Activities 1939 1945 Internal War Finance 2nd Ed. Edition Keynes - Get The Ebook in PDF Format For A Complete Experience
Activities 1939 1945 Internal War Finance 2nd Ed. Edition Keynes - Get The Ebook in PDF Format For A Complete Experience
https://ebookultra.com/download/activities-1906-1914-india-and-
cambridge-2nd-ed-edition-keynes/
https://ebookultra.com/download/activities-1922-1929-the-return-to-
gold-and-industrial-policy-2nd-ed-edition-keynes/
https://ebookultra.com/download/panzer-divisions-at-
war-1939-1945-images-of-war-ian-baxter/
The U Boat War 1939 1945 Images of War 1st Edition Ian
Baxter
https://ebookultra.com/download/the-u-boat-war-1939-1945-images-of-
war-1st-edition-ian-baxter/
Hollywood s War with Poland 1939 1945 1st Edition M.B.B.
Biskupski
https://ebookultra.com/download/hollywood-s-war-with-
poland-1939-1945-1st-edition-m-b-b-biskupski/
https://ebookultra.com/download/german-artillery-at-
war-1939-1945-vol-2-1st-edition-frank-v-de-sisto/
https://ebookultra.com/download/hitler-s-mountain-
troops-1939-1945-the-gebirgsjager-images-of-war-1st-edition-ian-
baxter/
https://ebookultra.com/download/a-tract-on-monetary-reform-2nd-ed-
edition-keynes/
https://ebookultra.com/download/the-cold-war-1945-91-2nd-edition-
dockrill/
Activities 1939 1945 Internal War Finance 2nd ed. Edition
Keynes Digital Instant Download
Author(s): Keynes, John Maynard
ISBN(s): 9781139520157, 1139520156
Edition: 2nd ed.
File Details: PDF, 24.46 MB
Year: 2012
Language: english
the collected writings of
J O H N M AY NA R D K E Y N E S
Managing Editors:
Professor Austin Robinson and Professor Donald Moggridge
John Maynard Keynes (1883–1946) was without doubt one of the most influ-
ential thinkers of the twentieth century. His work revolutionised the theory
and practice of modern economics. It has had a profound impact on the
way economics is taught and written, and on economic policy, around the
world. The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, published in full in
electronic and paperback format for the first time, makes available in thirty
volumes all of Keynes’s published books and articles. This includes writings
from his time in the India Office and Treasury, correspondence in which he
developed his ideas in discussion with fellow economists and correspondence
relating to public affairs. Arguments about Keynes’s work have continued
long beyond his lifetime, but his ideas remain central to any understanding of
modern economics, and a point of departure from which each new generation
of economists draws inspiration.
Between the outbreak of war in 1939 and his death in 1946 Keynes was closely
involved in the management of Britain’s war economy and the planning of
the post-war world. This volume, the first of several dealing with this period,
focuses on two aspects of his activities during the war: his efforts as a private
citizen to influence opinion of the tasks ahead prior to July 1940, and his
contributions within the Treasury to Britain’s internal financial management
thereafter. It contains the correspondence and memoranda surrounding How
to Pay for the War, perhaps his most successful essay in persuasion; the 1941
Budget, the first explicitly Keynesian Budget in Britain; the development of
the associated national income estimates; and his later attempts to influence
other areas of financial policy. This is a necessary companion to How to Pay
for the War, which appears in Volume IX of this series.
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:46:28, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:46:28, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157
THE COLLECTED WRITINGS OF
JOHN MAYNARD KEYNES
VO LU M E X X I I
ACTIVITIES 1939–1945
I N T E R NA L WA R F I NA N C E
edited by
DONALD MOGGRIDGE
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:46:28, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157
© The Royal Economic Society 1978, 2013
www.cambridge.org
Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9781107696648
A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:46:28, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157
CONTENTS
1 THE BEGINNING 3
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:46:39, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:46:39, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157
GENERAL INTRODUCTION
This new standard edition of The Collected Writings of John
Maynard Keynes forms the memorial to him of the Royal
Economic Society. He devoted a very large share of his busy
life to the Society. In 1911, at the age of twenty-eight, he
became editor of the Economic Journal in succession to Edge-
worth; two years later he was made secretary as well. He held
these offices without intermittence until almost the end of his
life. Edgeworth, it is true, returned to help him with the
editorship from 1919 to 1925; Macgregor took Edgeworth's
place until 1934, when Austin Robinson succeeded him and
continued to assist Keynes down to 1945. But through all these
years Keynes himself carried the major responsibility and
made the principal decisions about the articles that were to
appear in the Economic Journal, without any break save for
one or two issues when he was seriously ill in 1937. It was only
a few months before his death at Easter 1946 that he was
elected president and handed over his editorship to Roy
Harrod and the secretaryship to Austin Robinson.
In his dual capacity of editor and secretary Keynes played
a major part in framing the policies of the Royal Economic
Society. It was very largely due to him that some of the
major publishing activities of the Society—Sraffa's edition
of Ricardo, Stark's edition of the economic writings of
Bentham, and Guillebaud's edition of Marshall, as well as a
number of earlier publications in the 1930s—were initiated.
