Intermediate Public Economics 2nd Edition Hindriks - Download The Ebook Now To Never Miss Important Information
Intermediate Public Economics 2nd Edition Hindriks - Download The Ebook Now To Never Miss Important Information
com
         https://ebookgate.com/product/intermediate-public-
                   economics-2nd-edition-hindriks/
OR CLICK HERE
DOWLOAD NOW
https://ebookgate.com/product/public-economics-6th-edition-philip-
black/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/intermediate-algebra-2nd-ed-edition-
margaret-l-lial/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/modern-labor-economics-theory-and-
public-policy-11th-edition-ronald-g-ehrenberg/
ebookgate.com
Solutions 2nd edition Intermediate Student s Book Tim
Falla
https://ebookgate.com/product/solutions-2nd-edition-intermediate-
student-s-book-tim-falla/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/schaum-s-outlines-intermediate-
accounting-i-2nd-edition-mgh/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/intermediate-persian-a-grammar-and-
workbook-2nd-edition-saeed-yousef/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/handbook-of-public-economics-3-1st-
edition-alan-j-auerbach-and-martin-feldstein-eds/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/principles-of-economics-2nd-edition-
openstax/
ebookgate.com
INTERMEDIATE PUBLIC ECONOMICS
second edition
INTERMEDIATE PUBLIC ECONOMICS
second edition
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical
means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission
in writing from the publisher.
MIT Press books may be purchased at special quantity discounts for business or sales promotional use.
For information, please email [email protected] or write to Special Sales Department,
The MIT Press, 55 Hayward Street, Cambridge, MA 02142.
This book was set in Times New Roman by Westchester Books group. Printed and bound in the United
States of America.
Hindriks, Jean.
Intermediate public economics / Jean Hindriks and Gareth D. Myles.–2nd ed.
   p. cm.
Includes Index.
ISBN 978-0-262-01869-2 (hardcover : alk. paper)
1. Welfare economics 2. Finance, Public 3. Economic policy. I. Myles, Gareth D. II. Title.
HB846.5.H56 2013
336′ .001—dc23
2012029292
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
pour mon épouse Ewa et mes enfants (JH)
to the memory of my parents (GDM)
Contents
II GOVERNMENT
IV POLITICAL ECONOMY
         11     Voting                                345
         11.1   Introduction                          345
         11.2   Stability                             345
         11.3   Impossibility                         347
         11.4   Majority Rule                         350
                11.4.1 May’s Theorem                  350
                11.4.2 Condorcet Winner               351
                11.4.3 Median Voter Theorems          351
                11.4.4 Multidimensional Voting        356
                11.4.5 Agenda Manipulation            358
         11.5   Alternatives to Majority Rule         361
                11.5.1 Borda Voting                   361
                11.5.2 Plurality Voting               363
                11.5.3 Approval Voting                363
                11.5.4 Runoff Voting                  364
         11.6   The Paradox of Voting                 365
         11.7   The “Alabama” Paradox                 371
         11.8   Political Competition                 372
                11.8.1 Downsian Model                 372
                11.8.2 Policy Divergence              373
                11.8.3 Multidimensional Competition   376
                11.8.4 “Swing Voter” Politics         377
                11.8.5 Citizen-Candidate Model        379
         11.9   Conclusions                           381
xiii      Contents
          12      Rent-Seeking                       387
          12.1    Introduction                       387
          12.2    Definitions                        388
          12.3    Rent-Seeking Games                 390
                  12.3.1 Deterministic Game          391
                  12.3.2 Probabilistic Game          394
                  12.3.3 Free-Entry                  396
                  12.3.4 Risk Aversion               397
                  12.3.5 Conclusions                 398
          12.4    Social Cost of Monopoly            398
          12.5    Equilibrium Effects                401
          12.6    Government Policy                  404
                  12.6.1 Lobbying                    404
                  12.6.2 Rent Creation               406
                  12.6.3 Conclusions                 408
          12.7    Informative Lobbying               408
          12.8    Controlling Rent-Seeking           413
          12.9    Conclusions                        414
VI TAXATION
IX APPLICATIONS
      Index                                                     947
Preface to Second Edition
              We have been very pleased with the reception given to the first edition of Intermediate
              Public Economics. We wish to thank all our colleagues in universities across the world
              who have adopted the book to support their teaching. Their helpful comments and
              encouragement have provided the motivation to undertake this substantive revision.
                 The second edition of Intermediate Public Economic reflects recent developments in
              the academic literature and in policy debate. New chapters are included on behavioral
              economics, cost–benefit analysis, economics of climate policy, and international taxa-
              tion. A chapter has also been added on the limits to redistribution that complements the
              existing chapters on commodity taxation and income taxation. The advice of numer-
              ous users of the first edition has resulted in many other parts of the book having been
              improved by the expansion of some arguments and the clarification of others.
                 The book is written with the intention that it should be accessible to anyone with
              a background of intermediate microeconomics and macroeconomics. The level and
              quantity of mathematics is kept as low as possible without sacrificing intellectual rigor,
              but the book remains analytical rather than discursive. Some fairly abstract arguments
              are included—particularly in the new chapter on redistribution—where it has been
              judged that these make sufficiently important points that the extra burden imposed on
              the reader will be amply rewarded.
                 Additional exercises have been added at the end of each chapter. Correspondingly, a
              new Solutions Manual is available to accompany the book. Powerpoint slides for each
              of the chapters are also available.
                 The list of people to whom we are indebted for directly or indirectly assisting with
              the preparation of this book continues to grow. For assistance with the second edition
              we wish to thank Nizar Allouch, Douglas Bernheim, Thierry Bréchet, James David-
              son, Pascale Duran-Vigneron, Alessandro Ferrera, Christian Gollier, Roger Guesnerie,
              Andreea Halunga, Nigar Hashimzade, Tatiana Kirsanova, Christos Kotsogiannis, Eti-
              enne Lehmann, Cuong Le Van, Miguel-Angel Lopez-Garcia, Miltos Makris, François
              Maniquet, Ross McKitrick, Sushama Murthy, Pierre Pestieau, Matthew Rablen, Em-
              manuelle Taugourdeau, Henry Tulkens, Unal Zenginobuz, and the members of the
              Mirrlees Review of the UK tax system.
