0% found this document useful (0 votes)
103 views24 pages

The Lancaseter County Court of Common Pleas Civil Division: Preliminary or Special Injunction

Stanley J. Caterbone has filed a civil case against Direct Express and local businesses, seeking a preliminary injunction for the repayment of funds lost due to alleged extortion and fraud. He demands various forms of relief, including compensation for damages, cessation of harassment, and restoration of property. The document details numerous grievances against local entities and law enforcement, alleging a long history of abuse and negligence towards his complaints.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
103 views24 pages

The Lancaseter County Court of Common Pleas Civil Division: Preliminary or Special Injunction

Stanley J. Caterbone has filed a civil case against Direct Express and local businesses, seeking a preliminary injunction for the repayment of funds lost due to alleged extortion and fraud. He demands various forms of relief, including compensation for damages, cessation of harassment, and restoration of property. The document details numerous grievances against local entities and law enforcement, alleging a long history of abuse and negligence towards his complaints.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 24

by Stan J.

Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©

THE LANCASETER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

CIVIL DIVISION

In Re: STANLEY J. CATERBONE


PETITIONERS
Case No. 25-_________
v.
Direct Express
Cigar Bar
Tobacco Store
DEFENDANTS

PRELIMINARY OR SPECIAL INJUNCTION


Re The REPAYMENT of Funds Lost Thru COINTELPRO EXTORTION
DIRTY TRICKS and EXTORTION PLOTS In The Amound of $1,158.95.

Direct Express AGAIN DENIED A DISPUTE RESOLUTION Re AMAZON for


$408.00 when the EVIDENCE IS CLEAR AND BINDING. Dan Falcone and
the CIGAR BAR Extorted some $50.00 Thru Over-Charging on First Friday
February 7th, 2025 at the Cigar Bar on East King Street. And the Tobacco
Store on East King Street Sold a DEFECTIVE VAPOR PEN FOR MEDICAL
MARIJUANA for $24.95 Plus Tax and REFUSED TO EXCHANGE OR REFUND.

Date: MONDAY February 10th, 2025

Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
[email protected]
717-429-2972

Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 1 of 23 MONDAY February 10th, 2025
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©

Page No.
Page 1 of
No. 1A33
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©

RELIEF DEMANDED

OTHER RELIEF THAT SHOULD ALSO BE UNDER


CONSIDERATION OF THIS COURT
1. CEASE-AND-DISIST From BEING DRUGGED WITH ROHYPNOL OR OTHER DRUGS
AND PERPETRATORS DELETING AND FILES AND DOCUMENTS FROM COMPUTERS
AND BACK-UP MEDIA.

2. CEASE-AND-DISIST From HACKERS HACKING ALL OF MY ELECTRONICS


INCLUDING CLONING MY SMARTPHONE.

3. CEASE-AND-DISIST From TOXIC POISONEOUS GASES into My Home similar to how


the IRANIAN SCHOOLGIRLS WERE GASSED IN MARCH OF 2023 -

Hundreds of schoolgirls poisoned across Iran with toxic gas -


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Akcer_ur-ys

4. CEASE-AND-DISIST From the RAMIREZ FAMILY From PUTTING WATER THRU THE
WALL AT THE KITHEN AND BASEMENT SINKS for 2 Years while also DAMAGING
THE WASH MACHINE USELESS.

5. CEASE-AND-DISIST From the RAMIREZ FAMILY From PUTTING ROACHES in my


KITCHEN & BATHROOM.

6. The IMMEDIATE RELIEF and ACCESS TO ALL DOWNTOWN LANCASTER CITY BARS
& RESTUARANTS.

7. Both RAMIREZ Stalking Charges Dismissed - Lower Court 6520-2017 and 0921-
2019

8. Immediate Release From Probation

9. The REFUND of some $713.00 in Fraudulent Transactions in my DIRECT EXPRESS


DEBIT CARD ACCOUNT – Where Every Third Wednesday $1,733.00 is DEPOSITED
for the Social Security Disability Payments.

10. A CEASE-AND-DISIST To All PERSONS BREAKING INTO MY HOME AT 1250


Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA on a DAILY BASIS Gaslighting Contents,
Damaging Contents, Stealing Contents, and ALTERING FOOD & BEVERAGES.

11. The CONSTANT SURVEILLANCE AND STALKING BY NEIGHBORS – And


TREATEING IN ORDER TO KEEP ME FROM LEAVING AND WORKING OR
ENJOING THE OUTDOORS.

12. The RESTORATION of all Damaged and Sabatoged Electrical Outlets


(INDOOR & OUTDOOR) and Thermostat.

