Firefly

Executive Summary
Prepared by

Firefly – Independent Sexual Abuse Investigations1

Investigation of Mike Bickle2 and the

International House of Prayer Kansas City3

February 3, 2025

1
Hereafter, we utilize the acronym FIREFLY
2
Hereafter, we use the name BICKLE
3
Hereafter, we utilize the acronym IHOPKC

1
 Index

3 Introduction
6 Scope and Methodology
7 Investigative Process
9 Allegations of sexually abusive misconduct by Mike Bickle in his association with the
International House of Prayer, Kansas City, MO
13 Manipulative and Sophisticated Grooming Tactics
19 Gaining Access and Isolating the Victim
20 Trust Development and Keeping Secrets
22 Controlling Behavior
25 Desensitization to Touch
28 Sexual Behavior
29 Prophetic Manipulation
34 Other Staff at IHOPKC Involving Sexual Misconduct and Coverups
43 Executive Leadership Team Concerns
46 Face-to-Face with the Abusers
49 Reporting – Staff
50 Reporting – Victims
52 Outside the Scope
54 IHOPKC Child, Youth, and Worker Protection Policy
56 Conclusions
55 Implementation Strategies
57 Supporting Documents

2
INTRODUCTION

The following report summarizes the information gathered throughout this investigation,
including witness interviews and documentation. It is based on multiple interviews with
witnesses, alleged offenders, and other individuals with direct knowledge of the events that
occurred.

FIREFLY has received two hundred twenty-four (224) intakes through various channels,
including online survey responses, emails, and phone calls. Only three submissions were made
anonymously through the survey.

We have been able to identify and interview thirty-two (32) Interviewed Survivors4 (IS) who
were sexually abused or experienced sexually abusive misconduct during their time at IHOPKC.

The credibility of this report is founded on the collective and corroborating testimony of the
experiences of the victims and witnesses. It is not reliant on any single experience or victim, but
rather on the consistent and overlapping accounts that paint a comprehensive picture of the
systemic issues and misconduct within IHOPKC. This approach ensures that no single testimony
is isolated, but instead, is part of a larger narrative that illustrates the extent and severity of the
issues. This collective testimony strengthens the report's validity and highlights the urgent need
to address the identified problems and implement changes to create a safer and more supportive
environment.

By considering the combined voices of multiple individuals, the report highlights patterns of
abuse, cover-ups, and failures within the leadership. The corroborated accounts provide a
powerful foundation for advocating for accountability, transparency, and meaningful reforms
within IHOPKC.

4
Hereafter, we utilize the acronym “IS” for Interviewed Survivor

3
During the investigation, we learned of numerous other potential victims who have been sexually
harassed or experienced sexually abusive misconduct by Bickle and/or other staff on campus.
Many of these accounts are based on hearsay, as we have not directly heard from the victims
themselves; therefore, we will not disclose these stories.

Out of respect and privacy for the women and men interviewed, we will not use their names or
initials in this report unless permission was previously obtained.

Each person was provided the opportunity to be interviewed anonymously, agreeing that their
names and specific stories would not be released due to concerns for their safety unless
permission was granted. This ensures that their personal information remains confidential and
their identities are protected. By maintaining anonymity, we aim to create a safe and trusting
environment where participants can share their stories and experiences freely, without fear of
repercussions. This approach upholds ethical standards and allows for more honest and open
communication. This respectful handling of sensitive information will lead to a more authentic
and impactful report.

Throughout this report, any victims who chose to remain anonymous will be referred to as
“Interviewed Survivors” (IS). Similarly, all witnesses will be designated as " Interviewed
Witnesses” (IW)5. This approach ensures the privacy and protection of individuals involved
while maintaining clear identification for reference purposes.

Staff members implicated in sexual abuse or misconduct during the investigation will be
designated as, "Accused Staff Member"6 (ASM). This designation aims to clearly identify
individuals under scrutiny and ensure that appropriate measures are taken to address the
allegations. By implementing this designation, we hope to maintain transparency and
accountability throughout the investigation process.

5
Hereafter, we utilize the acronym “IW” for Interviewed Witness
6
Hereafter, we utilize the acronym “ASM” for Accused Staff Member

4
During the investigation, potential victims were not solicited from lists provided by groups,
organizations, or individuals. Every Interviewed Survivor (IS) and Interviewed Witness (IW)
included in the report independently and voluntarily came forward to share their story. All
victims listed in the report were interviewed by phone, via Zoom, or in person. In-person
interviews were conducted during five trips to the Kansas City, Colorado Springs, and
Minneapolis areas. Additionally, FIREFLY supplemented these efforts with phone and Zoom
interviews. This emphasizes the genuine and self-initiated nature of their disclosures, free from
external solicitation or influence.

Victims often choose not to disclose their experiences for various reasons, and we do not want to
re-traumatize anyone unwilling to share their story. Factors found to influence delayed disclosure
decisions can include guilt, shame, and self-blame following the abuse.7

The silence of these victims stresses the gravity of the situation and highlights the need for a
supportive and transparent environment where victims can feel safe to speak out. The courage of
those who have come forward is commendable, but it also brings to light the stories of countless
others who may still be suffering in silence.

Throughout the investigation, no restrictions were placed on FIREFLY, ensuring complete

autonomy. Moreover, no group or individual has attempted to sway or influence the course of the
investigation. Additionally, the names of victims and witnesses have remained confidential and
have not been shared with anyone during the investigation. This steadfast commitment to
impartiality and privacy underscores the integrity of our investigative process.

Throughout the investigation, FIREFLY meticulously reviewed and analyzed over 6,000
documents directly related to this case. These documents were obtained from numerous groups
and organizations, both public and private, and individuals with direct knowledge of BICKLE

7
McGill L, McElvaney R. Adult and Adolescent Disclosures of Child Sexual Abuse: A Comparative Analysis. J
Interpers Violence. 2023 Jan;38(1-2):NP1163-NP1186. doi: 10.1177/08862605221088278. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
PMID: 35481775; PMCID: PMC9723505.

5
and IHOPKC. The documents obtained from these groups and individuals provided a
comprehensive overview of the interactions, policies, and practices involving BICKLE and
IHOPKC, shedding light on various aspects of the case.

This report delves into the complex and deeply troubling issue of sexual abuse within the clergy,
examining patterns of behavior, institutional responses, and the profound impact on survivors.
Through interviews with two hundred ten (210) individuals, this report seeks to uncover the
underlying dynamics that have allowed abuse to persist and often go unaddressed. FIREFLY will
take a more comprehensive view of sexual abuse and sexually abusive misconduct to include not
only abuse within the historically narrow understanding of those terms (sexual assault and
battery without consent) but also to include physical and non-physical conduct that a person
suffers, submits to, participates in, or performs due to the deception, manipulation, coercion,
grooming (children and adults) and/or intimidation by another.

SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY

The Engagement Agreement between FIREFLY and Tikkun International8 dated September 5,
2024, specifies the scope of the investigation:

“FIREFLY shall conduct an independent investigation into allegations of sexually

abusive misconduct by Mike BICKLE in his association with the International House of
Prayer, Kansas City, MO (hereinafter referred to as IHOPKC) and others in leadership at
IHOPKC during that time—and whether there were systemic patterns of behavior within
the IHOPKC leadership that contributed to any abuse (if the abuse is confirmed).

FIREFLY shall also investigate the cover-up of any allegation of sexual

abuse/misconduct connected with IHOPKC that was reported to IHOPKC leadership.
This shall include how IHOPKC leadership responded to such allegations brought to
them and how incorrect responses negatively affected victims.”

8
See Engagement Agreement signed by Tikkun International and FIREFLY on September 5, 2024

6
In compliance with the scope of this investigation, FIREFLY created a confidential online
survey that was accessible on the FIREFLY website.9 It was made available to the broader
IHOPKC community (former and active) to assist the investigative team in collecting relevant
information within the scope of this investigation. The purpose of the survey, the scope of the
investigation, and definitions of abuse and misconduct were articulated at the beginning of the
survey.

Through this investigation, FIREFLY conducted two hundred ten (210) initial witness
interviews and twenty-eight (28) reinterviews.

INVESTIGATIVE PROCESS

IHOPKC has seen thousands come through its doors seeking a sanctuary of corporate worship
and intercession. IHOPKC is staffed by prayer leaders, singers, musicians, and worship leaders
who serve as missionaries. Many lives have been touched, and much good has come from the
organization. The prayer room is designed to reflect the Tabernacle of David (1 Chr. 9:33; 22–
24), describing it as a place where they never cease worshiping the Lord and interceding for our
world.10.

IHOPKC is renowned for its continuous prayer and worship, creating a unique spiritual
environment for its attendees. A representative of FIREFLY visited the House of Prayer and
observed the worship and praise activities firsthand to gain deeper insights into their spiritual
practices and community engagement. Given recent concerns, it is crucial to understand the
proactive measures the board is taking to ensure the safety and well-being of church members.
Despite multiple attempts to contact the current board of directors for comments on the proactive
measures implemented within IHOPKC, we have received no responses.

The lack of response from the board members further exacerbates the issue, raising concerns
about the efficacy and sincerity of the proactive measures purportedly in place. IW #45 reported

9
(https://fireflyisai.com)
10
From https://ihopkc.org/ website

7
that, in a meeting, IHOPKC Board Chairman Kurt Fuller stated, “The AGs were liars, and the sex
abuse allegations were consensual.” This statement added to the growing concerns about the
handling of sexual abuse allegations within the organization, raising questions about
accountability and transparency. IW #45 was taken aback by Fuller's remarks and felt compelled
to document the statement. They noted that such comments could have significant implications
for ongoing investigations and the organization's reputation. IW #45's decision to come forward
with this information stemmed from a deep sense of duty to ensure transparency and
accountability within IHOPKC.

The leadership must address these allegations transparently and take concrete steps to ensure the
safety and well-being of all members. The voices of those who remain silent are a powerful
reminder of the work that still needs to be done to create a truly safe and supportive community.
IW #178, when asked what they would like to see after a third-party investigation, replied, “Best
case scenario, the current leaders at IHOPKC choose to be transparent and stop all operations
until the organization has been scrubbed clean of dangerous, predator-protecting practices.”
This sentiment echoes the frustrations of many within the IHOPKC community who feel that
genuine accountability and reform are necessary for restoring trust and fostering a culture of
safety and respect. It highlights the urgent need for IHOPKC leadership to take decisive action
and implement meaningful changes that reflect their commitment to protecting all members.

IHOPKC has indeed faced serious allegations of sexual and spiritual abuse. BICKLE, the
founder, has been accused of misconduct spanning decades involving multiple women. These
allegations highlight a troubling pattern within this particular institution, where abuse was
allowed to persist unchecked, often with perpetrators being protected rather than held
accountable.

This issue is not just a matter of individual misconduct but reflects a broader pattern within
religious institutions. The phrase “sanctuary of sexual predators” in the church highlights the
historical and ongoing problem of religious organizations providing cover for clergy and other

8
religious figures accused of sexual abuse.11 Often, instead of reporting these allegations to proper
authorities, institutions have promoted and transferred perpetrators, allowing them to continue
their abusive behavior. Through the victims and witnesses interviewed, we have found there was
a culture of systematic abuse and coverups that thrived at IHOPKC.

