Hydrocarbon Processing March 2011
Hydrocarbon Processing March 2011
WWW.RENTECHBOILERS.COM
KPE
BOILERS FOR PEOPLE WHO KNOW AND CARE Select 58 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS
MARCH 2011
www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com
KPE
Select 55 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS
KPE
MARCH 2011 • VOL. 90 NO. 3
www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com
KPE
years $539, digital format one year $199. Airmail rate outside North
America $175 additional a year. Single copies $25, prepaid.
Because Hydrocarbon Processing is edited specifically to be of greatest
www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com value to people working in this specialized business, subscriptions are
restricted to those engaged in the hydrocarbon processing industry, or
service and supply company personnel connected thereto.
Houston Office: 2 Greenway Plaza, Suite 1020, Houston, Texas, 77046 USA
Hydrocarbon Processing is indexed by Applied Science & Technology
Mailing Address: P. O. Box 2608, Houston, Texas 77252-2608, USA
Phone: +1 (713) 529-4301, Fax: +1 (713) 520-4433 Index, by Chemical Abstracts and by Engineering Index Inc. Microfilm
E-mail: [email protected] copies available through University Microfilms, International, Ann
www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com Arbor, Mich. The full text of Hydrocarbon Processing is also available
in electronic versions of the Business Periodicals Index.
Publisher Bill Wageneck [email protected]
ARTICLE REPRINTS
EDITORIAL If you would like to have a recent article reprinted for an upcoming confer-
Editor Stephany Romanow ence or for use as a marketing tool, contact Foster Printing Company for
Process Editor Tricia Crossey a price quote. Articles are reprinted on quality stock with advertisements
Reliability/Equipment Editor Heinz P. Bloch removed; options are available for covers and turnaround times. Our mini-
News Editor Billy Thinnes mum order is a quantity of 100.
Associate Editor Helen Meche
European Editor Tim Lloyd Wright For more information about article reprints, call Rhonda Brown with
Contributing Editor Loraine A. Huchler Foster Printing Company at +1 (866) 879-9144 ext 194
Contributing Editor William M. Goble or e-mail [email protected].
Contributing Editor Y. Zak Friedman HYDROCARBON PROCESSING (ISSN 0018-8190) is published monthly by Gulf Publishing Co., 2 Greenway Plaza,
Contributing Editor ARC Advisory Group (various) Suite 1020, Houston, Texas 77046. Periodicals postage paid at Houston, Texas, and at additional mailing office.
POSTMASTER: Send address changes to Hydrocarbon Processing, P.O. Box 2608, Houston, Texas 77252.
MAGAZINE PRODUCTION Copyright © 2011 by Gulf Publishing Co. All rights reserved.
Director—Editorial Production Sheryl Stone Permission is granted by the copyright owner to libraries and others registered with the Copyright Clearance Center
Manager—Editorial Production Angela Bathe (CCC) to photocopy any articles herein for the base fee of $3 per copy per page. Payment should be sent directly to
the CCC, 21 Congress St., Salem, Mass. 01970. Copying for other than personal or internal reference use without
Artist/Illustrator David Weeks express permission is prohibited. Requests for special permission or bulk orders should be addressed to the Editor.
Manager—Advertising Production Cheryl Willis ISSN 0018-8190/01.
www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com
ADVERTISING SALES
See Sales Offices page 92. GULF PUBLISHING COMPANY
John Royall, President/CEO
CIRCULATION +1 (713) 520-4440 Ron Higgins, Vice President
Director—Circulation Suzanne McGehee Pamela Harvey, Business Finance Manager
E-mail: [email protected] Part of Euromoney Institutional Investor PLC.
KPE
Select 151 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS
4
I MARCH 2011 HydrocarbonProcessing.com
YOUR GLOBAL GASKET PROVIDER
AFTER
450°C
IT’S ADVANTAGE
THERMICULITE . ®
KPE
Select 93 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS
I have someone retiring after 33 years on the job.
I have someone taking 33 years of experience with him.
And now someone with just
3 years has to do that job.
With new Human Centered Design technologies from Emerson, it’s like the experience
never left. Using our deep insights into how your people perform their roles and tasks, Emerson
is designing all of our new products based on the science of Human Centered Design. This lets us
embed the same experience and understanding that’s walking through your plant into our control
and monitoring technologies — making them the easiest and most intuitive to use. Tasks are
accomplished in fewer steps, and with greater confidence, even when relying on less expertise
and specialization. It’s the certainty that jobs are done right, no matter who’s doing them. Find the
experience you’ve been missing at EmersonProcess.com/Experience
The Emerson logo is a trademark and a service mark of Emerson Electric Co. © 2011 Emerson Electric Co.
KPE
HPIN BRIEF
BILLY THINNES, NEWS EDITOR
Meeting your
challenges head on
As the global economy slowly recovers, refiners can expect to see a positive shift in the demand
for finished petroleum products in mature markets and growing, developing regions.
Now more than ever, GE’s advanced treatment technologies, monitoring tools, and unmatched
domain expertise for the hydrocarbon process industries provide a variety of solutions to help
our customers find new ways to solve their toughest challenges.
* Denotes a trademark of
General Electric Company.
KPE
Select 72 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS
HPIN RELIABILITY
HEINZ P. BLOCH, RELIABILITY/EQUIPMENT EDITOR
High pressure. Extreme temperatures. Volatile products. It’s all part of the job in
hydrocarbon processing. But so is the goal of maximizing safety integrity. We make
the process more secure with our innovative valves and controls, which is why the
industry relies on us to keep their workers safe and their plants running smoothly.
Engineering transformation.™
KPE
Learn more about our plant performance solutions at CWFC.com
Select 76 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS
HPIN EUROPE
TIM LLOYD WRIGHT, EUROPEAN EDITOR
In reality. The wave that is breaking up and reforming Europe’s China’s deal. After much speculation in the Scottish press,
refining operations is also the result of a passing behemoth. I PetroChina has now joined a partnership with the operator of
described in my December 2010 column that the international the 400 Mbpd Ineos (formerly BP) refinery at Grangemouth in
oil companies (IOCs) are, in many cases, raking in their “chips” Scotland. The deal also involves the 220 Mbpd Lavéra refinery
and leaving the table. And there is a sense of unease among the at Marseille on the Mediterranean coast, from where it supplies
large customers of this industry as they wake up to a new creed French, Swiss and Southern German markets.
of trader—or banker-supplier. But since I wrote, the tectonic of At a signing ceremony in London presided over by Nick Clegg,
these changes are becoming clearer, and they are on a grander scale. the British deputy prime minister, and Li Ke Qiang, the Chinese
The oil rich are joining skills-rich. The cash rich are merging their vice premier, PetroChina’s UK general manager echoed to an
interests with wealthy western inland markets. And the IOCs and extent the sentiment of Igor Sechin. “The framework agreement
the national oil companies (NOCs) are getting together. to work toward forming trading and refining related joint ventures
with INEOS is consistent with PetroChina’s strategy of building
Russian deal. Through a landmark $16 billion share swap at a broader business platform in Europe and of becoming a leading
the start of the year, Kremlin-controlled Rosneft is now the single international energy company,” he said.
largest shareholder in BP. Thwarted, it may feel, in the Gulf of
Mexico, the deal gives BP a route to explore for oil on the massive Changing field. A research desk friend and I were discussing
Russian Arctic continental shelf in an area comparable in size and the current changes: “The buyers are long crude,” he pointed
potential, say the companies, to the North Sea. It’s said to be the out. He sees coincidence on an epic scale, rather than some grand
first major equity-linked partnership between an international and design—the NOCs picking up opportunities as the IOCs seek to
a national oil company, giving the Russian company a 5% stake get more value out of what they particularly can do well. Focusing
in BP in return for 9.5% of its shares. upstream, he said, at least gave the IOCs a chance to differentiate
Since BP remains a substantial force in refining, and is said themselves. “With the possible exception of Exxon, refineries are
to be the largest supplier of the US military, the tie-up has had built by a handful of companies—UOP, KBR, the Japanese …
US Congress members questioning its security implications. But and they buy catalysts from BASF, UOP, Albemarle, Axens and
here’s what Rosneft Chairman Igor Sechin, who is also deputy Haldor Topsøe. It’s hard to differentiate yourself by processing
prime minister, had to say about the purpose of the deal. “Rosneft another barrel of oil.” Better, he suggested, for the IOCs to be
is working on a new strategy aimed at transforming the company operating in an environment where good seismic or better drilling
into an international energy holding. . . BP has gained a great can make a substantial difference.
amount of experience, including the Gulf of Mexico incident,” In the context of these deals, the rise of the Vitols and Morgan
he told Russian television station, RT. Mr. Sechin is on record as Stanleys as products suppliers is put into perspective. The arrival of
saying that his dream is to sell finished products, not crude oil: “In PetroChina may even cause a small skirmish. Morgan has, in recent
10, 15, 20 years, I would really like for Russian crude to be refined years, marketed products from INEOS’ refineries. As for the ice
on Russian refining assets or those with Russian ownership,” he skaters, they may have been half a mile from land; but fortunately,
told the Wall Street Journal in 2009. they were just a mobile-phone call from rescue by helicopter. HP
It’s not just crude that the Russians export to the West. Fuel
oils from straight-run Russian sites are also an upgrading staple of The author is HP’s European Editor and also a specialist in European distillate
Northwest European refiners. Russia’s Lukoil is expanding inter- markets. He has been active as a reporter and conference chair in the European
nationally through acquisitions, as well. It is now firmly in the key downstream industry since 1997, before which he was a feature writer and reporter
ARA oil hub at Vlissingen, in The Netherlands, where in 2009, it for the UK broadsheet press and BBC radio. Mr. Wright lives in Sweden and is the
founder of a local climate and sustainability initiative.
bought 45% of the Total TNR refinery. The company also took a
KPE
HYDROCARBON PROCESSING MARCH 2011
I 11
© 2010 Swagelok Company
We don’t have a department from Swagelok, it’s top quality. Because Quality isn’t just one of our values.
It’s our attitude. It’s the focus of every associate, affecting everything from
dedicated to quality. We have our services to our products. And by using the same disciplines, practices,
and technologies through every office in every country, that focus is constant.
a company dedicated to it. We know that quality isn’t just a well-made product, it’s customers served
beyond what they were expecting. To see what that attitude can do for you,
visit swagelok.com/quality.
KPE
Select 63 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS
HPINTEGRATION STRATEGIES
PAUL MILLER, CONTRIBUTING EDITOR
Some good news. The good news is that existing specialist ever-increasing number of different petroleum- and biofuel-related
suppliers in the terminal automation system (TAS) space have products and additives, deal with extreme price volatility, and com-
been continually enhancing their hardware and/or software offer- ply with stringent and ever-changing governmental regulations.
ings to make them even more functional, flexible, interoperable Several highly publicized terminal explosions, fires and spills
and easy to use. Terminal management systems (TMS) are also underscore the need for increased safety to protect people, equip-
available to extend the capabilities of terminal automation systems ment, property and the environment. The threat of terrorists or
to help optimize the supply chain and provide more effective tools disgruntled employees targeting these relatively vulnerable facili-
for real-time decision support (relative to allocations management, ties and ongoing problems with product theft highlight the need
credit management, product pricing, etc.). Several prominent, for increased security. All this has become extremely difficult, if
full-line automation suppliers have also effectively leveraged their not impossible, to handle manually or with stand-alone paper-
general automation expertise and wide-ranging portfolios (includ- based systems.
ing some well-targeted acquisitions) to develop comprehensive ter-
minal-automation solutions with compelling value propositions. Challenges in TAS supplier selection. The wide variety
Most suppliers to this market can point to a successful track record of major and minor sub-systems and applications that must be
of projects and a fairly long list of customer reference sites. Almost integrated makes terminal automation particularly challenging.
all claim to be able to work well with SAP, Oracle/JD Edwards, In the past, there were only a limited number of TAS suppliers
and other back office ERP systems used within the oil and gas and and few, if any, that offered comprehensive terminal-automation
petrochemicals industries. Several even have certified interfaces. solutions. However, there are a growing number of suppliers,
So, as an owner/operator, how do you go about selecting the several of which offer (at a price) relatively comprehensive, largely
right automation solution for your terminal or terminals? Should pre-integrated terminal automation solutions encompassing hard-
you stick with your current supplier(s) (if any) or look elsewhere? ware, application-specific software and appropriate services. Other
Should you partner with the same full-line automation supplier suppliers offer more specialized terminal-automation hardware
that might be providing measurement and control systems else- and software, or specialized TMS software solutions. Increasingly,
where within your parent organization, or work with a specialist these are designed with a high degree of openness and interoper-
in this area? What are the characteristics and functionalities of the ability, making them relative easy to integrate within a larger TAS
many different suppliers’ offerings within this space, and how do solution.
you map these against your specific terminal requirements? These In our comprehensive market outlook study, ARC divided the
are some of the questions that ARC attempted to answer in a suppliers into two logical categories: full-line automation suppli-
recent series of reports on terminal automation systems. ers with dedicated solutions for terminal automation, and more
specialized TAS/TMS suppliers that largely focus on the terminal-
Terminal automation becoming more sophisticated. automation market. HP
While, in the past, a surprisingly large number of petroleum-prod-
uct terminals operated with minimal automation (limited largely Paul Miller is a senior editor/analyst at ARC Advisory Group and has 25 years
to either the load racks or some limited transactional functions), of experience in industrial automation industry. He has published numerous articles
terminal automation is no longer optional. Today’s terminals, large in industry trade publications. Mr. Miller follows both the terminal automation and
water/wastewater sectors for ARC.
or small, need to accommodate and accurately account for an
KPE
HYDROCARBON PROCESSING MARCH 2011
I 13
Sulfur
Experience For the past four decades, Linde Process Plants, Inc. (LPP) has designed and/or constructed
sulfur recovery systems. These systems process off gases from gas treating units and sour water
strippers. LPP is a world leader in plant modularization and on-site constructed plants.
Advantages LPP has the experience, specialized skills, impressive track record, and extensive fabrication
facilities to successfully deliver major turnkey process units to global markets.
- Extensive technology portfolio
- Full turnkey capabilities, including process design, detail engineering, fabrication,
construction, and start-up
- Competitive pricing
- ISO 9001 certified
- Single source provider
KPE
HYDROCARBON PROCESSING MARCH 2011
I 15
Spray Spray Spray Spray
Nozzles Control Analysis Fabrication
Water-Jacketed Injector
for High-Temperature
Applications
Computational Fluid
Dynamics (CFD) Manufacturing quality and flexibility.
Need a simple quill or multi-nozzle injector? Insertion length of a
few inches or several feet? 25# or 2500# class flange? High-pressure,
high-temperature and/or corrosion-resistant construction? Special
design features like a water-jacket, air purge or easy retraction for
maintenance? Tell us what you need and we’ll design and manufacture
to your specifications and meet B31.1, B33.3 and CRN (Canadian
Registration Number) requirements.
Design validation with process modeling.
Let us simulate the injection environment to identify potential
problems. We can model gas flow, droplet trajectory and velocity,
atomization, heat transfer, thermal stresses, vibration and more
to ensure optimal performance.
CFD shows the change in drop size based
on nozzle placement in the duct.
D32 Proven track record.
(μm) We’ve manufactured hundreds of injectors for water wash, slurry
220 backflush, feed and additive injection, SNCR and SCR NOx control,
desuperheating and more. Customers include Jacobs Engineering,
Foster Wheeler Corp, Shaw Group, Conoco Phillips Co, Shell, Valero
165 Nozzle spraying
Z = 0.6 m in-line with duct and dozens more.
Pipeline safety bill generally considered a safer mode of trans- additional pipeline inspectors and pipe-
introduced in US Senate portation than other options for moving line safety support employees through a
gas and liquids. phased-in increase over the next four years.
Two US senators have introduced leg- Since 2006, there have been approxi-
islation to enhance pipeline safety in the mately 40 pipeline incidents each year that 2010 midstream M&A
country. The bill strengthens pipeline safety resulted in a fatality or injury. Last Sep-
oversight by the US federal government tember, a natural-gas pipeline exploded in activity hits $49 billion
and addresses long-standing safety issues, San Bruno, California, killing eight people. Worldwide mergers and acquisitions
including the use of automatic shutoff In January of this year, a 12-in. gas main (M&A) transactions involving midstream
valves and excess flow valves. exploded in a residential neighborhood of energy assets, which include natural gas
“Pipelines transport valuable energy Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, killing a gas pipelines, gas-gathering and processing
resources to communities across our nation. company employee and injuring five oth- facilities, as well as tankers and diversified
While our pipeline system is largely safe, ers. The cause of that blast remains under holdings, returned to the 2006 all-time
when accidents occur the consequences investigation. high of $49 billion in 2010, according to
can be catastrophic,” said Senator Frank The pipeline safety legislation seeks to results in a recent IHS Herold study.
Lautenberg (D-NJ), one of the bill’s two mitigate pipeline risks through a number This figure represents a 400% increase
original co-sponsors. “Our legislation will of measures. It would reauthorize and (above 2009 transaction values of $12.6
help to ensure the safety and efficiency of strengthen the authority of the PHMSA billion) in total asset deal value. Accord-
this vital transportation network. We can through fiscal year 2014. Other highlights ing to the report, nearly all (94%) of mid-
prevent deadly accidents by requiring more of the bill include: increased civil penal- stream M&A activity in 2010 was driven by
advanced technology, increased inspections, ties for violators of pipeline regulations; spending on gas pipelines and gas-gathering
and steeper penalties for safety violations.” expanded excess flow valve requirements to and processing facilities in the US. Several
“Safety should be the bedrock of any include multi-family buildings and small large transactions involving restructurings
responsible business,” said Senator Jay commercial facilities; required installation of master limited partnerships (MLPs)
Rockefeller IV (D-WV), the other origi- of automatic or remote-controlled shut- operating primarily in conventional US
nal co-sponsor of the legislation. “We off valves on new transmission pipelines; gas plays contributed more than two-thirds
want to make sure worker and consumer instructs the US Secretary of Transporta- of 2010 total transaction value, but total
safety remain a top priority. This bill will tion to establish time limits on accident transaction value for shale gas play assets
give the US Department of Transporta- and leak notification by pipeline opera- was up 255% year-over-year, reaching an
tion’s Pipeline and Hazardous Materials tors to local and state government officials all-time high of more than $5 billion.
Safety Administration (PHMSA) the tools and emergency responders; requires the Transactions involving gas-gathering
it needs to provide stronger oversight of US Secretary of Transportation to evalu- and processing facilities led the deal count
our nation’s pipeline system. Safety should ate whether integrity management system with 24 deals in 2010, followed by 10 deals
never take a backseat to profit.” requirements should be expanded beyond involving liquids pipelines and eight deals
The US has approximately 2.5 mil- currently defined high-consequence areas involving gas pipelines.
lion miles of pipelines that transport oil, and establish regulations as appropriate; “The midstream M&A activity in
natural gas and hazardous liquids. These makes pipeline information, inspections, 2010 was clearly a reflection of the rapidly
pipelines are an integral component of the and standards available to the public on increasing volumes of natural gas that are
US economy and energy supply, and are the PHMSA’s website; and authorizes being produced and brought online in the
US combined with the current unfavorable
TABLE 1. Highlights of Pipeline Transportation Safety Improvement Act of 2010
economic climate for gas,” said Cynthia
• Reauthorizes the authority of the US Department of Transportation’s Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Pross, senior analyst for M&A research at
Safety Administration (PHMSA) through fiscal year 2014 IHS. “I think many of these deals indicate a
• Increases civil penalties for violators of pipeline regulations desire by companies to cut costs by stream-
lining operations through restructuring,
• Expands excess flow valve requirements to include multi-family buildings and small commercial facilities
to improve balance sheets, and to gain
• Requires installation of automatic or remote-controlled shut-off valves on new transmission pipelines
increased access to capital through larger,
• Instructs the US Secretary of Transportation to establish time limits on accident and leak notification by consolidated operations. Ultimately, they
pipeline operators to local and state government officials and emergency responders want to optimize their profitability, since
• Requires the US Secretary of Transportation to evaluate whether integrity management system requirements natural gas margins are so thin.”
should be expanded beyond currently defined high-consequence areas and establish regulations as appropriate
• Makes pipeline information, inspections and standards available to the public on the PHMSA’s website MLPs. Ms. Pross said there were several
• Authorizes additional pipeline inspectors and pipeline safety support employees through a phased-in US midstream restructurings in 2010
increase over the next four years. involving master limited partnerships. “We
KPE
HYDROCARBON PROCESSING MARCH 2011
I 17
Continuous Level Coke Drum
Measurement System
The system is fully customizable to meet customer needs and provide the
following benefits:
϶ Continuous monitoring of the drum level throughout the entire coking cycle
϶ Reduces antifoam usage and saves costs associated with the change out
frequency of catalyst beds
www.vega-americas.com
[email protected]
1-800-FOR-LEVEL
KPE
Select 92 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS
HPIMPACT
have seen MLPs streamlining operations infrastructure continues to develop in the gressional panel, the National Petrochemi-
through acquisition of their general part- shale plays, we would expect to see more cal and Refiners Association (NPRA) said
ners, eliminating general partner distribu- consolidation among players, resulting in existing Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism
tion requirements and using those funds for fewer companies, but those that remain will Standards (CFATS) are effective and should
capital expenditures or to maintain distri- be larger, stronger companies with bigger be made permanent. The association’s state-
butions to MLP unit-holders.” footprints in the shale plays.” ment was given to the US House Commit-
One such example of this streamlining tee on Homeland Security’s Subcommittee
strategy, the IHS report noted, was evident Association says CFATS on Cybersecurity, Infrastructure Protection
in the largest midstream transaction in and Security Technologies.
2010, when Enterprise Products Partners, should be made permanent “Maintaining a high level of security has
the gas-gathering and processing MLP, In written testimony before a US con- always been, and remains, a top priority
acquired its general partner, Enterprise GP
Holdings, giving the MLP control of the
$22 billion enterprise value MLP. Enter-
prise Products Partners has geographically
diverse gas-gathering and storage assets in
Texas, Louisiana, Colorado and Ohio, pri-
marily serving conventional gas plays.