13. The RETURN of ALL MAIL STOLEN in the Past Few Months.

14. The RETURN OF A LIKE-KIND 2004 HYUNDI SANTA FE – 2012 Or After.

Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 2 of 23 MONDAY February 10th, 2025
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©

15. Return of ALL FINES & COSTS RESTRAINING Order Re ALL PAST AND
PRESENT OCCUPANTS OF 1252 Fremont Street. Being Restored-To-Whole, back to
when these injustices first began on June 23, 1987

16. Compensated for the $79,237.79 of Vandalism and Thefts

17. Compensated for the $2,437,970.54 of Pro Se Billings

18. Provided Security for all Property, including ALL Electronic Data

19. Provide a Federal Arbitrator for all Federal, State, and Local Claims –
including Anti-Trust and American Disabilities Act of 1990 Violation

20. An automatic claim as described in the The HAVANA ACT of 2021

21. Absolute DISMISSAL and EXONERATION of ALL CRIMINAL CHARGES since


1987

22. Access to all PUBLIC PLACES which had fabricated events and No Trespass
Notices

23. Condemnation of 1252, 1256, 1258, 1261 and 1242 Fremont Street
Properties as Domestic Terrorists

24. The Condemnation and Deed to the original 1470 Manhiem Pike, Lancaster,
PA property as it was for Sam Caterbone Cleaners, Inc.

25. The Condemnation and Deed to 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga,
Pennsylvania

26. The Condemnation and Deed to 554 Berkley Road, Stone Harbor, New Jersey

27. The Condemnation and Deed to 433 West Marion Street, Lancaster,
Pennsylvania

28. The Condemnation and Deed to 2323 New Danville Pike, Conestoga,
Pennsylvania

Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 3 of 23 MONDAY February 10th, 2025
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©

THE 2009 CIVIL COMPLAINT v. The Lancaster City Police for REVIEW and
CONSIDERATION in Adjudicating This Case
STAN CATERBONE v. Lancaster City Police - Case No. 08-08942 in U.S
District Court
The Case Was WITHDRAWN WITHOUT PREJUDICE and GRANTED The Following is the
Introduction Filed in that case.

 To 30 Omitted due to a COMPUTER HACKER

 The PLAINTIFF, Stanley J. Caterbone (CATERBONE), alleges that the City of


Lancaster and the Lancaster City Bureau of Police and others colluded to
deliberately ignore CATERBONE’S complaints, an abuse of process, in an effort to
interrupt and sabotage current and ongoing litigation and civil complaints against
several major businesses and government agencies with headquarters in the City
of Lancaster and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania. Those would include the
Lancaster General Hospital; High Industries (Penn Square Partners and the
Lancaster County Convention Center); Fulton Bank and Fulton Financial
Corporation; Wachovia Bank branches; Lancaster Newspapers; the County of
Lancaster; the Lancaster County Prison; the Hotel Brunswick; James Street
Investment District; Aurora Films; Haverstick Films; and the Lancaster City Bureau
of Police.

 CATERBONE also alleges that the Lancaster City Bureau of Police were used to
retaliate and sabotage other litigation and civil complaints against other police
departments, namely the Southern Regional Police Department, Manheim
Township Police Department, East Lampeter Police Department, Millersville Boro
Police, Avalon Police Department and the Stone Harbor Police Department.

 CATERBONE alleges that by ignoring his complaints the Lancaster City Police
Department gave the green light for others to continue a long and successful
period of harassment, thievery, property damage, computer and electronic
hacking, deletion and manipulation of court related documents, records and
evidence, mail fraud, and the like. These activities are so intense that they have
taken on the characteristics of hate crimes.

 CATERBONE alleges that the gross abuse and negligence defamed his name and
that of his company, ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, which discredited his reputation
in an effort to diminish credibility in the courts and to disrupt and thwart any
possible business relations and operations of ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP resulting
in direct and immediate financial losses and loss of income.

 Chief Keith Sadler and the Lancaster City Police Bureau rejected and refused to
resolve these disputes through mediation when CATERBONE opened a case with
the Lancaster Center for Mediation in May of 2008 and Keith Sadler communicated
on May 8, 2008 that he would not cooperate and mediate with CATERBONE.

 On several occasions in 2007 several police officers of the Lancaster City Bureau
of Police instructed CATERBONE, in person upon responding to complaints, not to
call 911 or the Lancaster City Police Department and that the Lancaster City
Bureau of Police would not respond or take complaints.

