Indigenous Place Stories
Indigenous Place Stories
net/publication/326661431
CITATIONS READS
0 21
3 authors, including:
Liam M. Brady
Flinders University
45 PUBLICATIONS 393 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Liam M. Brady on 07 May 2020.
This article is dedicated to a close examination of how stories of Indigenous place meaning
come to light, and the pathways by which they travel, both physically (as tangible expressions)
and intellectually (as intangible expressions). It offers a reflection on the epistemic habits that
render these stories audible, visual, and otherwise sensual in the context of one Indigenous
Australian community. Appreciating the communicative pathways that exist in place, and which
reveal the nature of place, is what motivates an ethnographic commitment to Indigenous knowl-
edge in reading meaning in place. We conclude that opening up both anthropology and archae-
ology to plurality in “knowing the place world” illuminates a “poetics of fit” for certain people in
certain places, highlighting the extent to which place has its own empirical order, and identity,
which, with certain epistemic habits, may be read, felt, and known.
Key words: place, Indigenous Australia, agency, ethnography, Indigenous knowledge,
sentiency
This was the strong place, old people, the Law, ceremony,
and fun too, fun dances and singing all night and
stories, many stories, Malarndarri grew us up
—(Annie Karrakayn [Bradley fieldnotes, 1982])
Submitted February 21, 2017; accepted May 28, 2017; published online July 27, 2018.
Journal of Anthropological Research (Fall 2018). © 2018 by The University of New Mexico.
All rights reserved. 0091-7710/2018/7403-000X$10.00
000
from the northwest Kimberley region of northern Australia: “We humans did not
make the world with our own hands.” As such, the processes that bring place into
being are “not reducible to either the practical consciousness or the physical capabil-
ities of individual human beings” (Redmond 2001:120). Operating in this context
are logics of place agency, intentionality, and place’s transformative capacity.
Place agency and sentience hold on, even transmogrify relative to a range of con-
ditions that shape the character, mood, and distinctive qualities of place. Part of this
condition is human presence, experience, and ongoing interactions with place, both in
times of cultural certainty and also in periods of change. Place harbors human life in
the good times and bad, and it may come to carry signs of life’s joys and hardships.
In fact, a vast range of human experiences may be represented in place through inscrip-
tion and markers of play, family life, resistance, and struggle (e.g., David and Wilson
2002a, 2002b; Whitridge 2004). They also come to reside in narrative form, as the
corpus of a group’s social memory. When aligned, these forms of inscription distinguish
place as both an agent of meaning and a harborer of stories and human experience.
This article is dedicated to a close examination of how stories of Indigenous place
meaning come to light, and the pathways by which they travel, both physically (as tan-
gible expressions) and intellectually (as intangible expressions). It offers a reflection on
the epistemic habits that render these stories audible, visual, and otherwise sensual in
the context of one Indigenous Australian community. In our discussion we explore the
perceptual capacity of anthropology as a discipline inclined to encounter rich stories of
Indigenous place meaning, and to be privy to those accounts that emerge from Indig-
enous ontologies. A specific reading of place character, and story from Yanyuwa coun-
try in the southwest Gulf of Carpentaria (northern Australia; Figure 1) provides the
ethnographic context and inspiration to advance a methodology for realizing sentiency
and the prevailing power of stories in, and about, place. Informing this research is an
ethnographic method led by decolonizing logic. This safeguards against the “othering”
of Indigenous knowledge or speaking on behalf of Indigenous peoples. It is not dis-
similar to Johnson’s (2012:829) work on a critical pedagogy of place, which “seeks to
decolonize and reinhabit the storied landscape through ‘reading’ the ways in which In-
digenous peoples’ places and environments have been injured and exploited.” Commit-
ment to a decolonizing methodology requires methods that allow for the articulation of
place knowledge as expressed through nested ecology, kincentricity, and emotional ge-
ography. These methods include participating in the place world that is Yanyuwa coun-
try, as led by Yanyuwa invitation and visits to their country; narrations on Yanyuwa
country as performances of kincentricity; embodied encounters with places of substance
(in this case, Malarndarri); and listening closely to what Yanyuwa have to say about place
agency and sentiency—not as metaphor or culturally nuanced perspective, but as “the”
perspective which leads this study.
Decolonizing methodologies of this kind have been inspired by the critiques of the
unequal power that has long defined research and allowed for the alienating of Indig-
enous persons and their knowledge from intellectual inquiry and knowledge produc-
tion (Smith 2012; Zavala 2013). Taking to task the intersecting worlds of Indigenous
peoples and that of research, Smith (2012) and others (e.g., Battiste 2000; Rigney
1999; Zavala 2013) have closely reflected on the “absences,” “silences,” and “invisibil-
ity” of certain people and ideas in the research process. Smith’s work highlights the ex-
tent to which Indigenous knowledge is expert knowledge and has emerged as a vital
intellectual space amid conditions that have largely conspired to silence it through per-
vasive and powerful canons of imperial and colonial thought. Yanyuwa knowledge fea-
tures as a vital part of this research because it makes available a holistic and socially so-
phisticated framework for appreciating the relationship between people and place (see
also Barnhardt and Kawagley 2005; Battiste and Henderson 2000; McGregor 2004;
Nakata and Langton 2009; Rose 2000; Smith 2012).
