6477
6477
com
https://ebookball.com/product/eboo-pdf-dynamics-of-the-
vascular-system-interaction-with-the-heart-2nd-edition-by-
john-kj-li-9814723762-9789814723763-full-chapters-22482/
OR CLICK HERE
DOWLOAD EBOOK
ebookball.com
ebookball.com
ebookball.com
https://ebookball.com/product/ebook-pdf-biomechanics-of-the-brain-2nd-
edition-by-karol-miller-3030049965-9783030049966-full-chapters-22578/
ebookball.com
ebookball.com
ebookball.com
ebookball.com
https://ebookball.com/product/ebook-pdf-books-in-the-digital-age-1st-
editon-by-john-thompson-0745683266-9780745683263-full-chapters-23134/
ebookball.com
Series on Bioengineering a nd Biomedica l E ngineering – Vol. 9
D Y N A M I C S o f the
VASCULAR SYSTEM
Interaction with the Heart
Second Edition
The aims of the book series are to present a publishing forum for established
researchers, educators and professionals in the field of bioengineering and
biomedical engineering to promote in-depth documentation of new scientific
findings, technological advances, and to provide effective teaching tools of the
fundamental aspects of the field. Single or multiple authored or edited books,
research monographs, textbooks, lab manuals and specialized conference pro-
ceedings are welcome. Topics of interest include biosensors, biomedical devices
and instrumentation, physiological modeling and signal processing, medical
imaging, drug delivery systems, clinical monitoring, tissue engineering, sys-
tems biology and bioinformatics, biomechanics and biomaterials, rehabilitation
and prostheses, nano and micro applications to biomedicine, biomedical optics,
biofluid mechanics, artificial organs and assist devices.
Published
DYNAMICS of the
VASCULAR SYSTEM
Interaction with the Heart
Second Edition
John K-J Li
Rutgers University, USA
World Scientific
NEW JERSEY • LONDON • SINGAPORE • BEIJING • SHANGHAI • HONG KONG • TAIPEI • CHENNAI • TOKYO
For photocopying of material in this volume, please pay a copying fee through the Copyright Clearance
Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA. In this case permission to photocopy
is not required from the publisher.
Printed in Singapore
v
9in x 6in b3250 Dynamics of the Vascular System: Interaction with the Heart (2nd Edn) b3250-FM
John Kong-Jiann Li
New Jersey, USA
9in x 6in b3250 Dynamics of the Vascular System: Interaction with the Heart (2nd Edn) b3250-FM
This book was originally published in 2004 as the first volume of the
Bioengineering and Biomedical Engineering Book Series. A decade has
quickly passed, together with the many advances in the sciences,
medicine and technology. I decided to take up the task to update some of
the materials for this second edition, while preserving the fundamental
concepts of the original text.
The contents of this second edition include explicitly a chapter on the
Interaction of the Heart and the Arterial System. This topic was
supported by the National Science Foundation that I began working on
right after completing my doctorate at the University of Pennsylvania
four decades ago with the late Professor Abraham Noordergraaf. This
chapter includes basic cardiac muscle mechanics, the contractile function
of the heart and its dependence on the operating relations with the
vascular system under normal and heart failure conditions, with emphasis
on their dynamic interaction. Examples of mechanical cardiac assist
devices and drug treatment are also included.
This second edition continues to emphasize on quantitative treatment
of the vascular system by analyzing the structural and functional
correlates of the underlying physiology. This may purposefully overlook
some of the clinical aspects in terms of diagnosis and treatment efficacies
of certain cardiovascular diseases. Similar to the first edition, rather than
being exhaustive, only selected topics and references are provided. In
this regard, worthwhile publications from some investigators may not
have been included.
vii
9in x 6in b3250 Dynamics of the Vascular System: Interaction with the Heart (2nd Edn) b3250-FM
John Kong-Jiann Li
New Jersey, USA
9in x 6in b3250 Dynamics of the Vascular System: Interaction with the Heart (2nd Edn) b3250-FM
ix
b2530 International Strategic Relations and China’s National Security: World at the Crossroads
Contents
xi
9in x 6in b3250 Dynamics of the Vascular System: Interaction with the Heart (2nd Edn) b3250-TOC
xii Contents
Contents xiii
xiv Contents
Contents xv
Chapter 9. Interaction of the Heart and the Arterial System ................ 229
9.1 Ventricular Outflow and the Aorta ......................................... 229
9.1.1 Ventricular Ejection ..................................................... 229
9in x 6in b3250 Dynamics of the Vascular System: Interaction with the Heart (2nd Edn) b3250-TOC
xvi Contents
Index...................................................................................................... 273
9in x 6in b3250 Dynamics of the Vascular System: Interaction with the Heart (2nd Edn) b3250-ch01
Chapter 1
That “blood moves in closed circle” was apparently known in the Far
East, several millennia ago, about 2,650 B.C., as recorded in the book by
the Yellow Emperor of China written in the Canon of Medicine (Nei
Ching). Ancient Chinese practitioners customarily felt palpable wrist
artery (radial artery) pulsations as a means of diagnosing the cardiac state
of their patients. In this approach, the practitioners were able to obtain
both the strength of the pulsation to infer the vigor of contraction of the
heart, and the interval duration of the pulses, hence heart rate. This
seemingly indicates that the importance of the rate-pressure product, now
a popular clinical index of myocardial oxygen consumption, might even
have been considered pertinent at that time. The supply and demand of
oxygenation, as well as its proper utilization in terms of energy balance,
or ying-yang, is center to achieving body harmony. Thus, this suggestion
of an intrinsic transfer of the energy (Chi) generated by the heart to the
peripheral arteries may have been known since antiquity, although the
theoretical foundation was not established until much later.
In the West, the observation that man must inspire air to sustain life
led ancient scientists and philosophers to toy with the idea that arteries
contained air rather than blood. This was the notion originally attributed
to Erasistratus in the third century B.C., following the teaching of
Aristotle. Aristotle and later Herophilus performed numerous anatomical
studies and the latter discovered the connecting arteries to the contracting
heart. That arteries themselves contract and relax thus was known in
Aristotle’s time. Arterial properties in terms of elastic stiffness,
distensibility and compliance, as we know now, were not fully described.
Galen’s (130-200) description of the ebb and flow of blood in arteries,
1
9in x 6in b3250 Dynamics of the Vascular System: Interaction with the Heart (2nd Edn) b3250-ch01
Fig. 1.1.1: Anatomic drawings by Vesalius. The extensiveness of the vascular tree is well
appreciated.
9in x 6in b3250 Dynamics of the Vascular System: Interaction with the Heart (2nd Edn) b3250-ch01
Eh
c0 (1.1.1)
2r
In terms of the dynamics of the vascular system, the function of the heart
is to provide energy and perfuse organ vascular beds. For the heart to
accomplish this efficiently, the vascular system plays a central role as the
distributing conduits. As such, both the distributing arteries and the
peripheral vascular beds present the load to the pumping heart.
