Scribd
Upload
18 views4 pages

Ангк

The document provides detailed descriptions of various language testing types, including proficiency, achievement, diagnostic, and placement tests, each serving distinct purposes in assessing language skills. It also contrasts direct versus indirect testing, discrete point versus integrative testing, and norm-referenced versus criterion-referenced testing, along with objective versus subjective testing. Additionally, it discusses computer adaptive testing and communicative language testing, emphasizing their roles in evaluating learners' abilities in real-world contexts.

Uploaded by

Nurgul Akylbek
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
18 views4 pages

Ангк

The document provides detailed descriptions of various language testing types, including proficiency, achievement, diagnostic, and placement tests, each serving distinct purposes in assessing language skills. It also contrasts direct versus indirect testing, discrete point versus integrative testing, and norm-referenced versus criterion-referenced testing, along with objective versus subjective testing. Additionally, it discusses computer adaptive testing and communicative language testing, emphasizing their roles in evaluating learners' abilities in real-world contexts.

Uploaded by

Nurgul Akylbek
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Give detailed description to each of the following test types.

1) Proficiency tests
2) Achievement tests
3) Diagnostic tests
4) Placement tests
5) Direct versus indirect testing
6) Discrete point versus integrative testing
7) Norm-referenced versus criterion-referenced testing
8) Objective testing versus subjective testing
9) Computer adaptive testing
10) Communicative language testing

1. Proficiency Tests

Proficiency tests are designed to assess a test-taker’s overall ability


in a language, often without regard to specific course content or
learning objectives. These tests measure the general language skills
of a learner, typically covering all areas such as reading, writing,
listening, and speaking. Proficiency tests aim to evaluate how well a
person can use the language in real-world situations, not necessarily
reflecting the specific curriculum or teaching methods used.
Examples include the TOEFL and IELTS.

2. Achievement Tests

Achievement tests assess how well a learner has mastered specific


content or skills taught during a particular course or instructional
period. These tests are often linked directly to the syllabus or
curriculum and measure the learner’s progress in that context.
Achievement tests can be comprehensive, covering all aspects of
the material learned, or they can be focused on particular units or
topics. An example is a final exam at the end of a language course.

3. Diagnostic Tests

Diagnostic tests are used to identify a learner’s strengths and


weaknesses before or during a language course. They help teachers
pinpoint areas where students may need additional support or
remediation. These tests are typically given at the beginning of a
course or program to inform instruction and adjust learning
strategies. They focus on detecting specific language difficulties,
whether in grammar, vocabulary, pronunciation, etc.
4. Placement Tests

Placement tests are designed to determine a learner’s appropriate


level in a language course or program. These tests help place
students in the right group based on their existing skills so that they
are neither over-challenged nor under-challenged. Placement tests
often evaluate a broad range of language skills, and the results
guide decisions about which course or level is most suitable for the
learner. A typical example would be an online test to determine the
appropriate language proficiency level for a student enrolling in a
language school.

5. Direct versus Indirect Testing

• Direct Testing: In direct testing, the test items require the


examinee to perform the language skills in question. For example,
speaking tests that require students to engage in conversations or
writing tasks that assess composition skills.
• Indirect Testing: Indirect testing, on the other hand, assesses
the learner’s ability through tasks that do not directly involve the
language skill itself but still provide insight into that skill. For
example, listening to a passage and answering questions about it
can indirectly measure speaking or comprehension skills, even
though the focus is on listening.

6. Discrete Point versus Integrative Testing

• Discrete Point Testing: This type of testing focuses on


assessing specific, individual aspects of language (e.g., vocabulary,
grammar, or pronunciation) in isolation. Each item tests a single
feature, such as filling in the blank with a particular grammatical
structure.
• Integrative Testing: In contrast, integrative testing evaluates
multiple language skills together, typically in a more holistic
context. Tasks such as writing essays or having conversations
involve integrating several language components simultaneously
(e.g., grammar, vocabulary, and fluency), making these tests more
reflective of real-world language use.

7. Norm-Referenced versus Criterion-Referenced


Testing
• Norm-Referenced Testing: These tests compare a learner’s
performance to the performance of a group of peers (the norm
group). The results are used to rank students, often producing a
bell curve of scores. The focus is on relative standing, not
necessarily on whether a student meets a predefined standard.
• Criterion-Referenced Testing: Criterion-referenced tests
measure whether a learner has met a specific standard or criteria,
regardless of how other test-takers perform. The focus is on the
learner’s ability to demonstrate mastery of certain skills or
knowledge, such as achieving a passing score on a test based on
predefined criteria.

8. Objective Testing versus Subjective Testing

• Objective Testing: In objective testing, there is a clear


correct answer for each question. Multiple-choice, true/false, and
fill-in-the-blank questions are typical of objective tests. These tests
are easy to score and are often used for testing factual knowledge
and specific language structures.
• Subjective Testing: Subjective tests rely on the judgment of
the examiner to score responses, as there may be no single correct
answer. Essays, speaking tests, and open-ended questions are
examples of subjective tests. These types of tests are used to
assess more complex or nuanced aspects of language proficiency,
such as writing style, argumentation skills, or speaking fluency.

9. Computer Adaptive Testing

Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT) uses technology to adjust the


difficulty level of the test based on the test-taker’s performance in
real-time. As the test progresses, the system selects questions that
are suited to the test-taker’s ability level. If a test-taker answers
correctly, the next question may be more difficult; if they answer
incorrectly, the next question will be easier. CAT offers a more
efficient testing experience and can provide a more accurate
measurement of a learner’s proficiency level with fewer questions
compared to traditional testing methods. Examples include the GRE
and TOEFL.

10. Communicative Language Testing

Communicative language testing focuses on assessing a learner’s


ability to use language effectively in real-world communication
situations. The primary goal is to evaluate how well a learner can
perform communicative tasks, such as giving a presentation,
participating in a discussion, or navigating a social situation. These
tests often include tasks that integrate multiple language skills, such
as speaking, listening, reading, and writing, and they are designed
to reflect authentic language use. Examples include role-plays,
problem-solving tasks, and simulations.

Each of these test types serves different purposes in assessing


language proficiency, ranging from measuring general ability to
evaluating specific language skills or knowledge.

You might also like