HHS Public Access

Author manuscript
Matern Child Health J. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2021 June 01.
Author Manuscript

Published in final edited form as:

Matern Child Health J. 2020 June ; 24(6): 796–804. doi:10.1007/s10995-019-02858-6.

Health care transition planning among youth with ASD and other
mental, behavioral, and developmental disorders
Benjamin Zablotsky, PhD1, Jessica Rast, MPH2, Matthew D. Bramlett, PhD1, Paul T.
Shattuck, PhD2

1Centersfor Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville,
Author Manuscript

Maryland 2A.J. Drexel Autism Institute, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Abstract
Objective: To estimate the prevalence of health care transition components among youth with
autism spectrum disorder (ASD) aged 12-17 using the 2016 National Survey of Children’s Health
(NSCH), compared to youth with other mental, behavioral, or developmental disorders (MBDDs)
or youth without MBDDs.

Methods: The 2016 NSCH is a nationally and state representative survey that explores issues of
health and well-being among children ages 0-17. Within the NSCH, parents of a subset of youth,
ages 12-17, are asked a series of questions about their youth’s eventual transition into the adult
health care system. The current study explores components of this transition, comparing youth
Author Manuscript

diagnosed with ASD, youth with other mental, behavioral, or developmental disorders (MBDDs),
and youth without MBDDs.

Results: Approximately 1-in-4 youth with ASD had actively worked with their doctor to
understand future changes to their health care, significantly less than youth with other MBDDs
and youth without MBDDs. Fewer than 2-in-5 youth with ASD had met with their doctor privately
or had a parent who knew how their youth would be insured when they reached adulthood.

Conclusions: The current analysis of a nationally representative sample of youth reveals

discrepancies in the proportion of youth with ASD receiving appropriate health care transition
planning compared to youth with other MBDDs and youth without MBDDs. These findings
suggest the potential for barriers among youth with ASD to effectively transitioning into the adult
health care system.
Author Manuscript

Keywords
autism spectrum disorder; transition; NSCH; health care

Address correspondence to: Benjamin Zablotsky, National Center for Health Statistics, 3311 Toledo Road, Hyattsville, MD, 20782,
[email protected]; 301-458-4621.
Publisher's Disclaimer: Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily
represent the official position of the CDC, HRSA, HHS nor does mention of these department or agency names imply endorsement by
the US government.
Financial disclosure: The authors have indicated that they have no financial relationships relative to this article to disclose.
Conflicts of interest: None to disclose.
 Zablotsky et al. Page 2

Health care transition (HCT) planning is the individualized process of addressing the
Author Manuscript

comprehensive healthcare needs of adolescents as they age into adulthood, and was designed
to ensure developmentally appropriate health care services are available in an uninterrupted
manner (AAP et al., 2011). Although HCT planning is necessary and recommended for all
adolescents, researchers and practitioners have made efforts to emphasize the importance of
such planning for youth with special health care needs (YSHCN), particularly youth with
mental, behavioral, and developmental disorders (AAP et al., 2002). These youth usually
have a harder time during this transition period, as it can be challenging to find high-quality
developmentally appropriate health care services in adulthood, which may be further
complicated by eligibility issues for supportive services (Gore et al., 2007; Hogan & Astone,
1986; Rutter, 1993). In fact, several studies have corroborated an increased need for HCT
planning among these youth, underscored by the high number not receiving any services to
aid in this transition (Cheak-Zamora et al., 2013; Lotstein et al., 2009; Nageswaran et al.,
Author Manuscript

2011). Recent research has also demonstrated a link between HCT planning and better
health outcomes in adulthood among a population of former youth with chronic health
conditions (Sharma et al., 2014).

A population of youth who may have an additional need for HCT planning are youth with
autism spectrum disorder (ASD), who use more health care services, have more inpatient
hospital visits that are longer in mean duration, make more health care claims, and have
higher healthcare expenditures when compared to their peers with other special health care
needs (Tregnago & Cheak-Zamora, 2012). Youth with ASD additionally have high rates of
unmet medical needs, particularly among children with comorbid psychiatric conditions
(Zablotsky et al., 2015; Zablotsky, Maenner, & Blumberg, 2019).

Current research shows that youth with ASD less often receive HCT planning than other
Author Manuscript

YSHCN; estimates are that only 15-21% of transition age youth (between 12-17 years of
age) with ASD receive HCT planning (Cheak-Zamora et al., 2013; Cheak-Zamora et al.,
2014; Rast et al., 2018).

