Tadano Truck Crane TS-75M-1 Parts

Catalog_EN_JP
To download the complete and correct content, please visit:

https://manualpost.com/download/tadano-truck-crane-ts-75m-1-parts-catalog_en_j
p

Tadano Truck Crane TS-75M-1 Parts Catalog_EN_JPSize : 23.0 MBFormat :

PDFLanguage : English, JapaneseBrand: TadanoType of machine: Truck
CraneType of document: Parts CatalogModel: TS-75M-1Serial Number:
237775Content:TS-75M-1_PX1-1EJTS-75M-1_P3-4EJ
Download all on: manualpost.com.
 [Unrelated content]
Another random document on
Internet:
for twenty-five years before, and only free from contagion three
years in above seventy; enlarging of the streets, and modern way of
building, there is such a free circulation of sweet air through the
streets, that offensive vapours are expelled, and the city freed from
pestilential symptoms: so that it may now justly be averred that
there is no place in the kingdom where the inhabitants enjoy a
better state of health, or live to a greater age, than the citizens of
London.
 SECTION III.
VARIOUS OPINIONS CONCERNING THE CAUSES OF
THE GREAT FIRE.

Whether the fire came casually, or on design, remains still a secret:

though the general opinion might be that it was casual, yet there
were presumptions on the other side of a very odd nature. Great
calamities naturally produce various conjectures; men seldom
considering, that the most stupendous effects often proceed from
the most minute causes, or most remote accidents. People failed not
to give a scope to their imagination, and to form guesses concerning
the causes and authors of this afflicting and astonishing misfortune.
The king in his speech calls it "God's judgment;" the pious and
religious, and at first all other men, generally and naturally ascribed
it to the just vengeance of Heaven, on a city where vice and
immorality reigned so openly and shamefully, and which had not
been sufficiently humbled by the raging pestilence of the foregoing
year.
Sir Edward Turner, speaker of the House of Commons, at presenting
bills for the royal assent, says, "We must for ever with humility,
acknowledge the justice of God in punishing this whole nation by the
late dreadful conflagration of London."
The act of common-council for rebuilding, says, "The fire was by all
justly resented as a most sad and dismal judgment of Heaven."
But time soon produced abundance of suspicions and variety of
opinions concerning the means and instruments made use of.
There were some so bold as even to suspect the king. Those
reports, and Oates's and Bedloe's narratives, are suppositions too
monstrous, and the evidence too wretchedly mean to deserve
consideration.
The citizens were not well satisfied with the Duke of York's
behaviour: they thought him a little too gay and negligent for such
an occasion; that his look and air discovered the pleasure he took in
that dreadful spectacle; on which account, a jealousy that he was
concerned in it was spread with great industry, but with very little
appearance of truth.
Some suspected it was an insidious way of the Dutch and French
making war upon the English; their two fleets being then nearest to
a conjunction. What increased the suspicion was, that some
criminals that suffered were said to be under the direction of a
committee at London, and received orders from another council in
Holland.
Not long before the fire, the French sent the governor of Chousey in
a small boat with a letter to Major-General Lambert, then prisoner in
Guernsey, to offer him terms to contrive the delivery of that island to
them.
Divers strangers, both French and Dutch, were apprehended, upon
suspicion, imprisoned, and strictly examined. It was said, a Dutch
boy of ten years old, confessed, that his father, his uncle, and
himself, had thrown fire-balls into the house where the fire began,
through a window which stood open.
The English fleet had some time before landed on the Vly, an island
near the Texel, and burnt it; upon which some came to De Wit, and
offered, in revenge, if they were but assisted, to set London on fire;
but he rejected the [villanous] proposal; and thought no more on it
till he heard the city was burnt.
The fire which laid so great part of London in ashes, gave a fresh
occasion to the enemies of the republicans to charge them with
being the malicious authors thereof; because the fire happened to
break out the third of September, a day esteemed fortunate to the
republicans, on account of the victories of Dunbar and Worcester,
obtained by Oliver Cromwell, when general of the armies of the
commonwealth of England.
In the April before, some commonwealth men were found in a plot,
and hanged; and at their execution confessed, that they had been
requested, to assist in a design of firing London on the second of
September.
At the trial of the conspirators at the Old Bailey, it appeared, a
design was laid to surprise the town and fire the city; the third of
September was pitched on for the attempt, as being found by Lilly's
almanack, and a scheme erected for that purpose, to be a lucky day.
The third of September was a day auspicious and full of expectation
from one party, but at this time ominous and direful to the nation.
The city was burnt at the time projected and prognosticated, which
gave a strong suspicion, though not a proof, of the authors and