Peripheral resistance has been popularly viewed in the clinical setting as
the principal vascular load to the heart. This applies mainly to steady
flow conditions. This description is naturally inadequate, because of the
pulsatile nature of blood flow which remains throughout the
microcirculation. Pulsatility implies that there is an oscillatory or
pulsatile contribution to the vascular load to the heart. The significance
9in x 6in b3250 Dynamics of the Vascular System: Interaction with the Heart (2nd Edn) b3250-ch01
This book deals primarily with the dynamic behavior of the components
of the vascular system and methods and techniques for their quantitative
measurements. The book is written applying fundamental physical
principles in conjunction with physiological measurements to the
analysis of the structural and functional aspects of the vascular tree that
includes the arterial circulation, the venous circulation, and the
microcirculation, inclusive of arterioles, capillaries and venules. In
addition, the constituent components, such as collagen, elastin, smooth
muscle, and endothelial and red blood cells as well as transport
phenomena are also discussed. An additional chapter on the interaction
of the heart and the arterial system is also included in this second edition.
Quantitative approaches are emphasized in the overall treatment.
9in x 6in b3250 Dynamics of the Vascular System: Interaction with the Heart (2nd Edn) b3250-ch01
attenuated at the vascular branching. Thus, the design of the arterial tree
is to facilitate pulse transmission to vascular beds. How this is optimized
is explained.
Chapter 6 deals with the less studied aspects of the venous circulation,
because of its low pressure and collapsibility and less life-threatening
behavior. Blood volume is the highest at rest in the venous circulation,
giving rise to its reservoir-like properties. The functional aspects of
collapsibility and venous valves are also discussed, in terms of pressure-
flow relations and the waterfall hypothesis. Modeling aspect is given in
terms of mathematical descriptions and hydrodynamic set-ups.
Chapter 7 deals with the microcirculation. The greatest drop in mean
blood pressure is found in the arterioles, hence justifying the vascular
waterfall interpretation. How the contributions of the microcirculation to
total peripheral resistance in its control of cardiac output are explained.
The capillary circulation, for its vast networking and exchange
environment is of utmost importance in terms of meeting the metabolic
demand of the supplying tissues. The aspects of diffusion and cellular
transports are of critical importance.
Thus, the design of the arterial tree is to facilitate pulse transmission
to vascular beds. These latter are discussed in detail for their importance
in both basic and clinical situations. Pulse pressure and flow remain
pulsatile even in the microcirculation, albeit to a much more reduced
amplitudes. The pulsatility facilitates capillary exchanges.
Chapter 8 deals with aspects of experimental methods, instrument-
ation and devices that are widely used for hemodynamic measurements.
Clinically useful methods and instruments for invasive and noninvasive
determination of blood pressure flow, and vessel dimensions are first
described. This begins with the commonly used noninvasive methods,
such as auscultatory method, the sphygmomanometer cuff method and
tonometry. Invasive blood pressure measurement system such as
catheter-pressure transducer combination is also evaluated in terms of its
frequency response.
Blood flow measurement with both electromagnetic flowmeter and
Doppler ultrasonic method are described, as well as the technique of
thermodilution measurement of cardiac output. The combination of
9in x 6in b3250 Dynamics of the Vascular System: Interaction with the Heart (2nd Edn) b3250-ch01
Chapter 2
15
9in x 6in b3250 Dynamics of the Vascular System: Interaction with the Heart (2nd Edn) b3250-ch02
PULMONARY
CAPILLARIES
PULM.
ARTERIES
RA LA
VENA
CAVAE PULMONARY
VEINS
LV
RV AORTA
SYSTEMIC
CAPILLARIES
Fig. 2.1.1: Diagram illustrating the overall circulation. The four cardiac chambers (LV =
left ventricle, LA = left atrium, RV = right ventricle, RA = right atrium) and systemic and
pulmonary circulations are shown. Arrows indicate directions of blood flow.
9in x 6in b3250 Dynamics of the Vascular System: Interaction with the Heart (2nd Edn) b3250-ch02
There are four heart valves involved in the filling and pumping action
of the heart. The mitral valve, with just two leaflets, situates between the
left atrium and the left ventricle. It controls the flow between these two
chambers, but is a one-way valve. The tricuspid valve, as the name
implies, has three cusps. These are the posterior, the septal, and the
anterior. The cusps have similar geometric shapes. The right ventricle
and the low-pressure pulmonary arterial system on the other hand, are
separated by the pulmonary valve. The aortic valve separates the left
ventricle from the ascending aorta leading to the high pressure systemic
arterial system. These valves have three leaflets and are of similar shape.
Fig. 2.1.2: Blood pressure and blood volume distribution of the systemic circulation.
Notice the largest pressure drop occurs in the arterioles and the largest amount of blood
volume reside in the veins which serve as reservoir. From Rushmer (1972).
9in x 6in b3250 Dynamics of the Vascular System: Interaction with the Heart (2nd Edn) b3250-ch02
Fig. 2.1.3: Sketch of the mammalian arterial tree. Anatomic structures reveal branching
characteristics of the arterial system.
aorto-iliac junction with left and right iliac arteries and its continuation.
In the human, it is a bifurcation. The femoral artery, a well-known
peripheral artery, because of its accessibility, continues from the iliac
artery. These are the arteries perfusing the upper thighs with the tibial
arteries peruse the lower legs and leading to the ankle arteries. The aorta
has, comparatively speaking, the greatest geometric taper, with its
diameter decreasing with increasing distance away from the ventricle.
The common carotid arteries are the longest, relatively uniform vessels,
with the least geometrical tapering. The brachial arteries perfuse the
upper arms leading to distal radial arteries. It is worth noting here that in
humans, both brachial and radial arteries are the most common sites for
noninvasive blood pressure monitoring, with radial in particular as
wearable sensor site.
A( z ) A(0)e kz / r (2.2.1)
where:
z = distance in the longitudinal axial direction along the vessel
r = vessel lumen radius in cm
k = taper factor, dimensionless
A(0) = the cross-sectional area at the entrance of the vessel in cm2
A(z) = the cross-sectional at distance z along the vessel in cm2
A r 2 (2.2.2)
r A( o )
k ln (2.2.3)
z A( z )
Taper factor, k, for the aorta has been reported to be in the range of
0.0314-0.0367 for 20-30 Kg dogs (Li, 2000). Geometric taper factor can
change substantially during varied vasoactive conditions and in disease
conditions, such as atherosclerosis, stenosis or aneurysm. When
vasoactive drugs are administered which have differential effects on
large and small arteries, changes in taper factors from normal can be
quite pronounced.
Alternative formula to calculate taper factor per unit length, or ko, is
expressed as follows:
A( z ) A( 0) e k o z (2.2.4)
9in x 6in b3250 Dynamics of the Vascular System: Interaction with the Heart (2nd Edn) b3250-ch02
Fig. 2.2.1: Schematic diagram illustrating a blood vessel with geometric taper. The vessel
diameter narrows with increasing distance (z) away from the origin. Geometric taper, an
exponential function of distance, is normally calculated from the change in cross-
sectional areas (A) as shown.
The reported values of ko obtained for the abdominal aorta, the iliac,
femoral and carotid arteries are shown in Table 2.2.1. These are
measured in vivo at a mean arterial pressure of about 90 mmHg. The
average body weights of dogs used are about 20 kg. It is obvious from
these data that the taper factor is smaller for smaller vessels. Carotid
arteries have the least taper. They are thus the best approximation to a
geometrically uniform cylindrical vessel.