North America facturing HPC, enabling production of ethylene glycol plant of up to 1.5 million
Sasol plans to construct what is said to STARS catalysts. tpy, using Shell’s proprietary only MEG
be the world’s first commercial ethylene advantaged (OMEGA) technology and
tetramerization unit, capable of produc- Europe other olefin derivatives to yield over 2 mil-
ing over 100,000 metric tpy of combined Alfa Laval has received an order for lion tons of finished products.
1-octene and 1-hexene at its Lake Charles compact heat exchangers from a refinery
production site in Louisiana. The unit will in Russia. The order value is about SEK Süd-Chemie AG and Yara Interna-
use Sasol’s proprietary technology to con- 70 million and delivery is scheduled for tional ASA have a five-year framework
vert ethylene to 1-octene and 1-hexene. 2011. The compact heat exchangers will agreement on catalysts for fertilizer pro-
This unique process selectively produces be used in the refinery’s distillation process, duction. Moreover, this long-term supply
alpha olefins required for the high-growth where the crude oil is preheated for further agreement will cover more than 50% of
polymer markets. Construction will com- refining into high-value products such as the requirements of Qatar Fertiliser Co.
mence in 2011, and the plant will reach gasoline. By using Alfa Laval’s compact heat (Qafco), a joint venture of which Yara owns
beneficial operation in mid-2013. exchangers, it is possible to recover heat 25%. Under the agreement, Süd-Chemie
from other parts of the process and use it to will develop, produce and deliver all front-
Endicott Biofuels, LLC (EBF) has an preheat the oil, thereby achieving a highly end catalysts involved in producing ammo-
agreement with KMTEX Ltd. to construct energy-efficient solution. nia, as well as applied technical support.
a 30 million-gpy biorefinery in Port Arthur, Süd-Chemie expects to generate more
Texas. The biorefinery will use EBF’s pro- The Dow Chemical Co. has increased than $40 million from the agreement
prietary technology for producing high- its monopropylene glycol (MPG) capacity during the next five years. In particular,
purity G2 Clear biodiesel. KMTEX will by 15%, an additional 35 kilotons/yr, in Süd-Chemie will provide advanced cata-
host EBF as well as provide certain con- its Stade, Germany, plant after completion lytic technologies for feed purification,
struction and operational services. Equity of an advanced energy improvement and hydrodesulfurization, steam reforming, and
funding will come from Haddington Ven- technology optimization project. high- and low-temperature CO conversion
tures, LLC, and construction is expected to The Stade expansion was completed in and methanation.
begin in late January 2011. August 2010 during planned maintenance,
and it raises the plant’s propylene glycol JGC Corp. has an award to build the
Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. has a nameplate capacity to approximately 270 gas processing facilities for the Barzan
three-year contract with North Atlantic kilotons/yr. Onshore Project in Qatar. The Barzan Proj-
Refining Ltd. to provide turnaround and ect is managed by RasGas Co., Ltd., which
small capital work services at the company’s Stamicarbon, the licensing and intel- is owned by Qatar Petroleum (70%) and
refinery in Newfoundland, Canada. Jacobs lectual property center of Maire Tecnimont an affiliate of ExxonMobil (30%).
will provide turnaround planning and exe- S.p.A., has acquired the Italian engineering
cution, including pre-planning and post company Noy Engineering from Tecni-
turnaround activities, as well as delivery of mont. With this acquisition, Stamicarbon’s Trend analysis forecasting
small capital works at the site. extensive licensing, innovation and cus- Hydrocarbon Processing maintains an
extensive database of historical HPI project
tomer-service experience are combined with information. The Boxscore Database is
South America Noy Engineering’s polyester and polymeriza- a 35-year compilation of projects by type,
Albemarle Corp. and Petrobras have tion technologies. operating company, licensor, engineering/
signed a memorandum of understanding to Noy Engineering, established in 1983, is constructor, location, etc. Many companies
build a world-scale hydroprocessing catalyst said to be a leading company in the field of use the historical data for trending or sales
forecasting.
(HPC) production plant on the site of their process engineering and plant contracting. The historical information is available in
existing joint-venture Fabrica Carioca de The company designs and builds plants comma-delimited or Excel® and can be custom
Catalisadores SA (FCC SA) in Santa Cruz, worldwide, based on proprietary technolo- sorted to suit your needs. The cost depends on
Brazil. The new facility will complement gies. It has developed an extensive portfolio the size and complexity of the sort requested.
existing production of fluid catalytic crack- of polymer technologies and acrylic. You can focus on a narrow request, such as
the history of a particular type of project, or
ing (FCC) catalysts.
you can obtain the entire 35-year Boxscore
The plant will be constructed ahead Middle East database or portions thereof. Simply send
of significant growth in demand for Qatar Petroleum and Shell have a clear description of the data needed and
hydroprocessing catalysts, as Petrobras signed a memorandum of understanding receive a prompt cost quotation.
begins to introduce new hydrotreaters to to jointly study development of a major Contact: Drew Combs
existing and new refineries over the com- petrochemicals complex in Ras Laffan P.O. Box 2608, Houston, Texas, 77252-2608
ing years. Albemarle will provide FCC Industrial City, Qatar. The scope under 713-520-4409
[email protected]
SA with its leading technology for manu- consideration would include a mono-
KPE
HYDROCARBON PROCESSING MARCH 2011
I 21
"TNBMMQSPCMFNDBOTPNFUJNFTHPVOEFUFDUFE
*GPOMZZPVµETFFOJUDPNJOH
:PVSFMZPONBOZWBMWFTUPLFFQZPVSQMBOUPQFSBUJOHTNPPUIMZ*UUBLFTPOMZPOF
OPOSFTQPOTJWFWBMWFUPVQTFUZPVSFOUJSFQSPDFTT8JUIUIJTJONJOE XF´WFEFTJHOFE
UIF'JTIFSXJSFMFTTQPTJUJPONPOJUPSGPSZPVSBOBMPHDPOUSPMWBMWFT5IFQSPWJEFT
EFT
OE
QPTJUJPOGFFECBDLXJUIPVUUIFDPTUBOEIBTTMFPGXJSFT8IBU´TNPSF JU´TTJNQMFUPVTFBOE
FBTZUPJOTUBMM/PXZPVDBOEFUFDUTNBMMQSPCMFNTCFGPSFUIFZCFDPNFMBSHF8BOUUPMFBSO
BSO
NPSF 7JTJUXXX'JTIFSDPN
5IF&NFSTPOMPHPJTBUSBEFNBSLBOETFSWJDFNBSLPG&NFSTPO&MFDUSJD$P'JTIFS$POUSPMT*OUFSOBUJPOBM--$
KPE
Select 69 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS
HPIN CONSTRUCTION
The project, located in Ras Laffan between GDF SUEZ and Santos Ltd., has beginning of 2012. The investment of more
Industrial City, 80 km north of Doha, calls a planned LNG capacity of two million tpy. than €10 million will create 60 new jobs.
for the engineering, procurement and con-
struction (EPC) of the gas processing facili- LANXESS continues to expand its Fluor Corp. has an engineering, pro-
ties. This includes a gas-processing unit, a Indian production site in Jhagadia, Gujarat curement and construction (EPC) con-
sulfur-recovery unit and an NGL-recovery State. The specialty chemicals group broke tract with Santos Ltd. for its Gladstone
unit to produce methane, ethane, propane, ground for new compounding facilities, Liquefied Natural Gas (GLNG) project in
butane and condensate. The lump-sum with an initial capacity of 20,000 metric Queensland, Australia. Fluor’s EPC con-
turnkey contract is a multi-billion US dol- tpy. These facilities will start producing the tract includes upstream facilities associ-
lar EPC contract. high-tech plastics Durethan (polyamide) and ated with the 7.8 million-tpy LNG project
Pocan (polybutylene terephthalate) at the that will extract and liquefy gas from coal
The Elliott Group has been selected
to supply the compressor packages for the
residue fluid catalytic cracker (RFCC) and
the crude-oil distillation plant as part of
Abu Dhabi Oil Refining Co.’s (Takreer)
Ruwais refinery expansion.
The RFCC unit is the centerpiece of the
project. Under contract with the engineer-
ing procurement contractor, GS Engineer-
'HFRQWDPLQDWHQDWXUDOO\LQDVLQJOHVWHS
%LRGHJUDGDEOH
ing & Construction Corp., Elliott will ,QRQHHDV\VWHS=\PH)ORZUHPRYHVKD]DUGRXVFRQWDPLQDQWV
provide seven compressor trains, a power- IURPUHÀQHU\DQGSHWURFKHPLFDOXQLWVQDWXUDOVDIH
IRU\RXUSHRSOH6XOÀGHV +6 DQGS\URSKRULFVDUHHOLPLQDWHG
recovery expander train and associated
/(/VDQGEHQ]HQHDUHUHPRYHG5HVLGXDORLODQGJDVDUHJRQH
auxiliaries. Equipment includes a wet-gas
$OOZLWKRXWLPSDFWLQJZDVWHZDWHUIDFLOLWLHVSHUVRQQHODQGWKH
compressor, two heat-pump compressors,
HQYLURQPHQW6LPSO\SXWLWҋVDQDWXUDOIRUIDVWDQGHIIHFWLYHUHVXOWV
two refrigeration compressors, a propylene
compressor and a hot-gas expander. ;LS!c;VSS-YLL!ca`TLÅV^JVT
The Elliott Group will provide the com-
pressors for the crude-oil distillation plant
under contract with SK Engineering &
Construction Co. Delivery is scheduled
for mid-2013, with commissioning to fol-
low in the first quarter of 2014.
Asia-Pacific
Air Liquide has signed a long-term con-
tract with Tongmei Guangfa Chemical
Industry Co., Ltd., whose major share-
holder is Datong Coal Mine Group Co.
Under agreement terms, Air Liquide will
invest around €60 million in a large air-
separation unit (ASU) with production
capacity of 2,000 tpd of oxygen to sup-
ply oxygen and nitrogen to the customer’s
methanol-production project in Datong,
Shanxi Province, China. Industrial pro-
duction is scheduled to begin in July 2012.
During Phase 1 of the project, 600,000 tpy
of methanol will be produced.
Cashco, Inc.
P.O. Box 6, Ellsworth, KS 67439-0006
Ph. (785) 472-4461, Fax: (785) 472-3539
KPE
Select 155 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS
24
I MARCH 2011 HydrocarbonProcessing.com
Sharper Detection of
Off-Angle Cracks Leak
Repairs
Field
Machining
NDE/NDT
INSPECTION
Hot Taps /
Line Stops
Technical
Bolting
Valve
Repair
Valve
Insertion
KPE
HPI CONSTRUCTION BOXSCORE UPDATE
Company City Plant Site Project Capacity Unit Cost Status Yr Cmpl Licensor Engineering Constructor
AFRICA
Algeria Sonatrach Algiers Algeries Refinery RE 60 Bcfd 908 M 2013 SONARA Technip
Angola Sonangol Lobito Lobito Refinery 200 Mbpd U 2015 KBR
Morocco SAMIR Mohammedia Mohammedia Treater, Kerosine 600 t/a E 2012 UOP Tecnicas Reunidas
ASIA/PACIFIC
Australia Santos\PETRONAS JV Queensland Bowen-Surat Basin LNG EX 1.5 Mtpy 750 U 2011 Total Fluor Fluor
China Unocal Indonesia Ltd Sichuan Sichuan Sulfur 212 MMcfd 1300 E 2013 WorleyParsons
India Mangalore Rfg & Petrochemicals Mangalore Mangalore Refinery EX 9.69 MMtpy 2400 U 2011 EIL|Toyo Japan EIL EIL
Papua New Guinea Esso Highlands PNG LNG Kutubu Kutubu LNG 6.6 MMtpy U 2014 JGC|Chiyoda CB&I
South Korea Hyundai Oilbank Co., Ltd. Daesan Daesan Refinery, Heavy Ends (2) 510 bpd 2330 C 2011
Vietnam Petrovietnam Dung Quat Dung Quat Refinery EX 6.5 MMtpy 3000 P 2016 Technip|JGC| Tecnicas Reunidas
Tecnicas Reunidas JGC|Technip
CANADA
Alberta Altagas Harmattan Harmattan Gas Plant 95 MMcfd 50 P 2012 Gas Liquids Eng
British Columbia Murphy Oil Co Ltd West Tupper West Tupper Gas Plant 180 MMcfd 180 U 2011 Gas Liquids Eng TAHK Projects Ltd
EUROPE
Belarus Mozyr Refinery Mozyr Mozyr Treater, Tail Gas 240 t/a E 2013 Siirtec Nigi Siirtec Nigi
Belgium Eval Europe NV Antwerp Antwerp Polymer (2) EX t/a 470 M 2012 Kuraray Aker Kvaerner Aker Kvaerner
Bulgaria Lukoil Neftochim Bourgas Burgas Burgas Hydrocrack, Resid 2.2 MMtpy 95 E 2013 Axens Technip
Greece Hellenic Petroleum SA Elefsina Elefsina Amine Recovery 280 tpd U 2011 Haldor Topsøe Tecnicas Reunidas
Italy Eni SpA Sannazzaro Raffineria di Sannazzaro Sour Water Stripper 3.5 Mcfd U 2012 Siirtec Nigi
Kazakhstan AGIP KCO Kashagan Kashagan Field Gas Dehydration (1) 200 MMcfd U 2013 Siirtec Nigi Siirtec Nigi
Netherlands Kuwait Petro Corp Rotterdam Rotterdam Sulfur Recovery Unit (2) None 100 C 2011
Portugal Galp Energia Sines Sines Cracker, FCC RE None U 2011 UOP Tecnicas Reunidas Tecnicas Reunidas
Russian Federation Rosneft Angarsk Angarsk Sulfur Recovery Unit 114 m-tpd E 2013 WorleyParsons WorleyParsons
Spain Repsol YPF Cartagena Cartagena Coker, Gas Oil 920000 tpy U 2011 Axens Tecnicas Reunidas Tecnicas Reunidas
UK Powerfuel Plc Hatfield Hatfield Sulfur Recovery Unit 50 m-tpd E 2014 WorleyParsons |Cryoplants WorleyParsons
LATIN AMERICA
Brazil Agrenco Bio-Energia Parana Parana Biodiesel 135 Mtpy S 2013
Mexico Pemex Minatitlan Minatitlan Hydrotreater, Gasoil EX 50 bpd U 2011 Tecnicas Reunidas Rio San Juan Constr
Constr N. Odebrecht
Peru Petroperu Talara Talara Hydrotreater, Diesel 41 bpsd E 2014 Axens Tecnicas Reunidas Tecnicas Reunidas
MIDDLE EAST
Bahrain BAPCO\Neste Oil Corp JV Bahrain City Bahrain City Lube Oil Refining 36 m-t 9300 C 2011 CLG|Neste Jacobs Samsung Eng Samsung Eng
Oman Octal Holding & Co Salalah Salalah PET (2) 527 Mt 296 E 2012 Uhde Inventa-Fischer
Qatar Qatar Petroleum Mesaieed Mesaieed Sulfur Recovery TO 308 m-tpd E 2012 WorleyParsons WorleyParsons Petrofac
Saudi Arabia Saudi Aramco Yanbu Yanbu Refinery 400 bpd 580 U 2014 KBR
Turkey TUPRAS Izmit Izmit Utilities None E 2014 Tecnicas Reunidas Tecnicas Reunidas
UNITED STATES
Alaska Tesoro Corp Kenai Kenai Benzene Reduction EX None 90 A 2012 Mustang
Texas Delek Refining Tyler Tyler Cracker, FCC Reactor RE None 10 C 2011 UOP Mustang AltairStrickland
Utah Tesoro Corp Salt Lake City Salt Lake City Benzene Reduction EX None 55 C 2011 UOP Mustang
KPE
Select 156 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS
26
I JANUARY 2011 HYDROCARBON PROCESSING
KPE
Select 97 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS
Reliability has
no quitting time.
Think about ITT.
In oil and gas facilities around the world, ITT delivers pumps, valves, composite piping, switches,
regulators and vibration isolation systems that can handle harsh conditions and keep going.
After all, in the 24/7/365 refinery business, the last thing you want is a piece of equipment that
fails. With ITT, your processes stay up—and your total cost of ownership stays down. For more
information, and to receive our Oil and Gas catalog, visit www.ittoilgas.com or call 1-800-734-7867.
Conoflow | Enidine | Fabri-Valve | Fiberbond | Goulds | ITT Standard | Midland-ACS | Neo-Dyn KPE
Select 86 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS
CORROSION CONTROL SPECIALREPORT
Updates on improving
refractory lining service life
Tips help maintenance and operations care and maintain
refractory products in high-temperature operations
M. MAITY, SABIC Technology Centre, Jubail, Saudi Arabia
T
he hydrocarbon processing indus- shutdowns and maintenance outages is The furnaces and vessels in the HPI do
try (HPI) utilizes high-temperature increasing with the implementation of not consume the refractory with corrosive
conditions and relies on the perfor- stringent quality control and preventive liquid metal, slag, abrasion, impact, etc.,
mance of refractory lining for various fur- maintenance programs. The shutdown which are common in metallurgical fur-
naces and vessels. The total installed cost period is usually short in duration and is naces. Refractory lining problems and fail-
of refractories in HPI facilities is negligible planned primarily for mechanical overhaul. ures are mainly due to thermo-mechanical
compared to the total cost of the entire The life and durability of refractory lining stresses, erosion and chemical attack. The
complex. should not be the determining factor in most common refractory problems as expe-
However, refractory lining is very impor- the frequency and duration of shutdowns. rienced in the HPI are:
tant and it plays a critical role in the total In spite of its importance, refractories • Hot spots (higher casing temperature)
performance, profitability and reliable are, in many cases, neglected, misunder- • Excessive cracking
operation of the plant. There are several stood and abused, and the uncared for • Spalling of lining (thermal,
instances of refractory lining non-perfor- refractory can cause several problems dur- mechanical, structural)
mances and premature failures resulted in ing regular plant operations. • Erosion and thinning of lining
unplanned emergency shutdown. We will The unexpected problems can cause • Chemical attack/corrosion from
discuss common problems and failures an emergency shutdown or require lon- process gases (such as hydrogen,
encountered in HPI facilities and some ger maintenance time to rectify both the carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide,
remedial measures to follow. damages in the refractory lining as well as alkalies), flue gases (sulfur, sodium,
mechanical damages to unit equipment. vanadium), steam, etc.
Background. In the HPI, refractories are Also, the sudden failure of the lining can • Acid-gas dew-point corrosion of
mostly installed on fired heaters, hydrogen pose a significant risk and threat to plant refractory and metallic parts
reformers, ammonia primary and second- safety. Therefore, it is important for HPI • Partial melting and degradation of
ary reformers, cracking furnaces, incinera- facilities to optimize the lining reliability lining
tors, process gas boilers, catalytic crack- and performance in various applications. • Excessive shrinkage and development
ing units, coke calciner, sulfur furnaces, It may be possible to minimize refrac- of gaps
utility boilers, air heaters, ducting, stacks, tory related problems and reduce unnec- • Anchor failure and detachment of
etc. Some of the listed equipment operate essary expenses by introducing sound lining from wall
under high pressure, and operating tem- engineering practices, following proven • Failure of metal liner over refractory
perature can vary from very low to very guidelines and sharing practical experiences • Explosive spalling during dry out
high (approximately 500°C to 1,600°C). while designing the lining and selecting • Mechanical damages.
Refractories play a critical role for the construction materials, installation meth- The extent of damages and failures may
total performance and reliable operation of ods, etc. This article will discuss several vary equipment to equipment. Sometimes
high-temperature processing units. Refrac- common problems and failures of refrac- the problems appear within a short time of
tories can be the controlling factor in the tory lining and highlight important consid- operation or during commissioning, and
success or failure of a furnace and vessel’s erations to mitigate such problems. this can become a major concern.
service life, as well as the safe and profitable Most processing industries handle
operation of the plant. Common problems and failures. highly combustible hydrocarbons. There-
Most HPI facilities operate under con- The performance of any lining in a furnace fore, lining problems in critical pressure ves-
tinuous operating mode and will run for is considered to be reasonable when similar sels and boilers are a major concern and, in
several years before a scheduled shutdown service lives are achieved on a regular basis. many cases, causes immediate shutdown to
for maintenance or turnaround. Therefore, Premature lining failure may be defined as avoid any accidents. HPI processing plants
the prime objective here is equipment reli- one that does not achieve normal or average are complicated involving continuous chain
ability. Also, in the HPI, the time between performance and service life. reactions in the interconnected network of
KPE
HYDROCARBON PROCESSING MARCH 2011
I 29
SPECIALREPORT CORROSION CONTROL
reactors, vessels and pipelines. Any problem shell plate. Also, mechanical damage in the mechanical stresses, etc., can cause vari-
in any particular vessel due to a refractory cyclones due to erosion of the lining and ous problems in the lining. In many cases,
problem can result in a complete shutdown plate may disturb the unit operation. Fail- localized hot spots or high temperatures
of the unit and/or the entire facility. ure of the lining due to inadequate anchor are controlled by steam impingement to
Here are some of the common exam- system is very common for all kinds of reduce the casing temperature and continue
ples of refractory damage (Figs. 1–12). lining. Explosive spalling may be caused plant operation. Reductions in thermal effi-
The reduction in lining thickness in the during the initial dry out due to uncon- ciency, as well as associated risks and plant
catalytic cracking unit is caused either by trolled heating. safety, are major concern for such cases.
cracking and spalling due to heavy thermal Differential movement of the shell and
shock or erosion by catalyst particles and lining due to a mismatch in expansion Failure analysis and corrective
subsequent hot spot or partial exposure of behavior, uncontrolled heating-cooling, actions. Refractory-lined equipment
function as a system. There are several
interacting physical and chemical effects
that may be ongoing, progressive, cyclic,
etc., that will definitely control the perfor-
mance of refractory. Therefore, in most of
the cases, it may be very difficult to con-
clude a single reason for nonperformance
and premature failure of the lining. Also,
there are numerous precommissioning fac-
tors related to design, material selection,
installation, etc., as explained previously
that directly affect performance.
In some cases, the poor quality material
or installation workmanship of the refrac-
FIG. 4 Typical refractory lining failures— tory may contribute to the problem. But it
FIG. 1 Typical refractory lining failures— Castable damage and anchors is also possible that a good quality refrac-
Crack in castable lining. exposed.
tory or installation can give unsatisfactory
performance because of a combination of
other factors. The analysis of any refractory
problem should consider numerous factors
and identify the main root cause for the
problems and select appropriate recom-
mendations.
