0 ratings 0% found this document useful (0 votes) 121 views 27 pages Production Order Variance
The document discusses the importance of understanding production order variance through standard costs in managerial accounting, emphasizing efficiency as a key factor in profitability. It explains the differences between standard costs and budgets, the process of variance analysis, and how to determine variances from standards for materials, labor, and overhead. The document also highlights the significance of timely reporting of variances to management for effective decision-making and corrective actions.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here .
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Go to previous items Go to next items
Save Production Order Variance For Later Understanding Production Order Variance —
Part 1 Performance Evaluvation Through Standard
Costs
Understanding Production Order Variance — Part 1
Managerial Accounting — Performance Evaluation Through
Standard Costs
The ultimate aim of any company will be generating profit and increasing the profit margin, There are
many interpretations of the word profit. Time, resource, money, effod, effectiveness etc are in one instance or the other
equated to profit. We can say all these words can be consolidated and merged into “Efficiency”. By measuring the
eficiency of a ficm we can calculate the profit and by improving the efficiency the proft margin grows. Lets aril down to find
the ingredients of “Efficiency’. Efficiency focuses on the cost of accomplishing the task,
Lets explain “Efficiency’ with an example. To evaluate the effectiveness of a praduct protkiced the following questions has
to be answered effectively;
Was the best cost obtained in purctiasing raw materiais
‘Whether the speciied quantity of raw material was used.
Was extra raw materials used
Was the specified amount and level of overheads used
‘Was the task completed within specified time
PWEERS
Measuring all hase and confirming to the specified range will increase the eflectivenessthere by increasing eliciency
‘The importance of “STANDARDS*
Many finance managers arques on the point, actual price should only be followed while valuating finished and sem
finished goods, not the standard price, The starting point of batter controling begins with better " STANDARD*, let it
be for price determination or far employee performance evaluation.
In our daily life we are bound to meet certain standards; the food we eat, the mobile phone we use, the car we drive,
Government standards, organizational standards are few to be noted. All and everything in our daily life has to meet
certain “STANDARD*
Difference between Standard Cost and Budget,
Standards and Budgets are essentially the same in concepl. Both are predetermined costs and bath contribute significantly
to management planning and control. A Standard is a Unitamount, whereas a budget is a Total amount.
There af@ important accounting differences belween budgets and standards, Budgel data are not jawnalized in cost
accounting, Standard cost vail be incorporated into accounting systems.
2
Standard Cost offer the following advantages:
«Facilitate Management Planning by establishing expected future casts
+ Makes employees more “Gast Cansafaus”
‘+ Useful for Setting “Selling Price” for fnisned goods
= Contribute to Management Control by providing a basis for evaluating the performance of managers responsible for
controlling costs,
Performance may be evaluated through management by exception, as devations (or Variances) from standard are
highlighted
‘When standard costs are incorporated into the accounting system, they simplify the costing of imentories: and
reduce clerical costs,
«Provides @ clear overMew of the entire process in the company,
Salling Standard Costs
Solting up standard cost is a highly difficul task. Standards may be set at one of two levels: /deal
Standards or Normal Standards.
deal Standards represent the optimum level of performance under perfect operating conditians.
Normal Standards represent an efficient level of performance thal is attainable under expected operaiti
To be effective in controlling costs, standard costs need to be current at all times. Thus, Standards should be
under continuo’s review and should be changed whenever it is determined that the existing standard is not good
measure of performance.To establish the standard cost of producirig a product, itis nocessary to establish standards for each manufacturing
cast element - direct ‘materials, direct labor and manufacturing overhead. The standard for each element
is derived from a consideration of the standard price to be paid and the standard quantily to be used.
The standard cost provides the basis for determining variances ftom standards.
Determining Variances from Standards.
One of the major management use of standard cost is the determination of Variances: Variances are the differences
between total actual costs and total standard cost. The process by which the total difference batwean standard and
actual results is analysed is known as variance analysis, When actual results are better than the expected results, we
have .a favourable variance (F). #, on the other hand, actual resulls are worse than expected results, we have an
adverse (A).
The following types of variance can be calculated;
+ Planning variances
— Input price variance
= Resouree-usage variance
= Input quatity variance
— Remaining input variance
— Sctap variance
+ Production variances
= Input price
= variance
= Resource-usage variance
= Input quaitlty variance
— Remaining input variance
Production variance of the period
— Input price
variance
= Resource-usage variance
= Input quantity variance
—Rer
ng input variance
= Scrap variance
~Mixed-price variance
= Oulput price variance
= Lot size variance
«Total variance= input price
~ variance
= Resource-tisage variance
~ input quantity variance
— Remaining input variance
= Scrap variance
= Mived-price variance:
= Output price variance
~ Lotsize variance
= Remaining variance
* In make-to-stock production, standard cost Is calculated in the standard cost estimate for the material
* During production, actual costs are collected on the order (product cost collector or manufacturing order). The
actual ovsis thal are campared with the target costs are reduced by the work in process and scrap variances (the
result is called the net actual cost},
Unfavourable and Favourable Variance
When actual costs exceed standard casts, the variance is unfavourable (A). Thus, the 2,500.00 variance is
unfavourable. An unfavourable variance has a negative connotation. t suggests that too much was paid for one or
more manufacturing cost elements or that the elements were usedf inefficiently.
fF the actual casts are less than standard costs, the variance is favourable (F). A favourable variance has a positive
inference. It suiggests efficiencies in incurring manufacturing costs and in using direct materials, direct labour, and
manufacturing overhead. Favourable variance can also be by using inferior quality materials.
