0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views25 pages

Taqiyah Dissimulation

The document explains the concept of Taqiyah, which allows Muslims to conceal their faith in situations where their life, honor, or property is at risk. It discusses its significance in Islamic terminology, its permissibility in both Shi'a and Sunni traditions, and provides examples from the Qur'an and the life of the Prophet Muhammad. The text emphasizes that Taqiyah is not hypocrisy, but rather a necessary measure to protect one's faith and life.

Uploaded by

vuyuhdsdjikdsds
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views25 pages

Taqiyah Dissimulation

The document explains the concept of Taqiyah, which allows Muslims to conceal their faith in situations where their life, honor, or property is at risk. It discusses its significance in Islamic terminology, its permissibility in both Shi'a and Sunni traditions, and provides examples from the Qur'an and the life of the Prophet Muhammad. The text emphasizes that Taqiyah is not hypocrisy, but rather a necessary measure to protect one's faith and life.

Uploaded by

vuyuhdsdjikdsds
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 25

Chapter 1

What is Taqiyah?
He who disbelieves in Allah after his belief in Him, (is the liar) except he who is
compelled while his heart remains steadfast with the faith (has nothing
worry). But who opens his breast for infidelity; on these is wrath of Allah, and
for them is a great torment. [1]

This verse of the Qur’an refers to the incident when 'Ammar bin Yasir
(May Allah be pleased with both) had to utter some words against Islam
to save himself from the Quraishite infidels.

It clearly allows hiding one 's true faith when one is in danger of one's
life. This rule is called taqiyah.

Question 1: What is the meaning of "Taqiyah"?

Answer: Its literal meaning is to safeguard; to defend; to fear; piety


(because it saves one from the displeasure of Allah).

Al‑Munjid says:

This gist of above is that the word taqiyahmeans to be on guard, to fear,


to be pious.

The dictionary as‑Surah says, (Taqiyah, tuqat = piety)

Question 2: What is its significance in Islamic terminology?

Answer: In Islamic terminology it means "to save life, honour. or prop-


erty (either one's own or of other b
elievers) by hiding one's belief or religion". [2]

2
Question 3: Is it something peculiar to the Shi'ism, because I have
heard many people accusing the Shi'as because oftaq'iyah?

Answer: Every society, religion and group practices it and has prac-
ticed it at one time or the other. You will find so many examples
of taqiyahin the Old and the New Testaments, and even in the lives of the
Holy Prophet of Islam, his Companions and many Sunni scholars.

Question 4: But is this practice allowed in Islam?

Answer. Yes. Allah has allowed it in the Qur’an; and reason too shows
the wisdom of this permission.

Shah `Abdul `Aziz Dehlawi writes: "It should be known thattaqiyah is,
in fact, allowed by shari`ah, by authority of theQur’anic verses, "except
when ;you have to guard against them" ; and "except he who is compelled while
his heart remains steadfast with the faith.” [3]

Famous Sunni scholar, `Allamah Wahidu 'z‑zaman Khan of Haydara-


bad (India) says: "Taqiyah is proved from theQur’an, "except when you have
to guard against them"; and ignorant people think that taqiyah is something
peculiar to the Shi'as, while it is allowed in the Sunni faith also at times."
[4]

Question 5: If you hide your belief and declare yourself to believe in


some anti‑Islamic tenets, won't you automatically go outside the pale of
Islam and become a 'Kafir'?

Answer: Belief and faith as well as the disbelief or rejection of faith (in
short, Iman and Kufr) are basically the matters of "heart". That is why Al-
lah rebuked those newly‑converted Arabs who claimed to be `Believers':

The desert Arabs‑say: "We believe" : Say (unto them): "You believed not;
rather say "we accepted Islam" be cause the Faith has not yet entered your
hearts ". [5]

The declaration by tongue has a very minor role in it., A belief without
declaration is acceptable but a declaration without belief is condemned
in the Qur’an in severest terms:

3
When come unto thee the hypocrites, they say: "We bear witness that verily
you are the Messenger of Allah"; and verily Allah knows that you are certainly
this Messenger; and verily Allah bears witness that the hypocrites are certainly
the liars. [6]

Now remember that the life of a Muslim is very precious in the eyes of
Islam. The importance attached to even one life is seen in this verse:‑

And he who saves it (i.e., a human life) shall be as though he has saved the
whole mankind. [7]

And a Muslim is bound to save a life from unlawful destruction,


whether it is some one else's or his own:

And cast not yourselves with your own hands into perdition. [8]

It is for this reason that suicide has been declared a capital sin just like
murder; and it is for this reason that Shi'aShari`ah does not allow starting
a jihad (war) without permission of the Prophet, Imam or their especially
appointed deputies or in defense.