Identifying the actual reason of non-
performance for the lining is a difficult
task, and this involves systematic study and
analysis of the problem. Reviews of back-
ground information particularly design
engineering, quality and source of mate-
rial, installation procedures and records,
operational records, post-service inspection
FIG. 2 Typical refractory lining failures— FIG. 5 Typical refractory lining failures— and maintenance history are important for
Castable wall detached. Loose bricks hanging. the root-cause analysis. Awareness of the
operational parameters and potential deg-
radation mechanisms that can lead to fail-
ure of the lining is essential to understand
the problems and remedial measures. A
thorough system analysis should result in a
better understanding of the various factors
that control the performance of the lin-
ing and yield in sound basis for corrective
remedial measures and actions. Therefore,
clues and relevant facts of failure should be
gathered, analyzed, explored and studied
to make a meaningful conclusion. Collect-
ing samples and selective laboratory test-
ing should be part of the failure analysis, if
required. Important factors responsible for
FIG. 3 Typical refractory lining failures— FIG. 6 Typical refractory lining failures— the performance of the lining are briefly
Roof lining collapse. CF module fallen from roof. explained here.
KPE
30
I MARCH 2011 HydrocarbonProcessing.com
How come the weather is the only
nasty thing at this gas field?
Visit us at
booth A220, hall 1
at GASTECH 2011,
March 21–24,
Amsterdam,
Netherlands
company NAM and its contractors. Siemens has advanced the compression and variable speed drive technologies to ensure
the adaptation of the gas supply to fluctuating demand, to slash maintenance requirements, and to maximize environmental
performance. Highest availability and low power consumption of all units are the best basis for an eco-friendly and successful
operation. Learn more: www.siemens.com/energy
Sweet Solutions.™
www.merichem.com
KPE
Select 79 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS
SPECIALREPORT CORROSION CONTROL
are explained in the literature. All of the While designing a new lining for a ves- high alumina varieties—both insulating
important operating factors and any other sel it is important to consider ease of future and dense types. Mainly bricks, monolith-
criteria specific to the process under consid- maintenance and repair. However, this ics, ceramic fiber items, different types of
eration should be verified for their possible aspect of the lining design is compromised insulating blocks, etc., are used for lining.
effect on the performance of the lining. in many cases because a lining system Bricks and monolithics are available for
Thermal calculation is essential for any that is maintenance friendly may be more both dense and insulating types with a wide
lining to ensure design casing temperature, expensive with respect to initial materials range of properties and each material has an
temperature gradient in the wall and heat and installation expenses as compared to application that is more suitable.
losses. Thermo-mechanical FEM analysis a lining that is adequate to meet the initial Selecting materials should always be
may be carried out for critical vessels and contractual requirements. based on properties and specifications suit-
load bearing refractory structures to predict Details of the lining layout structure, able for the specific application and operat-
temperatures, stresses and displacements in thickness, dimension, shape and sizes of ing conditions. Most refractory materials
the lining. The FEM analysis is a reliable individual bricks and other shaped items, react and change during service according
tool to investigate the spalling mechanisms their laying and bonding patterns, provi- to the principle of thermo-chemistry. It
and to develop ways on improving the lin- sions for expansion allowances, support of is important to know the furnace atmo-
ing behavior. brick-wall, etc., should be part of the detail sphere, presence of any major or minor
Anchors are used for almost all types of engineering for each piece of equipment. chemicals and their possible effects on the
refractory applications. These are mostly Finally, practical experiences and expe- lining. Selecting materials solely based
metallic type. Lining failures due to inad- rience-based judgments are very impor- on price and ease of installation should
equacies in the anchoring system are very tant for successful and reliable design of any be avoided. Very often, monolithic lin-
common (Figs. 6, 9 and 10). Selecting the refractory lining. Therefore, involvement ing system is selected in the lining design
proper metallurgy, anchor dimensions, of experienced engineers from the design of critical vessels where brick lining or
configurations, and spacing are very impor- stages to final implementation is one of the some other design may be more suitable.
tant to achieve the maximum service life of essential parameters to get the optimum The selection may be due to cheap and
the lining. Where metal liners are used over performance of lining. easy availability of monolithics and easier
the lining, the mechanical design should be Selection of refractory materials and installation than brick lining and to avoid
sound and allow free movement of the liner specification. The majority of refractories preparation of too many engineering draw-
on one end from its fixed positions. used in the HPI are alumina–silicate and ings for the complicated brick shapes and
laying details. In many cases, recommen-
dations of refractory manufacturers are
biased and based on their available product
ranges, which may not be appropriate for
the required conditions.
Selection should be based on the desired
service life and cost considerations. Initial
cost of refractory lining should not be the
selection criteria but rather the service life
of lining under operating conditions. It is
better to develop the material specification
for any application based on discussions
with the manufacturers to ensure it is more
practical and realistic. The specification
FIG. 9 Typical refractory lining failures— FIG. 11 Typical refractory lining failures— should be regularly reviewed and updated
Oxidation of anchor. Brick wall bulged. based on actual performance of used mate-
rials and current industry practices.
Quality of refractory materials.
Refractory materials are heterogeneous, and
quality varies both as manufactured and
as installed. Materials should be procured
against specifications most appropriate to
the specific application. For critical appli-
cations, purchasing of materials based on a
comparison of product datasheet or cata-
logue specifications or equivalent principles
should be avoided. The actual performance
references and records for specific products
or brands should be verified against simi-
lar applications. Reviews of manufacturing
FIG. 10 Typical refractory lining failures— FIG. 12 Typical refractory lining failures— facilities and quality-control program, and
Surface spalling and exposed Brick wall collapsed and hexmesh random inspection and testing of impor-
anchor. detachment. tant properties are essential.
KPE
34
I MARCH 2011 HydrocarbonProcessing.com
MERICHEM COMPANY
Sweet Solutions.™
Lining installation. Unlike other engi- subtropical weather conditions. Dry-out temperature and locate hot spots. Infra-
neering subjects, there are very few well- needs to be done at the earliest to prevent red thermography is an important tool for
established and recognized engineering damage. When delays in dry out or com- online-temperature measurement, condi-
standards, design and installation guide- plete dry-out are not practical, suitable seal- tion monitoring of lining, predicting prob-
lines for refractory jobs to ensure quality ants may be used on monolithic lining to lems, and maintaining equipment uptime
installation of the lining and its subsequent reduce alkali hydrolysis reaction and dam- during a problem.
satisfactory performance. In many applica- age. Also, natural-air circulation should be Thermography is very useful for locat-
tions and contracts, the only quality assur- maintained within the furnace to avoid hot ing and monitoring effected areas in case
ance is limited to warranty and guarantee of and humid conditions. of any operational upset or localized prob-
material and lining for a limited operating Developing job specifications for the lem in the furnace, and thus allowing the
period. Installations of refractory rely upon dry out schedule is essential instead of fol- inspectors insight into what is happening
manpower. Because of the human element, lowing general guidelines from the sup- inside the lining. This allows the plant to
care should be taken to ensure involve- plier. Burner size and location, exhaust make appropriate decisions in planning
ment of only experienced manpower in location, air volume, velocity, temperature- the shutdown schedule and maintenance
the installation. Developing job specific control locations, etc., need to be properly repairs and estimating the total materials
installation procedures, quality plans and addressed. Permanent burners or special needed for these repairs.
acceptance criteria of the installed lining, external burners may be used for dry out The maintenance strategy for refractory
prequalification materials, and installation depending on requirements. Permanent linings should be based on cost-effective
crew are some of the important factors that burners have limitations of inadequate proactive systems rather than on con-
companies must address before any job. temperature control at the initial stage. ventional reactive systems. The probable
API 936 guidelines, developed by the Many specialized dry-out agencies are reasons and mode of failure should be
American Petroleum Institute (API) are available to carry out this job in most pro- ascertained before redesigning or repair-
very useful tools for quality control of fessional manner. ing a lining. Change in lining design
monolithic lining. There are also some Unit operation. Production and opera- and installation practices without proper
specifications and standards developed tion personnel should be aware of the pro- analysis of factors limiting the service life
by Process Industry Practices (PIP) espe- cess parameters that may affect the service of the existing lining may not be a long-
cially for process industries. Prequalifica- life of the refractory lining for furnaces term solution. All repair and maintenance
tion of materials, installation procedures, or reactors. Minor changes in operating jobs should be treated like a new job with
machinery and crew, testing of as installed conditions and processes may strongly proper quality control. It is important to
samples, ambient condition monitoring, influence the performance of any lining. inspect and record all repairs to maintain
acceptance criteria for installed lining, Abnormal changes in burner operation— a proper trend and database.
involvement of neutral inspection agency such as flame impingement on refractory Other factors. There are many other
for quality monitoring, etc., are important surface, incomplete burning of fuel causing factors that may directly or indirectly
requirements of these standards. Many change in furnace atmosphere, changes in affect the performance of the lining. In
clients and licensors have started recom- temperature, pressure, fuel quality (dirty most construction sites, refractory instal-
mending compliance to these guidelines fuel), heating and cooling rate, etc.—have lation is one of the last activities. With
for critical applications. Possible quality direct effects on the refractory lining. Oper- any delay in other pre-activities, there is
control for brick and ceramic fiber lining ating at a higher temperature than specified always pressure on shortening and pos-
in similar lines are expected to improve in the design can reduce the service life of sibly compromising the refractory instal-
quality for the total installation job and the refractory. High limit thermocouples lation schedule to make up for earlier
compliance to engineering practices. should be located at strategic positions for delays. This attitude of getting the job
Using common standards and guide- monitoring and controlling temperatures done fast may have major adverse effects
lines will help the industry to mitigate within the system. on quality.
installation problems. This also helps in In many cases, the problem or ini- Ambient temperature and working con-
developing quality installation manpower tiation of deterioration in lining due to ditions for workers have direct effects on
that are actually executing the jobs in operational issues may not become visible the quality of the installation job. Imple-
the field, particularly crews, masons and immediately. Therefore, it is important to menting cost-cutting measures, purchas-
supervisors. gather information on operational infor- ing refractory and selecting the contractor
Dry out and heat up. The heat dry out mation and records while studying the solely on the basis of commercial issues
of a new lining, particularly monolithic problem. with less importance on quality, services,
lining, is a critical step when consider- Inspection and maintenance. Regu- etc., may be the contributing factors to
ing the total quality for the installation. lar inspection of the lining and condition poor performance over the longer term.
Slow and controlled removal of free and monitoring should be part of the operating
chemically bonded water from the lining plan for critical equipment. The frequency Observations for quality. Refrac-
system is essential before actual startup of inspection may be decided based on tory is a diverse class of materials that are
of the unit. Explosive spalling or crack- historical problems, severity of operating used to insulate and protect industrial fur-
ing may occur in lining when quick and conditions, complexity of design and other naces and vessels. The properties of the
uncontrolled initial heat up or dry out of factors. Timely identification of problems refractories are tailored to specific applica-
the refractory is done. and corrective actions may lead to longer tions by varying the composition of raw
Also, alkali hydrolysis is a major con- life of the lining. Temperature-sensitive materials. The technology of refractories
cern for monolithic lining in tropical and paints are widely used to monitor casing is making remarkable progress recently.
KPE
36
I MARCH 2011 HydrocarbonProcessing.com
CORROSION CONTROL
Before your crude hits the pipeline, the light mercaptans must go.
In remote areas, that’s especially tough. MERICAT™ C uses reliable
FIBER-FILM® patented technology to sweeten mercaptan odors,
even where access is limited.
Manabendra Maity is work- Finding the right treating application for hydrocarbon streams is
ing as a refractory specialist at the
Materials & Corrosion Section of Sabic
challenging. Merichem’s decades of experience and commitment
Technology Centre, Jubail, KSA. He to innovation means treating gaseous and liquid hydrocarbons
holds B.Tech degree in ceramic engi-
neering from Calcutta University and a M.Tech degree is efficient, economical and clean.
in ceramic engineering from IT-BHU, India. He has more
than 16 years of extensive experience in refractory lining
design, engineering, installation & quality control, failure Learn how sweet it is at www.merichem.com/MERICATC
analysis and troubleshooting for furnaces and vessels for
the refining, petrochemical and metallurgical industries.
He started his career in 1994 as a refractories & non- Merichem: A global provider of focused technology,
metallics engineer in Engineers India Ltd., New Delhi
and continued there until 2007. It was followed by two
chemical and service solutions.
years in Ciria Division of Thermal Ceramics. Mr. Maity is
life member of India Ceramic Society & Indian Institute
of Ceramics. He has qualifiedfor API-936 Refractory P: 713.428.5000 | E: [email protected] | www.merichem.com
Personnel Certification Program.
KPE
Select 158 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS
37
Anytime, Anywhere
®
Anchor-Loc 3 insulating fiber
modules keep your project on
schedule with consistent, reliable Consistent design & quality assurance
Anchor-Loc 3 module design features construc-
performance anywhere in the world. tion from a continuous fold of spun blanket,
®
Anchor-Loc 3 insulating fiber modules are stainless steel alloy hardware and center mount
specifically designed and manufactured for the attachment. The design allows for consistent
global market, providing a winning combination furnace layout, ease of installation and depend-
of performance, reliability and consistency you able service life. All components meet or exceed
can count on anywhere in the established industry standards assuring the
world. This new generation same high quality worldwide.
Insulating Fiber Modules ®
of Anchor-Loc modules is
designed to meet a wide range of application Fast, cost-effective delivery
requirements in a variety of heat processing The Unifrax sales team provides design
vessels. They provide continuous S-folded recommendations, engineering layout and
blanket construction for improved thermal product sourcing options, ensuring a cost-
performance in high temperature applications effective furnace lining solution wherever
and are available in various fiber chemistries, you’re located in the global market.
temperature grades and densities to meet the
For more information and a list of our
most demanding requirements. Anchor-Loc 3
worldwide manufacturing locations, visit
modules offer:
the Unifrax website, call 716-278-3800 or
Universal specifications email [email protected].
Anchor-Loc 3 modules are produced in each
of our global manufacturing centers using the
same raw material specifications, dimensional
tolerances and assembly procedures, providing
product uniformity and consistency worldwide. www.unifrax.com
Select 68 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS
KPE
CORROSION CONTROL SPECIALREPORT
A
gas flare, alternatively known as a Steam can be injected near the end of mally handles some cold vapors (up to
flare stack, is an elevated vertical the flare tip to reduce formation of black –45°C).
conveyance that is part of installa- smoke. The injected steam does, however, • A dry flare header designed to handle
tions such as oil and gas wells, oil rigs, refin- increase the noise level of the burning gas. dry flare gases. These will also be cold, with
eries, chemical, petrochemical and natural To keep the flare system functional and normal temperatures below –45°C.
gas plants, and other facilities (Fig. 1). On instantly useable, a small amount of purge • A low-pressure acetylene flare header,
oil- production rigs and in refineries and gas is continuously burned. It thus resem- exclusively provided to handle acetylene-
petrochemical plants, the flare stacks primar- bles a pilot light, maintaining the system rich gases.
ily serve to protect vessels or pipes from over- ready for its primary purpose as an over- At Reliance’s Nagothane facility, a large
pressuring during unexpected plant upsets. pressure safety system. The continuous gas flare stack with a design load of 1,000 met-
source also helps to prevent oxygen ingress ric tph is located on the north-east side
Safety system. Whenever plant equip- into the system. of a gas-cracker plant. Flare headers from
ment is over-pressured, the pressure, relief As mentioned earlier, flare systems individual plants—polypropylene, low-
valves on the equipment automatically enhance plant safety by dependably dispos- density polyethylene, linear-low density
release gases (and sometimes liquids as well) ing of all hydrocarbons discharged during polyethylene, gas cracker-OSBL and gas
that are routed through large piping runs plant upsets. All safety valve releases go to cracked-ISBL) join the main flare header,
called flare headers after liquid hydrocar- the flare system. There are, however, two which routes to the flare stack (Fig. 2). The
bons are completely vaporized and then types of flare feeder systems in ISBL: main flare header leads to a knockout drum
send to the flare stack. The released gases • A wet flare header is used to handle in the flare area.
are burned as they exit the flare stack. The flare gases that contain moisture but are The purpose of the knockout drum is
size and brightness of the resulting flame not “cold” gases. to separate entrained liquid droplets car-
depends on how much flammable material • An intermediate flare header, which ried with the gases passing through relief
was released. could contain some moisture and nor- valves. Liquid capture avoids the danger
Flare stack
CPP
Water
seal
drum
Knockout
Water inlet
drum
OSBL
ISBL
LLD
B-1
WF
PP
LD
drum
FIG. 1 Flare stack. FIG. 2 Flare system schematic at the Nagothane plant in India.
KPE
HYDROCARBON PROCESSING MARCH 2011
I 39
SPECIALREPORT CORROSION CONTROL
Selecting the best amine/solvent for gas treating is not a Tertiary Amines
trivial task. There are a number of amines available to A tertiary amine such as MDEA is often used to selectively
remove contaminants such as CO2, H2S and organic sulfur remove H2S, especially for cases with a high CO2 to H2S ratio
compounds from sour gas streams. The most commonly used in the sour gas. One benefit of selective absorption of H2S is a
amines are methanolamine (MEA), diethanolamine (DEA), Claus feed rich in H2S. MDEA can remove H2S to 4 ppm while
and methyldiethanolamine (MDEA). Other amines include maintaining 2% or less CO2 in the treated gas using relatively
diglycolamine® (DGA), diisopropanolamine (DIPA), and less energy for regeneration than that for DEA. Higher weight
percent amine and less CO2 absorbed results in lower circulation
triethanolamine (TEA). Mixtures of amines can also be used
rates as well. Typical solution strengths are 40-50 weight % with
to customize or optimize the acid gas recovery. Temperature, a maximum rich loading of 0.55 mole/mole. Because MDEA
pressure, sour gas composition, and purity requirements for is not prone to degradation, corrosion is low and a reclaimer is
the treated gas must all be considered when choosing the most unnecessary. Operating pressure can range from atmospheric,
appropriate amine for a given application. typical of tail gas treating units, to over 1,000 psia.
Mixed Solvents
In certain situations, the solvent can be “customized” to
optimize the sweetening process. For example, adding a
primary or secondary amine to MDEA can increase the rate
of CO2 absorption without compromising the advantages of
MDEA. Another less obvious application is adding MDEA to
an existing DEA unit to increase the effective weight % amine
to absorb more acid gas without increasing circulation rate or
reboiler duty. Many plants utilize a mixture of amine with
physical solvents. SULFINOL® is a licensed product from
Shell Oil Products that combines an amine with a physical
solvent. Advantages of this solvent are increased mercaptan
pickup, lower regeneration energy, and selectivity to H2S.
Primary Amines
The primary amine MEA removes both CO2 and H2S from Choosing the Best Alternative
sour gas and is effective at low pressure. Depending on Given the wide variety of gas treating
options, a process simulator that
the conditions, MEA can remove H2S to less than 4 ppmv
can accurately predict sweetening
while removing CO2 to less than 100 ppmv. MEA systems results is a necessity when attempting
generally require a reclaimer to remove degraded products to determine the best option.
from circulation. Typical solution strength ranges from 10 to ProMax® has been proven to accurately
20 weight % with a maximum rich loading of 0.35 mole acid predict results for numerous process
gas/mole MEA. DGA® is another primary amine that removes schemes. Additionally, ProMax can
CO2, H2S, COS, and mercaptans. Typical solution strengths are utilize a scenario tool to perform
50-60 weight %, which result in lower circulation rates and less feasibility studies. The scenario
energy required for stripping as compared with MEA. DGA tool may be used to systematically
also requires reclaiming to remove the degradation products. vary selected parameters in an
effort to determine the optimum operating conditions and the
Secondary Amines appropriate solvent. These studies can determine rich loading,
The secondary amine DEA removes both CO2 and H2S but reboiler duty, acid gas content of the sweet gas, amine losses,
generally requires higher pressure than MEA to meet overhead required circulation rate, type of amine or physical solvent,
specifications. Because DEA is a weaker amine than MEA, it weight percent of amine, and other parameters. ProMax can
requires less energy for stripping. Typical solution strength model virtually any flow process or configuration including
ranges from 25 to 35 weight % with a maximum rich loading multiple columns, liquid hydrocarbon treating, and split flow
of 0.35 mole/mole. DIPA is a secondary amine that exhibits processes. In addition, ProMax can accurately model caustic
some selectivity for H2S although it is not as pronounced as for treating applications as well as physical solvent sweetening
tertiary amines. DIPA also removes COS. Solutions are low with solvents such as Coastal AGR®, methanol, and NMP. For
in corrosion and require relatively low energy for regeneration. more information about ProMax and its ability to determine the
appropriate solvent for a given set of conditions, contact Bryan
The most common applications for DIPA are in the ADIP® and
Research & Engineering.
SULFINOL® processes.