The transition to the adult medical care is difficult because complex needs must be
communicated to a new provider, yet a limited number of providers of adult care feel they
have adequate knowledge or skills to provide care to adults with ASD (Zerbo et al., 2015).
Compounding this challenge is the fact that the transition period spans across many service
systems, likely without overlapping providers (Narendorf, Shattuck & Sterzing, 2011;
Shattuck et al., 2011).

In addition to the prevalent deficiencies in HCT planning among youth with ASD, recent
literature shows this population is both growing in size and changing in health characteristics
Author Manuscript

(Baio et al., 2018; Christensen et al., 2016). The increased size of this population marks it as
an important public health concern. The changes of the demographic composition and
distribution of impairments, including fewer youth with an intellectual disability and smaller
differences in prevalence by race, ethnicity, and sex (Baio et al., 2018; Christensen et al.,
2016) should be considered as research is updated. Understanding the experiences and needs
of this changing population is integral to providing targeted services and interventions.

Matern Child Health J. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2021 June 01.
 Zablotsky et al. Page 3

The majority of research on HCT planning at the national level comes from a survey of
Author Manuscript

children with special health care needs (SHCN), the most recent estimates accompanying the
2009-2010 National Survey of Children with Special Health Care Needs (NS-CSHCN) (e.g.,
Lotstein et al. 2009, Cheak-Zamora et al. 2013). The NS-CSHCN was a sample of children
(0-17 years of age) with SHCN identified based on a five question screener designed to
capture the presence of a chronic health condition and the use of medical services (Bethell et
al., 2002). Although an important source of detailed health and health needs information, the
NS-CSHCN was not representative of the experiences of all children, but instead was
exclusively those experiences of children with special health care needs.

In 2016, the National Survey of Children’s Health (NSCH) was redesigned, combining
elements of former NS-CSHCN and NSCH questionnaires and sampling frameworks,
resulting in broader topical coverage in an expanded sample of children with and without
SHCN. This creates a unique opportunity to explore transition questions in a timely and
Author Manuscript

nationally representative sample of all children. The primary objective of the current study is
to describe health care transition components among the population of youth with ASD,
youth with other mental, behavioral, or developmental disorders, and youth without any
mental, behavioral, or developmental disorders serving as comparisons.

Methods
Source
Data come from the 2016 National Survey of Children’s Health (NSCH), a cross-sectional,
nationally representative population-based survey designed to monitor the health and well-
being of non-institutionalized children in the United States ages 0-17. The NSCH is
sponsored by the Health Resources and Services Administration’s Maternal and Child
Author Manuscript

Health Bureau and is conducted by the United States Census Bureau. As a secondary data
analysis of a deidentified data set, this study is exempt from review by the NCHS Ethics
Review Board.

Households are randomly selected for inclusion in the NSCH (from the Census Master
Address File appended with indicators from the Census Bureau’s Center for Administrative
Records Research and Applications), receiving a mailed invitation in the form of a
household screener questionnaire. The screener includes questions about the race and
ethnicity, age, sex, and English proficiency (for children over 4 years of age) for all children
in the household. Additionally, the screener asks about whether any child has a SHCN, as
defined through responses to a series of questions focused on functional limitation,
prescription medication use, elevated service use or need, use of specialized therapies,
Author Manuscript

and/or ongoing emotional, developmental, or behavioral conditions requiring treatment

(Bethell et al., 2002). Eligible households later receive an invitation to complete the NSCH
on one randomly selected child either by completing a mailed paper version of the
questionnaire or by completing the survey online using a secure confidential website. Three
separate questionnaires were developed for different age groups: 0-5, 6-11, and 12-17 years
of age.

Matern Child Health J. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2021 June 01.
 Zablotsky et al. Page 4

A total of 50,212 interviews were completed in the 2016 NSCH, with an overall weighted
Author Manuscript

response rate of 40.7%; the survey completion rate among eligible households was 69.7%.
Respondents were adults familiar with the health and health care of the sampled child, with
the vast majority of respondents being the child’s parent (93% of cases; hereafter referred to
as parents). For more information about the NSCH, including survey methods and response
rates, see https://mchb.hrsa.gov/data/national-surveys. Data used in the current paper were
publicly available.

Sample
Eligibility for the analytic sample included being between the ages of 12-17 years (hereafter
referred to as “youth”), with information available on whether the youth had been diagnosed
with a current mental, behavioral, or developmental disorder (MBDD) (n=20,121) (less than
3% of the sample was missing on MBDD status). The sample was divided into three
Author Manuscript

subgroups: youth who were currently diagnosed with ASD (n=586); youth currently
diagnosed with any other current mental, behavioral, or developmental disorder (other
MBDD) (n=4,735); and youth without a current MBDD (n=14,800).