And it is to save the life of a believer that one is allowed to utter a lie
and save that precious life.

Question 6: All Right. You saved a life; but you committed one of the
greatest sins, i.e., lie. So, spiritually you are doomed to disgrace in either
case. Then, why not tell the truth and let the enemies kill you if they
want?

Answer: When a person is in such a situation that no matter whichever


course of action he chooses he has to commit an evil, then the reason
says that he should select the lesser evil.

Or if he is forced to destroy or damage one of his two possessions,


then surely he would damage or destroy the less‑expensive item to save
the more precious one.

Imam Fakhru 'd‑din ar‑Razi says commenting on the events of the


Prophet Musa (as) and Khidr (as), mentioned in Surah al‑Kahf:

4
When one is confronted by two damaging alternatives, it iswajib to
bear the lesser one in order to ward off the greater one; and this was the
principle followed in the three actions (done byKhidr)’. [9]

Islamic Shari`ah abounds with examples of this principle. Prayer is the


most important pillar of Islam. But if you are praying and a child falls
down a well, and there is no one else to save the child,
the Shari’ah commands you to leave your prayer, and try to save the
child. If you ignored this command, that prayer would not be accepted,
and you would be guilty of neglecting to save a life.

Now, suppose the unbelievers are determined to kill a Muslim, not be-
cause he has committed any crime but just because of his faith. The said
Muslim goes into hiding and you know where he is. The unbelievers
come to you and ask you whether you knew where that person was. You
are caught between two evils: either you say `No' and become a liar, or
you say `Yes' and cause the murder of an innocent Muslim. The reason
says that telling a lie in that situation is preferable than the truth which
would lead to murder. [10]

Now suppose that the unbelievers have caught a Muslim and that
Muslim happens to be `You'. They put two alternatives before you: Eith-
er renounce Islam or be killed. If the flame of true Faith is lighting your
heart, mere words of tongue cannot extinguish it at all. Those words of
disbelief will be just like a dark cover to hide the light of your faith from
the unbelievers, but they can have no adverse effect on the flame itself.

And if you do not hide that flame behind that cover, your life will be
forfeited and with that you will lose the possibility of serving Islam at
some other time.

In short, by uttering a few false words against Islam you will save
your life as well as your faith; and by not uttering those words your life
will come to its end and with it will vanish all chances of Islamic services
which you could have rendered had you been alive. Allah, therefore, has
allowed you to save your life by uttering a few false words against Islam.
[11]

Question 7: Say whatever you like, but the fact remains thattaqiyah is
just another form of Nifaq (hypocrisy).

5
Answer. Far from it. In fact taqiyah is opposite of Nifaq. Remem-
ber, Iman and Kufr, when seen with their `declaration', can be divided in
four categories only:

(1) Correct belief of Islam by heart and its declaration in words.

This is open Iman (faith).

(2) Belief against Islam by heart and expression of that anti‑Islamic be-
lief in words.

This is open Kufr (infidelity). These two categories are opposite to each
other and cannot combine in one place.

(3) Belief against Islam in heart but declaration of Islam in words.

This is Nifaq (hypocricy).

(4) Correct belief of Islam by heart but declaration of anti‑Islamic belief


in words.

This is taqiyah, and these two categories (Nifaq and Taqyah are, like-
wise, opposite to each other and can never be found in one place. [12]

Question 8: You claimed above that many companions of the Holy


Prophet practiced it. Can you give an example?