D
uring an emergency, equipment failure or a planned main- • Construction material is carbon steel
tenance event, hydrocarbon-processing industry (HPI) • Other design basis parameters are listed in Table 1.
pressure vessels are normally depressurized. This action The first simulation was done without including the vessels’
may cause auto-refrigeration and low-metal temperature situations metal mass. In other words, the control volume of depressuriza-
in which the likelihood of brittle fracture may occur in steel vessels tion study was limited to the fluid inside the vessel, and the metal-
and reactors. This case history describes the results from a simu- wall temperature was assumed to be the same as the inventory
lation regarding auto-refrigeration effects on HPI reactors. The fluid temperature. Also, the temperature difference between vapor
study also included investigation on brittle-fracture phenomenon and liquid was assumed to be negligible. Table 2 lists the final fluid
and recommendations for a proactive engineering approach to temperatures obtained in the first simulation.
mitigate such failures. Key points highlighted from the study are: In the second depressurization simulation, the metal mass of
• Although the process-fluid temperature from auto-refrig- each vessel was included in the control volume of the model. Table
eration drops to –86°C, considering the vessel’s metal-mass heat 3 shows the results of the second simulation based on the metal
capacity and ambient temperature, the short-term vessel minimum mass values. As shown in Table 3, the calculated inner-wall tem-
metal temperature does not become colder than –28°C. Therefore,
selecting expensive material of construction can be avoided. TABLE 1. Design basis parameter for simulation
• Complying with the ASME rules or other internationally
V-100 V-101 V-102
recognized codes for minimum requirements is crucial to the struc-
tural integrity of a pressure vessel. However, proactive engineer- Vessel volume, m3 18.3 6.2 8.6
ing practices and precautions pertaining to the design, materials, Initial liquid volume, m3 1.5 1.0 1.1
fabrication, nondestructive examinations and operation are also Initial mass of vapor, kg 2,115 687.1 620.3
required to ensure that the vessels are resistant to brittle fracture. Initial mass of liquid, kg 917.0 584.0 656.3
Vessel metal mass, kg 41,700 11,500 9,200
PROCESS ENGINEERING
Initial operating pressure, bar-g 120 105 69
This case study focuses on a gas field production facility, which
uses several separation vessels and a stabilization unit to obtain Initial operating temperature, ºC 30 4 –10
dew-point control for the natural gas products and Rvp-controlled
condensate products. The process vessels operate as three-phase sepa-
rators containing vapor, light-liquid hydrocarbons and heavy-liquid
phase. The study focused on the simulation and design of three inter-
connected separation vessels—V-100, V-101 and V-102 (Fig. 1). Produced
dry gas
Since in accordance with API 521, all process equipment with
Feed heat
operating pressure higher than 18 barg must be depressurized in Feed gas exchanger
case of an incidence, the fluid pressure should be reduced to 6.9 from
manifold
barg and the blowdown lines including the restricted orifice were production
V-101 V-102
1st stage 2nd stage
designed based on depressurizing to 6.9 barg within 15 minutes.4 line
3-phase 3-phase
In practice during depressurization and blowdown events, the separator separator
actual vessel-fluid pressure drops from operating pressure (initial V-100 V-101 V-102
pressure) down to almost atmospheric pressure (final pressure). V-100
The general assumptions and process design basis parameters used 3-phase
in the simulation include: inlet
separator To condensate
• Minimum ambient temperature of –13°C is the minimum stabilization unit
outer metal-wall temperature of the vessels
• “PV work term contribution” is defined as isentropic expan- FIG. 1 Flow diagram of three vessels for the separation process
sion efficiency and assumed as 100% (a conservative assumption) of the gas plant.
KPE
HYDROCARBON PROCESSING MARCH 2011
I 43
SPECIALREPORT CORROSION CONTROL
peratures are considerably higher than the calculated fluid final of MDMT calculations for this study’s vessels based on ASME,
temperatures listed in Table 2 from the first simulation. Section VIII, Div. 2.
The simulation work indicates that including the metal-mass
heat capacity into evaluation increases the accuracy of estimated Minimum allowable temperature (MAT), as defined
minimum metal temperature of the vessels. Consequently, more in API 579, is “the lowest (coldest) permissible metal tempera-
accurate vessel wall temperatures aid cost-effective selection of ture for a given material and thickness based on its resistance to
construction materials for the separation vessels. brittle fracture. It may be a single temperature or an envelope of
allowable operating temperatures as a function of pressure.6 The
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING MAT is derived from mechanical design information and material
All three separation vessels were designed using ASME Code specification. MAT at design pressure is MDMT.
Section VIII , Division 2. Table 4 lists the design data for the
separation vessles.5 Lowest metal temperature (LMT). LMT as defined and
used in this article is the lowest metal temperature due to the
MDMT of vessels. The minimum design metal temperature operating condition and minimum ambient temperature. The
(MDMT) of a vessel is the minimum metal temperature in LMT may be a single temperature at an operating pressure or
which the vessel can sustain its full design pressure without hav- an envelope of temperatures and coincident pressures. Actually,
ing to be impact tested. When the vessel operates at pressures the LMT, in this case, is derived from the calculated inner wall
less than its full design pressure, concessions on MDMT are temperature due to the contained process fluid temperature and
allowed based on ASME Section VIII. Table 5 lists the result also the minimum ambient temperature. The LMTs of the ves-
sels coincident with final pressures (after depressurization and
40 blowdown) are shown in Table 6.
As shown in Figs. 2–4 and Table 6, the LMTs for all of the
30 vessels at the final pressure as well as other coincident pressures
20 are on the safe side based on the rules and design philosophy of
ASME Section VIII Div. II. Although the code requirements have
10 been satisfied, further considerations and precautions are required
Temperature, °C
-30
-40 TABLE 4. Design data for separation vessels
-50 Vessels V-100 V-101 V-102
-60 Design pressure, barg 128 113.4 76.4
-70 Design temperature, °C 80 80 80
-80 Material of construction Plates: A516 same as same as
LMT
-90 Gr. 70 normalized V-100 V-100
MAT flanges: A105
-100
-110
100 80 60 40 20 0 TABLE 5. MDMT calculations
Pressure, barg
Vessels V-100 V-101 V-102
FIG. 3 LMT curve for vessel, V-101, during depressurization event.
MDMT, °C –20 –22 –22
KPE
44
I MARCH 2011 HydrocarbonProcessing.com
CORROSION CONTROL SPECIALREPORT
BRITTLE FRACTURE PHENOMENA phosphorous (P) present in steels decreases the transition tempera-
The major concern for low-temperature vessels is brittle-frac- ture of steel and improves weldability. In general, steel-transition
ture phenomenon, which can be a cause for vessel failure. Many temperature is a function of carbon content percent plus 20 times
metals loose their ductility and toughness; they become suscep- the percentage of phosphorous. Furthermore, adding nickel to
tible to brittle fracture as the metal temperature decreases. At nor- steel can increase steel toughness and decrease its transition tem-
mal or higher temperatures, a warning is normally given by plastic perature. Stainless steel 304 with 8% nickel can resist impact loads
deformation (bulging, stretching or leaking) as signs of potential at –320°F. Furthermore, sufficiently low carbon equivalents con-
vessel failure. However, under low-temperature conditions, no tribute to the weldability of the material (reducing hardness and
such warnings of plastic deformation are given. Unfortunately, cold-cracking susceptibility) and, thus, making metal crack-free
an abrupt fracture can cause a catastrophic event. girth welds.4 Selecting the appropriate welding material also is a
Only materials that have been impact tested to ensure metal determining factor to ensure a crack-free weld.3
toughness at or above a specified metal temperature should be • Steel structure. A correlation was developed between steel
used. However, certain paragraphs in the ASME Pressure Vessel structure (microstructure and grain size) and fracture-tough-
Code applying to low-temperature vessels indicate when impact ness by numerous fracture toughness tests at different low tem-
testing may not be required for a pressure-vessel component mate- peratures. Based on this correlation, steels with coarse-grained
rial (impact test exemptions). In general, four main factors, in microstructures have lower toughness at low temperatures as
combination, can cause brittle fracture of steel vessels. These factors compared to steels with the fine-grained microstructure. During
are represented in the form of “brittle fracture square” as shown in an 1999 incidence with a high-density polyethylene (HDPE)
Fig. 5. The factors that contribute to the brittle fracture of carbon reactor, a brittle fracture occurred at a temperature of –12°C in
or low-alloy steel pressure vessels are reviewed briefly here: a 24-in. flange of ASTM A105 material that had a coarse-grain
microstructure (ASTM grain size number 5 to 6 ferrite-pearlite
Low temperature. A metal depending on its toughness prop- microstructure ).1a
erty has a transition temperature range within which it is in a semi-
brittle condition (ductile to brittle transition). Within this range, a 0
notch or crack may cause brittle fracture (notch brittleness). Above
the transition range (warmer), brittle fracture will not happen even LMT
if a notch exists. Below the transition range (colder), brittle fracture -10 MAT
can happen even though no notches or cracks may exist.3 Although
the transition from ductile to brittle fracture actually occurs over
Temperature, °C
• Hydrogen cracks (hydrogen-induced cracks or so-called There are various techniques to prevent hydrogen cracks,
flakes). When hydrogen atoms diffuse into the metal during including appropriate heat treatments or slow cooling after forg-
material manufacturing operations such as forming, forging and ing, in which the hydrogen within the metal diffuses out. In the
welding or when hydrogen is introduced to the metal through a case of welding, usually pre-heating and post-heating are applied to
galvanic or hydrogen sulfide (H2S) corrosion process, the metal diffuse out the hydrogen and to prevent any cracks and brittleness.
is prone to hydrogen cracks. • Environmental stress fracture. Steels exposed to corro-
sive fluids such as wet H2S, moist air or
sea water are prone to premature fracture
Perform auto- Implement “Control
refrigeration simulation of Operation” under tensile stresses, considerably below
their “fracture toughness” threshold. Suit-
able steel materials should be used when
Select (or reselect) Fabricate vessel, Yes Are material No exposure to corrosive fluids is possible.
materials, and design applying relevant requirements
vessel considering “PE” PEs measures satisfied ?
Crack/stress risers. Steel vessels with
thicker walls have a greater probability
Determine MAT and
LMT envelope potential for brittle fracture due to the larger
thermal gradient across the wall thickness.
Examine/inspect materials Thicker metal walls can result in differen-
specification/quality versus
Compare LMT with MAT required specifications tial expansion of material across the wall
thickness and could possibly lead to a crack
occurrence and eventually brittle fracture.
Stress raisers such as sharp or abrupt
No Is LMT< Yes Order materials applying transitions or changes of sections, cor-
MAT ? relevant PE's measures ners or notches (as may be found in weld
Nomenclature
LMT Lowest metal temperature defects) as a result of design or fabrica-
MAT Metal allowable temperature
PE Proactive engineering
tion processes are all stress risers, which
can cause stress intensification. The weak
FIG. 6 Proactive engineering program in designing and manufacturing vessels to avoid points are prone to brittle fracture when
brittle fracture from auto-refrigeration.
other susceptible conditions exist.
KPE
Select 159 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS
46
I MARCH 2011 HydrocarbonProcessing.com
CORROSION CONTROL SPECIALREPORT
recognized codes.b
• Apply “control of operation” proactively, whenever practical,
(e.g., after a depressurizing to ensure that the vessel metal
temperature is sufficiently warm prior to re-pressurization).
A proactive engineering program, as envisioned in Fig. 6, can
incorporate the listed measures during vessels design, procurement
and
nd Scaling
NOTES
a Research was conducted by the Belgian Institute for Welding Techniques
on pipe flanges made in forged steel complying with ASTM A105. In June
2002, the study produced a series of recommendations for new flanges as well
as flanges already in service.1 The Fundamentals of Corrosion and Scaling
b The beneficial effect of a hydrostatic test is that crack-like flaws located in the for Petroleum and Environmental Engineers
component are blunted resulting in an increase in brittle fracture resistance.6 Price: $195
c Requiring full penetration would minimize any highly localized stresses
(especially at Category C and D joints) that can have deleterious effect on the
vessel’s ability to resist brittle fracture.”2 Corrosion Awareness Video
d Carbon equivalent in terms of welding is a rate of weldability related to Price: $995
different alloying elements including carbon, manganese, chromium,
molybdenum, vanadium, nickel and carbon content, which affect hardness of
e
the steel being welded.
Fracture toughness is an important property of any material for virtually all
design applications; it indicates the ability of a material containing a crack
GULF
P U B L I S H I N G C O M PA N Y
to resist fracture.
f +1-713-520-4426 l +1-800-231-6275
Proper PWHT reduces residual stresses, improves the resistance of the hard
Email: [email protected] I www.GulfPub.com
heat affected zone to environmental cracking, and improves the toughness.
KPE
Select 160 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS
47
refining your profit
Backed by over 50 years of hydroprocessing innovations, UOP offers the best and most advanced solutions
to keep your business one step ahead.
F
or crude-unit overhead systems, pH is the main process region for the corrosion process to begin. Neutralization equa-
parameter that impacts corrosion rates. To control corrosion tions are:
conditions, many operators use various neutralizers at opti- HCl (aq) + NH3 (aq) => NH4Cl (aq)
mum ranges determined by site-specific conditions. A four-year HCl (aq) + RNH2 (aq) => RNH3Cl (aq)
study (2005–2008) was conducted at a Petrobras refinery using One concern for neutralization is the difficulty of controlling
amine-blend solutions to control pH. Over this period, corrosion the ammonia or amine flowrates, which depend on the varying
rates were measured through ultrasonic inspections and weight- HCl levels in the CDU. The neutralizer injection levels can be
loss coupons. Important process parameters monitored included: too low and the pH in the overhead can drop. Excess neutral-
• pH, chloride and iron concentrations at the bottom of the izer levels, especially in the presence of hydrogen sulfide (H2S),
overhead drum contribute to precipitation of salts, such as ammonia or amine
• Neutralizer and inhibitor flowrates. disulfides or chlorides. Once formed, these salts (molten or solid)
A qualitative comparison was done with two refineries, using deposit on pipe surfaces, likewise, they can cause localized cor-
two other neutralizers: sour water from fluid catalytic cracking rosion with a high rate of thickness loss. If salt formation occurs
(FCC) unit and an ammonium aqueous solution. This investiga- after condensation, then its dissolution into water represents
tion proved that maintaining a low chloride level and stable pH minimal corrosion risk.2
levels were the most effective ways to control equipment damage In this article, some field results are presented, including chem-
from corrosion. Also, the study found that several inspection ical analysis, pH and corrosion rate for a CDU tower overhead. A
techniques were particularly useful in estimating service life qualitative comparison was conducted investigating the different
for pipes and other crude-unit equipment. Applying better pH ways to control corrosion, as listed in Table 1.
control and improved monitoring and inspection programs can
reduce equipment damage from corrosion. Field data. At Refinery A, the observed corrosion rates in pipes,
heat exchangers and accumulator drum, were obtained from
Background. Hydrocarbon-processing companies follow dif- thickness measuring via ultrasonic testing. Corrosion rates reached
ferent methods in controlling crude distillation unit (CDU) values of 0.15 mm/yr. The heat exchanger tubes presented an
overhead corrosion. Common approaches include inhibitors average service life of only seven years, and corrosion deposits
to neutralize acid solutions. Even with a good control on crude were found in baffle-plate regions. Some thickness loss and stress-
oil in storage tanks and the desalting process, hydrochloric acid corrosion cracking were also reported on the shells of the equip-
(HCl) will still be present at the atmospheric tower overhead and ment, which can be attributed to high H2S levels (2,553 ppm) in
it demands proper chemical treatment. Merrick and Auerbach the neutralizing solution used.
performed a study on 129 different distillation units. From these At Refinery B, high chloride levels, caused by inefficiencies in
studies, it was observed that the average chloride concentration the crude preparation and desalting processes, generated high cor-
was 10 ppm to 30 ppm in accumulator overhead drums.1 Chlo- rosion rates. The average corrosion rate observed by the coupon
rides are generated from some salts contained in the crude oil that weight loss over two years was 0.29 mm/yr. The pipes connecting
is processed in the CDU; thus HCl is formed.
There are three main ways to neutralize acidic aqueous solu- TABLE 1. Refineries and neutralizing solutions used
tions at the CDU overhead; they include injecting: for overhead corrosion control
• Gaseous ammonia (NH3)
• Ammoniac water (NH4OH solution) Refinery Neutralizer for overhead control
• Neutralizing amine solutions. A N1—sour water from FCC unit
Regardless of the neutralization technique applied, the pH is B N2—amine blend, based on MEA
lower than the dew point of water. This adds more challenges in
C N3—ammonium aqueous solution
measuring pH when condensation occurs; this is the preferred
KPE
HYDROCARBON PROCESSING MARCH 2011
I 49
SPECIALREPORT CORROSION CONTROL
the top of the atmospheric tower and condensers have flaws from In 2004, measurements were made on about 70 points before
previous campaigns. Localized under-deposit corrosion in the the condensers. Another 70 points were inspected with the same
lower blank of the condenser shell was observed. technique in pipes after the condensers. The same 140 points
At Refinery C, monitoring results for coupons installed in the were inspected again in 2005. The results allowed defining several
overhead condenser (air cooler), had average corrosion losses of average corrosion rates:
0.16 mm/yr. This reflects a uniform thickness loss expected in • Before the condensers: 0.14 mm/yr
equipment and pipes. But there were failures in pipes caused by • After the condensers: 0.16 mm/yr.
localized under-deposit corrosion. In the air cooler, the average Also, there were high standard deviations in both cases, 0.16
tube service life was five years, and failures were reported immedi- mm/yr before and 0.15 mm/yr after the condensers. The highest
ately after the flow entrance, where condensation begins. rate observed in the first case was 0.63 mm/yr, and the lowest 0.02
mm/yr. After the condensers, the highest rate was equal to 0.61
Thickness measuring. For this study, two regions of the mm/yr and the lowest 0.02 mm/yr.
overhead pipe were selected at Refinery B to conduct thickness Before the condenser, 25 points were measured again in 2008;
measurement via ultrasonic testing. Initially, the testing was sepa- the average corrosion rate (2005–2008) was equal to 0.17 mm/
rated into two areas: yr. The data from the corrosion coupons indicated an average rate
• Overhead atmospheric tower and condenser of 0.19 mm/yr in the same period.
• Between the condenser and accumulator drum. In December 2008 and June 2009, five points were measured
Different behaviors are expected from the pipes carrying in random areas of the pipes before the condensers, resulting in an
the fluid before the condenser in the vapor phase (by design), average corrosion rate equal to 0.21 mm/yr. In the same period,
then after, where the water is already in liquid phase. Thus, the some corrosion coupons were analyzed monthly, positioned on
observed corrosion rates were different, as shown in Fig. 1. the inlet connections of overhead condensers; these coupons had
The locations for thickness measurement are always chosen an average corrosion rate equal to 0.28 mm/yr.
based on the experience of the inspection team supervising the
unit and the measurements usually apply these aspects: Process data. For Refinery B, the study was expanded to
• In the curves, the corrosion rates may be higher due to an include how operating conditions had contributed to equipment
increased propensity for the occurrence of corrosion associated deterioration. For example, in 2007, some studies researched the
with erosion. impact from the chloride content variations in the feed at the pre-
• Regions of encounter between two pipes, in the form of “T,” flash tower overhead, while the corrosion rates were measured by
are also preferred regions for erosion. coupons. Due to the ineffectiveness of desalting, there was a direct
• In the straight sections, fewer points are selected, which are influence on the corrosive process in the overhead system, as is
expected to be representative of the system. illustrated in Table 2. During these periods, electrical problems
caused transformer problems that affected the inner electrodes to
TABLE 2. Relationship between problems in the desalting drums. Poor desalting of the crude led to chloride
desalination and corrosion rates in the overhead levels above 1,000 ppm in the overhead accumulator drum. Also,
atmospheric tower system pH was affected, reaching values approximately 4. Weight-loss
coupons were installed in the inlet connections of the atmospheric
Period analysis, Desalting stopped, Corrosion rate, overhead condensers.
(Year–2007) Time–hours mm/yr To improve desalter efficiency at full operating conditions,
1 2/13–4/20 24 0.359 more tests were made by adjusting the differential pressure of the
2 4/30–5/29 0 0.073 mixer valve. Usually covered with ΔP = 1 kgf/cm², this value was
3 5/29–6/28 0 0.086 increased by 0.2 kg/cm². Result: Without any other changes in
4 8/1–9/3 0 0.014
operating parameters, a reduction of 44% in the chloride content
in the accumulator drum was obtained.
5 9/3–11/13 4 0.259
In the overhead atmospheric system, pH, chloride, iron and
6 11/13–12/21 5 0.220 corrosion rates were monitored by weight-loss coupons. Fig. 2
shows the historic data of pH values measured in the accumulator
drum since 2008. The figure shows the mean values and standard
Before After
condenser condenser
Corrosion inhibitor
9
Neutralizer
system-Refinery B
pH of atmospheric
Overhead
condenser 6
Accumulator
drum 3
Aug/08
Jan/08
Feb/08
Mar/08
Jun/08
Jul/08
Oct/08
Nov/08
Dec/08
tower
Time
FIG. 1 CDU showing locations identified for thickness monitoring FIG. 2 Historic data of pH values in the overhead accumulator
by ultrasonic testing. drum of the atmospheric tower for refinery B.
KPE
50
I MARCH 2011 HydrocarbonProcessing.com
CORROSION CONTROL SPECIALREPORT
deviations for measurements over each month, except May and The mass balance at the tower overhead is shown in Fig. 7. It
September, when there were no analysis reports. is known that the chloride content measured in the top accumu-
It is observed that the average pH over the years has always lator is directly linked to the presence of HC1 formed from the
been very close to or within the recommended range. But the high hydrolysis of salts present in the feed. Thus, it is possible to set
standard deviations showed a lack of control during some periods. base values for neutralizing agent flowrates. From the condensate
There were some incidents in January in which a pH reaching 1.5 analysis in the overhead drum, several periods were selected in
was observed and adjusted to 3 on the same day and recovered to which the chloride content was close to 100 ppm, or 50% of
a pH = 6 on the next day. On two days, the pH reached 4. The this, 50 ppm. On the same dates, the average flowrates of the
higher standard deviation observed in this month contributed neutralizing solution and pH were recorded, as listed in Table 3.
significantly to increased corrosion rates. With the pH near the equivalence point, if we consider only
Fig. 3 shows the measured chlorine values in the same drum. the presence of HCl, neutralizer and water, the result is salt for-
The target is 40 ppm as the maximum, which can only be guar- mation, N2Cl, which dissociates. We can determine the resulting
anteed with efficient control in crude preparation at the storage pH; the reactions are:3
tanks and desalter. N2Cl j N2+ + Cl- (1)
It is observed that the values remained above the recommended N2+ + H2O = N2OH + H+ (2)
targets throughout the year, showing deficiency in the early stages From the salt concentration, it is possible to determine the
of crude processing. As an immediate consequence, we can expect expected pH:
greater usage of neutralizers and corrosion inhibitors. What is not K [N 2OH ]×[H + ] [H + ]2
always sufficient to maintain is the appropriate pH and low cor- Ka = w = = = 5.6×10−5
Kb [N 2+ ] [N 2+ ]
rosion rates over slack periods, as observed in January (average of
108.96 ppm chloride). As Ka is very low, the salt concentration Cs = [N2+]:
The iron level in the water was also monitored. Iron can be
another indicator of corrosion in the overhead system. In Fig. 4,
the measurements from 2008 are shown; conditions exceeded 4
atmospheric system
Iron concentration
the maximum value of 1 ppm over the year. Also, we can observe
Refinery B, ppm
3
that the iron content was below the recommended limit 4 of the
10 months evaluated. These results vary greatly over the month, 2
with standard deviations above the mean values; the data is not 1
included in Fig. 4. Intakes of neutralizing solutions and corrosion
inhibitors also represent relevant data on analyzing control param- 0
Jan/08
Jun/08
Jul/08
Feb/08
Mar/08
Apr/08
Aug/08
Oct/08
Nov/08
Dec/08
eters in the overhead system. Figs. 5 and 6 show the injection rates
for neutralizers and inhibitors for Refinery B in 2008.
