Procter & Gamble

Coalition member since 2020 | As of September 2022, palm oil, palm oil derivatives, and paper, pulp, and
fibre-based packaging (PPP) are material commodities for Procter & Gamble.

The following table includes a list of each Key Performance Indicator (KPI) for each material commodity, along with the company’s 2021 and 2022 reporting record. The
record includes the following responses:
• “Yes” indicates a company is reporting against a KPI and reporting quantitively where indicated
• “Yes – narrative reporting” indicates a company is reporting qualitatively against a quantitative KPI
• “Not yet reporting” response indicates a company is not yet reporting on a KPI
• “N/A” indicates a KPI was not established in a given year

Companies have also provided information on their performance against appropriate KPIs, along with methodologies and targets. This information has been self-reported
by companies and verified by Proforest.

Links are provided to information when a company is reporting (“Yes”) against a public information requirement, and when a company is reporting qualitatively (“Yes –
narrative reporting”) against a quantitative KPI.

For a full methodology on the Forest Positive Coalition’s reporting process, including a list of all KPIs and public information requirements, visit
transparency.tcgfforestpositive.com.

Last updated September 2022 | 1

 2021 Reporting Record & 2022 Reporting Record &
KPI Methodology Target (Optional)
Performance Performance
Palm Oil
Element 1 (Own Supply) Key Performance Indicators for Manufacturers
1.1 Policy commitments to the
Yes Yes
forest positive (or NDPE) goals
1.2 Timebound action plan
Yes Yes
summary
1.3 Mill list using the
conventions of the Universal Yes Yes
Mill List to make group links
1.4 Progress of mills toward
Not reporting yet Yes – narrative reporting Methodology not available
forest positive (or NDPE)
1.5 Percentage traceable to Yes Yes
mill Methodology not available
98% 98%
1.6 Percentage traceable to
We monitored 13.6+ million
FFB sources
hectares of P&G supplier
landbanks across Indonesia,
Malaysia, and Papua New
Guinea. We tracked supply
chains to over 1,600
plantations and determined
that 99.98% of supply chain
landscapes monitored were
Not reporting yet Yes – narrative reporting “free of deforestation or
conversion issues”. Where
issues may have occurred, the
robust information has
allowed us to engage more
effectively in discussions with
our suppliers and to provide
data to help guide
remediation and monitor
progress

Last updated September 2022 | 2

 2021 Reporting Record & 2022 Reporting Record &
KPI Methodology Target (Optional)
Performance Performance
1.7 Percentage physically Yes Yes
certified (MB/SG) Methodology not available
• Palm Oil: 100% • Palm Oil: 100%
• Palm Kernel Oil: 44% • Palm Kernel Oil: 99%
Element 2 (Suppliers and Traders) Key Performance Indicators for Manufacturers
2.1 Direct supplier list Yes Yes
2.2 Percentage of direct
suppliers engaged and All suppliers engaged via
informed of the Forest alignment P&G Palm Policy
Not reporting yet Yes – narrative reporting
Positive Suppliers’ which has all the FPC
Commitment and Forest elements
Positive Approach
2.3 Performance of direct
suppliers against the elements
All suppliers engaged via
of the Forest Positive
alignment P&G Palm Policy
Approach and changes over Not reporting yet Yes – narrative reporting
which has all the FPC
time including progress on
elements
delivery across entire palm oil
business
Element 3 (Monitoring and Response) Key Performance Indicators for Manufacturers
3.1 Summary of company
grievance process that aligns
Yes
with Coalition Deforestation Yes
Monitoring and Response
Framework (MRF)
3.2 Summary of progress of
grievance cases [e.g. in
grievance log or relevant
N/A Yes
progress report(s)]

