PRE TRIAL BRIEF J. Llamas
PRE TRIAL BRIEF J. Llamas
PEOPLE OF THE
PHILIPPINES,
Prosecution,
PRE-TRIAL BRIEF
OF THE ACCUSED
1.1. The accused and the private complainant, Mary Kate Imperial, along
with her husband, the victim, Larry Imperial, are neighbors.
1.2. On July 22, 2024, the accused decided to drop by his neighbor’s
house and speak directly with Larry Imperial regarding the recent
altercation between their sons at school.
1.3. The accused brought his licensed .45 caliber pistol and motorcycle
keys, intending to go to a scheduled target practice after visiting his
neighbors.
1.4. Before accused could arrive at his neighbor’s house, he found that
Larry Imperial, visibly upset, was already on his way to meet him.
1.5. A verbal argument ensued, during which the Larry Imperial grabbed
the accused by the collar and threatened him. Accused instinctively
pushed the victim away, trying to create space between them.
However, Larry Imperial retaliated by hitting him in the chest,
escalating the situation into an all-out fistfight.
Page 1 of 5
1.6. Larry Imperial got hold of an iron pipe on the ground and charged
at the accused. Fearing for his life, accused drew his gun and shot in
self-defense as Larry Imperial advanced with the weapon.
1.7. Realizing the severity of the situation, the accused rode to the
Ozamiz City Police Station, where he voluntarily surrendered,
knowing he needed to face the consequences as he was overcome
with guilt.
1.8. The accused believed his actions were a necessary response to defend
himself from real and imminent danger, praying such would be
considered in the charges against him.
2.2.1. That while the accused had previously dated the private
complainant, he had no known encounters with the latter nor
his husband, the victim, since 2014;
2.2.2. That the accused had no history of animosity with the victim;
2.2.3. That the accused only took his .45 caliber pistol before
heading out, as he had planned to go to a scheduled target
practice later that day of the incident;
2.2.4. That the accused had license to possess and carry the .45
caliber pistol;
2.2.5. That the accused did not reach the victim’s house since the
victim was already on his way to go to the accused;
Page 2 of 5
2.2.6. That the accused and the victim had a verbal argument
regarding their sons’ altercation in school;
2.2.7. That during the argument, the victim grabbed the accused by
the collar and threatened him;
2.2.8. That the victim was larger than the accused in body
proportions;
2.2.9. That the victim got hold of an iron pipe from the construction
site;
2.2.10. That there was no intent to kill on the part of the accused; and
2.3.3. The accused reserves the right to raise such other defenses that
may become apparent in the course of the presentation of
evidence and trial.
Documentary Evidence:
4.1. Copy of the Text Message received by the accused on July 22, 2024
confirming scheduled target practice at 4:30 PM on the same day at
Royal Pistol Indoor Firing Range to be marked as Exhibit “1”
Purpose: To prove that the accused solely brought his firearm for
his scheduled target practice on the day of the incident.
Page 3 of 5
4.2. License to Own and Possess Firearms and Permit to Carry of John
Pontio Michael P. Madrigal to be marked as Exhibit “2”
Witness:
The accused respectfully requests that the trial dates be agreed upon
during the pre-trial conference where all the parties are in attendance to avoid
conflict of schedules of the parties and the calendar of this Honorable Court.
Page 4 of 5
Most respectfully submitted this 1st day of October 2024 at Ozamiz City,
Misamis Occidental, Philippines.
COPY FURNISHED:
Page 5 of 5