Answer. We have mentioned in the very beginning the example of


'Ammar bin Yasir (ra): The Quraishites brutally martyred Yasir and his
wife Sumaiyah just because of their faith. They were the first martyrs of
Islam. When the parents were killed, 'Ammar pretended to renounce
Islam, and thus saved his life. Someone told the Prophet that 'Ammar
had become kafir. The Prophet said: "Never; verily the flesh and blood of
'Ammar is saturated with true faith." Then 'Ammar came to the Holy
Prophet bitterly weeping that he had to utter evil words against Islam so
that he could slip away from the clutches of the infidels. The Prophet
asked him; `How did you find your heart?" 'Ammar said: "Steadfast in
Faith". The Holy Prophet told him not to worry and advised him to re-
peat those words if the infidels again asked him to do so.

6
And it was not only the Holy Prophet who liked the choice of 'Ammar
(ra). Even Allah confirmed his action in the verse which has been written
in the beginning:

He who disbelieves in Allah after his belief in Him (is the liar) except he who
is compelled while hiS heart remains steadfast with the faith (has nothing to
worry). But he who opens his breast for infidelity, on these is the wrath of Al-
lah, and for them is a great torment. [13]

All commentaries of the Qur’an narrate that it was revealed concerning


the above incident of 'Ammar (ra). [14]

Question 9: Is there any other verse sanctioning such a cause of


action?

Answer: Yes. See the following verse which says:

Let not the believers take the disbelievers as their friends rather than the be-
lievers; whoso shall do this then he has no relation with Allah except when you
have to guard Yourselves against them for fear from them; but Allah cautions
you of Himself for unto Allah is the end of your journey. Say, whether you con-
ceal what is in your hearts or manifest it, Allah knows it; and He knows all that
is in the heavens and all that is‑in the earth; and verily Allah has power over all
things. [15]

The reason of this permission is given in this very aya: "Say whether you
conceal what is in your hearts or manifest it, Allah knows it". Here Allah as-
sures the Muslims that Faith is a spiritual thing, connected with heart;.
and if your faith inside your heart is un‑impaired, then Allah is pleased
with you whether you manifest that faith or hide it. It is all the same with
Allah, because He knows your hidden secrets, and even when you hide
your faith from unbelievers, Allah knows it and recognizes it.

As explained in reply to Question No. 1, taqiyah and tuqatboth are


synoynmous.

as‑Suyuti writes inter alia under this verse:

7
"And Ibn Jarir and Ibn Abi Hatim have narrated through al‑`Awfi
from Ibn 'Abbas (that he said about this verse): `Sotaqiyah is by tongue.
Whoever is compelled to say something which is disobedience of Allah
and he speaks it because of those people's fear while his heart remains
steadfast in the faith, it will do him no harm; verily taqiyahis with the
tongue only.'

"…. And `Abd ibn Hamid has narrated from al‑Hasan (al‑Basri) that he
said: `Taqiyah is lawful upto the day of resurrection. And `Abd (ibn Ham-
id) has narrated from Abu Raja' that he was reciting, `illa an tattaqu min-
hum taqiyatan'; and `Abd ibn Hamid has narrated from Qatadah that he
was reciting (likewise) … . taqiyatan with ya”. [16]

Imam Fakhruddin ar‑Razi has mentioned some rules concern-


ing taqiyah under this verse, some of which are given here:

"Third Rule: Taqiyah is allowed in matters related to manifestation of


friendship or enmity; and it is also allowed in matters connected to pro-
fessing (their) religion. But it is certainly not allowed in matters which af-
fect other persons, like murder, fornication, usurpation of property, per-
jury, slander of married women or informing the unbelievers about the
weak points in the Muslims' defence.

"Fourth Rule: The Qur’anic verse apparently shows thattaqiyah is al-


lowed with dominant unbelievers. But according to the madhhab of
Imam Shafi'i (May Allah be pleased with him) if the condition between
(various sects of) the Muslims resembles the condition between the
Muslims and the polytheists, then taqiyah (from the Muslims too) is al-
lowed for the protection of one's life.

"Fifth Rule: Taqiyah is allowed for protection of life. The question is


whether it is allowed for the protection of property; possibly that too
may be allowed, because the Prophet (saw) has said: `The sanctity of
a‑Muslim's property is like the sanctity of his blood'; and also he (saw)
has said: `Whoever is killed in defence of his property, is a martyr'; and
also because man greatly needs his property; if water is sold at exorbit-
ant price, wudhu' does not remain wajib and one may pray
with tayammum to avoid that small loss of property; so why should not
this principle be applied here? And Allah knows better.