promoters of it.
The Dutch were pressed by the commonwealth men to invade
England, and were assured of powerful assistance, and hopes of a
general insurrection, but they would not venture in so hazardous a
design.
Though several persons were imprisoned, it was not possible to
discover, or prove, that the house where this dreadful calamity
began, was fired on purpose. Whether it was wilful or accidental was
a long time a party dispute.
The great talk at that time was, who were the burners of the city?
some said it was contrived and carried on by a conspiracy of the
Papists and Jesuits, which was afterward offered to be made appear
in the popish plot. And there came in so many testimonies to prove
that it was the plotted weapon of the papists, as caused the
parliament to appoint a committee to enquire into it, and receive
informations.
By the dreadful fire in 1666, multitudes of people lost their estates,
goods and merchandizes; and many families, once in flourishing
circumstances, were reduced to beggary. From the inscription on the
plinth of the lower pedestal of the Monument, it appears that the
Papists were the authors of this fire; the Parliament being of this
persuasion, addressed the king to issue a proclamation, requiring all
Popish Priests and Jesuits to depart the kingdom within a month;
and appointed a committee, who received evidence of some Papists,
who were seen throwing fire-balls into houses, and of others who
had materials for it in their pockets. This sad disaster produced some
kind of liberty to the Non-conformists.
A sudden and dreadful massacre of the Protestants was feared; and
the suspicion confirmed by particular kinds of knives found after the
fire in barrels.
Several evidences were given to the committee that men were seen
in several parts of the city casting fire-balls into houses; some that
were brought to the guard of soldiers, and to the Duke of York, but
were never heard of afterwards. Some weeks after, Sir Robert
Brooks, chairman of the committee, went to France, and as he was
ferried over a river, was drowned, with a kinsman of his, and the
business drowned with him.[7]
Oates, in his narrative, says: The dreadful fire in 1666 was
principally managed by Strange, the provincial of the Jesuits, in
which the society employed eighty or eighty-six men, and spent
seven hundred fire balls; and over all their vast expense, they were
fourteen thousand pounds gainers by the plunder; among which was
a box of jewels consisting of a thousand carats of diamonds. He
farther learned, that the fire in Southwark, in 1676, was brought
about by the like means; and though in that they were at the
expense of a thousand pounds, they made shift to get two thousand
clear into their own pockets.[8]
Mr. Echard was told by an eminent prelate, that Dr. Grant, a Papist,
was strongly suspected, who having a share in the waterworks,
contrived, as is believed, to stop up the pipes the night before the
fire broke out, so that it was many hours before any water could be
got after the usual manner.
Dr. Lloyd, afterward bishop of Worcester, told Dr. Burnet, that one
Grant, a Papist, had sometime before applied himself to Lloyd, who
had great interest with the Countess of Clarendon, (who had a large
estate in the new river, which is brought from Ware to London) and
said he could raise that estate considerably if she would make him a
trustee for her. His schemes were probable, and he was made one of
the board that governed that matter; and by that he had a right to
come as often as he pleased to view their works at Islington. He
went thither the Saturday before the fire broke out, and called for
the key of the place where the heads of the pipes were, and turned
all the cocks, which were then open, and stopped the water, and
went away, and carried the keys with him. When the fire broke out
next morning, they opened the pipes in the streets to find water, but
there was none. Some hours were lost in sending to Islington, where
the doors were to be broke open, and the cocks turned; and it was
long before the water got from Islington. Grant denied that he
turned the cocks; but the officer of the works affirmed that he had,
according to order, set them all a-running, and that no person had
got the keys from him but Grant; who confessed he had carried
away the keys, but did it without design.
When we consider, several depositions were made after the fire, of
its breaking out in several different places at the same time, and
that one man confessed his setting fire to the houses where it
began, when he was executed for it: when we remember Bishop
Lloyd's testimony concerning Grant, we cannot easily be convinced
that it was entirely accidental.
Bishop Kennet gives the following account: There was but one man
tried at the Old Bailey for being the incendiary, who was convicted
by his own confession, and executed for it. His name was Roger[9]
Hubert, a French Huguenot[10] of Rohan, in Normandy. Some people
shammed away this confession, and said he was non compos
mentis; and had a mind, it seems, to assume the glory of being
hanged for the greatest villain. Others say he was sober and
penitent; and being, after conviction, carried through the ruins to
shew where he put fire, he himself directed through the ashes and
