Research Paper 2
Research Paper 2
DOI: 10.1002/er.7904
Correspondence
Vijai Kumar Gupta, Biorefining and
Summary
Advanced Materials Research Center, Fast pyrolysis of six biomasses mustard, camellia, pinewood, sawdust, bamboo,
Scotland's Rural College (SRUC), Kings
and bagasse was completed at a temperature of 500 C in a fixed bed reactor and
Buildings, West Mains Road, Edinburgh
EH9 3JG, UK. a twin-screw reactor. It was found that the yield of bio-oil varied from 48 to
Email: [email protected], vijai.gupta@ 30 wt% in fixed bed reactor and 52 to 39 wt% in a twin-screw reactor, whereas
sruc.ac.uk
pyrolysis gases yield ranged from 34 to 20 wt% in a fixed bed reactor and 32 to
Dan Bahadur Pal, Department of
16 wt% in twin-screw reactor and biochar yield ranged from 36 to 24 wt% in fixed
Chemical Engineering, Birla Institute of
Technology, Mesra, Ranchi 835215, bed reactor and 32 to 16 wt% in a twin-screw reactor. High heating value (HHV)
Jharkhand, India. of bio-oil was found to be maximum for bamboo (24.45 MJ/kg) biomass, whereas
Email: [email protected]
in the case of biochar, the maximum HHV was obtained for pinewood (27 MJ/
Funding information kg) and sawdust (28 MJ/kg) biomass. On the characterization of the pyrolysis
King Khalid University, Grant/Award products, it is found that char obtained comprises mainly carbon while the liquid
Number: GRP-6-42
product, that is, bio-oil, is a mixture of hydrocarbons. The pyrolysis gases consist
of a mixture of carbon monoxide, hydrogen, carbon dioxide, and nitrogen.
Novelty Statement
Biofuel production uses various biomasses via two different reactors that is, a
fixed bed reactor and a twin-screw reactor. The yield of oil in the range from
48 to 30 wt% in fixed bed reactor and 52 to 39 wt% in a twin-screw reactor and
biochar yield ranged from 36 to 24 wt% in fixed bed reactor and 32 to 16 wt%
in a twin-screw reactor. The high heating value (HHV) was optimum for bio-
oil produced via bamboo biomass (24.45 MJ/kg) whereas HHV for biochar pro-
duced via pyrolysis was found to be optimum for pinewood and sawdust bio-
mass (27 MJ/kg and 28 MJ/kg).
Int J Energy Res. 2022;1–9. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/er © 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 1
2 KAPOOR ET AL.
KEYWORDS
biomass, fixed bed reactor, pyrolysis, twin-screw reactor
and agricultural residues, lignin, and cellulose. All these biomass was done to remove dirt, foreign materials, dust,
feedstocks have been tested under various pyrolysis con- etc. Biomass feedstock was then crushed and sieved to
ditions and in different pyrolysis reactors. A major por- size ranges 2 mm. Biomass feedstock was then dried to
tion of research has been done using olive bagasse, wheat remove the moisture content. The pyrolysis experiments
straw (agro-biomass), pinewood (woody biomass) bio- using these biomasses were then performed at a tempera-
masses as feedstocks.11 The intermediate pyrolysis of ture of 500 C.
rapeseed as reported in the literature12 was studied in
fixed bed reactors at a temperature of 550 C with a
heating rate of 300 C/min using 0.6- to 0.85-mm particle 2.2 | Experimental setup
size solids under nitrogen flow rates of 100 cm3/min. It
resulted in about 65 wt% of bio-oil yield. Neem seed The pyrolysis experiments were performed in two differ-
pyrolysis was studied in semi-batch reactors. It resulted ent biomass pyrolysis reactors, that is, twin-screw reactor
in 38 wt% yield of bio-oil operated at 400 C to 500 C at and fixed bed reactor. The twin-screw reactor is made up
the rate of 20 C/min.13 The intermediate pyrolysis of of a horizontal pipe (AISI 316 steel). Inside the reactor
groundnut as a feedstock was investigated in the fluid- pipe, two screws each of length 565 mm are assembled
ized bed reactor at 400 C to 475 C. It resulted in 63.48 wt along the length of the reactor. The rotation of the screws
% of bio-oil.14 From all of these studies, the five basic moves the biomass along the reactor, that is, from the
parameters of the resulting oil were identified, namely, inlet toward the hot zone and then toward the outlet of
viscosity, pH, density, and low heating value (LHV) the reactor. The reactor's outer surface is covered with an
(24.56 cSt, 4.20, 1.2 kg/m3, and 31.07 MJ/kg).15 It is found electrical resistance wire to provide the heat for the pyrol-
from the literature survey that only very few studies have ysis reaction. The temperature of the reactor is monitored
been done on fixed bed and twin-screw reactors using the with the help of two K-type thermocouples, one placed
fast pyrolysis method. Biomass pyrolysis incorporates sev- inside and the other one outside of the reactor. After
eral extremely complex reactions with quite a large num- completion of the reaction, hot vapors are made to pass
ber of intermediates and end products.16 Since devising through the condenser unit to get the liquid product, that
precise reaction, mechanisms for biomass pyrolysis are is, bio-oil, while the solid product, that is, bio-char, is col-
difficult, pyrolysis models are devised in a manner that is lected in a cylindrical enclosed flask attached to the reac-
more macroscopic and empirical. This research is aimed tor. The non-condensable gases move to an exhaust
at studying the effects of various process conditions on system.