 The Lancaster City Bureau of Police only took one (1) incident of gas siphoned and
stolen from CATERBONE’s 1991 Dodge pickup truck, and refused to take the over

Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 4 of 23 MONDAY February 10th, 2025
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©

50 (from December 20, 2007 to present), or so other incidents as a complaint,


regardless of the efforts to have Lancaster City Mayor Rick Grey and the Lancaster
City Solicitor to look into the allegations and complaints. CATERBONE had
meticulously documented the incidents in a journal and a log of gas receipts,
photographs, and odometer miles for all of the incidents.

 The Lancaster City Bureau of Police had responded to approximately 10 or so 911


calls in the last eighteen (18) months to 1250 Fremont Street, residence of
CATERBONE, for complaints of property damage; stolen property, legal and
business files and evidence for litigation; computer and electronic hacking with
deleted electronic files; harassment; terrorist threats, stalking, stolen mail, etc.,.

 CATERBONE had complained of abuse of process to state and federal law


enforcement of the situation, including U.S. Senator Arlen Specter’s office.
CATERBONE had also visited the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in both
Harrisburg and Philadelphia for help and intervention.

 CATERBONE also had personal meeting with Lancaster City Mayor Rick Gray in
Lancaster City Hall on at least 4 occasions to find a solution to the problems and
for help to mediate the problems and resolve the conflicts and the pain and
suffering, as well as loss and destruction of property and that CATERBONE was
undergoing.

 In November of 2007, CATERBONE and the Advanced Media Group went public
with their Downtown Lancaster investments and business plans that were
culminated over the past 9 years. The Advanced Media Group also formerly and
publicly introduced their Downtown Lancaster Action Plan via handouts, websites,
and blogs; and began meetings and negotiations with major stakeholders, City of
Lancaster Public Officials, Developers, and investors.

 In 1997 CATERBONE had solicited Attorney Christina Rainville of Philadelphia and


pro bono attorney for Lisa Michelle Lambert in the Laurie Show murder case. The
murder trials and appeals of the Lambert case demonized Ms. Christina Rainville
and U.S. District Court Judge Stewart Dalzell. After CATERBONE submitted
documents and audio recordings, Ms. Christina Rainville had communicated with
CATERBONE that she was not able to take his case due to the fact that her
Philadelphia law firm had banned her from taking on any more Lancaster County
residents, despite the fact that many more sought her legal counsel. On
December 31, 1997, CATERBONE had also personally delivered a CD-ROM to the
chambers of U.S. District Court Judge Stewart Dalzell in an effort to bring
attention to his case. In May of 1998 CATERBONE submitted an AFFADAVIT to the
law firm of Schneider and Harrison outlining the prosecutorial misconduct or
Finding of Facts of the 1987 cover-up for Ms. Christina Rainville. CATERBONE
alleges that these facts were part of the attitude and the motives for the law
enforcement-at-large of Lancaster County and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
to ignore the rule of law and procedure in order to bring these false arrests and
malicious prosecutions. The Lancaster County community-at-large had the same
attitude toward CATERBONE. The Lambert case received national notoriety when
U.S. District Judge Stuart Dalzell freed Lambert on a Habeus Corpus appeal
hearing citing she was “actually innocent” beyond a reasonable doubt. Judge
Dalzell was quoted in chambers as saying, "I can tell you, Mr. Madenspacher, that
I've thought about nothing else but this case for over three weeks, and in my
experience, sir, and I invite you to disabuse me of this at oral argument, I want
you and I want the Schnader firm to look for any case in any jurisdiction in the
English-speaking world where there has been as much prosecutorial misconduct,

Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 5 of 23 MONDAY February 10th, 2025
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©

because I haven't found it.” The case was covered by a 3 part series in the Los
Angeles Times by writer Barry Seigel on November 10, 1997 and a television
episode on the A&E Network American Justice Series. The Lancaster community
gathered over 10,000 signatures on a petition to impeach U.S. District Judge
Stewart Dalzell for his rulings. In the end, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
took control of the case and appealed the ruling that freed Lambert sending her
back to prison. The case went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court in 2005, after
being denied any review. The case accentuated the rights of Federal Law vs. State
Law and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania solicited a team of attorney generals
from across the nation to help their cause. CATERBONE attended a hearing before
Judge Larry Stengel in the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas and to this
day, due to his knowledge and experience with the Lancaster County Judicial
System and Law Enforcement believes the case should have never been conducted
without a jury trial, and that the over zealous prosecution proves that
prosecutorial misconduct was never thoroughly investigated or prosecuted in the
Lambert case. CATERBONE will not let that happen in his cases.

