0% found this document useful (0 votes)
50 views5 pages

l10 mth113 2025

The document provides an introduction to linear transformations, defining them as maps between vector spaces that preserve linear structure. It discusses properties such as the kernel and image of linear transformations, along with examples and the rank-nullity theorem. Additionally, it covers conditions for isomorphisms and provides proofs for various theorems related to linear transformations in finite-dimensional vector spaces.

Uploaded by

yoriichi870
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
50 views5 pages

l10 mth113 2025

The document provides an introduction to linear transformations, defining them as maps between vector spaces that preserve linear structure. It discusses properties such as the kernel and image of linear transformations, along with examples and the rank-nullity theorem. Additionally, it covers conditions for isomorphisms and provides proofs for various theorems related to linear transformations in finite-dimensional vector spaces.

Uploaded by

yoriichi870
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

An introduction to Linear Algebra, January, 2025

Department of Mathematics and Statistics Indian Institute of Technology - Kanpur

General properties of linear transformations

We shall now focus our attention to the study of linear transformations. These are maps between
vector spaces, over a given field, that preserve the linear structure of a vector space. More precisely:

Definition 0.1. Let (V, F ) and (W, F ) be two vector spaces over. A function L : V −→ W is called
a linear transformation/linear map if

• L(v1 + v2 ) = L(v1 ) + L(v2 ) for all v1 , v2 ∈ V .

• For all α ∈ F and for all v ∈ V , L(αu) = αL(u).

Given V, W ,vector spaces over F , we denote by L(V, W ) the set of all linear transformations
from V into W . The map 0 ∈ L(V, W ), where 0(v) = 0, for all v ∈ V , is called the zero
map/transformation. The set L(V, W ) is a vector space over F under the following addition and
scalar multiplication:

L1 + L2 (v) := L1 (v) + L2 (v) ∀v ∈ V, L1 , L2 ∈ L(V, W ).

αL (v) := αL(v) ∀α ∈ F, v ∈ V.

Examples.

1. Consider V = W = F , then any linear transformation L : F −→ F is given by L(v) = αv for


all v ∈ V where α ∈ F is a fixed scalar.

2. Given a matrix A ∈ Mm,n (F ), consider the map L : F n −→ F m defined by L(x) = Ax for all
x ∈ F n . Note that Ax denoteds the matrix multiplication of A with x where we consider x
as column matrix (x1 , . . . , xn )T . Clearly L(x + y) = A(x + y) = Ax + Ay = L(x) + L(y) and
L(αx) = αx for all α ∈ F and x, y ∈ F n . This shows that L is a linear transformation from
F n to F m . Note that if we write y = L(x), and y = (y1 , . . . , ym ) then
n
X
yi = aij xj for all 1 ≤ i ≤ m
j=1

3. Let V be the space of all real-valued differentiable functions on R and W be the space of all
real-valued functions on R. Note that both are vector spaces over R under the point-wise
addition of functions and pointwise scalar multiplication of a function. Consider the map
D : V −→ W defined by D(f ) = f ′ = the derivative of f . The linearity of D follows from
the fact that if f and g are differentiable functions then so is f + g and αf for any α ∈ R.
2

4. Recall R[x; n] the vector space of polynomials


h with coefficients in R of degree less than or
iT 
equal to n. Define L : Rn+1 → R[x; n] by L a1 . . . an+1 = a1 + a2 x + · · · + an+1 xn ,
h iT
for each a1 . . . an+1 ∈ Rn+1 . Then L is a linear transformation.

5. Is the map T : R[x; n] → R[x; n + 1] defined by T (f (x)) = xf (x), for all f (x) ∈ R[x; n] a
linear transformation?

Definition 0.2. Let L : V −→ W be a linear transformation between two vector spaces V, W


over F . The kernel of L is the set Ker(L) := {x ∈ V : L(x) = 0}. The image of L is the set
Img(L) = {L(x) : x ∈ V }. Ker(L) and Img(L) are also called the null space of L and the range
space of T respectively.

Ker(L) and Img(L) are subspaces of V and W respectively. When V is finite-dimensional, the
dimension of Ker(L) is called the nullity of L and is denoted by N ullity(L); the dimension of the
image of L or range of L is called the rank of L and is denoted by rank(L). We shall now restrict
our attention to linear transformations between finite-dimensional vector space.

Lemma 0.3. Let V and W be finite-dimensional vector spaces over F and let L1 , L2 ∈ L(V, W ).
Let B be any basis of V such that

L1 (v) = L2 (v) ∀v ∈ B.