                 We also want to thank again the people we thanked for the first edition, many of
              whom have also contributed to this edition: Paul Belleflamme, Tim Besley, Chuck
              Blackorby, Christopher Bliss, Craig Brett, John Conley, Richard Cornes, Philippe
              De Donder, Sanjit Dhami, Peter Diamond, Jean Gabszewicz, Peter Hammond, Arye
xxii   Preface to Second Edition
       Hillman, Norman Ireland, Michael Keen, Jack Mintz, James Mirrlees, Frank Page Jr.,
       Susana Peralta, Pierre Pestieau, Pierre M. Picard, Ian Preston, Maria Racionero,
       Antonio Rangel, Les Reinhorn, Elena del Rey, Todd Sandler, Kim Scharf, Hyun
       Shin, Michael Smart, Stephen Smith, Klaas Staal, Jacques Thisse, Harrie Verbon,
       John Weymark, David Wildasin, and Myrna Wooders.
          Jean notes that the chapter on behavioral economics has benefited from the inspiring
       lectures given by Douglas Bernheim and Vincent Crawford at the 2011 ECORE Summer
       School in Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium. He also wishes to thank his Master’s degree
       students at UCL who tested several of the chapters. Gareth wishes to thank ATAX
       (University of New South Wales), ENS Cachan, NYU in London, and Universitat
       Autònoma de Barcelona for generous hospitality while parts of the book were written
       and tested. He also wishes to thank the Association of Public Economic Theory for
       providing such excellent conferences that make it possible to keep in touch with the
       book’s users.
          We observed in the Preface to the first edition that Public Economics is about the
       government and the economic effects of its policies. We should also observe that public
       economics continually absorbs new ideas from other fields and uses these whenever
       they can improve the understanding of policy. This book offers an extended insight into
       what Public Economics says and what it can do. We hope that you enjoy it.
       Jean Hindriks
       Louvain La Neuve
       Gareth Myles
       Exeter
       February 2012
Preface to First Edition
               This book has been prepared as the basis for a final-year undergraduate or first-year
               graduate course in Public Economics. It is based on lectures given by the authors at
               several institutions over many years. It covers the traditional topics of efficiency and
               equity but also emphasizes more recent developments in information, games, and,
               especially, political economy.
                  The book should be accessible to anyone with a background of intermediate microe-
               conomics and macroeconomics. We have deliberately kept the quantity of math as low
               as we could without sacrificing intellectual rigor. Even so, the book remains analytical
               rather than discursive.
                  To support the content, further reading is given for each chapter. This reading is
               intended to offer a range of material from the classic papers in each area through recent
               contributions to surveys and critiques. Exercises are included for each chapter. Most
               of these should be possible for a good undergraduate but some may prove challenging.
                  There are many people who have contributed directly or indirectly to the prepara-
               tion of this book. Nigar Hashimzade is entitled to special thanks for making incisive
               comments on the entire text and for assisting with the analysis in chapters 11 and 24.
               Thanks are also due to Paul Belleflamme, Tim Besley, Chuck Blackorby, Christopher
               Bliss, Craig Brett, John Conley, Richard Cornes, Philippe De Donder, Sanjit Dhami,
               Peter Diamond, Jean Gabszewicz, Peter Hammond, Arye Hillman, Norman Ireland,
               Michael Keen, Francois Maniquet, Jack Mintz, James Mirrlees, Frank Page Jr., Su-
               sana Peralta, Pierre Pestieau, Pierre M. Picard, Ian Preston, Maria Racionero, Antonio
               Rangel, Les Reinhorn, Elena del Rey, Todd Sandler, Kim Scharf, Hyun Shin, Michael
               Smart, Stephen Smith, Klaas Staal, Jacques Thisse, Harrie Verbon, John Weymark,
               David Wildasin, and Myrna Wooders.
                  Public Economics is about the government and the economic effects of its policies.
               This book offers an insight into what Public Economics says and what it can do. We
               hope that you enjoy it.
               Jean Hindriks
               Louvain La Neuve
               Gareth Myles
               Exeter
               February 2005
List of Figures
              The study of public economics has a long tradition. It developed out of the original
              political economy of John Stuart Mill and David Ricardo, through the public finance
              tradition of tax analysis into public economics, and has now returned to its roots with
              the development of the new political economy. From the inception of economics as a
              scientific discipline, public economics has always been one of its core branches. The
              explanation for why it has always been so central is the foundation that it provides for
              practical policy analysis. This has always been the motivation of public economists,
              even if the issues studied and the analytical methods employed have evolved over
              time. We intend the theory described in this book to provide an organized and coherent
              structure for addressing economic policy in a rigorous and coherent way.
                 In the broadest interpretation, public economics is the study of economic efficiency,
              distribution, and government economic policy. The subject encompasses topics as
              diverse as responses to market failure due to the existence of externalities, the motives
              for tax evasion, and the explanation of bureaucratic decision-making. In order to reach
              into all of these areas, public economics has developed from its initial narrow focus on
              the collection and spending of government revenues to its present concern with every
              aspect of government interaction with the economy.
                 Public economics attempts to understand both how the government makes decisions
              and what decisions it should make. To understand how the government makes decisions,
              it is necessary to investigate the motives of the decision makers within government,
              how the decision makers are chosen, and how they are influenced by outside forces.
              Determining what decisions should be made involves studying the effects of the al-
              ternative policies that are available and evaluating the outcomes to which they lead.
              These aspects are interwoven throughout the text. By pulling them together, this book
              provides an accessible introduction to both of these aspects of public economics.