Allegations of sexually abusive misconduct by Mike Bickle in his association

with the International House of Prayer, Kansas City, MO

We have made multiple attempts to contact BICKLE and have been unable to elicit any response
from him.

In an email dated October 23, 2023, at 12:42 PM, Bickle wrote to IW #13, (IS) Deborah
Perkins's husband, reminding him of the Matthew 18 process. Towards the end of the email,
Bickle states, “I am still waiting for the ladies who allegedly have a story to come to me and
Stuart according to Matthew 18:15-18. I am very sure none will come because they do have a
real story. I’m praying.12”

Throughout the investigation, we have identified and interviewed seventeen (17) Survivors who
were either sexually abused or experienced sexually abusive misconduct, including sexual abuse,
rape, clergy abuse, and spiritual abuse, perpetrated by BICKLE beginning to our knowledge in
the mid-1970s. These acts of abuse have had profound and lasting impacts on the lives of the
victims, causing significant emotional, psychological, and spiritual harm. The survivors have
shown immense courage in coming forward to share their experiences despite the fear and
trauma associated with these events.

11
Orleans, A. S. D., Loyola University New. (2023). Child Sex Abusers in Protestant Christian Churches: An
Offender Typology. Journal of Qualitative Criminal Justice & Criminology.
https://doi.org/10.21428/88de04a1.000ff84d
12
See attached October 23, 2023, email

9
On October 28th, 2023, BICKLE called IW #17. According to IW #17, BICKLE stated, “I need
to let you know about a little fire—Deborah Heibert has come forward.” According to IW #17,
BICKLE went on to disclose that when he (BICKLE) and (IS) Deborah Perkins were in Paris,
“he was praying hard with her, and he started kissing her.”

BICKLE also told IW #17 that on another trip, he had booked a hotel for (IS) Deborah Perkins
to stay in for a night, stating that Diane was out of town. BICKLE told IW #17 that he had taken
a shower, and when he got out, he had left the door open, and (IS) Deborah Perkins saw him
completely naked. When IW #17 questioned him about it, BICKLE stated that “he wasn’t the
most righteous man.”

On December 12th, BICKLE admitted to "inappropriate behavior" and "moral failures" that
occurred over 20 years ago. This confession came after allegations of sexual misconduct
emerged, leading to a third-party investigation by IHOPKC. BICKLE expressed deep regret for
his actions and asked for forgiveness, though he denied the more severe accusations against him.

Before the publicly released statement, on or about November 30th, 2023, BICKLE first drafted
the confession letter dated December 1st and addressed it to “family and friends.” BICKLE sent
the letter to IW #12 for review, and it stated below:

To my family and friends, December 1, 2023

“With a very heavy heart I want to express how terribly sorry I am that my past sins have led to
so much pain, confusion, and division in the body of Christ in this hour. I am confessing that 20+
years ago, I sinned by engaging in inappropriate conversations and behavior – my acts of
indiscretions were spontaneous, brief, and rare. (they did not include some of the more intense
sexual activities that some are suggesting), yet I saw my sins as grievous before a holy God.
Since I take sin seriously, on those occasions I quickly and sincerely repented in a way that gave
me assurance with God (ps. 18:35; 51:1). The Lord helped me to respond with a broken and
contrite heart that was filled with Godly sorrow (Ps. 51:17; Cor. 7:10).”

10
The draft statement was revised before the final release, with BICKLE changing, “They did not
include some of the more intense sexual activities that some are suggesting,” to the publicly
released version of, “I am not admitting to the more intense sexual activities that some are
suggesting”. Copies of both correspondences have been obtained through this investigation.

In the final statement made by BICKLE on December 12th, 2023, he stated the following:

“To my family and friends, December 12, 2023

With a very heavy heart I want to express how deeply grieved I am that my past sins have led to
so much pain, confusion, and division in the body of Christ in this hour. I sadly admit that 20+
years ago, I sinned by engaging in inappropriate behavior—my moral failures were real. (I am
not admitting to the more intense sexual activities that some are suggesting). I hate my sin and
I see it as serious and grievous before a holy God. I take all sin seriously, so on those occasions I
quickly and sincerely repented in a way that resulted in receiving assurance from God followed
by a daily resolve to live holy in all of my ways. God graciously helped me to respond in those
times with a broken and contrite heart that was filled with godly sorrow. To this day, I remain
sorrowful about those past failures.

11
12
BICKLE, as a pastor and leader, was entrusted with the care of his congregation's spiritual well-
being; however, he betrayed this trust by misusing his position of authority to engage in sexual
misconduct with multiple victims. His actions not only violated the sanctity of his role but also
caused profound harm to those he was meant to guide and protect. As Dr. Diane Langberg
explains, “Clergy sexual abuse is an abuse of power and desecration of the name of Christ. It is
not an affair, nor is the victim equally culpable. The safety of God's sheep results from His
character not theirs. And so it should be for the broken, confused, wounded sheep and our
communities. They should be safe because of the shepherd's character and where they are not, a
shepherd's character is exposed as being abusive of power, deceptive and clearly unlike the
character of the one he calls master.”13

Manipulative and Sophisticated Grooming Tactics

Before we can address the specific nature of sexually abusive misconduct by BICKLE and his
association with IHOPKC, we must look at the systemic patterns of behavior of a sexual abuse
offender. Through multiple interviews, we were able to observe very distinct patterns that
BICKLE used in the course of his conduct.

Sexual grooming is a manipulative process where an abuser builds a relationship, trust, and
emotional connection with a victim to exploit and abuse them, and it often involves a series of
calculated steps to gain the victim's trust and isolate them from others. Grooming is described as
a deliberate behavior used to manipulate another person over time, intending to erode their
defenses and gain control over their actions. “In essence, grooming is the process of an offender
using gifts, power, or some other enticement to initially sexually abuse and to continue their
abuse.” 14

13
Dr. Diane Langberg, “Sexual Abuse in Christian Organizations”

14
Orleans, A. S. D., Loyola University New. (2023). Child Sex Abusers in Protestant Christian Churches: An
Offender Typology. Journal of Qualitative Criminal Justice & Criminology.
https://doi.org/10.21428/88de04a1.000ff84d

13
In 1997, BICKLE initiated an informal program called “Friends of the Bridegroom,” which
consisted of a research team of a carefully selected group of 18-19-year-olds, primarily girls.
Victims and witnesses stated that BICKLE would meet privately with the group, laying his hands
on each of them and praying for them. The group was required to fast and maintain celibacy, and
many of the victims referred to this group as “BICKLE’S Team, “MYSTICS Team,” or MIKES
Team." Victims reported that BICKLE often crossed inappropriate boundaries, frequently
coming and going as he pleased in the apartment they were staying at, buying gifts, and
providing money. IS #18 stated that BICKLE “bred a secrecy” between the group of girls,
using prophetic words to address each girl specifically. This behavior contributed to an
environment of unease and discomfort for the girls involved, raising concerns about their well-
being and the program's true nature.

IW #170 said BICKLE frequently described his marriage with Diane as “almost celibate.” Their
relationship was characterized as "special," with BICKLE indicating that he was exempt from
the usual expectations of marriage.

From those we spoke with, BICKLE was seen as a fatherly figure and took on the role of
protector. He always had a group of young girls around him and was rarely seen in public with
his wife, Diane.

This grooming was evident with (IS) Deborah Perkins. BICKLE had known (IS) Deborah
Perkins’s family for some time, and he and Diane, BICKLE'S wife, were close to them. This
relationship allowed him to gain the family's trust and access to Deborah. Over time, BICKLE'S
charm and persuasive nature enabled him to exert his influence, gradually drawing (IS) Deborah
Perkins into his circle.

IW #194 reported that Bickle took a keen interest in him and his family, including (IS) Deborah
Perkins. Bickle would often take them to the park to play football, treat them to meals at
restaurants, and accompany them to the bookstore, investing a significant amount of time with
them. Both IW #194 and (IS) Deborah Perkins admired BICKLE and respected who he was.
This tactic is often used by individuals to gain the trust of those around them. In this case,

14
BICKLE’S strategy appeared to win over (IS) Deborah Perkins's family, thus gaining their
confidence and isolating her.

BICKLE emerged as a significant figure within Tammy Woods' family, forming close ties with
her mother and other relatives. (IS) Tammy Woods (MINOR – 14-year-old) described him as
charming and charismatic, with a contagious passion for Jesus. His presence brought a new
dynamic to the family, as he often engaged them in thought-provoking conversations and shared
his beliefs with enthusiasm. Family gatherings became more lively and meaningful, with
BICKLE'S influence creating a sense of unity and shared purpose among the members.

BICKLE was able to gain the trust of (IS) Terry Hartley (MINOR– 15-year-old) and her
family. This was a well-thought-out tactic that BICKLE used within his grooming and selection
process. Everyone looked up to him and admired his ability to connect on a personal level. His
charm and persuasive skills were instrumental in winning over the family, making them feel
valued and understood. BICKLE'S calculated approach allowed him to subtly influence their
thoughts and actions, embedding himself deeply into their lives.

BICKLE employed a variety of manipulative tactics against his victims. These women were
systematically and intentionally groomed into harmful, emotional, and spiritual abuse. His
calculated actions created an environment of control and exploitation, where the victims were
coerced into compliance and silence. This deliberate grooming process not only inflicted deep
psychological and emotional trauma but also eroded their sense of self-worth and trust.

In a private meeting with Judy Doughty, BICKLE, and IW #202, a 17-year-old female, Bickle
mentioned that he wanted her to be “the next Misty.” According to IW #202, BICKLE offered
her an empty apartment to live rent-free, suggesting she could “go hard” in the prayer room. This
incident exemplifies the early grooming practices experienced by young interns in the prayer
room.

15
Many repeated patterns were observed among the victims. These patterns included systematic
grooming, emotional manipulation, and spiritual abuse. The victims were often isolated from
their support networks, making them more vulnerable to BICKLE’S control. This consistent and
deliberate approach further highlights the calculated nature of his actions and the widespread
impact on the victims' lives.

Sexual abuse isn't always apparent, even to the person experiencing it. Victims are often
groomed by their predators, making them feel that the events they have experienced are not
sexual and do not constitute abuse. This report aims to shed light on the manipulative tactics
used by abusers and the profound impact these actions have on victims.

BICKLE was known in the church and his neighborhood for his generosity towards the young
children around him. He would often give them candy and money, small tokens that brought
immense joy to their young hearts. His actions, however, were not just casual acts of kindness.
For some children and teens, BICKLE'S gestures were more personalized, as he singled them
out, making them feel exceptionally special through his words and actions. IW #190, who
vividly recalled her teenage years, stated that she remembered explicitly being singled out by
BICKLE.

Most victims were roughly 20 years younger than BICKLE and were in positions where he had
easy access to them. This age disparity and the victims' proximity to BICKLE allowed him to
exploit his authority and influence over them. By targeting individuals who were younger and
more vulnerable, BICKLE was able to manipulate and control them more effectively, further
entrenching the cycle of abuse. As previously noted, this was observed in the stories shared by
(IS) Terry Hartley (age 15) and (IS) Tammy Woods (age 14), both minors, and both who
experienced the grooming behavior of BICKLE.