Area ratios calculated for vascular branching junctions were about
1.08 at the aortic arch, and 1.05 at the aorto-iliac junction (Li et al.,
1984). These values are slightly larger than 1.0. The hemodynamic
consequences of these are discussed in Chapter 5.
Table 2.2.1: Measured external diameters and calculated taper factors in different
arteries. Lower taper factor indicates more uniform longitudinal geometry.
d (cm) ko (cm-1)
Abdominal aorta 0.777 0.027±0.007
Iliac artery 0.413 0.021±0.005
Femoral artery 0.342 0.018±0.007
Carotid artery 0.378 0.008±0.004
9in x 6in b3250 Dynamics of the Vascular System: Interaction with the Heart (2nd Edn) b3250-ch02
In the broadest sense, the arterial wall (Fig. 2.2.2) consists of elastin,
collagen, and smooth muscle embedded in a mucopolysaccharide ground
substance. A cross section reveals the tunica intima, which is the
innermost layer consisting of a thin layer (0.5-1 m) of endothelial cells,
connective tissue, and basement membrane. The next layer is the thick
tunica media, separated from the intima by a prominent layer of elastic
tissue, the internal lamina. The media contains elastin, smooth muscle,
and collagen.
Fig. 2.2.2: Sketch of the cross sections of the artery reveal three distinctive layers: the
innermost tunica intima, the thick tunica media, and the outermost adventitia.
Fig. 2.2.3: Relative contents of endothelium, elastic and fibrous tissues, and smooth
muscle in different vessels. Large arteries have more elastic and fibrous tissues whole
smaller arteries have more smooth muscle in the tunica media. From Rushmer (1972).
Stress has the dimension of pressure, or force (F) per unit area (A),
F
t P (2.2.6)
A
P=hg (2.2.7)
Fig. 2.2.4: Ultrasonic dimension gages recorded diameter of the aorta, together with
aortic blood pressure. Calculation of radial strain can be obtained from the fractional
change in diameter, D/D. This allows subsequent computation of pressure-strain elastic
modulus, Ep=P/(D/D), where P is the pulse pressure.
1.93
r 0.1 (2.2.11)
19.3
9in x 6in b3250 Dynamics of the Vascular System: Interaction with the Heart (2nd Edn) b3250-ch02
T pr (2.2.12)
This assumes the vessel has a thin wall or that the ratio of vessel wall
thickness (h) to vessel lumen radius (r) is small, or h/r 1/10. Here p is
the intramural-extramural pressure difference, or the transmural pressure.
When the vessel wall thickness is taken into account, the Lame equation
becomes relevant:
pr
t (2.2.13)
h
r r / r
n (2.2.14)
t l / l
When radial strain is half that of longitudinal strain, or when n = 0.5,
the material is said to be incompressible. This means that when a
cylindrical material is stretched, its volume remains unchanged. Or, in
the case of an artery, when it is stretched, its lumen volume remains
unchanged. Experimental measurements to obtain the Poisson ratio for
arteries have shown n to be close to 0.5. Arteries, therefore, can be
considered to be close to being incompressible.
The above analysis assumes an isotropic arterial wall. The non-
isotropy, or anisotropy, is seen in the various differences in the relative
content and physical properties of the arterial wall. Collagen is the
stiffest wall component, with an elastic modulus of 108 - 109 dynes/cm2.
This is some two orders of magnitude larger than those of elastin, 1-6 x
106 dynes/cm2, and smooth muscle, 0.1-2.5 x 106 dynes/cm2.
Elastin is relatively extensible, but is not a purely Hookean material.
Collagen on the other hand is relatively inextensible, because of its high
stiffness. Much more is known about vascular smooth muscle.
Mechanical properties of arterial vessel walls can also be altered by
neural mechanisms and by circulating catecholamine, such as
norepinephrine. The composite of the arterial wall components operates
in such a manner that at low pressures, elastin dominates the composite
behavior. At high pressures, collagen becomes more important. Elastic
modulus is a nonlinear function of pressure. The pressure dependence
of the mechanical properties of arteries has been reported by several
investigators (e.g. Cox, 1975; Weizsacker and Pascal, 1982; Drzewiecki
et al., 1997). Figure 2.2.5 illustrates how arterial lumen diameter, hence
volume and compliance vary with changing transmural pressure. With
9in x 6in b3250 Dynamics of the Vascular System: Interaction with the Heart (2nd Edn) b3250-ch02
PV nkT (2.3.1)
P C c RT (2.3.3)
pi f i P (2.3.4)
ci n
Si (2.3.5)
p i p iV
100
Arterial
pH 7.6
7.4
7.2
80
Venous
O2 saturation (%)
60
40
20
0
30 60 90
PO2 (mm Hg)
Fig. 2.3.1: Oxygen saturation curve displaying its S-shaped characteristics. Normal
arterial and venous blood O2 saturations are also indicated. Normal arterial O2 saturation
is about 96%.
The oxygen affinity decreases with decreasing pH. This is termed the
Bohr effect by which changes in blood PCO2 which affects blood pH,
indirectly also influence hemoglobin-oxygen affinity.
Hemoglobin consists of four polypeptide chains or globins and four
disc-shaped molecular ring or heme groups, allowing binding of four
oxygen molecules. Once bound with oxygen, the iron atoms in
hemoglobin give it the red color. Optical absorptions of hemoglobin and
oxy-hemoglobin (Fig. 2.3.2) can be readily monitored by near-infrared
spectroscopy. The isobestic point, when the two absorptions are equal
which can be used as a reference, is at 805 nm.
Another Random Document on
Scribd Without Any Related Topics
written in longhand on the letterhead of “Minister President General
Göring,” and is in the handwriting of Colonel Bodenschatz, Göring’s
Chief of Staff. I offer this memorandum as Exhibit Number USA-580.
It is our Document 3474-PS, and I direct the Tribunal’s attention to
the fact that the date of this document is the 2d of December 1936.
That was a conference, apparently, at which all the chief officers and
generals of the Air Force, the German Air Force, met. Besides the
Defendant Göring, there were General Milch, General Kesselring,
Rüdel, Stumpff, Christiansen, and all the top commanders of the Air
Force, and I read:
“World press excited about the landing of 5,000 German
volunteers in Spain. Official complaint by Great Britain; she
gets in touch with France.
“Italy suggests that Germany and Italy send, each, one
division ground troops to Spain. It is, however, necessary
that Italy, as interested Mediterranean power, issue a
political declaration first. A decision can be expected only
within a few days.
“The general situation is very serious. Russia wants the war.
England rearms speedily. Command therefore: Beginning
today ‘höchste Einsatzbereitschaft’ ”—apparently the
translator did not see fit to translate those words, which
mean the “highest degree of readiness”—“regardless of
financial difficulties. Göring takes over full responsibility.”
“Peace until 1941 is desirable. However, we cannot know
whether there will be implications before. We are already in
a state of war. It is only that no shot is being fired so far.”
THE PRESIDENT: Perhaps that would be a convenient time to
break off.
[A recess was taken until 1400 hours.]
Afternoon Session
MR. ALBRECHT: May it please the Tribunal, two important
conferences which have already been adverted to by the Prosecution
show clearly how the Defendant Göring inspired and directed the
preparation of the German economy for aggressive war. On the 8th
of July 1938 he addressed a number of the leading German aircraft
manufacturers and laid the groundwork for a vast increase in aircraft
production. He stated that war with Czechoslovakia was imminent
and boasted that the German Air Force was already superior in
quality and quantity to the English. He said that:
“. . . if Germany wins the war. Then she will be the greatest
power in the world, dominating the world market, and
Germany will be a rich nation. For this goal, risks must be
taken. . . .”
