Lecture 08-09 notes
Lecture 08-09 notes
1
2
b
1111111111111111111111111111111
0000000000000000000000000000000
V2
0000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111
0000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111
0000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111
0000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111
0000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111 A2
b’1111111111111111111111111111111
0000000000000000000000000000000
0000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111
P∆ t 0000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111
2
0000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111
0000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111
0000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111
P2
0000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111
a 0000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111
∆ E2
a’11111111 0000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111
00000000
11111111
00000000 0000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111 c
00000000
11111111
11111111
00000000 0000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111
00000000
11111111
00000000
11111111 0000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111
00000000
11111111
00000000
11111111
E
∆ 1
00000000
11111111 V1 0000000000000000000000000000000
1111111111111111111111111111111
00000000
11111111
00000000
11111111
00000000
11111111
00000000
11111111
c’ V2 ∆ t
z2
00000000
11111111
00000000
11111111
00000000
11111111 1
P1 00000000
11111111
00000000
11111111
00000000
11111111
00000000
11111111
00000000
11111111
00000000
11111111
00000000
11111111
00000000
11111111
A1
00000000
11111111
00000000
11111111
00000000
11111111
00000000
11111111
Pf ∆ t
z1 d’
V1 ∆ t
d
Fig. 1:
r
z1
z2
R
P1 U
P2
V(r)
x
d
Fig. 2:
from the pipe flow rate. The sketch of experimental apparatus and an ex-
ample of the obtained results are illustrated on figure 3. Reynolds found the
linear dependence for low flow rates, when the flow in the pipe is laminar. In
logarithmic coordinates used on the figure this dependence is represented by
the straight line with the slope 1. After the flow rate reaches some critical
value rapid changes of flow characteristics occurs in the narrow region of flow
rates (critical region), and the line inclination decreases. This new behaviour
roughly corresponds to a power low with an exponent n < 1. For these larger
values of flow rates flow in the pipe becomes turbulent leading to significant
changes of flow characteristics. Reynolds found that the divergence from the
laminar behaviour for a pipe flow always starts when the nondimensional
parameter known now as Reynolds number
Ud
Re = , (6)
ν
reaches a certain critical value Rec . This value was found to be about 2300
and does not depends on pipe diameter and could be slightly lower for pipes
with a rough surface.
Extensive experiments for determination of friction factor f for circular
pipes of different diameters and wall roughness carrying flows of various mean
velocities had been carried by L.F.Moody in 1944. The results of these
experiments are represented in the form of Moody diagram (figure 4),
which is widely used for calculating flows trough pipes. It turns out that
friction factor depends on the Reynolds number and on the relative roughness
of the pipe wall k/d.
Regions with different behaviour of f can be observed on the Moody
diagram. For small values of the Reynolds number (laminar flows) the friction
factor does not depends on the wall roughness, and is specified by a simple
formula
16
f= . (7)
Re
In the narrow critical zone flow becomes turbulent and for larger Reynolds
numbers f depends on both Re and k/d (transition zone). For very large
Reynolds numbers (complete turbulence) f depends on k/d only. Moody
diagram can be used to find the flow rate through a given pipe, when a given
pressure difference is applied to pipe ends. For a laminar flow, using (3), (5),
(6) and (7) we obtain the Poiseuille equation:
π R4 ∆P
Q= ,
8µ L
where µ = ρ ν is dynamic viscosity. In the case of complete turbulence,
keeping in mind that f does not depend on Re and therefore is constant for
7
Fig. 4: Moody diagram
8
U2
hf = Kf (8)
2g
where the loss coefficient Kf depends only on the properties of a particular
pipe in the pipeline and does not depend on the flow rate.
Pipes are not the only elements of pipelines where head loss is possible.
The head loss can also occur in pipe fittings, bends, contractions, etc. Flow
rate through a pipeline can be regulated by changing a head loss in valves.
Equation (8) provides the general form of equations used to calculate head
loss in various elements of a pipeline, with a specific empirical (that is found
from an experiment) loss coefficient Kf for each such an element. Examples
of pipe line elements with loss coefficients can be found in the literature.
Pipes in series
If pipes or other elements are connected in series, that is from end to end, the
total head loss is the sum of losses in all individual elements. It is convenient
to express equations (5) and (8) for each element by using the flow rate
Q = A U, which is the same for all elements connected in series. Then the
9
1
.
hf
2
.
z1
z2
Fig. 5:
Example:
Water flows between tanks with water levels z1 and z2 trough two identi-
cal pipes of length l and diameter d (figure 5). The pipes are connected
by an elbow with the loss coefficient K1 = 0.1. Sharp edged inlet and
outlet have the loss coefficients K2 = 0.5 and K3 = 1 respectively. The
friction coefficient f of the pipes is constant for given flow conditions.
Find the flow rate of fluid in the pipes.
For a steady flow the head loss along the path 1–2 should be balanced by
the difference of the total head at points 1 and 2. Pressure at points 1 and
2 is the same, and velocities there are negligibly small. Therefore, only the
potential head contributes to the total head difference. That is
hf = z1 − z2 .
The head loss along the pipes is the sum of individual losses
2
l l U
hf = 4 f + 4 f + K1 + K2 + K3 ,
d d 2g
and the corresponding flow rate is
s
2
πd 2 g ( z1 − z2 )
Q= .
4 4 f (l/d) + K1 + K2 + K3
10
B C
1 2
Fig. 6:
Parallel pipes
The flow divides between two or more pipes and then comes together again.