Measures
Health Care Transition Components—The current study focuses on several questions
dedicated to a youth’s transition into the adult health care system. Three health care
transition components were examined.

Active work: Parents were asked four questions about whether the youth’s doctor or other
health care provider had actively worked with their youth to 1) “think about and plan for his
or her future,” 2) “make positive choices about his or her health,” 3) “gain skills to manage
Author Manuscript

his or her health and health care,” and 4) “understand the changes in health care that happen
at age 18”. Youth whose parents answered in the affirmative to at least three of the four
items were considered to be actively working with their doctor.

Insurance: Additionally, parents were asked “Do you know how this child will be insured
as he or she becomes an adult?” This question is intended to serve as a proxy for whether the
child will likely have continued health insurance coverage which facilitates health care and
receipt of transition planning.

Independence: Parents were also asked whether their youth had had “a chance to speak
with the doctor or other health care provider privately, without you or another adult in the
room?” at their youth’s last preventive check-up. This question evaluates whether the youth
is building independent health care skills.
Author Manuscript

Comparison Groups—We created three comparison groups for this study based on a
series of questions about the presence of a diagnosed condition. Parents were asked “Has a
doctor or other health care provider [or educator] EVER told you that this child has
[specified condition]?”. In instances where the parent answered in the affirmative, the
follow-up question was asked, “does the child CURRENTLY have the condition?”. Ten
conditions were considered mental, behavioral or developmental disorders (MBDDs) for the

Matern Child Health J. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2021 June 01.
 Zablotsky et al. Page 5

purpose of this study, which included: “autism or autism spectrum disorder (including
Author Manuscript

diagnoses of Asperger’s Disorder or Pervasive Developmental Disorder (PDD),” “attentive

deficit disorder or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder,” “depression,” “anxiety
problems,” “behavioral or conduct problems,” “Tourette syndrome,” “learning disability,”
“intellectual disability (also known as mental retardation),” “developmental delay,” and
“speech or other language disorder”. We created the following groups: 1) youth with current
autism spectrum disorder, 2) youth with current other mental, behavioral, or developmental
disorders, and 3) youth without current mental, behavioral, or developmental disorders.
Youth with both autism spectrum disorder and some other mental, behavioral, or
developmental disorder, which was common (n=534, 92%) were placed in the autism
spectrum disorder group.

Demographic characteristics—Youth characteristics included age, sex, race and

ethnicity, insurance status (any current private; current public only; uninsured), and whether
Author Manuscript

the youth is currently receiving services under a special education or early intervention plan,
including through an Individualized Education Plan (IEP). Family characteristics included
federal poverty level ratio, family structure, highest education reported among adults in the
family, and geographic region.

Statistical analysis
Estimates were calculated using Stata 13.0 to account for the complex survey design of the
NSCH, incorporating both the sampling weights and the sample design variables. First,
demographic characteristics were described for youth diagnosed with ASD, youth diagnosed
with other MBDDs, and youth without current MBDDs (Table 1). A design-based Rao-Scott
corrected χ2 test was used to test whether an overall difference existed between these groups
for each characteristic. Next, the proportion in each group who had experienced each of the
Author Manuscript

four indicators of active work (see Figure 1) and three health transition components of active
work, insurance and independence (see Table 2; Figure 2) was calculated, and χ2 tests were
again used to detect whether a difference existed among the three groups’ unadjusted
estimates. When the χ2 produced a significant test statistic (p<.05), a series of multivariate
logistic regressions (rotating which of the three groups was the reference group) were used
as an adjustment follow-up to examine whether the proportion of children in each group
differed significantly after controlling for youth (age, race and ethnicity, sex, insurance
status, current IEP) and family (federal poverty level, family structure, highest education,
region) demographics.

Adjusted predicted marginal probabilities and adjusted odds ratios for all models can be
found in an online supplemental table. There were no missing data for the youth’s sex, race
Author Manuscript

and ethnicity, or family poverty ratio due to single hot-deck imputations performed by the
US Census Bureau (2011). Missing data on family type, youth insurance type, and highest
education in the family were limited to less than 3% of the analytic sample.

Results
Table 1 contains demographic information about youth in the analytic sample. Youth with
ASD were most likely to be male, have an IEP and be on public health insurance, but were

Matern Child Health J. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2021 June 01.
 Zablotsky et al. Page 6

least likely to be Hispanic or uninsured. Youth without MBDDs were most likely to be
Author Manuscript

Hispanic, living in two married parent household and have private health insurance. Youth
with other MBDDs were more likely to live in the Midwest, but less likely to live in the
West when compared to youth without MBDDs.