BICKLE would make his victims feel special and singled out with his intense focus, sometimes
publicly from his platform as a preacher. IW #70 stated that BICKLE would make her feel
special by prophesying over her that she was an “Esther.” He often gave her gifts and money,
making her feel special. He created a sense of importance and exclusivity by giving victims

16
attention and recognition. The public displays of attention further isolated the victims, as they
felt a unique connection to BICKLE that others did not share.

BICKLE’S behavior towards (IS) Deborah Perkins, an 18-year-old intern, followed a similar
pattern of manipulation and control. He created a sense of dependency and obligation by
showering her with gifts, money, and places to live. His regular visits to her apartment and
taking her for rides were tactics to isolate her and establish a private, controlled environment.
She received special treatment from BICKLE. This grooming process made (IS) Deborah
Perkins feel special and valued, but it was a calculated move to gain her trust and compliance.

As time went on, BICKLE’S control over (IS) Deborah Perkins intensified. He began to dictate
her daily activities, limiting her interactions with others and reinforcing her reliance on him. This
isolation further entrenched her dependency, making it increasingly difficult for her to break free
from his influence. The special treatment she received was a double-edged sword, as it
simultaneously made her feel privileged and trapped. The emotional turmoil caused by this
manipulation left her struggling to understand her own feelings and the reality of the situation.

According to our interviews, BICKLE often commented on young women's appearances in over-
the-top and publicly embarrassing ways. While these comments were intended to be affirming,
they often had the opposite effect, making the recipients feel uncomfortable and objectified.

IW #85 remembered numerous interactions where BICKLE would make comments to women
such as, “You know how much I love you,” “You’re mine forever,” and offer “Papa time.”
According to IW #85, he would shower the girls around him with gift cards, special movie
nights, and food.

Another example of BICKLE’S comments toward women was shown during the interview of IS
#18, who had been collecting various phrases and clips BICKLE had sent her, assembling them
into a scrapbook. Some of these clippings from BICKLE consisted of the following, “I love you
MUCH, Blessings, Mike,” “You are truly amazing—love Mike,” “Hey, good looking,” “How
much does my own heart cost?,” and “My dear one, I don’t want you for what you can do for

17
me…I want you, and I want you for life, for as long as the Lord will give you to me! You’re
mine!” These messages highlight the inappropriate boundaries that BICKLE had overstepped, as
they reflect a level of intimacy and possessiveness that was unwarranted and intrusive.
BICKLE'S communications blurred the lines between professional and personal interactions,
creating an uncomfortable and potentially harmful dynamic for IS #18.

18
In a group setting at a restaurant, IW #105 observed BICKLE with his hands on another woman
beneath the table, where he was seen rubbing the woman's leg. Similarly, IW #6 observed
BICKLE running his hands up a woman's leg at another restaurant with a group of people. These
incidents highlight a pattern of inappropriate behavior by BICKLE in public settings, raising
concerns about his conduct and the potential impact on those around him.

Gaining Access and Isolating the Victim

BICKLE was revered as a special prophet within IHOPKC. His followers and staff members
admired him deeply and sought his approval and presence, viewing him as a profoundly Godly
individual. This level of admiration created an environment where people were more inclined to
please him and less likely to question his actions or authority.

This dynamic contributed to the systemic issues within the organization, as the desire to stay in
BICKLE’S favor often outweighed the imperative to address misconduct and support victims.
The culture of idolizing leaders like BICKLE allowed harmful behaviors to persist and be
covered up.

BICKLE was a master at physically and emotionally separating his victims, thus allowing
him access to them. He employed various tactics to isolate his victims from their support
networks, making them more vulnerable to his control. The time spent in proximity with
BICKLE was a commodity of the ministry.

BICKLE’S manipulation of (IS) Deborah Perkins extended to controlling her lifestyle and daily
habits. By convincing her to follow the isolation of the early “desert fathers.” 15 By isolating her
from others, he further entrenched her dependency on him. The requirement to fast three days a
week was another method of control, weakening her physically and emotionally and making her
more susceptible to his influence.

15
https://earlychurchhistory.org/who-were-the-desert-fathers/

19
Another manipulative tactic BICKLE employed was the promise of special anointing and
ministries tied to his apostolic chariot–vision-initiated calling. He used these promises to entice
and control his victims, creating a sense of dependency and obligation. This spiritual
manipulation exploited the victims' faith and trust, further deepening the emotional and spiritual
abuse. By leveraging these promises, BICKLE maintained a position of power and influence,
making it even more challenging for the victims to recognize and escape the abusive
environment.

Furthermore, according to victim and witness interviews, BICKLE claimed that individuals who
were closely connected to him would receive unique spiritual blessings and ministries. This
tactic created a sense of exclusivity and spiritual superiority among his followers, making them
more susceptible to his control and less likely to question his actions.

Trust Development and Keeping Secrets

BICKLE gained the trust of his victims due to his position of authority. He used various tactics
such as giving gifts, providing attention, and sharing "secrets" to make the victims feel that they
had a caring relationship with him. This manipulation was designed to create a sense of loyalty
and dependency, making the victims more susceptible to his control. By fostering this false sense
of trust, BICKLE was able to train his victims to keep the relationship secret, further isolating
them and deepening the emotional and spiritual abuse. This deliberate strategy of trust
development and secrecy highlights the calculated nature of his actions and the profound impact
on the victims' lives.

BICKLE told women he was “their spiritual father” and not to tell anyone what was happening.
This manipulation tactic further isolated his victims, making them feel dependent on him for
spiritual guidance and support. By positioning himself as a paternal figure, he exploited their
trust and loyalty, deepening the emotional and psychological control he had over them. This
secrecy also prevented victims from seeking help or sharing their experiences with others,
allowing the abuse to continue unchecked. The combination of spiritual authority and enforced
silence created a powerful and damaging dynamic that left many victims feeling trapped and
powerless.

20
(IS) Terry Hartley (MINOR) described how she felt very special being around BICKLE and
seemed to have formed a “soul tie” with him, a bond that persisted even into adulthood. She
spoke of the unique connection she felt with BICKLE, one that transcended ordinary
relationships. This deep emotional bond made it challenging for (IS) Terry Hartley (MINOR)
to fully grasp the manipulative nature of BICKLE'S actions.

This grooming was evident with (IS) Tammy Woods (MINOR) in 1988 when she babysat for
the BICKLE family. BICKLE was able to bond with her family and gain their trust, which
allowed free access to her. This is a common tactic with sexual predators to gain the trust of
everyone around. This manipulation made her feel as though she had no one else to turn to. The
gifts and attention, driving her to and from school and gymnastics, which initially seemed kind,
became tools of control. BICKLE’S flirtatious behavior turned into inappropriate advances,
leaving (IS) Tammy Woods (MINOR) feeling confused and trapped. BICKLE would often
share Proverbs 31:30 with her. “Charm is deceitful, and beauty is vain, but a woman who fears
the Lord shall be praised.”16 She struggled to reconcile the image of the caring family friend
with the reality of his predatory actions. He would make her feel special with gifts, sharing bible
verses, and food. Each time they were together, he became more flirtatious with her. As time
went on, BICKLE’S behavior escalated into sexual assault and deviate sexual intercourse, as
defined by current Missouri statute 566.010. Chapter 566 and chapter 568 definitions. 17

According to (IS) Terry Hartley, in the mid-1970s, while BICKLE was a youth group intern at
Colonial Presbyterian Church in Kansas City, and (IS) Terry Hartley was a 15-year-old student,
the grooming escalated to her being sexually assaulted when BICKLE kissed her on the lips and
fondled her breasts.

BICKLE’S actions in taking (IS) Tammy Woods (MINOR) out for dinner and offering her
wine are clear indicators of his continued manipulation and disregard for her well-being. While
on a mission trip to Paris in 1997, BICKLE gave (IS) Deborah Perkins wine after dinner while
being alone with her. This behavior further exemplifies his attempts to blur boundaries and
normalize inappropriate conduct. By introducing alcohol, he aimed to lower the victim's

16
See Proverbs 31:30
17
https://revisor.mo.gov/main/OneSection.aspx?section=566.010&bid=34710&hl=

21
inhibitions and increase their vulnerability. This tactic is often used by abusers to gain further
control over their victims and to make them more compliant.

BICKLE’S manipulation extended beyond just offering alcohol. He used these moments to
reinforce his control, making the victims feel special and chosen, while simultaneously isolating
them from others who might offer support or intervention. This duality of making the victims
feel privileged yet trapped is a hallmark of predatory behavior.

BICKLE’S manipulation extended to spiritualizing his demands for secrecy with (IS) Deborah
Perkins. By framing his requirements in a religious context, he further exploited her faith and
trust. This tactic made her feel as though keeping their interactions secret was not only necessary
but also divinely sanctioned.

Controlling Behavior

Sexual offenders often employ a range of controlling behaviors to maintain power over their
victims. These tactics can include emotional manipulation, threats, and even physical
intimidation. According to Stanton Samenow, Ph.D. “The pursuit of power and control. A
critical part of the perpetrator’s self-image is being able to dominate others. He proceeds to
do this as he pursues whomever he finds attractive.”18

By creating an environment of fear and dependency, the offender ensures that the victim
feels trapped and unable to seek help. This control extends to various aspects of the victim's
life, including their social interactions, daily routines, and even their thoughts and feelings.
The psychological impact of such control can be devastating, leading to long-term trauma
and difficulties in forming healthy relationships.

18
The Thinking Processes of Sexual Predators With Enhanced Power, the Predator Reveals Himself.
Posted December 15, 2017, https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/inside-the-criminal-mind/201712/the-
thinking-processes-of-sexual-predators

22
(IS) Tammy Woods (MINOR) was persuaded to cut her hair and use specific code words
between her and BICKLE. BICKLE wanted (IS) Tammy Woods (MINOR) to move back
to Kansas City to be close to him. At one point, he sent his assistant to her with a “Prophetic
word of the Lord” that she would marry. BICKLE would show up at her high school,
placing surprise gifts in her locker, making her feel special and carefully grooming her.
These visits to her school were a strategic part of the grooming process, aimed at gaining her
trust and increasing her dependency on him.

BICKLE not only tried to manipulate his victims as minors but also stayed in touch with
them as they grew older. He persuaded them to join him in the Kansas City movement, a
tactic designed to keep them under his influence. By maintaining these connections,
BICKLE ensured that his control over the victims extended well into their adult lives,
further entrenching the cycle of manipulation and abuse.

Victims reported often being terrified about what was going to happen when BICKLE
approached them. IS #10, while standing in the prayer room, stated she was approached from
behind by Bickle, who placed her in a chokehold and touched her face with his hands. This
aggressive and inappropriate behavior further emphasized the alarming nature of BICKLE’S
actions and the fear he instilled in women. This incident highlighted the pervasive sense of
danger and violation experienced by the victims.

(IS) Deborah Perkins felt particularly special and valued when BICKLE provided her with an
apartment and a key to his office. These gestures were not only symbols of trust and favor but
also tools of control and dependency. By giving her these privileges, BICKLE reinforced the
illusion of a special relationship, further entrenching her loyalty and compliance. However, these
acts were calculated moves to maintain dominance and ensure she felt obligated to him. The
complexity of such manipulation can leave victims feeling both privileged and trapped, making it
even harder to break free from the abuser's influence.

