CRITERIA CHECKLIST FOR GROUP PRESENTATION
1. Content Knowledge and Theory (10%)
Accuracy of Theories Presented (4%)
Theories on vocabulary, grammar, and pronunciation are accurately explained with
appropriate terminology.
o 4% = Fully accurate
o 2.5% = Mostly accurate
o 1.5% = Some errors
o 0.5% = Many errors
Depth of Explanation (3%)
The presentation demonstrates a clear understanding of the subject matter, providing
detailed explanations of language theories.
o 3% = Thorough explanation
o 2% = Adequate explanation
o 1% = Insufficient explanation
Use of Relevant Examples (3%)
Provides relevant and clear examples to illustrate language theories (vocabulary,
grammar, pronunciation).
o 3% = Excellent examples
o 2% = Some relevant examples
o 1% = Few/irrelevant examples
2. Language Analysis (10%)
Quality of Speech Sample Analysis (5%)
The speech sample is thoroughly analyzed, highlighting key points related to vocabulary,
grammar, and pronunciation.
o 5% = Thorough analysis
o 3.5% = Detailed but minor gaps
o 2.5% = Some gaps
o 1% = Incomplete analysis
o 0.5% = No analysis
Identification of Strengths and Weaknesses (3%)
The analysis identifies strengths and areas for improvement in the speech sample.
o 3% = Strong identification
o 2% = Some identification
o 1% = Minimal identification
Suggestions for Revision (2%)
Clear and practical revision suggestions are made based on the analysis.
o 2% = Excellent suggestions
o 1% = Some suggestions
o 0% = No suggestions
3. Presentation Skills (10%)
Clarity and Structure (4%)
The presentation is well-structured, with clear sections (introduction, main body,
conclusion).
o 4% = Clear and logical
o 2.5% = Mostly clear
o 1.5% = Somewhat unclear
o 0.5% = Unclear
Engagement with Audience (3%)
The presenter maintains eye contact, uses gestures, and engages with the audience
effectively.
o 3% = Excellent engagement
o 2% = Adequate engagement
o 1% = Minimal engagement
Time Management (3%)
The presentation is within the allotted time and covers all required points.
o 3% = Perfect timing
o 2% = Slightly over/under time
o 1% = Significantly over/under time
4. Language Use and Delivery (10%)
Accuracy of Language Use (Grammar, Vocabulary) (4%)
The presenter uses accurate and appropriate language throughout the presentation.
o 4% = No significant errors
o 2.5% = Few errors
o 1.5% = Some errors
o 0.5% = Frequent errors
Pronunciation and Intonation (3%)
Pronunciation is clear, with appropriate stress and intonation.
o 3% = Clear and accurate
o 2% = Mostly clear
o 1% = Difficult to understand
Fluency and Coherence (3%)
The presenter speaks fluently and maintains coherence throughout the presentation.
o 3% = Very fluent
o 2% = Some hesitation
o 1% = Frequent pauses/hesitation
5. Visual and Supporting Materials (10%)
Quality of Visuals (3%)
The presentation uses clear, relevant, and well-designed visual aids (slides, charts, etc.).
o 3% = Excellent quality
o 2% = Adequate
o 1% = Poor quality
Integration of Visuals (3%)
Visuals support and enhance the presentation rather than distract from it.
o 3% = Well-integrated
o 2% = Some integration
o 1% = Little integration
Use of Additional Resources (4%)
The presentation incorporates additional resources (handouts, videos, etc.) to support the
content.
o 4% = Excellent use
o 2.5% = Good use
o 1.5% = Some use
o 0.5% = No use
6. Group Collaboration (10%)
Equal Participation (3%)
All group members contribute equally to the presentation.
o 3% = Equal contribution
o 2% = Minor imbalances
o 1% = Unequal contribution
Interaction and Teamwork (3%)
Group members interact effectively with one another, demonstrating teamwork during
the presentation.
o 3% = Excellent teamwork
o 2% = Adequate
o 1% = Minimal interaction
Coordination and Transitions (4%)
Transitions between speakers are smooth, and the presentation feels cohesive.
o 4% = Seamless
o 2.5% = Minor awkwardness
o 1.5% = Some disorganization
o 0.5% = Poor coordination
