See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/364844337

Analysis of Multi-Storey Building using Structural Software MIDAS General

Article · June 2020

CITATIONS READS

0 381

3 authors, including:

Patel Priyank Hiteshbhai

R. N. G. Patel Institute of Technology Bardoli
3 PUBLICATIONS 1 CITATION

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Patel Priyank Hiteshbhai on 29 October 2022.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

 International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD)
Volume 4 Issue 4, June 2020 Available Online: www.ijtsrd.com e-ISSN: 2456 – 6470

Analysis of Multi- Storey Building using

Structural Software MIDAS General
Priyank H. Patel1, Jenish M. Mistry2, Vishal N. Patel2
1Lecturer, 2Assistant
Professor,
1,2Civil engineering Department, SNPIT & RC, Umrakh, Bardoli, Surat, Gujrat, India

ABSTRACT How to cite this paper: Priyank H. Patel |

Earthquakes are known to produce one of the most destructive forces on Jenish M. Mistry | Vishal N. Patel "Analysis
earth. It has been seen that during past earthquakes many of the buildings of Multi- Storey Building using Structural
were collapsed. Therefore, realistic method for analysis and design are Software MIDAS
required. Performance Based Design is the modern approach for earthquake General" Published
resistant design. It is an attempt to predict the performance of buildings under in International
expected seismic event. A structure designed with Performance Based Design Journal of Trend in
(PBD) concept does not developed undesirable failure mechanism during Scientific Research
earthquake. The analysis can be performed on new as well as existing and Development
buildings and the performance of buildings in future earthquake can be (ijtsrd), ISSN: 2456- IJTSRD30961
evaluated. In this research we apply different type type of analysis method on 6470, Volume-4 |
the 30 storey building plan and compare the result. Issue-4, June 2020, pp.383-387, URL:
www.ijtsrd.com/papers/ijtsrd30961.pdf
KEYWORDS: push over analysis, Time history analysis, Multi storey building
Copyright © 2020 by author(s) and
International Journal of Trend in Scientific
Research and Development Journal. This
is an Open Access article distributed
under the terms of
the Creative
Commons Attribution
License (CC BY 4.0)
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by
/4.0)
INTRODUCTION
Amongst the natural hazards, earthquakes have the potential earthquakes. Performance based Seismic design is an elastic
for causing the greatest damages. Since earthquake forces design methodology done on the probable performance of
are random in nature & unpredictable, the engineering tools the building under input ground motions. The performance-
needs to be sharpened for analysing structures under the based seismic design process explicitly evaluates how a
action of these forces. Performance based design is gaining a building is likely to perform; given the potential hazard it is
new dimension in the seismic design philosophy wherein the likely to experience, considering uncertainties inherent in
near field ground motion (usually acceleration) is to be the quantification of potential hazard and uncertainties in
considered. Earthquake loads are to be carefully modelled so assessment of the actual building response. In performance-
as to assess the real behaviour of structure with a clear based design, identifying and assessing the performance
understanding that damage is expected but it should be capability of a building is an integral part of the design
regulated. In this context pushover analysis which is an process, and guides the many design decisions that must be
iterative procedure shall be looked upon as an alternative for made. Figure 1-1 shows a flowchart that presents the key
the orthodox analysis procedures. This study focuses on steps in the performance-based design process. It is an
pushover analysis of multi-storey RC framed buildings iterative process that begins with the selection of
subjecting them to monotonically increasing lateral forces performance objectives, followed by the development of a
with an invariant height wise distribution until the present preliminary design, an assessment as to whether or not the
performance level (target displacement) is reached. The design meets the performance objectives, and finally
promise of performance-based seismic engineering (PBSE) is redesign and reassessment, if required, until the desired
to produce structures with predictable seismic performance. performance level is achieved.
To turn this promise into a reality, a comprehensive and
well-coordinated effort by professionals from several Steps to carried out Performance based seismic design
disciplines is required.
Select the performance level of building in association
with architect, structure engineer and client based on
EASE OF USE site condition are expected.
Performance based seismic engineering
Preliminary design is carried out as per Indian code. The
Basic concept of Performance Based Seismic Design is to story drift limit is checked as per IS:1893 (part-1)-2002.
provide engineers with the capability to design buildings
If design is safe than performance based analysis is
that have a predictable and reliable performance in carried out to meet the performance objective which is

