See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/283456176

Are compression garments effective for the recovery of exercise-induced muscle

damage? A systematic review with meta-analysis

Article in Physiology & Behavior · November 2015

DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.10.027

CITATIONS READS

88 2,175

5 authors, including:

Diego Marqués-Jiménez Julio Calleja Gonzalez

Deportivo Alaves Universidad del País Vasco / Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea
27 PUBLICATIONS 364 CITATIONS 362 PUBLICATIONS 4,357 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Iñaki Arratibel Anne Delextrat

Universidad del País Vasco / Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea Oxford Brookes University
30 PUBLICATIONS 297 CITATIONS 113 PUBLICATIONS 2,644 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:

Sports nutrition View project

COgnitive Rehabilitation and Training with EXercise for SchizoPhrenia: CORTEX-SP study View project

All content following this page was uploaded by Diego Marqués-Jiménez on 09 November 2017.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

    
Are compression garments effective for the recovery of exercise-induced
muscle damage? A systematic review with meta-analysis

Diego Marqués-Jiménez, Julio Calleja-González, Iñaki Arratibel, Anne

Delextrat, Nicolás Terrados

PII: S0031-9384(15)30156-6
DOI: doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.10.027
Reference: PHB 11077

To appear in: Physiology & Behavior

Received date: 20 August 2015

Revised date: 22 October 2015
Accepted date: 26 October 2015

Please cite this article as: Marqués-Jiménez Diego, Calleja-González Julio, Arratibel
Iñaki, Delextrat Anne, Terrados Nicolás, Are compression garments effective for the
recovery of exercise-induced muscle damage? A systematic review with meta-analysis,
Physiology & Behavior (2015), doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2015.10.027

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication.
As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript.
The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof
before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process
errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that
apply to the journal pertain.
 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Title: Are compression garments effective for the recovery of exercise-induced muscle damage? A
systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:
Marqués-Jiménez, Diego. Physical Education and Sport Department, University of Basque Country
(UPV-EHU), Vitoria, Spain. [email protected]
Calleja-González, Julio. Physical Education and Sport Department, University of Basque Country (UPV-

T
EHU), Vitoria, Spain. [email protected]
Arratibel, Iñaki. Physical Education and Sport Department, University of Basque Country (UPV-EHU),

IP
Vitoria, Spain. [email protected]
Delextrat, Anne. Sport and Health Sciences Department, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, UK.
[email protected]

R
Terrados, Nicolás. Department of Functional Biology, University of Oviedo, Oviedo, Spain. Regional
Unit of Sports Medicine of Asturias, Avilés, Spain. [email protected]

SC
Corresponding author:
Name: Diego
Surname: Marqués-Jiménez

NU
Email: [email protected]
Affiliation: Faculty of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, University of Basque Country (UPV-EHU).
Address: Physical Education and Sport Department – Faculty of Physical Activity and Sport Sciences
(UPV-EHU). Portal de Lasarte, 71, 01007, Vitoria-Gasteiz (País Vasco), Spain.
MA
Phone: 0034 666027573
D
P TE
CE
AC

1
 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

ABSTRACT

Purpose
The aim was to identify benefits of compression garments used for recovery of exercised-induced muscle
damage.
Methods
Computer-based literature research was performed in September 2015 using four online databases:

T
Medline (PubMed), Cochrane, WOS (Web Of Science) and Scopus. The analysis of risk of bias was

IP
completed in accordance with the Cochrane Collaboration Guidelines. Mean differences and 95%
confidence intervals were calculated with Hedges’ g for continuous outcomes. A random effect meta-
analysis model was used. Systematic differences (heterogeneity) were assessed with I2 statistic.

R
Results
Most results obtained had high heterogeneity, thus their interpretation should be careful. Our findings

SC
showed that creatine kinase (standard mean difference = -0.02, 9 studies) was unaffected when using
compression garments for recovery purposes. In contrast, blood lactate concentration was increased
(standard mean difference = 0.98, 5 studies). Applying compression reduced lactate dehydrogenase
(standard mean difference = -0.52, 2 studies), muscle swelling (standard mean difference = -0.73, 5

NU
studies) and perceptual measurements (standard mean difference = -0.43, 15 studies). Analyses of power
(standard mean difference = 1.63, 5 studies) and strength (standard mean difference = 1.18, 8 studies)
indicate faster recovery of muscle function after exercise.
Conclusions
MA
These results suggest that the application of compression clothing may aid the recovery of exercise
induced muscle damage, although the findings need corroboration.

KEYWORDS
Exercise, metabolism, venous hemodynamic, metabolites, muscle function.
D
P TE
CE
AC

2
 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

1. INTRODUCTION
Amongst recovery interventions to help improve performance, the use of compression garments (CG) is
currently widely used by athletes. These were first used in the medical industry for vascular patients, but
their use has become more and more popular in athletes (Duffield & Portus, 2007). However, there are
still contrasting results in the literature about the potential benefits of CG on the recovery of physiological
parameters and subsequent performance.

T
Elastic CG externally compress the body through the pressure applied to the skin and musculature, which

IP
depends on the mechanical properties of the garment defined by the manufacturer (MacRae et al., 2011).
Nevertheless, effective pressure gradients for compression clothes do not seem to have been studied

R
systematically, which is not surprising given the modest effects of CG during or following exercise
(MacRae et al., 2011). Furthermore, attention towards understanding the mechanical and physical

SC
properties of compression clothes in the published literature is rare (Troynikov et al., 2010), although
pressure measurement has become more common in studies on CG in sports (Ali et al., 2010; Trenell et
al., 2006).

NU
The increasing popularity of compression clothing in different sports is likely due to their success in
enhancing performance (Bringard et al., 2006; Doan et al., 2003) and recovery (Gill et al., 2006; Kraemer
et al., 2010). As a result of different findings, manufacturers of these garments have reported that CG
improve recovery, increase power and enhance athletic performance (Wallace et al., 2006). But the
effects of wearing CG on physiological parameters, sports performance and recovery show equivocal
MA
findings (de Glanville & Hamlin, 2012). Graduated CG have been reported to reduce muscle oscillation
(Doan et al., 2003), to increase blood flow and blood flow velocity, to improve peripheral circulation and
venous return (Agu et al., 2004; Davies et al., 2009; Lawrence & Kakkar, 1980; O´Donnell et al., 1979;
Ramelet, 2002; Sigel et al., 1975; Starkey, 2013), to increase arterial perfusion (Bochmann, et al., 2005),
and to reduce the space available for swelling (Davies et al., 2009). CG can also enhance recovery by
D

acting on markers of exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD) such as preventing the temporary
reduction in muscle strength, decreased rate of force development, or reduced range of motion (ROM)
TE

(Byrne et al., 2004; Cleak & Eston, 1992; Tee et al., 2007). Besides, they can decrease muscle soreness
(MS) (Ali et al., 2007; Jakeman et al., 2010a; Kraemer et al, 2001a, 2001b; Kraemer et al., 2010) and
enhance the clearance of blood lactate ([La–]p) (Chatard et al., 2004) and creatine kinase (CK-3) (Duffield
P

& Portus, 2007; Gill et al., 2006; Kraemer et al, 2001a; 2001b) following exercise. Nevertheless, others
studies found no beneficial effect of CG on speed and explosive performance during recovery (Carling et
CE

al., 1995; French et al., 2008; Kraemer et al., 2010), ROM (French et al., 2008; Kraemer et al, 2001a;
2001b), MS (Carling et al., 1995; Davies et al., 2009; French et al., 2008; Trenell et al., 2006), or
clearance of [La–]p (Duffield & Portus, 2007) and CK-3(Davies et al., 2009; French et al., 2008; Jakeman
et al., 2010a).
AC

As described above, the benefits of compression clothing on indicators of recovery of EIMD seem to have
been demonstrated separately in several studies. Although several meta-analysis have been published to
assess the effect of the application of compression clothing on recovery enhancement, they did not take
into account the variability of results on muscle damage markers due to time-course (Born et al., 2013) or
different muscle damage markers measured in previous researches (Hill et al., 2013). Therefore, the aims
for this systematic review with meta-analysis were to review the current literature about the benefits of
CG for recovery, identify potential explanatory mechanisms for these results and provide practical
recommendations.

2. METHODS
2.1. Data sources
This research was completed in accordance with the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items
for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement (Moher et al., 2010). A computerized literature
search was performed using four online databases: Medline (PubMed), Cochrane, WOS (Web Of
Science) and Scopus (ended in September 2015). The following key words used to find relevant papers
were: “clothes”, “compression”, “compressive”, “delayed onset muscle soreness”, “exercise”,
“exercise induced muscle damage”, “fatigue”, “garments”, “muscle”, “muscle damage”, “muscle

3
 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

soreness”, “post-exercise”, “post-game”, “recovery”, “recovery strategy”, “recovery modality”,

“sports”, “stockings”. The reference sections of all identified articles were also examined.

