0 ratings 0% found this document useful (0 votes) 448 views 15 pages NIOS Allow Order by NCTE
The NCTE issued a communication regarding a Supreme Court order on the eligibility of candidates with an 18-month D.EI.Ed. from NIOS for teaching positions in Uttarakhand. The Supreme Court ruled that the 18-month diploma is not equivalent to the 2-year diploma required for teacher appointments, emphasizing that the shorter course was only a temporary measure for in-service teachers. Consequently, the NCTE and Ministry of Education are directed to clarify the eligibility criteria for teacher recruitment in light of this ruling.
AI-enhanced title and description
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here .
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Go to previous items Go to next items
Save NIOS Allow order by NCTE For Later ashe seareften ues §z National Council for Teacher Education
(A Statutory Body of the Government of indi
Gre eRorar verte wer) ee : :
efera By Email/ Speed Post
NCTE
F. No-NCTE-Regl011/166/2017-US (Regulation)-HQ Dated: 27.01.2025
‘Computer No. 11209
To,
All Secretaries/Commissioners of Education of State Governments) UT Administrations/
Commissioners of all the Central Government Schools/Commissioner KVS/Chairperson
CBSE
(As per list enclosed)
Subject- To forward the Order dated 10.12.2024passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court
of India in the matter of Viswanath & Ors. Vs. The State of Uttarakhand in
Review Petition of 2024 (Diary No. 4961 of 2024) in Civil Appeal No. 7873 of
2023 -regarding.
Madam/Sir,
NCTE, as a statutory body of Government of India, came into existence in pursuance
of the National Council for Teacher Education Act, 1993 on 17th August 1995 with the
mandate to achieve planned and coordinated development of teacher education throughout
the country and to govern the regulation and proper maintenance of norms and standards for
teacher education
2. Section 12 A of the NCTE Act 1993 provides as under:
“12A. Power of Council to determine minimum standards of education of school
teachers.—For the purpose of maintaining standards of education in schools, the
Council may, by regulations, determine the qualifications of persons for being
recruited as teachers in any pre-primary, primary, upper primary, secondary, senior
secondary or intermediate school or college, by whatever name called, established,
run, aided or recognised by the Central Government or a State Government or a
local or other authority:
Provided that nothing in this section shall adversely affect the continuance of any
person recruited in any pre-primary, primary, upper primary, secondary, senior
secondary or intermediate schools or colleges, under any rule, regulation or order
made by the Central Government, a State Government, a local or other authority,
immediately before the commencement of the National Council for Teacher
Education (Amendment) Act, 2011 (18 of 2011) solely on the ground of now
fulfilment of such qualifications as may be specified by the Council
-v
sector ~ 10, Dwarka,New Delhi ~ 110075
(OF scanned wt oHENScmnerusa sear afters $z National Council for Teacher Education
(A Statutory Body of the Government of India)
Gira eReret vefattie ter) wejera er ‘by Email / Speed Post
NCTE
To
Provided further that the minimum qualifications of a teacher referred to in the first
proviso shall be acquired within the period specified in this Act or under the Right of
Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 (35 of 2009).”
3. The NCTE had laid down various notifications prescribing the minimum academic
and professional qualifications for consideration of a person to be eligible for appointment as
a teacher up to Class XII published on 23.08.2010, 29.07.2011, 13.11.2019 and 13.10.2021
4, On the directions of the Ministry of Education, the Northern Regional Committee of
NCTE issued Recognition order dated 22.09.2017 to National Institute of Open Schooling,
‘NOIDA, Uttar Pradesh for 18" months D.EI.Ed. on certain conditions including that the
duration of the said programme shall be 18 months instead of 2 years which shall include 6
months internship.
5. ‘Writ petition CWJC No. 19842 of 2019 was filed before the Hon’ble Patna High
Court, Bihar by Sh. Sanjay Kumar Yadav along with 302 other petitioners against the
Director, Primary Education, Bihar, NCTE, Union of India and others and after hearing the
submissions of the parties the Hon’ble High Court of Patna passed the judgment dated
21.01.2020 wherein it observed that:
“The NCTE recognized one time course in D.ELED. conducted by NIOS. The
relaxation of some period was only granted to the in-service teachers who had not
obtained the required degree training course such as B.Ed/D.ELEd. which is made
‘minimum requisite qualification for appointment on the post of teachers in elementary
and primary schools thus, it cannot be said that the teachers who had obtained
D.EL.Ed. through NIOS is not at par with the two years period D.EL.Ed. course.