Then L1 = L2 , i.e., a linear transformation L is determined by the images of L on a basis of V .

Proof. Let B be a basis of V over F . Then, for each v ∈ V , there exist vectors u1 , . . . , uk in B and
k
P
c1 , . . . , ck ∈ F such that v = ci ui . Thus
i=1

k k k k
!
X X X X
L1 (v) = L1 ci ui = L1 (ci ui ) = ci L1 (ui ) = ci L2 (ui ) = L2 (v) ∀v ∈ V,
i=1 i=1 i=1 i=1

and we are done.

The proof of the above lemma implies the following:

Lemma 0.4. Let V be a finite dimensional vector space over F and W be any vector spaces over F .
If T : V → W is a linear transformation and B is a basis of V then Img(T ) = LS({T (x)|x ∈ B}).

Fix a ∈ Rn and write a = (a1 , . . . , an )and consider f (x) = aT x = a1 x1 + a2 x2 + · · · + an xn , for all


x ∈ Rn . Then by Example (2) above, f ∈ L(Rn , R) is a linear transformation. We now show that
these are the only ones.

Corollary 0.5. Let T ∈ L(Rn , R). Then, there exists a ∈ Rn such that T (x) = aT x.
3

Proof. By the first lemma, T is determined by {T (e1 ), . . . , T (en )}, for the standard basis {e1 , . . . , en }
h iT
of Rn . So, for 1 ≤ i ≤ n, let T (ei ) = ai , for some ai ∈ R. Now set a := a1 · · · an .
h iT
Then for all x := x1 · · · xn ∈ Rn , we have

n n n
!
X X X
T (x) = T xi ei = xi T (ei ) = xi ai = aT x for all x ∈ Rn .
i=1 i=1 i=1

Thus, the required result follows.


We now prove a very important theorem, namely, the rank-nullity theorem.

Theorem 0.6 (Rank-Nullity Theorem). Let V and W be vector spaces over F and assume that
dimF V is finite. If T ∈ L(V, W ) then

Rank(T ) + Nullity(T ) = dimF Img(T ) + dimF Ker(T ) = dimF V.

Proof. Since Ker(T ) is a subspace of V and V is finite dimensional, Ker(T ) is finite dimensional
and dim(Ker(T )) ≤ dim(V ). Let B = {v1 , . . . , vm } be a basis of Ker(T ). Extend this basis to a set
B1 = {v1 , . . . , vm , w1 , . . . , wn } such that B1 is a basis of V . Clearly dim(V ) = dim(Ker(T )) + n.
Claim. n = dim(Image(T )).
To establish the claim, we shall prove that the set {T (w1 ), . . . , T (wn )} is a basis of Image(T ). Note
that if w ∈ Image(T ) then w = T (v) for some v ∈ V and since B1 = {v1 , . . . , vm , w1 , . . . , wn } is a
basis of V , v = α1 v1 + · · · + αm vm + β1 w1 + · · · + βm wm . Therefore

w = T (v) = T (α1 v1 + · · · + αm vm + β1 w1 + · · · + βm wm )
= α1 T (v1 ) + · · · αm T (vm ) + β1 T (w1 ) + · · · + βm T (wm )
= β1 T (w1 ) + · · · + βm T (wm ).

Since w is arbitrary, we get Image(T ) = LS({T (w1 ), . . . , T (wn )}). Now we show that {T (w1 ), . . . , T (wn )}
is linearly independent. For that let us consider
n
X n
X n
X

βj T (wj ) = 0 =⇒ T βj wj = 0 =⇒ βj wj ∈ Ker(T ). (0.1)
j=1 j=1 j=1

As B = {v1 , . . . , vm } is a basis of Ker(T ), there exist αj ’s such that


n
X m
X
β j wj = αi vi .
j=1 i=1

Since B1 = {v1 , . . . , vm , w1 , . . . , wn } is linearly independent, we get αi = 0 = βj for all i, j. Hence


the set {T (w1 ), . . . , T (wn )} is linearly independent whence is a basis for Image(T ). Therefore,
dim(Image(T)) = n and we are done.
4

Given vector spaces U, V, W over the field F , we consider L(U, V ) and L(V, W ). Given L1 ∈ L(U, V )
and L2 ∈ L(V, W ), we consider the product L2 ◦ L1 defined by
 
L2 ◦ L1 (u) := L2 L1 (u) ∀u ∈ U.

Check that L2 ◦ L1 is a linear transformation from U into W , i.e., L2 ◦ L1 L(U, W ). The product of
linear transformation satisfies the distributive properties over the addition and scalar multiplication.