__________________________________________________

Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 6 of 23 MONDAY February 10th, 2025
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©

THE CIVIL CONSPIRACY AND COINTELPRO Operation to DISCREDIT Stan J.


Caterbone and ALL ALLEGATIONS
 (CLICK) In 1983 Then Stock Broker Gib Armstrong, later to become one of the leading
Pennsylvania State Senators, solicits Stan J. Caterbone to purchase shares of
International Signal and Control, or ISC, which he purchases 1,000 shares -
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_y_mfOrcUeqTSBta02vWnPOzubaP0GRn/view?
usp=sharing

 On June 23, 1987 International Signal and Control, or ISC Executive Larry Resch,
(one of 3 Executive Sued for the $1 Billion Dollar Fraud by Ferranti International of
England) visits Stan J. Caterbone at his office at Financial Management Group, Ltd.,
which he co-founded, to help finance some of International Signal and Control, or ISC
failing assests or companies

 Stan J. Caterbone on June 23, 1987 has his locks changed to his office by Russel
Locksmith of Lititz and begins his WHISTLEBLOWING ACTITIES

 On September 2, 1987 – The Manheim Towhship Police and Lancaster County District
Attorney's Office File 8 False Arrests (5 Felonies & 3 Misdameanors) and Falsely
Imprison Stan J. Caterbone

 In December of 1987 International Signal and Control, or ISC MERGE With Ferranti
International of London, England in a $1 Billion Dollar Merger

 In March of 1988 ALL Charges are DISMISSED by Lancaster County District Attorney's
Office

 In The 1970's William Barr was employed by the Central Intelligence Agency, or CIA

 In the Summer of 1991 Craig Stedman Arrives from the Department of Defense'
Military Intelligence Training Program as an Assistant District Attorney

 In September of 1991 Robert Gates is Confirmed Director of Central Intelligence


Agency, or CIA Amid Questions from Judiciary Hearing regarding Internatianl Signal
and Control, or ISC and Lancaster, PA

 In November of 991 ISC is Indicted as one of the largest Frauds in U.S. History at $1
Billion Dollars

 In November of 1991 William Barr is Appointed U. S. Attorney General by President


George H.W. Bush until the January 20th, 1992 Inauguration of President William
Jefferson Clinton

 In 1992 President Clinton Appoints Admiral Bobby Ray Inman for Secretary of Defense
only to have him Remove his name amid Press Questions regarding International
Signal and Control, or ISC Scandal

 In November of 2017 while William Barr is U.S. Attorney General and Craig Stedman is
Lancaster County District Attorney Stan J. Caterbone is FALSLEY ARRESTED AND
IMPRISONED for the 1st FABRICATED RAMIREZ Stalking Charge

 On January 11th, 2019, again while William Barr is U.S. Attorney General and Craig
Stedman is Lancaster County District Attorney Stan J. Caterbone is FALSLEY
ARRESTED AND IMPRISONED for the 2nd FABRICATED RAMIREZ Stalking Charge and
FALSLEY IMPRISONED until October 3, 2019 or Almost 9 Months

Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 7 of 23 MONDAY February 10th, 2025
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©

 On October 3, 2019 Stan J. Caterbone Pleads NO CONTEST and Is Released From the
Lancaster County Prison only after RECIEVING 16 Years of Probation and is in the
Custody of the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas until the age of 77.

Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 8 of 23 MONDAY February 10th, 2025
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©