1.2 Methods
              The feature that most characterizes modern public economics is the use made of eco-
              nomic models. These models are employed as a tool to ensure that arguments are
              conducted coherently with a rigorous logical basis. Models are used for analysis because
4   Part I: Public Economics and Economic Efficiency
    the possibilities for experimentation are limited and past experience cannot always be
    relied on to provide a guide to the consequences of new policies. Each model is in-
    tended to be a simplified description of the part of the economy that is relevant for the
    analysis. What distinguishes economic models from those in the natural sciences is the
    incorporation of independent decision-making by the firms, consumers, and politicians
    that populate the economy. These actors in the economy do not respond mechanically
    but are motivated by personal objectives and are strategic in their behavior. Capturing
    the implications of this complex behavior in a convincing manner is one of the key
    skills of a successful economic modeler.
       Once a model has been chosen, its implications have to be derived. These implications
    are obtained by applying logical arguments that proceed from the assumptions of the
    model to a set of formally correct conclusions. Those conclusions then need to be
    given an interpretation in terms that can be related to the original question of interest.
    Policy recommendations can subsequently be derived but always with a recognition
    of the limitations of the model. A careful line has to be drawn between conclusions
    that are justifiable given the model and conclusions that go beyond what the model can
    support.
       The institutional setting for the study of public economics is invariably the mixed
    economy where individual decisions are respected but the government attempts to af-
    fect these through the policies it implements. Within this environment many alternative
    objectives can be assigned to the government. For instance, the government can be as-
    sumed to care about the aggregate level of welfare in the economy and to act selflessly
    in attempting to increase this. Such a viewpoint is the foundation of optimal policy
    analysis that inquires how the government should behave. But there can be no pre-
    sumption that actual governments act in this way. An alternative, and sometimes more
    compelling view, is that the government is composed of a set of individuals pursuing
    their own selfish agenda. Such a view provides a very different interpretation of the
    actions of the government and often provides a foundation for understanding how gov-
    ernments actually choose their policies. This perspective will also be considered in this
    book.
       The focus on the mixed economy makes the analysis applicable to most developed
    and developing economies. It also permits the study of how the government behaves
    and how it should behave. To provide a benchmark from which to judge the outcome
    of the economy under alternative policies, the command economy with an omniscient
    planner is often employed. This, of course, is just an analytical abstraction.
5             Chapter 1: An Introduction to Public Economics
              The method of policy analysis in public economics is to build a model of the economy
              and to find its equilibrium. Policy analysis is undertaken by tracing the effects of a
              policy through the ways in which it changes the equilibrium of the economy relative
              to some status quo. Alternative policies are contrasted by comparing the equilibria to
              which they lead.
                 In conducting the assessment of policy, it is often helpful to emphasize the distinc-
              tion between positive and normative analysis. The positive analysis of government
              investigates topics such as why there is a public sector, where government objectives
              emerge, and how government policies are chosen. It is also about understanding what
              effects policies have on the economy. In contrast, normative analysis investigates what
              the best policies are, and aims to provide a guide to good government. These are not
              entirely disjoint activities. To proceed with a normative analysis, it is first necessary to
              conduct the positive analysis: it is not possible to say what is the best policy without
              knowing the effects of alternative policies upon the economy. It could also be argued
              that a positive analysis is of no value until used as part of a normative analysis of pol-
              icy. Normative analysis is conducted under the assumption that the government has a
              specified set of objectives and its action are chosen in the way that best achieves these.
              Alternative policies (including the policy of laissez faire or, literally “leave to do”) are
              compared by using the results of the positive analysis. The optimal policy is that which
              best meets the government’s objective. Hence the equilibria for different policies are
              determined and the government’s objective is evaluated for each equilibrium.
                 In every case restrictions are placed on the set of policies from which the government
              may choose. These restrictions are usually intended to capture limits on the information
              that the government has available. The information the government can obtain on the
              consumers and firms in the economy restricts the degree of sophistication that policy
              can have. For example, the extent to which taxes can be differentiated among different
              taxpayers depends on the information the government can acquire about each individual.
              Administrative and compliance costs are also relevant in generating restrictions on
              possible policies.
                 When the government’s objective is taken to be some aggregate level of social welfare
              in the economy, important questions are raised as to how welfare can be measured. This
              issue is discussed in some detail in a later chapter, but it can be noted here that the answer
              involves invoking some degree of comparability between the welfare levels of different
              individuals. It has been the willingness to proceed on the basis that such comparisons
6             Part I: Public Economics and Economic Efficiency
              can be made that has allowed the development of public economics. While differences
              of opinion exist on the extent to which these comparisons are valid, it is still scientifically
              justifiable to investigate what they would imply if they could be made. Furthermore
              general principles can be established that apply to any degree of comparability.
1.4 Preview
              Part I of the book, which includes this chapter, introduces public economics and pro-
              vides a review of basic results that are used repeatedly in later chapters. The discussion
              of the methodology of public economics has shown that a necessary starting point for
              the development of the theory of policy analysis is an introduction to economic model-
              ing. This represents the content of chapter 2 in which the basic model of a competitive
              economy is introduced. The chapter describes the agents involved in the economy and
              characterizes economic equilibrium. An emphasis is placed upon the assumptions on
              which the analysis is based since much of the subject matter of public economics follows
              from looking at how the government should respond if these are not satisfied. Having
              established the basic model, the chapter then investigates the efficiency of the com-
              petitive equilibrium. This leads into some fundamental results in welfare economics.
              The analysis of competitive equilibrium is based on the standard assumption that in-
              dividuals act rationally in their pursuit of narrow self-interest. This assumption has
              been increasingly challenged by mounting evidence of observed behavior (so-called
              anomalies) that is inconsistent with rationality and self-interest. The literature that ex-
              plores these inconsistencies is typically called behavioral economics. The anomalies
              raise important questions in many areas of economic policy, so a review of the most
              relevant parts of behavioral economics is undertaken in chapter 3.