8
"Sixth Rule: Mujahid has said that this rule (of taqiyah) was valid in the
beginning of Islam, because of the weakness of the believers; but now
that the Islamic government has got power and strength, it is not valid.
But `Awfi has narrated from al‑Hasan (al‑Basri) that he said: `Taqiyah is
allowed to the Muslims upto the day of resurrection.' And this opinion is
more acceptable because it is wajib to keep off all types of harm from
one's self as much as possible."

Imam Bukhari has written a full chapter, Kitabul Ikrah, on this subject
of compulsion, wherein he writes, inter alia:

And Allah said `except when you hale to guard yourselves against them for
fear from them’. And it is Taqiyah.

… . And Hassan (Basri) said: `Taqiyah is upto the Day of Resurrec-


tion … . And the Prophet (s.a:w.) said: `Deed are according to intention.
[18]

As‑Sayid ar‑Radi (the compiler of Nahj ul Balaghah) writes, inter alia,


in explanation of the verse 3:28‑29:

"Then Allah made an exception (in. this rule of not keeping friendship
with the unbelievers) and that exception is the situation of taqiyah; so he
said

and it is also read (taqiyatan), and both words have the same
meaning.

"It means that Allah bas permitted in this situation (when one is afraid
of ahem) to show their friendship and one's inclination towards them
`with tongue' but not with intention of heart." [19]

Also, there are four verses in the Qur’an which allow eating unlawful
food when one is starving to death and no lawful food is available: One
of them says:

Verily, verily; He has but prohibited that which dies of itself and blood and
swine flesh and whatsoever has other name than Allah's invoked upon it; but

9
whoever is forced to it without the desire (for it) not to transgress (the limits)
then it a no sin on him; verily Allah is Forgiving, Merciful'. [20]

The same thing has been repeated in 5:3, 6:145 and 14:115.

As explained earlier, the life of a believer is the most precious thing.


And it is for this reason that one has been allowed to eat such abomin-
able things as dead body or pork when life depends on it.

The same principle will apply if safety of life depends on uttering a


few false words.

That is why the Prophet (saw) has categorically said:

He who has no taqiyah has no religion. [21]

And Imam Muhammad al‑Baqir (as) has said:

Taqiyah is religion and the religion of my forefathers: He who has


no taqiyah has no faith.[22]

Question 10: Though this practice is allowed in the Qur’anand hadith,


nevertheless it is something evil. I do not believe that Allah would like
us to resort to it even if it is allowed.

Answer. You have just now seen that taqiyah is not only allowed but
even wajib in some cases. Do you think that Allah would make
something wajib without liking it. Also, the Prophet (saw)
makes taqiyah synonymous with religion, and Imam Muhammad
al‑Baqir (as) confirms it in clear words.

However, if you ponder on the Qur'an you will see that the Holy Book
of Allah presents taqiyah in a very commendable light. In the verse 40:28
Allah says:

And said a man who was a believer from among the people of Pharaoh: who
used to conceal his faith … [23]

It shows that Allah was well‑pleased with that hiding of the faith be-
cause it had great benefits, as Abu Talib kept his faith secret because it

10
had great benefits. Just because Abu Talib did not announce his Faith, he
was able to protect the life of the Holy Prophet (saw): Likewise, that be-
liever from the family of Pharaoh was able to protect Prophet Musa (as)
by not declaring his Faith openly.

Anyhow, his Faith based on taqiyah was so pleasing to Allah that he


was counted as a "Siddiq" (Most Truthful). The Holy Prophet (saw) has
said:

"There are three siddiqin: (1) Habib Najjar; (2) The faithful from the
family of Pharaoh arid (3) 'Ali bin Abi Talib". [24]

Not only "the Believer from the Family of Pharaoh" but, according to
Al‑Baidawi, even the Prophet Musa (as) had spent a considerable period
of his life in taqiyah: See his Commentary under the following ayat,

Said (Pharaoh): Did we not cherish you amidst us as a child? And you did
dwell amidst us for years of your' life.[25]

Coming back to the time of the Holy Prophet of Islam, we know that
the Holy Prophet kept his Mission secret for 3 years; and we have seen
how 'Ammar bin Yasir resorted totaqiyah. This was in Meccan period.
Even after Hijrah there remained in Mecca many believers whose Islam
was unknown to others. When the peace of treaty was concluded in
Hudaibiyah in 6 A.H. many Muslims were displeased with its terms.