the fixed bed and screw reactor using a few sample bio- The second rector used for this study is a fixed bed
masses.This study seeks to understand the potential for reactor. This is a vertical reactor system, which consists
producing bio-oil by pyrolysis of certain biomass that is of a vertical tube made of INCONEL 800. The length of
widely available in Uttarakhand, India. The motivation the vertical tube is around 3 ft. and the inner diameter of
for the study is the need to produce renewable liquid the vertical tube is around 25 mm. The vertical tube is
fuels. For experimentation, six different types of bio- covered with the electrical furnace, which provides the
masses were collected from the local agriculture field in heat for the pyrolysis reaction. In this reactor, setup three
the Dehradun region India. The collected biomass was thermocouples are installed along with digital tempera-
washed and dried properly to make it ready for experi- ture indicators. The hot vapors produced via pyrolysis
mentation. Two types of reactors were used for the pyrol- reaction are made to pass through two glass condensers
ysis, namely fixed bed reactors and twin screw/moving where cold water is circulated for quenching the vapors
bed reactors. The experimental results obtained from that are obtained via pyrolysis to get the desired bio-oil.
both the reactors were compared based on yields The solid obtained within the reactor is cooled and is
obtained. then weighed. The gas formed is measured by making a
difference.
followed to perform the experiments was the preparation TABLE 2 ASTM standards for proximate analysis
of biomass samples, that is, the biomasses used were first Proximate analysis Standards
crushed, sieved, and dried completely. The temperature
Moisture ASTM E871
of the reactor was then set in the control panel attached
Ash ASTN E830, ASTN D 1102
to the reactor which ultimately raises the reactor temper-
ature to the required set limit. The temperature in the Volatiles ASTM E872/E897
reactor is monitored with the help of thermocouples Fixed carbon By difference
arranged along the reactor length. Three thermocouples
were being used in the case of the fixed bed reactor and
two thermocouples were used in the case of the twin-
screw reactor. The temperature of the reactor was collected and weighed. After the collection of bio-oil and
maintained constant throughout all the experimental char, the whole reactor assembly was cleaned properly
runs with the help of the temperature control panel. The with acetone.
coolant used was pumped along with the condensers.
The continuous nitrogen supply was maintained to create
an inert atmosphere inside the reactor. The motor in the 2.4 | Biomass characterization
case of the twin-screw reactor was then switched on to
rotate the twin screws in the reactor. In the case of the Elemental analysis of all biomass samples has been done
fixed bed reactor, the pre-weighed biomass sample was using an elemental analyzer (Perkin Elmer, 2400 series
kept inside the reactor for various time intervals while in II). The results of the proximate analysis, ultimate analy-
the case of the twin-screw reactor the biomass sample is sis, and high heating value are shown in Table 1. The
fed into the feeding hopper from where it moves inside proximate analysis for biomass samples was done as per
the reactor with the help of the screw arrangement. As the standard ASTM method, as shown in Table 2. The
the twin screw rotates the biomass samples move inside calorific value of all biomass feedstock is determined
the reactor where the pyrolysis reaction takes place. The through experiments in a bomb calorimeter. The theoret-
experimental run was considered complete when no bio- ical calorific value has been calculated using a modified
mass sample is observed in the feeding hopper and no Dulong equation:
gaseous product is visible at the exhaust of the reactor. At
this stage, the heater and rotational motor (in the case of MJ 33:5 wt%carbon 14:2 wt%hydrogen
CV ¼ þ
kg 100 100
the twin-screw reactor) are switched off. The nitrogen ð1Þ
supply is then stopped. The coolant pump is then 15:4 wt%oxygen
:
switched off. The bio-oil and char thus obtained are then 100
KAPOOR ET AL. 5
Pinewood tent present in the biomass affects the heat transfer rate
60 significantly, which, in turn, influences the product yield.
In this study, it was found that the high moisture content
of the biomass leads to high liquid yields. Consequently,
40
biomasses such as pinewood, sawdust, and bamboo are
more favorable in bio-oil production (related to the lignin
20 content). The ratios of moisture content, ash content, vol-
atile matter, and fixed carbon content of various bio-
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 masses have an important effect on the product yields.
