AN ANALYSIS OF GENDER INEQUALITY AND ITS IMPACT ON GIRL CHILD

ENROLLMENT RETENTION AND COMPLETION OF SECONDARY SCHOOL IN

KARU LOCAL GOVERNMENT AREA, NASARAWA STATE, NIGERIA

CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 Background of the Study
Gender inequality remains a significant global challenge across various sectors, including
education. Despite substantial progress in some regions, millions of girls continue to face
barriers to accessing quality education due to entrenched socio-cultural norms, economic
disparities, and weak policy enforcement. This study explores gender inequality and its impact
on secondary school education for girls in Karu Local Government Area, Nasarawa State,
Nigeria.
Globally, gender inequality affects women and girls disproportionately in their pursuit of
education. According to UNESCO (2019), approximately 39 million girls of lower secondary age
are out of school, and women account for two-thirds of the world’s 796 million illiterate adults.
Socio-cultural norms, economic constraints, and gender-based violence remain the primary
barriers, particularly in low-income and developing countries. This disparity in access to
education has long-term implications, including reduced economic growth, increased child
mortality rates, and limited national development (World Bank, 2021).
The absence of equal educational opportunities for girls exacerbates poverty and inequality,
perpetuating a cycle of deprivation. Education is not only a basic human right but also a critical
enabler for achieving gender equity and sustainable development. Research highlights that
educated women are more likely to contribute to family income, improve child health outcomes,
and participate actively in decision making processes (Kapur, 2019).
In Nigeria, the issue of gender inequality in education has historical and cultural roots.
Traditionally, societal norms prioritized boys' education as they were perceived to be future
breadwinners, while girls were confined to domestic roles. Even after independence, efforts to
promote universal education through programs like the Universal Primary Education (UPE) in
1976 and the Universal Basic Education (UBE) in 1999 struggled to bridge the gender gap,
especially in rural areas (Fareo, 2019).
Today, gender disparities in education persist, particularly in marginalized regions like Karu
Local Government Area. Reports reveal that girls face challenges such as early marriages, child
labor, and a lack of supportive infrastructure like safe school environments and adequate
transportation. Despite these barriers, some progress has been observed in urban areas where
more parents are beginning to value education for their daughters (UNESCO, 2019).
Karu Local Government Area, located close to the Federal Capital Territory, represents the
intersection of urban and rural challenges in gender and education. While proximity to Abuja
brings potential economic opportunities, many families in Karu face poverty, cultural
restrictions, and inadequate government support. Fareo (2019) highlights that socio economic
conditions, coupled with cultural practices such as early marriage and preference for boys’
education, limit girls’ access to education in this region.
Additionally, school infrastructure deficits, including a lack of gender sensitive facilities like
separate toilets for girls, contribute to low enrollment and retention rates for female students.
Safety concerns, such as harassment during long commutes, further exacerbate the problem.
Addressing these issues requires a targeted approach, informed by empirical data and grounded
in the local context.
Socio economic, cultural, and political factors significantly contribute to gender inequality in
education, particularly in regions like Karu. Poverty serves as a major barrier, as families often
prioritize boys' education, viewing them as future breadwinners, while girls are seen as economic
burdens; the costs associated with schooling, such as uniforms, transportation, and books, further
discourage parents from sending their daughters to school (Kapur, 2019; Fareo, 2019). Deeply
entrenched cultural norms emphasize domestic roles and early marriages for girls, perpetuating
the belief that investing in their education yields minimal returns, as they are expected to marry
and assume household responsibilities (UNESCO, 2019). Politically, while initiatives such as the
Universal Basic Education (UBE) aim to promote inclusive education, weak policy enforcement,
inadequate funding, and corruption undermine these efforts, while the absence of targeted
interventions like scholarships for girls and community awareness programs further hampers
progress toward gender equity in education (World Bank, 2021).
Education is a powerful tool for achieving gender equity and social transformation. In regions
like Karu, addressing gender inequality in education is essential for breaking the cycle of poverty
and empowering communities. Educating girls has a multiplier effect, benefiting not only the
individual but also families and communities. It aligns with the Sustainable Development Goals
(SDG 4 and SDG 5), which emphasize inclusive, equitable quality education and gender equality
(UNESCO, 2019).
This study will investigate the socio economic, cultural, and political factors contributing to
gender inequality in Karu and evaluates their impact on girls' education. By identifying barriers
and proposing targeted interventions, it aims to inform policies and practices that promote gender
inclusive education.

1.2 Statement of the Problem

In Karu Local Government Area of Nasarawa State, girls face significant barriers to accessing
education. Social, economic, and cultural challenges hinder their ability to attend secondary
school. Many families prioritize early marriage and household responsibilities over girls'
education, believing that it offers little return on investment. Despite some efforts to improve this
situation, traditional views often see girls' education as less important (UNESCO, 2019).
Economic challenges make the situation worse, as many families prioritize the education of boys
over girls, viewing girls as added financial burdens in times of widespread poverty. The expenses
related to schooling, like tuition and supplies, contribute to a high rate of girls dropping out of
school (Fareo, 2019). Additionally, poor school facilities that don't take girls' needs into account
further prevent them from attending classes regularly (Kapur, 2019). These educational gaps
have broader societal implications, as uneducated girls are more vulnerable to early marriages,
limited career options, and poor health outcomes, perpetuating cycles of poverty and inequality.
This lack of education obstructs national development, as educated women contribute more
effectively to economic growth and social stability (World Bank, 2021).
Current initiatives like the Universal Basic Education (UBE) program have struggled due to
inadequate enforcement, corruption, and a lack of targeted gender strategies (Fareo, 2019). This
study aims to analyze the specific socio economic, cultural, and infrastructural barriers affecting
girls' education in Karu. By identifying these challenges, the research will offer actionable
strategies and recommendations to inform policy and community interventions, supporting the
global goals of inclusive education and gender equality (SDG 4 and SDG 5) (UNESCO, 2019).
1.3 Purpose of the Study
The purpose of this study is to investigate the extent and nature of gender inequality in secondary
school education in Karu Local Government Area of Nasarawa State, Nigeria. The specific
objectives of the study are as follows:
1. To determine the impact of gender inequality on girls’ enrollment in secondary schools in
Karu.
2. To assess the influence of gender inequality on girls’ retention in secondary schools in
Karu.
3. To evaluate the impact of gender inequality on girls’ completion of secondary school in
Karu.
This streamlined focus ensures clarity and depth, addressing the key variables relevant to the
study while providing actionable insights.

1.4 Research Questions

Based on the objectives of this study, the following research questions are posed:
1. What is the impact of gender inequality on the enrollment of girls in secondary schools in
Karu?
2. How does gender inequality influence the retention of girls in secondary schools in Karu?
3. What is the impact of gender inequality on the completion of secondary education for
girls in Karu?

1.5 Research Hypothesis

The following hypothesis will also be put forward to ensure the objectives of the research is
thoroughly explored;
1. H₀₁: Gender inequality has no significant impact on the enrollment of girls in secondary
schools in Karu Local Government Area.
2. H₀₂: Gender inequality does not significantly influence the retention of girls in
secondary schools in Karu Local Government Area.
3. H₀₃: Gender inequality has no significant impact on the completion of secondary school
education for girls in the Karu Local Government Area.
1.6 Significance of the Study
This study is important because it adds to the understanding of gender inequality and education
in Nigeria, especially focusing on secondary schools in the Karu Local Government Area. It
looks at how different social, economic, and institutional issues combine to create challenges for
girls trying to get a good education. By doing this, the study helps explain the obstacles that girls
encounter in their pursuit of quality education (UNICEF, 2020).
The findings will offer valuable insights for policymakers and stakeholders, including non-
governmental organizations (NGOs) and educators, to develop and implement gender-sensitive
interventions. For example, identifying key challenges such as early marriage and poverty will
help stakeholders design targeted programs to promote girls' education (Nwosu, 2021).
Policymakers can use these insights to refine existing educational policies, such as the Universal
Basic Education (UBE) program, ensuring their effective implementation in rural communities
like Karu (UNESCO, 2019).
This study emphasizes how important it is to provide inclusive education for everyone, as it
contributes to the growth of communities and nations. When girls receive an education, it creates
positive ripple effects, such as better health for families, a decrease in poverty, and a boost in
economic productivity (Khan & Jabeen, 2020). By tackling the gap in education between
genders, the findings show just how crucial education is for achieving global goals related to
quality education and gender equality (World Bank, 2021).