rubbish, and pointed at the spot where the first burning house
stood.
The fire was generally charged on the Papists; one Hubert, a a
Frenchman, who was seized in Essex as he was flying to France,
confessed he had begun the conflagration. He was blindfolded, and
purposely conducted to wrong places, where he told them it was not
the spot where he began the flames; but when he was brought to
the right, he confessed that was the place where he threw the fire-
ball into the baker's house, the place where the fatal fire began,
which he persisted in to the last moments of his execution. He was
hanged upon no other evidence: though his broken account made
some believe him melancholy mad.[11]
But Oates several years afterwards informed the world the execrable
deed was performed by a knot of eighty jesuits, friars, and priests,
of several nations.[12]
After all examinations there was but one man tried for being the
incendiary, who confessing the fact, was executed for it: this was
Robert Hubert, a French Hugenot, of Rohan, in Normandy, a person
falsely said to be a Papist, but really a sort of lunatic, who by mere
accident was brought into England just before the breaking out of
the fire, but not landed till two days after, as appeared by the
evidence of Laurence Peterson, the master of the ship who had him
on board.[13]
It was soon after complained of, that Hubert was not sufficiently
examined who set him to work, and who joined with him. And Mr.
Hawles, in his remarks upon Fitzharris's trial is bold to say, that the
Commons resolving to examine Hubert upon that matter next day,
Hubert was hanged before the house sat, so could tell no farther
tales.
Lord Russell and Sir Henry Capel observed to the House of
Commons (1680) that those that were taken in carrying on that
wicked act, were generally discharged without trial.
In 1679, the House of Commons were suddenly alarmed with an
information of a fresh design of the Papists to burn London a second
time. The house of one Bird, in Fetter-lane, being set on fire, his
servant Elizabeth Oxly, was suspected of firing it wilfully, and sent to
prison. She confessed the fact, and declared she had been employed
to do it by one Stubbs, a Papist, who had promised her five pounds.
Stubbs being taken up, confessed he persuaded her to do it, and
that Father Giffard, his confessor, put him upon it; telling him it was
no sin to burn all the houses of heretics. He added he had frequent
conferences on this affair with Giffard and two Irishmen. Stubbs and
the maid declared, the Papists were to make an insurrection, and
expected an army of sixty thousand men from France. It was
generally inferred from this incident, that it was not Giffard's fault
(nor that of his party), that the city of London was not burnt, as in
the year 1666; and confirmed those in their opinion who thought
that general conflagration was the contrivance and work of the
Papists.
The hand of man was made use of in the beginning and carrying on
of this fire. The beginning of the fire at such a time when there had
been so much hot weather which had dried the houses, and made
them the more fit for fuel; the beginning of it in such a place, where
there were so many timber houses, and the shops filled with so
much combustible matter; and the beginning of it just when the
wind did blow so fiercely upon that corner toward the rest of the
city, which then was like tinder to the sparks; this doth smell of a
popish design, hatched in the same nest with the gunpowder plot.
The world sufficiently knows how correspondent this is to popish
principles and practices; they might, without any scruple of their
kinds of conscience, burn an heretical city, as they count it, into
ashes: for beside the dispensations they can have from his holiness
(rather his wickedness) it is not unlikely but they count such an
action as this meritorious.
Lord Chancellor (Earl of Nottingham) in his speech in giving
judgment against Lord Viscount Stafford, said, "Who can doubt any
longer that London was burnt by Papists?" though there was not one
word in the whole trial relating to it.
The inscription on the plinth of the lower pedestal of the Monument
has given an opportunity to the Reverend Mr. Crookshanks to say, it
appears that the Papists were the authors of the fire, and that the
Parliament being of the same persuasion, addressed the king.
The inscription is in English:
"This pillar was set up in perpetual remembrance of the most
dreadful burning of this protestant city, begun and carried on by the
treachery and malice of the popish faction, in the beginning of
September, in the year of our Lord 1666. In order to the carrying on
their horrid plot for extirpating the protestant religion and old
English liberty, and introducing popery and slavery."[14]
This inscription was erased by King James upon his succession to the
crown; but reinscribed presently after the revolution, in such deep
characters as are not easily to be blotted out.
The latter part of the inscription on the north side (Sed furor
papisticus, qui tam dira patravit, nondum restinguitur) containing an
offensive truth, was erased at King James's accession, and
reinscribed soon after the revolution.
Mr. Pope differs much in his opinion concerning these inscriptions,
when he says—