2.2.Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Studies were included if: 1) participants were randomized into a CG or control group (studies were also
included if the same participant had one limb without CG -control group- and the other with CG -CG

T
group-); 2) authors measured at least one variable at baseline and again at least 10 minutes after the
exercise bout; 3) CG were worn before and/or during and/or following exercise; 4) participants of the

IP
study did not have any cardiovascular, metabolic, or musculoskeletal disorders. Studies were excluded if
the experimental group received multiple treatments or the control group undertook any practice that
could be perceived to improve recovery, like wearing garments without pressure.

R
2.3.Study selection

SC
One author selected papers for inclusion (DM). Titles and abstracts of publications obtained by the search
strategy were screened. All trials classified as relevant were retrieved and full text was peer-reviewed.

NU
Based on the information within the full reports, we used the inclusion and exclusion criteria to select the
trials eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. Doubts at this stage were resolved by consensus (DM,
JC). 48931 records were identified through database searches and 14 studies through reference list
searches. 48886 studies were excluded by screening the abstract for inclusion criteria. As a result, 59
MA
studies were assessed for eligibility. Of these studies, 39 were excluded because they were not in
accordance with the inclusion criteria. Consequently, 20 studies met the inclusion criteria and were
selected for the meta-analysis (Figure 1).
D
P TE
CE
AC

Fig. 1 Summary of search strategy and selection process based on included and excluded studies
***1,5 column***

2.4.Outcome variables
The literature was examined for the effects of CG on recovery using several outcome variables (reported
in Table 1 as recovery indicators). The heterogeneity of the results can be influenced by type, familiarity,
intensity and duration of the preceding exercise, duration of compression treatment, pressure applied
(mainly reported without being measured by researchers as stated by Hill et al. (2014)), and type of CG.
Subjects’ characteristics, such as age, gender, body shape and composition, exercise familiarity,
differences in training or nutrition status, and ethnicity may also influence the heterogeneity of the results.

2.5.Detail of Comparisons

4
 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

The characteristics of the participants and the CG, measured variables, and the protocols used in the
different studies are in Table 1 (Ali et al., 2007; Berry & McMurray, 1987; Boucourt et al., 2014;
Bovenschen et al., 2013; Carling et al., 1995; Davies et al., 2009; Duffield et al., 2008; Duffield et al.,
2010; Duffield & Portus, 2007; French et al., 2008; Goto & Morishima, 2014; Jakeman et al., 2010a,
2010b; Kraemer et al, 2001a, 2001b; Ménétrier et al., 2001; Perrey et al., 2008; Rimaud et al., 2010;
Sperlich et al, 2013; Trenell et al., 2006). There was a total of 279 participants (n=169 men, n=99 women,
and 11 not reported) with a mean and SD age of 23.6±2.99 years. There were important differences in

T
sample size, age, gender and training status of the participants, design of studies, types of CG, time of
treatment, and pressures applied.

R IP
SC
NU
MA
D
P TE
CE
AC

5
 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table 1. Studies investigating the effect of compression garments on recovery enhancement

Characteristics of

T
Characteristics of Participants Compression Clothing
Sample size, Applied

IP
gender, age pressure Exercise protocol Effects
Study (y) Athletic category Type (mmHg) (timing and duration of application) Recovery indicator (time following exercise) of CG

CR
Ali et al. (2007) 14, M, Recreational Knee length 18-22 2 x20 m. shuttle-runs separated by 1 h. (DE) MS (1, 24 h.) ↔
22 ± 1 runners stockings (GC) HR (1 h.) ↑
Berry & 6, M, Healthy college Stockings (GC) 8-18 Study 2: 3-min cycling at 110% VO2; 30- Plasma volume (5, 15, 30 min.) ↔
McMurray 21.9 ± 4.85 students min. recovery supine (DE, FE for 30 min.; or [La–]p GCS wore DE, FE (time NR) ↓

US
(1987) DE only) [La–]p GCS wore DE only (time NR) ↔
Boucourt et al. 11, NR, Athletes Sleeves 14-28 15 min. incremental cycling exercise: 3 min. stO2 (1 to 10 min.) ↑
(2014) 29.6 ± 2.8 at each intensity - 40, 80, 120, 160 and 200

N
W, preceded and followed by 10 min. in
seated position (DE, FE for 10 min.)

MA
Bovenschen et 6, M, 7, F, Recreational Stockings one 25-35 Study 1: 10-km Running Track at MS study 1 and 2 (0, 30 min.; 48 h.) ↔
al. (2013) 40.5 ± 15.8 runners leg (GC) comfortable running speed (DE) Lower leg volume study 1 and 2 (0 min.) ↓
Study 2: Stepwise, speed incremented (0.5 Lower leg volume study 1 and 2 (5, 30 min.) ↔
km/h every 3 min.) maximum treadmill (0%)
test (DE)

D
Carling et al. 7, M, 16, F, Healthy college Sleeves ~ 17 70 maximal eccentric contractions of non- MS (10 min.; 24, 48, 72 h.) ↔
(1995) 26 ± 4 students dominant elbow flexors (72 h. FE) Arm middle girth (10 min.; 24, 48, 72 h.) ↔

TE
Arm volume (10 min; 24, 48, 72 h.) ↔
Maximal concentric elbow flexor force (10
min.; 24, 48, 72 h.) ↔

P
Elbow extensor ROM (10 min.; 24, 48, 72 h.) ↔
↔
Davies et al.
(2009)
7, F, 19.7 ± 0.5
4, M, 26.3 ±
5.1
University netball
and basketball
players
Tights (GC)
CE 15 5x20 plyometric drop jumps with 2-min. rest
between sets (48 h. FE)
MS (24, 48 h.)
[CK-3] (24, 48 h.)
[LDH-5] (24, 48 h.)
↔
↔
Mid-thigh girth (24, 48 h.) ↔
AC
CMJ height (48 h.) ↔
5-, 10-, 20-m sprint (48 h.) ↔
5–0–5 agility (48 h.) ↔
Duffield et al. 11, M, Regional rugby Tights NR Intermittent sprinting - 10 min: 1x20-m MS (2 h.) ↔
(2010) 20.9 ± 2.7 players sprint and 10 SJs/min. (DE, 24 h. FE) MS (24 h.) ↓
RPE (0 h.) ↔
pH (0, 2 h.) ↔
[La–]p (0, 2 h.) ↔
[CK-3] (2, 24 h.) ↔
[C-RP]p (2, 24 h.) ↔
[AST]p (2 h.) ↔
[AST]p (24 h.) ↓
Peak quadriceps extension force (0, 2, 24 h.) ↔
Peak flexion of hamstrings (0, 2, 24 h.) ↔
Knee extensor peak twitch force (0, 2, 24 h.) ↔

6
 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Duffield et al. 14, M, Club-standard Tights NR Simulated team game: 10-20 m. sprints in a MS (pre, post day 1, 24 h. post day 1, post day
(2008) 19 ± 1 rugby players U- simulated rugby game (4x15 min.) (DE, and 2, 48-h post-day 2.) ↓
21 of regional 15 h. FE) HR (pre-exercise and every 10 min. throughout

T
category. the exercise protocol) ↔

IP
ST (BE, every 10 min. DE and FE) ↑
TT (BE, every 10 min. DE and FE) ↔
[La–]p (BE, DE and 10, 15 min. FE both days) ↔

CR
[CK-3] (BE , post day 1, 24 h. post day 1, 48-
h. post-day 2) ↔
Peak power (BE and after 2nd and 4th quarters
↔

US
of STG at day 1 and day 2)
20 m sprint (BE and after 2nd and 4th quarters
of STG at day 1 and day 2) ↔
Duffield & 10, M, Regional cricket WBC NR Maximal-distance throwing; throwing MS, arms (24 h.) ↓

N
Portus (2007) 22.1 ± 1.1 players accuracy; intermittent sprinting: 20-m MS, legs (24 h.) ↓
sprints/min. for 30 min. (DE, and 24 h. FE) RPE (0 h.) ↔

MA
HR (0 h.) ↔
Body mass (0 h.) ↔
ST (0 h.) ↑
pH (0 h.) ↔

D
[La–]p (0 h.) ↔
[CK-3] (24 h.) ↓

TE
SaO2 (0 h.) ↔
pO2 (0 h.) ↔
French et al. 26, M, Active Tights (GC) 12-20 6x10 parallel squats at 100% BW + 11th MS (0, 1, 24, 48 h.) ↔

P
(2008) 24.12 ± 3.2 repetition at 1-RM (12 h. FE) [CK-3] (1, 24, 48 h.) ↔
[Mb]p (1, 24, 48 h.) ↔
CE Mid-thigh girth (48 h.)
Mid-calf girth (48 h.)
↔
↔
CMJ height (48 h.) ↔
↔
AC
5RM back squat (48 h.)
10 m sprint (48 h.) ↔
30 m sprint (48 h.) ↓
Multiplanar speed (48 h.) ↔
Ankle dorsiflexion (0 h.) ↔
Knee extension (0 h.) ↔
Knee flexion (0 h.) ↔
Hip extension (0 h.) ↔
Hip flexion (0 h.) ↔
Hip abduction (0 h.) ↔
Goto & 9, M, Trained in WBC NR 6 exercises set for upper body muscles and 3 MS (24 h.) ↓
Morishima 21± 0.4 endurance exercises set for lower body muscles with 10 [Mb]p (1, 3, 5, 8, 24 h.) ↔
(2014) repetitions at 70%RM with 90 s between sets [T]p (1, 3, 5, 8, 24 h.) ↔
and exercises. [IGF-1]p (1, 3, 5, 8, 24 h.) ↔
[IL-6]p (1, 3, 5, 8, 24 h.) ↔
[IL-1ra]p (1, 3, 5, 8, 24 h.) ↔