FIG. 4 Historic data of iron values in the overhead accumulator
drum of the atmospheric tower for Refinery B.
TABLE 3. Relationship between levels of chloride
neutralizer flow (N2) and pH analyzed in the condensate
from the overhead drum—Refinery B 150
Neutralizer injection, l/d
Aug/08
Jan/08
Feb/08
Mar/08
May/08
Jun/08
Jul/08
Sept/08
Oct/08
Nov/08
Dec/08
D5 97 115.2 7.1
D6 100 43.2 5.1
D7 100 115.2 6.8
FIG. 5 Historic data of neutralizer amine flowrates at overhead
D8 103 80.6 5.3 pipe in the atmospheric tower for Refinery B.
200 50
of atmospheric system
Chloride concentration
40
Refinery B, ppm
150
30
100
20
50
10
0 0
Jan/08
Jun/08
Jul/08
Feb/08
Mar/08
Apr/08
Aug/08
Oct/08
Nov/08
Dec/08
Apr/08
Aug/08
Jan/08
Feb/08
Mar/08
May/08
Jun/08
Jul/08
Sept/08
Oct/08
Nov/08
Dec/08
FIG. 3 Historic data of chloride values in the overhead FIG. 6 Historic data of inhibitor flowrates at overhead pipe in the
accumulator drum of the atmospheric tower for Refinery B. atmospheric tower for Refinery B.
KPE
HYDROCARBON PROCESSING MARCH 2011
I 51
SPECIALREPORT CORROSION CONTROL
0.70
0.60 in equilibrium condition, the steam is fully condensed, and the
0.50 final concentration of the liquid is reached. In Refinery C, this
0.40
0.30
0.20 TABLE 4. Relationship between levels of chloride
0.10
0.00 neutralizer flow (N2) and pH analyzed in the condensate
Nov-04
Dec-04
Jan-05
Feb-05
Mar-05
Apr-05
May-05
Jun-05
Jul-05
Aug-05
Sept-05
Oct-05
Nov-05
Dec-05
Jan-06
Feb-06
Mar-06
Apr-06
May-06
Jun-06
Jul-06
Aug-06
Sept-06
Oct-06
Nov-06
Concentration, Concentration,
Atmospheric tower Day Flowrate, l/d CS (molar) pH, mean CS (molar)
Corrosion rate, mm/yr
0.70
0.60 D1 115.2 0.000017 7.1 0.000016
0.50
0.40 D2 43.2 0.002754 6. 0.000006
0.30
0.20 D3 11.5 0.000002 7.6 0.000002
0.10
0.00 D4 115.2 0.000017 7.1 0.000016
Apr/07
May/07
Jun/07
Jul/07
Aug/07
Sept/07
Oct/07
Nov/07
Dec/07
Jan/08
Feb/08
Mar/08
Apr/08
May/08
Jun/08
Jul/08
Aug/08
Sept/08
Oct/08
Nov/08
Dec/08
Jan/09
Feb/09
Mar/09
Apr/09
May/09
control, the measured consumption was 120 l/d. We can conclude Conclusions. Among the available neutralizing solutions,
that the predicted flowrate for the neutralizing solution can be a refiners should use the one that provides the best efficiency,
guide for the process, but only constant pH monitoring (preferably coupled with the cost benefit for each unit, while considering
online) can promote adequate control for amine injection. environmental aspects from waste generation and final treat-
Corrosion rates are directly proportional to pH. Accord- ment. There are pros and cons associated with each neutral-
ingly, field monitoring uses weight-loss coupons to validate the izer.10 The results showed that the type of neutralizer used on
quality of process parameters control. At Refinery B, measure- the CDU atmospheric tower overhead was not the determining
ments were made from 2004 until early 2009, when only 45% of factor in minimizing corrosion. Only a good control of process
cases were below the limit—0.125 mm/yr. Throughout 2008, the parameters, especially the desalting efficiency (low chloride level
weight loss was framed in only 30% of the months monitored. at the overhead accumulator drum), can increase equipment
Comparing these results with inspections by thickness measure- service life. We can also establish a direct relationship between
ment, we realized that the difference between the rates obtained the historic data of the process parameters (chloride level, pH,
with both techniques was short only at the second decimal num- temperature and pressure) and the expected thickness loss of the
ber, as shown in Table 7. equipment and pipes.
This study listed a number of results available in many CDUs. Monitoring weight-loss coupons is essential to validate the
But the relationship between them can generate even more support quality of the process parameters’ control. At Refinery B, the rates
for inspection teams that manage equipment integrity. From the obtained with the coupons were compared to results from inspec-
temperature (T) and pressure (P) in the overhead pipe, it is pos- tions by ultrasonic thickness measurement, where only a small
sible to estimate if water vapor and its components reach the dew difference in the second decimal number (0.02 mm to 0.07 mm)
point before the condenser. The pH measured in the accumulator was observed. With these low rates and constant monitoring,
drum indicates how the developed corrosive process will progress the likelihood of failure is minimized, and it becomes possible to
throughout the system. The chloride content, which is directly predict damage to equipment and avoid unplanned shutdowns
related to the flowrate of the neutralizer, also increases corrosion due to equipment failures by corrosion.
at high values, even if the pH is controlled. Injecting inhibitors Plant results and literature data indicate that there is an opti-
can reduce corrosion rates but not with the same intensity as pH mal pH control range for the CDU overhead system. The main
adjustments. Thus, we must work to meet the primary objective process parameter, defined in terms of two main corrosion mecha-
of the refinery integrity program: to reduce unplanned shutdowns, nisms are:
identify root causes for corrosion degradation of equipment and • At low pH (pH below 5.5) the HCl causes severe corrosion
ultimately develop a good corrosion monitoring program.9 in the mild steel
• At high pH (pH above 6.5), due to the presence of H2S,
there is an increase in the uniform corrosion rate due to the break-
down of the iron sulfide layer, and localized corrosion under
deposit is also more likely to occur because of the salts formed.
For each system, an optimal range should be specified. It
will depend on the chemical composition of the final solution
obtained in the accumulator drum. It is important to note that
pH stability is dependent on system automation. More reliable
online information enables low deviations if there is an instru-
mented injection control fed by online pH measurement. HP
LITERATURE CITED
1 Merrick, R. D. and T. Auerbach, “Crude unit overhead corrosion control,”
Materials Performance, September 1983, p. 15.
2 Couper, A. S. “Bothered by corrosion of your crude-unit condensers?,” Oil &
KPE
Select 162 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS
54
TURNAROUND AND
MAINTENANCE
2011
Special Supplement to
CONTENTS
How would you rate leadership of your capital projects? T–57
What are the “magnificent seven” elements to successfully pick a contractor? T–60
Corporate Profiles
Cooper Crouse-Hinds T–56 AltairStrickland T–63 Curtiss Wright Flow Control T–65 Dunn Heat Exchangers T–67
Microtherm T–69 Rentech Boiler Services T–71 Dollinger Filtration T–73 Voith T–74
Cover Photo: Suncor Plant in Edmonton, Alberta. The curtain material were utilized to shield workers from the environment
and enclose maintenance activities. Photo courtesy of HiTemp Products. www.hitemp.ca
KPE
CORPORATE PROFILE: COOPER CROUSE-HINDS GMBH
TURNAROUND AND MAINTENANCE 2011
Maintenance
Headline equipment for hazardous
areas
(2 lines)
improves efficiency and safety
Servicing and maintenance in hazardous areas can
be time-consuming and costly, particularly if engi-
neers are not provided with the right tools to carry
out the job quickly and safely
Enhancing Safety
&
Productivity
www.coopercrouse-hinds.eu
KPE
T-56
I TURNAROUND AND MAINTENANCE 2011 Select 165 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS SPONSORED CONTENT
TURNAROUND AND MAINTENANCE 2011
To achieve substantially improved benchmarks in lence. World-class clients and industry-leading senior managers of FEL and EPC
project performance, profound change is needed projects periodically assess remaining project vulnerability (to cost, schedules and
productivity over-runs). These assessments identify the value gained by improv-
Recently, in a major oil company, a team of senior project managers and value ing current work processes and procedures through management by lean work
improving practices experts assessed the impact of implementing lean methods process standards. Sometimes called norms, their development and use provide
during front-end-loading (FEL) and concluded that both total-in-place cost (TIC) and a promising opportunity to take FEL and EPC project performance and reliability
schedule would improve by at least 10% (see Fig. 1). The company’s vice president to the next level.
(VP) approved two pilot projects, with high priority; however, they failed to over-
come middle management resistance to change, stalling their recommendations Creating a foundation of sustained excellence. What
and approvals before actual piloting. separates a good project from a poorly executed one? Some factors include:
Under director level leadership, a major engineering department (approximately • Sub-task level work process standards depict engineering and management
1,500 engineers) evaluated the engineering-lean potential to increase throughput expectations regarding the specifics of what will be done, how, by whom and in
at about 25% with corresponding project cost reduction. Under pressure from the Two line caption
what sequence to achieve desired measurable results during actual circumstances
team’s lean recommendation and client dissatisfaction, the VP of engineering said, faced by employees.
“We recognize the value, but we have a lot of things on our plate right now. We • Lean work process standards are derived with performance measures estab-
think you are about a year ahead of when we can do this.”The VP of engineering lished to provide just what is needed for those doing the job to consistently enable
had been personally responsible for most of the systems currently in use. In the face best practice. Subdividing tasks (e.g., sub-task size to a single deliverable) must be
of overwhelming evidence presented by his team investigating lean, he could not sufficient to assure each sub-task-lead has everything they need to start, execute
deny the benefits, so, he did the next worst thing: admitted the need, but delayed and deliver what is needed without ever stopping. Sub-task sequencing extends
implementation, after all, the clients keep paying the bills. Although resistance was the planning to include all active sub-tasks in the current week to four-week
natural, the lack of executive leadership was also evident and a profound disap- execution window.
pointment to the team. • Lean management by standards requires both policy deployment (calling
Under the author’s guidance, foremen and construction managers at a major for commitment to the standards by the leadership responsible to execute them)
engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) contractor site, quantified the and actual progress of each active task at the workface to be visible to manage-
impact of and opportunity for construction-lean (see partial results in Fig. 2). The ment. If any standard does not cause the right things to happen, consistently and
EPC team proceeded to improve many things within their control; then, they solic- reliably, then it is not considered lean. The team must improve: the standard, and/
ited the client to achieve the really profound savings through improved planning or the standard’s deployment policy, and/or workface progress visibility, until the
during design. The issue involved the EPC aligning seven chemical plant operating right things happen.
divisions during FEL to improve reliability. It is now evident that the team should perform nearly everything in engineering,
The Client declined involvement in the face of profound opportunity to improve construction and business according to the best work process standards or their
the root cause of poor planning—i.e., late client information and changes. Client equivalent by some other name (e.g., norms). Teams should define standards jointly,
leadership-of-change among the seven divisions was lacking. Client middle man- led by those who are responsible to manage and must include those who perform
agers resisted the necessary alignment—although senior management was crying inside the company or within their supply and subcontracting chain.
from the profound losses. Short of doing all the work themselves, standards are, in fact, the best way that
Our recently published handbook1 presents many examples of substantial engineering discipline leads or management at each level can effectively assure
improvements and serious root causes in recent multi-bil-
lion dollar losses and explains the processes that created
ERA
the improvements and could have prevented the losses. Traditional project
The authors’ bring the reader a rapid improvement Design
Bid
their team understands and implements their ideals, principles and expectations. for balanced progress of every available workface, management eliminates sub-
Lean standards at the work process (e.g., sub-task) level constitute the foundation stantial remaining risk and chaos within able and diligent teams that are trying to
level extension of corporate governance into the workface. figure out how to most effectively perform. The content of standards, their sequence
The workface is where the team can add or manipulate information or material and transparency become the basis upon which teams evaluate performance and
to add value. During project design, it is where the team assimilates information, derive further improvements.
makes calculations or decisions, renders drawings and writes program code or Lessons learned for safety, quality, productivity, constructability, maintainability,
specifications. During manufacturing or construction, it is where the team adds, environmental improvements, etc., are institutionalized quickly by building them
cuts away, alters or assembles material to add value. The team should consider the into sub-task level standards. Management and engineering skill and stakeholders
following as wasting resources: most contributory work (see examples in Fig. 2), build their experience, e.g., what they know about how to avoid problems, into
idleness or rework (in engineering, fabrication or construction), and any available the standards and expect them to be executed and improved. Teams are more
workface that is not fully utilized. Teams can reduce or eliminate these sources of effective and confident when operating within established standards and being
waste by further application of lean principles2 and tools.3 evaluated accordingly. Team trust and morale improves when these systems are
An available workface is where the team can productively perform design, in place. Management’s expectation that teams will anticipate problems before
manufacturing or construction without such work rendering any other work they happen and improve the standards they use while executing them enables
less than fully productive. The establishment of lean work process standards, continuous improvement.
policy of use and systems that provide transparency to achieve aligned progress If, notwithstanding the team’s best efforts, circumstances prevent performance
of value added work at every available workface, profoundly benefits cost and at the standards, then employees are generally expected to halt execution and seek
performance reliability. immediate reevaluation of the standard and its content, sequence or transpar-
ency improvement by applicable skill and stakeholders. The benefits of employee
Benefits—reliable best practice performance. Tradi- empowerment to do so are similar to those experienced by authorization to halt
tional project planning and management systems harness considerable control of work that an employee considers unsafe. Employees know halting the workflow
risks and associated chaos that would otherwise exist. By establishing management is extremely expensive, and ownership of standards they use coupled with man-
by lean work process standards, aligned with a sequence and system, transparent4 agement trust and dependent peers’ visible expectations, will motivate them to
anticipate problems and eliminate them before they happen. All the universal
performance measures and their reliability are profoundly improved: 1) safety, 2)
Non-contributory, waiting and quality, 3) productivity, 4) cost, 5) schedule, 6) environmental protection, and 7)
non-value added work 25.2% employee morale.
Effective setup 13.5%
Direct Dismantle, 1.9% Current opportunity, senior resource leveraging. In
value Fabrication and an industry strained for expertise and experience, standards can close the perfor-
added pre-assembly, 5.8%
mance gap quickly between ambitious young engineers or managers and their
work Excavating and
35.8% backfilling, 2.8% highly experienced senior peers. The sub-task level standards enable reasonably
Final assembly, 11.4% trained and experienced employees to quickly come up to performance at best
Placing, 0.4% practice. Managers who have built what they know and expect into standards for
Contributory work 39% about 90% of what their subordinates do, can use transparent systems to more
Safety work, 3.8%
Rigging and flagging, 1.3% effectively manage many more people than they can with conventional oversight.
Non-contributory, waiting and Inspection and testing, 0.5%
non-value added work 25.2% A broad, flat and highly effective management structure emerges for reliably
Material and equipment
loading, unloading and achieving best practice. Corporate knowledge and experience are captured in the
storage, 1.6% standards and made available when and where they are needed—not lost by
Clean up, 3.2%
Contributory
Maintenance and
repair, 1.0% It is senior management’s fiduciary responsibility to their clients, sharehold-
Personal time, 1.3% ers and employees to recognize any project vulnerability resulting from current
Move self, 8.9%
Move tools and policies and procedures. They must become experts themselves or engage a lean
materials, 14.8% subject matter expert to quantify the benefits of establishing lean standards at
Direct value added Locating and the work-process level, together with visible workface optimization planning. With
work 35.8% positioning, 2.2%
Holding materials or this evidence, senior managers resource the work process standard development
equipment, 0.4% function at the workface then set the example by deriving lean work process
Contributory work 39% standards in support of the workface, with their middle managers at every level.
Idle – crew balance, 6.2%
Non-contributory,waiting and
non-value added work 25.2%
Idle – interference, 2.6% Each must assure agendas include time (about 5%) for reflection on how to
Idle – talk, 0.4% eliminate the source of problems, and build what it will take to prevent problems
Idle – over manning, 2.5%
Idle – late start or early into the standards.
quit, 3.2% Consider what is wrong with the recent response of a well-compensated oil
Idle – discretionary, 3.2% and gas company executive to a well-evidenced lean introduction. “If we hire a lean
Idle – institutionalized consultant, he is going to expect us to do the right things, not just look good, and
standby, 4.2%
Ineffective work, 1.5% that is going to be a whole lot of work. As long as projects continue to go more
Direct value added
work 35.8% Rework, 1.5% or less as they have before, we’re just fine. If not, we are victims of circumstance
and not responsible.”
FIG. 2. Partial results of workface sampling during chemical plant While few will argue against experience being the best teacher, it is usually
construction, Jan. 14–24, 2008. the most expensive. Knowledgeable stockholders cringe and clients’ satisfaction
KPE
T-58
I TURNAROUND AND MAINTENANCE 2011 HydrocarbonProcessing.com
TURNAROUND AND MAINTENANCE 2011
KPE
HYDROCARBON PROCESSING TURNAROUND AND MAINTENANCE 2011
I T-59
TURNAROUND AND MAINTENANCE 2011
Valuable pointers help industrial plant managers the contractor to provide a list of the potential workers and request their job his-
minimize downtime, maintain quality and safety tory. If not available, think twice.
to improve operations
3. Right equipment for the job. Often underestimated, the
At some point in time, every industrial plant must bring in an outside contractor painful truth is that inappropriate or underperforming equipment can greatly
to do specialized work such as boiler blasting, concrete waterproofing and ceiling increase the time to complete a project. Conversely, a contractor can actually bring
painting that in-house manpower cannot perform on a cost-effective basis. Such about a cost savings for plant management, and return the plant to full operation
an option makes sense, in that many industrial operations do not enjoy the luxury quicker, if proper equipment is selected with forethought and applicability to the
of reassigning staff to do labor-intensive work that requires additional training. specific project.
Nor does facility management have at their ready disposal the unique equipment When tackling a critical project such as applying a coating of epoxy novolac to
required to perform major maintenance or upgrade projects. the inside of a 300-ft diameter storage tank, contractors should be willing to go
However, the greater challenge lies not in deciding whether or not to call in through the trouble of bringing in portable air conditioners, or heaters depending
outside help, but rather, determining which contractor is best able to do the job on the time of year, to manage the environment within the tank. This controls the
Two line caption
on time, within budget, with the best outcome and the least lapses in safety. With humidity and prevents premature rusting of exposed metal before the coating goes
the right selection, an outside contractor can act as an ongoing partner to help on. Without such precaution, unanticipated coating failure could develop. At the
plant managers and facility engineers lower costs and add value over the long run. same time, the controlled environment allows workers to continue spraying 24
hours a day instead of just 8. The job gets finished in one-third of the time, so, the
1. Precise planning. The need to run at 100% production levels at all tank can get put back online sooner.
times heads the priority list at most every processing facilities. Downtime for main- Even something as simple as ready access to the equipment and tools can
tenance or upgrades equates with an interruption in revenue stream. In defense, make a difference in the timeline. For example, one informal time/motion study
the best way to avoid having any outside work halt the process is to ensure that the revealed that the average mechanic spends an hour and five minutes each day
contractor provides a precise, highly detailed plan of the project work in advance. looking for tools. Ask to see photographs of the contractor’s equipment and tool
If a contractor can’t tell you how he’s going to do that job, and lay it out in an trucks. If you see a gang box filled with a bunch of tools that guys have to dig
organized, detailed, step-by-step fashion, then you shouldn’t hire him. through to find what they need, then that disorganization can lead to cost overruns.
If you can’t build it on paper, then you can’t build it in reality. For example,
by using “critical path method scheduling” (which incorporates close to 30 items 4. Safe work practices. Safety can never be compromised for the
and covers the scope of work, the crew, specifications, safety checks, tasks broken sake of speed. If anything, a serious accident can stop a project in its tracks and
down by each different craft and a complete timeline from start to finish) a project immediately place a project budget in peril. Checking a contractor’s commitment
schedule should be provided to the plant manager well in advance of any work. to safety begins at the top.
Headline
The mechanics will do whatever the supervisor lets them do. If the foreman
allows the workers to stand on a ladder without a safety belt, they will do it. So,
supervisors should attend process safety management training classes so that they
customer is crucial. The customer should receive three separate reports at the end
of each day, each one covering construction overview, safety and quality.
(2 lines)
will set the right tone. Once a project begins, conditions should be constantly moni-
tored, and safety inspections are conducted weekly by the operations manager.
A contractor’s membership in the American Society of Safety Engineers
7. A willingness to partner for the long run. An index of
suspicion should rise when a contractor appears anxious to take the money and run.
Some eventually declare bankruptcy, leaving plant management with no recourse
also indicates a commitment to reducing injuries. Additionally, the prospective if anything goes wrong. Look for a contractor who is willing to maintain an onsite
contractor should be able to demonstrate site-specific training of its employees. presence well after completion of the scheduled work. Even beyond that, added
Examples include training in fall protection, respiratory protection, hazard- value stems from a contractor who is willing to act as a resource for long-term
ous waste handling, Mine Safety and Health Administration procedures, and a maintenance planning. Such partnerships actually free up the plant’s workforce to
confined-space program. concentrate on more immediate needs.