Definition 0.7. Let T ∈ L(V, W ), where V and W are vector spaces over F . We say T is invertible
if there exists a linear transformation S ∈ L(W, V ) such that S ◦ T = IV and T ◦ S = IW , where
IV , IW are the identity maps on V and W , respectively, which map a vector to itself.

Definition 0.8. Let V and W be two finite dimensional vector spaces over F . Then V is said to
∼ W , if there exists an invertible linear transformation T from V
be isomorphic to W , denoted V =
into W .

We record the following lemma:

Lemma 0.9. Let V and W be vector spaces over F . A linear transformation T ∈ L(V, W ) is a
vector space isomorphism if and only if the linear transformation T ∈ L(V, W ) is one-one and onto.

Proof. Note that T ◦ S = IdW implies that T is onto. If T (u) = T (v), then u = ST (u) = ST (v) = v
showing T is one-one.
On the other hand, if T is one-one and onto, for every v ∈ V , then there exists a unique u ∈ V
such that T (u) = v. Thus the inverse function S : V → V by S(v) = T −1 {v}, the pre-image of v
under the function T , is well defined. Moreover, by construction, S ◦ T = T ◦ S = IV (check that
S is a linear transformation!).
h iT
Example 0.10. Let V = { x y z ∈ R3 : z = 0}. Then, any element of V is of the form
h iT h iT h iT
x y 0 . So, we can define a map f : R2 → V by f ( x y ) = x y 0 . Then, it can
be easily verified that f is a linear transformation which is one-one and onto. Hence, f gives an
isomorphism of V and R2 .

In general, we have the following result.

Theorem 0.11. Let V be an n-dimensional vector space over F . Then V ∼


= F n.

Proof. Let {v1 , . . . , vn } be a basisof V and {e1 , . . . , en }, the standard basis of F n . Now define
n n

P P
T (vi ) = ei , for 1 ≤ i ≤ n and T αi vi = αi ei , for α1 , . . . , αn ∈ F . Then, it is easy to
i=1 i=1
observe that T ∈ L(V, F n ), T is one-one and onto. Hence, T is an isomorphism.

Exercise 0.12. Prove that the vector space Mn,m (R) is isomorphic to Rmn .
5

We now describe various equivalent conditions under which a linear operator on a finite dimensional
vector space is an isomorphism. The proof basically uses the rank-nullity theorem.

Theorem 0.13. Let V be a vector space over F with dimF V = n. Then the following statements
are equivalent for T ∈ L(V ).
1. T is one-one.
2. ker(T ) = {0}.
3. Rank(T ) = n = dimF Img(T ).
4. T is onto.
5. T : V → V is an isomorphism.
6. For any linearly independent set {v1 , . . . , vm } in V , {T (v1 ), . . . , T (vm )} is a linearly indepen-
dent set in V .

Proof. 1 =⇒ 2 : Let T be one-one. Suppose u ∈ ker(T ). Then, T (u) = 0 = T (0). Thus, one-one
implies u = 0.
2 =⇒ 3 : Let ker(T ) = {0}. Rank-nullity theorem gives Rank(T ) = n − nullity(T ) = n.
3 =⇒ 4 : Let n = dimF Img(T ) ≤ dimF V = n. Thus, Img(T ) = V .
4 =⇒ 1 : Let T be onto. Then, dimF Img(T ) = n. The Rank-Nullity theorem gives nullity(T ) = 0
implying Ker(T ) = 0. Hence T (u) = T (v) implies T (u − v) = 0. Thus, u − v ∈ Ker(T ) = {0}
implying u = v.
Thus, we have shown that Parts 1 to 4 are equivalent. Now, let us proceed with the rest of the
equivalent conditions.
1, 2, 3, 4 ⇔ 5 : So, let T be one-one. Then, T is one-one and onto. Thus T gives an isomorphism.
Further, T is an isomorphism implies T is one-one and onto.
1, 2, 3, 4 ⇔ 6 : Let ker(T ) = {0} and {vi , 1 ≤ i ≤ m} be a linearly independent set in V . Consider
the relation
X
xi T (vi ) = 0, xi ∈ F. (0.2)
1≤i≤m
P
This implies T ( 1≤i≤m xi vi ) = T (0) = 0 and hence by our hypothesis on ker(T ), we obtain
P
1≤i≤m xi vi = 0. Thus from the linear independence of vi , 1 ≤ i ≤ m, we deduce that xi = 0 ∀ i
whence the set {T (vi ), 1 ≤ i ≤ m} is linearly independent. If Condition 6 holds then a basis of V
is sent onto a basis of V . Thus, T is onto.

You might also like