0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views5 pages

JUS315 Malfitano T

This essay examines the dual role of media in shaping public perceptions of the criminal justice system, highlighting how it can both expose injustices and contribute to biases. It discusses various perspectives on a specific traffic stop incident, emphasizing the importance of context and the potential for media narratives to influence public opinion and judicial outcomes. The paper concludes with suggestions for improving media reporting standards to better balance accountability and fairness in the justice system.

Uploaded by

urbanusmuema246
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views5 pages

JUS315 Malfitano T

This essay examines the dual role of media in shaping public perceptions of the criminal justice system, highlighting how it can both expose injustices and contribute to biases. It discusses various perspectives on a specific traffic stop incident, emphasizing the importance of context and the potential for media narratives to influence public opinion and judicial outcomes. The paper concludes with suggestions for improving media reporting standards to better balance accountability and fairness in the justice system.

Uploaded by

urbanusmuema246
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

JUS315MalfitanoT_Justice Essay

Introduction

The media plays an important role in shaping public perceptions of the criminal justice

system. However, news coverage can sometimes reflect and even exacerbate biases, rather than

providing a balanced view of complex issues. This paper will analyze how the media story

shown this week could be interpreted from different perspectives, and discuss ways media

coverage can both implicate and exonerate actors within the justice system. Finding an objective

approach is challenging but critical for informing the public and promoting accountability and

reform when needed.

Different Views of the Scene

The body camera footage provides glimpses into how the traffic stop scene could be

viewed and interpreted from different perspectives. From the officer perspective, one could argue

they were simply responding to what appeared a threatening situation requiring forceful action to

subdue a non-compliant suspect and ensure safety during a volatile arrest. Initially pulling the

vehicle over due to an observed traffic violation, the limited camera angles may not have

captured all details. However, looking through the eyes of the civilian, aspects of the situation

like the frequency and particularly sensitive nature of some force used once restrained could

understandably seem excessive and unjustified, with no clear signs of aggressive resistance

warranting such measures. The videos leave uncertainty around full justification for the level of

force depicted.

A more neutral third-party viewpoint would acknowledge footage alone does not provide

necessary context like the severity of any initial traffic violation or specific threats encountered
prior to recording. Important missing pieces like independent witness accounts and expert review

of proper protocol application could aid fair analysis. Without a more complete picture, no

definitive conclusions about proper procedures followed may reasonably be drawn.

There are also perspectives more skeptical of the official police narrative, calling into

question the stated reason for the stop in light of contradictory surveillance evidence and

inability to see the purported violation. Lack of action regarding acknowledged untruthfulness

undermines credibility and trust in the authenticity of the "official" story told.

The Role of The Media

The media plays a powerful role in shaping public perceptions of the criminal justice

system. Through their coverage of high-profile cases, the media can either exonerate or convict

individuals accused of crimes, even before the legal process has run its course (Fadhilah, 2024).

This influence can have significant implications for the fairness and impartiality of the justice

system.

On one hand, the media can be used to expose abuses and wrongdoings within the

criminal justice system. Investigative journalism has uncovered numerous instances of racial

bias, police misconduct, prosecutorial overreach, and other systemic problems. Documentaries

like "13th" have shed light on the disproportionate incarceration of minorities and the legacy of

slavery embedded in the justice system. By bringing these issues to public attention, the media

can galvanize social movements and pressure lawmakers to enact reforms.

But the media can also be used to sentence people in the court of public opinion, even if

the formal proof isn't clear or is contradictory (Brown, 2021). In particular, social media has

turned into a "new court of justice" where people quickly come together to either blame or clear
suspects based on scant evidence. It can be very hard on judges and juries, and they may feel like

they have to make decisions based on how people feel instead of following the law exactly.