@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD30961 | Volume – 4 | Issue – 4 | May-June 2020 Page 383
 International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
interpreted by both quantified hazard level and Spectral Acceleration (Sa) versus Time Period (T) curve is
quantified performance level. given in IS: 1893(Part1)-2002 which is converted in to

If performance point is not meet to objective revise the Spectral Acceleration (Sa) versus Spectral. Displacement
design by increasing or decreasing percentage of steel or (Sd) curve, Capacity curve and Demand curve are generated
size of member. in spectral coordinates to find- out performance point ap and
dp. The equal displacement a’ and d’ is good starting point
The process of analysis and design is repeated till expected for the iterative process as shown in Fig.1.2.
performance objectives are met. Capacity and demand both
change with structural design. Performance based design is The location of performance point must satisfy two
iterative in nature compared to one step analysis and design relationships:
as per IS: 1893(Part1)-2002. 1) the point must lie on the capacity spectrum curve in order
to represent the structure at a given displacement, and (2)
Push-Over Analysis the point must lie on a demand spectrum curve or 5%
Pushover analysis is a static, nonlinear procedure using damped design spectrum, that represent the nonlinear
simplified nonlinear technique to estimate seismic structural demand at the same structural displacement. For this
deformations. It is an incremental static analysis used to methodology, spectral reduction factors are given in term of
determine the force-displacement relationship, or the effective damping. An approximate effective damping is
capacity curve, for a structure or structural element. The calculated based on the shape of capacity curve, different soil
analysis involves applying horizontal loads, in a prescribed profile, and resulting hysteresis loop.
pattern, to the structure incrementally, i.e. pushing the
structure and plotting the total applied shear force and
associated lateral displacement at each increment, until the
structure or collapse condition. In technique a computer
model of the building is subjected to a lateral load of a
certain shape (i.e., inverted triangular or uniform). The
intensity of the lateral load is slowly increased and the
sequence of cracks, yielding, plastic hinge formation, and
failure of various structural components is recorded.
Pushover analysis can provide a significant insight into the Fig.1.2 Demand spectra curve Performance Point
weak links in seismic performance of a structure. The Curve
performance criteria for pushover analysis are generally Performance Point Curve
established as the desired state of the building given roof-top The intersection of the pushover capacity and demand
or spectral displacement amplitude. spectrum curves defines as the “performance point” as
shown in Fig. 1.3. Allowable tolerance is considered within
Types of Push-Over Analysis
5% of the displacement of the trial performance point. Using
Forced Controlled
the Performance Point or Target Displacement, the global
Used when load is known and structure is desired to support
response of the structure and individual component
this load. For gravity load on structure force controlled, push
deformations are compared with specific performance goals
over analysis is used.
for building as per ATC 40 criteria.
Displacement Controlled
Used when load is unknown but displacement is known and
structure is desired to lose their strength and become
unstable. For lateral load on structure displacement
controlled, pushover analysis is used.

Capacity-Curve
It is represents the increasing lateral displacement as a
function of the force applied monotonically from zero to the
ultimate level corresponding to the incipient collapse of the
structure and response behaviour is gauged by
measurement of strength of structure. The simplified Fig.1.3 Performance Point curve
nonlinear procedure is followed for the generation of the
Advantages of Push-Over Analysis
capacity curve. This capacity curve is in form of Base Shear
1. It allows us to evaluate overall structural behaviours
versus Displacement curve which is converted in to Spectral
and performance characteristics.
Acceleration (Sa) versus Spectral Displacement (Sd) curve.
2. It enables us to investigate the sequential formation of
An approximate effective damping is also calculated based
plastic hinges in the individual structural elements
on the shape of the capacity curve.
constituting the entire structure.
3. When a structure is to be strengthened through a
rehabilitation process, it allows us to selectively
reinforce only the required members maximizing the
cost efficiency.
4. 4) The pushover analysis provides good estimate of
global and local inelastic deformation demands for
structures that vibrate primarily in the fundamental
Fig. 1.1 Capacity curve Demand Spectra Curve mode.