1.7 Scope of the Study

This study examines how gender inequality affects girls' education in Karu Local Government
Area, Nasarawa State. It highlights the challenges female students face in enrolling in and
completing secondary school, focusing on social, economic, and cultural factors that influence
their experiences (Fareo, 2019; UNESCO, 2020).

1.8 Operational Definition of Terms

 Gender Inequality: Disparities in access to resources and opportunities between males
and females, focusing on girls' limited access to quality secondary education in Karu
LGA due to socio-cultural norms, early marriage, and poverty (World Economic Forum,
2020; UN, 2021).
 Secondary School Education: Formal education for ages 12–18 in Nigeria, covering
junior and senior levels, crucial for socio-economic mobility and skill development
(UNESCO, 2020; Ojo, 2019).
 Karu Local Government Area: A region in Nasarawa State, Nigeria, with urban-rural
dynamics affecting girls' educational access due to socio-economic and cultural factors
(Nasarawa State Government, 2021).
 Early Marriage: Marrying girls before 18, disrupting their education and limiting
personal development (UNICEF, 2020; Durojaiye & Olanrewaju, 2021).
 Poverty: Lack of financial resources hindering girls’ education, a major driver of gender
inequality in rural areas (World Bank, 2021; Oxfam, 2020).
 Socio-Cultural Factors: Norms and values influencing gender roles, often discourage
girls' education beyond basic levels (Kapur, 2019; Adeyemo & Aderonke, 2021).
 Institutional Factors: Educational policies, infrastructure, and systems affecting gender
equality, with barriers like inadequate facilities limiting girls' opportunities (Ogunyemi,
2020; UNESCO, 2019).
 CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
This chapter focuses on the important background information related to this research. The
literature review is organized into several main sections to make it easier to follow.
2.1 Conceptual Framework
2.2 Theoretical Framework
2.3 Empirical Framework
2.4 Appraisal of the Reviewed Literature

2.1 Conceptual Framework

2.1.1 Overview of Gender Inequality in Education
Over recent decades, gender inequality in education has evolved from a struggle for basic access
to a more nuanced challenge characterized by both progress and persistent disparities. Feminist
movements have significantly narrowed the gender gap in many developed countries, resulting in
improved enrollment and degree completion for women (Nowak, 2021). However, entrenched
stereotypes and systemic biases still influence educational experiences and outcomes (Nowak,
2021). While overall enrollment disparities have decreased and in some cases reversed women
remain largely concentrated in fields such as the social sciences and humanities, which often
yield less favorable labor market prospects. In contrast, women are underrepresented in high-
demand areas like engineering and ICT, a pattern that perpetuates gender inequalities in the
workforce (Hendley & Charles, 2016; Barone & Assirelli, 2020). Additionally, higher education
institutions, despite their potential to promote equality, frequently reinforce gender imbalances
through unequal pay and limited representation in top academic roles (Rosa & Clavero, 2021).
Research shows that young women now outperform men in high school graduation, college
enrollment, and degree completion; yet, they continue to be underrepresented in elite institutions
and STEM fields (Buchmann, 2009). Moreover, education, while increasing awareness of gender
issues, does not always translate into support for remedies, sometimes even reinforcing existing
inequalities in employment attitudes (Kane, 1995). Future studies should adopt interdisciplinary
approaches to explore how gender differences in cognitive and noncognitive abilities, coupled
with educational structures and practices, intersect with other forms of inequality such as race
and class (Buchmann et al., 2008; Buchmann, 2009). Addressing these challenges will require
comprehensive policy reforms and targeted educational initiatives.
Gender inequality in education refers to the disparity in educational opportunities, access, and
outcomes between genders, particularly between males and females. This inequality is often
rooted in socio-cultural, economic, and systemic biases that limit the ability of women and girls
to achieve equal footing in education compared to their male counterparts. While education is
recognized universally as a basic human right, gender-based discrimination continues to act as a
barrier for millions of girls and women worldwide, particularly in developing countries such as
Nigeria (Ngwoke, 2020, p. 257)
The European Institute for Gender Equality defines gender inequality as the "legal, social, and
cultural situation in which sex and/or gender determine different rights and dignity for women
and men, reflected in their unequal access to or enjoyment of rights" (Nowak, 2021, p. 427). In
the educational context, this manifests as unequal access to schools, learning resources, and
opportunities for academic or career advancement. Gender inequality is not merely a reflection
of access to education but also its content, such as curricula that reinforce gender stereotypes or
teacher biases that limit female students' potential (Ngwoke, 2020, p. 260).
The conceptual model for this study illustrates the interrelated factors contributing to gender
inequality in secondary education within Karu Local Government Area. The model emphasizes
the cyclical nature of these factors, where socio-cultural norms, economic constraints, and
institutional barriers collectively reinforce each other, leading to sustained educational
disparities.
Socio-cultural norms, such as deep-seated cultural beliefs and practices, dictate gender roles that
often place a lower value on female education, influencing community attitudes where practices
like early marriage directly impact girls' educational attainment. Additionally, gender-based
violence and harmful cultural beliefs about women's roles further inhibit girls' access to
education (UNICEF, 2020; UNESCO, 2021). Economic constraints, particularly financial
hardships, compel families to make difficult choices regarding education, often prioritizing boys'
education over girls, thereby perpetuating the cycle of gender inequality. Families may view
girls' education as less of a priority, especially when faced with limited resources (World Bank,
2021; Oxfam, 2020). Institutional barriers, such as a lack of gender-sensitive infrastructure and
policies, including insufficient sanitation facilities, a lack of female teachers as role models, and
curricula that do not address gender-specific needs, create environments that hinder girls'
academic success. These institutional barriers contribute to an unfriendly environment for girls,
making it more challenging for them to thrive academically (USAID, 2008; Kapur, 2019).
Understanding these linkages is crucial for developing targeted interventions aimed at reducing
gender disparities in education, as addressing each factor within the model can lead to a more
equitable educational environment for all genders.

2.1.2 Causes of Gender Inequality in Education

The primary drivers of gender inequality in education are multidimensional. They include:
1. Cultural Norms and Practices: In many societies, cultural traditions prioritize the
education of boys over girls, often relegating girls to domestic roles. For instance, early
marriages and the perception that a woman's place is in the home restrict girls' access to
education (Mefeuwo, 2021, p. 9).
2. Economic Barriers: Families with limited resources often prioritize the education of
male children, as they are seen as future breadwinners. This economic favoritism
perpetuates the gender gap in education, particularly in rural areas (Ngwoke, 2020, p.
261).
3. Systemic Challenges: Gender inequality in education is exacerbated by poorly
implemented educational policies and infrastructure deficits, such as inadequate schools
and teachers in rural areas (Nowak, 2021, p. 428).