Hadhrat Umar bin Khattab was so incensed that he protested to the


Holy Prophet (saw), and in later days he used to say:

I did not entertain any doubt about the prophethood of the Holy
Prophet‑since I accepted Islam exc;pt on that day of Hudaibiyah. [26]

Replying to that group, Allah explains one of the reasons of that treaty
and one of the causes why war was not waged at that time:

And were it not for the believing men ‑ and believing women, not having
known them you might' have trodden them down; a crime would have afflicted
you because of them without (your) knowledge. [27]

11
This verse clearly says that there were believing men and believing
women in Mecca whose Islam was unknown, not only to the pagans but
even to the Muslims of Medina. And Allah describes such practicers
of taqiyah a: 'believing men' and `believing women'.

In short, these verses, traditions and incidents clearly show and


demonstrate that if one is in danger of one's life because of his faith, then
it is allowed to utter words against one's true belief of Islam, to save the
life which is more important and that `lie' will not be counted against
him.

as‑Sayid ar‑Radi says:

" … and we know that taqiyah affects only externally (i.e.' its effect is
only on the tongue) and not internally (on the heart, spirit, soul). When
someone forces another one to do something, (and that thing happens to
be connected with heart) then the oppressor has no way of knowing that
his wish has been complied with, except through some utterings by the
tongue from which he will conclude that he has succeeded in changing
the heart of the oppressed. Therefore, the best course of action at the time
of taqiyah is to show the friendship with the unbelievers by words, to mix
with them and live with them with good manners, but the heart must re-
main firmly with the previous feelings towards them, of hidden enmity
and the belief of aloofness from them.

"And such a man (who finds himself in such a situation) should‑as far
as possible‑use dissimulation and double‑entendre (i.e. words and sen-
tences that admit two interpretations‑one correct, one wrong; the speaker
intends correct meaning and the unbelievers take it to mean the other
meaning).' [28]

[1] Qur’an, Surah 16 (an‑Nahl), verse 100

[2]Shah `Abdu 'l‑`Aziz Dehlawi, Tuhfa‑e‑Ithna‑'ashariyah, ch. 1, p. 368.

[3] Ibid.

[4]`Allamah Wahidu'z‑Zaman Khan, Anwaru 'l‑lughah, Bangalor ed.,


para 20, p. 84.

12
[5]Qur’an, 49:14

[6]Qur’an, 63:1

[7]Qur’an, 5:32

[8] Qur’an, 2:195

[9]ar‑Razi, Tafsir Mafatihu 'l ghayb, old ed. vol. 5, pp. 746‑750.

[10] All Muslim sects agree that taqiyah is not only permissible but
compulsory (wajib) in conditions like this. See, for example, Sahih Muslim
with its Sharh by Nawawi which says:

The Islamic jurisprudents are agreed that if an oppressor comes look-


ing for a man in hiding with intention to kill him, or looking for a thing
given in trust, with an aim to usurp it. unlawfully, and he asks about
him or it, then it is wajib on a person who knows about it to hide it and to
deny any knowledge of him or it; and this is lawful ‑ rather wajib ‑ lie; be-
cause it is spoken to ward off an oppressor. (See its pages 106, 110, 200
and 325)

Imam Muslim has written a whole chapter on 'this theme, i.e., The
chapter of unlawfulness of lie and description of lawful lies;

(a) al `Ayni, Umdatu 'l‑Qari Sharh Sahih al‑Bukhari, Egypt, vol. 5, p. 581;
vol. 6, p. 352.

(b) Imam ar‑Razi, Tafsir Mafatihu 'l‑Ghayb, vol. 6, p. 164.