Analyzing variances begins wih a determination of the cost elements that comprise the variance, For each Cost
element total variance is calculated. Then this variance is analyzed into a price variance and @ quantity
variance.
=] : =|
=| : 8]
=| - S|
Direct Material Variance
For producing 1,000 Ton of Cement, compainy A used 4,200 Ton of raWv material purchased ata cost 6f 3.10 per unit,
The total material variance is computed from the following farmwal;
Each of the Variance are explained in detail below.Sa eaites Bae Cheat ea as ‘Tossl Mdateital Veriance:
‘Actual Price (AP) ‘Stondard Price (SP) ~ erm)
The total material variance for Comapny A is 1,020 (A) (13,020 - 12,000). (unfavourable variance)
(4,200 x 3.10) —(4,000 x 3.00) = 1,020.00 (A)
The mate rial pr is computed from the formula given below
Al ete! _ 2 Material Price Variance
Actual Price (AP) BAe
The material price variance for Company A is 420.00 (A) (13,020 = 12,600). (unfavourable Variance)
(4.200 x 3.10)— (4,200 x 3.00) = 420.00 (A)
The mate rial quantity (usage) variance is determined fromthe following formula:
Aciaicientyo} || Standarioinny(5@) | sae caityVaane
Standiord Price (SP) Standard Price (SP) food
The material quantit unfavourable variance is 600 (A) (12,600 — 12,000), (Unfavourable Variance)
(4.200 x 3.00) = (4.000 x 3.00) = 600 (A)
Maicral Quantity Variance
Toul Material Variance taa0 (A)
‘Variance Matrix
Variance matrix can be used to determine and analyze a variance. When the matrix is used, the formulas foreach
cost elomentare computed first and then the variances.
Applying variance marti
“Actual Quaitity (AQ)
x
Direct Labor Variance:
‘The process of determining direct labor variance Is the same as for determining the direct material variance.
The total labor variance is oblained from the formula;
‘Actual Hours (AM) ‘Standard Hours (SH) Total Labor
x - x = Vasiance
‘Actual Rate (AR) ‘Standard Rate (SR) am
The total labor unfavourable variance is 580 (A) (20,850 ~ 20,000). (Unfayourable Variance)(2,190 x 9.8) ~ (2,000 x 10.00) = 580 (A)
The labor price (o1 variance is calculated using the formula;
The labor price variance is 420 (F) (20,580 —21,000), (Favourable Variance)
(2,100 x 9:8) ~ (2,100 x 10.00) = 420 (F)
‘The labor quantity (ar efficiency) variance is calculated using the formula;
The labor quantity variance is 1,000 (A) (21,000 ~20,000). (uniavourable variance)
(2,100 x 10,00) — (2,000 10 ,000 (A)
The total direct labor variance can be derieved trom:
Labor Prige Variance
Total Direct Labor Variance 580 (Ay
Using the Variance Matrix
a ® c
'20,$80 = 22,000 » (420)
Note: When idle time occurs the efficiency variance is based on hours actually worked (not hours paid for}
andan idle time variance (hours of idle time x standard rate per hour) is calculated.
Manufacturing Overhead Variance
The computation of the manufacturing overhead variance Is conceptually the same as the computation of the
materials and labor variances.
Total Overhead Variance
The total overhead variance is the difference between actual overhead costs and overhead costs applied to work
done. With standard costs. manufacturing overhead casts are applied to work in process on the basis of
the standard hours allowed for the work done. Standard hours allowed are the hours that should have
been worked for the units produced. in the example company A's standard hours allowed for completing work B is
2,000 and the predetermined overhead rate [Is 5 per direct labor hour. Thus overhead applied is 10,000 (2,000 x5)
Note: The actual hours of diract labor are not used in applying manufacturing overhead.
The formula for the total overhead variance is:Thus total overhead variance for Comapny A is 900.
10,900 ~ 10,000 = 800
The overhead variance is generally analyzed through @ price variance and a quantity variance, The name usuatly
given to the price vastance is tne overfiead controllable variance, whereas the quantity variance is referred to as
the ov val rane
The overhead controllable variance (also called the budget or spending variance) is the difference between the
actual overhead costs incurred and the budgeted costs for the standard hours allowed. The budgeted costs are
determined from the flexible manufactruning overhead budget.
The budgel far Company A is as fallow,
As shown, the budgeted casts for 2,000 standard hours are 10,400 (6,000 variable and 4,400 fixed)
The formula for the overhead controllable variance is:
‘Overhead
Actual Gothen = Controllable
Overhead (AO) = en = Variance
The overhead controllable variance for Comapny A is 500 (unfavourable).
10,900 - 10,400 = 500
Most controllable variance are associated with variable costs which are controllable costs. Fixed costs are usually at
the time the budget Is prepared.