When Keynes died in 1946 it was natural that the Royal
Economic Society should wish to commemorate him. It was
perhaps equally natural that the Society chose to commem-
orate him by producing an edition of his collected works.
Keynes himself had always taken a joy in fine printing, and
the Society, with the help of Messrs Macmillan as publishers
vii
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:43:53, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157.001
GENERAL INTRODUCTION
and the Cambridge University Press as printers, has been
anxious to give Keynes's writings a permanent form that is
wholly worthy of him.
The present edition will publish as much as is possible of
his work in the field of economics. It will not include any
private and personal correspondence or publish letters in the
possession of his family. The edition is concerned, that is to
say, with Keynes as an economist.
Keynes's writings fall into five broad categories. First there
are the books which he wrote and published as books. Second
there are collections of articles and pamphlets which he
himself made during his lifetime (Essays in Persuasion and
Essays in Biography). Third, there is a very considerable
volume of published but uncollected writings—articles
written for newspapers, letters to newspapers, articles in
journals that have not been included in his two volumes of
collections, and various pamphlets. Fourth, there are a few
hitherto unpublished writings. Fifth, there is correspondence
with economists and concerned with economics or public
affairs.
This series will attempt to publish a complete record of
Keynes's serious writing as an economist. It is the intention
to publish almost completely the whole of the first four
categories listed above. The only exceptions are a few syndi-
cated articles where Keynes wrote almost the same material
for publication in different newspapers or in different coun-
tries, with minor and unimportant variations. In these cases,
this series will publish one only of the variations, choosing the
most interesting.
The publication of Keynes's economic correspondence
must inevitably be selective. In the day of the typewriter and
the filing cabinet and particularly in the case of so active and
busy a man, to publish every scrap of paper that he may have
dictated about some unimportant or ephemeral matter is
impossible. We are aiming to collect and publish as much as
Vlll
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:43:53, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157.001
GENERAL INTRODUCTION
possible, however, of the correspondence in which Keynes
developed his own ideas in argument with his fellow econ-
omists, as well as the more significant correspondence at
times when Keynes was in the middle of public affairs.
Apart from his published books, the main sources available
to those preparing this series have been two. First, Keynes in
his will made Richard Kahn his executor and responsible for
his economic papers. They have been placed in the Marshall
Library of the University of Cambridge and have been avail-
able for this edition. Until 1914 Keynes did not have a
secretary and his earliest papers are in the main limited to
drafts of important letters that he made in his own handwrit-
ing and retained. At that stage most of the correspondence
that we possess is represented by what he received rather than
by what he wrote. During the war years of 1914-18 Keynes
was serving in the Treasury. With the opening in 1968 of the
records under the thirty-year rule, many of the papers that
he wrote then and later have become available. From 1919
onwards, throughout the rest of his life, Keynes had the help
of a secretary—for many years Mrs Stevens. Thus for the last
twenty-five years of his working life we have in most cases
the carbon copies of his own letters as well as the originals of
the letters that he received.
There were, of course, occasions during this period on
which Keynes wrote himself in his own handwriting. In some
of these cases, with the help of his correspondents, we have
been able to collect the whole of both sides of some important
interchange and we have been anxious, in justice to both
correspondents, to see that both sides of the correspondence
are published in full.
The second main source of information has been a group
of scrapbooks kept over a very long period of years by
Keynes's mother, Florence Keynes, wife of Neville Keynes.
From 1919 onwards these scrapbooks contain almost the
whole of Maynard Keynes's more ephemeral writing, his
IX
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:43:53, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157.001
GENERAL INTRODUCTION
letters to newspapers and a great deal of material which
enables one to see not only what he wrote but the reaction
of others to his writing. Without these very carefully kept
scrapbooks the task of any editor or biographer of Keynes
would have been immensely more difficult.
The plan of the edition, as at present intended, is this. It
will total twenty-nine volumes. Of these the first eight are
Keynes's published books from Indian Currency and Finance,
in 1913, to the General Theory in 1936, with the addition of his
Treatise on Probability. There next follow, as vols. ix and x,
Essays in Persuasion and Essays in Biography, representing
Keynes's own collections of articles. Essays in Persuasion differs
from the original printing in two respects: it contains the full
texts of the articles or pamphlets included in it and not (as
in the original printing) abbreviated versions of these articles,
and it also contains one or two later articles which are of
exactly the same character as those included by Keynes in his
original collection. In Essays in Biography there have been
added a number of biographical studies that Keynes wrote
both before and after 1933.
There will follow two volumes, xi-xn, of economic articles
and correspondence and a further two volumes, already
published, xm-xiv, covering the development of his thinking
as he moved towards the General Theory. There are included
in these volumes such part of Keynes's economic correspon-
dence as is closely associated with the articles that are printed
in them.