23
BICKLE’S manipulation extended to creating a distorted narrative where he cast himself as the
Priest, his wife Diane as the Nun, and (IS) Deborah Perkins as the Shulamite. This twisted
portrayal further exploited (IS) Deborah Perkins’s faith and trust, making her feel as though
their relationship was divinely ordained. By using religious imagery and roles, BICKLE
deepened his control over her, reinforcing the idea that their interactions were special and
justified.

As time passed, Bickle's behavior escalated, becoming increasingly inappropriate and predatory.
He began to exhibit manipulative tactics, isolating (IS) Deborah Perkins from her support
network and gaining her trust through calculated actions. This ultimately culminated in the
sexual assault of (IS) Deborah Perkins.

On November 16th, 2023, at 8:56 PM, BICKLE emailed19 the husband of (IS) Deborah
Perkins, writing:

“I assure you that I will honor you and your family all my days. I will never present you
or any of our friends as betrayers or agents of the Black Horse. I want peace, humility,
and love for Jesus and one another, and reconciliation with all of us—I know that will
take some years, but this is what I am contending for. I am totally against any speaking
against, attacking, or suing one another, etc. I will not allow anything negative to happen
to any of them to the degree that I have influence. I will zealously advocate for blessing
those who are against me.”

“My heart for you has not changed even 1%. I saw the Lord crown you in 2004—that is
how He sees you and so I will always agree with Him in this. It is the same with Deborah
I have some insight into how the Lord sees her.” He went on to say, “I will never present
you or any of our friends as betrayers or agents of the Black Horse.”

19
See attached email date November 16, 2023

24
Even as the story unfolds, BICKLE reaches for the prophetic manipulation he has used so often
over the years. By claiming to have “some insight into how the Lord sees her,” he continues his
controlling behavior and passes blame, suggesting the possibility that (IS) Deborah Perkins and
her husband might be seen as betrayers or agents of the Black Horse.

On October 9, 2023, at 7:58 PM, BICKLE emailed IW #13, (IS) Deborah Perkins's husband,
stating, “However, I cannot imagine the relational anguish and confusion it would cause in the
multi-level long-term sovereign relationship with IHOP and Deborah." Bickle goes on to say, “I
realize that she has not betrayed me at this point (so forgive me for using such ugly language as
‘betrayal’) but even the chance of her doing this creates great pain in me (but not anger at
her)—that a most trusted friend did this to me at the end of my life after 40 years of being in
prayer meetings many hours a day, six days a week.” This was a clear message on how BICKLE
reversed the blame for what had occurred, placing it on (IS) Deborah Perkins and portraying
her as the instigator of his distress. By doing so, BICKLE effectively positioned himself as a
victim of betrayal despite (IS) Deborah Perkins actions being seen in a different light. This
manipulation shifted the narrative away from the actual events and highlighted the emotional toll
it allegedly took on BICKLE, further victimizing (IS) Deborah Perkins in the process. 20

Desensitization to Touch
BICKLE was a master at the casual touch of a victim that appeared harmless, such as
hugging, wrestling, kissing, choking, touching legs, touching thighs, and tickling. BICKLE
would then escalate his touching to be increasingly more sexual with certain victims.
Witnesses would often see Bickle, during church services and prayer meetings, grab girls by
their throats, kiss them on their faces, and ruffle their hair. This behavior, masked as
innocent affection, was a calculated tactic to desensitize his victims to physical contact,
gradually pushing boundaries until they were normalized. By doing so, he created an
environment where his actions were less likely to be questioned or resisted, further
entrenching his control over his victims. His ability to blend these actions into seemingly
benign interactions made it difficult for others to recognize the abuse, allowing him to

20
See attached email dated October 9, 2023

25
continue his predatory behavior unchecked. The psychological impact on his victims was
profound, as they struggled to reconcile their trust in a spiritual leader with the violation of
their personal boundaries.

IS #32 reported that she participated in the Nightwatch program from January to June 2023.
She recalled eight encounters with Bickle that were 'very inappropriate.' Two of these
incidents occurred in the rapid-fire prayer line at approximately 1:00 AM. She felt a hand on
her neck, froze, and realized it was Bickle. His hands moved from her neck down to her
shoulders, caressing both shoulders with his face close to hers. IS #32 stated, 'I felt frozen
and in fright mode.' She reached out to her leader, but the conversation never progressed.
This incident highlights how victims can feel violated and powerless, especially when their
concerns are not addressed, allowing the abuser to continue their behavior.

IW #7 stated that she observed BICKLE single out a young woman in the prayer room, making
her feel special by rubbing her shoulders and face with his fingers.

BICKLE’S grooming of IS #5, IS #6, and IS #7 followed a similar pattern of manipulation and
control. He created an illusion of affection and care by whispering in their ear, rubbing their
shoulders, and caressing their hair. However, his actions were far from benign. The physical
control he exerted by grabbing their necks and forcibly gripping under their ear while
commenting on their hair or appearance was a clear display of dominance and power.

IS #28 stated that BICKLE would hug and kiss her on her forehead in the prayer room. She
noted how it was “Alarming to think that other leaders knew of Mike’s issues and still allowed
him to touch women in the prayer room without holding him accountable.”

IS #29 stated that while in the prayer room, BICKLE would touch her lower back, grab her from
the back of the neck, and kiss her on her cheeks, forehead, and the top of her head.

IW #15 advised that he observed BICKLE touch a singer in the prayer room by her chin as he
slowly ran his hand up her jaw. Alarmed by what he had observed, IW #15 reported the incident
to Isaac Bennet, lead pastor at Forerunner Church, who dismissed the concern, stating, “That’s

26
just the way BICKLE is,” and no action was taken. This lack of response further underscored the
troubling environment and the normalization of BICKLE’S inappropriate behavior.

BICKLE’S behavior towards IS #9 is another clear example of his manipulative and predatory
tactics. According to IS #9, BICKLE created an illusion of affection and care by rubbing her
back, running his fingers through her hair, and kissing her face. However, these actions were far
from innocent. In a one-on-one situation, his behavior escalated as he placed his hand on her bare
leg, ran it up to her thigh, and made the inappropriate comment, "Freshly shaved," according to
IS #9. This conduct was designed to blur boundaries and normalize inappropriate behavior,
making IS #9 feel confused and powerless.

BICKLE’S actions were not isolated incidents but part of a broader pattern of manipulation and
control. By targeting IS #9, he exploited her vulnerability and trust, using physical touch and
inappropriate comments to assert dominance. This behavior is indicative of a deeper issue, where
BICKLE’S actions are calculated to undermine IS #9's sense of self-worth and autonomy.

IW #66 recounted multiple instances where BICKLE would extend his hand in front of others
and touch her face with his palm, often making remarks about her makeup. On one occasion,
while seated at a table in the prayer room, BICKLE approached her from behind, placed her in a
chokehold, and smiled at her. She was startled and scared by the sudden and aggressive action.

Another example of BICKLE’S manipulation was kissing IS #16 on the head and face while
giving her cash. BICKLE’S behavior towards IS #16 is another clear example of his
manipulative tactics. By kissing her on the head and face while giving her money, he created a
false sense of affection and care. This act was designed to make her feel unique and valued while
reinforcing her dependency on him.

Other examples of inappropriate touching or behavior between BICKLE and women within the
church were detailed by IW #18, IW #20, IW #66, IW #6, IW #32, IW #95, IW #175, and IW
#92.

IW #18 observed an adult female with her hands inside BICKLE’S pants in his office. IW #20,
walking into BICKLE’S office, observed an adult woman rubbing BICKLE’S legs as he sat in

27
his chair and the woman on the floor. One evening, IW #66 walked into BICKLE’S office and
observed an adult female on her knees at BICKLE’S feet as he sat at his desk. IW #6 reported
seeing BICKLE caress a staff person's knee under a table at a restaurant. IW #32 stated he
observed hundreds of secretive communications between his wife and BICKLE over six years.
He noted that his wife would spend many hours alone with BICKLE in his office and other
locations, bringing him food and providing personal massages using essential oils on bare skin.
IW #95, on multiple occasions, would see food being brought in by IW #32’s wife to BICKLE.
Additionally, IW #175 reported an incident where, upon entering BICKLE'S office, they
observed an inappropriate action involving BICKLE and IW 32’s wife, with her hand inside
BICKLE'S pants. IW # 92, concerned about what was occurring between BICKLE and IW #32’s
wife, advised they reached out to Stuart Greaves21 and Lenny LaGuardia22 about the
inappropriate relationship, with no action being taken.

These witnessed incidents, regardless of if consensual, between BICKLE and presumably several
women highlight a pattern of behavior that is not only unprofessional but also deeply troubling,
as it creates an unsafe and uncomfortable environment for those around him. These interactions
were inappropriate and demonstrated a complete lack of boundaries inside and outside his office.

Sexual Behavior

During our investigation, (IS) Tammy Woods, (IS) Deborah Perkins, and IS #4 reported
observing BICKLE in a state of undress, with an erection. Each encounter appeared to be
deliberate and targeted towards the girls.

IW #12 questioned BICKLE about when BICKLE provided (IS) Deborah Perkins a hotel
room. After paying for the room, he and (IS) Deborah Perkins went inside. BICKLE told IW
#12 that he was sweaty from all the running around and decided to shower in the same room as
(IS) Debroh Perkins was in. IW #12 advised he pressed BICKLE, stating, “You walked out of

21
Hereafter referred to as GREAVE’S
22
Hereafter referred to as LAGUARDIA

28
the shower naked with a full erection and exposed yourself to her.” According to IW #12,
BICKLE said, “It was immoral, it was immoral, it was immoral.” BICKLE also said, “A man of
God will not be humiliated if he humbles himself.” IW #12 advised that he asked BICKLE, “So
you got dressed and left the room.” According to IW #12, BICKLE stated, “No, I stayed there
for maybe another 90 minutes.”

Prophetic Manipulation

Before presenting examples of how BICKLE used “prophetic words” to manipulate his victims,
we must first explore how spiritual authority functions within evangelical institutions, and the
significance of prophetic ministry in charismatic evangelical spaces like IHOPKC, specifically.23

A core tenet of evangelical theology is biblicism—that is, a high regard for and obedience to the
Bible as the ultimate authority in all areas of Christian faith and practice.24 This emphasis on the
authority of scripture derives from the Reformation ideal of sola scriptura, or “scripture alone.”
In his 2024 book on power and the ideology of the religious right, Scott M. Coley observes that
this ideal was originally conceived as a check on the power of men in positions of authority
within the Church: no authority, be it a priest, pastor, teacher, deacon, prophet, or bishop, is
above the Bible. Coley notes that according to the Reformation ideal of sola scriptura, the Bible
is the only infallible authority on matters of Christian faith and practice. It follows that Scripture,
as the only infallible authority, is the highest authority. This doesn’t mean that there is no
authority outside of scripture—merely that scripture is sovereign over lesser sources of authority,
such as church tradition, ecumenical creeds, doctrinal statements, or ecclesial officials (e.g.,
pastors or denominational leaders). Thus, in theory, the Reformation ideal of sola scriptura
subordinates the conventions, institutions, and opinions of men to the word of God.