Overhead Volume Variance:
The overhead volume variance indicates whether plan! facilities ware efficiently used during the period, The formula
for calculating overhead volume variance is as follows:
Overhead
‘Overhead ‘Overhead
Vowume
Budgeted ‘Applied =
(oa) on) ae
Both the factors on this formula has been explained above. The overhead budgeted is the sameas the amount used
in computing the controliable variance . Gverhead applied is the amount used in determining the totoal overhead
variance,
In example for Company A the pyerhead volume variance (unfavourable) is 400
10,400 - 10,000 = 400
The budgeted overhead consist of variable and fixed,A careful examination of this analysis indicates that the overhead volume variance relates solely to fixed
costs. Thus, the volume variance measures the amount that fixed overhead costs are under -or aver applied
IF the standard hours allowed are less than the standard hours at normal capacity, fiwed overhead costs: will be
underapplied.
if praduction exceads normal capacity, fixad overhead costs will be overapplied,
{An allemative formula for computing the overhead volume variance is shown below,
Fixed Normal Capacity Hours ‘Overhead
‘Overhead = Volume
Rate x : = Voriance
(FOR) Standard Hours Allowed
in example the normal capacity is 26,400 hours for the year or 2,200 hours for a month (26,400 / 12), and the fixed
averhead rate is 2 per hour. Thus, the volume variance is 400 unfavourable;
2x (2.200 — 2.000) = 400
[Overhead controllable variance 008
[Overhead volume variance [300
Total Overhead Variance p00"
Using Variance Matrix:
ag 8 c
‘Actual Overhead (AO)
30,900
‘Controllable Variance
a8
130,900 =20, 400.» 500
All variances should be reported to appropriate levels of management as soon as possible. The sooner management
is informed, the sooner problems can be evaluvated and corrective actions taken if necessary.
Cause of Variances
The causes of variance may relate to both external and intrenal factors,
Materials Variance
Labor Variance
Manufacturing Overhead VarianceEvery PP, Fl and CO user in any Manufacturing Industry will be having a tough time while processing month-end
activities. Production Order Variance posted against each process orders will have to be examined, explained &
investigated thoroughly. Major questions ansing will be;
Origin of Variance
How to Categorize the variance
How tocut downthe variance.
Impact of variance on COGM, COGS & Closing Stock,
Answering these will be realty tough.
We have faced all these scenarios and after months of deep research in this field 1 came across few conclusions,
ndard Cost Estimate:
The Standard Cast Estimate is involved in variance analysis because It is used for stack valuation. When a
production or process order delivers production to inventory, it receives credit based on standard price. Total
variance is the difference between actual costs debited to theorderand costs credited ta the orderdue to
deliveries to stock.
f) Preliminary Cost Estimate:
The Preliminary Cost Estimate is involved with praduction, variance calculation and valuating scrap variance and WiP.
4g) Mixed Cost Estimate:
If there are different procurement altemativesforthe same material, suchas two productionlines or two
vendors, mixed costing can be used when inventory valuation has to reflect the rrixed procurement costs,
3) Actual Postings
Plan costsare posted prior to a fiseal period. Actual costsare posted in real timeduring a fiscal period.
Actual Cost can be divided into two groups based on the pasting origin;
= Postings ta CO from externa/ business transactions results in Primary Costs.
'* Business transactions within CO results in Secondary Costs.
3.1 Bomar Cost:
Primary cost will be posted toCO mainly in the Following scenarios:
‘ZL. Goods issue to Production Order:
When goods are issued from inventory, a generat ledger balance sheet account is credited, and profit
and lass consumption (expense) accountis debited. A prirnary cost element with the some number and identifier
as the inventory consumption |s usually createdin CO during initial systemimplementation. When the system,
detects. corresponding primary cost element in CO during a posting to General ledger expense account, a
posting to CO cost object is also required.
Primary Cost are: pasted to CO from FI,
GLentry during Goods Issue
rod earn
Raw Material Consungption [xxx | |
Stock of Raw Material XX
Table 1.03.2 Secondary Cost:
‘The costs inCO are allocated from overhead cost centers to production cost centers during assessmentand
then onto production order during activity confirmation.
3.2.1 Assessment
Period- end assessments move costs from overhead cost centers to praduction cost centers.
3.2.2 Activity Confirmation:
When production order activities are confirmed, the production or product cost collector is debited, and the
production cost centeris credited. There are no FI postings during activity confirmation.
3.3 Primary Credits
Primary Credits occurwhen production orders deliver Finished / Semi finished good into inventory.
As finished goods are delivered from manufacturing order into inventory, an inventory balance sheet
account is debited, and profit and loss production output account is credited. Because there is a primary cost
element corresponding to the production output account, a CO abject is also credited. The finished goods are
delivered from a production order, so the system automatically chooses the production order or product cost,
collector to receive the primary credit.
The credit value Is calculated by multiplying the finished goods standard price by the quantity delivered to
inventory.
Stock of Finished Good XXX
[COGM of Finished Good XXX
Raw Material Consumption XXX
[Stock of Raw Material XXX
Table 2.0
3.4 Secondary Cregit
‘At period end the production order receives a secondary credit that is equal to the variance during settlement,
resulting in zero balance.
During the settlement process, product cost collectors and process order variance are posted to Profitability
Analysis (CO-PA) and FI.
Debit 7100 Raw Material
100 Labor
100 Over Heads
Credit (250) Finished Good
alanee [50 Variance
Table 3.0
Total Variance is the diflerence between total production order debits and credits.
Variance calculation at period end divides the variance into categories, based on the source of the variance,
Production Variance settled to CO-PA are included at the grass profit margin level.
Cost Center under/over absorption costs assessed to CO-PA are included at theoperating profit level.3:5) Post Actual Costs
1) Period - End Processing
5.1. The three common types af variance cakulation are as follows;
'$.1.1) Total Variance
Total variance is the difference between the actual cost debited to the onderand credits from
deliveries to inventory. Total Variance is variance relevant to settlement. The variance is settled in Financial
Accounting (Fl), Profit Center Accounting and Profitability Analysis
5
2) Production Variance
Praduction variance is the difference between net actual costs debited to the order and target
costs based on the preliminary cost estimate and quantity delivered to inventory.