7
 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Upper arm girth (24 h.) ↓

Tigh girth (24 h.) ↓
Knee extensor isokinetic muscle strength (1, 3,

T
5, 8, h.) ↔

IP
Knee extensor isokinetic muscle strength (24
h.) ↑
RM chest press (1, 24 h.) ↔

CR
RM chest press (3, 5, 8 h.) ↑
Jakeman et al. 17, F, Physically active Tights (GC) 15-17 10x10 repetitions of plyometric drop jumps MS (1, 24, 48, 72 h.) ↓
(2010a) 21.4 ± 1.7 from a 0.6 m. box. 10 s. between jumps, 1 MS (96 h.) ↔
↔

US
min. between sets (12 h. FE) [CK-3] (1, 24, 48, 72, 96 h.)
CMJ height (1, 24, 72, 96 h.) ↔
CMJ height (48 h.) ↑
SJ height (1 h.) ↔

N
SJ height (24, 48, 72, 96 h.) ↑
Knee extensor isokinetic muscle strength (1 h.) ↔

MA
Knee extensor isokinetic muscle strength (24,
48, 72, 96 h.) ↑
Jakeman et al. 32, F, Physically active Tights (GC) 15-17 10x10 repetitions of plyometric drop jumps MS (1, 24, 48, 72 h.) ↓
(2010b) 21.4 ± 1.7 from a 0.6 m. box. 10 s. between jumps, 1 MS (96 h.) ↔

D
min. between sets (12h FE) [CK-3] (1, 24, 48, 72, 96 h.) ↔
CMJ height (1, 24, 48, 96 h.) ↔

TE
CMJ height (72h.) ↑
SJ height (1, 24, 48, 72, 96 h.) ↑
Knee extensor isokinetic muscle strength (1 h.) ↔

P
Knee extensor isokinetic muscle strength (24,
48, 72, 96 h.) ↑
Kraemer et al.
(2001a)
20, F,
21.2 ± 3.1
Non-strength-
trained women
Sleeves (GC) CE10 2x50 arm curls repetitions, with maximal a
eccentric contraction every fourth passive
Global MS (24, 48, 72 h.)
Global MS (96, 120 h.)
↔
↓
without any repetition, with 3 min. rest between set (120 [CK-3] (24, 48 h.) ↓
↔
AC
resistance training h. FE) [CK-3] (72, 96, 120 h.)
[Cortisol]p (24, 48, 72, 96, 120 h). ↔
[LDH-5] (24, 48, 72, 96, 120 h.) ↔
Arm girth (24, 48, 72, 96, 120 h.) ↓
Elbow flexor peak torque (24, 48 h.) ↔
Elbow flexor peak torque (72, 96, 120 h.) ↑
Elbow flexor peak power (24, 48 h.) ↔
Elbow flexor peak power (72, 96, 120 h.) ↑
ROM resting elbow angle (24, 48, 72, 96, 120
h.) ↓
Kraemer et al. 15, M, Non-strength- Sleeves (GC) 10 2x50 arm curls repetitions, with maximal a Global MS (24, 48 h.) ↑
(2001b) 21.2 ± 3.1 trained men eccentric contraction every fourth passive Global MS (72 h.) ↓
repetition, with 3 min. rest between set (72 h. [CK-3] (24, 48 h.) ↔
FE) [CK-3] (72 h.) ↓
Arm girth (24, 48 h.) ↓
Arm girth (72 h.) ↔

8
 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Elbow flexor peak torque (24, 48 h.) ↑

Elbow flexor peak torque (72 h.) ↔
Elbow flexor peak power (24, 48, 72 h.) ↑

T
ROM resting elbow angle (24 h.) ↔

IP
ROM resting elbow angle (48, 72 h.) ↑
Ménétrier et al. 14, M, Moderately Stockings (GC) 15-27 15 min at rest, 30 min at 60% MAV on a StO2 (5, 10 min. following 1st trial; 5 min.
(2011) 21.9 ± 0.7 trained in 12% treadmill slope, 15 min. of recovery, a following 2nd trial) ↔

CR
endurance running time to exhaustion at 100% MAV on StO2 (BE, 10, 20, 30 min. following 2nd trial) ↑
a 12% treadmill slope, and a last 30 min.
recovery period (DE, and 30 min. FE)
↔

US
Perrey et al. 8, M, Healthy and Stockings one NR Backwards-downhill walking for 30 min. (5 MS (0, 2, 24, 48, h.)
(2008) 26 ± 4 physically active leg h. per day at 2, 24, 48 and 72 h. FE) MS (72 h.) ↓
Peak torque twitch of plantar flexors (2, 48, 72
h.) ↔

N
Peak torque twitch of plantar flexors (24 h.) ↑
Peak voluntary torque of plantar flexors (2,

MA
24, 48, 72 h.) ↔
Rimaud et al. 8, M, Regularly trained Stockings (GC) 12-22 Incremental cycling test. Work rate was RPE (0 h.) ↔
(2010) 27.1 ± 0.9 in endurance increased every 2 min. by 30 W until HR (0 and during 15 min of recovery) ↔
exhaustion, followed by 60 min. of passive SBP (0, 3, 5, 10, 15, 30, 60 min.) ↔

D
recovery seated on a chair (DE, and 60 min. DBP (0, (3, 5, 10, 15, 30, 60 min.) ↔
FE) [La–]p (0 h.) ↑

TE
[La–]p (3, 5, 10, 15, 30, 60 min.) ↔
VO2max (0 h.) ↔
Sperlich et al. 6, M, Healthy men. Shorts (GC) one 35 10-min. warm-up at 100W, high intensity MBF (30 min.) ↓

P
(2013) 22 ± 2 leg cycling to exhaustion (+25 W/min), 1 min. MGU (30 min.) ↔
of recovery followed by cycling at 75% of

Trenell et al. 11, M, Recreational Tights (GC) one

CE NR
VO2max (20 min. BE and 40 min. FE)
Downhill walking protocol for 30 min. on a MS (1, 48 h.) ↔
(2006) 21.2 ± 3.1 athletes leg treadmill: 6 km·h-1, 25% grade (48 h. FE) pH (1, 48 h.) ↔
↔
AC
PCr/Pi (1, 48 h.)
[Mg2+] (1, 48 h.) ↔
[PDE] (1h.) ↑
[PDE] (48 h.) ↔
[PME] (1, 48 h.) ↔
AST = aspartate transaminase; BE = before exercise ; BW = body weigh; CK = creatine kinase; CMJ = countermovement jump; C-RP = c-reactive protein; DE = during main exercise protocol; DBP =
diastolic blood pressure; F = female; FE = following exercise; GC = graduated compression; HR = heart rate; IGF-1 = insulin-like growth factor-1; IL-1ra = plasma interleukin-1 receptor antagonist;
IL-6 = plasma interleukin-6; La– = lactate; LDH = lactate dehydrogenase; M = male; MAV = maximal aerobic velocity; Mb = myoglobin; MBF = muscle blood flow; MGU = muscle glucose uptake;
Mg2+ = magnesium; NR = not reported; P = plasma; PCr = phosphocreatine; PDE = phosphodiester; pH; Pi = inorganic phosphate; PME = phosphomonoester; pO2 = oxygen partial pressure; ROM =
range of motion; RPE = rating of perceived exertion; RM = repetition maximum; SBP = systolic blood pressure; SJ = squat jump; SaO2 = oxygen saturation of haemoglobin; StO2 = tissue oxygen
saturation; ST = skin temperature; T = testosterone; TT = tympanic temperature; VO2 = oxygen uptake; VO2max = maximal VO2; WBC = whole-body compression; ↑ indicates significantly higher than
the no CG (control) condition; ↓ indicates significantly lower than the no CG (control) condition; ↔ indicates not significantly different from the no CG (control) condition; % indicates percentage; ~
indicates approximately; [] indicates concentration.

9
 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

2.6.Extraction of data
Mean, standard deviation (SD) and sample size (SS) data were extracted by one author from tables of all
included papers. Whenever necessary we made contact with the authors to get the data. When it was
impossible, mean and SD were extrapolated from the figures. Some studies mentioned analysis of various
outcomes without reporting them in graphs, or sending them to us on request. In these cases data were
excluded from the analysis. Any disagreement was resolved by consensus (DM, JC), or third-party

T
adjudication (NT).