That quotation, may it please the Court, is taken from Document R-
140, Exhibit Number USA-160.
A few weeks after the Munich Agreement, on the 14th of October
1938, at another conference held in Göring’s office, he made the
statement that Hitler had instructed him to organize a gigantic
armament program which would make insignificant all previous
achievements. He indicated that he had been ordered to build as
rapidly as possible an air force five times as large, to increase the
speed of army and navy rearmament, and to concentrate on
offensive weapons, principally heavy artillery and heavy tanks; and
at that meeting he proposed a specific program designed to
accomplish those ends. That is a short summary of facts which
appear from Exhibit Number USA-123 already in evidence, our
Document 1301-PS.
In his dual role as Reich Air Minister and Commander-in-Chief of
the German Air Force it was Göring’s function to develop the
Luftwaffe to practical war strength. As early as the 10th of March
1935, in an interview with the correspondent of the London Daily
Mail, the mask of hypocrisy was removed and Göring frankly
announced to the world that he was in the process of building a true
military air force.
Two months later, in a speech to 1,000 Air Force officers, Göring
spoke in a still bolder vein. I offer in evidence from Exhibit Number
USA-437, our Document 3441-PS—which is Göring’s Reden und
Aufsätze—another excerpt that has not yet been read in evidence,
from Page 242. Göring said:
“I repeat: I intend to create a Luftwaffe which, if the hour
should strike, shall burst upon the foe like a chorus of
revenge. The enemy must have the feeling of being lost
already before having fought.”
In the same year, on the 16th of March 1935, he signed his name
to the conscription law which provided for compulsory military
service and constituted an act of defiance on the part of Nazi
Germany in violation of the Versailles Treaty. The Tribunal will take
judicial notice of that decree, which is our Document 1654-PS, from
which I shall not read, with the permission of the Tribunal—the Law
for the Organization of the Armed Forces; it is cited in 1935
Reichsgesetzblatt, Part I, Page 369.
As is demonstrated by the affidavit of Ambassador Messersmith
already in evidence, Göring’s statements during this period left no
doubt in the minds of Allied diplomats that Germany was engaged in
full mobilization of air power for an impending war.
Göring was in fact the central figure in German preparation for
military aggression. In German economic development, too, he held
the key positions throughout the pre-war period. Although he held
no official position in the field of foreign affairs, as the Number Two
Nazi, history records that he was prominent in all major phases of
Nazi aggression between 1937 and 1941.
In the Austrian affair Göring was the prompter and director of the
diplomatic “tragicomedy” enacted before a shocked but silent world.
The Tribunal is familiar with Göring’s complicity in the aggression
against Austria. However, some additional documents have just
come to our notice which show that Göring not only participated
actively, but may even have been in direct charge of the German
plan to bring about the Austrian Anschluss. I will offer the first of
these documents, our Document 3473-PS, as Exhibit Number USA-
581. I shall not read from that exhibit, if Your Honors please, but I
would like to call the attention of the Tribunal to the letter from
Keppler, who was one of Göring’s agents, addressed to the
Defendant Göring. It is dated the 6th of January 1938. From its
context it would seem that a valid inference can be drawn that
Göring was already active in the Austrian matter in 1937. Our prior
evidence brought him into the picture much later. The Prosecution
believes this document to be of great significance, as it shows that
the Defendant Seyss-Inquart actually had Göring’s mandate to carry
out the orders of the Nazi conspirators in Vienna. The document
itself will be read and discussed in the presentation of the case
showing the individual responsibility of the Defendant Seyss-Inquart;
and I shall not take the time of the Tribunal at this time.
The second document I wish to introduce is Exhibit Number USA-
582, our Document 3472-PS. This exhibit would seem to show that
the conspirators attempted to create the impression that the
Anschluss, when it took place, was achieved by “legal” means. The
command apparently was given the members of the NSDAP in
Austria to keep “hands off” in order to permit the deviltry to be
worked out by the official Reich agencies, that is, through the
Defendant Göring and, presumably, the Defendant Von Papen, by
direct contact with the Austrian officials.
I read from that document:
“Yesterday information reached me to the effect that
Landesleiter Leopold”—and may I interrupt for a moment to
point out that the word “Landesleiter” is the title of the
leader of the Nazi community in Austria—“also on his part
has started negotiations with Chancellor Schuschnigg.
Thereupon I have asked the Foreign Office to investigate
the truth of this information and, in case it is true, to take
care that such negotiations are not held because they
would merely disturb the proceedings of the other
negotiations.
“Just now I got word from the Foreign Office that they
received a report from the embassy in Vienna confirming
the facts. I therefore would like to know whether it would
not be more appropriate to forbid Landesleiter Leopold and
the other members of the country’s leadership to negotiate
with Chancellor Schuschnigg as well as with any Austrian
Government authorities as to the execution of the pact of
the 11th of July 1936, unless it is done after contacting and
in agreement with the authorities in charge in the Reich.”
Now below, if I may call the attention of the Tribunal to the note
that appears in this letter. It is written in blue pencil, and, while the
translator has not indicated the initial below that note, it is a large
“G”; and I have no doubt that that note was written by the
Defendant Göring. It reads:
“Agreed, Minister Hess or Herr Bormann can give this order
best! Keppler ought to ask therefore by telephone!”
If I may direct your attention to the upper right corner, there is
another note in pencil, “Transmitted to Herr Keppler on the 11th of
February 1938 by Fräulein Ernst;” and it is signed with initial “G,”
which in this case, however, we are quite sure is the initial of Miss
Grundmann, who was one of Göring’s secretaries.
The third document I offer as Exhibit Number USA-583, our
Document 3471-PS. The first letter of this exhibit is written by the
same Keppler to the same Bodenschatz mentioned a short while
ago, but who is now a general. I shall not read from this exhibit,
with the permission of the Tribunal, but I shall briefly summarize it.
This letter and the annexes show that Leopold, the Nazi Landesleiter
in Austria, was apparently not completely amenable to the orders
given by Berlin and pursued his own methods for accomplishing an
Anschluss. The second annex to this letter, addressed to Keppler,
who appears from this letter to have been an SS Gruppenführer,
shows that prominent Nazis had declared themselves in favor of a
Major Klausner to succeed Leopold as Landesleiter; and I would like
to call the Tribunal’s attention to the fact that in the left margin of
the covering letter appear some red crayon marks in the
characteristic color employed on several occasions, to our
knowledge, by Göring; and they would seem to show that Göring
personally had seen these documents and that General Bodenschatz
had brought them to his attention. In any event these letters again
demonstrate that Göring was one of the principal conspirators in the
Austrian affair.
When the time finally came, on 11 March 1938, to consummate
the Anschluss, Göring was in complete command. Throughout the
afternoon and evening of that day he directed by telephone the
activities of the Defendant Seyss-Inquart and of the other Nazi
conspirators in Vienna. The pertinent portions of these telephone
conversations, it will be remembered, were read into the record.