2.1.3 Impacts of Gender Inequality in Education

Gender inequality in education has far-reaching implications. Socially, it reinforces a cycle of
marginalization and exploitation of women. Economically, it restricts the participation of women
in productive activities and denies nations the benefits of a fully educated populace. For instance,
women with higher education levels are better positioned to contribute to economic growth and
are less likely to live in poverty (Ngwoke, 2020, p. 261). The Global Partnership for Education
(GPE) reports that if all girls completed 12 years of schooling, it could boost economies by $30
trillion (Nowak, 2021, p. 426).
The United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals (SDG 4) emphasize the need for equitable
and inclusive quality education for all genders. Specific strategies include:
 Legislative Reforms: Implementing policies that criminalize gender discrimination in
education and mandate compulsory education for girls.
 Community Engagement: Addressing cultural barriers through advocacy and awareness
campaigns to change societal perceptions about the value of educating girls.
 Economic Incentives: Providing scholarships and financial aid to families to support
girls' education (Ngwoke, 2020, p. 262).
Gender inequality in education is a pervasive challenge that undermines individual potential and
societal progress. Overcoming this issue requires a multidimensional approach, addressing
cultural, economic, and systemic barriers while promoting policies and practices that foster
gender equality. As former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan stated, "Gender equality is more
than a goal in itself. It is a precondition for reducing poverty, promoting sustainable
development, and building good governance" (Mefeuwo, 2021, p. 8).
Gender inequality in education refers to the disparities in access, opportunities, and outcomes
between males and females within educational systems. These disparities are influenced by a
complex interplay of socio-cultural, economic, and institutional factors that collectively hinder
equal educational opportunities for all genders (UNESCO, 2019; World Economic Forum, 2020).
Key Factors Contributing to Gender Inequality in Education

1. Socio-Cultural Factors: Traditional gender roles and cultural norms often prioritize male
education over female education, leading to lower enrollment and retention rates for girls.
Practices such as early marriage, gender-based violence, and societal expectations about
women's roles further exacerbate these disparities. Gender roles that restrict women’s mobility
and decision-making power also limit their ability to pursue education (UNICEF, 2020;
UNESCO, 2021).
2. Economic Factors: Poverty is a significant barrier to educational access. Families in low-
income settings often prioritize boys' education due to limited resources. This economic disparity
results in higher dropout rates among girls, particularly in rural areas, where education costs such
as school fees, uniforms, and transportation can be prohibitive (World Bank, 2021; Oxfam,
2020).
3. Institutional Factors: Educational policies and practices can either mitigate or perpetuate
gender disparities. A lack of gender-sensitive curricula, inadequate sanitation facilities for girls,
and insufficient female teachers can create environments that are not conducive to female
education. Inadequate implementation of policies supporting gender equality in education also
reinforces these disparities (USAID, 2008; Kapur, 2019).

2.1.4 Concepts of Equal Access, Retention, and Academic Performance in Education

Making education fair and accessible for everyone is a key goal in today’s schools. This means
that all individuals, no matter their background or circumstances, should have the chance to learn
and succeed. It’s important not only to make sure students can join in education but also to keep
them engaged and interested in their studies. Finally, we need to look at how well students are
doing to ensure that schools are helping them achieve their best. By focusing on fairness,
engagement, and success, we can create a better learning experience for all.
The interconnected notions of equal access, retention, and academic performance are essential
pillars in achieving educational success. Each concept contributes uniquely to the overall student
experience, yet they are mutually reinforcing.

2.1.4.1 Equal Access: A Foundational Principle

Equal access to education is a universal right acknowledged by international bodies and
policymakers. It involves removing barriers that prevent marginalized groups from participating
fully in education. As noted by Bilgin and Erbuğ (2021), "The state is obliged to prevent
inequalities arising from economic, social, regional, and biological differences in access to
education." This principle underscores the role of governments in creating inclusive policies that
address structural inequities.
The concept of equal access has evolved significantly. Historically, it was associated with
providing legal avenues for all individuals to attend school. Today, it encompasses a more
nuanced approach, considering factors such as socioeconomic status, geographic location, and
disability. According to the OECD (2016), equitable education systems are those that "ensure
access to, participation in, and outcomes based only on individuals' innate ability and effort,
unaffected by personal and social circumstances." This definition highlights the need for
systemic efforts to create fair opportunities.
Equal access emphasizes the importance of providing every student, regardless of their
background, the opportunity to engage in educational pursuits. This principle underpins widening
participation initiatives, which are designed to create pathways for students from lower socio-
economic backgrounds to enter higher education (Yorke & Thomas, 2003; Roberts, 2011). The
ongoing debate between equity and equality in education further illustrates the need for
customized approaches: while equality advocates for a uniform distribution of resources, equity
calls for differential support tailored to individual student needs (Espinoza, 2007).

2.1.4.2 Retention: Sustaining Educational Engagement

Retention in education ensures students remain engaged and complete their academic programs.
It is a critical measure of the inclusiveness and effectiveness of educational systems. Factors
influencing retention include financial constraints, academic preparedness, and social integration
within institutions. Escarré and Boldrini (2017) emphasize that "governments and universities
are devoting significant efforts to retaining students through academic, personal, financial, and
structural support programs." Such initiatives are crucial for mitigating drop-out rates and
promoting inclusivity.
Retention strategies often involve targeted interventions for at-risk groups. For instance, outreach
programs and academic bridging initiatives help students transition smoothly from secondary to
tertiary education. Examples include Vietnam’s Hue University Pathways program, which
provides tutoring and academic coaching to disadvantaged students (Young & Chang, 2008).
These measures address disparities in preparedness and ensure that students from diverse
backgrounds can succeed.
Retention refers to the capacity of educational institutions to maintain student enrollment until
the completion of their academic programs. Several factors impact retention, including academic
support, socio-economic status, and early academic performance. Research indicates that the
provision of academic support services and mentoring significantly bolsters retention, especially
among first-year students (Glew et al., 2019; Westrick et al., 2020; Campbell & Campbell,
1997). Institutions that demonstrate a strong commitment to retaining students from
disadvantaged backgrounds often implement robust policies and practical measures (Yorke &
Thomas, 2003). Furthermore, innovative pedagogical approaches that align classroom
experiences with the diverse expectations of non-traditional students have proven effective in
enhancing retention rates (Roberts, 2011).

2.1.4.3 Academic Performance: Measuring Success

Academic performance reflects the outcomes of educational processes and serves as a
benchmark for evaluating the quality of education. It is influenced by several factors, including
teacher quality, curriculum design, and resource availability. The World Bank (2011) identified
teacher quality as one of the most critical variables affecting student success, underscoring the
importance of investments in teacher training and professional development.
High-performing educational systems prioritize equitable resource distribution and personalized
learning approaches. According to Alp (2015), "Education must be designed and accessible,
taking into account the different characteristics and needs of each child." This perspective aligns
with contemporary views that emphasize tailored educational experiences to maximize student
potential.
Academic performance, as measured by students' success in their studies, is closely linked to
retention. Early academic achievements, particularly in the first year of study, are strong
indicators of a student’s likelihood to persist in their educational program (Westrick et al., 2020).
Support programs, such as academic literacy initiatives and structured mentoring, have been
shown to improve both academic outcomes and retention rates (Glew et al., 2019; Campbell &
Campbell, 1997). Conversely, research on grade retention in secondary education suggests that
retaining students based on performance may have detrimental effects on their academic
motivation and overall performance, highlighting the need for alternative support strategies
(Rodríguez-Rodríguez, 2022).
In summary, equal access, retention, and academic performance are deeply interwoven
components that together determine educational success. Ensuring equal access requires
addressing both the principles of equity and equality to meet the diverse needs of the student
body. Meanwhile, targeted support strategies such as mentoring and academic assistance not only
improve retention but also enhance academic performance. A comprehensive approach that
integrates these elements is critical for fostering an educational environment where all students
have the opportunity to succeed.
2.1.4.4 Intersections and Challenges
The interplay between equal access, retention, and academic performance reveals complex
dynamics. While equal access lays the groundwork for inclusive education, retention ensures
students remain engaged, and academic performance provides evidence of system efficacy.
However, challenges persist in aligning these elements. Economic disparities remain a significant
barrier to equal access and retention. Akay (2020) highlights that "The right to education, a
fundamental right, varies according to privileged groups," emphasizing the need for targeted
financial support. Scholarships and need-based aid are proven tools for addressing these
disparities, as demonstrated by successful initiatives in both developed and developing countries
(OECD & World Bank, 2009).
Geographic and cultural factors also influence retention and academic outcomes. In rural areas,
limited access to quality schools and educational resources hinders student engagement and
achievement. Addressing these gaps requires coordinated efforts to improve infrastructure,
teacher availability, and community support systems. Additionally, systemic biases in admission
processes and curriculum design can perpetuate inequalities. Helms (2008) critiques entrance
tests for their unintended biases, which disadvantage students from marginalized groups.
Alternative assessment methods that consider diverse backgrounds and experiences are essential
for fostering equity.
The concepts of equal access, retention, and academic performance are integral to building
inclusive and effective education systems. They reflect a commitment to social justice and the
recognition of education as a fundamental human right. By addressing economic, geographic,
and systemic barriers, policymakers and educators can create opportunities for all individuals to
thrive academically and contribute meaningfully to society.