Plant foreman can benefit from permanently delegating some of their technical
5. Access to spare parts and equipment for unfore- services to a contractor with expertise in their respective fields. A supplemental
seen circumstances. Every product manufacturer understands the need part of some contractors’ businesses is to develop specifications and procedures
for a “second-source” supplier. It should be no different for contractors who show to reduce rework and extend service life. Many foremen stay on at a given site
up to do critical work at a plant. The contractor must outline a systematic process to provide such services as corrosion surveys, failure analyses, computerized
to acquire spare parts on an urgent basis when the “inevitable” emergency occurs. maintenance painting programs, industrial cleaning, fireproofing and OSHA pipe
You have to have “Plan B” as well as “Plan C”. To be on the safe side, the labeling and safety-sign surveys, which can prove to be very valuable services for
contractor should have duplicate pieces of machinery at the ready so if a part most plants. Ultimately, enlisting the help of a proven contractor on a year-round
breaks, it won’t halt the work. For example, when working on a tight timeline for basis allows processors and manufacturers to keep their own staff focused on the
a project, it’s a good idea to ship backup equipment to the site. It may just sit there core competency of the organization. HP
as a backup and never be used, but the expense is well worth the peace of mind. Two line caption
Michael McMahon is president of Coating Systems, Inc. (CSI), Savannah,
6. Constant communication with plant management. Georgia. CSI is a SSPC QP1-certified specialty maintenance contractor that provides
a full range of industrial painting and protective coating services for power plants,
Upon completion of a project, few plant managers like surprises such as unex- transmission pipeline companies, petrochemical plants and chemical processing
pected, expensive change orders or up-scoping. A conscientious contractor must companies. Its clients include Shell, DuPont, Proctor & Gamble, Kimberly Clark, Olin
be willing to provide project reports up-front and on a daily basis. Clarity with the Chemical, and Colonial Pipeline Co.
KPE
Select 163 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS
TURNAROUND AND MAINTENANCE 2011
I 61
KPE
Select 97 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS
CORPORATE PROFILE: ALTAIRSTRICKLAND
TURNAROUND AND MAINTENANCE 2011
Dunn operates its own fleet of specially designed tractor- Dunn’s 5 shell side cleaning bays and 7 tube side
trailers to provide fully covered, drip-pan containment of cleaning bays allows our hydro cleaning facility to
equipment for safe transportation. simultaneously clean 12 heat exchangers.
Dunn’s licensed
l d Bake-Out-Oven
k thermally
h ll decomposes
d Dunn offers a service to help you with decommission
product residue while maintaining equipment integrity. and disposal of your “out of service” obsolete
Dunn meets or exceeds all EPA standards for liquid and equipment. This turnkey service includes safe transport,
solid waste treatment & disposal. dismantling and cleaning of equipment that is no longer
required for plant operations.
Dunn is a fully
f ll certified
fi d ASME code
d ffacility
l offering
ff both
b h repair and
d new fabrication
f b services.
Contact Dunn today to discuss your plant requirements and how you can benefit by using the many services provided
by Dunn Heat Exchangers. Visit us at www.dunnheat.com.
281-337-1222 409-948-1704
KPE
Select 59 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS
CORPORATE PROFILE: DUNN HEAT EXCHANGERS, INC.
TURNAROUND AND MAINTENANCE 2011
Critical Path
Performance = Success
In the early 60’s Dunn recognized a need for off-site Heat Exchanger Service
for the local Petro-Chemical plants. That idea that has grown from a shop of just
over 6,000 square feet serving 2 to 3 local plants, to a thriving business serving
more than 120 customers in 3 countries.
Since 1968, Dunn Heat Exchangers, Inc. has worked hard to become one of operations.
the largest Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger Service companies. Serving clients Dunn owns and operates a fleet of tractor trailers for pickup and delivery of
needs throughout the United States, Canada and Mexico. Dunn specializes in your equipment. These trucks are specifically designed, totally enclosed flatbed
cleaning, repair, design, and fabrication of Shell and Tube Heat Exchangers and trailers, for safe transit of your equipment.
unfired pressure vessels. Dunn’s on site waste water treatment facility meets or exceeds all EPA stan-
With better than 150,000 square feet of covered workspace in Texas City, dards and guidelines for liquid and solid waste treatment and disposal.
Texas, Dunn is capable of handling your largest shutdowns meeting your plan- For additional information contact Dunn Heat Exchangers.
ning requirements, while alleviating turnaround congestion in your plant. Dunn
is available for operation twenty-four hours a day seven days a week.
Dunn’s service facility along with our cleaning capabilities enable us to clean
in excess of 80 tube bundles per week utilizing a variety of processes including
high pressure hydro blasting, sandblast, and thermal baking. Complimented by
an equally capable service facility, your heat exchangers receive the priority treat-
ment when serviced at Dunn Heat Exchangers.
Dunn has built a reputation on prompt service of your heat exchangers. While
unexpected discovery work, seems to expand work scope all too often we are
prepared and equipped to handle that emergency retube, replacement bundle,
component or full replacement exchanger that your needs may dictate.
Dunn’s custom designed Band Saw has a maximum cut of 96 inches and plays
a vital part in our exchanger repair and metal recycling services.
Dunn is a certified “U” and “R” stamp ASME and National Board shop.
Backed by a full machine shop and a qualified staff of welders and machinist we Contact information
are ready to meet you fabrication needs. 410 21st Street South
Dunn now manufactures a full line of tapered tube plugs, stocking carbon Texas City, TX 77590
steel, stainless steel and brass. Special material requirements are manufactured Phone: 409-948-1704
as requested. 281-337-1222
Dunn offers a service to help you with decommission and disposal of your Fax: 409-945-9873
“out of service” obsolete equipment. This turnkey service includes safe transport, Email: [email protected]
dismantling and cleaning of equipment that is no longer required for plant Website: www.dunnheat.com
KPE
SPONSORED CONTENT HYDROCARBON PROCESSING TURNAROUND AND MAINTENANCE 2011
I T-67
When space is limited . . . Microtherm - Truly the Best Performance at High Temperatures
Aerogel
Microtherm is THE choice
for low thermal conductivity Calcium Silicate
insulation in high
Ceramic Fiber
temperature applications.
Mineral Wool
C1676
ASTM Standard
0.000 0.020 0.040 0.060 0.080 0.100 0.120 0.140 0.160
for Microporous
Data Per ASTM
Thermal Conductivity (W/m-K) at 600 °C Mean Testing Standards
1450 °F
Internal
Equivalent Personnel Protection Equivalent Heat Loss
• 3” of Microtherm MPS over 6” NPS • 1 1/4” of Microtherm MPS & Quilt over 6” NPS
• 127 °F Cold Face (11 °F lower) • 187 °F Cold Face
• 228 BTU/ft•hr Heat Loss (51% less) • 451 BTU/ft•hr Heat Loss (3% less)
• Save Space, Weight, & Energy! • Minimize Space and Weight!
www.microthermgroup.com
Microtherm Inc. +1 865 681 0155
Microtherm NV +32 3 760 19 80
Nippon Microtherm +81 3 3377KPE
2821
Select 100 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS
CORPORATE PROFILE: MICROTHERM
TURNAROUND AND MAINTENANCE 2011
RENTECH
Boiler Services, Inc.
Since 1921 Dollinger has stood at the forefront of filtration technology, serving a vast range of industries
around the world with a wide breadth of service and scope of products.
t Air Intake Filter Systems t High Efficiency Filter Panels & Cartridges
- Multistage
t Oil Mist Eliminators
- Pulse Jet [self-cleaning]
- Inertial spin [maintenance free] t Lube Oil Filter Systems
KPE
Select 99 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS
CORPORATE PROFILE: DOLLINGER FILTRATION
TURNAROUND AND MAINTENANCE 2011
Filtering everything…
…that flows through industry
In 1921 Dollinger laid its foundation with the development of the world’s first
air intake filter for the automotive industry. Dollinger built on this success to become
a leader in process filtration technology, serving a diverse range of industries with
contaminant removal for air, gas, and liquid processes.
Today Dollinger is an SPX company and a global provider of engineered prod-
ucts and service solutions. These solutions provide technological advancements to
the process industries striving to achieve higher efficiencies and output, reduce
downtime, energy consumption, and environmental impacts.
Headquartered in Ocala, FL, U.S.A., Dollinger ensures business leaders will
achieve better operational capabilities by tailoring filtration solutions to their
individual needs.
Our leadership in filtration technology is supported by renowned global exper-
tise with engineering offices in Europe, North America, India, Asia, and beyond. Our
customers benefit from international engineering knowledge with a local focus.
Our philosophy began with dedication to supply high-quality products and
continues today with innovation through engineering.
We are available anytime, in emergencies 24 hours, 7 days a week. Via our worldwide service network we are always only a
few steps away. Call us at +49 (0)8321 802-555 on our service portfolio or check at www.bhs-gearbox-service.com
Voith Turbo BHS Getriebe GmbH
Sonthofen / Germany
www.bhs-getriebe.com
KPE
T-74
I TURNAROUND AND MAINTENANCE 2011 Select 166 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS SPONSORED CONTENT
PLANT SAFETY BONUSREPORT
T
he Process Safety Management if an IPL is inadequate, degraded or fails. effective if performed at the wrong time or
(PSM) regulation 29 CFR 1910.119 Undefined hazards also exist and the asso- under stress; thus, errors can be missed. A
was developed in response to a series ciated hazard consequence and likelihood purchase order with a single digit error in a
of major accidents. These same events led are unknown. lengthy model number procures the wrong
to the creation of the safety instrumented material. A person with essential techni-
system (SIS) standard, ANSI/ISA-84.00.01- Project execution. Today’s typical cal knowledge misses a key meeting. An
2004 Part 1 (IEC 61511-1 Mod). Both pro- large-scale engineering projects have major inspector misses an important detail at a
vide a wholistic, lifecycle approach to the teams that interact with many organiza- factory check. Undetected errors can occur
design, operation and maintenance of SIS tions and companies. In a relatively short in the engineering data exchange between
and facilities. Plant safety improves when time, they generate thousands of docu- companies if the data exchange protocols
these programs are implemented, although ments and a thousand-fold increase in are not well defined or managed.
accidents can still occur. project data that resides in many forms, Construction projects have a higher
From studies of major accidents, most formats and systems. This information is number of personnel who work within a
result from the simultaneous occurrence of communicated through many different physically more hazardous environment.
multiple and seemingly minor errors and media. Being a human endeavor, quality Onsite decisions are constant. Items don’t
“incidents” that interact in complex and checkpoints are added at key points. Sched- fit, material cannot be located or a key per-
unforeseen ways. 1 PSM and ANSI/ISA ule compression tends to increase error son in the communication channel is taken
84.00.01 are similar in that both have inter- rates and challenge the quality-check pro- ill. A missed or inaccurate positive material
dependent elements that work together to cess. Compression is common to fast-track check on a case of bulk alloy fittings is not
reduce the likelihood of errors and hazards projects, and can occur with late design detected. If detected, the installed locations
that can contribute to an accident. A failure changes, delayed decisions and extended may be unknown. The transition from
or error in any element becomes the weak approval cycles. Quality checks become less construction to pre-commissioning and
link. This article explores some of the hid-
den errors and conditions that can occur
Ops/maint.
during the SIS or facility life cycle, and req’mts. Fn safety
plan
refers to them as “blind spots.” Examples
of their varied modes and risks are high- LOPA Bypass,
SIS
schematic
report & reset, Standards
lighted. “Red flags” are a common prelude F/U SIF manual definitions
diagrams
to a major accident. As an aid to revealing requirements ESD
SIL & STR targets SIS
blind spots, an awareness of common red architecture
Test & diagnostic & interfaces
flags may be helpful. Examples from major Target SIL & STR req’mts, SIF change
P&IDs,
process
SIL calcs.
accidents are listed. Target test intervals
Vendor reliability data
& studies
to meet SIL
SRS Valve failure mode engr.
“Blind spots” are often recognized as SIS Process response
Equipment, architecture time, trip settings
a significant contributor to a major acci- diagnostics, & loop Validation
standard design
dent. Those discussed here have hid- architecture results Validation SIL calculations
test & inspection
den or unforeseen mechanisms that can Approved vendor list
SIS & SIF
Make &
results
loop Action list, validation status
degrade an SIS or a safety management project design standards design model
SIF design & status, required
program. Independent protection layers Reports diagnostics minimum test
Instr. frequency, auto-generated
(IPLs) applied to reduce risk are methodi- data Design test procedures
cally selected and implemented to reduce sheets req’mts. Application software SRS,
detailed design definition
the probability of hazard occurrence to a
tolerable risk. Typical IPLs include relief FIG. 1 Safety requirements specification (SRS).
valves, alarms and SIS. Accidents can result
KPE
HYDROCARBON PROCESSING MARCH 2011
I 75
BONUSREPORT PLANT SAFETY
startup involves handoffs of many docu- upgrades often have subtle and undocu- as experienced by a stressed individual
ments and status reports—all opportunities mented technical and performance differ- may be significantly longer than perceived.
for missed information. ences. Implementing a change before it is When presented with a problem, humans
fully tested introduces an unknown risk. tend to develop a mental model of what is
Safety assessments. Safety assess- If a facility’s software backup and recov- happening and select data that supports
ments such as hazard and operability ery procedures are inadequate or not fol- that model. Data that does not support
studies (HAZOPS) identify hazards and lowed, then the wrong program or an out- the model is often ignored—a condition
quantify their respective risks. A hidden dated version may be loaded in response that has contributed to major accidents.
deficiency in this process can result in risks to an unplanned emergency repair. Inad- On the positive side, humans are essential
that are underestimated so that the applied equate physical and administrative control because they provide the only means avail-
IPLs are inadequate. A hazard can be missed of an engineering work station connected able to mitigate or manage a hazard that
or incorrectly assessed if the team is missing to a safety system can compromise system was previously unknown and has no other
key technical, operating or maintenance integrity. Sensitive process control net- safeguards.
expertise.2 Combustion and process experts works, thought to be isolated, may, in fact,
are needed to assess the complex impact of connect to a business network or unpro- Organization. High-performance
a major fuel gas drum swing on multiple tected Internet connection and become organizations of the type needed to man-
fired vessels across the facility. Perhaps the a tempting target for computer hackers age high-integrity safety systems and
burner data sheets no longer exist so it is worldwide. Cross-connection of a process- successfully merge PSM and ANSI/
not possible to verify if the burners can control system network to a business enter- ISA S84.00.01 are not at a natural state;
operate safely with the current fuel-gas prise network opens the opportunity for a the laws of entropy apply. Organizations
composition range. Expertise needed to control system interruption or upset that undergo continuous change, whether desired
identify and accurately assess hazards that may be caused by a routine business net- or not. The organization affects the other
are unique to rotating equipment, exother- work administrative change or update. listed modes in positive and negative ways,
mal reactors and high-pressure equipment High-integrity pressure protective sys- which means it contributes to blind spots.
may also be missing. The assessment may tems (HIPPS) are increasingly being used A seemingly subtle change in priorities,
fail to consider all modes of operation, to reduce project cost or increase produc- staffing, training, work processes, safety
common mode failures, process response tion. A well-designed and managed HIPPS culture, age, technical expertise or tools can
time or the complex scenarios that can offers safety benefits, but is also a “high- significantly affect process safety as it inter-
result when a major upset occurs in a tech” solution that replaces a low-tech solu- acts with other listed modes.
shared utility system, e.g., steam, instru- tion that is well understood. Management When SIS progresses through its life
ment air or cooling water. of HIPPS and other SIL 3, high-integrity cycle, the safety requirements specification
A safety related alarm applied as an IPL safety systems require a mature, disciplined (SRS) provides the essential foundation
may be invalid. This can occur if an opera- and technically talented organization for document needed to define and maintain
tor cannot reliably respond to the alarm the duration of the system’s life cycle. Most system integrity. Fig. 1 summarizes the
within the process response time (pref- of the blind-spot failures discussed here can information included in this document. An
erable half the time). Further, the alarm degrade this system. Because a SIL 3 system inadvertent change in any item can degrade
IPL is invalid if a common event generates is typically implemented to mitigate a high- or disable one or more safety instru-
multiple alarms that exceed the generally consequence safety hazard, its failure or mented functions residing in that safety
recognized operator alarm response limit degradation can result in a major accident. system. Mapping each datum element to
of 10 alarms in a 10 minute period.3 The the department, technical discipline or
assessment may fail to explore this possibil- Human factors. Humans will always organization charged with its creation or
ity. Finally, if the alarm is invalid, then the make mistakes regardless of age, training management provides an indication of the
SIL assigned to an associated safety instru- and level of experience. A well-designed potential challenge. The opportunity for
mented function may be insufficient. system, organization or procedure inte- hidden errors and changes increases when
grates humans into activities and processes elements are distributed across organiza-
Technology. New technology and new where they are known to perform well, tional boundaries.
designs often create unforeseen “challenges.” and it avoids or minimizes activities that If the group charged with managing a
When the industry embraced open sys- humans are known to perform less reli- PSM program operates like a regulatory
tems, the Microsoft Operating System ably. If this is not the case, the expected organization, then the expected safety man-
became a standard component in many error rate will be higher, and the resulting agement culture and practices are probably
control systems. The unforeseen risk was errors may be overt, hidden or unforeseen. not being fully realized, although “full com-
an ongoing urgency to install frequent soft- Human error in any type of process or pliance” may be what’s listed in company
ware “patches” to correct security holes and activity increases when humans are under reports. Current organizational structures
software stability problems. Another is the tasked, over tasked or placed under stress.5 may be an impediment when attempting
increased exposure to destructive viruses Human error is not random, but it is to merge the requirements of ANSI/ISA
of the type recently revealed as the Stuxnet now understood to be systematic. The S84.00.01 into the existing organization.
virus.4 Computer servers require frequent error is biased by the systems, culture and How organizations integrate this standard
replacement due to early obsolescence. environments in which humans oper- with their PSM program appears to be
Control-system vendors press users to ate. 5 Under high stress, the perception an early work in progress for many. Until
upgrade application software and hardware of time can become distorted. During a this process is complete and the “bugs” are
to ensure future product support. These plant emergency, the actual elapsed time worked out, mistakes will happen.
KPE
76
I MARCH 2011 HydrocarbonProcessing.com
PLANT SAFETY BONUSREPORT
Operations and maintenance. slightly different form, can occur during Red flags. Several blind spot modes have
Operating modes may exist that are “below the engineering phase of a project when been discussed. Many others exist, includ-
the radar” and, therefore, not assessed from a tight schedule conflicts with the time ing training, standards and procedures,
a safety and risk perspective. A facility may needed to finish a safety-critical assess- physical environment and regulatory envi-
regularly have a manual bypass valve open ment or quality check. ronment, to name a few. A complete listing
around a control valve to increase through- of possible blind spots within each mode
put. Others may operate a fired process Accident investigations. Analyzing can fill volumes. To limit their accident
heater when a forced draft fan has failed. and identifying the root cause of a near contributions, an awareness and accep-
A damper is opened and the heater is oper- miss or an accident is an essential element tance that blind spots exist are essential.
ated in a natural draft mode that was not in a safety management program. Past Another important element in a safety
considered in its original design. An opera- theory and practices for accident investi- management program should include an
tor tweaks a mechanical stop on a fuel-gas gations took an approach that often cited awareness of the red flags that often pre-
valve, changing a process heater’s minimum “operator error” as the root cause. The new cede a catastrophic accident. Management
firing rate. Use of safety system bypasses theory, which takes a much wider view, will and safety leaders should give pause when
may become a common and casual act. The often trace the root cause to a management they hear several important listed words;
duration that a safety function is bypassed failure or a failure of the organization or they may have just arrived at “that point,
may be increasing, but it is not tracked and system in which humans function.5 Those that last chance” when a critical failure can
goes unnoticed. applying the old approach (still common- be prevented:
On the maintenance side, off-the- place) are not aware of where the true weak- • Experience says that will never hap-
books repairs and undocumented soft- ness in their systems exists, so similar acci- pen (most catastrophic accidents)6, 7
ware changes may be implemented in dents may reoccur. • We need to reduce maintenance,
response to a problem that occurs during staffing and training to cut costs (Bhopal
an unscheduled event, holiday weekend Management and leadership. MIC release)7
maintenance callout. Spare parts used may All organizations, whether they are proj- • “So we are all in agreement, RIGHT”
not actually meet the “replacement in kind” ect teams or operating facilities, face the (Shuttle Challenger and Columbia Disas-
requirement of PSM or the more rigorous dichotomy of balancing process safety ters)6
requirements in ANSI/ISA S84.00.01. with production, cost and schedule • We don’t have time for that (most
Changes may be made without applying demands. By words, actions and exam- catastrophic accidents)6, 7
the “Management of Change” process ples, management and safety leaders • Prove to me that it is not safe (Shuttle
(from PSM), or perhaps the process is not demonstrate their expectations. Subordi- Challenger and Columbia Disaster).6 HP
sufficiently controlled or transparent. nates interpret this message and bias their
actions and attitudes accordingly. Given LITERATURE CITED
1 Perrow, C., Normal Accidents: Living with High-
Risk acceptance creep. Individual the challenges of communications in large
Risk Technologies, New York, Basic Books Inc.,
risk tolerances can shift when the person and complex organizations, a few misun- 1999.
is faced with an immediate decision on derstood words or an ambiguous or con- 2 Shephard, T. and D. Hansen, “IEC 61511
whether to proceed (e.g., maintain pro- flicting message may degrade the process Implementation—The Execution Challenge,”
duction) or revert to a known safe state safety attitude of employees. Control, May 2010.
3 Bullemer, P. and D. Metzger, “CCPS Process
(e.g., shutdown). Risk acceptance appears For example, the appearance of an Safety Metric Review: Considerations from an
to increase or perhaps, risk denial occurs. overriding priority on production may ASM Perspective, ” ASM Consortium Metrics
For example, a difficult new unit startup is bias an operator’s belief that a unit- Work Group, May 23, 2008.
4 Bartels, N., “Worst Fears Realized,” Control
nearing completion. A safety event occurs, shutdown button should only be used if
Engineering, September 24, 2010.
forcing the person in charge to decide on the hazard is certain and imminent. The 5 Decker, S., The Field Guide to Understanding
whether to proceed or shut down. The systematic bias may be to delay a safety Human Error, Surrey UK, Ashgate Publishing
risk associated with proceeding is not response when it conflicts with produc- Ltd., Reprint 2010.