                 The analysis of government begins in part II. Chapter 4 provides an overview of
              the public sector. It first charts the historical growth of public sector expenditure over
              the previous century and then reviews statistics on the present size of the public sector
              in several of the major developed economies. The division of expenditure and the
              composition of income are then considered. The level of public debt has recently
              become an issue of major policy importance, so data are given to demonstrate the
              increase in debt over time and its allocation across countries. Finally, issues involved
              in measuring the size of the public sector are addressed. The issues raised by the
              statistics of chapter 4 are addressed by the discussion of theories of the public sector in
              chapter 5. Reasons for the existence of the public sector are considered, as are theories
              that attempt to explain its growth. A positive analysis of how the government may have
7   Chapter 1: An Introduction to Public Economics
       Part VI is concerned with taxation. It analyzes the basic tax instruments and the
    economics of tax evasion. Chapters 15 and 16 consider commodity taxation and income
    taxation, which are the two main taxes levied on consumers. In both of these chapters
    the economic effects of the instruments are considered and rules for setting the taxes
    optimally are derived. The results illustrate the resolution of the equity/efficiency trade-
    off in the design of policy and the consequences of the limited information available
    to the government. In addition to the theoretical analysis the results of application
    of the methods to data are considered. The numerical results are useful, since the
    theoretical analysis leads only to characterizations of optimal taxes rather than explicit
    solutions. These chapters all assume that the taxes that are levied are paid honestly
    and in full. This empirically doubtful assumption is corrected in chapter 17, which
    looks at the extent of the hidden economy and analyzes the motives for tax evasion and
    its consequences. The final chapter of this section, chapter 18, adopts a very abstract
    approach to investigate the question of whether restricting attention to mixed economies
    limits what can be achieved by policy intervention. It provides the comforting result
    that there is no allocation mechanism that can out-perform competitive trade with tax
    intervention.
       Part VII studies public economics when there is more than one decision-making
    body. Chapter 19 on fiscal federalism addresses why there should be multiple levels
    of government and discusses the optimal division of responsibilities between different
    levels. The concept of tax competition is studied in chapter 20. It is shown how tax
    competition can limit the success of delegating tax-setting powers to independent ju-
    risdictions. The globalization of the world economy and the closer integration of the
    European economies has emphasized the importance of the international dimension of
    taxation. A range of issues involved in the design of tax systems in a globalized world
    are reviewed in chapter 21.
       Part VIII concentrates on intertemporal issues in public economics. Chapter 22 de-
    scribes the overlapping generations economy that is the main analytical tool of this part.
    The concept of the Golden Rule is introduced for economies with production and cap-
    ital accumulation, and the potential for economic inefficiency is discussed. Chapter 23
    analyzes social security policy and relates this to the potential inefficiency of the com-
    petitive equilibrium. Both the motivation for the existence of social security programs
    and the determination of the level of benefits are addressed. Ricardian equivalence is
    linked to the existence of gifts and bequests. This part is completed by chapter 24, which
    considers the effects of taxation and public expenditure on economic growth. Alterna-
    tive models of economic growth are introduced, and the evidence linking government
    policy to the level of growth is discussed.
9             Chapter 1: An Introduction to Public Economics
                 The final part of the book, part IX, considers two applications of the theory. The
              discussion of cost–benefit analysis in chapter 25 draws on many of the earlier results
              to detail a methodology for evaluating when the implementation of a project—which
              can be interpreted as any change in policy—will increase social welfare. Chapter 26
              completes the book with a discussion of the economics of climate policy. The focus
              in the chapter is on how the tools of public economics can be applied to policy in the
              presence of pervasive uncertainty.
1.5 Scope
Further Reading
Exercises
            1.1     Should an economic model be judged on the basis of its assumptions or its conclusions?
            1.2     Explain the economic implications of the imposition of quality standards for drinking
                    water.
            1.3     Can economics contribute to an understanding of how government decisions are made?
            1.4     In the introduction to “The Economics of Welfare” (1928) Pigou states that:
                    When a man sets out upon any course of inquiry, the object of his search may be either light or
                    fruit—either knowledge for its own sake or knowledge for the sake of good things to which
                    it leads.
                    What should be the balance betweeen light and fruit in public economics?
     1.11   “Poverty should be reduced to lessen the extent of malnutrition and raise economic growth.”
            Distinguish the positive and normative components of this statement.
     1.12   “It is economically efficient to maintain a pool of unemployed labor.” Is this claim based on
            positive or normative reasoning?
     1.13   “High-income earners should pay a high rate of tax because their labor supply is inelastic
            and the revenue raised can be used to assist those on low incomes.” Distinguish between the
            positive and normative components of this statement.
     1.14   Bob Wailer was a talented singer from a very early age. With no training or practice he built
            a successful career as the enigmatic frontman of a punk revivalist band. From the day she
            could hold a bow Emma Libro was trained in classical violin. After many years of study and
            practice she finally obtained lead violin for the Exeter Philharmonic and a lucrative recording
            contract. Assume that Bob and Emma have the same income. Is it equitable for them to pay
            the same amount of tax?
     1.15   Consider two methods of dividing a cake between two people. Method 1 is to throw some of
            the cake away, and share what is left equally. Method 2 is to give one person 75 percent of
            the cake and the other 25 percent. Which method do you prefer, and why?
     1.16   A cake has to be apportioned between two people. One is well-nourished, and the other is
            not. If the well-nourished person receives a share x, 0 ≤ x ≤ 1, a share y = [1 − x]2 is left
            for the other person (some is lost when the cake is divided). Plot the possible shares that the
            two people can have. What allocation of shares would you choose? How would your answer
            change if y = [1 − x]4 ?
     1.17   A cake is to be divided between two people. Unfortunately, when the cake is sliced some
            is lost. Specifically, if the sizes of the two portions are denoted x and y, then the size of
            the slices satisfy the relation x 1/2 + y 1/2 = 1. Graph the possible divisions of the cake and
            discuss how the balance between efficiency and equity will affect the choice of division.
     1.18   Can an economic model be acceptable if it assumes that consumers solve computationally
            complex maximization problems? Does your answer imply that Tiger Woods can derive the
            law of motion for a golf ball?
     1.19   To analyze the effect of a subsidy to rice production, would you employ a partial equilibrium
            or a general equilibrium model?
     1.20   If the European Union considered replacing the income tax with an increase in VAT, would
            you model this using partial equilibrium?
     1.21   What proportion of the world’s economies (by number, population, and wealth) can be
            described as “mixed”?