2.1.5 Pathways to Improvement

Achieving the goals of equal access, retention, and academic performance requires a multi-
faceted approach. Policymakers must prioritize equity in resource allocation, ensuring all
students have access to quality education. This includes investing in early childhood education,
improving teacher training, and enhancing technological infrastructure to bridge digital divides.
Retention strategies should focus on creating supportive learning environments. Mentorship
programs, mental health services, and inclusive policies are vital for sustaining student
engagement. Furthermore, academic performance can be bolstered through personalized learning
approaches and continuous assessment mechanisms that adapt to students' evolving needs.

2.1.6 The Role of Education in Empowering Girls and Reducing Gender Gaps
Education plays a pivotal role in empowering girls and addressing gender gaps, acting as a
powerful catalyst for societal transformation. This comprehensive analysis explores how
education contributes to girls' empowerment, dismantles gender disparities, and builds equitable
societies. Education equips girls with knowledge, skills, and confidence necessary to overcome
traditional barriers and claim their rightful place in society. By providing access to learning,
education fosters critical thinking and problem-solving skills, enabling girls to make informed
decisions about their lives. Kabeer (2005) highlights that education empowers women by
enhancing their decision-making power, economic opportunities, and self-esteem. Educated girls
are better positioned to challenge societal norms, advocate for their rights, and influence change
within their communities.
Despite significant strides, gender disparities persist in education, often rooted in cultural,
economic, and structural barriers. Girls in many regions face obstacles such as early marriage,
poverty, and limited access to schools, which hinder their educational opportunities. UNESCO
(2022) highlights the importance of tackling these barriers through gender-responsive policies,
emphasizing that education can break the intergenerational cycle of gender inequality. Ensuring
safe school environments and incorporating life skills education can help girls overcome societal
constraints and build resilience. Education is intrinsically linked to economic empowerment. It
opens pathways to formal employment, higher wages, and entrepreneurship, reducing women's
vulnerability to poverty.
Educated women are more likely to invest in their families and communities, creating a ripple
effect that promotes sustainable development. Chen and Yap (2019) emphasize that investing in
girls' education yields substantial economic and social returns, enhancing their contribution to
economic growth and poverty reduction. Educated women enjoy improved health outcomes,
both for themselves and their families. Education increases awareness of nutrition, reproductive
health, and disease prevention, contributing to lower maternal and infant mortality rates
(Dhiman, 2023). Additionally, education empowers women to make better healthcare decisions
and advocate for their families' well-being. This link between education and health underscores
its transformative potential in achieving gender equality and societal progress.

2.1.7 Overcoming Gender Bias in Educational Settings

The perpetuation of gender biases within educational systems presents a significant challenge.
Curricula and teaching practices often reinforce stereotypes, discouraging girls from pursuing
certain fields, particularly in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics).
UNESCO (2021) emphasizes the importance of integrating gender perspectives into curricula
and creating supportive environments that encourage girls to explore STEM fields, fostering
their representation in traditionally male-dominated areas.
Case Studies: Success in Promoting Gender Equality
Several initiatives have successfully empowered girls through education. Programs like "Girls
Who Code" in the U.S. and "She Can STEM" in India demonstrate how targeted efforts can
inspire and support girls in breaking barriers (Dhiman, 2022). These initiatives not only provide
technical skills but also foster networks of mentorship and role models, crucial for sustained
empowerment. Efforts to promote gender equality must consider intersectionality, recognizing
that girls face overlapping challenges based on their socio-economic status, ethnicity, and
geographic location. For instance, rural girls may face compounded barriers such as lack of
infrastructure and cultural resistance. Tailored interventions addressing these layered challenges
are vital to ensuring no girl is left behind.
The need for comprehensive policies to bridge gender gaps in education remains critical.
Recommendations include:
 Gender-Responsive Policies: Developing curricula that challenge stereotypes and
promote inclusivity.
 Safe Learning Environments: Ensuring schools are free from gender-based violence and
discrimination.
 Financial Support: Providing scholarships and incentives to encourage girls' enrollment
and retention.
 Community Engagement: Mobilizing communities to challenge cultural norms that
restrict girls' education (UNESCO, 2022).
Education is not merely a tool for individual empowerment but a cornerstone for societal
transformation. By addressing the structural and cultural barriers to education, societies can
empower girls to reach their full potential, thereby reducing gender gaps and fostering equitable
growth. Sustained investments in girls' education, coupled with gender-responsive policies and
community involvement, are imperative for achieving global gender equality and social justice.

2.2 Theoretical Framework: Social Constructivist Theory (Vygotsky)

Lev Vygotsky's Social Constructivist Theory focuses on how our social interactions and cultural
backgrounds shape how we think and learn. One key idea is the Zone of Proximal Development
(ZPD), which refers to the gap between what a person can do on their own and what they can
achieve with help from others. Vygotsky also introduced the concept of scaffolding, which is like
having support or guidance as we learn new things. Overall, his theory emphasizes that learning
happens through conversations and activities with other friends, teachers, or even members of
the community making it a shared and social experience rather than a solitary one (Ormrod,
2020; Wibowo et al., 2025).
The Zone of Proximal Development highlights the range of tasks a learner can accomplish with
guidance but not yet independently. This framework underscores the importance of support
structures or scaffolding, which are gradually removed as learners gain competence (Negi, 2023).
Furthermore, Vygotsky viewed language as the most critical cultural tool, enabling individuals to
communicate, share experiences, and internalize knowledge (Schunk, 2019). Through this lens,
cognitive development is deeply embedded in the cultural and historical milieu of the learner,
where education serves as a transformative force in shaping both individual potential and societal
structures.
Vygotsky’s focus on collaborative learning and co-construction of knowledge directly challenges
traditional educational models that treat learning as a passive transmission of information.
Instead, his theory positions learners as active participants, constructing understanding through
their social and cultural experiences (Wangid et al., 2024). This perspective is particularly
relevant to contexts where systemic inequalities, such as gender disparities, influence access to
educational opportunities and outcomes.

2.2.1 Relevance to Gender Inequality in Education

The application of Vygotsky’s Social Constructivist Theory to the issue of gender inequality in
education offers a nuanced understanding of how societal structures, cultural practices, and
interactions shape educational outcomes for girls. In the context of secondary school education in
Karu Local Government Area, Nasarawa State, Nigeria, entrenched patriarchal norms and
traditional beliefs often prioritize boys’ education over girls’, creating significant barriers to
access and equity (Wibowo et al., 2025).
Vygotsky’s emphasis on the sociocultural environment highlights how cultural norms and
practices influence learning. In many communities, societal expectations regarding gender roles
limit girls’ participation in educational activities. For instance, the undervaluing of girls’
education, early marriage practices, and domestic responsibilities restrict their ability to engage
fully in the learning process. These social factors create a ZPD for girls that is narrower than
their male counterparts, as they are denied access to the cultural tools and scaffolding necessary
for optimal development (Negi, 2023; Schunk, 2019).
Scaffolding, a key concept in Vygotsky’s theory, can be strategically employed to address these
disparities. Interventions such as mentorship programs, scholarships, and community advocacy
can provide the support needed to bridge educational gaps (Ormrod, 2020). For example,
mentorship by female educators can serve as a powerful motivator and role model for girls,
encouraging them to pursue academic and personal goals despite societal constraints. Similarly,
gender-sensitive teaching methods can foster inclusive classrooms where girls are empowered to
participate actively and confidently (Wibowo et al., 2025).
Language, as a cultural tool, also plays a critical role in perpetuating or challenging gender
norms. In many patriarchal societies, linguistic practices reinforce stereotypes that devalue girls’
contributions and intellectual capabilities. By promoting gender-equitable language and dialogue
within educational settings, schools can challenge these norms and create an environment
conducive to learning for all students (Schunk, 2019).
The cultural mediation of knowledge further underscores the importance of addressing the
structural barriers to girls’ education. For instance, Vygotsky’s theory advocates for an education
system that reflects the sociocultural realities of the learners. In Karu, incorporating culturally
relevant content and practices into the curriculum can make education more meaningful and
accessible to girls. Moreover, fostering collaborative learning environments where boys and girls
work together can challenge existing gender biases and promote mutual respect and
understanding (Wangid et al., 2024).
Vygotsky’s theory also provides a framework for examining the psychological impact of gender
inequality on girls’ self-perception and motivation. When societal norms limit girls’ opportunities
to achieve their potential, their confidence and aspirations are negatively affected. By addressing
these barriers and providing a supportive learning environment, educators can help girls expand
their ZPD and achieve their full potential (Negi, 2023).