Where London's column, pointing at the skies,

Like a tall bully, rears its head, and lies.

It seems wonderful (says the author of the Craftsman) that the

plague was not as peremptorily imputed to the Papists as the fire.[15]
There was a general suspicion of incendiaries laying combustible
stuff in many places, having observed several houses to be on fire at
the same time: but we are told, God with his great bellows did blow
upon it, and made it spread quickly, and horrible flakes of fire
mounted to the skies.
There was a strange concurrence of several natural causes which
occasioned the fire so vigorously to spread and increase.
There was a great supineness and negligence in the people of the
house where it began: it began between one and two o'clock after
midnight, when all were in a dead sleep: on a Saturday night, when
many of the eminent citizens, merchants, and others, were retired
into the country, and left servants to look to their city houses: it
happened in the long vacation, at a time of year when many wealthy
citizens are wont to be in the country at fairs, or getting in debts,
and making up accounts with their chapmen.
The houses where it began were mostly built of timber, and those
very old: the closeness and narrowness of the streets did much
facilitate the progress of the fire, and prevented the bringing in
engines. The wares and commodities stowed and vended in those
parts were most combustible of any other, as oil, pitch, tar, cordage,
hemp, flax, rosin, wax, butter, cheese, wine, brandy, sugar, and such
like.
The warmth of the preceding season had so dried the timber, that it
was never more apt to take fire; and an easterly wind (which is the
driest of all) had blown for several days together before, and at that
time very strongly.
The unexpected failing of the water from the New River; the engine
at London-bridge called the Thames water-tower was out of order,
and in a few hours was itself burnt down, so that the pipes which
conveyed the water from thence through the streets, were soon
empty.
Beside, there was an unusual negligence at first, and a confidence of
easily quenching it, and of its stopping at several places afterward;
which at last turned into confusion, consternation, and despair;
people choosing rather by flight to save their goods, than by a
vigorous opposition to save their own houses and the whole city.
Thus a small spark, from an unknown cause, for want of timely care,
increased to such a flame, that nothing could extinguish, which laid
waste the greatest part of the city in three days' time.
The king in his speech to the parliament, says, "God be thanked for
our meeting together in this place: little time hath passed since we
were almost in despair of having this place left to meet in. You see
the dismal ruins the fire hath made: and nothing but a miracle of
God's mercy could have preserved what is left from the same
destruction."
When the presumptions of the city's being burnt by design came to
be laid before a committee of the House of Commons, they were
found of no weight: and the many stories, published at that time
with great assurance, were declared void of credibility.[16]
After all, it may perhaps be queried, whether the foregoing rumours
and examinations, though incongruous with each other, may not
afford some colour to a whisper, that the government itself was not
without some ground of suspicion of having been the secret cause of
the conflagration; to afford an opportunity of restoring the capital of
the nation, in a manner more secure from future contagion, more
generally wholesome for the inhabitants, more safe from fires, and
more beautiful on the whole, from the united effect of all these
salutary purposes. Such, however, has been the result of that
temporary disaster, whether accidental or not; and if intended, a
more pardonable instance of doing evil that good may come of it,
cannot perhaps be produced.[17]
 SECTION IV.
OF THE MONUMENT.