IP
2.7.Risk of bias

R
Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed by two authors independently (DM, JC), and
disagreements were resolved by third part evaluation (NT), in accordance with the Cochrane

SC
Collaboration Guidelines (Higgins & Green, 2008). The items on the list were divided into six domains:
selection bias (random sequence generation, allocation concealment); performance bias (blinding of
participants and researchers); detection bias (blinding of outcome assessment); attrition bias (incomplete
outcome data); reporting bias (selective reporting); and other bias. For each research, domains were
judged by consensus (DM, JC), or third-party adjudication (NT). They were characterized as ‘low’ if

NU
criteria for a low risk of bias were met (plausible bias unlikely to seriously alter the results) or ‘high’ if
criteria for a high risk of bias were met (plausible bias that seriously weakens confidence in the results). If
the risk of bias was unknown, it was considered ‘unclear’ (plausible bias that raises some doubt about the
results). Full details are given in Figure 2 and Figure 3.
MA
D
P TE
CE
AC

Fig. 2 Risk of bias graph: review authors’ judgements about each risk of bias item presented as
percentages across all included studies. indicate low risk of bias; indicate unknown risk of bias;
indicate high risk of bias
***1 column***

10
 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

T
IP
Fig. 3 Risk of bias summary: review authors’ judgements about each risk of bias item for each included
study

R
***2 column***

SC
2.8.Statistical analysis
SS and data variance can influence the discussion of the practical applications of statistical significance
when comparing the data of control and experimental groups. Effect size (ES) quantifies the size of the

NU
difference between two groups, and may be a true measure of the significance of the difference (Coe,
2002). For each study, mean differences and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated with Hedges’
g (Hedges & Olkin, 1985) for continuous outcomes. For continuous outcomes pooled on different scales,
data were modified to fit the same scale. Hedges’ g was computed using the difference between means of
MA
an experimental (compression) and control (non compression) group divided by the average population
SD (Higgins & Green, 2008). Hedges’ g can be small (<0.40), moderate (0.40–0.70) or large (>0.70)
(Hedges & Olkin, 1985). To avoid problems using Q statistic to assess systematic differences
(heterogeneity), we calculated an I2 statistic, which indicates the percentage of observed total variation
across studies that is due to real heterogeneity rather than chance (Higgins & Green, 2008). I2
D

interpretation is intuitive and lies between 0% and 100%, 0% indicating no observed heterogeneity, and
larger values showing increasing heterogeneity (Higgins et al., 2003). A restrictive categorization of
TE

values for I2 would not be appropriate for all circumstances, although we would tentatively accept
adjectives of low, moderate, and high to I2 values of 25%, 50%, and 75% (Borenstein et al., 2009;
Higgins & Thompson, 2002; Higgins et al., 2003). Because several studies did not use a control group,
but instead a control (no treatment) vs. experimental condition comparison within the same subjects, we
P

used a random effect meta-analysis model. The random effect model will tend to give a more
conservative estimate (i.e. with wider confidence intervals), but the results from the two models usually
CE

agree when there is no heterogeneity. Under the random effect model the true effects in the studies are
assumed to vary between studies and the summary effect is the weighted average of the effects reported in
the different studies (Borenstein et al., 2009). In addition, weighting of the studies was applied according
to the magnitude of the respective standard error. A significance level of p≤0.05 was applied. Statistical
AC

analysis and figures were carried out by Review Manager version 5.3.5 (The Nordic Cochrane Centre,
The Cochrane Collaboration, Copenhagen, Denmark) and statistical analyses and figures of risk of bias
were carried out by Microsoft Office Excel 2010.

3. RESULTS
3.1.Physiological and Physical Effects
We identified five studies that determined the effect of CG (stockings, tights and WBC) on [La–]p
removal following exercise (Berry & McMurray, 1987; Duffield et al., 2008, 2010; Duffield & Portus,
2007; Rimaud et al., 2010) at an average pressure of 10-20 mmHg (range 8-18 – 12-22). These studies
included 52 male (22.04 ± 2.11 years) recreational runners, regularly trained in endurance, regional rugby
and cricket players and healthy college students. The analysis showed large negative effects on [La–]p
removal following exercise (Figure 4) with a weighted small standard mean difference of 0.98 at all
follow-up times, smaller than results reported at 0 hour (1.07).

11
 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

T
R IP
SC
NU
MA
D
P TE

Fig. 4 Forest plot representing a comparison between the use of a CG and a control for measures of [La–
]p
CE

***2 column***

The search identified nine studies that examined the potential benefits of compression (stockings, tights,
sleeves and WBC) on CK-3 removal (Davies et al., 2009; Duffield et al., 2008, 2010; Duffield & Portus,
AC

2007; French et al., 2008; Jakeman et al., 2010a, 2010b; Kraemer et al., 2001a, 2001b) at an average
pressure of 12.4-14.4 mmHg (range 10-10 – 12-20) in 80 male and 76 female (N = 156). These studies
included participants ranging in experience from university and regional levels to non-strength-trained
men and women or active people (21.65 ± 2.32 years), representing a variety of disciplines (rugby,
cricket, netball and basketball). The use of CG had a small reduction on CK-3 concentrations following
exercise (Figure 5). The analysis showed a weighted small standard mean difference of -0.02 at all
follow-up times. At 1, 24, 48 and 96 hours following exercise, results shows a moderate increase (0.62 at
1 hour; 0.06 at 24 hours; 0.01 at 48 hours; 0.07 at 96 hours), although at 72 hours following exercise
results are favorable to treatment (-0.90)

12
 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

T
R IP
SC
NU
MA
D
P TE
CE

Fig. 5 Forest plot representing a comparison between the use of a CG and a control for measures of CK-3
***2 column***
AC

We identified two studies that examined the effect of compression (tights and sleeves) on lactate
dehydrogenase (LDH-5) (Davies et al., 2009;Kraemer et al., 2001a) at an average pressure of 12.5 mmHg
(range 10 – 15), in 4 male and 27 female (N = 31) university netball and basketball players and non-
strength-trained women (22,4 ± 2.9 years). Figure 6 shows the meta-analysis of the effects of
compression treatment, with a weighted mean small standard mean difference of -0.52 at all follow-up
times. Although LDH-5 removal seems to be negative at 24 hours following exercise (0.65), results are in
favor of compression at any time point after then.

13
 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

T
R IP
SC
Fig. 6 Forest plot representing a comparison between the use of a CG and a control for measures of LDH-

NU
5
***2 column***

The search identified five studies that examined the use of compression (stockings, tights and sleeves) to
reduce muscle swelling of the limbs (Bovenschen et al., 2013; Carling et al., 1995; Davies et al., 2009;
MA
Kraemer, et al., 2001a, 2001b) at an average pressure of 15.4-17.4 mmHg (range 10 – 25-35), in 32 male
and 50 female (N = 82). These studies included participants ranging in experience from university level
(basketball, netball) to non-strength-trained men and women or recreational runners (25.81 ± 5.26 years).
Figure 7 shows the meta-analysis of the effects of the compression treatment, with a weighted mean small
standard mean difference of -0.73 at all follow-up times. Results from these studies showed that swelling
D

is reduced with the treatment at all time points (-0.12 at 0 hour; -0.08 at 5 minutes; -0.02 at 30 minutes; -
0.56 at 24 hours; -1.01 at 48 hours; -1.22 at 72 hours following exercise)
P TE
CE
AC

14
 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

T
R IP
SC
NU
MA
D
P TE
CE

Fig. 7 Forest plot representing a comparison between the use of a CG and a control for measures of
muscle swelling
***2 column***
AC

3.2.Subsequent-Performance Measures.
We included five studies that determined the effect of CG (tights and sleeves) on the recovery of power
measured by squat jump, countermovement jump and dynamometer cart peak power (Duffield et al.,
2008; Jakeman et al., 2010a, 2010b; Kraemer et al., 2001a, 2001b) at an average pressure of 12.5-13.5
mmHg (range 10 – 15-17) in 29 male and 69 female (N = 98). Participants (20.84 ± 2.12 years) were non-
strength-trained men and women, physically active and rugby players of regional category. The analysis
showed large and positive effects on the recovery from power tasks (Figure 8) with a weighted mean
small standard mean difference of 1.63 at all follow-up times. Results obtained at any time point
following exercise were also favorable to the use of CG (0.86 at 1 hour; 1.82 at 24 hours; 2.12 at 48
hours; 2.23 at 72 hours; 1.19 at 96 hours following exercise)

15
 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

T
R IP
SC
NU
MA
D
P TE
CE

Fig. 8 Forest plot representing a comparison between the use of a CG and a control for measures of
muscle power
***2 column***
AC

We included eight studies that determined the effect of CG (tights and sleeves) on the recovery of muscle
strength measured by maximal voluntary contraction, peak torque, isokinetic muscle strength and 1
repetition maximum (RM) (Carling et al., 1995; Duffield et al., 2010; Goto & Morishima, 2014; Jakeman
et al., 2010a, 2010b; Kraemer et al., 2001a, 2001b; Perrey et al., 2008) at an average pressure of 13.4-13.8
mmHg (range 10 – 17) in 50 male and 85 female (N = 135). These studies included various participants
with experience ranging from college and regional levels to non-strength-trained men and women, active
people, or trained in endurance (22,29 ± 2.59 years). Figure 9 shows the meta-analysis of the effects of
the compression treatment, with a weighted mean small standard mean difference of 1.18 at all follow-up
times. Results obtained at 0 hour following exercise (0.18) and 2 hours following exercise (0.35)
indicated small effect on recovery of muscle strength, whereas at 1 (0.92), 3 (2.36), 5 (2.98), 8 (2.88), 24
(1.01), 48 (1.47), 72 (1.57) and 96 hours following exercise (1.88) the effect of the treatment was large.