     1.22   What problems may arise in setting economic policy if consumers know the economic model?
     1.23   Should firms maximize profit?
     1.24   To what extent is it possible to view the government as having a single objective?
     1.25   Are you happier than your neighbor? How many times happier or less happy?
12   Part I: Public Economics and Economic Efficiency
     1.26   Assume that consumers are randomly allocated to either earn income Mℓ or income Mh ,
            where Mh >Mℓ . The probability of being allocated to Mℓ is π . Prior to being allocated to an
            income level, consumers wish to maximize their expected income level. If it is possible to
            redistribute income costlessly, show that prior to allocation to income levels, no consumer
            would object to a transfer scheme. Now assume that there is a cost  for each consumer of
            income Mh from whom income is taken. Find the maximum value of π for which there is
            still unanimous agreement that transfers should take place.
2             Equilibrium and Efficiency
2.1 Introduction
              The link between competition and efficiency can be traced back, at least, to Adam
              Smith’s eighteenth-century description of the working of the invisible hand. Smith’s
              description of individually motivated decisions being coordinated to produce a socially
              efficient outcome is a powerful one that has found resonance in policy circles ever
              since. The expression of the efficiency argument in the language of formal economics,
              and the deeper understanding that comes with it, is a more recent innovation.
                 The focus of this chapter is to review what is meant by competition and to describe
              equilibrium in a competitive economy. The model of competition combines indepen-
              dent decision-making of consumers and firms into a complete model of the economy.
              Equilibrium is shown to be achieved in the economy by prices adjusting to equate
              demand and supply. Most important, the chapter employs the competitive model to
              demonstrate the efficiency theorems.
                 Surprisingly, equilibrium prices can always be found that simultaneously equate
              demand and supply for all goods. What is even more remarkable is that the equilibrium
              so obtained also has properties of efficiency. Why this is remarkable is that individual
              households and firms pursue their independent objectives with no concern other than
              their own welfare. Even so, the final state that emerges achieves efficiency solely
              through the coordinating role played by prices.
              Prior to starting the analysis, it is worth reflecting on why economists employ models
              to make predictions about the effects of economic policies. Models are used essentially
              because of problems of conducting experiments on economic systems and because the
              system is too large and complex to analyze in its entirety. Moreover formal modeling
              ensures that arguments are logically consistent with all the underlying assumptions
              exposed.
                 The models used, while inevitably being simplifications of the real economy, are
              designed to capture the essential aspects of the problem under study. Although many
              different models will be studied in this book, there are important common features that
              apply to all. Most models in public economics specify the objectives of the individual
14           Part I: Public Economics and Economic Efficiency
             agents (e.g., firms and consumers) in the economy, and the constraints they face, and
             then aggregate individual decisions to arrive at market demand and supply. The equi-
             librium of the economy is next determined, and in a policy analysis the effects of
             government choice variables on this are calculated. This is done with various degrees
             of detail. Sometimes only a single market is studied—this is the case of partial equilib-
             rium analysis. At other times general equilibrium analysis is used with many markets
             analyzed simultaneously. Similarly the number of firms and consumers varies from one
             or two to very many.
                An essential consideration in the choice of the level of detail for a model is that
             its equilibrium must demonstrate a dependence on policy that gives insight into the
             functioning of the actual economy. On the one hand, if the model is too highly specified,
             it may not be capable of capturing important forms of response. On the other hand, if it
             is too general, it may not be able to provide any clear prediction. The theory described
             in this book will show how this trade-off can be successfully resolved. Achieving a
             successful compromise between these competing objectives is the “art” of economic
             modeling.
             The essential feature of competition is that the consumers and firms in the economy
             do not consider their actions to have any effect on prices. Consequently, in making
             decisions, they treat the prices they observe in the market place as fixed (or parametric).
             This assumption can be justified when all consumers and firms are truly negligible in
             size relative to the market. In such a case the quantity traded by an individual consumer
             or firm is not sufficient to change the market price. But the assumption that the agents
             view prices as parametric can also be imposed as a modeling tool, even in an economy
             with a single consumer and a single firm.
                This defining characteristic of competition places a focus on the role of prices, as
             is maintained throughout the chapter. Prices measure values and are the signals that
             guide the decisions of firms and consumers. It was the exploration of what determined
             the relative values of different goods and services that led to the formulation of the
             competitive model. The adjustment of prices equates supply and demand to ensure that
             equilibrium is achieved. The role of prices in coordinating the decisions of independent
             economic agents is also crucial for the attainment of economic efficiency.
                The secondary feature of the economies in this chapter is that all agents have access
             to the same information, or in formal terminology, that information is symmetric. This
15           Chapter 2: Equilibrium and Efficiency
             does not imply that there cannot be uncertainty, but only that when there is uncertainty,
             all agents are equally uninformed. Put differently, no agent is permitted to have an
             informational advantage. For example, by this assumption, the future profit levels of
             firms are allowed to be uncertain and shares in the firms to be traded on the basis of
             individual assessments of future profits. What the assumption does not allow is for
             the directors of the firms to be better informed than other shareholders about future
             prospects and to trade profitably on the basis of this information advantage.
                Two forms of the competitive model are introduced in this chapter. The first form is
             an exchange economy in which there is no production. Initial stocks of goods are held
             by consumers and economic activity occurs through the trade of these stocks to mutual
             advantage. The second form of competitive economy introduces production. This is
             undertaken by firms with given production technologies who use inputs to produce
             outputs and distribute their profits as dividends to consumers.
             The exchange economy models the simplest form of economic activity: the trade of
             commodities between two parties in order to obtain mutual advantage. Despite the
             simplicity of this model, it is a surprisingly instructive tool for obtaining fundamental
             insights about taxation and tax policy. This will become evident as we proceed. This
             section presents a description of a two-consumer, two-good exchange economy. The
             restriction on the number of goods and consumers does not alter any of the conclusions
             that will be derived; they will all extend to larger numbers. What restricting the numbers
             does is allow the economy to be displayed and analyzed in a simple diagram.
