provide another take on how two people might
try and make a relationship work.
Even if a novel can’t support another significant subplot, you can have
smaller subplots that don’t get in the way of the main story. These too will
relate to relationships in some way. In Fandango there is a couple who are
friends with the heroine. They were divorced but are now seeing each other
again. We only see them three or four times during the novel, but we learn a
little about them and their relationship takes a significant turn at the end of
the novel which ties up most of the loose ends of their story arc. Maybe.
There is a slightly larger subplot featuring the heroine’s eccentric
landlady and her attempt to ‘snag’ another husband. Her story serves as a
prompt for the heroine and hero to have the courage to seize the moment.
Fandango is around 90,000 words in length, so I had the freedom to include
a couple of small romantic subplots as well as showing another couple who
were happily married and deeply in love.
If you introduce a secondary character with a story situation, you can
give them a story arc with a beginning, middle, and end that plays out in
only a few paragraphs during the course of a novel, giving a sense that your
romance story takes place within a larger world where other people have
lives.
If we accept the mantra to ‘show don’t tell,’ one of the best ways to reveal
character is to show character’s doing things. And one of the best ways to
do that in a romance is to show a main character interacting with other
characters. So, if we want the reader to know that our hero has a caring
side, we don’t have his thoughts or another character telling us that, we
have him demonstrate this trait in his dealings with a secondary character.
In romance novels, the first sense that the reader – and perhaps the heroine
– gets that the hero is capable of caring is in a scene featuring an older
person or a child. Or sometimes an animal.
Similarly, the heroine may reveal her hidden power or self-confidence in
a scene where she stands up for herself or someone else, facing off against
an antagonistic or selfish secondary character.
Another way in which a character’s personality and attitude can be
demonstrated is by putting them in a scene with someone who has a very
different personality and/or attitude.
If you put two very similar characters into a scene, there is little opportunity
for conflict. Above I quoted the ‘never put two people in a scene who agree
with each other’ rule of thumb. If two people don’t agree, it gives them
something to talk about. It might be a minor disagreement, or it may
escalate into a blazing row and the possibility of physical violence,
depending on the needs of your story at that particular moment.
We learn more about characters when we see them presenting different
sides of an argument. We get to see what their beliefs are, we may get
glimpses of their life experience, and we see how they respond in a
challenging situation. If you put one of your primary characters in a scene
with someone who is very different to them, you can show us new things
about them.
An obvious way of contrasting two characters occurs in a love triangle
story where you pit Mr. Wrong against Mr. Right (or Ms. Wrong against
Ms. Right) and have the other main character – and the reader – choose
between them. The same thing occurs on a smaller scale with a main
character and a secondary character. Sometimes the reader will side with
your heroine or hero, but sometimes they will see that the secondary
character is right and will want to see the heroine/hero come around to the
correct point of view.
Another way to use a contrasting ‘Mr. Wrong’ character (or Ms. Wrong)
is to portray them as the heroine’s (or hero’s) preferred type of partner. The
heroine is attracted to Mr. Wrong because he closely matches the ideal mate
she pictures in her head. The hero does not. Mr. Wrong has character traits
that the heroine wishes the hero would have. Mr. Wrong demonstrates what
the hero lacks and shows the changes he needs to make in his life and his
attitude if he wants to win the heroine’s heart. It is much more effective to
have Mr. Wrong symbolise what the hero lacks than to have the heroine tell
him to his face that he behaves like a lazy, untidy adolescent who needs to
grow up and accept responsibility for his own life. Or whatever.
Obviously, you would need to counterbalance the hero’s faults with some
positive qualities that Mr. Wrong might lack – typically in these situations
the hero represents spontaneity and joy in contrast to Mr. Wrong’s slightly
dull approach to life. In stories which aren’t full-blown love triangle stories,
a secondary character may function as a temporary Mr. Wrong to contrast
with the hero in this way.
With secondary characters, creating strong contrasts in personality,
attitude, and behaviour has the added advantage of helping the reader
remember who’s who. We’ll look at some ways to create these contrasts
later.
Some types of story depend on character differences for their conflict and
character development. ‘Buddy’ movies such as 48HRS or Lethal Weapon
pair people with different personalities so audiences can watch the sparks
fly. Something very similar happens with a romance story. In fact, a ‘buddy’
movie is pretty much a romance without kissing. Probably. Another
example is the movie The Odd Couple, which pairs a neat freak with an
untidy slob to create humour and to plot the development of a friendship.
The greater the difference between two characters, the more potential you
have for conflict and the more interesting your story will be.
Another way to use character contrast is to put a person into an
unfamiliar situation. The ‘fish out of water’ story is based on this idea. An
extraordinary character is placed in an ordinary situation, or an ordinary
character is placed in an extraordinary situation. The contrast between
character and circumstances offers an opportunity for conflict and humour.
In romance novels we often have a quirky or outrageously outspoken
character to liven things up.
As well as contrasting a primary character with a secondary character,
you can contrast two secondary characters. Sometimes you might need to
do this to establish the two characters before you have them interact with
the heroine or hero. Establishing a character, making their personality and
attitude clear to the reader, sets up an expectation. The reader wonders what
will happen when this strong-willed secondary character encounters an
equally strong-willed but very different primary character.
Contrasting characters provide choices, both direct and indirect. The
reader and the primary characters have to choose which option they most
closely identify with. Is either side the right choice? Or do we need a third
option?
When creating your cast of characters, choose a mix of contrasting
personality traits and attitudes. Don’t just make them look different, make
them believe different things and behave differently. Contrast is a hugely
useful tool in writing a romance.
The most important aspects of a secondary character are that they have
distinct personality traits and attitudes that are evident in their choices and
actions. They must represent a unique perspective on romantic relationships
in particular and on life in general. Some people are optimists, some are
pessimists, and some are cynics. Cynics are often optimists or romantics
who have been disappointed by their life experiences.
In his book Supporting Characters, William C. Martell describes the
three main characters in the film The Hangover (2009) as ‘a weirdo, a
whiner, and a wild-man.’ They have different personalities, different
strengths and weaknesses, different appearances, different vocabularies and
speech rhythms, and different ways of handling problems. You know who
they are by the things they do, the choices they make, and the actions they
take. You should take a similar, though perhaps less extreme, approach
when creating a cast of primary and secondary characters.
Martell emphasises that in writing about these diverse characters, you
need to be able to see the world of the story through their eyes, not your
own. You have to pretend that you have only experienced what that person
has experienced, you believe what they believe, and you know only what
they know. And you have to think up choices and actions that they would
make based on their inner life. You can’t just make them do what you, the
author, wants them to do to make your plot work. Remember that every
secondary character is the heroine or hero of their own life story.
Personality traits and attitude mean that even if your characters look the
same – if they’re all college students or soldiers or fast-food restaurant
employees in the same outfits – you can distinguish between them and
make each one a unique person. Keep the traits and attitude broad enough
and you can establish their differences even if they only appear in the story
for a handful of paragraphs.
William C. Martell says that if you put five very different people in the
same situation, they will each experience very different things. He
compares it to the film Rashomon where people who witnessed the same
incident all described it in different ways. Our personality, attitudes, and
previous life experience mean that we all see things with a slightly different
slant. Whatever a character says or does should demonstrate their unique
viewpoint.
What does a secondary character say and how do they say it? When I’m
writing dialogue, I find it difficult to give my characters individual voices.
They all end up sounding like me. This isn’t a problem if you’re David
Mamet or Woody Allen – audiences want to hear your voice. But for the
rest of us, we need to find ways to give our story people their own voices.
A big part of making a character sound unique lies in expressing their
personality and attitude to life. When William C. Martell refers to
characters in The Hangover as a whiner, a weirdo, and a wild-man, we
know each of those characters are going to speak in a very definite way. Or
think of our optimist, pessimist, and cynic if you prefer. The words they
choose and the sentences they construct will reflect their dominant attitude.
In part their individuality will be based on their vocabulary – the words they
know and use every day. That will depend on their level of education, the
community in which they grew up, and the kind of work they do. A farmer
will use different analogies to a car mechanic or a surgeon.
Most people will have favourite words or phrases that they say again and
again in their everyday speech. This may be the way they greet people or
something they tag on the end of sentences – you know what I mean?
Favourite curse words are another thing to consider – or a character’s
refusal to utter them. And you can also have fun with euphemisms.
Personality will determine how they speak – are they confident and
articulate? Or self-conscious and inclined to mumble, use non-sequiturs,
and let their sentences drift off into nothing? (I think I just described
myself). Are they happy and positive? Or do they always see the negative in
every situation? How they think and view the world will be reflected in the
rhythm of their speech, the musical up and down quality of their tone, and
the length of their sentences. Some people favour a sing-song way of
speaking. Others are clipped and abrupt.
Be careful about using phonetic spellings to indicate a dialect or accent –
this can be incredibly difficult to read and risks pulling the reader out of the
story. And it risks offending people who speak that way if you are not one
of them. Use a few dialect words and use the construction and rhythm of
sentences to indicate the rest.
Sense of Humour
Relationships
Given that a romance centres on the heroine and hero, every secondary
character in the story will have some sort of relationship with one or both of
them. That relationship might begin in the current story, or it may have
begun years before the story opens. Some or all of the secondary characters
will also have relationships with each other. They may be lovers, friends, or
arch-enemies. All of these relationships will influence the way the story
develops. Some characters may have had relationships in the past – they
may have been lovers or even married and this can add complications.
New relationships may be formed between characters as the story goes
along and some relationships will be changed or even ended because of
events in the story. Events in a story may put a relationship under pressure,
to see if it is strong enough to survive.
Character Names
Avoid having multiple characters with names that start with the same letter.
Also, avoid having names that sound alike or rhyme.
Minor characters may not need real names, your viewpoint character may
just refer to them as something they are wearing – Baseball Cap – or by a
quirk of behaviour – Nose Picker – as if this was their proper name. You
can also use nicknames – which the secondary character may or may not
like to be used to refer to them.
14 | Point of View
Point of view refers to the vantage point from which the reader experiences
the events of the story. Think of it as where the reader is standing to observe
what is going on. There are three basic viewpoints that we can use: first-
person, second-person, and third-person.
Carol Thurston published the findings of her surveys in 1987 and in them
she reported that romance readers like to have access to the hero’s thoughts
as well as the heroine’s. Writers then began writing what I’m calling the
‘modern romance.’ Obviously, you can use the third-person point of view to
give access to more than one character’s thoughts (see below), but in the
romance genre, some writers began using two first-person narrators – the
heroine and the hero. Viewpoint changes usually occur in a new chapter,
with the chapter heading being the name of the character who’s head we are
in.
Typically, more of the story is told from the heroine’s point of view – the
hero receives fewer chapters and/or shorter chapters. Switching between the
two viewpoints allows the writer to give contrasting versions of the same
incidents. In this way, you can show how the heroine and the hero may have
very different interpretations of what has happened. And you can show how
misunderstandings arise.
This can work well for a story where there are two characters that the
reader wishes to know well and/or where contrasting viewpoints on events
can be used for dramatic effect. But using more than two such character-
narrators is tricky and risky, as there is a danger that the reader may fail to
‘bond’ with one or more of the narrators or – worse – lose track of who is
telling the story at any particular point or forget who knows what or who
saw what.
First-person narratives are usually told in the past tense as the
recollections of someone who saw events which occurred before the story
begins. On rare occasions, the present tense may be used – ‘I see’ rather
than ‘I saw’ and ‘I say’ rather than ‘I said’. While this seems to offer a
greater sense of immediacy – things are happening here and now rather than
in the past – this is an effect that tends to draw attention to itself and is
probably best used only in short stories or in short passages within a novel.
Second-person point of view is almost never used in novels and very rarely
in short stories. In it the reader is addressed as if they are a participant in the
story – ‘you see’ or ‘you say.’ Jay McInerney’s first novel Bright Lights, Big
City (1984) is one of those rare examples. Second-person is more
commonly found in non-fiction, where you – the reader – are given advice
on how you should do things. In fiction, the one place you are likely to see
it is in a ‘choose your own adventure’ novel:
You are standing at a junction. To the left is an unlit corridor and to the
right is a dimly lit passageway littered with rubble and broken furniture.
You, the reader, are then asked to choose whether to proceed to either the
left or right. Another thing to note is that with this point of view the present
tense is typically used – ‘you see’ rather than ‘you saw.’ This is not to say
that you shouldn’t write a second-person narrative in the past tense – it
might be quite effective in a short story. But generally, readers encounter
this viewpoint so rarely that they are likely to be put off by it and I wouldn’t
advise using it for a novel.
A variation on the second-person point of view, which overlaps to some
degree with first-person, is where the reader is referred to as one of two or
more characters: We are standing in a corridor and we see... This is very,
very rarely used but occasionally you will see it in a screenplay as the
writer describes what ‘we’ the audience will see on screen. Screenplay
writers are often advised against this – there is no ‘we’ in the story and
using ‘we see’ draws attention to the fact that the story is being told by a
writer and this reduces the reader’s sense of being present as events occur.
Unless you are deliberately trying to achieve a specific dramatic effect,
do not use second-person narration.
Many novels and short stories use the third-person viewpoint. It allows the
writer to tell the story as an external observer rather than as a character. It is
sometimes referred to as the objective viewpoint because it does not use the
subjective point of view of an individual witness or participant. The narrator
is a non-participant who stands ‘outside’. Third-person narratives are
usually presented in the past tense – ‘he said’ or ‘he saw’ – though present
tense may be used for short passages in a novel or for short stories in their
entirety.
There are two main forms of third-person point of view, typically
referred to as omniscient (or unrestricted) and limited (restricted).
Third-Person Omniscient
Third-Person Limited
There is no one viewpoint that is best for all romance novels. Which you
choose will depend on (a) which point of view you are most comfortable
writing, and (b) which is most commonly used in successful books in your
chosen sub-genre.
I said earlier in the book that readers of romance novels like to have
access to the hero’s thoughts, they want to understand why he does what he
does, but that does not mean that you need to write from the hero’s point of
view in your novel. In her essay ‘The Androgynous Reader: Point of View
in the Romance,’ Laura Kinsale says that a skilful writer can create reader
identification with the hero ‘without ever entering his point of view’ and
that a ‘truly great’ writer can do it even within a story told from the
heroine’s point of view – she cites Jane Eyre as a classic example. You have
to be very skilled at showing rather than telling.
But if you want to share your hero’s thoughts directly with the reader,
consider using multiple first-person viewpoints or a limited third-person
where you allow access to the heroine’s thoughts and the hero’s but no one
else’s.
Whichever point of view you choose for your novel, you are probably going
to want to share the thoughts of one or more of your characters. These
thoughts run through a person’s head as a sort of internal monologue –
literally a stream of consciousness.
Using the first-person point of view, the whole story – or the chapters
told by that character – are effectively their thoughts, though within this
they may also report what they were thinking at some point in the past that
they are telling the reader about.
How should you format a character’s thoughts on the page? There is no
hard and fast rule, though if you plan to submit your novel to a particular
publisher, you should look at how it is usually done in their books.
Your options for presenting your characters’ thoughts are as follows:
a. Format them in the same way as dialogue, using she thought instead of
she said (or I thought instead of I said). If you are using double
quotation marks for dialogue, use the same for thoughts: “I don’t like
the look of that,” she thought.
b. As above but use double quotes for dialogue and single quotes for
thoughts.
c. Don’t use quotations, put the thoughts in italics instead. Well, that’s a
hot mess, I thought. I would only do this if you have only a few lines
of character thoughts in a chapter – readers may find a lot of italics on
a page off-putting.
d. Report them instead of quoting them. Quoting: “He looks fine in those
tight jeans,” Lizzie thought. Reporting: Lizzie thought he looked fine
in his tight jeans. The guidelines for using reported thoughts are the
same as those for using reported dialogue: if it’s significant, you
should quote it, if it’s relatively insignificant or repeating something
already quoted, report it.
15 | The Modern Romance Plot:
Eight Sequences
In this chapter, we’ll look at the sequence of events that make up the
romantic relationship part of a romantic novel’s plot – the A-story. The aim
is to answer the question, What goes where? There are around forty separate
things that occur during the course of the romance. I’ll introduce them here
and then in the next two chapters cover some of the major ones in more
depth. After that, we’ll move on to the B-story (or subplot), the sequence of
external events that occur alongside the A-story and have an impact on it.
The forty or so things outlined below are not necessarily separate scenes
– you might include several of them in a single scene. And some may be
split across several scenes. Think of the model below as a template or
checklist to remind you of what you could – and sometimes should – be
including at each stage of your story.
I have separated things into the three acts – beginning middle, and end –
that people often refer to, splitting Act II into two parts with a midpoint.
This effectively splits the story into four quarters. And within those acts, I
have indicated the eight sequences. I find that splitting the plot up in this
way makes it more manageable.
Note that the eight sequences in your story may not turn out to be equal
eighths of your overall wordcount. Sequences at the beginning of the story
are often a little longer than those at the end. Sequence 8 is typically the
shortest, though it doesn’t have to be. This also means that the ‘midpoint’
my actually be a little after halfway through your total wordcount.
Items listed within a sequence can occur in any order, so in Sequence 1
for example, the heroine might be introduced first or the story may open
with the hero. There is also some flexibility in moving things from one
sequence to another, so something I’ve listed as occurring in Sequence 2
may be delayed until Sequence 3. And some things may be repeated in
more than one place.
All the suggestions below are just that – suggestions. This is not the way
to plot a romance novel, but it is a way. I have studied the plots of dozens of
romance novels using this model. And I have written a handful using it. I
refined the model based on what I learned while writing my first romantic
comedy novel Fandango (2022).
Towards the end of the book, we’ll look at how different sub-genres of
romance use variations of this plot. In many cases, the variations are
relatively minor. But in some, such as romantic suspense, there are more
significant changes, particularly in the amount of space given to the B-story.
Let’s begin at the beginning and continue on to the end.
Sequence 1
The main function of this sequence is to introduce our two main characters
and have them meet in a way that means they cannot ignore or be
indifferent to each other.
The Heroine’s Ordinary World (Optional) – Where does the story take
place? This may only be hinted at in Sequence 1, with more detail being
revealed in Sequence 2 when we spend more time with the heroine. Also
referred to as her status quo. There is often a suggestion that something is
lacking in her life – perhaps a hint of her backstory, though this will be
revealed more in Sequence 2 and a later ‘confessional’ scene in Sequence 4
or 5.
Introduce the Hero – His personality and appearance. His situation may be
slightly mysterious initially – we may not know his social situation or the
job he does. But there may be a hint of something lacking in his life. Details
of his backstory are typically not revealed until he and the heroine are
dating – in Sequences 4 and 5.
The Hero’s Ordinary World (Optional) – Some stories begin in the heroine’s
world, into which the hero intrudes at the cute meet. But in stories like the
Hollywood screwball comedy, the heroine intrudes on his world, so we
initially see his status quo rather than hers.
Sparks Fly – When the heroine and hero first meet, they experience strong
emotions. These may be positive – one or both of them experiences love at
first sight. Or they may be negative – the situation of their meeting may be
such that they hate each other on sight. You can create conflict if one of
them is attracted to and one repelled by the other. Or one or both may
experience contradictory feelings – being both attracted and repelled.
Whatever the nature of these feelings, they disrupt the equilibrium of one or
both characters and they are going to have to decide what to do about it.
Potential – Even if the two characters hate each other on sight, we will see
a glimpse of the fact that they could be a good match romantically. Even if
they do not recognise it or are not yet ready to admit it. To some extent, this
is assumed by the reader – when you introduce two mismatched characters
in a romance of course they’re going to end up together. But you should still
include a hint of the possibility here, possibly in terms of the internal
thoughts of one or both of them.
Sequence 1 brings our two main characters together and presents them with
an opportunity or challenge – a ‘call to love.’ Once this has been achieved,
we move on to Sequence 2 where we learn more about our characters and,
more importantly, discover how they respond to the challenge/opportunity.
Sequence 2
The three basic functions of this part of the story are – show how the two
characters react to the ‘call to love’; hint at why they react in this way, and
trap them in a situation where they can’t get away from each other, forcing
them to do something in response to the call. Once they are locked together
in this way, the set-up of our story is complete and we move into ACT II.
In terms of the hero and heroine’s response to each other we have three
options – (i) both are attracted to each other, in which case it is external
circumstances that serve as obstacles to their love; (ii) one is attracted to the
other and the other is (or claims to be) repelled, and (iii) they are both
repelled, which is typically the case in an ‘enemies to lovers’ story.
The first option, where the heroine and hero both fall in love at first sight
but are kept apart by external factors is found in Romeo and Juliet and also
in most romantic suspense novels. External obstacles play a much bigger
role in the plot. We will look at the structure of external events – the B-plot
or subplot – and the way they provide obstacles to love in a later chapter.
The third option, enemies to lovers, is a specific type of romance plot and
I’ll include a separate overview of it in another chapter.
The middle option – one attracted, one repelled – is more common in a
romantic comedy. In a Hollywood romantic comedy, the heroine is attracted
to the hero, but he tries to escape from her. They are trapped together and he
eventually recognises his feelings for her. Bringing Up Baby is an example
of this sort of plot. In romantic comedy novels, it is more often the hero
who is attracted to the heroine, and she tries to avoid becoming entangled
with him. This occurs in Janet Evanovich’s romantic comedies originally
published in the Loveswept series.
For simplicity’s sake, I’m going to describe situations below where the
hero is attracted to the heroine, but she is reluctant to respond to his
advances. You can switch the places of hero and heroine to create a story
where he is the reluctant one, or you can use this plot for a same-sex
relationship or for intersex or non-binary characters. It is character
personality and backstory that are the key things here, not the gender or
biological sex of the characters.
This is the simplest ‘he changes her’ (or ‘she changes him’) sort of story.
In the more complex ‘they change each other’ story, both hero and heroine
have a character development arc where they must both overcome a
reluctance to respond to the call to love. I will include references to this
type of story as being optional below.
In this section, we also begin to see obstacles to love – internal ones
relating to the inner fears of the heroine and/or hero, and external ones
arising from the subplot.
More About the Heroine and Her Ordinary World – We see where she lives
and learn about her job and/or her interests. These things tell us more about
her personality. They also tell us something about her greatest fear (see
below) and perhaps introduce us to her family or her friends, including her
confidante (see below).
Heroine’s Greatest Fear & Defences – One of the reasons the heroine is
afraid of accepting the call to love is because of something that occurred in
her past. It may be a traumatic incident or set of circumstances in her
childhood, or it may have been an unpleasant experience in a previous
marriage or relationship. She suffers a lack or an emotional or
psychological wound. This wounding is related to the shadow self (fear)
and denied self (shame) previously mentioned. And she has put defences in
place to protect herself from it. These defences include the physical
protection of her ordinary world and the false self or persona that she
presents to the outside world. The heroine’s need to overcome her fear and
shame, and to achieve wholeness in a way that gives her the self-confidence
to allow people to see her true self is sometimes referred to as her ‘core
need.’
In a romantic comedy – or a romance of any kind – the Heroine’s
Greatest Fear is that she will never find love (or won’t ever find love again)
and that if she does allow herself to love someone, she will be hurt by them
in a way that echoes her earlier traumatic wounding experience.
It is the hero’s function to challenge the heroine’s beliefs and force her to
confront her greatest fear. At some level, she recognises this and it is one of
the reasons she shies away from having a relationship with him.
Heroine Says ‘No’ to Love – The heroine puts forward her argument against
accepting the call to love. Typically, she will say that she doesn’t need a
man in her life right now or that she’s not yet ready for another relationship.
Or she has sworn off men for good because her last relationship was a
complete disaster. She may say that she has another priority in her life –
perhaps work-related or perhaps related to a family member such as a child
– and doesn’t want a romantic relationship to interfere with that. The
heroine may reveal more of her backstory as part of this argument.
This argument is only the partial truth. She doesn’t want to acknowledge
or admit that she is afraid of entering a relationship with the hero. The
reader and the heroine’s closest friend will be aware of this fear, even
though it is not addressed directly by the heroine’s argument.
The heroine provides this argument against love either in internal
thoughts to herself or in dialogue with her confidante or directly to the hero.
Variations of the argument may be made in both thought and dialogue at
different points of the story. The heroine may move from saying that she
doesn’t want a relationship at all, to saying that she doesn’t want to make a
long-term commitment, but a no-strings-attached fling is okay in the short
term.
If the heroine is cynical about love, perhaps as a result of a past
relationship, you can create contrast and conflict by having the hero
positive about love and actively pursue it. If both characters are wary of
love, don’t make them both cynical, give one of them another form of
negative response.
Heroine’s Decision & Action – In stories where the hero shows no interest
in her, the heroine may decide to pursue him. This occurs in many
Hollywood screwball comedies, where it is the heroine who takes the
initiative. If the hero does express an interest in her, she may decide that she
wants nothing to do with him and either ignores him (passive or passive-
aggressive response) or takes action to send him away or scare him away
(active response).
Even if she is attracted to the hero, she may decide to deny those feelings
and take no action, ignoring his attempts to woo her or actively
discouraging him. She feels she needs to protect herself and so acts
antagonistically.
Her decision and choice of action here are based on a desire to restore
equilibrium to her life – to protect the defensive walls and cozy world she
has made for herself. She may have to make a different decision and choose
different actions when it becomes clear that she cannot restore the old
balance to her life – this occurs at the lock-in (see below).
More About the Hero – Having been introduced to the hero, we learn more
about him – though we don’t learn everything, there is still an element of
mystery about him – more for the reader and the heroine to discover. If the
hero has fallen in love with the heroine and wants to woo her, then he is
presented as handsome, charming, funny, generous, and caring. This makes
the heroine’s decision to avoid having a relationship with him more
intriguing – Why doesn’t she want him, he’s perfect?
If the hero doesn’t express an interest in her, the heroine may decide to
woo him. In this case, the hero may be more distant or reserved – though he
is still handsome and will be revealed to have a hidden, caring side.
Hero’s Initial Reaction to the Call to Love – As mentioned above, the hero’s
response to the meet cute may be to fall in love at first sight and decide to
try and woo the heroine. There is little or no doubt in his mind, he knows
what he wants. In the more complex ‘they change each other’ type of story,
the hero may suffer the same doubts and fears as the heroine (see above).
Hero’s Greatest Fear & Defences – (Optional) In a story where the hero and
heroine change each other, the hero will have a fear, secret shame, and
defences in the same way as the heroine (see above). It is the heroine’s
function to challenge the hero’s beliefs and force him to confront his
greatest fear. At some level, he recognises this, and it is one of the reasons
he shies away from having a relationship with her.
Hero’s Confidant – (Optional) The hero may also have a close friend that he
confides in. This person is usually male and often anti-relationship – either
because the confidant has had a bad experience in a relationship or because
he is afraid of losing his best friend if the hero enters a romantic
relationship. The confidant may also (optionally) be a reflection of the
hero’s false self or may represent the kind of person he could become if he
overcame his greatest fear.
Hero Says ‘No’ to Love – (Optional – If the hero falls in love at first sight,
this doesn’t apply). If the hero is cynical about love, perhaps as a result of a
past relationship, you can create contrast and conflict by having the heroine
positive about love and actively pursue it.
Hero’s Decision & Action – As we’ve said, often the hero is attracted to the
heroine from the moment of their first meeting and sets out to win her heart.
He may try to seduce her and he may even manage to elicit the first kiss –
though kisses are more significant in a sweet romance and so tend not to
occur until later.
The Lock-In – External events force the heroine and hero together or trap
them together in a way that means they can no longer avoid or ignore each
other. They are compelled to deal with the other person and their feelings
for that person. The lock-in can involve them having to do something
together or it may place them on opposite sides in some sort of battle or
argument, tied together by the fact that they are opponents.
The lock-in comes as a result of some sort of external action or change in
circumstance, and it often coincides with the End of Act I Turning Point
(see below). Heroine and hero must work together – or work against each
other – until the external (subplot) situation is resolved. Often, they
reluctantly agree to make the best of an awkward situation, becoming
mistrustful allies.
There are many turning points in a story – things that send the action in a
new direction – but there are three major ones: one at the end of Act I that
moves the story on into Act II; one in the middle of Act II, which is both the
middle of that act and the middle of the story as a whole, and one at the end
of Act II that moves it into Act III, setting up the crisis and resolution of the
story.
The End of Act I Turning Point is typically a point where the romance
(the A-story) and the external subplot (the B-story) come together and begin
influencing each other. The B-story provides obstacles for the romance and
the romance provides obstacles to the action of the subplot.
At this point in the story, the two central issues of the story have been
defined – A-story: Will the heroine and hero get together as a couple? And
B-story: Will the events of the subplot be resolved? In a romantic comedy,
the action of the A-plot – the romance – takes precedence, taking up more
than 50% of the text of the story. In something like a romantic suspense
story, where external action provides most of the obstacles to love, the B-
plot can be 50% or more of the text, even though the outcome of the ‘Will
they won’t they?’ question is what the reader cares most about.
Stakes Established – The turning point at the end of Act I raises the
stakes in the B-story and the A-story. There is now a romance at stake and
the outcome of subplot events. By the end of Act I, we know what is at
stake in the A-story and the B-story. We also have some idea of the
emotional and psychological stakes for the heroine (and perhaps the hero),
in terms of their greatest fear. Put simply, we know what the story is about.
It’s worth noting that even though external events have trapped the
heroine and hero together in some way, a romantic relationship is still
optional for them. Either or both of them could still walk away from the
relationship, even if they still have to carry on the external action together.
They do not become ‘locked in’ to the relationship until the midpoint (see
below) when something significant occurs between them – in a sweet
romance, this is often the first significant kiss, and in a spicier romance it is
the first time they have sex, but other options are available. Until the
midpoint, the story is full of sexual tension – will they or won’t they. At the
midpoint – the middle turning point – that question is answered, and the
story moves into a new phase as the two characters are now officially a
couple and/or have to deal with what the kiss/sex means for them.
Until the midpoint, sexual tension is of major significance. Internal
conflict – fears and doubts – and external conflict – the events of the
subplot – place the outcome of the romantic relationship in jeopardy. The
reader is left wondering, ‘Will they, or won’t they?’ This is what keeps them
turning the pages through the first half of the book. Of course, everyone
knows that they will, but we want to see how they get there. We want to be
with them on their journey to the ‘I will’ moment.
In some romances, particularly those of a spicier nature, the hero and
heroine may both be attracted to each other physically and decide to have a
fling or a one-night stand to get this out of their system. They both go into it
with their eyes open, telling each other and themselves that this is ‘just sex’
with no strings attached. After this, they both believe they can go back to
the equilibrium of their lives as they were. But the reader knows that’s not
going to happen.
Denial – In some stories, one character denies their attraction and the other
seeks to pursue a romantic relationship. The heroine may want nothing to
do with hero, deciding that she doesn’t want a relationship at this point in
her life. Or it may be a reluctant hero who tries to avoid a heroine who is
attracted to him. In other stories, both characters deny the attraction that
they are feeling.
The heroine’s denial is caused by the contradictory feelings she is
experiencing. There is attraction but she also feels a need to protect herself.
If the hero is expressing an interest in her, she will be reluctant to trust
him. She thinks is interest in her must be purely sexual, because she
believes that’s what men are like. To win her heart, the hero will have to
prove that he is in love with her and that it is not merely lust. The reader
may already be aware that he genuinely loves her, but the heroine does not
know it.
Denying the attraction they feel, the heroine (or hero or both) will do
what she can to avoid becoming involved romantically with the other
person. If they have to work together, she will be professional and polite but
also cool as she seeks to maintain her distance. But this doesn’t work –
either because the hero is actively trying to win her over, or because her
own feelings for him are becoming too strong to ignore. Or both.
Attempts may be made to have a platonic relationship – ‘just friends’ – or
to be opponents – ‘just enemies’ – but things aren’t that simple. Emotions
one one or both sides complicate things. There is romantic or sexual tension
to contend with.
Feeling the need to protect herself, the heroine may take stronger
measures to try and keep him away, behaving coldly and perhaps even
becoming angry with him. The hero will be confused by this anger because
he hasn’t done anything to deserve it. He doesn’t understand her behaviour,
because it is the result of her inner conflict and deepest fears. Her coldness
and/or anger may increase even further in Sequence 4, or she may resort to
other measures to ‘protect’ herself from the hero and the emotions he
evokes in her.
If she wants to avoid falling hopelessly in love, she will have to take
more active steps to get rid of the hero and/or her feelings for him. Towards
the end of the sequence, perhaps against the advice of her confidante, she
makes a decision to try and end this once and for all.
Cross-Purposes – At this point in the story, the heroine and hero do not
understand each other. They may want different things in terms of a
relationship and in terms of external goals. In an ‘enemies to lovers’ story,
they will be on opposite sides of some external conflict. There may be
several instances of approach and retreat as they try to get to know each
other. The heroine my try to ensure that the hero retreats every time,
regarding him as a threat.
Their very different viewpoints and goals mean that there is plenty of
scope for doubts and misunderstanding. But during this approach and
retreat phase, they are getting to know each other better – whether they
want to or not.
Heroine (or Hero) Says ‘No’ to Love – This may be an intensification of the
same character’s argument as was expressed in Sequence 2 above, or it may
be the other character expressing a similar argument.
Hero Says ‘Yes’ to Love – If the hero is in love and has decided to woo the
heroine, instead of arguing against love, he will provide an argument in
favour of love. He may make this argument to the heroine face-to-face –
perhaps stating in general terms why love is good for people. Or he may
argue with his confidant, who may be opposed to the relationship.
Hero Displays His Sensitive Side – One of the reasons why the heroine
struggles to deny her feelings for the hero is because she sees evidence of
his gentler side. He demonstrates kindness in his interaction with a child, an
old person, or a pet. He has a hidden ability to be a carer and the heroine
finds this attractive. There will a hint here that she may grow to trust him in
time, if she sees more of this side of him. This also lets the reader see that
the hero is potential ‘husband material,’ despite any negative qualities he
appears to have. This is an argument for romance, countering the denial
(which is against), and helps to create romantic suspense.
Increased Attraction – Despite her denial, the heroine (or hero or both) feel
their attraction to the other person growing. There may even be a romantic
moment – a kiss or an attempted kiss – that is interrupted, to the heroine’s
relief. This tells the reader that ‘it’s going to happen, but not yet,’ adding to
the romantic suspense. Something else is required to push the characters to
a point where denial is no longer possible – this occurs towards the end of
Sequence 4, the midpoint of the story.
External Obstacles – As well as internal conflict experienced by one or both
of the main characters, events in the B-story or subplot also act as obstacles
to the development of the romantic relationship. An event in Sequence 3
may serve to establish or increase the stakes in the B-story.
Final Attempt at Denial – The heroine (or the hero) may instigate a meeting
of some sort to try and end all of this sexual tension nonsense. If they can
sit down and clear up any misunderstandings between them, the situation
can be resolved and they can get on with their lives. But, of course, this
doesn’t go according to plan. What starts out as an attempt to say ‘no’ to
love in no uncertain terms, ends up going in a very different direction.
Getting to Know You – The heroine and hero are spending more time
together and will often find themselves doing the sorts of domestic things
that couples do. This is often shown by the two of them preparing a meal
together. But it could involve a DIY task such as fixing a leak or decorating
a room. Or they may go shopping together. Or attend a social function or
sports game. Some of the things they do together may involve the heroine’s
friends. Others will require the heroine and hero to spend time with each
other with no-one else around.
Something Sexy – The hero does something that the heroine finds sexy – he
either rescues her or he demonstrates his caring nature in some other way.
The heroine does something that the hero finds sexy, perhaps demonstrating
her strength and feistiness. These are first indications that each character
can overcome their inner flaw and are also glimpses of their true selves.
Change in Behaviour – As heroine and hero grow to know each other and
their feelings of attraction develop, we will see some changes in their
behaviour. In film, internal changes in feelings or attitudes are often
symbolised by a change in a character’s appearance, especially their
costume. We can do a similar thing in novels.
The heroine is no longer denying her feelings for the hero. She starts to
care what he thinks about her, and she wants to make a good impression.
She may change the way she dresses and perhaps the way she styles her
hair.
The Midpoint
The midpoint occurs at the end of Sequence 4 and marks the middle of Act
II and the middle of the story as a whole. At the midpoint, something
happens that shows the relationship has moved to a new level and taken on
added significance for the heroine and hero. In a clean or sweet romance,
this is likely to be the first significant kiss. There may have been a kiss on
the cheek, nose, or forehead prior to this, but at the midpoint it is his mouth
on her mouth and tongues are involved. In the spicier type of romance, the
heroine and hero have sex for the first time at the midpoint, French kissing
having occurred earlier in the story.
In a very spicy romance, you might want your characters to have sex
much earlier, perhaps soon after the meet cute. In this case, it is intended to
be ‘just sex’ – a one-night stand with no strings attached. But one of the
characters (or both) realise that they have a much deeper attraction to the
other. In some stories, no-strings-attached sex may occur in Sequence 3 as
an attempt to ‘get it out of their system’ and move on. But again, deeper
feelings mean this doesn’t resolve things in the intended way. In either of
these cases, the sex that occurs at the midpoint is different – instead of
being a purely physical thing, there is now an emotional attachment
between heroine and hero. Things have changed for them.
This interaction – kiss or sex – at the midpoint is a new form of ‘lock-in’
– the two characters are now connected by shared feelings. They have
acknowledged the attraction between them, and they have taken action to
validate it. In terms of the relationship, this raises the stakes. Both of them
now have more to lose if things don’t turn out well. They have made
themselves vulnerable by admitting their feelings.
They may also have made themselves more vulnerable in terms of the B-
story or subplot. A villain doesn’t have to target the hero, he can target the
person that the hero cares about. A hero with a romantic partner is in a
riskier position – he may be willing to suffer torture or death himself, but if
the heroine is threatened, he may do anything to save her, including letting
the villain win.
The midpoint and the lock-in at the end of Act I may be linked
thematically. At the end of Act I, the heroine and/or the hero had their
defences in place and were presenting their masks or false selves to the
world. At the midpoint, those defences are beginning to come down and the
characters are showing signs of who they really are. They still have some
way to go, and there will be a major setback at the end of Act II, but the
midpoint is an important moment on their character development arcs.
Until the midpoint, both the heroine and the hero had the equivalent of a
‘Get Out of Jail Free’ card. They could walk away from the relationship at
any point, even if they were trapped in an external situation where they had
to interact with each other. At the midpoint, this option is gone. They can’t
go back to how things were – they have acknowledged to each other that
their feelings exist. The denial phase is over. They can only go forward –
the relationship exists so they can explore it or bring it to an end.
The midpoint also marks another change in the story. In the first half of
the story, external circumstances served to push the heroine and hero
together, with the lock-in and the midpoint being significant examples of
this. At the midpoint, the two characters acknowledge their feelings for each
other and decide that they want to be a couple. After this point, external
events serve to try and force heroine and hero apart – and this is what
happens at the end of Act II.
The part of the story immediately after the midpoint is one some writers
struggle with. If a middle is going to ‘sag’ it will happen here. You’ve got to
the moment where your characters have kissed or had sex and it feels like
the story is over. What else is there? Your plot has run out of steam. It
doesn’t help that may guides for writers gloss over this part of the story. It
can make you want to rush ahead and start working on the crisis of the story
that you know occurs at the end of Act II. But it is too soon for that.
In romance and romantic comedy, dealing with this part of the story is
easier because we can give it a specific label and a specific function.
Knowing these, we can write scenes to fulfil that function.
I said earlier that a romance novel isn’t about being in love, it is about
two people falling in love and facing obstacles along the way. Sequence 5 is
the exception to this as it is about being in love. One-eighth of a romance
story is about being in love. I’ve heard this sequence described as ‘the
romance of the romance’ or a brief ‘honeymoon’ period.
When a non-romance story has a romantic subplot, Sequence 5 is also
often about being in love. And in a buddy movie, Sequence 5 is where they
finally become friends. At least for a while. In other types of story, this
sequence is often a quieter, character-based moment. There are a couple of
reasons for this.
In a romance or a romantic comedy, we want to show our two main
characters, and our readers, what love could be like if they overcome all of
their internal and external obstacles. This sequence offers a glimpse or a
taste of the future they could have together. It is the prize that they could
win.
Also, there’s a lot going on in the first half of a story. There’s all that
setting up and setting in motion, major plot turning points, and all kinds of
other stuff. But when you reach the midpoint, the characters, the world they
live in, and the situation they face together has all be established. Now you
as the writer get to play in this world and have fun with it. Everything that
you use in the second half of your story should have been set-up in the first
half. If you suddenly introduce something new in the second half, you risk
having the reader feel that you’re cheating by pulling a rabbit from a hat.
Sequence 5 can feel like a moment to take a breath. Having set all that
stuff up, we can spend some time with the characters in a relatively quiet
place and get to know them better. And they can get to know each other
better. In most stories, this is where characters trust each other enough to
share stories about the emotional trauma they have suffered in the past,
either during childhood or in previous relationships. This is where we learn
why the characters built the defences that they have in place and why they
have the character flaw that they need to overcome. We’ve had hints before,
but now we get the full story.
The other reason why we give our characters a nice friendly or romantic
moment here is that it will seem all the more dramatic when we take it away
from them (Boy Loses Girl) towards the end of Sequence 6, where we have
the dark moment followed by the crisis. We give them happiness in order to
take it away from them. If you want to be a romance writer, you have to be
a bit of a sadist when it comes to your characters. You have to make them
suffer. But first, romance.
Our heroine and hero have acknowledged their feelings for each other,
and this was demonstrated at the midpoint by an incredibly sensual kiss or
sex, depending on the spice level of your story.
In Sequence 5, the two of them are happy together, everything seems
ideal. But the reader knows that there are still obstacles to deal with. In the
external B-plot or subplot, there will be challenges that interrupt or threaten
their romantic togetherness. And there are internal character flaws that need
to be overcome by one or both characters.
And at the back of the reader’s mind should be that situation you set up at
the end of Sequence 3 that still hasn’t been resolved. That set-up will pay
off at the end of Sequence 5, setting in motion the events leading to boy
losing girl.
Although we see the heroine and hero beginning to trust each other here,
they are not yet in a position to trust each other completely. They still have
their defence mechanisms in place to protect them from their deepest fears
and to prevent people seeing their deepest shame. In Sequence 5, they will
lower these defences a little, as an experiment, and they will like the way it
feels to trust someone and give them a glimpse of their true selves. But
those walls are ready to go back up at the first sign of danger. And that is
what will happen after the dark moment. Typically, the hero is afraid to be
vulnerable and express his feelings because he has been taught that this is a
form of weakness. The heroine is afraid of losing her personal identity and
the control (power) she has achieved over her own life. Until they can
overcome these fears, they will not be able to have a trusting and happy
long-term relationship. What they have in Sequence 5 is a chance to see
what that could be like.
The tenderness and trust that the hero and heroine share in Sequence 5
helps to move them further along their character development arc. By
sharing their past emotional trauma with someone who cares and
understands, they begin to deal with it. Having someone accept them, faults
and all, makes them feel more confident about revealing their true selves,
rather than hiding behind the mask of their persona. They help to heal each
other’s emotional or psychic wounds.
At the climax of Sequence 5, the Sequence 3 set-up pays off and this,
usually coupled with some sort of misunderstanding between the heroine
and hero, begins an unravelling that leads to their break-up in Sequence 6.
Heroine in the Hero’s World – (Optional) You don’t see this as often as a
story point in this sequence. In some stories – romantic suspense or Western
romance, for example – the whole story takes place in the hero’s world. In
romantic comedy, the heroine sometimes intrudes on the hero’s world to
cause chaos or disruption. And in stories where hero and heroine must work
together, they typically share a world – a newspaper office, for example.
But you are less likely to see the heroine ‘getting to know’ the hero by
spending time with his circle of friends (assuming he has one).
Family – Having spent some time in isolation with the hero, when the
relationship enters the public phase, the heroine may introduce him to her
family or they may return to a place where family is present. A family
setting, particularly if it includes parents and young children, can represent
the sort of life that the couple want for themselves. Or it may be something
that one of them dreads. A situation such as a family meal or a ritual event
such as Thanksgiving or Christmas gives an opportunity for the hero to
show his caring side in interactions with older relatives, children, and/or
animals.
Romantic Dates – The heroine and hero may have gone on dates in
Sequence 4 or even Sequence 3, leading to the first kiss and (possibly) first
sex. In Sequence 5 they date as an established couple. There is likely to be a
romantic date with just the two of them. But as their relationship has now
been made public, they might go on a double-date with friends of the
heroine or attend an event with several other couples (usually people in the
heroine’s friendship circle). Interacting with other couples who are in
successful long-term relationships is another way of showing what the hero
and heroine could achieve if they can make their own relationship work. Or
they may see couples with less successful relationships and learn something
from their mistakes.
Domesticity – I mentioned this in the previous sequence, but it can occur
here instead or as well. We see the heroine and hero doing ordinary
domestic tasks together, being comfortable in a domestic environment.
Heroine’s Backstory – The heroine now trusts the hero to tell him about
significant events in her childhood and details about her previous marriage
or relationship. These memories will include some positive things – ‘I loved
to do this thing when I was a girl.’ The hero can later demonstrate his caring
side by remembering this thing and arranging some gift or outing that
allows the heroine to recapture the joy she felt as a child. There will also be
darker memories that allow the hero to understand the nature of her deepest
fears and of her shame. By listening, accepting, and demonstrating love for
her – including her faults – he helps her begin to overcome her fear and
shame.
In many stories, part of the heroine’s character growth/development arc
involves dealing with feelings and beliefs arising out of a previous,
unsuccessful relationship. I have created a whole chapter on ‘How to Get
Over Your Ex.’
Hero’s Backstory – The hero now trusts the heroine enough to allow himself
to be vulnerable around her. He shows her his caring side, which she has
seen a little bit previously – it is one of the things that attracted her to him.
He also may talk about his childhood and is likely to talk about past
experiences with women that have made him cautious or even cynical when
it comes to romance. He will also reveal something of his fear and shame.
By accepting and loving him despite his faults, the heroine helps him begin
to overcome his character flaw.
Confidante – The heroine and/or hero may have a scene where they tell
their closest friend how they feel about the person they are falling in love
with. The confidante may be supportive, or they may feel threatened by the
relationship. Even a supportive confidante may have some concerns,
recognising that the heroine (or hero) hasn’t dealt with all of their internal
baggage yet. They may also be worried what will happen if the relationship
doesn’t work out – will the heroine (or hero) become an emotional wreck
who isn’t able to function?
Cloud on the Horizon – At some point during this sequence, you need to
hint at trouble to come. This may be a subtle reminder of the thing that was
set-up in Sequence 3 or it may be something that will lead, like the first
event in a chain reaction, to that set-up being paid off. Often, the hero or
heroine has a secret, and we see something here that threatens to expose this
secret. Someone from the character’s past may appear or maybe there’s a
hint that someone close, the confidant perhaps, might betray it. Or we could
see a bit of the heroine or hero’s flawed behaviour, showing that they still
have fear and shame that could jeopardise the couple’s happiness.
There may also be events in the external B-story that could develop into a
threat to their relationship. Or we may see a suggestion that the relationship
will pose a risk to the hero or heroine’s ability to complete the B-story task,
quest or adventure.
We can’t allow our characters to be happy and settled for too long, we
need to set up a new source of tension. We answered the ‘Will they won’t
they?’ question at the midpoint. Now we need to evoke a new question in
the reader’s mind, ‘Can they make it work for the long-term?’ Here we
begin hinting at the threats that their romance will face.
This cloud might be represented by their first disagreement or a minor
quarrel. Or a misunderstanding that sows a seed of doubt in the mind of one
of the characters. This quarrel demonstrates that they still have their
defensive behaviours in place.
Set-up Dark Moment – There is an even stronger hint that something isn’t
right. Perhaps the heroine’s (or hero’s) confidante suspects something or has
heard rumours. Or a mysterious character – perhaps someone from the
hero’s past – makes an appearance or a second appearance.
Heroine’s Ideal Man – (Optional) One of the reasons the heroine is attracted
to the hero is that she feels he does not have a negative trait that her ex-
boyfriend or ex-husband (or perhaps her father) had. This man in her past
treated her badly, creating or intensifying her feelings of fear and shame.
She felt she could trust this man but felt betrayed by him. At the dark
moment in the story, there will be a combination of external events and a
misunderstanding that lead the heroine to feel that the hero has betrayed her
in exactly the same way.
To set this up, the heroine may talk to her confidante or to the hero,
describing the qualities of the sort of man she could settle down with
permanently. She is essentially describing the hero – but the reader knows
that the hero has a secret that may ruin his chances of being this ideal man.
Or the heroine has a secret that the hero will react to in a way that will show
he isn’t the ideal man.
As the heroine talks about her version of Prince Charming, the reader
again knows something she doesn’t know. This technique of putting the
reader in a superior position, knowing things the characters don’t, is called
dramatic irony as is a key way of creating tension or suspense in this part of
the story.
Real Proposal – (Optional) The hero makes a proper proposal or some other
gesture indicating a more permanent commitment to her. The heroine may
refuse, ask for time to think about it, or accept. Or there may be some
external interruption that means she can’t give him an answer right now.
In terms of the character development arc of the heroine and/or hero, this
isn’t the right time to make a proposal/commitment. They aren’t ready yet.
A long-term relationship won’t work until they have done all the necessary
work to overcome their character flaw. If the hero proposes here, he’s doing
it for the wrong reasons. Perhaps he’s afraid of losing her because he senses
that something bad is coming. And if the heroine accepts, she’s also doing it
for the wrong reason – perhaps she too does it out of a fear of losing him.
Or because she is responding to pressure from her friends or relatives.
Confession Interrupted – If the hero (or the heroine) has a secret, they must
make an attempt to confess it. This is a vitally important part of the story
because it shows that the hero is basically a good, honest guy and it is one
of the reasons why the heroine is able to forgive him after their break-up. If
the hero was able to make this confession, coming clean about the secret in
his past or present life, it would prevent the dark moment. The dark moment
is caused by this secret and by some misunderstanding related to it.
The hero tells the heroine that he has something important to tell her. But
circumstances conspire against him. Perhaps he can’t get a moment alone
with her. Perhaps she isn’t in the mood for a serious talk – maybe she’s
drunk or horny or in a bad mood about something else. Or she’s distracted
by a task. Or events in the B-story get in the way. And then when he does
get a quiet moment with her and begins his confession, something interrupts
him. He has to give up for the moment, but he believes he’ll have another
opportunity to come clean. But Fate has other ideas. In terms of the story, it
is vitally important that he tried to do the right thing.
Reality Shift – In the movies, this sort of moment is often shown using a
camera trick. We see an image of familiar surroundings from an unfamiliar
or extreme angle – perhaps from high above or from below looking up or
tilted at an angle. If you’ve seen the film Inception, think about the way the
world suddenly moves in ways that we know it shouldn’t. Another trick is
the one seen in Jaws when the camera zooms in on Chief Brody (Roy
Scheider) but at the same time the background seems to zoom away from
the camera. Or think about the way your stomach feels if an elevator car
drops suddenly or you go over a humpbacked bridge too fast. This is the
kind of feeling you want to achieve at the dark moment. The clichéd
expression ‘the bottom dropped out of my world’ expresses this. We want
the heroine (or hero) to feel that this is what has happened to them.
The dark moment needs to be sudden and sharp – and from the point of
view of the characters, unexpected. But the reader knew it was coming,
they’ve been dreading it but also anticipating it. To ensure it has maximum
impact, you should keep this brief. It happens. There aren’t too many
details, there is no long explanation – that can wait until Sequence 7 – it just
drops like a bomb, leaving the character(s) stunned. We don’t even see their
reactions until the next sequence. Think of it as being something awful
happens and then a freeze-frame on a face that is too shocked to respond.
The dark moment marks the end of Act II, the end of the middle of the
story, and it sets up Act III, the end.
Boy loses girl. It has to seem like a devastating blow that means the
relationship is over and the two of them won’t ever be reconciled. The two
may not actually split up at this moment – there may be some desperate
attempts to deny or recover from this dark moment early in Sequence 7 –
but this event signals the beginning of the end of their happiness. At least
for now.
The dark moment in their relationship may coincide with a similarly
devastating moment in the B-story or subplot. But in terms of the
relationship, the dark moment must be related to the characters and their
backstory and/or flaws. The break-up of their relationship cannot be caused
only by the subplot events. You can’t separate the two of them by making
her believe that the hero has been killed in an accident, for example. If you
want this as a B-story plot point, it would have to occur after the emotional
break-up of their relationship, adding to her sense of loss but not being the
sole cause of it.
Heroine Berates Herself – She is angry at herself for having let down her
defences and trusted the hero. And for allowing herself to dream that a
perfect relationship was possible. (Or the hero berates himself)
Decision Time – Having learned the ‘truth’ during the dark moment
revelation, the heroine (or hero) must decide what to do next. If the hero has
proposed to the heroine and is waiting for an answer, she has to put that off
until she decides what to do about what she has learned. If she has already
accepted his proposal, she has to decide what to do with the ring. She may
take it off and hide it for now. Or she may ‘lose’ it. She may put off
questions about marriage by saying she is planning to have a long
engagement. These attempts to ‘buy time’ are forms of denial – see Five
Stages of Change below – because the heroine isn’t yet ready to accept that
her relationship is about to end.
Heroine Tries to Discover the Truth – The heroine sets out to discover if
what she learned at the dark moment is true. She may sneak around like a
private detective. Or she might talk to other people who know the hero. Or
she could try to trick him into revealing the truth. If she suspects him of
being unfaithful in some way, she may set up some sort of fidelity test to
prove whether he can or cannot be trusted. This usually backfires in some
way or leaves the heroine looking foolish. (Or the hero tries to discover the
truth)
Truth Admitted – The hero may admit the truth, confess his secret, or the
heroine may find some other kind of proof.
Betrayal – The heroine feels that the hero has betrayed her. He isn’t the man
she thought he was. He isn’t the man she fell in love with. He has behaved
in a way that has made her deepest fear come true. At least, that’s what it
feels like from her point of view. She is reliving the emotional trauma of the
relationship she had with a man in the past. Or it may be the hero that feels
he has been betrayed by the heroine. Or both.
Heroine Confronts Hero – Why did you lie to me? The heroine makes it
clear that she feels he has betrayed her. (Or the hero confronts her)
Hero’s Response – How the hero responds to the confrontation will depend
on the nature of the misunderstanding that exists between them. He may
shrug it off and treat it as a joke, which may only make her angrier. He may
feel that he is innocent and being unjustly accused of a crime, which may
make him feel hurt, resentful, or angry. Or he may feel that he deserves her
anger, which confirms that (in his mind) he isn’t worthy of her love.
End of Relationship – The heroine (or the hero) ends the relationship. They
are emotionally and physically separated. This may be a permanent break,
or they may say that they need some time apart to think about what has
happened.
Heroine Tries to Avoid Hero – She may have been trying to do this ever
since the dark moment, but now she really doesn’t want to see him. But
Fate has other ideas. She may need to take deliberate action to get away
from him. She may provoke an argument to try and get him to go away.
End of Lock-In – The lock-in has been keeping the heroine and hero
together since the end of Act I. You might need to find some way to end
these circumstances or to circumvent them at least temporarily. If they have
been working together, one of them may quit the job. If they have been on
opposite sides of a conflict, one may say they no longer care about the
outcome.
Hero Goes Away – The hero may decide that he needs some time alone to
sort things out. Either the heroine has said she doesn’t want to see him
anymore or she has said he needs to change his behaviour. He needs time to
think. When he is gone, we will see that the heroine and her friends and/or
family miss him. Their relationship has achieved a status where it doesn’t
just affect the two of them anymore – other people care about the outcome
of their disagreement.
Loss – The end of the relationship brings a profound feeling of loss, similar
to a bereavement. The Kübler-Ross model of the five stages of grief (see
below) has been adapted for other types of change in life, and you can see
those stages in play in this part of a romance.
The loss that the heroine (or hero) suffers is a double blow. By
committing to the relationship at the midpoint, they moved away from their
old life and they cannot go back to it. Things have changed and it won’t be
the same. Perhaps a bridge was burned when the heroine chose her
relationship with the hero over something else. Or perhaps some event in
the B-story serves as a burnt bridge. At the same time, she has now lost the
new life that her relationship seemed to promise. With both of these gone,
she feels lost and in a sense of limbo. It is also likely to affect her sense of
identity – she’s not who she was before she met the hero and she’s no
longer one half of a couple. She may end up asking, ‘Who am I?’
Character Growth – The break-up serves as the catalyst for the final stages
of the hero and/or heroine’s character development arc. If he or she wants
to win back the other, they are going to overcome their character flaw by
integrating their shadow and denied selves, achieving wholeness, and
abandoning the defensive mask of their false selves and committing to
being their true self. There is more on this in the chapter on character
development arcs.
Alone Again – The heroine and the hero are alone. Each is missing the other
and they are feeling unhappy. They do not believe that there is any chance
of the two of them getting back together. They may look back fondly on the
good times they had together – and berate themselves for believing that it
could last.
Hero Returns – Having spent some time alone, the hero decides that he
can’t live without the heroine. He returns and professes his love for her. She
rebuffs him, ‘If you love me, you’ll stay away from me.’ She cannot be
reconciled with him until he can prove that he has overcome his character
flaw. He needs to abandon his self-defeating protective behaviours and
become his true self. He has to complete his character development arc –
only then is he worthy of her love. The heroine may also have some growth
of her own to complete, to prove to herself that she is worthy of his love.
Hero Demonstrates His Caring Side – The hero may complete some task
that helps the heroine or her family. Or perhaps he completes some part of
the B-story. This is a sort of farewell gesture and it typically accompanies a
more permanent going away. If the hero and heroine were living together,
he moves out. He may even leave town. If they were working together, he
quits (if he hasn’t already), or he abandons the conflict they have been
engaged in. He doesn’t care about any of it anymore. He will do what she
asked and leave her alone. This seems to show that their relationship is over
completely and there can be no going back.
Tentative Move by the Hero – The hero may do something to make try and
make things right. The hero may remain offstage for this, and we see only
the heroine’s reaction to it. She is not ready to forgive him and wants no
part of it. If it is the hero who is not yet ready to forgive, it may be the
heroine who makes this move.
Heroine and Hero Miserable Without Each Other – Both characters are
unhappy, but their defences are back in place, and they don’t want to take
the risk of showing their vulnerability. When they encounter each other,
there may be some flirting – ‘Remember what we used to have?’ – but they
aren’t yet ready to kiss and make-up.
Hero’s Epiphany – The hero knows he loves the heroine and now he reaches
a point where he realises he doesn’t want to live without her. He cannot live
without her.
Hero Completes Character Growth – The ‘epiphany’ is the final push the
hero needs to overcome his character flaw. He deals with his fear and
shame, abandons his false self and defensive behaviours, and accepts his
true self. He is ready to go into the world as his true self. The heroine is so
important to him that he doesn’t care what this costs him. He doesn’t care
what other people think and he doesn’t care if it makes him vulnerable. He
has finally learned what is most important to him in life – being his true self
so he can be with the heroine who has accepted and loves his true self. I
discussed this last stage of growth in the chapter on character development
arcs.
External Events Push Them Apart – Having recognised they need each
other, the heroine and hero may then find themselves pushed apart by
events in the B-story or subplot. The cliché is that the villain kidnaps the
heroine, and the hero must rescue her. If you are not writing a romantic
suspense novel, the external event will be something more subtle. Or maybe
not – the heroine may have decided to marry another guy who has been
around in the background as a bland, safe alternative to the hero.
Reconciliation – The epiphanies and the hero’s grand gesture bring the
heroine and hero together emotionally – there are usually some tears shed
here. Then they will sit down and sort out the misunderstanding that
separated them. Apologies will be made, explanations, given, and there will
be understanding and forgiveness.
Epilogue – (Optional) Sometimes you might want to show the heroine and
hero living happily ever after without having to describe the wedding and
moving in together and the birth of their first child or whatever. You can
show that they achieve some or all of these things by having an epilogue
that takes place six months or a year or several years later. You can provide
a nice, neat finale in this way. Keep this short, probably no more than two
or three pages, because you don’t want to rob the last chapters of your story
of their emotional impact. The epilogue is just the cherry on the cake.
The epilogue also shows the heroine and hero’s new ‘ordinary world’ –
this is where they now live (together) and they have achieved a new and
comfortable equilibrium.
That completes our bird’s-eye view of the romance novel plot – the A-story.
In a novella or short novel, this may be all the plot you need. In the next
chapter I will cover a few of the key story points listed above in more
detail, namely Introducing the Heroine; the Heroine’s Ordinary World, with
some prompts of things to consider; the Meet Cute or first encounter
between your heroine and hero, including examples for inspiration; the
Lock-in, again with examples; some thoughts on the Denial stage and
creating Sexual Tension; how to handle the Break-up, and the ‘Grand
Gesture’ that a hero (or perhaps heroine) might use as a visible symbol of
their love to win back their heroine (or hero).
16 | The Plot Thickens
In this chapter and the next, I want to look in more detail at some of the key
plot elements referred to in the plot model in Chapter 15. Here we’ll look at
Acts I and II (Sequences 1-6) and in Chapter 17 we’ll consider Act III, the
break-up and what comes after it. I’ll take the plot elements in the order
they would appear in the story. Mostly what is included here are some ideas
to consider and some questions to prompt you as you plan these elements
for your novel. There are also some lists of examples for you to adapt or to
use as inspiration. You might find it helpful to create lists like this of your
own, adding to them as inspiration strikes or as you see ideas in stories you
read. Having access to such lists will hopefully mean that you are never
stuck for ideas when creating your own stories.
If you want to try and guess which of the above I have suffered personally,
go for it – but I’m not telling you if you’re right.
Having brainstormed situations similar to these – or you can pick one of
the above and use it with my blessing – you need to expand on it to come
up with things to write about. You want to create a scene of at least a couple
of pages or maybe a short chapter. Ask yourself – What happens in the here
and now? Or, What has just happened? Why is this significant to the
heroine? What are the potential consequences?
As an example, I took the idea of the heroine having just lost her job. I
wasn’t sure whether she had quit or been fired, I just had an image in my
head of her standing in a parking lot with a cardboard box with her
possessions in, and a stunned expression on her face as if she was thinking,
‘How did that happen?’ My imagination tends to work visually, so a picture
like that in my mind’s eye starts my creative process. For other people, the
creative trigger may be a line of dialogue. Or something else.
Having picked a situation – jobless heroine in parking lot – I started
brainstorming again. I asked myself questions about her situation. I’ve
included my list of ideas below. I’ve placed these into three broad groups –
her immediate situation, its short-term implications, and the longer-term
implications. The ideas didn’t come to me neatly packaged in that way, but I
noticed these groupings when I reviewed my list. I think it’s likely that
anyone finding themselves in a problematic situation or a dramatic change
of circumstances is going to think about the immediate, short-term, and
long-term in that order as their brain begins to process things.
Most of the ideas below are designed to evoke sympathy in the reader.
When introducing the heroine, we want the reader to like her and perhaps
identify with her, and one way to do that is to place her in a situation that
garners sympathy.
Immediate Situation
Describe some of the items in her box – they have memories attached
to them. Bittersweet.
Medium-Term Implications
Heroine realises that she no longer has a regular income to pay her
bills. The money she has in the bank will keep her going for x days or
weeks.
She goes to her car. Is it a wreck that keeps costing her money to fix?
Or is it as a new car that she loves but will no longer be able to afford
the payments on?
If she hated her job and/or her boss and/or the people she worked with,
losing her job may feel like a tremendous relief. Despite any other
consequences. She feels free. She may want to take a few hours to
celebrate this freedom before facing the reality of her new situation. Or
she may love her job and feel angry – at herself or her boss? – for
losing it.
Long-Term Consequences
The nature of the heroine’s inner thoughts and fears, and the words she uses
in thinking about them, helps to reveal something about her personality.
Readers like to see pages broken up by dialogue – it puts more white space
on the page – so you might want to format some of her thoughts as dialogue
she speaks to herself. Or perhaps she addresses a fluffy toy in her box?
We also need to explain how and why she quit her job or got fired from
it. Was it her own fault – did she do something clumsy or stupid? Was she
just the unlucky victim of an accident or circumstance – e.g. she had to be
‘let go’ because the company lost a major client? Do you want the reader to
feel sorry for her? Angry on her behalf? Worried about her because of the
consequences or because she doesn’t seem to be able to take care of
herself? Are they shaking their head because she’s clumsy or ditzy? Do they
think she brought it on herself and needs to buck up her ideas, become more
self-confident, or stop acting like a child? Do they want her to fight for
justice or revenge? Or get a new job where she isn’t treated like crap?
Something else to consider is how this introductory situation might be
related to the heroine’s deepest fears – which won’t be revealed to the
reader until later in the story. Her deepest fear is also related to the darkest
moment – much later in the story. You can give your novel a greater sense
of cohesion – a feeling that all of its parts are connected thematically – if
your heroine’s introduction is related to things that come later. She may
even face a directly comparable situation to this first one later in the story –
comparing her reactions in each of these may show the reader how far she
has come in terms of character growth.
