The Lancaseter County Court of Common Pleas Civil Division: Preliminary or Special Injunction
The Lancaseter County Court of Common Pleas Civil Division: Preliminary or Special Injunction
Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©
CIVIL DIVISION
Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 1 of 23                           MONDAY February 10th, 2025
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©
             Page No.
               Page   1 of
                    No. 1A33
                                     by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©
RELIEF DEMANDED
        4. CEASE-AND-DISIST From the RAMIREZ FAMILY From PUTTING WATER THRU THE
           WALL AT THE KITHEN AND BASEMENT SINKS for 2 Years while also DAMAGING
           THE WASH MACHINE USELESS.
        6. The IMMEDIATE RELIEF and ACCESS TO ALL DOWNTOWN LANCASTER CITY BARS
           & RESTUARANTS.
        7. Both RAMIREZ Stalking Charges Dismissed - Lower Court 6520-2017 and 0921-
           2019
13. The RETURN of ALL MAIL STOLEN in the Past Few Months.
Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 2 of 23                           MONDAY February 10th, 2025
                                     by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©
        15.    Return of ALL FINES & COSTS RESTRAINING Order Re ALL PAST AND
           PRESENT OCCUPANTS OF 1252 Fremont Street. Being Restored-To-Whole, back to
           when these injustices first began on June 23, 1987
18. Provided Security for all Property, including ALL Electronic Data
        19.        Provide a Federal Arbitrator for all Federal, State, and Local Claims –
                   including Anti-Trust and American Disabilities Act of 1990 Violation
        22.        Access to all PUBLIC PLACES which had fabricated events and No Trespass
                   Notices
        23.        Condemnation of 1252, 1256, 1258, 1261 and 1242 Fremont Street
                   Properties as Domestic Terrorists
        24.        The Condemnation and Deed to the original 1470 Manhiem Pike, Lancaster,
                   PA property as it was for Sam Caterbone Cleaners, Inc.
        25.        The Condemnation and Deed to 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga,
                   Pennsylvania
26. The Condemnation and Deed to 554 Berkley Road, Stone Harbor, New Jersey
        27.        The Condemnation and Deed to 433 West Marion Street, Lancaster,
                   Pennsylvania
        28.        The Condemnation and Deed to 2323 New Danville Pike, Conestoga,
                   Pennsylvania
Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 3 of 23                           MONDAY February 10th, 2025
                                     by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©
     THE 2009 CIVIL COMPLAINT v. The Lancaster City Police for REVIEW and
     CONSIDERATION in Adjudicating This Case
     STAN CATERBONE v. Lancaster City Police - Case No. 08-08942 in U.S
     District Court
     The Case Was WITHDRAWN WITHOUT PREJUDICE and GRANTED The Following is the
     Introduction Filed in that case.
           CATERBONE also alleges that the Lancaster City Bureau of Police were used to
            retaliate and sabotage other litigation and civil complaints against other police
            departments, namely the Southern Regional Police Department, Manheim
            Township Police Department, East Lampeter Police Department, Millersville Boro
            Police, Avalon Police Department and the Stone Harbor Police Department.
           CATERBONE alleges that by ignoring his complaints the Lancaster City Police
            Department gave the green light for others to continue a long and successful
            period of harassment, thievery, property damage, computer and electronic
            hacking, deletion and manipulation of court related documents, records and
            evidence, mail fraud, and the like. These activities are so intense that they have
            taken on the characteristics of hate crimes.
           CATERBONE alleges that the gross abuse and negligence defamed his name and
            that of his company, ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, which discredited his reputation
            in an effort to diminish credibility in the courts and to disrupt and thwart any
            possible business relations and operations of ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP resulting
            in direct and immediate financial losses and loss of income.
           Chief Keith Sadler and the Lancaster City Police Bureau rejected and refused to
            resolve these disputes through mediation when CATERBONE opened a case with
            the Lancaster Center for Mediation in May of 2008 and Keith Sadler communicated
            on May 8, 2008 that he would not cooperate and mediate with CATERBONE.
           On several occasions in 2007 several police officers of the Lancaster City Bureau
            of Police instructed CATERBONE, in person upon responding to complaints, not to
            call 911 or the Lancaster City Police Department and that the Lancaster City
            Bureau of Police would not respond or take complaints.
           The Lancaster City Bureau of Police only took one (1) incident of gas siphoned and
            stolen from CATERBONE’s 1991 Dodge pickup truck, and refused to take the over
Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 4 of 23                           MONDAY February 10th, 2025
                                     by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©
           CATERBONE also had personal meeting with Lancaster City Mayor Rick Gray in
            Lancaster City Hall on at least 4 occasions to find a solution to the problems and
            for help to mediate the problems and resolve the conflicts and the pain and
            suffering, as well as loss and destruction of property and that CATERBONE was
            undergoing.