In the context of contemporary evangelicalism, however, Coley points out that appeals to biblical
authority often serve to amplify the social control exercised by ecclesial authorities—namely,

23
The phrase “prophetic word” is a term of art used to describe a message from God. Evangelicals broadly (including
charismatics) use the term “prophet” to describe a kind of vocation. What sets the charismatic understanding of
prophecy apart is that within charismatic institutions such as IHOPKC, figures like Bickle were believed to receive
“words of knowledge” or “prophetic words” directly from God. Thus, in effect, figures like Bickle have the ability to
speak for God.
24
National Association of Evangelicals, “What is an Evangelical?,” https://tinyurl.com/49x6t97y. See also
Bebbington, David, The Evangelical Quadrilateral: The Denominational Mosaic of the British Gospel Movement,
Vol. 2, Waco, TX: Baylor University Press, 2021.

29
those authorities who have the power to dictate what the Bible means: if the Bible’s authority
cannot be questioned, and certain individuals have the power to dictate how the Bible is to be
understood, then those individuals cannot be questioned. As Coley notes, the Reformation ideal
of biblical authority is “meant to attenuate ecclesial authority. Yet the opposite is achieved when
ecclesial authorities… dictate the meaning of Scripture and then invoke the authority of that
same Scripture in order to silence dissent.” In effect, this arrangement permits those in positions
of power to “speak on behalf of God.”25

It’s equally important to observe that in the context of a charismatic evangelical institution like
IHOPKC, this dynamic is compounded by an emphasis on “prophetic words.” Within many non-
charismatic evangelical institutions, the power of church authorities to speak on God’s behalf is
restricted to the four corners of the biblical text. But the emphasis on prophetic ministry within
institutions like IHOPKC extends this power beyond the Bible, by legitimizing the notion that
those with the gift of prophecy receive messages directly from God. As Matthew D. Taylor
observes, in apostolic and prophetic circles, people like BICKLE are given an almost
unfathomable amount of spiritual authority—far beyond most evangelical pastors. They are seen
as oracles of God, speaking with the voice of God through prophecy, and leading the church
under divine apostolic directives. That is a straightforward recipe for abuse and cover-up. Indeed,
it’s baked into BICKLE’S decades-long prophetic narrative that anyone who criticizes or exposes
him must be an agent of Satan.26

In sermons and other talks on the subject of prophecy, BICKLE assures his audience that
legitimate prophesies must accord with scripture. But this assurance is cold comfort indeed,
given BICKLE’S enormous influence over how the Bible is understood by those within his
sphere of influence.

BICKLE was a master at using prophetic words to gain his victims' trust. By presenting himself
as a spiritual authority with divine insight, he manipulated his victims into believing that his
actions were guided by a higher power. “Everyone around BICKLE wanted to please him and

25
Coley, Scott M. Ministers of Propaganda: Truth, Power, and the Ideology of the Religious Right. Grand Rapids:
Eerdmans, 2024, pp. 47–9.
26
Taylor, Matthew D. 2023. Important Context for the Mike Bickle/IHOP-KC Sexual Accusations. October 29.
https://matthewdtaylor.substack.com/p/important-context-for-the-mike-bickleihop.

30
for BICKLE to think they were radical and Godly,” said IS #11. This tactic created a sense of
dependency and reverence, making it difficult for the victims to question his intentions or resist
his control.

BICKLE has been accused of engaging in egregious spiritual, emotional, and sexual abuse over
decades. He allegedly groomed and fostered inappropriate relationships with women, using the
concept of an "apostolic chariot-vision calling" to create an intoxicating partner narrative.
BICKLE reportedly shared prophetic words with (IS) Tammy Woods and (IS) Deborah
Perkins, claiming that the Lord had shown him that Diane (BICKLE’S wife) was going to die
and that they would be in the chariot with him. This narrative expanded his influence among the
women involved.

During an interview with (IS) Terry Hartly, she advised in October of 1983, “Mike (BICKLE)
explicitly told me of a prophecy regarding the death of his wife, Diane. He believed Diane’s
death would happen in an earthquake in St. Louis, and the implication of sharing the prophecy
with me was that her death would open up a path forward for him and I to pursue a romantic
relationship together.”

Another example of BICKLE’S use of prophetic manipulation, though previously mentioned in

this report, is when he would single out women within the church and refer to them as “Esther.”
This term, drawn from a respected biblical figure, appears to be part of his grooming tactics.

According to IW #14, BICKLE would also use other people to help with his prophetic
manipulation, such as charismatic minister Paul Cain, and feeding him (Cain) information about
certain women that BICKLE was pursuing. By presenting himself as a spiritual authority with
divine insight, he manipulated his victims into believing that a higher power guided his actions.
This method allowed BICKLE to exploit his victims' deepest fears and hopes, ensuring their
compliance through a combination of fear, guilt, and a perceived sense of spiritual obligation.

BICKLE’S ability to exert power and control was multifaceted. He used his authoritative
position to create an environment where questioning his actions was seen as questioning divine
will. This manipulation extended to isolating victims from their support networks, making them
more reliant on him. This manipulative behavior was shown when BICKLE expressed remorse

31
but then placed blame on (IS) Tammy Woods after their encounter. In doing this, BICKLE was
attempting to shift responsibility and create confusion. This emotional manipulation can make
the victim feel guilty and complicit in the abuse, further entrenching their sense of
powerlessness.

BICKLE’S actions in having (IS) Deborah Perkins pray Psalm 51 (see below) after sexual
encounters was another layer of his manipulation. By invoking a prayer of repentance, he further
distorted her understanding of the situation, making her feel complicit in the abuse. Similar to
(IS) Tammy Woods, this tactic not only reinforced his control but also exploited her faith,
creating a false sense of shared guilt.

Psalm 51 New International Version

1 Have mercy on me, O God, according to your unfailing love; according to your great
compassion blot out my transgressions. 2 Wash away all my iniquity and cleanse me from my sin.
3 For I know my transgressions, and my sin is always before me. 4 Against you, you only, have I
sinned and done what is evil in your sight; so you are right in your verdict and justified when
you judge. 5 Surely I was sinful at birth, sinful from the time my mother conceived me. 6 Yet you
desired faithfulness even in the womb; you taught me wisdom in that secret place. 7 Cleanse me
with hyssop, and I will be clean; wash me, and I will be whiter than snow. 8 Let me hear joy and
gladness; let the bones you have crushed rejoice. 9 Hide your face from my sins and blot out all
my iniquity. 10 Create in me a pure heart, O God, and renew a steadfast spirit within me.11 Do
not cast me from your presence or take your Holy Spirit from me. 12 Restore to me the joy of
your salvation and grant me a willing spirit, to sustain me. 13 Then I will teach transgressors
your ways, so that sinners will turn back to you. 14 Deliver me from the guilt of bloodshed, O
God, you who are God my Savior, and my tongue will sing of your righteousness. 15 Open my
lips, Lord, and my mouth will declare your praise. 16 You do not delight in sacrifice, or I
would bring it; you do not take pleasure in burnt offerings. 17 My sacrifice, O God, is[b] a broken
spirit; a broken and contrite heart you, God, will not despise. 18 May it please you to prosper

32
Zion, to build up the walls of Jerusalem.19 Then you will delight in the sacrifices of the righteous,
in burnt offerings offered whole; then bulls will be offered on your altar.”27

BICKLE’S manipulation of (IS) Deborah Perkins took on a deeply disturbing and manipulative
tone. By claiming that the Lord had told him his wife Diane was going to die and that they would
be together, he exploited her faith and trust in him. This tactic is particularly insidious, as it uses
religious beliefs to justify and normalize his predatory behavior. BICKLE’S vivid descriptions of
their future life together, including living in a house by the lake and being "in the chariot" with
him, were designed to create a sense of inevitability and destiny. This manipulation further
isolated (IS) Deborah Perkins, making her feel complicit in his plans and deepening her
dependency on him.

BICKLE’S manipulation extended to using religious scriptures to justify his actions, further
exploiting (IS) Deborah Perkins's faith and trust. During Friday Night Watch prayer meetings,
he would tell her that he felt the presence of the Lord and that his wife Diane was going to die.
This tactic not only manipulated her emotions but also created a false sense of divine approval
for his actions. By invoking religious authority, BICKLE deepened his control over (IS)
Deborah Perkins, making it even harder for her to question his behavior or seek help.

On December 6, 2023, LAGUARDIA met with the Ministry Outreach team and an attorney who
guided them through a 50-page document that the Executive Leadership Team (ELT)28 had
received from the Advocate Group (AG)29. During the meeting, IW #206 mentioned that
LAGUARDIA had urged the group to disregard the allegations against BICKLE. When IW #206
asked LAGUARDIA about the story of BICKLE’S wife dying, LAGUARDIA responded by
saying, “Jesus is going to return soon, Mike and Diane are going to preach boldly, Diane is
going to die a martyr, and Mike will have to marry someone else.”

27
See Psalm 51
28
Hereafter, we utilize the acronym ELT

29
Hereafter, we utilize the acronym AG

33
Other Staff at IHOPKC Involving Sexual Misconduct and Coverups

The investigation into IHOPKC has indeed uncovered troubling patterns. Beyond the allegations
against BICKLE, we uncovered numerous instances of sexual abuse and misconduct perpetrated
by individuals associated with IHOPKC. It is crucial to emphasize that these instances are not
directly related to BICKLE. These findings highlight a broader issue within the organization that
requires immediate attention and action. Due to the extensive nature of the report and the time
constraints, we will provide a summary of the various stories and the responses from IHOPKC
leadership. This summary aims to shed light on the systemic issues and the steps taken by the
leadership to address them.

Throughout the investigation, we identified sixteen (16) Accused Staff Members (ASM)
implicated in sexual misconduct claims. Many of the Interviewed Survivors (IS) who shared
their stories have chosen not to include their experiences in the report due to fear of retribution
from the abusers and/or IHOPKC. We have been permitted to share nine (9) of these stories.

ASM #1

ASM #1 allegedly sexually assaulted and raped a 14-year-old female in the 1980s. It should be
noted that this was before the time ASM #1 worked within IHOPKC. We have made multiple
attempts to contact ASM #1 via email and phone and have been unable to elicit any response
from him.

In 2012, ASM #1 applied for an internship at IHOPKC. The application asked if there had been
any previous allegations of physical or sexual abuse, and he answered that while he was an intern
in his youth ministry at a different congregation, he moved outside of his marriage with a 16-
year-old girl and stated that it went no further than inappropriate touch.

On or about March 3, 2018, the ELT sent an email to the “Known Survivor” of the sexual assault
by ASM #1 (included below). Such sensitive matters demand a framework of established
guidelines, and the expertise of professionals trained to handle the complexities involved,
ensuring that the victims' welfare remains the top priority. The absence of proper protocols and

34
professional involvement in addressing these issues has further exacerbated the trauma
experienced by the survivors and undermined the credibility of the investigation.

35
After the email was delivered to the “Known Survivor,” she advised the ELT that they were not
qualified to conduct an investigation and to bring in a third-party investigator. The ELT then
decided to sign a contract with GRACE for an independent third-party investigation.