(c) `Allamah Wahidu 'z‑Zaman, Nuzulu 'l abrar min fiqhi 'n Nabii
'l‑Mukhtar vol. 3, p. 123.‑

[11] See the above references to appreciate that the Sunni scholars un-
animously agree that taqiyah is allowed to save one's own life, honour or
property.

[12] Imam ar‑Razi too has clearly described this contrast in his tafsir in
the following words:

13
This points to the fact that (in these matters) consideration is given
only to what is hidden iii the heart. A hypocrite who shows faith and
hides disbelief is a disbeliever, while a believer who under compulsion
shows disbelief and hides faith is a believer; and Allah better knows that
is hidden in the hearts of all. (Vide Tafsir Mafatihu ‘l ghayb, Egypt, under
verse 19:10).)

[13]Qur’an, 16:106.

[14]

(a) as‑Suyuti, Tafsir ad‑Durru 'l‑manthur, vol. 4, p. 132;

(b) ar‑Razi, Tafsir Mafatihu l‑ghayb;

(c) az‑Zamakhshari, Tafsir al‑Kashshaf, Beirut, vol. 2, p. 43c). Practically


all books of Tafsir describe this event under this verse.

[15] Qur’an, 3;28‑29.

[16] as‑Suyuti, ad‑Durru l‑manthur, vol. 2, pp. 10‑17.

[17]ar‑Razi, Tafsir Mafatihu ‘l ghayb, Beirut, 3rd ed., vol. 7, p. 13.

[18] al‑Bukhari, as‑Sahib. Egypt ed., vol. 9, pp. 24‑25.

[19[ as‑Sayid ar‑Radi, Tafsir Haqa'iqu 't‑ta'wil, vol. 5, p. 74.

[20] Qur’an, 2;173.

[21] Mulla `Ali Muttaqi, Kanzu l‑`ummal, Beirut, 5th ed., 1405/1985,
vol. 3, p. 96, hadith no. 5665.

[22] al‑Kulayni, al‑Kafi, Tehran, 1388, vol. 2, p.174.

[23] Qur’an, 40:28

[24] `ubaydullah Amritsari, Arjahu 'l‑rnatalib, 2nd ed., p. 23

14
[25] Qur’an, 20.18; Tafsir al‑Baydawi, Egypt, vol. 1, pp. 112, 396 as
quoted in Fulkun‑Najat, vol. 2, p. 103.

[26] as‑Suyuti, ad‑Durru 'l‑manthur, vol. 6, p. 77

[27] Qur’an, 48:25

[28] as‑Sayid ar‑Radi, op. cit, p. 77.

15
Part 1
Best way to perform Taqiyah

16
Tawriyah

Question 11: What is the meaning of the last paragraph of as‑Sayid


ar‑Radi quoted here?

Answer: He has alluded here to the best way of taqiyah, which is


called tawriyah.

Sometimes a sentence or phrase may be used in such a way that the


hearer takes it to conform with his own ideas, while the speaker takes it
to mean a quite different thing. A good example of tawriyah is found in a
talk of the "believer from the family of Pharaoh".

Islamic traditions say that he was a cousin of Pharaoh. When his parti-
ality towards Prophet Musa (as) became known, some courtiers of
Pharaoh told him that his cousin was a secret follower of Musa and did
not believe in divinity of Pharaoh.

Pharaoh was naturally furious, and asked his cousin to explain it. The
court was full. "The believer from the family of Pharaoh" asked them:

The Believer: Tell me who is your Lord?

Courtiers: Pharaoh.

The Believer: Who is your Creator?

Courtiers: Pharaoh.

The Believer: Who is your sustainer, who guarantees your livelihood


and removes your troubles?

Courtiers: Pharaoh.

Then the Believer declared: "O King! I keep you and all these present
as my witness that their Lord is my Lord, and their Sustainer is my Sus-
tainer; and the One , who looks after their lives and livelihood is the One
who looks after my life and livelihood. I have no Lord or Creator except
their Lord, Creator and Sustainer… "

17
Pharaoh's anxiety vanished and the backbiters were severely tortured
and put to death. [29]

But, in spite of the joy of Pharaoh on this declaration, the real intention
of "The Believer" is quite clear.

Also two examples from New Testament come here to mind.