The place upon which this ethnographic reflection rests is Malarndarri, situated
on the eastern bank of the McArthur River across from the town of Borroloola (Fig-
ure 2). Malarndarri holds a special place in the lives of Yanyuwa men and women;
many elders today recall living here and remember this place as the setting in which
they solidified their adulthood, raising their families on the river bank, surrounded
by extended kin and the presence of Nangurrbuwala—the Hill Kangaroo Ancestral
Beings who moved through here, leaving spring waters in their wake. Established in
1916 by colonial authorities who sought to remove “all ‘unemployed’ Aboriginal
people” (Baker 1990:52, see below) from the nearby central township of Borroloola,
Malarndarri was a permanent Yanyuwa camp until 1969. Yanyuwa were not alone in
the experience of simultaneous exile and containment; neighboring Aboriginal groups,
including those of the Marra and Garrwa language groups, were also forcibly removed
from their country by settler colonial agents.
A sequence of unexpected and tragic events caused the abandonment of Ma-
larndarri (see below), and in the years that followed this place has become central
to Yanyuwa social memory. Whilst it has been left in relative solitude since the early
1970s, it continues to harbor and articulate stories of Yanyuwa life. Malarndarri is a
place with its own social memory. This memory is expressed in the shadowy foot-
prints of old campsites, the remains of children’s playgrounds, and the metamor-
phosed body parts of the ancestral Hill Kangaroos that distinguish this place as one
of great importance. Through a close and considered reading of this place, and a cul-
turally attuned listening to and looking upon Malarndarri through Yanyuwa testi-
monies, we seek to articulate a particular relationship with place, one with the capacity
to assist anthropologists in their navigation and appreciation of place meaning and its
meaningfulness to people today.
gagement informed by the past but also oriented toward a future and present moment
(Emirbayer and Mische 1998:962). Agency invokes a sense of movement and sparked
motivation, intentionality, will, purposiveness, and creativity (Emirbayer and Mische
1998:962). For the most part associated with human beings, depending on the episte-
mic space in which one operates, agency can also be found distinguishing the lives and
existences of nonhuman agents and presences in the world. When agency is recog-
nized in place, it is possible to configure relationships of interaction, intentionality,
and communication between and among people and the places they call home. In
the context of Indigenous place meaning, what distinguishes place relations is kinship
and an ability for both humans and places to enact and extend kinship. Intentionality
is also embedded in place names that transcend human objectivation (see Bradley and
Yanyuwa Families 2010:134–35). Rose (2000:105) describes this concept of related-
ness as
the meat of life, situating people’s bodily presence in shared projects that link
human and nonhuman interests around intersecting and crosscutting contexts
of tracks, countries, totems and sites. Every discrete category is linked to other
discrete categories through kinship, and is crosscut by other discrete categories;
thus the concept of exclusivity is both sustained (because categories are dis-
crete), and demolished (because they are crosscut). This system links species,
places, and regions and leaves no region, place, species or individual standing
outside of creation, life processes and responsibilities.
People talk about country in the same way they talk about a person: they speak
to country, sing to country, visit country, worry about country, feel sorry for
country, and long for country. People say that country knows, hears, smells,
takes notice, takes care, is sorry or happy. Country is not a generalised or undif-
ferentiated type of place, such as one might indicate with terms like “spending
the day in the country” or “going up the country.”
Whilst often representative of localized settings and local knowledge, some themes
related to place meaning emerge across the literature. Cajete (1986:17–18, 2000) in-
dicates that strands of connectedness do exist across Indigenous thought, a view bal-
anced by Battiste and Henderson’s (2000:41) reflection that “given the existing eco-
logical diversity, a corresponding diversity of Indigenous languages, knowledge, and
heritages exists.” Some of the key principles include knowledge of and belief in unseen
powers, knowledge that all things contained in the world and ecosystem are dependent
on one another, and knowledge that personal relationships reinforce the bond among
people, place, and all other elements (Battiste and Henderson 2000:42–43). This
means that place itself is a dynamic and relational structure in which human life is al-
ready embedded, rather than a static object over which “ownership” or narrative con-
trol can be asserted (Malpas 2009). In the seminal work Wisdom Sits in Places (Basso
1996:70), an Apache man reflects, “Wisdom sits in places. It’s like water that never
dries up. You need to drink water to stay alive, don’t you? Well, you also need to drink
from places. You must remember everything about them.” In describing a “Native Sci-
ence” approach to place, Tewa scholar Greg Cajete (2000:41) refers to an intellectual
commitment that requires “mutual reciprocity, [and] which presupposes a responsibil-
ity to care for, sustain, and respect the rights of other living things, plants, animals, and
the place in which one lives.” The universe thus becomes a “living breathing entity,”
“considered to be ‘alive,’ animate and imbued with ‘spirit’ or energy” (Cajete 2000:41,
75). Conveying a form of animism, coupled with perspectivism and distinctivism,
place is alive and imbued with its own character, spirit, mood, and energy. The earth
and all of its physical features are perceived as a “living soul” (Cajete 2000:186) as well
as a “living, breathing entity” (Cajete 2000:41) that has the power to move, create, and
destruct.
Rose (2001) describes the action and agency of Ancestral Beings that created Indig-
enous Australian territories and homelands. Everything that exists in the world is alive:
“animals, trees, rains, sun, moon, some rocks and hills, and people are all conscious.
So too are other beings such as the Rainbow Snake, the Hairy People, and the Stumpy
Men. All have a right to exist, all have their own places of belonging, all have their
own Law and culture” (Rose 1996:23). Place is held to be bursting with life (Rose
1996:24); it is richly animate, cognizant, and visceral. The beings are described as
back and looked ahead, and still travelled, changing languages, changing songs,
changing skin (Rose 2000:104).
catalyst for a process of “coming in” (voluntary or forced relocation into areas of co-
lonial settlement) and increased welfare dependency for Aboriginal people in the re-
gion (see Baker 1999). Yanyuwa resisted the pressures of colonial violence and expan-
sion by largely remaining in country and seeking safety and autonomy on the islands
and coastal reaches of their homelands rather than relocating to Borroloola. This re-
sistance eventually proved difficult to maintain as the colonial desire for lands and con-
trol over the region escalated. Intermittent visits to Borroloola throughout the early
twentieth century, drawn by government welfare and food rations, were replaced by
increasingly centralized and permanent settlement across the river from the township
throughout the 1950s and 1960s. Malarndarri, as a camping place, was established
in 1916 by the local police as a way of segregating or moving Aboriginal people away
from Borroloola, and it remained a major camp until 1969.