Production variance is not relevant forsettlement, only for information.
5.1.3) Planning Variance
Planning variance is the difference between costs on the preliminary cost estimate for the order
and target costs based on the standard cost estimate and planned order quantity.
5.2) Variance Categories
During variance caicuiation, the order balance is divided into categories on the input and output sides.
Variance category provide reasons forthe cause of the variance, Thare areno Fl posting dunng variance
calculation.
Variance can be categorized into Input Variance and Output Variance
5.2.4) Input Varionce
Variance based on Goods Issue, Internal activity allocation, overhead allocation, general ledger account
postings.
‘Input Variance is divided into the following categories during variance calculation, according ta their
source:
Category IV. 1) Input Price Variance
Inia prion vation oceursing a ult of itariat pcm ohaning ater tna Nahar iaues wenaried Sosbastinateld
release
Teoccursinany of the below mentioned scenarios;
“If the material valuation is based on standard price control, a standard cost estimate forthe
‘component. could be released after the cost estimate forthe assembly is released.
‘If the material valuation is basedon Moving average price control, a goods receipt of the component
could change-the component price after the cost estimate for the materials released,
input price variance = (actual price — plan price) * actual input quantity
Category IV. 2) Resource ~ Usage Variance
Resource ~ Usage variance occurs asa result of substituting components. This could occur if a component is nat
available, and another component witha different material number is used instead.
Resource Usage variance = Actual costs target costs — input price variance
Category IV, 3) Input quantity varianceInput quantity variance oceurs as a result of a difference between plan and actual quantities of materials and
activities consumed.
put quantity variance = (actual input quantity = target input quantity) * plan price
Category IV:4) Remaining Input Variance
Wher
Put variance cannot be assigned to any other variance category. 5.2.2) Output Variance
Variance can be from too little or too much of planned order quantity baing delivered, or becausethe delivered
quantity was valuated differently.
5.2.2) Output Variance is divided into;
Category OV, 1} Mixed - Price Variance
Mixed-Price variance occurs when inventary is valuated using 2 mixed cost estimate forthe material.
Category OV.2) Output Price Variance
Output price variance can occur in the following scenarios;
1) IF thestandard price is changed atterdelivery to inventory, and before variance calculation,
2) _ If the material is valuated at moving average price and itis not delivered to inventory at standard price
during target value calculation.
uiput price variance = actual activity * (plan price ~ actual price)
Category OV. 3} Lot Size Variance
Lot Size variance oceursif 3 manufacturing ondar jot size is different from the standard cost estimate costing
lot size.
Category OV.4) Remaining Variance
‘Occursif variance cannot be assigned to any other variance categary.
Category OV,5) Output Quantity Variance
Represents the difference between manually entered actual costs and allacated actual quantities,
Output Quantity variance = (actual quantity-manual actual quantity) * pian price
5.3) Period End
‘The most important petiad-end process relevant to production order variance analysis is;
Variance can be calculated using the formula;
Variance = Actual Cost— Actual Cast Allocated (credits) WIP- Scrap
During variance calculation, target and control costs are compared, and variance categories are assigned.
Variance categories are assigned in the following sequence:
= Input price variance
+ Resource -usage variance
‘= Input quantity variance1
2
3
4a
«Mixed -price variance
+ Qutput price variance
«Lot Size Variance
+ Remaining Variance
Settlement >
Remaining input variance
Settlement of Production Orders will be executed.
K088 = Indivdual Settlement
C088 — Collective Settlement
Now let us examine the main points under Category B:
Now you wil be having a basic idea about production order variance, variance calculation types & various
categones, Now let us try to co-relatethis with real life scenarios,
will divide the topic into below mentioned sections;
How to analyze production order variance posted against production arders
Major Reasons for the variance
How to minimize the variance
Impact of production order variance on COGM, COGS & Closing Stock
Category B.1) How to analyze variance posted against production order
For explaining the scenarios I am taking one Semi Finished Good (SFG1-Semi Finished Good 1) whichis used as
a raw material for production of Finished Good.
Master Recipe of SFG1 is;
Gertie
fone
Fixed Value
Cre mn
RAWMATERIALS
RAWMATERIALS
RAWMATERIALS
TOTAL,
12.90
Pracess order No far SFG1 is 15000035
Figure 2.0
Variance Posted against the Process Order for the month is 128,190.87 AED
Aftertechnically completing ("TECO") the process order & before executing casting run checkfor the variance In
transaction code KO88 (CO88 ~ Collective) in Test Run mode.
For analyzing the variance in detail we will use transaction codes KKBC_ORD & KOBL.Lat me explain differenee between KKBC_ORD and KOB1.
1RKBC_ORD is used for analyzing single order, Planned and Actual cost details relating to the production order will
be recorded in KKBC_ORD.
KOBL you can execute for single as well as bulk order. KOB1 provides the "Actual" values (cost & quantity) of
raw materials and overheads used for the production of the material.