Multiple IW’s have reported their frustrations when attempting to contact the ELT members at
IHOPKC regarding this case. IW #40 and IW #56 both stated that they had tried to communicate
with GREAVES and Dave Sliker30, advocating for ASM #1’s not to be restored to regular staff
following the allegations made against him. They were encouraged to follow the Matthew 18
process with ASM #1, provided they believed he had taken full responsibility for his actions.
Additionally, IW #2 mentioned that despite the push for accountability, ASM #1 continued to
hold a position at IHOPU, actively recruiting students. These reports indicate a disconnect
between the leadership's stated commitment to accountability and the actual outcomes observed
by the IW's. Moreover, these experiences have led to growing concerns among the IWs about the
transparency and effectiveness of the processes in place to handle such serious matters.

In a Press Release from IHOPKC dated April 19, 2019, titled, “International House of Prayer of
Kansas City Concludes Misconduct Investigation.”

After one full year, all investigations regarding a 2018 sexual misconduct allegation made
against an international House of Prayer of Kansas City IHOPKC staff member have been
completed. “Both the victim and the accused member of this investigation have found
resolution,” says a senior IHOPKC official.

During the course of the discovery, the victim realized that the accused did make a genuine
apology and she has genuinely forgiven him,” her Sacramento lawyer, Joseph George said on
Friday, December 14, 2018 in a telephone interview with the Modesto Bee.

In 2018, charges were made against an IHOP KC staff member during his tenure at a ministry
unrelated to IHOPKC in another state over 30 years ago. The accused was placed on a leave of
absence while the IHOPKC Executive Leadership Team spent considerable time in discovery and
fact-finding with regards to the victims accusations. When the injured party escalated the nature
of the original claim and requested an expansion to the internal process, IHOPKC agreed to
bring an outside organization of the victim’s recommendation to ensure a fair and thorough
investigation.

During the course of both the internal and external investigations, the accused demonstrated
genuine remorse and repentance over the clear moral failure committed at that time as well as

30
Hereafter referred to as SLIKER

36
complete cooperation with the litigation. The injured realized that the accuser made a genuine
apology and has genuinely forgiven him.

“The critical conclusion of the report is that no evidence of further incidents was discovered by
the independent firm, nor has there been any evidence of further wrongdoing over the last 30+
years including time spent at IHOPKC,” says that senior IHOPKC official. IHOPKC diligently
seeks to be safe, accountable, transparent and integrous organization, fully alert and
cooperatively aware to abuses and abusers, of any kind. We desire to be a safe, trustworthy
organization that deeply embodies the values and actions of Jesus for justice, mercy, and
redemption. We are committed to both the prevention of oppression and to justice for those
oppressed. Additionally, we challenge abusers toward full repentance with the hope of eventual
restoration.”

In response to the review conducted by the external agency, with further recommendations
concerning IHOPKC's Sexual Harassment prevention and protection policies, IHOPKC
leadership instituted several additional processes to ensure that IHOPKC is a safe place to work,
including but not limited to an audit of the Ministry Staff Application Screening Process, training
for those that review and interview applicants, Restoration Guidelines for Victims of Sexual
Harassment, and Sexual Harassment Training for all IHOPKC staff. 31

The decision by IHOPKC not to publicly release the GRACE report reveals a significant
disregard for transparency and the congregation's well-being. By withholding the report, the
leadership has demonstrated a lack of commitment to accountability and potentially
compromised the trust and safety of church members. This perceived inaction has fostered a
sense of mistrust and frustration within the community, highlighting the urgent need for more
robust and transparent measures to ensure accountability and safety.

Despite the controversy, the board ultimately decided to permit ASM #1 back on staff at
IHOPKC. This decision was made while knowing the facts in the case against ASM #1 and
acknowledging the recommendations in the GRACE report, which stated, “Should he ever be
permitted to return to IHOP, he must never be allowed on the property when minors are present.
In addition, he must never be allowed at, or granted participation in, any off-campus IHOP
activities in which minors are present.”

31
See attached Press Release from IHOPKC dated April 19, 2019, titled, “International House of Prayer of Kansas City
Concludes Misconduct Investigation”

37
On June 21, 2023, ASM #1 emailed the IHOPU Connect group about planning a lunch for
campers.

ASM #2
In 2010, ASM #2 allegedly sexually assaulted and raped a 16-year-old male, IS #24. We have
attempted to contact ASM #2, and ASM #2 referred us to his attorney. We did receive an email
response that stated he was willing to cooperate with the third-party investigation but, because of
pending legal action, was forbidden to be interviewed. (Note that on October 17, 2024, the
Jackson County, Missouri prosecutor decided not to file charges against ASM #2).

38
According to IW #2, ASM #2 was involved in youth leadership at IHOPKC and led a small
group of teen boys. IW #4 stated that he would often take the boys on outings to places like the
YWCA gym in Overland Park, MO. While at the gym, the boys would be encouraged to disrobe
and take showers. IS #25 stated that ASM #2 would find ways to be alone with the boys and ask
personal questions about their sexuality.

IW #4 advised he contacted SLIKER about the allegations occurring during the youth outings,
and that SLIKER stated, “he didn’t think it was a big deal.” ASM #2 was allowed to continue in
the ministry. IW #2 noted that the situation was reported to GREAVES and LAGUARDIA, and
nothing was done. IW #50 went to LAGUARDIA stating that ASM #2 needed to be removed
from working around kids, and he was told, “No one could be banned.” IW #27, while working
in the children’s department, was never notified of the actions being taken by the ELT during the
investigation of ASM #2 and what occurred during the youth outings. IW #8 stated that ASM
#2, while in the prayer room, pulled a boy, who was unable to be identified as part of this
investigation, into a side room to talk to him about masturbation, his need to confess, and that he
wanted to find time to shower with him to wash away his sins.

IW #2 shared IS #24’s story of abuse with Ed Hackett, an IHOPKC board member, 11 days
before IS #24 story went public on Tuesday, July 30, 2024.

39
IW #2 stated that immediately after telling Ed Hackett, he contacted Joseph Taylor, the
Executive Director of IHOPKC, and informed him of IS #24’s allegation of being sexually
abused by an IHOPKC staff member as a minor.

On Friday, August 2, 2024, IHOPKC released a statement to the Kansas City Star32, claiming
this was the FIRST TIME they had learned of these allegations.

“We are heartbroken by these allegations, which we have learned of for the first time as a result of
your inquiries. All efforts are being extended to uncover the details. We are reaching out to the
Werner and Abuhl families to offer our full support. This includes supporting the involvement of law
enforcement. We have also opened an internal review to understand how the leadership at the time
handled allegations, identify lapses, and create a summary report with recommendations to ensure
that training and processes are in place going forward so that this cannot happen again period.”

ASM #3

IW #51 observed ASM #3 having an inappropriate relationship with another intern. This was
reported to GREAVES, and he stated that he was handling the situation. IW #173 said that ASM
#3 would always go to the interns' apartments and give them gifts and food. IW #173 stated that
ASM #3 brought a massage table to provide massages to the interns.

Multiple girls lived in a basement apartment owned by ASM #3 and his wife. The bedroom door
locks were removed to allow free access for ASM #3. (IS) Olivia Bauman-Pousseur (18-year-
old), an intern at IHOPKC, was physically and sexually assaulted by ASM #3 in 2010-2011.
During this period, she had been punched and thrown to the ground and sexually assaulted on
multiple occasions. (IS) Olivia Bauman-Pousseur contacted Dave and Tracey Sliker to assist
her. (SLIKER was on the ELT as the President of the International House of Prayer University)

SLIKER wanted to meet (IS) Olivia Bauman-Pousseur in person, so she asked IW #109 to
attend the meeting. IW #109 stated, “What I came to realize very quickly was this meeting was

32
www.kansascity.com/news/local/article290857694.html August 11, 2024 “Former IHOPKC teens allege sexual misconduct by youth

group leader. Was it a coverup? By Judy Thomas

40
about extreme grooming, repeated sexual assault disguised as “pastoring” and “one-on-one
counseling” she was experiencing at the hands of her landlord.” The focus of the meeting
according to IW #109 was “keeping her quiet and the only way to move forward was to forgive,
forget everything and not to ask any more questions.” SLIKER told (IS) Olivia Bauman-
Pousseur, “This is all a considerable misinterpretation.”

During a second meeting, held at SLIKER’S home, (IS) Olivia Bauman-Pousseur was told not
to bring IW #109 and to attend alone. She was surprised that the meeting was with ASM #3 and
SLIKER. She was told that ASM #3 had repented and warned her not to tell anyone, including
her parents, of what had happened. SLIKER told her, “Jesus doesn’t go spreading all of our sins,
so we shouldn’t share the sins of others.” SLIKER also warned (IS) Olivia Bauman-Pousseur
not to report the incidents to the police. (IS) Olivia Bauman-Pousseur was aware of a meeting
with SLIKER, GREAVES, and BICKLE and never heard the outcome of the meeting. IW #109
attempted to reach out to GREAVES several times but never received a reply.

ASM #5

IS #8, after being sexually assaulted by ASM #5 at IHOPKC, sought help from trusted
leadership figures. Instead of receiving support, she was told that the term "assault" was too
strong and was discouraged from going to the police or disclosing the incident to anyone. IW
#16 said, “You are Holy if you don’t talk. If you talk, you are toxic.” This statement was made
many times throughout the investigation by other victims. IW # 191 stated there was a “code of
silence” at IHOPKC.

ASM #6

IS #22 advised they were sexually assaulted by ASM #6 and then told not to discuss it with
anyone from IHOPKC. It is a clear failure of the organization's duty to protect and support its
members. Forcing him to attend the "Living Waters" program instead of addressing the assault
only adds to the trauma and silences the victim.

41
ASM #7

IS #23, a minor, joined IHOPKC as an intern. Unfortunately, there were no specific protections
in place for minors, and they were treated as adults, encouraged to fast and spend long hours in
the prayer room. Shortly after his arrival, he was targeted and groomed by ASM #7, a male
leader who exploited the prophetic to lure interns into sexual abuse.

ASM #9

IS #14 was sexually assaulted and raped by ASM #9, a staff member of the Nightwatch program.
She reported what had happened to her supervisor, Donna Edwards, and they met with
GREAVES, the director of the Nightwatch program. IS #14 was told that the word “rape” was
too strong of a word to use for what happened. She attended multiple meetings with different
people who questioned her about the incident, which only crushed her spirit. Church officials
asked her to retract her story and apologize to the offender formally. They also told her that she
should not go to the police. IS #14 stated that “How the church handled the situation was far
more traumatic than the rape itself.” This incident highlights the critical need for organizations to
have proper safeguarding measures and to take allegations seriously while providing a safe and
supportive environment for those who come forward.

ASM #10

ASM #10, a former Music School leader and IHOPKC staff member, led a group of students to
"Tangibly comfort one another, using physical touch to show the heart of Jesus," according to
IW #199. In doing so, according to IW #199, "A single girl would sit with her head in ASM
#10's lap, as he would stroke her hair, while ASM #10's wife was in another room watching
their children.” According to IW #199, questioning this behavior was met with the accusation
that any impure thoughts indicated the students weren't as redeemed as ASM #10. IW #199
further stated, “He could touch the women in the group and be closest friends with the married
women, as he was displaying Jesus to them.” Some of the couples I remain in contact with have
been so damaged by this chapter that they have had to seek therapy and healing."