The Act of Parliament 19 and 20 Car. II., enacts, that—The better to

preserve the memory of this dreadful visitation, a column or pillar of
brass or stone be erected on, or as near unto the place where the
fire unhappily began, as conveniently may be; in perpetual
remembrance thereof: with such inscription thereon as the lord
mayor and court of aldermen shall direct.
In obedience to which act, the fine piece of architecture, called The
Monument, was erected, at the expense of fourteen thousand five
hundred pounds; it is the design of the great Sir Christopher Wren,
and undoubtedly the finest modern column in the world, and in
some respects may vie with the most famous of antiquity, being
twenty-four feet higher than Trajan's pillar at Rome. It is of the Doric
order, fluted; its altitude, two hundred and two feet from the
ground; greatest diameter of the body fifteen feet; the ground
bounded by the plinth or lower part of the pedestal, twenty-eight
feet square; and the pedestal is in altitude forty feet; all of Portland
stone. Within, is a large staircase of black marble, containing three
hundred and forty-five steps, ten inches and a half broad, and six
inches risers; a balcony within thirty-two feet from the top, whereon
is a spacious and curious gilded flame, very suitable to the intent of
the whole column.
On the front or west side of the die of the pedestal of this
magnificent column is finely carved a curious emblem of this tragical
scene, by the masterly hand of Mr. Gabriel Cibber. The eleven
principal figures are in alto, the rest in basso relievo.
At the north end of the plain the city is represented in flames, and
the inhabitants in consternation, their arms extended upward, crying
for succour. A little nearer the horizon, the arms, cap of
maintenance, and other ensigns of the city's grandeur, partly buried
under the ruins. On the ruins, lies the figure of a woman crowned
with a castle, her breasts pregnant, and in her hand a sword;
representing the strong, plentiful, and well-governed city of London
in distress. The king is represented on a place ascended to by three
steps, providing by his power and prudence for the comfort of his
citizens and ornament of his city. On the steps stand three women:
1. Liberty, having in her right hand a hat, wherein the word Liberty,
denoting the freedom or liberty given those who engaged three
years in the work. 2. Ichnographia, with rule and compasses in one
hand, and a scroll in the other; near her, the emblem of Industry, a
beehive. 3. Imagination, holding the emblem of Invention. All which
intimate, that the speedy re-erection of the city was principally
owing to liberty, imagination, contrivance, art, and industry. There is
the figure of time raising the woman in distress, and Providence with
a winged hand containing an eye, promising peace and plenty, by
pointing to those two figures in the clouds. Behind the king, the
work is going forward. Under the king's feet appears Envy enraged
at the prospect of success, and blowing flames out of his mouth.
The figure of a lion, with one fore-foot tied up, and the muzzle of a
cannon, denote this deplorable misfortune to have happened in time
of war; and Mars, with a chaplet in his hand, is an emblem of
approaching peace. Round the cornice are noble enrichments of
trophy work, sword, the king's arms, cap of maintenance, &c., at the
angles, four very large dragons, the supporters of the city arms.
On this column of perpetual remembrance the lord mayor and court
of aldermen have ordered inscriptions to be cut in Latin:
That on the north side, describes the desolation of the city in ashes;
and is thus translated:
In the year of Christ 1666, the second day of September, eastward
from hence at the distance of two hundred and two feet, (the height
of this column) about midnight, a most terrible fire broke out, which,
driven by a high wind, not only wasted the adjacent parts, but also
places very remote, with incredible noise and fury: it consumed