BACKGROUND
Stan J. Caterbone am a Federal Whistleblower and in 1987 Stan J. Caterbone met with
Executives of an International Arms dealer named International Signal and Control, PLC., or
ISC, headquartered in my hometown of Lancaster, Pennsylvania. Stan J. Caterbone at the
time was a shareholder and Stan J. Caterbone was solicited to finance some problematic
operations through financial firm that Stan J. Caterbone had founded, Financial Management
Group, Ltd., In 1991 they were indicted for the third largest fraud in the United States, a
$Billion Dollar Fraud, when they merged with Great Britain's largest Defense Contractor,
Ferranti International, Plc., in 1987. In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone was arrested for literally
stealing my own files from my own office and faced 4 felonies and 3 misdemeanors with
prison terms in the tens of years. After the merger was completed in December of 1987, all
of my charges were dismissed by the Lancaster County District Attorney's Office in March of
1988. ISC Board Member, Bobby Ray Inman, who was former Secretary of the Navy and
former Director of the National Security Agency, or NSA was nominated to be Secretary of
Defense for Bill Clinton. He later had to withdraw his name after allegations of ISC began to
surface. In 1991 Ted Koppel and the Financial Times of London broadcast 3 different
segments disclosing that ISC was essentially a black ops program of the NSA and CIA and
tried desperately to derail the nomination for Director of the CIA, Robert Gates, who they
allege was involved in the early stages of the program. He was named Director of the CIA
and later served as Secretary of Defense for George W. Bush and now President Barrack
Obama. ISC responsible for developing the Cluster Bomb, and Saddam Hussein was a loyal
customer.
In the late 1980's and early 1990 Stan J. Caterbone was a contractor for several government
agencies, including DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency of the
Department of Defense. My company Advanced Media Group had conducted business all over
the world, including some 15 or more foreign countries. DARPA IS WIDELY KNOWN AS A
DEVELOPER OF MIND CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES AND HOLDS PATENTS. DARPA is also
credited for developing the internet. Stan J. Caterbone was an expert in optical publishing
and my company was one of only 4 or 5 that had the capability to manufacture CD-ROM's in
the domestic United States.
Now, lets get to Bobby Ray Inman, former Navy, Director of the National Security Agency
(NSA), former Director of International Signal & Control (ISC), and currently part of the
Mind Control industry. The following appears on the Welcome page of my website:

"S.A.I.C. involvement in 1993 American Para psychological Association meeting


arrangements, via their 'Cognitive Sciences Laboratory'. Science Applications International
Corporation is a big time defense contractor, has held the largest number of research
contracts of any defense contractor. Bobby Ray Inman (ISC Board of Directors) is on its
board of directors, among others." by John Porter, CIA Program on Mind Control copyright
1996. In 1994, after Bobby Ray Inman requested to be withdrawn from consideration as
Bill Clinton's first Defense Secretary, his critics speculated that the decision was motivated
by a desire to conceal his links to ISC. Inman was a member of the so-called "shadow
board" of the company which was allegedly either negligent or approved the exports."by
Wikipedia on International Signal and Control, (ISC).”

Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 9 of 23 MONDAY February 10th, 2025
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©

U.S. SPONSORED MIND CONTROL


U.S. Sponsored Mind Control Systems are used to compliment these illegal programs to
silence WHISTLEBLOWERS and others that our government recognizes as a threat to their
illegal strategies and those that are seeking the TRUTH. Synthetic Telepathy Coupled with
Electromagnetic Weapons used for pain have been the ELECTRONIC WEAPONS OF CHOICE
by the PERPETRATORS committing these haneus crimes against, PRO SE PLAINTIFF STAN J.
CATERBONE since at least 2005. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., the father of PRO SE PLAINTIFF
STAN J. CATERBONE, U.S. Navy 1943 to 1947 was a victim of MK-ULTRA and experienced the
same effects since at least the early 1960's. Brainwashing techniques via electro-shock
therapy, synthetic telepathy, vandalism to property, extortion of property and businesses
were first used against him – a prototype for later use against PRO PLAINTIFF STAN J.
CATERBONE. Ironically the Lancaster City Police Department were the AGENTS OF CHOICE in
both occurrences.

PRO SE PLAINTIFF STAN J. CATERBONE'S brother, Samuel A. Caterbone, (Sammy) (U.S. Air
Force 1969-1971) received the same victimization through the use of the LSD experiments
of the same program while in the United States Air Force with FLASHBACKS after being
discharged in or about in 1971.

PRO SE PLAINTIFF STAN J. CATERBONE declared that after an explosive harassment


campaign, connection with the SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY occurred in 2004-2005. The
synthetic telepathy first consisted of months of NON-STOP INTERROGATIONS BY MALE
SUBJECTS WHO IDENTIFIED THEMSELVES AS CIA OPERATIVES. The interrogations lasted
hours upon hours at a time and covered just about every aspect of Pro Se PLAINTIFF STAN
J. CATERBONE'S life. The “HANDLERS”, for lack of a better term, not only focused on the
WHISTLEBLOWING ACTIVITIES OF ISC IN 1987, but also covered mundane everyday
experiences, as a form to harass and torture.

In late spring of 2005, the “HANDLERS” introduce females to the sessions. To this day, the
torture consists of the same, interrogations mixed in with harassment, sex, and humor. It is
the opinion of Pro Se PLAINTIFF STAN J. CATERBONE, that the only way to keep from
desensitizing and numbing the harassment and pain is to experience pleasure and laughter
so as to keep the magnitude of the pain at it's highest level.