18
Tawriyah of Jesus Christ
St. Matthews reports,

Then went the Pharisees, and took counsel how they might entangle
him (Jesus) in his talk.

And they sent out unto him their disciples with the Herodians, saying:
Master, we know that thou art true, and teachest the way of God in
truth, neither carest thou for any man: for thou regardest not the person
of men.

Tell us therefore, What thinkest thou? Is it lawful to give tribute unto


Caesar, or not?

But Jesus perceived their wickedness, and said, Why tempt ye me, ye
hypocrites?

Show me the tribute money. And they brought unto him a penny.

And he saith unto them, whose is this image and superscription?

They say unto him, Caesar's. Then saith he unto them, Render there-
fore unto Caesar the things which are Caesar's; and unto God the things
that are God's.

When they had heard these words, they marvelled, and left him, and
went their way. [30]

19
Taqiyah of St. Paul
St. Paul was brought before a gathering of the Jews who wanted to pun-
ish him for his faith in Christianity Now read the accounts from the
`Acts':

But when Paul perceived that the one part were Sadducees, and the
other Pharisees, he cried out in the council, men and brethren, I am a
Pharisee, the son of a Pharisee; to the hope and resurrection of the dead I
am called in question.

And when he had so said, there arose a dissension between . the Phar-
isees and the Sadducees: and the multitude was divided.

For the Sadducees say that there is no resurrection, neither angel, nor
spirit: but the Pharisee, confess both.

And there arose a great cry: and the Scribes that were of the Pharisees'
part arose, and strove„saying, We find no evil in this man. [31]

Many examples of this kind of taqiyah could be quoted from Shi'a


sources. But, as many of them entail explanations of Arabic grammar, I
prefer not to write them here. However, one is given here to complete
this topic.

A preacher was asked during his sermon: "Who was the supreme most
after the Holy Prophet? Abu Bakr or 'Ali?" He replied:

It may be interpreted as "He whose daughter was in his (i.e.,


Prophet's) house." i.e.; Abu Bakr.

And may as easily mean "He that his (Prophet's) daughter was in his
house". i.e. 'Ali.

[29] at‑Tabrasi, al‑Ihtijaj,. Beirut, 1403/1983, vol. 2, pp. 3711‑371.

[30]Matthew, 22:15‑22

[31]Acts, 23:6‑9

20
Chapter 2
When Taqiyah is not allowed
Question 12: If Taqiyah is allowed by Islam, then why did not Imam Hu-
sain (as) resort to it? Why did he sacrifice his all on the altar of truth in-
stead of taking refuge in taqiyah?

Answer. Taqiyah is based on the principle of opting for the lesser evil.
Telling a lie is not as big a sin as destroying a life. Therefore, lie is prefer-
able to putting oneself in danger of life.

Now, if safety of one's own life depends upon putting another


believer's life in danger, then, by the same reasoning,taqiyah is not al-
lowed, because one believer is going to die in any case. So, it is better for
you to die than to cause the death of another believer.

By the same reasoning, if there is a likelihood that one'staqiyah may


destroy the belief of other believers, thentaqiyah is forbidden to such a
person.

Take for example the case of Imam Husain (as). The character of Yazid
is well known and we need not go into its details here. Such a person de-
mands allegience from Imam Husain (as), the grandson of the Holy
Prophet of Islam and symbol of Islamic values and religious uprightness.
Yazid had written to his governor of Madina to demand allegiance from
Imam; and, if Imam refused, then the governor was to send his head to
Damascus.

So Imam Husain (as) was well aware of the consequences of his rejec-
tion of that demand. Still, he knew that if he did swear allegiance to
Yazid, Muslims would think that Yazid was the rightful successor of the
Holy Prophet (saw), and thus all the debaucheries of Yazid would be-
come a part of Islam. In short, Islam would have been completely

21
disfigured if Imam Husain (as) had accepted Yazid as the legal Khalifah
of the Holy Prophet.

Thus we come to the conclusion that if someone is of such a status that


if he, resorted to taqiyah, others would be misled into un‑Islamic tenets
and beliefs, then the basic principle demands that he should sacrifice his
life but save others from going astray. One or more lives are not as im-
portant as one or more people's Faith and spiritual deliverance.