2.2.2 Choice and Application of Theory

The choice of Vygotsky’s Social Constructivist Theory for this research is grounded in its ability
to address the intersection of education, culture, and social interaction. This theory’s focus on the
sociocultural context aligns with the complexities of gender inequality in Karu, where cultural
norms and systemic barriers significantly influence educational outcomes for girls. By
emphasizing the co-construction of knowledge and the role of scaffolding, Vygotsky’s
framework offers practical strategies for addressing these disparities (Ormrod, 2020; Wibowo et
al., 2025).
One of the most compelling aspects of Vygotsky’s theory is its potential for transformative
application. The ZPD provides a roadmap for designing interventions that empower girls to
overcome societal barriers. For example, community-driven programs that involve parents,
teachers, and local leaders can create a supportive network of scaffolding for girls. These
programs can focus on raising awareness about the importance of girls’ education, providing
financial support, and fostering mentorship opportunities (Wangid et al., 2024).
Additionally, Vygotsky’s emphasis on collaborative learning can be applied to create inclusive
classroom environments where girls feel valued and supported. Teachers can employ strategies
such as group projects and peer learning to encourage interaction and mutual support among
students. These methods not only enhance cognitive development but also challenge gender
stereotypes by promoting equal participation (Negi, 2023; Schunk, 2019).
Another critical application of Vygotsky’s theory lies in curriculum development. Incorporating
culturally relevant materials that reflect the experiences and aspirations of girls can make
education more engaging and relatable. For instance, including stories and examples of
successful women from the community can inspire girls and challenge societal norms (Wibowo
et al., 2025).
Furthermore, Vygotsky’s focus on language as a tool for learning underscores the importance of
promoting gender-equitable discourse within schools. Training teachers to use inclusive language
and address biases can help create a positive and empowering environment for all students
(Ormrod, 2020).
Vygotsky’s Social Constructivist Theory offers a robust framework for addressing gender
inequality in education. By focusing on the sociocultural context, scaffolding, and collaborative
learning, this theory provides both a theoretical and practical foundation for empowering girls in
Karu to achieve their educational potential. Through targeted interventions and inclusive
practices, the barriers to girls’ education can be dismantled, fostering a more equitable and
transformative learning environment.

2.2.3 Capability Approach (Amartya Sen)

Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach (CA) is a groundbreaking theoretical framework that
provides a lens for evaluating human development through the expansion of individuals'
substantive freedoms. As opposed to traditional measures of development, such as Gross
Domestic Product (GDP) or utility maximization, the CA emphasizes what individuals can do
and be their capabilities and how societal structures either enhance or inhibit these capabilities
(Sen, 1999; Robeyns, 2022).
The CA is particularly useful for addressing gender inequality and its impact on secondary
school education for girls in Karu Local Government Area, Nasarawa State, Nigeria, where
systemic barriers continue to limit girls’ access to education. This explanation examines the
theoretical foundations of the CA, its principles, and its practical application to understanding
and mitigating gender-based educational disparities in Karu.

2.2.4 Core Concepts of the Capability Approach

1. Functioning and Capabilities: Sen (1993) distinguishes between functioning, the
"beings and doings" of a person (e.g., being educated, being healthy), and capabilities, the
substantive freedoms to achieve this functioning. For example, a girl who has the
 opportunity to attend school but is unable to participate due to domestic chores cannot
benefit fully from education (Robeyns, 2005).
2. Means versus Ends: The CA differentiates between means (e.g., income, school
infrastructure) and ends (e.g., educational achievement). The ultimate goal is to expand
individuals' capabilities, which represent their real freedoms to lead lives they value (Sen,
2000).
3. Diversity and Conversion Factors: The CA emphasizes the diversity of human needs
and circumstances. Conversion factors such as personal attributes (e.g., age, gender),
social norms, and environmental conditions affect how resources translate into
meaningful outcomes (Robeyns, 2022).
4. Agency and Choice: Central to the CA is the idea of agency the ability to make choices
and act on them. For girls in Karu, agency is often constrained by societal expectations,
economic limitations, and institutional inefficiencies (Kuhumba, 2022).

2.2.5 Relevance to Gender Inequality

Gender inequality is a multidimensional deprivation of capabilities. It manifests in Karu through
restricted access to education, early marriage, domestic responsibilities, and gender-based
violence. These barriers are more than material; they reflect systemic unfreedoms that limit girls’
ability to pursue education and develop their potential (Sen, 1999).
The CA views education as both an intrinsic and instrumental value. Intrinsically, education
enhances personal agency and dignity. Instrumentally, it improves economic opportunities, health
outcomes, and societal participation (UNDP, 2020). Addressing gender inequality through the
CA framework means not only providing resources but also dismantling the structural and
cultural barriers that hinder girls' capabilities.

2.2.6 Application of the Capability Approach to Karu

The CA provides a multidimensional framework for addressing these challenges. It shifts the
focus from enrollment statistics to the substantive freedoms girls have to achieve educational
outcomes.
1. Holistic Evaluation of Well-being: The CA evaluates not only whether girls are enrolled
in school but also whether they have the freedom to benefit from education. For example,
 it considers factors like safety, time allocation, and family support as essential to
educational success (Sen, 1999).
2. Expanding Substantive Freedoms: Addressing capability deprivation involves
removing unfreedoms such as child marriage, domestic violence, and lack of access to
quality education. Policies should aim to empower girls with real opportunities to learn
and thrive (Robeyns, 2022).
3. Challenging Social Norms: Community engagement programs informed by the CA can
help shift societal perceptions about girls' education. For example, involving religious
and community leaders in advocacy efforts can challenge patriarchal norms (Kuhumba,
2022).
4. Addressing Conversion Factors: Providing resources like scholarships, safe
transportation, and gender-sensitive curricula addresses economic and institutional
barriers, while community-level initiatives can reshape attitudes toward girls' education
(UNDP, 2020).
Amartya Sen’s Capability Approach offers a powerful framework for understanding and
addressing gender inequality in education. By focusing on the expansion of girls’ substantive
freedoms, the CA highlights the need for holistic, context-specific interventions in Karu.
Addressing the systemic barriers to girls’ education requires more than resource allocation; it
demands a transformation of societal norms, institutional practices, and economic structures.
Through the CA lens, education becomes a pathway to empowerment, equity, and sustainable
development for girls in Karu and beyond.

2.3 Empirical Studies

Gender inequality remains a significant barrier to educational access and attainment for girls
worldwide, particularly in secondary education. Empirical studies conducted between 2019 and
2024 have explored the multifaceted impact of gender disparities on education at global,
regional, and local levels, with a focus on socio-cultural, economic, and institutional factors. This
review synthesizes recent research findings, highlighting the purpose, methodologies, and key
outcomes of these studies, and examines interventions aimed at mitigating gender-based
educational disparities.
2.3.1 Global Impact of Gender Inequality on Education
A comprehensive review by Unterhalter and North (2024) analyzed gender dynamics in teacher
education across multiple countries, including Nigeria. The study aimed to understand how
gender equality issues are addressed in teacher education courses and their influence on
pedagogic practices. Utilizing a mixed-methods approach, data were collected from 4,524
student teachers in their final year across 11 colleges of education. Findings indicated that while
gender issues are acknowledged, there is a lack of depth in addressing them, leading to the
perpetuation of gender biases in educational settings (Unterhalter & North, 2024).

2.3.2 Regional Studies in Africa

In Sub-Saharan Africa, gender disparities in education are pronounced. A study by the
International Monetary Fund (IMF) (2024) examined the relationship between gender equality
and economic development in the region. The research utilized cross-country regression analyses
to assess the impact of narrowing gender gaps in education on economic growth. Findings
demonstrated that increased educational attainment among girls leads to higher female labor
force participation, which in turn contributes to economic development (IMF, 2024).
Another study focused on Rwanda identified socio-economic and cultural determinants
influencing gender disparities in education. Through qualitative interviews and surveys with
students, parents, and educators, the research highlighted factors such as poverty, cultural norms
favoring boys' education, and early marriage as significant barriers to girls' educational
attainment (Key Socio-Economic and Cultural Determinants Influencing Gender..., 2024).