6 Brigadier Gen. Duane W. Deal, USAF, “Beyond
immediately clear or understood. The tion. A downsizing that lays off a key tech-
the Widget: Columbia Accidents Lesson Learned
time-sensitive decision increases stress nical expert who provides maintenance Affirmed,” Air & Space Power Journal, Summer
and may offer little time to consult others support for a highly technical safety sys- 2004.
who may understand the risk. (Perhaps the tem, places that system at risk. Manage- 7 Joseph, G., M. Kaszniak and L. Long, “Lessons
person who understands the risk is not in ment and safety leaders may not be aware After Bhopal: CSB a Catalyst for Change,” Journal o
f Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, Vol. 18,
a position to affect critical decisions.) The of the possible limitations in their safety Issues 4–6, July–November 2005.
decision to proceed or shut down reflects management program. Many companies
the attributes of the decision-makers and are implementing behavior-based safety
how they have internalized their under- programs that have been very effective
standing of the company’s management at reducing injuries and accidents. These
Tom Shephard is an automa-
expectations, safety culture, priorities and same programs may be less effective at tion project manager at Mustang
training. The decision to proceed is made, revealing or mitigating errors caused by Engineering. He has 28 years of con-
and the situation improves, worsens or technology or project execution blind trol and safety system experience in
remains unclear. This may be followed by spots. An assumption that a given safety the oil and gas, refining, marketing
and chemical industries. Mr. Shepherd is a Certified
another decision to proceed and it fol- program sufficiently encompasses the full Automation Professional (ISA) and a certified Project
lows the well-worn adage, “in for a penny, breadth of the safety management chal- Management Professional (PMI). He holds a BS degree
in for a pound.” This phenomenon, in a lenge may be a serious blind spot. in chemical engineering from Notre Dame University.
KPE
HYDROCARBON PROCESSING MARCH 2011
I 77
BONUSREPORT PLANT SAFETY
T
he January 2011 HP article, “Considerations for blast- accidents involving the release of potentially dangerous materials,
resistant electrical equipment centers,” focused on the his- energy releases (such as fires and explosions), or both. Process
tory, background and key considerations of blast-resistant safety incidents can have catastrophic effects and can result in
modules (BRMs) and blast-resistant electrical equipment centers multiple injuries and fatalities, as well as substantial economic,
(BRECs), designed to protect personnel and vital electrical con- property and environmental damage. Process safety refinery
trols, respectively. The article outlined the benefits of utilizing pro- incidents can affect workers inside the refinery and members of
tective shelters at hydrocarbon processing industry (HPI) plants. the public who reside nearby. Process safety in a refinery involves
The premise for greater concern with regard to both personnel preventing leaks, spills, equipment malfunctions, over-pressures,
and process safety was established. Whereas the discussion gave excessive temperatures, corrosion, metal fatigue and other similar
light to both shelter types, this article focuses specifically on the conditions. Process safety programs focus on the design and engi-
detailed aspects of BRECs: design, construction, analysis, blast neering of facilities, hazard assessments, management of change,
load testing, test results and conclusions. inspection, testing and maintenance of equipment, effective
Following the Texas City, Texas, incident of March 23, 2005, a alarms, effective process control, procedures, training of person-
special panel headed by former Secretary of State James Baker was nel and human factors. The Texas City tragedy in March 2005
convened. The panel findings are documented in what became was a process safety accident (Fig. 1).”
known as the “Baker Report” of January 2007. One of the most This underscores the need for risk managers, planners and
notable sets of statements made in the report places process safety engineers at HPI plants to put as much emphasis on providing
on par with personnel safety: process safety as they do on personnel safety. It naturally follows
“Not all refining hazards are caused by the same factors or that implementing and utilizing BRECs at refineries directly
involve the same degree of potential damage. Personal or occupa- impact process safety. In addition to maintaining critical process
tional safety hazards give rise to incidents—such as slips, falls and operations during and after an overpressure incident, blast-resis-
vehicle accidents—that primarily affect one individual worker tant equipment shelters can limit extensive downtime and prevent
for each occurrence. Process safety hazards can give rise to major ever having to replace critical equipment rendered inoperable or
destroyed due to the effects of a blast event.
possible. Therefore, in establishing baseline criteria for BREC nearly 1,000 feet from the blast-area center sustained damage to
performance and system design, the first step taken is typically a varying degrees.
siting analysis. Table 1 describes three levels of blast pressure damage on build-
ings in HPI facilities subject to blast loads. As information, the
Siting analyses. Site maps of refining facilities containing terms damage level and response level are often used interchange-
concentric rings that depict various explosive potential levels are ably, as shown in Table 2.
used in required siting analyses. The rings indicate overpressure
levels in psi, with the higher pressures appearing at the potential Optimal blast-resistance and affordability. Recently,
blast sources or positions between blast potentials. Blast sources a highly advanced team of designers and engineering managers
and reflective convergences appear in much the same manner as with decades of experience in blast-resistant structures made a
do the peaks on a topographical map. The site map of the Texas decision that is significantly impacting the HPI: A thorough
City refinery is shown in Fig. 2. research, analysis and testing program would be undertaken to
rate the performance limits of existing electrical equipment cen-
Standoff distances. The best way to protect a building from ter designs. It was also understood that test results would, at the
blast loads is to ensure that it is kept as far from the blast load same time, provide needed feedback leading to improvements
origin as possible. By contrast, the structures that shelter equip- in blast-resistant structure construction, and also determine the
ment required to maintain essential or critical systems are often best possible material and design technology combinations for
required to be inside the potential blast zone. Close proximity for the most advanced equipment shelters.
equipment is also often a function of cost due to power losses and
equipment derating, as well as the heavy power cables connected Analysis phase: complete BREC and components.
to the equipment. Computer analysis began, using a single-degree-of-freedom
(SDOF) approach, analyzing the maximum BREC compo-
Blast loads. The load on a structure from a nearby explosion nent response at various blast loadings. The SDOF approach
takes the form of an almost instantaneous pressure increase to was used to determine the blast-load capacities for various
a maximum value, followed by a brief period during which the pressure-impulse (P-i) combinations. P-i diagrams (Fig. 3) are
pressure decays back to its ambient value. Pressures are measured commonly used in protective-structure preliminary designs to
in psi and kPa. establish safe response limits for given blast-loading scenarios.
A free-field blast load is the measurement of a blast pressure Considered here was the potential peak pressure experienced by
that radiates equally in all directions with no reflections. The side- wall panels in the blast-facing wall. The impulse was the blast
on pressure is equivalent to the unreflected wave pressure at the duration in milliseconds times the peak pressure in psi (or kPa).
point where it reaches the structure. This is the “rating” pressure This value is measured in psi-msec.
used to map the site and to position the blast-rated structures.
A free-field blast is the usual result of a vapor-cloud explosion TABLE 1. Building damage level/response level
(VCE). The pressure wave generated by the VCE impacts the descriptions
structure on the facing wall, creating a peak reflected pressure due
to the Doppler effect (change in the observed frequency of a wave) Building
of the pressure reflecting off the structure’s wall. damage level Component consequence
1 (low) Localized building damage. Building can be used; however,
Blast pressure effects. The VCE experienced during the repairs are required to restore structural-integrity envelope.
Texas City incident in 2005 produced a 2.49-psi (17.2-kPa)
Total repair cost is moderate.
free-field blast, which, in turn, produced an equivalent side-on
pressure. This pressure level was sufficient to destroy construc- 2 (medium) Widespread building damage. Building cannot be used until
tion trailers positioned within the blast zone, and, in fact, trailers repaired. Total repair cost is significant.
3 (high) Building has lost structural integrity and may collapse due
to environmental conditions (i.e., wind, snow, rain).
Total repair cost approaches building replacement cost.
shown in Figs. 5 and 6. Included in the analyses and testing was Interior wall
an optional inner wall comprising a series of 50-mm studs with a
1.2-mm steel liner panel. Other options for equipment support
include unistruts and structural tube steel. The ceiling has a set- 3 in.
up similar to the walls, but without the insulation and inner-liner
panel. The floor system consists of 6.3- to 9.5-mm metal plate
fastened above various hot-rolled steel beams and angles. Exterior interlocking wall panels 3 in. fiberglass insulation
Wall panels used in the analysis and testing were modeled as FIG. 5 Typical interlocking wall panel section.
ASTM A36 steel. It should be noted that BRECs are actually con-
structed of A653CQ Grade 38 steel; therefore, the material cited
in the analyses is on the conservative side. Most panels were wall
panels of interlocking steel construction (Figs. 5 and 7); one panel 2 in. x 1 in. formed channel
Interior panel
was constructed to validate 6.3-mm seam-welded, crimped-plate
1 in. – 4 in. 21⁄8 in.
(SWCP) construction (Figs. 6 and 8). 315⁄16 in.
and amount of material, screw spacing, door construction and they were able to conclude that a proper program of computer
equipment door configuration. A key difference in a BREC layout analyses can be used to accurately predict equipment-center
is the addition of a deflection space between the outer blast wall response to known blast loads. That knowledge and testing have
and any interior equipment supports or interior walls. For pres- effectively extended BREC performance limits from less than
sures above 1.0 psi, the use of special blast-rated doors and HVAC 0.5 psi to 4.0 psi.
units with blast dampers is required. It is also assumed that these What this means for HPI companies is that there are now
designs will be installed on foundations adequate to support the specific design and build parameters for BRECs that can be used
structures and anchor systems effective in holding the BRECs in to optimize their integration into a program of process safety at
place during a blast event. With this in mind, power and control every facility. In short, the state of the industry in equipment
cables can be configured to enter the structure through penetra- centers now allows for the best combination of protection and
tion points, preferably in the floor. Penetration points for power cost-effectiveness.
cables and wiring should be sealed using glands or other readily These factors, combined with the features list found in
available cable sealing systems. today’s BREC construction, result in benefits that can be directly
translated to the client’s bottom line: low cost, weather-tight,
Wrapping it all up. With a vast amount of design and build contaminant-proof buildings that are flexible, easily retrofit-
experience using both interlocking-panel and welded-steel con- ted and repaired, and ductile in response to applied loads. The
struction in blast-resistant equipment centers, an expert team technology, effectiveness and availability of BRECs can provide
of engineers has developed computer-based blast-loading and every refinery with a higher level of safety and security for the
damage profiles. Its ambitious program of evaluations began process system. HP
with SDOF analyses for wall and door components. The team
then developed computer models of both a complete and half- BIBLIOGRAPHY
symmetry building, using FEA. The purpose was to further Cole, D., R. H. Bennett and D. Austin, “Protecting Essential Refining
evaluate and verify the SDOF calculations that showed the limits Operations Using Blast-Resistant Electrical Equipment Shelters,” IEEE-
PCIC-AN-22, 2008.
of blast loadings on the wall panels and other BREC compo- “The Report of the BP US Refineries Independent Safety Review Panel,” The
nents. Armed with the results of these analyses, actual physical Baker Report, January 2007.
test specimens were prepared using 12-gauge steel sections, after Schmidt, J. A. and B. B. Brettmann, “Protective Structural Design: Resisting
which a battery of physical blast load testing regimes was run on Blast Loads,” March 2002.
“Management of Hazards Associated with Location of Process Plant Portable
built-up steel-wall and door components. Team members then Buildings,” API RP 753, First Edition, American Petroleum Institute,
compared the results of the physical tests with those of their Washington, D.C., June 2007.
computer analyses. After they developed a strong correlation “Fatal Accident Investigation Report: Isomerization Unit Explosion—Final
between the analyses with the results of the shock tube testing, Report,” Texas City, Texas, incident date: March 23, 2005, report date:
December 9, 2005.
“Design of Blast-Resistant Buildings in Petrochemical Facilities,” American
Society of Civil Engineers, Task Committee on Blast Resistant Design, New
York, New York, 1997.
“Single Degree of Freedom Structural Response Limits for Antiterrorism
Design,” US Army Corps of Engineers Protective Design Center Technical
Report PDC-TR- 06-08, October 20, 2006.
Edel, M., J. Florek, K. Sriboonma and J. R. Montoya, “Blast Assessment of
Modular Metal Building, final report,” BakerRisk Project No. 01-1958-001-
07, Baker Engineering and Risk Consultants, February 19, 2008.
Montoya, J. R. and M. J. Lowak, “Blast Performance Testing of Wall Panels,”
draft report, BakerRisk Project No. 01-02385-001-08, Baker Engineering
FIG. 7 Interior and exterior wall panels used in physical test and Risk Consultants, January 28, 2009.
phase.
W
e hear it all the time—after a Security Vulnerability Assessment (SVA). After a company or facility gets its final
9/11, everything having to do Facilities were placed into categories tier assignment from the DHS, it has 120
with security changed. It forced after the top screen analyzed the type, days to develop a site security plan (SSP)
us to take a second look at many things quantity, storage, manufacturing and han- using the 18 RBPSs as guidelines. This
in our lives and it was natural to look at dling of each COI. The SVA then took a means laying out a comprehensive plan that
the security of our critical infrastructure more in-depth look at each facility and its takes into account the facility’s tier level. For
including roads, waterways, airports and existing security and vulnerabilities to come example, the first RBPS addresses perimeter
bridges. Of course, chemical security had up with a final ranking based on four tiers. security. The expected security level for a
to be part of that. Lawmakers wanted to Facilities with the highest level of COIs Tier 1 facility is going to be much higher
make sure that companies using, making and vulnerability combined, were placed than a Tier 3 or Tier 4. Putting together an
and storing chemicals were taking the steps into Tier 1. Those with the lowest levels of SSP takes a team approach. It cannot fall to
to secure their facilities and contents. chemicals and threats were put into Tier 4. one person in the facility. The RBPS man-
According to the Department of Home- The DHS considers its criteria for tier date covers a wide range of areas including
land Security (DHS), the Chemical Facility rankings to be classified and does not dis- personnel, security, safety, compliance and
Anti-Terrorism Standard (CFATS) was cre- close what elements make a facility a tier legal issues. All of these departments need to
ated in 2006 to establish security standards one. The rankings appear to be based on a have a seat at the table in putting together
for facilities considered to be at high risk. combination of factors from the top screen this type of plan.
CFATS defines security requirements based to SVA submissions. Characteristics obvi- After the SSP is submitted, it is reviewed
on a list of about 323 chemicals, called ously change from site to site, but tier rat- by the DHS and then implemented by the
chemicals of interest (COI). CFATS does ings appear to be based on a combination company. The final step is an authoriza-
not just affect the chemical or petrochemi- of COI type and amount, proximity to a tion inspection by the DHS. This inspec-
cal industries. It also includes sectors such population center and the recognition of tion usually takes about a week as the DHS
as chemical manufacturing, storage and dis- the COI by the general public. examines the entire plan and looks at it, not
tribution, energy and utilities, agriculture CFATS is a risked-based mandate. At only on paper but also in practice.
and food, paints and coatings, explosives, the heart of it are 18 published Risk-Based So what is the real reason for the CFATS
mining, electronics, plastics universities, Performance Standards (RBPSs) and each mandate? What are the concerns and what
and healthcare facilities. tier has a specific level of security within is the DHS looking to secure? The specific
At this time, CFATS does not apply to those standards to be met. The DHS does concerns about chemical production, use
facilities under the jurisdiction of the Mari- not mandate specific technologies and and storage fall into three main categories:
time Transportation Security Act (MTSA), procedures for facilities. Instead, it sets • Release of dangerous chemicals
facilities owned or operated by the US security goals based on a number of factors • Theft and diversion of chemicals
Department of Defense or those regulated and the facilities are given the flexibility to • Sabotage or contamination.
by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. develop their own processes and solutions. The release of dangerous chemicals and
Public water systems and wastewater treat- This allows for the vast differences in facil- the threat this poses to the health and safety
ment facilities currently fall under the US ities. You might think that the larger the of the surrounding public is pretty obvious.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) facility the higher the risk level, but often Toxic, flammable or explosive chemicals
regulations. that is not the case. For example, a large can be very dangerous and cause extensive
The DHS set thresholds for each of the facility may have perimeter and access damage to people and property. Release is
COIs. The facilities that use or store chemi- security in place that makes it very secure. a matter of keeping unwanted people out
cals above those thresholds were required to A small facility, like a university research of your facility and screening your person-
submit a “top screen” to the department. center, probably does not have the ability nel to make sure that they are who they
So far, the DHS has indicated that about to put in place the same perimeter security, appear to be.
32,000 facilities submitted top screens. Of so it has to take extra precautions to make Theft and diversion gets a little murkier.
those, about 7,000 were notified that they sure access to certain chemicals is limited Here we are talking about stealing chemi-
were required to move to the second step— to very few authorized people. cals to create chemical weapons including
KPE
HYDROCARBON PROCESSING MARCH 2011
I 83
BONUSREPORT PLANT SAFETY
homemade bombs, explosives, gas bombs CFATS just celebrated its fourth birth- for smaller facilities and businesses. The
and improvised explosive devices (IEDs). day. Those four years have been a learn- Collins amendment removes this provi-
Again, stealing is pretty straightforward and ing process and, as the DHS has acknowl- sion from the bill and adds several other
that threat affects almost all CFATS facili- edged, the department is learning with the elements, including:
ties. Both big and small facilities have to industry. It has been a strong collaborative • Creating voluntary exercise and train-
protect their chemical inventory and assets process with the usual snags and disagree- ing programs
against someone going in and taking them. ments. Overall, the legislation has gotten • Establishing a voluntary technical
Diversion is a different story. Chemicals off to a good start and is beginning to hit assistance program
can be stolen at the facility or in route, but its stride. At this point, almost all facilities • Creating a chemical facility security
chemicals can also be diverted in a number should have been given a final tier assign- best practices clearing house
of different ways. According to the DHS, ment and most initial inspections for Tier • Establishing an advisory board to
diversion is the criminal act of acquiring 1 facilities completed. advise the DHS on implementation and
a product (or service) by means of decep- The DHS has reached out to the the voluntary technical assistance program.
tion. Deception can include purchasing chemical industry and is trying to work In general, the industry has been very
or paying for chemicals. The crime here with facilities to facilitate compliance. The supportive of this legislation with the Col-
is the acquisition of the chemicals even if department started working with compa- lins amendment included. The National
they are purchased. Diversion includes the nies by making preauthorization inspec- Association of Chemical Distributors
following tactics: tions. These allow companies and facilities (NACD), the Society of Chemical Manu-
Hijacking—Placing an order that puts to meet with DHS inspectors to discuss facturers and Affiliates (SOCMA) and oth-
the goods in motion and then stealing them what they are doing and get feedback. This ers have come out in its support.
in route. seems to be a process that is working well Still, the bill has to make it to the Sen-
Dummy company—Setting up a fake and is giving many companies the direc- ate floor for a vote. The chairman of the
company and placing an order. Once the tion and advice they need. The DHS also Senate Homeland Security Committee,
order is delivered, the company disappears. provides a lot of information online for Joseph Lieberman, I-Connecticut, has said
Breakout scheme—Variation of a facilities, as well as lists of frequently asked the bill will need significant modifications
dummy company, but a real company is questions and a help line for additional to get through the Senate. Some senators
purchased, usually on credit, and orders are assistance. have already said that they will make an
placed through that company. The com- The department has also initiated an effort to reintroduce an IST-type provision
pany operates until the credit runs out. open dialogue for some of the tougher in the bill.
Co-opted customer—An existing cus- issues, like personnel surety, which deals With a shift after the November elec-
tomer is co-opted by a terrorist group and with background checks and certifications tions in the makeup of both the House
is either coerced, infiltrated or bribed into for employees, vendors and delivery peo- and, to a lesser extent, the Senate, CFATS
ordering materials. ple. Another area is material modification. did not get much attention at the end of
False flag—Terrorists place an order as The DHS has acknowledged that com- last year. The program will continue for
an existing customer but steal the goods panies are constantly changing processes another year through a rider on the DHS
once they are delivered or the order is sent and the chemicals used in those processes. appropriations bill. This will allow facili-
to a new false address. Handling these modifications and the ties that use, store and process chemicals to
Pretext purchase—For example, some- impact they may have on tiering, SSPs and continue their current work with the DHS.
one pretending to be a professor at a uni- compliance is a difficult task. And again, We may see a different approach to
versity or college chemistry department in this instance, the DHS is looking to the CFATS with a new Congress. But, as Sue
places an order. industry for input and discussion. Armstrong of the DHS recently reminded
Cyber attack on business manage- The biggest issue facing CFATS at this everyone at a security conference, terrorism
ment system—The network or computer time is legislative. The initial bill expired is a real threat that we all need to take seri-
system is hacked into and a reoccurring in October 2009 and was renewed for ously. The CFATS mandate is not meant
delivery is scheduled and hidden. one year. Since then, legislation has been to be an additional burden to business, but
Sabotage or contamination of materi- introduced in the US Senate and the to ensure that we are protecting our com-
als is another concern driving the CFATS House of Representatives. In July, the Sen- munities and our businesses. HP
mandate. Chemicals that release toxic gases ate Homeland Security Committee voted
when exposed to water, fall into this cat- unanimously to extend the CFATS for
egory. So businesses have to not only be three years to 2013. The 13-0 bipartisan
Ryan Loughin is the director of
concerned about someone stealing or tak- vote was for HR 2868 with an amend- Petrochemical and Energy Solutions
ing COIs out of the facility, but they must ment from Senator Susan Collins, Repub- for the Advanced Integration division
also be very concerned with what is coming lican-Maine. of ADT (www.adtbusiness.com/petro-
into those facilities. HR 2868 was introduced by Repre- chem). He provides security education
to CFATS and MTSA-affected companies and is a member
All of these scenarios have to be sentative Bennie Thompson, Democrat- of the National Petrochemical and Refiners Association
addressed in a facility’s SSP and security Mississippi and was passed by the House in (NPRA), Society of Chemical Manufacturers and Associ-
measures must be put into place to limit November. That version of the bill included ates (SOCMA), American Chemistry Council (ACC), the
the possibility of these situations happen- an inherently safer technology (IST) provi- Energy Security Council (ESC) and the American Society
for Industrial Security (ASIS). Mr. Loughin has also com-
ing. It takes a careful review of your facil- sion. The chemical industry is opposed to pleted multiple levels of Chemical-Terrorism Vulnerability
ity and its business processes, along with this provision because it is open to inter- Information (CVI) which was authored by the US Depart-
knowledge of the security options available. pretation and it could be costly, especially ment of Homeland Security.