           In November of 2007, CATERBONE and the Advanced Media Group went public
            with their Downtown Lancaster investments and business plans that were
            culminated over the past 9 years. The Advanced Media Group also formerly and
            publicly introduced their Downtown Lancaster Action Plan via handouts, websites,
            and blogs; and began meetings and negotiations with major stakeholders, City of
            Lancaster Public Officials, Developers, and investors.
Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 5 of 23                           MONDAY February 10th, 2025
                                     by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©
            because I haven't found it.” The case was covered by a 3 part series in the Los
            Angeles Times by writer Barry Seigel on November 10, 1997 and a television
            episode on the A&E Network American Justice Series. The Lancaster community
            gathered over 10,000 signatures on a petition to impeach U.S. District Judge
            Stewart Dalzell for his rulings. In the end, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
            took control of the case and appealed the ruling that freed Lambert sending her
            back to prison. The case went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court in 2005, after
            being denied any review. The case accentuated the rights of Federal Law vs. State
            Law and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania solicited a team of attorney generals
            from across the nation to help their cause. CATERBONE attended a hearing before
            Judge Larry Stengel in the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas and to this
            day, due to his knowledge and experience with the Lancaster County Judicial
            System and Law Enforcement believes the case should have never been conducted
            without a jury trial, and that the over zealous prosecution proves that
            prosecutorial misconduct was never thoroughly investigated or prosecuted in the
            Lambert case. CATERBONE will not let that happen in his cases.
__________________________________________________
Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 6 of 23                           MONDAY February 10th, 2025
                                     by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©
           On June 23, 1987 International Signal and Control, or ISC Executive Larry Resch,
            (one of 3 Executive Sued for the $1 Billion Dollar Fraud by Ferranti International of
            England) visits Stan J. Caterbone at his office at Financial Management Group, Ltd.,
            which he co-founded, to help finance some of International Signal and Control, or ISC
            failing assests or companies
           Stan J. Caterbone on June 23, 1987 has his locks changed to his office by Russel
            Locksmith of Lititz and begins his WHISTLEBLOWING ACTITIES
           On September 2, 1987 – The Manheim Towhship Police and Lancaster County District
            Attorney's Office File 8 False Arrests (5 Felonies & 3 Misdameanors) and Falsely
            Imprison Stan J. Caterbone
           In December of 1987 International Signal and Control, or ISC MERGE With Ferranti
            International of London, England in a $1 Billion Dollar Merger
           In March of 1988 ALL Charges are DISMISSED by Lancaster County District Attorney's
            Office
 In The 1970's William Barr was employed by the Central Intelligence Agency, or CIA
           In the Summer of 1991 Craig Stedman Arrives from the Department of Defense'
            Military Intelligence Training Program as an Assistant District Attorney
           In November of 991 ISC is Indicted as one of the largest Frauds in U.S. History at $1
            Billion Dollars
           In 1992 President Clinton Appoints Admiral Bobby Ray Inman for Secretary of Defense
            only to have him Remove his name amid Press Questions regarding International
            Signal and Control, or ISC Scandal
           In November of 2017 while William Barr is U.S. Attorney General and Craig Stedman is
            Lancaster County District Attorney Stan J. Caterbone is FALSLEY ARRESTED AND
            IMPRISONED for the 1st FABRICATED RAMIREZ Stalking Charge
           On January 11th, 2019, again while William Barr is U.S. Attorney General and Craig
            Stedman is Lancaster County District Attorney Stan J. Caterbone is FALSLEY
            ARRESTED AND IMPRISONED for the 2nd FABRICATED RAMIREZ Stalking Charge and
            FALSLEY IMPRISONED until October 3, 2019 or Almost 9 Months
Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 7 of 23                           MONDAY February 10th, 2025
                                     by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©
           On October 3, 2019 Stan J. Caterbone Pleads NO CONTEST and Is Released From the
            Lancaster County Prison only after RECIEVING 16 Years of Probation and is in the
            Custody of the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas until the age of 77.
Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 8 of 23                           MONDAY February 10th, 2025
                                     by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©
     BACKGROUND
            Stan J. Caterbone am a Federal Whistleblower and in 1987 Stan J. Caterbone met with
     Executives of an International Arms dealer named International Signal and Control, PLC., or
     ISC, headquartered in my hometown of Lancaster, Pennsylvania. Stan J. Caterbone at the
     time was a shareholder and Stan J. Caterbone was solicited to finance some problematic
     operations through financial firm that Stan J. Caterbone had founded, Financial Management
     Group, Ltd., In 1991 they were indicted for the third largest fraud in the United States, a
     $Billion Dollar Fraud, when they merged with Great Britain's largest Defense Contractor,
     Ferranti International, Plc., in 1987. In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone was arrested for literally
     stealing my own files from my own office and faced 4 felonies and 3 misdemeanors with
     prison terms in the tens of years. After the merger was completed in December of 1987, all
     of my charges were dismissed by the Lancaster County District Attorney's Office in March of
     1988. ISC Board Member, Bobby Ray Inman, who was former Secretary of the Navy and
     former Director of the National Security Agency, or NSA was nominated to be Secretary of
     Defense for Bill Clinton. He later had to withdraw his name after allegations of ISC began to
     surface. In 1991 Ted Koppel and the Financial Times of London broadcast 3 different
     segments disclosing that ISC was essentially a black ops program of the NSA and CIA and
     tried desperately to derail the nomination for Director of the CIA, Robert Gates, who they
     allege was involved in the early stages of the program. He was named Director of the CIA
     and later served as Secretary of Defense for George W. Bush and now President Barrack
     Obama. ISC responsible for developing the Cluster Bomb, and Saddam Hussein was a loyal
     customer.
     In the late 1980's and early 1990 Stan J. Caterbone was a contractor for several government
     agencies, including DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency of the
     Department of Defense. My company Advanced Media Group had conducted business all over
     the world, including some 15 or more foreign countries. DARPA IS WIDELY KNOWN AS A
     DEVELOPER OF MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES AND HOLDS PATENTS. DARPA is also
     credited for developing the internet. Stan J. Caterbone was an expert in optical publishing
     and my company was one of only 4 or 5 that had the capability to manufacture CD-ROM's in
     the domestic United States.
     Now, lets get to Bobby Ray Inman, former Navy, Director of the National Security Agency
     (NSA), former Director of International Signal & Control (ISC), and currently part of the
     Mind Control industry. The following appears on the Welcome page of my website:
Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 9 of 23                           MONDAY February 10th, 2025
                                     by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©
     PRO SE PLAINTIFF STAN J. CATERBONE'S brother, Samuel A. Caterbone, (Sammy) (U.S. Air
     Force 1969-1971) received the same victimization through the use of the LSD experiments
     of the same program while in the United States Air Force with FLASHBACKS after being
     discharged in or about in 1971.
     In late spring of 2005, the “HANDLERS” introduce females to the sessions. To this day, the
     torture consists of the same, interrogations mixed in with harassment, sex, and humor. It is
     the opinion of Pro Se PLAINTIFF STAN J. CATERBONE, that the only way to keep from
     desensitizing and numbing the harassment and pain is to experience pleasure and laughter
     so as to keep the magnitude of the pain at it's highest level.
     This can be substantiated and validated by the fact that the Social Security Administration
     Under Health And Human Services granted Pro Se PLAINTIFF STAN J. CATERBONE disability
     benefits in August of 2009 for symptoms and illnesses related to U.S. SPONSORED MIND
     CONTROL, and in fact stated in the award letter that disability was determined to begin in
     December of 2005; the date Pro Se PLAINTIFF STAN J. CATERBONE declared that the
     synthetic telepathy had gone full-time 24/7, without interruption, to this day.
     One must remember that the U.S. Sponsored Mind Control Programs were the direct result
     of the Soviet Union's accomplishments using Microwave Technologies to bombard the U.S.
Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 10 of 23                          MONDAY February 10th, 2025
                                     by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©
     Embassy in Moscow as early the 1950's and the use of German Psychiatrists by Adolf Hitler
     in the 1940's developing psychological warfare programs. Both the German and Soviet Mind
     Control Programs predate that of the United States. Thus, the beginning of the Mind Control
     Arms Race. Just this year, the Trump Administration introduced the NEW MILITARY SPACE
     AGENCY, in an effort to formalize the weaponization of Space and Microwave Weapons
     under one agency. This will convert the Department of Defense programs and that of the U.
     S. Intelligence Agencies to this new Military Space Agency.
Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 11 of 23                          MONDAY February 10th, 2025
                                     by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©
EXHIBIT
Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 12 of 23                          MONDAY February 10th, 2025
                                     by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©
Customer Service:
           On January 15th and January 16th, 2025 I placed PURCHASES and PAID for Purchases
     to be Delivered on or about January 17 th, 2025. However, after the DELIVERIES WERE
     MARKED DELIVERED IN MY AMAZON ACCOUNT in both the Desktop and Smartphone
     Applications MY FRONT PORCH WAS EMPTY AND DID NOT CONTAIN ANY DELIVERIES. The
     Problem arising when in the AMAZON REFUND System, THERE IS NO CATEGORY TO SELECT
     FOR DELIVERED TO WRONG ADDRESS. Several Attempts were made to have AMAZON
     Refund the Purchases without any success.