KKEC_ORD
Cast Element (Text) © Totaltarget costs © Total act.casts T Target/actual var. | T/1 vart%)
cogu 0.00 2,006,051.00- 2,006,051.00-
Limestone Consumotion 485,190.00 496,630.00 11,440.00 2.36
‘Stca Consumption: 89,251.00 89,824.45, S73.45 0.64
ron Ore Consumotion’ 258,169.00 209,858.91 49,310.09 18 71-
Slica Redshale Consumption 108,617.00 104,162.80 545620 4.98
Copper Steg Consumotion 0.00 735.00 735.00
Bauxte Consumption 7,186.00 517.57 6.67043 92.80
coc 0.00 128,190.87 128,190.87
Adimnistration & Other Expenses 59,800.00 59,900.00 0.00
Labour 119,800.00 119,800.00 6.00
Depreciation 59,900.00 99,900.00 0.00
Power 772,710.00 2,205.40 20,904.60 10.42:
“Mantenance, Consumables & Overh 49,326.00 44,226.00 0.00
+ 2,006,051.00 - 0.00 + — 2,006,051.00-
Figure 3.0
KOBE
Figure 4.0
Here you can see settlement (Variance) of 128,190.87 AED.
1 will explain how we are calculating the variance,
Below table shows the formula used for Variance Calculation,
All the Std, Rate, Std, Qty, Std, Cost value fields in Table 4,0 are calculatedbased on the master details (Material
Recipe Figure 2.0).
All the Actual Rate, Actual Qty. Actual Cast vale fields in table 4,0 are extracted fromKOBL.estas
RAWMATERIALL
[496,630.00
Variance
RAWMATERIAL2
[89,824.45
RAWMATERIALS.
104, 162.8
RAWMATERIALA
RAWMATERIALS
RAWMATERIALG
[209,858.91
[Administration
1,609, 780.
FINISHED GOOD.
[2,006.05 1.00)
Table 4.0
Now let us fill in valves in Table 5.0 with the production order values.fees eeas Std. Cost| Actual Neuen)
ced
RAWMATERIALL [c11,449,00)
RAWMATERIAL? [24.4262 . E [(573.45)
RAWMATERIALS [17.7670 z 5,454.20
RAWMATERIALA [179.5833 [48,310.08
RAWMATERIALS: ; i 5 [6,070.43
RAWMATERIALS (235.00)
POWER
FINISHED GOOD.
Now let us categorize the variance.
Variance has been posted in the following order
Sn ce
RMvi—[RAWMATERIALI |(11.440.00)|Catoyory IV.3
RMV2__|RAWMATERIAL2 (573.45) [Category 1V.3 + Category IV. 1
RMV3__|RAWMATERIALS [5,454.20 [Category IV.3 + Category 1V.1
RMV__[RAWMATERIALA [48,310.09 [Category IV.3 + Category IV.1
RAWMATERIALS [6,670.33
RMVé__[RAWMATERIAL6 (735.00) [Cateyory 1V.2
onvit [Power [80,508.6 [Category 1V3
Table 6.0
Let us try to calculate Variance by applying Formula for each category.
Category V.1: Input Price Variance = (Actual Price ~ Plan Price) * Actual Input Quantity
Gategory IV.2: Resource Usage Variance - Actual Cost - Target Cost - Input Price Variance
Category 1V.3: Input Quantity Variance = (Actual Input Quantity ~ Target Input Quantity) * Plan Price
es cr MC i ie ri om Cunt
Cats Se A eM Sk A
RAWMATERIALL 485,190,00)10.00 _|49,663.00_|a96,630.0c1___ [11,440.00 _ |
JRAWMATERIAL2 |24.4262 [3,653.90 89,251 4H) 126.3338 [3.4 11.00, 80,824.45 [C2 [S73.45,
IRAWMATERIALS [17.7670 [169.70 [100,617.00 17.968% [5,798.00 [sae
RAWMATEERIALS |179,5833]1,437.6
RAWMATERIALS [60.00 [119.80 [7.18800 [57.5078
RAWMATERIALS [35.00
Power
(48,3 10,09)Crt ar nr et en Mca Im urn)
Feats aya) 1k" es SS ED
Table 7.0
Category B.2) Majer Reasons or the variance
From My experience I can point out that Production order variance occur mainly from,
a) Material BOM not updated properly (Category iV.3)
b) Material Price Change after release of Standard Cost Estimate (Category IV.1)
€) Activity Price (Material Recipe) not updated properly (Category 1V.2)
Standard Cost estimate released for ane productian versian and confirmation done against another production
order. (Category OV.3)
) Total Planned Quantity and Actual Produced Quantity Difference (CategaryIV.4)
) Material used not included in BOM (( Category 1V.2)
Let us try to analyze all the scenarios.
a) Material BOM not updated properly
Explained in Category 8.1
by Ae
ty Price (Material
Explained in Category 8.1
‘Total POWER consumption as per KOB1 (Actual as per Material Recipe) and FBL3N should be approximately
equal.
KOBL -> POWER consumption for the Materials Produced
FBL3N -> Actual POWER receipt report
(Receipt = Consumption)
c) _ Standard Cost estimate released for one production version and confirmation done against another
production order,
Costing run executed for one Production Version and Process Order created against another production version.
Let us take one example where two production versions are present Production Version 1 and Production Version
2 for Finished Good FG1. Production Version 1 will be usingRM1 as raw material and production version 2 will be
using RM2 as raw material,
Standard cost estimate is released against Production version 1.