It will be recalled that early on the same evening of 11 March he
dictated to the Defendant Seyss-Inquart the telegram which the
latter was to send to Berlin, requesting the Nazi Government to send
German troops to “prevent bloodshed.” Two days later he was able
to call the Defendant Ribbentrop in London and gleefully relate to
him of his success and that “this story that we had given an
ultimatum is just foolish gossip.”
If I may interrupt for a moment, that passage I just alluded to
was read into the record at Page 581 (Volume II, Page 424).
Similarly, Göring played an important role in the attack on
Czechoslovakia. In March of 1938, at the time of the Anschluss, he
had given a solemn assurance to the Czechoslovakian Minister in
Berlin that the developments in Austria would in no way have a
detrimental influence on the relations between Germany and
Czechoslovakia and he had emphasized the continued earnest
endeavor on the part of Germany to improve these relations. In this
connection Göring had used the expression, “Ich gebe Ihnen mein
Ehrenwort” (“I give you my word of honor”).
That expression was read previously into the record at Page 962
(Volume III, Page 192).
On the other hand, in his address to German airplane
manufacturers on the 8th of July 1938, which I have already
mentioned, he made his private views on this subject, which were
hardly consistent with his solemn official statements, abundantly
clear.
On the 14th of October 1938, shortly after the Munich
Agreement, at a conference in the Air Ministry, Göring stated that
the Sudetenland had to be exploited with all means and that he
counted upon a complete industrial assimilation of Czechoslovakia.
Meanwhile, as proof before the Tribunal shows, he was deceiving the
representatives of the puppet Slovakian Government to the same
end.
In the following year, with the rape of Czechoslovakia complete,
Göring frankly stated what Germany’s purpose had been throughout
the whole affair. He explained that the incorporation of Bohemia and
Moravia into the German economy had taken place, among other
reasons, in order to increase the German war potential by
exploitation of the industry there.
Göring was also a moving force in the later crimes against the
peace. As the successor designate to Hitler, chief of the air forces
and economic czar of Greater Germany, he was a party to all the
planning for military operations of the Nazi forces in the East and in
the West.
In the Polish affair, for example, it was Göring who, on the 31st
of January 1935, gave assurances to the Polish Government through
Count Czembek, as revealed in the Polish White Book, of which I ask
the Tribunal to take judicial notice, that “there should be not the
slightest fear in Poland that on the German side it”—meaning the
German-Polish alliance—“would not be continued in the future.” Yet,
4 years later, Göring helped to formulate plans for the ruthless
invasion of Polish territory.
In respect to the attack upon the Soviet Union, the documents
already introduced prove that plans for the ruthless exploitation of
Soviet territory were made months in advance of the opening of
hostilities. Göring was placed in charge of this army of spoliation,
whose mission was that of “seizing raw materials and taking over all
important concerns.”
But these specific instances cited are merely illustrative of
Göring’s activities in the field of aggressive war. On Pages 20, 21,
and 22 of our brief there appears a list of documents—by no means
exhaustive—previously offered by the Prosecution, which
demonstrate Göring’s knowledge of and continued participation in
the Nazi war program.
We turn now to Göring’s responsibility for planning and his
participation in the procurement of forced labor, the deportation and
enslavement of residents of occupied territories, the employment of
prisoners of war in war industry, the looting of works of art, and the
Germanization and spoliation of countries overrun by the Nazis.
Evidence previously introduced has detailed the slave labor
program of the Nazi conspirators and has shown its two purposes,
both of them criminal. The first was to satisfy the labor requirements
of the Nazi war machine by forcing residents of occupied countries
to work in Germany. The second purpose was to destroy or weaken
the peoples of the occupied territories. It has been shown that
millions of foreign workers were taken to Germany, for the most part
under pressure and generally by physical force; that these workers
were forced to labor under conditions of indescribable brutality and
degradation; and that often they were used in factories and
industries devoted exclusively to the production of munitions of war.
Göring was at all times implicated in the slave labor program.
Recruitment and allocation of manpower and determination of
working conditions were included in his jurisdiction as
Plenipotentiary for the Four Year Plan, and from its beginning a part
of the Four Year Plan Office was devoted to such work. I ask the
Tribunal in this connection to take judicial notice of our Document
1862-PS, Ordinance for the Execution of the Four Year Plan, dated
18 October 1936, which appears in 1936, Reichsgesetzblatt, Part I,
Page 887, and with the permission of the Tribunal I shall not read
the same.
Soon after the fall of Poland Göring began the enslavement of
large numbers of Poles. On 25 January 1940 the Defendant Frank,
the Governor General of Poland, reported to Göring on his directive
for the:
“Supply and transportation of at least 1 million male and
female agricultural and industrial workers to the Reich—
among them at least 750,000 agricultural workers of which
at least 50 percent must be women in order to guarantee
agricultural production in the Reich and as a replacement
for industrial workers lacking in the Reich.”
This is taken from our Exhibit Number USA-172, our Document
Number 1375-PS.
That orders for this enormous number of workers originated with
the Defendant Göring is clear from statements in the Defendant
Frank’s diary for 10 May 1940, already introduced in evidence.
For the harsh treatment given those workers when they reached
Germany the Defendant Göring is also responsible. On 8 March
1940, as Plenipotentiary for the Four Year Plan and as Chairman of
the Cabinet Council for the Defense of the Reich, he issued a
directive entitled, “Treatment of Male and Female Civilian Workers of
Polish Nationality in the Reich.” I refer to our Document R-148 as
proof of that fact. I shall not introduce it at this time into evidence,
with the permission of the Tribunal, as it will be introduced by the
Soviet prosecution at a later date.
On 29 January 1942 the division for the employment of labor in
the Four Year Plan office issued a circular, signed by Dr. Mansfeld,
the general delegate for labor employed in the Four Year Plan office,
addressed to various civilian and military authorities in the occupied
territories, explaining that, and I quote, “any and all . . . methods
. . . must be adopted” to force workers to go to Germany. I shall not
read from our exhibit, if the Tribunal please, but I would like to offer
in evidence Document 1183-PS as our Exhibit Number USA-585. This
is a circular letter dated the 29th of January 1942 of the
Commissioner for the Four Year Plan.
It has been shown previously that on 21 March 1942 Hitler
promulgated a decree appointing the Defendant Sauckel
Plenipotentiary General for manpower, directing him to carry out his
tasks within the framework of the Four Year Plan, and making him
directly responsible to Göring as head of the Four Year Plan.
On 27 March 1942 the Defendant Göring issued his important
enabling decree in pursuance of the decree of the Führer of 21
March 1942. The Tribunal has already judicially noted this decree,
which is our Document 1666-PS.
Since the Defendant Sauckel was an authority under the Four
Year Plan, the Defendant Göring retains full responsibility for the
enormous war crimes committed by Sauckel as Plenipotentiary
General for manpower. These crimes have been the subject of our
presentations on slave labor and on the illegal use of prisoners of
war.
It was also proven during those presentations that the Nazi
conspirators ordered prisoners of war to work under dangerous
conditions and in the manufacturing and transportation of arms and
munitions of war, in violation of the laws of war and of Articles 31
and 32 of the Geneva Convention of 27 July 1929 on prisoners of
war. The Defendant Göring had a part in all these crimes.
