LAFUENTE MARIN 2008 Methodology of Research in Social Sciences
LAFUENTE MARIN 2008 Methodology of Research in Social Sciences
METHODOLOGIES OF THE
RESEARCH IN THE
SOCIAL SCIENCES:
PHASES, SOURCES AND SELECTION OF TECHNIQUES
Carmen Lafuente Ibanez*
Ainhoa Marin Egoscozabal**
SUMMARY
The scientific method can be defined as the set of This article is about a general review of the methodology and
different phases of the scientific research process; Moreover, it
tactics used to construct knowledge. These are the
shows the selection criteria and description of several
steps and instruments that lead us to explain qualitative and quantitative techniques that could be applied to
phenomena, or to establish relationships between a scientific process in Social Sciences.
facts. The tactics used are diverse, although it is Therefore, this study is of
common to distinguish between two types of methods: special interest for those processes which
the deductive method and the inductive or empirical are involved in the design and realization of
an academic research process
method. and for those professionals interested in the
selection and application of different existing
The deductive method is part of the so-called rational techniques to contrast
the hypotheses and the information management
logic and consists of: starting from some general in research processes.
premises, reaching inferring particular statements. If it
happens that these initial general conceptions are not
demonstrable (axioms), the method will then be
axiomatic-deductive.
The inductive or empirical method consists of creating general statements from experience, starting with the
observation of a phenomenon, and repeatedly reviewing comparable phenomena, to establish by inference laws
of a universal character. In this sense, it is possible to affirm that both types of methods follow inverse processes,
where the tactics used go from the general to the particular (deductive method), or from the particular to the general (inductive
or empirical method).
KEY WORDS
The scientific method provides the means to achieve an objective, but it does not
provide the objective itself, which must be posed through the process discussed below.
Scientific Research
Methodology
Techniques
EAN
Magazine
In practice, one cannot speak of a purely hypothesis that will be validated or refuted. After
inductive or deductive research strategy. choosing the topic that frames the problem, the
Synthetic methods are usually used, a mixture of process continues with a review of the
both methods. publications and references on the subject.
Note that in these early stages, a research
2.2 The research process: problem,
objectives and hypothesis process in the strict sense has not yet
begun, however a fundamental step is taken, the
The first task that must be faced in the development definition of the research objective, as outlined in
of an investigation is the statement of the problem, the following table:
which would be the area that would give rise to the
TABLE 1
Phases in the research process
Two types of objectives can be The origin of the hypothesis is in the problem
distinguished: the general objective, which posed, and there is no method to reach it. It
must reflect the essence of the problem to may appear as a result of inspiration, genius,
be investigated and which is somehow reading, for example, but it always has its
expressed in the title of the doctoral thesis. origin in a problem. On the other hand, the
On the other hand, there are specific objectives (both general and specific) must
objectives, which can be defined as the be clear and precise, because in this way
steps taken to achieve the general objective. the risk of making mistakes in the selection
Consequently, the specific objectives should of techniques to achieve them is lower.
not only not hinder the main objective, but
should complement it and allow the research
to be directed towards its culmination.
The research process formally begins
with the formulation of the hypothesis.
UNIVERSIT
Y
EAN
»ee
EAN
Magazine
2.3 Variables in the research process Variables are of great importance in the
scientific method because we classify and
Variables are observable qualities, group them, we relate and study them, and
properties or features of the elements of the we interpret them. Variables are involved in all
scientific study. Variables are susceptible to change phases of the process, so we must define them
and to being linked to each other, according to thoroughly and specifically.
various types of relationships.
TABLE 2
Data and techniques in the research process
(EA EAN
N)
Magazine
a starting point for the development of more describe and interrelate the research
specific research. variables for subsequent decision-making.
We will choose explanatory-predictive
research when our study is not limited to just When we carry out statistical analysis, we
measuring variables, but we also aim to must go through the following phases:
understand behavior and determine and
quantify the relationships between variables. • Data collection.
With this type of research we try to • Ordering and presentation of data.
understand the structure and factors that • Data processing and exploitation.
influence a variable, in most cases, with the
ultimate goal of establishing predictions Data collection, being an elementary task, is
about it. not without its difficulties. Our effort in
obtaining data should not be less than that
3.1 Statistical research
dedicated to carrying out other tasks or
activities. For our research to be useful, we
must ensure, to the extent possible, that the
data collected does not contain errors or
3. QUANTITATIVE TECHNIQUES
biases that could invalidate the study. For
the data to be true, we must ensure that the
variables have been thoroughly defined,
since the data are the direct result of
Throughout this article we have referred to observing said variables.