Let me explain with an example;
As per Released Standard Cost Estimate Material recipe / Ton of FG1
fein fees fom recy
Pot GCPRODCGM1 PO31_ POWER 15.05 0.035
POs ]GCPRODCGM1 PO31_ ADMINE [0.50 1.00Gente cen fees eee meted
PO31 GCPRODCGM1 PO31__DEPRN 1,00 1.00
POST GCPRODCGM1 PO31 LABOUR [0.70 1.00,
Pos GCPRODCGMI PO31_ MACOOH [1.19 1.00
cor RMT 149.54 loss
[cor RMB. laa? fo.0ss
[rorAL 17RAS:
Table 8.0
Process Order has been Created Under production version "PO32"
‘The Activity Price recorded in systemagainst "PO32"is as follows
Goeteeunchecen foe neotenic
PO32 |GCPRODCGM2 PO32_ POWER 17.00 0.080
POS? (GCPRODCGM2 PO32__ADMINI 00) 1.00
PO: ]SCPRODCGM2 PO32_DEPRN 00
POs? ]GCPRODCGM? PO32 LABOUR 100) 1.00
POR? [GCPRODCGM2 PO32_MACOOH [1.50 1.00
[econ RM2. 152.00 [0.930
[cor RMA [5.50 [0.075
TOTAL, 17781
Table 9.0
After Settlement (For 1000 TO of FG1) entries will be in the following sequence;
Greteicn Cores Te CI Coe
Wairicns Rte Rate
post GCPRODCGM1 F031
POWER
GCPRODEGMI POST
[500.00
[ADMIN
POST GCPRODCGM PO3L 1,000.00 [0.00 1,000.00)
DEPRN
POST (GCPRODCGMT POST 700.00 o.oo 700.00
LABGUR.
GCPRODEGMI PO3I
MACOOH
COL RMI
Post
1,190.00
149,540.00
COL RMS 14,470.00 [0.00 [4,470.00
Pose GCPRODCGM2 PO32 [0.00 17,000.00 (17,000.00)
POWER
Pose GCPRODCGM2 POS2 (0.00 7,000.00 |(1,000.00)
ADMINI
GCPRODCGM2 POS?
DEPRN
GCPRODCGM2 POR2
LABOUR
PO3z GCPRODCGM2 POs2
MACOOH
COL RMZ
cor RMA
0.00 1,500.00 [a,so0.
0.00 152,000.00 _[(132,000.00)
{0.00 15,500,00 (5,500.00)
TOTAL _|(7.940)Table 10.0
Here if we see the total variance of POWER = 15,050 + (17,000)
= (950.00)
‘Similarly for all the Material and resources.
In order to avoid the Over head Variance input same activity price for all the production versions,
i Le. the net difference willbe then POWER = 17,000 + (17,000) = 0
Let us see @ LIVE Process Order
example:
Product: FG1
Table 11.0
Material Recipee for FG1 (CK13N)
Gerke ed
Figur 5.0
Process Orderis Created under production Version "PO3Z"
When a Process order is created for Material FG1 systemcalculates Planned cost as follows;
Quantity Produced - > 25,302.00 TO.
Use the same calculation logic used in Table 1.0;
ries Crees
im [23,910.39
13,916.10
[25,302.00 .
MACOOH [25,302.00 [30,109.38
POWER [885,570.00 [380,795.10
Table 12.0Planned Cost for Producing 25,302.00 TO of FG
in7itao 6.00 #774140 100.00-
35,302.00 6.00 25,302.00- 160.00-
380,738.10 PO310.00 380,795.10- _100.00-
20,100.38 0.90 30,109.38 100.00-
Adernistration & Other Exoenses 12,651.00 0.00 12,651.00- 100.00-
Figure 6.0
Process Onder hay been crestedin Production version “POM. During Canfirnation Systemcalculates actus cost
as follows;
17,7 ao
25,202.00
977,260.20
30,109.38
Figure 7.0
d) Total Planned Quantity and Actual Produced Quantity Difference
We came across this praduction order variance in few process orders only. While doing final confirmation of
process orders user made mistake by not allowing system to re calculatethe activity prices,
Material: FG1
Total Process Order Quantity: 93,000TO
Quantity Produced: 8,865.00T0
“The total quantity produced is 8,865.00 TO against which the activities booked are;
Cm Eton ma
LABOR, TON 17730000
DEPRIN 8865 1 DH TON 8,865.00
MACOOH 865 * 0.74 DH/ TON 6560.10
ADMIN 8,865" 1 DH] TON s.865,00
Powe 8.65 * 0.03 * 1000 265,950.00
TOTAL [42,020.10
Table 13.0
Since during final confirmation of the Order, re calculation of activities were bypassed (by user) system
calculated the activities against the production orderas below;
ery Cres (Seri
LABOR. 193,000* 2 DH / TON 186,000.00
DEPREN
MACOOH 93,000Cis i
2,857,172.00 (User 1,228,583.96
TOTAL [a40,820.00
Table 14.0
A Variance of 440,820.00 ~ 42,020.00 = 39,880.00 TO was posted against all the activities
(Cost Element (Text) ' Totaltarget costs = Total acticosts = Target/actualvar. T/Evar(%)
f 17,730.00 186,000.00 168,270.00 49.07
Depreciation 8,865.00 93,000.00 4,135.00 349.07
Power 114,358.50 1,228,583.96 4,114,22546 974.33
“Mantenance, Consumables & Overh, 6,560.10 66,820.00 62,259.90 949.07
admnistration & Other Expenses 8,865.00 93,000.00 84,135.00 949.07
_* 1,669,403.96 313,025.36
Figure 9.0
Note: While doing final confirmation ensure that all the activity prices are recalculated as per the new output.