16
 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

T
R IP
SC
NU
MA
D
P TE
CE
AC

Fig. 9 Forest plot representing a comparison between the use of a CG and a control for measures of
muscle strength
***2 column***

17
 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

3.3.Perceptual Responses
The search identified fifteen studies that examined the effectiveness of CG (stockings, tights and sleeves)
on perceived MS (Ali et al., 2007; Bovenschen et al., 2013; Carling et al., 1995; Davies et al., 2009;
Duffield et al., 2008, 2010; Duffield & Portus, 2007; French et al., 2008; Goto & Morishima, 2014;
Jakeman et al., 2010a, 2010b; Kraemer et al., 2001a, 2001b; Perrey et al., 2008; Trenell et al., 2006) at an
average pressure of 15.3-18.1 mmHg (range 10 – 25-35), in 135 male and 99 female (N = 234). These

T
studies included recreational runners and athletes, active participants, non-strength-trained men and
women, healthy college students, university netball and basketball players, U-21 rugby players of

IP
regional category, regional cricket players, and people trained in endurance (23.32 ± 3.22 years). Figure
10 shows the meta-analysis of the effects of compression treatment, with a weighted mean small standard
mean difference of -0.43 at all follow-up times. Although at 1 h. following exercise (0.15) MS seemed to

R
be increased, results obtained showed that MS was reduced with the treatment (-0.19 at 0 hour; -0.41 at 2
hours; -0.49 at 24 hours; -0.51 at 48 hours; -0.82 at 72 hours; -0.90 at 96 hours following exercise)

SC
NU
MA
D
P TE
CE
AC

18
 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

T
R IP
SC
NU
MA
D
P TE
CE
AC

Fig. 10 Forest plot representing a comparison between the use of a CG and a control for measures of
perceived MS
***2 column***

4. DISCUSSION

19
 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

These results suggest that the application of compression clothing may aid the recovery of EIMD.
However they must be interpreted with caution, because they also indicate very high heterogeneity. I2
statistic focuses on the effect of any type of heterogeneity on the meta-analysis (Higgins et al., 2003),
which includes additive components due to within-study variation (usually between-patient variation) and
between-study variation (heterogeneity) (Higgins & Thompson, 2002). Each study was conducted with
different methods and participants, thus it can be assumed that the high heterogeneity reported in most
results of this meta-analysis is due to these aspects.

T
4.1.Physiological and Physical Effects

IP
The literature suggests that compression-induced increase in venous blood flow could increase the
clearance of metabolites and the supply of nutrients (Berry & McMurray, 1987; Chatard et al., 2004).

R
However we have found negative effects of CG on [La–]p removal following exercise (Fig. 5). It is worth
mentioning that [La–]p per se is not necessarily a valid indicator of recovery quality (Barnett, 2006).

SC
However, the fact that lactate is somewhat retained in the previously active muscle with compression
stockings rather than being cleared more quickly without (Berry & McMurray, 1987; Rimaud et al., 2010)
suggests that the efficacy of wearing compression stockings during passive recovery may be limited
(Rimaud et al., 2010). It may instead favor muscle glyconeogenesis (Bangsbo et al., 1997), an important

NU
fate of lactate during recovery (Fournier et al., 2002; McDermott & Bonen, 1992). Furthermore, some
studies reporting changes in [La–]p (Berry & McMurray, 1987; Chatard et al., 2004) have also reported
small plasma volume shifts, which may account for the observed reductions in [La–]p.
MA
Strenuous exercise that damages skeletal muscle cell structure results in an increase in blood CK-3
Armstrong et al., 1991; Epstein, 1995; Mair et al., 1995). This response is a reflection of both diffusion
and clearance from the circulatory system (Clarkson & Hubal, 2002). CK-3 travels from the damaged
muscle tissue into the interstitial fluid prior to entering the circulation (Hortobagyi & Denahan, 1989),
thus CK-3 does not appear in the blood until several hours after the injection (Volfinger et al., 1994). On
D

the one hand, several studies reported that CK-3 concentrations in experimental groups were not as high
as those found in control groups, but differences among groups started occurring 24 (Duffield & Portus,
TE

2007), 48 (Kraemer et al., 2001a) or 72 hours following exercise (Kraemer et al., 2001b). On the other
hand, several studies showed no difference between conditions, although CK-3 activity increased
significantly after damaging exercise in both groups (Davies et al., 2009; Duffield et al., 2008, 2010;
French et al., 2008; Jakeman et al., 2010a, 2010b). Previous findings (Born et al., 2013; Hill et al., 2013)
P

have pointed out that the use of CG is able to reduce concentrations of CK-3, which may be attributed to
CE

an attenuation in the release of CK-3 into the bloodstream, the improved venous return and the enhanced
clearance of metabolites (Ali et al., 2007; Kraemer et al., 2004). However our results (Fig 6.) indicate that
this benefit is not clearly shown, and it remains unclear why. Nevertheless, LDH-5 (Fig. 7) seems to be
reduced, especially 48 hours following exercise. The responses of CK-3 and LDH-5 might depend upon
AC

where the primary site of muscle damage occurred (Kraemer et al., 2001a), the training status of the
participants (Maughan & Gleeson, 2010; Pyne, 1994), the type and familiarity with the exercise modality
used, and therefore, the extent of myocellular release of specific proteins. The high inter- and intra-
individual variability in CK-3 and LDH-5 response question its accuracy at gauging the magnitude of
muscle damage because these parameters mostly serve as global markers for damage to contractile
elements and as indicators of recovery, rather than providing evidence for its progress (Clarkson et al.,
1986; Friden & Lieber, 2001).

The inflammatory response which follows tissue damage to the sarcolemma, leads to a disruption of
calcium homeostasis, cell necrosis and infiltration of neutrophil cells (Armstrong, 1984; Friden et al.,
1989). This release of the proteins from the damaged contractile elements into the interstitial fluid
(Kraemer et al., 2001a) results in sensations of pain and soreness and creates an increase in tissue osmosis
(Volfinger et al., 1994). Because of the osmotic gradient, fluid from the circulatory system is absorbed,
which increases the interstitial fluid and intracompartmental pressure, resulting in an edema (Kraemer et
al., 2001a). Applying compression can reduce exercise-induced edema by promoting lymphatic outflow
and transporting the profuse fluid from the interstitium of the muscle back into the circulation (Burnand et
al., 1980; Kraemer et al., 2001a). This is due to an external pressure gradient that attenuates changes in
osmotic pressure and reduces the space available for swelling and haematoma to occur (Kraemer et al.,
2004). Although several studies reported no significant difference between compression and control
groups (Carling et al., 1995; Davies et al., 2009), others found differences after a running exercise
(Bovenschen et al., 2013), at 24 hours (Goto & Morishima, 2014), 48 hours (Kraemer et al., 2001b) and
the fifth day of recovery (Kraemer et al., 2001a). Based on our results (Fig. 8) the greater benefits of

20
 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

compression in reducing swelling occurred at 48 and 72 hours following exercise, when swelling appears
intramuscularly and subcutaneously (Kraemer et al., 2004). A reduction in the edema could attenuate the
inflammatory response that would promote further structural damage (Kraemer et al., 2001a), and hence
potentially be the underlying cause of the decreased perception of soreness (Jakeman et al., 2010a), or the
enhanced recovery of power and strength measurements when wearing CG.

4.2.Subsequent-Performance Measures.