Malarndarri’s proximity to Borroloola facilitated some degree of lifestyle change
and allowed for choice in terms of individual and group engagement with incoming
colonial agents and their provisions, yet its location across the river afforded a healthy
distance from the dysfunction of a colonial frontier town and ensured cultural auton-
omy and safety for many Yanyuwa (Baker 1999:155). Despite restrictions placed on
Malarndarri’s residents by government authorities, such as dusk-to-dawn curfews,
Baker (1999:155) reports that a significant feature of life at Malarndarri was the au-
tonomy of the people living there. People recall the independence they enjoyed and
the authority of “Aboriginal bosses” and “councils of elders” in camp life (Baker
1999:155). What overwhelmingly characterizes social memories about the years at
Malarndarri are accounts of freedoms, the pervasiveness of Aboriginal Law in govern-
ing everyday life, and the connectedness people maintained to hunting and gather-
ing, and moving across country in accordance with kinship rules and obligations.
Malarndarri was a place steeped in Law itself and thus was capable of supporting
Yanyuwa life in the best ways possible—something that many Yanyuwa people then
and still today feel cannot be achieved within Borroloola, where most Yanyuwa now
reside.
Places such as Malarndarri are ordered in ways that inherently dispose them to a
Yanyuwa way of life; they have a “poetics of fit,” which resonates with kinship and
Law (see Rose 2014 for an extended discussion). The following Yanyuwa testimonies
of life at Malarndarri illustrate this principle:
In the old days they all made their camp at that place we call Malarndarri. The
women would go and draw water from the spring water amongst the rocks; it
was clean clear spring water that was always there. The men would go down-
stream and hunt for kangaroo and we women would go out and hunt for wild
honey, goannas, long-necked turtle and blue tongues, while other men would
go down to the sea and bring back dugong and sea turtle. At night the moon
would be shining like a lantern. It was a beautiful place, there was no grog [al-
cohol], they never carried grog to that place, and we were there contented all
through the night. The moon would come out and shine across the broad ex-
panse of the river, shining brightly; it was a beautiful place (Bella Charlie in
Yanyuwa Families et al. 2003:242).
Malarndarri camp, well, that place is where I was born. Mum even remembers
that bloodwood tree. She says that every year, she still remembers. My last
memory of that place is canoes. They was parked all the way along Malarndarri
there. I used to love those boat, the canoes, they were comfortable and long,
you didn’t have to jump around to just sit, like this new model boat, you just
sit in there and have your little arms out. Now you think, what are they doing,
crocodiles around. And they were fit and healthy you know, looking back at
the olden time photos, oh some of them, so strong. They were strong because
of that place—simple, that’s what it was (Roddy Friday Jr. [Kearney fieldnotes,
2002]).
See, this was the basketball court, church right next to it and then on the other
side place for fighting, you know proper way boomerang and fighting stick,
same place for Kulyukulyu ceremony, Yalkawarru ceremony, and a-Marndiwa,
big business that way east, I went through business here [men’s initiation], too
many stories here, too many memories, you know the other side river, you
know where we live now is fuck all! (Stanley Matthews [Bradley fieldnotes,
1985]).
You know we talk about this Malarndarri but people forget, white people made
that place, forced us across the river, rounded us up like a bullock, like a com-
pound, but you know it was good for us because white man left us alone and we
sang and danced every kind of ceremony, even missionary couldn’t stop us
(Mussolini Harvey [Bradley fieldnotes, 1988]).
As part of his research into Yanyuwa oral histories in the 1980s, Richard Baker
also recorded people’s feelings about life at Malarndarri, testimonies that reveal a no-
ticeable preference for Malarndarri over their current home at Borroloola. During a
visit to Malarndarri, Bella Marrajabu commented, “We should camp long here . . .
we don’t like it there amongst the whiteman,” while Eileen Yakibijna stated, “More
better here we’ve got to come back soon” (Baker 1990:56).
Beginning in 1969 a series of events significantly impacted the Yanyuwa commu-
nity and its cultural life, ultimately affecting language use and living patterns. A vir-
ulent form of influenza spread through the Yanyuwa camp, causing the deaths of
many elders (Kirton 1988:5); the camp was subsequently abandoned, although sev-
eral “satellite” camps were established until further deaths prompted complete dis-
bandment of Malarndarri. The breakdown in camp life was accelerated in 1974
when the community was affected by major floods, which led to further residential
dislocation (Kirton 1988:5). Social memory of this time remains strong among
present-day elders, who recall desperate efforts to make sense of illness and seek
remedies for them from their existing suite of medicinal knowledge. The loss of
life as critical mass in any community, coupled with the loss of political structure
and capacity to transmit powerful knowledge from elders to younger generations,
had a profound effect on Yanyuwa at this time and in years to come.
of its ancestral origins, while the cooking of damper in the rockshelter is explained as
an activity of young girls playing at housekeeping and mimicking family subsistence
practices (Figure 4). Accustomed to the provision of flour, young girls would cook
the damper in little ground ovens, later becoming domestic workers in the region’s
pastoral households. The eating of mangoes is recalled as both the habit of young
people sitting under the mango tree as well as the catalyst for its existence (Figure 6).