As a reminder, the heroine’s deepest fear and the story’s darkest moment
typically relate to one of the following three issues:
In the notes I brainstormed about the heroine’s situation above, you can see
some thoughts relating to the heroine’s personal fears that could be
developed to become a theme in a novel.
The heroine’s deepest fear symbolises something that she needs to
overcome during the course of her character development arc.
Two final thoughts on introducing your heroine. The first is to think how
this introduction relates to the meeting between her and the hero. This
introduction may be part of the meet cute or it may lead directly into it.
Having introduced the heroine, you don’t want to leave it too long before
getting her to the meet cute.
The second thing is to consider how this introductory situation might be
related to the heroine’s relationship with the hero during the rest of the
story. When I was brainstorming my example, I wrote this:
A wealthy hero seeking to woo a non-wealthy heroine might need to pretend
that he doesn’t have stacks of cash. He may be the one who generates
humour by learning to do things without money. And this pretence may
trigger the dark moment. When she learns who he really is, she may feel
that he has betrayed her trust. ‘You lied to me!’
Home or Away?
Some stories take place away from the heroine’s everyday world. She may
travel back to the town where she was born for a reunion or a funeral. She
may go away on vacation to escape from her ordinary world. Or she may
move to a new location to escape from her past and start a new life.
These ‘other’ locations provide opportunities for interactions with
different characters and different activities – both of which may challenge
the heroine.
How the heroine reacts to this ‘other’ world tells us something about her
– and she will give clues about how this world differs from her ordinary
world where she feels comfortable and safe. What does she miss about her
ordinary world? What freedoms does she have here that she doesn’t have
there (and vice versa)?
This usually occurs in Sequence 1. The ‘meet cute’ is a way to get your two
main characters to encounter each other and quickly get your story off and
running. The term originated in Hollywood in the 1930s where it was used
in romantic or ‘screwball’ comedies. The exact origins of the term ‘meet
cute’ are not known, though it is referenced in a Anthony Boucher’s
mystery novel The Case of the Solid Key (1941) and so must have been in
use for some time before that. A meet cute is a fun way of achieving the
‘boy meets girl’ part of a story. It forces two strangers to interact, if only to
apologise to each other. And then, when their eyes meet, there is a spark of
attraction (see below). This encounter, however chaotic or disruptive, upsets
the equilibrium of their lives. Nothing will ever be the same again.
Typically, a meet cute involves an accidental meeting, sometimes a literal
collision, in a situation filled with awkwardness and/or embarrassment. It
may involve mistaken identity or a misunderstanding. It may involve one
character being naked or in some other embarrassing situation. One
character may cause physical harm to another or to that person’s property. It
may prevent them going about their normal business. It may ruin a business
opportunity or a romantic encounter.
Another idea is what the TV Tropes website calls a ‘suggestive collision’
where two people bump into each other and end up in a sexually suggestive
pose. Perhaps the hero has his face in the heroine’s bosom or with his hands
on it. Or she is sitting on his face or in his lap. It may even result in an
accidental kiss. Typically, the heroine will accuse him of doing this on
purpose and call him a sex maniac. I used this for the meet cute in my novel
Fandango (2022).
Sometimes a meet cute is deliberately engineered by a character who
wants an excuse to meet another character in whom they have an interest.
A genuine accidental meeting may result in one or both characters being
hostile – they may have an instant dislike for each other. This is common in
the ‘enemies to lovers’ sub-genre, which we’ll look at in more detail later in
the book.
The meet cute may be followed by the same two people meeting in more
formal circumstances. These formal circumstances may be what locks them
together, despite their previous hostility.
A classic example of a meet cute occurs in Billy Wilder’s 1938 screwball
comedy Bluebeard’s Eighth Wife, in which two characters meet in a
department store – he seeking to buy pajama bottoms and she seeking to
buy a pajama top. Wilder said the ‘meet cute’ was a staple of romantic
comedy by that point.
Men are not supposed to be sensitive and caring, because these are
regarded as ‘feminine’ traits, and so men tend to be ashamed of this
side of their personality, regarding it as a weakness.
Women are not supposed to be sexual or dominant and are made to
feel ashamed of these traits.
The heroine is often afraid of her own power (often represented positively
as strength and negatively as anger) because she has been taught that these
traits ‘belong’ to males exclusively. She is ashamed of her sexuality because
(a) society has taught her that good girls don’t, and (b) because she hasn’t
had the opportunity to explore her sexuality fully. She is either a virgin or
she has had an unsatisfying relationship.
The hero is often afraid and ashamed of his sensitive side – (a) because
he has been taught that men don’t express emotion and they certainly don’t
cry, and (b) because he has either been hurt in a previous relationship or
because he feels he’s supposed to be an alpha male, macho-type who is only
interested in sex.
Romances allow us to explore the denied side of ourselves. The heroine
represents the feminine side of our nature and the hero represents the
masculine.
At the moment where the spark is felt, the characters experience both the
challenge that the other character presents and also the opportunity. The
push and the pull. Annoyance and attraction.
While physical attraction comes first, personality traits play a part after
this. She senses and is attracted to his sensitive side and he senses and is
attracted to her sexual and self-confident side. She recognises his sensitive
and caring side and encourages him to express it, accepting his denied self
and moving closer to the wholeness of the true self. He brings out her
sexual side and the power that will bring her self-confidence.
Romantic attraction is a combination of ‘opposites attract’ –
male/masculine versus female/feminine – but also of recognising similar
traits – that the male has a ‘feminine’ side (the anima according to Jung)
and the female a ‘masculine’ side (the animus). This allows for a feeling of
being different but also equals.
He calls to her masculine side (as well as her feminine side)
She calls to his feminine side (as well as his masculine side)
In fictional romantic relationships, there is often an element of role
reversal – she ‘wears the trousers,’ to use an outdated term.
In creating a hero and a heroine, we need to show the potential of the two
characters –
The Lock-in
This typically occurs in Sequence 2 but can occur in Sequence 1. Until the
‘lock-in’ occurs, your heroine and hero can both walk away from their
potential relationship. The lock-in is an external situation that creates
‘forced proximity,’ keeping them together and making them interact. You
have to create a set of circumstances that mean they cannot get away from
each other.
These external circumstances are usually related to the subplot (or B-
plot). In romantic suspense, for example, the situation that keeps the
heroine and hero together comes out of the conspiracy they face or the quest
they are trying to complete. In stories where the B-plot is less significant,
there will still be some external goings-on that serve to keep the two main
characters together.
The B-plot often defines the subgenre of a romance. The A-plot is always
about two people falling in love and the B-plot typically includes
circumstances that provide obstacles to them being together. In a
paranormal romance, for example, the paranormal or supernatural elements
typically make up the B-plot. Depending on the subgenre, A-plot may be a
much greater part of the novel than B-plot, or they may have equal
prominence, or sometimes the B-plot may seem – at least in terms of
number of words allocated to it – to be more important than the romantic A-
plot. But the outcome of the A-plot – the happy ever after (or happy for
now) – is always the thing that matters most.
Following is a list of examples of circumstances that can be used to
create the lock-in for a romance. Again, this is not a complete list, but it will
provide a starting point for you. When you encounter other examples – in
romances or buddy movies – make a note of them for future use.
I’ve divided this list into two broad categories. The first part gives
situations where hero and heroine are jointly involved in a situation. The
second lists those where one character is trying to do something to the
other. None of these situations are gender specific – the hero and heroine
can take either side in a situation, and they all work for same-sex couples
and non-binary characters.
In the wording below I’ve tried to keep things generic – you will need to
create a specific set of circumstances that meet the criteria. Note that you do
not have to use the most literal or obvious version of these situations. One
character may ‘hold someone prisoner’ in a light-hearted way: “I’m not
letting you leave until my parents are gone.”
Sometimes one character reluctantly agrees to work with the other to
complete some task because they think the other will go away when the job
is done.
The specific situation you create may vary depending on whether you are
writing about two people who meet as strangers or a couple in a second
chance or secret baby or ‘friends to lovers’ romance who are already known
to each other.
Lock-In Examples
In real life, sexual tension exists when two people want to have sex with
each other but cannot because of a relational or environmental obstacle. It is
based on mutual attraction, not a one-sided infatuation – that’s a different
form of sexual frustration. They know they can’t or shouldn’t act on their
attraction to each other. Sexual tension is a combination of excitement and
frustration, of wanting something and not being able to have it. This
frustration could be temporary – the time isn’t right. Or it could be
something more permanent – it’s never going to happen.
The two people often think that their sexual tension is a secret that only
the two of them know about. But other people can become aware of it too.
And these other people may also know that the two people can’t or
shouldn’t act on their attraction to each other, potentially adding more
external complications.
In romantic fiction, sexual tension is created when the reader wants to see
two characters get together romantically but they can’t because of internal
obstacles (doubt, anxiety or whatever) and external obstacles. I’m referring
to it as sexual tension because that’s the more common term, but it doesn’t
have to be about sex – it can just as easily be ‘romantic tension.’
As readers, when we become aware that two characters are attracted to
each other, it piques our interest. And if one or both of them don’t want to
admit this attraction or don’t want to act on it, it creates tension. As we read
on, we’re waiting to see when they’ll admit their attraction and do
something about it.
In a romance novel, the sexual or romantic tension exists for as long as
the reader is asking, ‘Will they, won’t they?’ When the two characters do
get together – often at the midpoint of the book – that question is answered.
In the second half of the book, tension – the thing that keeps readers turning
the pages to find out what happens – is created by a new question: Can they
make their relationship work in the long-term? This is heightened at the
moment of the break-up by the addition of a new question, ‘Will they get
back together?’
In her book Writing Romance Fiction for Love and Money, Helene
Schellenberg Barnhart writes about romantic fiction in terms of the
heroine’s conflicting feelings about the hero – her attraction to him versus
her negative feelings about him (or to the idea of being in a relationship
with him). She describes it as a “...tug of war in her heart between the force
of strong sexual attraction and the equally strong opposing forces of
caution, fear, and reason.” Often it is the passionate feelings of the heart
versus the cool, practical logic of the head. The heroine and hero are pulled
together by physical attraction and pushed apart by fears, problems, and
complications. Sexual tension in a story is created and modulated by
varying the influence of push against pull at different points.
The pull of attraction begins with the spark of attraction and grows as the
heroine and hero can't keep their thoughts away from each other.
Pushing them apart is done by creating obstacles – both internal and
external – to their relationship. External obstacles can come from the
community they live in, particularly if theirs is a love forbidden according
to the rules or conventions of society. Or they can come from events in the
external subplot or B-story. Internal obstacles surface early in the story in
the form of the denial of attraction by one or both characters. The roots of
this denial lie in the characters’ fears and secret shame.
When you read romance novels, look for the push-pull. In the examples
Barnhart quotes, you can see both sides of the heroine’s conflicted feelings
within the same paragraph when she is thinking about or reacting to the
hero.
Sally J. Walker, in Romantic Screenplays 101, also refers to the pull-push
of sexual tension, which she describes as “...the recognition of attraction
followed immediately by the rejection of willingness to act upon it.” She
gives the example of a hero thinking, ‘I want her, but I don’t want to be
trapped.’
In Romance-ology 101: Writing Romantic Tension for the Inspirational
and Sweet Markets, Julie Lessman uses the term ‘romantic tension,’
referring to novels where the sexual element is absent or only hinted at.
Lessman notes that you can create tension in a scene where the heroine is
attracted to the hero but refuses to do anything about it. But you can create
more tension where you also present the hero’s point of view and show that
they are both attracted to each other and suppressing these feelings. This is
one reason why it is a good thing to include the hero’s viewpoint in your
story.
Until the sexual tension is resolved – by answering the ‘Will they, won’t
they?’ question – the couple engage in a lot of flirting. In a ‘sweet’ or
‘clean’ romance, there won’t be any kissing – you save the big kiss for the
scene that answers the question. In a spicier romance, the characters can
engage in everything short of sex. And in the spiciest romances, sex can
occur much earlier in the story, and romantic tension then has to be created
by asking whether casual sex or a short-term relationship can blossom into
a committed long-term relationship.
Readers may feel frustrated if the sexual tension between two characters
is not ultimately resolved. Readers of a romance novel certainly want to see
an answer to the ‘Will they, won’t they?’ question. And it must be resolved
before the end of the book. In other genres, the tension in a romantic
subplot might be extended over several novels or multiple television
episodes. A classic example is the television series Moonlighting (1985-
1989). Viewers loved the sexual tension between the characters played by
Cybill Shepherd and Bruce Willis and there was disappointment when the
‘Will they, won’t they?’ question was answered at the end of Season 3. A
similar thing happened between Mulder and Scully in The X-Files.
In any scene where your two main characters are together, no matter what
else is going on, you as the writer should be aware that they are attracted to
each other and communicate this to the reader either directly or in the
subtext of the scene. And when you present their thoughts, there should be
some clue to the conflict that is going on within them.
When it comes to individual scenes within the story, you create sexual or
romantic tension in the same way that the writer of a thriller creates
suspense in their story. I spent some time researching the techniques used
for creating suspense in stories – you can read about it in my book Suspense
Thriller (2018). I was curious to know if these techniques could be used in
romances to create sexual tension.
The terms tension and suspense are often used interchangeably. In a
paper on the psychology of tension and suspense, Moritz Lehne and Stefan
Koelsch suggest that “...suspense usually involves the anticipation of two
clearly opposed outcomes.” Either A will happen or B. Typically, A is
something that the characters and the reader want, while B is something
they wish to avoid. Whereas, “...tension often denotes a more diffuse state
of anticipation, in which anticipated events are less specific.” We know
something is going to happen, but we can’t be sure what. It’s also worth
noting that to ‘suspend’ something is to hang it from one or more points,
such as a hook on the ceiling. Or suspension can refer to a temporary halt.
‘Tension’ refers to something that is stretched, like an elastic band pulled
tight or the inflated surface of a balloon. In fiction, despite these subtle
differences, both refer to an anticipated outcome.
A number of elements are involved in the creation of tension/suspense in
a story:
A character that the reader cares about. Alfred Hitchcock played with
audiences by making them care about the outcome of suspenseful
scenes featuring a villain or anti-hero, but generally a reader feels
more tension if they have sympathy for or empathy with the character.
An unresolved situation and a desire for closure. You create an
unresolved situation – e.g. ‘Will they, won’t they?’ – such that the
reader wants it resolved.
Uncertainty of outcome with both negative and positive outcomes
possible. In our example, the heroine and hero become a couple or
they don’t.
Probability. You can increase tension by making it appear as if a
negative outcome is more probable than a positive one. This is what
we do at the ‘dark moment’ in a romance, the break-up is the point
when a ‘happy ever after’ seems least probable.
Delayed outcome. The longer you leave the situation unresolved, the
stronger the desire to see the resolution. This is related to the
‘stretching out’ that we associate with tension. And to the ‘temporary
halt’ of suspension – if events are proceeding as expected and then
there is a halt, readers will want to see things resumed. We use this
technique when we reach a particular point in a scene and then ‘cut
away’ to events occurring elsewhere. Tension is maintained until we
‘cut back’ to the original action to see what happens next.
The reader knows something the character doesn’t. This is dramatic
irony. You reveal something significant to the reader but the character
doesn’t know it yet. Tension is created as the character comes closer to
learning this ‘secret’ and the reader wonders how it will impact the
character and how they will react to it.
Helplessness. No matter how much information the reader has, they
cannot do anything to affect the outcome of the story situation. They
can only sit and watch it unfold.
High stakes. There must be something important at stake for the
character involved.
Cliff-hanger. I’ve already mentioned this, but it belongs in this list. You
write a scene, building to a point where something significant is about to
happen – and then you cut away to another location or another moment in
time, delaying the climax of the original scene. You can achieve a similar
effect by switching viewpoint character. This lets you go back in time and
show the same events unfolding from a different point of view, building to
the same moment where an outcome is anticipated.
Many romance writers know that readers often stop reading at the end of
a chapter, so they deliberately end chapters at a point where something
significant is about to happen. And the beginning of the next chapter might
take the reader to a different place or to one of the subplots, further delaying
the expected/anticipated outcome.
Changing event order. You’ve seen this one on tv dozens of times. A show
opens with your favourite characters in a tense situation where, perhaps,
one of them is injured and/or a familiar location is on fire or has been blown
up. Then, just as your interest has been captured, there is a change in scene
and the caption ‘48 Hours Earlier’ appears on screen and you spend most of
the episode watching how that opening situation came about. You know
where things are going, so you anticipate the coming scene. There are
subtler ways to use the same idea to create suspense in a romance novel.
You show an outcome and then skip back to show how it occurred. We
enjoy reading or watching things like this because we expect stories to
unfold as a series of causes and effects, like a chain reaction, and we’re
smart enough to be able to follow along when bits of the chain are moved
around, out of their usual temporal sequence. The trick is to show a chain of
events that is not quite what the reader expected.
Alone and vulnerable. This is another one from thrillers and horror movies.
Isolating someone and removing all possible forms of help or support
increases suspense. To some extent we do this in romance after the break-
up, with the separation of the two characters being emphasised by showing
them in scenes where they are alone. Obviously, it can also be used in
romantic suspense in the same way as a thriller or horror story.
No one believes me. You don’t have to be on your own to feel isolated. In
movies, no one believes the heroine when she says she’s seen aliens, or she
knows that the creepy guy in the mask is a serial killer. In personal
situations, we feel alone if no one understands what we are feeling. Or if
everyone thinks we’re better off without our bad boy hero, but our heart is
breaking.
A major cause of sexual or romantic tension in the first half of a novel is the
fact that one or both of the two main characters deny that they are attracted
to the other. Initially, they will probably deny it to themselves, refusing to
believe that the spark of attraction exists. Finding themselves thinking about
the other person all the time and feeling flustered when they encounter
them, a character will eventually admit the attraction – but only to
themselves. They don’t want anyone else to know about it and they
certainly don’t want the other person to know. But this is often an open
secret – a character’s closest friends, and probably the other person as well,
are aware of the attraction. Again, the character will seek to deny this,
refusing to believe that other people are aware of the attraction. They try to
convince themselves that their secret is safe.
In some stories, the denial may be based, at least in part, on external factors.
A relationship between the two main characters may not be possible
because of practical or societal constraints. We’ll explore this in more detail
in the chapter on forbidden love.
In most stories, a denial of attraction is based on internal obstacles. There
are often multiple factors involved, but they tend to boil down to the
character’s deepest fear and their secret shame. Denial is based on what a
character fears might happen. Often some version of this feared
consequence comes true at the point of the break-up, the ‘dark moment’ in
the story. At the dark moment, the situation is doubly bad because not only
has the character’s worst fear come true, but they have also allowed
themselves to become more vulnerable to it by letting down their defences
and have now lost someone they (thought they) loved.
An individual character’s denial of the attraction they feel is related to
their shadow self and their denied self, discussed previously. They have
built up defences to protect themselves from their fear and their fear of
exposure. At some level, they recognise that the person they are attracted to
is a threat to these defences. They are aware, perhaps only at a subconscious
level, that this person will challenge them.
There is also the fear that a romantic relationship brings another person
very close to them. And there is a worry that this person will see through
the mask the character wears in public, the persona or false self they
present to the world. They are afraid that becoming intimate with someone
would allow them to see the true person behind the disguise. And there is
then the fear that this person would be repulsed by the true self. If they
really knew what I’m like, they could never love me.
These fears can exist in someone whose self-esteem is low but they can
also be present in an apparently robust alpha male who has a fear and/or
secret shame in one area of his life. This area is typically related to
emotions and close relationships.
Remember that in the A-story, the development of the romantic
relationship, there is no villain or opponent. Unless you’re writing a love
triangle story, which I’ll treat later as a separate sub-genre. In a typical
romance, the heroine and hero act as both co-protagonist and antagonist for
each other. At times, they are supportive and caring, but at other times they
provide challenges and obstacles – threatening to destroy the protective
barrier, the false self, that is in place.
To some degree, denial of attraction is a form of self-sabotage. A
character might wish to be in a loving relationship with someone, but they
dare not take the risk they perceive this to involve, so they push this person
away with their words and their behaviour.
A character needs to abandon their false self and embrace their true self,
but they don’t become aware that this is a positive thing until they have
progressed some way along their character development arc. During the
first half of the story, any threat to their false self will be regarded as a
negative thing. They don’t yet realise that what one of the things that
attracted the other person to them was a glimpse of their true self. This false
self versus true self contrast is symbolised in Beauty and the Beast and The
Frog Prince. A ‘spell’ of false belief must be broken to allow a character to
become their true self and feel worthy of being loved.
To re-emphasise what I suggested earlier, in a romance, the idea of a
lover making someone ‘whole’ is not suggesting a woman is incomplete
without a husband (or vice versa), instead it is saying that with the help of a
supportive partner, a person can embrace their true/whole selves – including
the darker side and the parts they are ashamed of – and be loved for who
they really are. Most characters are aware that they need to face this
challenge and become whole, but they are afraid of what might be involved.
Knowing that the person they are attracted to will challenge them to take on
this challenge, they try to deny the attraction.
The events in the A-story – and often the external B-story – push or pull
the character towards the challenge. The character development arc maps
out the stages required in completing the challenge. For some characters,
this arc is relatively short, perhaps requiring only a single ‘epiphany’ to
make them realise that their fears are unfounded. Sometimes a character is
already part of the way along their arc when the story opens. But for some
characters we get to see the whole of their journey from being ‘broken’ to
be being whole.
17 | The Break-Up & After
This occurs at the end of Sequence 6 or early in Sequence 7. Something
causes the heroine and the hero to split up. There is an argument, a
misunderstanding, or some other form of disagreement that ends the
relationship and makes it seem like the two lovers can never be reconciled.
The romance is over. This point in the story is sometimes referred to as the
Darkest Hour or the Dark Moment. It begins two-thirds or three-quarters of
the way through the story, typically marking the end of Act II and the
beginning of Act III.
Originally, this break-up would have been an unexpected plot twist, but
now it is a plot convention – one of the tropes that romance readers expect a
story to have. ‘Boy loses girl’ is the middle of the three-part definition of
what a romance plot is.
An effective story needs conflict. If you have two characters who meet and
live happily ever after, there isn’t anything to write about. It is an old
Hollywood adage that nobody wants to see village of the happy people. We
know that life can be challenging, bad things happen, and people make
mistakes – and we want to see that a happy ending is possible despite all of
these things.
Another storytelling rule of thumb is that contrast increases dramatic and
emotional effect. A story does not contain a series of similar scenes, if it did
it would be monotonous, like a song played all on one note. Violent scenes
are contrasted with quiet ones. Fast-paced scenes with slower ones. And sad
scenes with happy ones. By definition, the ending of a romance is happy
ever after (or happy for now). You can make your characters’ happiness
more intense if you contrast it with a dark, unhappy moment. The break-up
serves this purpose.
In our culture, there is a feeling that rewards must be earned and should
not just be given to you. In a romance, the couple must earn their happy
ending. You make them do that by having them work to save their
relationship – they have to overcome the cause of their break-up. As a
romance writer, you have to prove that love conquers all obstacles. The love
between the heroine and the hero is validated by showing that it can
overcome the gravest of difficulties.
And finally, when done properly, the break-up creates suspense or
tension. The reader wonders, “Will they get back together?” And they will
keep turning the pages to find out the answer. Cynics might claim that there
is no suspense here, that the reader knows there will be a happy ending. But
research has shown that stories create suspense even when we know the
outcome of a story. We still experience the emotional journey even if the
destination is known to us. This is one of the reasons why we are able to
enjoy re-watching a movie or re-reading a novel.
Major varieties of the cause of the break-up are:
Commitment Issues
The Misunderstanding
Communication Breakdown
Differing Values or Priorities
Self-Esteem Issues – I’m Not Worthy
Cruel to Be Kind
Power Struggle
Breaking Point – The Last Straw
Backsliding
Relationship Sabotage
Commitment Phobia
This can be one-sided, where the heroine wants to make a commitment and
the hero doesn’t (or vice versa), or both characters may have a reason for
avoiding making a commitment. Generally speaking, in romances the
heroine wants a serious relationship, but the hero is reluctant to make a
long-term commitment. What I write in this section will reflect that. But a
heroine’s character flaw may mean that she too has issues when it comes to
making a commitment. Most of what I say below could apply equally to the
heroine and the hero, though mostly I’ll refer to the commitment-phobe as
‘he.’
In their book Bad Boys, Carole Lieberman and Lisa Collier Cool write
that the commitment-phobe wants to keep his options open when it comes
to romance and sex, avoiding any move towards a long-term relationship. If
things start to look serious, he becomes uncomfortable and starts to look
around for a way out, seeking an excuse to end the relationship. Discussions
about the future, especially those concerning marriage or babies, are likely
to have him breaking out in a cold sweat and looking for the nearest exit.
Even joking about such things can be enough to set his alarms off.
A man with commitment issues often has unreasonable expectations
when it comes to his ideal partner. It would be impossible for anyone to
meet his criteria, some of which are mutually exclusive, and this is exactly
the point: he doesn’t want to find ‘the one’ and settle down with her.
The commitment-phobe fears being controlled or boxed in and is hyper-
alert for any signal that a girlfriend wants to formalise their relationship or
move in with him. Some men are so concerned about this that they don’t
want a girlfriend to leave any clothes or other personal belongings at his
place, even if she spends weekends there.
Some men are nervous about commitment because a previous marriage
or long-term relationship ended badly. They promise themselves ‘never
again.’
Men who have never had a long-term relationship may be averse to
becoming emotionally attached to anyone because they fear that person will
ultimately leave them broken-hearted. This may result from the fact that a
parent or other significant person in their life left when they were younger.
The commitment-phobe may also avoid commitment in other areas of his
life, never staying long in one job, not being a team player in sports or at
work, and not having long-term friendships with male friends.
Commitment-phobes often avoid direct confrontation, saying that they
don’t want to hurt someone’s feelings, using an ‘it’s not you, it’s me’
explanation that leaves his ex wondering what it was she did wrong. If he
was open about his reasons for ending a relationship, he would have to
express his true feelings, and this would require a level of intimacy he’s not
comfortable with. Also, he’s almost certainly aware that his ‘logical’ reason
for breaking up with someone is nonsense and is just a sort of defence
mechanism – a way to avoid admitting his flaws and vulnerability.
Avoiding confrontation and expression of emotion means that when he is
in a relationship, the commitment-phobe engages in deception and passive
aggression. Instead of saying he doesn’t want to meet his girlfriend’s
parents or friends, he will agree to the date and then either cancel at the last
minute, have an ‘accident’ that means he can’t get there, or ‘forget’ to turn
up.
He’s probably also careful about birth control, almost to the point of
paranoia, not wanting to be ‘trapped’ in a relationship because of an
unplanned pregnancy.
Motivation
The Misunderstanding
This is a common cause for a break-up in a romance novel – and there’s a
reason for that. As we’ve said, by definition, a romance needs a break-up.
Boy loses girl. We have no story without it. But we don’t want the cause of
the break-up to be something so major that reconciliation would seem
unrealistic. We don’t want either of our main characters to do something so
bad that it can’t be forgiven. A misunderstanding is ideal for our purposes –
it can be cleared up relatively easily and it doesn’t leave any lasting
damage.
The two most common forms of misunderstanding are where one person
is believed to be cheating or where one half of the couple suspects that the
other’s feelings are not genuine. But most of the causes of a break-up can
include some element of misunderstanding – often based on a mistaken
assumption or misreading of ‘evidence.’
Often there is damning evidence that seems to ‘prove’ that the hero (or
occasionally the heroine) is cheating. Stereotypical clues include underwear
in the glovebox of the hero’s car, lipstick on his collar, a love letter, or a
blonde hair on his jacket. Obviously, if you’re writing a story today, you
need to come up with more original variants on these – though you can still
play these clichés for laughs. The suspected cheater may also be seen out
with someone else or – worse! – seen hugging or kissing that person.
Sometimes the truth is so unlikely that it is almost impossible for it to be
believed. The suspected cheater may refuse to try and provide an
explanation because “They’d never believe me anyway.”
A misunderstanding can be extended or deepened if there is a good
reason why the suspected cheater cannot provide a reasonable explanation
due to other circumstances. They may not be able to reveal the truth
because of a promise they have made to someone else, or because they need
to protect the identity of the other person and/or the true nature of their
relationship, or there is some other secret that must be kept, at least in the
short term.
In a love triangle, a misunderstanding between the hero and the heroine
will have to be resolved. If it occurs between the hero or heroine and the
wrong person in the triangle, the fact that this person refuses to believe the
innocent person’s explanation can be proof that they are, indeed, the wrong
person for that character. There can’t be a relationship if there is no trust
and/or no forgiveness.
Communication Breakdown
When two people are able to communicate fully and honestly, they can deal
with any problem that might arise. But if they put up barriers and don’t
express what they are feeling, things can quickly go wrong. An inability to
communicate fully can lead to the end of a relationship.
Key problems in communication between couples include:
Talking but not listening. Some people talk a lot because they feel
insecure and feel uncomfortable just sitting with someone in silence. Others
talk about themselves constantly because they are self-absorbed. Both kinds
of people may be unaware of the importance of listening. Active listening,
as discussed elsewhere, is a quality that most people find attractive. People
like to feel that they are being heard and that notice is taken of what they
say. Often in romance stories, the hero demonstrates the caring side of his
nature by doing something that proves he listened to the heroine. She may
only have mentioned something in passing, but he took note and acted upon
it, giving her a pleasant surprise. People who don’t listen are likely to
disappoint and frustrate their partners.
Another form of this problem is when one partner talks at the other,
rather than to them. Talking at someone means you want to be heard and
you are not in the frame of mind to listen to the other person’s side. Talking
to or with someone involves a dialogue, give and take. If you are only
expressing your opinion or point of view, the other person is likely to
switch off or walk away. If the person doing the talking is doing it in a
threatening way or shouting, this will engage the other person’s self-
protection mechanisms – freeze, fight, or flight – and they will be
concerned only with protecting themselves, not listening to what is being
communicated. Communication isn’t just about making sure you are being
understood, you also have to make sure that you are understanding the
other person.
Because men often assume it’s their job to ‘fix’ things, they will often
jump in with a solution when all their partner really wanted was an
opportunity to speak and be heard. Typically, men feel they’re expected to
come up with practical solutions. At work, they’re probably told by their
bosses, ‘Don’t just bring me a problem, bring me a possible solution as
well.’ They don’t necessarily understand that talking is a solution in its own
right.
Allowing a partner to speak, and then waiting for them to finish speaking
without jumping in with a quick fix or a counter-argument, is a difficult
skill to master, especially for alpha males or Warriors.
Betrayal of trust. When two people talk and share private details,
including anecdotes about their past, hopes and dreams, there is an
expectation that these discussions will be kept private. Secrets will not be
shared with others. If someone shares these things with a third person, even
if they do so in a way that wasn’t intended to cause harm, it can feel like a
betrayal of trust. Once trust has been damaged or lost, it is very difficult to
earn it back. Trust is a vital component in any relationship, but so is
forgiveness. We’ll explore apologies and forgiveness in more detail in a
later chapter.
Downplaying another’s concerns. This is linked to a failure to listen in
that it also involves not hearing the other person’s concerns. When someone
feels a need to talk about something that is important to them, that thing is
going to stay on their mind until the issue has been discussed. Failing to
recognise someone’s need to talk or putting off a discussion because it is
going to be awkward or unpleasant, only makes things worse. Something
relatively minor that could have been dealt with quickly and relatively
painlessly becomes a major issue of contention. Or it gets added to a list of
other concerns that were dismissed, so that the scope of the list then
becomes an issue. If their concerns are not addressed, a partner will feel
abandoned, disrespected, and/or frustrated. That frustration can them
develop into resentment and anger.
Another aspect of this is not paying attention to the other person’s ideas,
beliefs, or areas of interest.
Not knowing when to let something go. In any relationship, you have to
decide which battles are worth fighting. If you bring up every little thing
that you find mildly annoying, the other person is likely to feel that they are
being controlled or micromanaged. You have to decide if something is
worth making an issue out of. This can be linked to the downplaying of
concerns mentioned above. If you complain about everything, how is a
partner supposed to sort out the minor gripes from the major issues? They
hear so many complaints that they eventually tune it all out. They have to,
for their own protection. On the flipside, a person may feel there is no
damage in complaining about everything, because everything they say is
ignored anyway.
Sometimes just speaking about an issue is enough. For the person with
the issue, airing it is enough to make it seem less of a problem. But the
person hearing the complaint may feel that there is an expectation that they
will do something to fix the problem. If it is something they cannot fix, or if
they are hearing an endless list of complaints, they may end up feeling
overwhelmed, inadequate and/or frustrated. And again, that frustration can
lead to anger.
Bad timing. Sometimes the thing that causes communication to fail is
bringing something up at the wrong time. A person’s mood, pressures on
their time, and their health and energy levels can affect how receptive they
will be to a ‘serious conversation.’ If they are drunk or in a playful mood
where they’re not taking anything seriously, you shouldn’t spring a serious
moment on them. If they are having a bad day or a bad week, do you really
want to start a conversation that will make them feel bad about something
else? If their self-confidence has just taken a knock or if they are having
problems with another friend or family member, they are unlikely to be able
to give a new issue their undivided attention.
Failure to express feelings, needs, or opinions. Full and honest
communication requires that both people speak what is on their minds or in
their hearts. But this requires trust as revealing your deepest feelings makes
you feel vulnerable. You are afraid that your feelings will be ignored or
ridiculed or exploited. Generally speaking, men are more comfortable
expressing opinions (from the head) and are less able to express emotions
or feelings (from the heart or gut). Men are taught from a young age that
expression of feelings is a ‘feminine’ trait. Women, on the other hand, tend
to be taught that expressing their opinions and their feelings of anger is
inappropriate because these are ‘masculine’ behaviours. Hopefully this kind
of wrong-headed ‘teaching’ will fade as our society matures, but for now it
can have a strongly negative impact on communication between people in
relationships.
Another form of this is the ‘silent treatment,’ which is a form of passive-
aggression used to ‘punish’ someone who has upset us.
Some people are afraid to ask for what they need because they believe
that being ‘needy’ will push the other person away. This is dangerous
ground, particularly if the thing in question is a genuine need rather than
just a ‘want’ or ‘nice to have.’ If our needs are not being met, our wellbeing
suffers. We shouldn’t feel guilty about having our needs met and we
shouldn’t be afraid to ask for what we need – but people with low self-
esteem often do. When our needs are not met, we can feel unhappy and
resentful. We may seek to blame the other person for not recognising our
needs and meeting them. But this person cannot read minds. It is
unreasonable to expect them to know things we haven’t told them. Even if
our needs should be obvious to them, they can’t know how important the
need is to us or to what extent it is not being met.
Mixed messages also belong here. If you tell someone, ‘I’m fine’ or ‘I’m
not upset,’ it’s reasonable for them to believe you, unless your physical
situation or your body language strongly contradicts your words. If you’ve
just made light of something, treating it as a joke, you can’t expect someone
to realise when you suddenly change your mind and decide it’s serious. If
you don’t say it out loud, they are not going to magically divine it.
Thinking in terms of ‘I’ instead of ‘we.’ As children, our decisions and our
actions are strongly influenced by what our parents or guardians need or
want. Our freedoms are limited. When we become adults, we find ourselves
freed of parental control and are able to decide what we want and act
accordingly. Becoming part of a couple means that we are again in a
position of needing to take someone else’s needs or wants into
consideration. Some people find this adjustment more difficult than others.
Someone with a strong Carer element in their personality finds it more
natural to think about how their decisions and actions affect others than a
Warrior-type – or a Thinker-type who spends a lot of time inside his (or her)
own head.
Two people in a relationship need a certain amount of freedom and
independence to be themselves. But this needs to be balanced by what is
necessary to keep a partnership healthy and workable. Pragmatic and
emotional adjustments need to be made. Someone who carries on like they
are still a bachelor (or bachelorette) is going to alienate their partner.
Refusing to accept responsibility. We all have responsibilities – both to
ourselves and to the people around us. We need to take care of our own
wellbeing, physical, mental, and emotional. We cannot hand this
responsibility over to anyone else. When people say something like, ‘You
make me feel...’ they are passing responsibility for their feelings to someone
else. No one can make us feel, we are responsible for our own reactions. We
can’t always control them, but they belong to us.
At the same time, we are responsible for the consequences of our own
words and actions. And we need to be aware that we can evoke negative
responses in other people. It might not be our intention to hurt someone, but
we are still responsible if this occurs accidentally. Being able to own our
mistakes and apologise and make reparation are important social skills.
Some people struggle with this in close relationships. Admitting you’re
wrong and apologising is especially difficult for Warrior-types, who have
been taught that to admit a mistake is to show weakness. On the flipside, a
person with low self-esteem will take on responsibility or blame for other
people’s mistakes and apologise for things they didn’t do. In doing this,
they are refusing to accept responsibility for their own wellbeing.
Failure to accept responsibility seriously undermines our ability to
communicate fully and honestly, because it is a form of dishonesty. To say,
‘It’s not my fault’ or to seek to blame others, ‘Look what you made me do,’
is unhealthy. And so is allowing the other person to shirk their
responsibilities.
Speaking without thinking about the impact of your words on the other
person can have huge consequences. It’s always better to say the right thing
in the right way than to end up protesting your innocence – ‘That’s not what
I meant!’
Keeping score and using absolutes. Someone who is uncomfortable
receiving criticism will often seek to bring up the past, ‘What about the
time you...’ They may also keep a list of their partner’s mistakes, faults, or
bad behaviours to use as ammunition so they can ‘win’ an argument. In a
relationship, trying to be the person who always ‘wins’ is not healthy as it
will eventually cause the relationship to fail. No one wants to be the person
who always loses.
Associated with this are judgments that begin with something like, ‘You
always do this...’ A large-scale accusation of this kind is difficult to argue
against and the other person is likely to just shake their head and refuse to
even try. Similarly, bringing out the big gun of hyperbole makes genuine
communication impossible. People say things like ‘I hate it when...’ or
‘When you do that it drives me crazy!’ When in fact they’re referring to
something that is probably nothing more than a minor annoyance.
You can use communication breakdown to create conflict in your story
and it can contribute to the break-down of a romantic relationship. But you
also need to be able to fix the problem when your characters get back
together. Reconciliation is a major moment in a romance novel, as we’ll see
later.
It is said that opposites attract, but sometimes this can lead to irreconcilable
differences. If the heroine describes her ‘happy ever after’ and it is
fundamentally different to the future the hero has imagined for himself and
a partner, then the two of them need to have a serious discussion.
Sometimes love requires compromise and sometimes it requires sacrifice,
but there are occasions when two people’s views are so different as to be
contradictory, and at that point they have to consider whether it is possible
for them to have a long-term romantic relationship.
Sometimes a hero or heroine will seek to ‘protect’ their lover by
withholding some of the truth. They may pretend to be someone else or they
may even seek to sabotage their own relationship. But sometimes they tell
their lover everything so they can make up their own mind. Usually, a lover
will accept this truth and stand by his or her partner. But occasionally, that
truth can be too much for the lover to deal with. In a paranormal romance,
for example, a lover may decide that all this talk about vampires and
ancient curses is more than she or he signed on for. Or the stress of waiting
for a secret agent or a superhero to come home every night is too much.
Two people can disagree on a whole range of issues, but the dominant
ones in fiction are likely to be marriage, children, religion, money, politics,
and work.
Marriage – For some people, a committed relationship must be
formalised in marriage. For others, marriage is an old-fashioned institution.
Someone who has been married previously may not want to make ‘the same
mistake’ again. Someone who is single may not wish to give up what they
perceive as their ‘freedom.’ There are also religious and cultural aspects of
marriage that can be additional areas of contention – the status of a wife in
relation to her husband, for example. Monogamy versus polyamory may be
another area of difference. The role of parents or tribal elders in arranging
‘suitable’ marriages may also be an issue.
Children – Many cultures put direct or indirect pressure on married
couples to have children. The family and society expect it. This may be one
reason why someone is resistant to marry. But today, many children our
born outside marriage so that unwed couples also feel pressure to
reproduce. Women are assumed to have a maternal instinct. And men are
expected to ‘continue the family name’ by producing an heir. Both of these
things are cultural expectations and not everyone feels a biological need to
have children. There may be medical reasons why someone cannot be a
biological parent. And individuals may have other reasons why they do not
want to have children – perhaps because of the nature of their own
childhood. In a relationship, if one person wants to have children and the
other doesn’t, they have to decide whether this is a ‘deal-breaker.’
For women, there is also an issue of whether having a child affects their
ability to have a career. It was once believed that a woman could either have
a career or get married and have children, but she could not do both. Even
today, some people believe that it is a woman’s role to stay at home and
take care of the children.
Some men feel threatened by a successful, high-powered
businesswoman. She is the female equivalent of the alpha male billionaire
who features in a subgenre of the romance. And even if this type of female
character is in a successful relationship, she may still be expected to do all
the tasks that a stay-at-home mom does. Because if she doesn’t, she’s not a
‘proper woman’ she’s some sort of cold-hearted, emasculating bitch.
Religion – The strength of a person’s religious beliefs can affect whether
or not they will feel able to be in a relationship with someone from another
religion. Some countries and communities are deeply religious, and beliefs
impact all aspects of life. Other communities are now largely secular.
Bringing together two people of different faiths in a romantic relationship is
something that will be difficult to handle in a romantic comedy. How do
you reconcile the differences without offending people? I would advise
against writing about any religion other than your own. Pairing an atheist
and a Christian offers some scope for comedy, if handled tactfully. And gay
and non-binary relationships in communities that traditionally oppose such
things can also be written using humour.
Money – Romantic relationships involving someone who is rich and
someone who is poor have been written about for centuries. Nice girls have
always fallen in love with the boy from the other side of the tracks. And
ordinary guys have always fallen in love with princesses. A character from a
wealthy family is often presented with an ultimatum – they must abandon
the person they love if they want to inherit the family fortune. The 1981
film Arthur is an example, and there is an element of it in Pretty Woman
(1990). Differences in social class, and associated cultural values and
behaviours, are a prime target for comedy. Such stories typically
demonstrate that there are some things – i.e. love – that are of greater value
than money. But on their way to a happy ending, financial and class
differences can provide the heroine and hero with almost insurmountable
differences.
Politics – Politics is concerned with who has power, how they get it, and
what they can do with it to influence how society is run. Traditionally,
political differences have been expressed in terms of right-wing versus left-
wing, but in more recent times ‘green issues’ have created a third
alternative. In life and in fiction, we have national politics and local politics.
Characters with different political values and beliefs are likely to clash on a
variety of topics, and you can use these differences to create conflict in a
romantic comedy. As with religion, this requires a light touch and some
political issues, such as abortion and gun ownership, are probably not topics
for humour.
Work – For some people, work is a necessary evil. For others, it is a
fundamental part of who they view themselves to be. In either case, work
can get in the way of a romantic relationship. Someone working every
available hour to make ends meet doesn’t have much free time (or cash) to
spend on romantic dates. And someone who is obsessed by their job may
view it as being more important than a relationship (see below).
Don E. Hamachek, in his book Encounters with the Self (1971), lists the
symptoms of inferiority as being:
1. Sensitivity to criticism
2. Overresponse to flattery
3. Hypercritical attitude - directing attention away from one's own errors
or flaws
4. A tendency towards blaming - projecting one’s own weaknesses or
failings onto others
5. Feelings of persecution
6. Negative feelings about competition - wants to be a winner but isn't
optimistic about winning
7. A tendency toward seclusiveness, shyness and timidity
Shame
Shame arises when we feel we have done something that other people will
disapprove of. It is a fear that other people will find out that we have done
something bad, made a mistake, or have some kind of weakness. We fear
the judgment of others. We fear our actions are socially unacceptable.
Guilt arises when we do something that violates our own moral code. We
judge ourselves. We know that, according to our own rules, we have done
something wrong, it is morally unacceptable. Our own code of acceptable
behaviour, our value system, tends to come from our society, so we may
feel shame as well as guilt if we do something wrong.
In a court of law, the jury – representing society as a whole – must decide
whether the defendant committed an act that was morally wrong. They are
not debating whether the act is socially acceptable, the laws drawn up by
society say that it is not, they are trying to discover if the person actually
did it. Did the person do something that he or she knew was morally
wrong?
John Bradshaw writes that toxic shame mainly comes from significant
relationships. Shame arises because we worry about what others might
think about us. And we worry most about the judgment of the people who
are closest to us. As children, this means our parents or parent substitutes
including other relatives and our teachers. As adolescents we may rebel
against our parents and care more about what our peer group, our friends,
think about us. And as adults we care what our lovers think.
Toxic shame can begin at any one of these stages in life but is likely to
have its origins in childhood and be built upon through the other stages of
life. And it is caused when we feel that someone whose opinion is important
to us doesn’t value us for who we are and wishes we were something
different. Let’s take some obvious examples. A girl might be born and her
father had hoped for a boy. A boy is born but instead of becoming an athlete
he becomes an artist or a bookworm. If a child senses that they are
disappointing their parent, they will try to become what the parent wants.
They will create a false self. They will believe that they are supposed to be
this false self. Their true self isn’t good enough. Bradshaw quotes Joel
Covitz, who said of one person, “She learned to her dismay that she only
felt loved when she wasn’t being herself.” A person who believes this is
likely to develop contingent self-esteem – they will only feel good enough
if they meet certain standards of behaviour, if they be who they’re ‘meant’
to be.
Who I am is not good enough. This is the belief of anyone who
experiences toxic shame. It lies behind low self-esteem. It is the belief held
by the hero whose marriage failed and by the bad boy hero who felt he was
a disappointment to his father.
All kinds of life experiences – backstories – can lead to characters
suffering from low self-esteem. I can’t cover all of them here. You will find
lots of examples in self-help books on raising self-esteem and dealing with
shame.
Self-Compassion
An ironic fact in the Carer personality type is that they tend to be extremely
good at showing compassion for others but may be very bad at being
compassionate towards themselves. They are often extremely self-critical
and unforgiving of their own mistakes or perceived inadequacies. Often,
self-compassion is a skill they need to learn. They must learn to treat
themselves with the same understanding they give to others. Warriors feel
that compassion is ‘feminine’ and therefore a weakness. They do not show
it for others or for themselves.
Kristin D. Neff developed a scale for measuring self-compassion based
on three pairings: self-kindness vs. self-judgment; common humanity vs.
isolation (i.e. regarding yourself separately from the rest of humanity), and
mindfulness vs. over-identification (being open and non-judgmental about
our own thoughts and feelings without getting too caught up in them).
It’s important to note that self-compassion is not self-pity or self-
indulgence, it is a healthy form of self-care.
In a romance novel, the heroine – or any character with a significant
Carer component in their personality – might need to learn self-compassion
as part of their character development arc. They are likely to be supported
in this learning by a confidante character and by the hero. A Warrior needs
to learn express compassion for others and himself.
Learning or improving self-compassion includes comparing how you
treat yourself to how you would treat a friend who was in a similar
situation. We are often much harsher and unforgiving of ourselves. It can
also be helpful to become aware of what your inner critic is saying and seek
to change how it phrases its observations. Our inner critic says things to us
that we would never dream of saying to another person.
Cruel to Be Kind
Sometimes the hero or heroine feels that they need to end the relationship
because it is in the best interest of the person they are in love with. The
argument here is, “I love you so I must let you go.” There are a number of
circumstances where this might be the case.
Here the hero or heroine engages in behaviour designed to make their lover
leave them. If a hero or heroine can’t persuade their lover to leave because
danger is coming, they have to resort to other methods to make them leave.
They might take them somewhere far away and abandon them, but the lover
may find their way back. A more permanent – and dramatic because it’s
painful – solution is for the hero or heroine to do something to make the
loved one go away. The hero may say that he never loved her, or that he
made a mistake in thinking he did. He has to break her heart to save her.
The hero or heroine deliberately does hurtful things to turn their loved
one against them. He or she has to hurt them to protect them from a greater
harm.
Obviously, you have to create story circumstances where this is the hero
or heroine’s only option. If your reader can see that there’s another, less
drastic solution to the problem, they will just think you’ve created an idiot
plot (see below).
Sabotaging your own relationship may not actually work or it may have
unintended consequences. The harm the hero does to his loved one may be
greater than the potential harm from the villain, in which case, the hero
looks like a bad person. Or the sabotage may result in the loved one falling
into the villain’s clutches anyway – a distraught loved one may not care
about their own safety or be blinded by tears and so become an easy target.
A hero or heroine may also do such a great job of sabotaging the
relationship that reconciliation becomes impossible. There are some things
you just can’t take back.
Power Struggle
Everyone wants to feel that they are being heard, that their needs are being
recognised, their feelings validated, and their contributions appreciated.
They want to feel loved and respected. And every individual has an image
in their head of what this ‘love and respect’ should look like. To them, it is
defined by certain behaviours. If this person loves and respects me, they
should do this, this, and this. But – and this is a big but – not everyone has
the same image or list of behaviours in their definition of love and respect.
And they are not aware that other people have different definitions in their
heads.
Earlier, I introduced the concept of six basic character personalities. Each
of them will have a different idea of what ‘love and respect’ looks like. This
is because they have different views on what is important in life – certain
moral values are more important to them than others – different fears,
sources of shame, and different dreams. These are the things they need the
other person to recognise and accept – but the other person doesn’t know
that they exist. We have a tendency to assume that was is going on in our
head (and heart and gut) is the same as everyone else’s, but it’s not. If we
want someone else to understand us, we need to communicate our thoughts
and feelings. But to do that, we have to allow ourselves to be vulnerable
and trust the other person. But how can we trust them until they have shown
that they love and respect us? If we want to escape this endless circle, we
have to make a leap of faith. When people don’t, they end up in a power
struggle, trying to make sure they’re loved and respected according to their
own rules of the game.
The three main character types I referred to earlier – Warrior, Carer, and
Thinker – have different relationships to power. The Warrior uses power in
relationships to establish a dominant position. His behaviours generally
involved external action, doing things. Fighting battles and fixing problems.
He accepts power as being his by right. The Carer values relationships and
other people, so has a tendency to put their needs before her own. She
doesn’t want to fight, even when she feels she would be right to do so,
because she is afraid of ruining a relationship. In doing so, she denies her
own power. The Thinker is afraid of power. He (or she) seeks to avoid
confrontation and so withdraws from any sort of disagreement, even when
they believe their argument is factually correct.
The three hybrid character types – the Artist, Adventurer, and Crusader –
combine elements of the first three and so by definition have some form of
internal conflict in relation to power, even before we consider their
relationship with another person. Broadly speaking, you will find that with
the hybrid personality types, either the Warrior or the Carer will be
dominant in fictional characters. And the stereotype is that the Warrior is
masculine and the Carer feminine.
Different pairings of personality types are going to behave differently in
the post-honeymoon period of a relationship. And this can be a cause of
misunderstanding, frustration, and resentment. The Warrior is going to be
forceful in putting forward his side of an argument – he will be openly
aggressive. The Carer will not openly express her opinions or feelings but is
likely to engage in passive-aggressive (or covertly aggressive) behaviours.
And the Thinker will withdraw and not engage at all, but again may use
covert aggression to ‘prove’ their argument.
Carer vs. Warrior – The Carer has a need for intimacy within a relationship
but doesn’t express this need for fear of putting the relationship at risk. The
Warrior fears being ‘smothered’ or controlled in a relationship and
expresses his need for ‘freedom to act’ without considering what this means
for the Carer and without feeling the need to express the reasons for his
action to her. The Carer does not express her own needs because she is
afraid that she is not good enough, so her needs are not as important as his.
Thinker vs. Warrior – The Warrior wants discussion and direct action and is
happy the change things and create new situations. He is comfortable with
lively dialogue and arguments. The Thinker seeks to avoid confrontation, is
afraid of it, and so withdraws. The Thinker is reluctant to enter a
relationship at the beginning and when in it, wants to avoid conflict by
pretending it doesn’t exist.
Carer vs. Thinker – The Thinker expresses fear of change, seeking to avoid
a new relationship. Once in a relationship they seek to avoid conflict. The
Carer needs intimate contact and feels ashamed that she (or he) is not strong
enough to protect the Thinker from what they fear. The Carer may believe
that he (or she) is not good enough.
People who suffer from low self-esteem sometimes feel a need to bring
other people down so that they don’t feel so bad about themselves. They
may envy the other person’s qualities or achievements and so feel a desire
to belittle them with back-handed compliments or by drawing attention to
minor flaws. This can be difficult to deal with if the barbs and sarcasm are
directed at you, but it is also painful to see someone you care about engage
in this negative behaviour. Low-self esteem is a character flaw that can be
overcome by completing the character development arc, and a caring
partner will usually be there to support this growth. But negative defensive
behaviours can sometimes become so extreme that they put a relationship at
risk.
Some people find it extremely difficult to admit they have made a
mistake and to apologise for it. This is character flaw is associated with the
idea that making mistakes is a sign of weakness and apologising only draws
attention to the weakness and makes it worse. Warrior-types often have this
problem, feeling they don’t need to apologise, but it is also a sign of low
self-esteem. Admitting you’re wrong and making amends is so important in
relationships that I’ve written a chapter on it.
If one partner loses their job or suffers an illness or injury, they may find
themselves in a power imbalance. Suddenly they are reliant on the other
person. Romance writers often use these situations in stories either to add
conflict or to show the caring and supportive side of the hero or to have fun
by switching around the traditional ‘masculine’ and ‘feminine’ – Warrior
and Carer – roles.
A temporary power imbalance like this can become a major issue if one
character takes advantage of the imbalance – either by taking a dominant
position over the ‘weaker’ person or by overplaying the ‘victim’ role to get
what they want. Or if one feels deeply uncomfortable suddenly being in the
position of needing to be supported. Both of these show that there is still a
need for more character growth. Being strong enough to accept help is just
as important as being able to give it.
This occurs in a story where the hero or heroine needs to undergo character
development in order to earn their happy ever after. Either the heroine
needs to change, or the hero needs to change, or they both do. The break-up
occurs when the behaviour of one partner becomes so bad that the other is
unable to take it any longer.
The behaviour that causes the break-up may come as the final act of
increasingly bad behaviour – the final straw. Or it may come when a
character reverts to a previous form of bad behaviour that it was hoped
they’d overcome or grown out of – a backslide. Many characters who are
trying to change and escape from bad habits will return to old ways,
perhaps as a result of stress or temptation, and the backslide may be of
minor significance. But in this case it is significant enough to cause a break-
up of the relationship.
Sometimes the actual action of the offending character can be relatively
minor. It is what the action symbolises – what it means to the other
character – that makes it dramatically significant. The ‘straw that broke the
camel’s back’ is a small thing in itself, but the cumulative effect of large
numbers of similar straws had a devastating effect on the camel.
If someone is trying to overcome a significant personal demon – drug or
alcohol addiction or issues with anger – then a single return to previous
habits can mark a major setback.
In romantic comedy, we’re not going to be writing about dead camels or
drug addiction, but the problems faced by our heroes and heroines will
operate in a similar way. Issues pile up until a character can no longer deal
with them or a return to old habits makes them believe that long-term
change on the part of the other isn’t possible, and they are better to cut their
losses.
A minor incident may be insignificant on its own, but it can be the thing
that causes a character to reach breaking point. Having been triggered, they
unload months or years of pent-up frustration – often leaving their partner
stunned by the apparently unprovoked outburst. And in the heat of the
moment cruel things may be said, faults may be exaggerated, and an almost
childish tit-for-tat list of grievance and counter-grievance may be
unleashed. When a situation like this gets out of hand, it can appear that
there are irreconcilable differences that lead to the break-up of a
relationship.
Comedy cliché examples here include guys that always leave the toilet
seat up and the person who squeezes the toothpaste tube in the middle. In
themselves, these aren’t enough to cause the break-up of a relationship, but
they can be symbolic of greater problems for that couple. Before no-fault
divorces were permitted, couples had to state that there was ‘mental
suffering’ caused by the behaviour of the spouse, and a series of small
irritations were offered as ‘proof.’
The important thing to remember here is that the disagreement must be
properly set-up. If you suddenly have a character exploding over some
minor fault of their partner with no good reason, it’s going to look like you
– the writer – are trying to force a break-up to make your story work. This
is an example of an idiot plot (see below). Your characters have to act
irrationally and out of character to make your plot work. You should never
do this. To create a proper ‘final straw’ or ‘backsliding’ break-up, you have
to create a chain of events that starts much earlier in the story – and that
means planning out the character development arc of the hero (or heroine)
who needs to change.
For a break-up to happen, a character must reach a point where they feel
compelled to act. They reach a breaking point. This is true for all types of
break-ups, but it is particularly true for the ‘last straw’ kind.
Typically, we think of a breaking point being an explosion of anger, but
not all characters are able to access their anger and some that can choose
not to. Characters exist on a spectrum when it comes to anger. At one end is
explosive rage, the kind that leads to violence. You are not likely to use this
in a romance unless it is part of the personality of a villain in a romantic
suspense novel or a Mr. Wrong in a love triangle. Even then, it is so
extreme as to be melodramatic. An alpha male character, someone with a
strong Warrior element to their personality, may resort to anger – especially
if he still has some way to go along his character development arc – but this
will be a less violent form of expression. He might punch or break things in
his frustration, but he won’t use violence or threaten violence against the
heroine.
Further along the scale comes suppressed anger, where a person feels
anger but does not express it. Their actions don’t reveal it, but you can see it
in their eyes or hear it in their voice. It will also be visible in their body
language. But it is more controlled. This is harder to write, but it can be
very effective. Have a look at a book on body language for the tell-tale
signs of anger and apply them to your character. A character's choice of
words and how they are delivered can also reveal suppressed anger. Their
dialogue is likely to consist of short sentences or fragments, often described
as ‘clipped.’ They are saying as little as possible, afraid that if they say too
much the dam will burst and all of their anger will spill out.
Next up is what the TV Tropes website calls tranquil fury. The character
appears ‘eerily calm’ and ‘icy cool.’ There could still be an outburst of
anger or violence, but the character is able to turn it on and off at will. This
person is not suppressing their emotion and is not afraid of it, they are in
control of it. If and when they do act, it will be ‘cold-blooded’ or
‘premeditated.’ In some ways, this can be scarier than some who just lets
their anger come spilling out. This person is dangerous. You see this a lot in
martial arts movies.
Next along the spectrum of anger, again from the TV Tropes website, is
the quiet one or the still one. This person does not express anger in any way
– until they reach their breaking point. The fact that they are typically still
and quiet makes their violent outburst – in action or words – even more
dramatic when it does come. This person gives careful thought to a situation
before they act. They weigh their options and consider the consequences.
Their words can be deeply insightful but cutting and hurtful. And when
their anger begins to spill out, they may go too far, being more hurtful than
they intended. They never wanted to say these things in the first place and
now they struggle to dam the flow. Their criticism is intended to be
constructive, not simply cruel, but they may become lost in the moment and
give full vent to their frustration. This type of anger is often associated with
a character who has a significant Thinker element to their personality.
Towards the opposite end of the scale from rage lies passive aggression
or covert aggression. This is used by people who have been taught that it is
not appropriate for them to express their anger or by people who are afraid
of their own anger. The American Psychiatric Association, in the Diagnostic
and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM IV), referred to passive-
aggressive behaviour in work situations but also noted that it can appear in
‘interpersonal contexts.’ They say it is “...characterized by a habitual pattern
of non-active resistance to expected work requirements, opposition,
sullenness, stubbornness, and negative attitudes in response to requirements
for normal performance levels expected by others.”
Other sources note that in interpersonal relationships, passive-aggressive
behaviour includes procrastination, resentment, learned or feigned
helplessness, and failure to complete tasks. Behaviours can also include
avoiding or ignoring someone, evasion, deliberately stalling or obstructing,
fear of competition, sulking, often being late, ‘forgetting’ things, blaming
others, and regarding oneself as a victim. Withholding usual behaviours is
another example. In dialogue, sarcasm and back-handed compliments are
forms of passive aggression. So is a failure to communicate clearly what an
issue is. Passive aggression can include saying you’ll do something in order
to pacify someone while having no intention of carrying out the task.
Passive aggressive people say things like, ‘I’m not angry,’ ‘Fine.
Whatever,’ ‘I thought you knew,’ ‘I was only joking,’ or ‘Why are you
overreacting like this?’ They will also express a wish for something and
then say, ‘But that will never happen.’
A key element of passive aggression or covert aggression is mixed
messages. And they are deliberately mixed. A person’s words or actions
don’t match their feelings. They hide their true meaning as a form of
defence. They can’t be accused of aggression if their words or actions are
ambiguous. Their anger is expressed indirectly, behind a mask of ‘I’m fine.’
A character with a strong Carer element in their personality is likely to
have learned that expressing anger is wrong and dangerous because it can
have a negative impact on personal relationships. Stereotypically, women
are assumed to be Carers and so there is an assumption that passive-
aggression is a female thing. This is blatantly wrong – everyone, regardless
of biological sex or social gender, is capable of expressing anger using any
of the methods above.
I Quit!
If you’re finding it difficult to get into the mindset of someone who walks
out on a relationship, it might help to think of it as being like quitting a job
or social group that you’ve had enough of. You might need the salary from
the job or the friendship of the social group, but eventually, it may reach a
stage where you can’t stand it anymore. The situation is sapping your
energy, perhaps affecting your health, making you annoyed, and just
generally making you feel unhappy or in a low mood. The behaviour of the
people involved may be emotionally abusive, immoral, controlling, or
threatening. Or maybe your boss is an idiot who was promoted beyond the
limits of his experience and competence. Or he’s corrupt. Perhaps you’re
the person who always gets the blame if something goes wrong or doesn’t
get done. Or all the tasks no one else wants get dumped on you. Or maybe
someone else takes the credit for the work you have done. Or the work is
just incredibly boring.
Most of us have had experiences such as this in work, school, or
friendship groups. You can channel these experiences and the emotions
associated with them into your writing about a failing relationship. In such
circumstances, your unhappiness and resentment build to a point where you
want to quit. In real life, you may never quit, but you want to. In a
relationship, these feelings can build until there is an explosion of anger,
passive aggression, or a quiet decision that ‘I deserve better than this,’
which causes the character to walk away.
When a character says to themselves, ‘I deserve better than this,’ it could
be a major turning point in their lives. It is a demonstration of self-respect. I
am worthy. It may show that someone has progressed to a significant point
in their character development arc. In a love triangle story, it may be the
point where the heroine becomes ready to abandon Mr. Wrong and choose
Mr. Right. But it could also cause them to make a wrong decision. They
may be so upset with Mr. Right that they think they will be better off with
Mr. Wrong.
The breaking point may be the instant when a character discovers that
something has been holding them back. Their response at the breaking point
may be the result of an important personal revelation or epiphany – about
who they are or the circumstances of their life. This revelation enables them
to move on and become ‘unstuck,’ overcoming a psychological or
emotional block and no longer have to repeat previous behaviours that have
been limiting them. They may then express what they have learned in action
or speech.
In terms of their relationship with another character, they may realise that
they are now empowered and will no longer be held back by the other
person. They are able to be themselves and stand up for themself.
When someone does quit, you will have to think about how the other
person in the relationship feels about this. They may not be aware of the
heroine’s (or hero’s) reasons for quitting. To them, it may seem
unmotivated. Or they may be in denial about the part their own behaviour
played and want to believe that their abandonment is undeserved. They may
regard the quitting as an act of betrayal.
Backsliding
Relationship Sabotage
A relationship saboteur has several techniques available to him (or her). The
most obvious is disinformation – telling lies or manufacturing false
evidence. This may take the form of spreading false rumours, perhaps in the
form of an exaggeration of something that is partly true. Or it may involve
planting evidence for a person’s lover to discover. A saboteur can
deliberately cause any of the things mentioned in the misunderstanding
section above to occur. They could plant the equivalent of lipstick on the
collar or a hair of the wrong colour. They could fake love letters or other
forms of communication. Or they could just do things that make the heroine
or hero look bad in an attempt to get the other person to end the
relationship.
A jealous best friend may deliberately seek to ruin the moment, doing
something to sabotage the romantic date that their friend has carefully
arranged for their lover. In a romantic comedy, you can have some fun
showing the jealous best friend ‘stalking’ the lovers and setting up some
simple or elaborate form of moment killer. The best friend might amusingly
fail to achieve his objective initially – perhaps two attempts have the
opposite effect, making the relationship stronger – before he or she
succeeds at the dark moment. You might even have the best friend realise
that they are wrong to try and ruin their friend’s happiness and give up on
the sabotage, only to wreck the relationship accidentally or through a
delayed bit of sabotage.
If the saboteur functions as a mentor or confidante to the heroine or hero,
they can provide bad advice. This poor advice will be deliberately designed
to make the character look bad and ruin the chances of impressing their
lover. Again, in a romantic comedy you can have fun by having the saboteur
give obviously bad advice. They may base the advice on knowledge that the
hero or heroine doesn’t have – knowing something what will annoy, upset,
hurt, offend, or otherwise disorientate the lover.