15. Thus, Ifind that on such misrepresentation and misreading of the clarification
issued by the NCTE, the Director, Primary Education has illegally issued direction
that the persons who had obtained D.ELEd. course duly run for 18 months by NIOS
are not eligible for appointment on the post of teachers in primary schools and thus,
the letter as contained in Annexure-1 is illegal, unsustainable and violative of Article
14 of the Constitution. Accordingly, Annexure-11 is set aside.
16. The writ petitions are allowed. The respondents are directed to allow the
petitioners to apply within one month and consider the case of the petitioners for
‘appointment on the post of primary teachers.”
6. __ The Ministry of Education vide letter dated 28.02.2020 directed NCTE that an appeal
should not be filed against the above order of the Hon'ble High Court of Patna.
7. __ The Ministry of Education issued a letter dated 16.12.2020 to the Chairperson, NCTE
advising to issue a clarification to all states and UT's that those candidates who have
completed the D.EI.Ed course of NIOS (ODL mode) may be given an opportunity to apply
for fresh recruitment at par with the other D.EL.ED. candidates subject to adherence to all the
other criteria and qualification requirements, such as passing of TET ete, as per the NCTE
2
10, Dwarka
(OF scanned wt onEN Scannerasia seme afeTe $x National Council for Teacher Education
(A Statutory Body of the Government of India)
(area wearer yore ae) Praise
NCTE
Soe
notification dated 23.08.2010 (as amended from time to time) and any other qualification as
mandated by the State. Accordingly, NCTE issued a letter dated 6" January 2021 to the
Chief Secretaries of all the States and Union Territory Administrations.
8. In pursuance of the said letter of NCTE, the Secretary, Government of Uttarakhand
issued a letter dated 15th January 2021 to the Director, Elementary Education, Uttarakhand to
permit all such candidates, to apply for the post of Assistant Teacher (Primary) against
vacancies issued. However, vide communication dated 10th February 2021, the earlier letter
dated 15th January 2021 was withdrawn mentioning that there was no clear provision in the
Uttarakhand Government Elementary Education (Teachers) Service Rules 2012 (amended
from time to time) regarding the eligibility of D.EI.Ed. (ODL) course of NIOS as a minimum
qualification.
9. ‘The aforesaid letter dated 10" February 2021 was challenged by the petitioners ic.
‘Nandan Singh along with other applicants for the vacancy of Assistant teachers in the state of
‘Uttarakhand in a bunch of writ petitions before the Hon'ble High Court Uttarakhand.
10. The Hon’ble High Court Uttarakhand vide Judgment and Order dated 14.09.2022
quashed and set aside the letter dated 10th February 2021 issued by the Government of
‘Uttarakhand,
11. The judgment dated 14.09.2022 passed by the Hon’ble High Court Uttarakhand was
challenged before the Hon’ble Supreme Court in SLP No. 23583-84 of 2022 by Petitioners
i.e. Jaiveer Singh along with others while SLP No. 23943 of 2022 was filed by the State of
Uttarakhand. MoE and NCTE were Respondent no. 5 & 3 respectively with lead case
numbered as SLP No. 23583-84 of 2022. MoE was Respondent no. 3 in SLP no. 23943 of
2022.The Hon’ ble Supreme Court, vide judgment dated 28.11.2023, allowed the appeal and
quashed and set aside the impugned judgment dated 14.09.2022, The operative part of the
same is as under:
41. In view of what has been held by this Court hereinabove, we find that
the High Court erred in holding that 18 months Diploma conducted by NIOS
through ODL mode is equivalent to the 2 years regular Diploma, particularly
‘80, when there was no material placed on record to even remotely hold that
such a qualification was recommended by the Expert Body NCTE. On the
contrary, the communication dated 6th September 2019 of NCTE, the
directives of MHRD so also the recognition order dated 22nd September 2017
clearly go on to show that the 18 months Diploma was provided as a one time
window 10 the in-service teachers to acquire the minimum qualifications
between the 2017 Amendment Act and the outer limit of 1st April 2019. In our
considered view, the High Court has totally erred in holding that the 2 years
Diploma is equivatent to 18 months Diploma.
jes s
C2e
“= G-7, Sector ~ 10, Dwarka,New Delhi ~ 110075
(© scanned wt onEN Sener