T
The decreased force after fatiguing exercise protocols (Clarkson et al., 1992; Howell et al., 1993;

IP
Newham et al., 1983; Nottle & Nosaka, 2005) is due to pain and structural damage (Kraemer et al.,
2001a, 2001b), local muscle trauma (Allen, 2001) and the possible reduction in contractile function due to
the peripheral contractile interference (Duffield et al., 2010; Green, 1997) caused by the accumulation of

R
metabolic intermediates (Green, 1997). This disruption of the neural function has also been associated
with the inhibition of muscle function (Michaut et al., 2002; Perrey et al., 2008) suggesting the existence

SC
of a “central modulation”, presented in the literature as a central protection of the muscle from further
peripheral fatigue and damage (Gandevia, 2001). The muscle fiber alignment provided by CG (Kraemer
et al., 2001b) may limit EIMD and stimulate a better recovery of membrane structures, which may speed-
up the recovery of contractile components and excitation–contraction coupling processes, and may serve

NU
as an external mechanical support to the muscle. However these findings may also be explained by other
physiological markers. This might be why power (Fig. 9) and strength (Fig. 10) results at all follow-up
times revealed a great positive effect when applying compression compared with control groups,
confirming the findings of earlier research (Born et al., 2013; Hill et al., 2013). Although benefits were
MA
reported immediately following exercise, power and strength values were higher when subjects were
wearing CG, especially 24 hours following exercise. Several authors have indicated that the compression
treatment seems to be particularly beneficial between 48 and 72 hours following exercise for peak torque
and isokinetic muscle strength (Jakeman et al., 2010a, 2010b; Kraemer et al., 2001a, 2001b; Perrey et al.,
2008) and at 24 hours following exercise for voluntary muscle activation (Perrey et al., 2008). These
D

results suggest that despite the fact that contractile properties could recover relatively early, the recovery
of the ability to generate force seems to be delayed. The individual stretch-shortening cycle (SSC)
TE

contribution to increased power output should also be considered (Miyaguchi & Demura, 2006). As it
largely removes the contribution of the SSC to performance, the SJ along with knee extension may be
considered as a better indicator of knee extensor performance than CMJ performance (Jakeman et al.,
2010a). Other performance areas related to power but not analyzed here are sprint and agility
P

performances. Sprint or repeated-sprint performance (5, 10, 20 and 30 m.) measured in several studies
CE

(Davies et al., 2009; Duffield et al., 2008; French et al., 2008), as well as the 5–0–5 agility test (Davies et
al., 2009), or multiplanar speed (French et al., 2008) show equivocal findings because there was no
significant difference between CG and a control group 24–48 hours after various types of exercise.
AC

4.3.Perceptual Responses
Exercise-induced MS accompanies muscle damage, and ratings of perceived MS are widely used to
evaluate CG effects during recovery (MacRae et al., 2011) because it provides further information
regarding the state of the muscle environment, although it may not specifically reflect the magnitude of
exercise-induced muscle damage (Nosaka et al., 2002). The underlying mechanisms behind the cause of
delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS) remain unclear (Cheung et al., 2003; MacIntyre et al., 1995),
because active inflammatory cells are not always present with signs and symptoms of DOMS (Schwane et
al., 1982). Therefore other factors are likely to contribute to the perception of soreness (Friden et al.,
1986; Newham, 1988; Stauber et al., 1990). DOMS are related to mechanical forces in the contractile or
elastic tissue, that result in the disruption of the muscle fiber and surrounding connective tissue
(Armstrong, 1984; Stauber et al., 1990), the inflammatory response (Smith, 1991) or a combination of
both (Clarkson & Hubal, 2002; Connolly et al., 2003). Moreover, the time course between damage and
pain is controversial, as the inflammatory response starts as rapidly as a few hours after tissue injury,
before muscles become painful (Armstrong et al., 1980). The positive effects of CG on these symptoms
could cause reductions in perceived MS regardless of measurement time, but we must be cautious with
this interpretation due to the subjectivity of these measurements (Brophy-Williams et al., 2014; Davies et
al., 2009). MS Results obtained at different follow-up times indicated that CG alleviated the perception of
DOMS. As such, the use of CG may be beneficial to promote psychological recovery from high-intensity
exercise regardless of potential physiological changes.

5. LIMITATIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS.
21
 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Many factors can influence the inconclusive findings and the high heterogeneity stated. Although studies
reported pressures ranging from 15 to 35 mmHg, which are within the range of values considered as
beneficial, it is likely that participants may not have received adequate levels of pressure to induce
measurable changes (Brophy-Williams et al., 2014; Hill et al., 2015). The variations in pressure
classifications between countries (Bianchi & Todd, 2000; Clark & Krimmel, 2006; Linnitt & Davies,
2007), different manufacturers of CG (Jonker et al., 2001), type of CG (graduated compression or not),

T
anatomical regions covered by the garment (Bottaro et al., 2011; Kraemer et al., 2001a), postures and foot
positions (Wertheim et al., 1999) and gender (Tiidus & Enns, 2008; Volfinger et al., 1994) may also

IP
contribute to the inconsistencies between results. Moreover, some athletes may be more or less
susceptible to alterations in myocyte membrane permeability, or have differing biomarker clearance rates
due to individual responses to exercise and training status. Further research with different types of CG

R
(whenever was possible with a placebo condition) is needed to identify the optimal pressure to induce the
greatest increase in venous blood flow (Brophy-Williams et al., 2014; Driller & Halson, 2013). It is also

SC
necessary to know the optimal length of time that CG must be worn, the effect of compression clothes to
tolerate greater training loads or maintain consistency between trials, over a number of days following
exercise and how this treatment affects longer-term recovery, the influence of posture and his relation to
the pressure exerted, and if wearing compression while participants sleeps affect MS perception.

NU
Due to the variation in muscle damage characteristics from one individual to another (Warhol et al.,
1985), the variability in responses to EIMD (Clarkson & Hubal, 2002), the complex nature of EIMD, and
the inconsistent findings, limited practical recommendations can be reported. Athletes should benefit
MA
from these resources especially in sports where limited rest between competitions is available, when there
is a significant increase in training intensity and volume, or during travel. To provide the ideal graduated
compression, the CG need to be custom fit to the contours of an individuals´ limbs. Although therapeutic
compression should be applied immediately after EIMD and for at least 72 hours following exercise
(Kraemer et al., 2004), the benefits of CG seem to be most pronounced when they are applied for
D

recovery purposes 12 to 48 hours following exercise (Born et al., 2013). To date, it can be assumed that
the longer an athlete can wear compression for following exercise, the better (Vaile et al., 2010).
TE

6. CONCLUSIONS.
P

Based on our results, CG may be able to assist athletic recovery following exercise, but the findings are
often isolated (need corroboration) or inconclusive (mixed results across studies). Most results obtained
CE

have high heterogeneity, thus findings should be interpreted with caution, because sometimes true effects
are assumed to vary between studies. In addition, similarly to other reviews, it is possible that certain
studies appeared after the manuscript was completed. Therefore, although various unknown factors may
affect our findings, CG seem to be beneficial for the recovery of several markers of EIMD in athletes..
AC

Compression treatment does not attenuate the concentration of CK-3 following exercise, and there seems
to be increases in [La–]p and reductions on LDH-5 concentration. Nevertheless, it accelerates the recovery
of muscle function, mainly 24 hours following exercise. Power and strength results indicate the benefits
of CG on other physiological variables, such as those related to muscle swelling. Finally, perceptual
measurements tend to be better with compression, being most pronounced 72 hours following exercise.
Thus, the present review found conclusive evidence that swelling, power, strength, and MS are improved
during recovery with CG, HR seems to be unaffected, but there are little and inconsistent evidence of the
benefit of CG in other markers of EIMD like [La–]p, CK-3 or LDH-5.

7. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Special thanks to authors who supplied data when it was required (Duffield et al., 2008; Duffiled et al.,
2010; Duffield & Portus, 2007; Jakeman et al., 2010a, 2010b; Perrey et al., 2008; Sperlich et al., 2013).

8. COMPLIANCE WITH ETHICAL STANDARDS

These authors have no support or funding to report, and declare they have no conflict of interest related to
the content of this systematic review.

22
 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

9. REFERENCE LIST
Agu O, Baker D, Seifalian AM. Effect of graduated compression stockings on limb oxygenation and
venous function during exercise in patients with venous insufficiency. Vascular 2004; 12(1):69–
76.

Ali A, Caine MP, Snow BG. Graduated compression stockings: Physiological and perceptual responses

T
during and after exercise. J Sports Sci 2007; 25(4):413–9.

IP
Ali A, Creasy RH, Edge JA. Physiological effects of wearing graduated compression stockings during
running. Eur J Appl Physiol 2010; 109(6):1017–25.

R
Allen DG. Eccentric muscle damage: mechanisms of early reduction of force. Acta Physiol Scand 2001;

SC
171(3):311–9.

Armstrong RB. Mechanisms of exercise-induced delayed onset muscular soreness: a brief review. Med

NU
Sci Sports Exerc 1984; 16(6):529–38.

Armstrong RB, Garshnek V, Schwane JA. Muscle inflammation: response to eccentric exercise. Med Sci
Sports Exerc 1980; 12:94-5.
MA
Armstrong RB, Warren GL, Warren JA. Mechanisms of exercise-induced muscle fibre injury. Sports Med
1991; 12(3):184–207.

Bangsbo J, Madsen K, Kiens B, Richter EA. Muscle glycogen synthesis in recovery from intense exercise
D

in humans. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 1997; 36(2):E416.

TE

Barnett A. Using Recovery Modalities between Training Sessions in Elite Athletes. Sports Med 2006;
36(9):781–96.
P

Berry MJ, McMurray RG. Effects of graduated compression stockings on blood lactate following an
exhaustive bout of exercise. Am J Phys Med 1987; 66(3):121–32.
CE

Bianchi J, Todd M. The management of a patient with lymphoedema of the legs. Nurs Stand 2000;
14(40):51–6.
AC

Bochmann RP, Seibel W, Haase E, Hietschold V, Rödel H, Deussen A. External compression increases
forearm perfusion. J Appl Physiol 2005; 99(6):2337–44.

Borenstein M, Hedges L V., Higgins JP, Rothstein HR. Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley &
Sons, Chichester, England, 2009.