It’s worth pointing out that some reasons for a break-up are more
dramatic or emotional than others. If the behaviour of one character causes
the other to break-up with them, you have a break-up based on legitimate
conflict and the reader may sympathise with the wronged individual. If one
character breaks up with another because of a mistaken belief, you add an
extra element. The reader will know that the person who has just been
dumped doesn’t deserve it, and so their sympathy will be with the person
who is the victim of the dumping. And finally, you have the character who
doesn’t want to end a relationship, but does so because they feel it is in the
best interests of the person they love – in this case, the reader is likely to
feel sympathy for both characters.
To end the chapter, we will consider a couple of potential pitfalls when
creating your characters’ break-up. The fact that the romance ‘formula’ says
that you must have a break-up means that writers sometimes shoehorn one
in, without integrating it in a convincing way. This can lead to unconvincing
conflict or, worse, the idiot plot.
This is technically a variation of the idiot plot (see below). Here, characters
engage in or provoke conflict which is not properly motivated, or which
contradicts established characterisation. The characters act out of character
and engage in conflict simply because it is convenient for the writer.
Conflict is vital in storytelling, but it must be convincingly motivated –
arising as a consequence of earlier actions and from the established
personalities and experiences of characters. If the conflict appears from
nowhere or arises from trite, unconvincing motivation, the story will lack
credibility.
Conflict will seem unconvincing if it occurs because a character suddenly
behaves in a way that they have not behaved before. A character suddenly
‘sees red’ and loses their temper, even though they have never expressed
anger before. Or they suddenly take issue with a character’s behaviour and
challenge it, even though they have never challenged people before. Instead
of behaving reasonably and in character, they suddenly appear prickly and
thin-skinned for no reason. This is a particular risk with the male hero
because there is a stereotypical assumption that men get angry more than
women. This may be true for a Warrior/alpha male hero (in which case, his
temper will have been established early on), but it is less believable in a
beta/New Man hero.
Characterisation and convincing character personalities are extremely
important in romances. The behaviour of characters must seem credible to
the reader. They will look at the heroine’s behaviour and decide whether
they would do the same thing in similar circumstances. They might decide
that the heroine has made a wrong choice, but they must understand and
accept her reason for doing so. And they will look at the hero’s behaviour
and decide whether they would behave in this way if they were a man, and
whether this type of behaviour is acceptable or excusable given the hero’s
current circumstances.
If your heroine or hero does something stupid without good reason, you
risk destroying the relationship you have created between reader and
character.
An idiot plot is a plot that relies on the fact that that the characters behave
like idiots. The term was originally coined by science fiction author James
Blish when he was reading and reviewing a lot of bad books. An idiot plot
would fall apart if one of the characters did a smart thing. The smart thing
would resolve the problem on which the plot depends. You can usually
recognise an idiot plot if you’re sitting there thinking, “Why didn’t they
just...?”
An idiot plot often relies on a misunderstanding. A character makes a
wrong assumption or draws a wrong conclusion and behaves as if it is a true
fact. In romantic comedies, the misunderstanding often involves the heroine
believing that the hero is being unfaithful, perhaps as a result of being seen
with an ex-girlfriend. Or the story may have begun with the hero making a
bet with a friend to see who can kiss the girl first, with this stupid bet
coming back to haunt him later after he’s really fallen in love with the girl.
These and similar plots can seem like idiot plots because a simple question
or explanation would quickly resolve the misunderstanding. “Why didn’t
they just talk to each other?”
You can get away with a character behaving like an idiot if you have
established that the character is an idiot. An idiot plot relies on one or more
intelligent characters behaving like an idiot, or even all of the characters
acting like idiots. Any character who acts like an idiot just so the writer can
make the plot work is acting out of character. It is bad writing – unless you
provide a valid reason for the character’s behaviour (see Avoiding the Idiot
Plot below).
There are circumstances where making a poor decision is not out of
character. It can be justified if a character is young and inexperienced,
poorly educated, lacks social or communication skills, or is acting under
extreme stress. But these explanations have to be set-up early in the story or
it will simply appear that the character is ‘carrying the idiot ball’ for the
purposes of the writer.
If you want to have a misunderstanding in your plot and don’t want your
characters to look like idiots, you need to include a valid reason why they
can’t or don’t do the obvious thing. You need to answer the “Why don’t
they just...?” question that will naturally arise.
If your character is going to make a wrong assumption or conclusion, you
have to set up a believable reason for them to do that. Often this can be
done with an incident in their backstory. If a character was betrayed by an
ex-lover in a particular manner in the past, they are more likely to believe
that their new lover might do the same sort of thing. You establish this
particular way of ‘being an idiot’ as a character flaw with a genuine prior
cause.
Or you establish that the new lover has a character flaw that causes him
to behave in a certain way in a certain circumstance – we see examples of
this earlier in the story – so it is not too much of a stretch to believe that he
would behave in this way later in the story.
If you’re writing a romantic suspense story, you often have to deal with
an obvious question – “Why doesn’t she just go to the police?” You have to
provide a believable reason why the heroine can’t do this if you want her to
go on the run with the hero instead.
You have to deal with similar questions in a paranormal romance or any
story where the heroine (or hero) does not do what an ordinary person
would do in such a situation. You have to show the reader or explain to
them why the obvious solution or course of action won’t work in this
particular instance.
Sometimes you may have to explain away more than one “Why didn’t
they...?” questions. You also need to make sure that the explanation you
give doesn’t open the way for an “Okay, so why didn’t they just...?” follow-
up question. Anticipate your reader’s questions and head them off.
Bear in mind the fact that just because something happened in real life
doesn’t automatically make it believable in a story. Stories have their own
cause-and-effect logic, and you have to respect this in order to create an
effective plot. If a reader thinks your plot is stupid, “My friend really did
that” is not a valid excuse. A failed plot is a failed plot. Sorry.
It’s important to note that I am not arguing that characters should always
do the right thing. Characters do make mistakes and they do make wrong
choices. Many stories exist to explore the consequences of characters
getting it wrong and learning from their mistakes. But characters should not
do an out-of-character stupid thing just so the writer can move the plot
forward or get a cheap laugh. Character behaviour must be motivated and
believable.
While we’re talking about avoiding bad plotting, it’s worth remembering
another of writing’s rules of thumb: You can’t use a significant plot element
in the second half of your story if it wasn’t set up in the first half.
This ‘rule’ is meant to stop you pulling a rabbit out of the hat in a way
that makes your story seem unconvincing.
In a paranormal romance, for example, you have to set up the rules of
how magic works in the first half of the story. If you don’t, and a character
suddenly rustles up a magic weapon at the climax of the story, it will look
like you – the author – are cheating. And will probably lead the reader to
ask why the character didn’t use this magic weapon earlier. It’s important to
establish the rules of your story world and keep them consistent. The same
thing applies in a contemporary romance – you can’t have a character
suddenly have an identical twin if the possibility of the twin’s existence
wasn’t mentioned earlier. If you’re going to include a major twist like this,
you probably need a couple of subtle references to it in the first half of the
book. You don’t want to telegraph or ‘hang a lampshade’ on your plot twist,
but you do need to establish it as a possibility by some sort of reference
whose meaning is only clear in retrospect.
Epiphany
This is the moment when one character realises that they are in love with
another and that this love is more important than anything else. They don’t
want to live without this person. In the old-school romance, this was often
referred to as the moment when the heroine has brought the alpha male hero
to his knees.
This isn’t a moment when the hero confesses his love to the heroine, that
comes later, this is a private moment when he finally realises how important
she is to him. And that he will do anything to be with her.
In most romances, the hero decides that his love for the heroine is more
important than some internal belief or some external objective. He is
prepared to sacrifice this to be with her. In a love triangle story, the hero
realises he’s been pursuing the wrong woman (the love rival) and that he
genuinely loves the heroine.
The epiphany is when the hero can no longer deny the strength of his
feelings for the heroine. There may be a smaller epiphany earlier in a story,
as in an ‘enemies to lovers’ story where the hero realises he is attracted to
the heroine. But this doesn’t lead to commitment. It may not even lead
immediately to a relationship, as he might fight his attraction and be even
more cold and angry around her to hide his feelings. The epiphany near the
end of a novel – later in Sequence 7 or early in Sequence 8 – is on a much
larger scale because it will lead to a life-changing decision.
The TV Tropes website identifies a couple of versions of this trope. The
‘green-eyed epiphany’ occurs when the hero experiences envy/jealousy
when he sees the heroine with someone else. The strength of his feeling
convinces him of how he feels about her. The ‘love revelation epiphany’
occurs when a hero realises he loves the heroine after she confesses or
demonstrates her love for him. And the ‘belated love epiphany’ occurs when
it is too late to do anything about it. The epiphany late in a romance novel is
often of this kind – the break-up means that reconciliation with the heroine
seems impossible. But the hero feels he has to try.
The epiphany can also be triggered when the hero realises the lengths
he’s prepared to go, the dangers he’s prepared to face, to protect the
heroine. Even after their break-up.
Reconciliation
Reconciliation does not – and should not – occur spontaneously. It requires
effort, patience, and perseverance. If the hero wishes to be reconciled with
the heroine, she must be able to see that he has changed. She must see a
reason to give him a second chance. It’s not enough that she loves him –
he’s hurt her once so naturally she fears he could do it again.
And the hero cannot do this alone, reconciliation requires the active
participation of both sides. They must both want it.
The hero needs to ask himself three things. What behaviour of his
contributed to the break-up? Why did he engage in this behaviour? This
involves understanding why fear and shame caused him to employ certain
defensive mechanisms. And, what changes can he make in his life and his
behaviour to convince the heroine to give him a second chance and ensure
that he doesn't make the same mistakes again? This is likely to involve him
taking action to complete his character development arc or to at least make
significant progress along it.
Having done this, the hero then needs to re-establish effective
communication with the heroine. I talked about the importance of honest
and empathetic communication in the section on communication
breakdown above.
Despite what some people have said elsewhere, reconciliation isn’t
simply a matter of the hero getting down on his knees and begging for
forgiveness. Apology and forgiveness is a two-way process – I have
included a chapter on ‘how to say you’re sorry’ later in the book.
A study by T. Joel Wade et al. showed that when it came to reconciliation
in romantic relationships, women tended to respond best to behaviours that
demonstrated emotional accessibility and commitment, while men
responded to behaviours that indicated sexual availability. These findings
were said to be consistent with the belief that in choosing a mate, women
seek emotional/romantic commitment and men prioritise sexual
reproduction. Which is a scientific way of saying that women want love and
men want sex. That is not a theme we’re looking to promote in romance
fiction. If your hero wants to reconciled with your heroine, he has to
demonstrate that he’s looking for more than sex. He has to show that he is
no longer afraid or ashamed of his emotions and that he has overcome his
fear of being ‘trapped’ in a relationship.
And then, after bridges have been mended somewhat, the hero and
heroine then have to establish a new version of their relationship. To some
extent, this is a process of them falling in love with each other again. But
this time, they are both engaged in being their true selves – they are not
trying to hide anything. So their relationship is built on a better foundation
and stands a better chance of being permanent.
Actions possibly related to reconciliation discussed in the Wade study
were giving gifts such as flowers, nice gestures like favours, compliments,
doing chores, etc., being willing to say yes to things, to give in or to give
up, to allow each other space, spend time together, to apologise or expect an
apology, make-up sex, arguing, laughing and having fun, forgiving the other
person, taking the blame or admitting wrongdoing, compromising,
pretending nothing happened or forgetting it, baking or cooking for a
partner, showing affection with a kiss or a hug, communication.
In romance novels, this process of reconciliation is often shortened or
symbolised by one event. This shortcut is sometimes recognised as being a
fiction by having an epilogue to the story showing the heroine and hero in
their relationship at some point in the future when the full process of
reconciliation has been completed. In other stories, the reader just accepts
the convenient fiction of near instantaneous reconciliation.
It’s worth noting here that reconciliation is a major theme in ‘second
chance’ and ‘secret baby’ romances.
As in other examples in the book, I’m assuming that it is the hero that
needs to make the first move when it comes to reconciliation. Traditionally,
this is the case. But it is not true for all romance stories.
18 | Subplots
We’ve already established that the development of a romantic relationship is
your main plot. Everything else in your novel revolves around this. In
Hollywood screenplays and television scripts this is known as your A-story. It
has a beginning, middle, and end, and you can structure it using plot points or
‘beats.’
Most romance novels will have at least one other story thread, a subplot or
B-story. This too will have a beginning, middle, and end, and a series of plot
points or beats. This subplot will almost always consist of external action that
affects the A-story in some way. The important thing to remember is that the
sub part of subplot means that this story thread is subordinate to your A-story.
It can never be allowed to be more important than your romantic relationship.
This arrangement of romantic A-story and external action B-story makes
romantic novels (and movies) unique. In other genres, the A-story consists of
the external action – Indiana Jones trying to locate the Ark of the Covenant –
and the B-story is a romantic subplot – Indy rekindling his relationship with
Marion.
In a romantic novel, the romantic A-story is more important than the external
action, but what does that mean in terms of allocating the chapters or pages of
your manuscript. What proportion should be main plot and what proportion
should be subplot? There is no hard and fast rule, and the division will depend
on the sub-genre you are writing in and the length of your novel. In a short
contemporary romance or romantic comedy, the external action may be
relatively minor, consisting of little more than a few vignettes that act as
obstacles to the romance. In romantic suspense – which feature a thriller or
action-adventure subplot – the B-story may take up a high proportion of
chapters/pages – but the external action will (for the majority of scenes) be
written to show how it impacts on the romantic relationship. Think of the
movie Romancing the Stone, which looks a lot like an Indiana Jones action-
adventure, but the main interest in the story comes from the relationship
between Joan Wilder (Kathleen Turner) and Jack Colton (Michael Douglas).
Although I will be talking primarily about a single subplot in this chapter,
you can have more than one. I would say that a short (50,000 to 65,000 word)
novel can really only support a single subplot (plus a few vignettes), while
longer novels have more room for multiple subplots without detracting from
the main plot. Additional subplots are referred to as the C-story, D- story, and
so on. Each additional subplot will be less significant than the previous one and
occupy less story time.
Before we look at how to construct a subplot, I want to consider some of the
uses that a subplot can be put to. I’ve seen a few articles online that suggest
you can use a subplot to ‘pad out’ your story to novel length, but you should
really be thinking in terms of integrating a subplot rather than thinking of
something you can add to your story.
Functions of Subplots
What can a subplot add to your story, other than bulking out the word count?
You won’t be surprised to learn that a subplot can function in the same way as
any other scene or series of scenes in your story. It can:
(a) Increasing Conflict – I’ve said that in the first half of your romance,
suspense is created by making the reader ask, ‘Will they, won’t they?’ and in
the second by making them wonder if the couple can overcome everything and
make a long-term commitment to each other. In both parts of the story, you
need obstacles – internal doubts and fears and external circumstances – that
mean becoming a couple and making their relationship work is a struggle. We
have to make it appear to the reader that the ’happy ever after’ is in serious
jeopardy. You can use one or more subplots to increase internal doubts and
fears and provide external situations that threaten the relationship, separating
the two main characters or even setting them in conflict with each other. In an
‘enemies to friends’ story, the main subplot, the B-story, concerns whatever the
heroine and hero are in conflict about.
(b) Developing & Revealing Character – A subplot can be used to show us new
things about one of the main characters (or both of them) and/or it can be used
to portray their growth as a person by taking them some way (or all the way)
along their character development arc. If the heroine needs to increase her self-
esteem and self-confidence, for example, a subplot could be used to show how
she achieves this – perhaps with the hero’s support or perhaps she achieves it
by opposing him. Subplots, which are usually external action, can also reveal
personality traits – showing rather than telling – or character flaws that need to
be overcome. The hero’s caring side or his vulnerability can be demonstrated
via a subplot, for example.
(c) Exploring Theme – Subplots can add depth to your story, and you can make
them feel more integrated into the plot by having them explore another aspect
of the theme of the story. A main theme in most romances is that your character
must have the courage to be their authentic self, rather than pretending to be
someone they feel they ought to be, and to do this they have to allow
themselves to be vulnerable. This is true for the heroine and the hero. You can
also explore this theme – or any other theme in your story – by showing a
secondary character or another couple facing the same issues as your main
characters. You could use the subplot featuring these other characters to
provide a positive example – this is what the heroine and hero could achieve if
they make the right choices – or as a negative example – they could suffer this
fate if they make the wrong choices.
Types of Subplot
There are different types of subplot that can be used to achieve the above
functions.
(iii) Contrasting Subplot – This is similar to the mirroring subplot above, but
the situation of the secondary character contrasts with that of the main
character. This might show the main character that they have an option to
improve their life in a way that the secondary character cannot. Or it might
show the secondary character facing a similar situation but making a different
choice to the main character, with a lesson coming from the consequences of
this choice.
The secondary character involved in any of these subplots may be the heroine’s
confidante (or the hero’s) but in many cases it is someone else known to one or
both of the main characters. A subplot might provide a learning opportunity for
the heroine or the hero or both.
Talking about these subplots in the abstract makes them seem more
complicated than they really are. Look at the subplots in the romance novels
you read to see what functions they serve and what type of subplot the author
has used.
Integrating Subplots
It is possible to write a parallel subplot that runs alongside your main plot but
never directly affects it. Your characters observe it and perhaps learn something
valuable from it, but it never affects them personally. I would advise against
doing this for a main subplot (B-story), though it may be okay for a C- or D-
story. Parallel subplots risk looking like something that has been tacked on and
may strike the reader as being irrelevant. If it doesn’t directly affect the main
characters, why is it there? If you use one, you will need to show how it has
some kind of affect on the main characters who witness it.
You are on much safer ground if you integrate your subplots, having them
affect the main characters directly and having them intersect the main plot at
various points.
There is a great article by Gabriela Pereira at the DIY MFA website that
shows visually how subplots might intersect, using a subway (underground
railway) style map of The Hunger Games as an example:
https://diymfa.com/writing/mapping-out-your-story
Here’s a simplified map of how a story featuring three subplots might look –
at the top are the three parallel plotlines and below is the map of how they
intersect. Black story points are unique to one of the plotlines, white story
points are shared by two (or more) plotlines:
Something that Gabriela Pereira didn’t show in her example, but which I have
included above, is that some subplots may begin after the main plot begins and
may end before the main plot ends. You may want to tie up a subplot in
Sequence 6 or 7 so you can concentrate on the ending of your main plot in
Sequence 8.
In Writing a Romantic Novel and Getting Published, Donna Baker says that
subplots “...don’t occur in neat little bundles. They run unevenly. One may
simmer quietly in the background for a while before erupting again, another
may tear like a raging hurricane through two or three chapters and then blow
itself out.”
Subplot Vignettes
You create a subplot in the same way that you create any other plot. The
subplot needs a protagonist – this may be the hero or heroine of your main
story or it could be another character. This person needs a goal, something they
are trying to achieve, and there must be some form of opposition or obstacle
that they need to overcome in order to achieve their goal. This creates the
‘dramatic question’ of the subplot – Will they achieve their goal? The subplot
also requires a beginning, middle, and end.
Effectively, what I have just described there is a story. Every subplot could,
in theory, function as a separate story if you took it out of your novel. One
thing that ties it into your novel is the fact that some of the setup – introducing
characters and the story world – is shared with the main plot.
Having said that each subplot is a story, I will say that the scale of the
subplot within the novel will determine what kind of story it is. A major
subplot could be structured in eight sequences in the same way as a full-length
novel or screenplay. Or it could be slightly smaller, being more like a novella.
A lesser subplot could develop more like a short story.
It can be helpful to develop the plot of your subplot separately from your
main plot. That way you can see that you have all the necessary elements in
place. Once you have created the plot of the subplot, you can look at how to
weave it together with your main plot and any other subplots.
When screenwriters and television writers develop multiple plotlines in this
way, they often use different colour index cards for each plotline, pinning them
on a corkboard on the wall and shifting them around to see where they fit best.
Some writing software includes this ‘corkboard’ feature if you don’t have a
physical wall big enough.
You may not need to go to these lengths to plot out your subplot, but if you
get stuck, the coloured cards method can be useful.
In a romantic suspense novel, as well as your romance plotline (your A-
story), you will have a thriller or action-adventure plot (the B-story). In this
case, your B-story will be a major part of your novel and you will need to
create a full-length plot like that for a thriller or action-adventure movie or
novel. I’m not going to go into detail about how to create that sort of plot – my
book Suspense Thriller (2018) contains details of how to create a thriller and
there are eight-sequence models for nine types of suspense thriller plot. And
Crime Thriller (2019) breaks down fourteen more kinds of plot into eight
sequences. In other books in the Genre Writer series, I provide coverage of
other genre plots including murder mysteries. If you want to write romantic
suspense, I recommend studying the plot structures of novels and films in the
thriller and/or action-adventure genres as well as romantic suspense novels.
Here, I want to look at a smaller sort of subplot, on the scale of a novella or
one-hour television episode rather than a full-length screenplay or novel. This
smaller scale subplot leaves plenty of room to explore the romance plot, while
still providing a substantial and satisfying subplot.
In a one-hour television episode or a novella, you don’t have the space to
explore a plot that uses the full eight sequences that I have outlined elsewhere.
Television writers used a four-act model until relatively recently, though that
has been expanded to a five or six ‘act’ model that includes a ‘teaser’ at the
beginning or a ‘tag’ or epilogue at the end, or both. We’ll use a variation of the
older four-act model here.
One of the reasons I like to use the television episode plot model for a
subplot is that in a tv series the main characters and the world have been
established in the pilot and each week a new episode uses those characters and
that world. In a romance novel, you set up the characters and world for your
main plot and then the subplot is a story that occurs in that world.
Act I
As in all stories, the first part introduces the protagonists, the situation – a
problem or opportunity, the potential conflicts, and what is at stake for the
characters. Remember that some of your set-up will already have been done in
the first part of your main story. Also, don’t forget that the protagonist of the
subplot may not be the heroine or hero from your main plot. But it could be.
Whoever the ‘subplot protagonist’ is, they must be someone the reader is
interested in to the extent of wanting to see them achieve their subplot goal.
Ideally, by showing what is at stake in the subplot, this first act will tie the
subplot into one of the main themes of your novel.
The ‘inciting incident’ or ‘catalyst’ that sets the subplot in motion will occur
in this act, unless it appeared in the ‘teaser.’ Ellen Sandler, in The TV Writer’s
Workbook, points out that while this incident is vital to the subplot, the
characters may not initially recognise its significance. She also writes that the
inciting incident “...can be as small as a broken zipper or as big as a corpse.”
Sandler also says that your set-up in Act I should explain why this incident is
happening now. Incidents in a story shouldn’t just happen because it is
convenient for the writer to have them happen. If you answer the question,
‘Why now?’ your reader will more readily accept the situation. Remember, the
‘meet cute’ of your heroine and hero was probably a big, unlikely coincidence,
so you can’t have another one. Coincidences are cheating, you’re only allowed
one early in a story. Fortunately, your explanation doesn’t have to be
complicated. The example Ellen Sandler gives would work just as well in a
romance as it would in a sitcom. If a character decides to get a dog, ask ‘Why
now?’ The answer might be that a neighbour’s house was broken into and the
character feels vulnerable living alone. Or the character recently ended a
relationship and is feeling lonely.
In Act I, the subplot protagonist is faced with a situation that requires a
decision. They can choose not to act, allowing themselves to be a victim, and
suffering whatever consequences or humiliation this may bring. Or they can
act. Which do they choose? Tune in to Act II to find out.
Act II
The subplot protagonist ether chooses to take action to resolve their situation or
they are forced to take action when the situation worsens significantly. They
must then take a moment to consider their new circumstances and decide what
to do next. At this point we often present vital exposition or backstory to
explain where we are and why the circumstances are significant. We may also
learn some backstory, telling us who the subplot protagonist is and how they
got to this point in their life.
The subplot protagonist sets out to resolve the situation, choosing a goal and
actions to reach that goal. Their actions reveal or create new obstacles. How do
you create new obstacles for your character? One way is to introduce a subplot
antagonist, a character who actively opposes them. This antagonist may want
to prevent the protagonist achieving their goal, either because they want the
‘prize’ for themselves, or because the protagonist’s success would cause some
other plan of the antagonist’s to fail.
Another way to increase conflict here is to have one of the subplot
protagonist’s friends or family members oppose their plan. ‘I don’t want to.’ If
you’re having trouble with this, Ellen Sandler suggests brainstorming a list of
responses that an ally of the subplot protagonist might come up with to oppose
them. Either the ally resists the subplot protagonist or the subplot protagonist
resists the ally. Sandler suggests coming up with at least ten options here,
including even ideas that seem unlikely or even stupid. You may find that an
unlikely or stupid idea gives you the basis of an original and amusing
confrontation.
Pamela Douglas, in Writing the TV Drama Series, says that your character
may have underestimated the opposition in Act I, but now discovers that they
face a determined subplot antagonist. And they may discover that the
antagonist is not who or what they expected. Sometimes your subplot
antagonist will follow a red herring in Act II and only discover they’ve been
duped at the midpoint. Or they may overcome an obstacle or defeat an
opponent and think they’ve won, only to discover that a stronger and more
active antagonist awaits them.
In Story Maps: TV Drama, Daniel Calvisi says that Act II should contain a
‘meaningful skirmish’ that serves as the subplot protagonist’s ‘first trial.’ It
should also produce some sort of failure or victim – a ‘first casualty’ – who
could be the subplot protagonist themselves or another character who suffers a
“...figurative death, like a loss of innocence.”
The Midpoint
This occurs at the end of Act II and sets up Act III. It is something unexpected
that turns the story in a new direction. We often see that the stakes are raised at
this point. Often, the subplot protagonist discovers that the problem they
thought they were facing is much bigger or more serious than they anticipated.
They discover what it is that they are really up against.
An element of this discovery is often connected to the subplot protagonists
greatest fear. This character’s fear will be related to their personality archetype
in the same way as the heroine’s or the hero’s. There is something that they
really don’t want to do, and the midpoint discovery suggests that they might
end up having to do this scary thing if things don’t go right. And, of course,
things don’t go right. Immediately after the midpoint there is often a quiet
moment when the subplot protagonist admits their fears and may explain the
origins of this fear (revealing their backstory).
Daniel Calvisi says that the midpoint creates a new challenge that propels
the story into Act II and which will ultimately pay off in the climax.
Act III
The subplot protagonist reacts to the change that has just occurred and sees the
new obstacles it has created. They make decisions and choose new actions that
they believe will help them achieve their subplot goal, hopefully avoiding them
having to face their greatest fear. Daniel Calvisi says that the subplot
protagonist’s decision to act at this moment is a ‘character-defining action.’ He
calls it an assumption of power, as the character assumes responsibility and
fully commits to resolving the situation, come what may.
Calvisi writes that the subplot protagonist is faced with no choice but to
make a (symbolic) ‘declaration of war.’ They will take a big risk to try and
resolve the situation once and for all. There may be a moment when this action
seems to have brought victory, but this is short-lived. Something goes wrong
and the protagonist’s situation ends up even worse than when they started. This
is the ‘darkest hour’ in the subplot, the moment when all seems lost. This is
what forces the subplot protagonist to ‘go for broke’ and do something to face
their greatest fear.
Act IV
In the early part of your romance novel, there is plenty for your heroine and
hero to do as they meet each other and get to know each other. But then you
enter a period in their relationship that is likely to involve dating, doing things
together, and then doing things with other couples. There are only so many
dinner dates, trips out, and evenings out with the gang that you can write in a
story. Subplots give you the opportunity to space these things out and include a
bit of variety in your scenes.
If you have a relatively quiet period in your main romance plot, you can
include the drama or action of a subplot to maintain interest. This can help
overcome the feeling that the middle of your story is ‘sagging’ in places.
Another good place to include parts of a subplot is where you want to extend
suspense or tension to the maximum. You can create a cliff-hanger – a moment
of high physical or emotional drama – and then cut away to a subplot for a few
pages, keeping the reader wondering how the cliff-hanger will be resolved. You
could then create a mini cliff-hanger or dramatic question in the subplot and
cut back to the main plot, extending the suspense in the subplot.
Pick some good examples of novels in your chosen sub-genre or sub-sub-
genre. Look at how they weave together the main romance plot and the B-
story. See if they include a C-story or a D-story. Make note of the chapters
where these subplots begin and where they end. See which characters are
involved in them. Note where story points in the subplot coincide with events
in the main plot and in other subplots. If it helps, take a paperback and go
through marking the plot and different subplots with different coloured sticky
notes or highlighters. Or use different coloured index cards and write out the
key story points for each plot and subplot, seeing how the different colours get
mixed together.
If all that seems like too much work, start writing your own subplots and see
where you end up. It’s up to you whether you plot them and write them
separately before weaving them together. You may just decide to do it on the
fly. There is not right way to do this, all that matters is that the end product
satisfies the reader.
19 | Romantic Dialogue: Banter &
Witty Repartee
Dialogue, the words spoken by your characters, plays an important role in
your romance novel. It is how one character expresses her or his feelings to
another. Yes, we can use expressions, gestures and body language, but we
aren’t writing a movie, we have to create pictures in the reader’s head using
words on a page. And dialogue – including the ‘internal dialogue’ of a
character’s thoughts – is a direct way of showing rather than telling.
In real life, couples don’t communicate as much as they should.
Traditionally, men have been less able to express their feelings in words
than women. Maybe that’s changing as social attitudes toward gender roles
alter, but it’s a very slow process. In romances we create a fantasy world
where men and women can more freely express their feelings and their
vulnerabilities in words. We create characters so that readers can compare
their own experiences and their own feelings to the ones in the story. And
we have fun with words while we’re doing it.
In this chapter I want to discuss two types of dialogue, romantic dialogue
in which characters express their feelings and the humorous banter that
couples engage in that has its origins in Hollywood romantic comedies of
the 1930s.
Romantic Dialogue
Tone of Voice
I refer to this several times in this book, but tone of voice is something that
makes a person attractive. What you say is often less important than how
you say it. One expert estimated that tone of voice is five times more
important than choice of words.
Bonnie Gabriel describes an attractive male voice as being “...beautifully
modulated, warm, expressive...” and “...both soothing and arousing.” Sexy
voices, she says, are “...richer, more resonant, aesthetically pleasing...” In
comparison, an unsexy voice might be “...high, thin, whiny...”
The qualities that go into an attractive voice, Gabriel says, are “...breath
control, relaxation, volume, pitch, resonance, rhythm and expression.”
These are all things that singers work on to improve their voices.
Many people usually breathe using the upper muscles of the chest – this
is called thoracic breathing. A deeper form of breathing called ‘belly’
breathing or diaphragmatic breathing uses the muscles of the abdomen.
This deeper breathing method is slower and helps to relax the body and it
improves oxygen flow. When singers use diaphragmatic breathing they are
better able to project their voices than if they use shallower breaths from
their upper chest and throat. In speech, this kind of breathing helps slow the
rate of speech and helps create a lower, more resonant sound.
As well as slower, deeper breathing, other relaxation techniques can help
ease tension. Tension in the throat can cause a voice to sound strained or
‘strangulated.’ Not sexy.
This is an obvious one, but don’t overlook it: when lovers speak to each
other they use softer, gentler voices. They lower the volume. When we are
engaged in private or intimate conversations, we don’t speak loudly.
Sometimes we even whisper, drawing our partner in even closer.
In describing the pitch of a voice, we often use terms from music and
singing. Female singing voices, from highest to lowest, are soprano, mezzo-
soprano, and contralto. Male voices, again from highest to lowest are
countertenor, tenor, baritone, and bass. A male castrato would have a voice
in the female range, but you don’t get many of those as heroes in romantic
fiction. Most people will be familiar with the term bass, and you could use a
phrase like ‘rich baritone’ and be understood, but general readers are
unlikely to know what the other musical terms sound like so I wouldn’t use
them in descriptions of voices. You need to find ways of suggesting those
sounds.
Most people, male and female, find the lower/deeper pitches of voice
more sexy than higher ones. Higher voices tend to be associated with
anxiety and a tightness of the chest and throat, while deeper voices sound
more relaxed. While most human voices have a natural range, people may
have to learn to use the lower part of their range by practicing breathing and
relaxation techniques.
The resonance of a sound is the quality of being deep, clear, and
reverberating. In a musical instrument or a human voice, it is affected by
the air-filled cavities that sounds pass through on the way to the outside air.
Resonance affects the timbre of a sound. Timbre refers to qualities of an
individual sound that distinguish it from another. For example, a violin and
a guitar might play the same musical note, but they sound different because
of the timbre of the instrument. Timbre is sometimes referred to as tone
colour or tone quality. Words used to describe the timbre or ‘colour’ of a
sound include bright, brassy, breathy, clean, piercing, distorted, rich, thin,
warm, heavy, thin, dull and so on. Many of these and similar words could
be used to describe the sound of a human voice.
Vocal resonance is affected by six different ‘chambers’ in the body, the
larynx and pharynx in the throat; the mouth – where our normal speaking
voice typically resonates – and the head which produces softer sounds. And
then there are the final two which are used much more often in describing a
voice. The chest is the largest air-filled chamber in the body and chest
resonance causes low vibrations, a deep rumble. These sounds are described
as being richer and darker and they are associated with power and
sensuality. The nose is a smaller cavity and nasal (or mask) resonance gives
a brighter and clearer sound. You will often see characters described as
having a nasal voice. The term ‘adenoidal’ is often used to describe a voice
that sounds as if the nose is blocked.
Just as a facial expression can reveal a person’s emotions, speech can
also express feelings. Without this expression, speech sounds lifeless or
robotic. Meaning is often expressed in how something is said. In their book
Expression in Speech, Katherine Morton and Mark Tatham write that
expression can be seen as communicating “...some aspect of our internal
world to someone else.” They also note that this may not be under our
conscious control – our speech can reveal or betray emotions, feelings,
attitudes and moods.
Rhythm
In music, rhythm is created by a pattern of sound, silence, and emphasis of
certain notes. We are more aware of rhythm when it is absent, referring to a
piece of music played in a flat or monotonous way as when someone is
learning to play the piano. In speech, a similar thing occurs – rhythm is
created by sounds and pauses and by the emphasis on certain syllables.
If you studied poetry at school, you probably had to mark the emphasis
or stress on syllables in lines of poetry to determine its rhythm or meter.
You may even remember that Shakespeare’s plays were written in iambic
pentameter which had five pairs of unstressed and stressed syllables in the
form of da DUM da DUM da DUM da DUM da DUM.
This is close to the rhythm of a normal speaking voice. And to the beating
of a human heart. But, like Shakespeare, you need to break it up with some
variations now and again, so it doesn’t sound too plodding. One way to do
this is to vary the length of sentences – the number of words and syllables.
Don’t forget that some words – yonder and window above – have more than
one syllable, so you can have different numbers of words but still end up
with the same number of syllables.
Something else that affects how written dialogue ‘sounds’ in the head of
the reader is how individual words or syllables are delivered. If someone is
angry or emphasising a point they may speak with a staccato rhythm, each
sound is short and sharp. Stab stab stab. Think of the music from the movie
Psycho. In music, a gentler sound, a legato, is created when sounds are
played smoothly and connected together – think of romantic string music
like that from the Lord of the Rings movies.
Softer, more flowing speech is created using words with long vowel
sounds and gentle sounds such as s, sh, f, and th. J.R.R. Tolkien once said
that the most beautiful phrase in the English language is cellar door. And
elbow is said to be one of the most beautiful words we have. Robert Beard
has written a book, The 100 Most Beautiful Words in English – some of
them are a bit obscure, but have a look at them to see the sort of sound
combinations that sound euphonious:
https://www.alphadictionary.com/articles/100_most_beautiful_words.html
John Mitchell’s little book Euphonics: A Poet’s Dictionary of Enchantments
is also a guide to beautiful word sounds.
Compliments
In writing, one way that our stories are unique is in our choice of specific
details. The whole premise of this book is that romance novels follow
similar patterns of plot and character. What makes each romance novel
unique are the specific details the author selects for presentation. These
choices also contribute to an author’s individual writing style.
In dialogue too we need to make specific choices. Let’s take compliments
as an example. A character might say, ‘You’re beautiful’ or ‘You have very
pretty eyes.’ These are fairly generic statements. Imagine the number of
times someone with red hair must hear ‘You’ve got beautiful hair’ during
the course of their lifetime. There must come a point when they think,
‘Yeah, whatever’ and wonder if that is the only thing people notice about
them. And they know that others with red hair must hear the same thing.
The compliments above are simple unsubstantiated statements – they
could be disputed by the hearer or another speaker. They don’t carry a great
deal of authority or originality. Our brains react differently if we hear an
opinion, or something backed up by evidence or explained with a reason. ‘I
think you have beautiful hair’ is an opinion and it carries more weight
because it is specific to the speaker rather than being a generic statement. It
is also harder to dispute – how can you challenge what someone says they
personally believe? Rather than say, ‘That’s a nice dress,’ it is better to say,
‘I love how you look in that dress.’ This is both an opinion and personalises
the statement – it is ‘you’ that look good in the dress rather than a dress that
could look good on anyone. You could also back it up with a reason – ‘You
look great in that dress, it brings out the green of your eyes.’
Flirty Questions
Search online and you’ll find lots of sites with ‘100 Flirty Questions’ or
more – and they’re all pretty much terrible. Your characters should not be
asking things like, ‘What is your favourite thing about me?’ or ‘What’s the
one thing you’d like to try in the bedroom?’ Unless you want to portray
them as being hopeless at flirting.
The best kind of flirty questions arise out of the situation the characters
are in and are specific to the person who is the target of the question. If you
want to have a character slip in an innuendo, you need to set it up, so it
sounds like it arose naturally in conversation. ‘Do you like whipped cream
on everything?’
You can also try ‘leading’ questions that are obviously heading in a
specific direction. ‘Did you know that kissing can burn up to twenty-six
calories?’ ‘Is laughing in the bedroom okay, or do you prefer to be serious?’
It’s possible to say, ‘You really shouldn’t do that’ in a way that means, ‘I
like it, do it some more.’ Tone of voice and expression convey the true
meaning as subtext, literally the meaning under the words.
By suggesting something else, you can test to see if someone is on the
same wavelength. And it gives them a chance to back out gracefully if
they’re not interested – they can just ignore the suggestion. A humorous
way of using this technique is innuendo which we’ll cover later.
You can also use tone of voice to be enigmatic. People like a bit of
mystery. If you say something in a particular way it can make the other
person wonder, ‘Do they mean what I think they mean?’
If you master the art of the sensual voice, you can make anything sound
erotic. Companies do this in the voiceovers for commercials all the time –
especially for things like chocolate and ice-cream desserts aimed at adults.
In Britain, Marks & Spencer has used both male and female voices to make
their food sound like a sensual experience.
Shared Fantasies
When two people become comfortable talking to each other, the barriers
come down and they begin to share more intimate thoughts. To progress the
conversation successfully, the other person needs to be aware of when this
is happening and encourage it by sharing thoughts of their own. Fantasies
shared in this way can be romantic or sexual or both.
If one partner plants a sensual or sexual fantasy in a lover’s mind while
they are engaged in a mundane activity, repeating that activity at a later date
will bring that fantasy to mind. What a great way of making ironing a task
we want to do.
Fantasies can also be humorous or have a crazy surreal element. ‘We
could steal a police car and drive to Vegas to get married.’ The couple might
then elaborate on this fantasy, deciding whether they would say their vows
in front of an Elvis impersonator and if they might gamble their life savings
on the roulette wheel or the slot machines. ‘Imagine if we won a million
dollars in nickels and dimes and had to carry it out in buckets.’
You can use dialogue to create sexual tension. One way to do this is what
Bonnie Gabriel calls ‘a preview of coming attractions.’ This sounds better
than ‘what I’m going to do to you later.’ One partner uses words to arouse
the other’s imagination by describing sensual acts that will occur in the
future. You could do this just before a romantic encounter, while a partner is
bathing or undressing, or you could do it much further ahead of the main
event. If you plant a sexual fantasy in a lover’s mind in the morning, they
could be thinking about it all day. Or you could stretch the tension even
further if your characters are going to be parted for a whole week. Or more.
If you’re going to part them for longer than a week, you might need to top
up the flirting with some phone flirting or sexting. Or letters if your story is
set in the past.
A ‘preview of coming attractions’ could also be used when a couple is
engaged in a sensual but nonsexual activity such as cuddling or massage.
Much of the dialogue we’re talking about in this chapter is based on the
idea that two people want something from each other. Romance or sex or
both. But it is important that couples be able to express love without an
ulterior motive. Each must show the other that they are loved
unconditionally. The ‘I love you’ should have no strings attached.
When growing up, many people received love from parents or family
members only if they lived up to certain expectations. They received love
because they looked nice or because they behaved in an ‘acceptable’ way.
This can have an impact on a person’s self-esteem because they feel they
are valued for what they do rather than who they are. They can begin to feel
that who they are simply isn’t good enough, they must strive to be more. Or
they give up the hope of being loved.
One of the things lovers can give to each other is the feeling of being
valued for who they are. But a partner can also make the mistake of
reopening old wounds by making it seem that they are attracted to what
someone does and not who they are.
One way that a lover can make their partner feel valued is by making it
clear that the partners needs and desires are important. If you can show
someone that meeting their needs or satisfying their desires makes you
happy, you make them feel loved for who they are and not for what they
can do for you.
When we see that our partner cares about us and doesn’t have any
ulterior motives – they are not doing it to get something for themselves –
our fears are eased, and our suspicions are allayed. We begin to trust them.
And if we treat them in the same way, we create a cycle of unselfish giving
and receiving.
If you show appreciation, your partner is likely to repeat the behaviour and
maybe try out some other similar moves. Phrases like ‘I love it when you do
that,’ or ‘Don’t stop,’ are all it takes to keep things going.
The erotic feedback loop is another Bonnie Gabriel term. She says that if
a partner’s words and touch arouse you, and you then hear your partner
acknowledging your arousal in words, you become even more turned on.
This may then create “...a loop of erotic energy that can build to a state of
utter bliss.”
We are likely to feel more comfortable about expressing our own needs if
we feel we are doing this in a reciprocal arrangement. We can almost make
a game out of discovering what our partner wants and allowing them to
learn what we want. Dialogue for this would be along the lines of, ‘Do you
want me to do this, or would you rather that I did this instead?’ Discovery is
all about experimentation. We may surprise ourselves when we discover
what it is that we actually do like.
It is important to acknowledge and validate what the other person says,
without expressing judgement. You validate by repeating or paraphrasing
what they said – this demonstrates that you’ve listened and understood. It
also gives them an opportunity to steer you in the right direction if you’ve
misunderstood. If your partner needs a foot rub, then encourage them to let
you know when and where. And check with them to make sure you’re
rubbing in just the right place. You should also seek confirmation that your
partner has received what they wanted and what they were expecting. ‘Does
this feel good?’ ‘On a scale of one to ten, how close am I?’
Bonnie Gabriel also recommends thanking your partner for sharing their
needs with you, ‘Thank you for telling me what you want. I’m glad we’re
able to be open and share our desires.’
In the same spirit of sharing and experimentation, you can then share one
of your own needs or wishes. Remember to give feedback in the form of
‘that’s good, but it would feel better if you...’
Many romance readers like to see the heroine and hero equally matched
when it comes to exchanging witty dialogue. We use words back and forth
in a volley, describing it as being like a tennis match as the ball is lobbed
from one side of the court to the other. This kind of dialogue originated in
Hollywood romantic comedies or ‘screwball’ comedies of the 1930s
directed by Ernst Lubitsch, Howard Hawks, and Preston Sturges among
others. Cary Grant and Katharine Hepburn in Bringing Up Baby (1938) are
an archetypal couple who threw this sort of dialogue around. It has been an
element of romantic comedy ever since and played a big part in the appeal
of the television show Moonlighting starring Cybill Shepherd and Bruce
Willis in the 1980s.
I said at the beginning of this book that I wasn’t going to go into detail
about writing a Hollywood romantic comedy because that sort of story
doesn’t find its way into romance novels. In movies, it is typically the hero
who plays the lead character. But the style of dialogue from these films
does find its way into the modern romance novel.
Hollywood didn’t invent the battle of wits between a man and a woman.
We see it in comedy from Ancient Greece and Shakespeare made use of it
too, especially in The Taming of the Shrew, a play parodied in the famous
Moonlighting episode ‘Atomic Shakespeare’ (season 3, episode 7). In
Shakespeare’s play, the hero Petruchio and the heroine Kate engage in fast-
paced wordplay as they insult each other and attempt to gain the upper
hand, particularly in Act 2, Scene 1.
Let’s look at some of the techniques writers use to create banter and witty
repartee.
Another way that the hero may tease the heroine is by accusing her of
behaviour normally assumed to be masculine. If they are both flirting, he
may accuse her of trying to pick him up. ‘Do you always try and seduce
guys like this?’ Or if she accidentally brushes against him, he may complain
loudly to embarrass her: ‘Hands off the merchandise,’ or ‘Stop touching my
ass!’
Cary Grant often played characters who encountered women who were
tougher than him. Audiences liked this kind of reversal and romance readers
still like to see an element of it in dialogue. It’s good to see a strong female
character. If a heroine seems especially tough, the hero might say something
like, ‘You’re the kind of girl I’d want backing me up in a bar fight.’
In movies you’ll often see a hero make a protest along the lines of, ‘If
you were a man, I wouldn’t let you get away with that.’ To which the
heroine will retort, ‘If I was a man, I wouldn’t want to.’
Sexual Innuendo – Dirty Minds Think Alike
Bonnie Gabriel says that a great way to flirt is “...by asking a provocative
question with a hidden or implied message.” As two people grow to like
each other and (perhaps) start thinking about having sex, flirting starts to
include sexual innuendo.
‘You’re a great doctor. Do you make house calls?’
Innuendo lets us start hinting about sex but retains the safety value of
having a literal meaning that isn’t about sex. This safety valve reduces the
risk of rejection. If someone accuses you of saying something inappropriate
or flirty, you can pretend to be innocent, leaning on the literal meaning of
the words. You can even turn it around and accuse them of having a dirty
mind. Innuendo also allows the other person to ignore the implied meaning
if they’re not ready to start thinking about sex.
Innuendo relies on the fact that two people are on the same wavelength
and can both read the subtext, the hidden meaning. Writers often have fun
with this when writing witty banter in romances. The stereotype in western
society is that women think about romance and men think about sex. With
innuendo, both your heroine and hero are talking about sex. Kind of. But
you can have the hero flip things around and pretend to be innocent, taking
the literal meaning of a sentence and then accusing the heroine of having a
dirty mind. Just for a moment, she is flustered, wondering if she has
misread the situation and the hero – and the reader – can enjoy her
discomfort. Until she realises he’s teasing her and sets out to get her own
back.
Many sexual innuendos occur in the form of a double entendre or ‘double
meaning.’
Playfulness
Banter and repartee can appear confrontational, but there is also a strong
element of playfulness about them. The challenge is a game. It is the
context that takes the edge off its nastiness. The following example was not
dialogue between lovers, but you have to hope it was meant playfully. Lady
Nancy Astor said to Winston Churchill, ‘If you were my husband, I’d
poison your tea.’ He replied, ‘If I were your husband, I’d drink it.’
Cocky & Funny
Many of the techniques used in romantic and screwball comedies have been
adopted and modified for use in real life. In the early days of the internet,
communities of men gathered online and did what women have done for
years. They talked about relationships. The anonymity of the online space
made it easier. They didn’t talk about romance, of course, they talked about
‘how to get any woman to go to bed with you.’ A whole ‘seduction’ industry
was born, with various self-proclaimed gurus offering advice online and
hosting high-priced ‘in the field’ courses and conferences. Neil Strauss’s
book The Game: Undercover in the Secret Society of Pickup Artists (2007)
is a fascinating inside look at the whole thing.
In researching this book, I read some of the ‘how to get any woman to go
to bed with you’ books so that you don’t have to. You can thank me later. As
far as I can see, their advice boils down to a few key points that are all
intended to make you seem like an alpha male. You should exercise and eat
well to make the most of your body. You should take personal hygiene
seriously. You should dress well and maybe wear one unusual item as a
conversation starter. You should be persistent and overcome your fear of
being rejected by approaching as many women as possible. You should give
the impression of self-confidence by pretending you have no interest in
sleeping with a woman and you should make her think that it would be a
privilege for her to sleep with you. The phrase ‘treat ‘em mean to keep ‘em
keen’ originated in this space.
Reading about the ‘art of seduction’ made me think that there are a lot of
lonely guys out there who think they will find fulfilment in sex, but what
they really want are adult romantic relationships. It’s sad to think that some
major changes in societal attitudes need to be made before our young men
can grow up knowing the difference.
The other thing I discovered in those books was the idea of being ‘cocky
and funny.’ David DeAngelo wrote about this online and in his book
Double Your Dating (2001). Much of his advice follows the same themes as
those I listed above, but he also suggested that many women are attracted to
men who are just a little bit too cocky. But not too much – they don’t like
men who are overly arrogant. He says to think Tom Cruise in Top Gun.
DeAngelo said it’s also important to have a sense of humour and be able to
make a woman laugh. His advice is that guys should tease women in a
humorous way – “Little boys tease little girls when they’re eight, and
women still love it when they’re twenty-eight and forty-eight.”
According to DeAngelo, a man shouldn’t say, ‘I really like you’ to a
woman. Instead, he should tease her by saying, ‘You really like me.’
DeAngelo also says it’s important to be unpredictable. Send mixed
messages. So as well as the ‘treat ‘em mean’ advice, he says he also
surprises them by hugging them and by saying ‘I’ve been thinking about
you.’ He says that one of the reasons why women like unexpected gifts such
as a delivery of flowers is that it demonstrates that she has been in a man’s
thoughts when she wasn’t around. ‘Predictability,’ DeAngelo says, ‘is the
enemy of interesting.’ A man wants a woman to think he’s interesting. But
not to the point where he seems temperamentally unstable.
David DeAngelo says he learned about being funny from an unnamed
friend and from reading books, including Mel Helitzer’s Comedy Writing
Secrets. Helitzer’s book is one of the classics on the subject. From it,
DeAngelo says he learned that character is more important than jokes.
Being a person who is funny in the context of a situation is much more
important than being able to memorise one-liners of witty chat-up lines.
If he was aware that a woman was interested in him, DeAngelo would
play hard to get, turning the tables on her. Or if a woman stood close to him
or brushed against him in a bar he would say, ‘Will you please stop
touching me!’ If the woman apologised and said she didn’t realise she’d
touched him, he would say, ‘Well, you did. And if you’re going to keep
doing it, I’d appreciate it if you’d touch a little higher.’ If she laughed at
this, he could carry on a flirty conversation with her.
A humorous way of ‘being mean’ used by DeAngelo applies if a woman
makes a critical comment about her own hair or clothing. This is a common
way of fishing for a complement, so instead of saying the expected, ‘You
look great,’ he would say, ‘I didn’t want to say anything,’ as if he was
agreeing with her. If a woman ended up with a drink stain on her clothing,
he might say, ‘Did you forget to do laundry?’ Later in the evening he might
return to the subject, making another comment about her ‘terrible’ hair or
‘dirty’ dress, in the same way that a comedian might return to a topic,
perhaps enhancing the humour by using exaggeration.
A final suggestion from DeAngelo concerns responding to awkward
questions with humorous evasive answers. For example, if a date asked him
if he’d had many girlfriends he might say, ‘No, but I’ve had a few
boyfriends.’ If he keeps a straight face, she’ll wonder if he’s kidding. If she
asks, ‘Where were you last night? I went to the bar and you weren’t here,’
his response might be, ‘I waited for you, but when you didn’t arrive I went
partying with a coupe of exotic dancers.’ If she pushes, saying, ‘C’mon,
seriously...’ he might keep up the charade for a while, elaborating the story,
before giving in.
Part of the ‘game’ of flirtation is the heroine rebuffing the hero’s advances
in order to protect her reputation. She doesn’t want to give the appearance
of being someone of lax morals who falls for every guy that makes a pass at
her. She has to prove that she isn’t a slut, in part because of the whole
double standard thing concerning male and female sexuality. But, of course,
the heroine is a sexual being in the same way that the hero is, so to some
extent her rejection of him is for show. She is actually enjoying his
attentions and has as much invested in the outcome as he does.
In the next chapter we will look at the process of flirting, including
nonverbal communication, in much more detail.
20 | Flirting & Body Language
Some people are uncomfortable with the idea of flirting, associating it with
sex and promiscuity or with seduction techniques designed to manipulate
someone to get them into bed. But in reality, flirting is an important social
skill applicable to all relationships and social interactions, not just romantic
ones. It is a combination of listening skills, self-confidence, verbal and non-
verbal communication skills, and the ability to read the body language of
others. But, of course, here we are going to concentrate on the use of flirting
in romantic situations.
In The Five Flirting Styles, Jeffrey A. Hall defines flirting as being
“...when one person expresses sexual or romantic interest in another person,
is the target of such an expression or is engaged with another person in just
trying to figure out if the feeling is mutual.” He also says that flirting “...is
the communication and discovery of romantic or sexual interest.”
On the subject of flirting, it is worth remembering that someone who was
in a relationship for some time will be out of practice. If they return to the
dating scene, they we feel anxious and out of their depth.
As mentioned above, flirting relies on both verbal and nonverbal
communication skills. Estimates vary on what percentage of
communication is nonverbal but it has been suggested that when it comes to
emotions and attitudes, more than ninety percent may be conveyed without
words. And Albert Mehrabian has also said that where behaviour
contradicts speech, it is behaviour that probably indicates the truth.
Elizabeth Clark, writing in Flirting for Dummies, says that men have
about ten flirting signals and that women have fifty-two. She also says that
we shouldn’t base conclusions on just a single nonverbal clue, we should
look for a cluster of three or four.
Men, according to Jeffrey A. Hall, are notoriously overoptimistic in
thinking that a woman is flirting with them. But in a survey for
eHarmony.com most respondents said they had been in a situation where
someone was flirting with them and they didn’t realise, and around 90%
had been in a situation where they thought someone was flirting with them,
but they weren’t. Reading the signs isn’t easy because people often don’t
want to be too overt in their flirting and because sometimes people send
mixed signals.
Although men are typically thought of as the ‘seducers’ who ‘make a
move’ on women, Jeffrey A. Hall and other writers report that it is women
who are most commonly in control of the interaction. A man may signal
interest or make an approach, but it is the woman who decides whether or
not to recognise this and respond. If she says no, there is no flirting. But if
she says yes, the man will think it is due to his efforts – he made the
flirtation happen.
1. Attracting Attention
2. Recognition
3. Approach
4. Speaking
5. Touching
6. Kissing
7. Lovemaking
We will look at each of these phases in turn, but some of them deserve
chapters of their own. I have a chapter on Romantic Dialogue, one on
Kissing, and one on Sex Scenes – items 4, 6, and 7 on the above list – so I
will cover them only briefly in this chapter.
With the emphasis on phases 1 (Attracting Attention), 2 (Recognition), 3
(Approach) and 5 (Touching), I’ve titled this chapter Flirting and Body
Language.
Before we look at the seven phases in more detail, we need to tackle the
thing that makes flirting so nerve-wracking.
Fear of Rejection
Humans are social animals and we have a fear of being rejected by others.
In the distant past, being cast out of the group meant that your survival was
at risk. Rejection also meant that you would not be able to mate and ensure
the survival of your genes. Fear of rejection can be more damaging than
rejection itself. The fear can paralyse us and cause us to withdraw.
Both men and women fear rejection, but for males it can be especially
nerve-wracking because socially men are conditioned to believe that they
are meant to be ‘winners.’ Men also feel more at risk because women can
begin a flirtation from across the room with a smile and an eyebrow raise,
but men have to physically approach a woman and speak to her. Is it little
wonder that men get all caught up in the importance of chat-up lines?
Handling Rejection
Our fear of rejection comes from experiences of being rejected in the past.
We know what it feels like. Studies have shown that the feeling originates in
the same part of the brain that registers real physical pain. This is why
rejection hurts.
One of the reasons people find rejection so hard to take is that they
regard it as a rejection of them as a person. They take it personally. If you
want to overcome your fear of rejection, you have to change the way you
think about it. If you show an interest in someone and they indicate that
they are not interested, you need to try and accept this as a situation to be
dealt with rather than as a judgment on you as a person. The other person
may have any one of dozens of reasons for not responding positively to you
on this occasion – they may already be in a relationship or just ending one;
they may be too shy to respond positively; they may have their eye on
someone else; they may be meeting a family member for a drink; they have
had a terrible day at work...
Sometimes the rejection occurs because you made a mistake. In those
circumstances, you have to accept it as a learning experience. And,
importantly, the more experience you have the more you will learn. It may
help you if you go out knowing that you’re likely to be rejected and so seek
a learning experience rather than a successful relationship.
If someone rejects you, accept it gracefully. If you don’t, the only
possible outcome is damage to your reputation. Don’t hang around trying to
persuade someone they’ve made a mistake and argue that you’re a good
catch. They aren’t likely to change their mind.
And don’t forget to be kind when it is your turn to do the rejecting. Use
body language to show your disinterest and don’t send any mixed messages.
1. Attracting Attention
Before you can flirt with someone, you have to attract their attention. David
Givens says that this is “...not the time to pursue. It is the time to let
yourself be seen.” In romance fiction we often use coincidence, Fate, or
some other plot device to bring our two characters together. I’ve referred to
this as the Encounter or by the Hollywood term ‘Meet Cute.’ Our characters
encounter each other and can’t avoid gaining each other’s attention. And
there is typically an instant spark of attraction between them, even if the
scene is written as ‘hate at first sight.’
Although the encounter or meet cute does away with the normal dating
experience where two people meet as strangers in a bar (or wherever), I
think it’s worth noting the stages that real-life couples experience as we
may use variations of some of them in our first encounter and second
encounter scenes. We’ll proceed as if two people are meeting for the first
time in a bar.
To ‘check someone out’ is to look them up and down and assess whether
you are attracted to them based on their physical appearance. Typically, this
is done covertly, without letting the other person know you are doing it.
Before showing an interest in someone, it is important to know whether
they are likely to welcome your attention. We need to know whether the
person on the other side of the room is waiting for their partner or is in the
bar because they’re hoping to meet someone new. There are a few clues we
can look for.
Appearance – If someone is hoping to attract a new partner, they tend to
dress in a way that will draw attention to them and emphasise their best
physical features. We’ll look at this in a little more detail below. However,
just because a woman is wearing a ‘sexy’ outfit, a man shouldn’t assume
she’s doing it for his benefit.
Posture & Pose – The way someone stands can give an idea of whether
they are receptive to being approached. Women tend to stand in a way that
accentuates their curves, having most of their weight on one leg. If they are
sitting, they may cross their legs with the toe of their shoe pointing in the
direction of someone they’re interested in. Or they may dangle their shoe
off that toe. Men tend to stand tall and with their legs apart. Tilting their
head back slightly can make their neck look thicker and more muscular.
They may stand with their thumbs in their beltloops with their hands
framing their crotch area or with their fingers in their pockets with thumbs
pointing towards their crotch.
Preening – Stroking or twisting strands of hair or tossing back long hair
is a sign that someone is seeking attention. So is smoothing out their clothes
or adjusting jewellery. Licking or biting the lips or putting a finger or other
object in their mouth is also a sign of sexual interest. Touching their own
body also draws attention to it. If a woman has an updo, unpinning it and
shaking it loose is definitely a provocative gesture – at least in the movies.
In real life some styles require her to contend with more than just a single
pin or clip.
Scanning the Room – Someone who looks around the room rather than
paying attention to the people near them is potentially seeking someone
new.
Location – If someone is in a bar or nightclub, they are more likely to be
receptive to attention than if they are in a location where flirting is not
expected. This isn’t to say that people don’t flirt in a supermarket queue or a
dentist’s waiting room, but in such places the recognition phase becomes
much more important – you need to know that someone is actually flirting
and not just being friendly.
If you do find someone attractive and it appears that they are ‘available,’
you must then make them aware of your interest. You do that by trying to
make eye contact.
You make eye contact with someone by looking directly at their eyes until
they become aware you are doing it. They then glance towards you and
your eyes ‘meet,’ as in the phrase ‘our eyes met across a crowded room.’
A brief raising of both eyebrows is a typical greeting in western society.
It is non-threatening and non-sexual and can be used on both men and
women. Generally, the other person will acknowledge you by raising their
eyebrows. It is friendly but carries less emotion than a smile meaning
people are more likely to respond to it. With a smile you have more of a risk
of rejection if someone decides they don’t want to encourage you to interact
with them. Both eyebrows should be raised. Raising a single eyebrow
suggests a question or a judgment or may be mistaken for leering. David
Givens says that after an eyebrow flash, you should look away as this
“...suggests you expect nothing in return.” Eye contact plus an eyebrow
flash “...make your greeting emotionally unconditional. You neither
pressure nor wait for a response in kind.”
Next, to demonstrate your interest, you look at the person again for a
longer period. The length of this ‘prolonged glance’ should be about three
seconds – any longer than that and staring starts to feel creepy. Look away
and then look back. If the other person is still looking at you, this indicates
that they are interested.
Eye contact and a smile makes the other person aware of your presence
and of the fact that you are potentially interested in them. To move things
on, Givens says, a person must ‘broadcast’ non-verbal signals that say ‘I am
here’ and ‘I am female’ or ‘I am male.’ They do this via “...their clothing,
facial adornment, aromas, gestures, and deeds...” At the same time, they
should give out signals which say ‘I am not a threat.’ Alpha males or men
pretending to be alpha males often fail in this last area, so let’s look at that
one first.
Show No Threat
Both men and women ‘check out’ members of the opposite sex, but
generally speaking, flirting is initiated by women. It is the woman who
makes eye contact and smiles. If the man smiles back, she then does the
eyebrow flash that is a signal that he can approach her. A woman needs to
be able to gain a man’s attention via eye contact and send out the signals
that she is interested in him.
Men need to be able to read the signals that women send them. And
respond to them in the appropriate way.
Why don’t men initiate flirting? Firstly, a man needs to know that a
woman is single and ‘available’ to flirt with. Flirting with someone who’s
‘spoken for’ is dangerous. Secondly, he doesn’t want to come across as the
sleazy guy with the corny chat-up lines. In person-to-person advertising
they talk about ‘cold calling’ and ‘warm leads’ – it’s much easier to sell to
someone who has been ‘warmed up’ and has already shown an interest in a
product. The same thing applies in social interaction. Thirdly, attitudes have
changed since the #MeToo campaign and men are wary of making
unwanted advances. And finally, no matter how tough a guy looks, he’s
probably shy and a little nervous. Showing an interest in someone is a risk –
there is a danger that he will be rejected. Or worse, laughed at. So he waits
and looks for a clue that she is interested in him. He waits for an invitation.
One of the reasons we love alpha male heroes in fiction is that they
ignore these social niceties. They do initiate flirting. They aren’t afraid of
what other people might think and they have the whole seduction thing
perfected and don’t come across as being sleazy.
‘I am Here’
Having attracted attention by eye contact and smiling, you have to keep the
person’s attention. You can do that by the way you look and the way you
move.
Generally speaking, something that moves captures our attention more
than something that is still. The same is true of the human body –
movement draws attention to it. When people go jogging in a public park,
they’re not just there for the exercise, they want to be seen. The same holds
true for dancing in a nightclub. Our eyes are especially drawn to rhythmic
repetition. That woman swinging her shoe on the end of her toe knows what
she’s doing. Women may also draw attention to themselves by touching
their faces or necks, tossing their hair or running their fingers through it,
and smoothing their clothing.
A man may attract a woman’s attention by crossing in front of her on his
way to another part of the room – he can cross directly in front of her, from
left to right or vice versa, or he can approach at an angle. A man should
never approach a woman from behind as this may cause him to be
perceived as a threat. He may look for signs of interest as he passes and
perhaps seek to make eye contact and smile.
One of the displays that an alpha male puts on is a show of ‘spatial
dominance.’ He demonstrates his self confidence by taking charge of the
space he occupies. It is his domain. He does this by standing up straight and
presenting his physical self in the most flattering way possible – shoulders
back, chest out, legs apart, and maybe hands on hips in a Superman pose.
Clothing is one way of drawing attention and keeping it. Both men and
women are drawn by bright colours and bold contrasts. Wearing something
that draws the eye is sometimes referred to as ‘peacocking’ for obvious
reasons.
Human eyes are particularly aware of contrasts between light and dark
and of the colour red. It has been suggested that our awareness of red is
related to it being the colour of ripe berries that are good for eating, the
colour of blood, and the redness of skin associated with sexual arousal.
Whatever the cause, seeing the colour red has a measurable impact on our
bodies. We associate it with sexuality, with heat, and with anger. Orange
and yellow are bright, happy, optimistic colours – they remind us of the
warmth of sunlight or fire. Blue, the colour of the sky and the ocean, is a
cool colour that is seen as calming but also related to confidence and
independence. It is one of the most popular colours, seen most commonly in
denim jeans. Purples, being a mixture of hot red and cool blue is regarded
as an emotional and dramatic colour – it’s relative rarity as a natural dye
meant it used to be associated with royalty. Green, the colour of leaves, is
regarded as a cool and natural colour with calming properties. It is also
typically the colour of money. Black is linked with mystery and shadow and
is the preferred colour of the Goth, perhaps due to its funereal association.
