Mixed_Method_Research_Report
Mixed_Method_Research_Report
Mixed methods can help you gain a more complete picture than a standalone quantitative or
qualitative study, as it integrates benefits of both methods. It is often used in the behavioral,
health, and social sciences, especially in multidisciplinary settings and complex situational
or societal research.
To corroborate findings from both qualitative and quantitative data. Better understanding
can be obtained by triangulating one set of results with another and thereby enhancing the
validity of inferences.
To use different data sources to complement each other. Elaboration or clarification of the
results from one method with the findings from the other method.
TRIANGULATION
COMPLEMENTARITY
To use results from one method to inform the other (e.g., using qualitative data to develop a
quantitative survey). When the researcher uses the results from one method to help
develop the use of the other method.
DEVELOPMENT
INITIATION
EXPANSION
When you need both numerical data and personal experiences to fully understand a
phenomenon.
1.Convergent Parallel Design - In a convergent parallel design, you collect quantitative and
qualitative data at the same time and analyze them separately. After both analyses are
complete, compare your results to draw overall conclusions.
Example:
In your research on cycling safety in Amsterdam, you undertake both sides of your research
simultaneously:
On the qualitative side, you analyze cyclist complaints via the city’s database and on social
media to find out which areas are perceived as dangerous and why.
On the quantitative side, you analyze accident reports in the city’s database to find out how
frequently accidents occur in different areas of the city
2. Explanatory sequential design - your quantitative data collection and analysis occurs first,
followed by qualitative data collection and analysis. You should use this design if you think
your qualitative data will explain and contextualize your quantitative findings.
You analyze the accident statistics first and draw preliminary conclusions about which
areas are most dangerous. Based on these findings, you conduct interviews with cyclists in
high-accident areas and analyze complaints qualitatively.
You can utilize the qualitative data to explain why accidents occur on specific roads, and
take a deep dive into particular problem areas.
You first interview cyclists to develop an initial understanding of problem areas, and draw
preliminary conclusions. Then you analyze accident statistics to test whether cyclist
perceptions line up with where accidents occur.
Embedded Design - One method (qualitative or quantitative) is dominant, while the other
plays a supportive role.
•What is the key research question you want to address? Why does it need both qualitative
and quantitative methods?
•Select the design that best fits your research goals (convergent, sequential, etc.).
•Methods such as interviews, focus groups, and open-ended questions. It explores deep,
contextual insights.
•Sampling Techniques:
•Sequential design: Use one set of results to inform the next phase.
Integrating qualitative and quantitative data can improve the value of research by
combining different ways of knowing and balancing the strengths and limitations of each
type of data.
•Comprehensive Insights:
Combining the strengths of both data types provides richer, more complete findings.
•Triangulation:
Using multiple methods and data sources to validate and cross-check results.
•Complementarity:
Qualitative data explains or enhances understanding of quantitative results and vice versa.
MERGING
Combine the data for joint analysis.
Qualitative and quantitative data are collected and analyzed separately but then combined
for a joint analysis.
MERGING
Qualitative and quantitative data are collected and analyzed separately but then combined
for a joint analysis.
This design collects qualitative data first, then quantitative data. For example, to study how
parents interact with their children, you could conduct interviews first, then use a survey to
measure these interactions.
This design collects qualitative and quantitative data simultaneously and independently,
then analyzes the results. For example, one team could conduct ethnographic research at
customer locations, while another team surveys customers on the same product experience.
The teams would then compare and contrast the results to look for patterns.
SIDE-BY-SIDE DISPLAY
This display integrates qualitative data into an experiment. For example, you could create a
side-by-side display to compare patient experiences with their quantitative data.
TABLE OR GRID
You can organize data in a table or grid that includes both qualitative and quantitative data
for each participant. This can help you identify where the data fits together and where there
are contradictions.
•Example:
•In a health study: a table that compares patient satisfaction scores (quantitative) with
patient narratives (qualitative) to highlight alignment or contradictions.
2. CONNECTING DATA
Use one set of results (e.g., qualitative themes) to inform the next method (e.g., quantitative
survey questions).
Example: Using qualitative results (e.g., themes from focus groups) to design a quantitative
survey.
•Collect one form of data first (usually quantitative or qualitative), then use those findings
to inform the second phase of data collection.
•Example:
A survey reveals that 60% of employees are dissatisfied with workplace policies
(quantitative). In-depth interviews are then conducted to explore why employees feel
dissatisfied (qualitative).
HOW IT WORKS?
Collect qualitative data first, then use the findings to inform the quantitative data collection.
For example, you could use focus group results to design survey questions that focus on
topics that are important to participants.
Collect quantitative data first, then use qualitative data to explain the quantitative findings
in more detail. For example, you could use focus groups to explore how individuals'
personal experiences match up with instrument results about costs.
3. EMBEDDING DATA
One type of data plays a supportive role within the primary method.
•Collect one dominant form of data (e.g., a large-scale survey) but include a subset of
qualitative data (e.g., open-ended responses) to enrich the findings.
•Example:
A quantitative study on student performance embeds focus group discussions within the
design to understand emotional factors influencing scores.
HOW IT WORKS?
In a quantitative study that tests if the number of cyclist complaints correlates with the
number of accidents, you could embed qualitative interviews with cyclists who submitted
complaints.
SURVEYING STUDENTS
You could survey students about their opinions of an online learning platform, and then
conduct individual interviews to gain further insight into their responses.
You could gather quantitative data from an experiment with a control and a treatment
group, and then incorporate qualitative data from interviews and feedback forms within the
treatment group.
3. Data Transformation: Convert one type of data into another. Example: Turn qualitative
themes into numerical codes or vice versa, where quantitative data is used to generate
qualitative interpretations.
Quantitative findings are visualized with bar charts, while qualitative insights are added as
text annotations for richer interpretation.
•Example:
A bar chart showing high levels of job stress is accompanied by a qualitative note,
“Employees cite lack of work-life balance as the main cause.”
•Plan Ahead:
Think about how you will integrate data early in the study design.
Joint displays, tables, and charts can help present integrated findings.
Acknowledge and explain when qualitative and quantitative data do not align, offering
possible reasons or interpretations.
Ensure that both datasets are rigorously collected and analyzed before integration.
1. Contradictory Findings:
Qualitative and quantitative data may point to different conclusions. This requires careful
interpretation and explanation.
2. Time-Intensive:
The process of data integration requires additional time for data collection, analysis, and
interpretation.
3. Expertise in Both Methods:
A study on student learning outcomes uses test scores (quantitative) alongside student
interviews (qualitative) to explore how teaching methods impact engagement and
performance.
Quantitative data on patient recovery rates is combined with qualitative data from patient
feedback to improve the quality of care.
CONCLUSION
•Integrating qualitative and quantitative data in mixed methods research provides deeper
insights, strengthens findings, and allows for a more nuanced understanding of research
problems.