Last updated September 2022 | 3

 2021 Reporting Record & 2022 Reporting Record &
KPI Methodology Target (Optional)
Performance Performance
3.3 Coverage of deforestation
and peat monitoring: Yes
percentage of supply base
covered by deforestation and
peat monitoring (including During 2020-2021, we
supplier and landscape monitored 13.6+ million
monitoring systems) aligned hectares of P&G supplier
with Monitoring Minimum landbanks across Indonesia,
N/A Malaysia, and Papua New Methodology not available
Requirements
Guinea. We tracked supply
chains to over 1,600
plantations and determined
that 99.98% of supply chain
landscapes monitored were
“free of deforestation or
conversion issues”
3.4 Coverage of deforestation
and peat monitoring: For
Coalition member companies
involved, narrative summary
of support provided to
develop on the ground N/A Yes
monitoring and response
systems beyond own supply
chains including landscape
initiatives and sectoral
collaborations
3.5 Progress towards tackling
deforestation and peat
grievances: Percentage of
supply mills with, or N/A Yes – narrative reporting Methodology not available
potentially linked to,
deforestation and peat
grievances

Last updated September 2022 | 4

 2021 Reporting Record & 2022 Reporting Record &
KPI Methodology Target (Optional)
Performance Performance
3.6 Progress towards tackling
deforestation and peat
grievances: Percentage of
deforestation and peat N/A Yes – narrative reporting Methodology not available
grievances where action taken
in line with MRF steps and
requirements
Palm Oil Derivatives
Element 1 (Own Supply) Key Performance Indicators for Manufacturers and Retailers
1.1 Policy commitments to the
Yes Yes
forest positive (or NDPE) goals
1.2 Timebound action plan
Yes Yes
summary
1.7 Percentage physically Yes Yes
certified (MB/SG) • Palm oil derivatives: 100% • Palm oil derivatives: 95% Methodology not available
• Palm Kernel Oil • Palm Kernel Oil
derivatives: 37% derivatives: 89%
Element 2 (Suppliers and Traders) Key Performance Indicators for Manufacturers and Retailers
2.1 Direct supplier list Yes Yes
2.2 Percentage of direct
suppliers engaged and All direct suppliers engaged
informed of the Forest through alignment to the P&G
Positive Suppliers’ Not reporting yet Yes – narrative reporting
Palm Policy which has all the
Commitment and Forest elements of the FPC
Positive Approach

Last updated September 2022 | 5

 2021 Reporting Record & 2022 Reporting Record &
KPI Methodology Target (Optional)
Performance Performance
2.3 Performance of direct
suppliers against the elements
All direct suppliers engaged
of the Forest Positive
through alignment to the P&G
Approach and changes over Not reporting yet Yes – narrative reporting
Palm Policy which has all the
time including progress on
elements of the FPC
delivery across entire palm oil
business
2.4 List of identified major
upstream suppliers/traders Yes Yes Methodology not available
prioritized
2.5 Upstream
suppliers/traders prioritised,
engaged (directly or via a
Not reporting yet Yes – narrative reporting Methodology not available
collective approach) and
informed of the Forest
Positive Approach
2.6 Performance of upstream
suppliers/traders against the
elements of the Forest
Positive Approach and Not reporting yet Yes – narrative reporting Methodology not available
changes over time including
progress on delivery across
entire palm oil business
Element 3 (Monitoring and Response) Key Performance Indicators for Manufacturers and Retailers
3.7 Narrative summary of
progress made towards
N/A Yes
reporting on Element 3 in
2023
Paper, Pulp, and Fibre-based Packaging
Element 1 (Own Supply) Key Performance Indicators for Manufacturers and Retailers
1.1 PPP Sourcing Policy
including commitment to the Yes Yes
forest positive goals

Last updated September 2022 | 6

 2021 Reporting Record & 2022 Reporting Record &
KPI Methodology Target (Optional)
Performance Performance
1.2 Timebound action plan
Yes Yes
summary
1.3 Percentage recycled, Yes Yes
percentage virgin fibre • 80% Recycled Paper-based packaging:
• 20% Virgin • 83% Recycled Methodology not available
• 17% Virgin