2) Variance Due to Price change
Price change of material due to execution of standard cost estimate will be posted with document type "PR"
3) Hew toreduce variance
For reducing production order variance
2) Material BOM should be up to date;
User should not be modifying the material quantity manually while confirmation (COR6N)
by Activity Price should be Updated periodically
©) Confirm activity getting booked while doing final confirmation
d) _ Tryto ensure that process order for Finished Good is created an the same production version released in
standard cost estimate.
4) Impactof the variance on COGM, COGS, Closing Stock
Variances posted with document type "SA", "AB", should have been part of COGM, COGS and Closing Stock.
Because of variance material movement cannot be analysed correctly, material value can either Overestimated
or under estimated. In order to figure out how much partion of variance should be allocated to COGM,COGS &
closing stock We are following manual calculation.
Step1: List down all the Semi Finished and Finished Gaods.
Step 2: Record total variance posted against each material (FBL3N) (Document type “SA” & “AB")
Step 3: Record total quantity produced (MBSB with movement types 101 & 102)
Step4: Variance Per Ton = Step3 / Step 2
Step5: Record closing stock of Material (MBSB)
Step6: Closing Stock Variance Allocation = StepS * StepaStep7: Record COGM Quantity (MBSB with mavement type 201 + 202 & 261 + 262)
-Step8: COGM Variance Allocation = Step? * Step4
Step9: Record COGS Quantity (BSB with movement type 601 + 602)
Step10: COGS Variance Allocation = Step9* Step4
Tern
Few Important Document Types Posted in Production Order Variance GL are;
AB -> Reversal of Production Grder Settlement
SA -> Production Order Settlement
PR -> Price Change
WA -> Confirmation Reversal (If Price Changed after Confirmation)
WL -> Sales Reversal (If Price Changed after Sales}Input Price Variance:
Input price variance occurs asa result of material price change after the higher level material cost estimate is
released.
It occurs in any of the below mentioned scenarios;
«If the material valuation is based on standard price control, a standard cost estimate for the component
could be released after the cost estimate for the assembly is released,
«If the material valuation is based on Moving average price control, a goods receipt of the camponent
‘could change the component price afterthe cost estimate for the material is released.
Input price variance = (actual price — plan price) * actual input quantity
Let us try to understand How Price difference variance occours;
The Price difference Variance will be posted mainly during the following process:
a) Process Order Confirmation
Price difference variance occours mainly due to the following reasons;
1) Different Raw Material Price in released Standard Cost Estimate and Process Order
Confirmation
2) Change of Standard Price of Finished or Semi Finished Good.
b) Cancellation of Pracess Order Confirmation
Price difference variance occours mainly due to the following reasons;
1) Raw Material Price Difference
2) Finished / Semi Finished Good Price Difference
Let us try to analyse the scenarios one by one;
Let us take Raw Material “RM” as an example;
The Standard Cost Estimate released for Finished Good “FG1" is as Follows;
Raw Material Std. Rate -> As per Released Standard Cost Estimate of Finished Good 1
(FG1), Released on 01.01.2012
Raw Material Std. Quantity -> As per Released Standard Cost Estimate of Finished Good 1
(FG1), Released on 01.01.2012
[eran Bem Std. Quantity Semen
Raw Material 1 (RMI) 25.00 1.00, 25.00
Raw Material 2 (RM2) 10.00) 1.00, 10,00,
Raw Material 3 (M3) 60.00 1.00) 60.00
aw Material 4 (RMA) 15.00 1.00) 15.00,
ADMIN 1.30 1.00 150
DEPRIN 75 1.00 1.75Etmio Eemeremn Bement
Las 1.00 13s
1.00 1.30
POWER 0.43 1.00 0.43
Finished Good 1 (FGI) 116.23 1.00 116.23
Table 1.0
Scenario 1;
a) Process Order Confirmation:
a.1) Different Raw Material Price in released Standard Cost Estimate and Process Order
Confirmation
1000 TO of Finished Good “FG1" confirmed (Produced).
Planned and Actual Material Consumption for "F G1" (1000 TO);
Raw Material Std, Rate -> As per Released Standard Cost Estimate of Finished Good 7
(FG1), Released on 01.01.2012
Raw Material Actual Rate -> As per Moving Average Price as on 01.02.2012
Cc Ce mc ren crs
Cra CMe mee teats Rate Quantity Cost
[Raw Material) 25.00 | 1000.00 38,000.00 | (10,000.00)
1 eRMI)
Raw Matera) 10.00 | 1000.00
2 (RM2)
Raw Materia] 60,00 | 1000.00
3 (RM3)
aw Material] 15.00 | 1000.00
4 (RMA)
ADMIN, ee
10,000.00 | 13.00 | 1000.00 | 15,000.00 | (3,000.00)
«60,000.00 | 37.00 | 1000.00 | 57,000.00 | 3,000.00
75,000.00 [13.00 | 1000.00 | 13,000.00
Ee A 0.00
1,750.00 | 1,75. | 1000.00 | 1,750.00 9.00
DEPRIN 175. | 1090.00
MacooH | 1.25 | 1000.00] 1,250.00 | 1.25 | 1000.00) 1,250.00 9.00
LaBouR | 1.30 | 1000.00] 1,300.00 | 1.30 | 1000.00) 1,300.00 0.00
rower | 0.43 | 1000.00] 430.00 | 0.43 | 1000.00] 430.00 0.00
Finished | 116.23 | 1000.00 | 116,230.00 | 128.23 | 1000.00 | 128,230.00 | (12,000.00)
‘Good
(Fan)
Table 2.0
The variance has been posted because of the change in Raw Material Price.