Born DP, Sperlich B, Holmberg HC. Bringing light into the dark: effects of compression clothing on
performance and recovery. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2013; 8(1):4–18.

Bottaro M, Martorelli S, Vilaça J. Neuromuscular compression garments: effects on neuromuscular strngu

and recovery. Journa of human kinetics 2001; 29, 27-31.

Boucourt B, Bouhaddi M, Mourot L, Tordi N, Ménétrier A. Changes in tissue oxygen saturation with calf
compression sleeves - before, during and after a cycling exercise. J Sports Med Phys Fitness
2014;

Bovenschen HJ, Booij MT, Van Der Vleuten CJM. Graduated Compression Stockings for Runners:
Friend, Foe, or Fake? J Athl Train 2013; 48(2):226-32.

23
 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Bringard A, Perrey S, Belluye N. Aerobic energy cost and sensation responses during submaximal
running exercise–positive effects of wearing compression tights. Int J Sports Med 2006; 27:373–
8.

Brophy-Williams N, Driller MW, Shing CM, Fell JW, Halson SL. Confounding compression: the effects
of posture, sizing and garment type on measured interface pressure in sports compression
clothing. J Sports Sci 2005; 2014; doi: 10.1080/02640414.2014.990489

T
Burnand KG, Clemenson G, Morland M, Jarrett PE, Browse NL. Venous lipodermatosclerosis: treatment

IP
by fibrinolytic enhancement and elastic compression. Br Med J 1980; 280(6206):7.

R
Byrne C, Twist C, Eston R. Neuromuscular function after exercise-induced muscle damage. Sports Med
2004; 34(1):49–69.

SC
Carling J, Francis K, Lorish C. The effects of continuous external compression on delayed-onset muscle
soreness (DOMS). Int J Rehabil Health 1995; 1(4):223–35.

NU
Chatard J-C, Atlaoui D, Farjanel J, Louisy F, Rastel D, Guezennec CY. Elastic stockings, performance
and leg pain recovery in 63-year-old sportsmen. Eur J Appl Physiol 2004; 93(3):347–52.

Cheung K, Hume P, Maxwell L. Delayed onset muscle soreness : treatment strategies and performance
MA
factors. Sports Med 2003; 33(2):145–64.

Clark M, Krimmel G. Lymphoedema and the construction and classification of compression hosiery. In:
Lymphoedema Framework. Template for Practice: compression hosiery in lymphoedema. MEP
D

Ltd, London,; 2006, pp.2–4.

TE

Clarkson PM, Byrnes WC, McCormick KM, Turcotte LP, White JS. Muscle soreness and serum creatine
kinase activity following isometric, eccentric, and concentric exercise. Int J Sports Med 1986;
7(03):152–5.
P

Clarkson PM, Hubal MJ. Exercise-induced muscle damage in humans. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2002;
81(11):S52–S69.
CE

Clarkson PM, Nosaka K, Braun B. Muscle function after exercise-induced muscle damage and rapid
adaptation. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1992; 24(5):512–20.
AC

Cleak MJ, Eston RG. Muscle soreness, swelling, stiffness and strength loss after intense eccentric
exercise. Br J Sports Med 1992; 26(4):267–72.

Coe R. It’s the effect size, stupid: What effect size is and why it is important. In: British Education Index
(BEI) and British Education Thesaurus (BET) 2002.
http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/00002182.htm. Accessed 23 Aug 2014.

Connolly DAJ, Sayers SP, McHugh MP. Treatment and prevention of delayed onset muscle soreness. J
Strength Cond Res 2003; 17(1):197–208.

Davies V, Thompson KG, Cooper SM. The Effects of Compression Garments on Recovery. J Strength
Cond Res 2009; 23(6):1786–94.

de Glanville KM, Hamlin MJ. Positive Effect of Lower Body Compression Garments on Subsequent 40-
kM Cycling Time Trial Performance. J Strength Cond Res 2012; 26(2):480–6.

Doan BK, Kwon YH, Newton RU, Shim J, Popper EM., Rogers RA., Bolt LR., et al. Evaluation of a
lower-body compression garment. J Sports Sci 2003; 21(8):601–10.

24
 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Driller MW, Halson SL. The effects of lower-body compression garments on recovery between exercise
bouts in highly-trained cyclists. J Sci Cycling 2013; 2(1):45–50.

Duffield R, Cannon J, King M. The effects of compression garments on recovery of muscle performance
following high-intensity sprint and plyometric exercise. J Sci Med Sport 2010; 13(1):136–40.

Duffield R, Edge J, Merrels R, Hawke E, Barnes M, Simcock D, Gill ND. The effects of compression

T
garments on intermittent exercise performance and recovery on consecutive days. Int J Sports
Physiol Perform 2008; 3(4):454–68.

IP
Duffield R, Portus M. Comparison of three types of full-body compression garments on throwing and

R
repeat-sprint performance in cricket players. Br J Sports Med 2007; Jan 41(7):409–14.

SC
Epstein Y. Clinical significance of serum creatine phosphokinase activity levels following exercise. Isr J
Med Sci 1995; 31(11):698.

Fournier PA, Bräu L, Ferreira LB, Fairchild T, Raja G, James A., Palmer TN. Glycogen resynthesis in the

NU
absence of food ingestion during recovery from moderate or high intensity physical activity:
novel insights from rat and human studies. Comp Biochem Physiol A 2002; 133(3):755–63.

French DN, Thompson KG, Garland SW, Barnes CA., Portas MD, Hood PE. Wilkes G. The effects of
MA
contrast bathing and compression therapy on muscular performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008;
40(7):1297.

Friden J, Lieber RL. Eccentric exercise-induced injuries to contractile and cytoskeletal muscle fibre
D

components. Acta Physiol Scand 2001; 171(3):321–6.

TE

Friden J, Sfakianos PN, Hargens AR. Muscle soreness and intramuscular fluid pressure: comparison
between eccentric and concentric load. J Appl Physiol 1986; 61(6):2175–9.

Friden J, Sfakianos PN, Hargens AR. Blood indices of muscle injury associated with eccentric muscle
P

contractions. J Orthop Res 1989; 7(1):142–5.

CE

Gandevia SC. Spinal and supraspinal factors in human muscle fatigue. Physiol rev 2001; 81(4):1725–89.

Gill ND, Beaven CM, Cook C. Effectiveness of post-match recovery strategies in rugby players. Br J
AC

Sports Med 2006; 40(3):260–3.

Goto K, Morishima T. Compression Garment Promotes Muscular Strength Recovery after Resistance
Exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014; Doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000000359

Green HJ. Mechanisms of muscle fatigue in intense exercise. J Sports Sci 1997; 15(3):247–56.

Hedges L, Olkin I. Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Academic Press, New York, 1985

Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Wiley Online Library,
2008

Higgins J, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med 2002; 21(11):1539–58.

Higgins J, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. Br Med J
2003; 327:557–60.

Hill JA, Howatson G, van Someren KA, Davidson S, Pedlar CR. The variation in pressures exerted by
commercially available compression garments. Sports Eng2015; 1–7.

25
 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Hill JA, Howatson G, Someren KA, Leeder J, Pedlar CR. Compression garments and recovery from
exercise-induced muscle damage: a meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 2013; doi:10.1136/bjsports-
2013-092456

Hill JA, Howatson G, van Someren KA, Walshe I, Pedlar CR. Influence of compression garments on
recovery after marathon running. J Strength Cond Res 2014; 28(8):2228–35.

T
Hortobagyi T, Denahan T. Variability in creatine kinase: methodological, exercise, and clinically related
factors. Int J Sports Med 1989;10(2):69–80.

IP
Howell JN, Chleboun G, Conatser R. Muscle stiffness, strength loss, swelling and soreness following

R
exercise-induced injury in humans. J Physiol 1963; 464(1):183–96.

SC
Jakeman JR, Byrne C, Eston RG. Lower limb compression garment improves recovery from exercise-
induced muscle damage in young, active females. Eur J Appl Physiol 2010a; 109(6):1137–44.

Jakeman JR, Byrne C, Eston RG. Efficacy of lower limb compression and combined treatment of manual

NU
massage and lower limb compression on symptoms of exercise-induced muscle damage in
women. J Strength Cond Res 2010b; 24(11):3157–65.

Jonker MJ, De Boer EM, Ader HJ, Bezemer PD. The oedema-protective effect of Lycra® support
MA
stockings. Dermatology 2001; 203(4):294–8.

Kraemer WJ, Bush JA, Wickham RB, Denegar CR, Gómez AL, Gotshalk LA, Duncan ND, Volek JS,
Putukian M, et al. Influence of compression therapy on symptoms following soft tissue injury
D

from maximal eccentric exercise. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2001a; 31(6):282–90.
TE

Kraemer WJ, Bush JA, Wickham RB, Denegar CR, Gómez AL, Gotshalk LA, Duncan ND, Volek JS,
Newton RU, et al. Continuous compression as an effective therapeutic intervention in treating
eccentric-exercise-induced muscle soreness. J Sport Rehab 2001b; 10(1):11–23.
P

Kraemer WJ, Flanagan SD, Comstock BA, Fragala MS, Earp JE, Dunn-Lewis C, Ho JY, et al. Effects of
a Whole Body Compression Garment on Markers of Recovery After a Heavy Resistance Workout
CE

in Men and Women. J Strength Cond Res 2010; 24(3):804–14.