                Each of the two consumers has an initial stock, or endowment, of the economy’s two
             goods. The endowments can be interpreted literally as stocks of goods, or less literally
             as human capital, and are the quantities that are available for trade. Given the absence
             of production, these quantities remain constant. The consumers exchange quantities
             of the two commodities in order to achieve consumption plans that are preferred to
             their initial endowments. The rate at which one commodity can be exchanged for
             the other is given by the market prices. Both consumers believe that their behavior
             cannot affect these prices. This is the fundamental assumption of competitive price-
             taking behavior. More will be said about the validity and interpretation of this in
             section 2.6.
                A consumer is described by their endowments and their preferences. The endowment
                                                           
             of consumer h is denoted by ωh = ω1h , ω2h , where ωih ≥ 0 is h’s initial stock of good i.
16   Part I: Public Economics and Economic Efficiency
                                                                                  
     When prices are p1 and p2 , a consumption plan for consumer h, x h = x1h , x2h , is
     affordable if it satisfies the budget constraint
     The preferences of each consumer are described by their utility function. This func-
     tion should be seen as a representation of the consumer’s indifference curves and does
     not imply any comparability of utility levels between consumers—the issue of com-
     parability is taken up in chapter 13. The utility function for consumer h is denoted by
                       
     U h = U h x1h , x2h .                                                              (2.2)
     It is assumed that the consumers enjoy the goods (so the marginal utility of consumption
     is positive for both goods) and that the indifference curves have the standard convex
     shape.
         This economy can be pictured in a simple diagram that allows the role of prices in
     achieving equilibrium to be explored. The diagram is constructed by noting that the
     total consumption of the two consumers must equal the available stock of the goods,
     where the stock is determined by the endowments. Any pair of consumption plans
     that satisfies this requirement is called a feasible plan for the economy. A plan for the
     economy is feasible if the consumption levels can be met from the endowments, so that
     The consumption plans satisfying (2.3) can be represented as points in a rectangle with
     sides of length ω11 + ω12 and ω21 + ω22 . In this rectangle the southwest corner can be
     treated as the zero consumption point for consumer 1 and the northeast corner as the
     zero consumption point for consumer 2. The consumption of good 1 for consumer 1 is
     then measured horizontally from the southwest corner and for consumer 2 horizontally
     from the northeast corner. Measurements for good 2 are made vertically.
        The diagram constructed in this way is called an Edgeworth box and a typical box
     is shown in figure 2.1. It should be noted that the method of construction results in the
     endowment point, marked ω, being the initial endowment point for both consumers.
        The Edgeworth box is completed by adding the preferences and budget constraints of
     the consumers. The indifference curves of consumer 1 are drawn relative to the south-
     west corner and those of consumer 2 relative to the northeast corner. From (2.1) it can
     be seen that the budget constraint for both consumers must pass through the endowment
     point, since consumers can always afford their endowment. The endowment point is
17   Chapter 2: Equilibrium and Efficiency
                                                         x12
                                                                    2
                   1
                  x2                                           x         2
      1
          +   2                                                         x2
      2       2
                       1                                  1
                                                         x1
                                             1       2
                                             1
                                                 +   1
     Figure 2.1
     Typical Edgeworth box
     common to both consumers, so a single budget line through the endowment point with
     gradient − pp21 captures the market opportunities of the two consumers. Thus, viewed
     from the southwest, it is the budget line of consumer 1, and viewed from the north-
     east, the budget line of consumer 2. Given the budget line determined by the prices p1
     and p2 , the utility-maximizing choices for the two consumers are characterized by the
     standard tangency condition between the highest attainable indifference curve and the
     budget line. This is illustrated in figure 2.2, where x 1 denotes the choice of consumer
     1 and x 2 that of 2.
        At an equilibrium of the economy, supply is equal to demand. This is assumed to be
     achieved via the adjustment of prices. The prices at which supply is equal to demand
     are called equilibrium prices. How such prices are arrived at will be discussed later. For
     the present the focus will be placed on the nature of equilibrium and its properties. The
     consumer choices shown in figure 2.2 do not constitute an equilibrium for the economy.
     This can be seen by summing the demands and comparing these to the level of the
     endowments. Doing this shows that the demand for good 1 exceeds the endowment
     but the demand for good 2 falls short. To achieve an equilibrium position, the relative
     prices of the goods must change. An increase in the relative price of good 1 raises
     the absolute value of the gradient −p1 /p2 of the budget line, making the budget line
     steeper. It becomes flatter if the relative price of good 1 falls. At all prices the budget
Discovering Diverse Content Through
     Random Scribd Documents
and it feeds the several plasmodes which bathe the several tissues.
Passing into the capillaries, it becomes transformed as it passes
through their walls into the intercellular spaces, saturating the acid
products of the cell-activities with its alkalies, and furnishing the
protoplasms with their needed materials.
   62. It will be understood that, although in appearance these
stages are sharply defined, in reality they are insensible. But from
the analytical point of view we may regard Nutrition as the office of
the plasmode, and Evolution as the office of the protoplasm.
Although evolution or genesis of form depends on assimilation, it is
not a necessary consequence: the plasmode or the protoplasm
might preserve such perfect equality in the waste and repair, such
complete equilibrium, as not to undergo any development. The ova,
for example, which exist in the ovaries at birth are not all
subsequently developed; and if with modern embryologists we
conclude that there is no replacement of these by proliferation we
shall in them have examples of organites remaining unchanged
                                21
through a period of fifty years. But such an equilibrium is perhaps
only possible in complete inactivity.
   63. Again, although the office of the plasmode is primarily that of
forming protoplasm, I think there is evidence to suggest that it not
only does this, but that some of it is used in the direct development
of energy, especially heat and electricity. The various forms of starch
and sugar taken in with the food or formed in the liver, certainly do
not as such enter into protoplasm. The same with alcohol.