eighty-nine churches, the city gates, Guildhall, many public
structures, hospitals, schools, libraries, a vast number of stately
edifices, thirteen thousand two hundred dwelling houses, four
hundred streets; of twenty-six wards, it entirely consumed fifteen,
and left eight others shattered and half burnt; the ruins of the city
were four hundred and thirty-six acres, from the Tower by the
Thames side to the Temple church, and from the north-east gate of
the city wall to Holborn-bridge: to the estates and fortunes of the
citizens it was merciless, but to their lives very favourable[18]; that it
might in all things resemble the last conflagration of the world.
The destruction was sudden, for in a small space of time, the same
city, was seen most flourishing, and reduced to nothing.
Three days after, when this fatal fire had baffled all human councils
and endeavours, in the opinions of all, as it were by the will of
heaven, it stopped, and on every side was extinguished.
The south side describes the glorious restoration of the city, and has
been thus translated:—
Charles the Second, son of Charles the Martyr, King of Great Britain,
France, and Ireland, defender of the faith, a most gracious prince,
commiserating the deplorable state of things, while the ruins were
yet smoking, provided for the comfort of his citizens, and the
ornament of his city; remitted their taxes, and referred the petitions
of the magistrates and inhabitants to the parliament, who
immediately passed an act, that public buildings should be restored
to greater beauty with public money, to be raised by an imposition
on coals; that churches, and the cathedral of St. Paul's, should be
rebuilt from their foundations with all magnificence; that bridges,
gates, and prisons should be made new; the sewers cleansed; the
streets made straight and regular; such as were steep, levelled, and
those too narrow, made wider; markets and shambles removed to
separate places. They also enacted, that every house should be built
with party walls, and all in front raised of equal height, and those
walls all of square stone or brick; and that no man should delay
beyond the space of seven years. Moreover, care was taken by law
to prevent all suits about their bounds. Also, anniversary prayers
were enjoined;[19] and to perpetuate the memory hereof to
posterity, they caused this column to be erected. The work was
carried on with diligence, and London is restored; but whether with
greater speed or beauty may be made a question. Three years' time
saw that finished which was supposed to be the business of an age.
The east side, over the door, has an inscription, thus Englished:
This pillar was begun, Sir Richard Ford, knight, being lord mayor of
London, in the year 1671: carried on in the mayoralties of Sir George
Waterman, knight; Sir Robert Hanson, knight; Sir William Hooker,
knight; Sir Robert Viner, knight; Sir Joseph Sheldon, knight; and
finished, Sir Thomas Davis, knight, being lord mayor, in the year
1677.
The inscription on the plinth of the lower pedestal is in page 245.
On a stone in front of the house built on the spot where the fire
began, there was (very lately) the following inscription:
"Here, by the permission of Heaven, hell broke loose on this
protestant city, from the malicious hearts of barbarous Papists, by
the hand of their agent, Hubert, who confessed, and on the ruins of
this place declared his fact, for which he was hanged, viz.:—That he
here began the dreadful fire, which is described and perpetuated on
and by the neighbouring pillar. Erected 1680, in the mayorality of Sir
Patience Ward, knight."
 FOOTNOTES
[1] Rev. xiv. 18.
[2] Seymour's Survey, i. 70.
[3] Carte Ormd. i. 329.
[4] Of this clumsy piece of sculpture we have the following
account from Maitland's Survey, page 1,049:—"It is impossible
to quit this place without taking notice of the equestrian
statue raised here in honour of Charles II.; a thing in itself so
exceedingly ridiculous and absurd, that it is in no one's power