42
ASM #11

IW #48 stated that his daughter was being stalked and harassed ASM #11. He reported the abuse
to two ELT members, Ed Hacket and Isac Bennett, who reported the incident to BICKLE.
According to IW #48, BICKLE, who was familiar with the staff member, stated that he backed
him and that no other action was needed.

Executive Leadership Team (ELT) Concerns

The investigation has revealed that certain members of the ELT at IHOPKC were more focused
on suppressing and minimizing reports of sexual abuse, misconduct, and rape rather than
supporting the victims or staff who reported these incidents.

The investigation revealed troubling practices within IHOPKC involving SLIKER, a member of
the IHOPKC leadership team and then president of IHOP University. We have made multiple
attempts to contact SLIKER by email. He did respond initially, but all correspondence came to
an abrupt stop.

IW #77 reported to us that when he questioned SLIKER as to why an alleged offender was still
on staff, SLIKER commented, “We never take a guy out of his game when he's being restored.”
This attitude reflects a concern for prioritizing the offender's restoration over the victim's well-
being.

It's incredibly disheartening to hear that multiple identified survivors have reported such
experiences. When SLIKER oversaw Matthew 18 meetings, instead of providing support, he
interrogated the victims in front of the alleged offender. This approach not only failed to support
the victims but also added to their trauma. Forcing victims into agreeing not to talk with anyone
within IHOPKC further silenced them and prevented them from seeking the help and support
they often needed.

43
IS #26 stated that while talking with SLIKER, BICKLE approached her, touched her face,
played with her hair, and then walked away. According to IS #26, SLIKER stood by, observing
her discomfort, and did nothing to intervene. This behavior was normalized within the
leadership, as no one stepped in to stop it, further perpetuating a culture of acceptance of such
actions.

The investigation has revealed troubling practices within IHOPKC involving Stuart Greaves33, a
member of the IHOPKC leadership team and then Vice President of the Global Prayer Room. We
have made multiple attempts to contact GREAVES, and we have been unable to elicit any
response from him.

To silence victims, GREAVES would hold meetings where victims were interrogated and, in
many instances, forced to apologize to the alleged offenders. Victims were often blamed for what
happened to them, causing further trauma.

In cases of sexual abuse, victims were advised that the investigation would be handled in-house
and that law enforcement should not be involved. This approach not only silenced victims but
also allowed perpetrators to continue their abusive behavior without fear of legal consequences.

Additionally, GREAVES shared his prophetic dreams with victims and others, including a
prophetic dream about “Barking Dogs” with IS #14. In this dream, GREAVES told IS #14 that
the barking dogs symbolized a warning or alert, often interpreted as a message from the spiritual
realm to pay attention to certain issues or threats. This practice again exemplifies the
manipulation and control exerted over victims, using spiritual language to justify and perpetuate
harmful behaviors.

GREAVES told IW #10 not to tell anyone or report an incident where a relative, who was also
an IHOPKC church member, was sexually assaulting a minor because it would be taken care of
in-house by IHOPKC.

33
Hereafter referred to as GREAVES

44
IW #2 confronted GREAVES about why he told IS #14 not to go to the police after they
reported abuse. According to IW #2, GREAVES started to cry and claimed, “Another black man
is going to jail.”

IW #110 reported that GREAVES initially contacted her with work-related messages, but the
nature of his texts soon became more personal. At one point, he sent her a picture of himself
from his hotel room in his pilot's uniform, raising suspicions about his intentions.

The investigation has revealed troubling practices within IHOPKC involving LAGUARDIA.
LAGUARDIA was a member of the IHOPKC leadership team, Vice President of Ministries, and
local chaplain for the Kansas City and Grandview Police Departments. We have made multiple
attempts to contact LAGUARDIA via email and in person at his residence. Unfortunately, we
have been unable to elicit any response from him.

In 2023, IS #14 confronted GREAVES in a recorded conversation at the Forerunner Church

regarding his mishandling of her report of being sexually assaulted. GREAVES denied any
cover-up of the assault. LAGUARDIA was also present during this confrontation. According to
IS #14, LAGUARDIA warned her, saying, “If you don’t delete that, I’m going to give your name
to somebody, and they’re going to contact you. It will cause trouble if she’s recording to trap
somebody. It’s not going to be helpful for you.” After the confrontation, IS #14 felt deeply
distressed and unsupported, as her attempt to seek justice was met with threats and denial.

After witnessing concerning interactions involving a minor child and other young children, IW
#25 contacted LAGUARDIA. According to IW #25, LAGUARDIA acknowledged observing
the same behavior and assured IW #25 that appropriate actions would be taken. However, no
measures were implemented, and the incident remained unreported.

IW #20, IW #10, IW #50, IW #130, and IW #2 all shared stories of seeking assistance from
LAGUARDIA with help on different disclosures of sexual abuse victims in which they were told
that IHOPKC would be handling the situation, and they should not discuss the occurrences with
anyone.

45
Face-to-Face with the Abusers

The investigation revealed that many victims were subjected to "Matthew 18" meetings, where
they were pressured into face-to-face confrontations with their accusers to determine who was
lying. These meetings not only compounded the emotional distress of the victims but also
undermined the integrity of the investigation process. Many victims felt intimidated and coerced,
which led to further trauma and a sense of injustice. As a result, the credibility of the testimonies
collected during these meetings was compromised.

BICKLE’S "Making a Purity Covenant: Seven Practical Commitments," released in 2008,

outlined stringent principles for the International House of Prayer Kansas City (IHOPKC). A
central tenet of these commitments was to handle issues internally, avoiding involvement from
law enforcement or external entities. This internal approach was deemed essential for the
organization's continued operation and longevity, a practice it upheld for many years. By
fostering a culture of self-regulation, IHOPKC aimed to ensure a unified community, minimize
public scrutiny, and maintain the integrity of its spiritual mission. The Purity Covenant not only
guided personal behavior but also reinforced the organization's commitment to resolving
conflicts and maintaining discipline from within its own ranks.34

Interns entering the program were compelled to disclose sexual sins or experiences, often
involving childhood victimization. These disclosures were sometimes used manipulatively,
adhering to the principles set by BICKLE in the Forerunner Christian Fellowship's Purity
Covenant (March 2008). “Commitment #4: I commit to hold any confession of my friend's failure
in strict confidentiality. If I do speak it to another then I commit to tell it to the one who
confessed their sin to me. The one who breaks confidence should confess also to the one whom
he broke the confidence.”35 According to this commitment, any confession of a friend's failure
was to be held in strict confidentiality, with breaches requiring confession to the one whose
confidence was broken.

34
See attached Making a Purity Covenant: Seven Practical Commitments," released in 2008
35
See attached Making a Purity Covenant: Seven Practical Commitments," released in 2008

46
IW #180 stated that there would be a “mass deliverance process” where they were made to
disclose any sexual history that they may have.

In 2022, IW #75 reported that the IHOPKC counseling department received a directive from
BICKLE via GREAVES, mandating that any intern with "sexual struggles" be reported directly
to BICKLE. (We have not been able to locate this document.)

IS #13 had confidentially contacted her leaders seeking help about a situation with a female staff
member who was sexually harassing her. She was told that she wasn’t following the biblical
process, Matthew 18, correctly. No action was ever taken by the ELT against the staff member.
IS #13 reached out to SLIKER, who reportedly told her to “Pull your big girl panties up; you
signed up for this.”

It's deeply troubling when someone reaches out for help and is met with such dismissive and
inappropriate responses. IS #13’s experience highlights the importance of supportive and
empathetic leadership, especially in sensitive situations. The lack of action from the ELT and the
response from SLIKER are both concerning and unacceptable.

What we have consistently observed within IHOPKC is that often, when someone reaches out
for help, they would be forced to say confessions and be silenced. Sadly, according to survivors,
their “dirty laundry” was shared with the leadership, and nothing was done to rectify the
situation with the alleged offenders. This was shown during our interview with IW #199, who
stated, “The focus on purity and our sexuality in group settings was unsettling.” IW #199 further
advised, “Forced confessions were common, as we were often coerced with music and prayer in
“pure heart” weekends, where we were to confess to strangers all of our sexual sins.”

IS #31 reported that after disclosing a sexual assault, she was told her story was unbelievable and
was discouraged from going to the police. Instead, she was coerced into a meeting with her
accuser, further traumatizing her and undermining her credibility.

This practice reflects a deeply flawed approach to handling allegations of abuse, prioritizing the
organization's reputation over the well-being of the victims. The use of "Matthew 18 meetings"
not only silenced victims but also perpetuated a culture of fear and intimidation. Victims were

47
made to feel as though their experiences were invalid, and the burden of proof was unfairly
placed on them.

Multiple victims reported that after the Matthew 18 meetings, they were required to attend
IHOP’s Living Waters Program, which was run by Tracey Bickle (BICKLE’S sister). This
program was intended to help individuals with sexual issues. However, the mandatory nature of
this program and its connection to the leadership raised concerns about its effectiveness and the
true intentions behind it. Many of the victims we interviewed felt that the program was another
way to control and silence them rather than providing genuine support and healing.

Another commitment from the "Making a Purity Covenant: Seven Practical Commitments"
included specific guidelines that held victims to certain standards when they disclosed incidents
of sexual misconduct. The emphasis on purity and accountability, specifically commitments E
through H, while intended to promote moral integrity, also raised concerns about the potential for
victim-blaming and the pressure on survivors to conform to stringent behavioral expectations.

FORERUNNER CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP (MARCH 2008) – BICKLE Making a Purity

Covenant: Seven Practical Commitments (E-H)

E. Commitment #5: If I “repeatedly” stumble in immorality, I will show the fruit of repentance
by going with my friend to confess to the leadership and then accept the boundaries they give me.

F. Commitment #6: I commit to share with the leadership if my friend “repeatedly” stumbles in
immorality. I will first tell my friend before sharing with a leader to convince him to go with me.
If your brother sins against you, go and tell him his fault between you and him alone. If he hears
you, you have gained your brother. If he will not hear, take with you one or two more…If he
refuses to hear them, tell it to the church. (Mt. 18:15-17)

G. Commitment #7: For leaders: I commit to follow the process of bringing those who ‘continue’
in immorality to the appropriate level of “discipline” instead of offering them “unsanctified
mercy”. Those who continue in sin, rebuke in the presence of all… (1 Tim 5:20, NAS) Deliver
such a one to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that his spirit may be saved in the day of the
Lord Jesus. (1 Cor. 5:5)

H. We will not bring public shame to anyone who repents. We hope to never expose one’s sin
publicly. There are many levels of discipline that do not require personal exposure. Above all

48
things have fervent love…for love will cover a multitude of sins. (1 Pet. 4:8) He who covers a
transgression seeks love… (Prov. 17:9) 36

Reporting – Staff

The investigation has revealed that staff members who reported sexual abuse victims to their
supervisors often faced retaliation. Instead of being supported, these whistleblowers were
frequently disciplined by being transferred to different positions or having their work hours
reduced, despite the assurances in the IHOPKC Whistleblower Policy. 37Adopted on December
1, 2008.