Figure 1 presents the prevalence of the four active work indicators. Approximately 1 in 4
youth with ASD (22.6%) had actively worked with their doctor to understand future changes
to their health care, a significantly lower proportion compared to youth with other MBDDs
(33.8%) (p<.01) and youth without MBDDs (34.9%) (p<.01), after adjustment for youth and
family characteristics. After adjustment, youth with ASD (50.7%) were also less likely to
have worked with their doctor to gain skills to manage their health and health care than
youth with other MBDDs (67.2%) (p<.01). Youth without MBDDs were less likely than
youth with other MBDDs to have actively worked with their doctor to gain skills to manage
health and health care (56.2% vs. 67.2%) (p<.01), make positive choices (75.7% vs. 81.7%)
Author Manuscript

(p<.001), and plan for the future (33.5% vs. 46.1%) (p<.001), after adjustment. The
difference in making positive choices between youth with ASD (75.7%) and youth with
other MBDDs (81.7%) was comparable to that between youth with other MBDDs and youth
without MBDDs (75.7%), but was not statistically significant, presumably due to the smaller
sample size for youth with ASD.

Table 2 presents the composite of whether the youth was considered to be actively working
with their provider (defined as having at least three of the four items from Figure 1). About 1
in 3 youth with ASD were actively working with their doctor (34.4%), significantly less than
youth with other MBDDs (48.6%) (p<.01), who were significantly more likely to have
actively worked with their doctor compared to youth without MBDDs (39.8%) (p<.001).
However, youth without MBDDs (56.8%) were significantly more likely to have parents
Author Manuscript

who know how their youth will be insured when they reach adulthood compared to either
youth with ASD (39.0%) (p<.01) or other MBDDs (48.0%) (p<.05). Approximately half of
youth with other MBDDs have met with their doctor privately (52.2%), which was
significantly more likely than youth with ASD (37.8%) (p<.05) and youth without MBDDs
(48.7%) (p<.05).

Figure 2 depicts the distribution of the three HCT components (active work (having at least
three of the four indicators), insurance, independence) experienced by group. Youth with
ASD were the least likely to have all three HCT components (6.5%) with only about 1 in 15
youth having accomplished all three components of actively working with their doctor,
meeting with their doctor privately, and having a parent who knows how they will be insured
when they reach adulthood when compared to youth with other MBDDs (19.1%) (p<.001)
Author Manuscript

and youth without MBDDs (17.0%) (p<.05). Youth with other MBDDs were the most likely
to have all three HCT components.

Discussion
Overall, youth with ASD were less likely to have completed HCT items when compared to
youth with other MBDDs and youth without MBDDs. Youth with ASD were less likely than
their peers with other MBDDs to be actively working with their doctor or meeting with their

Matern Child Health J. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2021 June 01.
 Zablotsky et al. Page 7

doctor privately, and less likely than youth without MBDDs to have a parent who knows
Author Manuscript

how they’ll be insured when they reached adulthood.

We found that the prevalence of HCT components among youth with ASD was lower, with 1
in 3 doctors actively working with these youth or meeting with them privately. Providers
possibly have lowered expectations that youth with ASD will be able to take over healthcare
decisions and actions when they reach adulthood (Burdo-Hartman & Patel, 2008;
Kingsnorth et al., 2011) which may be compounded by a shortage of adult primary care
providers who are knowledgeable about the unique needs among youth with mental or
developmental disabilities (Cheak-Zamora & Teti, 2015).

Regardless, the needs of youth with ASD are unlikely to decline as they reach adulthood
given current projections of service utilization through transition (Nathenson & Zablotsky,
2017). In addition, emerging evidence suggests that adults with ASD are more likely to have
Author Manuscript

major chronic medical conditions than adults without ASD, including hypertension,
diabetes, thyroid disease, GI disorders, and seizures (Croen et al., 2015).

