0% found this document useful (0 votes)
88 views4 pages

Drs Nkab Ps06 Qms Drs 006 r1 RMC Approval Oem

The document outlines the review process for a submittal by M/S Larsen & Toubro Ltd regarding vendor credentials for Concrete OEM Pvt. Ltd. It details comments from reviewers, their severity, and the responses provided by the submitter, indicating that most comments were closed with minor issues noted. The DRS emphasizes that acceptance of documents does not imply validation or acceptance of design details, and it outlines the roles and actions required in the review process.

Uploaded by

nadicom1964
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
88 views4 pages

Drs Nkab Ps06 Qms Drs 006 r1 RMC Approval Oem

The document outlines the review process for a submittal by M/S Larsen & Toubro Ltd regarding vendor credentials for Concrete OEM Pvt. Ltd. It details comments from reviewers, their severity, and the responses provided by the submitter, indicating that most comments were closed with minor issues noted. The DRS emphasizes that acceptance of documents does not imply validation or acceptance of design details, and it outlines the roles and actions required in the review process.

Uploaded by

nadicom1964
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

CHENNAI METRO RAIL PROJECT

DOCUMENT REVIEW SHEET (DRS)


SUBMITTAL - DETAILS

Document/Drawing Submitted by M/S Larsen & Toubro Ltd [PS06] Contract Reference CP20.1/PS-06

Submittal Document No. LTCD/PT&D/SS/CMRL/09-23/14 DRS Reference NKAB-PS06-QMS-DRS-006_R0_RMC Approval-OEM

Submittal Name Submission of Vendor Credentials of M/s. Concrete OEM Pvt. Ltd. (RMC) DRS Revision No. R1

Date of Submittal Received Wednesday, September 27, 2023 Date Issued Tuesday, October 3, 2023

PMIS/Transmittal Reference LET-LANT-NKAB-POH06-PSS-09-23-29 DRS Owner Mani. P

Major: will attribute to Rejected Status


Severity of the Comments Moderate: will attribute to NOWC Status Status Awarded NONO Comment
Minor: will attribute to NONO Status Status by
Engineer
Item Doc/Drg/Section/ Page Reviewer`s Comments Reviewer Initials Severity Submitter's Response

R0:The Recent Batching Plant calibration certificate/Report to be submitted R0: Enclosed the batching Calibration report/Certificate of Batching plant. Valid upto
1 General
R1: Noted & closed
KMN Minor
02-Nov-23
Closed

R0:The validity of ISO certificates will going to expire on September 27, 2023;ensure
2 General the renewal of certificate KMN Minor R0: Enclosed the latest ISO 9001:2015 Certificate Valid through 27-Sep-24 Closed
R1: Noted & closed

R0:Roof sheet covering not available for Aggregate Stockbins R0: RMC vendor is under the process of Roof Sheet covering for aggregate stock bins.
3 General
R1: Noted & closed
KMN Minor
Till such time, we will ensure the necessary Preventive/Protective measures for RMC.
Closed

R0: The ingridients of concrete Sampling and testing to be done the presence of GC
4 Note from the Batching plant KMN Minor R0: Noted Closed
R1: Noted & closed

R0: Concrete Trial Mix to be conducted for the intended grades at this Batching Plant
5 Note with the witness of GC by raising RFI. KMN Minor R0: Noted Closed
R1: Noted & closed

R0: Please make sure that all concrete being supplied for RSS and other allied works
shall meet the temperature criteria of 32° C. and in no case temperature of the
6 Note
concrete should increase from the specified both day and night concrete.
KMN Minor R0: Noted Closed

R1: Noted & closed

R0- The approval has been granted based on attached document furnished by you. In
case if any deterioration is observed in quality of materials/ Works, the engineer
7 Note
reserves the right to cancel the approval.
KMN Minor R0: Noted Closed