Oral tradition has it that one of today’s elders, as a child, ate a mango in the shelter,
brought in from another location. The seed was dropped in situ, and in due course
germinated, eventuating in a large mango tree, which has grown up within the light
recess of this shelter. Today it stands as a grand shock of deep green amid the area’s
native vegetation. These recollections of Malarndarri’s features, including the water-
hole, the rockshelter, and the mango tree, are inflected with a sense of nostalgia and
pragmatism and tell of times of normalcy in everyday Yanyuwa life. Too often eth-
darri says something very specific about the empirical order of this place, its capacity
to hold Yanyuwa people in a Yanyuwa way, and the certainty of safety in changing
times that this location once provided. That everyday life could continue in such a
manner highlights the extent to which people felt at home in this place, and that this
place harbored them in ways that allowed for everyday life to maintain and flourish.
This resonates with Rose’s poetics of fit in that the agentic force—the power of peo-
ple and places to act in a certain way—of Malarndarri was and is aligned with Yan-
yuwa ontology, epistemology, and axiology. It is capable of supporting Yanyuwa life in
this fullest sense because it allows everyday life to continue and has the provisions, an-
cestrally, geographically, ecologically, and socially, to sustain life in this manner.
The poetics of fit between Malarndarri and Yanyuwa families amplified the im-
pact of change and external incursion into Yanyuwa life at this place. As such,
Malarndarri is also the site of memories related to “hard times,” when people faced
challenges from colonial authorities, the introduction of disease and illness by colo-
nial agents, and the realization of the loss of autonomy and attacks on Indigenous
family life. For example, Yanyuwa women recall using song to alert the community
to the arrival of the “welfare car” at Malarndarri. Across Australia, children judged by
colonial authorities to be of mixed descent (Indigenous and non-Indigenous) were
taken from their families and placed into missions and foster homes as part of a na-
tionwide forced removal of the “Stolen Generations.” To warn of their approach at
Malarndarri, the women would sing:
Go quickly,
This is another welfare officer
That is coming from the west
The top of his car is shining
(Composed by Nora Jalirduma, from Yanyuwa Families and Bradley
2016:370)
Bradley has also recorded oral testimonies of hard times associated with the 1969
flu epidemic. Many of these testimonies reflect a great depth of sadness and memo-
ries of this time, infused by feelings of helplessness:
All of the old people were here at Malarndarri, we were all here growing up
with them. The Law was strong at this place, there were still people travelling
to the sea in canoes and people foot walking from here into the east to Manan-
kurra, and people walking from Manankurra to here. It was at the time of the
Borroloola rodeo when all of those old people died. We all had that flu. There
was Amy and her sister Bella and myself; we were cooking bush medicine for
those sick people. We used to lift those sick people up and wash them, then we
would make their beds for them and make them sleep. We would be there
with them with our heads bowed and we would pray over them. Some of the
really sick old men and women we would take them in dugout canoes to the west
bank of the river and Mr. Stretton the missionary he would wait for us in his
truck. We would carry them to that truck and we would take them to the mis-
sion house and we would give them medicine. There were deaths from that great
sickness; it was truly very bad. We would carry those old people back over the
river to Malarndarri, but all those old people died. We couldn’t cry because
too many of them died all at once, all those old men and women. The police-
man, the missionary, and the Yanyuwa men would carry the bodies on their
beds, carrying them by their sides down to the canoes at the river, and they
would take the bodies downstream to Wumarrawanya. It was there they were
buried. None of us women went to that place, we were alone; only the men they
went there. They died all at once at Malarndarri. They died from that great sick-
ness. . . . It is because of that flu that we left Malarndarri; too many people died.
It is because of that we moved across to the west bank. We never went back; we
stayed on the west bank at Borroloola (Yanyuwa Families et al. 2003:242)
Yanyuwa social memory serves a greater purpose than recalling the past and pre-
vails as an exercise in sense-making, particularly when trying to understand traumatic
events and rapid-onset disasters within the community. That so many people died at
Malarndarri within a brief time frame deeply ruptured the Law of Yanyuwa exis-
tence, which places huge emphasis on the lives of elders and the knowledge they pos-
sess. The loss of elders from unknown causes and catastrophic illness introduced new
elements to the emotional geography of Malarndarri, including fear, grief, and un-
certainty. The shock of these events, which ultimately led to the abandonment of
Malarndarri and the gradual move into Borroloola, brought shock to the bodies
and lives of Yanyuwa, which came with new lifestyles, daily habits, and foods, and
also to Malarndarri, with the sudden absence of its human kin. The joy of Yanyuwa
presence would be replaced by the melancholy induced by their absence. In Yan-
yuwa, there is an understanding that people, as kin, lift up place, making it vital,
strong, healthy, and shining, through their daily activities and enduring presence.
The responsive nature of place is that it needs its people. Malarndarri is no exception.
In the years that have followed the abandonment of this place, imprints of its human
presence have endured, and when looked upon by Yanyuwa today, they reawaken
the call and response that distinguishes relationships with place.