For such pipe systems the sum of flow rates through individual components
is the entire flow rate through the system
X
Q= Qi .
i
For each element of the parallel pipe system the difference of the total head
between its ends is the same, which means that all elements have the same
head loss
κi Q2i = hh .
For an N-element system (i = 1, 2, 3, . . . N) we usually have an unknown
head loss hf and N unknown flow rates Qi . To find these N + 1 values we
can use N + 1 equations above.
Example:
Two identical pipes A and B have length L and cross section area A.
The pipes are connected in parallel to a pipeline with a constant flow
rate Q (figure 6). A valve C is used to regulate flows through the pipes.
When the valve is fully opened its loss coefficient is K = 0.3. Friction
coefficient f of the pipes is constant under the given flow conditions,
and the losses in fittings are negligible. Find the minimal and the
maximal flow rate trough pipe A.
Head loss in each pipe between 1 and 2 is equal to the difference in the total
heads between these points:
H1 − H2 = hA = hB .
11
QA + QB = Q.
The flow rate QA should be less then Q, therefore we should take the solution
with the minus sign. Maximal QA corresponds to the closed valve (K = ∞),
when all fluid flows through the pipe A: QA = Q. The minimal QA corre-
sponds to the fully opened valve, and its value can be found by substituting
the value of K into the formula (9). Note, that if K = 0 (no extra valve
resistance) both parallel branches are identical, and have the same flow rate
QA = QB = Q/2. Equation (9) gives value QA = Q/2 in the limit K → 0.
Pipe branches
A classical problem with a branching pipeline is the three reservoir prob-
lem illustrated on figure 7. Three reservoirs with different water levels are
connected by three pipes with a junction point 0 and unknown flow rates.
One of the difficulties of the problem is that we usually do not know the
flow direction in one of the branches (branch 3) before solving the problem.
General principles applied for solving the three reservoir problem and other
problems with branching pipes are:
1. The uniqueness of the total head. This means that at each point of a
pipeline the total head have only one value. The important subsequence
of this property is that the value of the total head at a junction point
is the same for all pipes.
1
.
3
.
Q1
Q3
0
z1
Q2
z3
2
.
z0
z2
Fig. 7:
hi = κi Q2i .
Assuming originally the direction of the flow in the pipe 0–3 as shown on the
figure 7 and using the principles stated above we can write:
z1 − H0 = κ1 Q21
H0 − z2 = κ1 Q22
H0 − z3 = κ1 Q23
Q1 = Q2 + Q3 .
H0
∆H
Ps
Fig. 8:
Pumping
A pump can can deliver water to a higher level by transmitting energy tho
the flow. Pumps are characterised by the total head ∆H applied to the fluid,
discharge Q and the shaft horsepower Ps . A particular pump can provide
a head increase ∆H for a discharge Q and requires power Ps on the shaft.
The curve expressing the relationship of the pump discharge and the head
is called the characteristic curve or head curve, and the curve specifying the
required power is the power curve. A typical example of pump characteristics
κ1
κ2
H0
14
Fig. 9: Typical pump characteristics. c BJM Pumps http://www.bjmpumps.com
15
is given on figure 9, where B.H.P. stands for brake horsepower, that is the
power of an engine driving the pump shaft. The power transmitted by a
pump to water flow or water horsepower is specified as
Pw = ρ g Q ∆H,
∆H = H0 + κ Q2 ,
where the value of κ can be regulated by the valve, which will change the
flow in the pipeline. The problem can be solved graphically, by plotting the
parabola of the required head H0 + κ Q2 on the pump diagram and finding
its intersection with the characteristic curve of the pump.
Quasi-steady flows
The energy equation have been derived for the case of a steady flow. For a
flow in a pipeline this means that flow rates and heads at different points of
the pipeline do not depend on time. However, if flow changes very slowly
and unsteady effects can be neglected, we can apply the steady flow energy
equation with sufficient accuracy at any instant during the process. Unsteady
flows with slowly changing parameters which can be assumed steady at each
time moment are called quasi-steady flows. For example, if a tank with a
large area of water surface A (figure 10) is drained through a pipe of a much
smaller cross section a the water level in the tank will change very slowly
and we can calculate the flow rate Q through the pipe at each time instant t
by taking the current value of the water level Z(t) and applying the steady
flow energy equation as if Z was constant:
U2
H1 − H3 = K ,
2g
where the total heads of the water surface in the tank of the jet at the pipe
outlet are
Pa U2 Pa
H1 = Z + and H3 = +
ρg 2g ρg
16
Z1 A 1
.
Z(t)
2
Z2 Q ( t ) = − A dZ / dt
a
3
Fig. 10:
respectively, and K is the total loss coefficient of the pipeline including fric-
tion losses in the pipe, fittings losses, entry losses, etc. This gives
Q2
Z(t) = (1 + K) ,
2 a2 g
and using the relation between the flow rate and the water level Q = −A dZ/dt
we obtain the following differential equation describing the evolution of the
water level in the tank:
r
dZ a 2g p
=− Z(t) .
dt A 1+K
We can see that when the value of the area ratio a/A is small and the water
level Z(t) is not too big, then the non-stationary term dZ/dt is small and
the application of the steady flow energy equation is justified. This equation
can be used to calculate the time required to change the level of water in the
tank from the initial level Z(0) = z1 to any given level Z(t) = z:
s Zz s
A 1+K dZ A 1+K √ √
t=− √ = ( z1 − z ) .
a 2g Z a 2g
z1
This equation can also be used to determine the level z left after a given time
t has elapsed.