@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD30961 | Volume – 4 | Issue – 4 | May-June 2020 Page 384
 International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
Disadvantages of Push-Over Analysis Table.1.2 Value of base shear
1. Deformation estimates obtained from a pushover
analysis may be grossly inaccurate for structures where
higher mode effects are significant.
2. In most cases it will be necessary to perform the
analysis with displacement rather than force control,
since the target displacement may be associated with
very small positive or even a negative lateral stiffness
because of the development of mechanisms and P-delta
effects.
3. Pushover analysis implicitly assurances that damage is a Fig. 1.4 Value of Base shear
function only of the lateral deformation of the structure,
neglecting duration effects, number of stress reversals Comparison of Displacement:
and cumulative energy dissipation demand Method Of Analysis Value(m)
4. The procedure does not take into account for the Response Spectrum Method 0.0896
progressive changes in modal properties that take place Time History Method 0.0349
in a structure as it experiences cyclic non-linear yielding Pushover Analysis 0.1341
during earthquake.
Table.1.3 Comparison of displacement
5. Most critical is the concern that the pushover analysis
may detect only the first local mechanism that will form
in an earthquake mechanism that will form in an
earthquake and may not expose other weakness that
will be generated when the structures dynamic
characteristics change after formation of first local
mechanism.

Modelling in software
General Information
Fig.1.5 Comparison of displacement

Comparison of Storey Drift (X):

Method Of Analysis Value(m)
Response Spectrum Method 0.0036
Time History Method 0.0149
Pushover Analysis 0.0078
Table.1.4 Comparison of Storey drift (X)

Fig. 1.4 Modelling in software

Sr. no Name Detail of Model

1 Storey height G + 30
2 Spacing along X direction 5m
3 Spacing along Y direction 5m
4 Size of column 500 x 500 mm
5 Size of beam 300 x 300 mm
6 Slab thickness 150 mm
4 KN/m2typical Fig. 1.6 Comparison of Storey drift
7 live load 1.5 KN/m2terrace
(X) Comparison of Storey Drift (Y):
Method Of Analysis Value(m)
8 Floor finish 1 KN/m2
Response Spectrum Method 0.0036
9 water proofing 2 KN/m2
Time History Method 0.0136
10 Earthquake As per IS:1893 2002
Pushover Analysis 0.0145
Type II medium as
11 Type of soil Table.1.5 Comparison of Storey drift (Y)
per IS 1893
12 Seismic zone Zone III
Table.1.1 General details of the building

Result
Value of Base Shear:
Method Of Analysis Value(KN)
Response Spectrum Method 995.21
Time History Method 6117.6
Pushover Analysis 2772.83