2.3.3 Local Context in Nigeria

In Nigeria, gender inequality in education persists, particularly in regions like Ekiti State.
Omojemite (2024) conducted a study examining the socio-cultural factors contributing to gender
disparities in education. Using feminist and critical theories as frameworks, the research involved
qualitative methods, including interviews and focus group discussions with students, parents, and
teachers. Findings revealed that patriarchal norms, economic constraints, and inadequate policy
implementation contribute to the exclusion of girls from educational opportunities (Omojemite,
2024). Socio-cultural factors, including entrenched gender norms and expectations, significantly
impact girls' education. A study by the Right to Education Initiative (2023) highlighted that
women and girls face multiple barriers based on gender, intersecting with factors such as age,
ethnicity, poverty, and disability. These intersections exacerbate educational disparities, limiting
access and participation for marginalized groups (Right to Education Initiative, 2023).
Economic factors also play a critical role. Research by the World Bank (2023) examined large-
scale interventions aimed at improving girls' education. The study reviewed programs providing
financial incentives, such as scholarships and cash transfers, to alleviate economic barriers.
Findings indicated that such interventions effectively increase enrollment and completion rates
among girls, particularly in low-income settings (World Bank, 2023). Institutional factors,
including the availability of female teachers and gender-sensitive curricula, influence girls'
educational experiences. A UNESCO report (2024) emphasized the importance of investing in
teachers and school leaders, especially women, to educate girls and end gender-based violence in
schools. The study utilized qualitative data from various African countries, highlighting that
female educators serve as role models and provide safer learning environments for girls
(UNESCO, 2024).

2.3.4 Interventions and Policies Addressing Gender Inequality

Various interventions have been implemented to address gender disparities in education. A
review by the United Nations Girls' Education Initiative (UNGEI) (2021) explored social norms
that impede girls' education access, participation, and achievement. The study documented
community-based programs aimed at shifting harmful social norms through advocacy and
education. Findings suggested that engaging community leaders and utilizing culturally sensitive
approaches are effective in promoting gender equality in education (UNGEI, 2021).
In Nigeria, policies targeting gender inequality in education have shown mixed results. A study
by the Right to Education Initiative (2023) examined the effectiveness of gender-responsive
education sector plans. Through policy analysis and stakeholder interviews, the research found
that while such plans exist, challenges in implementation, monitoring, and resource allocation
hinder their success. The study recommended strengthening institutional capacities and ensuring
community involvement to enhance policy effectiveness (Right to Education Initiative, 2023).
Empirical studies from 2019 to 2024 underscore the persistent impact of gender inequality on
girls' secondary education globally, regionally, and locally. Socio-cultural norms, economic
constraints, and institutional deficiencies continue to impede educational access and attainment
for girls. Interventions such as financial incentives, community engagement, and policy reforms
have demonstrated potential in addressing these disparities. However, the effectiveness of these
measures depends on context-specific factors and the commitment to sustained implementation.
Future research should focus on longitudinal analyses to assess the long-term impact of
interventions and explore innovative strategies to overcome emerging challenges in girls'
education.

2.4 Appraisal of the Reviewed Literature

The body of literature under review provides a detailed exploration of how gender discrimination
undermines the academic performance of female students, particularly in the Karu Local
Government Area. By drawing on a mix of local and international studies, the literature identifies
multiple structural and socio-cultural factors such as institutional shortcomings, teacher biases,
and deeply rooted societal attitudes that collectively contribute to the educational challenges
faced by girls.

2.4.1 Empirical Insights

A study conducted in five junior secondary schools within Karu Local Government Area reveals
that male students typically achieve higher academic outcomes than their female peers. This
discrepancy has been linked to several interrelated issues: negative teacher attitudes, insufficient
educational facilities, low student motivation, and erratic attendance patterns among female
students (Ph & Abdul, 2019). The study suggests that professional development in gender-
sensitive teaching practices and enhanced parental engagement are key strategies for addressing
these disparities.
In another investigation, Egberi and Madubueze (2023) examine a collaborative initiative
between the United Nations and Nigeria, which seeks to reform an education system in Northern
Nigeria characterized by gender bias and extremist ideologies. The authors align their analysis
with the Sustainable Development Goals, emphasizing that achieving quality education on an
equal basis is essential for social progress. Their work offers several policy recommendations
intended to improve the efficacy of such international partnerships. Research from the Odogbolu
Local Government Area in Ogun State further underscores the influence of societal norms on the
education of girls. Despite widespread awareness of gender discrimination, practices such as
early marriage, cultural rigidity, and religious biases continue to limit girls’ access to education,
leading to higher dropout rates (Adegbesan & Oyelade, 2024). The study advocates for the
introduction of community education programs and stricter policy enforcement to protect girls’
rights.
Additionally, a study focused on Nasarawa State highlights the significant role that parental
expectations play in shaping the educational trajectories of girls. Fatokun and Idagboyi (2011)
found that parents tend to encourage boys to pursue science while steering girls toward
commercial or arts-related subjects. This parental bias, compounded by economic constraints and
cultural factors, contributes to lower performance among girls in science disciplines. The authors
recommend cooperative strategies to foster an environment that supports balanced academic
development for all students.

2.4.2 Key Strengths: Comprehensive View of Educational Equity

The reviewed studies collectively offer a robust framework for understanding educational equity
by interlinking access, retention, and academic achievement. They clearly illustrate how gaps in
gender-sensitive curricula, inadequate sanitation, and limited availability of female educators can
create significant barriers to girls’ success. By referencing major policy frameworks from
organizations such as USAID and the OECD, the literature provides a well-rounded foundation
for discussing remedial actions and policy reforms.
2.4.3 Theoretical Integration
The literature benefits from the application of influential theoretical models. For instance,
Vygotsky’s Social Constructivist Theory with its focus on the Zone of Proximal Development
and the concept of scaffolding provides a basis for understanding how collaborative and
culturally relevant teaching methods can empower female students. In parallel, Amartya Sen’s
Capability Approach reframes the discussion to focus on expanding the substantive freedoms that
girls need to realize their potential. These theories together not only diagnose the roots of gender
disparities but also guide the design of effective interventions, including mentorship, community
outreach, and curriculum innovation.
The research draws on a range of methodologies from large-scale quantitative studies to
qualitative fieldwork across different geographic settings. Global studies offer a broad
perspective on gender dynamics in education, while localized studies in Nigeria and other parts
of Sub-Saharan Africa provide context-specific insights into the socio-cultural and economic
factors at play. This diversity in research methods and settings strengthens the overall reliability
of the conclusions drawn. A notable aspect of the literature is its focus on translating research
findings into practical policy recommendations. Interventions such as the development of
gender-responsive curricula, the establishment of safe and inclusive learning environments, and
the implementation of financial support measures are repeatedly advocated. The evidence
indicates that when such measures are tailored to the local context and implemented holistically,
they can substantially improve enrollment, retention, and academic performance among girls.