2) Change of Standard Price of Finished or Semi Finished GoodLet us consider Finished Good 2 for explaining the scenario.
Released Standard Cost Estimate for Finished Good 2 “FG2" is;
Semi Finished Good Sta. Rate -> As per Released Standard Cost Estimate of Finished
Good 2 (FG2), Released on 01.01.2012
Semi Finished Good Std. Quantity _-> As per Released Standard Cost Estimate of Finished
Good 2 (FG2), Released on 01.01.2012
Pei e) Bre
Raw Material | (RMI) 10,00
[Semi Finished Good | (SFG1) 25.00
[Semi Finished Good 2 (SFG2)
ADMIN 130
Be eo mmc eo
1.00 25.00
1.00 130
DEPRIN 17s 1.00 Ls
MACOOH
LABOUR
POWER 0.43 1.00 0.43
Finished Good 2 (FG2) 61.23 1.00 61.23
Table 3.0
Let us consider that Standard Cost Etimate for Semi Finished Good 1 ("SFG1") was released on
01.02.2012,
New Standard Cost of SFG1 = 35.00
Standard Cost Estimate for “FG2" was not run or released after “SFG1" cost estimate release.
Planned and Actual Material Consumption for “FG2" (1000 TO);
Semi Finished Good Sid. Rate -> As per Released Standard Cost Estimate of Finished Good
2(FG2) , Released on 01.01.2012
Semi Finished Good Actual Rate -> As per Released Standard Cost Estimate of Semi Finished
Good (SFG) , Released on 01.02.2012
Material) Std. || ‘Sid. Std. Cast | Actual
CVA MMC eMe re neg
Ferrie)
Reem cut ance
Re)
Raw Materia 1] 10.00 | 1000.00 10.00 | 1000.00 | 10,000.00 ] 0.00
(M1)
[Semi Finished | 25.00 35.00 | 1000.00 [35,000.00 (10,000.00)
(Good 1 (SFGI)
[Semi Finished | 20.00 18.00 | 1000.00 | 18,000.00 | 2,000.00
Good 2 (SFG2)
ADMIN. 150) 0.00(roc Len nr cand
COC mmr cme ang ere Mee re nriLy mmer!
130 1,300.00 | 1.30 | 1000.00 | 1,300.00 | 0.00
1000.00
POWER 0.43 | 1000.00 | 430.00 | 0.43 | 1000.00 | 430.00 0.00
61.23 | 1000.00 | 61,230.00 | 69.23 | 1000.00 | 69,230.00 | (8,000.00)
Table 4.0
Scenario 2:
b) Cancellation of Process Order Confirmation
b.1) Raw Material Price Difference
H the Moving Average Price of Raw Material during confirmation (Production) of Finished
Good 3 "FG3" is different from the Moving Average Price when the confirmation is reversed, price
difference will be posted.
For Example: 1000 TO Finished Good 3 FG3 Confirmed.
Nate:
Std. Rate > During Confimration of Finished Good 3 (FG3)
Std. Quantity > During Confimtation of Finished Good 3 (FG3)
Std. Cost > During Confimration of Finished Gaod 3 (FG3)
Actual Rate > During Finished Good 3 (FG3) Confimration Cancellation
Actual Quantity -> During Finished Good 3 (FG3) Confimration Cancellation
Actual Cast -> During Finished Good 3 (FG3) Confimration Cancellation
Ce
eeu
ET
Coo Cees
Pea ih aie)
Raw Material 1 .00 | 10,000.00 | 8 .00 | 8,000.00 | 2,000.00
(RMI)
Raw Material 2 .00 | 20,000.00 | 22, 00 | 22,000.00 | (2,000.00)
(ent)
Raw Material 3 1.00 | 25,000.00 | 30, "30,000 00 | (5,000.00)
(M3)
ADMIN 1,500.00 [1 300.00 [0.00
DEPRIN, 1.00 | 1,750.00, i 0.00
POWER
Finished Good
34FG3)
66,230.00 | (5,000.00)Table 5.0
The GL Entries Posted during Confirmation of Finished Good 3 (Production);
[Stock of Finished Good 3 (FG3)
COGM of Finished Good 3 (FG3)
Raw Material Consumption
XXX
Jock of fou el ke
Table 6.0
(ee
‘Deserption I
Stock - FG = Cement
cOGM 206,238.24-
‘Stock - Gypsum 3,630.79-
‘Gypsum Consumption (5,630.79
Figure 1.0
The GL Entries Posted during Confirmation Cancellation:
COGM of Finished Good 3 (FG3)
[Stock of Finished Good 3(FG3)
Stock of Raw Material
XXX
Raw Material Consumption
Price Diff+Produetion Order Variance
Table 7.0
iB) Jf) ws
| Description | “Amount
‘Stock - SFG 142,601.40
‘cogm 142,601.40-
a mae
coe ce
‘Stock-Fuel Ol & Co 39,692.17
Natural Gas Cons (39,692.17-
ae eae
‘coc 499,119.10
Pmt oe var 7882
b.2) Finished _/ Semi Fi
hed Good Price Difference
When a cost estimate for a finished / semi finished good is released and the higher level product
cost estimate is not updated.