The next thirteen volumes, as we estimate at present, deal
with Keynes's Activities during the years from the beginning
of his public life in 1905 until his death. In each of the
periods into which we divide this material, the volume con-
cerned publishes his more ephemeral writings, all of it
hitherto uncollected, his correspondence relating to these
activities, and such other material and correspondence as is
necessary to the understanding of Keynes's activities. These
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:43:53, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157.001
GENERAL INTRODUCTION
volumes are edited by Elizabeth Johnson and Donald Mog-
gridge, and it is their task to trace and interpret Keynes's
activities sufficiently to make the material fully intelligible to
a later generation. There will be a further volume printing
his social, political and literary writings and a final volume of
bibliography and index.
Those responsible for this edition have been: Lord Kahn,
both as Lord Keynes's executor and as a long and intimate
friend of Lord Keynes, able to help in the interpreting of
much that would be otherwise misunderstood; Sir Roy
Harrod as the author of his biography; Austin Robinson as
Keynes's co-editor on the Economic Journal and successor as
Secretary of the Royal Economic Society, who has acted
throughout as Managing Editor.
Elizabeth Johnson has been responsible for the Activities
volumes xv-xvm covering Keynes's early life, the Versailles
Conference and his early post-1918 concern with reparations
and international finance. Donald Moggridge has been res-
ponsible for the two volumes covering the origins of the
General Theory and for all the Activities volumes from 1924 to
the end of his life in 1946.
The work of Elizabeth Johnson and Donald Moggridge has
been assisted at different times by Jane Thistlethwaite, Mrs
McDonald, who was originally responsible for the systematic
ordering of the files of the Keynes papers and Judith Master-
man, who for many years worked with Mrs Johnson on the
papers. More recently Susan Wilsher, Margaret Butler and
Leonora Woollam have continued the secretarial work. Bar-
bara Lowe has been responsible for the indexing. Susan
Howson undertook much of the important final editorial
work on these volumes.
XI
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:43:53, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157.001
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:43:53, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157.001
EDITORIAL NOTE
In this volume, the first of three concerning Keynes's involve-
ment in the problems of financing Britain's war effort after
1939, the concentration is on internal financial policies. Later
volumes will deal with the external aspects of Britain's war
finance including lend lease. A further three volumes will
be devoted to Keynes's efforts to shape the post-war world.
For Keynes's efforts to shape opinion through contribu-
tions to the Press, the main source is the series of scrapbooks
which, as explained in the General Introduction, his mother
carefully maintained (with Keynes's assistance) throughout
his working life. For correspondence and memoranda, we are
dependent on his surviving papers, materials available in
the Public Record Office and the papers of colleagues and
friends, in particular Professor J. R. N. Stone, to whom
Keynes passed his working files concerning the national
income exercise that accompanied the 1941 Budget. Where
the material used has come from the Public Record Office,
the call numbers for the relevant files appear in the List of
Documents Reproduced following page 487.
In this and the succeeding wartime volumes, to aid the
reader in keeping track of the various personalities who pass
through the pages that follow, we have included brief
biographical notes on the first occasion on which they appear.
These notes are designed to be cumulative over the whole run
of wartime volumes.
In this, as in all the similar volumes, in general all of
Keynes's own writings are printed in larger type. All intro-
ductory matter and all writings by others than Keynes are
printed in smaller type. The only exception to this general
rule is that occasional short quotations from a letter from
Keynes to his parents or to a friend, used in introductory
xm
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:43:55, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157.002
EDITORIAL NOTE
xiv
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:43:55, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157.002
PART I
SHAPING OPINION
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:46:26, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:46:26, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157
Chapter i
THE BEGINNING
On 15 August 1939 Keynes left England for a fortnight's holiday at Royat.
He expected an international crisis in the next month, but as he told
Richard Kahn1 on 14 August:
I shall be most surprised if it ends in war. It seems to me that Hitler's
argument is unanswerable that he must get Danzig, because it matters
so little to him or to anyone else. They willfixup some formula by which
Danzig becomes part of the Reich, with no substantial change in the actual
situation, e.g. by making it a demilitarised zone. So do not break your
holiday, whatever you read in the papers until the last extremity.
He expressed similar views on 25 August.
The outbreak of war on 3 September saw him back in England. At the
time he expected that he would 'come up here [to King's] to run a good
part of the bursary of the College, the Economic Journal, and teaching in
the Economics Faculty, which... [would] in due course release more active
people' (Letter to R. F. Harrod, 7 September 1939). He told Lord Stamp
on 15 September that' Committee work, which would involve quiet drafting
in my own room and occasional visits to London, would be the sort of thing
I might befitfor'.
However, by that time he had already turned his mind to the economic
problems of the war. On 14 September, talks in London had led him to
his first contribution, which he sent to Lord Stamp,2 H. D. Henderson,3
R. F. Kahn and the Treasury a day later.
1
Richard Ferdinand Kahn (b. 1905), Life Peer 1965; Fellow of King's College,
Cambridge; temporary civil servant in various government departments, 1939-46;
Professor of Economics, University of Cambridge, 1951-72.
2
Josiah Stamp (1880-1941), K.B.E. 1920, 1st Baron 1938; Inland Revenue Depart-
ment, 1896—1919; Chairman, L.M.S. Railway, 1926-41; Director, Bank of England,
1928-41; member. Economic Advisory Council, 1930-9; Chairman, Committee on
Economic Information, 1931-g; Chairman, Survey of Financial and Economic
Plans (attached to Cabinet Office), 1939-41.