2.4.4 Identified Limitations and Future Directions

1. Implementation Inconsistencies:
Although a variety of interventions are proposed, their practical implementation is inconsistent.
Gender-responsive plans in Nigeria, for example, are hindered by issues such as inadequate
monitoring, limited resources, and low community participation. Future research should focus on
longitudinal studies to evaluate the sustainability and impact of these initiatives over time.
2. Need for Deeper Intersectional Analysis:
While the literature acknowledges cultural factors and socio-economic intersections affecting
gender, a more granular investigation into how identities such as ethnicity, disability, and rural
versus urban status interact would be beneficial. Detailed studies in this area could lead to more
finely tuned-intervention strategies.
3. Exploration of Digital Innovations:
Given the rapid evolution of digital and blended learning environments, future studies should
explore how technology-based solutions can be leveraged to reduce gender disparities, especially
in remote or under-resourced areas.
4. Cross-Regional Comparisons:
More comparative research across different regions and cultural contexts would enrich our
understanding of common challenges and successful strategies in promoting gender equality in
education. Such studies could identify best practices that are adaptable across diverse settings.
The reviewed literature provides a comprehensive and nuanced perspective on the factors
contributing to gender discrimination in education. By integrating conceptual frameworks,
theoretical insights, and a broad range of empirical evidence, it identifies both the systemic
barriers and the potential strategies for reform. Despite certain limitations such as variability in
implementation and the need for more intersectional and technology-focused research, the
literature offers a strong foundation for future scholarly inquiry and policy development. The
emphasis on context-specific, inclusive interventions highlights the critical need for coordinated
action among educators, policymakers, and communities to ensure that every girl has the
opportunity to succeed academically.
 CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
Preamble
In this chapter, the processes and procedures that were followed in carrying out the study are
discussed under the following subheadings:
3.1. Research Design
3.2. Population of the Study
3.3. Sample and Sampling Technique
3.4. Instrument for Data Collection
3.5. Validity of the Instrument
3.6. Reliability of the Instrument
3.7. Procedure for Data Collection
3.8. Method of Data Analysis

3.1 Research Design

The study will adopt a descriptive survey research design. This design is appropriate because it
allows for the collection of data from a large group of respondents to describe the current
situation regarding gender inequality and its impact on secondary school education for girls in
Karu Local Government Area. Descriptive surveys are useful in understanding patterns,
behaviours, and attitudes in a population and are widely used in social science research to
explore relationships and identify trends. The justification for this design is its ability to provide
a snapshot of the phenomenon being studied and its suitability for studies involving primary data
collection.

3.2 Population of the Study

The study targets stakeholders in secondary school education in Karu Local Government Area,
Nasarawa State, Nigeria. The population includes:
 Teachers
 Heads of Schools
  School Administrators
 Community leaders involved in education

3.3 Sample and Sampling Techniques

This study will employ a stratified random sampling technique to ensure adequate representation
of all stakeholder categories. The total sample size will be 350 participants, distributed as
follows:
 210 Teachers (both male and female, across different schools)
 70 Heads of Schools
 70 School Administrators
This sampling technique was justifiably chosen based on the following reasons:
 Stratified Random Sampling ensures that each category of respondents is
proportionately represented, thereby reducing selection bias and enhancing the reliability
of the study.
 Purposive Sampling will be applied for school administrators and heads of schools to
gather in-depth insights into policy and administrative barriers related to gender equality
in education.
This structured approach will facilitate comprehensive data collection, providing a clearer
understanding of gender inequality and its impact on girls' education in Karu Local Government
Area.

3.4 Instrument for Data Collection

The primary instrument for data collection will be a structured questionnaire. The questionnaire
will be divided into three sections:
1. Demographic Information: This section will capture respondents’ age, gender, occupation,
and educational background.
2. Perceptions of Gender Inequality: Questions in this section will assess participants'
perceptions of gender inequality in education, focusing on socio-cultural, economic, and
institutional factors.
3. Impact on Education: This section will explore how gender inequality affects girls'
secondary school enrollment, attendance, and academic performance.
The questionnaire will use a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5
(Strongly Agree) for consistency and ease of analysis. Open-ended questions will be included to
gather qualitative insights. Additionally, interview guides will be used for in-depth interviews
with selected parents and community leaders to complement the survey data with richer
qualitative perspectives.

3.5 Validity of the Instrument

To ensure validity:
1. Face and Content Validity: The instrument will be reviewed by three experts in gender
studies, education, and research methodology to ensure it measures what it intends to measure
and covers all relevant dimensions of gender inequality and education.
2. Construct Validity: The questionnaire items will be designed based on established
frameworks in gender and education studies, ensuring alignment with theoretical constructs.
Feedback from a pilot test with 20 participants (not part of the main study) will be incorporated
to refine the instrument.

3.6 Reliability of the Instrument

Reliability will be assessed using the test-retest method. The questionnaire will be administered
twice to the same group of 20 participants within a two-week interval. The Pearson correlation
coefficient will be calculated to determine consistency in responses. A reliability coefficient of
0.7 or higher will indicate acceptable reliability.

3.7 Procedure for Data Collection

The data collection will follow these steps:
1. Approval and Ethical Clearance: Obtain permission from relevant authorities, including the
Nasarawa State Ministry of Education, school principals, and community leaders.
2. Recruitment of Research Assistants: Train research assistants to ensure standardized
administration of the questionnaire and interview guides.
3. Data Collection: Distribute questionnaires to participants during school hours, ensuring
anonymity and confidentiality. In-depth interviews with parents and community leaders will be
conducted at mutually convenient locations.
4. Follow-up and Retrieval: Follow up to ensure the timely completion and collection of all
distributed questionnaires.