R1: Noted & closed

Note:
1. The acceptance of these documents by Engineer /Employer shall not be deemed as validation of your submission and nor does it infer their fitness for the purpose. Engineer / Employer does not accept any 4. Whenever any change occurs that invalidates the information contained in the previously submitted and reviewed document, within 14 days of the occurrence of such change; and when requested by the Engineer from time to time
liability for the submission. 5. This DRS Report is part of the Drawing/Document and shall be kept in the last pages of drawing/Document.
2. Any changes to the documents should be undertaken in accordance with your organization’s approved change control procedures. 6. The Engineer's opinion on the status of the comments or the overall status of the DRS is final.
Such variations must be formally recorded and evidence should accompany any resubmission. 7. The status of document shall not in any way imply any change to the Contract price or Time for Completion.
3. Without relieving the originating organization of their contractual responsibilities, the status codes for each document are provided after review.

Disclaimer : Permission to proceed shall not constitute acceptance or approval of design details, calculations, analyses, test methods or materials developed or selected by the Contractor and shall not relieve the Contractor from full compliance with Contractual obligations.

DC to circulate
This DRS document is invalid unless Signature Signature signed PDF
it is signed off by all people (as along with
applicable) in all pages Native file to
Reviewed by (Engineers/Architects) Checked by (DREs/Experts/Sr. Managers) Issued by (CREs/Chief Experts/CM/DTL) the Contractor
CHENNAI METRO RAIL PROJECT
DOCUMENT REVIEW STATUS (DRS) - REVIEW PROCEDURE

Step Role Action Remarks


1. Uploads/Sends the document for review to the Reviewer (PMIS/Transmittal)
1 Document Controller
2. Intimates the above to all the stakeholders by email (using mail format)

1. Initialises the DRS sheet with document review details and initialises the DRS revision to R1.
The Experts to be chosen as per the document contents.
Lead Reviewer 2. Selects applicable experts and shares the document (or link) and DRS through Document Controller for review
2 Ex: Method Statement review to involve Installation team, Safety, Environment, Design and
(DRS Owner) comments
Quality.
3. Reiview the comments of reviewers team and award the status of the review.

# Log your comments or re-comments as per the pattern indicated in the next section
1. Review the documents and update the DRS.
below.
2. Put your initials for each comment and the initial status of the comment.
# Use relevant checklist from the "Document Review Checklists"
# Keep the Comments precise and short.
-You can copy the checklist to this DRS and refer the checkpoints in your comments.
3 Reviewers -Give enough references for reader to understand the comment.
# If you have no comments, then Update your section as "No Comments"
-Use alphabet bullets to indicate multiple defects/issues. It makes responses easy to track and re-comment.
# Provide your DRS to the lead reviewer on time to close the review.
# If required, a meeting may be conducted to explain the comments.
# In the comments, do not use verbal expressions or works like"please", "kindly" etc. It shall
3. If severity exists only "Minor"for all comments then the document status should be given as "NoNo".
be formal and "reporting" in nature.

1. Collates the comments from all the Expert reviewers and summarises them with the help of Document Controller.
Lead Reviewer
4 May call for a meeting if required.
(DRS Owner)
2. Concludes the review - Gives a Code, Signs the DRS and shares with the contractor officially.

Responses to be as per the pattern indicated below.


5 Document Controller Reworks the document and updates his/her response in the DRS sheet with Signatures. DRS can be shared to the contractor by e-mail & PMIS as PDF along with Native file for
response from the Submitter.

# In case there is disagreement on closing the comments, then the lead reviewer`s call is
1. Updates the DRS revision (Ex: R1, R2, R3…..Increments for each time it comes back to GC) final, but with justification in the DRS sheet.
6 Reviewers 2. Verifies the comments and updates the comment description(same column, as per pattern indicated below). # If there are any actions planned for future, then they need to be carried to the action
tracker of the project with remarks in the DRS sheet.
May goto step 3 or end review.

Lead Reviewer 1. If all comments are resolved, then concludes the review - Gives a final Code, Signs the DRS and shares with the
7
(DRS Owner) contractor officially.
OPTIONAL SHEET
Add a checklist in place of this sheet
OPTIONAL SHEET
Add references, images etc to support your response to review comments

You might also like