White is typically associated with purity and peace (the white dove). Strong
contrasts occur when white is paired with black, yellow with blue or purple
– and basically any two colours diagonally opposite on a colour wheel.
One of the rules of ‘peacocking’ is to stand out from the crowd. This can
be done by wearing a flash of colour on an otherwise monochrome outfit,
by wearing bold patterns, or by the choice of one unusual item of clothing
or an accessory that draws attention and invites comment.
Albert Mehrabian, in his book Silent Messages, writes that in days past a
woman might ‘accidentally’ drop her handkerchief in order to attract the
attention of a man. She was forbidden to show direct interest in him. As he
stopped to pick up the fallen item, he was making a submissive bowing
gesture. Even today we still see examples of dropped items – anything from
a pile of textbooks to a spilled coffee – used to allow the heroine and the
hero to meet.
‘I am Female’ or ‘I am Male’
Provocative Poses
Raising your arms with your hands behind your head is a submissive
gesture – you are exposing the vulnerable neck and thorax of your body. In
women, it is said to be a provocative pose of submission. It has also been
suggested that exposing the armpits helps the release of pheromones, but
the scientific jury is still out on the significance of pheromones in human
courtship. In men, raising the arms in this way is more of a dominant
gesture – demonstrating a confidence in his own strength such that he
doesn’t fear attack. It can also mean that someone is tired and stretching.
First Impressions
We know how important first impressions are in any form of social
interaction. Studies have shown how difficult it can be to alter a person’s
perception of us once that first impression has been made – even when new
information strongly contradicts that first impression.
David Givens advises that the best strategy when seeking to attract
attentions is to do it without being too obvious, too eager, or too blunt.
Overdoing it will make the wrong first impression. “Instead of chasing,
cornering, and capturing a mate,” he says, “you emit ‘come hither’ signals
and await a response.”
2. Recognition
In this phase, the person who is seeking to attract attention looks for clues
that they have gained the other person’s interest and that the person is
receptive to being approached. Communication in this phase is mostly
nonverbal. We are still testing the waters and don’t want to do anything that
overtly expresses our interest in the other person. To do that would leave us
open to rejection. We fear rejection because we know it feels like a real
physical pain. So we proceed with caution, looking for gestures of
encouragement from the other person.
David Givens identifies a number of positive signals:
Lips – When a woman is sexually interested, her lips may look redder and
more swollen. This is why red lipstick is regarded as attractive by men.
Parting the lips slightly is a signal that she is receptive and so is wetting her
lips with the tip of her tongue. Lip gloss imitates the look of wet lips.
Blushing – Romantic interest can cause the skin of women and men to
redden. The cheeks, neck, ears, forehead, and perhaps the upper chest may
feel hot as blood vessels near the surface of the skin dilate. Some people
blush intensely but some may not redden at all. The outer edges of the ear
are often the first, and sometimes only, clue that someone is blushing.
A blush isn’t clear proof of sexual interest, some people blush intensely
because of shyness or social anxiety. Don’t assume it is a positive signal,
look for multiple clues.
Wide Eyed – There are three things to look out for here. Physical attraction
can cause the eyelids to open more widely, revealing more of the white of
the eye. Making the eyes appear bigger makes them seem more child-like
and therefore more attractive. Eyes widened in this way indicates that a
person’s distrust of a stranger has been replaced by interest and a wish for
the other person to approach them.
In addition, the pupils of someone’s eyes will dilate when they are
looking at someone they find attractive. Although this change in pupil size
is a relatively small signal, it is thought that people can recognise it up to
six feet away. Finally, eyes may appear more moist, glistening with tears,
giving the ‘starry-eyed’ look.
Jaw drop – We have all heard people use the phrase ‘jaw dropping’ to
describe something remarkable. This refers to an actual physical lowering
or ‘drooping’ that was noted by Charles Darwin. When one person is
attracted to another, there may be a slight parting of the lips, similar to that
seen when two people come together to kiss. In a more pronounced version
of this, the jaw may open a little. Again, this can be a signal that an
approach would be welcomed.
Leaning forward – People tend to lean towards something that has drawn
their attention or that is important to them. Leaning can be an example of an
intention gesture – someone would like to move towards something or
someone but feels inhibited so instead of an overt move they lean in the
direction they would like to move. People in conversation tend to lean
towards each other. Because a leaning motion involves the whole upper
body, it is regarded as a more ‘telling’ gesture than a hand or leg movement.
Gazing across – When someone wishes to make eye contact but doesn’t
want to initiate the contact, perhaps out of fear of being rebuffed, they may
gaze across your field of view to see if you respond. They lift their eyes and
let their eyes pass over the other person’s and then rest on something
beyond or to the side of the person. The turn of the head and the movement
of the eyes, it is hoped, will attract the other person’s attention and result in
some sign of recognition and encouragement.
Mixed Messages
David Givens notes that these early stages of courtship or flirting can be
confusing because we may receive contradictory signals. A person may
signal ‘come closer’ and ‘stay away.’ They haven’t quite made up their
mind yet and may need more signals from you that your are harmless and
that your are interested in them.
In this phase we must also be aware of negative signals, nonverbal cues that
tell us to back off.
No recognition – Our attempt to gain the other person’s attention receives
no response at all. Women are more adept at reading this response and will
move on to seek attention elsewhere; men may assume their attention is
being tolerated, because there was no negative response, and so may persist.
Lip compression – When the lips are tightly pressed together, and perhaps
are rolled inwards, this is a sign that the other person is uncomfortable or
displeased. It is a signal to back away.
Cold shoulder – The body is angled away from us so that the shoulder
acts as a barrier or shield.
Freezing – If the other person becomes rigid and looks like a rabbit
caught in the headlights, they are distressed by your attention, probably due
to extreme shyness.
3. Approach
If you have received signals that lead you to believe the other person would
like you to approach them, do it confidently and directly. Don’t take an
indirect route and don’t try and approach them from behind. No one likes to
be ambushed.
Proximity
When you approach someone and begin interacting with them, you need to
look for clues that show how they are feeling towards you. We often talk
about this in terms of temperature. Someone who has no interest in you is
icy and may dismiss you by giving you the ‘cold’ shoulder, turning away
from you. At the other end of the scale, we say that someone is hot for you
or has the hots for you. There are several stages between the two. Here’s
how to tell where you sit on that temperature scale.
Icy – Almost no eye contact and any smile is forced or ‘polite.’ We
typically say that a fake or forced smile doesn’t reach their eyes. Increasing
distance between themselves and the other person. Retracting limbs and
avoidance of touching. Pointing their feet away from the other person
indicating a desire to move away. Becoming still and unresponsive.
Cool – Eye contact, smile and eyebrow flash
Warm – Preening, playing with hair, adjusting clothing. Placing an arm or
leg into the other person’s territory. ‘Accidental’ touching. Closer proximity.
Compliments. Mirroring. Pointing their feet towards the other person.
Making an approach.
Hot – Mirroring body language, and breathing pattern. Touching of
objects or themselves. Getting into the intimate zone. Lowering of the
voice. Deliberate touching.
If someone is at the same or a higher level on the scale than you, that is a
sign to proceed. If someone is at a higher level and you’re not interested,
you should show behaviour on the cool side, moving to icy if they don’t
take the hint.
4. Speaking
Having approached someone, you need to say something to begin a
conversation. This is often referred to as an icebreaker. The simplest
opening is to introduce yourself, inviting the other person to do the same.
‘Hello, I’m Joe.’ ‘Hi, I’m Lucy.’ A more confident person might open with a
compliment. A creative person might open with something more like a
story. It is best to avoid jokes or anything too contrived. ‘Chat-up lines’
really don’t work, unless you’re the sort of person who can deliver them
ironically or humorously.
Jeffrey A. Hall notes that while most women claim to hate ‘cheesy’ pick-
up lines, in the eHarmony.com survey 70% of women said they would be
okay if delivered by the ‘right person.’
Always phrase things in a positive way. You want to encourage the other
person to nod or say ‘yes’ to something so they begin to feel positive about
you and want to remain in your company.
Speaking to a stranger is a significant step for both parties and there is
some initial discomfort to be overcome. Body language can help ease
people through this. Each will unconsciously check the other for positive
signs of interest. The ideal way to achieve a connection is through relaxed
laughter.
Although eye contact is a positive sign, staring at someone too intently
can make them feel awkward. It is best to look at the other person for three
to five seconds and then shift your gaze away to something else for a
similar amount of time before looking back at them. Generally, you look at
a person as they are speaking to show interest and look away when you are
speaking or thinking. It is thought that women maintain eye contact longer
than men. Women make more eye contact with friends than men do but men
may misread a woman’s eye contact with them as meaning more than it
does. She is being friendly not saying, ‘Take me to bed.’
In the book Silent Messages, Albert Mehrabian suggested that when
expressing emotion and attitudes, words count for only about 7% of what is
communicated, tone of voice about 38%, and body language 55%. A
pleasant, friendly tone of voice is more important than what you say.
Desmond Morris described small talk between couples as ‘grooming talk,’
comparing it to the way apes groom each other’s fur as a way of being
friendly. ‘How are you?’ and ‘What have you been up to?’ are examples.
Positive encouragement as someone speaks includes things like ‘uh-huh,’
‘right,’ ‘sure,’ and so on, accompanied by smiling and nodding of the head.
In the early part of a conversation, you don’t want to seem like you are
interrogating the other person or trying to obtain private information. This
will make them feel challenged and suspicious of your motives. To begin
with, it is best to choose neutral topics. In Britain, the cliché is that we talk
about the weather. This is a ‘safe’ topic because it is external and referring
to it means that you’re not pressing someone for an opinion. External
objects or situations that both people can see, hear, feel, or smell are ‘safe.’
Talking about them doesn’t require a decision be made or an emotion be
shared.
I covered romantic dialogue in much more detail in Chapter 19. Here I’ll
cover a few topics related to flirting and to the crossover between speech
and body language.
Hot Topics
Tone of Voice
Hand Gestures
The way a person places or moves their hands can reveal a lot about what
they’re thinking or feeling. If they try to hide them, it could mean that
they’ve got something to hide. Wringing your hands is a sign of anxiety.
Rubbing your palms together slowly can make it seem like you’re up to
something – it’s a slowed-down version of what someone does when they
think they’re about to make a profit.
Most people move their hands when they talk, the gestures add meaning
and emphasis to the words spoken. When we are nervous, we may have a
tendency to restrict our movements, perhaps because we were told as
children not to run around or gesticulate wildly in polite company. Research
shows that hand gestures add a great deal to communication, making what
we say more understandable and believable, so it is best to relax and let our
hands do their thing. An open hand with the palm up is a friendly gesture
and works like an indication for the other person to approach, drawing them
towards you. It can also indicate that someone is telling the truth, saying,
‘Look, I’m not hiding anything.’
Another gesture some people use is to point towards themselves when
they say something positive. They want the other person to associate them
with positive things.
Elizabeth Clark says that dominant males often have their thumbs on
display, folding their arms and having their thumbs pointing upwards or
having their hands in their front pockets with the thumbs still exposed.
If a person touches their face, it can indicate that they are thinking or
seriously considering what they have heard or what they want to say. The
classic ‘thinking’ gesture is chin stroking. Another is resting a closed hand
on their cheek with the index finger pointing upward.
Read My Lips
Research has suggested that most people are adept at reading fleeting,
almost invisible changes in a person’s facial expression. And that we read
lips during conversation much more than you might imagine. Women are
especially good at reading lips according to a number of studies. This would
suggest that it is incredibly important to keep your face towards the person
you are speaking to, even if you break eye contact while speaking.
You build rapport by sharing personal information about yourself, but not
too much and nothing too personal. And by asking questions about the other
person to demonstrate an interest in them and to encourage them to share
information about themselves and about subjects that interest them. It is
best to use open questions, not closed questions where a ‘yes’ or ‘no’
answer is all they can give. Avoid telling jokes with a punchline, that just
makes it seem like you want an audience and want to monopolise the
conversation. More open, observational humour can work if that’s the sort
of thing you normally do – but keep it positive. You want to encourage nods
and smiles.
When you answer a question, you can keep the conversation going by
tagging a question on the end of your answer. Make sure it is related to the
topic of conversation and follows on naturally.
If a person only gives short superficial answers, look for other clues that
they are not keen on spending time with you. If they answer at more length,
they probably want to spend more time with you. Or they like the sound of
their own voice.
In writing conversations, use the present tense and keep it specific and
personal. ‘I love to dance to songs like this’ is better than, ‘People tend to
prefer songs like this for dancing.’
I’ve stressed the importance of using positive language a couple of times
already. It bears repeating. If you are positive and enthusiastic, it shows in
your facial expressions and people will be drawn to that. Negative language
also affects your face and your body posture – it may cause you to adopt
protective gestures such as crossing your arms as a barrier across your
chest. Positive and negative language can also affect the other person in the
same way – their body language may be affected by your negative speech.
Try to find positive phrases to replace negative ones. The old cliché is to
describe ‘problems’ as ‘challenges’ or ‘opportunities to improve.’
Listening
A conversation involves two people and that means you have to be able to
talk and you have to be able to listen. People who enjoy talking will
appreciate the fact that you are a ‘good listener.’ People who are less
comfortable speaking about themselves will appreciate your efforts to
encourage them to speak. If you are talking more than half the time, you’re
talking too much.
If you are asking a person questions, only ask one question at a time,
don’t ask multi-part questions that might confuse or fluster someone. And
give them an opportunity to finish answering before asking another
question. Try and stay on topic, don’t go off on tangents. And avoid non-
sequiturs that don’t go anywhere. I need to have that last sentence tattooed
on my forearm. Use non-verbal cues to show that you are listening.
It has been suggested that women are happy to talk about feelings and
emotions and that men are more comfortable talking about thoughts and
facts. This is another example of the men are Warriors and women are
Carers generalisation, but it is worth bearing in mind that a person’s
personality – whichever of the six archetypes they are closest to – will
influence what they are happiest talking about and how they express
themselves. In an early conversation between the heroine and an alpha hero,
he is not likely to open up and discuss his feelings. He will only feel
comfortable doing that when he knows her better and has grown to trust her
and can relax when he’s with her. If the heroine wants to encourage him to
talk, she’ll stick to topics she senses he’s comfortable with. If your plot
requires a quick end to the encounter, she’ll do the opposite and try to get
him to talk about deeply held feelings.
5. Touching
Our respect for another person’s personal space and the inviolacy of their
body means that reaching out and touching them is a significant move. It is
also one that brings with it the risk of rejection.
If one person is attracted to another and would like to be touched by
them, they may unconsciously signal this by touching themselves, signally
‘I am touchable.’ Their touch draws attention to areas where they might like
to be touched – the neck, arms, thighs, face and lips – which are vulnerable
places that we normally protect. Be aware that self-touching may also be
used if someone is uncomfortable – they seek to soothe and reassure
themselves, as their mother did when they were young.
Before touching the other person, someone might first touch something
belonging to them. The anthropologist Edward Hall referred to this as
touching a body extension. They might touch the other person’s glass,
cigarette lighter, phone, or other personal possession. They will gauge the
reaction to this to see whether touching of the body might be acceptable.
Touching jewellery or another item that someone is wearing works in the
same way. Sometimes people deliberately wear items that invite touching.
Elizabeth Clark says that if a woman finds a man attractive, she may
begin to move objects, ‘invading’ the man’s space. She may push her wine
glass onto his side of the table, for example. If she keeps her hand on the
stem, she may be hoping that the man will touch her hand. Clark also says
that a woman’s handbag/purse is a very personal object and the closer she
places it to a man, the more she trusts him.
As mentioned previously, a person may indicate an intention or desire to
touch by a partial movement or intention gesture.
Mirroring the other person’s self-touching, ‘body extension’ touching, or
intention gestures signals that you are in sync with them and reassures them
that you will not object if they reach out to touch you.
To touch another person, you have to be close enough to reach them. The
touch also needs to be properly motivated. We might hug someone to
comfort them or to protect them. A brief touch on the arm or hand may
show that we’re agreeing with someone, sharing something personal, or
empathising with them. Early in a relationship, all touching should be above
the waist – back, shoulder, arm and hand touching is safe. Touching their
face isn’t appropriate until they have signalled it is okay to enter their
intimate space. Putting an arm around someone may be intended to be
protective or supportive, but it can also be seen as a dominant gesture. The
first touch of skin to skin is likely to be made to appear ‘accidental.’ A light
brush of a hand against a neutral body part. For example, a man will often
lightly touch a woman’s back as he steps aside and ‘guides’ her through a
doorway.
Touching any part of the head is best avoided initially as it may cause the
other person to draw back and this is a negative reaction that you must then
work to overcome. The head and face can only be touched when a greater
level of trust has been established. More intimate areas such as the chest,
hips, thighs, or buttocks are off-limits until later still.
David Givens warns that women and men often regard touching as
having different meanings. Men may regard touching as expressing sexual
interest. They may touch women for this reason and assume that if a woman
touches them, she does so for the same reason. But women employ touch
much more often in their relationships with friends and for them, a touch is
a demonstration of warmth and caring. Men need to be aware of this
difference or may respond inappropriately to a woman’s touch.
Although men are typically uncomfortable touching other males in
friendship, they don’t feel the same inhibition when it comes to touching a
woman that they are attracted to. During courtship, a man may touch a
woman more frequently than she touches him.
Touch Lightly
In intimate situations, the best touches are tender ones. Light stroking with
the fingertips can affect the touch-sensitive hairs on the skin or the nerve
endings under the skin. These light touches can trigger goosebumps and a
pleasant tickling sensation. If this causes laughter, it may encourage more
intentional tickling. Laughing together can strengthen a couple’s emotional
bond.
Because our senses of smell and touch evolved before our other senses,
we respond on a deeper level to touch than to sound. We more readily
believe that which we can touch, it makes the world real. Touch is also the
most intimate form of communication, requiring no words. We stroke,
tickle, pat, and playfully nibble the person we are with, lost in our own
private sensory bubble.
Hugging
6. Kissing
7. Making Love
Sex is the most intimate stage of courtship – one that some people believe
should be experienced only after marriage. The act itself relies on the sense
of touch and tends to require little in the way of dialogue. It is much more
about feeling than thinking.
In Chapter 23 we’ll explore the acts of foreplay and coitus in the writing
of Sex Scenes.
Not every example of flirting you write is going to end up in the formation
of a happy and committed relationship. Let’s look at some of the things you
can do to make things go wrong.
A woman wants to feel that she is special and unique, never compare her to
anyone else. Don’t tell her she looks like an actress (especially not a porn
star), your mother, or your ex. She also wants to feel that she has your
undivided attention, so don’t look over her shoulder at what’s going on in
the room and don’t comment on how attractive other women are.
A man is looking for a good time and doesn’t want to answer questions
about the possibility of a long-term commitment. Don’t talk to him about
marriage, meeting your parents, or having children. Also avoid fishing for
compliments, it will make him think you’re needy or high maintenance.
Never mention your ex or talk about how many people you’ve slept with.
And don’t ask the other person about these things. Men should avoid
bragging about their job, house, or money and they should avoid any
‘amusing’ stories about how they got revenge on someone who dissed them.
Similarly, women should avoid saying how they sympathised with the
Glenn Close character in Fatal Attraction when Michael Douglas betrayed
her.
It's also best to avoid weaving elaborate lies that you’re never going to be
able to remember later. The truth is always easier to remember.
Avoid fiddling with objects such as clothes, jewellery, spectacles, or
phones. It can be distracting and may give the impression that you are
nervous or untrustworthy. Your attention should be on the other person.
Elizabeth Clark also advises men that they shouldn’t be putting their hand
inside their trousers and ‘rummaging’ around down there – especially if
they intend to reach out and touch someone with that hand.
Body language mistakes include lack of eye contact – this might suggest
nervousness, disinterest, or arrogance. None of these are positive
impressions. Avoid too much self-soothing or wrapping your arms around
yourself for comfort. People find openness attractive in communication.
Leaning away from someone suggests you don’t want to be near them and
so does angling your feet towards the nearest exit. And slouching suggests
either that you’re disinterested, disrespectful, or lacking in self-esteem.
Does love at first sight really exist? In French it is le coup de foudre, a flash
of lightning or a thunderbolt, and in Spanish it is el flechazo, an arrow’s
strike, perhaps a reference to Cupid’s arrow. There have been no scientific
studies of the phenomenon, but there are many anecdotal accounts. One
report suggested it is more likely to strike men than women.
David Givens says that love at first sight is a ‘physiological reaction’
triggered by eye contact in a similar way to the bond between that of a
mother and her baby. It is a mixture of physical and emotional attraction
and attachment.
In the pages that follow we’ll look at how characters can move through
these stages smoothly and effectively. A lot of the ‘dating advice’ here is
common sense and obvious, but one of the reasons I want to include it is
that it will hopefully give you ideas and prompts if you want to create
situations that don’t go as planned. If you have your heroine dating a Mr.
Wrong before she discovers she’s in love with Mr. Right, you can have Mr.
Wrong commit some of the sins of a bad date. Or if you want to have a date
go badly – for dramatic purposes or for comedy – you’ll find some ideas
here for where and how things can go wrong.
It’s possible that someone might set you up for a ‘blind date’ with a person
you’ve never spoken to, or that you use an intermediary to ask someone out,
but in most cases one person must ask another out. In stories, I think it is
better if this is a face-to-face interaction. Maybe I’m old-fashioned. In
reality, many people now interact via dating apps or websites and may
communicate by some form of text message. But in romance stories, we
like to see people engaging with each other. There are advantages to asking
someone directly: you can read their body language. And your own body
language can help them ‘read’ whether you are genuine and someone who
can be trusted.
This is not to say that you can’t have characters meet for a blind date or
have a third-party set-up the date, but then the date will be more akin to a
‘meet cute’ or first encounter.
Traditionally the hero asks the heroine out. Further back in history, he might
ask permission ‘to pay her court.’ Today it is still more common for the
more dominant partner, still assumed to be the male in heterosexual
relationships, to approach the less dominant. In your story, you get to
choose whether your characters follow this tradition or not.
If you have an alpha male hero, his assumption will be that he should ask
the heroine out. How would he feel if she asked him? Would he feel
confused, threatened, or amused?
If your heroine lacks self-confidence, what circumstances might push her
into asking the alpha hero for a date?
With a beta hero, there is less of an assumption that he will take the lead.
If he’s shy and bumbling, the heroine may have to make the first move if
their relationship is to go anywhere at all.
It doesn’t matter who asks who, the person who asks will suffer the same
fear: What if the other person says no? Or worse, laughs in their face?
Asking someone out on a date can feel scarier than actually going on a date.
There is a fear of rejection.
The best way to ask for a date is not, ‘Would you like to go out with me
sometime?’ To stand a better chance of getting a ‘Yes,’ the approach must
seem confident and it must be specific. ‘Would you like to go to that new
Mexican restaurant with me on Saturday?’ And be ready with options about
the timing of the date and the proposed setting.
In terms of the best time to ask for a date, it’s better to ask when you’re
feeling happy and confident and when you can give the other person your
undivided attention. Don’t ask for a date if you’re feeling down or worrying
about something else. Aim to speak to the other person in a relatively
private space where they won’t be embarrassed by your approach but where
they won’t feel hemmed in, pressured, or threatened.
It's also a good idea to do some homework. If the other person is a vegan,
you don’t want to invite them to a steakhouse. Also be aware of their
current situation – don’t ask for a date if they have just split up with their
ex, leave a respectful amount of time. The same if their partner is recently
deceased. And if they’ve lost a friend, family member, or even a pet, be
respectful of this loss too. Take the hint if they’ve been telling you that
they’re far to busy to date anyone right now – they’re probably trying to be
tactful and not say you’re just not their type. The same is true if they’ve
talked about what they think their ideal partner would be like and it’s
obviously not you. If they keep talking about their ex-partner, it’s obvious
they haven’t moved on from that relationship yet and you should back off.
You don’t want to be anyone’s rebound relationship and you don’t want to
find yourself constantly compared to the one that got away. Your character
probably has only one chance to ask for a date, so they need to pick the
perfect time and circumstances.
Obviously, if you want the scene to go horribly wrong, you have them
ignore some or all of the above advice.
Another thing to bear in mind is that it is customary for the person asking
for a date to pay the bill at the end of the meal or buy the tickets or
whatever, unless other arrangements are made beforehand. More on this
later.
If you ask someone on a date and they say yes, you will want to
exchange phone numbers. You need to be able to communicate any changes
in the time or place for the meeting, or let the other person know if illness,
injury, or something else means you cannot make it. This brings us to the
matter of personal safety.
Personal Safety
To what extent should heroines in romance novels share the fears of women
in real life when it comes to personal violence? Should romance heroines
take sensible precautions to protect their safety when dating someone who
is essentially a stranger? Although our stories take place in a romantic
fantasy world, there are still times when it can be appropriate for characters
to be aware of their personal safety. This may be a particular issue if a
character has had an unpleasant experience in the past, but even where that
is not the case it can give a sense of reality if someone is aware that there
may be risks in dating.
In my novel Fandango, the hero is taking the heroine off to an isolated
location and he asks her to call home to let someone know where she’s
going and who with. Without being over the top, it recognises the possible
risk in going somewhere remote with someone you don’t yet know well,
and it also demonstrates the hero’s caring nature.
Although we’re not writing self-help manuals, it doesn’t hurt to have
your characters demonstrate good sense when dating, particularly in a
contemporary romance. In historical romance, different rules and etiquette
apply, so you would need to be historically accurate in referring to those,
whether your characters adhere to them or ignore them.
Again, you may want to consider what happens if a character doesn’t
follow sensible precautions, particularly if someone is dating Mr. Wrong (or
Ms. Wrong) or a ‘cruel hero.’ Here is a brief guide to dating safety
precautions:
There are two main types of date for couples. The romantic dinner for
two or an activity that two people can do together. A first date is likely to
involve one or the other. Later dates may include a combination of the two.
Here we’ll consider some advice relating to each type and then I’ll include
examples of activities as a starting point for your own character’s dates.
Location/Venue
The purpose of a date is for two people to get to know each other better. For
most people, this is done by talking to the other person, so a quiet dinner for
two is an ideal option. Going to the movies is an old-fashioned date idea,
young people used to go there to get away from their parents and kiss in the
dark theatre, but it’s not a great place to go if you want to talk. No one
wants to be shushed by the folks who are watching the movie. This is why
going to the movies isn’t an ideal choice for a first date. And it’s the
Hollywood cliché. But there are people who are less comfortable engaging
in conversation and so they may prefer to take part in an activity with the
other person. This may be more appropriate for two active, sporty people or
two people who enjoy practical crafts and working with their hands. They
may meet for an informal chat over coffee and then arrange a more active
first date.
The Restaurant
A dinner date is more formal than meeting for coffee. The choice of
restaurant determines just how formal the date will feel.
Some things to consider when choosing a restaurant are:
Location. Pick a place that’s easy to get to and easy to find. Don’t pick
somewhere obscure that you’ve never been to or even seen.
Noise levels. Choose somewhere that it is okay to talk, where you can
be heard, but where there is enough privacy that you can’t be
overheard by the people at the next table. Avoid places that play loud
music or annoying muzak. On a first date you probably should also
avoid the kind of place where a live musician comes to serenade you at
your table and hands out red roses.
Dietary requirements and preferences. Vegetarianism and veganism
are much more common than they used to be, and most places have
options on their menu, but when asking someone out for a date it is
best to know beforehand and choose a place that specialises in such
things. Food allergies and intolerances are also something to be aware
of.
Layout. You want somewhere that is cosy but not too cramped. You
don’t want to be squashed together with other people or sitting nose-
to-nose with your date so it feels intimidating.
Lighting. You don’t want it so bright it makes you squint, but nor do
you want it so dark that you can’t see the other person’s face.
Price range. Pick somewhere that you can comfortably afford, don’t
choose a really expensive place because you think it will impress your
date. Also, if someone asks you on a date and asks you to suggest a
restaurant, don’t pick the most expensive place you can think of.
Service. You want somewhere that the wait staff are attentive but don’t
hover over you or pressure you with ‘upsells.’ And you don’t want to
be treated as a nobody in the kind of place that prefers to sit famous
people at the best tables or in a VIP area. Also, you don’t want to be
rushed out as soon as your meal is over, you want to be able to linger
over your coffee and chat some more.
Familiarity. The best place to choose is somewhere that you’re
familiar with and have visited recently. That way there’s be no nasty
surprises in terms of ambience, layout, menu, or service. You want it to
be somewhere where you can feel relaxed. Avoid places where you
can’t pronounce the dishes on the menu or where you have no idea
what a dish contains – save more adventurous cuisines for later dates.
Finally, when arranging a date, it is important to be able to contact the other
person to let them know of any changes in venue or time, or to warn them
about any delays or travel issues on the say of the date. The last thing you
want is for your date to arrive at a venue and feel that they’ve been ‘stood
up.’
Keep it strictly for the two of you, don’t invite friends or family
members along – there will be opportunity to introduce your date to
other people if the relationship lasts beyond a first date.
Choose something you enjoy doing and are familiar with, not
something new that you think will impress your date.
Make it affordable and don’t pretend that you’re a millionaire with
money to throw around. You don’t want your date being disappointed
when they discover the truth. It’s always better to be you and avoid
faking it.
Pick something that doesn’t require special clothing or equipment,
unless it’s provided by the venue. And don’t choose an activity that
risks ruining the other person’s outfit.
Don’t go for anything competitive – you want to get to know your
date, not best them or humiliate them.
Stick to activities that don’t take more than a couple of hours to
complete and make sure you leave time afterwards for conversation.
For a first date, avoid inviting someone to a beach or swimming pool,
it might look like you’re over-keen to see them in a bathing costume.
The Date
In the chapter on flirting, we saw how body language and giving the
appearance of being confident is important in attracting the attention of a
potential lover. The same guidance applies when trying to make a good
impression during a date.
Who Pays?
Dates can be disasters for all sorts of external reasons, we’ll look at some of
them below, but here I’m focusing on a date where the two people just don’t
connect romantically.
How do you tell if a date isn’t going well? Some signs are more subtle
than others. Let’s begin with the less subtle ones. You know things aren’t
going well if your date goes to the bathroom and you never see them again.
Or they move and sit at another table. They flirt with the waiter or the
barman. They order a taxi to come and pick them up. They disappear with
your wallet and car keys. They say they can’t see you again because they’re
emigrating.
More subtle signs can be picked up from what your dates says. Looking
at their watch or phone and saying, ‘It’s getting late,’ isn’t a good sign. If
they were into you, they wouldn’t be noticing the passage of time. A stifled
yawn is another clue. ‘You know so many great stories,’ is probably a hint
that you talk too much and most of it is about yourself. ‘Your life is so
different to mine,’ says you have nothing in common. ‘You aren’t how I
expected you to be,’ is ambiguous but it probably indicates disappointment.
‘It’s been an interesting experience,’ says the date has been something they
never want to experience again.
Body language will also be a clue, as they will move from an attempt at
more intimate communication back into a ‘cooler’ zone.
Obviously, a viewpoint character can also use these things to signal that
things aren’t going well.
Ending it gracefully. If it’s obvious things aren’t going well, the best
thing to do is bring the evening to a close. And it is in both people’s
interests to be clear that things haven’t worked out between them. Saying,
‘I’ll give you a call sometime,’ is ambiguous and sends a mixed message.
You might feel you’re letting the other person down gently, but really
you’re just prolonging their agony. It isn’t fair to leave them hanging on,
hoping you’ll call.
If it’s obvious to you that the other person isn’t having fun, you can put
them out of their misery by saying something like, ‘I’m ready to call it a
night, are you?’ Or, ‘The food was great. Can I give you a lift home?’ Allow
them to back out gracefully, they will thank you for sparing them any
awkwardness.
When a date is going well, it’s okay to talk about seeing the other person
again sometime soon.
If two people hug at the end of a date, the way they hug is an indication
of how well the date has gone and what they feel about each other. Least
intense is a brief hug like the one you’d give in greeting a friend who isn’t
your best friend. There’s no great feeling there. Next up is the triangle or
tent, where upper bodies come into contact and the hug lasts a little longer,
but there is clear distance between the lower bodies – this is friendly but
seems to say the couple aren’t yet sure how they feel about each other. A
longer hug where the lower bodies, including the hips, connect indicates
romantic or sexual interest or at least the potential for it. A ‘bear hug’ is
more soulful and indicates a close connection, the best of friends and maybe
more. If it is accompanied by a kiss on the cheek or the lips, romance is
definitely in the air.
At the end of a date, how can you tell if it’s the right moment for a kiss?
This is especially tricky to judge on a first date. We explored this more fully
in the chapter on kissing scenes, but here are some thoughts on the body
language involved.
Signs that someone is not wanting to be kissed include head down and
lack of eye contact (though this could be shyness); lips tightly clamped
shut; offering to shake hands to say goodnight; keeping their hands in their
pockets or behind their back; holding something in front of them – a bag or
a jacket – like a shield or barrier; maintaining a polite distance with no
accidental or casual brushing or touching.
Signs they someone would like to kiss or be kissed include looking
directly into the other person’s eyes; standing facing the other person, body
relaxed and perhaps a little nervous; head tilted slightly upward and perhaps
a little to the right; parting the lips slightly and perhaps licking them;
making no obvious move to end their time together; no arms or objects
acting as a barrier; leaning forwards slightly; standing between the other
person and any possible exit says ‘I don’t want you to go.’
How soon after a date should someone call the other person? If someone
calls too soon, they might worry they seem too eager and needy. If they
leave it too long, it might seem that they’re not interested or are exploring
other options. The cliché is that ‘girls’ should act coy to maintain the guy’s
interest, and guys should play it cool, ‘treat ‘em mean and keep ‘em keen.’
Contacting someone the day after the date and saying, ‘I had a great time
last night, I’d like to see you again,’ is fine if both things are true. These
days sending a text/SMS message is an option and it is less ‘pushy’ than
actually phoning someone. It doesn’t put them under any pressure or
demand their immediate attention, they can respond at their leisure. Or not.
If you didn’t connect with the other person and don’t want to see them
again, it is wrong to say, ‘I’d like to see you again sometime.’ This isn’t
letting them down gently, it is cowardly. It is much kinder to be honest and
say it in the most tactful way you can manage. ‘I enjoyed the meal, but I
don’t feel we’re right for each other,’ doesn’t leave any room for
misunderstanding. If the other person doesn’t accept that and continues to
send messages, a more abrupt, ‘I’m sorry but I don’t want to see you again,’
may be necessary.
If you contact someone and express an interest in seeing them but they
don’t respond, this may be a hint that they’re not interested. It is acceptable
to contact them again forty-eight hours after your first message. After that,
leave them alone, they’re obviously not feeling the same urgency to connect
as you.
According to Flirting for Dummies, research suggests men and women
think differently about the acceptable time that can or should be left before
responding to messages. Women see anything over forty-eight hours as too
long to wait. Men tend to think a week’s delay is fine, maybe even ten days.
The heroine may expect to receive flowers after a date. The hero may
think this is only appropriate after a date that ended with sex. After one
date, the heroine may be fantasising about marriage and a life together. The
hero may be fantasising about sex. These are clichés, but we should realise
that people have different expectations and may feel disappointed if those
expectations aren’t met. The gap between expectation and reality can have a
significant effect in a story.
Romantic Weekends
When a relationship has reached a stage where (perhaps) the couple are
sleeping together, they may want to spend weekends away. They might
spend a weekend at a hotel in the country or a bed ‘n’ breakfast near the sea.
It is necessary to book in advance to avoid disappointment and they should
check for policies regarding dogs if someone has a pet or an allergy. It’s
always best to read online reviews before booking. There are many unusual
places to stay that can be booked online, including log cabins, yurts, and
‘tiny houses.’
Another weekend away activity is attending a course or class together.
This could include sports activities such as skiing or yachting or mountain
climbing. Or it could be a foreign language class that also included the
national cuisine and activities. Or a craft-themed weekend, including
painting, pottery, sculpture, or crafts using fabrics or natural resources
scavenged locally. Music-themed weekends might include attending a
music festival or attending a class to make music, sing, create instruments,
or learn drumming.
The story of Daphnis and Chloe is thought to have been an inspiration for
William Goldman’s The Princess Bride. I wanted exclude the extract above
because it shows that writing about romance – and kisses! – has been fairly
constant across the centuries.
Poets and novelists often speak of ‘stolen kisses’ or ‘stealing a kiss,’ but
it is important to remember that they’re not talking about a kiss ‘taken’
against the other person’s wishes. Rather, the kiss is shared in secret,
perhaps going against the wishes of other people around them or societal
norms. Kissing someone against their wishes is just another form of sexual
violence. Nyrop writes that a kiss “...must be given and taken in frank,
joyous affection. To have recourse to violence is unknightly, unlovely, and
despicable in the highest degree.”
Body Language
If you want a technical term for kissing, you could use osculation (from the
Latin osculari, to kiss), but this tends to be used humorously. Even to a
scientist, a kiss is still a kiss.
Scientists don’t know whether kissing is instinctual or if it is a learned
behaviour. The ‘nursing and pre-mastication’ theory suggests it recalls the
lip movements of a child feeding from its mother’s breast and, possibly, the
transfer of pre-chewed food passed from a mother to the infant when it is
being weaned.
Humans are different to other animals, including other primates, in that
the soft inner skin of the mouth is pursed outwards to form lips. This skin is
extremely sensitive, carrying an unusually large number of nerve endings.
This outward display of a sensitive body part, coupled with the fact that lips
are often redder than the surrounding skin, can be regarded as alluring.
Sheril Kirshenbaum says that kissing feels pleasurable because it sends
sensations directly to the limbic system, the parts of the brain associated
with love, passion, and lust. It also stimulates our bodies to produce “...a
number of neurotransmitters, and hormones including dopamine, oxytocin,
serotonin, and adrenaline.” It can also create a natural ‘high’ through the
release of endorphins that cause us to feel exhilarated. Andréa Demirjian
says that kissing can give people the same sort of rush as parachuting,
bungee jumping, and other extreme sports.
Scientists believe that kissing may allow two people to learn things about
each other, including perhaps their genetic suitability for producing
offspring. Kirshenbaum writes that a kiss “...brings two individuals together
in an exchange of sensory information by way of taste, smell, touch, and
possibly even silent chemical messengers called pheromones (odourless
airborne signals)...”
Kissing is an activity that brings two people into close physical contact
and so all five senses may be engaged, with sight possibly playing a lesser
role than usual in human activity.
In terms of mating, human females may learn more from a kiss than men
and so be more likely to value kissing. A male’s healthy-looking teeth and
the smell of his breath give her some clues about the general state of his
health. It is possible that women also use their sense of smell to judge the
genetic compatibility of a mate. Studies using t-shirts worn by men have
shown that women regard a scent as attractive if the man carries genes
different to her own, a sign that they would produce healthy offspring. A
single kiss might signal whether a man would be a suitable partner, based
on how he tastes and smells. This may be why some kisses feel special and
some do not.
Does any of this help us when writing romances? Maybe. If you look at
descriptions of heroes in romance novels, there is often a reference to his
strong white teeth and to the fact that he smells good. In part, this just
signals good personal hygiene, but it also echoes the things that – in
evolutionary terms – females look for in a mate.
Kirshenbaum writes that women place more emphasis on being a ‘good
kisser’ than men. This may be because when it comes to producing
offspring, women make a much greater personal investment – they must
carry, birth, and raise the child. In terms of choosing a mate, they want to
find The One – the male whose physical characteristics are most likely to
produce a healthy child and whose social status is going to ensure the
survival of her child – he needs to be a good provider. Men, on the other
hand, have less of an investment and so different priorities. These
prehistoric instincts may account for the fact that men value kisses less than
women.
Another t-shirt test has suggested that men find a woman’s scent more
attractive when she is ovulating, so it could be that they are able to detect
hormonal changes that indicate she would be more receptive to having sex.
Some people are comfortable kissing on a first date, while others prefer to
wait until the third or fourth – or perhaps longer. A kiss is a way of
communicating romantic interest in someone, so if there is no kissing, that
interest must be shown in some other way.
In romantic fiction, the status of a kiss is partly defined by the sub-genre
or category of the novel. In a sweet romance, a kiss carries much more
significance than it does in a spicier story. Where a kiss is as far as things
go, you will need to build up to it much more gradually.
Sometimes a person isn’t ready for a kiss. If they’re not expecting it, they
may be stunned into immobility or they may push the other person away or
take a step back. No one should have to accept any form of physical contact
that makes them uncomfortable, so they should make their discomfort
known – they certainly shouldn’t go along with it because they’re afraid to
‘make a scene.’ A little embarrassment on both sides is better than giving a
‘yes’ that they don’t mean.
People hold different views on whether you should kiss where other people
can see you. Young couples are often comfortable kissing deeply in a dark
club or bar or when hanging out with their friends. Older generations may
only be comfortable with a chaste peck on the cheek or lips in a public
place.
The Ancient Romans, the Catholic Church of the middle ages, and the
Victorians all had strong views on kissing in public. It just wasn’t done.
Kristoffer Nyrop, writing in 1901, said that kisses “...ought to be given, as
they should be taken, in secret ; only in such case have they their full
freshness, their intoxicating power ... No profane eyes should see them:
they only concern the pair of lovers – none other in the whole world.
Secrecy and silence must rest over these kisses, as over all else that regards
the soul of love, so that the butterfly's wings may not lose their delicate
down.”
In a contemporary romance novel, it will be the personalities of the
characters and their levels of self-confidence that determine whether or not
they are comfortable with public displays of affection. Characters with a
strong Thinker element to their personalities will almost certainly not be.
Andréa Demirjian says that in an American poll, 41% of people said they
kept their eyes shut and 8% said they kept them open. 20% admitted to
peeking. Among the women surveyed, around 70% said they peeked
sometimes.
Hugh Morris in his 1936 manual The Art of Kissing said that, for him,
there is “...an additional thrill in seeing, before my eyes, the drama of bliss
and pleasure as it is played on the face of my beloved. I can see tiny
wrinkles form at the comers of her eyes, wrinkles of joy. I can see fleeting
spasms of happiness flit across her eyes. I can see these things and, in
seeing them, my pleasurable reactions to the kiss are considerably
heightened. In keeping my eyes open, I am giving pleasure not to one sense
alone, the sense of touch, but to two senses, the senses of touch and of
sight.”
Types of Kiss
William Cane identifies around twenty types of kiss in his book The Art of
Kissing. The Kama Sutra, written in India sometime before the 6th century
by the Brahmin priest Vatsyana also lists a number of different kisses.
Kristoff Nyrop says that while the French have identified twenty types of
kiss German dictionaries list over thirty. I’m not going to attempt to
translate the names of those kisses from German. Instead, here are some of
the kisses we have in English – you will probably use several of these at
various points in a romance novel.
Bottom lip kiss. Only the partner’s bottom lip is kissed, either with a
brief touch or by pulling on it gently with both lips. Can be effective as
a first, teasing kiss that promises more intense kissing is to come.
Breath kiss. Where lips are close but not touching and mouths are
open, the two characters inhale each other’s breath.
Butterfly kiss. Another kiss without lips, this involves fluttering
eyelashes against someone’s cheek.
Chaste kiss. There are degrees of chasteness. A chaste kiss may refer to
a kiss on the cheek or a brief, closed-mouth kiss on the lips. There’s
not much passion here, but it can be used to raise tension in someone
who was expecting more.
French kiss or ‘soul kiss’ or ‘kissing with tongues’ is the most erotic
form of mouth-on-mouth kissing. In France it is known as un baiser
amoureux, a lover’s kiss. In a romance novel when the author writes
‘his kiss deepened,’ they’re usually referring to the fact that he’s using
his tongue.
Kiss an earlobe. Earlobes are extremely sensitive so a light kiss or a
gentle nibble there can feel very sensual.
Kiss on the cheek. Used as a greeting for friends and family members
and as a casual romantic gesture between lovers. Usually platonic and
one of the ‘chaste’ kisses.
Kiss on the eyelid. Usually only attempted when someone’s eyes are
already closed and typically only used by people in longer-term
relationships.
Kiss on the forehead. Often used as a kiss goodnight for a child, so
associated with affection, trust, and being comforting.
Kiss on the hand. Kissing the back of the hand is an old-fashioned
greeting to a woman, now often used as a slightly jokey knight in
shining armour gesture. Kissing someone’s palm is a more intimate
gesture.
Kiss on the Shoulder. Not something to be done on first acquaintance,
so again one for couples who have been together for a while.
Rubbing noses. Often referred to as an ‘Eskimo kiss,’ this is seen in a
number of cultures around the world. Among Inuit-speaking people, it
is called a kunik, and the nose is often brushed against someone’s
cheek rather than nose to nose. In western culture, rubbing noses is a
fun gesture that is not quite as intimate as a kiss on the lips.
Touch the rim of her ear with your lips in a sort of brushing motion.
Breathe gently into the delicate shell ... murmur ‘sweet, airy nothings’ into
it. From the ear to her neck is but another few inches. Let your lips traverse
this distance quickly and then dart into the nape and, with your lips well
pursed, nip the skin there, using the same gentleness as would a cat lifting
her precious kittens. Then, with a series of little nips, bring your lips around
from the nape of her neck to the curving, swerve of her jaw, close to the ear.
Gently kiss the lobe of her ear. But be sure, to return to the tender softness
of her jaw. From then on, the way should be clear to you. Nuzzle your lips
along the soft, downy expanse until you reach the corner of her lips.
Lift your lips away slightly, centre them so that when you make contact
there will be a perfect union. Notice, only momentarily, the picture of her
teeth in her lips. And, then, like a sea-gull swooping gracefully down
through the air, bring your lips down firmly onto the lips of the girl who is
quivering in your arms.
Kiss her!
Kiss her as though, at that moment, nothing else exists in the world. Kiss
her as though your entire life is wrapped up into the period of the kiss. Kiss
her as though there is nothing else that you would rather be doing.
Here I want to present a model or template that you could use when plotting
and writing a kissing scene for your novel. It shows how the scene might
progress, from first approach to the parting of the lovers. To give you plenty
of options, I have tried to include everything that could be included in such
a scene. You won’t use every one of these in every scene – pick a selection
that seems to work for the specific moment in your story and adapt them to
suit your specific characters.
As mentioned above, this model could be used for constructing a first
kiss scene, as long as you bear in mind the additional thoughts and feelings
that such a kiss might engender in the person kissing and/or the person
being kissed.
Point of View
I suggested earlier that a kissing scene might best be written from a single
character’s point of view. This is not a rule, but I think it helps provide the
reader with a single, intense experience. Switching viewpoints – ‘head
hopping’ – in this case risks being a distraction that ruins the moment.
When you’re having a good time kissing someone, you don’t want to be
interrupted or distracted. Your reader probably feels the same way.
Having said that, if you are allowing the reader access to both the heroine
and hero’s points of view, either in a limited third-person or a first-person
viewpoint, you might want to split events so that the set-up part of the scene
is seen from the viewpoint of the nervous hero who is hoping to kiss his
girlfriend tonight, and then switch to her point of view to show her
experience of the kiss. Later you could switch back to the hero’s viewpoint
as he assesses how well it went. Or not.
Describe the experience of the kiss purely from this one character’s point
of view. If you’re writing from a third-person viewpoint, don’t be tempted
to ‘pull back’ and give a wider view of what’s going on. Kissing is an
‘extreme close-up’ activity for the people involved, so you should give the
reader that experience in your writing.
While the physical sensations of the kiss are vitally important, later in the
scene you will also want to share what the viewpoint character is thinking
about this encounter. You might want to contrast the character’s thoughts
and feelings at the beginning of the scene and at the end. Have they
changed? Did they start off feeling nervous or reluctant? Or were they
enthusiastic? Did they intend to be dominant or submissive? How did things
play out on that score?
In an enemies to lovers story, one character (usually the heroine) comes
into the scene with the intention of not kissing the other. She will lead the
hero on and then humiliate him by rejecting him. There will definitely be no
kissing. Not even a chaste kiss on the cheek. She’s absolutely certain about
this. She can’t stand the man. But, of course, things don’t go according to
plan. She enters the scene with one lot of thoughts and feelings, and leaves
it... perhaps confused. What just happened?
Earlier, I said that a kiss involves all five senses of the people kissing.
Trying to include all five in describing every kiss is overkill, but do try and
include two or three each time. But avoid saying the kiss sounded like a
cow’s hoof being pulled out of a swamp.
Taste – How do the other person’s lips taste? And if tongues are involved,
what does their tongue and the inside of their mouth taste like? Lip gloss or
lipstick. The mint of a toothpaste, breath mint, or mouthwash. Wine or
brandy or whatever they have just drunk. Food they have eaten – but keep
this to pleasant tastes such as citrus or cinnamon or strawberries.
Sight – These two people are now closer than they’ve ever been and so
might notice new things from their close-up view. Small, light freckles.
Flecks of colour in the irises of someone’s eyes. Tiny laughter lines at the
corners of their eyes. The soft peach-fuzz of vellus hairs on skin. Small
scars or moles.
Sound – The soft inhalation or exhalation of a breath. A sigh. A soft
moan. The sound of fabric brushing skin. A gasp.
Smell – Perfume or aftershave/cologne? Soap on someone’s hands.
Shampoo in their hair. The scent of a recently visited place on clothing. The
smell of a woollen coat after a rain shower. The leather of a jacket or new
handbag. The oil a man uses on his beard. If someone has just been engaged
in sport or exercise or a strenuous work activity, there may be the clean
smell of fresh sweat. Or muskiness. Hugh Morris in The Art of Kissing
(1936) said, “The odour of a woman’s hair can send shivers of joy coursing
up and down a man’s spine. The odour of her body can convulse him with
throes of passion.”
Touch – The soft flicker of eyelashes against a cheek. The rasp of the
hero’s unshaved chin. The feel of a cotton or silk or leather fabric. The
softness of lips compared to the hardness of teeth. The softness of the
heroine’s body. The firmness of the hero’s muscles.
In your descriptions of a kiss, you can use many of the tools in a poet’s
toolbox. Synaesthesia is one that you’ve probably come across without
being aware of it. This is where you express the experience from one sense
in a way usually associated with another. For example, voices and laughter
are sometimes described as ‘silvery.’ Silver is a colour that can be seen but
not heard, though its use might call to mind the sound of silver bells. Or you
might say something like ‘her laughter was the bright yellow of sunshine.’
This allows you to compare someone to a bright summer’s day and evoke
the joyful feelings associated with it. You can use figurative language –
similes and metaphors – and play the sounds of words using alliteration or
consonance. You probably never thought you’d hear those words again
outside of a poetry class.
Don’t forget that being in love can feel like an addiction and that some of
the things a kissing couple will feel will be like the euphoria experienced
from a drug ‘high.’ Hormones and other chemicals rush through their
bodies, affecting how they think and what they feel.
The physical act of kissing will also have an effect on their lips. Intense
and long-lasting kissing sessions make lips feel plump or swollen,
sometimes referred to as ‘love-bruised lips.’ Kissing also increases the
sensitivity of the lips and the blood flow to them, making them look redder.
The Set-Up
Where a kiss takes place is important, especially if this is a first kiss. It
needs a romantic location. I provided some possibilities earlier. Pick
somewhere that is in keeping with the setting and tone of your story and
with the backgrounds and personalities of your characters. Establish the
setting, describing it so that the reader knows where the action is taking
place. If you are going to introduce a third character or some other event as
an interruption, make sure you establish the potential for this person or
thing to appear, without ‘telegraphing’ the surprise and ruining it.
Remember that some readers are smart enough to see a set-up when they
see one, so don’t make it too obvious.
Mood is probably more important than location. The character taking the
lead in the scene needs to establish a mood where the other person will feel
comfortable and ready for kissing to occur. And you, the writer, must create
this mood for your characters and your reader.
Part of the set-up section of the scene will be the dialogue and action that
leads up to the kiss. We might see that the hero is nervous as he
contemplates his plans for the evening. He wants to kiss the heroine but
he’s afraid of rejection.
One way for him to test the waters to see if his date might be receptive to
a kiss is to employ physical contact earlier in their encounter. When the
heroine appears, he might greet her by taking her hand or kissing it in a
mock-chivalrous gesture. He might hug her or give her a brief kiss on the
cheek, the kind of greeting a close friend might give. Obviously, it depends
on how well he knows her as to whether this would be appropriate. If she
responds by smiling or hugging him back, he has a clue that she’s okay with
physical contact. Even just taking her coat is a safe way of beginning an
interaction. In the chapter on flirting and body language we also saw other
examples of ways in which physical contact can be made.
If the hero and heroine haven’t actually arranged to meet on a date, you
may need to set-up a situation for them to be together in a similar way to a
‘cute meet.’
Places Everybody!
Once the introductory action is over, you then need to get your characters
into position so that kissing can take place. In very simple terms, they need
to be close enough together to be able to kiss. Trying to lean across a table
in a restaurant or bar isn’t going to work.
It may be that the hero has to lead the heroine to a more appropriate
location. And it’s up to you as the writer to decide whether the heroine
figures out what he’s up to. And whether she trusts him enough to allow
him to take her to a more secluded place.
Is the heroine wanting to kiss the hero as much as he wants her to? Is she
playing along as a knowing ‘victim’? Or is the hero planning to whirl her
around, pull her towards him, and surprise her with a kiss. This is a risky
move and could win him a slap in the face if he’s judged her mood wrong.
Your alpha hero is going to be taller than your heroine, so you have to
give some thought about the extent of the height difference (go back and
make the heroine slightly less short if you need to!) and how the hero plans
on getting their lips on the same level.
Sexual Tension
We know the hero wants to kiss her, but ‘will they or won’t they?’ Much of
the story up to this point will have been building the tension up to this
point. And in the scene itself you can use the hero’s feelings of anxiety, fear
or rejection, and self-consciousness to raise the stakes and the suspense
further.
You also want to tease the reader and prolong the tension for as long as
possible. You want them to be leaning forward in their seat and willing the
two characters to lock lips. You might also want to add an external element
of danger. Something that could ruin the hero’s plans for the evening. You
could include a couple of near-misses. And later, if the hero and heroine’s
kiss is finally interrupted, you could have this potential danger pay off in an
unexpected way.
The flirting that the two characters engage in in the earlier part of the
scene also contributes towards the increase in sexual tension. You can show
the tension they both feel by making reference to a heart racing, mouth
going dry, hands being cold and clammy, feeling light-headed, or finding it
hard to breathe. They may also show their nerves by stuttering or talking
too quickly, saying things that hardly make sense, or shifting around
uncomfortably in their seat.
Anticipation reaches its highest point as the hero leans towards the
heroine, intending to kiss her as he carefully watches her body language for
signs of rejection or of encouragement. To prolong the moment and tease
the reader further, you can have the hero stop his forward motion and look
the heroine in the eye for a moment. You want your reader to be practically
screaming for you to let them kiss.
You can even continue with the suspense after the physical contact
begins. The hero may begin with a cheeky ‘Eskimo kiss.’ Or he may kiss
the heroine, but not on the lips. He could kiss her cheek, forehead, eyelids,
tip of her nose, or the corner of her mouth. Or he may kiss her hand or
wrist. He may begin a kiss behind her ear and plant little kisses along her
jaw as he works slowly towards her lips. Like the reader, the heroine may
have been expecting a ‘proper’ kiss and will lean forward in anticipation of
the real deal.
In the chapter on flirting and body language we saw that it is often the
heroine who makes the first move by using nonverbal clues that say she’s
‘available’ or interested in a guy. Assuming she has the confidence and
experience to do this. If the guy is a bit slow on the uptake she may have to
fire a ‘come hither’ look at him.
Alpha male heroes are much more confident at making the first move,
usually having something smooth or charming or flattering to open the
conversation. Beta males tend to be more comfortable with females making
the first move when it comes to kissing – as long as they don’t feel too
intimidated by the woman who approaches them.
The person who makes the first move may not be the one who takes the
lead when the kissing is underway. Once they’re over the initial hurdle, the
other person may feel more confident and be more daring. To add variety to
a scene, you might have the two characters each take the lead for a while.
He tries out a few different kisses on her, then she takes a turn kissing him
in a way that makes him crazy.
The Kiss
For simplicity’s sake here, I’m going to assume that the hero initiates the
kiss and the heroine responds positively, encouraging him to continue. With
the first kiss of a scene, it is best to start slow and gentle. If the hero goes in
too hard or too fast, it might intimidate the heroine and cause her to pull
back. It’s much better to ease into things. Perhaps he begins with a closed
mouth kiss or a bottom lip kiss. He may kiss the heroine’s bottom lip,
holding it between his lips and pulling or sucking on it gently. Then he may
kiss her upper lip.
The hero may cradle the heroine’s jaw in his hand or hold the back of her
neck, drawing her towards him. Or he may place his hands on her hips,
waist, or lower back. She may rest a hand on his chest.
When he is sure that she is responding positively, he can ‘deepen’ the kiss
by using his tongue. Again, he should begin by being gentle and taking it
slow. He may touch the tip of his tongue lightly to her upper lip or lower
lip. This may tickle, so the heroine might shrink back slightly, give a little
shiver, or perhaps even giggle. If she doesn’t retreat completely from the
kiss, she may signal that she wants to continue by parting her lips slightly.
He may trace the top of her lower lip and/or the bottom of her upper lip
with his tongue. Then he might insert the tip of his tongue between her lips
and touch her tongue. Again, this first gentle touch may tickle. If she is
responsive, she may touch the tip of her tongue to the inside of his lips or to
his tongue.
Describing ‘kissing with tongues’ is tricky in a romance novel. How do
you make ‘he stuck his tongue in her mouth’ sound romantic and sensual? If
you look at a non-fiction book on kissing, you’ll find tongues ‘swirling’ or
‘twirling’ in the other person’s mouth. That doesn’t sound much of a turn-on
to me. “Caress your partner’s tongue with your tongue the way you’d enjoy
your ice cream,” Andréa Demirjian writes. “Lick it slowly. Stroke it. Suck
it. Flick the tip of their tongue with yours. Roll your tongue along their lips.
Or playfully twirl your tongue through theirs.” That all sounds fine as a
technique and is great for an instruction manual. But it’s too clinical for a
romance novel. Too ‘on the nose,’ so to speak.
Referring to the tip of someone’s tongue is fine, in my opinion. But when
it comes to sliding the whole thing in there, we have to start being a bit
more poetic. You might refer to the rhythm of his kiss, but avoid talking
about what goes where or it’ll sound like a medical textbook.
The First Kiss
The first time two people kiss is different to later kissing scenes between
them. When they don’t yet know each other, and don’t know what the other
person likes, the initial kisses will be more tentative and ‘vanilla.’ These can
be followed by a little experimentation. A first kiss is also likely to be
awkward and possibly clumsy. There may also be a mismatch of
expectations, with one person going in for a light and gentle kiss and the
other planning something more intense – obviously its more fun if this goes
against expectations, with the alpha male being surprised by the heroine’s
eagerness – leading to her being embarrassed for going in too strong.
People may be more likely to open their eyes to ‘sneak a peek’ while
kissing, perhaps to keep an eye on what their partner is up to or maybe to
check on their response to see if they’re enjoying the way things are going.
As well as preferences for the types of kisses and style of kissing, people
tend to be comfortable with a particular rhythm and tempo. Though in a
first kiss scene, this can also depend on the circumstances that led up to the
kiss.
If you’re writing about someone’s first ever kiss, then there will be
additional nervousness and feelings of not knowing what is going to happen
next. They will be concerned about their inexperience and lack of
technique.
Once the kissing is underway, one or both of the characters will want to
keep things interesting by trying something new. To mix things up a bit, the
hero will move from deep French kissing back to gentle lip kisses. By this
stage, the heroine will probably be guiding him, letting him know what she
likes. Soft kisses will be interspersed with more firm ones. Open-mouthed
kisses followed by just kissing their lower lip. Nibbling on a the heroine’s
lip or earlobe is something else the hero might try.
Kissing begins on the lips, but it can move on to other parts of the head
and face. Andréa Demirjian says that favourite spots for kissing include the
neck, the ears, and the corners of the mouth. “For goose bumps,” she says,
“it’s the back of the neck under the hair. That spot can really kick you into a
frenzy!”
As the kissing continues, the hero may use his palms to explore the
heroine’s body, if she indicates she’s comfortable being touched in this way.
And she may touch him, her hands moving round to his back, just below the
shoulder blades, pulling her towards him. And her hands may slide down to
grip his butt, especially if in an earlier chapter she notices how shapely and
firm it looked.
The hero might rub his hand up and down the heroine’s spine. She might
run her fingers through his hair – as long as you’ve described his hair as
being long enough for that. She may slide her fingers into the gap between
the buttons of his shirt. Or slide her hands into the rear pockets of his jeans.
Their fingers may become entwined up at chest height or with their arms
extended downwards. She may teasingly trace his nipple through the fabric
of his shirt. He may run a finger along the edge of her ear.
And Breathe...
When the hero is kissing the heroine, he is literally in her face. They are so
close together that even if they open their eyes to look, they find it hard to
focus. After the initial bout of kissing and touching, the hero may lean back
and look into her eyes. Or maybe she is the one who does this. It gives them
a chance to focus on the other person’s face – and for them to smile at each
other while maintaining eye contact. And it gives them, and the reader, a
moment to take a breath. Then they can lean in again for round two. Why
am I using a boxing metaphor? It should be more like a dance.
You can throw in a little sexual tension here too, if you want. Are they
going to carry on with the kissing or step back? And this allows a moment
where the two people are deciding if the kissing so far was good enough for
them to want more. Hopefully, by this point the reader will be convinced
that it was and that they do.
Now the two characters know more about each other, they know how and
where the other person likes to be kissed and (perhaps) where they like to
be touched.
Not all kissing scenes are gentle and measured. Sometimes the hero and
heroine experience a sense of urgency. Erotic tension has been building up
all evening and has reached a point where they can’t keep their hands – or
their lips – off each other. When they feel a desperate need for each other,
their kissing can begin hard and fast – and carry on that way. A similar
urgency might be shown if the two characters have been separated for a
length of time. Or perhaps they are about to be separated for a while. If one
of the characters has a deadline, such as the boarding time for a flight, there
may be limited time for kissing, creating a sense of urgency – and adding
pressure to make these good kisses as they have got to keep the couple
going for a while and/or make sure they remain true to each other while
they’re separated.
The kissing here is likely to be mainly open-mouthed erotic kissing, with
an intense rhythm and fast tempo. Kisses are also likely to be harder and
last longer. Hand movements are likely to be faster paced and involve
harder squeezing of the other person’s flesh.
This is the kind of kissing we often see in movies, where a couple end up
tearing each other’s clothes off and leaping into bed.
Something else that can increase tension in a kissing scene is a location
where there is a danger of the two smoochers being discovered together.
A kiss might lead directly to the two characters having sex. The kisses
become deeper and more erotic and there is a lot more touching going on –
what folks in the USA used to refer to as ‘heaving petting.’ If that’s the way
you want your scene to go, you can skip ahead to the next chapter. But
many kissing scenes aren’t going to go that far. Not yet. You’ll need to find
a way to end the kiss and separate your two lovers.
You’ve got a couple of options here – either the hero or heroine can end
the kiss, or they can be interrupted by someone or some external event.
One character may signal an end to a kiss if they feel it is going too far. A
gentle push back and a line such as, “We shouldn’t...” or “I can’t...” Or one
character may simply step back to look at the other person’s face and pay
them a compliment.
Often the best way to end a scene is to leave your reader – and your
characters – wanting more. End your scene before it runs out of steam, so to
speak. Interrupting a scene by having someone else intrude or by having
something else – the weather, a pet, a zombie invasion – spoil the mood
provides a twist and gives the two characters some unfinished business.
There can be a hint that their kissing will resume another time.
Sometimes the two characters might take a time out in the middle of a
kissing scene. Maybe you want to include some dialogue, perhaps an
anecdote that reveals a bit of backstory. Or maybe you need a change of
location so their kissing/make-out scene can develop into something spicier.
Often in a movie or tv show, the interrupted is dealt with and the heroine or
hero says, “Where were we?” Try to come up with something a little more
original. Or not.
You might be tempted to just ‘fade out’ the scene, but that may lead some
readers to assume the characters carried on kissing and maybe went on to
do something even more intimate. You should try and leave a strong
impression of how the encounter will end, even if you don’t show it. Even if
you intend to open the next chapter by telling how things didn’t end as
expected.
How long should a kissing scene go on for? It depends on the
significance of the kiss in terms of the story. A first kiss will typically be
longer than a kiss that ends a second or third date. The more time you spend
on something, the more important it should be in plot terms. Kissing scenes
tend to indicate different stages of the development of the romance. You
should probably be aiming for two pages for a less important scene and four
pages (or more!) for an important one. Have a look at examples of scenes
from successful books in your subgenre for a guide.