3
Hubert Douglas Henderson (1890-1952), Kt. 1942; Editor, The Nation and
Athenaeum, 1923-30; Joint Secretary, Economic Advisory Council, 1930-4; Econ-
omic Adviser, Treasury, 1939-44; member, Survey of Financial and Economic
Plans, 1939-41; Drummond Professor of Political Economy, Oxford, 1945-52;
Fellow of All Souls College, Oxford, 1934-52.
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:43:55, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157.003
SHAPING OPINION
PRICE POLICY
A large number, but not all, of the raw material controls
have, as a temporary measure, fixed prices substantially at the
pre-war figure. For a preliminary period of, say, a month this
may do no harm. But before the separate controls can develop
a more permanent price policy, it is evident that general
decisions must be taken governing price policy as a whole. It
is out of the question for the different controls to be settling
the matter in isolation and without reference to a general
principle of policy.
To establish a general principle of price policy, applicable
at any rate for the rest of this year, is therefore one of the
most urgent and important matters for the Home Cabinet.
The following notes are intended to indicate some of the
relevant points. The suggestions thrown out are mere pos-
sibilities, and it does not follow that the writer himself is in
favour of all of them.
i. The sterling exchange has fallen nearly 15 per cent in
relation to the dollar; to which has to be added the increased
costs of freight and war risk. Thus if the international prices
of raw commodities were unchanged, the delivered cost in
sterling would probably rise by not less than 20 per cent on
the average.
In fact international prices have risen sharply. Some of
these rises seem to be beyond all reason and must be due to
a wave of speculation or a hasty stocking up by manufacturers.
Thus some reaction is to be expected; indeed it has already
begun in the case of some commodities compared with the
highest point reached last week. On the other hand, many
pre-war prices were unduly low both in relation to the level
of activity already reached and to the cost of production. For
example, it would require a rise of nearly 15 per cent to bring
the Board of Trade wholesale index for July 1939 up to the
level of July 1937; and the same was true of the United States
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:43:55, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157.003
THE BEGINNING
index. Thus a fairly substantial rise of a more permanent
character is to be expected. At any rate for some months;—
a more considerable reaction is possible after there has been
time for new productive capacity to be set in motion.
At the present time (Sept. 13) Moody's daily index of staple
commodity prices in the U.S.A. is 22 per cent above what it
was a month ago. It follows that the average sterling costs in
the United Kingdom of goods imported from U.S.A. is now
about 46 per cent higher than a month ago.
Thus it is fanciful to suppose that the prices of imported
goods can be maintained much longer in the neighbourhood
of pre-war levels. To do so would throw most private im-
porters out of business. The Government would have to take
over the importation of almost everything and then sell the
stuff at a stupendous loss to the Treasury.
Of course it does not follow that the delivered U.K. prices
of commodities produced within the Empire have risen, or
need rise, nearly so much. (See § 7 below.)
2. Apart from the increased cost of imported goods, it is
actually desirable that the British price of such goods should
rise relatively to the price of home-produced goods. We want
to divert consumption away from imported goods. If they
remain as cheap as before, it would require an extremely
complicated and complete system of rationing to effect this
object.
3. The previous paragraph aims at influencing the direc-
tion of domestic consumption. But what about the domestic
producer? We want him, in the case of essential commodities,
to increase his output considerably in conditions of some diffi-
culty where his costs are likely to rise quite apart from the
cost of imported material. Will he do this if he is limited to
a pre-war selling price which will very probably involve him
in a loss?
The most obvious example is that of agriculture. In the case
of livestock there is probably a high elasticity of supply in
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:43:55, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157.003
SHAPING OPINION
response to a wholesale price rise of say 15-20 per cent. But
pre-war prices were already unsatisfactory to the farmer, and
the recent announcement fixing the prices of sheep and pigs
at the pre-war level is already having a disastrous effect on
his policy. One might have hoped that he would now set out
to increase his breeding stock. But at a sale of young breeding
sows held in my neighbourhood yesterday the prices were
disastrous and below the pre-war level. The farmers were
simply not buying. They say, with reason, that the price fixed
for bacon is one at which they cannot afford to produce. Yet
we are told that bacon is one of the very few foodstuffs which
may have to be rationed very shortly owing to shortage. It
is a sad waste of time to discourage farmers from breeding.
I believe that the market for store cattle is also weak.
4. The aspect of higher prices as an instrument of revenue
is not to be overlooked. Direct taxation can scarcely do all that
is wanted. A tax on consumption will be required in some
shape or form. The policy of a somewhat higher price level
combined with provisions for diverting to the Treasury
directly or indirectly a large proportion of any resulting
profits deserves to be considered.