IHOPKC Whistleblower Policy Item #3: “No Retaliation”38

“No Retaliation” states, “No board member, officer, employee, or volunteer who in good faith
reports a violation shall suffer harassment, retaliation, or adverse employment consequences. An
employee who retaliates against someone who has reported a violation in good faith is subject to
discipline up to and including termination of employment. The whistleblower policy is intended
to encourage and enable employees and others to raise serious concerns within IHOPKC prior to
seeking resolution outside IHOPKC.”

This punitive response staff members received, despite the policy set in place, discouraged staff
from coming forward. Alarmingly, the policy also pushed to keep complaints inside the
organization, with all reported complaints and allegations going directly to the compliance
officer and the Executive Director.

36
See attached Making a Purity Covenant: Seven Practical Commitments," released in 2008
37
See attached Whistleblower Policy
38
See attached Whistleblower Policy

49
IHOPKC Whistleblower Policy Item #5: “Compliance Officer”39

“IHOPKC'S compliance officer is responsible for investigating and resolving all reported
complaints and allegations concerning violations and, at his discretion, shall advise the Executive
Director and/or the audit committee. The Compliance Officer has direct access to the audit
committee of the board of directors and is required to report to the audit committee at least
annually on compliance activity.”

IW #161, a staff worship leader on the Night Watch, received a report from one of her singers
that another staff member had sexually assaulted her. GREAVES, the director of Night Watch,
was informed. The victim was taken for a sexual assault/rape exam; later, she was forced to tell
her story multiple times to different people. According to IW #161, the victim held onto the
claim of rape until she was worn out and persuaded to reconsider and drop the charges.
According to IW #161, the alleged offender was promoted and given a larger stipend to continue
in the ministry.

Reporting – Victims

The investigation has revealed that victims were often forced to disclose their personal sexual
history or history of being sexually abused as a child. In many instances, these deeply personal
stories were then used in prophetic words spoken by leaders or were used publicly to humiliate
victims in front of other students and staff. The use of victims' personal histories in such a
manner is a gross violation of trust and further exemplifies the toxic environment fostered by the
leadership.

SLIKER, the president of IHOP University, addressed IHOPU on October 27th, 2024, informing
the students about the allegations against BICKLE. He urged the students to “not spiritualize”
the situation and stated, “Suddenly, it's not safe for a woman, or anyone, to come forward with a
point of pain or something they want to work through. So, we’re not going with the black horse
narrative. I’m urging you to do the same.”

39
See attached Whistleblower Policy

50
IW #130 stated that the phrase, "You did not speak against the Lord's anointed," was often used
to silence those who tried to report abuse, creating an environment where victims felt powerless
and unsupported. This systemic failure within the leadership has had a profound impact on the
victims and the overall integrity of the organization.

IS #8's experience is deeply distressing. At 18, she advised she was sexually assaulted by ASM #
5. When she reported the assault to two staff members, she was told not to talk about it and was
forced to leave the prayer room group. She was made to attend a Matthew 18 meeting with the
offender and was told to use the word "violate" instead of "sexual abuse." IS #8 said, “She went
to people she thought she could trust, only to be met with dismissal and further harm.”

The church's failure to address the issue appropriately sends a harmful message to both victims
and perpetrators. For victims, it discourages them from coming forward, knowing they might
face further victimization rather than support. For perpetrators, it implies that their actions will
be met with protection rather than accountability.

IS #15 stated that she left IHOPKC hurt and confused, advising, “Mike Bickle, Stuart Greaves,
and Dave Sliker had an utter disregard for anyone's wellbeing.”

IS #21 advised she was sexually assaulted as an intern and was referred to the IHOP’s
counseling service, Living Waters, run by Tracey Bickle. IS #21 stated she was forced to tell her
story about being sexually assaulted as the counselor blamed her, telling her it was her fault.

IS #12 advised they were experiencing unwanted sexual advances by ASM #8 and reached out
to multiple leaders for help, but none was provided. ASM #8 stayed on staff.

51
Outside the scope

FIREFLY identified two distinct concerns during the investigation that fall outside its primary
scope. The main focus of this investigation is on specific allegations of sexually abusive
misconduct against BICKLE, as well as the actions of other individuals associated with BICKLE
and IHOPKC.

1. IHOPKC Financials

We have received numerous inquiries regarding whether FIREFLY will investigate the alleged
financial improprieties at IHOPKC. However, this aspect does not fall within the scope of the
current investigation and will not be covered in this report. While financial matters are
undoubtedly important, addressing them requires a thorough investigation with its own criteria
and objectives.

2. Hope City

We have received reports from several interviewed witnesses about alleged sexually abusive
misconduct within this organization. Testimonies from witnesses revealed a consistent pattern of
not reporting sexual misconduct incidents and highlighted the absence of clear reporting policies.
However, we realize that Hope City was a startup from IHOPKC and is a separate independent
organization. Any further investigation would be outside the scope.

52
IHOPKC Child, Youth, and Worker Protection Policy

The Child, Youth, and Worker Protection Policy40 was revised in 2018 and circulated as recently
as 2022 after the investigation into ASM #1. Page 5, under “Reporting Suspected Abuse or
Neglect,” states,

“To preserve confidentiality, it is important to discuss the incident initially only with any of these
four individuals.

Department leadership, along with the individual receiving a report or suspecting child abuse,
will proceed to give information to the division head Lenny LaGuardia, Vice President of
Ministries and Justice.

The VP of ministries will proceed to determine whether there are grounds to support a report
being made to the Missouri Children's Division (i.e., responsible cause to support that a child
has been or may be subjected to abuse or neglect or observes a child being subjected to
conditions or circumstances which would reasonably result in abuse or neglect) Prior to any
reporting to the Children and Family Services the VP will inform, consult, and inform John Hall,
COO and Eric Oppriecht, Compliance officer.”

Throughout this report, multiple victims have been affected by this policy of only discussing
sexual abuse with top leaders. It was then up to leaders to decide if they should contact law
enforcement. This approach has often led to delayed or inadequate responses, further
perpetuating a culture of silence and enabling ongoing misconduct.

Examining the long-standing culture of systemic sexual misconduct and coverups that have
thrived in the 24/7 prayer movement since IHOPKC's inception in 1999, it is evident that
leadership often took it upon themselves to investigate sexual misconduct claims, interrogate
victims, and discourage them from reporting to the police.

Furthermore, the systemic nature of this misconduct cannot be overlooked. Patterns of behavior
that shielded perpetrators and minimized victims' experiences were embedded within the
organizational structures. In many cases, leadership employed tactics such as victim-blaming,
gaslighting, and coercion to suppress allegations. Moreover, the lack of external oversight and
accountability allowed these practices to continue unabated.

40
See attached International House of Prayer Child, Youth, and Worker Protection Policy, page 5

53
Conclusions

Based on the documented statements of victims and witnesses interviewed and the evidence in
the form of documents and correspondence with the accused, this investigation concludes that
BICKLE has committed spiritual, emotional, and sexual abuse within IHOPKC. BICKLE’S
reported abuse was an ongoing course of action and patterned behavior starting as early as the
1970s based on victim accounts. Through the identified IHOPKC programs, BICKLE
systematically groomed and developed inappropriate relationships with women in the
congregation while using “Matthew 18 Meetings” to conceal, minimize, and silence victims of
sexual abuse within the church.

In further support of the above, victim accounts show BICKLE’S repeated behavior in using
prophetic language to speak to victims, isolating victims from others, purchasing gifts, frequent
visits to church-supplied apartments where victims resided, controlling behavior, public praise
and attention, frequent touching of victim’s bodies, kissing victims, and creating circumstances
where victims would observe him undressed and aroused.

BICKLE’S correspondence on December 12, 2023, acknowledges his “inappropriate behavior”

but attempts to minimize it by stating it occurred decades ago and was not the “… more intense
sexual activities that some are suggesting.” Regardless of the intensity, BICKLE’S grooming,
sexual solicitation, and abusive misconduct involving seventeen (17) women, some of whom
were minors, is evident and should not be downplayed. This behavior has caused significant
harm and trauma to the victims, and it is crucial to recognize the severity of his actions. By
minimizing his misconduct, BICKLE not only undermines the experiences of the survivors but
also perpetuates a culture of silence and impunity. It is essential to hold him accountable and
ensure that such behavior is not tolerated.

Furthermore, this report finds a deliberate indifference by BICKLE and the ELT in minimizing
reports of sexual abuse, requiring victims to confront their offenders, and discouraging victims
from seeking law enforcement assistance. Their actions, or lack thereof, contributed to an

54
environment where victims felt unsupported and vulnerable. By downplaying the severity of the
abuse and failing to take appropriate measures, BICKLE and the ELT failed to protect the
victims and uphold their duty of care. This indifference not only exacerbated the trauma
experienced by the victims but also allowed the perpetrators to evade accountability and continue
their misconduct.

IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES

1. Create a Clear and Comprehensive Policy

It is recommended that IHOPKC develop a clear and comprehensive policy on sexual
abuse, primarily focused on prevention while providing clear and actionable steps for
staff and volunteers to follow should sexual abuse be observed or reported. This policy
should be reviewed with all staff and volunteers on an annual basis, or upon joining the
staff or volunteers of the church.

2. Background Checks and Screening

All employees, staff members, and volunteers having contact with children, young
people, and vulnerable adults should be subjected to a thorough background check,
including the subject’s criminal history, child abuse clearances, and a check of the sex
offender registry. IHOPKC should continually monitor those in positions of trust through
annual screening.

3. Training and Education

IHOPKC should mandate training for ALL staff and volunteers on recognizing the signs
of abuse, both sexual and physical, and the reporting procedures should they observe said
abuse. IHOPKC should create and monitor a form of tracking all personnel to ensure
each has completed the training. This training should be conducted on an annual basis, or
upon joining the staff or volunteers of the church.

55
 4. Clear Reporting Procedures
IHOPKC should create a confidential system where church members can report abuse
without the fear of retaliation. Although not mandated by Kansas law, IHOPKC should
train staff and volunteers as mandated reporters of abuse. If a report of abuse is made,
IHOPKC must notify child protective services (or state equivalent) and/or the local law
enforcement agency. This ensures an independent investigation can occur while reducing
the opportunity or speculation of covering up reported abuse.

5. Accountability and Transparency

When a report of abuse involves a staff member or volunteer, IHOPKC should create and
follow a policy suspending the accused until the incident is investigated by authorities.
IHOPKC should be transparent about past abuse by acknowledging what has occurred,
offering apologies, and outlining the actionable steps the church is taking to rebuild the
trust of the congregation and community.

6. Support for Survivors

IHOPKC should offer support and counseling services for those impacted by sexual
abuse within their congregation. This can be accomplished by creating support groups
within the church that are led by outside professionals who specialize in sexual abuse and
mental health services.

7. Vulnerable Persons Policy

IHOPKC should create a policy restricting the ability of staff and volunteers to be alone
with children, young people, and vulnerable adults.

8. External Policy Review

IHOPKC should use an external organization to assess the church’s policy on sexual
abuse prevention, investigation, and reporting. This will ensure the IHOPKC is following
industry standards in maintaining the safety of children, young people, and vulnerable
adults within their congregation.

56
 SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS

57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68