Statistics as the science on which the
research process to be carried out to The errors that we may encounter do not
achieve our objectives must be based. At this always have a theoretical meaning, but may
point, it is time to ask: What does statistical analysis be due to incorrect annotations, tabulations
consist of? And what techniques and instruments and/or classifications, or to the existence of
does it offer us for solving problems? values that are too large or too small,
considered as atypical data. In these cases,
Statistical analysis indicates the procedures the techniques of statistical analysis allow us
that allow us to present, summarize, to detect the existence of anomalous data; if
describe and compare a set of numerical in a frequency table or in the graph of a set
data. of data we observe that a value is repeated a
lot or a little, or we find maximums or
To understand the social and economic minimums, respectively, it may be due to the
reality we need a set of data, already existence of incorrect data. Once these data
existing or created by ourselves, over time or have been found, we must correct the error
at a given moment, of the variables specific and we can even eliminate those that are
to this discipline. atypical and that make the measures used
lose representativeness, justifying why they
In statistical analysis we find valid -
were eliminated and how this can influence
instruments to summarize the information in
the theory that we want to empirically
a few measures that allow us to know,
EAN
Magazine
The target population is made up of units The questionnaire is the instrument we use to obtain
that share one or more common - information through the sampling survey.
characteristics that we want to study. It is Although this technique is widely used, it is
usually quite difficult to define the population increasingly losing credibility due to the bias
and determine its size due to the differences in in the responses of those surveyed. If we
information depending on the source consulted. In create a questionnaire that is objective,
other cases, this problem arises because we do clear, precise and correct, we can reduce
not have data since the population we want biased responses. In this sense, it can be
to analyze is unknown. very helpful to investigate the existence of
questionnaires carried out on topics similar
In these cases, to delimit the population and or identical to those of our study. If we
determine its size, we must use the cannot find them, we must create our own.
information from the source that best fits our
research, and in some cases it will be To develop a good questionnaire, we must
necessary to make all kinds of assumptions. begin by determining the type of questions
we are going to use and establishing the
Once the population has been defined, we must
appropriate measurement scale (nominal,
consider whether it is possible to study it in its
ordinal, interval or ratio) for each of the
entirety. Its size may be very small, or we must think
population characteristics we want to know.
about whether we select a set of elements from it
since it is materially impossible to study the entire
When formulating questions, we must take
population or group. into account two aspects: on the one hand, the
computer software that we are going to use to
In most cases we will have to extract a process the information (it is easier to work with
closed questions than open ones, and to process
sample from the population and consider
single-answer questions than multiple-answer
whether the study will be limited to describing and
questions); on the other hand, it is important to
understanding the elements that make up the sample
remember that the data obtained is the basis on
without any further pretensions, or whether we want
which our research is based and that not even the
to apply the sample results to the entire population.
most sophisticated methodology is capable of
In this last case we will need statistical inference
providing good results if the initial information is false.
techniques so that the generalization of the results is For this reason, it is very useful to include questions
valid, starting by using those techniques that in the questionnaire that allow the validity of the
guarantee that the sample is representative of the answers to be detected.
population from a statistical point of view.
Once the questionnaire is completed, we will procedures, but in this case Statistics does
choose the type of sampling that we will not provide us with techniques that validate
carry out to obtain the units to which it is the inference of sample results to the
directed. To achieve maximum accuracy in population. The second condition to
the selection of the sample, we must take guarantee the goodness of the choice is that
into account two fundamental conditions. we must take into account that the chosen
The first condition is that the generalization sample must be adequate to achieve our
of the results obtained in the sample to the objectives.
population must be valid. This requirement is
met, from a statistical point of view, when the We determine the sample size based on the
choice is made using random or probabilistic type of sampling chosen, the desired
sampling. We can also use non-random precision, the financial resources, the time
procedures, that is, directed or opinionated available, and the ease of selection.
TABLE 3
Operation planning and sampling plan design
Questionnaire design
• Nature of the
TOScope
information (quantity, complexity and
Territorial accessibility)
Temporary
Sampling type
Scope
Population
Fountain. Own elaboration
UNIVERSIT
Y
EAN
»ee
EAN
Magazine
3.3 Data processing and exploitation Usually, our interest will not be limited to knowing and
describing the characteristics of a sample, but we will
At this stage of statistical analysis, we consider which want to describe and know the characteristics of an
techniques and instruments we are going to use to entire population based on knowledge of the sample.
achieve the specific objectives proposed that will lead This will be the time to formulate all kinds of statistical
us to achieve the general objective. hypotheses and to choose the appropriate contrasts to
validate or refute them.
The proposed objectives and the nature of the
information determine the type of research we are The use of most of these statistical instruments is only
going to carry out according to the function it fulfills. possible when we have quantitative or numerical data.