Malarndarri’s capacity to hold evidence of the enlivening role of people in places
can be seen in both physical and social memory. Upon visiting Malarndarri, one of
the first features people encounter is a series of long, narrow stone alignments wind-
ing through the rocky landscape in a roughly north-south direction (Figure 7).2 At
first glance these stone arrangements seem similar to others found across the conti-
nent that oftentimes are investigated using archaeological and ethnohistoric research
methods with an emphasis on their antiquity, form, and function. Although stone
alignments in Australia are often linked to ritual and ceremony (e.g., initiations),
and in some cases are known and remembered for their role as turtle lookouts and
“increase sites” (e.g., David et al. 2004; McIntyre-Tamwoy and Harrison 2004; O’Con-
nor et al. 2007), they have also been discussed in contemporary contexts focusing on
their role in the political sphere as symbols of the reconciliation process between In-
digenous and non-Indigenous people (Ross 2008). However, at Malarndarri, the
stone alignments have an entirely different character, one which further highlights
the nature and depth of people’s relationships to, and memoires of, place. In this case,
attempts to investigate the stone’s cosmological and political meanings must be sus-
pended, because the alignments here are the product of children at play. Yanyuwa oral
histories collected by the authors over the past 37 years from men and women who
lived at Malarndarri recount that the stones were collected by boys from across the
landscape to construct a “motor car” race track or “highway” where boys and girls
would then race “billy cars”3 constructed from old tin cans (tinned beef, flour, pow-
dered milk, syrup, etc.) filled with sand and “driven” (pushed or pulled) along the track
by attaching a long metal wire to the can (Figure 8). Along the way, “drivers” would
stop to pay a “toll” (consisting of small pebbles) at a small, strategically positioned
flat-topped rock. The inspiration for these race tracks came in the 1930s when exten-
sive roadworks were being undertaken near Borroloola to facilitate access to Darwin,
as well as the construction of an airstrip near the township. Children witnessed bull-
dozers carving new roads through the landscape and emulated these activities by con-
structing their own roads using stones to outline their racetrack.
Memories of the racetrack and children racing their billy cars along the landscape
evoke a range of emotions among people who remember this activity. Most notably,
people remember the happiness and fun associated with playing games, but also sad-
ness since such activities are rarely played in town today. Johnson Timothy and Don
Miller, two senior Yanyuwa men who worked with Bradley in the 1980s and 1990s,
commented on children’s play at Malarndarri:
That motor car business, up there, that started when I was a young man, I did
not play, I would go and look at them kid, lot of fun they were having, track
everywhere, proper highway number one, makes me really sorry, there were a
lot of good times over there, no whitefella humbug ( Johnson Timothy [Brad-
ley fieldnotes, 1990]).
Oh dear me! This one place, this one place alone I remember, it is here I grew
up with the old people, it was here that I saw the Law. It was a strong place,
and when I was little and silly I played motorcars up there on the rocks (Don
Miller [Bradley fieldnotes, 1982]).
People hunted and gathered, collected seeds, shared food, performed ceremo-
nies, eloped, bore children, fought, died, and so on. Such activities came to be
associated or memorialized—for the actors and their relatives—in the places
they occurred, and passage or residence through these areas invariably recalls
the happenings. In this way, through human action, places acquire—or
“gather”—meanings from lived experiences.
The description of events and activities that occur at particular places in the Central
Desert is equally relevant to Malarndarri. Here, the stories of seemingly mundane
experiences and memories involving racetracks, showers, and shelters for cooking
damper reflect what Myers (2000:100) refers to as “a sense of relation to the place.”
These experiences and memories are central to the process of recognizing and appre-
ciating the nature and depth of people’s relationships, which continue to anchor
Yanyuwa’s attachment to Malarndarri. Myers’s discussion is focused on the “tradi-
tional” movements of a desert-based hunter-gatherer society. The Malarndarri case
study and the narratives linked to it have a different character, shaped by different
forces, yet still grounded in everyday actions and experiences, as well as in Yanyuwa
cosmology.
The events and memories that have come to shape people’s relationships with
Malarndarri are also similar to findings of studies that focus on how place acquires
meaning, most notably in the Jawoyn community near Katherine in the Northern
Territory. Ralph and Smith (2014) have investigated the relationship between graffiti
and place in the context of social and political upheaval in Jawoyn country. With the
introduction of the Northern Territory Emergency Response Act (also referred to as
“The Intervention” or NTER) in 2007 by the federal government, new regulations
meant consumption of alcohol in Aboriginal communities became highly restricted
(see e.g., Toohey 2008). The Jawoyn responded to the new rules by constructing
steel shelters just beyond the limits of the liquor restrictions, not just as places to con-
sume alcohol free of strict government regulations but also where people could meet
and interact, wait for rides, and so on. Ralph and Smith (2014:82) note that graffiti is
most likely a “secondary outcome” of people’s visits to the steel shelters, but that
nonetheless it is a significant marker that constructs meaning in and of place.
The steel shelters represent a place that becomes meaningful through inscriptions
or “tags” (names, initials, illustrations, statements, etc.) that reference individual and
group identity. The shelters can also be considered a new place, one born out of co-
lonial policy whose identity is slowly being shaped through the social practice of graf-
fiti. Much like at Malarndarri, relationships with a place and the acts that help con-
struct these relationships were created as a result of dramatic and rapid social and
cultural changes pursuant to colonial policy. Despite the restrictions placed on Yan-
yuwa movement at Malarndarri, they continued the songs, ceremonies, and subsis-
tence practices that would normally have been performed on the islands or across
the neighboring savannah grasslands. While the actions of Jawoyn and Yanyuwa
people—graffiti and ongoing cultural practices, respectively—could be viewed in
the broader context of resistance, they are also acts of cultural assertion which are
pivotal in reinforcing or establishing new relationships to place—that is, the peo-
ple’s tangible and intangible expressions reveal the identity of a place.
In the opening paragraphs of this article, we stated that place agency and sentience
holds on, even transmogrifies relative to a range of conditions that shape a place’s
unique character and mood. One of these conditions is presence of and ongoing hu-
man interactions with place, both in times of cultural certainty and also in periods of
change.