Kraemer WJ, French DN, Spiering BA. Compression in the treatment of acute muscle injuries in sport.
AC

Int Sport Med J 2004; 5(3):200-8

Lawrence D, Kakkar VV. Graduated, static, external compression of the lower limb: a physiological
assessment. Br J Surg 1980; 67(2):119–21.

Linnitt N, Davies R. Fundamentals of compression in the management of lymphoedema. Br J Nurs 2007;

16(10):588–92.

MacIntyre DL, Reid WD, McKenzie DC. Delayed muscle soreness. The inflammatory response to muscle
injury and its clinical implications. Sports Med 1995; 20(1):24–40

MacRae BA, Cotter JD, Laing RM. Compression garments and exercise: garment considerations,
physiology and performance. Sports Med 2011; 41(10):815–43.

Mair J, Mayr M, Mullet E, Koller A, Haid C, Artner-Dworzak E, Calzolari C, et al. Rapid adaptation to
eccentric exercise-induced muscle damage. Int J Sports Med 1995; 16(06):352–6.

Maughan RJ, Gleeson M. The biochemical basis of sports performance. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press,
Oxford, 2010.

26
 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

McDermott JC, Bonen A. Glyconeogenic and oxidative lactate utilization in skeletal muscle. Can J
Physiol Pharmacol 1992; 70(1):142–9.

Ménétrier A, Mourot L, Bouhaddi M, Regnard J, Tordi N. Compression sleeves increase tissue oxygen
saturation but not running performance. Int. J. Sports Physiol Med 2011; 32(11):864–8.

Michaut A, Pousson M, Babault N, Van Hoecke J. Is eccentric exercise-induced torque decrease

T
contraction type dependent? Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002; 34(6):1003–8.

IP
Miyaguchi K, Demura S. Muscle power output properties using the stretch-shortening cycle of the upper
limb and their relationships with a one-repetition maximum bench press. J Physiol Anthropol

R
2006; 25(3):239–45.

SC
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altamn DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-
analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg 2010; 8(5):336–41.

Newham DJ. The consequences of eccentric contractions and their relationship to delayed onset muscle

NU
pain. Eur J Appl Physiol 1998; 57(3):353–9.

Newham DJ, Mills KR, Quigley BM, Edwards RH; Pain and fatigue after concentric and eccentric
muscle contractions. Clin Sci 1983; 64(1):55–62.
MA
Nosaka K, Newton M, Sacco P. Delayed-onset muscle soreness does not reflect the magnitude of
eccentric exercise-induced muscle damage. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2002; 12(6):337–46.
D

Nottle C, Nosaka K. The magnitude of muscle damage induced by downhill backward walking. J Sci Med
Sport 2005; 8(3):264–73.
TE

O’Donnell TF, Rosenthal DA, Callow AD, Ledig BL. Effect of elastic compression on venous
hemodynamics in postphlebitic limbs. J Am Med Assoc 1979; 242(25):2766–8.
P

Perrey S, Bringard A, Racinais S, Puchaux K, Belluye N. Graduated compression stockings and delayed
CE

onset muscle soreness (P105). In: Estivalet M, Brisson P, (ed) The Engineering of Sport 7, Paris.
Springer; 2008, pp 546-54.

Pyne MDB. Regulation of neutrophil function during exercise. Sports Med 1994; 17(4):245–58.
AC

Ramelet AA. Compression therapy. Derm Surg (2002) 28(1):6–10.

Rimaud D, Messonnier L, Castells J, Devillard X, Calmels P. Effects of compression stockings during

exercise and recovery on blood lactate kinetics. Eur J Appl Physiol 2010; 110(2):425–33.

Schwane JA, Johnson SR, Vandenakker CB, Armstrong RB. Delayed-onset muscular soreness and
plasma CPK and LDH activities after downhill running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1982; 15(1):51–6.

Starkey C.Therapeutic modalities. 4th ed. Philadelphia: FA Davis; 2013.

Smith LL. Acute inflammation: the underlying mechanism in delayed onset muscle soreness? Med Sci
Sports Exerc 1991; 23(5):542–51.

Sigel B, Edelstein AL, Savitch L, Hasty JH, Felix WR. Type of compression for reducing venous stasis: a
study of lower extremities during inactive recumbency. Arch Surg 1975; 110(2):171–5.

Sperlich B, Born D-P, Kaskinoro K, Kalliokoski KK, Laaksonen MS. Squeezing the muscle: compression
clothing and muscle metabolism during recovery from high intensity exercise. PloS one 2013;
8(4):e60923.

27
 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Stauber W, Clarkson PM, Fritz VK, Evans WJ. Extracellular matrix disruption and pain after eccentric
muscle action.. J Appl Physiol 1990; 69(3):868-874

Tee JC, Bosch AN, Lambert MI. Metabolic consequences of exercise-induced muscle damage. Sports
Med 2007; 37(10):827–36.

Thorsson O, Hemdal B, Lilja B, Westlin N. The effect of external pressure on intramuscular blood flow at

T
rest and after running. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1987; 19(5):469–73.

IP
Tiidus PM, Enns DL. Point: estrogen and sex do influence PE indexes of muscle damage, inflammation
and repair. J Appl Physiol 2008; 106(3):1010–1012

R
Trenell MI, Rooney KB, Carolyn M, Campbell S, Thompson H. Compression garments and recovery

SC
from eccentric exercise: a 31P-MRS Study. J Sports Sci Med 2006; 5:106–14.

Troynikov O, Ashayeri E, Burton M, Subic A, Alam F, Marteau S. Factors influencing the effectiveness
of compression garments used in sports. Procedia Eng 2010; 2(2):2823–9.

NU
Vaile J, Halson S, Graham S. Recovery review: science vs. practice. J Aust Strength Cond2010; 5–21.
MA
Volfinger L, Lassourd V, Michaux JM, Braun JP, Toutain PL. Kinetic evaluation of muscle damage
during exercise by calculation of amount of creatine kinase released. Am J Physiol 1994;
266:R434–R434.

Wallace L, Slattery K, Coutts A. Compression garments: do they influence athletic performance and
D

recovery. Sports Coach 2006; 28(4):38–9.

TE

Warhol MJ, Siegel AJ, Evans WJ, Silverman LM. Skeletal muscle injury and repair in marathon runners
after competition. Am J Pathol 1985; 118(2):331.

Wertheim D, Melhuish J, Williams R, Harding K. Measurement of forces associated with compression

P

therapy. Med Biol Eng Comput 1999; 37(1):31–4.

CE
AC

28
 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

LEGENDS OF FIGURES
Fig. 1 Summary of search strategy and selection process based on included and excluded studies

Fig. 2 Risk of bias graph: review authors’ judgements about each risk of bias item presented as

T
percentages across all included studies. indicate low risk of bias; indicate unknown risk of bias;
indicate high risk of bias

IP
Fig. 3 Risk of bias summary: review authors’ judgements about each risk of bias item for each included
study

R
Fig. 4 Forest plot representing a comparison between the use of a CG and a control for measures of [La–

SC
]p

Fig. 5 Forest plot representing a comparison between the use of a CG and a control for measures of CK-3

NU
Fig. 6 Forest plot representing a comparison between the use of a CG and a control for measures of LDH-
5

Fig. 7 Forest plot representing a comparison between the use of a CG and a control for measures of
MA
muscle swelling

Fig. 8 Forest plot representing a comparison between the use of a CG and a control for measures of
muscle power
D

Fig. 9 Forest plot representing a comparison between the use of a CG and a control for measures of
muscle strength
TE

Fig. 10 Forest plot representing a comparison between the use of a CG and a control for measures of
perceived MS
P
CE
AC

29
 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

CONTRIBUTORSHIP STATEMENT
Diego Marqués-Jiménez has made substantial contributions to conception and design, acquisition of data,
analysis and interpretation of data and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that
questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and
resolved.

T
Julio Calleja-González and Nicolás Terrados have made substantial contributions to conception and
design, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation of data, have been involved in drafting the

IP
manuscript or revising it critically for important intellectual content, have given final approval of the
version to be published and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions

R
related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

SC
Iñaki Arratibel and Anne Delextrat have been involved in drafting the manuscript or revising it critically
for important intellectual content, has given final approval of the version to be published and agree to be
accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of
any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

NU
MA
D
P TE
CE
AC

30
 ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Highlights

 Controversy in pressure, time of treatment and type of garment to maximize benefit.

 Conclusive evidence increasing power and strength.
 Conclusive evidence reducing perceived muscle soreness and swelling.
 No clear evidence of decreased lactate or creatine kinase.
 Little evidence of decreased lactate dehydrogenase.

T
R IP
SC
NU
MA
D
P TE
CE
AC

31

View publication stats