This can be substantiated and validated by the fact that the Social Security Administration
Under Health And Human Services granted Pro Se PLAINTIFF STAN J. CATERBONE disability
benefits in August of 2009 for symptoms and illnesses related to U.S. SPONSORED MIND
CONTROL, and in fact stated in the award letter that disability was determined to begin in
December of 2005; the date Pro Se PLAINTIFF STAN J. CATERBONE declared that the
synthetic telepathy had gone full-time 24/7, without interruption, to this day.

THE LEGAL NEXUS TO INTERNATIONAL SIGNAL AND CONTROL


The NEXUS to International Signal and Control, Plc., or ISC; the CIA; the NSA; Lancaster,
Pennsylvania; and U.S. Sponsored Mind Control comes through ISC Board of Director,
Admiral Bobby Ray Inman. Bobby Ray Inman was the former Director of the NSA, and The
Director of U.S. Naval Intelligence. Like today, when foreign police is politicized for partisan
reasons, patriots and traitors are often confused as being one in the same. The operations
by ISC and the respective intelligence agencies were conspired for tactical and logistical
reasons that the Department of Defense and others could not find a way to communicate it's
objectives to Congress for approval without compromising it's missions. ISC founder James
Guerin and others were indicted in 1991 and sentenced to prison terms in 1992.

One must remember that the U.S. Sponsored Mind Control Programs were the direct result
of the Soviet Union's accomplishments using Microwave Technologies to bombard the U.S.

Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 10 of 23 MONDAY February 10th, 2025
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©

Embassy in Moscow as early the 1950's and the use of German Psychiatrists by Adolf Hitler
in the 1940's developing psychological warfare programs. Both the German and Soviet Mind
Control Programs predate that of the United States. Thus, the beginning of the Mind Control
Arms Race. Just this year, the Trump Administration introduced the NEW MILITARY SPACE
AGENCY, in an effort to formalize the weaponization of Space and Microwave Weapons
under one agency. This will convert the Department of Defense programs and that of the U.
S. Intelligence Agencies to this new Military Space Agency.

Date: MONDAY February 10th, 2025

Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
[email protected]
717-429-2972

Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 11 of 23 MONDAY February 10th, 2025
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©

EXHIBIT

Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 12 of 23 MONDAY February 10th, 2025
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©

Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and Federal Whistleblower


Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
[email protected]
(717)429-2972

FRIDAY January 24th, 2025

To: Direct Express Payment Processing Center

Customer Account Services

P.O. Box 245998

San Antonio, TX 78224-5998

Re: DISPUTE RESOLUTION Service Request No. 1-8431890259 For $408.38

Amazon Purchase on January 15th, 2025 $119.34

Amazon Purchase on January 15th, 2025 $289.04

Customer Service:

On January 15th and January 16th, 2025 I placed PURCHASES and PAID for Purchases
to be Delivered on or about January 17 th, 2025. However, after the DELIVERIES WERE
MARKED DELIVERED IN MY AMAZON ACCOUNT in both the Desktop and Smartphone
Applications MY FRONT PORCH WAS EMPTY AND DID NOT CONTAIN ANY DELIVERIES. The
Problem arising when in the AMAZON REFUND System, THERE IS NO CATEGORY TO SELECT
FOR DELIVERED TO WRONG ADDRESS. Several Attempts were made to have AMAZON
Refund the Purchases without any success.

ATTACHED IS THE REQUEST LETTER AND ACCOMPANYING DIRECT EXPRESS LEDGER


SHOWING THE AMAZON PURCHASES AND THE DEBITS TO MY DEBIT CARD ACCOUNT. Also is
a Previous letter that Did NOT END IN ANY PAYMENTS, WHY?

Thank You in advanced for your cooperation.

MONDAY January 15th, 2024

______________________________

Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 13 of 23 MONDAY February 10th, 2025
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©

Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and Federal Whistleblower


Advanced Media Group
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
[email protected]
(717)429-2972
MONDAY January 15th, 2024

To: Direct Express Payment Processing Center

Customer Account Services

P.O. Box 245998

San Antonio, TX 78224-5998

Re: NEW DISPUTE RESOLUTION for FRAUDULENT TRANSACTIONS For a Total of $263.94

Dispute Resolution 1-7286031907 HP Instant Ink on June 23, 2023

Transaction ID 23373164508 in The Amount of $149.46 and


The REVERSAL OF THE CREDIT ON JULY 10th, 2023

Customer Service:

The following transactions mysteriously appeared on my account WITHOUT MY KNOWLEDGE


OR CONSENT. The are as follows:

 12/11/2023 24803236666 GNC*BOSTON GLOBE SUBS $27.72


 12/05/2023 24752243812 ACADEMIA.EDU/PAYMENTS $208.50
 01/08/2024 25028344744 GNC*BOSTON GLOBE SUBS $27.72
TOTAL $263.94

June 23, 2023 $149.46


GRAND TOTAL $413.40
Following is my previous correspondence which has yet to be credited to my account, again
the transactions mysteriously appeared on my account WITHOUT MY KNOWLEDGE OR
CONSENT
Thank You in advanced for your cooperation.