1.4 Percentage of virgin Yes Yes

supply certified, and Paper-based packaging: Paper-based packaging:
percentage per scheme and • 94% of Virgin fiber that • 95% of Virgin fiber was
chain of custody model was 3rd party Certified 3rd party Certified
• 42% of Virgin fiber that • 45% of Virgin fiber was
was 3rd party Certified 3rd party Certified FSC
FSC • 99.6% of total recycled or
• 99.5% of total recycled or 3rd party certified virgin
3rd party certified virgin Methodology not available
Wood pulp:
Wood pulp: • 59% FSC CoC
• 100% of the wood pulp • 13% SFI
P&G sources is certified. • 2% PEFC/CSA-SFF
• 51% FSC CoC 27% FSC CW
• 15% SFI
• 15% PEFC/CSA-SFF
19% FSC CW
1.5 Percentage of supply from
Yes – narrative reporting Yes – narrative reporting Methodology not available
high-risk sources

Last updated September 2022 | 7

 2021 Reporting Record & 2022 Reporting Record &
KPI Methodology Target (Optional)
Performance Performance
1.6 Actions being taken for
supply from high-risk sources
Yes

Note: P&G works with

suppliers and stakeholders to
address deforestation
Yes concerns in high-risk areas.
P&G’s commitment to
increasing the use of third-
party certification lowers the
risk of deforestation within
our supply chain

Element 2 (Suppliers and Traders) Key Performance Indicators for Manufacturers and Retailers
2.1 Proportion of suppliers Yes – narrative reporting
informed about the Forest Click here 100% suppliers through
N/A
Positive Suppliers approach Click here Sourcing Policy alignment
Click here
2.2 Number or proportion of Yes – narrative reporting
suppliers as identified as Click here
N/A Methodology not available
priority for engagement and Click here
percentage engaged Click here
2.3 Performance of engaged Yes – narrative reporting
suppliers and changes over Click here
N/A Methodology not available
time including progress on Click here
delivery across entire business Click here

Last updated September 2022 | 8

Element 4 (Landscape Engagement) Key Performance Indicators | As of September 2022, Procter &
Gamble is focusing its landscape engagement on palm oil.
2021 Reporting Record & 2022 Reporting Record &
KPI Methodology Target (Optional)
Performance Performance
Palm Oil
4.1 Priority production
N/A Yes See KPI 4.2
landscapes identified
4.2 Methodology used to
identify priority production N/A Yes
landscapes
4.3 Number of landscape Yes
initiatives currently involved N/A Methodology not available
in 3 initiatives
4.4 For each landscape
initiative your company is
currently engaged in,
information on:
● Name, location,
timeline and other
partners involved
● Report on type of
engagement (e.g.
disbursed financial
N/A Yes
support, in-kind
support, capacity,
preferential sourcing)
● Specific actions or
projects that are
supported
● How the actions
intend to address
systemic issues and
contribute to

Last updated September 2022 | 9

 delivering forest
positive goals (at
least one of
conservation,
restoration, positive
inclusion of farmers
and communities,
landscape level
multi-stakeholder
platforms or
partnerships)
● Linkages to shared
landscape-level goals
developed through
multistakeholder
processes
PPP
4.1 Priority production
N/A Yes Methodology not available
landscapes identified
4.2 Methodology used to
identify priority production N/A Not reporting yet
landscapes
4.3 Number of landscape Yes
initiatives currently involved N/A Methodology not available
4 initiatives
in
4.4 For each landscape
initiative your company is
currently engaged in,
information on:
Yes
● Name, location,
Click here
timeline and other N/A
Click here
partners involved
Click here
● Report on type of
engagement (e.g.
disbursed financial
support, in-kind

Last updated September 2022 | 10

 support, capacity,
preferential sourcing)
● Specific actions or
projects that are
supported
● How the actions
intend to address
systemic issues and
contribute to
delivering forest
positive goals (at
least one of
conservation,
restoration, positive
inclusion of farmers
and communities,
landscape level
multi-stakeholder
platforms or
partnerships)
● Linkages to shared
landscape-level goals
developed through
multistakeholder
processes

Last updated September 2022 | 11