to look upon it without reflecting on the tastes of those who
set it up. But when we enquire into the history of it, the farce
improves upon our hands, and what was before contemptible,
grows entertaining. This statue was originally made for John
Sobieski, King of Poland, but, by some accident was left upon
the workman's hands. About the same time the city was loyal
enough to pay their devoirs to King Charles immediately upon
his restoration; and finding this statue ready made to their
hands, resolved to do it in the cheapest way, and convert the
Polander into a Briton, and the Turk underneath into Oliver
Cromwell, to make their compliment complete: and the
turban upon the last mentioned figure is an undeniable proof
of the truth of the story."
[5]The certificate says, eighty-nine parish Churches; but see
the Act of Parliament and inscription on the monument.
[6] London's Remembrancer, page 33,—ten years before the
fire.
[7] Oldmison, i. 547.
[8] Rapin, ii. 690.
[9] Robert, according to Rapin.
[10] Bishop Burnet and some others say he was a Papist.
[11] Burnet, Abr., 120.
[12] Howell, Impartial History of James II., i. 9.
[13] Echard, i. 169.
[14] Old. Hist. of the Church of Scotland, i. 207. [Transcriber's
Note: The marker for this footnote is missing in the original;
its location has been guessed.]
[15]Seymour, i. 454. [Transcriber's Note: The marker for this
footnote is missing in the original; its location has been
guessed.]
[16]Echard, iii. 168. [Transcriber's Note: The marker for this
footnote is missing in the original; its location has been
guessed.]
[17]Burnet, Abr. 121. [Transcriber's Note: The marker for this
footnote is missing in the original; its location has been
guessed.]
[18]It was a very miraculous circumstance, amidst all this
destruction and public confusion, no person was known either
to be burnt, or trodden to death in the streets.
[19] By statute 19 and 20, Car. II., it is enacted, That the
citizens of London, and their successors for the time to come,
may retain the memory of so sad a desolation, and reflect
seriously on the manifold iniquities, which are the unhappy
causes of such judgments: be it therefore enacted, that the
second day of September (unless the same happen to be
Sunday, and if so, then the next day following) be yearly for
ever hereafter observed as a day of fasting and humiliation
within the said city and liberties thereof, to implore the mercy
of Almighty God upon the said city; to make devout prayers
and supplications unto him, to divert the like calamity for the
time to come.
 *** END OF THE PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK AN HISTORICAL
NARRATIVE OF THE GREAT AND TERRIBLE FIRE OF LONDON, SEPT.
2ND 1666 ***

Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.

Creating the works from print editions not protected by U.S.

copyright law means that no one owns a United States copyright in
these works, so the Foundation (and you!) can copy and distribute it
in the United States without permission and without paying
copyright royalties. Special rules, set forth in the General Terms of
Use part of this license, apply to copying and distributing Project
Gutenberg™ electronic works to protect the PROJECT GUTENBERG™
concept and trademark. Project Gutenberg is a registered trademark,
and may not be used if you charge for an eBook, except by following
the terms of the trademark license, including paying royalties for use
of the Project Gutenberg trademark. If you do not charge anything
for copies of this eBook, complying with the trademark license is
very easy. You may use this eBook for nearly any purpose such as
creation of derivative works, reports, performances and research.
Project Gutenberg eBooks may be modified and printed and given
away—you may do practically ANYTHING in the United States with
eBooks not protected by U.S. copyright law. Redistribution is subject
to the trademark license, especially commercial redistribution.

START: FULL LICENSE

THE FULL PROJECT GUTENBERG LICENSE