Typically coinciding with a transition into the adult health care system is an exit from the
education system. Given the reliance on supportive services such as mental health care
through special education, many youth with mental, behavioral, and developmental disorders
experience what is referred to as a “services cliff” during this transition age. Roughly 50,000
youth with ASD are estimated to turn 18 every year (Shattuck et al., 2012a), a number that
has steadily increased with the increasing prevalence of ASD (now 1 in 59 children) (Baio et
al., 2018), and many will be particularly vulnerable during this time because of the
complexity of their service needs and functional challenges. During secondary school,
parents of youth with ASD more often report insufficient services and expending greater
Author Manuscript

effort to receive needed services than other youth in special education (Levine, Marder, &
Wagner, 2007). The percentage of families who report some or great effort to access services
increases following exit from secondary school (Roux et al., 2015). Postsecondary education
is a source of support for some young adults with ASD after leaving special education
services in high school (about 1/3 attend within the first several years after leaving high
school (Shattuck et al., 2012b)), but services provided through a college setting are less
comprehensive than those services received through special education in secondary school,
and are often only academically focused, if received at all (Gelbar, Smith, & Reichow,
2014).

Implications
More comprehensive health care in young adulthood and the provision of health care
Author Manuscript

transition have the potential to improve the health outcomes of young adults with these
conditions (AAP et al., 2011). HCT services are designed to maximize lifelong functioning
and potential by providing patient-centered care during the transition (AAP et al., 2002) and
are increasingly recognized as a desirable outcome for all youth, and particularly youth with
special health care needs. The American Academy of Pediatrics has emphasized the
importance of providing health care transition to youth, particularly youth with special
health care needs, in a 2002 consensus statement with American Academy of Family
Physicians, and the American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine

Matern Child Health J. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2021 June 01.
 Zablotsky et al. Page 8

(AAP et al., 2002). The Maternal and Child Health Bureau has also named HCT as a Title V
Author Manuscript

Maternal and Child Health Services Block Grant program National Performance Measure
(CAMHI, 2018) and Healthy People 2020 has a goal to increase the proportion of YSCHN
whose health care provider has discussed transition planning from pediatric to adult health
care (Healthy People 2020).

Limitations and strengths

A major strength of using data from a large and nationally representative survey such as the
National Survey of Children’s Health is the ability to generalize findings and explore
associations and outcomes in various subgroups, including disentangling youth with ASD
from other youth with mental, behavioral, or developmental disorders. However, in some
instances statistical tests of differences in prevalence between youth with ASD and youth
from other groups may have been underpowered due to the smaller sample size for youth
Author Manuscript

with ASD.

Additionally, the cross-sectional nature of the NSCH prevents the determination of

directionality or causality in the associations examined. Several questions ask parents to
assess whether their youth is actively working with their doctor, and a parent’s perception of
their youth’s preparedness for transition may possibly influence their response to various
indicators. If some youth are meeting privately with their doctor, parents may not be fully
aware of what activities are taking place.

Finally, the reliance on parental report for all current diagnoses is subject to recall biases and
diagnoses have not been validated either through clinical evaluation or educational records.
Some children who appear in the control group may possibly have been diagnosed with a
mental, behavioral, or developmental disorder had they been evaluated.
Author Manuscript

Conclusions
Findings from the current study of a nationally representative sample of youth with ASD
highlight a population where less than half have received key health care transition
components. Future iterations of the National Survey of Children Health provide an
opportunity to continue monitoring health care transition and better understand the unique
needs of youth with ASD.

Supplementary Material
Refer to Web version on PubMed Central for supplementary material.
Author Manuscript

References
American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Family Physicians, American College of
Physicians, & Transitions Clinical Report Authoring Group. (2011). Clinical report—Supporting the
health care transition from adolescence to adulthood in the medical home. Pediatrics 128(1):182–
200. [PubMed: 21708806]
American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Family Physicians, & American College of
Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine. (2002). A consensus statement on health care

Matern Child Health J. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2021 June 01.
 Zablotsky et al. Page 9

transitions for young adults with special health care needs. Pediatrics 110(Supplement 3):1304–
1306. [PubMed: 12456949]
Author Manuscript

Baio J, Wiggins L, Christensen DL, Maenner MJ, Daniels J Warren Z & … Dowling NF (2018).
Prevalence of autism spectrum disroder among children aged 8 years – autism and developmental
disabilities monitoring network, 11 sites, United States, 2014. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly
Report, 67(6):1–23. [PubMed: 29324727]
Bethell CD, Read D, Stein RE, Blumberg SJ, Wells N, & Newacheck PW (2002). Identifying children
with special health care needs: development and evaluation of a short screening instrument.
Ambulatory Pediatrics, 2(1), 38–48. [PubMed: 11888437]
Burdo-Hartman WA, & Patel DR (2008). Medical home and transition planning for children and youth
with special health care needs. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 55(6), 1287–1297. [PubMed:
19041458]
Cheak-Zamora NC, Farmer JE, Mayfield WA, Clark MJ, Marvin AR, Law JK, & Law PA (2014).
Health care transition services for youth with autism spectrum disorders. Rehabilitation Psychology,
59(3), 340. [PubMed: 25019309]
Cheak-Zamora NC, & Teti M (2015). “You think it’s hard now… It gets much harder for our
Author Manuscript