23 | Sex Scenes
If you have no interest in writing sex scenes or if discussion of such matters
makes you uncomfortable, you can skip this chapter completely. In writing
about this topic, I can’t avoid reference to body parts and certain types of
activity, but I am not using sexual slang here and I’m not going to talk in
any detail about specific acts. If you would prefer to read some guidance
with more graphic detail than I provide here, have a look at Val Kovalin’s
How to Write Sexy Descriptions and Sex Scenes.
Embarrassment
Something you may need to consider before writing a sex scene is your own
level of discomfort. Are you concerned what other people may think about
you when they read what you have written? Are you afraid that a close
family member will read it and pass judgment on you? Many writers,
especially if their genre is erotic fiction, use a pseudonym. It allows them to
keep their work secret from friends and family.
Embarrassment can prevent people from writing more explicit sex
scenes, or it can prevent them writing about certain sexual acts – there is a
line the writer feels they cannot cross. One fear that some writers have is of
readers thinking that sex acts in stories are ones the writer takes part in.
This applies particularly to kinkier activities. This is probably due to the
social taboos surrounding sex that use shame to steer us towards the vanilla
sex aisle. When writers create stories about serial killers, they don’t worry
that people will assume they’ve actually removed the skin from a murder
victim on at least one occasion. For some reason, sex is different.
The thing to bear in mind is that your fictional character is not you. Their
sexual experiences and their fantasies are not the same as yours. Sometimes
you just have to let them do their thing and reveal who they really are.
Susie Bright suggests another reason why we might feel uncomfortable
about writing about sex. Perhaps it is the physical and emotional intensity
of it. She compares it to writing about other significant life events such as
birth, death, and ‘seeing God.’
And then there is the fear that we can’t write about it because we
ourselves do not have the necessary experience. This should not be a
handicap because we are not writing a non-fiction account about sexual
experience, we are creating a fantasy. Virgins can write great erotica, Susie
Bright tells us. Really bad lovers can write great erotica. And even bad sex
can be erotic.
Romance novels treat sex in one of four ways. No sex, implied sex, modest
sex, and explicit/erotic sex. In this book I’ve been half-jokingly referring to
these as different levels of spiciness, like the heat of a curry or a chili con
carne.
No Sex
Implied Sex
Modest Sex
The modest sex scene includes sexual contact, but the details tend to be
relatively hazy, relying on hints and euphemism, leaving the rest to the
reader’s imagination. The tone will be poetic rather than erotic.
An advantage of this approach is that it allows you to show how a
romantic or spiritual connection can be expressed or symbolised by a
physical connection. Their relationship expands to include a physical
element, but this doesn’t draw the attention entirely onto the physical.
Typically, what we find in this type of scene is ‘vanilla sex’ – mostly
missionary position and nothing too showy or kinky. Oral sex is a maybe,
but heterosexual couples don’t contemplate anal.
There is a danger here that the scene may seem contrived or twee. There
is also a danger of overwriting the ‘spiritual’ element of their physical
connection so it sounds like something from bad 1970s ‘new age’ poetry.
Explicit/Erotic Sex
Here the descriptions are relatively explicit without being clinical and the
passion is raw and sweaty. It may take place in unexpected locations and
include some acts that might be considered ‘kinky.’
The detail of the scene, if properly written, allows the reader to share the
intensity of the feelings between the two characters.
Writing explicit or erotic sex scenes requires skill and taste – get it wrong
and a scene can read like pornography. Or comedy. “The line between
literary eroticism and cheesy smut is difficult to walk,” writes Raymond
Obstfeld, in Novelist’s Guide to Crafting Scenes. His chapter on writing sex
scenes is a good one.
Stacia Kane says that she prefers to write (and read) a fairly detailed sex
scene. She feels cheated if the sex happens ‘offstage,’ because this is telling
rather than showing. She, and other readers like her, want to experience
what the hero and heroine are experiencing – their thoughts, their emotions,
and the changes the event stirred in them. Seeing the sex scene unfold in
real time gives direct access to these things.
Stacia Kane writes urban fantasy and erotic fantasy, she is also the author
of Be a Sex-Writing Strumpet, which includes plenty of examples of sex
scenes and discussions about why she wrote the scenes as she did. The book
is based on a long series of blog posts, so if you want to sample her advice
check the link below – be warned that the language she uses is pretty
explicit in places:
www.staciakane.net/2008/07/09/be-a-sex-writing-strumpet/
If you want to see examples of how not to do it, the magazine Literary
Review awards an annual ‘Bad Sex in Fiction Award’ for “...poorly written,
redundant, or downright cringeworthy passages of sexual description in
modern fiction...” As the name of the magazine suggests, the focus is on
‘literary’ or mainstream fiction rather than romance or erotica. But bad
writing is bad writing. Have a look at literaryreview.co.uk/bad-sex-in-
fiction-award
Only the first category, no sex, is a strict one, there can be some overlap
between the others. And if a romantic novel has several sex scenes, they
may be of varying degrees of ‘heat.’
Whether a sex scene is ‘hot’ or ‘spicy’ isn’t determined by the sex acts
being described, it is a matter of how they are described. As we’ll see later
in this chapter, it’s a mistake to think that writing about penetration and
orgasms is going to get your reader hot and bothered. As in real life, the
foreplay is of vital importance.
As mentioned above, the level of spice in your novel will be determined,
to some extent, by the sub-genre of romance you choose to write in.
Traditional publishers typically have guidelines that state what level of
sexual description is allowed or expected and will sometimes even say how
many sex scenes readers will be expecting to see. Obviously, there is more
freedom in the self-published market, but you will need to look at
successful examples in a sub-genre or sub-sub-genre to get a clear idea of
what readers want. Fail to give readers what they’re looking for and you
risk getting a batch of two-star ‘meh’ reviews.
Promiscuity
In the old-school romance, the heroine was a virgin and the hero was older
and more sexually experienced. Until the sexual revolution of the 1960s,
following the introduction of the birth control pill, good girls didn’t. And
even now, some people are of the opinion that they shouldn’t. It is perfectly
fine for a man to ‘sow his wild oats,’ but a woman who has sex before
marriage becomes ‘spoiled goods.’ The sexual double standard lingers on.
In the modern romance, with the exception of one or two sub-genres, it is
acceptable for the heroine to have had sexual relationships before she meets
the hero. It is not necessary that she has, but the two now tend to meet on
more equal terms. Though it is still more acceptable for the hero to be
promiscuous than it is for the heroine. Typically, he sleeps around because
he has commitment phobia or he suffered a broken heart from a previous
relationship and will never trust a woman enough to have a serious
relationship again. Until he meets the heroine.
But a central theme of the romance genre is the value of trust and
commitment, usually expressed in a strictly monogamous relationship. Or a
committed polygamous one. The importance of this theme means that as
soon as the heroine and hero begin a relationship, they should not be having
sex with anyone else. They should not ‘cheat’ on each other. The
relationship in a romance novel is an unwritten agreement of exclusivity.
If the hero (or heroine) in a modern romance does sleep with someone
else during the course of the story, it happens in a period when the couple
have broken up or separated for some reason. Or perhaps at a stage before
the informal agreement has been made. Sex with someone else while they
together is going to complicate the story with feelings of guilt and leave the
reader feeling uncomfortable about the level of trust and commitment on
display. This may be okay in an edgier romance, but if you’re aiming for a
lighter tone, this kind of angst should probably be avoided.
At the beginning of a romance, the heroine may be dating or engaged to
someone but feel unfulfilled by her relationship. Meeting the hero will
confirm her feeling that she has chosen the wrong man. A decent heroine
will deny her attraction to the hero until she feels able to separate formally
from her fiancé. “She must let him down gently, and with good reason,”
Jean Saunders writes, “to prevent the reader from thinking she’s heartless.”
We don’t want to give the impression that she leaves her fiancé easily,
because that sows a seed of doubt in the reader’s mind – Could she abandon
the hero just as easily? Is she incapable of serious commitment?
The heroine may be divorced or formally separated from a long-term
partner, but it is best if she wasn’t guilty of ending the relationship by
having an affair with someone else. Again, this hints that she doesn’t take
commitment seriously and that is against the thematic argument of the
romance.
She may also be a widow or in a situation where her husband is
presumed dead. If the assumed dead husband makes a reappearance, that
becomes a plot complication or an opportunity for a second chance
romance.
It used to be said that it was easier for a man to regard sex as being
something engaged in just for pleasure, while women found it more difficult
to separate sex and love. A cheating spouse would say ‘It didn’t mean
anything,’ but his long-suffering wife couldn’t accept that he could have sex
with someone else but still love her. This was a throwback to an era when it
was believed that women were not sexual beings in their own right. Now it
is equally possible for a woman to engage in ‘meaningless’ sex, purely for
the fun of it. But probably not in a romance novel, where sex usually does
have some meaning. Sex for sex’s sake is mostly found in erotica, which is
a whole other genre.
Donna Baker has suggested that there is still a place in romance fiction
for the difference in attitudes towards sex of men and women. The hero, she
says, can be physically attracted to the heroine without falling romantically
in love with her – at least in the early stages of their relationship. Only as
their relationship develops does his lust turn into love. This works in more
erotic romance novels where sex can come before love, and could also be
made to work in a ‘clean’ or ‘modest’ romance, but there it is harder to
make the hero’s sexual interest in the heroine seem romantic.
Sexual Compatibility
The heroine and the hero are virtually always sexually compatible. It is one
of the things that makes them both realise that the other might be The One.
The sex is always good. Any obstacle to their love or conflict will be related
to something else – self-confidence, power, commitment, or whatever.
Sex as a Weapon
In the modern romance, neither the heroine nor the hero uses sex as a
weapon. In the old school romance, the hero might use sex to dominate,
control, and even punish the heroine. I will discuss attitudes to sexual
violence and rape in a later chapter. Spoiler alert: they have no place in a
modern romance novel.
And the heroine should never use sex to manipulate a man to get what
she wants. Only a seductress does that, and she typically only appears as the
Other Woman in a love triangle story. Having said that, in an enemies to
lovers story, the heroine may set out to seduce the hero and then find herself
falling in love with him.
A good scene will do two of these and a great scene will do all three. In a
romance novel, ‘revealing character’ includes both showing something new
about the heroine and the hero as individual people, and also something
about their relationship at that moment in the story. And in a sex scene, one
response you hope to evoke in the reader is sexual arousal. Probably.
Back in the 1980s, there was a tendency to try and make some movies more
marketable and people spoke about screenplays being rewritten by a ‘tits
and ass guy’ to spice them up. There were also ‘tits and car chase’ guys who
would go through a script and add both types of action. When people talk
about ‘gratuitous’ sex and violence, they’re talking about scenes that are
shoehorned into a story without being a necessary part of the development
of a plot. There is a danger that we can do the same thing with romance
novels. We might have an idea that, at a certain point in the plot, the two
lead characters should have sex. It shows that their relationship has reached
a certain landmark.
But sex shouldn’t ever be just a plot point. It must be shown to mean
something to the two (or more) people involved. And sex scenes at different
points in the story will have different meanings for them.
Elizabeth Benedict, in The Joy of Writing Sex, says a good sex scene is
about sex and something else. It isn’t just there to titillate the reader, it must
also have another function. It should reveal something about the characters,
she writes – “...who the characters are, what they want, what they might not
get, what they think they can get away with...” or “...act as a metaphor, a
symbol, or an illustration of an aspect of your theme, your plot, and/or your
characters’ desires and dilemmas.” The scene must be related to what has
come before and have some influence on everything that happens after.
Does Your Story Need a Sex Scene? – Why Sex and Why Now?
If your sex scene doesn’t reveal character, advance the plot, and/or evoke an
emotional response in the reader, it shouldn’t be in your story. You
shouldn’t include a sex scene simply because the outline for your novel says
Insert Sex Scene Here. A sex scene should be more than just a plot point in
your story. You should write a sex scene when your characters need to have
sex. They should have a good reason to want to have sex, rather than
provide an excuse for the writer to include a sex scene.
Also, it should occur at a point in the story where the reader wants them
to have sex – at a point where they care about the characters and their
relationship. If you haven’t created ‘chemistry’ between the two characters,
who really cares about them having a roll in the hay?
What motivates the two (or more) characters to have sex? Why do the
two characters want or need to have sex at this point in the story? Ideally,
you’d hope that two people have sex because it symbolises a deep
connection between them. But in reality, and in fiction, people have
different motives for having sex. One character may believe that this is
what you do, it’s traditional to have sex on the third date. Or they may feel
that they must allow sex to happen now because they’re afraid the other
person will lose interest and look for sex elsewhere. Or perhaps they
haven’t had sex for so long that they are just desperate to end the drought.
Or maybe they are challenging themselves to get over their fear of sex after
a bad relationship. Or they are a virgin and just really want to move beyond
that status. For some people, sex is just a physical release, a healthy bodily
function, and it means nothing beyond that.
Where things become interesting in a story is when the sex means
different things to the two characters involved. Early in their relationship,
they may both want sex but for different reasons. They are not on the same
page. Not yet. The cliché is that men are interested in sex and women want
love – and while the stereotype is just that, two people may have different
thoughts about what the act signifies. It is important to know what each
character wants from sex, what they are seeking. Drama and conflict are
created when one character cannot or will not give what the other is looking
for, or doesn’t understand the other person’s need.
What does the sex scene reveal about the characters and their
relationship? Often, the sex between heroine and hero marks a significant
turning point in their relationship. It is an act of consummation. It shows
how important the heroine has become to the hero, and he to her. In many
stories, including motion pictures, the sex scene occurs at the midpoint. The
first half of the story leads up to it and the second half explores the changes
it brings in the characters and other consequences of their coming together.
One possible consequence of the scene is that it raises the stakes. If the
hero now cares about the heroine and respects her, something that he did in
the past (recent or distant) may take on added significance. His close
relationship may now put some external situation in jeopardy, or the
external thing may pose a threat to the relationship. Or both.
In stories where there are several sex scenes, with the first occurring
before the midpoint, we should see a change in the thoughts and emotions
of the heroine and/or hero. The contrast between Love Scene 1 and Love
Scene 2 should reveal how their feelings have changed as a result of events
between them.
How does the sex scene advance the plot? Since the relationship is the
main plot, the plot advances as the relationship evolves. But there may be
ways that a sex scene can also advance the external plot, the subplot. In a
romantic suspense story, for example, the hero may have a birthmark, scar,
or tattoo in a place that is normally covered by clothing. Seeing it as he lies
naked next to her, the heroine may realise that the hero is not who he claims
to be or is the stranger she has been searching for or a member of a
motorcycle gang responsible for a crime she is investigating or whatever.
Or maybe she discovers he’s a vampire or a werewolf. Or a Republican.
Whatever she discovers about him – or he learns about her – may create
new complications or obstacles that will affect the development of the
external plot and/or their relationship.
Two people who work in the same office may be risking their jobs or
their opportunity for advancement by sleeping together. Especially if one is
the boss of the other. Some companies have strict guidelines on
relationships between co-workers, particularly when there is a risk of
accusations of sexual misconduct. This takes us into the realm of
‘forbidden’ relationships, which I discuss in a separate chapter.
A sexual liaison also has the potential to affect other relationships. What
if the heroine is sleeping with her best friend’s brother? Or the hero is
having sex with his best friend’s ex? Or with someone the best friend has
confessed to being attracted to?
Point of View
There are good reasons for sticking with one point of view in a sex scene. If
you switch viewpoint from one character to another, you break the flow of a
scene and risk the reader losing the connection to a character. And having
access to both character’s feelings can remove some of the mystery or
suspense from a scene. If the heroine wonders what the hero is thinking, we
wonder along with her. If we then have access to his thoughts, the suspense
is broken, and the writer then has to create new tension based on what the
reader now knows about the hero that the heroine doesn’t know. Mystery
and tension keep the reader turning the pages. And readers like to be able to
figure things out for themselves, rather than have everyone’s secret thoughts
handed to them. There are occasions when switching viewpoint is the right
thing to do, but you need to be aware of your reasons for doing it.
If you do switch viewpoints within a third-person sex scene, just starting
the new viewpoint in a new paragraph should be enough. You don’t need to
start a new chapter or insert a blank line. Your choice of words should be
enough to tip the reader off about the change in viewpoint – readers are
pretty used to this sort of thing nowadays. If you have both characters using
the first-person point of view, you will need to use whatever indicator
you’ve used in other parts of the story to show the switch.
Sex scenes that include significant self-discoveries or revelations for both
characters almost certainly should be seen from both viewpoints. Readers
will want to see the impact on both the heroine and the hero – and compare
and contrast their feelings.
Generally speaking, you should switch viewpoint only once in a sex
scene. Constant ‘head-hopping’ in a single scene interrupts the flow.
Obviously, if you’re writing a sex scene featuring more than two characters,
you may need more than two viewpoints.
When first writing a sex scene, Elizabeth Benedict suggests that you
focus your attention on just one of the characters, exploring their desires,
thoughts and emotions. Once you have those established, you can turn to
the partner to compare their desires, thoughts and emotions and also
consider this person’s ability and willingness to meet the needs of the first
character.
To draw a reader into a scene and make them feel they are part of it, you
must make it seem as subjective as possible. Use ‘close-ups’ and share what
the viewpoint character is experiencing. If you stand too far back from the
action, Elizabeth Benedict warns, you risk making the reader feel like a
Peeping Tom, a voyeur rather than a participant in the scene.
One of the best ways to achieve this intimacy is to write phrases like,
‘The touch of his warm, calloused palm on her thigh made her shiver.’ Not,
‘She felt the touch of his warm calloused palm on her thigh and it made her
shiver.’ The second example is telling us what she felt, where the first
comes closer to showing us. Better still, we can share her thoughts directly
(or indirectly) with the reader: Touch me there, that’s what I want...
Look at how many times you are using ‘she’ and ‘he’ and words like
‘felt’ – they will indicate that you’re not getting the reader into the scene.
Different points of view allow us access to what characters are thinking
and feeling, so let’s look at ways of presenting these things to the reader.
Description
The rhythm and flow of a scene – any scene – depends on your word
choices and the way you construct your sentences. When writing action,
we’re advised to use ‘active’ verbs and the active voice – ‘He cooked
bacon’ not ‘He was cooking bacon’ or ‘The bacon was cooked by him.’
We are also told to choose specific verbs, ‘doing words,’ and cut out
adverbs. And to use specific nouns and avoid adjectives. Adverbs and
adjectives, we are told, are ‘telling’ and we should be showing. But in
writing a sex scene, we may need to relax these guidelines a bit. Yes, we
should choose the sexiest nouns and verbs we can, but we may need some
adjectives and adverbs to achieve the kind of sensuality and emotion the
scene requires. Those –ly words also help create a softer flow to sentences –
softly, gently, haltingly, hesitantly. Just don’t add modifiers or multiple
modifiers to every verb and noun. There’s a fine line between sensual prose
and purple prose.
If you’re going to write about sex, you need to use sexy words. There are a
number of books that offer advice and lists of words. In Be a Sex-Writing
Strumpet, Stacia Kane includes some lists of ‘trigger’ words that she uses.
Jean Kent and Candace Shelton produced The Romance Writers’ Phrase
Book. Dahlia Evans has Thinking Like a Romance Writer: The Sensual
Writer’s Sourcebook of Words and Phrases and Cara Bristol has Naughty
Words for Nice Writers: A Romance Novel Thesaurus. I’m sure there are
others. These all offer a starting point for discovering words for use in your
romance novel, but ultimately you must develop your own preferred
vocabulary.
This choice of words will be part of your own style or ‘voice’ as a writer.
Look at the words and phrases other writers use. Seek out writers whose
style is closest to what you aspire to. And if you’ve already developed your
own style, trust your instincts, and don’t feel you have to ape what anyone
else is doing. But do listen to any feedback you get from readers, either
directly or in reviews. Over the years, I’ve received valuable advice from
friends, fellow writers, and people who bought my books – and I’ve tried to
incorporate their best suggestions into my style going forward.
When choosing words for describing sexual organs and their individual
parts, the best approach is to use terms that your character would use. If you
are describing the sex scene from the point of view of one (or more)
participants – and you should be – then you should be using their language.
The description and the words should be in character.
Yes, your character may be less inhibited in the bedroom and use words
that she (or he) would not use in polite company, but these choices should
still be in keeping with what we already know about this person.
If you’re struggling with this, you can get away with not naming things at
all. Elizabeth Benedict singled out a scene in David Lodge’s Paradise News
as being ‘very sexy’ while still avoiding the naming of parts. Have a look at
that book and see if you could do something similar.
Words for male sexual organs tend to cause less of a problem for writers
and readers. Penis, dick, cock, testicles, nuts, and balls are used so widely
that hardly anyone bats an eyelid. This is probably a result of our male-
dominated society. The flip side of this is that anything relating to female
sexuality has tended to be more mysterious and surrounded by superstitions
and taboos. The suppression of female sexuality means that words for
female sex organs are almost never used in everyday speech. The word c**t
is one of the most controversial four-letter words.
In the old-school romance, euphemisms abounded. The erect male penis
was his maleness, hardness, his sex, ‘himself’ or even his ‘virility.’ Other
terms included his length, manhood, member, organ, rod, staff, shaft, or
even ‘root.’ In Australia and New Zealand, ‘to root’ is to have sex, so there
may be some connection there. Or not. It might also be described in terms
of hard materials such as iron or steel. And in terms relating to weapons
such as swords or lances.
Euphemisms for female sex organs include the Victorian phrase ‘gates of
paradise,’ love cave, Cupid’s hole or Cupid’s furrow, Venus’s honeypot, and
the altar of love. More recent terms are cleft, vajajay, hoo hah, or the eastern
term yoni. A modern phrase I’ve seen suggested is ‘her hot, wet core.’ In the
town where I live, there used to be a florist shop called The Fragrant Oasis,
which always sounded like a euphemism to me. Many of these terms sound
ridiculous. Phyllis Taylor Pianka advises against using anything that may be
unintentionally humorous. Humour is okay in a love scene, she says, but
“...we want the reader to laugh with us, not at us.”
Details
Something else that makes your style unique as a writer is the choice of
details you draw the reader’s attention to. In any scene, we cannot describe
everything. We must choose details to represent the whole. Elsewhere, I’ve
said that reading is a collaborative activity, the reader wants to contribute
something to the process. I called it reader participation. They want you to
give them a few clues in your description and then step back and let them
fill in the rest of the scene. If you mention a dusty old rag rug on the floor
and a brightly coloured crocheted blanket on the sofa, that can be enough to
let them picture the whole room. And allowing them to bring this to the
story makes it more vivid and real to them. The same applies to the
description in a sex scene. Try and choose one detail that suggests many
more.
You probably studied figurative language at school. Simile is when you say
something is like (or similar to) something else. He was like a lion.
Metaphor is when you say something is something else. He was a lion. You
can use these to create images and associations that give your descriptions
extra oomph and help tie them into the themes of your story.
You might want to give us an impression of your hero by suggesting his
similarity to a wolf. Your heroine might even think ‘What big teeth you
have, Mister Wolf,’ alluding to the story of Little Red Riding Hood. The
whole lone wolf thing has probably been overdone, but you could come up
with something that works equally well. Obviously, if you’re going to
reveal that your hero really is a werewolf, you’d need imagery of a different
kind – suggesting something animal and primal, but not telegraphing the
twist by mentioning a wolf.
Maybe the heroine thinks of the hero as being like a secret agent. James
Bond. You can carry this idea and use it for little bits of description of his
appearance and actions at various points in the story. Having set this up,
you can then draw on it when you’re describing the heroine and hero
making love.
Ideally, you want your reader to feel turned on by the sex scene you have
written. Opinions vary on whether you should be feeling turned on yourself
as you write it. If you are, that’s probably not a bad thing.
It’s possible to write an explicit sex scene which isn’t sexy. The reader
doesn’t feel the romantic connection between the two characters and the
acts described lack any sort of passion.
When we see the term ‘sensual’ we tend to think it refers to something
sexual or at least sexy, but it really means relating to the senses. If you want
to write a ‘sensual’ scene, your descriptions have got to appeal to the five
senses.
The descriptions of the two lovers that feature in a sex scene often
emphasise the contrast between male and female bodies. They concentrate
on the aspects of the female body that appeal to males, and the aspects of
the male body that appeal to females. In descriptions of same-sex couples,
description is likely to consider similarities and differences between the two
people’s bodies, emphasising features each partner finds attractive. In
scenes with non-gendered persons, description might avoid reference to
primary and secondary sexual characteristics.
Sight – He will typically notice the soft curves of her body and she will
refer to the more angular planes of his muscles. He will almost always be
broad shouldered and slim hipped, and she will be the opposite – her body
is a triangle or a pear, his is an upside-down triangle. Don’t forget contrasts
between light and dark. Sunlight and shadow. Firelight and candlelight are
both moving, creating dancing shadows. He might see her skin flush. She
might notice the rise and fall of his chest or the tightening of his stomach
muscles. Signs of arousal might include her nipples or his erection, visible
through clothing.
Sound – The heroine’s voice or laugh is often described as being musical
or silvery. His voice is a deep rumble or growl. Both male and female
voices tend to become lower and more husky during sexual arousal. The
intimacy of the scene means that whispers and breathy voices are common.
Floorboards may creak and so do old bedsprings. The wind or the rain may
be heard outside. In the city, sounds like a police siren or an aircraft might
be heard distantly. I’ll talk more about dialogue and sounds later in the
chapter.
Touch – The softness of the heroine’s skin is often contrasted with the
roughness of his calloused hands. Or with the rougher ‘weather-beaten’
texture of his skin. Include textures from the setting too – the rough feel of
floorboards against the sole of a foot or the feel of a rough woollen blanket
or cool silk sheets.
Smell – Here you can refer to the scent of perfume, cologne, aftershave,
soap, shampoo and other products a person might use on their body or hair.
Like clothing, hair can also retain odours from the atmosphere, including
cigarette smoke, smoke from a barbecue, food or kitchen smells, the salty
smell of the sea, or anything else that might be carried on the air in a
specific location. The hero is often described in terms of the spiciness or
muskiness of his aftershave. Or he might have a musky smell of his own.
Some writers also refer to the ‘smell of their sex’ on bed linen, but
references to sexual odours rarely go beyond that. Odours from the setting
might include the pine forest or the meadow outside the window.
Taste – You might describe the taste of champagne or strawberries on her
lips. Perhaps the oaky or smoky flavour of malt whisky on his. Typically,
her breath is compared to something like apple blossom. Cigars and
cigarettes were once considered masculine flavours, but these have fallen
out of fashion – no one wants to know what it’s like to lick an ashtray.
Again, spicy flavours work well – cinnamon, cloves, or nutmeg. Mint and
citrus also have pleasant connotations.
Sexual Tension
Tone
Humour
Some writers are wary about using humour in a sex scene. At school, we
probably learned that ‘sex isn’t funny,’ and only immature boys sniggered
about it at the back of the ‘sex ed’ class. Or we’ve learned that men have a
dread fear of being laughed at, particularly in the areas of sexual
endowment and/or sexual prowess. But if you’re writing a romantic
comedy, there is no reason to exclude humour from the sex scenes. The
only rule is that the heroine and hero should be laughing together, they
shouldn’t be laughing at one another. There should be no victim of the joke
or humorous observation. If the hero is all fingers and thumbs as he fumbles
to undo his shoelaces or get the condom out of the wrapper, they should be
laughing about it together. And that’s before she discovers that he’s
extremely ticklish... Sex isn’t funny. But it can be.
Setting
If you are going to be writing several romance novels, you will have to
come up with different locations for sex scenes to occur, especially if you
have more than one per book. Bedrooms and hotel rooms. A cozy bed ‘n’
breakfast. A motel – usually regarded as a bit sleazy, but you could put a
new spin on it. An elevator. In a shower, hot tub, or bathtub. In the kitchen.
Out in the garden. In a public park. A graveyard. By a waterfall. On a
beach. In a gym or a locker room. Make a list and keep adding to it.
Some settings allow the couple to lie down, in some they have to stand
up, and some – like the backseat of a car – may require a bit of contortion.
Some places are more suited to wild, spontaneous sex, some for a ‘quickie,’
and some for more drawn-out, languorous lovemaking.
You could choose a romantic location that suits the romantic nature of the
lovemaking. Or a gritty location that fits in with the angry, urgent sex. Or
the location may be mundane, so the sex is shown as a contrast – a
remarkable act in an unremarkable location. Or you can make the location
and the romance clash strongly – having tender lovemaking occur in a wild
and dangerous place, or raunchy passionate sex occur in a twee romantic
location. The choice you make will depend on your characters, the
situations in your story, and the sub-genre you are writing in. Elizabeth
Benedict refers to this as ‘setting the emotional stage,’ which is a useful
idea to bear in mind. What a character sees around them affects what they
feel in the moment and what they will remember afterwards.
Weather and other local factors can be used to reflect the emotion or
action of a scene. Thunderstorms and crashing waves can be a bit of a
cliché for wild sex, but don’t let that stop you using them if a fresh
approach occurs to you. The same with lazy romantic sex in a sunny
meadow.
The location should also contribute something to the scene and not just
be a static backdrop. Does it provide obstacles to what the two characters
want to do? Is it confined, making movement difficult? Are there uneven
surfaces or sharp objects? Is it dusty or wet or muddy? Warm or cold? Still
and humid or blowing a gale? Are there insects or small animals? Or danger
from large animals? Is the location isolated or is there the risk of being seen
or interrupted?
Also consider the characters’ emotional relationship to the place. If it
occurs in the boss’s office, does this enhance the feeling that he is more
dominant and confident? Does the setting hold memories or emotional
connections for one of the characters? In Daphne Du Maurier’s Rebecca,
the story takes place in Manderley, a house haunted by the presence of the
hero’s dead wife. Does the heroine feel uncomfortable having sex in a bed
she shared with her ex? Does the room hold memories of violent, unhappy,
or joyful acts?
Alison Kent reminds us that the reason why a character chooses a
location for a sexual encounter is also important. If an alpha male
billionaire hero wants to impress the heroine with his success, he’s likely to
take her to his penthouse or away to some exclusive tropical island. But if
the same hero wants to show that wealth doesn’t define him and hasn’t
changed him, he may take her to the ordinary little town or ranch where he
grew up.
Should you include dialogue in a sex scene? If you want your characters to
deliver a lot of dialogue, the advice is that you should have your character’s
doing something while they talk. That’s why you see a lot of ‘walk and talk’
scenes on television and in movies – no one wants to see people sitting in a
café or at the kitchen table for ten minutes. But sex is not an activity you
should have your story people doing while they talk. Sex should be the
main focus of a sex scene, not dialogue. Write a sex scene or a dialogue
scene, don’t try and combine the two.
Any dialogue you do include should be delivered by a character in
character. It should be appropriate for the personality you have established
for them. If your hero is a taciturn, young Clint Eastwood type, he’s not
going to get chatty in bed during sex. But if you have established that your
heroine and hero engage in witty banter, you can include some of that in a
sex scene.
Talking Dirty
Sex Sounds
What sounds do the characters make during sex? This includes any sounds
from their mouths and also any sounds their bodies make as they come into
contact. The slap of flesh against flesh is often omitted from movie sex
scenes and descriptions in romances.
Sounds made during sex are often involuntary and show that the
character is becoming lost in the moment. Such sounds are more difficult to
fake. Unless you’re Meg Ryan in When Harry Met Sally. People may make
different sounds as their level of pleasure rises. They may begin with quiet
moans and groans, move on to loud encouraging cries, and finally
delivering a deep-throated yell, scream, or bellow at the moment of climax.
Val Kovalin suggests adding a simple adjective to a sound to intensify the
emotion it reveals, e.g. a wrenching cry or a guttural groan.
As mentioned above, be careful about the sounds you have the heroine
making when she has an orgasm. It is much better to share with the reader
how her climax feels than to try and come up with some phonetic way of
expressing her screams of pleasure.
“Avoid if you can, letting your heroine moan and your hero groan,” Joan
Saunders writes. “They always sound as if they’re in so much pain...” You
may also need to come up with an answer to the old joke-question, ‘What
does an atheist shout when they’re having an orgasm?’
Susie Bright advises against using sounds made during sex as a substitute
for description. While moans and gasps do show inhibitions being
overcome, you shouldn’t try to describe an orgasm using only these sounds.
Listening to the sounds of two people having sex can be arousing, Bright
says, but reading a transcription of these noises is much less so. The same
applies to the brief sentences or fragments shouted out as climax is reached.
They still need actual description to support them.
Dialogue
In some sex scenes, it is all about raw physical passion and there is little or
no dialogue. But you don’t want your sex scene to read like something from
a silent movie. Dialogue can be used to help pace a scene and break up
large chunks of description. Reader’s like to see some white on the page.
But the speeches should be brief vocalisations rather than long
explanations. Write the sex of your sex scene without dialogue first,
communicating as much as you can through expression, gesture, touch, and
body position. Then only add whatever dialogue you need to express what
couldn’t be said non-verbally.
Dialogue works best in a sex scene if it is included during foreplay or
during the post coital afterglow. It doesn’t really belong during the physical
sex part.
I don’t need to say this, but I’m going to anyway: Don’t look at porn for
ideas about dialogue. Adult entertainment is notorious for its awful
dialogue. Nobody in the real world says, ‘Give it to me, big boy!’
Ashley Lister offers some pointers on writing dialogue that occurs during
sex. As the couple move from flirting to foreplay, their speech is likely to
move from longer sentences to shorter ones. In the throes of passion, speech
has a level of urgency that matches the physical movements of the
characters. And the more intense the action becomes, the more likely that
sounds will become monosyllabic or turn into grunts.
In the chapter on romantic dialogue, I covered some of the sorts of things
lovers might say to each other, and many of those examples can be adapted
for use in a sex scene.
Elizabeth Benedict has said that dialogue in the sex scene has the
potential to achieve four things: reveal information about character; reveal
or give clues about conflict between the two lovers or between the lovers
and the outside world; allow characters to explore and resolve conflicts, or
realise that they cannot be resolved, and reveal something about the
characters’ feelings and beliefs about sex and sexuality, which may affect
the outcome of the scene or the development of the plot.
When two characters go to bed together, they may reveal more than just
their bodies. In this most intimate of moments, they may reveal their
deepest dreams and fears.
The dialogue in a sex scene, like any other scene, should be true to the
character. The words should be things they would say and should be spoken
in a way that they would say them. Yes, a person may reveal something new
about themselves in this situation – the heroine may be more daring and
raunchier, the hero gentler and more caring – but we should not see a
complete change of personality. Some characters will speak gentle, tender
words of encouragement and offer compliments. They will express
approval, saying what they like about the other person and about what the
other person is doing. And they will seek to guide, saying what they would
like their partner to do. Others will tease and use humour. And some may be
too overcome with emotion to speak. Perhaps a less confident character
goes from no sound to pleasure sounds, to more verbal, to dialogue.
As I said earlier, during sex, and just prior to it, a person’s voice may
become deeper and more husky. This is true of both males and females.
Conversely, if someone is extremely nervous, the constriction of their throat
may cause their voice to become more high-pitched and squeakier. Some
women adopt a ‘little girl’ or ‘baby doll’ voice, which some men find
attractive. And some lovers use something very like baby talk and also have
‘cutesy’ nicknames for each other.
In terms of presenting dialogue in a sex scene, the rule about only using
‘he said’ and ‘she said’ as dialogue tags may need to be relaxed a little. If
your macho hero type speaks, you might want to use ‘he growled.’ And for
your heroine, you might need ‘she gasped.’ But if she gasps, make sure the
words include an exhalation of breath. And if ‘he hissed,’ there had better
be some sibilants in what he said.
Elizabeth Benedict, in The Joy of Writing Sex, says, “There are no secret
formulas, no shortcuts, no clever tricks to writing a good sex scene.” I’m
not sure if this lets me off the hook or increases the pressure to make this
chapter something special. I don’t have a formula for you, but I do have a
sequence of events that you can use as a basis or inspiration for your scenes.
Taking Desmond Morris’s twelve stages as a guide, I have this for you:
Flirting
Kissing
Foreplay
Undressing
Arousal – including Erogenous Zones
Penetration
The Sex Act
Orgasm
Afterglow
After-Afterglow
Flirting
I’ve written a whole chapter on flirting, so all I’ll do here is emphasise how
important it is in the build-up to a sex scene. And some of it will carry on
during the sex scene.
Something I didn’t mention in the earlier chapter, and that Stacia Kane
gives as an example, is a more violent form of pre-sex interaction. She
shows how two characters could be having a loud and emotionally charged
argument that looks like it could end in physical violence. But instead the
two characters end up in each other’s arms and this quickly leads to
passionate and very physical sex. This fits in some genres better than others.
Flirting covers the first six of Morris’s twelve stages, half of them, but
these occur relatively quickly.
Kissing
Again, we’ve already had a chapter on this so I’ll just emphasise that it has
an important role in foreplay. Now the characters aren’t restricted to kissing
each other’s head and neck and hands, they have the whole body to explore.
They can seek out those erogenous zones (see below) and try to drive each
other crazy.
Kissing is the seventh of Morris’s stages of intimacy and it also typically
includes the eighth, hand to head.
Foreplay
Foreplay is erotic stimulation designed to get lovers ‘in the mood’ and
physically aroused ready for sex. Men usually require less preparation for
sex than women, though there are circumstances where a man may need
some encouragement. It is not enough to describe foreplay happening, you
have to show your characters responding to it.
In real-life, good sex is something like 70% foreplay, 20% penetrative
sex, and 10% afterglow (the cuddling part). You might argue about those
actual numbers, but proportionally, foreplay is ideally the largest part.
Erotica focuses attention on the 20% that is the actual sex act. Sex scenes in
romance novels are more likely to follow the percentages above. If you’re
writing a modest sex scene, you can close the door on the 20% in the
middle and focus just on the foreplay and the afterglow.
Foreplay, then, is likely to be seventy to ninety percent of your sex scene.
What goes into it?
Foreplay continues the sexual tension that was begun with flirting. But
the verbal teasing is now accompanied by physical contact. It heightens the
expectation that sex will occur. Foreplay is where you can get creative and
create something unique.
The penetrative part of sex is almost entirely physical. It’s about friction
and the sense of touch more than anything else. It is regarded as primal or
animalistic. The pleasure centres of the brain take over so there’s not a lot
of thinking going on, certainly not as the body approaches climax. And that
physical part of sex is pretty much the same for everybody. Foreplay is
where the mind plays a part in sex, it's where the brain is stimulated. And it
is unique to each person. This is where you can show your characters
having sex. It is where you ensure that the scene is true to your characters’
already established personalities. During sex, your characters are at their
most vulnerable, physically and emotionally. You can allow your reader to
have access to their deepest thoughts and feelings, even if the characters
aren’t yet ready to share those things with each other. This is where the
reader often discovers how the hero really feels about the heroine, what she
has come to mean to him.
Foreplay covers three of Morris’s stages of intimacy (9 through 11) –
hand to body, mouth to breast, and hand to genitals.
Earlier I mentioned Stacie Kane’s exercise for using ‘fake’ dialogue as a
way of accessing the emotional subtext of a scene. This is definitely
something you can use when creating the foreplay section of a sex scene.
In a sex scene, you’re not just describing body parts. There needs to be
movement. Action. They are doing it. Both of them. You don’t want anyone
just lying on their back and thinking of England. Each action will be
motivated, there will be purpose behind it. It may not achieve the intended
result, but the intention has to be there. And the way actions are described is
equally important. In fiction generally, simple description of action is a
good thing. But you can’t take the Hemingway approach with a sex scene.
It’s too bland. How you describe something contributes to the mood and
emotion of the scene.
It’s important not to rush the writing of foreplay. Your reader isn’t in any
rush to get to the penetration part. The longer you linger on the foreplay, the
sexier your scene should be. Take some time to concentrate on each of the
stages suggested below. You won’t use all of them in every scene, that
would be too much. But choose a handful of options that best suit your
characters and the mood you want to create in the scene.
Also remember that the reader wants to have access to the hero’s
thoughts and emotions as well as the heroine’s.
Undressing
Undressing can form a part of foreplay. Characters may remove their own
clothes, or they may undress the other person. I’ve seen other writers use
the term ‘disrobe’ here, but that sounds to me like something you do for a
medical examination.
How a character removes his or her clothes can reveal something about
their personality. Are they enthusiastic and uninhibited? Do they strip in a
seductive manner, like the dance of the seven veils? Perhaps tossing
discarded garments at their partner. Or is the person embarrassed and
awkward, looking like they really are undressing for a medical exam by an
army doctor?
Does the person want to rip off their partner’s clothes? Or do they keep
their own clothes on and watch voyeuristically as the other person
undresses? Does he or she sit back and give instructions about how the
other person should undress? The contrast between a clothed person and an
unclothed one can be dramatic. Our nudity taboos mean that we can feel
vulnerable when naked and may regard a clothed person as being in a more
fortunate or dominant position.
Wearing another person’s clothes can be an intimate act, particularly if an
item is still warm from their body. In movies, a girlfriend will often wear a
guy’s t-shirt to bed or walk around the house in his dress shirt. Sharing
underwear is probably the most intimate of exchanges.
The removal of one character’s clothing may be described from the point
of view of another. What do they see as each item is removed?
Don’t forget that accessories like earrings, a necklace, or a watch may
also be removed. Or left on. Military and ex-military personnel wear dog
tags. And some people wear glasses, which they may or may not prefer to
wear when making love, depending on how bad their eyesight is.
Think about the textures of fabrics seen or felt by the characters. And any
sounds that clothing makes as it is unzipped, un-velcroed, unlaced,
unbuttoned, or torn.
Do your characters undress themselves or each other? How do they do it?
Is it a sexy striptease or do they frantically tear their clothes of, sending
buttons flying in all directions? Do they leave a trail of discarded clothing
in their wake or leave it in a pile in the corner of the room? Do you want to
have one or more pieces of clothing go missing later? Or are they the sort of
person who neatly folds their clothes as they undress? An ex-soldier may
treat his clothing in a different way to an ex-footballer.
Do they get completely naked, or do they keep some pieces of clothing
on? Some (but not all) men are turned on by certain types of sexy lingerie.
Or spiked heels. Some people like it if a guy keeps his socks on. Or his
work boots. If they keep clothing on, consider how it might restrict or
dictate their movements, and be aware of any other consequences of it
being in the way of or contributing to the action.
Someone who feels self-conscious about their body might seek to hide
those parts – or to hide all of it and ask to make love in the dark. Or they
might feel uncomfortable if their partner strokes or kisses that body part.
Does the other person become aware of this discomfort or shyness? And if
so, how do they respond to it?
A shy character may also avoid looking directly into her (or his) lover’s
eyes.
When a character is able to overcome their self-consciousness or shyness,
to feel good about having that part of their body touched, or to be able to
look their lover in the eye – this is a significant moment in their character
development arc.
Finally on the subject of clothing, dressing up and roleplay is a whole
other area that your characters may want to explore. It also edges into the
area of sexual fetishism.
Arousal
There are different stages of sexual arousal. Initial stages tend to be subtle
and a character may seek to deny them, remaining cool and dignified. But
the tell-tale signs become more and more obvious. A character may also
grow less inhibited as the other person’s intentions become clearer.
Involuntary responses, which cannot be faked or controlled, include
dilation of the pupils, blushing of the skin, shallower and faster breathing,
and increased heartrate. A woman’s nipples might tighten and both men and
women may experience swelling of the genitals and release of moisture.
The level of arousal someone experiences must be in proportion to the
level of stimulation they receive – though in adolescents, the required
stimulation tends to be much less.
A person’s breathing may become more ragged as their level of arousal
increases, to the point where they may feel dizzy or hyperventilate.
Flushing of the skin can also spread and become more intense, bringing a
feeling of heat, perhaps causing sweating. The swelling of the genitals also
increases.
In most cases, it takes a longer for a woman to become aroused than a
man. It has been suggested that the mismatch in timing between male and
female arousal might have had practical advantages in our prehistory. If a
male takes the time to meet a female’s sexual needs, she is more likely to
mate with him again and form a long-term relationship with him. Some
things don’t change.
Individuals, both male and female, are sexually aroused or ‘turned on’ by
different things. It has been suggested that men tend to prefer visual
stimulation, accounting for the popularity of pornographic magazines and
videos for men. Visual stimulation also plays a part in female arousal, but it
is thought to be less important. Pornographic magazines for women never
really caught on, suggesting that females require additional forms of
stimulation.
Verbal communication probably plays a greater role in the arousal
process of women. Touch and skin to skin contact is also more important.
This may relate to nurturing functions and physical comfort being
designated as ‘feminine,’ while boys are taught to be more independent of
their mothers and siblings.
Biological differences also play a role in arousal for females, males, and
intersex persons. Though we should bear in mind the idea that the most
significant ‘erogenous zone’ for all humans is the brain. That’s where our
fantasies and our learned responses live.
In men, the two main body parts involved in sexual arousal and climax
are the penis and the prostate. The prostate can be stimulated independently
of the penis, bringing a man to orgasm. The fact that the prostate can only
be indirectly access via the anus means that not all heterosexual men
experience this form of stimulation.
In women, the two main parts involved in sexual arousal and climax are
the clitoris and the internal G-spot. Named after the German gynaecologist
Ernst Gräfenberg, the G-spot is difficult to stimulate during penetrative sex
in the ‘missionary’ position. The existence of an actual physical G-spot has
been debated for many years, but it has been suggested it could be
connected with the Skene’s glands or ‘female prostate.’ The location of the
clitoris means that it too is rarely stimulated directly by the penis during
penetrative sex.
While the genitals are the main source of sexual stimulation, there are
other parts of the body which are also erogenous zones.
Erogenous Zones
Masturbation
People generally think of masturbation as something you do alone, but it
doesn’t have to be. Two lovers – or even two friends – may masturbate
together or bring each other to climax. A sex scene may begin with one
partner accidentally (or not) discovering the other engaged in masturbation.
Historically, religious groups and other ‘moralists’ have taken a very dim
view of masturbation. Bizarre and cruel methods were created by those
seeking to discourage the practice. John Harvey Kellogg (of cornflakes
fame) had some unpleasant suggestions for its prevention. The widespread
adoption of male circumcision in the United States – and perhaps elsewhere
– may have been the result of a wish to prevent masturbation by boys.
Masturbation has tended to be much more common among males than
females, in part due to the fact that patriarchal societies discourage the idea
of women being sexual beings in their own right and as a result they are less
able to make discoveries about their own bodies.
Writing in The Joy of Writing Sex, Elizabeth Benedict says that in writing
about masturbation, we shouldn’t ignore the uneasy feelings a character
might have about it. These are part of the experience. There are also
concerns about being caught doing it or leaving evidence. The absence of a
partner, Benedict says, means that sexual fantasy plays a large part here. It
may also lead to feelings of loneliness and shame associated with being
alone.
Oral Sex
The Hite Report on Female Sexuality, originally published in 1976, said that
over seventy percent of women do not achieve orgasm from penetrative sex
alone. Just as it takes women longer to become sexually aroused, it also
takes longer for them to reach a climax. Apparently, many men are not
aware of this, leaving women to ‘fake it’ or to finish themselves off. Neither
of these options tend to find their way into romance novels. I suppose it
ruins the fantasy. Either the heroine and hero manage to achieve
simultaneous orgasms or the hero makes additional efforts to ensure that the
heroine does’t feel left out.
In Be a Sex-Writing Strumpet, Stacia Kane says she believes oral sex is
an important aspect of foreplay. Women are less likely to achieve orgasm
from penetrative sex, she writes, so oral sex helps her achieve what she
needs: “...women should like oral sex and a true hero wants to give it ... A
man who doesn’t want to do it, or who makes derogatory statements about
it, is not a hero; he is a jerk.”
As with any other aspect of sex, whether or not you write about oral sex
and what level of detail you include will be determined by what you are
comfortable with – and on the expectations of readers in your chosen sub-
genre. Many readers will be okay if the hero uses his tongue and kisses her
in her ‘special place,’ but descriptions of smell, taste, and body fluids may
only be appropriate in erotica or at the most erotic end of erotic romance.
Safe Sex
Some writers don’t like to mention things like condoms or other forms of
contraception. They avoid mention of the risk of sexually transmitted
diseases. And the need for lubrication is barely hinted at. In the end, it is a
question of how much realism you want in your fantasy sex. There’s no
reason why you can’t make lubrication and condom use part of foreplay.
Penetration
Practical Issues
If you have said that the hero is a foot taller than the heroine, you have to
take account of that height difference when they are in bed. And of any
significant weight difference, though that is usually less of an issue. If the
hero has entered the heroine, that point of contact restricts what movements
are possible for them. He may be able to kiss her breasts, but her navel is
out of reach as far as his mouth is concerned. If she is shorter than him, he
can kiss her forehead but she’s not going to be able to kiss his unless he
bends in a way that allows it. If they’re face to face – or face to chest – at
this point, neither of them is going to be able to touch the other’s feet. Or
their own. Whatever they’re doing, make sure they have enough hands to do
it and that it’s physically possible to reach the place in question without too
much contortion or rotating bodies at unusual angles.
From the movies we have come to expect the first coupling of heroine
and hero to be frenzied and desperate, with a second bout conducted more
slowly and tenderly with hardly a pause after the first one. The same
approach may be appropriate in some romance novels, if the two characters
have reached a point in their relationship where both can barely contain
themselves. But many romance stories approach the first love scene in a
less frantic manner.
During sex, the two people caress each other and cling to one another’s
bodies. Depending on the relative positions of their bodies, the two lovers
may be able to see each other’s faces and make eye contact. Kisses will be
placed on whatever parts of the body the lips can reach and teeth may
nibble or bite flesh too. Hands may explore the other person’s body or hold
onto them, guiding or restraining. In the throes of passion, fingernails may
rake flesh, leaving red marks or even drawing blood. Fingers may close
tightly on a partner’s flesh or grab onto bedclothes. The partner being
penetrated may wrap their legs around their lover. Or they may be on top,
riding their partner.
Penetrative sex involves a thrusting motion that usually begins slowly
and gently, increasing in tempo and intensity. The sensation of flesh sliding
across flesh, with sufficient friction as to create increasing levels of
pleasure, leads to a climax. The person being penetrated will match this
rhythm with the clenching and relaxing of their body.
The first time that two characters have sex will be a special moment in
their relationship and readers will be expecting something pretty amazing.
There will have been a long build-up to this moment. We must see that it
has a significant emotional impact on the two characters involved. It should
mark a change in their relationship and be a significant point along their
character development arc.
Later sex scenes, if there are any, can mark significant developments in
the relationship between the heroine and hero.
Who’s On Top?
We tend to assume that the person on top is taking a dominant role in the
action – the hero is dominating the heroine, or the heroine is ‘riding’ the
hero. But this is not necessarily the case. The person who is on top isn’t
always the one taking the lead. In gay relationships, we have the concept of
the power bottom. The ‘submissive’ partner can direct the action in order to
receive whatever he or she desires or needs from their partner.
Although many romance readers enjoy seeing a dominant male hero, an
alpha male, very few also want to see a completely submissive female. In
the chapter on flirting, we saw that it is often the heroine who takes a lead.
She is the one who signals an interest in the hero or lets him know that she
is available. And when it comes to sex, she is the one who says ‘yes’ or
‘no.’
Whether or not the heroine takes a dominant role during sex may be an
indication of her current level of self-confidence. The first time she and the
hero make love, she may be mostly reactive. In a later sex scene, she may
be much more confident in herself and take a more proactive role and she
may even initiate it.
If one character is dominant in the scene, how and why did they take
control? Did the other person willingly submit? Or did they feel it wasn’t
their place to try and lead? Did they feel unable to take the lead due to lack
of experience? Or did they just feel overwhelmed by the other person? Did
it never occur to them that they could take charge for some or all of the
action?
Do the positions of dominance and submission reflect the characters’
roles outside in the world? Or are their positions reversed? If someone is
dominant in other aspects of their lives, how does it feel to be submissive
during sex? If they are also normally ‘on top’ during sex, how does it feel
for them if their partner suddenly assumes this role? And if a normally
submissive person finds themselves in charge, how would they feel about
this? Nervous? Confident? Would they want to be gentle or a little cruel?
People react in different ways when they find themselves in a position of
power.
Sexual Positions
Rhythm
I’m not talking about pulling out before the climactic moment here, I’m
talking about the flow of a scene. Think of it being like the rhythm of a
piece of music or a dance. The sexual act itself has a natural rhythm and a
prose description of the encounter will also have a rhythm.
Rhythm is created by the tempo – fast or slow – of movement in the
scene and the nature of the movement. The tempo of a sex scene tends to
begin slowly, increasing very gradually until it reaches a peak, and then
slowing fairly suddenly after the sexual climax.
The nature or quality of movement also changes during a sex scene.
Initially, movements may be halting or clumsy, until the characters relax
and are more at ease, when their movements become gentler and more
flowing. As the intensity of the scene develops, foreplay may become more
restless and jerky, leading up to penetration. Then movements become more
powerful and regular.
Orgasm
Afterglow
The afterglow or post coital moment occurs immediately after the orgasm.
The two characters may hold onto each other for a few moments before
separating. Then they lie together, snuggling or cuddling. As the sweat
cools on their bodies, the characters may be in a euphoric or blissful state,
feeling satisfied or satiated, and ready to drift off to sleep. Or they may
want to take a moment to reflect on their relationship.
Phyllis Taylor Pianka, in How to Write Romances, says that this moment
of closeness “...should not be overlooked because the sensitivity between
the hero and heroine are an indication to the reader that the lovemaking was
not intended to be a one-night stand, but a fulfilment.”
If you want to have dialogue in a sex scene, this is a moment when both
characters may be open to speaking about their deepest feelings or hopes or
fears. This is a moment when these may feel they trust each other and are
willing to show their vulnerability. Their defences are down. A character
may say something that she or he later regrets. Or one of them may say
something that makes the other uncomfortable, leading to them shutting
down and becoming sullen, or perhaps provoking an argument. It depends
on where you want to take your story next. Susie Bright advises against the
cliché of having “...the lovers fluff up their pillows and deliver some
profound message to each other, the moral lesson of the tale.”
Dialogue should avoid clichés like ‘How was it for you?’ unless one of
the partners is very insecure about their sexual skills. Instead they might
talk about how they feel about what has just happened. They may express
how their feelings for the other person have deepened. Or it may have
affected how they think about themselves, especially if they didn’t regard
them self as a sexual person or were concerned about their inexperience.
They may also need to talk about any potential consequences or
implications of what they have done, perhaps ending in an agreement not to
tell anyone. This may then become an issue of concern or conflict in the
relationship going forward – particularly if one of the partners wants to be
able to celebrate their relationship.
It was an old movie cliché to show characters sharing a cigarette in this
moment, but this has fallen out of fashion. Nothing says ‘I love you’ like a
shared risk of lung cancer.
Another cliché has it that a guy will just roll over and go to sleep rather
than wanting to share this moment with his lover. This is unlikely in a
genuine romantic relationship. Unless the guy has intimacy issues that
cause him to separate sex and love.
‘Spooning’ refers to two people lying on their sides, both facing in the
same direction, so the curves of their bodies fit together, like spoons in a
kitchen drawer. It might be regarded as less intimate than lying face to face
and cuddling but is more intimate than two people lying on their backs next
to each other.
Spooning is frequently used in tv shows and movies where the director
wants to have one character’s face show an expression that the other doesn’t
see. This can often indicate a mismatch between the two character’s
feelings following sex.
In French, the moment after an orgasm is sometimes referred to as la
petite mort, the ‘little death.’ Originally this meant a weakening or
unconsciousness following sex, but it now also describes a short period of
melancholy or regret that follows sexual release.
Susie Bright writes about the importance of this moment for bringing
your characters and your readers down from the emotional height of the
scene’s climax. She also says it is a time to concentrate on where the story
is going next. Her advice is to use “...small actions and gestures that speak
volumes...” and words that “...indicate states of mind, and a return to self-
consciousness.”
After-Afterglow
This refers to whatever action your characters may take after they have
spent some time cuddling. Do they get up and have a glass of milk? Raid
the refrigerator and share a tub of ice cream? Or phone out for a pizza?
Maybe they share a shower. Or maybe they just fall asleep in each other’s
arms.
What your two characters feel comfortable doing in the immediate
aftermath of sex will say something about the current state of their
relationship.
Another cliché is that the guy gets out of bed and starts pulling on his
clothes. He got what he wanted, and he doesn’t want to hang around for any
emotional stuff or discussions about a serious relationship. His partner,
meanwhile, asks him to stay. Or pleads with him.
Alison Kent writes that the ‘morning after’ isn’t just the time until noon the
next day. A sexual encounter can be something that has an effect on a
character’s life that is long-lived or even permanent. The character’s
emotions that next morning may be a continuation of whatever they felt
immediately after sex, but there may be longer-term consequences or effects
on other people or relationships for some time beyond that.
In an essay titled ‘Fighting Sex,’ Isabo Kelly compares writing a sex scene
with writing a fight scene.
The choreography of a sex scene includes keeping track of what limb is
where at any given moment. The hero has only two hands, so he can’t be
touching three different places at once. And a heroine can’t take her bra off
twice. If you’re writing a sex scene featuring more than two people, the
choreography becomes even more complicated. And like dance moves or
fight moves, the positions characters adopt during sex must be physically
possible.
Kelly says that just as different characters may have their own unique
fighting styles, they may also have their own way of making love. A
person’s character and their typical emotional responses to challenging
situations affect how they fight and how they frolic. Both fighting and sex
expose a persona’s vulnerabilities and how a character responds to this tells
us something about who they are. And just as a fight may alter someone’s
life or their image of themselves, a sexual encounter may have a similar
effect.
Casual Sex
In this chapter, we have been exploring sex within the context of a romantic
relationship. But in some stories, one or more characters may be looking for
casual sex – at least initially. We use different names for it – hooking up,
sleeping around, pick-ups, recreational sex, or just dating. Plus there are
‘friends with benefits.’ Someone may want a fling with no strings attached.
Sex without commitment. Or they may think they do.
This was never an option for the heroine of the old-school romance, the
sexual double standard meant she was supposed to be a virgin while he was
‘experienced.’ But in the modern world, women now also have the
opportunity to have sex just for the fun of it.
Two people ‘hooking up’ probably have little or no history together and
have no expectation of a long-term relationship. This is mainly a physical
thing, so the emotional stakes are not high. This is why it appeals to some
people. They regard sex as just a healthy activity and are comfortable with
the idea of being physically close to someone without being emotionally
connected.
If the sex truly is ‘no strings attached’ for both people involved, there is
no expectation of commitment and no mismatch between their wants or
needs. This does not provide the potential for conflict that a story needs.
Given that key themes of the romance genre are emotional connection
and commitment, casual sex cannot be a significant part of the story. Two
people may claim to be wanting just a fling, but for there to be a romance,
one or both of them must have a change of heart and want emotional as well
as physical intimacy. To create conflict and tension between the characters,
they must have different expectations for the future of the relationship.
If a sex scene you’re writing is just – well – limp, there could be a couple of
reasons for this. Either you’re not in the mood or the characters aren’t.
Either way, you can’t fake it.
I’m not saying that you have to be in the mood to write, sitting waiting
for the Muse to settle on your shoulder and whisper in your ear. If you want
to be a productive writer, you can’t have that sort of attitude. But with sex
scenes, you do have to prepare yourself so you can access the emotion.
Remember that a sex scene without emotion is just porn.
When it comes to the characters, remember that a sex scene is the
culmination of everything that has gone before in the story. You have to
have set things up so that this is the right moment – from the point of view
of the reader and the characters – for these two people to want – better still,
to need – to have sex. You have to have created chemistry between them –
the initial spark of attraction – and you have to have built the sexual
tension. If any of that is missing, it will feel like you’re just trying to
shoehorn a sex scene in to liven up the plot.
Also, check that you’re not writing bad porno dialogue. If you’re trying
to make the heroine or hero say things that are out of character, they may be
fighting you and trying to let you know, ‘I would never use that word!’ Or
maybe you’re trying to get them to perform an act that they wouldn’t do at
this stage in the relationship. Or ever. He’d do anything for love, but he
wouldn’t do that. I’ve never been sure what Meatloaf was referring to.
Maybe it involved a branding iron. Or bee stings.
The actions you want your characters to perform have got to be things
they are comfortable with. Yes, there may be some things that will
challenge them to expand their horizons, but some things will be just wrong
for them. Again, this comes down to what the person’s issues are – power,
self-confidence, trust, whatever.
Maybe you need to change it up by picking a new location – one that
offers more potential for humour or tension or varied body positions.
It could be that you just aren’t comfortable writing about sex. Especially
the more explicit kind of sex scene. Only you can decide whether this is
something you want to try and overcome. Reread the paragraphs above on
embarrassment and give it some thought. Try and figure out why it makes
you feel uncomfortable. If you decide erotic sex scenes aren’t for you,
choose one of the other kinds mentioned at the beginning of the chapter.
Bear in mind that your choice of sex scene ‘spiciness’ might cause a change
in the kind of sub-genres or sub-sub-genres available to you. Don’t ever
think you have to try and write sex scenes that you’re not ‘into’ just because
you can make more money there. If you can’t write such scenes confidently
and well, you’re not likely to get the sales anyway.
If you’re struggling to write about sex in a sexy way, here’s another tip
from Stacie Kane. Write about something completely unrelated to sex, but
write about it in a sensual, sexy way. Practice this style of writing before
applying it to descriptions of sexual activity.
Watch sex scenes in Hollywood movies – these tend to be sexier than
porn films. And read sex scenes in novels. You may also find inspiration in
a collection of erotic short stories – there are annual collections aimed at
men and women, heterosexuals and homosexuals.
Coitus Interruptus – Bad Sex & Funny Sex
As with kissing scenes, not every sex scene has to be a complete action.
Sometimes things just don’t go according to plan. Something comes up. Or
fails to. Or the mood just isn’t right.
You can use an interrupted sex scene to increase frustration and tension –
If not now then when? How much longer do we have to wait? This is
particularly effective if the reader and the characters want there to be sex.
You can also create tension by making it seem like the heroine is going to
have sex with Mr. Wrong and then save her from this bad decision at the
last moment.
Or you can use the interruption to create humour. It’s much easier to
create comedy from a failed sex scene than from a complete one. If you’re
writing a comedy sex scene – Stacia Kane calls it a ‘Gotcha’ – you need all
the flirting and foreplay to create tension, but then the climax is penetration
not happening. The more tension you can create in the build-up, the greater
the disappointment will be – and the funnier it can become.
The nature of the interruption can also increase the frustration or the
comedy. Someone might walk in on them. Pets or other critters may be the
cause – a dog wants to join in, a cat claws the hero’s ass, a wasp stings, or
ants mount an invasion. There may be an accident such as a broken bed (or
desk or kitchen table) or a burst water pipe. One of the characters might
have a sneezing fit, hiccups, an allergic reaction, sunstroke, or food
poisoning.
If you want to interrupt sex with Mr. Wrong (or have the hero fail to
consummate his relationship with Ms. Wrong), you can pick a more
embarrassing issue. The hero may discover that she’s not the person she
appeared to be – using artificial means to enhance her physical
characteristics. Or maybe Mister Wrong has a pair of sweat socks creating
the bulge of his crotch and an undershirt with fake abs. Erectile
dysfunction, premature ejaculation, bad breath, body odour, and other
bodily functions are all passion killers.
A good sex scene, Elizabeth Benedict tells us, does not have to be about
good sex. A sexual encounter is an opportunity for two people to make a
connection – or to fail to do so. The more desperate they are to connect, the
more impact an unsatisfactory encounter will have. Their disappointment or
disillusionment or embarrassment will be greater.
Erotic Romance – Romance, Erotica or Porn?
Erotic romances first appeared in the 1970s when historical romances such
as Kathleen E. Woodiwiss’s The Flame and the Flower (1972) began to
include more physical intimacy between the heroine and hero, creating the
‘bodice ripper’ sub-genre. In more recent times, erotic romance gained
media attention with the publication of Fifty Shades of Grey (2011). E.L.
James’s novel and its sequels have been described as erotica and ‘mommy
porn,’ but they are actually erotic romances.
In her essay ‘The Brown Paper Bag,’ Sylvia Day notes that there has
been some controversy around the sub-genre of erotic romance: “It was said
that erotic romance wasn’t really romance.” Some publishers and readers
objected to the inclusion of explicit sex scenes, arguing that books
containing such things were erotica not romance.
‘Is Fifty Shades Erotica?’ D.L. King asked in her essay with that title. “I
say no. I say the three Fifty Shades books are erotic romance, and there is a
definite difference ... it isn’t the amount of explicit sex that makes a book
romance or erotica, it’s the plotline and the happily-ever-after contrivance.”
In defining what a romance is, King uses the same definition we’ve been
using: “...the book really has to be about the love story ... with roadblocks
thrown in.” Erotic romance, she says, “...means there’s explicit sex in the
story, but it’s still essentially a romance...”
King also notes that erotic romance stories have been approaching the
explicitness of erotica for some time, with sex occurring before the
romantic commitment, but in any romance, the commitment has to be there.
But erotica is more about sex than love. D.L. King: “...you can take the sex
out of an erotic romance and the story will survive just fine (although it
won’t be nearly as much fun to read), but you can’t take the sex out of
erotica.”