MONDAY January 15th, 2024

______________________________

Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
[email protected]
717-429-2972

Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 14 of 23 MONDAY February 10th, 2025
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©

 Dispute Resolution 1-7286031907 HP Instant Ink on June 23, 2023

Transaction ID 23373164508 in The Amount of $149.46 and


The REVERSAL OF THE CREDIT ON JULY 10th, 2023

Customer Service:

Yesterday, Thursday July 13th at 4:09pm EST I placed a call to your customer service
regarding the REVERSAL of the HP Instant Ink on July 10 th, 2023 of $149.42. The customer
Service Representative told me that the DISPUTE RESOLUTION WAS DENIED. How can this
be when in fact:

29. On June 21st, 2023 I received a DISPUTE RESOLUTION CREDIT for the 1 st HP
Instant Ink Dispute of $113.42.
30. I purchased the HP Printer from Amazon for $113.87 and it was Delivered on
April 21st, 2023 to my Home/Office at 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster PA.
31. Included in the Sales Price was “6 Months of FREE” HP Instant Ink including ALL
Ink Cartridges and Paper on a Monthly basis. I have provided this documentation to
you on several different occasions by email and U.S. Mails.
32. On July 7th, 2023 I CANCELLED the HP Instant Ink Free Trial, and received a
confirmation email. However, the CANCELLATION does not take effect until the end of
the current cycle, which is July 21 st, 2023.
33. HP Instant Ink is LINKED to the Printer via WIFI and TRACKS EVERY PAGE
PRINTED. I will automatically receive a FREE Ream of Paper upon 700 pages and INK
REFILLS on every cycle, the next July 21st.

Below, is the previous letter that I had sent.

June 28th, 2023


Today I received the old HP INSTANT INK Provisional Credit, which I had already
received. I thought today was for this NEW HP INSTANT INK Provisional Credit. On June
24th at 12:36pm EST I called HP INSTANT INK and was on the phone with a Customer
Service Rep. I was discussing my FRAUDULENT transaction of June 23 rd when the service
rep hung up the phone on me. I called for this DISPUTE RESOLUTION at 12:45pm EST the
same day.

I Recently went to cancel this service, however in the fine print, I CANNOT CANCEL
until July 21st, the start of the next billing cycle. Enclosed is the documentation for my
PROVISIONAL CREDIT.

Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 15 of 23 MONDAY February 10th, 2025
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©

IN FORMA
PAUPERIS

Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 16 of 23 MONDAY February 10th, 2025
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

OF LANCASTER COUNTY

CIVIL DIVISION

___________________________________________

In Re: STANLEY J. CATERBONE


and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
PETITIONERS
` Case No. _________________
v.

Bureau of Lancaster City Police


Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas
Lancaster County Adult Probation
Lancaster County District Attorney's Office
Pennsylvania Attorney General
DEFENDANTS

PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

TO THE HONORABLE, THE JUDGES OF SAID COURT:

(1) I am the (check one) X PLAINTIFF � DEFENDANT in the above matter and do live
alone and because of my financial condition I am unable to pay the required filing fee of
$ 171.00.

(2) I am unable to obtain funds from anyone, including my family and associates, to

continue paying fees associated with this case

Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 17 of 23 MONDAY February 10th, 2025
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©

Check one:

I am currently a recipient of the following type(s) of Benefits from the Social Security
Administration for Long Term Disability Benefits for illnesses and symptoms relating
to U.S. Sponsored Mind Control as evidenced by my documentation and the fact that
no medical reports or physicians were reported in the entire application process and
there was never a psychiatric evaluation for the same said purposes. I am receiving
a net monthly benefit of $1682.00 and have been since April of 2008 and was
declared disabled in December of 2005, the same said month that I reported that I
became the victim of full-time synthetic telepathy, as well as other related
symptoms and illnesses.

X I am currently receiving cash or medical Public Assistance benefits and I am


attaching a completed Poverty Affidavit that verifies my financial condition, and
why I cannot afford to keep paying the associated fees for this case.

I verify that the statement made in this Petition, and attached Poverty Affidavit (if
applicable), are true and correct. I understand that false statements herein are made
subject to the penalties of 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 4904, relating to unsworn falsification to
authorities.