The story of Malarndarri, a vital part of Yanyuwa country and emotional geogra-
phy, highlights the particular histories and experiences that define human and place-
Malarndarri makes most sense when told in a Yanyuwa way, for it is a Yanyuwa ep-
istemic habit that renders it audible, visual, and otherwise sensual. There is a huge
lesson in this for those disciplines that seek to understand human interactions with
place, in both the past and present. As Gero (2015:9) notes, what we learn is directly
linked to how we work, and this in turn directly reflects our intellectual, social, pro-
fessional, and personal worlds. “Like other scientists, archaeologists write as though
objects, facts, sometimes even laws, are givens, and that such facts and laws merely
await the timely revelation of their existence by devoted scholars.” We are inclined,
she writes, “to think of our facts as being removed from any human agency that was
responsible for having produced them” (2015:9). So too we might overlook the role
of other agents in the making of our world and the meanings it invariably contains.
Appreciating the communicative pathways that exist in place, and that reveal the
nature of place, is what motivates an ethnographic commitment to Indigenous knowl-
edge as shown throughout this article. This commitment, imbued with decolonizing
logic, allows for complex encounters that challenge the anthropologist or archaeologist
by way of presenting ambiguity (Gero 2015:13). This ambiguity is not problematic;
rather it is ontological and epistemological—things that resist certitude and might re-
flect the limits of our experience. This is found in the ongoing importance of Malarn-
darri despite people’s absence from this place for some time now. So too it is found in
the proximity of this place, yet also in the distance it afforded historically from the
agents of settler colonialism. When encountering place, whether marked clearly by
tangible indicators of human presence or held strong in the minds of its kin, silences
may befall an intercultural encounter with it. In which case, when seeking to under-
stand the importance of place, or the substance of place, we must be prepared to listen
and attempt to understand what we simply don’t know (Gero 2015:13). Plurality is
key here, and this raises at least three substantive points for anthropological and ar-
chaeological reflection about place:
• Landscape “features” (i.e., shelters, stone alignments, mango trees) need not be
described only according to their morphology; rather, through careful investiga-
tion they can reveal certain identities in place and time.
• Place has its own empirical order, and identity, which, with certain epistemic
habits, may be read, felt, and known.
• Place has the capacity to reveal itself and the effects of presence and absence of
humans.
In closing, this article promotes an increased awareness of, and sensitivity to, place
agency and sentiency that might expand the perceptual capacity of broader human
life to configure place as a sentient co-presence, to which we are but one relational
element, albeit a very important one. A shift of this kind, in perceptual capacity, in-
vokes the willingness to be with another in a manner which shifts the self and to
practice a critical intimacy as an ethical way of coming to know the intimacy of place.
NOTES
We wish to acknowledge Yanyuwa contributions to this research; in particular we
are indebted to those who have been our teachers over the past 35 years, including
Johnson Timothy, Mussolini Harvey, Nora Jalirduma, Bella Charlie, Don Miller,
Stanley Matthews, Annie Karrakayn, Dinah Norman, Graham Friday, Jemima Mil-
ler, Roddy Friday Jr., Nancy McDinny, and Stewart Hoosen. From as early as the
1980s through to 2016 they have shared with us their experiences of living at Ma-
larndarri and of moving across their country throughout the southwest Gulf of Car-
pentaria. Thank you also to two anonymous reviewers and the editor of JAR for their
thoughtful comments and suggestions, which have improved this paper. This re-
search was funded by an Australian Research Council Discovery (DP1093341) grant
awarded to the authors and Ian McNiven.
1. For Yanyuwa, ardirri, the spirit children who inhabit the land and sea, are un-
derstood as placed in the earth by ancestral beings. Yanyuwa exclaim, for example,
rra-mangaji rra-kuridi kanda-yibarranthaninya ardirri nguthundu barra baji Wuman-
thala, which translates to “the Groper ancestor she placed spirit children there to the
north in that place Wumanthala” (Yanyuwa Families and Bradley 2016: 399, 408).
This spirit child, once born and inhabiting the body of a living person, is held to
reside deep within the bones of an individual, those being the least corruptible part
of a person (Yanyuwa Families and Bradley 2016:399, 408). This spirit child, a con-
stitutive part of place, hence resides in the bones of a Yanyuwa person, taking the
mutual constitution of people and place to a profound level.
2. Bradley has collected information about a second stone arrangement in the
shape of an airplane that children used to sit in and pretend to fly. This stone ar-
rangement could not be relocated.
3. The term “billy” is used in Aboriginal English to refer to an empty tin can
(tinned beef, flour, powdered milk, syrup etc.); a “billy” is most commonly used to
boil water for tea over an open fire but can have other uses such as the one discussed
here (see “Meanings and origins of Australian words and idioms,” Australian National
Dictionary Centre: http://andc.anu.edu.au/australian-words/meanings-origins/b).
R E FE R E N C E S C I T E D
Ashmore, Wendy, and A. Bernard Knapp, eds. 1999. Archaeologies of landscape: Contemporary
perspectives. Malden: Blackwell.
Baker, Richard. 1990. Coming in? The Yanyuwa as a case study in the geography of contact
history. Aboriginal History 14(1):25–60.
———. 1999. Land is life: From bush to town, the story of the Yanyuwa people. St. Leonards,
UK: Allen and Unwin.
Barnhardt, Ray, and Angayuqaq Kawagley. 2005. Indigenous knowledge systems and Alaska
Native ways of knowing. Anthropolog y and Education Quarterly 36(1):8–23.
Basso, Keith. 1996. Wisdom sits in places: Landscape and language among the Western Apache.
Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
Battiste, Marie. 2000. “Introduction: Unfolding the lessons of colonization,” in Reclaiming in-
digenous voice and vision. Edited by Marie Battiste, pp. xvi–xxx. Vancouver, BC: UBC Press.
Battiste, Marie, and James Youngblood Henderson. 2000. Protecting Indigenous knowledge and
heritage: A global challenge. Saskatoon: Purich.
Bender, Barbara. 2002. Time and landscape. Current Anthropolog y 43(4):103–12.
Bradley, John. 2001. “Landscapes of the mind, landscapes of the spirit: Negotiating a sentient
landscape,” in Working on country: Indigenous environmental management of Australia’s lands
and coastal regions. Edited by Richard Baker, Jocelyn Davies, and Elspeth Young, pp. 295–
304. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.
Bradley, John, and Yanyuwa Families. 2010. Singing saltwater country: Journey to the songlines
of Carpentaria. Crows Nest: Allen and Unwin.
Bradley, Richard. 1998. The significance of monuments: On the shaping of human experience in
Neolithic and Bronze Age Europe. London: Routledge.
———. 2000. An archaeolog y of natural places. London: Routledge
Brady, Liam M., and John Bradley. 2016. “Who do you want to kill?” Relational and affectual
understandings at a sorcery rock art site in the southwest Gulf of Carpentaria, northern Aus-
tralia. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 22(4):884–901.
Cajete, Gregory. 1986. Science: A Native American perspective. A culturally based science educa-
tion curriculum. PhD dissertation, International College, Los Angeles.
———. 2000. Native science: Natural laws of interdependence. Santa Fe: Clear Light.
Casey, Edward. 1996. “How to get from space to place in a fairly short stretch of time: Phe-
nomenological prolegomena,” in Sense of Place. Edited by Steven Feld and Keith Basso,
pp.13–52. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
Cruikshank, Julie. 2005. Do glaciers listen? Local knowledge, colonial encounters, and social imag-
ination. Vancouver: UBC Press.
David, Bruno. 2002. Landscapes, rock-art and the dreaming: An archaeolog y of preunderstanding.
London: Leicester University Press.
David, Bruno, and Julian Thomas, eds. 2008. Handbook of landscape archaeolog y. Walnut
Creek: Left Coast Press.
David, Bruno, and Meredith Wilson. 2002a. “Spaces of resistance: Graffiti and Indigenous
place markings in the early European contact period of northern Australia,” in Inscribed land-
scapes: Marking and making place. Edited by Bruno David and Meredith Wilson, pp. 42–60.
Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
———, eds. 2002b. Inscribed landscapes: Marking and making place. Honolulu: University of
Hawai’i Press.
David, Bruno, Ian J. McNiven, and Bryce Barker, eds. 2006. The social archaeolog y of Austra-
lian Indigenous societies. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press.
David, Bruno, Ian McNiven, Mura Badulgal (Torres Strait Islanders) Corporation, Joe Crouch,
and Liam Brady. 2004. The Argan stone arrangement complex, Badu Island: Initial results
from Torres Strait. Australian Archaeolog y 58:1–6.
Deloria, Vine. 1994. God is red: A native view of religion. Golden, CO: Fulcrum.
Emirbayer, Mustafa, and Ann Mische. 1998. What is agency? American Journal of Sociology
103(4):962–1023.
Gero, Joan. 2015. Yutopian: Archaeology, ambiguity, and the production of knowledge in north-
west Argentina. University of Texas Press.
Johnson, Jay. 2012. Place-based learning and knowing: Critical pedagogies grounded in
Indigeneity. GeoJournal 77:829–36.
Kahn, Miriam. 2011. Tahiti beyond the postcard: Power, place, and everyday life. Seattle: Uni-
versity of Washington Press.
Kearney, Amanda. 2009. Before the old people and still today: An ethnoarchaeology of Yanyuwa
places and narratives of engagement. Melbourne: Australian Scholarly Publishing.
———. 2016 Violence in place: Cultural and environmental wounding. Abingdon, UK: Rout-
ledge.
Kirton, Jean. 1988. Men’s and women’s dialects. Aboriginal Linguistics 1:111–25.
Langton, Marcia. 2002. “The edge of the sacred, the edge of death,” in Inscribed landscapes:
Marking and making place. Edited by Bruno David and Meredith Wilson M, pp. 253–
69. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
Layton, Robert. 1997. “Representing and translating people’s place in the landscape of northern
Australia,” in After writing culture: Epistemology and praxis in contemporary anthropology. Edited
by Allison James, Jenny Hockey and Andrew Dawson, pp. 122–43. New York: Routledge.
———. 1999. “The Alawa totemic landscape: Ecology, religion and politics,” in The archae-
ology and anthropolog y of landscape: Shaping your landscape. Edited by Peter J. Ucko and
Robert Layton, pp. 221–41. London: Routledge.
Malpas, Jeff. 1999. Place and experience: A philosophical topography. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
———. 2009. Place and human being. Environmental and Architectural Phenomenolog y News-
letter 20(3):19–23.
McGregor, Deborah. 2004. Indigenous knowledge, environment and our future. American In-
dian Quarterly 28 (3/4):385–410.
McIntyre-Tamwoy, Susan, and Rodney Harrison. 2004. Monuments to colonialism? Stone
arrangements, tourist cairns and turtle magic at Evans Bay, Cape York. Australian Archae-
olog y 59:31–42.
McNiven, Ian. 2004. Saltwater people: Spiritscapes, maritime rituals and the archaeology of
Australian Indigenous seascapes. World Archaeolog y 35(3):329–49.