The Fifty Shades books follow the traditional plot structure – the
structure I have presented in this book – and so they are erotic romances
and not erotica or porn. One of the reason’s why E.L. James’s book
received so much attention was because it featured fetishistic sexual
fantasies including BDSM. Sexual fantasy occurs in the imagination and
may or may not be acted out in real life. They may or may not include
fetishism, BDSM, and kink. If you’re interested in learning more about the
kinds of sexual fantasies people commonly have and why they might have
them, Brett Kahr’s Who’s Been Sleeping in Your Head?: The Secret World
of Sexual Fantasies (2008) is an interesting read.
I’m not going to try and explain how to write BDSM scenes, there are
people better qualified than me to cover the subject. Tymber Dalton’s short
guide Whip Me, Beat Me, Make Me Write Hot Sex!: A Writer's Guide to
BDSM Basics is a good place to start. As another starting point, you might
want to consider the chapters here on ‘Kissing Scenes’ and ‘Sex Scenes’ as
possible models for a more erotic scene.
24 | How to Get Over Your Ex
There are typically two places in a romance story where a character has to
deal with the aftermath of a relationship break-up.
First: In a contemporary romance, the heroine and the hero are usually
single as the story opens because their previous relationship ended six
months ago or perhaps longer. Six months is about the shortest length of
time because it shows that the romance in your story isn’t just a rebound
relationship. The hero and heroine are dealing with the later stages of this
break-up, getting to the point where they are ready to have a serious
relationship again. Depending on the nature of your story, one of them may
be further along in their recovery journey than the other.
Second: When the heroine and hero break up after the Dark Moment,
they both experience the first stages of the end of a relationship. How
deeply they experience this loss and for how long depends on the nature and
length of your story.
There may also be secondary characters in a story at different stages in
the journey or who are dealing with the end of a relationship in a different
way. These serve to mirror or contrast what is happening to the heroine or
hero.
When a relationship ends, there is usually at least one person who feels
‘heartbroken,’ and maybe they both do. It takes time to recover from a
break-up and trying to rush the process or pretend it isn’t necessary will
only lead to problems down the line. Sometimes the couple may want to be
friends afterwards – and sometimes they will get back together and form a
long-lasting relationship. But straight after a break-up, they need to part and
not see each other for a while.
For presentation purposes here, I’m going to discuss the stages of the
recovery journey in chronological order from beginning to end. I’ll indicate
where I think the break is for the later stages that would apply to the heroine
and/or hero’s old relationship.
Guy Winch, in his book How to Fix a Broken Heart (2018), says that a
person’s journey through heartbreak is affected by a number of variables:
“...the specific nature of the relationship or loss, our fundamental character
and coping styles, our individual and familial histories, the current context
of our lives, and how we manage or mismanage our recovery.” Another
important factor, as we’ll see, is the ‘support system’ an individual has in
place: friends and family, education establishment or workplace, and the
wider community.
The circumstances in which a relationship ends vary. We might be the
one who ends the relationship or be the one who got ‘dumped.’ It could be
our partner’s behaviour that ruined the relationship or our own – often it is
some combination of the two. The relationship may have been our first love
or it may have been a long-term relationship or a marriage. Or it might have
been an illicit affair. Or it may have been an unrequited love. And some
relationships end when a partner dies.
Breaking Up
The heartbreak that follows the end of a relationship is one of the worst
pains that you can feel without having a physical illness or injury. Scientific
studies have shown that heartbreak activates the parts of the brain that are
associated with physical pain – and at a level that is only slightly lower than
unbearable physical pain.
It is sometimes compared to the grief that follows the death of a loved
one, but the experiences aren’t quite the same – when a relationship ends,
the person you have ‘lost’ is usually still around.
Addicted to Love
Studies of the way the brain functions have shown that romantic love
activates the same parts of the brain as an addiction. And a break-up affects
us in a similar way to an addict suffering withdrawal symptoms when
deprived of a drug like cocaine or heroin. Withdrawal symptoms include
irritability, lethargy, paranoia, low mood, loss of appetite, disturbed sleep,
and anxiety. And just as an addict craves their substance of choice, a person
suffering heartbreak may long for the presence of their ex-partner. And if
they can’t have that person next to them, they will indulge in the next best
thing – obsessively reliving memories and clinging to keepsakes.
This craving for the lost lover can lead a person to create an idealised
image of them. They may convince themselves that they cannot exist
without this perfect partner, this person who was The One. This obsession
can lead some people to send constant messages to their ex or make
numerous phone calls. Or they may ‘stalk’ them online.
Addicts who successfully kick their habit know that they need to avoid
the substance they are addicted to if they are to remain sober. Sufferers of a
broken heart need to learn the same thing. You can’t move on from a
relationship until you are ready to let it go. Completely.
An addict’s ‘relationship’ with a substance progresses through a number
of stages:
You can see how an unhealthy relationship might progress along a similar
path. A character in an unhealthy relationship, or one that has escaped from
one, will have chosen to be in that relationship because the other person
somehow met needs that arose from the false self.
Although the experience of love may be like an addiction, I don’t think
recovering from a broken heart follows the same path as recovery from
substance addiction. If someone is coming out of an extremely toxic and
abusive relationship, then perhaps the twelve-step programme developed by
Alcoholics Anonymous would apply, but that is not the kind of relationship
we are usually writing about in a romance novel. Even if the heroine or
hero’s previous relationship was bad, it isn’t that bad. Dealing with the
aftermath of an abusive relationship takes us too far from the tone and
themes of the romance genre. And even if the heroine has been in a
relationship that could be described as abusive, it isn’t explored in great
depth in the novel. A former relationship exists mainly to provide backstory,
the focus of the novel is her current relationship. For this reason, I’m going
to use the ‘stages of grief’ model here to explore the aftermath of a break-
up, as it can be applied to all kinds of major change in a person’s life.
In her book On Death and Dying (1969), Elisabeth Kübler-Ross
identified five stages of grief that follow a death or a terminal diagnosis:
denial, anger, bargaining, depression and acceptance. This model was
adapted, particularly in the business world, to explore other significant
changes that people experience in life. In a later book, On Grief and
Grieving (2005) written in collaboration with David Kessler, Kübler-Ross
expanded her theory to include other forms of loss, including the end of a
relationship. Other models for the grieving process have also been
proposed. Milton Greenblatt identified four phases of mourning – (i) the
initial reaction of shock, numbness, denial and disbelief; (ii) pining,
yearning, and depression; (iii) emancipation from the loved one, and (iv)
readjustment to the new environment.
From these theories we can pick a sequence on which to base our
character’s journey of recovery:
Of these, I would say that 1 through 5 are the early stages of the process. In
a romance novel, in the chapters following the Dark Moment and break-up
of the heroine and hero, they will both experience some or all of these.
When it comes to getting over their previous relationship, the heroine or
hero will probably be towards the end of 5 (pining, yearning, and
depression) or into 6 and 7.
Although these are presented here as a linear, stage-by-stage process, in
reality, people can move from one stage to another but then slip back into
an earlier stage in a series of loops. And some people can get stuck at a
particular stage or in a particular loop, unable to move on and complete the
journey. Not everyone completes the recovery journey completely, so it
could be that your heroine or hero is stuck somewhere along the road and
will need to complete the journey before they can make a success of the
relationship that forms the plot of the novel.
Let’s look at each of the seven stages in more detail, exploring how they
relate to a romance story.
Even if a character is the one who ends a relationship, they are likely to feel
dazed, confused, or discombobulated by the sudden change in their
circumstances. A relationship in which they were heavily invested is over. A
more stoic character – typically the hero – might deny that he is affected by
the change (see below), particularly if it was his choice to leave his partner,
but it does have an effect on him.
A shock like this can have a physical impact as well as affecting a
person’s thoughts and emotions. Head, heart and gut are all involved. The
body responds as it would if faced with a physical threat, first being frozen
into immobility by the shock and then moving on to the fight or flight
response being triggered. If there is no release of heightened alertness and
tension, this becomes longer-term stress. The best way to release stress is to
expend the stored energy in the muscles through exercise, DIY, housework,
or whatever. These also act as a distraction, keeping a person’s thoughts off
the event that triggered the shock.
Shock
Panic
3) Anger
Feelings of Betrayal
Blame
Blame plays a role in how we feel about a break-up, whether we blame the
other person for the ending of the relationship or blame ourselves. If we
blame the other person, we want to think of ourselves as a victim. We feel
better if we can feel righteous indignation. We didn’t deserve this, they are
at fault. This comes back to the idea that we like to think that we are right
and good.
Blame can also be used by an ex-partner in devious ways. They may
make the other person feel that they are to blame for the ending of the
relationship, that it was their behaviour that pushed them apart. This create
feelings and guilt – ‘I did something bad’ – and shame – ‘I am a bad
person.’ But then the person may discover the ex-partner had been having
an affair for ages and just didn’t want to admit they were guilty.
In some people, anger is expressed in sarcasm or bitchiness. In people
who have been taught that expressing anger is unacceptable, it may appear
as passive-aggression or it may be directed inwards at themselves as self-
blame.
Revenge
When in the grip of anger, a person might think about ‘getting their own
back’ on the person who has caused them pain, particularly if they regard
themselves as an innocent victim. The person feels that their life is
spiralling out of control and an act of vengeance will help them feel that
they are in charge again. Their current mental state means that they are
probably not in a position to make good decisions and they might end up
doing something they regret later.
Wilful destruction of another person’s property and physical violence are
criminal acts that can lead to expensive fines or even a prison sentence. In
the shorter term they may also put the ‘avenger,’ their ex, or an innocent
third part in physical danger. There is a reason why they say ‘revenge is a
dish best eaten cold’ – if you do it in the heat of the moment, it might do
you more harm than good. And you’re not in the best position to be able to
appreciate it.
Having said that, small ‘vengeful’ acts might be therapeutic – moving an
ex’s favourite chair into the garage, using their toothbrush to clean mud off
your shoes, throwing out that jar of French mustard they always insist on
adding to casseroles... whatever makes you feel better.
If an ex-partner was having an affair before the end of the relationship, a
person may feel like exacting revenge on the ‘other woman’ (or man).
Sometimes hatred for this ‘home-wrecker’ is even stronger than those
against the ex-partner. In part, this may be because it is easier to deal with a
problem if we have someone else to blame – and there may be a secret hope
that the relationship could be salvaged if something happened to this other
person. But such thoughts are often a form of self-deception arising from a
reluctance to accept the fact that the relationship is over (and has been
failing for some time) and that they themselves may be partially responsible
for its end. A person suffering from heartbreak won’t be able to accept this
kind of responsibility until they are in a position to examine their
relationship – and their actions in it – more objectively (see below).
In How to Mend Your Broken Heart, Paul McKenna and Hugh Willborn
advise that people shouldn’t get mad, they shouldn’t try to get even, they
should just get out: “Trying to settle the score or being angry with your ex
is continuing the relationship but with negative instead of positive feelings.”
The best way to get out of this negative mindset is to go out and meet new
people and start new relationships – friendships rather than romantic
relationships at this stage. People who stay at home feeling sorry for
themselves tend to spiral downwards and end up feeling that they can’t go
out. They become isolated, which is a problem in itself. Having a social life
makes you feel better and provides new opportunities for relationships –
when you are ready for that stage.
How a person deals with anger is part of what defines their character or
personality. Some people, especially those with a dominant Warrior aspect
in their personality, have issues with anger. They feel anger often and they
choose to express it outward in acts of aggression. Such people are said to
have ‘anger management issues.’ There are specific techniques available to
help people who have problems handling their aggressive impulses.
Other people have been taught that it is inappropriate to express anger
and told they will lose the love of people around them if they appear to be
angry. This is true of those with a dominant Carer aspect in their
personality. Carers often resort to passive-aggressive behaviours or covert
aggression.
Thinker types fear all expression of emotions and so withdraw, taking
their anger inwards. Repressing emotions in this way has all sorts of
negative consequences for this type of person and the people around them.
The healthy expression of anger is assertive rather than aggressive. To
summarise:
Aggressive Response: Becomes defensive when confronted and gives a
direct, forceful response. Strong-willed and doesn’t like to back down or
compromise, so tends to repeat and reinforce their argument. Expresses an
opinion and gives advice, even when it isn’t requested. Likes to point out
the mistakes and shortcomings of others. Doesn’t take the feelings of other
people into account. Can be physically intimidating, raising their voice or
perhaps threatening or even resorting to violence, hitting or throwing
things. Outbursts may not be proportional to the triggering event.
Passive-Aggressive Response: Resorts to behaviours designed to irritate
others – becoming silent, sulking and pouting, evasive, procrastinating,
sabotaging, missing appointments or deadlines, avoiding responsibility and
blaming others for mistakes, refusing to volunteer or do favours. Uses
sarcasm and/or complains about people behind their back rather than
confronting them directly. Tends to adopt a martyr-like attitude, giving the
impression of ongoing suffering but telling people that they don’t want to
be a ‘burden.’
Withdrawn Response: Refuses to admit feelings or to express them,
including anger. Pretends to have things under control, even when it feels
like their life is falling apart around them. Internalises emotions, becoming
moody or depressed. Secretive and evasive, not wanting others to know
about their personal problems. Avoids talking about sensitive or
controversial topics and is afraid of expressing opinions. May be indecisive
and lack confidence in their own abilities. Tends to suffer in silence, not
speaking out when someone has said or done something to upset them. If
confronted, they are paralysed by fear. Unable to seek support from others.
Keeps things bottled up, growing resentful and impatient about many little
things while avoiding major issues, and then suddenly erupts. Becomes
embarrassed and withdrawn after the explosion.
Healthy Assertive Response: Seeks to express disappointment and
frustration without blaming others. Expresses emotion honestly without
being forceful or meek. Accepts responsibility for own mistakes. If
confrontation is necessary, speaks gently and respectfully, and chooses a
time and place to minimise embarrassment and doesn’t seek to ‘ambush’
others. Raises sensitive subjects tactfully and is aware of the feelings of
others. Listens to the opinions of others without being judgmental and
accepts that opinions may differ. Tries to remain neutral rather than
threatening or retreating, and seeks a mutually beneficial outcome to
conflict. Aims to be supportive and forgives others for past mistakes. Seeks
to gain the trust of others by being honest and respectful and by being true
to their own values.
If someone has cheated on you, abandoned you, or failed you in some
other way, it is normal to feel anger. You need to express that anger in a
healthy way. Repressing it is not healthy. Expressing it via aggression or
passive-aggression is not healthy. Being assertive means being aware of
your own needs and feelings and having the confidence to express them
without blaming or harming others. But sometimes you may just need to
punch something – a cushion on the sofa or a punchbag at the gym.
Even when someone is the one who chose to end the relationship, they
may still feel anger – towards their ex and/or towards themselves. They
may be annoyed because they wasted time and energy on the relationship;
they stayed with it for X years and have nothing to show for it; they picked
the wrong person and it’s obvious now that they weren’t right for each
other; their dreams of becoming a parent have come to nothing; their
dreams of sharing an ideal life with a like-minded person have been
wrecked...
Anger can also manifest in other ways and be directed at someone other
than the ex or their new partner. Envy may make us feel anger for those
who have successful relationships, especially if we convince ourselves that
they are ‘less deserving’ than us. It’s never a good idea to start telling a
friend or acquaintance that they don’t ‘deserve’ what they have or to start
pointing out flaws in their relationship to stop them acting so ‘smug’ about
what they have.
Or, in the absence of the real targets of our anger, we may take it out on
an innocent third party – a friend, a family member, a son or daughter, a
colleague at work, a shopworker, a cop who pulls us over for speeding...
Venting our anger at inappropriate targets can cause us all sorts of short-
term or long-term problems. Sometimes we can’t help ourselves, in which
case it is important to give a proper explanation and apology as soon as
we’re feeling cool-headed enough to do so.
4) Bargaining
A character might try to ‘do a deal’ with Fate, God, or the Universe, in the
form of ‘If this, then this.’ This may be along the lines of, ‘If my
relationship is restored, I will change my behaviour so it doesn’t get broken
again.’ This kind of bargain is usually a promise that the character would
behave even more inauthentically, presenting to their partner an even falser
self, just to return to the status quo.
If a character knows there is no hope of their old relationship being
revived, there will sometimes be a short-lived ‘rebound’ relationship, where
the character makes exactly the same mistakes as they did with their ex.
They try and tell themselves that ‘this time it will be different,’ but it isn’t.
The character has internal issues that must be dealt with before they are
ready to have another long-term relationship. If they don’t tackle these
issues, history will just repeat itself as they continue to make bad choices
motivated by their attempts to protect and reinforce their false self.
And sometimes a character’s bargain will be in the form of, ‘I promise to
never have another relationship if you just make this pain go away.’
Sometimes bargaining begins before a relationship has ended. Couples
may be aware that a relationship is in trouble and so try to negotiate some
sort of agreement to save it. If we get married and make a formal
commitment to each other, then things will get better. Marriage is unlikely
to save a failing relationship. And a short-lived marriage just adds extra
problems and perhaps humiliation to the situation, especially if it was a big
wedding staged to try and ‘prove’ that the relationship was for all time.
A married or co-habiting couple may decide that if they have a baby then
their relationship will be strengthened by the fact that they have taken on a
new shared responsibility. This is not a good reason for deciding to become
parents. A new-born places additional stresses on a relationship – not least
because of a lack of sleep and potential feelings of jealousy. And if the
relationship does subsequently fail, both parents then have to negotiate not
only their own best interests but those of the child.
Rebound Romance
When a person gets to a certain point in their recovery journey, they may
feel that the work is done and they are ready to seek a new romance. Doing
this too soon is rarely a good idea. They are still carrying too much baggage
from the last relationship. These thoughts are the equivalent of a ‘relapse’ in
the recovery process. A slipping back into old ways of behaving. If
someone thinks they’re ready to be in a relationship again, they aren’t being
honest with themselves. Some people try to reconcile with their ex. Some
people try to avoid the hurt that relationships can bring by engaging in a
string of meaningless affairs. And someone who has had an affair may
decide that having another affair is better than dealing with the feelings of
being alone. But entering into another relationship too soon damages their
changes of recovering properly from the old relationship. It is much better
to redirect their need for human contact into non-romantic friendships,
hobbies, and helping others.
Loss
Loneliness
The end of a relationship also raises fears of loneliness. The heroine fears
she will be a lonely old spinster with a house full of cats. The hero fears
he’ll become a miserly old man who gets angry when the neighbourhood
kids kick a ball over onto his lawn.
In the immediate aftermath of a break-up, when we’re feeling upset and
depressed, we don’t want anyone to ‘see us like this.’ We withdraw and
suffer alone. Soon after, our support network of friends and family will
probably come to support us. Or we will make some effort to interact with
people in the outside world – even if it is only while walking the dog.
In the days and weeks after a break-up, we may feel that we don’t know
how to be alone. We’re afraid we can’t cope with it. We’ve been part of a
relationship for so long that we’ve forgotten what it’s like to live as an
individual. Initially, someone might feel they need to have a tv or radio on
so that their living space doesn’t feel so empty. But ultimately they need to
be comfortable with silence and a space that just has them in it. Part of the
recovery process is discovering that you can do this. You have to become
comfortable being with yourself. You have to learn that you don’t need
another person to survive. You are a strong, independent person who can
stand on their own two feet.
Human beings need some physical contact with another person. We are
social animals. But we don’t need to be in a relationship to receive this sort
of contact. A trip to the hairdressers or a nail salon can do it. A massage is a
more intense form of contact. Generally speaking, women are more
comfortable seeking this sort of ‘pampering’ than men. And gay men are
better at it that straight men. Straight guys might prefer some sort of contact
sport such as a martial art.
Someone with a very strong need to be loved – a ‘neediness’ – may have
unreasonable expectations of a romantic relationship. They may want
something that no real human being could ever provide. They have a
particular requirement to develop self-nurturing skills.
Guilt – It’s My Fault
It is common when faced with a break-up that someone will wonder if they
were to blame. They ask themselves if they could have done more to save
the relationship. What did they do – or not do – that pushed their partner
away. Self-doubt can contribute to a loss of self-esteem and a loss of self-
confidence. They may also worry that they are not good enough or not
worthy.
Research shows that crying is good for us. It has therapeutic benefits.
Studies also show that women are ‘better’ at crying than men, partly as a
result of hormonal differences and partly due to socialisation – males are
taught that ‘boys don’t cry.’
Sleep is also important and someone in this stage of the recovery journey
may find they need more sleep than usual. Even if you don’t sleep more,
taking time to just rest and unwind is valuable. Reading a book might be
your thing. Or a craft activity that keeps your hands occupied and distracts
your thoughts – sewing, knitting, crochet, whittling, doing a jigsaw puzzle,
painting, colouring...
When a relationship ends, a clean break with no contact between the two
people is often the best option. At least in the short-term. This is true even if
the split is amicable and the two wish to remain friends. They each must
come to terms with the break-up and move on in their own way – and this
requires time and some private space. But this is not always possible –
practical issues such a living accommodation, children, and/or work may
mean that complete separation is impossible.
When someone ends a relationship, they may feel guilty and suggest
staying in touch with their ex. They think this may be less painful for them
than an abrupt split. Or they may feel that they need to visit and take care of
their ex, performing whatever duties or chores were their responsibility
when they were a couple. But this risks sending mixed messages. Do they
really want to separate or are they leaving the door open for a possible
reconciliation? Their partner may feel confused or may harbour false hope
that the relationship can be saved.
If the decision to break-up was a mutual one, being friends afterwards
may be easier, but it is still better to separate completely for a while –
perhaps three months or so. Not doing this can make it difficult to move on.
Or, as Christine Webber points out, one partner may be able to move on to a
new relationship much sooner than the other. This can result in feelings of
resentment, hurt, and anger. Separating for a while allows this ‘moving on’
to be carried out in a more discreet and tactful way.
And if you are the person who has been left by a partner, you may need a
complete separation to help you come to terms with the reality of the
situation, especially if their leaving came as a surprise to you. If they offer
to remain friends and keep in contact, that makes the break-up seem less
real and leaves open the possibility of a second chance. The same is true if
your ex suggests they continue to provide the support or to do the tasks they
did when you were a couple. This prevents you moving on and taking
responsibility for your own life.
There is a blurring of the break-up situation if someone wants a ‘trial
separation’ or suggests living apart for a while because they need time to
get their head together. Webber suggests this is just a case of them hedging
their bets or having an escape hatch in case their plans for a new life outside
the relationship don’t work out. Or that someone wants the best of both
worlds – the advantages of being in a relationship plus the freedom from
responsibility of being single. In a marriage, a trial separation may just be
an excuse for putting off the emotional and financial cost of a divorce.
A clean break makes the situation clear and is the most open and honest
way of dealing with the situation. It doesn’t close the door to being friends
in the future.
This section of the journey is somewhat self-indulgent. It involves
looking back and allowing ourselves to feel bad. It is a necessary part of the
process. How long someone needs to spend in this phase depends on the
individual and their circumstances. But there is a danger that they could
become stuck at this point and suffer a longer period of depression. It may
even reach a point where they need to seek professional help to overcome
their feelings of loss.
Coming out of this low point in the journey requires two things. That the
individual treats themselves with compassion and takes care of their own
health and physical needs. And that they move from dwelling in the past to
dealing with the present. Eventually the pain and the longing for the ex
fades to a dull ache and the person is ready to move on the more positive
stages of recovery, a time of reflection and self-renewal.
Support & Advice from Friends & Relatives
The Confidante
In a romance novel, the person the heroine shares her thoughts and feelings
with is the confidante. It often helps if this character isn’t her closest friend
or someone who has known her since kindergarten. Someone who is
slightly removed from her life can offer a more objective viewpoint on the
heroine’s situation than a person who is living through it with her. And it
often easier to discuss our problems with a stranger or someone who isn’t
emotionally involved with us. We are less concerned about them judging us
negatively because we don’t have a huge personal investment in our
relationship with them.
Ideally the heroine needs to talk with someone who is prepared to listen
without offering a judgment.
This is the final stage of acceptance, where the character knows that the
relationship is over, there is no going back, and their ex no longer has any
influence in their life. This is where the character regains control of their
life, they are no longer driven by the circumstances of their loss.
The character also begins to see the positive aspects of the change in their
circumstances. In part this comes from seeing things from a new
perspective. This is sometimes referred to as ‘reframing.’ Instead of viewing
the break-up of their relationship as a disaster that ruined their life, they
come to see it as a challenge that offers new opportunities. As well as being
an ending, it is also a beginning. Sometimes it helps to have discussions
with someone who can provide a more objective view of their situation.
How did they view the relationship and/or the ex?
In this stage, how a character remembers or visualises their ex changes.
Previously, their memories were entirely subjective. Close-up images where
they themselves are in the picture. As time passes, they can begin to see
their ex from a distance. Metaphorically, the colour may fade from the
images as they become sepia or monochrome, indicating that they are from
the past.
There are four key things that need to occur in this stage: the person must
take care of their own physical and mental wellbeing; they must stop
dwelling on the past or worrying about the future, concentrating instead on
living in the present; they must objectively reassess their lost relationship,
and they must let their ex go to achieve closure.
If a relationship ends badly, it is easy to become bitter and write the whole
thing off as a complete waste of time and energy. Your ex-partner is a
monster and you were an idiot for putting up with them for as long as you
did. But this person must have had some positive qualities, something that
attracted you to them in the first place.
One reason to try and find positive qualities in a disastrous relationship is
that it allows you to let go of your bitterness. That bitterness is preventing
you letting go of the relationship. You need to complete a sort of profit and
loss balance sheet and then draw a line under the final total, whether it’s a
plus or a minus.
Most ex-partners have some positive qualities, even if they don’t have
enough to make a relationship with them worth saving.
Some of the things that a person feels were good about a relationship
actually have nothing to do with the person they were in a relationship with.
See the section below ‘What Do They Want from a Relationship?’ for more
on this.
If all else fails, you can consider what the negative aspects of a
relationship taught you. You know what to look for next time so you don’t
make the same mistakes.
Forgiveness
‘Love means never having to say you’re sorry,’ is a quote from the 1970
movie Love Story, taken from the novel by Erich Segal. It seems to suggest
that people in a close relationship don’t need to apologise, their partner will
understand that mistakes, misunderstandings, and disagreements aren’t
significant. People in loving relationships should accept each other, warts
and all, no matter how they behave. Molly Howes, in A Good Apology
(2020) writes that this is entirely wrong and that “...the more important the
relationship, the more crucial making a good apology can be, and the
greater the cost of failing to employ one.”
In 1999, Segal was asked what he meant by this line of dialogue, and he
said, “Don’t ask me, I’m only the author...” and that “...its significance has
long escaped me.” In the same magazine, Deborah Tannen suggested the
line should read: ‘Love means being able to say you’re sorry, and say it as if
you mean it, and say what you’re going to do to make amends.’
What is an Apology?
Who Apologises?
Research cited by Aaron Lazare and that cited by Jane Bybee, indicates that
women apologise more than men. Deborah Tannen has studied how men
and women communicate differently. Writing in Civilization magazine she
said that when it came to apologies, for “...most women, they are to be
embraced because they reinforce connections, but many men are attuned to
the symbolic power of an apology to advertise defeat.”
Jane Bybee, writing about ‘The Emergence of Gender Differences in
Guilt during Adolescence,’ considers a wide range of academic studies and
says that from adolescence onward, when compared to males, females are
“...more strongly predisposed to various forms of guilt,” and are more likely
“...to mention feeling guilty about inconsiderate and dishonest behaviour.”
Females are “...more likely to admit culpability...” and “...offer more
numerous and complex concessions for wrongdoing.” Males are “...more
likely to...fabricate lies,” Bybee writes, suggesting that “Denial may serve
to minimize feelings of guilt.”
Elaine Showalter has written about how art mimics life in terms of male
characters in English literature by male writers: “Allowing a hero to
humiliate himself before a wronged woman would render him awkward,
wimpish, embarrassing, and lacking in sex appeal – in a word, unmanned.”
In contrast, she says, female writers make men take responsibility for their
actions – “...forgiveness comes the hard way: You have to earn it.”
Lazare also writes that women are very much aware that they apologise
more than men, and that they wish men would apologise more for harmful
words and actions. This gives us a clue to how we should handle the
‘reconciliation’ section of a romance novel. The hero must apologise to the
heroine – this is what she wants to see and what will prove that the hero
isn’t just like other men. In the following sections we’ll look at how the
hero – and you as the writer – can construct an effective apology.
What are the needs of the aggrieved and what are the motives of the
offender? Lazare suggests that the aggrieved person is seeking to have one
or more of the following needs addressed: “...the restoration of respect and
dignity, assurances that they and the offender have shared values,
assurances that they were not at fault, assurances that they are safe from
further harm by the offender, knowledge that the offender has suffered as a
result of their offense, a promise of adequate reparations, and the
opportunity to communicate their suffering and other feelings about the
offense.”
The offender, meanwhile, is motivated to apologize for two reasons –
“their response to shame, guilt, and empathic regard for those they have
offended...” and “...their attempt to restore the relationship and to avoid
further damage to the relationship, abandonment, retaliation, or other
punishments.”
Lazare notes that typically, the offender and the aggrieved are unaware of
each other’s needs, so “...it is understandable that many apologies end up
not satisfying either party.”
‘Go and say you’re sorry,’ a parent tells their child. Begrudgingly, the child
walks over and mumbles the words. It is part of the socialisation process
that teaches how some behaviours are moral and acceptable (virtues) and
some immoral and unacceptable (vices). Children under the age of eight
don’t really have a concept of guilt (or shame) they have to be taught it, and
the learning process continues into adulthood. And somewhere during that
process, as teenagers, we learn to roll our eyes and say ‘sorreeee.’
The words ‘I’m sorry,’ on their own, don’t constitute an apology. We use
them as if they are a magic phrase that will absolve us of our guilt, but it’s
not that simple. A genuine apology contains four elements or stages, as
we’ll see below.
From Aaron Lazare and Molly Howes, we can identify four parts of the
apology process:
Obviously, the final (hoped for) stage is forgiveness from the aggrieved
person, but this cannot be guaranteed. This feeds into a ‘happy ever after’ or
a ‘happy for now,’ depending on how much forgiveness and how much trust
the aggrieved person feels able to muster.
The importance of each of the four parts of an apology will vary depending
on circumstances, but they must all be there in some degree. Missing out or
failing to complete one of these stages is going to lead to a failed apology.
We often see examples of failure in public apologies.
If someone says, ‘I apologise for whatever I may have done,’ they are
just going through the motions. This isn’t a sincere apology. They have not
listened to the person they have offended, they are not showing an
understanding of the specific harm caused, they are just issuing a blanket
statement that they hope will get them off the hook. It’s not good enough.
In his resignation speech, President Richard Nixon said he was sorry for
‘any injuries that may have been done.’ Again, he’s not taking responsibility
for specific actions or acknowledging genuine harm.
‘If I hurt you, I’m sorry,’ is another failed apology. The ‘if’ makes the
apology conditional, as if the person speaking doesn’t believe harm was
caused. They are not accepting or validating the other person’s feelings in
the matter.
Aaron Lazare writes that those “...who offer a pseudo-apology are
unwilling to take the steps necessary for a genuine apology; that is, they do
not acknowledge the offense adequately, or express genuine remorse, or
offer appropriate reparations, including a commitment to make changes in
the future.”
Given that apologies offer benefits to both the aggrieved person and the
offender, why are people so resistant to making an apology? Molly Howes
suggests that our brains are ‘hardwired’ to limit our awareness of any
mistakes we make. There are a number of processes that contribute towards
this.
Confirmation bias – a tendency to give more weight to evidence that
supports our beliefs than to evidence that challenges them.
Selective inattention – we focus our attention in one direction and miss
what is happening elsewhere. This feature is exploited by magicians who
misdirect us using sleight of hand.
Cognitive dissonance – the mental discomfort we feel when we hold
conflicting beliefs, values, or attitudes. This is often seen in terms of a
behaviour (e.g. gaining pleasure from smoking) conflicts with a thought
(the knowledge that smoking causes cancer). We often try and resolve this
dissonance by convincing ourselves that the thought is false or that the
dangers don’t apply to us – we believe what we want to believe.
Self-justification – a tendency to perceive our own behaviour as
acceptable or ‘normal’ in comparison to that of others.
Another factor that influences our behaviour is the society around us.
Western societies tend to be male-dominated (patriarchal) – there is an
assumption that male is superior to female. And there is a clear definition of
what constitutes ‘masculine’ behaviour. This affects not only an individual
male’s behaviour, which is supposed to be stoic, dominant, competitive, and
aggressive, but also the behaviour seen as being good for society as a
whole. We are told it is good to be successful, to be a ‘winner’. We also
prize individuality – being able to ‘stand on your own two feet’ – over
relationships with or supporting others. This dominant culture affects how
we view the act of apologising. Dominant males, ‘winners,’ shouldn’t feel a
need to apologise. If our actions upset someone, they just need to ‘toughen
up.’
We also live in a culture where quick profits and quick fixes are preferred
over long-term investments. This has spilled over from business life into
human relationships. Building and maintaining genuine relationships takes
time and effort and the returns on this investment cannot be viewed on a
spreadsheet.
Over recent years, perhaps as a result of social media, society has also
become more divided. Left-wing versus right-wing. Rich versus poor. I’m
right, you’re wrong. Or I’m right, you’re an idiot. It has become much more
difficult to find common ground. And there is less concern about offending
others by insulting their beliefs and ignoring their feelings. This can mean
that many of us become concerned about the possibility of conflict. We try
to avoid it at all costs – we fear being ‘flamed’ or targeted by trolls. Or shot
in the chest.
This can be a problem if we carry it over into relationships. Avoiding or
ignoring conflict is not healthy in a relationship. If two people can handle
conflict and resolve it in a way that works for both of them, their
relationship will become stronger and is more likely to last.
Aaron Lazare says that offenders who are afraid or unwilling to apologise
fall into two groups. Those in the first group “...fear the recipients of the
apologies will lose their regard for them, threaten to or end the relationship,
become smug and self-satisfied, feel superior, make a scene, hold a grudge,
withhold forgiveness, or dole out punishment, including humiliations.”
People in this group feel that making an apology just draws attention to
their offending reactions, whereas if they remain quiet, the aggrieved person
might remain unaware of the offense. They also tend to fear that the
response to their apology will be some form of punishment. They are afraid
how the other person might react, worried they might seek to gain revenge
or that they might make a scene. Or they fear that the other person would
hold some sort of power over them or might seek to show their superiority
by humiliating the offender or being smug. They may also worry about the
future of their relationship with the aggrieved person – the other person
might no longer love or respect them. They might end the relationship. And
the offender might fear that despite the apology, they will never be forgiven.
Their fears are about what will happen in the external world.
The second group are more concerned with internal issues feeling
“...incompetent, defeated, guilty, ashamed, emotional, like a loser—in
essence losing their self-esteem...” They appear to be more concerned about
what the apology means than they are about what their original offending
behaviour means. They view an apology as an admission of guilt. An
apology requires that the offender lower their defences and allow
themselves to be vulnerable. They are seeking forgiveness and there is no
guarantee that they will receive it. Feeling vulnerable and admitting a
mistake can make them feel weak – it dents their self-confidence. They may
also fear that the process of apologising might make them experience and
display emotions that make them uncomfortable. There is also a danger that
they will confuse guilt – ‘my action was wrong’ – with shame – ‘I am a bad
person.’
It Takes Two
We have seen that step one of an apology is seeking to see the situation
from the aggrieved person’s point of view. Before making an apology to
someone, the offender needs their input, either directly or through a third
party. They need to know what the aggrieved person wants or expects.
Without this understanding, how man an apology be successful?
When someone feels they are owed an apology, they may be reluctant to
say so for fear or appearing weak or suffering retribution. To reduce these
risks, the aggrieved person can choose words that sound less like an
accusation and more like an invitation to discussion. Instead of saying ‘you
were rude’ they could say that they found a particular remark upsetting.
Speak of the specific action rather than the person as a whole. Or they could
ask a third person to let the offender know that certain words or behaviour
have caused offence.
Another thing to consider is that in many cases, neither party is entirely
blameless. An aggrieved person may have contributed to the situation which
ultimately caused them harm. In such cases, it can be difficult for them to
admit the part that they played. In western society as it stands today, there is
a tendency to see things as being binary. Right and wrong. If you feel that
you are not wrong, then you must be right. But most real-life situations are
much more complicated, it is not a choice between right (white) and wrong
(black) – there are ‘grey areas.’
When someone has perpetrated a minor wrong and suffered a major
wrong, they tend to overlook their own actions and concentrate on what has
been done to them. They do no consider apologising for the wrong they did.
By doing so, they might feel that they are prepared to dismiss the wrong
that has been done to them. But by making a first move, apologising for the
part they played in the situation, the aggrieved person may elicit a full
apology in return.
Participating in the apology process is not an easy thing for either party.
The offender, in seeking forgiveness, is exposed to the risk of rejection,
retaliation, or ridicule. The aggrieved person must face a person who caused
them harm and be prepared to acknowledge their own feelings of hurt,
anger, or humiliation, as well as possibly empathising with the feelings of
the offender. The situation may be emotionally charged and draining.
Forgiveness
No Forgiveness
1. The apology fails to meet the needs of the offended person. Perhaps the
apology doesn’t meet the four criteria above.
2. Forgiveness makes the offended person feel weak or leaves them open
to be taken advantage of. Or they may not want to acknowledge that
the offence took place, because to admit that they suffered suggests the
offender had some sort of power over them. Or they may feel that
withholding forgiveness gives them power over the offender. Or the
aggrieved person may fear that accepting the apology and forgiving the
offender will return their relationship to how it was before – and it may
not be a type of relationship they wish to return to.
3. The offense is regarded as being too big to forgive. They may feel that
accepting the apology and forgiving the offender is letting them off too
lightly. Or the aggrieved person may feel that they do not have the
right to offer forgiveness – this is often the case where a third person
was also harmed.
For the duration of the discussion here, I’m going to assume that the hero
has wronged the heroine and must apologise and make things right. In a
story, it could just as easily be the heroine who hurts the hero and needs to
apologise.
The mistake that the hero makes (or the heroine makes) in the Dark
Moment should be in some way related to the thing the wronged person
fears most – to the heroine’s flaw. It should seem like their worst fear has
been realised – that the other person has betrayed them. It may also be
caused by his character flaw, which he has not completely overcome at that
point in the story.
The hurt the hero causes makes the heroine face her worst fear – and
discover that she has grown enough as a person to survive it. Her
perspective on life has changed. The hurt must also be of a form that can be
‘fixed’ by an apology and some visible action by the hero. He must make
some sort of sacrifice that demonstrates genuine remorse. In a story where
both hero and heroine change, his apology and associated action will also
demonstrate that he has developed as a person. He is aware of his flaw and
seeking to overcome it.
The apology that the hero makes should be challenging for him because
it forces him to overcome his character flaw. The reparation he makes and
the proof her offers to the heroine that he will not treat her badly again,
must relate to the immoral defensive behaviours he used to protect himself
from his deepest fear. Typically, his gives up something that symbolises the
behaviour he used to protect himself.
In writing a major apology scene in a romance, you need to consider
what sacrifice the hero makes to prove himself to the heroine. He must be
making a significant change in either his behaviour or his life circumstances
or both. What gesture does he make that symbolises his apology? This is
often referred to as a ‘grand gesture’ that the hero makes towards the end of
the story to signify a change in him that means he cannot live without the
heroine. He needs to demonstrate in some way that the heroine is more
important to him than his own selfish desires or plans.
26 | Rape & Sexual Violence
I’m aware that for some people, this is an uncomfortable subject. Please
skip this chapter if this applies to you – you will not miss any practical
advice related to writing the romance novel.
My personal opinion on this matter is that rape has no place in a modern
romance novel. But at the same time, I am aware that some women (and
some men) have sexual fantasies that include rape. For these reasons, I
didn’t want to completely ignore the issue. Note that in some sources, rape
in literature is referred to as ‘forced seduction’ (Wikipedia has an entry with
this title) or ‘ravishment.’
In Beyond Heaving Bosoms, Sarah Wendell and Candy Tan note that rape
scenes rarely appear in modern romances (those published from the early
1990s onwards) but that they were ‘ubiquitous’ in the romances published
from the early 1970s to the mid-1980s. The disappearance of the rape scene
was partly the result of changing attitudes towards women and among
women, but also to the surveys of romance readers conducted by Carol
Thurston in 1982 and 1985 (published in The Romance Revolution, 1987)
which showed ‘rape scenes’ were not popular.
Kathleen Woodiwiss is named by Janice Radway, Carol Thurston, and
Sarah Wendell and Candy Tan as an author whose novels featured such
scenes, with her novel The Flame and the Flower (1972) most often singled
out. I’ve never read it, so can’t pass comment, but if you’re looking for an
example to study, check out that book.
In her study of the old school romance, Janice Radway tried to explain
why the readers she met with might enjoy romances where the hero rapes
the heroine. She suggested that the inclusion of ‘male brutality’ including
rape might be “...an attempt to understand the meaning of an event that has
become almost unavoidable in the real world.” And that these romances
expressed “...misogynistic attitudes not because women share them but
because they increasingly need to know how to deal with them.” Perhaps
they reassured women by showing that an “...ideal love is possible even in
the worst possible circumstances...” It is also suggested that the hero’s use
of force was acceptable because it was “...always the product of his passion
and her irresistibility.”
When I first read Radway’s Reading the Romance some years ago, I
wasn’t convinced by these explanations. I felt she was defending something
indefensible. In my view, a rapist could never be a hero. It wasn’t until I
read Jenny Bivona and Joseph Critelli’s 2009 paper on women’s rape
fantasies (see below) that I began to understand Radway’s suggestions.
The Craft of Writing Romance by Jean Saunders was published in 1986,
and so is a guide to writing the old school romance. It is interesting to read
what she has to say to would-be writers on the subject of rape in romance
novels. Rape, she says, rarely appears and is never written about in detail.
When it is mentioned, “...it will have happened in the past, and it will have
changed the heroine’s attitude to men and life ... it will probably have made
her frigid.” No matter that she was an innocent victim, the heroine will feel
shame because of what happened to her. The writer can use this to create
sympathy for the heroine and give her a reason for continually rejecting the
hero. She doesn’t trust men. The hero can then show what a caring and
sympathetic soul he is by earning her trust, helping her overcome her
frigidity, and teaching her ‘how to love again.’
How times have changed. I hope.
Saunders advice for those writing a ‘steamy historical novel’ is slightly
different. A rape scene can be included as long as it serves a ‘specific
fictional purpose’ and that such a scene can be “...dramatic and violent,
sometimes ugly, sometimes very poignant...” She cautions the writer that a
“... rape scene is not a love scene.” And that they should not “...happen so
frequently that one wonders how the poor girl survives.”
I’m still sticking to my position that once is one time too many.
Sarah Wendell and Candy Tan, in Beyond Heaving Bosoms, include other
explanations for why rape might have a place in a romance novel. I will
mention them here briefly.
Non-Consensual Sex is Historically Accurate – Rape has always been a
crime in virtually all societies throughout history. In less enlightened times,
the crime was against the male who ‘owned’ her – her father or her
husband. More recently, the crime is against the woman herself. Men have
always known that rape is morally wrong. You could also argue that
dysentery is historically accurate, but we don’t put that in our novels.
Rape Allows the Heroine to Have Sex without Feeling Guilty – In western
culture, until the twentieth century, men had decided that women were not
supposed to enjoy sex and they shouldn’t ever want it. Only prostitutes did
that. They weren’t even supposed to enjoy it, it was just one of their wifely
duties. But if a romance heroine is ‘taken against her will,’ she remains
blameless – as long as she doesn’t appear to enjoy it too much. If she says
‘no’ and puts up a bit of struggle, she’s done what is expected of her.
She’s So Irresistible that the Hero Can’t Help Himself – This is an excuse
men have been using for centuries. And it is still trotted out today in some
cultures and some rape trials. It’s why women are supposed to cover their
bodies and not dress ‘provocatively’ – if they aren’t covered from head to
toe by a flour sack, they’re ‘asking for it.’ Because women are responsible
for their own behaviour and men aren’t. Or something. It’s nonsense.
She’s Unaware She’s a Sexual Being Until He Shows Her – Rape will
cure her virginity and/or her frigidity. She is supposed to surrender sexually
to the right man, otherwise she’s not being a proper woman.
The Heroine as Martyr – She is an innocent who is raped by the hero.
She and the reader knows she is virtuous. The hero may not know. When he
discovers that he’s raped a virgin and not a trollop, he is overcome by
remorse and begs her forgiveness, proving himself to be a hero. I don’t
think so.
Although rape scenes have pretty much disappeared from modern
romance novels, Sarah Wendell and Candy Tan notes that the fantasy of
being ‘taken against your will’ still survives in a different form in the
paranormal romance novel. The heroine is often bitten – an act symbolising
penetrative sex – by a vampire or a werewolf. She didn’t want this to
happen and fought against it. The act is painful and is quickly followed by
“...confusion and shame over her changed status. Resignation, then
acceptance set in, but always, the heroine blossoms into her new role and
finds that her new powers open completely new avenues to her.”
The reason why this type of scene occurs in modern paranormal
romances may have something to do with the nature of female sexual
fantasies.
Contemporary Romance
Erotic Romance
Historical Romance
Paranormal Romance (including Science Fiction)
Angels
Demons & Devils
Ghosts
Psychics (including Telepathy)
Vampire
Werewolves & Shapeshifters
Witches & Wizards
Romantic Suspense
Cowboys
Doctors
Firefighters
Highlanders
Military
Pirates
Politicians
Rich & Wealthy (including millionaires and billionaires)
Royalty & Aristocrats
Spies
Vikings
Amnesia
Beach
Black & African American
Clean & Wholesome
Fantasy
Gambling & Poker
Gothic
Holidays
International
LGBTQ+
Love Triangle
Medical
Multicultural & Interracial
Mystery & Suspense
Science Fiction
Second Chances
Secret Baby
Sports
Time Travel
Vacation
Wedding
Westerns
Workplace
Note: You can also find a list of the categories used in the print book
industry – the BISAC (Book Industry Standards and Communications)
Subject Codes – on the Book Industry Study Group website:
https://bisg.org/page/Fiction
The general romance category begins at code FIC027000 with the sub-
genres listed under that.
From the above list, I wanted to try and pull out the sub-genres or story
types that require more than minor tweaks to the eight-sequence romance
plot I outlined in Chapter 15. Many of the sub-categories feature a change
of characters and setting – Western romance, for example – but there is no
significant change to the structure of the romance story that feature those
characters and setting. I’ll describe each sub-genre briefly and indicate
which I think feature plot differences, then I will cover those differences in
plot structure in a little more detail.
Contemporary Romance – The eight-sequence plot outlined in Chapter 15 is
based on the contemporary romance, though a few of the story types
mentioned below are variations on that plot structure.
Young Adult Romance – This doesn’t require too many changes from the
typical plot, but since this is aimed at a different audience, I will include
some addition notes on it later (see below).
The hero types that Amazon lists refer to the characters in a novel and so
these do not directly impact the plot of a story that features them.
Of the story types that Amazon lists, some refer to specific locations or
milieu (Beach, Gambling & Poker, Holidays, International, Medical, Sports,
Vacation, Western, Workplace) that do not affect the structure of a novel’s
plot to any great degree. Clean & Wholesome refers to the absence of sex
and dirty talk, so again little impact on plot. Black & African American and
Multicultural & Interracial romances feature particular kinds of characters
and communities, but they do not require a particular kind of plot. These
characters and communities could feature in any historical period or in any
of the sub-genres. That leaves us with the following story types which I
think we need to discuss further – I’ve combined some that are not linked in
Amazon’s list.
Could the story take place without time travel? If yes, then it isn’t a
proper time travel romance.
Does the time travel element create significant obstacles for the
romance between the heroine and hero? It should.
Are the complexities and influences of time travel woven throughout
the story? It shouldn’t be something that occurs in the first few
chapters and then fades into the background.
The target audience of young adult books is twelve to fifteen year olds,
though children as young as ten may read them and some YA books are also
popular with adults. The hero and heroine are typically fifteen to eighteen
years old, due to the fact that readers wish they had the freedoms that older
children do.
Often, but not always, the heroine’s family – some combination of
mother, father, grandparents, brothers and sisters, pets – feature as an
important element of her homelife. She is also likely to have same-age
friends from school or activity groups outside school. Relationships with
family or friends may feature as well as the central romantic relationship.
There may be issues with peer pressure or a lack of popularity.
Characters will suffer the flaws and anxieties experienced by most people
during adolescence.
Unlike in the adult romance, the heroine is not seeking a committed
relationship with the hero. She might think about marriage at some future
date, but that is not her concern at the moment. She is a young person
discovering her sexuality and having her first romance.
Physical contact is not going to go beyond hugging and a couple of
kisses, including an amazing first kiss. Or maybe a not so amazing one.
Humour is popular in teen romances.
Phyllis Taylor Pianka says that writers should consider four things before
attempting a young adult romance:
Do you have a liking for the genre and a respect for young adults?
Are you able to see problems and conflicts through the eyes of
someone that age?
Do you have something to say that will capture the imagination and
emotions of young adult readers?
Do you understand that you must not write down to your readers?
Avoid stories with a moral or that preach to the reader about how they
should be behaving. Any ‘lesson’ that characters learn or observations on
life that they make must be written with subtlety.
The young adult romance market was created in the early 1980s with
series like Sweet Valley High. More recently, stories featuring the first love
experiences of LGBT+ teenagers have begun to appear.
Gothic Romance
The first Gothic novel is generally accepted to be Horace Walpole’s The
Castle of Otranto, published in 1764. In The Guardian newspaper, Jane
Bradley wrote: “Set in a crumbling castle with all the now-classic gothic
trappings (secret passageways, bleeding statues, unexplained noises and
talking portraits), it introduced the haunted house as a symbol of cultural
decay or change.”
In Walpole’s story, it is a man who is menaced in the old dark house. Ann
Radcliffe (1764–1823) wrote several Gothic novels featuring women in
peril, including The Mysteries of Udolpho (1794) which influenced many
later writers. Jane Austen parodied it in Northanger Abbey (1817). Ellen
Moers coined the term ‘Female Gothic’ in Literary Women in 1976.
I wrote about the Gothic romance and the woman-in-peril plot in
Suspense Thriller (2018) and don’t want to go over that same ground here.
Some writers consider the Gothic romance to be a form of romantic
suspense novel. I think that’s true of the woman-in-peril plot but I think
Gothic romance is a distinct sub-sub-category. In the romance genre, Gothic
romance is not currently popular, though you might write a variation on it in
the paranormal romance sub-genre.
28 | Romantic Suspense
The ‘romantic suspense’ heading covers a lot of story possibilities. Most
obviously there is the suspense thriller, but it also includes other types of
thriller, mystery, action-adventure, and war. The Gothic romance may also
be included in this category.
In this chapter I’m going to concentrate on the ‘couple on the run’ thriller
and I’ll also make some references to the ‘bodyguard’ variant of this. I’ll be
using the amateur on the run thriller plot from my book Suspense Thriller
(2018). In that book I examine nine different thriller plots in detail and there
are fourteen more plots in Crime Thriller (2019). I cover the two versions
of the murder mystery plot in Mystery (2017). Any of those plots could be
used as the basis for a romantic suspense novel. Here I’ll try to show how
any thriller genre plot can be combined with the development of a romantic
relationship.
This plot has been used in hundreds of films. It was more or less created by
Alfred Hitchcock in his 1935 film The 39 Steps, based on the novel The
Thirty-Nine Steps (1915) by John Buchan. Hitchcock’s main contribution to
the genre was to pair up his man-on-the-run hero with a female co-
protagonist. He literally handcuffed them together. The pair are initially
reluctant partners but a romance gradually develops between them as they
seek to evade and outwit the bad guys.
Other films that use the same basic plot include Three Days of the
Condor (1975) based on the novel Six Days of the Condor (1974) by James
Grady and Alfred Hitchcock’s Saboteur (1942) and North by Northwest
(1959). Bob Hope starred in a comedic version, My Favorite Blonde in
1942. A Google search for ‘couples on the run films’ or ‘lovers on the run
movies’ will give you lists of hundreds more. Obviously you don’t want to
use a film like Bonnie and Clyde as your model – it doesn’t end well for the
lovers.
The Romantic Suspense Plot
The Villain
One significant difference you see in many romantic suspense novels is that
there is a villain or antagonist. This character may be offstage for most of
the story, but his presence is felt through the actions of the people who
pursue the heroine and hero – his henchmen. The villain usually only serves
to create obstacles in the B-story – the thriller or action-adventure plot. His
actions also affect the development of the romantic relationship, but only as
a side effect. He isn’t typically a rival for the heroine’s affections. Though
he could be. The heroine could be a ‘runaway bride’ who teams up with the
hero. The villain, or the villain’s chief hench-person, could be a femme
fatale who is a rival for the hero’s affections. Or perhaps she is his ex-wife.
You have lots of options to play with. Remember, though, that may readers
do not enjoy love triangle stories.
In many thrillers, the villain will capture the heroine to force the hero to
do what he wants. Or he captures the hero to force the heroine to give
herself up. Or he captures both of them and threatens to kill them. This
typically occurs during the protagonists’ darkest hour in sequence six or
seven.
Enemies to Lovers
When you look at the plot template for a romantic suspense novel below,
you will spot some similarities with the ‘enemies to lovers’ plot. This isn’t
surprising. The heroine and hero in romantic suspense are often strangers
thrown together by external circumstances and initially they don’t want to
be together. They gradually get to know each other and fall in love during
the course of their adventures. There is attraction when they first meet, but
it may not be as strong as in a straightforward contemporary romance or
romantic comedy. They both have other things to worry about. But there
needs to be enough of a spark to show your readers that this couple have the
potential to be lovers.
As in the ‘enemies to lovers’ story, the heroine and hero here spend less
time in the ‘being in love’ phase of the story. Their adventures together
mean there isn’t much time for romantic candlelit dinners and days out –
the sort of thing we typically see in sequences five and six. The time they
spend together often involves being on the run from the bad guys or
navigating dangerous environments. There will usually be a couple of quiet
moments where they talk – in the early one (perhaps in sequence three or
four), the heroine often shares her backstory and in the later one (sequence
six or seven) the hero typically shares his. The first time the heroine and
hero kiss properly or the first time they may love may also occur later in the
plot – perhaps as late as sequence seven.
It's worth looking at the ‘enemies to lovers’ plot to see what you can
bring across into a romantic suspense novel. Examples of ‘enemies to
lovers’ novels may also provide inspiration for developing the relationship
between your heroine and hero.
In the plot below, I’ve assumed that the heroine is an ordinary person and
the hero is a professional adventurer of some kind. You could switch these
two roles. Or you could make both characters amateurs, having a beta male
hero instead of an alpha, and have them bumbling along together as they try
to outwit the villains.
Examples
The plot description below is going to seem vague and abstract unless you
look at it alongside the plot of a novel or film you are familiar with.
Examples you might want to look at include Romancing the Stone and The
Bodyguard, both of which have strong romantic plot threads. Or thrillers
such as The 39 Steps or Three Days of the Condor, which have romantic
subplots. You can also compare it to straightforward thrillers such as North
by Northwest or one of the James Bond or Jason Bourne films. Or perhaps
The Fast and the Furious – that one is an undercover policeman story. I
covered the undercover cop story in Crime Thriller (2019). The Keanu
Reeves-Patrick Swayze movie Point Break is another example. Smokey and
the Bandit has a runaway bride joining the road chase action. If you’re
looking for an action-adventure story, Raiders of the Lost Ark is an obvious
example. Or maybe you want a private detective story such as The Maltese
Falcon. In Crime Thriller and Suspense Thriller I cover the eight-sequence
plot structures of more than twenty different thriller sub-genres.
Of course, you also want to look at examples of romantic suspense
novels. A good example I found while researching this chapter is The Heart
of a Mercenary by Loreth Anne White. When looking for examples to
study, choose novels that you feel have a strong plot structure and make
good use of the conventions or tropes of the sub-genre. Initially, it would
probably be best to avoid examples that stand out as being different to the
typical romantic suspense novel. For your first attempt at such a novel, it is
best to stick with ideas and a structure that you know work for a large
number of readers. You can experiment later when you have established
your own readership. I would probably avoid dissecting your absolute
favourite stories, particularly if you plan to reread them for pleasure –
learning how a magic trick is achieved can spoil your enjoyment of it.
Theme
In a thriller, trust is often a major theme. The heroine finds herself involved
in a conspiracy and doesn’t know who she can trust. Trust is also an issue in
her own backstory – she was in a relationship with a man who betrayed her
trust in some significant way and now she has trust issues, feeling she can
never trust a man again. Her developing relationship with the hero will test
her and show her that (a) she has the self-confidence to survive and look
after herself, i.e. she learns to trust herself and her judgment, and (b) she
meets a man she learns she can trust. Not every man is like her
untrustworthy ex. It is likely that the hero also has a back story where trust
was an issue. Either he was betrayed by the woman he loved, or someone
put their trust in the hero to protect them and he failed them. Both
characters will overcome their trust issues during the course of the story,
coming to trust each other and themselves.
Introduce the Heroine and Her Situation – Briefly introduce the heroine and
her situation. Make the situation interesting/intriguing without going into
too much detail. Creating a bit of mystery keeps the reader turning the
pages to discover what is going on and why it is happening.
Get things moving. Open with action if you can. Don’t spend a lot of
time on backstory, that will be revealed later.
If you can, work in a few key details of physical description of the
heroine. One or two lines are enough. Just cover the basics. If you don’t do
this early on, the reader will create their own mental image of her which
may not match any physical details you include later. This description isn’t
essential unless there is a particular feature – red hair, say – that is
significant to the plot later. If you do need such a detail, you must include it
when she first appears and mention it a couple of times later, before it
become significant to the plot.
This part of the story will probably be ‘seen’ from the heroine’s point of
view.
Perhaps hint at how her situation will bring her into contact with the
hero. The reader wants to know that there will be a hero.
Establish the heroine’s personality (archetype) and her typical way of
responding to opportunities or problems.
Hint that she is disappointed or unhappy with her life at the moment, but
don’t explain in detail. Not yet. This is another mystery – the heroine’s
psychological or emotional ‘wound’ – that will be revealed later. Include
enough to suggest that she’s ready for some change in her life. She is ready
for romance – though she may not be ready to admit that to herself. Perhaps
a first hint that there was an unhappy relationship in her past – this is why
she has thrown herself into her work and/or moved to this location – to
escape.
Include some description of the location – enough to give a sense of
place. Again, don’t give too much detail. You can add more later to keep the
setting alive in the reader’s imagination.
First Meeting of Heroine and Hero – This is not likely to be a meet cute and
the ‘spark of attraction’ may not occur during this first encounter, which
may happen in the middle of some fast-moving or dangerous action.
If this is the first appearance of the hero in the story, we will see his
attitude towards the heroine – she is just a job to him or an inconvenience
that gets in the way of him doing his job. Or she’s a crazy woman who
drags him into some kind of danger.
The hero’s first impressions of the heroine, allowing for a more detailed
description of her from his point of view. There will be a hint that he finds
her attractive, but circumstances mean that he must block this out of his
thoughts. He sees her as an amateur who is out of her depth. Or a crazy
person he wants to get away from. If he has been sent to rescue or protect
her, he is concerned about her safety or worried that she has been injured.
Seeing her as vulnerable may awaken feelings in him, but he shuts them
down. He must behave professionally and do his job. He may feel sympathy
for her situation, but it is his job to protect her. He may have been told that
retrieving the MacGuffin or unmasking the conspirators is more important
than her safety, so if it comes down to a choice, he may have to sacrifice her
life for the greater good.
We also see the hero from the heroine’s point of view – her first
impression of him in a difficult and fast-moving situation. Only brief
description of his physical features – more attention is given to his actions,
skills (or lack of them), and attitude. He’s a man of action or an amateur
who is as much out of his depth as she is. She is afraid, doesn’t know who
the hero is and doesn’t know if she can trust him. He may be working for
the conspirators, whoever they are. She only knows he’s on her side after he
does something to protect her from the bad guys – either showing his
professional skills or being lucky when he acts out of panic.
The heroine tells him what she knows, what she has experienced. She
asks him what he’s doing there – what’s his mission? But he ignores her
questions.
If the hero is there to protect or rescue her, she may not be happy about
this. Perhaps she thinks she doesn’t need a protector, she can look after
herself. She may be uncomfortable about his use of violence or the fact that
he has a gun. Perhaps she is in denial about her situation and doesn’t realise
that she needs his help to survive. He may have to take a firm line with her,
telling her that she must do what he says or she will die. He regrets having
to be this brutal, but he is also in danger if he can’t convince her to do what
he says.
The hero has a plan and/or a way of doing things. She was planning to do
something different. He explains why his plan is better, telling her how her
plan would have failed and ended up with her being located by the bad
guys. She doesn’t like being wrong, but respects the logic of his plan and
has to admit that he has more experience.
At this stage, they are feeling each other out, testing boundaries, and
trying to get a sense of what the other person is like. If he has a sense of
humour, there may also be a slight softening of attitudes.
Perhaps a scene from the villain’s point of view, giving orders to his
henchman. He emphasises the importance of the MacGuffin and what is at
stake for him and his co-conspirators if the heroine and the hero deliver it to
the authorities. He sends his men out to retrieve it. If this scene is not
included, the hero may explain to the heroine what she has got into and
what is at stake instead.
The Environment – More details of the environment they are in and the
difficulties it presents to them. It could be an almost impassable jungle. Or
it could be a dangerous part of an urban setting. If the hero is a professional,
he knows how to operate in this place. He is also aware of all the potential
dangers. If he’s an amateur, he may be someone who knows this location,
having grown up or worked here. He has knowledge that would help the
heroine – but he may not be willing to stick around and risk his own safety.
If the heroine is reluctant to accept the hero’s help, he may throw up his
hands and say, ‘Fine!’ He may abandon her, leaving her to fend for herself.
And then she gets into trouble – and he’s there to rescue her. He’s proved
his point.
Close Contact – In protecting her or rescuing her from danger, the hero has
to get close to the heroine. He is aware of her body – but cannot allow
himself to be distracted. Perhaps her appearance, her words, or simply her
presence reminds him of his previous relationship – unpleasant memories
that he must shut out. He knows he can’t afford to get attached to the
heroine – she is just a package he must deliver safely. She may ask him
questions about his life – Does he have a wife? Children? She’s trying to be
friendly since they’re stuck together. But he is evasive and dismissive – he
doesn’t want to talk.
As he helps her, the heroine is also aware of his body. Of his strength.
She also gets a glimpse of his sensitive, caring side. She wants him to take
her in his arms and hug her, telling her everything will be fine. But she
knows this is a ridiculous thought.
She may struggle to keep up with him, asking him to slow down. She
may slip or trip and suffer a minor injury. He helps her, comforts her and
tries to boost her confidence by telling her she’s doing fine. He tells her
they need to get to a particular safe place – and then they can rest.
When they finally stop to rest, the heroine has a good chance to look at
him properly. Her feelings are a mixture of physical attraction and being
afraid of him, being put off by his gruff, abrasive personality and
professionalism. Or, if he’s an amateur, by his evasiveness and possibly
criminal character. She is aware that he is also looking at her.
The hero promises to help her, he’ll get her to her destination safely. She
tries to find out more about who he is, but he remains evasive.
‘Trust me,’ he says. But can she?
The heroine may not yet be aware that she has become mixed up in a
conspiracy, but the conspirators are aware of her and of the danger she
poses to them. They may think she was a professional accomplice of the
man who gave her the MacGuffin. They know she has it. Or believe she
does. The heroine may not be aware that the MacGuffin has been passed to
her.
If there is no MacGuffin, the villain may believe she has witnessed
something that puts the conspiracy at risk or that she has information that
they need. Either way, she has become a target. She has been ‘locked in’ to
the conspiracy plot without having any choice in the matter.
In many thrillers, the protagonist is wrongly accused of murder, perhaps
because of being in the wrong place at the wrong time or because the villain
sets them up. The victim may be the person who handed over the
MacGuffin, or it may be someone the heroine turns to for help. This is
another point of no return for the heroine – she is now hunted by the
conspirators and the police.
The heroine from the hero’s point of view – he’s attracted to her. He
knows she’s in danger – he thinks she’s soft and weak and will need
babysitting every step of the way. Perhaps he regards her as being spoiled
and entitled.
The hero from the heroine’s point of view. Masculine and dangerous.
Like a predatory animal. Not her type of guy at all. Or he’s an amateur, a
beta male, and more of a handicap than an asset. Either way, she has no
romantic thoughts about him.
He promises he’ll help her, get them to a place of safety where she can
hand over the MacGuffin (or whatever information she has) to the
authorities. Can she trust him? She was warned in sequence one not to trust
anyone. The hero could be working for the conspirators. Or he could be the
kind of man who will sell to the highest bidder. Perhaps he does something
to make her suspect that he cannot be trusted.