The media’s coverage of criminal cases could also influence the public’s perception of

the justice system since viewers tend to be told and sold something by sensational and

exaggerated drama presentations rather than the truth. The media intensifies the belief of social

injustice within the criminal justice system since the media focuses more on violent crimes,

especially those that are sensational even though overall crime rates have been declining over the

years (Kania, 2020).This can lead to the perpetuation of myths and misconceptions, such as the

belief that the justice system is more racially biased or ineffective than it actually is.

Furthermore, the media's dependence on ratings and advertising revenue may encourage

selective reporting of material that elicits the most public attention and indignation, rather than a

fair and nuanced depiction of the facts (Kania, 2020). This may lead to the presumption of guilt

being applied to persons before they have had their day in court, undermining the basic premise

of innocence.

At the same time, the media may play an important role in exonerating those who have

been falsely charged or condemned. High-profile cases, such as the Central Park jogger case,

have shown how media coverage may influence public opinion and even result in convictions

being reversed (Larkin, 2022). The media may shed light on miscarriages of justice and urge case

re-examination by scrutinizing anomalies in evidence, identifying procedural errors, and

providing voice to the accused.

Finally, the link between the media and the criminal justice system is complicated and

sometimes controversial. While the media may be an effective instrument for exposing abuses
and keeping the system responsible, it can also be a double-edged sword, undermining the justice

and impartiality of the judicial system.

To achieve a better balance, numerous measures have been suggested. Some experts

believe that the media should be subject to tougher rules and ethical norms while reporting on

current criminal proceedings in order to avoid the distribution of prejudiced material and the

premature attribution of guilt (Warden, 2013). Others suggest that the judicial system should

communicate with the media in a more open and proactive manner to guarantee that the public

has access to accurate and impartial information.

There have also been requests for the media to be more nuanced and contextual in its

depiction of crime and the criminal justice system. This might include doing a more in-depth

examination of the underlying social, economic, and political causes that lead to criminal

behavior, rather than merely sensationalizing the most spectacular and violent occurrences. The

media might help to promote significant changes and rebuild public faith in the judicial system

by encouraging more informed and deliberate public discussions.

In conclusion: the media is a double-edged sword as it may help improve the Criminal

Justice System while at the same time acting as a hindrance to its operations. To a certain extent,

the media can be useful to reveal abuses and make the system responsible, but it also distorts

justice’s fairness and impartiality through violent coverage and conditional sentencing. For a

balance to be struck and the problem to be solved, there has to be reform of the rule with regard

to the rights of the media to report on criminal cases as well as the manner in which crime and

justice are reported. In this way, the media can be quite beneficial in explaining the innocence of

the wrongfully accused, the guilt of the offenders, and in strengthening the Criminal Justice

System.
References

Brown, Z. (2021, February 12). “13th” Film and Discussion - Zoey Brown - Studies of Black

History at the University of San Diego. Studies of Black History at the University of San

Diego. https://sites.sandiego.edu/blackhistoryatusd/2021/02/12/13th-film-and-discussion-

zoey-brown/

Criminal Justice and Media. (n.d.). Www.southuniversity.edu.

https://www.southuniversity.edu/news-and-blogs/2024/05/criminal-justice-and-media

Fadhilah, N. (2024). The Influence of Mass Media on Public Perception of Criminal Cases: A

Qualitative Approach. Journal of Strafvordering Indonesian, 1(2), 1–5.

https://doi.org/10.62872/5scm0g45

Kania, R. (2020). Media’s Influence on the Perception of Criminal Justice. Crime & Justice

Research Alliance. https://crimeandjusticeresearchalliance.org/rsrch/medias-influence-on-

the-perception-of-criminal-justice/

Larkin, A. (2022). Media Coverage of the 1989 Central Park Jogger Case. CUJ, 1(1).

https://cujournal.ie/article/id/10/

Warden, R. (2013). The role of the media and public opinion on innocence reform: Past and

future. In Wrongful Conviction and Criminal Justice Reform (pp. 39-55). Routledge.

You might also like