3.8 Method of Data Analysis

The collected data will be analyzed using both quantitative and qualitative methods, with
quantitative analysis involving the use of the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) to
compute descriptive statistics (percentages, frequency counts, mean, and standard deviation) and
inferential statistics (chi-square tests and ANOVA) to test hypotheses on the relationship between
gender inequality and education outcomes, while qualitative analysis will involve transcribing
interview responses and conducting thematic analysis to identify recurring patterns and insights,
ensuring a comprehensive understanding of the research problem by capturing both numerical
trends and contextual depth.
 REFERENCES
Adegbesan, S., & Oyelade, A. (2024). Influence of Gender Discrimination on Girl Child Education
in Odogbolu Local Government Area of Ogun State, Nigeria. KIU Journal of Education.
https://doi.org/10.59568/kjed-2024-4-1-05
Adeyemo, D., & Aderonke, I. (2021). Gender disparities in education: Socio-cultural barriers in
Nigeria. Journal of Educational Studies, 15(4), 187-200.
Akay, B. (2020). Examining the rural tourism experiences of tourists in an emerging rural tourism
destination: Burdur province, Turkey. Geo Journal of Tourism and Geosites, 29(2), 534–544.
Alp, A. (2015). Evaluation of equal opportunity policies in education. Master’s Thesis.
Barone, C., & Assirelli, G. (2020). Gender segregation in higher education: an empirical test of
seven explanations. Higher Education, 79, 55-78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00396-2
Bilgin, R., & Erbuğ, E. (2021). A critical evaluation on inequality of opportunity in education.
International Journal of Economics Administrative and Social Sciences, 4(2), 231–239.
Buchmann, C. (2009). Gender Inequalities in the Transition to College. Teachers College Record:
The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 111, 2320 -
2346. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810911101002
Buchmann, C., DiPrete, T., & McDaniel, A. (2008). Gender Inequalities in Education. Review of
Sociology, 34, 319-337. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV.SOC.34.040507.134719
Chen, W., & Yap, M. T. (2019). Empowering women through education in developing countries: A
systematic review. Journal of International Development, 31(7), 558-583.
Dhiman, B. (2022). Case study: Promoting gender equality in STEM education through targeted
initiatives. Journal of Gender and Society, 12(4), 215-228.
Dhiman, B. (2023). Role of education in improving women's health and well-being. Global Health
Perspectives, 19(2), 101-110.
Durojaiye, M. T., & Olanrewaju, A. O. (2021). The impact of early marriage on girls' education in
Nigeria: Challenges and policy implications. African Journal of Educational Research , 24(2),
109-119.
Egberi, A., & Madubueze, M. (2023). Rethinking The United Nations – Nigeria Partnership Towards
Girl Child Education and Gender Equality Reforms: A Systematic Review. Education Policy and
Development. https://doi.org/10.31098/epd.v1i2.1528
Escarré, R., & Boldrini, E. (2017). Equitable access and retention in higher education: Challenges
and the road ahead. University of Alicante.
Fareo, D. O. (2019). Gender inequality among secondary school students in Maiha Local
Government Area, Adamawa State. East African Scholars Journal of Education, Humanities and
Literature , 2(7), 417-423.
Fareo, D. O. (2019). Gender inequality among secondary school students in Maiha Local
Government Area, Adamawa State. East African Scholars Journal of Education, Humanities and
Literature, 2(7), 417 423. Retrieved from http://www.easpublisher.com/easjehl/
Fatokun, K., & Idagboyi, I. (2011). Gender disparity and parental influence on secondary school
achievement in Nasarawa state, Nigeria. Journal of Research in National Development, 8.
https://doi.org/10.4314/JORIND.V8I2.66833.
Glew, P., Ramjan, L., Salas, M., Raper, K., Creed, H., & Salamonson, Y. (2019). Relationships
between academic literacy support, student retention and academic performance.. Nurse
education in practice, 39, 61-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2019.07.011
Helms, R. (2008). University admissions: An analysis of equity and access. Journal of Higher
Education Policy, 21(3), 185–197.
Hendley, A., & Charles, M. (2016). Gender Inequality in Education. , 1-
5. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118663219.WBEGSS099
International Monetary Fund. (2024). Gender equality and economic development in Sub-Saharan
Africa. Retrieved from https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/book/9798400246968/CH008.xml
Kane, E. (1995). Education and Beliefs About Gender Inequality. Social Problems, 42, 74-
90. https://doi.org/10.2307/3097006
Kapur, R. (2019). Gender inequality in education: Causes and remedies. Educational Foundations
Research. Retrieved from
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373555584_A_Study_of_Gender_Inequality_in_Educa
tion_Challenges_and_Suggested_Remedies
Key socio-economic and cultural determinants influencing gender disparities in Rwanda. (2024).
Journal of Educational Development in Africa, 32(1), 45–67. Retrieved from
https://journals.co.za/doi/full/10.10520/ejc-adminpub_v32_n1_a10
Khan, S., & Jabeen, F. (2020). Education and gender equality: A critical review. Journal of Gender
Studies, 15(3), 234 240.
Kuhumba, S. K. (2022). Amartya Sen’s capability approach as the theoretical foundation of human
development. Journal of Sociology and Development, 1(1), 127–131.
Mefeuwo, M. (2021). Education and gender inequality in Nigeria. Bachelor Thesis, University
College Stockholm.
Nasarawa State Government. (2021). Nasarawa State educational profile . Retrieved from
https://www.nasarawastate.gov.ng/
Negi, S. (2023). Constructivist Approach of Vygotsky for Innovative Trends in Learning and
Teaching.
Ngwoke, C. I. (2020). Gender inequality in education: Implications for socio-economic development
in Nigeria. Sapientia Foundation Journal of Education, Sciences and Gender Studies, 2(3), 257–
266.
Nowak, J. (2021). Gender Inequality in Education. Human, Technologies and Quality of Education,
2021. https://doi.org/10.22364/htqe.2021.31
Nowak, J. K. (2021). Gender inequality in education. Human, Technologies, and Quality of
Education, 2021, 424–430.
Nwosu, E. N. (2021). The role of gender sensitive interventions in improving girls’ education in
Nigeria. International Journal of Educational Development, 40(2), 108 118.
OECD & World Bank. (2009). Tertiary education in Chile. Washington, DC: World Bank.
OECD. (2016). Education at a glance: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Ogunyemi, B. O. (2020). Institutional barriers to girls' education in Nigeria. Educational Journal of
Policy , 16(3), 223-238.
Ojo, O. (2019). Secondary education and the socio-economic development of Nigeria. International
Journal of Education and Development , 14(1), 45-55.
Omojemite, F. (2024). The role of socio-cultural norms in perpetuating gender disparities in
education in Ekiti State, Nigeria. Journal of Culture and Values, 28(3), 120–134. Retrieved from
https://cultureandvalues.org/index.php/JCV/article/download/329/173
Ormrod, J. E. (2020). Human Learning. Pearson.
Oxfam. (2020). Poverty and education in Nigeria: A critical overview . Retrieved from
https://www.oxfam.org/
Ph, D., & Abdul, U. (2019). Gender Discrimination And Academic Achievement of Female Students
In Some Selected Senior Secondary Schools In Karu Local Government Area, Nasarawa State,
Nigeria. .
Right to Education Initiative. (2023). Girls and women’s right to education. Retrieved from
https://www.right-to-education.org/girlswomen
Roberts, S. (2011). Traditional practice for non‐traditional students? Examining the role of pedagogy
in higher education retention. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 35, 183 - 199.
https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2010.540320
Robeyns, I. (2017). Wellbeing, freedom, and social justice: The capability approach re-examined.
Open Book Publishers.
Rodríguez-Rodríguez, D. (2022). Grade Retention, Academic Performance and Motivational
Variables in Compulsory Secondary Education: A Longitudinal Study.. Psicothema, 34 3, 429-
436. https://doi.org/10.7334/psicothema2021.582
Rosa, R., & Clavero, S. (2021). Gender equality in higher education and research. Journal of Gender
Studies, 31, 1 - 7. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2022.2007446
Schunk, D. H. (2019). Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective. Pearson.
Sen, A. (1993). Capability and well-being. In M. Nussbaum & A. Sen (Eds.), The quality of life (pp.
30–53). Oxford University Press.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Knopf.
UNESCO. (2019). Global education monitoring report. Paris: UNESCO Publishing. Retrieved from
https://en.unesco.org/gem report/
UNESCO. (2021). Cracking the code: Girls’ and women’s education in STEM. Retrieved from
unesco.org
UNESCO. (2022). Gender Summary: Global Education Monitoring Report 2022. Paris: UNESCO
Publishing.
UNESCO. (2024). Investing in teachers and school leaders: Educating girls and ending gender-based
violence. Retrieved from
https://www.iicba.unesco.org/sites/default/files/medias/fichiers/2024/01/STUDY%202024-
2%20Africa%20Teachers%20Reports%20Series.pdf
UNICEF. (2020). Gender equality and education: A transformative agenda . United Nations
Children's Fund.
UNICEF. (2020). Gender equality and education: A transformative agenda . Retrieved from
https://www.unicef.org/
UNICEF. (2020). Gender equality and education: A transformative agenda. Retrieved from
https://www.unicef.org/
United Nations Development Programme. (2020). Human development report: Gender equality in
education.
United Nations Girls’ Education Initiative. (2021). Social norms as barriers to girls’ education: An
analysis of community-based interventions. Retrieved from
https://www.ungei.org/sites/default/files/2021-07/Social-Norms-Barriers-Girls-Education-GCI-
2021-eng.pdf
United Nations. (2021). Progress towards the SDGs: The case of gender equality . Retrieved from
https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/gender-equality/
Unterhalter, E., & North, A. (2024). Gender equality and teacher education: A global study.
Retrieved from https://www.gendereddata.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Unterhalter-and-
North-2024-Working-Paper-3.pdf
USAID. (2008). Conceptual Framework for Gender Equality in Education . United States Agency
for International Development.
Wangid, M. N., Wibowo, S., & Firdaus, F. M. (2024). The relevance of Vygotsky's constructivism
learning theory with differentiated learning in primary schools. Journal of Education and
Learning (EduLearn), 19(1), 431-440.
Westrick, P., Schmidt, F., Le, H., Robbins, S., & Radunzel, J. (2020). The Road to Retention Passes
through First Year Academic Performance: A Meta-Analytic Path Analysis of Academic
 Performance and Persistence. Educational Assessment, 26, 35 - 51.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2020.1848423
Wibowo, S., Wangid, M. N., & Firdaus, F. M. (2025). Application of constructivist principles in
education. Journal of Educational Studies, 34(2), 56-67.
World Bank. (2011). Turkey: Expanding opportunities for the next generation. Washington, DC:
World Bank.
World Bank. (2019). Gender equality and development: Investing in girls’ education. Washington,
DC: World Bank.Fareo, D. O. (2019). Gender inequality among secondary school students in
Maiha Local Government Area, Adamawa State. East African Scholars Journal of Education,
Humanities and Literature, 2(7), 417 423. Retrieved from http://www.easpublisher.com/easjehl/
World Bank. (2021). Women’s education: Key to global development . Washington, D.C.: World
Bank Group. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/
World Bank. (2023). Interventions to improve girls’ education in low-income countries. World Bank
Research Observer, 39(1), 47–71. Retrieved from
https://academic.oup.com/wbro/article/39/1/47/7118950
Young, N., & Chang, T. (2008). Case Study: Vietnam Hue University. Pathways to Higher
Education.