children”: Youth with autism and their caregiver’s perspectives of health care transition services.
Autism, 19(8), 992–1001. [PubMed: 25504639]
Cheak-Zamora NC, Yang X, Farmer JE, & Clark M (2013). Disparities in transition planning for youth
with autism spectrum disorder. Pediatrics 131(3), 447–454. [PubMed: 23400613]
Child and Adolescent Health Measurement Initiative (CAHMI), Data Resource Center for Child and
Adolescent Health. (2018). 2016 National Survey of Children’s Health: Child and Family Health
Measures and Subgroups, SAS Codebook, Version 1.0. http://www.childhealthdata.org. Accessed
15 February 2018.
Christensen DL, Baio J, Van Naarden-Braun K, Bilder D, Charles J, Constantino JN & … Yeargin-
Allsopp M (2016). Prevalence and Characteristics of Autism Spectrum Disorder Among Children
Aged 8 Years--Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network, 11 Sites, United
States, 2012. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 65(3), 1–23. [PubMed: 26766396]
Croen LA, Zerbo O, Qian Y, Massolo ML, Rich S, Sidney S & … Kripke C (2015). The health status
of adults on the autism spectrum. Autism, 19(7), 814–823. [PubMed: 25911091]
Gelbar NW, Smith I, & Reichow B (2014). Systematic review of articles describing experience and
Author Manuscript

supports of individuals with autism enrolled in college and university programs. Journal of autism
and developmental disorders, 44(10), 2593–2601. [PubMed: 24816943]
Gore S, Aseltine RH Jr., & Schilling EA (2007). Transition to adulthood, mental health, and inequality
Mental Health, Social Mirror: Springer; pps. 219–237.
Healthy People 2020. (2018). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Available at http://healthypeople2020.gov.
Accessed 21 February 2018.
Hogan DP, Astone NM (1986). The transition to adulthood. Annual Review of Sociology. 109–130.
Kingsnorth S, Gall C, Beayni S, & Rigby P (2011). Parents as transition experts? Qualitative findings
from a pilot parent-led peer support group. Child Care Health Development, 37(6), 833–840.
Levine P, Marder C, & Wagner M (2007). Services and Supports for Secondary School Students with
Disabilities: A Special Topic Report of Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition
Study-2 (NLTS2). National Center For Special Education Research.
Lotstein DS, Ghandour R, Cash A, McGuire E, Strickland B, & Newacheck P (2009). Planning for
Author Manuscript

health care transitions: results from the 2005–2006 national survey of children with special health
care needs. Pediatrics, 123(1), e145–e152. [PubMed: 19117836]
Nageswaran S, Parish SL, Rose RA, & Grady MD (2011). Do children with developmental disabilities
and mental health conditions have greater difficulty using health services than children with
physical disorders? Maternal and Child Health Journal, 15(5), 634–641. [PubMed: 20364366]
Narendorf SC, Shattuck PT, & Sterzing PR (2011). Mental health service use among adolescents with
an autism spectrum disorder. Psychiatric Services, 62(8), 975–978. [PubMed: 21807842]
Nathenson RA, & Zablotsky B (2017). The transition to the adult health care system among youths
with autism spectrum disorder. Psychiatric Services, 68, 735–738. [PubMed: 28292222]

Matern Child Health J. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2021 June 01.
 Zablotsky et al. Page 10

Rast JE, Shattuck PT, Roux AM, Anderson KA, & Kuo A (2018). The medical home and health care
transition for youth with autism. Pediatrics, 141(Supplement 4), S328–S334. [PubMed: 29610414]
Author Manuscript

Roux AM, Shattuck PT, Rast JE, Rava JA, & Anderson KA (2015). National Autism Indicators
Report: Transition into Young Adulthood. Philadelphia, PA: Life Course Outcomes Research
Program Area, A.J. Drexel Autism Institute, Drexel University.
Rutter M (1993). Resilience: Some conceptual considerations. Journal of Adolescent Health 14(8),
626–631. [PubMed: 8130234]
Sharma N, O’Hare K, Antonelli RC, & Sawicki GS (2014). Transition care: future directions in
education, health policy, and outcomes research. Academic Pediatrics, 14(2), 120–127. [PubMed:
24602574]
Shattuck PT, Roux AM, Hudson LE, Taylor JL, Maenner MJ, & Trani JF (2012a). Services for adults
with an autism spectrum disorder. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 57(5), 284–291. [PubMed:
22546060]
Shattuck PT, Narendorf SC, Cooper B, Sterzing PR, Wagner M, & Taylor JL (2012b). Postsecondary
education and employment among youth with an autism spectrum disorder. Pediatrics, 129(6),
1042–1049. [PubMed: 22585766]
Author Manuscript