At a conference on 7 November 1941, the subject of which was
the employment of citizens of the Soviet Union, including prisoners
of war, it appears from a memorandum signed by Körner, who was
State Secretary to the Defendant Göring as Plenipotentiary for the
Four Year Plan, that Göring gave certain ruthless directives for the
use of Soviet citizens, both prisoners of war and free Soviet workers,
as laborers. I refer to our Document 1193-PS which, with the
permission of the Tribunal, I shall not offer in evidence at this time
and which will be offered by the Soviet Prosecution.
In a set of top-secret notes of outlines laid down by Göring in
what was apparently the same conference of 7 November 1941,
which are already in evidence, the following facts appear:
1) That, of a total of 5 million prisoners of war, 2 million were
employed in war industries;
2) That it was better to employ PW’s than unsuitable foreign
workers;
3) That Poles, Dutchmen, et cetera, should be seized if necessary
as PW’s and employed as such, if work through free contract cannot
be obtained.
These facts, if Your Honors please, appear in our Document
1206-PS, which was submitted in evidence as Exhibit Number USA-
215.
In a secret letter from the Reich Minister of Labor to the
presidents of the regional labor exchange offices, already in
evidence, it is furthermore recorded that upon the personal order of
the Reich Marshal, the Defendant Göring, 100,000 men are to be
taken from among the French PW’s not yet employed in the
armament industry and assigned to the airplane armament industry
and that gaps in manpower supply resulting therefrom are to be
filled by Soviet PW’s.
Evidence has also been introduced showing the organized,
systematic program of the Nazi conspirators for the cultural
impoverishment of every country in Europe. The continuous
connection of the Defendant Göring with these activities has been
substantiated.
In October 1939 the Defendant Göring requested Dr. Mühlmann
to undertake immediately the “securing” of all Polish art treasures.
In his affidavit, already offered, Dr. Mühlmann states that he was the
special deputy of the Governor General of Poland, the Defendant
Frank, for the safeguarding of art treasures in the Government
General from October 1939 to September 1943, and that the
Defendant Göring, in his capacity as Chairman of the Reich Defense
Council, had commissioned him with this duty.
Mühlmann also confirms that it was the official policy of the
Defendant Frank to take into custody all important art treasures
which belonged to Polish public institutions, private collections, and
the Church, and that such art treasures were actually confiscated.
It appears also from a report made by Dr. Mühlmann on 16 July
1943 on his operations that at one time 31 valuable sketches by the
artist Albrecht Dürer were taken from the Polish collection and
personally handed to the Defendant Göring who took them to the
Führer’s headquarters.
The part played by Göring in the looting of art by the Einsatzstab
Rosenberg has been shown. We refer to Exhibit Number USA-368,
which is our Document Number 141-PS, which is an order dated 5
November 1940, already read in evidence, in which Göring directs
the chief of the Military Administration in Paris and the Einsatzstab
Rosenberg to dispose of the art objects brought to the Louvre in the
following priority:
“1) Those art objects as to the use of which the Führer has
reserved the decision for himself;
“2) Those art objects which serve to complete the Reich
Marshal’s collection;
“3) Those art objects and library stocks, which seem of use
for the establishment of the Hohe Schule and for
Rosenberg’s sphere of activities;
“4) Those art objects suitable for German museums . . . .”
In view of the high priority afforded by the foregoing order to the
completion of the defendant’s own collection, it is not surprising to
find that Göring continued to aid the operations of the Einsatzstab
Rosenberg. It has been established that on 1 May 1941 Göring
issued an order under his own signature to all Party, State, and
Wehrmacht services, requesting them to give all possible support
and assistance to the chief of staff of Reichsleiter Rosenberg.
By May 1942 the Defendant Göring was able to boast of the
assistance which he had rendered to the work of the Einsatzstab
Rosenberg. In our Document 1015(i)-PS which has been read in
evidence on Page 1678 of the record (Volume IV, Page 87), he is
shown writing to the Defendant Rosenberg that he personally
supports the work of the Einsatzstab wherever he can do so and that
accounted for the seizure of such a large number of art objects
because he was able to render assistance to the Einsatzstab.
Thus, the Defendant Göring’s responsibility for the planning of
the looting of art, which was actually accomplished by the
Einsatzstab Rosenberg, would seem clear.
Details of the execution of both the Germanization and spoliation
policies in both the Western and Eastern countries occupied by the
German armies will be presented subsequently by the French and
Soviet Delegations. The responsibility of the Defendant Göring, in his
capacity as Plenipotentiary for the Four Year Plan, as President of
the Cabinet Council for the Defense of the Reich, and in other
capacities, will be further demonstrated by that evidence.
The plans of the Nazi conspirators with respect to Poland have
been shown by evidence already offered. The Nazis purported to
incorporate the four western provinces of Poland into the German
Reich. In the remaining portions occupied by them they set up the
Government General. It has been shown that the Nazis planned to
germanize the so-called incorporated territories ruthlessly, by
deporting the Polish intelligentsia, Jews, and dissident elements to
the Government General for eventual elimination, by confiscating
Polish property, by sending those so deprived of their property to
Germany as laborers, and by importing German settlers. It was
specifically planned to exploit the people and material resources of
the territory within the Government General by taking whatever was
needed to strengthen the Nazi war machine, thus impoverishing this
region and reducing it to a vassal state.
The Defendant Göring, together with Hitler and Lammers and
with the Defendants Frick and Hess, on 8 October 1939 signed the
decree by which certain parts of Polish territory were incorporated
into the Reich.
Purporting to act by virtue of the foregoing decree, Göring, as
Plenipotentiary for the Four Year Plan, signed an order on 30
October 1939 concerning the introduction of the Four Year Plan in
the Eastern territories.
In his directive dated 19 October 1939 (Document Number EC-
410, Exhibit Number USA-298) Göring stated that the task for the
economic treatment of the various administrative regions would
differ, depending on whether a country was to be incorporated
politically into the German Reich or whether the Government General
was involved, which, in all probability, would not be made a part of
Germany. He went on to say:
“In the first mentioned territories the reconstruction and
expansion of the economy, the safeguarding of all their
production facilities and supplies must be aimed at, as well
as a complete incorporation into the Greater German
economic system at the earliest possible time. On the other
hand there must be removed from the territories of the
Government General all raw materials, scrap materials,
machines, et cetera, which are of use for the German war
economy. Enterprises which are not absolutely necessary
for the meager maintenance of the bare existence of the
population must be transferred to Germany, unless such
transfer would require an unreasonably long period of time
and would make it more practical to exploit those
enterprises by giving them German orders to be executed
at their present location.”
From the foregoing documents the complicity of the Defendant
Göring in the plans for the ruthless exploitation of Poland appears
clear. But his fine hand also may be found behind the remainder of
the Nazi plans for Poland. As an illustration, it was the Defendant
Göring who signed, with Hitler and the Defendant Keitel, the secret
decree of 7 October 1939 which entrusted Himmler with the task of
executing the Germanization program. That secret decree was read
into evidence at Pages 1522-23 (Volume III, Page 583).
Evidence already introduced has shown from the mouths of
Himmler, the Defendant Frank, and others just what this
appointment involved in human suffering and degradation.