Morphy, Howard. 1993. “Colonialism, history and the construction of place: The politics of
landscape in northern Australia,” in Landscape: Politics and perspectives. Edited by Barbara
Bender, pp.205–43. Providence/Oxford: Berg.
Myers, Fred. 1991. Pintupi country, Pintupi self: Sentiment, place, and politics among Western
Desert Aborigines. Berkeley: University of California Press.
———. 2000. “Ways of placemaking,” in Culture, landscape, and the environment: The Linacre
Lectures 1997. Edited by Kate Flint and Howard Morphy, pp. 72–110. Oxford: Oxford Uni-
versity Press.
Nakata, Martin, and Marcia Langton, eds. 2009. Australian Indigenous knowledge and libraries.
Sydney: University of Technology Sydney ePress.
O’Connor, Sue, Len Zell, and Anthony Barham. 2007. Stone constructions on Rankin Island,
Kimberley, Western Australia. Australian Archaeolog y 64:15–22.
Povinelli, Elizabeth. 1993. “Might be something”: The language of indeterminacy in Austra-
lian Aboriginal land use. Man 28 (4):679–704.
Ralph, Jordan, and Claire Smith. 2014. ‘We’ve got better things to do than worry about
whitefella politics”: Contemporary Indigenous graffiti and recent government interventions
in Jawoyn Country. Australian Archaeolog y 78:75–83.
Redmond, Anthony. 2001. “Places that move,” in Emplaced myth: Space, narrative, and knowl-
edge in Aboriginal Australia and Papua New Guinea. Edited by Alan Rumsey and James
Weiner, pp. 120–38. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
Rigney, Lester. 1999. Internationalization of an Indigenous anti-colonial cultural critique of
research methodologies: A guide to Indigenist research methodology and its principles.
Wicazo Sa Review 14 (2):109–21.
Roberts, Tony. 2005. Frontier justice: A history of the Gulf Country to 1900. St Lucia: Univer-
sity of Queensland Press.
Rose, Deborah Bird. 1992. Dingo makes us human: Life and land in an Australian Aboriginal
culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 1996. Nourishing terrains: Australian Aboriginal views of landscape and wilderness.
Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
———. 2000. Dingo makes us human: Life and land in Australian Aboriginal culture, second
ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
———. 2001. “Sacred site, ancestral clearing, and environmental ethics,” in Emplaced myth:
Space, narrative, and knowledge in Aboriginal Australia and Papua New Guinea. Edited by
Alan Rumsey and James Weiner, pp. 99–119. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.
———. 2014. Arts of flow: Poetics of “fit” in Aboriginal Australia. Dialectical Anthropology 38
(4):431–45.
Ross, Anne. 2008. Managing meaning at an ancient site in the 21st century: The Gummi-
ngurru Aboriginal stone arrangement on the Darling Downs, southern Queensland. Oceania
78(1):91–108.
Schmidt, Peter. 2017. Community-based heritage in Africa: Unveiling local research and devel-
opment initiatives. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Smith, Claire. 1999. “Ancestors, place and people: Social landscapes in Aboriginal Australia,”
in The archaeolog y and anthropology of landscape: Shaping your landscape. Edited by Peter J.
Ucko and Robert Layton, pp. 191–207. London: Routledge.
Smith, Linda Tuhiwai. 2012. Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples. New
York: Palgrave.
Strang, Veronica. 1997. Uncommon ground: Cultural landscapes and environmental values. Ox-
ford: Berg.
Taçon, Paul. 1994. Socialising landscapes: The long-term implications of signs, symbols and
marks on land. Archaeolog y in Oceania 29:117–29.
Tamisari, Franca. 2002. “Names and naming: Speaking forms into place,” in The land is a
map: Placenames of Indigenous origin in Australia. Edited by Luise Hercus, Flavia Hodges,
and Jane Simpson, pp. 87–102. Canberra: ANU E Press.
Thomas, Julian. 2012. “Archaeologies of place and landscape,” in Archaeological theory today.
Edited by Ian Hodder, pp. 167– 87. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Toohey, Paul. 2008. Last drinks: The impact of the Northern Territory Intervention. Quar-
terly Essay 30:1–97.
Ucko, Peter J., and Robert Layton, eds. 1999. The archaeology and anthropology of landscape:
Shaping your landscape. London: Routledge.
West, Paige. 2005. Translation, value and space: Theorizing the ethnographic and engaged
environmental anthropology. American Anthropologist 107(4):632–42.
———. 2006. Conservation is our government now: The politics of ecology in Papua New Guinea.
Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Whitridge, Peter. 2004. Landscapes, houses, bodies, things: “Place” and the archaeology of
Inuit imaginaries. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 11(2):213–50.
Wilson, Meredith, and Bruno David. 2002. “Introduction,” in Inscribed landscapes: Marking
and making place. Edited by Bruno David and Meredith Wilson, pp. 1–9. Honolulu: Uni-
versity of Hawai’i Press.
Yanyuwa Families, and John Bradley. 2016. Wuka nya-nganunga li-Yanyuwa li-Anthawirriyarra:
Language for us, the Yanyuwa saltwater people. A Yanyuwa encyclopaedic dictionary. Melbourne:
Australian Scholarly Publishing.
Yanyuwa Families, John Bradley, and Nona Cameron. 2003. Forget about Flinders: An Indig-
enous atlas of the southwest Gulf of Carpentaria. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal
Studies.
Yunupingu, Galarrwuy, ed. 1997. Our land is our life: Land rights – past, present and future.
St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.
Zavala, Miguel. 2013. What do we mean by decolonizing research strategies? Lessons from
decolonizing, Indigenous research projects in New Zealand and Latin America. Decoloniza-
tion: Indigeneity, Education and Society 2(1):55–71.