Which grammar?
and the Language in the National Curriculum (LINC) Project run by Ronald
     Carter at the University of Nottingham from 1989–1992. It’s probably an
     emphasis that is shared by teachers who have worked on A-level English
     Language courses over the last 25 or so years, particularly those run by AQA.
     And it’s certainly formed the basis of language work in some parts of Australia,
     for example in literacy/writing programmes based on genre-based pedagogies
     (efectively a teaching strategy that explicitly focuses on the grammar of
     particular genres to teach writing) as well as in the United States in the form of
     meaning-centred grammar (Hancock 2005) and rhetorical grammar (Kolln and
     Gray 2016). In the UK, the most notable infuence, aside from the National
     Strategies in the 2000s, which drew on some ideas from genre-based
     pedagogies, has been the work of Debra Myhill and her team at the University
     of Exeter. Over many years, Myhill has worked with teachers and students
     exploring the ways in which grammar can be taught most efectively to improve
     students’ writing. Drawing on a broadly functional approach, Myhill’s research
     has demonstrated that the explicit teaching of grammar in a contextualised
     way (for real pur-poses, using real texts as models and drawing the idea of
     grammar as a set of resources) can have positive efects on students’ ability to
     craft their own writing and see the connection between grammatical forms and
     possible inter-pretative efects. In her most recent work related to the project,
     Myhill and her team have developed a Grammar as Choice pedagogy based
     around LEAD principles.
          Myhill’s work provides a clear and enabling model that highlights the con-
     nection between language awareness broadly and writing outcomes. In par-
     ticular she is keen to emphasise that good grammar teaching should allow
     students to be attentive to language in a way that is focused on meaning
     rather than memorising lists of defnitions, provides plenty of opportunities for
     students to explore language and its possible efects in a variety of texts and in
     their own writing, and allows students time to discuss language choices
     explicitly and view them as a resource which writers draw on to position read-
     ers in particular ways.
          We share this sentiment and approach in this book. As we argue in Chap-
     ter 1, we believe that grammar teaching should be explicit and that language
     awareness is at the heart of good English teaching, whatever the content. But
     we also take a meaning-centred approach and believe that as Carter (1990:
     120) suggests:
         Knowing more about how grammar works is to understand more about how
         grammar is used and misused. Knowing more about grammar can impart
         better choice and control over grammar, as an expressive and interpretive
         medium. Knowing more about grammar, as part of KAL [Knowledge About
         Language], is to be empowered to respond to and to use grammar as central
         to the creation of textual meanings.
17