Temperature (°C) The biomass containing high volatile matter results in
high quantities of bio-oil and syngas, whereas the fixed
FIGURE 1 TGA analysis for different biomasses carbon increases the biochar production. The carbon,
oxygen, hydrogen, nitrogen, and ash content significantly
affect the pyrolysis products. It was found that the bio-
The TGA analysis for selected biomass samples in this mass feedstocks with low nitrogen and mineral contents
study is done in a TGA instrument (TGA-Q600) with the result in high bio-oil and syngas production.
N2 flow rate maintained at 40 mL/min and a heating rate
of 10 C/min. The sample taken for TGA analysis was
10 mg. All the selected samples for this study were heated 3.3 | Product yield
to 900 C.
The amount of moisture present in the biomass sam- The amount of bio-oil and biochar produced via fast pyrol-
ples significantly affects the conversion of biomass via ysis experiments in both the reactor setup was calculated
pyrolysis, so the moisture has to be removed before carry- by weighing the biomass samples before and after each of
ing out pyrolysis. The ash content in biomass usually the experiments. The product yields are then calculated
helps in catalyzing secondary pyrolysis reactions, which based on the weight of the products formed and the weight
has a major influence on product yield while the volatile of the initial samples taken. The product streams obtained
matter content and fixed carbon present in the biomass through fast pyrolysis presence of condensate of organic
samples shows the ease with which biomass feedstocks compound, commonly known as biochar, and gaseous
can be burnt. products known as non-condensable vapors. It is observed
that a higher bio-oil yield was found for pinewood, bam-
boo, and sawdust due to their high volatile matter content.
3 | R ES U L T S A N D D I S C U S S I O N It is found that pinewood and bamboo biomasses resulted
in maximum bio-oil yield (52 wt%) and lowest biochar
3.1 | Thermogravimetric analysis yield (24 wt%). This is due to the presence of high cellulose
and hemicellulose content in the biomass which results in
Figure 1 shows the results of thermogravimetric analysis high bio-oil yields in comparison to biomass with high lig-
for six-biomass feedstock used in this study. It is found nin content.18 The high volatile matter in these biomasses
that all the six biomasses started to devolatilize between also favors high bio-oil production. A high ash content
the temperature ranges of 200 C and 300 C. Major result in a decreased production of bio-oil while the pro-
weight loss in all the biomass samples occurs at around duction of char and gas increases. Thus, a higher bio-oil
300 C to 400 C. At 400 C, the weight loss becomes steady yield can be obtained in biomasses having higher amounts
and slower; this indicates the formation of biochar, and of volatile matter and a lower amount of ash. The percent-
continued up to 500 C as a result the pyrolysis tempera- age of the lighter components was found to be lower in the
ture was chosen at 500 C. The range of degradation tem- case of the twin-screw reactor in comparison to a fixed bed
perature for Hemicellulose, Cellulose, and Lignin are reactor as also being observed by other workers.19 The
200 C to 300 C, 250 C to 350 C, and 200 C to 500 C, pyrolysis experiments were performed at the temperature
respectively.17 of 500 C, at a nitrogen flow rate of 526 mL/min, the
6 KAPOOR ET AL.
FIGURE 2 Effect of moisture content on (A) bio char yield, (B) bio-oil yield, and (C) pyrolysis gases
FIGURE 3 Experimental result of product yield from (A) fixed bed reactor and (B) screw reactor
residence time of 2 min. In the twin-screw reactor, the compared to the screw reactor. This result is due to the
screw rpm was kept at 55 rpm. The mass flow rate of bio- high heating rate in the twin-screw reactor.
mass in a screw reactor is 0.5 kg/h. The product yield from
both the reactor system is shown in Figure 3. A consider-
able amount of liquid is obtained in both the reactors, that 3.4 | Bio-oil and biochar analysis
is, auger and fixed bed reactor. From Figure 3 it can be
observed that the product yields, that is, liquid and gas are The product streams obtained through fast pyrolysis pres-
found to be different based on the reactor type. The liquid ence of condensate of organic compound better known as
yield decreases (from 2 to 10 wt%) while the gas yield oil, the solid formed commonly known as biochar, and gas-
increases (from 2 to 10 wt%) in the fixed bed reactor when eous products known as non-condensable gases. It has been
KAPOOR ET AL. 7
FIGURE 5 Experimental and theoretical calorific value of biomass samples and products: (A) fixed bed reactor; (B) screw reactor
bio-oils obtained from the pyrolysis of bamboo, mustard, guidance. The authors would like to thank the Scientific
camellia, pinewood, bagasse, and sawdust. Bridgwater25 Research Deanship at King Khalid University, Abha,
stated that a higher heating value of bio-oil is produced Saudi Arabia for their financial support through General
from higher temperatures and shorter times. Research Project under grant number (GRP-6-42).