In those cases where the Government itself undertakes
importation, it would be better to make a substantial profit
on selling than to make a substantial loss. Let me take what
is very likely a bad example. It may be that the state of stocks
of petrol absolutely requires the stringent rationing recently
announced. If so, the Treasury will have to face a heavy loss
of revenue from motor and petrol taxes. If not, the necessity
to economise petrol should be harmonised as far as possible
with the interests of the Treasury. For example, the existing
small ration might be supplied at 15 6d and moderate, but
more substantial amounts obtainable at, say, 25 6d. This might
be more efficient administratively and more productive to the
Treasury than the endless wangling now in prospect to get
additional rations at is6don more or less plausible pretexts,
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:43:55, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157.003
THE BEGINNING
the real validity of which there will be no time to examine.
It might be sounder in every way to make motoring expensive
than to make it the subject of wangling;—it might even save
more petrol. I mention this because of its particular interest
to the Treasury (with the present ration the cost per mile
including car-tax and insurance is prohibitive). But it is easy
to think of less controversial examples.
5. If a higher price level is inevitable, it will be better to
bring it about by a deliberate act of policy at an early date
than to allow prices to drift gradually upwards as a result of
the necessities of individual control bodies.
6. The above relates to wholesale prices. The primary
object of price control is presumably to prevent retail prices
from rising to a level which will make a movement for higher
wages irresistible. Thus we have to think how best to adjust
the necessities of the situation to this primary object.
There is no reason why retail prices should rise nearly as
much as wholesale prices. We must be prepared to simplify
enormously the machinery of distribution, with a consequent
reduction of costs. There should be a drastic curtailment in
variety and in consumer's choice and all the frills of distribu-
tion, advertising, expensive systems of delivery and so forth,
should be dispensed with. There is no reason why the costs
of distribution, instead of going up should not be substantially
reduced. (We may even learn a good deal which may be useful
when peace returns.)
Some such price scheme as the following might be prac-
ticable. Let the wholesale price level rise on the average
by about 25 per cent, imports prices rising as a rule by more
than this, home produce by less. With a proper system of
distribution this should be compatible with a rise in the cost
of living (which includes rents) of 10 per cent at the outside
and it might well be less. Even a rise of 10 per cent would
make the cost of living only 7 per cent above the level of the
autumn of 1937 when wages (Oct. 1937) were 3K2 per cent
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:43:55, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157.003
SHAPING OPINION
below what they are now; so that the reduction in the hourly
real wage below what it was in 1937 would be only 3 ^ percent.
It is absurd to suppose that a war can be waged without any
reduction in anyone's standard of life. Yet allowing for an
increase in employment and in the length of the working
week, the rise suggested above might involve virtually no
reduction below the 1937 level. If the working week is in-
creased by 31/2 per cent with hourly wage rates unchanged, i.e.
if men work on the average a quarter of an hour more a day,
their real weekly wages would remain at the 1937 level.
All these figures are, of course, not much more than for
purposes of illustration. But they show that a rise in the
wholesale price-level of the order of 25 per cent could be
allowed without creating any reasonable claim for a rise in
the hourly rate of wages.
7. The task of keeping the price-rise of imported goods
within narrow limits is closely bound up with arrangements
with the Dominion and Colonial Administrations for the
limitation of prices and the maximum degree of self-sufficiency
within the Empire.
There are many substantial groups of imported goods
where the supply available within the Empire would be wholly
or almost sufficient for our needs. It might be advisable
for the Government to enter into arrangements with the
Dominion Administrators to purchase all we require of their
surplus output at a fixed price in sterling for the period of
a year.
It would not be advisable, any more than in the case of home
producers, that this fixed price should be the pre-war price.
As a general average I suggest that home and Empire pro-
ducers of staple raw commodities should alike receive a
price about 20 per cent above the pre-war level; which,
allowing for freights and war-risk, would mean a greater
c.i.f. cost for Empire than for home goods.
A plan on these lines would be immensely helpful in solving
8
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:43:55, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157.003
THE BEGINNING
His price policy memorandum led him into discussions with Sir Richard
Hopkins and Sir Frederick Phillips4 and a request from Phillips for his ideas
on exchange control, which he sent to Phillips and H. D. Henderson on
24 and 25 September respectively.5
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:43:55, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157.003
SHAPING OPINION
supplied by Morgans as our agents. E. C. Grenfell would
come round to the Treasury each morning with a pink cable
in his hand, showing what had been paid out on the previous
day.