______________________________
Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 13 of 23                          MONDAY February 10th, 2025
                                     by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©
Re: NEW DISPUTE RESOLUTION for FRAUDULENT TRANSACTIONS For a Total of $263.94
Customer Service:
______________________________
Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 14 of 23                          MONDAY February 10th, 2025
                                     by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©
Customer Service:
           Yesterday, Thursday July 13th at 4:09pm EST I placed a call to your customer service
     regarding the REVERSAL of the HP Instant Ink on July 10 th, 2023 of $149.42. The customer
     Service Representative told me that the DISPUTE RESOLUTION WAS DENIED. How can this
     be when in fact:
        29.      On June 21st, 2023 I received a DISPUTE RESOLUTION CREDIT for the 1 st HP
           Instant Ink Dispute of $113.42.
        30.      I purchased the HP Printer from Amazon for $113.87 and it was Delivered on
           April 21st, 2023 to my Home/Office at 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster PA.
        31.      Included in the Sales Price was “6 Months of FREE” HP Instant Ink including ALL
           Ink Cartridges and Paper on a Monthly basis. I have provided this documentation to
           you on several different occasions by email and U.S. Mails.
        32.      On July 7th, 2023 I CANCELLED the HP Instant Ink Free Trial, and received a
           confirmation email. However, the CANCELLATION does not take effect until the end of
           the current cycle, which is July 21 st, 2023.
        33.      HP Instant Ink is LINKED to the Printer via WIFI and TRACKS EVERY PAGE
           PRINTED. I will automatically receive a FREE Ream of Paper upon 700 pages and INK
           REFILLS on every cycle, the next July 21st.
           I Recently went to cancel this service, however in the fine print, I CANNOT CANCEL
     until July 21st, the start of the next billing cycle. Enclosed is the documentation for my
     PROVISIONAL CREDIT.
Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 15 of 23                          MONDAY February 10th, 2025
                                     by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©
                         IN FORMA
                         PAUPERIS
Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 16 of 23                          MONDAY February 10th, 2025
                                     by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©
OF LANCASTER COUNTY
CIVIL DIVISION
___________________________________________
     (1) I am the (check one) X PLAINTIFF � DEFENDANT in the above matter and do live
     alone and because of my financial condition I am unable to pay the required filing fee of
     $ 171.00.
(2) I am unable to obtain funds from anyone, including my family and associates, to
Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 17 of 23                          MONDAY February 10th, 2025
                                     by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©
Check one:
      I am currently a recipient of the following type(s) of Benefits from the Social Security
         Administration for Long Term Disability Benefits for illnesses and symptoms relating
         to U.S. Sponsored Mind Control as evidenced by my documentation and the fact that
         no medical reports or physicians were reported in the entire application process and
         there was never a psychiatric evaluation for the same said purposes. I am receiving
         a net monthly benefit of $1682.00 and have been since April of 2008 and was
         declared disabled in December of 2005, the same said month that I reported that I
         became the victim of full-time synthetic telepathy, as well as other related
         symptoms and illnesses.
     I verify that the statement made in this Petition, and attached Poverty Affidavit (if
     applicable), are true and correct. I understand that false statements herein are made
     subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 4904, relating to unsworn falsification to
     authorities.
_____________________________
Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 18 of 23                          MONDAY February 10th, 2025
                                     by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©
Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 19 of 23                          MONDAY February 10th, 2025
                                     by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©
__________________________________________________
c.) Please list any other income received within the past twelve months:
    (Write the gross amount (before taxes) per month that you received and the months
    you received this income.)
Interest: ______________________________________________
Dividends: _____________________________________________
Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 20 of 23                          MONDAY February 10th, 2025
                                     by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©
______________________________________________________
Other: ________________________________________________
(Write the gross amount (before taxes) per month that you received and the months you received this
Employer: _____________________________________________
    Real estate (including home): ¼ Ownership of 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA with
    brothers
Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 21 of 23                          MONDAY February 10th, 2025
                                     by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©
Other:
Utilities $600.00
Auto Loan: $
Auto Expenses: $
Loans: ________________________________________________
    Other: Total Liabilities from Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case No. 16-10157 in the U.S.
    Bankruptcy Court for Eastern Pennsylvania is $132,209.00
(Write all of your regular monthly bills, phone, utilities, cable, insurance, etc.)
Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 22 of 23                          MONDAY February 10th, 2025
                                     by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©
OF LANCASTER COUNTY
CIVIL DIVISION
___________________________________________
_______________________________________________________
BY THE COURT:
_____________________________
J.
Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 23 of 23 MONDAY February 10th, 2025