Shattuck PT, Wagner M, Narendorf S, Sterzing P, & Hensley M (2011). Post–high school service use
among young adults with an autism spectrum disorder. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent
Medicine, 165(2), 141–146. [PubMed: 21300654]
Tregnago MK, & Cheak-Zamora NC (2012). Systematic review of disparities in health care for
individuals with autism spectrum disorders in the United States. Research in Autism Spectrum
Disorders, 6(3), 1023–1031.
United States Census Bureau. (2011). 2010 Census Demographic Profile Summary file: 2010 Census
of Population and Housing. Available at https://www2.census.gov/programssurveys/decennial/
2010/technicaldocumentation/complete-tech-docs/summary-file/dpsf.pdf. Accessed 7 December
2016.
Zablotsky B, Maenner MJ, & Blumberg SJ (2019). Geographic disparities in treatment for children
with autism spectrum disorder. Academic Pediatrics, 19:740–747. [PubMed: 30858082]
Zablotsky B, Pringle BA, Colpe LJ, Kogan MD, Rice C, & Blumberg SJ (2015). Service and treatment
use among children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Developmental and
Behavioral Pediatrics, 36:98–105. [PubMed: 25650952]
Author Manuscript

Zerbo O, Massolo ML, Qian Y, & Croen LA (2015). A study of physician knowledge and experience
with autism in adults in a large integrated healthcare system. Journal of Autism and
Developmental Disorders, 45(12), 4002–4014. [PubMed: 26334872]
Author Manuscript

Matern Child Health J. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2021 June 01.
 Zablotsky et al. Page 11

Significance:
Author Manuscript

This study provides a timely update of HCT planning components in youth with autism
spectrum disorder from a national survey, compared to youth with other mental,
behavioral, and developmental disorders (MBDDs), and youth without MBDDs.
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript

Matern Child Health J. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2021 June 01.
 Zablotsky et al. Page 12
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript

Figure 1.
Prevalence of active work indicators, by MBDD status
NOTES: ASD = autism spectrum disorder; MBDD = mental, behavioral, or developmental
disorder.
Indicators presented are unadjusted estimates.
x Significantly different than youth with autism spectrum disorder based on adjusted odds
Author Manuscript

ratio (p<.05).
y Significantly different than youth with other mental, behavioral, or developmental

disorders based on adjusted odds ratio (p<.05).

Odds ratios are adjusted for youth (age, race and ethnicity, sex, insurance status, current IEP)
and family (federal poverty level, family structure, highest education, region) demographics.
Author Manuscript

Matern Child Health J. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2021 June 01.
 Zablotsky et al. Page 13
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript

Figure 2.
Number of health care transition components, by MBDD status
NOTES: ASD is autism spectrum disorder; MBDD is mental, behavioral, or developmental
disorder
The three HCT components presented are unadjusted estimates and include active work,
Author Manuscript

insurance, and independence. Youth had to have a parent who endorsed at least three of the
four indicators to be considered to meet the active work HCT component.
x Significantly different than youth with autism spectrum disorder based on adjusted odds

ratio (p<.05).
y Significantly different than youth with other mental, behavioral, or developmental

disorders based on adjusted odds ratio (p<.05).

Odds ratios are adjusted for youth (age, race and ethnicity, sex, insurance status, current IEP)
and family (federal poverty level, family structure, highest education, region) demographics.
Author Manuscript

Matern Child Health J. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2021 June 01.
 Zablotsky et al. Page 14

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics of the analytic, by MBDD status

Author Manuscript

Current ASD Current Other MBDD No current MBDD 1

(n=586) (n=4,735) (n=14,800) p-value
% (SE) % (SE) % (SE)

Youth characteristics

Sex <.001
Male 80.7 (3.4) x x
53.6 (1.5) 49.6 (1.0)
Female 19.3 (3.4) 46.4 (1.5) 50.4 (1.0)

Age .18
12-14 57.1 (3.9) 48.8 (1.5) 49.8 (1.0)
15-17 42.9 (3.9) 51.2 (1.5) 50.2 (1.0)
Author Manuscript