In the end, it should be reiterated that taqiyah is not an specialty of the


Shi'as. Every sect of Islam accepts the principle. Quotations
from Sahih Bukhari and Sunni Commentaries of the Qur’an have been
given in this article. Imam Shafi'i allowed taqiyah even from the Muslims
as well as from the infidels. And all great scholars of Sunni sect, without
any exception, have written that taqiyah is valid upto the Day of Judge-
ment. Those interested. in detailed references should see `Fulk‑un‑Najut'
of Maulana Ali Muhammad and Maulana Amirud‑Deen (Lahore,
Pakistan) where scores of references have been given from page 89 to
page 116.

The Sunni scholar, Najmuddin Tufi Hanbali writes:

"Know that the long arguments for and against taqiyah are useless ….
but there is no doubt in its validity and legality. Of course, common
people do not like its name (taqiyah) because it has been identified with
the Shi'as. Otherwise, the whole world uses it naturally, though some
call it `tolerance', others name it as `diplomacy, and some call it `com-
mon sense'. And it is proved by proofs of Shari’ah(Islam). [32]

Question 13: Keeping in view, all these verses of theQur’an and the
Prophet's traditions, and looking at all these historical facts in the lives of
the Holy Prophet (saw), his companions and even previous Prophets as
well as the Sunni scholars, how is it that the Wahhabis go on accusing
the Shi'as of various ridiculous beliefs and then declaring that even if the
Shia's deny such beliefs they should not be believed because they prac-
tice taqiyah?

Answer. Well, our books are readily available in Arabic, Persian, Urdu,
Gujarati, Bengali, Hindi, Swahili, English and many other languages.
They are on sale in Iran, Iraq, Gulf States, Lebanon, Pakistan, India, East

22
Africa, U.K, Canada, U.S.A and other countries. There are books on theo-
logy, jurisprudence, and social, ethical and philosophical subjects. Some
are meant for our children's education, others for youths and grown up
people. Let the Wahhabis produce proof from our books in support of
those baseless accusations. Unfortunately, they go on repeating those
foolish things from their own books and think that they have vanquished
the Shi'as!!

What will they say if we start writing that: "The Wahhabis believe that
Shaykh Muhammad ibn `Abdul Wahhab was their prophet, and that is
why they hate the Holy Prophet, Muhammad ibn `Abdullah (saw) so
much and always try to distract the Muslims from showing love and re-
spect to the Holy Prophet of Islam (saw), but they do not dare to declare
this belief openly because then, they would be turned out of Mecca and
Medina and would lose their power‑base."? How will they refute this al-
legation? What will be their defense when we will reject their words of
mouth and their writings, as we will go on asserting that it was all a pack
of lies just to safeguard their hold on the sanctuaries of Mecca and
Medina?

[32]Tufi, Sharhu 'l Arba'in an‑Nawawi as quoted inFalkun‑Najat, 2nd ed.


Lahore, vol. 2, p. 107.

23
From the same author on Feedbooks

Day of Judgement (1975)


A detailed and referenced Islamic perspective of the Soul, Death,
Hereafter and the Day of judgement. Sayyid Saeed Akhter Rizvi's
expertise on Islamic subjects such as these and simplistic use of
English language makes it a "Must Read" book.
It is hoped that this book will give enlightenment to our brothers
and sisters; and will help them in appreciating and following the
tenets of Islam more faithfully.
ISLAMICMOBILITY.COM

Muhammad (S) is the Last Prophet (2012)


This text is a response to the erroneous Ahmadiyya (Qadiani) be-
liefs about the alleged prophet-hood of Mirza Ghulam Ahmad. It
discusses in depth the finality of prophet-hood with Prophet
Muhammad in light of the Qur'an and traditions (ahadith). It also
refutes the claims that connect Imam Mahdi with Mirza Ghulam
Ahmad.
ISLAMICMOBILITY.COM
al-islam.org
Published by: Bilal Muslim Mission of Tanzania
Dar-Es-Salaam - Tanzania

24
"Wisdom is the lost property of the Believer,
let him claim it wherever he finds it"
Imam Ali (as)

You might also like