The hero feels protective towards the heroine and is angry at those who
want to harm her. At the moment, she’s just a job or an inconvenience to
him, but there is the potential for his feelings to deepen. She doesn’t belong
in this world. And he doesn’t like the feelings he’s arousing in her. He’s
sworn off relationships after what happened with his ex. It makes him put
his defensive walls in place and behave brusquely.
The heroine asks who he is and who he works for. If he’s a professional,
he tells her about the significance of the MacGuffin and says he’s being
paid to make sure she and it make it back to safety. He may also tell her
about the conspiracy she’s accidentally become entangled in. If he’s an
amateur, he may be as clueless as she is. He may also warn her against
trusting anyone.
Why should she trust him? He says she has no choice. If he’d wanted to
kill her, she’d have been dead before she ever saw him.
She says she doesn’t like men like him. He says she doesn’t know him.
For some reason, it bothers him that she doesn’t like him. He’s annoyed at
himself for wanting her approval. He tells her that as far as he’s concerned,
she’s just a job.
The heroine wonders if she’s managed to upset this big tough guy. When
he checks her over for injury or to check her pack is adjusted properly on
her back or whatever, he is gruff and unsympathetic. This makes her think
about her ex, a ruthless man who treated her as a trophy wife. She thinks the
hero must be the same kind of man. An alpha male.
She can’t work out if she’s angry at the hero and his attitude or just upset
about her situation and her vulnerability. She didn’t ask for any of this. She
thinks she saw a hint of tenderness in the hero before, but now it’s gone. Is
that her fault? She feels overwhelmed by her circumstances and knows she
can’t do this on her own. She’ll have to trust him. And her instinct tells her
she can.
Perhaps he needs to tend a small wound she has received. Nervously, she
removes her blouse or skirt or whatever so he can access the wound. Her
skin is pale and she is shivering. He is uncomfortable seeing this. A charged
moment as he touches her, cleaning the wound and dressing it. He is
attracted to her. He sees her face close up for the first time. Almost close
enough to kiss. He dismisses that thought. He doesn’t want to be drawn to
her. There is no future in a relationship between them. He just has to protect
her and deliver her.
She thanks him for helping her. He tells her he will get her to a
rendezvous where transport will be waiting to take them away. But when
they get there, there is no transport. Or the vehicle comes under attack and
has to flee without them. Or it is destroyed. Or it becomes apparent that the
person waiting for them is working for the conspirators. They need a Plan
B. If the heroine is travelling with an amateur hero, their plan might be to
get to some public transport – but they spot conspirators waiting at the
railway station, bus terminus, or whatever.
The hero decides they should head for a safe place he knows. It will
mean travelling through a dangerous environment – untamed jungle, a
rough part of a city, or whatever.
After this latest brush with danger, the heroine is now more nervous.
When they have to hide to avoid being discovered by the conspirators, she
may cling to him, afraid he’ll abandon her. He wants to make her feel safe,
but he doesn’t know how. Perhaps he takes her hand and squeezes it. Being
in close proximity to her makes him more aware of the softness of her body.
She doesn’t think she can do this. He encourages her, saying she can. Or
perhaps the heroine needs to encourage her amateur hero than he can do
this.
Perhaps their cell phones are destroyed or they have to abandon them in
case they’re being used to track their movements.
Sequence 3
The heroine is drawn deeper into the world of the conspiracy. Gradually, the
conspirators remove all of her options and her support systems. They fight
dirty, ensuring that she can get no help from the authorities, her friends, her
family, or her employer. She becomes aware that she is being pursued and
she feels threatened. She wants to return to her everyday life. She discovers
what the bad guys want from her, but she doesn’t have it. Or believes she
doesn’t. She finds out how far the villains are prepared to go to get what
they want – and the methods they are prepared to use.
The hero has to save the heroine from a fairly obvious danger. This is
proof that she could not survive without him. From now on, she should do
what he says.
The hero feels guilty at having to be so harsh in his words – he’s not very
good at talking to women. He just wants to protect her. And he needs her to
accept his advice if he’s going to do that. In an attempt to take her mind off
the danger, he asks her what she plans to do when she gets back home. He’s
trying to convince her they’ll get through this safely.
She knows what he’s trying to do. She tells him she’s determined to
survive and deliver the MacGuffin. She wants to stop the conspiracy, in
memory of those who have already been harmed and/or to protect those
who will be harmed by it.
Her anger and determination make her even more attractive to him. She’s
not the weak, helpless person he thought she might be. He likes being close
to her. He’d forgotten what it was like to be around a woman. He wonders if
she’s attracted to him. If she is, it’s probably just because he’s a big slab of
meat she needs to protect her for now. He has to remind himself that
romantic relationships are a bad idea. His last one proved that. His thoughts
don’t reveal what happened – he doesn’t want to think about it.
The heroine says she knows she needs the hero if she’s going to get out
of this, but that doesn’t mean she has to like him.
They realise that no one is going to come and rescue them. No one knows
if they’re alive and no one knows where they are. They’re on their own.
And people will die if they don’t deliver the MacGuffin.
Perhaps a scene with the villain. He knows the heroine has escaped with
the MacGuffin and that she has someone helping her. He sends more
henchmen out to pursue them. He wants the heroine alive. Or not. But he
must have the MacGuffin – its existence out in the open threatens the
conspiracy. If she’s not stopped, they may have to bring forward the
deadline for their plan. This reinforces what is at stake in the story and
gives a reminder of the ticking clock the heroine and hero are racing
against.
Still travelling, the heroine is exhausted and wants to rest. The hero wants
to keep going. He’s impatient. He tries to encourage her, convincing her that
he’s right. She sees that he’s trying to dominate and manipulate her – her ex
used to do that. She doesn’t like it. She tells him she’s fed up with him
trying to dominate her and with his know-it-all attitude. She’s afraid of him
and yet she’s attracted to him. This also makes her angry at herself. She
doesn’t want another relationship like this.
The hero is surprised by her angry outburst, but he’s glad she has her fire
back. She realises he’s manipulated her again. He tries to be nice to her, but
she is aware that she is just another job to him. Perhaps she forces him to
admit he’ll take the MacGuffin and leave her if he has to. Then she regrets
being mean to him after he becomes the silent professional type again.
Towards the end of this sequence, the heroine discovers just how much
she has lost and how alone she now is. Her status and reputation, her
credibility, all have been destroyed by her enemies. People are hunting her
and no matter how hard she tries to hide, she is threatened with recognition
and exposure at every moment. No one can or will help her. Except the
hero.
A risky situation. Physically dangerous. Perhaps they hear the sound of
pursuers getting closer, forcing them to take a risk to get away. The heroine
draws on her inner strength to face it. She makes the first move to complete
the challenge, but then – disaster!
Sequence 4
The hero has to save the heroine – and the MacGuffin she is carrying. In the
process, he receives an injury or may seem to be lost or dead. The heroine
locates him and tends to his injuries. She is worried that his injury may be
serious, but luckily it is not. They cannot go to a hospital because people are
out looking for them. It makes her feel good to help him – and to discover
that he is not invincible. Perhaps he has to remove his shirt or jeans so she
can tend his injury. She looks at his body. Mutual attraction. But she is wary
because of a bad experience with her ex-partner.
She thanks him for saving her. Perhaps she is in tears – angry, afraid,
frustrated. He is very much attracted her in that moment. He is vulnerable
too, just for a little while. She kisses him on the lips, a way of saying thank
you and expressing relief that he’s okay. This makes him uncomfortable and
he returns to he usual gruff ways.
The heroine is at a low point. Her comfortable ordinary world seems a
distant memory and she feels she’s lost everything she knew and
understood. She may even feel that her safe world was just a sham – she’s
now learned of the existence of a much darker reality. She was naïve before.
Events may be such that she and the hero are now being hunted by both
the bad guys and the authorities. Perhaps the hero or the heroine have been
framed for the murder of one of their own friends or colleagues. This means
there is no one they can turn to for help – they are even more isolated. The
hero may even be disowned and hunted by the organisation he works for –
especially if the conspirators have corrupted someone in the organisation.
The hero and/or heroine make a decision. They can’t keep running
forever. The conspirators are too powerful and there are too many of them.
The only way they can defeat the bad guys is to turn the tables and fight
back. They have to defeat the conspirators themselves. They have the
MacGuffin (or whatever information the heroine has) and the hero knows a
place where they can go and plan their campaign. A safe place.
Concerned for his comfort and strength, she pretends to need a rest so
that he has time to recover. They are now deep into the most dangerous part
of the environment of the story. While they are resting, they engage in
friendly and humorous banter. He accuses her of being controlling and she
says he’s stubborn, but it is meant in fun. A moment of closeness. Perhaps
he tells her she’s beautiful, making her aware that he is attracted to her. An
awkward moment. He breaks the tension, letting her off the hook.
The heroine reveals that she doesn’t want to go back to her old life. In
some ways, she enjoys being here more. She tells the hero about her bad
experience with her ex-partner. How he treated her and left her feeling
worthless. She knows she needs to get over these feelings. Her ex was
dominant, controlling, manipulative, and emotionally abusive.
Hearing this makes the hero angry. She deserved better.
The heroine realises she’s been comparing the hero to her ex, seeing his
negative qualities in the hero. She apologises, saying he’s nothing like her
ex. She knows the hero has a strong moral code, even if she doesn’t feel
comfortable with some of the actions he takes.
The hero tells her she’s not worthless and her ex was a bastard for
making her feel that way. She cries and he holds her to comfort her, again
demonstrating his more sensitive side.
Midpoint
The midpoint is them sharing a tender moment and the heroine re-
evaluating her feelings towards the hero. This moment is interrupted by the
sudden appearance of danger or of another person.
Sequence 5
The hero has taken her to a place he believes will be safe and where people
he knows will help them. But his friends or contacts refuse to help him –
they are afraid for their own safety. Or they don’t believe the hero is an
innocent victim of the conspiracy. Or perhaps his friends are corrupt and on
the side of the villain. Or perhaps the friend is killed by the conspirators –
and the murder is blamed on the hero or heroine.
The heroine is tense and afraid. The safety the hero promised her hasn’t
materialised. Perhaps a threat suddenly appears and she is forced to deal
with it. She may have to use violence to harm an attacker or may even have
to kill them. This upsets her even more. The hero tells her she did the right
thing, she saved them both. But violence and killing go against her values.
She is a Carer/nurturer, not a Warrior. And seeing him as a Warrior now, she
can’t believe that she was attracted to him. They have almost nothing in
common. She regards him as a predator and this reminds her of the worst
qualities of her ex.
The hero feels sympathy for her. He remembers the first time he had to
use violence to protect himself or perhaps the first time he had to kill
someone. He may find an important clue, perhaps from the man who
attacked them. This is an important, positive development but he feels
unhappy because of the damage that has been done to his relationship with
the heroine. He realises that he should have allowed her to get under his
skin. He just needs to get on with the job.
The heroine feels defeated and is ready to give up. The hero helps her
discover her own deeply held beliefs – what she believes is worth fighting
for. He convinces her to go on, despite the odds. Together they will defeat
the conspirators. She feels able to make a commitment to try and foil the
conspiracy.
Or perhaps it is the hero who has a crisis of confidence – especially if he
is an amateur rather than a professional – and the heroine demonstrates a
new-found determination and is able to convince him to continue the fight.
They have to move on, their hoped-for place of safety didn’t pan out.
They encounter more dangers in the environment as they travel. The
heroine is feeling numb, in an almost zombie-like state. The hero realises
he’s part of her problem.
The heroine wants to hate the hero, take her anger out on him and blame
him. But she can’t. She wants to talk to him, confide in him, but feels she
can’t do that either. She regards him as something beautiful but dangerous.
Someone she can’t understand – how does he use violence and manage to
live with himself? She feels a need to get away from him. But is afraid that
she cannot survive alone.
The hero tells her what he knows about the conspiracy and how
important it is to get the MacGuffin to people who will know what to do
with it. He may also share secrets with her about the people he works for, if
he is a professional. He tries to convince her that people like her, the Carers,
need Warriors like him in order to be able to continue their work in
dangerous places. If he’s an amateur, he will try to convince her that they
have to work together to survive. Whatever it takes. It is their duty to
deliver the MacGuffin – more lives than their own are at stake.
When she is asleep, the hero lies awake looking at her. He is attracted to
her. He’s fallen for her. He wants a relationship with her when this is over.
But he is afraid that he has nothing to offer her. Her reaction to the violence
earlier proves he’s the wrong kind of man for her. He wants to reach out and
touch her, but doesn’t. He needs to get over these feelings. It is just one
more thing for him to endure.
Sequence 6
The hero and heroine begin to learn the villain’s methods in order to be able
to use this knowledge against him later. The hero may act as a mentor for
the heroine. And she may teach him something helpful – perhaps because
she has a greater understanding of how relationships work. She may see a
weakness, a way in which the villain is vulnerable because of the way he
treats people in his team. They will not be as loyal to him as team members
who are treated with dignity and respect.
The heroine is moving from being a novice/amateur to being a
warrior/expert – and if the hero started out as an amateur, he is undergoing a
similar change. The heroine shows that she is now more self-confident and
more self-reliant. She has discovered skills and strength that she did not
realise she had. She is no longer afraid in the way she was at the beginning
of the story. She is no longer helpless.
The heroine and hero work together to survive a tricky situation. She
feels good about her newfound strength. She wants the hero to embrace her
and is disappointed when he turns away. She thinks about her past life and
realises she no longer feels controlled by her feelings about her former
relationship. She is finally free of her ex. She feels free. Happy. Perhaps she
tells the hero this. Or he may be happy that she is now demonstrating self-
confidence and strength. He may comment on the fact that she’s not the
woman she was before – she’s grown. This shared moment may build to a
kiss. But he then draws back from her. She’s no longer just a package to be
delivered, he has feelings for her. But he feels that he’s not good enough for
her. She deserves more than a damaged man like him.
As the heroine and hero approach their intended destination, she fears
that their time together will soon be over. In a scene close to domesticity,
they may share food or bathe in a river or take shelter from a storm and
build a fire. It feels like they are a couple.
The hero may share some of his backstory – but not the most painful part
of it. He may tell her about some of the other adventures he’s had. Despite
the fact that he enjoys his work, she can sense a sadness in his life. She tries
to ask him about it, but he deflects her questions or goes silent. He’s not
ready to reveal this yet.
She tells him that she cares for him. He can tell that she wants a
relationship with him. He would like that too. But he thinks it would be a
bad idea. He has too much baggage. He may tell her this, or he may only
reveal it to the reader via his thoughts. He returns to his gruff, business-like
self.
The climax of this sequence is their darkest hour. The hero is captured by
the villain or the heroine is taken by the villain’s men. Or they are both
captured. Or perhaps it appears that one of them betrays the other.
The heroine recommits herself to foiling the conspiracy. She may be
trapped in an enclosed space and have to demonstrate her adaptability by
finding a way to escape.
The hero and heroine may not be able to rely on things being what they
appear to be. He may have appeared to betray her and give the villain what
he wants. Evidence they were relying on to defeat the conspirators may
disappear or be destroyed. Someone though dead my suddenly reappear –
perhaps the villain’s main henchman. Or perhaps someone they thought was
one of the good guys. False identities may be revealed – there may be other
‘good guys’ who turn out to be in cahoots with the villain. Dialogue often
has double meanings, even between people who are on the same side.
It should seem at this point that the hero and heroine cannot win. The
odds are stacked to high against them. They are likely to be separated at this
point in the story – this separation functioning as a break-up – particularly
if the heroine thinks the hero has gone over to the other side. It seems that
there is now no possibility of a romantic relationship between. All the
heroine can do now is hope to survive. Or perhaps she resolves to sacrifice
herself to end the conspiracy and protect others from harm.
It could be that the hero or the heroine, or both, are sentenced to death by
the villain.
Sequence 7
The hero may rescue the heroine, revealing that he didn’t betray her. He
was tricking the villain. Or the heroine may arrange a distraction when he is
about to die, enabling them both to get away. Or, if they were both
sentenced to die, they work together to escape.
They may achieve something that they believe has ended the conspiracy
– perhaps sending a message to someone in authority. Or destroying some
equipment that is vital to the villain. Perhaps they even think they have
killed the villain or sent him into a trap where he will be captured.
The hero and heroine share a quiet moment together. This is equivalent to
the moment described as sequence five of the eight-sequence plot outlined
in Chapter 15. It may be a romantic encounter, where they kiss or have sex.
The heroine takes the lead, making it her choice. And after this moment of
tenderness, the hero is able to be vulnerable and share with her his
backstory, telling her about the emotionally traumatic events that made him
cynical and resistant to love. A stronger bond is formed between the two of
them.
But then the hero and heroine discover that the conspiracy isn’t over. The
villain is still free and the countdown to the big finish of the plot is still
running.
The hero gets the heroine to a place of safety. He tells her to wait for him
while he goes off to confront the conspirators. He tells her, ‘I love you.’ She
is afraid he’ll be killed in the final confrontation with the villain. And she’s
upset that his job is more important to him than his relationship with her.
She doesn’t think she can be in a long-term relationship with a man who
goes off and risks his life like this.
The hero turns the tables on the villain – perhaps with the heroine’s help,
because she refuses to stay hidden like her told her. They use the villain’s
own tactics against him. It becomes a battle of wits. And they are now a
serious threat to the villain and the conspiracy. The scene is set for one final
action set-piece – like when James Bond confronts the villain in his lair and
sets out to destroy it. Or there may be a race to a certain location to stop a
bomb (or some other weapons) being planted or activated.
Sequence 8
The hero says he wants to commit to a relationship with the heroine when
this is all over. She thinks he’s just saying it to try and be positive about
their chances – they’re probably not going to survive the final battle. And
she doesn’t want him to give up his life of adventure to be with her. He says
he won’t – he has an idea, a way for them to be together. He’ll tell her about
it after the final confrontation with the villain. She sends him on his way
with a kiss. The hero is more nervous than usual – he now has something in
his life that he’s afraid to lose. This fight isn’t just putting his own life at
risk, the heroine’s life is at risk too. And their future happiness together. He
has to succeed and he has to survive.
The conspiracy is foiled – the villain is unmasked and his plan defeated
when the heroine and hero exploit his weakness. The hero may be injured as
he protects the heroine during the final action against the villain’s
henchmen.
Equilibrium is restored and the heroine is able to return to the ordinary
world which she has helped to protect. But she has been changed by her
experience – she is aware of a world of danger that other people don’t know
about. And she has changed as a person – she is now more self-confident
and more self-reliant.
In the final scene or an epilogue, the heroine and hero are together and
often experience a ‘threatening’ situation that reprises an earlier event, but
this time it is presented as a fade-out joke.
Maybe an epilogue showing their life together a year later. Or setting up
the hero or heroine of the next book in the series.
29 | Marriage of Convenience &
Mail Order Brides
What is a Marriage of Convenience?
The Plot
The heroine and hero in this type of story can begin as strangers, as friends,
or as enemies. In the latter two cases you will be following a ‘friends to
lovers’ or ‘enemies to lovers’ plot. In addition to the ‘will they, won’t they’
tension in the first half of the plot, there will be an added risk of their
marriage being discovered to be fake. There may even be someone who
wants to betray the heroine (or hero) and expose their secret. Even after
they have fallen in love for real, there may still be a risk of their fake
marriage agreement being exposed – and this may happen and be the cause
of their break-up.
If your heroine and hero begin as strangers and have no shared backstory,
you’re in a slightly trickier position. Having them feel indifferent to one
another doesn’t make for an interesting story. If it is ‘hate at first sight,’ you
can use the ‘enemies to lovers’ plot. If there is no strong emotion, other than
a flicker of attraction, when they first meet, you will need to come up with
another reason for them to interact during the first half of your novel. You
might need a stronger B-story that will bring complications for them to
overcome, as in a romantic suspense novel. Or you may need to introduce a
rival or villain – but bear in mind that there is a specific readership for love
triangles and many readers don’t like them.
Author Tessa Dare, quoted in an article for The Writer by Kerrie
Flanagan, says: “The protagonists are already married. Once they fall in
love, what’s keeping them apart? It’s up to the writer to create internal and
external obstacles to keep that happily-ever-after uncertain until the end.”
Writing about marriages of convenience and arranged marriages, Mary
Lynne Nielsen points out a couple of important features or advantages:
“These stories, by default, include forced proximity and its underlying
current of sexual tension. Married people, regardless of the era, can have
sex together with impunity. But when your rationale for marriage is
something other than attraction, a delicious push/pull between physicality
and the convenient or arranged portions of the relationship come into play.”
Getting the no-sex-before-marriage problem out of the way by having the
marriage occur at the beginning can be useful if you want to write a saucy
historical romance.
Another form of ‘marriage before romance’ story is the mail order bride
plot. This is another one where you have to answer a major question up
front: Why would a woman agree to be a mail order bride?
When North America was first colonised by Europeans in the 1600s,
there were few European women available for marriage, so companies
sponsored the emigration of young women. The aim was to stop young men
deserting the new settlements and to discourage them from taking Native
American brides. During the expansion west in North America in the 1800s,
long-distance marriages made after a man selected a woman based only on
her photograph began in predominantly male communities of Asian and
European men. Most of the women putting themselves forward were from
poor families – they hoped to make a better life for themselves in the New
World.
During the goldrush in the West, it was mainly men who travelled to
make their fortunes and they would write to friends on the East coast asking
if they knew of any eligible females who might make good wives. Then
men began to advertise in newspapers. Relationships were often conducted
by exchange of letters before the woman decided to head West to marry.
Contrary to what the phrase ‘mail order bride’ suggests, men did not
purchase women from catalogues. But they would probably pay for their
fiancé’s travel from the east of the country to the west. The phrase ‘mail
order bride’ wasn’t used by the people who met and married in this way, it
was used by newspaper reports between about 1900 and 1920. The practice
died out after the 1920s. The personal ads used to seek a wife often
included a phrase such as ‘object matrimony’ or say they were seeking a
woman who was ‘matrimonially inclined,’ along with a post office or
newspaper box number. Ordinary people referred to such practices as a
‘courting by mail,’ ‘correspondence courtship’ or ‘epistolary courtship.’
‘Picture brides,’ selected by men based on a photograph, travelled to
America from Europe and the Balkans.
In the modern world, the process is typically used by women living in
developing countries who wish to marry a man in a developed nation.
According to research quoted in Wikipedia, most women using such
services “...are from Southeast Asia, countries of the former Eastern Bloc
and (to a lesser extent) from Latin America.”
Writing about mail order bride romances on her website, author Kristin
Holt says that a number of factors account for their appeal. Firstly, women
engaging in such a relationship must have been courageous. They travelled
across America or even across the world to begin a life with a man they had
never met. They must also have been optimistic about the kind of life they
might find there.
Holt says that one reason this kind of story appeals to her, as a writer and
a reader, is that “...the tale usually involves a married hero and heroine. It’s
almost magical to see a husband and wife develop tender feelings for one
another, gradually fall in love, learn to trust and rely on one another, and
find themselves significantly better off because of their union.” She also
says that the fact that the development of the romantic relationship occurs
in the ‘wrong’ order – with the marriage coming first – makes these stories
interesting.
Although they are married early in their relationship and begin keeping
house together – engaging in what I’ve referred to as the ‘domesticity’ part
of a relationship, the heroine and hero are effectively strangers. All they
know about each other is likely to have come from a handful of letters.
There will be a first meeting when the heroine steps off the train or the
stagecoach or whatever. And then they have a brief period to get to know
each other before they decide whether to get married. During that brief
period, they will discover whether they have both been honest in their
correspondence. Some men lied about how successful they had been in
discovering gold or starting up another form of business. The state of his
‘house’ might also come as a bit of a shock. One contemporary newspaper
account reports that a match failed because the man had forgotten to tell his
potential bride that he had bright red hair.
If a woman chose not to marry her fiancé, she might find herself in a
difficult situation. It is unlikely that she would have the money to return
home – especially if she had travelled from Europe or further. And the
abandoned groom might feel that she owed him the price of her passage. If
she chose another man instead, he might find himself with a debt to repay.
Or she, a lone woman, might find herself targeted by predatory males or the
proprietor of the local whorehouse.
The plot of a mail order bride romance could have much in common with
a ‘friends to lovers’ story or, if they turn out not to be a great match, an
‘enemies to lovers’ romance. There might also be an element of the Gothic
romance about it, with a vulnerable young woman coming to live in the
home of a less than friendly man, the difference being that she is now his
wife as well as his housekeeper or nanny to his children. Obviously, a story
of this type will have much in common with a Western romance and it
could also have an action-adventure B-story, making it more like a romantic
suspense story.
Kristin Holt’s website (KristinHolt.com) also includes recommendations
for reading and a number of articles on aspects of life in the American West
in the nineteenth century.
30 | Paranormal Romance
What is a Paranormal Romance?
Ashley Lister, in How to Write Erotic Fiction and Sex Scenes, writes: “The
erotic aspect of the supernatural is perennially popular, for obvious reasons.
Stories about the supernatural allow readers to confront their fears through
literature. Because the fear of sex and sexuality is an essential part of our
repressed western culture these stories work for a readership that is aware
of these fears.”
I’ll mention some of the reasons why shapeshifters are a popular element
of paranormal fiction towards the end of the chapter.
A paranormal romance novel can be based on any plot that you find in non-
romance paranormal fiction or urban fantasy. This plot would be the B-
story, woven together with the romance thread of the A-story. The structure
of the plot would then be very similar to the romantic suspense novel plot I
have outlined.
In this chapter, I am going to give a brief outline of a paranormal
romance plot based on the eight sequence plot I described earlier in the
book. I’m going to use a straightforward human heroine meets paranormal
hero story – the kind that forms the basis of romances inspired by The
Vampire Diaries, Twilight, and the first Sookie Stackhouse/True Blood story
Dead Until Dark. I’m going to assume that the heroine is not aware of the
existence of supernatural beings. In her Southern Vampire Mysteries series,
Charlaine Harris takes a different approach, having everyone aware of the
existence of vampires and giving Sookie an extraordinary power of her own
– it’s up to you if you want to do something similar, but I’m going to stick
with a more ‘vanilla’ approach for simplicity’s sake.
You might not want to use this plot for your paranormal romance, but the
notes below should give you some idea of key points to consider.
In the example below, I’m assuming the heroine and hero are both
attracted to each other when they first meet. You could use a variation of the
‘enemies to lovers’ plot. Or a love triangle.
I should also note here that although the example below is for a
paranormal romance novel, the plot structure would actually fit any bad boy
romance where the heroine meets a hero from another community. The
sequence of events below could easily occur with a hero from a motorcycle
gang or a Mafia-like criminal organisation, or any other criminal
underworld. It might also be adapted to fit a story with a non-criminal hero,
such as a ruthless billionaire businessman or a hedonistic rock ‘n’ roll star.
Sequence 1
Introduce the heroine and her (mundane) ordinary world. You want to show
a pleasant, unremarkable community that is about to have an encounter with
some sort of supernatural element. You need to show it as the kind of place
worth protecting, especially if the heroine and/or hero will be engaged in
saving it later in your story. Or it could just be that your main characters
want to prevent ordinary people in this world becoming aware that
supernatural creatures exist.
Early on, there should be a hint that something is wrong or weird. In The
Vampire Diaries, Elena becomes aware of a large crow watching her. It’s
enough to establish that strange things are in the offing.
The heroine encounters the hero. This can be a typical accidental encounter
or a humorous meet cute. Or it could be something darker, in keeping with
the supernatural nature of your story. In Dead Until Dark, Sookie saves the
vampire, Bill, from attackers who are after his blood. The heroine and hero
are attracted to each other. But the hero may suddenly change from being
gentle and polite to frowning and cold. Or he may disappear suddenly and
mysteriously. The heroine is intrigued by him and perhaps a little afraid of
him.
If you allow access to the hero’s thoughts this early in the story, you may
have him realising that falling in love with the heroine would be a mistake
and dangerous to them both. Hint that such a love would be forbidden love.
The hero feels he must restrain himself. Perhaps he is already betrothed to
someone from his own community. You don’t have to reveal the nature of
the hero’s community yet, keep it mysterious. You can have the reader learn
about it as the heroine does.
The heroine may learn something about the hero from other people in the
community. Local gossip or news. Perhaps there is something mysterious
about his history or the history of his family. She becomes more intrigued
and finds herself thinking about him.
If you are sharing the hero’s point of view, we may also see him thinking
about her. Perhaps he watches her from a distance.
Introduce mystery and danger. Having introduced the ‘Will they, won’t
they?’ question, you can also include another suspense element by revealing
that something unusual has happened in the wider community. Perhaps
someone has been killed in mysterious circumstances. The cliché is that
they seem to have been attacked by a large wild animal. Let the reader
wonder whether this could be the work of supernatural creatures.
Another alternative is to have the hero save the heroine from some sort of
attack – perhaps this even occurs during their first meeting. Then later, she
learns that her attacker has been found dead in mysterious circumstances.
Did the hero do this? Was it a revenge attack? Or is it just a coincidence?
Or perhaps it is people with supernatural abilities who are being killed by
one or more professional hunters. The hero is investigating the deaths and
the heroine will end up helping him.
Or it could just be that there is something strange and mysterious about
the hero. In Twilight, Edward Cullen and his family are not like ordinary
people, there is something different about them. The heroine is intrigued by
this.
The Lock-in. Create some external circumstances that mean the heroine and
hero will have to see more of each other in future. They cannot avoid each
other and so will have to deal with whatever attraction exists between them.
Initially, they will try to keep it polite and professional but cool and distant.
But the reader will know that this can’t last.
Sequence 2
The heroine and hero slowly get to know each other as people. This occurs
in a very similar way to any other beginning romantic relationship. But the
hero must keep his true nature secret from her. And she becomes aware that
he has a deep secret. She tries to earn his trust, hoping he will open up to
her. She senses that in some way he is a tortured hero, having suffered some
kind of emotionally traumatic experience in his past.
The hero is wary of trusting her, knowing that if she learns his secret she
may be repulsed by what he is and what he has done. He can’t allow
himself to fall too deeply for her, because he knows there can be no future
for them as a couple. But he enjoys being with her. And, against his better
judgment, he falls in love with her.
Towards the end of this sequence, something occurs that sets up Act II –
the middle – of the story. The heroine discovers – by accident, by someone
betraying the hero’s secret, through her own investigation, or by him being
honest with her – what the hero is. She learns that the man she is falling in
love with is some kind of ‘beast.’
She may initially be afraid and upset by what she has learned. If he didn’t
tell her himself, she may be upset at him for keeping this secret. But
eventually, she comes to terms with it. What she feels for the hero is
important to her and she is prepared to give the relationship a chance. If
he’s prepared to do the same. This is an important turning point for both of
them and it may take each of them some time to reach a decision. He may
try to convince her that she is better off without him – he’s not good enough
for her, she deserves someone better. Him saying this may be what causes
her to realise he’s a good man and she wants to be with him.
At the end of Act I, both heroine and hero decide to continue with their
relationship. No more secrets, they are in this together.
Sequence 3
The heroine is a little afraid of the hero but still attracted to him. He is a bad
boy, but she also recognises that he is a tortured hero. She believes that she
can help him. If he will trust her.
The hero resists bringing the heroine into his world. He doesn’t want her
to be ‘tainted’ by it. He is attracted by her innocence and purity – her
‘virginity’ – but at the same time, he wants her. He is afraid of destroying
the thing he loves. This internal conflict becomes an obstacle to them
forming a committed, long-term relationship.
Typically, the hero regards his supernatural condition to be a curse – the
vampire is cursed to live forever, watching human friends and lovers wither
and die; the werewolf is cursed to endure a painful change at every full
moon, losing his human self and becoming something more primitive and
bestial. You must decide how your characters regard their supernatural
powers and what rules and traditions govern them. You also have to decide
if there is a ‘cure’ for the condition. The hero may then face a dilemma –
should he keep his powers or take the cure and become mortal? If he takes
the cure, he can then be harmed by people with the powers he gave up.
The heroine is gradually introduced to the hero’s world – either visiting it
physically or hearing about it from him. She finds it exotic and thrilling. At
first, it is as if she has discovered Narnia. And she enjoys the power and
respect the hero commands in his own community – he’s much more
interesting and dramatic than any ordinary man she’s ever met.
In these early stages, she feels as if she’s learning about a place in a story,
like the island in Treasure Island or Wonderland in Peter Pan. Or it feels
like she is on vacation in another country where the people, language, and
customs all seem alien to her. She never suspected that a world like this
could exist. She may also find herself a fish out of water, as she tries to
learn the rules and social hierarchy of the hero’s community.
It is up to you to determine the nature of the hero’s ‘world.’ It could be a
physical place that exists in a separate reality parallel to our own. It could
be a small, isolated community. Or it may exist as a separate place within
our normal world, like the criminal underworld of the Mafia.
Sequence 4
The heroine may see evidence of the dark side of the supernatural world –
how cruel and dangerous it can be. And she may see the kind of thing the
hero has to do to survive in this world. She sees his darker side – a side that
he is ashamed of but cannot give up.
But she has also seen his gentler, more human side. She is aware that
there is a war going on within him. And she wants to help his good side
triumph.
The hero tries to push her away, even acting cruelly towards her to try
and make her want to leave him. He knows she will be in danger as she
learns more about his world. She is upset by his behaviour but is
determined not to give up on him. Even if he no longer loves her, she
believes that he can be saved and that it is worth trying to help him. She
takes some action to prove her belief in him and to demonstrate the strength
of her determination.
The hero is moved by her loyalty and the strength of her resolve. He
realises she is not as fragile and helpless as he thought. He begins to think
that there is a chance for them to be happy together as a couple. This leads
to...
Midpoint
A brief period of togetherness and happiness. Perhaps the hero lives with
the heroine in her world. They spend time as an ordinary(ish) couple in
love. She probably believes that this could be a permanent arrangement.
And perhaps he does too. Or this may be a bittersweet period for him
because he knows it cannot last.
In a moment of vulnerability and trust, he shares his life story with her –
the traumatic events that caused him to become who he is. He also listens to
her story. They share their hopes and dreams for the future.
This sequence will be similar to the one in the film Witness, where the
Harrison Ford character is hiding out in the simplicity and innocence of the
Amish community. But the shadow of his life in the other world hangs over
him.
Sequence 6
Reality intrudes. As in Witness, enemies from his own world come looking
for the hero, intending to drag him back to where he belongs. These people
bring the threat of harming the ordinary community. And of harming the
heroine. The hero realises it was a mistake to believe he could ever be
happy in the ordinary world, in a normal relationship. He doesn’t belong
here.
The hero leaves. Perhaps there is a tearful goodbye. Perhaps he just
disappears, unable to face saying goodbye. Or maybe he is dragged back to
his own world before he has a chance to say anything to the heroine.
The heroine is shocked and upset by his departure. She feels she has
failed to save him. Or she feels betrayed by him because he has fallen back
into his old, violent behaviour. She may or may not be aware that he has
sacrificed his happiness to protect her from danger.
The hero’s struggle to escape his community or world may be an external
struggle – he is doing battle with his own people. Or it could be internal.
There could be a battle between two sides of his own nature – the human
and the ‘beast.’ He may have been, tempted, tricked, or forced into
returning to his beast-like self. Perhaps being the ‘beast’ brings with it
intoxicating feelings that act like a drug. Feelings of strength, power,
intense emotion, and heightened senses.
In your story, there may be elements of both kinds of struggle for the
hero.
As in all romances, the heroine and hero being separated is the darkest
hour for them. It seems that their relationship is over forever.
Sequence 7
The heroine and hero are separated and they are both miserable. They spend
time alone thinking deeply about their relationship and the circumstances
around it. They look back on the good times they had together. And the bad.
But they cannot see any way out of the dark hole that they are in. Their
relationship seems lost forever. They begin to think about what their lives
will be like going forward. Perhaps they consider or even begin new
relationships with people from their own communities. But it just feels like
they are going through the motions.
The hero may be faced with an impossible choice. He can remain a
‘beast’ or sacrifice his supernatural powers and become mortal. Does he
love the heroine enough to make this sacrifice? Or his sacrifice may be that
he will be exiled forever from the supernatural community he belongs to.
You would have to make belonging to this community important to him,
demonstrated in earlier sections of the story, so that making this decision
will be very difficult for him.
Or perhaps he must choose whether to turn her into a supernatural being.
Could he inflict his ‘curse’ on her so they can be together forever? In this
case, the heroine also has a choice to make. Can she give up her ordinary
life and live in the hero’s world forever? Does she want to receive the
‘curse’ from him and become like him?
Sequence 8
The hero proves his love for her by choosing to make a sacrifice. Perhaps it
is enough that he made this choice – the heroine may not need him to go
through with it. She may suggest a workable compromise. Or she may
decide that she wants to accept the ‘curse,’ and asks him to make her like
him.
You have to determine your own happy ever after or happy for now for
your characters. Does the hero transform the hero, taking her away from her
old existence forever? That is something you have to decide.
Plot Variations
It’s fairly obvious that the above template has a lot in common with the
Beauty and the Beast story. In fact, I probably first became aware of many
of the conventions or tropes of this plot when watching the Beauty and the
Beast television show starring Linda Hamilton and Ron Perlman that ran
from 1987 to 1990. It was a modern re-imagining in which the Beast,
Vincent, lived in the World Below, a place that existed beneath the streets of
an ordinary city. Hamilton left the show at the end of Season 2. As with
many shows that are based around a romantic relationship, the series wasn’t
the same with the female lead gone and it ended after the third series. The
first two seasons are worth checking out if you’ve never seen them.
Once it had been established, variations on this plot model were possible.
An obvious variation is to switch roles so that the hero is the innocent
human and the heroine is the powerful supernatural being. In the 2003
movie Underworld, Kate Beckinsale plays the vampire and Scott Speedman
the unsuspecting human. Their romance is only a small subplot in the film,
but it gives an idea of what is possible. In Lynsay Sands A Quick Bite
(2005), the vampire is female and her lover is a human male.
Jaye Wells spins another subtle variation in The Art of Loving a Vampire
(2013) where she has a strong human female who enjoys sex but isn't
looking for a serious relationship and an emotionally aware male vampire
who is seeking commitment. Lily Harlem’s erotic romance Bite Mark
(2016) features a human heroine in a polyamorous relationship with two
male vampires.
You also have the possibility of a forbidden love story between two
people from rival communities – a vampire and a werewolf, for example.
This was used as one of the strands in the television series The Originals.
The paranormal romance plot as outlined above resurrects some elements
of the old-school romance. And it has been criticised by feminists for doing
so. If the hero is a werewolf (or some other form of shapeshifter who
becomes a ‘beast’), he is likely to be in the traditional bad boy mould, with
a hint of the tortured Byronic hero. If he is a vampire, he is likely to be a
more aristocratic type of male, similar to the rake of the Regency romance
(Mr. Darcy with fangs) or a Victorian gentleman. In either case, there are
likely to be elements of the old-school ‘cruel hero’ in his behaviour. And
like the old-school heroine, the paranormal romance heroine struggles to
understand the hero’s behaviour. His personality is a mystery that she must
unravel if she wants to know and understand him – especially after he has
acted cruelly towards her.
There is also a clear separation between the heroine’s world and that of
the hero. In the old-school romance, the heroine grew up in a protected
domestic environment and suddenly found herself thrust into the dangers of
an external world where men conducted their lives separately from their
womenfolk. In the paranormal romance, this split is between the mundane
ordinary world of the heroine and the supernatural world of the hero.
The initial indifference and aloofness of the old-school hero are mirrored
by the paranormal hero’s wariness at revealing his true nature to the heroine
and his wanting to protect her from the dangers of his world.
Shapeshifters
You will need to decide whether your heroine is literally a virgin or whether
her innocence and purity relate only to her awareness of the supernatural
world.
In their book Beyond Heaving Bosoms, Sarah Wendell and Candy Tan
suggest that paranormal romances put a new spin on the theme of virginity,
quoting the paranormal romance author Lilith Saintcrow, who has said that
“...the ‘changing’ or ‘turning’ motif of paranormal romances is the new
virginity...” If the hero bites the heroine, or in some other way transfers his
‘curse’ to her, he takes away her virginity. She is not the same person she
was before and she cannot return to that ‘innocent’ state. “Instead, the
happy ending hinges on the communion and then a new community – the
heroine becomes like the hero after he initiates her into his world.” In
Saintcrow’s words, the “metaphor of ‘contamination’ by werewolf,
vampire, etc., takes the place of the defloration.”
Ashley Lister listed a few other themes that can be explored through
supernatural fiction. Vampires can represent ‘sly sexual predators’ and
embody ‘promiscuity and hedonistic abandon.’ While werewolves might
show the consequences of promiscuity, explore self-control, or play a role
in stories about domination and submission, with the alpha taking charge.
Lister also writes: “Ghosts can be used to show that some characters have
influence even when they no longer have a presence.” In fiction we often
talk about characters being haunted by a metaphorical ‘ghost’ from their
past – story guru John Truby uses ‘ghost’ to refer to an emotional wound
caused by a traumatic experience in the character’s past. In paranormal
romances, they can be haunted by a literal ghost. In the case of the movie
Ghost, Demi Moore’s character is haunted by her dead husband she must let
go so she can move on with her life.
31 | The Love Triangle
Before we look at what goes into writing a love triangle romance novel, I
should point out that many readers do not like love triangle stories. I think
the main reason for this is that many (most?) readers are looking for a story
that focuses on the developing relationship between two people. We made
that part of our definition of a romance back at the start of the book. A love
triangle, at its simplest, is a story where one character has to choose
between two suitors. The existence of a third character, a rival for love,
changes the story greatly.
It’s important to know that if you write a love triangle novel, you are
targeting a particular (and smaller) audience. And you had better not try and
pretend that your story is something else in order to ‘trick’ people into
reading it. Those one-star reviews won’t do anything to help your sales.
Love triangle stories are more popular in films than in romance novels.
Examples include the films My Best Friend’s Wedding (1997), Philadelphia
Story (1940), and My Favorite Wife (1940).
With that public service announcement out of the way, we can explore
how to create a plot for a love triangle romance novel.
Your main character is likely to be the person who has to choose between
two potential lovers. In the example I’m using, the heroine will be our main
point of view character. There is no reason why the reader cannot also have
access to the hero’s thoughts in parts of the story from his point of view.
And you could also share the rival’s POV if you wanted to. If you are going
to give us three viewpoints, you will need to be careful about ‘head
hopping’ within a single scene – restrict the number of viewpoints in a
scene to one or two at most. This is not a rule – do what your story needs, as
long as you make it clear for the reader whose head they are in. If you have
three points of view in a scene, I would enter each head only once to get
each character’s perspective, don’t keep jumping around. Maybe start with
the heroine, then visit the thoughts of each of the males, and finally return
to the heroine.
Your main character’s personality and their need for character
development will help you decide on the personalities of the two people
who are wooing them. In my example, the heroine will have a weakness or
character flaw that she needs to overcome. The hero will challenge her in a
way that encourages and assists her in overcoming this flaw. The rival will
not challenge her in this way – typically he is a safe choice that will allow
her to keep her defences in place, or he is a fun distraction who presents no
challenge to the false self she presents to the world. The rival may seem to
present her with what she wants – safety or a distraction. The hero provides
what she needs – a challenge. You will often see discussions of how a
character’s needs and their wants create internal conflict. In a screenplay
where a hero must choose between two female lovers, you may even see
them referred to as ‘need-girl’ and ‘want-girl.’ What a person wants is often
selfish and shallow – they want to be with a good-looking or a wealthy
person. Or preferably both. What they need relates to something deep
within them, connected to the thing they fear most and/or to some secret
shame. In our romance novel, the heroine may want the rival, but she needs
the hero.
There is a danger in creating a heroine that she just becomes a cardboard
character who exists solely to choose between two men. You need to make
her a person in her own right. Making her flawed and funny can help – look
at Helen Fielding’s Bridget Jones or Janet Evanovich’s Stephanie Plum.
I’ve already said that you need to make the heroine’s choice between her
two men a difficult one. There shouldn’t be one obvious winner. If there is,
your story will lack the conflict and interest necessary to keep a reader’s
attention.
The personalities of the two male characters need to be different, but
each must be attractive in his own way. At first glance, they should both
seem to be perfectly acceptable choices – with the hero perhaps seeming to
be slightly less of a good choice.
In Bridget Jones’s Diary, Daniel Cleaver (played by Hugh Grant in the
movie version) is handsome, charming, funny, and unpredictable. Mark
Darcy (Colin Firth) is a bit dull and not very charming. It’s obvious who
Bridget can have a fun time with, but when it comes to a long-term
relationship, her choice is less clear.
Your hero may also need to undergo character growth of his own, having
his own weakness or flaw to overcome. His ability to face this challenge
and complete his character development arc will be one of the things that
convinces the heroine that he is the right man for her.
The rival may also have a need for character growth – he may even have
the same weakness or flaw as the hero – but he will fail or refuse to
complete his character development arc. To take a simple example, the hero
may mature and set aside foolish frat boy behaviour, but the rival will
refuse to do this – he will refuse to grow up, showing that he isn’t ready yet
for an adult relationship. You can make this seem like less of a cliché if
your hero is a bad boy on the outside who matures on the inside, while your
rival seems stable and grown-up on the outside but is a spoiled child on the
inside.
What’s It About?
A love triangle romance isn’t about how the heroine chooses one man
instead of another. It’s about how the heroine overcomes her character flaw
– facing her deepest fear and her secret shame – and is then able to choose
the man who is the best fit with the true self that she has finally chosen to
show to the world. The hero enables her to overcome her flaw.
In some stories, the hero may support her in overcoming her flaw so that
she then feels confident enough to choose the rival. The hero sacrifices his
happiness because he wants what is best for her. This sacrifice demonstrates
his love. She will then realise that the rival isn’t the right man for her and
she will return to the hero. She demonstrates her character growth by
choosing the right man.
Let’s take all this advice and put it into a workable plot structure. As
always, this isn’t the way to write a love triangle story, but it is one way.
In a love triangle plot you effectively have two love stories going on. One
between the heroine and hero and one between the heroine and the rival.
She’s not dating both men and sleeping with them at the same time,
romance readers aren’t likely to find a two-timing heroine sympathetic.
Either you have one romance occurring after the other, followed by a
situation where the heroine must choose which of the two she preferred. Or
you have the heroine pursuing a romance with the wrong person (the rival)
while Mr. Right watches on and supports her, wanting her to be happy. In
the second of these options, the hero functions partly as a confidant or best
friend, creating the potential for a ‘friends to lovers’ story for part of the
plot. In contrast, her romance with the rival might begin as an ‘enemies to
lovers’ plot or she might be pursuing a man who is initially indifferent to
her, until the hero-confidant helps her gain his attention.
Avoiding the Bellamy
In some stories, the heroine is already in a relationship with the rival when
she meets the hero. She may even be engaged to be married. This is the case
in the ‘screwball’ comedies His Girl Friday (1940) and The Awful Truth
(1937) where the heroine is in a ‘safe’ relationship with a rival character
played by Ralph Bellamy and the charming but unreliable hero is played by
Cary Grant. The characters played by Bellamy are earnest but dull, they
have no sense of humour and may have another downside such as a
domineering mother. This type of character, which was later nicknamed The
Bellamy after the actor who played them, exist to contrast with the lively,
outgoing personality of the hero and are obviously the wrong man for the
heroine that her choice is never in doubt. The Bill Pullman character in
Sleepless in Seattle is another Bellamy character.
You don’t want a Bellamy as your rival in a love triangle romance novel.
If the heroine is in a relationship with the rival as the story opens, he must
be attractive in his own right and an equal match for the hero.
A story can also open with the heroine in a relationship with the hero
before the rival comes on the scene and charms her.
In the examples I’ve looked at, there seem to be two variations on the
love triangle plot. They are similar, but I think there are enough differences
between them to make it worth considering them separately. By which I
mean, I tried to combine these into a single plot structure and it didn’t work.
I’m going to call these variations the sequential structure and the parallel
structure.
The sequential plot structure has the heroine having a romance with the
rival and the hero one after the other. Sometimes she dates the rival first and
sometimes she dates the hero first. External subplots keep the first man she
dates on the scene – and in the reader’s mind – while the second romance is
underway. Towards the end of the novel the heroine must make a decision
as to which of the men she wants to be with in the long-term. In the
discussion of this plot below, I’m using Helen Fielding’s Bridget Jones’s
Diary (1996) as an example.
In the parallel plot structure, the heroine pursues a romantic relationship
with the rival (Mr. Wrong) but at the same time she has a close platonic
friendship with the hero, never realising that (a) he is in love with her, and
(b) that he is Mr. Right. The hero’s love for the heroine is unrecognised and
unrequited, which adds a sympathetic and slightly tragic quality to his
character, especially if he helps her to win the attention of the rival. He is
prepared to sacrifice his happiness in order to allow her to have what she
wants – brining the hero’s ‘heroic sacrifice’ in earlier in the story. Plus it is a
‘friends to lovers’ story. I’m going to use the movie Some Kind of
Wonderful (1987) – written and produced by John Hughes – as an example.
In it, the hero must choose between the heroine and a rival, but it is the plot
structure that concerns us here rather than the genders of the characters. I
like Some Kind of Wonderful because it is a rare example where the hero is
an Artist rather than a Warrior or Warrior hybrid character.
Sequence 1
Introduce the main character and her ordinary life. Bridget is single, from a
middle class family, and works in the city where she has a circle of friends
who function as a support group and surrogate family.
Bridget is at a crossroads in her life. Seeing her friends going off to get
married and have children, she has to decide what life she wants for herself
as she reaches her thirtieth birthday. ‘Grown-ups’ keep asking her, ‘How’s
your love life?’ making her feel like a teenager. Bridget’s mum tries to plan
her life for her by setting her up with a ‘suitable’ man.
Introduce the hero (Mr. Right). Early in the story, Bridget is introduced to
Mark Darcy (Colin Firth in the movie) – the two knew each other as
children, but haven’t seen each other for years. Darcy is now a successful
barrister/lawyer. Bridget finds him dull, but he shares her quirky sense of
humour. They don’t hit it off.
Introduce the rival (Mr. Wrong). The rival is a character that the heroine
wants to have a relationship with. Bridget is attracted to Daniel Cleaver
(Hugh Grant), who she describes as having a wicked, dissolute air. He’s
also successful, clever, amusing, and flirty. He is an example of our
charmer/seducer character. He’s obviously Mr. Wrong, but Bridget can’t see
this because she has a crush on him. She believes he is unavailable – he
dates other women and is out of her league.
Beginning of the relationship between the heroine & Mr. Wrong. This can
occur as early as sequence one (as it does in Bridget Jones) or as late as
sequence three (Some Kind of Wonderful). In Bridget Jones’s Diary, Daniel
Cleaver asks Bridget out for a date but cancels on her at the last minute.
This begins what will become a pattern in their relationship – he doesn’t
respect her and he doesn’t treat her well. When they do finally go on a date,
he says he wants to have sex but not get involved. Bridget says no and
leaves. Her friends try to boost Bridget’s self-confidence, which is lacking,
and tell her Daniel will be ‘gagging for it’ if she plays hard to get. She’s not
convinced.
External Events (B-story). Bridget becomes aware that something his
happening between her parents – it is a mystery that is solved in sequence
two.
Sequence 2
Sequence 3
Sequence 4
Sequence 5
Sequence 6
Sequence 7
Relationship with Mr. Right – Her friends advise Bridget to host a dinner
party and invite Mark Darcy. He is pleased to be asked and tells her that
people are coming to see her, not to judge her by her cooking. How well he
understands her. Daniel never said anything like this to her. The food she
prepares isn’t a great success, but Darcy defends her gallantly, making a
joke of it.
External Obstacles – Bridget’s mother is accused of being an accomplice
in a criminal scheme run by her lover. Darcy, the barrister/lawyer, take
charge of her situation. Bridget doesn’t hear from him after this and she’s
afraid she won’t see him again.
Sequence 8
Bridget doesn’t hear from Darcy – she’s afraid she isn’t good enough for
him. Maybe she’s destined to be with someone like Daniel. She thinks she
should try and move on. Her parents, reconciled now, plan a Christmas
party as if nothing has happened. Mark Darcy is never mentioned.
Bridget thinks about Daniel. He makes a drunk phone call, telling her he
loves her and that he made a terrible mistake. He says he wants to see her,
but never turns up.
Christmas at her parents. Bridget is asked, ‘How’s your love life?’ Her
mother’s lover crashes the party and takes the mother ‘hostage.’ Mark
Darcy arrives with the police close behind – they’re in pursuit of the lover.
Bridget manages to trick her mother and get her away from her lover. The
police arrest him.
Darcy takes Bridget away for a proper Christmas celebration. He’s been
trying to track down the lover and retrieve the money he conned people out
of. He tricked the conman into coming back to England to carry his love,
Bridget’s mother, away. He didn’t phone Bridget because he didn’t think
she liked him very much.
In the movie, Darcy buys her a new diary, so she can make a fresh start in
the New Year. He doesn’t judge her for what she wrote about him, he loves
her.
Sequence 1
Introduce the hero and his ordinary life. Keith (Eric Stoltz), in Some Kind
of Wonderful, is from a blue-collar family in the poorer part of town and in
his final year of high school. He is an artist and a bit of a loner. He is at a
crossroads in his life – he has to decide what he wants to do after high
school. His father wants to plan his life for him, wanting Keith to go to
college and study business – to be the first person in their family who went
to college.
Introduce the rival. Keith has a crush on Amanda, a beautiful girl from
his side of town who has been accepted into the clique of wealthy and
beautiful young people at school because she is dating Hardy, who is from a
wealthy family. Keith makes sketches of Amanda in his notebook but has
never approached her.
Introduce the heroine. Keith has a tomboyish female friend, Watts (Mary
Stuart Masterson), who he has known his whole life. The two of them are
best friends and share each other’s secrets and dreams. Keith doesn’t think
of her romantically, but it is obvious Watts has a crush on him.
Introduce the antagonist. Amanda has a boyfriend, Hardy, who acts as an
opponent or antagonist, providing the external obstacles to Keith’s romantic
relationship.
The romantic relationship between Keith and Amanda (the rival) doesn’t
begin until sequence three. Instead, we see more of the (platonic)
relationship between Keith and Watts. This friendship and its undercurrent
of unrequited love plays out alongside the romantic relationship between
hero and rival during the whole story.
Sequence 2
Watts supports Keith, even though she is jealous of the attention he pays
Amanda. When Keith asks Watts if she’s jealous, she denies it. Keith says
Watts doesn’t understand what he’s feeling because she has never been in
love. Watts says she has. When Keith asks who with, she changes the
subject.
Watts knows she can’t compete with a beautiful and popular girl like
Amanda. She says that if Keith’s interest in Amanda is just about sex, as a
friend she could come to some sort of arrangement with him. This is not a
come on, she says, juts an offer for a friend. Keith is touched but says no.
There is an awkward moment. Watts asks Keith if he really wants to
challenge Hardy for Amanda. Keith says he has to. See note about Keith’s
character flaw below.
In Some Kind of Wonderful, instead of rivalry between the two female
characters (heroine and rival) the rivalry exists between the hero and the
opponent/antagonist, Hardy. Amanda and Watts don’t really meet until late
in the story, though Watts is jealous of the fact that Keith is gaga over
Amanda.
Show the Protagonist’s Flaw in Action. Keith has self-esteem issues.
Because he’s from a poorer neighbourhood and has a blue-collar job fixing
cars, he feels the need to prove himself. He is jealous of the rich kids with
their expensive cars. He doesn’t even have a car of his own. As an Artist
personality type, he might be expected to have some issues around his self-
image, but he seems confident in his identity as an artist and doesn’t
agonise over whether he should do what his father says and become a
businessman who does art in his spare time.
External Action. Keith deliberately gets himself into detention because he
thinks he’ll see Amanda there after she skips class. Instead, Keith finds
himself with a tough guy, Skinhead, and his cronies. Again, this sets up
something that will pay off later in the story.
Sequence 3
Beginning of the relationship with the rival. Hardy cheats on Amanda again,
in front of their friends. Amanda says she’s had enough and wants to end
their relationship. When Hardy tries to strongarm her, Keith intervenes.
Away from the others, Keith asks Amanda out. She says yes.
Support from confidante and/or family. At home, Keith’s family are
worried because he’s happy and smiling. He’s never happy and smiling. In
detention, Keith has won the respect of Skinhead – because of his artistic
skills and because he took Amanda away from Hardy.
Jealous, Watts hangs around with another boy, hoping that Keith will
notice.
Meanwhile, Amanda’s friends warn her that she’s made a mistake. If
she’s not Hardy’s girlfriend, she will lose her place in the ‘in crowd.’ Keith
offers Amanda a chance to back out of the date. She just smiles and doesn’t
take him up on the offer – but this isn’t an enthusiastic response. If Keith
notices this, he doesn’t mention it. When Keith is gone, Amanda says it’s no
big deal if she dates Keith once.
External action. Keith asking Amanda out kicks off the external conflict
which revolves around the jealousy of Hardy.
Sequence 4
Sequence 5
Sequence 6
Relationship with Ms. Right has a significant moment. Watts asks Keith if
he wants to practice his lines or his kissing technique on her. ‘Pretend I’m a
girl.’ They practice kissing – then Watts is embarrassed for being so into it.
She gets angry. Keith apologises.
Support from friends/family. Keith has withdrawn all of his savings – the
money to get him through college. His father confronts him about it. Keith
explains that all his life he’s felt like a misfit. He wants to live his own life,
make his own choices, and he needs to stand up to Hardy – if only to prove
something to himself. His father is supportive, says he’s proud of his son.
Relationship with Ms. Wrong. Keith has ‘borrowed’ a Jaguar from the
garage for his date. Watts has agreed to be his driver for the evening. He
takes Amanda to a restaurant – it isn’t expensive. Amanda is thinking this is
a mistake and things are awkward at first. He challenges her, asking if the
girls she hangs around with are really her friends. Amanda begins to enjoy
herself – Keith treats her much better than Hardy.
Watts watches through the window. She was hoping the date would be a
bust. She’s concerned that they’re getting on so well. When it comes time to
drive them on to the next location, Watts is snarky with Keith. He’s
confused by her attitude – she volunteered to help him.
Sequence 7
Keith enters Hardy’s party with Amanda. Hardy is with another girl but
abandons her. He welcomes his ‘guests.’ He taunts Keith, saying he had
Amanda first and Keith got her ‘used.’ Keith goes for Hardy, but Hardy’s
friends pull him off. Everyone is watching. Hardy tells his friends to take
Keith outside and beat him up. Nobody moves. Then one by one, people
start leaving the party. They don’t like Hardy’s behaviour. Hardy has lost
control of the situation and he’s lost everyone’s respect. Hardy tries to take
back control, but it’s too late. Amanda slaps Hardy.
Watts apologises for misjudging Amanda and leaves Keith and Amanda
together. Keith watches her walk away, feeling conflicted.
Amanda takes off the diamond earrings – ‘I think you want to give these
to someone else.’
Keith runs after Watts, calls her by her first name and tells her he loves
her. She puts on the earrings. Tomorrow, they will return them so he can
afford to go to art school. He says they’ll keep one of them and have it
made into a ring.
Ultimately, Keith didn’t have to prove anything to anyone except himself.
By being his true self, he won new allies, beginning with Skinhead, and the
respect of others around him. Once he realises that who he is is good
enough, he is able to recognise that he doesn’t need a ‘trophy’ girlfriend like
Amanda, and he’s free to be with the person who has always loved his true
self.
32 | Forbidden Love
“Two households, both alike in dignity, in fair Verona...” Shakespeare’s
Romeo and Juliet is perhaps the most famous story of forbidden love. The
heroine and hero are from two families with an ‘ancient grudge,’ and when
they fall in love... well, things don’t go so well for them. [Spoiler alert]
They don’t achieve their happy ever after – at least not in this world.
Juliet and Romeo’s love was forbidden because of an ‘us versus them’
situation. One society or community or family decides that another is the
enemy. Humans seem to do a lot of that sort of thing. We create barriers
based on nationality, religion, race, social class, financial status, opposing
sides in a war, or just family names – Hatfield versus McCoys, for example.
In some cultures, same-sex relationships are forbidden. And even in
‘enlightened’ societies, there are often issues relating to love with or
between persons who are physically or mentally ‘disabled.’ Of course, in
paranormal romance you have additional oppositions such as vampire
versus werewolf, and in fantasy romance you might have elf versus human.
Some relationships are taboo or questioned within a single society.
Adultery is perhaps more accepted today in the West, but in the past and in
some modern societies it is regarded as a crime. Incest, between parent and
child or between siblings, is taboo in most cultures. Age restrictions are also
placed on what is an acceptable love relationship – relationships with
children are forbidden, though the definition of ‘under-age’ varies between
cultures. And even between consenting adults, large age discrepancies – so-
called May-December relationships – are frowned upon. In another
example of the double standard, it is okay for an older man to have a
relationship with a younger woman or to take a ‘trophy wife,’ but less so for
an older woman to have a ‘toy boy.’
But despite all of these societal rules and the punishments used to enforce
them, people fall in love. Love doesn’t discriminate. It transcends barriers.
Love is blind. Love conquers all. The heart wants what the heart wants.
In romantic fiction, a society’s moral taboos – against paedophilia and
incest in particular – are accepted and respected. Relationships between
people of different ethnicities and religions may be problematic in some
cultures and so may have a more restricted audience. Romances featuring
same-sex relationships have specific readerships. The same is true of stories
featuring significant age differences. And those featuring ‘disabled’ persons.
At its most popular, the romance genre is fairly conservative.
Despite what I have just said, there is room for forbidden love in
romance fiction. Two people may fall in love if they are from different
countries, social classes, financial strata, sides in a war, or families with
long-standing grudges. The bad boy romance is one example.
In a story of forbidden love, the couple face opposition from the social
group(s) in which they live. Initially, this opposition will be implicit – the
pair know they are breaking the rules and must keep their love secret. But
when their secret is revealed, they face explicit and active opposition to
their union – their own people turn against them for a transgression of the
rules of acceptable behaviour. Ironically, they may even find the two
opposing sides uniting in condemnation of their relationship. And in another
irony, we may see violence used to try to prevent love.
Tales of forbidden love often end tragically. Romeo and Juliet is a classic
example. The couple cannot stand against the power of their own society
and so can only find long-lasting union in death. Not exactly the happy ever
after we are seeking in a romance novel. Though you could possibly use it
in a paranormal romance where death doesn’t mark the end of existence.
The happy ever after in a romance novel will see the heroine and hero
surviving and embarking on a long and happy life together. If the success of
their relationship also creates a bridge or even a reconciliation between the
two warring sides they come from, that is an added bonus. Two lovers
rejecting their own families and refusing to continue their dynasties might
be enough to make the old men who enforce the taboo think again. Our
world needs a lot more of this kind of thing.
In terms of plot structure, a forbidden love story will look something like
this:
Beginning (Sequences 1 & 2) – The heroine and hero first encounter each
other. This can be similar to any encounter or meet cute, but you will have
to create circumstances in which two people from opposing factions can
accidentally encounter each other. Perhaps one has heard of the beauty of
the other and sneaks across a boundary to catch a glimpse of them – and
then accidentally (or otherwise) falls into their field of vision. Or it could be
that they are accidentally forced together by circumstance – the equivalent
of having to perform a task or journey together, being snowed in, or some
other form of ‘lock-in’ that throws them together.
The spark of attraction between them will need to be quite strong,
because it is going to make them break the rules of their respective societal
groups. They could begin as enemies – especially if Fate has forced them
together – in which case you can use ideas from the ‘enemies to lovers’
story. Or one may be instantly attracted to the other and throw caution to the
wind, as happened with Romeo. Or the attraction may be mutual.
You will need to establish how and why a relationship between them is
forbidden. And what the consequences of breaking this taboo would be.
Initially, one or both of them may be reluctant to act on the feelings
between them – the potential consequences put them off. But it soon
becomes clear that the attraction is too strong to resist. By the end of
sequence two, they have agreed to become lovers. But they will have to
conduct their romance in secret.
Middle 1 (Sequences 3 & 4) – The two lovers get to know each other and
their love deepens. They have to take great pains to keep their meetings
secret and their ‘dates’ and days out may be somewhat unconventional. The
awareness of the danger they are in adds an extra frisson to their romance. It
is not only their relationship that is at risk. At this stage, neither of them is
thinking of this as a lifelong relationship – it is more of an adventure or an
experiment. They are just following their emotions to see where they lead.
They don’t fully consider the consequences of their actions because they
think this thing, whatever it is, might not last long. Tension in this part of
the story comes from the usual ‘will they, won’t they’ question with an
added question of could they form a committed relationship even if they
wanted to. There is also added tension in the question, ‘Will they be found
out?’
In some stories, the couple might conduct their relationship in open
defiance of the rules, in which case there is a question of how long they can
get away with it before the ‘authorities’ or ordinary people put an end to it.
Midpoint (end of Sequence 4, beginning of Sequence 5) – The true nature of
the risks they face becomes clear to the couple. Perhaps their secret is
exposed to everyone in both societies, or perhaps it is discovered by one
person who warns them to end it or tries to blackmail them. They may have
had a few near-misses earlier in the story but this is the first time they face
real external opposition to their romance.