   64. It is perhaps in forgetfulness of the artificial nature of
analytical distinctions that controversies rage respecting what are
called intercellular substances and cell-walls. Now that the wall is no
longer regarded as an essential constituent of the cell, but as a
secondary formation, two opinions are maintained: first, that it is
merely a concentration of the external layer of protoplasm; secondly,
that it is a product of secretion from the protoplasm. Both positions
may be correct. Certainly in some cases there is no other
appreciable difference between wall and protoplasm than that of a
greater consistence; whereas in many other cases there exists a
decided difference in their chemical reactions, showing a difference
of composition. Taking both orders of fact, we may conclude that the
cell-wall is sometimes part of the organite, and sometimes product:
a blood-cell and a cartilage-cell may be cited as examples of each.
And this argument applies to the intercellular substance also.
    65. The terms plasmode and protoplasm are general, and include
many species. There are different plasmodes for the different
tissues, so that we find phosphates of soda in the blood-serum,
phosphates of potash in the nerve-plasma, phosphates of magnesia
in the muscle-plasma, and phosphates of lime in the bone-plasma;
having severally to form the specifically different protoplasms of
these tissues. Observe, moreover, the gradations of these in respect
of their physical state: the blood being the most liquid, the nerve a
degree more solid, the muscle still more solid, and the bone almost
entirely solid; and since solubility of material is a necessary condition
of the chemical changes, we can understand how the blood, the
nerve, the muscle, and the bone represent degrees of vital activity:
the greater the instability of organized substance, the more active its
molecular renovation. Many serious errors result from overlooking
the specific differences of protoplasms; among them may be
mentioned that very common one of asserting that the ovum of a
man is not distinguishable from the ovum of any other mammal, nor
the ovum of a mammal from that of a reptile; nay, we sometimes
see it stated that the protoplasm from which a mammal may be
developed is the same as that which is the germ of an oak. So long
as this simply asserts that we have at present no means of
distinguishing them by any chemical or physical tests, there can be
no objection raised; but it is a serious misconception, which any
embryological investigation ought to rectify, to suppose that the
ovum is not specific from the first.
   66. Between the organites and their plasmodes there is the
necessary relation, which corresponds with the relation between
organisms and their mediums. Once formed, the organites are
arranged side by side, or end on end, into textures or tissues, and
these are grouped into organs, every organ being constituted by a
collection of tissues, as every apparatus is by a collection of organs,
and the organism by the federation of all the parts. We have more
than once insisted on the necessity of synthetic interpretation to
complete the indications of analysis: which means that no account of
vital phenomena is real unless it takes in all the co-operant factors,
both those of the organism and the medium. Neglect of this canon
vitiates Dr. Beale’s otherwise remarkable labors.
    81. The terms Property and Function are not always used with
desirable precision. There is, however, a marked distinction between
the property which characterizes a tissue in whatever organ the
tissue may be found, and the function which is exhibited by an
organ composed of several tissues. We ought never to speak of a
function unless we imply the existence of a correlative organ; and it
is therefore incorrect to speak of the function of Nutrition, since all
the tissues nourish themselves; but we may speak of certain organs
as special instruments in facilitating Nutrition. Thus also with
respiration, usually, but not accurately, spoken of as the function of
the lungs; the lungs being simply the most effective of the
instruments by which the interchange of gases (which also takes
place in every tissue) is facilitated. If by Respiration we mean
Breathing, then, indeed, Respiration is the function of the lungs; if
we mean the absorption of oxygen and the exhalation of carbonic
acid, Respiration is a general property of vital tissue. A fragment of
muscle removed from the body respires, so long as its organization
is intact; but it does not breathe—it has no accessory instruments,
nor does it need them. The co-operation of nerve centres,
diaphragm, ribs, circulating system, etc., necessary in the complex
organism to bring the due amount of oxygen to the tissues, and
convey away the carbonic acid, is here needless. In the ascending
animal series we find this necessity growing with the complexity of
the organism. The whole skin respires in the amphibia, and to some
extent in man also: a frog will live for ten or fourteen days after
extirpation of its lungs, the skin respiring sufficiently to keep up a
feeble vitality. But the skin does not suffice; and, very early, certain
portions are specialized into organs (at first in the shape of external
gills, and finally as internal lungs), for the more energetic, because
more specialized, performance of this office. In the simpler
organisms the blood is easily reached by the air; therefore no
instrument is needed. In primitive societies the transport of goods is
effected by men and women carrying them; in civilized societies by
the aid of horses and camels, and wagons drawn by oxen; till finally
these are insufficient, and railways are created, whose power of
transport transcends the earlier methods, as the breathing of a
mammal transcends the respiration of a mollusc. Breathing is the
special function of an organ—the lungs (or more strictly, the thoracic
apparatus)—as Railway Transport is a special social function.
Although each of the tissues forming this organ can, and does,
exhale carbonic acid and absorb oxygen—and each of the railway
servants can, and does, transport objects to and from the locomotive
—yet the main work is thrown upon the special apparatus.
    82. What is meant by properties of tissue and functions of organs
may be thus illustrated. Let us suppose ourselves investigating the
structure of a ship. We find it composed of various materials—wood,
iron, copper, hemp, canvas, etc.; and these under various
configurations are formed into particular parts serving particular
purposes, such as deck, masts, anchor, windlass, chains, ropes, sails,
etc. In all these parts the materials preserve their properties; and
wherever wood or iron may be placed, whatever purpose the part
may serve, the properties of wood and iron are unaffected; and it is
through a combination of these properties that the part is effective;
while through the connection of one part with another the purpose
becomes realized. The purposes to which masts, ropes, or sails are
subservient may be called their functions; and these of course only
exist, as such, in the ship. It is the same with the organism. We find
it composed of various Tissues, and these are combined into various
                          34
Organs or Instruments. The properties of Tissues remain the
same, no matter into what Organs they may be combined; they
preserve and exert their physical, chemical, and vital properties, as
wood and iron preserve their properties. Each Tissue has its
characteristic quality; and the Organ which is constructed out of a
combination of several Tissues, more or less modified, is effective
                                          35
solely in virtue of these properties, while the Function of that
organ comes into play through its combination with other organs.