Similarly, it was the Defendant Göring who, by virtue of his
powers as Plenipotentiary for the Four Year Plan, issued a decree on
17 September 1940 concerning confiscation in the incorporated
Eastern territories. This decree applied to “property of citizens of the
former Polish State within the territory of the Greater German Reich
including the incorporated Eastern territories.” I ask the Court to
take judicial notice of our Document 1665-PS, which is an “Order
concerning Treatment of Property of Nationals of the Former Polish
State,” cited in 1940 Reichsgesetzblatt, Part I, Page 1270. I shall
read from this document:
“Article I.
“1) Property of nationals of the former Polish State within
the area of the Greater German Reich, including annexed
Eastern territories, is subject to confiscation, administration
by commissioner and sequestration in accordance with the
following regulations.”
I now skip to Article II.
“1) Confiscation will be applied in case of property
belonging to: a) Jews; b) persons who have fled or who
have absented themselves for longer than a temporary
period.
“2) Confiscation may be applied: a) If the property is
needed for the public good, especially for purposes of
national defense or the strengthening of German folkdom;
b) if the owners or other persons entitled to it immigrated
into the area of the German Reich after 1 October 1918.”
I skip now to Article IX, the first part:
“1) Sequestered property can be confiscated in favor of the
Reich by the competent office . . . if the public weal,
particularly the defense of the Reich or the consolidation of
the German nationality, requires it.”
Evidence has also been introduced by the United States showing
the extent to which the spoliation of Soviet territory and resources
and the barbarous treatment inflicted on Soviet citizens were the
result of plans long made and carefully drawn up by the Nazis before
they launched their aggressive war on the Soviet Union. The Nazis
planned to destroy the industrial potential of the northern regions
occupied by their armies and so to administer the production of food
in the south and southeast, which normally produced a surplus of
food, that the population of the northern region would inevitably be
reduced to starvation because of diversion of such surplus food to
the German Reich. It has been shown also that the Nazis planned to
incorporate Galicia and all of the Baltic countries into Germany and
to convert the Crimea, an area north of the Crimea, the Volga
territory, and the district around Baku into German colonies.
By 29 April 1941, almost 2 months prior to the invasion of the
Soviet Union, it appears that Hitler had entrusted the Defendant
Göring with the over-all direction of the economic administration in
the area of operations and in the areas under political
administration. It further appears that Göring had set up an
economic staff and subsidiary authorities to carry out this function.
The form of this organization created by Göring and the duties of
its various sections appear more clearly in a set of directives “for the
operation of the economy in the newly occupied Eastern territories”
issued by Göring, as Reich Marshal of the Greater German Reich, in
June 1941. These directives are contained in the important Green
Portfolio which, curiously enough, was printed by the Wehrmacht. By
the terms of these directives it is stated that:
“The orders of the Reich Marshal cover all economic fields,
including nutrition and agriculture. They are to be executed
by the subordinate economic offices. . . .”
An Economic Staff East was charged with the execution of orders
transmitted to it from higher authority. One subdivision of this staff,
the agricultural section, was charged with the following functions:
“Nutrition and agriculture, the economy of all agricultural
products, provision of supplies for the Army in co-operation
with the army groups concerned.”
Excerpts from the Green Portfolio have already been admitted as
Exhibit Number USA-315, but I will offer at this time without reading
some additional excerpts in support of the facts that have just been
related. I would like to offer, as Exhibit Number USA-587, our
Document 1743-PS. This is another copy of the Green Portfolio, and
I want to offer this portfolio to show to the Tribunal that these
directives were originally published in June 1941. Document EC-472,
which is already in evidence as Exhibit Number USA-315, was a
revised edition published in July 1941. In other words, the economic
plan for the invasion was ready when the Wehrmacht actually
marched into the Soviet Union on June 22, 1941.
As appears from the foregoing directives, it was a subdivision of
the economic organization set up by the Defendant Göring, the
agricultural section of the Economic Staff East, which rendered a
report on 23 May 1941, containing a set of policy directives for the
exploitation of Soviet agriculture. It will be recalled that these
directives contemplated abandonment of all industry in the food
deficit regions, with certain exceptions, and the diversion of food
from the food surplus regions to German needs, even though
millions of people would inevitably die of starvation as a result.
Those directives have already been read into evidence at Page 1558
(Volume IV, Page 5).
Minutes of a meeting at Hitler’s headquarters on 16 July 1941,
kept by the Defendant Bormann, have also been read in part in
evidence. It was at this meeting that Hitler stated that the Nazis
never intended to leave the countries then being occupied by their
armies, that although the rest of the world was to be deceived on
this point, nevertheless, “this need not prevent us from taking all
necessary measures—shooting, desettling, et cetera—and we shall
take them.” That quotation, may it please the Tribunal, was taken
from our Exhibit USA-317, our Document L-221. Then Hitler
discussed making the Crimea and other parts of the Soviet Union
into German colonies. The Defendant Göring was present and
participated in this conference.
As a final illustration it appears from a memorandum dated 16
September 1941, which is our Exhibit Number USA-318, that Göring
presided over a meeting of German military officials concerned with
the better exploitation of the occupied territories for the German
food economy. In discussing this topic, the Defendant Göring said:
“In the occupied territories on principle only those people
are to be supplied with an adequate amount of food who
work for us. Even if one wanted to feed all the other
inhabitants, one could not do it in the newly occupied
Eastern areas. It is, therefore, wrong to funnel off food
supplies for this purpose if it is done at the expense of the
Army and necessitates increased supplies from home.”
From the foregoing documents participation of the Defendant
Göring in the Nazi plans for committing wholesale War Crimes in
occupied territories is, we submit, clear.
I turn now to Göring’s planning and his participation in inhumane
acts committed against civilian populations before and during the
war. It has been shown that shortly after becoming Prime Minister of
Prussia in 1933, Göring created the Gestapo in Prussia, which
became a model for that instrument of terror as it was extended to
the rest of Germany. Concentration camps were established in
Prussia in the spring of 1933 under his administration, and these
camps were then placed in the charge of the Gestapo, of which he
was chief.
The extent to which Göring and the other Nazi conspirators
employed these institutions as agencies for the commission of their
crimes already appears from the evidence. In 1936 Himmler became
chief of the German Police. Thereafter Göring was able to devote his
attention chiefly to the task of creating the German Air Force and to
the task of preparing the nation economically for aggressive war.
However, he continued to be concerned with these institutions of his
creation. An example of this is shown in our Document 1584(I)-PS,
already introduced as Exhibit Number USA-221, which is a teletype
sent by Göring to Himmler in which he requested the latter to place
at his disposal as great a number of concentration camp inmates as
possible, as the situation of air warfare made the subterranean
transfer of industry necessary.
In his reply Himmler advised Göring by teletype that a survey on
the employment of prisoners in the aviation industry showed that
36,000 were being employed for the purposes of the Air Forces and
that an increase to a total of 90,000 prisoners was being
contemplated.
Evidence has been introduced as to medical experiments
performed on human beings at the concentration camp at Dachau
and the part played by Field Marshal Milch, State Secretary and
deputy to the Defendant Göring as Air Minister, for whose acts the
latter must bear full responsibility. It is abundantly clear from letters
written by Milch to General Wolff on 20 May 1942 and to Himmler in
August 1942, both of which have been read in evidence at Page
1850 of the record (Volume IV, Page 204, 205), our Document 343-
PS.