It is common practice to apply these instruments to
When our study focuses on determining and describing
qualitative data, once they have been coded and
the key characteristics of social and economic reality,
assigned a number. This practice is not statistically
the frequency with which they occur and the degree of
correct, so we must be cautious in its application and
association between the different variables of interest,
subsequent interpretation of the results. It is important,
we can use statistical measures capable of
summarizing and synthesizing the information already as we already mentioned in the “information gathering”
stage, to assign each characteristic an appropriate measurement
organized and tabulated.
scale or numerical assessment, since in this way, we limit the
usefulness of the assigned numbers and the mathematical
In this synthesis process we look for a few numerical
operations that we can perform with them, and therefore choose
values that represent the sample data set. Position
the appropriate technique and instrument.
measures (means, mode, median, and percentiles) are
values that summarize all the available information.
In some cases, a descriptive study may be sufficient to
These measurements obtained from the sample
achieve our objectives; in others, we carry it out to
usually have a clear and concrete meaning and are
complement the development of explanatory-predictive
easy to calculate.
research.
(EA EAN
N)
Magazine
4.
With the experience and knowledge of
QUALITATIVE TECHNIQUES specialists, we can identify problems, obtain
unknown information about some aspect, detect
We have described the quantitative disruptive factors in the change process and predict
techniques and instruments to develop the evolution of future trends considering the different
descriptive and/or explanatory-predictive possible scenarios.
research.
The most commonly used qualitative
Most of the techniques discussed require a techniques are the Delphi method and
set of cross-sectional and/or historical opinion methods. If we choose one or the
numerical data on the economic variable of other, the basic process we must follow is
interest, so we will not be able to apply them the following (Sancho et al., 2001):
if we do not have them. Furthermore, when
we want to make predictions, there may be - • Select the experts.
significant changes in the starting conditions,
or the pattern observed in the past may not • Conduct the interview.
be maintained in the future; this makes the
• Collect the answers.
use of historical data to predict future values
of the series questionable.
• Get results.
We will therefore use qualitative procedures
The selection of experts is, according to
in those cases where we cannot quantify the
Sancho et al. (2001), one of the crucial
information and when the data is not
stages, since the opinions given by
applicable or is not available.
professionals in the field constitute the raw
material of our work.
Most qualitative methods offer us techniques
for collecting qualitative information and
The interview can be done with an entire
predictions based on the opinions of a group
group simultaneously or individually. We can
of experts. With the instruments provided by
carry it out in a way directed by the
these techniques we obtain internal interviewer, based on a questionnaire, or
information about individuals using small develop it through free response from the
samples, therefore their use is advisable to obtain interviewee, or through a combination of -
prior information on an unknown topic to be
both. Once we have obtained the answers
developed later in depth. and depending on the type of data we
obtain, we can apply one of the quantitative
If we want to know the impact of a possible techniques for its treatment.
financial crisis on the internationalization
process of an economic sector, it would be
appropriate to obtain information on the
possible effects by interviewing a group of
professionals.
EAN
Magazine
Although the results obtained through are forced to use qualitative methods. The
quantitative techniques do not necessarily advantage of one over the other is that they are
have to be more reliable than those derived relatively inexpensive and quick in obtaining
information.
from qualitative research, they do allow us to
measure the confidence with which they can In any case, research may be purely
be accepted. In some cases, it may happen qualitative or
that the data is scattered or scarce and we
5. CONCLUSIONS
LITERATURE
Anderson, D., Sweeney, D., and Williams, T. (1999): Statistics for Administration and
Economics.
Mexico, International Thomson Publishers.
Azorin, Fy Sánchez-C., J., (1986): Sampling methods and applications. Madrid, Alianza
Editorial.
Berenson, M.L. And Levine, DM, (1996): Basic Statistics in Administration. Mexico, Prentice
Hall Hispanoamericana.
Bernal, C., (2000): Research methodology for administration and economics. Colombia.
Casas Sánchez, JM, (1996): Statistical inference for economics and business administration.
Madrid, Ramón Areces Study Center Publishing House.
Sanchez Houses, J.M., Santos Peñas, J. (1999): Business Statistics, Madrid, Ramón Areces
Study Center Publishing House.
Hildebrand, D.K. and Lyman O. R., (1997): Statistics applied to administration and
economics.
Mexico, Addison-Wesley Iberoamericana.
Ortega Martinez, E., (1992). Business Research Handbook. Madrid, Pyramid Editions.
Perez, G. (1994): Qualitative research. Challenges and questions. Madrid, 21st Century.
Santos Peñas, J. And others, (1999): Design and statistical treatment of surveys for market
studies. Madrid, Ramon Areces.
Uriel, E and Muñiz M., (1993): Economic and business statistics. Madrid, AC.
UNIVERSIT
Y