_____________________________

Date: MONDAY February 10th, 2025 Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603

Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 18 of 23 MONDAY February 10th, 2025
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©

MOTION FOR LEAVE OF IN FORMA PAUPERIS


AND NOW, on this 10th day of February 2025, I, STANLEY J. CATERBONE and
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, Petitioners, appearing pro se, do hereby file the Application
for In Forma Pauperis.

Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
[email protected]
717-429-2972

Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 19 of 23 MONDAY February 10th, 2025
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©

PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS & AFFIDAVIT

b.) Employment: None

If you are presently employed, state your:

Employer: ________________________________________________ 1. I am the


petitioner in the above matter and because of my financial condition am unable to pay
the fees and costs of prosecuting or defending this action or proceeding.

Employer’s Address: ________________________________________

__________________________________________________

Salary or wages per month: ___________________________________

Type of work: _____________________________________________

If you are presently unemployed, state:

Date of last employment: ____________________________________

Salary or wages per month: ___________________________________

Type of work: _____________________________________________

c.) Please list any other income received within the past twelve months:

(Write the gross amount (before taxes) per month that you received and the months
you received this income.)

Business or profession: ___________________________________

Other self-employment: __________________________________

Interest: ______________________________________________

Dividends: _____________________________________________

Pension and annuities: ___________________________________

Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 20 of 23 MONDAY February 10th, 2025
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©

Social security benefits: _________________________________

Support payments: ______________________________________

Disability payments: $ 1,792.00

Unemployment compensation and/or supplemental benefits: ________

______________________________________________________

Workers’ Compensation: ________________________________ Public assistance:


_______________________________________

Other: ________________________________________________

d.) Other contributions to household support:

(Write the gross amount (before taxes) per month that you received and the months you received this

income.) (Wife) (Husband) Name: _________________________________

If your (wife) (husband) is employed, please state

Employer: _____________________________________________

Salary or wages per month: ________________________________

Type of work: __________________________________________

Contributions from children: _______________________________

Contributions from parents: _______________________________

Other contributions: _____________________________________

e.) Property owned:

Checking Account: $ 0.00

Savings Account: $0.00

Direct Express Debit Account: $99.00

Certificates of deposit: ___________________________________

Real estate (including home): ¼ Ownership of 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA with
brothers

Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 21 of 23 MONDAY February 10th, 2025
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©

Motor Vehicle: NONE

Other:

f.) Debts and obligations:

Mortgage: Taxes and Insurances $0.00

Utilities $600.00

Copy and Printing Expenses for pro se litigation: $250.00

Food and Clothing: $ 200.00

Computer Hacking Repairs and Computer Replacement: $200.00

House Security Expenses:

Auto Loan: $

Auto Expenses: $

TOTAL MONTHLY EXPENSES: $ 1, 250.00

Loans: ________________________________________________

Other: Total Liabilities from Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Case No. 16-10157 in the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court for Eastern Pennsylvania is $132,209.00

(Write all of your regular monthly bills, phone, utilities, cable, insurance, etc.)

g.) Persons dependent upon you for support: None

1. I understand that I have a continuing obligation to inform the court of


improvement in my financial circumstances which would permit me to pay the
costs incurred herein. I verify that the statements made in this affidavit are true
and correct. I understand that false statements herein are made subject to the
penalties of 18 Pa.C.S. § 4904, relating to unsworn falsification to authorities.

Date: Monday February 10th, 2025

Stanley J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant


1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
[email protected]
717-429-2972

Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 22 of 23 MONDAY February 10th, 2025
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2025©

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS

OF LANCASTER COUNTY

CIVIL DIVISION

___________________________________________

In Re: STANLEY J. CATERBONE


and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
PETITIONERS
` Case No. _________________
v.

Bureau of Lancaster City Police


Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas
Lancaster County Adult Probation
Lancaster County District Attorney's Office
Pennsylvania Attorney General
DEFENDANTS

_______________________________________________________

AND NOW, this day of , 2023 , upon consideration of the


attached Petition and Affidavit of Financial Status, it is hereby Ordered that the
Petitioner, Stanley J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group is permitted to
proceed with the filing of his/her action or appeal In Forma Pauperis, and shall
not be required to pay the costs or fees payable in connection with such matter,
but conditioned upon his/her payment of such costs from the proceeds of an
financial recovery in this case.

BY THE COURT:

_____________________________

J.

Emergency Injunction CATERBONE v. Direct Express Page No. 23 of 23 MONDAY February 10th, 2025

You might also like