0% found this document useful (0 votes)
37 views8 pages

Chanakya

Kautilya emphasizes the importance of a strong king who prioritizes the welfare of his subjects, asserting that a king's happiness is tied to the happiness of the people. He outlines the elements of the state and advocates for royal authority to maintain order and prevent anarchy, while also promoting the concept of a welfare state. Kautilya's work integrates various political variables and knowledge domains, aiming to create stability and prosperity in governance.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
37 views8 pages

Chanakya

Kautilya emphasizes the importance of a strong king who prioritizes the welfare of his subjects, asserting that a king's happiness is tied to the happiness of the people. He outlines the elements of the state and advocates for royal authority to maintain order and prevent anarchy, while also promoting the concept of a welfare state. Kautilya's work integrates various political variables and knowledge domains, aiming to create stability and prosperity in governance.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

Kautilya

 Kautilya understood politics essentially in administrative terms.


 Kautilya was in favor of strong king. It may me doubted whether he
was in favor of an absolute monarchy because in his state the king
had to work under so many restrictions
 It is unrighteous to do an act which causes popular fury. Kautilya is
respectful of popular fury not because of any moral considerations,
but because as an exponent of real politik he accepts the
substantial importance of keeping people happy.
 He adds, when people are impoverished, they become greedy,
greed makes them disaffected, when disaffected they voluntarily
go to the side of the enemy and destroy their own master.
 Hence no king should give room to such causes as would bring
impoverishment or greed among his people.
 He says, “in the happiness of his subjects lies the happiness of the
king, in their welfare, his welfare, whatever pleases him, he shall not
consider good, but whatever pleases his subjects he shall consider
good.
 Kautilya is convinced that the state is sovereign and with it the king must be
supreme.
 He gives seven elements of the state-
 King
 Minister
 Country
 Treasury
 Fort
 Army
 Friends and Enemy
 The king is above all other elements. Kautilya declares that a good king can
improve even the most defective constituents. The king makes or mars other
elements.
 Kautilya even makes a categorical assertion about the transcendental
character of the kings authority-
 The king alone selects his officials, rewards them, punishes them, endows
prosperity on anyone he likes.
 He tends to emphasize that the king derives his authority not so much from
popular contract as from divine benediction that makes any idea of revolt
against the king doubly difficult.
 Kautilya says that the kingship is a result of the
escape from the state of nature in which laws
of jungle prevailed. As a result, any state is
better than no state which throws people
back into anarchy.
 So ardent is his partiality towards a strong king
that he even pleads for modification of social
customs and practices by royal interventions,
though it should not always be at variance
with the rest of the society. Kautilya’s king has
last say in all the matters
Idea of a welfare State
 In kautilya’s book the idea of a welfare state is
repeated with great force. Acoording to him the
king must ensure that the people of the four castes
and four orders of life keep to their respective,
respective duties and occupations.
 He was convinced that a vicious and unrighteous
king who ignores the welfare of his subjects would
fall a victim to popular fury or become vulnerable
to enemies.
 The idea of a positive state is taken up and the
king is authorized to create conditions for a good
life by doing various tasks assigned to him.
Foreign Relations
 It is important because no state exists in isolation.
 Every state is competing with every other for land.
This this the natural order where none is content
with what he already has. State should be
capable of defending itself and also inflicting
damage on others when need arises.
 Kautilya mentions of “chakravartin” and says, if a
king is to become chakravartin he must have all
these three assets
 Military power
 Financial prudence
 Wisdom
Division of human knowledge
into four sciences
 Philosophy- deals with reasoned argument and
makes one study in weal and woe.
 The sacred canon- knowledge of four castes and
their respective duties, the performance of which
leads to heaven
 The science of Political Economy- better
agriculture and production of metals and forest
products
 The science of politics- it is the most important of
all the four kinds of knowledge because it leads to
acquisition and preservation of them all.
conclusion
 Kautilya has discussed almost all political variables
which might lead to the rise and decline of the
state, including influence of stars, mystical
numbers, religious superstition, and social practice.
 It was his singular achievement to weave the
influence of his geopolitical factors into his
science of administration which is truly inductive in
character.
 The context in which Arthashastra was written,
Kautilya was trying to create single handedly,
order out of chaos, peace out of war, a public
state out of a corrupt one. This is why his ideas
were extremely complex.

You might also like