Complete control was so much against the spirit of the age
that I doubt if it ever occurred to any of us that it was
possible. But the absence of it made my task of preparing a
monthly budget of the dollar position very precarious. I used
to obtain each month an estimate from the various depart-
ments and from the allies both of their total outstanding
dollar commitments and of the amounts which they expected
to mature in each month. To this, if I remember rightly, I
added my own estimate of the probable requirements of the
'free exchange'. On the other side, our dollar assets, actual
and prospective, were set out in the shape of gold and securi-
ties and the proceeds of loans. But the requirements of the
'free exchange' would come irregularly in great rushes, just
like the demands on the Equalisation Fund, largely depend-
ing on the nature of the war and political news. I remember
in particular a terrific run at the end of 1916, when the daily
requirements (if my memory is correct) ran for a short time
in excess of $5 million, which in those days we considered
simply terrific. Chalmers and Bradbury never fully confessed
to Ministers the extent of our extremity when it was actually
upon us, though of course they had warned them, fully but
unavailingly, months beforehand of what was coming. This
was because they feared that, if they emphasised the real
position, the policy of the peg might be abandoned, which,
they thought, would be disastrous. They had been brought
up in the doctrine that in a run one must pay out one's gold
reserve to the last bean. I thought then, and I still think, that
in the circumstances they were right. To have abandoned the
peg would have destroyed our credit and brought chaos to
business; and would have done no real good. I recall an
historic occasion a day or two after the formation of the
10
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:43:55, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157.003
THE BEGINNING
second coalition Government at the end of 1916. The position
was very bad. We in the Treasury were all convinced that the
only hope was to pay out and trust that the drain would
suddenly dry up as it had on previous occasions. But we had
no confidence in the understanding of Ministers. Chalmers
went over to Carson's room (my memory tells me that it was
in the War Office; but was it?) to report to the newly formed
War Cabinet. 'Well, Chalmers, what is the news?' said the
goat.' Splendid,' Chalmers replied in his high quaveringvoice,
'two days ago we had to pay out $20 million; the next day
it was $10 million; and yesterday only $5 million.' He did not
add that a continuance at this rate for a week would clean
us out completely, and that we considered an average of $2
million very heavy. I waited nervously in his room, until the
old fox came back triumphant. In fact the drain did dry up
almost immediately and we dragged along with a week or
two's cash in hand until March 1917 when U.S.A. came in and
that problem was over. So far as I know, the Germans were
totally unaware of our financial difficulties. But the American
Government, of course, knew them. It has been an important
part of the case of the recent Nye Committee for denying
credits to belligerents that Mr Page cabled to his government
as follows on 5 March 1917: 'I think that the pressure of this
approaching crisis has gone beyond the ability of the Morgan
financial agency for the British and French Governments.
Perhaps our going to war is the only way in which our
present prominent trade position can be maintained and
panic averted.'
On the other hand, my monthly estimates were saved by
the fact that, as a result of delays in deliveries, the depart-
ments and the Allies never succeeded anywhere near in
spending up to their forecasts. At the end of the war quite
a significant part of the orders placed by LI. G. and Russia in
the summer of 1915, were still undelivered; and there were
still hundreds of millions of dollars of these old orders out-
11
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:43:55, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157.003
SHAPING OPINION
standing when we were cleaned out in March 1917 and the
American Treasury had to foot the bill 6
2. These reminiscences are not meant to be wholly irrele-
vant. It is true that in one important respect our problem then
was different. Foreign balances in London were insignificant
and were greatly outweighed by what foreigners owed us on
acceptance credits. The financial crisis of 1914 was due, not
to our being unable to pay what we owed abroad, but to
foreigners being unable to pay us. It was not sterling which
crashed in that month, but the dollar (which went temporarily
over 6 to the £). But by 1916 the difference between the
position then and the position now was not so fundamental.
It is, therefore, well to remember that we did get through
after a fashion without blocking the exchanges; and this policy
was not without considerable advantages of simplicity and
efficiency.
Our international position is so totally different from Ger-
many's that their technique does not offer a good model for
us. I have not reached a decided opinion on the point. But
there is much to be said against blocking up all the loopholes
and crevices. Not all the money which slips through is 'lost'.
There is a good deal of business which does us no harm and
is better allowed which, nevertheless, one cannot make into
a precedent by giving it official approval. There is a case for
controls which those in charge know to be imperfect and
incomplete and deliberately leave so; especially in England.
It is far more trouble than it is worth to be too logical about
controls. (I remember how the day after I had established
the principle that the Russian credits should be for munitions
only, M. Routkowsky came round for my initials to a Bond
Street bill for a Grand Duchess's underclothing; and there was
the case of the beeswax for the Little Fathers.)
I am therefore, doubtful if it is practicable or advisable to
close down too completely the black exchange. It has its uses
6
I have depended wholly on my memory unrefreshed by documents in writing
the above, and it is probably inaccurate in detail.
12
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:43:55, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157.003
THE BEGINNING
within limits. One could see to it that it did not cost too much
net. I can even imagine occasions when it might be worth the
while of the Treasury to give it covert support. It is probably
on a relatively small scale and is a useful safety valve. It is not
advisable to render literally impossible all those transactions
which the Treasury cannot afford formally and publicly to
approve.
I suggest therefore, that the main transactions should be
canalised and that the rest should be left to themselves. My
main criticism of the measures put into force too quickly by
the Board of Trade etc. is that they seem to flow from the
belief that there is no middle course between complete laissez-
faire and complete totalitarianism. I feel that it would be more
in accordance with the traditions of the Treasury to be
cautious and cagey with its control-system, and to cultivate
turning a blind eye with the other one wide open. It looks,
indeed, as if wisdom of this kind has been already at work.
I return to the details later.
3. If we were to attempt complete exchange control on the
German model, the position of the Dominions would offer
to us an additional complication. It would be very undesirable
to treat their bank accounts as blocked foreign balances.