KPE
84
I MARCH 2011 HydrocarbonProcessing.com
INSTRUMENTATION
C
ontrol systems play a vital role in most instrumentation software systems cur- and designers naturally work. As an exam-
all aspects of modern living, from rently work. For too long, software ven- ple, Fig. 1 shows how a simple graphical
helping us drive our cars, to safely dors have denied engineers and designers user interface in a wiring manager module
running large petrochemical complexes the simple practicality of a graphical visual enables the user to route and reroute wir-
and power stations. According to recent engineering interface with “drag and drop” ing—and manage all associated changes—
industry research, instrumentation is the capability and inbuilt intelligence, ensuring in a few clicks of the mouse. Straightfor-
biggest spend item in plants. In 2010, changes are automatically replicated into all ward customization enables configuration
capital expenditure for buying new instru- the associated data and databases. by users without any need for program-
ments was estimated at $5 billion, with All too often, the time taken to learn ming skills. In short, this is a complete
maintenance and operation costs projected the currently available systems is prohibi- change to the way in which instrumenta-
to reach $4.9 billion. However, much of tive. Configuring them is a major spe- tion and control data is created and edited,
this cost is unnecessary. It arises because cialist undertaking, and their operation and it has led to design savings of 30% and
the technology used to plan and design constrains engineers to work in ways that more among current users.
instrumentation and control systems has are counter-intuitive and labor-intensive. Simplicity of use equates to less need
often been developed with little regard for Wasted time and money, and lost produc- for configuration and training, reduced
engineers’ and designers’ natural working tivity, are the results. administration and support overheads,
methods. Procedures that can be perfectly This new program delivers simplicity, and a design and engineering team whose
straightforward if represented graphically— to fit closely with the way that engineers time to productivity is greatly reduced. The
rerouting a wire, for example, or segregat-
ing cables—are all too often dependent on
manual, tabular data input, which is time-
consuming, expensive and prone to error.
Instrumentation and control experts
were interviewed across the industry, and
they identified no less than 10 key areas
where instrumentation design technolo-
gies fail to meet engineers’ and design-
ers’ requirements. These are the top-10
headaches that the engineers and design-
ers face on a daily basis. The good news is
that companies can avoid these headaches
entirely by deploying the “visual engineer-
ing” approach—a field-proven instrumen-
tation solution.
TOP-10 HEADACHES
graphical views are role-based, so each user tion. The wiring designer has to coordinate accurately reflected across the whole proj-
sees and interacts with those elements that design data manually between several dif- ect—which they rarely are. This can neces-
are of most use to them. ferent applications—an open invitation to sitate massive rework later in the process.
error, as well as a seriously inefficient use of The instrumentation program provides
No. 2.—Lack of change manage- a technically skilled individual’s time. dynamic catalog management as standard.
ment. While the creation of data is abso- To make things worse, input of data Vendor details and component references
lutely key to the early momentum of a proj- into the wiring design is usually via table can be changed any time throughout the
ect, the ongoing challenge is in managing and spreadsheet—there is no means of project with no need for manual rework.
changes to the design and ensuring that the visualizing the relationships and using If a pressure gauge supplied by vendor X
changes are properly reflected throughout those visualizations as the logical starting is changed in the catalog to a similar prod-
the dataset. Often, more cables and con- point for the creation and editing of the uct from vendor Y, identified by a differ-
nections are added to the plan than were wiring design. This instrumentation pro- ent part or tag number, these changes will
originally envisaged, swelling the data gram, by contrast, requires only one click be updated (or will simply show where
considerably and producing a significantly to enable the user to see a current graphical updates need to be made). This happens
altered design. This complicates the rela- representation (Fig. 3). There is no need automatically across all mentions and
tionships between existing and new infor- to request an output plot from a designer, instances of the original gauge—in cable
mation, forcing a time-consuming and which can take many hours of unnecessary block diagrams, loop diagrams, instrument
costly estimate revision process. work. Within a single application, loop dia- indexes, datasheets, hookup diagrams, ter-
The instrumentation program comprises grams, schedules and terminations can all mination diagrams, cable schedules, bill of
three integrated modules that share a com- be created and edited from the same visual materials, etc. Mismatches between cata-
mon, multi-user database for both design engineering environment. logue data and project execution data, as
and as-built data. This integrated data envi- well as the many expensive hours needed to
ronment enables extensive validation pro- No. 4.—Catalog of errors. Catalog rectify them, are a thing of the past.
cesses, automatic cross-referencing and link- changes are one of the biggest causes of
ing of associated information, and rigorous design data mismatches in the instrumenta- No. 5.—Lack of visualization and
change control. Change of all kinds can be tion and control universe. Yet they are often reporting clarity. The ability to report
easily tracked, highlighted and reported on, an essential way of managing and reducing on a design at will is fundamental both to
and its impact automatically flagged (Fig. 2). procurement costs, and so can heavily influ- progress management and design quality
ence the economic viability of a project. control. Yet with many software packages,
No. 3.—Wiring limitations. Wiring For example, the purchasing depart- reports can only be generated by the use of
design is a multi-phase process, involving ment might decide on a different supplier programming scripts that have to be spe-
loop diagrams, schedules and termina- for a particular component, causing a cially requested and produced—an unnec-
tions—yet many technologies currently change in the nomenclature of that compo- essary overhead in time and labor. There is
available on the market are unable to inte- nent and the associated vendor details. The no easy way, in most of the instrumentation
grate these procedures into one applica- problem comes when these changes are not software currently available on the market,
to quickly build up a picture of the interre-
lationships in the project dataset. Likewise,
no other vendor currently enables instant
reporting on the database revisions to give
an understanding of change history.
This instrumentation program is built
around user-defined reporting—across
schedules, lists, bill of materials, and other
data. The simple interface puts the report-
ing process back into the engineer’s hands
and enables all items, data and documents
that share the same tag to be instantly listed.
This graphically shows how changes to one
item might have impacts elsewhere in the
design. A full audit log of database changes
can also be instantly generated—vital for
root-cause analysis and risk management.
upgrades to the database that underpins ments with customers’ existing third-party work with multiple applications that are
them are often an expensive service. This applications and data types. not integrated. Instead, it enables the cre-
means that ongoing support and scalability The company does not force users to ation of datasheet templates within the
can only be achieved at a very high cost—
the exact opposite of what flexible scalabil-
ity should deliver.
application itself, in a way that is totally ate a huge amount of related information located. In a single click, an engineer or
integrated with the rest of the project including data sheets, documents, etc. designer can view the object and see exactly
workflow. These templates can be partially Many isolated systems completely fail to where all the information that relates to
populated by the engineer or designer with link this information together, as it typi- a specific component or design element
information that is already known. This cally comes from both internal and external resides. This reduces not only the direct
gives vendors a much clearer indication of sources. Engineers and designers, therefore, costs of manually searching for informa-
what information is needed, making their have to second guess both the nature of the tion (estimated in recent studies to take up
task easier and increasing the likelihood information and its location. Apart from as much as 60% of an engineer’s time), but
that the datasheet will be completed to the being terrifically time consuming, this also the less obvious expense, such as when
required standard. The content of the data- also perpetuates the problem of “unknown the designer or engineer approaches a col-
sheet is easily searchable and reportable. It unknowns” and this is clearly an unsatisfac- league to help him find information, thus
can be extracted and viewed in seconds, tory basis for making informed design and wasting two people’s time instead of one!
rather than having valuable minutes and engineering decisions. The majority of safety related incidents
hours wasted in attempts to search for it. The problem is often at its most acute have also ultimately been related to poor
3D models are fully integrated with other with external documents such as vendor information accessibility, so the ability to
providers to enable instrumentation data to datasheets. With internal documents, the diminish this risk substantially is a big part
be viewed in full 3D context. This means designer or engineer can bring pressure to of the benefit that this program brings.
that cable data can be integrated into the bear on the situation; he is organizationally
3D model straight from the instrumentation connected to the document producers and No. 10.—Fragmented bulk data
program and automated cable measurement, is regarded internally as a key customer. upload. The ability to bulk-upload data at
routing and segregation can then be gener- With external documents, this dynamic is the beginning of a project is key to achiev-
ated instantaneously. Greater control, less less relational—and so designers or engi- ing initial traction. However, the data typi-
rework and enhanced safety and compli- neers need a different way of bringing cally comes from many different sources
ance, without risky and time-consuming authority to their requests for information. and in many different formats, and this
guesswork, can save millions of dollars in The instrumentation program provides fragmentation often necessitates the use of
design time and material procurement. object-based navigation through hyper- several different applications. Piping and
links. Related items of data are linked instrumentation diagrams (P&IDs), for
No. 9.—Incomplete associations. together automatically, no matter what for- example, are an absolutely integral part of
Instruments and wiring activities gener- mat they are in or where they are physically the instrumentation and control design pro-
cess, but they are often not an integral part
of the data upload, having to be sourced and
integrated independently.
This reliance on a multi-application
approach consumes time, effort and
money, and increases the likelihood that
critical data will be missed or incompletely
The Fundamentals of Piping Design
captured. The program enables complete
By Peter Smith integration of all data types, including
262 pages t Hardcover t Pub date: April 2007 t Price: $175 P&IDs. An initial bulk upload creates links
ISBN: 978-1-933762-043
and associations between these different
Written for the piping engineer and designer in the field, this first part of the types of information. The project benefits
two-part series helps to fill a void in piping literature, since the Rip Weaver books
of the ‘90s were taken out of print. from much more rapid traction and the
engineers and designers have all the infor-
mation at their fingertips in a way that is
dynamically managed and updated across
Advanced Piping Design the life of the project. HP
By Rutger Botermans and Peter Smith
250 pages t Hardcover t Pub date: May 2008 t Price: $175
ISBN: 978-1-933762-18-0
An intermediate-level handbook covering guidelines and procedures on David JS Gibson is the head of
process plants and interconnecting piping systems. product strategy for instrumentation
and electrical systems for AVEVA. He
joined AVEVA business development
in December 1999 after serving 25
The Planning Guide to Piping Design years working for a major engineering, production
By Richard Beale, Paul Bowers and Peter Smith and construction company, formally in the engineer-
300 pages t Hardcover t Pub date: September 2010 t Price: $175 ing design and then as development project manager
ISBN: 978-1-933762-37-1 for engineering data management systems. He has
worked on a variety of engineering projects for various
The Planning Guide to Piping Design covers the entire process of planning a plant model
project from conceptual to mechanical completion, and explains where the piping lead falls clients in the oil and gas and pharmaceutical industries.
in the process along with his roles and responsibilities. Projects covered a wide range of processes for oil and
gas, pharmaceutical, chemicals and polymers and food
processing, and he has had experience in all aspects of
engineering design. Mr. Gibson attained his manage-
To place an order, visit www.gulfpub.com or call +1 (713) 520-4426.
ment qualifications from the Open University.
KPE
88
I MARCH 2011 HydrocarbonProcessing.com
ENGINEERING CASE HISTORIES
T
here are times in one’s career when a This simple CFD model produces inter- the production reactor. This would allow
quick decision is needed so a design esting results. In Fig. 2, the velocity is going evaluating parameters that could increase
will proceed in the correct direction. up the reactor main tube (15 ft/sec) and dis- production. HP
This may be in a design review meeting tribution to the three coolant tubes is very
where different views are being presented high in the 1-in. gap (c) region (red). It is
on a systems modification. high in the outer tube and low in the inner
tube (blue). Fig. 3 shows the redistribution
Case history. In this example, the draw- with a 3-in. gap. With the curved head and a
ings for a pilot reactor were being reviewed. larger gap, the flow was more evenly distrib-
The design had been modified from an orig- uted, and the pressure drop from the main
inally proposed rounded-head design, which tube to the tube outlets was low.
had been feared to create a “dead space.” It The 1-in. gap would not only have raised
now included a flat plate to eliminate the the horsepower requirement of the axial
“dead space” in the reactor head so that foul- flow pump but would also have resulted in
ing would not occur in that region. Fig. 1 uneven cooling from the tubes and raised
illustrates a simplified view of the reactor. the potential for frequent fouling.
Since the design with the plate looked
problematic, a simple analysis was done, Proving decisions. This is an example
FIG. 2 Velocity in reactor 1-in. gap.
which showed that a large pressure drop where a sophisticated analysis tool, used
would occur with this modification. In the on a simple 2D model, can produce useful
proposed flat-head design, the curved head results. The 2D models can be a real benefit
volume had been reduced to a 1–in. gap in developing a 3D model for scale-up of
flow. The resulting additional pressure drop
would have caused the axial-flow propel- Dead space
ler pump to exceed its horsepower rating. Head
Therefore, the proposed flat-head design
was not used, and the original large-volume C
head was successfully implemented. Flow
up
Recheck the decision. At a later date, D
a detailed analysis was performed that veri-
fied the simple analysis. Computational
fluid dynamics (CFD) is an analysis tool
that can analyze laminar and turbulent
flows. While three-dimensional analy-
ses with swirl are possible, a simple two-
dimensional analysis is applied here to add Main
information not available from the analyti- tube
FIG. 3 Velocity in reactor 3-in. gap.
cal analysis. Three reactor tubes, much like
heat exchanger tubes, are shown in addition
to the central tube.
Fig. 2 illustrates the flow velocity from Dr. Anthony (Tony) Sofro-
an axis-symmetric model, starting at the n a s , PE, was worldwide lead
pump discharge with the flat plate and 1-in. mechanical engineer for ExxonMobil
Pump before his retirement. Information on
gap. The simplification is that the three his books, seminars and consulting, as
tubes are really concentric channels with the FIG. 1 Reactor flow with head installed. well as comments to this article, are available at http://
same flow area as the corresponding tubes. mechanicalengineeringhelp.com.
KPE
HYDROCARBON PROCESSING MARCH 2011
I 89
HPI MARKETPLACE
800-704-2002
www.wabashpower.com
Select 202 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS FAX: 847-541-1279
847-541-5600
SURPLUS GAS PROCESSING/REFINING EQUIPMENT
NGL/LPG PLANTS: 10 – 600 MMCFD
AMINE PLANTS: 60 – 5,000 GPM
SULFUR PLANTS: 10 – 1,200 TPD
FRACTIONATION: 1,000 – 15,000 BPD
HELIUM RECOVERY: 75 & 80 MMCFD
NITROGEN REJECTION: 25 – 80 MMCFD
ALSO OTHER REFINING UNITS Select 204 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS Select 205 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS
We offer engineered surplus equipment solutions.
Bexar Energy Holdings, Inc.
Phone 210 342-7106
Fax 210 223-0018
www.bexarenergy.com
Email: [email protected]
Select 203 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS
Hydrocarbon Processing’s
Recruitment
Advertising
Program
Use a combination of print,
recruitment e-newsletter, plus
Website to reach our total
audience circulation
of more than 100,000!
Select 206 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS Select 207 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS
KPE
90
I MARCH 2011 HydrocarbonProcessing.com
HPI MARKETPLACE
CA
Co PE-O
0IPE 3TRESS
mp PE
0ROCESS 3IMULATION
0ELLETIZING $IE $ESIGN lian N
(EAT 4RANSFER !NALYSIS t!
&INITE %LEMENT !NALYSIS
#OMPUTATIONAL &LUID $YNAMICS
6ESSEL%XCHANGER-ACHINE $ESIGN
2OTOR $YNAMICS3TRUCTURAL $YNAMICS
HTRI Xchanger Suite® – an integrated, easy-to-use suite of tools that
3PECIALISTS IN DESIGN FAILURE delivers accurate design calculations for
ANALYSIS AND TROUBLESHOOTING OF (OUSTON 4EXAS
STATIC AND ROTATING EQUIPMENT
4EL ss • shell-and-tube heat exchangers • fired heaters
WWWKNIGHTHAWKCOM &AX ss
• jacketed-pipe heat exchangers • air coolers
Select 208 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS
• hairpin heat exchangers • economizers
• plate-and-frame heat exchangers • tube layouts
• spiral plate heat exchangers • vibration analysis
NOISE Interfaces with many process simulator and physical property
CONTROL ENGINEERING
packages either directly or via CAPE-OPEN.
HFP Acoustical Consultants
Houston TX Calgary AB
(888) 789-9400 (888) 259-3600 Heat Transfer Research, Inc. [email protected]
(713) 789-9400 (403) 259-6600 150 Venture Drive www.HTRI.net
E-mail: [email protected]
Internet: www.hfpacoustical.com College Station, Texas 77845, USA
Select 209 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS Select 210 at www.HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS
Flexware ®
Hydrocarbon Processing
® Turbomachinery Engineers
seeks Process Editor
Flexware® Live Analysis Gulf Publishing Company (Houston, Texas) is seeking an
Turbomachinery Performance Monitoring editor for its industry-leading publication, Hydrocarbon
Processing. The ideal candidate should have a BS degree
in engineering or similar discipline and five to ten years
of experience working in the HPI (refining, petrochemical/
chemical and gas processing), or extensive experience
working as an editor in the refining and petrochemical
industries with extensive experience with technical
information. Experience in process design and/or facility
maintenance is a bonus. Excellent written and verbal
communication skills are mandatory, and the ability to
work under tight deadlines in a sometimes high-pressure
environment is required.
KPE
92
I MARCH 2011 HydrocarbonProcessing.com
FREE Product and Service Information—MARCH 2011
HOW TO USE THE INDEX: The FIRST NUMBER after the company name is the page on which an This information must be pro-
advertisement appears. The SECOND NUMBER, appearing in parentheses, after the company vided to process your request:
name, is the READER SERVICE NUMBER. There are several ways readers can obtain information: PRIMARY DIVISION OF INDUSTRY
1. The quickest way to request information from an advertiser or about an editorial item is to go to www. (check one only):
HydrocarbonProcessing.com/RS. If you follow the instructions on the screen your request will be forwarded for A 䊐-Refining Company
immediate action. B 䊐-Petrochemical Co.
C 䊐-Gas Processing Co.
2. Go online to the advertiser's Website listed below. F 䊐-Equipment Manufacturer
G 䊐-Supply Company
3. Circle the Reader Service Number below and fax this page to +1 (416) 620-9790. Include your name, company, complete
H 䊐-Service Company
address, phone number, fax number and e-mail address, and check the box on the right for your division of industry and
J 䊐-Chemical Co.
job title.
P 䊐-Engrg./Construction Co.
Name ________________________________________________________ Company ________________________________________________________ JOB FUNCTION
Address ______________________________________________________ City/State/Zip ____________________________________________________ (check one only):
B 䊐-Company Official, Manager
Country ______________________________________________________ Phone No. _______________________________________________________
E 䊐-Engineer or Consultant
FAX No. ______________________________________________________ e-mail ___________________________________________________________ F 䊐-Supt. or Asst.
G 䊐-Foreman or Asst.
This Advertisers’ Index and procedure for securing additional information is provided as a service to Hydrocarbon I 䊐-Chemist
Processing advertisers and a convenience to our readers. Gulf Publishing Co. is not responsible for omissions or errors. J 䊐-Purchasing Agt.
ABV Energy S.p.A. . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 (152) GE Power & Water . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 (72) Quest Integrity Group LLC . . . . . . 87 (164)
www.info.hotims.com/35901-152 www.info.hotims.com/35901-72 www.info.hotims.com/35901-164
Altair Strickland. . . . . . . . . . . . . T-62 (97) Greene, Tweed & Co. . . . . . . . . . . 20 (153) Rentech Boiler Services . . . . . . . T-70 (83)
www.info.hotims.com/35901-97 www.info.hotims.com/35901-153 www.info.hotims.com/35901-83
Axens . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 (53) Gulf Publishing Company Samson GmbH . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 (161)
www.info.hotims.com/35901-53 www.info.hotims.com/35901-161
Construction Boxscore . . . . . . . . 26 (156)
Bryan Research & Engineering . . . 42 (113) www.info.hotims.com/35901-156 Siemens Ag . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 (52)
www.info.hotims.com/35901-113 www.info.hotims.com/35901-52
Events - Save The Date . . . . . . . 95
Cameron . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 (55) Silcotek . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 (157)
www.info.hotims.com/35901-55
GPC Books . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47, 88 www.info.hotims.com/35901-157
Cashco, Inc.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 (155) HPI Marketplace . . . . . . . . . 90–91 Socap Srl . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 (159)
www.info.hotims.com/35901-155 HPI Market DataBook . . . . . . . T-61 www.info.hotims.com/35901-159
Cooper Crouse-Hinds GmbH . . . T-56 (165) Site License Program . . . . . . . . . 48 Spraying Systems Co . . . . . . . . . . 16 (62)
www.info.hotims.com/35901-165 Subscription . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 www.info.hotims.com/35901-62
Curtiss-Wright Flow Control ITT Industries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 (86) Swagelok Co. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 (63)
Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T-64 (95) www.info.hotims.com/35901-63
www.info.hotims.com/35901-86
www.info.hotims.com/35901-95 Team Industrial Services . . . . . . . 25 (73)
Linde Process Plants . . . . . . . . . . 14 (81)
Curtiss-Wright Flow Control www.info.hotims.com/35901-73
www.info.hotims.com/35901-81
Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 (76) Trachte USA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 (162)
www.info.hotims.com/35901-76
Merichem Company . . . . . . . . . . 33 (79)
www.info.hotims.com/35901-162
www.info.hotims.com/35901-79
Dollinger Filtration, Unifrax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 (68)
An SPX Brand . . . . . . . . . . . . . T-72 (99) Merichem Company . . . . . . . . . . 35 (78) www.info.hotims.com/35901-68
www.info.hotims.com/35901-99 www.info.hotims.com/35901-78
United Laboratories International,
Dunn Heat Exchangers . . . . . . . T-66 (59) Merichem Company . . . . . . . . . . 37 (158) Llc/Zyme-Flow. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 (154)
www.info.hotims.com/35901-59 www.info.hotims.com/35901-158 www.info.hotims.com/35901-154
Emerson Process Management . . . 6 Microtherm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T-68 (100) UOP LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
www.info.hotims.com/35901-100
Emerson Process Management Vega Americas, Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . 18 (92)
(Fisher Controls) . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 (69) Neptune Research . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 (151) www.info.hotims.com/35901-92
www.info.hotims.com/35901-69 www.info.hotims.com/35901-151 VOITH TURBO GmbH &
Flexitallic LP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 (93) Paharpur Cooling Towers, Ltd. . . . 27 (97) CO. KG . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . T-74 (166)
www.info.hotims.com/35901-93 www.info.hotims.com/35901-97 www.info.hotims.com/35901-166
GULF
P U B L I S H I N G C O M PA N Y
KPE
Your objectives
in focus
Make the most of today’s and tomorrow’s
challenges with leading-edge solutions from Axens
- Clean and alternative fuel technologies
- Petrochemicals
- Energy efficiency
- High performance catalysts & adsorbents
- Revamps