Ending (Sequence 7 & 8) – The hero and heroine now face their darkest
hour, separated from the person they love, feeling lonely and miserable.
They may believe that their situation is hopeless and that they don’t want to
live anymore. Or they may begin to think that there is no point in
continuing to fight – they may as well accept their fate and agree to a
loveless marriage to someone their community approves of. Whatever else
happens, they will never forget the love they have enjoyed, however briefly
it lasted.
Sometimes, one of the lovers will have an unexpected ally – a mother or
father who had to give up their own forbidden love and has regretted it all
their life. They may offer support and some kind of leverage that the young
lover can use. The help offered may be a more realistic escape route to a
genuine safe haven. Or it may be something that can be used to help
persuade the other parent or ruler who opposes the love match.
Or perhaps, during their time together, the heroine and hero have learned
more about each other’s societies or families and gained some objective
insight that people within those groups lack. Their shared knowledge may
enable the two sides to be reconciled. If the couple have secretly married
and perhaps conceived a child, this may give added impetus for both sides
to overcome old differences.
Or the couple may create a family or community of their own, setting off
on their own or drawing other like-minded individuals or couples to their
cause.
33 | Second Chances & Secret
Babies
Kerry Winfrey, in an article on the Writer’s Digest website, says that readers
have mixed feelings about the second chance romance. Why? “You’re
starting with characters who’ve already broken up once ... In order for there
to be a second chance, your characters had to blow their first chance.”
Your characters have been through the various stages of the development
of a romantic relationship but they failed to achieve a happy ever after. As a
writer, you’ve now got to convince the reader that they can get it right the
second time around. And this can be especially hard if your two characters
meet for a second time and even they don’t think they should get back
together.
Writing a second chance romance gives you some serious questions to
answer.
In order to sell the idea of a second chance romance, you will need to show
the reader that one or both of the characters has changed since they were
together previously. We need to see that they have completed at least some
part of their journey of character growth. They need to have learned
something – about life and about themselves – in the time that they have
been apart. If there has been no change, why would the other person
consider giving them a second chance?
Second chance romances tend to feature slightly older protagonists –
probably late twenties to late thirties, though they could be older than this. I
saw something recently that said millennials – those born between 1981 and
1996 – are the largest group of readers of books. These people are now
entering their forties and so there might be an increasing readership for
novels with older protagonists. I’m not sure how much this will influence
the ages of characters in romance novels, but it is worth bearing in mind.
The reason why the main characters in second chance romances are older
is that they have to have lived long enough to have the first chance. And
that first chance needs to have been a committed relationship of a
reasonable length.
There are two circumstances that set the scene for a second chance
romance:
(a) The two protagonists were in separate long-term relationships, but both
of these ended as a result of divorce, the death of a partner, or some other
tragedy. The two surviving characters, our protagonists, don’t believe they
will ever love again. Until they meet each other.
(b) The two protagonists were previously in a long-term relationship but for
some reason, it failed and they separated. They meet again sometime later
and have an opportunity to try and make their relationship work again.
In both cases, the main characters are older and wiser, but their life
experience has made them wary of – and perhaps cynical about – true love.
They both have wounded hearts and need to heal these old wounds to have
a chance at a serious relationship again.
Option (a) above is a feature of many romances – the heroine and/or hero
are single as the story opens as a result of an earlier failed relationship. But
you can use it as the basis of a whole novel and place the story in the
second chance at love sub-category. I think this sort of story is likely to be
gentler and more sentimental, with the opportunity for characters to reveal a
great deal of heartache as they re-evaluate their previous relationship and
think about its loss. It’s likely that your characters are going to meet and
become friends before they become lovers – they have lost relationships in
common and may begin by supporting each other in empathic friendship
before the sparks fly. And if the sparks do fly at their first meeting, both are
likely to suppress or repress these feelings out of respect for their former
partner or out of fear of entering another potentially devastating
relationship.
Personally, I think option (b) provides the opportunity for a much more
dramatic story, since the heroine and hero have a shared backstory and
unresolved issues from their earlier relationship. If they parted amicably,
you have the opportunity to write a ‘friends to lovers’ story while exploring
the issues that exist between them. And if they parted as enemies then you
can use the ‘enemies to lovers’ plot as a basis for your story.
I’m going to concentrate on option (b) in this chapter.
Children
You will need to decide if your heroine and hero had one or more children
from their previous relationship. And if they did, who has custody of them,
and what have the visitation arrangements been? If you want your heroine
and hero to have been completely separated physically since the end of their
relationship, you will have to have had one of them relocated to a distant
part of the country or to another country completely.
You also have the option of a ‘secret baby’ plot here, but I’ll deal with
that trope separately.
Your heroine and hero first met – and possibly had their ‘meet cute’ – when
their original relationship began. They may recount or relive this experience
– and they each may have slightly different recollections of how that first
meeting went. It’s likely that one character is more romantic in their
memories of events than the other – and it doesn’t have to be the hero who
is more cynical.
It’s up to you to decide what sort of encounter they have when they meet
up for the second time. If you’re writing a romantic comedy, it can be
another ‘meet cute,’ perhaps one that causes chaos and/or minor injury to
one of them. They are likely to be surprised to see each other again. They
might look at each other and say, ‘You!’ Or perhaps one is pretending to be
surprised if they engineered this ‘accident.’
Lock-in
As with any romance, you have to come up with a way of keeping your two
characters in close proximity – particularly if they ended their previous
relationship on bad terms. Any kind of romance lock-in situation will
probably work. You also have some other options arising out of the fact that
they are related. There may be family obligations that bring them together –
a family member in the hospital, a major birthday celebration,
Thanksgiving, Christmas, a wedding, a funeral, or a major event in a child’s
life.
There might be additional complications if they haven’t told their family
about the separation or divorce. If they pretend that they’re still married,
you can play around with ‘marriage of convenience’ plot options. Perhaps
an elderly family member is suffering from memory loss and thinks they’re
still together, so they agree to play along. And this elderly person may be
faking it to try and effect a reconciliation.
The heroine and/or hero may interact with secondary characters who will
try to influence their second chance romance in one way or the other. A
character may be in favour of the two lovers getting back together again. Or
a confidante may have been around to support them when the relationship
ended and remembers how badly upset the heroine or hero was and how
long it took them to get over the break-up. ‘Do you want to go through that
again?’ This confidante is also likely to be less forgiving of a former
partner, acting as the cynical voice of reason: ‘He (or she) hasn’t changed!’
This confidante will be one source of opposition that the lovers will have to
overcome. They also give the heroine (or hero) someone to talk to about the
development and failure of the earlier relationship.
A secondary character may also have experience of how things can go
well (or go badly) when old lovers get back together.
Character Development
The original relationship will have failed because one or both of the main
characters was flawed. They were not able to overcome their character flaw
and make the relationship a success. In the time that the two of them have
been apart, one or both characters may have had experiences that have
enabled them to complete their character growth and overcome the flaw –
or at least go some way to recognising it and begin working on overcoming
it.
During the second chance romance, this growth needs to be tested and/or
completed. They need to demonstrate that they have changed or show that
they are in the process of changing. In terms of plotting the story, you need
to show how the flaw wrecked the previous relationship – with defensive
behaviours and a false self preventing the two of them from forming a
trusting, loving relationship. You will need to come up with events that
allowed them to complete some or all of their development arc. And you
will need to come up with a situation that tests their growth or forces them
to complete it. There must be trying circumstances that really target their
greatest fear and their secret shame.
You need to come up with some situations that each character has faced
in the time that they were apart that has caused or enabled them to grow as
a person. One of the things they will have learned – but are perhaps
reluctant to admit – is that ending the relationship was a mistake. It is
something they bitterly regret. They have learned just how much they lost
as a result of the break-up. They may not admit that they think they lost
their one chance in life to be with The One, but there is certainly a suspicion
that this may have happened.
There must also be some sense that they haven’t been able to move on
fully from the relationship. It is not something they have consigned to the
past and don’t think about anymore. Even if they won’t admit it to
themselves, that relationship is still an important part of their life. This may
be revealed in their behaviour – they may still go to a place or engage in
activities that recall things they did with their ex. And it may be seen in the
fact that they haven’t formed another long-term relationship or the fact that
they are dating someone who is a poor copy of their ex.
How did they first meet and fall in love? The first chance romance has to be
something significant and intense, such that both characters are still
thinking about it months or even years later. You can have an intense, short-
lived romance, but it will have to be something pretty spectacular. Perhaps
it was the first deeply passionate relationship for one or both of them.
Why did they break-up? Why were they not able to stay in a committed
relationship? Perhaps they were afraid of hurting or being hurt by the other
person. One of them may have felt that ending the relationship was in the
best interests of both of them. It could be that they didn’t want the other to
make whatever personal sacrifices would have been necessary for the
relationship to continue in the longer term.
The reason for the break-up has to be something so significant that it
cannot be resolved with a single conversation. As Mona Shroff writes, it has
to be caused by “...something so bad, both parties can’t/won’t/don’t want to
talk to the other, either from anger, fear, sadness.” It must be something so
emotionally traumatic that they have built walls to protect themselves from
the memory of it, and they don’t want to let those walls down and become
vulnerable to that hurt again.
In a blog post on the sub-genre, Lucy Mitchell asks, “Were they too
young? Was it a case of bad timing or did one hurt the other?”
What brings them back together? The heroine and hero have suffered the
break-up, dealt with it, and moved on with their lives. Why would they
want to return to a relationship that caused them so much pain? This is
likely to be a combination of circumstance – an unexpected encounter or
new ‘meet cute’ – and a matter of unresolved feelings. They may still have a
need to achieve some form of closure. Perhaps they agree to see each other
with the intention of tying up loose ends and finally drawing a line under
their whole relationship. But things don’t go according to plan. A ‘secret
baby’ is another possibility, as we’ll see later in the chapter. Or perhaps it is
business or politics that brings them back together – perhaps even forcing
them to work together.
How do they overcome their differences? In part, this involves dealing with
their own internal conflict and overcoming their character flaw. They
cannot enter a committed relationship with anyone until they accomplish
this. It was responsible, to some degree, for their original break-up and is
likely to cause the same problems again unless they deal with it.
Why do they fall in love again? The heroine and hero fell in love once
before and they genuinely loved each other and formed a strong connection.
Even after the break-up, they still had feelings for each other. That original
bond has never been fully broken. They belong together. Their original love
for each other is one part of the equation. The other part is that the
characters have grown or matured in the time they have been apart. Their
life experiences have allowed them to grow as people and there is more of
their true selves on show and less of their false selves. The original love
will have been based on a small glimpse of a heavily defended true self.
Now that there is more of that self on view, the attraction is likely to be
even stronger – even if a character hasn’t quite completed their character
development arc and allowed the true self fully into the light. In accepting
their true self, and who they really are, each character is more prepared to
give love and receive it from someone else. They do not feel that revealing
their feelings and allowing themselves to be vulnerable is quite as scary as
it was.
Honesty and vulnerability are important in all romance novels, but they are
especially important in a second chance romance. The heroine and hero got
it wrong the first time around, they weren’t as honest and open as they
needed to be. They were afraid to be vulnerable and let their true self be
seen fully. Second time around, they have got to overcome this fear and
share their deepest fears, insecurities, and private shame. In a way, this
unburdening will be a cathartic experience. It is liberating to reach a point
where you no longer have anything to hide. It frees you from baggage you
may have been carrying since childhood. But to feel comfortable enough to
do that, you have to feel a deep sense of trust in the other person. In a
second chance romance, the heroine and hero have a slight advantage in
that the other person has probably already seen them at their worst,
especially during a messy break-up, and they have come back for more.
Building trust – creating a relationship and environment where someone
feels safe enough to be honest and vulnerable – is an important part of any
romance story, but it is doubly important in a second chance romance
because these two people have already hurt each other deeply.
Commitment
Okay, we all know how she got pregnant, but if she didn’t want a baby, how
come she didn’t take precautions?
On her website, Write with Harte, Jenna Harte wrote a whole article on
this topic. There are a handful of possible causes:
Birth Control Failure – There are circumstances in which birth control
pills can fail to give 100% protection, including interactions with other
medications or supplements. Anything which prevents the birth control pill
from being fully absorbed in the body or causes it to be expelled – e.g.
vomiting – can affect its effectiveness. When someone changes birth control
pills, there can be a time right after the switch when protection may be
lower than normal. Certain medical conditions may also be the cause.
Physical forms of birth control may fail if dislodged or not fitted properly
and condoms can split or come off.
Mistaken Infertility Diagnosis – If the heroine or the hero has been told
by a doctor that they can never have children, they may decide that there is
no need to worry about birth control. (Sexually transmitted diseases are a
whole other issue and we tend not to refer to them in romances). If the
diagnosis was wrong or said that conception was virtually impossible, a
miracle baby might still occur. In this case, the hero or heroine might be
extremely happy to hear news of their ‘miracle’ baby. Or not.
Human Error – Being too drunk to take proper precautions is probably a
reason to avoid – it doesn’t reflect well on your heroine or hero. And there
is then also a question of whether she was too drunk to give proper consent
to sex. Do people still rely on the ‘rhythm method’? They probably
shouldn’t. It’s also worth remembering that sperm can survive for around
five days and can fertilise an egg if it remains in the reproductive tract.
Forgetting to take a birth control pill might occur if the heroine is in a
different location, or time zone, or is distracted by other events. Also, sex
sometimes occurs at unexpected times, meaning the appropriate
preparations might not have been made.
It could be that the heroine did want to get pregnant, which makes the
above moot. Did the hero also want to become a father? If not, you’ll have
to do some careful explaining about her motives. And if they were both up
for being parents, you’ll have to explain why they split up before the
pregnancy was known about.
Technically, the secret baby doesn’t have to be the heroine’s. She may
have agreed to adopt the child when a friend or relative was unable to
provide it with a healthy, stable home. The child’s father may then return
having learned of the existence of his child – and perhaps he and the
heroine then become involved in an enemies to lovers romance.
While the secret baby is typically seen in heterosexual romance novels,
there are ways it can be worked into male-male or lesbian romances.
Why does the heroine keep her pregnancy or the existence of their child a
secret from the father? There needs to be a compelling reason for doing this.
As soon as he finds out he’s a father, the hero is going to ask, ‘Why didn’t
you tell me?’ Even if their relationship ended before the heroine knew she
was pregnant, he’s still going to want to know why she didn’t get in touch
with him.
It could be that the hero’s behaviour or circumstances were the reason
why the relationship ended and why she didn’t want to contact him after she
discovered she was pregnant. Perhaps he ended up in jail, for example. But
then you’ve got to explain why she then chooses to get back together with
this man when he gets out of jail. Perhaps her life or that of the child is
threatened by the hero’s enemies. And perhaps he was framed for a crime
he didn’t commit.
Or maybe the hero left her because he thought she’d be better off without
her. When we get into reasons why they broke up, we’re often back in
‘second chance romance’ territory – see above.
One real-life compelling reason – he’s already married – is less
commonly found in romances. Fidelity and commitment are key themes in
a romance story and readers are less likely to feel sympathy for a hero who
cheats on his wife, even if the heroine is a better match for him than the
woman he is married to. There are ways to make his betrayal of his wife
more palatable, but you are still on tricky ground in this genre.
If the heroine was unable to contact the hero for some reason, that takes
the choice away from her. If she tried to track him down, we can understand
if this didn’t work out. Of course, you need a reason why she can’t find
him. Why doesn’t she have contact details for him? Mobile phones and the
internet mean it’s much easier to contact people than it used to be. Perhaps
the hero was using a fake identity – because he was an undercover cop or
something along those lines. But then you have an issue of him having
deceived her about who he was.
Lexi Whitlow writes that the ‘big reveal’ is a key moment in any secret
baby romance. While the pregnancy or the existence of the child remains a
secret from the hero, there is tension in the plot. Readers will want to know
what will happen when he finds out. The fact that he’s a father is a big
secret to keep from him.
Men are brought up to be stoic and not to show emotions – except perhaps
anger. Discovering that he has a child will be an emotional experience that
the hero probably isn’t equipped to handle. And he almost certainly won’t
be able to express his feelings openly and honestly. He may bottle things up
until they explode in an unhealthy way. He may blame the heroine for
trying to ‘trap’ and control him or he may be angry at himself for being
unfit to be a parent. Or both. He may feel that the child and the heroine
would be better off without him. But these thoughts will conflict with a
desire to be part of his child’s life.
Becoming a father is a life-changing experience for the hero. Potentially,
he has new responsibilities, both practical and financial. Everything from
paying for the child’s upkeep to changing nappies or sitting up all night if
the child is sick. People will expect him to grow up and start acting like a
dad. Or assume he’s incapable of this. There may be implications for his
wider family, especially if his parents were expecting him to give them
grandchildren or to produce an heir to the family fortune. Or the hero may
fear that the child will inherit the family curse – either a figurative curse or
the kind in a shifter romance. In the latter case, the hero may have a secret
to share with the heroine – ‘By the way, when our kid reaches puberty, the
change is going to be more complicated than you think...’
Being a father will also change the hero’s own perception of who he is.
He may feel proud and want to live up to his new responsibilities. Or he
may be afraid and believe that he will be a terrible father. To some extent,
his views on his own potential as a father may be based on the relationship
he had with his father or on the fact that his father was never there for him
to have a relationship.
The hero’s initial reaction may be negative – panic, anger, disbelief, or
some combination of all of these things. He may have to cycle through the
stages of the change curve quite quickly. The heroine might be disappointed
or repelled by his reaction, thinking it was a mistake to tell him about the
child. Again, we’re into ‘enemies to lovers’ territory. It may take the hero
some time to come around to accepting his new reality. And perhaps he will
need to encounter his own child or another, older child to give him some
perspective on fatherhood. Being with the child will allow him to discover
or rediscover his caring and protective side. And seeing him do this may
help the heroine fall in love with him all over again.
Just because two people conceived a child doesn’t mean that they should be
together in a relationship. I’m sure there are lots of cases in real life where
couples had a child thinking it would bring them closer together and save
their relationship or cases where they had a child because it is what couples
are supposed to do. These are not good reasons for having a child and a
pregnancy isn’t likely to save a romance. A baby gives people sleepless
nights and more reasons to be anxious – you need a strong relationship
before you can deal properly with something like that.
By the same argument, the existence of a child isn’t a reason in itself for
two people to get back together and give romance a second chance. A hero
who feels obligated to be with the woman who carried his child is unlikely
to be in the right frame of mind for romance. What I’m saying here is that
your heroine and hero must still have feelings for each other for this plot to
work. They may be deeply buried or denied, but they are still there.
Also, if the hero still has feelings for the heroine, he’s less likely to ask
her, ‘Is it mine?’ and demand a paternity test. And it avoids the issue of him
seeking to get custody of the child, unless that is an obstacle you want to
include in your story.
I suppose the ideal set-up is to have the hero come back to find the
heroine to try and rekindle their romance before he learns of the existence
of the child. And then, the longer she keeps him in the dark about the
paternity of her child, the more she is putting their rekindled relationship at
risk.
34 | Enemies to Lovers & Friends
to Lovers
Enemies to Lovers
From the Moment They First Meet – Hate at first sight. Instead of a meet
cute, they have some sort of encounter that results in an immediate and
deeply felt dislike for each other.
Since Childhood – The heroine and hero perhaps went to the same school
or lived in the same neighbourhood. Their personal antagonism began back
then or they belonged to different social groups who were ‘enemies’ to one
another.
Since a Previous Relationship – They may have been involved in a
relationship previously – either a platonic friendship, a working
relationship, or a romantic relationship. Unless they only dated once, a
previous romantic relationship makes the story overlap with the second
chance romance or perhaps a secret baby romance plot.
It’s worth noting that there is a non-romance version of this plot – the
‘buddy movie.’ These films bring two very different people together in a
situation that forces them to remain together. They initially dislike each
other, arguing and fighting, but gradually they come to know and respect
each other, and they ultimately end up as friends. Classic examples include
48HRS with Eddie Murphy and Nick Nolte, and Midnight Run with Robert
De Niro and Charles Grodin. My science fiction novel Bounty Hunter
(2020) uses this plot. I provided the eight sequences for the buddy movie
plot in Crime Thriller (2019). The plot is very similar to an enemies to
lovers romance.
If their enmity begins at their first meeting, you can show that disastrous
encounter to your reader directly and make it as dramatic or humorous as
you want. It’s a great way to start a romance novel. If you have two
characters who knew each other previously, their encounter at the beginning
of the story may be more low-key – depending on the depth of feeling
between them.
How strong are the emotions involved? This can range from ‘I don’t like
you’ to ‘I hate you,’ and on to ‘I want to destroy you and everything you
care about.’
Two things to bear in mind here are, (i) something must happen, or have
happened, that makes this level of dislike seem a reasonable response, and
(ii) your characters have got to overcome their dislike and become a couple,
so you need to be able to resolve the disagreement between them.
Commitment issues
A Misunderstanding
Communication Breakdown
Differing values or priorities
Confidence issues – ‘I’m not worthy’
Cruel to be kind
The last straw
Relationship sabotage
A power struggle
Other reasons why two characters may not get along include:
In Crime Thriller (2019) I showed how the two characters in a buddy movie
went through a series of stages, beginning as enemies and ending as friends.
Two people moving from being enemies to lovers will pass through the
same stages (see below). If you want to write an enemies to lovers romantic
suspense story, you might want to get hold of Crime Thriller and look at the
‘Buddy Movie’ and/or Suspense Thriller (2018) for the ‘Amateur on the
Run’ plot.
1) Antagonism
a. Confrontation
b. Grudging respect but dislike
c. Lack of empathy/sympathy
2) Thawing
4) Trust
6) Working together
In the eight sequences below I will show where I think each of these stages
might appear. For the purposes of demonstration, I’m going to assume that
the dislike between the two characters is mutual and that circumstances
force them to work together in some way. As always, this is not necessarily
the way to write this type of story, but it is a way.
You can open your story with the scene where heroine and hero meet each
other or you can introduce the two characters separately, showing the
differences in their personalities and life situations (their ‘ordinary world’),
and then bring them together. If the two of them will be clashing over a
particular external issue, you may also want to introduce this – perhaps
from the point of view of one of them or perhaps both. It’s also important to
establish that both characters are strong, independent, and self-reliant. The
reader wants to see that they are equally matched.
You could open with a prologue that introduces a situation that doesn’t
feature either protagonist but which will impact both their lives and perhaps
force them together as reluctant allies or as enemies. This kind of prologue
must be short as the reader will want to meet the heroine and hero as soon
as possible.
You need to decide whether this is a ‘he changes her’ story or ‘she
changes him’ or if they both change each other. This determines whether
you need one or two character development arcs. Often in these stories, one
character changes with the other person acting as a catalyst to trigger and
then encourage/support the change.
Sometimes, your two characters may first encounter each other as
anonymous strangers, engaging in a brief but heated altercation that they
assume will have no major consequences. But then they discover the person
they have just had a confrontation with is their new boss, co-worker, or
someone in some other kind of significant position – a lawyer, judge, or
detective, for example.
In other stories, the main characters first meet knowing they are
adversaries – they are on opposite sides of some kind of campaign, contest,
cause, or battle. The spark of attraction when they meet is unexpected and
unwanted, so they react even more brusquely or sarcastically than they
might have done otherwise.
Sometimes the heroine and hero become adversaries accidentally. The
heroine may steal the cab he’s just hailed, causing him to get soaked in a
rainstorm, be late for a vital meeting, and to suffer other consequential
losses. She will be completely unaware of the chaos she has caused him –
until he confronts her about it the next time they meet. She will probably be
surprised and then angry as he vents his frustration. In a romantic comedy,
the chaos the heroine causes the hero to suffer will be amusing, bordering
on slapstick, and cause him embarrassment and perhaps physical hurt.
In some stories, like in a buddy movie, two strangers are forced together
by external circumstances (the lock-in) and are determined not to like each
other. ‘We have to work together, but that doesn’t mean we have to be
friends.’
Romantic suspense thrillers often have the heroine and hero locked
together by circumstances – perhaps inspired by the way Alfred Hitchcock
handcuffed his heroine to his hero in the film The 39 Steps (1935). In
movies like The Bodyguard, the hero is hired to protect the heroine. She
resents having a man following her around and controlling her movements.
She is just a job to him and he thinks she is a spoiled rich bitch. His feelings
for her are somewhere between indifference and dislike. But gradually they
each come to know the other and feelings develop.
Your opening scenes may begin with the heroine (or hero) having a bad
day. One external circumstance piles on another until they are in a
particularly foul mood. It won’t take much for them to lose their temper,
scream, or break down in tears. And the first encounter with the hero (or
heroine) isn’t going to improve their mood any. A combination of bad mood
and unfortunate timing may lead to a misunderstanding. One or both of
them makes assumptions about the other. She may assume he’s a criminal
trying to mug her or a creep hitting on her. He may assume she’s a drunk, a
hooker, or a gold-digger. The hero responds to the heroine (or vice versa)
based on this wrong assumption, being rude, patronising, and/or sarcastic.
However your heroine and hero meet, they dislike each other
immediately. But there is a spark of attraction between them. It may be
barely acknowledged at the time, but the heroine and/or hero will find
themselves thinking about this annoying person later.
We meet again... – Where the heroine and hero have a history of
antagonism – going back to high school or a previous relationship – the
opening sequence of the story may be slightly different. They are not
strangers, they have a shared past. Their earlier antagonism forms part of
the backstory of both characters. One or both of them may be carrying a
long-standing grudge.
Instead of a first encounter, these characters will meet again. They bring
baggage to this meeting. Think of Ilsa walking into Rick’s bar in
Casablanca. We might see the awkwardness of two ex-lovers meeting.
They had an intimate relationship before parting to become strangers – or
adversaries. There will be all sorts of conflicting memories and emotions
swirling around – further complicated by that spark of attraction they are
feeling.
The heroine’s (or hero’s) defence mechanisms may have been put in
place, at least in part, because of the past actions of the other person. This
person is linked in some way to their deep fear and/or secret shame.
Because of their past history, this person is guaranteed to push their buttons.
As mentioned above, the antagonism between them may be one-sided.
One character may be unaware of the impact they had on the other’s life –
until they are confronted with it years later. One character may be attracted
to the other, unaware of the emotional hurt they caused previously.
Any character accused of ruining someone’s life is likely to pass through
the stages of change discussed earlier in the book – shock, denial, anger,
etc.
Other scenes you might include in the first sequence include:
The heroine finds out more about the hero while pretending that she isn’t
interested. Perhaps even spies on him a little. If she sees him with another
woman, she may feel a twinge of jealousy. She wants to know if he is
dating or single. And/or the hero may behave in this way in relation to then
heroine.
It bothers her that he doesn’t like her – even if she has decided she
doesn’t like him. She wants people to like her. In public he may act
disinterested or pretend that he doesn’t know her. Or perhaps she does this
to him out of spite.
She may deliberately avoid him or he may avoid her. The character
doesn’t want to acknowledge their feelings and so pretends they don’t exist.
But then another accidental (or not) meeting occurs. She may be pleased
that he notices she hadn’t been around. Or annoyed that he doesn’t mention
it.
Heroine discusses the hero with her confidante.
Perhaps also plant something that will develop during the story to
become the cause of the break-up in sequence six.
Sequence 2
The heroine from the hero’s point of view. He finds himself thinking about
her. She’s everything he doesn’t like in a person. But still... He’s
uncomfortable that he’s having feelings about her. Seeing her makes him
smile – but he won’t let her see that. She is nice to everyone except him.
This bothers him. He may regard her as being weak, out of her depth, naïve,
or ridiculous – but feels a need to protect her. He shouldn’t feel this, she’s
‘the enemy.’
The heroine thinks about the hero. Maybe he did something nice for her,
treated her with respect, treated her decently. She feels bad about being
mean to him. But she’s also annoyed that she now feels indebted to him.
More of the heroine’s ordinary life. She is obviously not fulfilled by her
work or social lives and she is lonely. But she will not accept this herself.
Perhaps she fought to achieve her position in life and doesn’t want to feel it
was wasted effort.
Heroine and hero encounter each other in a social setting. To try and
make him jealous, she pretends to be flirting and having a good time with a
man who has been hitting on her. She may pretend not to know the hero –
perhaps in revenge for him having done this to her earlier. It seems to
bother him. Or perhaps the hero does these things to her.
Heroine surprised and disappointed when she see’s that he is witty and
charming with other women – but not with her.
Confidante can see she’s interested in the hero. Heroine says she thinks
the hero hates her. Confidante says he doesn’t – he just doesn’t know how
to deal with her. The hero has been watching the heroine all night.
Confidante suggests that the heroine asks him out. She says she couldn’t
possibly do that. She fears rejection and humiliation.
Perhaps heroine and hero have a conversation at a social gathering or
while engaged in some mundane task together. He asks about the man she
was with at the earlier social gathering (or she asks about the woman she
was with), trying to make it sound like casual interest. The hero is cynical
about romance, revealing a distrust of women. Obviously he had some kind
of unpleasant relationship experience in the past. Perhaps they show
grudging respect for each other’s achievements initially as they try to be
nice to each other, but the dialogue may develop into back-handed
compliments, sniping, and/or criticism of each other’s lifestyle. When they
part, they seem further apart than ever. But even more intrigued with each
other.
Lock-in – Some external circumstance means that they are going to have
to see a lot more of each other. They agree to behave professionally – they
don’t have to be friends. Either they are both unhappy about the situation
they find themselves in or one is happy and the other unhappy. One may
make an attempt to get along, but the other is having none of it. The lock-in
may be such that one of them got what they wanted and the other suffered a
humiliating defeat. Perhaps one has to work under the supervision of the
other. Or the lock-in may be that they are placed on opposite sides of a
battle and they must engage with each other until one of them wins.
Sequence 3
The heroine and hero have entered a ‘new world’ where they are reluctant
partners in some task or are opponents in some sort of battle or contest.
They try to behave civilly to each other. But there is mistrust and
awkwardness. One of them may make an attempt to establish a friendship,
but it is unsuccessful, the other failing to respond with warmth or sympathy.
Perhaps the hero tries to make a joke, but misjudges the situation or phrases
it badly. The heroine takes offence. Perhaps he’s touched a raw nerve,
revealing some deep-seated issue of the heroine’s – relating to her fears and
secret shame. She lets the hero have it with both barrels. He is shocked and
upset by her angry words and criticism – perhaps some of it touches on a
personal issue of his.
Character flaws may be further revealed through their bickering and/or
contrasts in their behaviour and attitudes. The heroine is angry with the hero
– but she is still feeling attracted to him.
But amid their disagreements there may be moments of calm when they
discuss their hopes and dreams. Or some other personal matter. The first
small inklings of a thawing of their feelings.
Perhaps one of them tries to manipulate the other to win an argument or
to get what they want. This triggers fears of a power struggle – a fear of
being controlled by another person. Any small softening of attitude may be
wiped out as defensive walls are raised again.
The hero finds himself distracted, unable to concentrate on his work.
Having feelings like this is unfamiliar territory for him and makes him
uncomfortable. He feels guilty for upsetting the heroine. He said something
stupid because he was trying to keep up with her quick wit and sharp
tongue. She thinks he was belittling her, saying she was stupid or naïve, but
he doesn’t think that about her. He can see that she’s strong and more than a
match for him. In her own way.
The heroine is annoyed at herself for allowing the hero to provoke her
and make her lose her cool. Perhaps he sends flowers or some other form of
apology. This may amuse her – does he think this gesture completely
absolves him? She wants to teach him a lesson. She’ll show him she’s not
weak or naïve. She’ll beat him at his own game. She engineers a meeting to
present her challenge.
The hero accuses her of playing games. He says he doesn’t like to be
manipulated. Again, a fear of being controlled by someone else. Perhaps
she behaves in a deliberately provocative way or flirts with him, knowing it
makes him uncomfortable. The hero apologises for upsetting her – admits
he’s not good at talking to women. He may make a partial surrender,
opening up for the first time and telling her something about his life. She
learns something about his past and why he became so cynical about
women and romance. The heroine has had a glimpse of the man behind the
defensive walls, she understands him a little better, but not completely.
Sequence 4
The hero doesn’t understand what is going on between him and the heroine
– he can’t make sense of his feelings for her. He’s attracted to her but she
infuriates him at times. After opening up to her a little in the previous
sequence, his walls go back up to protect him.
More of the situation that will develop to cause the break-up in sequence
six. Often there is a secret that he will keep from her or she will keep from
him. Discovery of the secret will cause the break-up.
The heroine talks to the confidante or another friend about relationships
in general and the hero in particular. She may hear an account of a
relationship that turned out well or one that didn’t, the circumstances of the
two lovers reflecting her own situation. Perhaps the confidante talks about
someone – herself? – who didn’t take a risk on love but wished she had.
The heroine says she’s intrigued by the hero. He’s a challenge. But she is
convinced that he isn’t attracted to her. Perhaps that’s why she wants him,
he’s someone she can’t have. She is sabotaging her own chances of being in
a proper relationship by going after someone who isn’t emotionally
available.
They may have a conversation that reveals the heroine is trapped in
thinking about the kind of man she wants rather than thinking about the
kind of relationship she really needs. This relates to her character flaw and
the growth she needs to undergo as a person to overcome it.
The confidante may encourage her to take a risk and ask the hero out. Or
she may tell the heroine to forget about him – if he can’t appreciate her for
who she is, she needs to find a man who will.
Confused about her feelings for the hero, and feeling sure that he doesn’t
like her, the heroine goes out with another man. Perhaps the same man she
was flirting with in sequence two or perhaps someone else. It’s pretty
obvious he’s Mr. Wrong.
Midpoint – The hero sees the heroine out with another man. He is upset
and angry. Perhaps he confronts her. Or she challenges him. What business
is it of his who she is dating? Why does it bother him? By way of answer,
he kisses her. It is a hot kiss. But then he backs away and his defences come
up again. Perhaps her immediate reaction to the kiss – surprise, annoyance
– causes this. They are both confused by what just happened. What do they
do now?
Sequence 5
The hero’s response to the midpoint kiss. He is annoyed at the heroine and
the man she was with. He’s also annoyed at himself for acting impulsively
and out of jealousy. He doesn’t want to think about the kiss. He’d fantasised
about it. It was better than he imagined. But it has also left him feeling
humiliated. It reinforces his belief that he shouldn’t express his feelings.
The heroine’s reaction to the kiss. Feeling happy and elated. Or perhaps
confused. She may read more into it than is reasonable. Or she may try and
convince herself that it means nothing, he was just being jealous and trying
to humiliate her.
The hero avoids the heroine. After several days, she goes to see him. He
wants to close the door on her, but she forces her way in – physically or
using words. He’s secretly pleased to see her.
The hero is vulnerable. As well as being emotionally vulnerable, the hero
may also be physically weakened. Perhaps he has suffered an injury or is
unwell. Or perhaps he’s suffered some other difficult circumstance such as a
bereavement or losing his job. He needs the heroine’s help and she enjoys
being able to help him. He is even more attractive when his defences are
down – dressed in casual clothes, hair uncombed, unshaven, eyes sleepy.
They share more of their life stories and experiences with each other.
Domesticity. Perhaps she cooks for him, he cooks for her, or they cook
together. Or they complete some other task that couples normally do
together. He is surprised by her skills – she is defying his assumptions or
expectations. Or perhaps she feels that way about him. Perhaps they spend a
night in and watch a movie together or discover they have a favourite tv
show in common. A guilty pleasure.
They talk about the kiss. Maybe he apologises, saying it was a mistake.
This makes her sad, but she agrees. Or perhaps he tries to find out how she
felt about it. He says they should agree to forget about it because it won’t
happen again. She doesn’t want to agree to this, but she nods and says yes.
Again, this makes her unhappy. And him too. They spend time together. As
friends/colleagues.
Having recovered from whatever laid him low, the hero continues being
kind to her. He says he’s glad they’re friends. She says they’re more like
frenemies.
The heroine tries to convince herself that she and the hero are not right
for each other. She comes up with a profile of what she thinks the hero’s
ideal partner would be like. Qualities that she doesn’t have or an absence of
ones she does have. This profile matches one of the heroine’s friends.
Perhaps she tells this friend that it is okay for her to ask the hero out. Says
she wants the two of them to be happy. But she’s not sure how she really
feels about this. She’s hoping the hero won’t agree to go out with her friend.
Another reference to the secret that will cause the break-up.
The hero agrees to go out with the heroine’s friend. The heroine is
disappointed. Berates herself for not being honest with him or her friend.
Now she may have ruined any chance she had to be with him. She’s never
felt like this about a man before.
Outside the romance, the heroine and hero try to establish common
ground, realising that they have shared values and other things in common.
The heroine may try to win the hero over to her side of the battle (if there is
one), encouraging him to demonstrate his moral values by picking her side.
But there is still some distance between them and they do not fully trust
each other. There may be a fight or some other confrontation – necessary to
clear the air and set boundaries. Maybe the fight is over the fact that he’s
taking the heroine’s friend out to dinner.
Sequence 6
The hero comes to visit the heroine. He tells her he cancelled the date with
the friend or tells her what a terrible date it was. All he could think about
was her. He tells her the kiss wasn’t a mistake. He kisses her again.
Perhaps they have sex. Desperate, passionate sex. Afterwards she says it
was just something they needed to get out of their systems. He tells her it
wasn’t a one-time thing. They may have more sex over the course of a
weekend. More domesticity as they do things together as a couple. Feelings
of trust developing. There may be a moment where one partner reveals
some insight into the personality and/or fears of the other – and they may
also offer unwanted advice.
The heroine may ask him to go out with some of her friends who are in
couples, but he’s not ready to think of them as a couple yet. It’s too soon.
He wants more time where it is just the two of them. He asks her out to
dinner.
Their first proper date. Chat/banter. Flirting. Perhaps he asks her to be his
plus-one for an event – a work social event, wedding, or whatever. Are we
dating? She asks. He doesn’t say yes, but he makes it clear he wants them to
be exclusive.
Because there was more conflict earlier in the story, some parts of the
development of the romance are delayed. The break-up, which occurs at the
end of sequence six in the template I outlined earlier, may be shifted to the
end of sequence seven in this type of romance novel.
Sequence 7
In this type of romance, the dating stage occurs later because of the conflict
in the early part of the story. In sequence seven, you often find much of
what would occur in sequences five and six in other romances. From the
main eight sequence template I provided earlier, you can move events from
sequences five and six to this part of an enemies to lovers story.
Here we may see the heroine and hero in more domestic scenes. We also
see them beginning to do things outside the home as a couple, days out, and
getting together with other couples. They may also meet each other’s
parents and/or siblings.
The hero recognises that a change has taken place – the heroine has
become an important part of his life. Though he is still not fully comfortable
expressing this in words. The heroine’s happiness is important to him. In
any decision he makes or actions he takes he now has to accept that it is not
just his own happiness that he is risking.
The heroine may challenge him, encouraging him to make more of a
commitment to their relationship. But he’s still not ready for that either.
The confidante can see that the heroine is happy and in love. She may
joke about being a bridesmaid at the wedding. This makes the heroine
uncomfortable – they’ve only been a couple for a short time.
The heroine may suffer self-doubt. Afraid that this wonderful thing may
be taken from her because she doesn’t deserve it. She is aware that their
personalities and their lives are very different. The hero tries to reassure her.
Perhaps the heroine meets his male friends or work colleagues socially.
This may be the cause of the anxiety mentioned above. She is charming and
his friends like her. He feels proud of her, thinking of her has ‘his.’ A close
friend or confidant may comment on the fact that the hero has changed and
seems much happier – more fun to be around.
Setting up the break-up. The hero (or heroine) still has a secret. There
may be a reference to it here or feelings of guilt. Perhaps they make an
attempt at a confession, but it is interrupted.
The hero (or heroine) may be dreading that something bad will happen to
spoil their relationship, particularly since the issue of the secret still needs
to be tackled. The heroine may be feeling happy and hopeful that their
relationship may last forever, while the hero feels anxious that he’s about to
lose her – or vice versa. They may end up having desperate sex as they
cling on to each other.
The heroine learns the hero’s secret. Or he learns hers. It may be
discovered accidentally, a confidante may bring the news, or a jealous rival
might deliberately try to sabotage their relationship.
Sequence 8
The dark moment. Heroine and hero are separated and they are both
miserable.
Feelings of betrayal. The heroine may feel that the hero has betrayed her
trust. Or he may feel she has betrayed him.
The hero’s defeat. He feels that he is not the right man for her – he hasn’t
been able to give her a fairy-tale ending.
The heroine and her confidante. The heroine is upset. Partly blames
herself – she wanted more than he was able to give. She thinks he’s not
capable of loving someone.
The hero tries to apologise. Perhaps he sends flowers or makes some
other gesture. But it isn’t enough. The heroine can’t find it in herself to
forgive him.
The confidante doesn’t want the heroine to lose her optimism, her love of
life, or her belief that true love is possible. She says the heroine will find
her happy ever after someday soon. The heroine isn’t so sure – she thought
the hero was it.
The hero also talks to a confidant or close friend, mentor, colleague, or
family member. He’s grouchy. His confidant says the problem is that he’s
thinking about love rather than feeling it. He can’t apply logic here. He
regards logic as being safe because he’s afraid of being spontaneous and
vulnerable. The hero argues that if he allows himself to care too much, the
pain of loss would just be unbearable. And he feels it’s too late to do
anything – he’s already lost her.
The hero’s epiphany. Something makes the hero rethink his position.
Perhaps seeing the happiness of someone close to him makes him
reconsider his priorities. You don’t earn happiness by playing it safe, you
have to take risks. You have to fight for it. The heroine pursues happiness
every day – he needs to learn how to do that. He wants to. He wants to be
with her.
The hero’s grand gesture. He tries logic first, having prepared a speech. It
isn’t good enough and its not what she wants. Then he makes a spontaneous
gesture – a sacrifice for love. He allows himself to be vulnerable, to express
his true feelings. He makes a fool of himself. He tells her he loves her.
Please love me back, he pleads. She does. They spend an evening in her
world, pursuing happiness together. He makes a proposal/commitment.
Epilogue (optional) – Six months or a year later. Happy ever after.
In a buddy movie, sequence seven often ends at a low point for the
protagonists with whatever terrible fate they have been trying to avoid now
seeming certain to occur. The villain has the upper hand and it looks like his
plan will be successful. The primary protagonist – or both working together
– must come up with an ingenious plan – a last do-or-die attempt. All of the
opposing forces converge – villain, henchmen, the authorities and the
protagonists. The rival may turn up too, presenting an unexpected obstacle
or threatening to derail the protagonist’s plan. There is typically a bit of cat
‘n’ mouse and some sort of stand-off – and perhaps a final one-on-one fight
between protagonist and villain (or henchman). One partner may save the
life of the other.
Objectives are achieved and needs are fulfilled. This is typically where
we see that the primary protagonist has successfully achieved growth as a
character – or is well on the way towards it. He has recognised and
overcome his flaw, lack, or weakness and emerged from his adventure a
better person. He may have redeemed himself, either in his own eyes or
those of someone important to him. It may appear – as it does in the case of
Midnight Run – that the main protagonist has not achieved character growth
and is still determined to stick to his old ways, but then there is a twist that
shows he has changed – in his own way. An agreement or understanding is
reached between the two protagonists – there is still friendly rivalry, but
there is also a deep bond of friendship between them.
Friends to Lovers
In a friends to lovers romance, the heroine and hero are platonic friends and
may have been so for some time – perhaps since childhood. Now one or
both of them wants to move out of the friend zone and make their
relationship something more. How do you create a satisfying romance novel
from this scenario? They already have a successful relationship so where
does the conflict come from?
There isn’t a particular ‘friends to lovers’ plot, you can use any romance
plot including the eight-sequence plot outlined earlier in the book. The key
difference is the pre-existing relationship between the hero and heroine.
Remember that in the plot model we have been discussing, the first half
of the story is ‘Will they, won’t they?’ That same anticipation and suspense
can exist in a story where the heroine and hero are friends. This can be
especially tense if only one of the pair are having romantic feelings and are
afraid that admitting them might put a lifelong friendship at risk. The
second half of the story fits the usual mould in being ‘Can they make it
work long-term?’ And at the moment of the break-up, there is the added
pain of having lost a trusted friend and confident.
Below are a few key points to consider when developing a friends to
lovers story.
You need a reason why these two friends are only now thinking of each
other as romantic partners. What has changed?
Lacie Walden, on the Writer’s Digest website, says: “All you need is a
reason for one person to see the other through new eyes. Is one of them
suddenly single? Did one of them dive into a pond Colin-Firth-Darcy-style,
emerging with their shirt see-through and clinging to their unexpectedly
well-defined abs? Did one-too-many tequilas work their magic?”
Another option is to have a tragedy or some other difficult circumstance
bring the two of them together. As one comforts the other or they comfort
each other, new feelings may surface. Or perhaps they are trapped together
in some remote location and have to huddle together for warmth. That
alarm you can hear going off is the cliché alert.
Or you could bring in another common story idea and have one of them
pretending to be the other’s date (or fiancé) for a social event, playing out
the ‘marriage of convenience’ plotline where a fake relationship develops
into a real one.
Perhaps one character is consoling the other after the break-up of a
relationship. They may discuss relationships and dating. And then one of
them starts describing their perfect partner – and what they are describing is
the friend in front of them.
Another option is a sort of Cyrano De Bergerac situation where one
friend asks the other to be a go between and help them get a date with a
mutual friend. The best friend may realise that this target of the other’s
affections is completely unsuitable, wanting to help them avoid making
terrible mistake, and at the same time realising their own romantic feelings.
Or perhaps one has held a candle for the other for years but never dared
express their feelings.
What’s at Stake?
One thing that makes two people wary of beginning a romantic relationship
with an existing friend is the fact that if the romance doesn’t work out, they
may lose one of their best friends forever. Romance means the friendship is
at stake.
Two friends becoming lovers can also have an effect on their shared
circle of friends. People who have always seen them as platonic friends are
going to have to think of them differently. Some may be uncomfortable
with the idea. Some may be afraid that it will upset the stability of the
group. And some may be jealous of what these two people now have.
If the friendship group also includes the ex-lover of one of the two
friends, there may be added awkwardness.
Two friends will already know each other well. They have shared backstory
and they have probably already heard all the stories about the other person’s
childhood. They also probably have a shared circle of friends, interests in
common, and may have met each other’s parents and siblings.
The heroine and hero need to behave and speak like close friends –
almost like brother and sister. They know many of each other’s secrets.
They will have shared jokes and be able to use shorthand to refer to shared
experiences. They may already finish each other’s sentences.
The meet cute doesn’t play in the same way here – they may relive the
moment when they first met, long ago – and this may be an interesting,
revealing, and/or amusing story. But there may also be a moment when they
recognise a change in their feelings for each other. This may be as if they
are meeting for the first time, as they view their friend in another light.
Amnesia
The heroine and hero are lovers or perhaps married. As the result of an
accident or some other kind of trauma, the heroine – or perhaps the hero –
has lost their memory. They do not know their lover and cannot recall
anything about the relationship. There is typically a parallel plot where the
heroine (or hero) learns about their pre-accident relationship and a present
day romance as she falls in love with the hero again while he gently and
patiently cares for her. There will be a dark moment as the heroine learns a
secret that the hero has been keeping from her – perhaps he had an affair
before her accident or maybe she left him for another man.
The 1991 Harrison Ford film Regarding Henry is an example of this type
of plot. Overboard (1987) starring Goldie Hawn and Kurt Russell is
comedic take on the idea. A 2018 remake under the same title flips the male
and female roles.
You can mix in elements of the ‘friends to lovers’ plot. Or perhaps it
becomes a ‘love triangle’ if the heroine begins to fall in love with someone
other than the hero.
There is also an amnesia thriller plot – which I covered in some detail in
Suspense Thriller (2018) – you could use this for a romantic suspense
novel.
In an article about the sub-genre, the Harlequin Editors offer a few
pointers. Go easy on the medical side of the amnesia such as headaches and
dizziness – the reader must feel that the heroine is capable of agreeing to
and enjoying a romance. Amnesia makes a character vulnerable so they will
need to be with a caring and supportive partner. It's up to you to decide
what skills or abilities the amnesia sufferer recalls. Do they still make love
the same way they used to? The amnesia isn't enough on its own to create
dramatic conflict between the two characters so you will need additional
elements to create their emotional journey. Be careful that your hero doesn't
look like he's taking advantage of the heroine's amnesia – unless that is a
key plot point that leads to their break-up. Or unless you're writing a
comedy like Overboard.
A major plot moment in the story will be when the heroine gets her
memory back. While this is significant, it shouldn't solve all of the couples'
problems. There still needs to be a 'dark moment' and a break-up. The
heroine getting her memory back may even trigger this.
Runaway Bride
In a runaway bride romance the heroine leaves her fiancé at the altar and
makes her escape. Her motivation may be that she is in love with someone
else, that she needs to demonstrate her independence by fleeing from an
arranged marriage, or she has cold feet for some other reasons. Or maybe
she just has commitment phobia. Or she has just discovered that her fiancé
has been cheating on her – perhaps he was doing it literally moments before
the ceremony. Sometimes the bride may flee from her wedding after her
husband-to-be jilted her at the altar – she runs away because of the shame
and embarrassment of it.
When a heroine leaves her fiancé at the altar, the TV Tropes website notes
that the “...fact that it's also a humiliating, heart-breaking, psychologically-
scarring betrayal for the would-be groom tends to be glossed over.”
Sally Field plays a runaway bride who gets rescued by Burt Reynolds in
Smokey and the Bandit, where the groom and his father are in pursuit for
the rest of the movie. In Susan Meier’s The Spanish Millionaire’s Runaway
Bride, the heroine escapes from an arranged marriage and her father sends
someone after her. The heroine and her pursuer then feel the spark of
attraction... In other stories, the heroine may rely on another man to help her
make her escape, with no thought to the fact that the two of them might fall
in love. Or the heroine may be reunited with the man who helped some time
after she escaped.
In another variation on the idea, seen in Jenni Fletcher’s The Duke's
Runaway Bride, the heroine plans to runaway but ends up in a romance
with her estranged husband. Cathryn Brown’s Runaway to Romance pairs a
runaway bride with a hero who was abandoned at the altar by his fiancé.
During the course of the story, the heroine will have to overcome
whatever character flaw led her to agree to marry a man she didn’t love, or
to overcome the causes of her commitment phobia, or to be able to express
her individuality within a committed relationship.
Also referred to as the ‘stuck together’ or ‘forced proximity’ trope. Here the
lock-in element is the basis of the whole story. Two people – they may be
friends, enemies, or strangers – are trapped together in a remote or
otherwise inaccessible location for a certain amount of time. The cliché,
that is still often used successfully, is to have the hero and heroine snowed
in together in a remote cabin in the wilderness. A cabin with only one bed.
A narrow bed. Romances also trap their lovers on desert islands.
Plotwise, the opening is usually the situation that gets them stranded
together. The stages of the romance will be a mix of the standard eight
sequences and elements of the enemies or friends to lovers plot.
A single location gives your characters plenty of time to talk and to bond.
They might also work together to try and make their escape. If you don’t
want to have the restriction of just one setting, you can ‘trap’ your
characters together on a journey where they must travel together. There are
many ‘road trip’ stories where reluctant travelling companions have various
adventures together and gradually become friends – an obvious example is
Steve Martin and John Candy in Planes, Trains, and Automobiles (1987).
Just about any ‘buddy movie’ set-up could be adapted for a romance or a
romantic comedy.
You can also combine this with a ‘bodyguard’ element or some other
romantic suspense plot.
The hero (or sometimes the heroine) is presumed dead and their lover or
spouse has moved on with their life. Perhaps the heroine is about to get
married when her former lover or husband appears, apparently returned
from the dead. Now what? This idea can be combined with elements of the
amnesia story – the missing hero only just got some of his memory back –
or it might be told as a ‘second chance’ romance as heroine and hero fall in
love all over again.
Of course, in a paranormal romance, your hero could be literally dead
and return from the grave. This gives you complications of a different kind.
A twist on this plot occurs when an imposter arrives claiming to be the
hero returned from the dead. Does the heroine know or suspect that this
person is a fake? What does she do if she finds herself falling in love with
this imposter? This was the plot of the Jodie Foster and Richard Gere film
Sommersby (1993), based on the 1982 French film Le Retour de Martin
Guerre (The Return of Martin Guerre). There is also a ‘stolen identity’
thriller plot, which I explored in the Psychological Thriller chapter of
Suspense Thriller (2018).
Chick Lit
The term ‘chick lit’ came into use in publishing and reviewing in the mid-
to late-1990s to describe books marketed for younger professional women.
Terry McMillan’s Waiting to Exhale (1992) and Catherine Alliott’s The Old
Girl Network (1994) are early examples. Helen Fielding’s Bridget Jones’s
Diary (1996) and Candace Bushnell’s (non-fiction) Sex and the City (1997)
are two influential texts. The popularity of this sub-genre had faded by the
mid-2000s.
The term ‘chick lit’ probably originated on an American university
campus as a derogatory term for courses about female writers. It was taken
up more widely as a book-related equivalent to ‘chick flick,’ a term that
appeared in the late 1980s or early 1990s. ‘Chick lit’ as a term is sexist and
is best consigned to the history books. Romance novels about young
women living and working in urban environments are still written and
enjoyed, but they don’t need this label. Some modern writers and fans have
taken the term and made it their own, using it ironically.
If you want to learn more about writing in this sub-genre, you could
check out Cathy Yardley’s Will Write for Shoes: How to Write a Chick Lit
Novel (2006).
Wedding
I’ll admit that Amazon’s Wedding category confuses me a little bit because
it’s not really a type of story, it’s a setting – and one that usually only
appears in part of a romance. Sub-genres that might appear under this
heading include Marriage of Convenience, Runaway Bride, Mail Order
Bride, and perhaps stories about a jilted bride. In an article on Bridal Tropes
on the Write for Harlequin website, Kayla King adds ‘always a bridesmaid,
never a bride’ as a fifth option – with the heroine finally getting her chance
at a happy ever after. This makes me think that stories like the 2011 film
Bridesmaids and 28 Dresses (2008) also belong here.
Prologue (Optional)
Introduce the Heroine
The Heroine’s Ordinary World
Introduce the Hero
The Hero’s Ordinary World (Optional)
Cute Meet
Sparks Fly
Challenge
Potential
Sequence 6 – The Unravelling & The Dark Moment (Boy Loses Girl)
Friends/Family Interfere
Fake Proposal (Optional)
Set-up Dark Moment
Heroine’s Ideal Man (Optional)
Real Proposal (Optional)
Confession Interrupted
The Dark Moment – the Break-Up or Laying Ground for It
Confidante Reveals Hero’s Secret (Optional)
Reality Shift
Armintrout, Jennifer – ‘Every Breath You Take,’ in: Fifty Writers on Fifty
Shades of Grey. Smart Pop/BenBella Books, 2012
Below, L.K. – ‘The Law of Attraction,’ in: How to Write Hot Sex: Tips from
Multi-Published Erotic Romance Authors (Shoshanna Evers ed.). Shoshana
Evers, 2011
Bishop, Lloyd – The Romantic Hero and His Heirs in French Literature.
Peter Lang, 1984
Bishop, Scott R. et al. – ‘Mindfulness: A Proposed Operational Definition.’
Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3), 2004
Bronson, Howard & Mike Riley – How to Heal a Broken Heart in 30 Days:
A Day-by-Day Guide to Saying Good-bye and Getting On with Your Life.
Broadway Books, 2000
Browne, Joy – Dating for Dummies (2nd ed.). Wiley Publishing, 2006
Cabane, Olivia Fox (2012). The Charisma Myth: How Anyone Can Master
the Art and Science of Personal Magnetism. Portfolio/Penguin, 2012
Calvisi, Daniel – Story Maps: TV Drama: The Structure of the One-Hour
Television Pilot. Act Four Screenplays, 2016
Clair, Daphne and Robyn Donald – Writing Romantic Fiction. A & C Black,
1999
Clark, Elizabeth – Flirting for Dummies. John Wiley & Sons, 2009
Collison, Katherine L., Colin E. Vize, Joshua D. Miller & Donald R. Lynam
– ‘Development and Preliminary Validation of a Five Factor Model
Measure of Machiavellianism.’ Psychological Assessment, 30(10), 2018
Cook, Martie – Write to TV: Out of Your Head and Onto the Screen. Focal
Press, 2007
Day, Sylvia – ‘The Brown Paper Bag,’ in: Fifty Writers on Fifty Shades of
Grey. Smart Pop/BenBella Books, 2012
DeAngelo, David – Double Your Dating: What Every Man Should Know
About How to Be Successful with Women. David DeAngelo, 2001
Dryden, Delphine – ‘So You Think You Can Kink?’ in: How to Write Hot
Sex: Tips from Multi-Published Erotic Romance Authors (Shoshanna Evers
ed.). Shoshana Evers, 2011
Evers, Shoshanna (ed.) – How to Write Hot Sex: Tips from Multi-Published
Erotic Romance Authors. Shoshana Evers, 2011
Gabriel, Bonnie – The Fine Art of Erotic Talk: How to Entice, Excite and
Enchant Your Lover with Words. Bantam Books, 1996
Gilbo, Savannah – ‘10 Tips for Writing Better Love Triangles.’ Savannah
Gilbo: Editor and Book Coach [website], 19th May 2020
https://www.savannahgilbo.com/blog/love-triangles#comment-4920103775
Gray, John – Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus. Harper Collins,
1992
Greene, Fran – The Flirting Bible: Your Ultimate Photo Guide to Reading
Body Language, Getting Noticed, and Meeting More People Than You Ever
Thought Possible. Fair Winds Press, 2010
Hall, Jeffrey A. – The Five Flirting Styles: Use the Science of Flirting to
Attract the Love You Really Want. Harlequin Enterprises, 2013
Hamachek, Don E. – Encounters with the Self. Holt, Rinehart & Winston,
1971
Holt, Kristin – ‘Mail Order Brides in the 19th Century American West.’
Kristin Holt [website], 18th November 2014
http://www.kristinholt.com/archives/441
Howes, Molly – A Good Apology: Four Steps to Make Things Right. Grand
Central Publishing, 2020
Johnson, Jean – ‘Biology: The Good, The Bad, & the Sex Scene,’ in: How
to Write Hot Sex: Tips from Multi-Published Erotic Romance Authors
(Shoshanna Evers ed.). Shoshana Evers, 2011
Kahr, Brett – Who’s Been Sleeping in Your Head?: The Secret World of
Sexual Fantasies. Basic Books, 2008
Kelly, Isabo – ‘Fighting Sex,’ in: How to Write Hot Sex: Tips from Multi-
Published Erotic Romance Authors (Shoshanna Evers ed.). Shoshana Evers,
2011
Kent, Alison – The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Writing Erotic Romance.
Alpha Books, 2006
King, D.L. – ‘Is Fifty Shades Erotica? Ask an Erotica Writer,’ in: Fifty
Writers on Fifty Shades of Grey. Smart Pop/BenBella Books, 2012
King, Kayla – ‘Top 5 Bridal Tropes to Make You Hear Wedding Bells.’
Write for Harlequin [website], 19th June 2017
https://www.writeforharlequin.com/top-5-bridal-tropes-to-make-you-hear-
wedding-bells/
Kirshenbaum, Sheril – The Science of Kissing: What Our Lips are Telling
Us. Grand Central Publishing/Hachette, 2011
Kovalin, Val – How to Write Sexy Descriptions and Sex Scenes. Val
Kovalin, 2012
Kurzban, Robert, John Tooby & Leda Cosmides – ‘Can Race Be Erased?
Coalition Computation and Social Categorization,’ Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences (USA), 98 (26) December 2001
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC65039/
Lieberman, Carole & Lisa Collier Cool – Bad Boys: Why We Love Them,
How to Live with Them, and When to Leave Them. Dutton/Penguin, 1997
Lister, Ashley – How to Write Erotic Fiction and Sex Scenes. How To
Books/Constable & Robinson Ltd., 2013
MacManus, Yvonne – You Can Write a Romance and Get it Published (2nd
ed.). Toad Hall, Inc., 1997
McKenna, Paul & Hugh Willbourn – How to Mend Your Broken Heart.
Bantam Press, 2003
Morella, Joe & Edward Z. Epstein – Rebels: The Rebel Hero in Films.
Citadel Press, 1973
Nyrop, Kristoffer – The Kiss and Its History (trans. by William Frederick
Harvey). Sands & Co., 1901
Nystrom, Lisa – ‘Blood, Lust, and the Fe/Male Narrative in Bram Stoker’s
Dracula (1992) and the Novel (1897),’ in: Draculas, Vampires, and Other
Undead Forms: Essays on Gender, Race, and Culture, ed. by John Edgar
Browning and Carolyn Joan (Kay) Picart. Scarecrow, 2009
Obstfeld, Raymond – Novelist’s Guide to Crafting Scenes. Writer’s Digest
Books, 2000
Paulhus, Delroy L., & Kevin M. Williams – ‘The Dark Triad of Personality:
Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and Psychopathy.’ Journal of Research in
Personality 36, 2002
Pearson, Carol – Awakening the Heroes Within. Harper San Francisco, 1991
Pearson, Carol and Katherine Pope – The Female Hero in American and
British Literature. R. R. Bowker, 1981
Pearson, Mackenzie – ‘Why Girls Love the Dad Bod: If Your Man Can
Rock the Dad Bod, He’s a Keeper.’ The Odyssey Online, 30th March 2015
https://www.theodysseyonline.com/dad-bod
Pereira, Gabriela – ‘How to Create a Story Map.’ DIY MFA [website], 15th
May 2012
https://diymfa.com/writing/mapping-out-your-story
Prioleau, Betsy – Swoon: Great Seducers and Why Women Love Them.
W.W. Norton, 2013
Quinn, Cari – ‘Rx for a Saggy Love Scene,’ in: How to Write Hot Sex: Tips
from Multi-Published Erotic Romance Authors (Shoshanna Evers ed.).
Shoshana Evers, 2011
Sanzo, Jennifer – ‘The Byronic Hero Archetype and Christian Grey: Why
America’s Favorite Sadist is Nothing New,’ in: Fifty Writers on Fifty Shades
of Grey. Smart Pop/BenBella Books, 2012
Saunders, Jean – The Craft of Writing Romance: A Practical Guide. Allison
& Busby, 1986
Segal, Erich – ‘Love Means You Know What,’ Civilization, April/May 1999
Siminoski, Kerry & Jerald Bain – ‘The Relationships Among Height, Penile
Length, and Foot Size.’ Annals of Sex Research 6, 1993
Smith, Jean – Flirtology: Stop Swiping, Start Talking and Find Love.
Bantam Press, 2018
Swami, Viren, Dorothy Einon & Adrian Furnham – ‘The Leg-to-Body Ratio
as a Human Aesthetic Criterion.’ Body Image 3, August 2006
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Viren-
Swami/publication/5760025_The_leg-to-
body_ratio_as_a_human_aesthetic_criterion/links/59defefa458515376b32c
1ec/The-leg-to-body-ratio-as-a-human-aesthetic-criterion.pdf
Swendson, Shanna – ‘The Bad Boy Next Door,’ in: Perfectly Plum:
Unauthorized Essays on the Life, Loves, and Other Disasters of Stephanie
Plum, Trenton Bounty Hunter, ed. By Leah Wilson. Benbella Books, 2007
Tannen, Deborah – ‘Contrite Makes Right,’ Civilization, April/May 1999
Thurston, Carol – The Romance Revolution: Erotic Novels for Women and
the Quest for a New Sexual Identity. University of Illinois Press, 1987
Tomlinson, Paul – Crime Thriller: How to Write Detective, Noir, Caper &
Heist, Gangster& Police Procedural Thrillers. Paul Tomlinson, 2019
Vranich, Belisa & Ariane Marder – He's Got Potential: A Field Guide to
Shy Guys, Bad Boys, Intellectuals, Cheaters, and Everything in Between.
Wiley, 2010
Wendell, Sarah and Candy Tan – Beyond Heaving Bosoms: The Smart
Bitches’ Guide to Romance Novels. Fireside/Simon & Schuster, 2009
Whitlow, Lexi – ‘The Success Behind the Secret Baby Romance.’ Red
Feather Romance [website], 15th November 2016
https://www.redfeatherromance.com/2016/11/15/the-success-behind-the-
secret-baby-romance/
Wibberley, Mary – To Writers with Love. Ashford, Buchan & Enright, 1987
Williams, Stanley D. – The Moral Premise: Harnessing Virtue and Vice for
Box Office Success. Michael Wiese Productions, 2006
Winch, Guy – How to Fix a Broken Heart. TED Books/Simon & Schuster,
2018
Winch, Guy – How to Fix a Broken Heart [TED talk], February 2018
www.youtube.com/watch?v=k0GQSJrpVhM
Winter, Karen – Writing the First Kiss: How to Write a First Kiss Scene that
Will Leave Your Readers Breathless. Fountain Pen Publishing Ltd., 2018
Yardley, Cathy – Will Write for Shoes: How to Write a Chick Lit Novel.
Thomas Dunne Books/St. Martin's Press, 2006
Also by Paul Tomlinson
Genre Writer Series