V.K.G. would like to acknowledge the institutional
research funding supported by the Scotland’s Rural Col-
4 | C ON C L U S I ON S lege (SRUC), UK.
4. Brassard P, Godbout S, Raghavan V. Pyrolysis in auger reactors pyrolyser: product yields and its characterization. Bioresour
for biochar and bio oil production: a review. Biosyst Eng. 2017; Technol. 2015;188:258-264.
161:80-92. 17. Jahirul MI, Rasul MG, Chowdhury AA, Nanjappa A. Produc-
5. Mohanty P, Pant KK, Parikh J, Sharma DK. Liquid fuel pro- tion through biomass pyrolysis- a technological review. Ener-
duction from syngas using bifunctional CuO–CoO–Cr2O3 cata- gies. 2012;5(12):4952-5001.
lyst mixed with MFI zeolite. Fuel Process Technol. 2011;92(3): 18. Kapoor L, Bose D, Mekala A. Biomass pyrolysis in a twin-screw
600-608. reactor to produce green fuels. Biofuels. 2017;11(1):101-107.
6. Ansari KB, Kamal B, Beg S, et al. Recent developments in 19. Kapoor L. Experimental investigation of the pyrolysis of bio-
investigating reaction chemistry and transport effects in bio- mass to produce green fuels. International Journal of Sustain-
mass fast pyrolysis: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2021; able Energy. 2019;38(7):692-700.
150:111454. 20. Brown JN. Development of a Lab-Scale Auger Reactor for Bio-
7. Babu BV, Chaurasia AS. Pyrolysis of biomass: improved models mass Fast Pyrolysis and Process Optimization Using Response
for simultaneous kinetics and transport of heat, mass and Surface Methodology [dissertation]. Ames, IA: Iowa State Uni-
momentum. Energy Conver Manage. 2004;45:1297-1327. versity, 2009.
8. Raza M, Inayat A, Ahmed A, et al. Progress of the pyrolyzer 21. McKendry P. Energy production from biomass (part 1): an
reactors and advanced technologies for biomass pyrolysis overview of biomass. Bioresour Technol. 2002;83(1):37-46.
processing. Sustainability. 2021;13:11061. 22. Nanda S, Mohanty P, Kozinski JA, Dalai AK. Physico-chemical
9. Bridgwater AV. Principles and practice of biomass fast pyroly- properties of bio-oils from pyrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass
sis processes for liquids. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 1999;51(1):3-22. with high and slow heating rate. Energy Environ Res. 2014;4(3):
10. Tsai WT, Lee MK, Chang YM. Fast pyrolysis of rice straw, sug- 21-32.
arcane bagasse and coconut shell in an induction-heating reac- 23. Lam KL, Oyedun AO, Hui CW. Experimental and modelling
tor. J Anal Appl Pyrolysis. 2006;76(1–2):230-237. studies of biomass pyrolysis. Chin J Chem Eng. 2012;20(3):
11. Dickerson T, Soria J. Catalytic fast pyrolysis: a review. Energies. 543-550.
2013;6(1):514-538. 24. Xu Y, Hu X, Li W, et al. Preparation and characterization of
12. Zabeti M, Nguyen TS, Lefferts L, Heeres HJ, Seshan K. In bio-oil from biomass. Progress in Biomass and Bioenergy Pro-
situ catalytic pyrolysis of lignocellulose using alkali-modified duction. London, UK: IntechOpen Limited; 2010.
amorphous silica alumina. Bioresour Technol. 2012;118: 25. Bridgwater AV. Review of fast pyrolysis of biomass and product
374-381. upgrading. Biomass Bioenergy. 2011;38:68-94.
13. Onay O, Kockar OM. Slow, fast and flash pyrolysis of rapeseed.
Renew Energy. 2003;28(15):2417-2433.
14. Ates F, Buyuktuncer H, Yasar B, Isil A, Biricik G, Koparal AS.
Comparison of non-catalytic and catalytic fast pyrolysis of How to cite this article: Kapoor L,
pomegranate and grape marcs under vacuum and inert atmo- Mohammad A, Jha JM, et al. Biofuel production
spheres. Fuel. 2019;85:1851-1859. using fast pyrolysis of various plant waste
15. Demirbas A, Arin G. An overview of biomass pyrolysis. Energy biomasses in fixed bed and twin-screw reactors. Int
Source. 2002;24(5):471-482.
J Energy Res. 2022;1‐9. doi:10.1002/er.7904
16. Tinwala F, Mohanty P, Parmar S, Patel A, Pant KK. Intermedi-
ate pyrolysis of agro-industrial biomasses in bench-scale