Canada is establishing an exchange control, and other
Dominion Governments are likely to follow suit. But the
details of management are not likely to be the same in each
case.
4. For complete exchange control, it would be necessary
that each individual foreign account should be blocked and
only made available for specific approved purposes. This
would not increase our popularity with neutrals and would
involve an enormous amount of red-tape over London's
international relations. It is undesirable if it can be avoided.
5. It is arguable, therefore, that a moderate development
on the lines of what we are doing already would be best. The
following is an outline of what might be necessary:
(1) The most important step forward is to require that
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:43:55, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157.003
SHAPING OPINION
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:43:55, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157.003
THE BEGINNING
a free exchange on a modest scale. A modest discount below
the official exchange will encourage foreigners to pay their
sterling debts, and the amount of foreign money in London
anxious to escape will gradually diminish. I would even go
so far as to give covert support to the free exchange on a
moderate scale if the discount widened too much. A free
exchange, which is not much below the control price even
when the foreign news is not satisfactory, will be good for our
credit.
7. There remains the difficult problem of how to regulate
the provision of foreign exchange for the private purchase
of imports. In the last war (unless my memory is at fault) we
depended solely on import licences and an arrangement by
which the banks had to be satisfied that the exchange was
required for a normal and proper purpose. There was, I
think, a large volume of such normal transactions over the
free exchange; but then we did not commandeer the proceeds
of private exports.
Now import licences are usually given chiefly with
reference to the usefulness of the goods and the shipping
problems involved. It is difficult for an exchange controller
to have the necessary knowledge to divert the demand from
one source to another where exchange difficulties are less.
If trade can be left uncontrolled within the Empire, that
would be a great simplification. But I do not see my way
through the rest of this part of the problem.
24 September igjg j . M. KEYNES
Also, from 20 September, Keynes, in the course of his few days a week
in London, began to act as host to the 'Old Dogs'—First World War
officials not (with the exception of H. D. Henderson at the Treasury) as yet
involved officially in the war effort—H. D. Henderson, Sir Arthur Salter,
Sir William Beveridge and Sir Walter Layton.8 Inevitably, they discussed
8
Sir Arthur Salter (1881-1975), K.C.B. 1922, 1st Baron of Kidlington, 1953; Inde-
pendent M.P. for Oxford University, 1937-50; Conservative M.P. for Ormskirk,
1951-3; entered Admiralty, Transport Department, 1904; Director of Ship
l
5
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:43:55, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157.003
SHAPING OPINION
16
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:43:55, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157.003
THE BEGINNING
In the last war, both sides made the mistake of concentrat-
ing too much on specific goods and too little on money, which
is generalised purchasing power and available for any goods.
Germany started her unrestricted U-boat campaign within a
few weeks of the date of the exhaustion of our finances in
U.S.A. and without any reference to that vital fact (and,
probably, without any knowledge of it). Our blockade was
carried on to the grave impairment of our own financial
resources and was apparently based on the assumption that
the purchasing power of the enemy in the countries of the
neighbouring neutrals was inexhaustible.
I lay down the following proposition as being, at the least,
highly probable. Germany will succeed in spending all the
foreign purchasing power she can acquire, and will not end
the war with substantial foreign cash in hand. If this proposi-
tion is accepted, three important conclusions follow from it.
I. It should be our principal object to guide as much as
possible of Germany's purchasing power towards goods
which are not of absolutely the first order of necessity for
winning the war. This is what in the last war I used to call
'the temptation policy', though I was never successful in
persuading the Blockade Ministry of its importance.
If Germany's controls were to work with perfect coordina-
tion, efficacy and wisdom and with complete freedom from
departmental jealousy, they would be able to resist the
temptation policy. In fact we can hope that departmental zeal
in the provision of particular commodities will often cause
them to succumb to temptation, just as it would here. Every
mark which we can induce Germany to spend on what is not
absolutely essential is so much stolen from what is required
for the most efficient prosecution of a long war.
We should, therefore, take the utmost pains to distinguish
between what is essential to the German machine and what
is merely useful, and concentrate all our blockade efforts on
the former.
Let us now apply this principle to the important case of
l
7
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:43:55, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157.003
SHAPING OPINION
food. Can Germany affordto buy any material quantity of food
in excess of the amount with which in any case we have no
power to interfere? Are we not, perhaps, wasting our effort
and our money if, on this occasion, we attempt a complete
blockade of food?
Is there not some reason to think that the scale of rationing
already enforced in Berlin is stricter than is required by the
blockade we have enforced or are likely to be able to enforce,
and that the German authorities are deliberately economising
on food purchases in order to keep their resources for still
more essential purposes? Are we blockading (e.g.) sugar? Yet
I have read that Germany is actually trying to export sugar
to Holland in exchange for zinc.
If so, we are allowing them to put on our blockade the
odium of restrictions which they would think it prudent to
enforce in any case.
Moreover, if we were to remove from the contraband list
selected foodstuffs, our relations with neutrals would be made
much easier and we could effectively concentrate larger re-
sources on hindering really essential imports.
II. It is almost as useful to force Germany to pay a high
price for her imports as to prevent her from getting them.