Finally, I turn to Göring’s participation in and planning for
elimination of all members of the Jewish race from the economic life
of Germany and in the planned extermination of all Jews from the
continent of Europe.
In 1935 the Defendant Göring, as President of the Reichstag,
made a speech urging that body to pass the infamous Nuremberg
race laws. I offer, as Exhibit Number USA-588, our Document 3458-
PS, which is an excerpt from Rühle, Das Dritte Reich, Page 257.
Göring said:
“God has created the races. He did not want equality and
therefore we energetically reject any attempt to falsify the
concept of race purity by making it equivalent with racial
equality. We have experienced what it means when a
people has to live in accordance with the laws of an
equality that is alien to its kind and contrary to nature. For
this equality does not exist. We have never acknowledged
such an idea and therefore must reject it also, as a matter
of principle, in our laws, and we must acknowledge that
purity of race which nature and providence have destined.”
Again, to show his official attitude, as revealed on 26 March 1938
in a speech in Vienna, I offer, as Exhibit Number USA-437, our
Document 3460-PS, starting with Page 348. Göring said:
“I must address myself with a serious word to the city of
Vienna. The city of Vienna can no longer rightfully be called
a German city. So many Jews live in this city. Where there
are 300,000 Jews, you cannot speak of a German city.
“Vienna must once more become a German city, because it
must perform important tasks for Germany in Germany’s
Ostmark. These tasks lie in the sphere of culture as well as
in the sphere of economics. In neither of them can we, in
the long run, put up with the Jew.
“This, however, should not be attempted by inappropriate
interference and stupid measures but must be done
systematically and carefully. As Delegate for the Four Year
Plan, I commission the Reichsstatthalter in Austria jointly
with the Plenipotentiary of the Reich to consider and take
any steps necessary for the redirection of Jewish
commerce, i.e., for the Aryanization of business and
economic life, and to execute this process in accordance
with our laws, legally but inexorably.”
Acting within the framework of economic preparation for
aggressive war, the Nazi conspirators then began the complete
elimination of Jews from economic life preparatory to their physical
annihilation. The Defendant Göring, as head of the Four Year Plan,
was in active charge of this phase of the persecution.
The first step in his campaign was the decree of 26 April 1938,
requiring registration of all Jewish-owned property. Both Göring and
the Defendant Frick signed that law. It is already in evidence.
I beg the Tribunal’s pardon. I would like the Tribunal to take
judicial notice of that decree, which is our Document 1406-PS and
cited as 1938 Reichsgesetzblatt, Part I, Page 414.
Now, armed with the information thus secured, the Nazi
conspirators were fully prepared to take the next step. The killing of
Vom Rath, a German Legation secretary in Paris on 9 November
1938, was made the pretext for widespread “spontaneous” riots,
which included the looting and burning of many Jewish synagogues,
homes, and shops, all carefully organized and supervised by the Nazi
conspirators. The Defendant Göring was fully informed of the
measures taken. The teletype orders of 10 November 1938 given by
Heydrich are already in evidence and were read at Page 1405 of the
record (Volume III, Page 500). A letter which Heydrich wrote to
Göring on the following day has also been read. It is our Document
3058-PS, Exhibit Number USA-508. In it Himmler summarizes the so-
called “spontaneous” riots that had taken place. He reported the day
after the riot that insofar as the official reports from the district
police were concerned he was able to state that 815 shops were
destroyed, 171 dwelling houses set on fire or destroyed, and that all
this indicates only a fraction of the actual damage caused, as far as
arson is concerned. He also said that:
“Due to the urgency of the reporting, the reports received
to date are entirely limited to general statements, such as
‘numerous’ or ‘most shops destroyed’. Therefore”—says
Heydrich—“the figures given will be considerably
augmented.
“One hundred and ninety-one synagogues were set on fire
and another 76 completely destroyed. In addition 11 parish
halls, cemetery chapels, and similar buildings were set on
fire. . . .
“Twenty thousand Jews were arrested. . . .
“Thirty-six deaths were reported and those seriously injured
were also numbered at 36.”
Immediately after these so-called “spontaneous” riots of 9
November, Göring acted as chairman of a meeting at the Reich
Ministry of Air devoted to the Jewish question, which also was
attended by the Defendant Funk and other conspirators. The
stenographic report on that meeting is an extraordinary document,
and it does not make pretty reading. It is our Document 1816-PS,
which has already been offered as Exhibit Number USA-261. I should
like to read certain passages that have not as yet been read into the
record. I read from the top of first page, the first two paragraphs of
Page 1 of the German original; Göring speaks:
“Gentlemen, today’s meeting is of a decisive nature. I have
received a letter written on the Führer’s order by the
Stabsleiter of the Führer’s deputy, Bormann, requesting that
the Jewish question be now uniformly comprehended and
solved one way or another. And yesterday once again the
Führer requested me by phone to take co-ordinated action,
in the matter.
“Since the problem is mainly an economic one, it is from
the economic angle that it will have to be tackled. Naturally
a number of legal measures will have to be taken which fall
into the sphere of the Minister for Justice and into that of
the Minister of the Interior; then certain resulting
propaganda measures shall be taken care of by the office
of the Minister for Propaganda. The Minister of Finance and
the Minister for Economic Affairs shall take care of problems
falling into their respective departments.”
Specific measures to effect the Aryanization of Jewish business
were then discussed. A representative of German insurance
companies was called in to assist in the solving of the difficulties
created by the fact that most of the Jewish stores and other
property destroyed in the rioting were, in fact, insured, in some
cases, ultimately by foreign insurance companies. All present were
agreed that it would be unfortunate to pass a law which would have
the effect of allowing foreign insurance companies to escape liability.
The Defendant Göring then suggested a characteristic solution, and I
pass to Page 10. In German it is the third full paragraph on Page
3/11. Göring said:
“No, I don’t even dream of refunding the insurance
companies the money. The companies are liable. No, the
money belongs to the State. That’s quite clear. That would
indeed be a present for the insurance companies. You
made a wonderful Petitum there. You’ll fulfill your
obligations; you may count on that.”
It is superfluous to quote further from the extensive discussion of
all phases of persecution of the Jews that took place at this meeting.
It is sufficient to point out that on the same day the Defendant
Göring, over his own signature, promulgated three decrees putting
into effect the most important matters decided at this meeting. In
the first of these decrees a collective fine of 1 billion Reichsmarks
was placed on all German Jews. I ask the Tribunal to take judicial
notice of that decree, which is our Document 1412-PS and appears
in 1938 Reichsgesetzblatt, Part I, Page 1579.
The second decree entitled, “A Decree on Elimination of Jews
from German Economic Life” barred Jews from trades and crafts. I
ask the Tribunal to notice judicially that decree, which is our
Document 2875-PS, cited in 1938 Reichsgesetzblatt, Part I, Page
1580.
The third decree entitled, “Decree for the Restoration of the
Appearance of the Streets of Jewish Economic Enterprises” took care
of the insurance question raised in the morning’s meeting by
providing that insurance due to the Jews for various losses sustained
by them was to be collected by the State. I ask the Court to notice
judicially that decree also. It is our Document 2694-PS and appears
in 1938 Reichsgesetzblatt, Part I, Page 1581.
THE PRESIDENT: Shall we break off for 10 minutes there?
[A recess was taken.]
ebookball.com