Descriptive Statistics

Std.
N Mean Deviation Skewness Kurtosis

Logistic Performanc 381 2.69 .751 .553 .319

e
Information Sharing 381 2.71 .754 .610 .368
Block Chain 381 2.51 .698 .801 .939
Adoption
Collaboration 381 2.58 .661 .799 1.657

Correlations
Logistic Per Information Block Chain Collaborati
formance Sharing Adoption on
** **
Pearson 1 .676 .459 .308**
Logistic Performan Correlation
ce Sig. (2-tailed) <.001 <.001 <.001
N 381 381 381 381
Information Pearson .676** 1 .311** .268**
Sharing Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed) <.001 <.001 <.001
N 381 381 381 381
Block Chain Pearson .459** .311** 1 .290**
Adoption Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed) <.001 <.001 <.001
N 381 381 381 381
Collaboration Pearson .308** .268** .290** 1
Correlation
Sig. (2-tailed) <.001 <.001 <.001
N 381 381 381 381
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Case Processing Summary

 N %
Cases Valid 381 100.0
a
Excluded 0 .0
Total 381 100.0
a. Listwise deletion based on all
variables in the procedure.

Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's
Alpha Based
on
Cronbach's Standardized
Alpha Items N of Items
.815 .815 4

Model Summary
Change Statistics
Mode R Adjusted R Std. Error of R Square F Sig. F
R Square Square the Estimate Change Change df1 df2 Change
1 .729a .532 .528 .68707026 .532 142.658 3 377 <.001
a. Predictors: (Constant), Zscore: Collaboration, Zscore: Information Sharing, Zscore: Block Chain Adoption

ANOVAa
Sum of Mean
Model Squares df Square F Sig.
1 Regression 202.031 3 67.344 142.658 <.001b
Residual 177.969 377 .472
Total 380.000 380
a. Dependent Variable: Zscore: Logistic Performance
b. Predictors: (Constant), Zscore: Collaboration, Zscore: Information Sharing,
Zscore: Block Chain Adoption
 Coefficientsa
Unstandardized Standardized Collinea
Coefficients Coefficients Statisti
Toleranc
Model B Std. Error Beta t Sig. e
1 (Constant) -2.834E-15 .035 .000 1.000
Information .575 .038 .575 15.205 <.001 .868
Sharing
Block Chain .257 .038 .257 6.761 <.001 .857
Adoption
Collaboration .079 .038 .079 2.114 .035 .881
a. Dependent Variable: Zscore: Logistic Performance

Collinearity Diagnosticsa
Variance Proportions
Mode Dimensio Eigenval Condition (Constan Information Block Chain Collaboratio
l n ue Index t) Sharing Adoption n
1 1 1.580 1.000 .00 .18 .19 .18
2 1.000 1.257 1.00 .00 .00 .00
3 .735 1.466 .00 .38 .05 .76
4 .685 1.518 .00 .43 .76 .06
a. Dependent Variable: Zscore: Logistic Performance

ANOVA
Logistic Performance
Sum of Mean
Squares df Square F Sig.
Between 189.534 16 11.846 22.639 <.001
Groups
Within Groups 190.466 364 .523
Total 380.000 380
 Tests of Homogeneity of Variances
Levene
Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
Based on Mean 1.743 19 359 .028
Logistic Performan Based on Median 1.188 19 359 .265
ce Based on Median and 1.188 19 251.048 .268
with adjusted df
Based on trimmed 1.678 19 359 .038
mean

Tests of Homogeneity of Variances

Levene
Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
Based on Mean 1.248 19 361 .216
Logistic Performan Based on Median .810 19 361 .695
ce Based on Median and .810 19 259.104 .694
with adjusted df
Based on trimmed 1.106 19 361 .342
mean

ANOVA
Logistic Performance
Sum of Mean
Squares df Square F Sig.
Between 110.815 19 5.832 7.822 <.001
Groups
Within Groups 269.185 361 .746
Total 380.000 380

ANOVA Effect Sizesa

95% Confidence
Point Interval
Estimate Lower Upper
Eta-squared .292 .181 .328
Logistic Performanc Epsilon-squared .254 .138 .293
e Omega-squared Fixed- .254 .137 .292
effect
Omega-squared .018 .008 .021
Random-effect
a. Eta-squared and Epsilon-squared are estimated based on the fixed-effect model.

ANOVA
Logistic Performance
Sum of Mean
Squares df Square F Sig.
Between 66.364 21 3.160 3.617 <.001
Groups
Within Groups 313.636 359 .874
Total 380.000 380

ANOVA Effect Sizesa

95% Confidence
Point Interval
Estimate Lower Upper
Eta-squared .175 .065 .198
Logistic Performanc Epsilon-squared .126 .011 .151
e Omega-squared Fixed- .126 .011 .151
effect
Omega-squared .007 .001 .008
Random-effect
a. Eta-squared and Epsilon-squared are estimated based on the fixed-effect model.

Tests of Normalityc
Information Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Sharing Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
strongly agree . 2 .
Logistic Performan 1 .260 2 .
ce 2 .206 21 .021 .924 21 .106
2 .186 22 .045 .929 22 .118
agree .235 34 <.001 .886 34 .002
 2 .144 59 .004 .948 59 .014
3 .138 61 .005 .966 61 .084
3 .239 45 <.001 .903 45 .001
neutral .160 43 .008 .948 43 .051
3 .177 31 .015 .954 31 .195
*
4 .150 11 .200 .962 11 .791
4 .167 23 .095 .925 23 .083
disagree .311 10 .007 .789 10 .011
*
4 .204 6 .200 .864 6 .203
5 .303 5 .149 .748 5 .028
strongly disgree .337 5 .066 .676 5 .005
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction
c. Logistic Performance is constant when Information Sharing = 5. It has been omitted.