Race <.001
Non-Hispanic white 67.6 (3.8) 59.4 (1.6) xy
51.1 (1.0)
Non-Hispanic black 15.2 (3.5) 13.5 (1.1) 13.7 (0.7)
Non-Hispanic other 6.4 (1.3) 7.2 (0.6) xy
10.4 (0.5)
Hispanic 10.8 (2.2) x xy
19.9 (1.6) 24.9 (1.1)

Insurance status <.001

Private 52.1 (4.1) 58.3 (1.6) xy
67.9 (1.0)
Public 46.2 (4.1) x xy
36.8 (1.6) 25.1 (1.0)
Uninsured 1.8 (0.7) x xy
4.9 (0.7) 7.0 (0.6)
Author Manuscript

Current IEP 70.1 (3.7) x xy <.001

29.7 (1.4) 1.9 (3.2)

Family characteristics

Family structure <.001

Two parent, married 53.8 (4.2) 57.2 (1.5) xy
67.7 (0.9)
Two parent, unmarried 10.6 (2.9) 7.1 (0.9) 6.7 (0.5)
Single mother 24.7 (3.8) 23.8 (1.3) xy
16.9 (0.7)
Other 10.9 (3.4) 11.9 (0.9) y
8.7 (0.6)

Federal poverty level .09

<100% 26.7 (4.0) 22.5 (1.3) 20.0 (1.0)
Author Manuscript

100-199% 20.9 (3.5) 23.3 (1.4) 20.9 (0.9)

200-399% 23.3 (2.9) 24.5 (1.2) 27.1 (0.8)
≥400% 29.2 (3.3) 29.7 (1.3) 31.9 (0.8)

Highest education family member .60

Less than high school 9.1 (3.7) 10.3 (1.5) 10.2 (0.9)

Matern Child Health J. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2021 June 01.
 Zablotsky et al. Page 15

Current ASD Current Other MBDD No current MBDD 1

(n=586) (n=4,735) (n=14,800) p-value
% (SE) % (SE) % (SE)
Author Manuscript

High school graduate 23.0 (4.0) 23.5 (1.4) 20.6 (0.9)

Some college or more 68.0 (4.6) 66.1 (1.7) 69.2 (1.1)

Region .001
Northeast 16.8 (2.4) 16.7 (1.1) 16.4 (0.6)
Midwest 21.9 (3.0) 23.9 (1.1) y
20.5 (0.5)
South 45.3 (4.1) 39.4 (1.5) 37.5 (0.9)
West 16.1 (2.3) 20.0 (1.3) xy
25.6 (0.9)

Notes: ASD = autism spectrum disorder, MBDD = mental, behavioral, or developmental disorder, IEP = Individualized Education Plan.
1
Differences in proportions was examined using Rao-Scott corrected χ2 tests.
x
Author Manuscript

Significantly different than youth with autism spectrum disorder based on unadjusted odds ratio (p<.05).
y
Significantly different than youth with other mental, behavioral, or developmental disorders based on unadjusted odds ratio (p<.05).
Author Manuscript
Author Manuscript

Matern Child Health J. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2021 June 01.
 Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript Author Manuscript

Table 2.

Prevalence of health care transition components, by MBDD status

Unadjusted % (SE) Adjusted ORs (95% CI)

Current ASD Current Other MBDD Current No MBDD ASD vs. Other MBDD ASD vs. No MBDD Other MBDD vs. No MBDD
Zablotsky et al.

1 34.4 (4.1) 48.6 (1.7) 39.8 (1.1) 0.59** (0.41-0.85) 0.86 (0.59-1.26) 1.46*** (1.22-1.74)
Actively working with doctor

Parent knows how youth will be insured 39.0 (3.7) 48.0 (1.5) 56.8 (1.0) 0.73 (0.50-1.07) 0.59** (0.40-0.87) 0.80* (0.68-0.95)

Youth sees doctor privately 37.8 (4.2) 52.2 (1.6) 48.7 (1.1) 0.62* (0.39-0.98) 0.76 (0.47-1.23) 1.22* (1.02-1.46)

NOTES: ASD is autism spectrum disorder; MBDD is mental, behavioral, or developmental disorder
1
Youth had a parent who endorsed at least three of the four indicators that make up the active work component.

Odds ratios are adjusted for youth (age, race and ethnicity, sex, insurance status, current IEP) and family (federal poverty level, family structure, highest education, region) demographics.

A Rao-Scott corrected χ2 test was significant for each of the three health transition components and diagnostic group (p’s<.01).
***
p<.001
**
p<.01
*
p<.05

Matern Child Health J. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2021 June 01.
Page 16