@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD30961 | Volume – 4 | Issue – 4 | May-June 2020 Page 385
 International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
Fig. 1.7 Comparison of Storey Drift (Y) 7. rom the results of analysis of model we can conclude
Comparison of Storey Displacement (X): that it gives good results for Story Displacement (Y) for
Method of Analysis Value(m) Response spectrum method i.e.0.0895 m.
Response Spectrum Method 0.0895 8. From the results of analysis Response Spectrum Method
Time History Method 0.3425 gives best result for analysis of tall structure.
Pushover Analysis 0.1342
REFERENCES
Table.1.6 Comparison of Storey displacement (X) [1] Andreas J. Kappos, Georgios Panagopoulos,
“Performance- Based Seismic Design of 3D R/C
Buildings Using inelastic Static And Dynamic Analysis
Procedures” ISTE Journal of Earthquake Technology,
volume. 41, Paper No. 444, No.1, pp.141-158, March-
2004.
[2] Applied Technology Council - 40
[3] D. N. Shinde, Nair Veena V, Pudale Yojana M, “ Pushover
Analysis of Multi Story Building”, International Journal
of Innovative Research in science, Engineering and
Fig. 1.8 Comparison of Storey displacement (X)
Technology eISSN: 2319-1163, pISSN: 2321-7308.
Comparison of Storey Displacement (Y): [4] Dimpleben P. Sonwane, Dr. Kiran B. Ladhane, “Seismic
Method Of Analysis Value(m) Performance based Design of Reinforced Concrete
Building using Nonlinear Pushover analysis”,
Response Spectrum Method 0.0895
International Journal of Innovative Research in science,
Time History Method 0.3271 Engineering and Technology, volume.4 Issue 06, June-
Pushover Analysis 0.1342 2015, ISSN: 2278-0181.
Table.1.6 Comparison of Storey displacement (Y) [5] Dr. Rehan A. Khan (2014), “Performance Based seismic
Design of Reinforced Concrete Building “, International
Journal of Innovative Research in science, Engineering
and Technology volume. 3, ISSN: 2319-8753.
[6] Federal Emergency Management Agency - 40
[7] Mohommed Anwaruddin Md. Akberuddin, Mohd.
Zameeruddin Mohd. Saleemuddin, “Pushover Analysis
of Medium Rice Multi-Story RCC Frame With and
Without Vertical irregularity”, International journal of
Fig. 1.9 Comparison of Storey Displacement (Y) Engineering Research and Applications, volume. 3,
Issue 5, Sep-Oct 2013, pp.540-546.
CONCLUSION
[8] Prakash K. Siyani and Paresh V. Patel, “Comparison of
In this work Performance Based Seismic Analysis of model
Pushover Analysis Considering Site Response Spectra
with different methods of G+30 storey building has been
and Time History”, ACSGE-2009, OCT 25-27, BITS
carried out by MIDAS GEN and evaluating their performance
Pilani, India.
parameters.
[9] Prakash K. Siyani and Paresh V. Patel, “Effects of plastic
1. Pushover analysis is an elegant tool to visualize the
hinge properties in Performance based design”,
performance level of a building under given earthquake.
National Conference on Advances and Innovations in
It gives valuable information for the Performance Based
Civil Engineering (AICE’09), Tamilnadu, 25th March,
Analysis of building model.
2009.
2. From the results of analysis of model we can conclude
[10] Rahiman G. Khan, M. R. Vyawahare, “Pushover Analysis
that it gives good results for base shear for response
of Tall Building with Soft Stories at Different levels”,
spectrum method i.e. 995.2 KN.
International Journal of Engineering Research and
3. From the results of analysis of model we can conclude Applications, volume.3 Issue 4, Jul-Aug 2013, pp.176-
that it gives good results for displacement for Time 185, ISSN: 2248-9622.
history method i.e.0.0349 m.
[11] Rahul Rana, Limin Jin, Atila Zekloglu (2004), “Pushover
4. From the results of analysis of model we can conclude Analysis of A 19 Story Concrete shear Wall Building”,
that it gives good results for Story Drift (X) for response 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering
spectrum method i.e.0.0036 m. Vancouver, B.C., Canada August 1-6, Paper No.133.
5. From the results of analysis of model we can conclude [12] Rajesh M N, S K Prasad, “Seismic Performance Study on
that it gives good results for Story Drift (Y) for response RC Wall Buildings form Pushover Analysis”,
spectrum method i.e.0.0036 m. International Journal of Innovative Research in science,
Engineering and Technology, eISSN: 2319-1163, pISSN:
6. From the results of analysis of model we can conclude
2321-7308.
that it gives good results for Story Displacement (X) for
Response spectrum method i.e.0.0895 m.

@ IJTSRD | Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD30961 | Volume – 4 | Issue – 4 | May-June 2020 Page 386
 International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) @ www.ijtsrd.com eISSN: 2456-6470
[13] Riza Ainul Hakim, Mohammed Sohaib Alama, Samir A. Journal of Earthquake Technology, volume. 41, Paper
Ashour, “Application of Pushover analysis for No. 445, No.1, pp.159-181, March-2004.
Evaluating Seismic Performance of RC Building”,
[15] Srinivasu. A, Dr. Panduranga Rao. B, “Non-Linear Static
International Journal of Innovative Research in science,
Analysis of Multi-Storied Building”, International
Engineering and Technology volume.3 Issue 1, January-
journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, volume.
2014 ISSN: 2278-0181.
4, Issue 10, Oct 2013.
[14] Sashi K. Kunnat, Erol Kalkan, “Evaluation of Seismic
[16] R. Hasan, L. Xu, D. E. Grierson, “Push-Over Analysis for
Deformation Demands Using Non-Linear Procedures In
Performance-Based seismic Design”, Science Direct, 22
multistory Steel and Concrete Moment Frames”, ISTE
July 2002.

@ IJTSRD
View publication stats
| Unique Paper ID – IJTSRD30961 | Volume – 4 | Issue – 4 | May-June 2020 Page 387