For example, muscular tissue has a vital property which is
characteristic of it, Contractility; and muscles are organs constituted
                                       36
by this tissue and several others; such organs have the general
function of Contraction, but whether this shall be specially
manifested in the beating of the heart, the winking of the eyelid, the
movement of the chest, or the varied movements of the limbs, will
depend on the anatomical connections. The reader unfamiliar with
Biology is requested to pay very particular attention to this point; he
will find many obscurities dissipated if he once lays hold of the
“principal connections.”
   82a. Although Bichat’s conception was of great value, it was not
sufficiently disengaged from the metaphysical mode of viewing
biological phenomena. Both he and his disciples will be found
treating Properties as entities, and invoking them as causes of the
phenomena instead of recognizing them simply as abstract
expressions of the phenomena. Readers of my First Series will
remember how often I have had occasion to point out this common
error: men having baptized observed facts with a comprehensive
name, forget the process of baptism, and suppose the name to
represent a mysterious agency. The fact that gases combine is
expressed in the term affinity; and then Affinity is understood to be
the cause of the combinations. The fact that bodies tend towards
each other is called their gravitation, and Gravitation is then said to
cause the tendency. The doctrine of vital properties has been thus
misunderstood. While no one imagines that he can operate on
affinity otherwise than by operating on the known conditions under
which gases combine, many a biologist and physician speaks as if he
could operate on the Irritability of a tissue, or the Co-ordination of
muscles, by direct action on these abstractions.
    Let it be therefore once for all expressly stated that by the
property of a tissue is simply meant the constant mode of reaction
of that tissue under definite conditions. The property is not a cause,
otherwise than the conditions it expresses are a cause. And these
conditions are first those of the organized structure itself, and
secondly those of the medium in which it lives. Oxygen unites with
Hydrogen to form water, but only under certain pressures; so
likewise muscles manifest Contractility on being stimulated (that is
their mode of reaction), but only under certain degrees of
temperature, humidity, and a certain chemical composition of the
plasmode. The property is so truly an expression of the co-operant
conditions, that it is found to vary with those conditions, and to
vanish when they vary beyond a certain limit.
   An attempt has been made to restrict the notion of a property to
an ultimate fact. Whatever is not reducible to known conditions is to
be accepted as a property. Combustion, for example, is reducible to
the molecular combination of oxygen and some other gas; but this
combination itself is not reducible, and it is therefore christened
affinity. I cannot accept this view. Admitting our inability to say why
gases combine under certain conditions (and in this sense all facts
are inexplicable and ultimate, unless we take the how as ample
explanation of the why), I must still say that since affinity itself
depends on the co-operation of known conditions, it is not less
explicable than combustion. But the point is unimportant: what we
have here to settle is the meaning of a property of tissue,—and that
is the mode of reaction which that tissue manifests under constant
conditions, internal and external.
   83. The evolution of Life is the evolution of special properties and
functions from general properties and functions. The organism rises
in power as it ramifies into variety. Out of a seemingly structureless
germinal membrane, by successive differentiations certain portions
are set apart for the dominant, or exclusive, performance of certain
processes; just as in the social organism there is a setting apart of
certain classes of men for the dominant or exclusive performance of
offices, which by their co-operation constitute Society. The soldier
fights, but ceases to build or reap, weave or teach; the mason
builds; the agriculturist sows and reaps; the priest and thinker teach;
the statesman governs. In simple societies each does all, or nearly
all; but the social life thus manifested is markedly inferior to the
energetic life of a complex society. So with organisms. An amœba
manifests the general properties of Nutrition, Reproduction,
Sensibility, and Movement. But it has no special organs,
consequently no special functions. The polype has a certain
rudimentary specialization of parts: it has a simple alimentary cavity,
and prehensile tentacles; and although by these it can seize and
digest its prey, it can only do so in a limited way—all the manifold
varieties and power of prehension and digestion observed in more
complex organisms are impossible with such organs as the polype
possesses.
   84. Differences of structure and connection necessarily bring
about corresponding differences in Function, since Function is the
directed energy of the Properties of tissues. One organ will differ
from another in structure, as the liver from the pancreas, or the
kidney from the spleen; or one organ may closely resemble another
but differ from it only in connections, as a sensory and a motor
nerve, or an extensor and a flexor muscle. We must therefore always
bear both points in mind. Every modification, structural or
connectional, is translated by a corresponding modification in the
office. The hand and the foot show this well. The tissues are the
same in both, the properties are the same, and both have the same
general function of Prehension; but their morphological differences
carry corresponding differences in their uses.
   Suppose we have a galvanic battery, we know that its electric
force may be variously applied. Two pieces of charcoal fixed to the
ends of its conducting wires give us the electric light; replacing the
charcoal by a telegraphic apparatus we can transmit a message from
one continent to the other; the wires dipped in a solution effect a
chemical decomposition, dipped into a mixture of gases they effect a
chemical composition. In these, and many other applications, the
property of the battery is constant; but the functions it subserves
have varied with the varying co-operants. So with the properties of
       37
tissue. Not only have we to bear in mind the organic connections
of the tissues, but also the relation of the organs to their media.
Swimming and Walking, for example, are both functions of the
locomotive apparatus, but they are specially differenced by the
media in which the animal moves.
    85. The properties of tissues are their peculiar modes of reaction,
and each tissue has its dominant characteristic, such as the
Contractility of the muscle, and the Neurility of the nerve. But there
has of late years sprung up a misleading conception, partly a
consequence of the cell-theory, and partly of the almost inevitable
tendency of analysis to disregard whatever elements it provisionally
sets aside; this conception is the removal of the property from its
tissue, and the localization of it in one of the organites—cell or fibre.
This has been conspicuously mischievous in the case of the nerve-
cell, which has been endowed with mysterious powers, and may be
said to have usurped the place of nerve-tissue. I shall have to speak
of this in the next problem. Here I only warn the student against the
common error. The properties of a tissue depend on the structure
and composition of that tissue, together with its plasmode and
products; they vary as these vary. To select any one element in this
complex, and ascribe the reaction of the tissue to that, is only
permissible as a shorthand expression.
    86. What has just been expounded may be condensed in the
following biological law:—
ebookgate.com