Thus it is desirable to force up the prices of what she wants
in the neighbouring neutrals, even when we allow her to make
the final successful bid. In the last war we signally failed to
use this tactic and insisted on never being the under-bidder
even when we had forced up the price to an uneconomic
figure.
It is a tactic which needs much skill and finesse. But if one
is taking a long view, nothing is cleverer than to allow her to
buy very dear.
The great danger in a Ministry of Economic Warfare is
excessive zeal on the part of officials who are dealing ex-
clusively with particular commodities. It is safe to assume that
Germany will manage to use her purchasing power somehow,
18
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:43:55, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157.003
THE BEGINNING
that one cannot prevent this, and that one's prime object,
therefore, is to make her use it inefficiently and to the least
possible advantage.
III. It is just as important to interfere with Germany's
export trade as with her imports. Perhaps more important.
Since she will know how best to use her foreign purchasing
power, it is more important to curtail her purchasing power
than to impede her in the exercise of it in particular
directions.
Thus, corresponding to the policy of forcing her to buy her
imports dear, there should be a policy of forcing her to sell
her exports cheap by methods of cut-throat competition.
This requires exact knowledge of what she is exporting and
at what prices and a careful organisation of our own
exporters. We should flood the neighbouring neutrals with
cheap exports of the same general character as the German
exports. A convenient way of helping our own exporters in
this direction might be to buy from them the foreign currency
proceeds of their sales at a very favourable rate of exchange.
The fact that we shall need such currency to pay for our own
official purchases offers a sufficient excuse for this.
Money will be better spent in flooding the neighbouring
neutrals with our own exports at bargain prices than in buying
from them at very high prices commodities which the
Germans are quite likely better off without. For example, if
it turns out that Germany can spare any material quantity of
coal for export, we should not seek to prevent her, which is
probably impossible, but should ourselves offer coal to Scan-
dinavia on terms which would reduce the Scandinavian price
for that commodity to a very unremunerative level. On the
same principle we should be more concerned to raise the price
of Swedish ore than to attempt the impracticable task of
entirely preventing its shipment. If we can double the price
of Swedish ore in terms of German coal, we shall be at the
same time very popular in Scandinavia and highly efficient
'9
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:43:55, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157.003
SHAPING OPINION
in the conduct of economic warfare. This is a policy for which
we can expect covert Scandinavian cooperation!
In the last war our Ministry of Blockade came to the rescue
of the German Treasury, just as their U-boat campaign came
to the rescue of our Treasury. There are, of course, argu-
ments on both sides. But the considerations here emphasised
should not be lost sight of.
8.IO.39 J. M. KEYNES
WHEAT AS CONTRABAND
20
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:43:55, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157.003
THE BEGINNING
prevail in Germany, the odium of this state of affairs in the
eyes of the German population would be removed, in part
at least, from ourselves to where it properly belongs, namely
the German Government. The decision to starve the part of
the civilian population which has no military value would be
seen clearly as their decision and not ours.
4. For the odium which we are at present bringing on
ourselves in the eyes of the German public and before some
sections of neutral opinion may be serving a very negligible
military purpose. It is unlikely that German supplies of food,
actual and potential, are so short as to justify so low a civilian
ration as that which is already enforced. It is probable that
a better supply of food is already available, but that the
German authorities prefer to use their limited resources for
more essential military purposes. If this is true, we are
allowing them to throw on us an odium which belongs else-
where. It is for us to expose this situation; which we can do
by removing wheat, and wheat only, from the contraband list.
For no one need starve if abundant wheat is available.
5. It is a fallacy to conduct our blockade policy as though
the enemy's purchasing power were unlimited. We need to
concentrate on depriving him of first essentials, and even
to tempt him to purchase what is not a first essential. A
concentration of the blockade on a limited range of articles
will render it more effective, financially cheaper to us and
financially more exhausting to the enemy, than if we spread
ourselves ineffectually and expensively, with the maximum of
machinery and friction, over every conceivable thing; and
it will greatly ease our relations with the neighbouring
neutrals.
6. It is true that wheat can be turned into alcohol or
acetone and can be used, either directly or by substitution,
or by exchange, as a feeding stuff for animals. But it is
expensive and relatively inefficient for these purposes. There
should be better ways in which Germany is free to spend her
21
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:43:55, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157.003
SHAPING OPINION
limited supplies of foreign exchange; though it would be
necessary to enquire into Germany's holdings of blocked
exchange in (e.g.) the Argentine and what opportunities there
are for her to use it otherwise.
We cannot prevent Germany from spending her foreign
exchange on something, and it is futile to attempt it. Our
efforts should be directed to diverting her money towards
relatively inefficient and expensive purchases and, above all,
to interfere with her ability to acquire money by exporting.
We need subtler methods than that of attempting the im-
practicable task of a hundred per cent blockade, in which
everything is treated as equally important.
7. It is not suggested that we should demand any kind of
reciprocity from Germany. We should not get reciprocity if
we asked for it, and we should lose the psychological gain that
we are seeking of showing the neutrals that we behave
differently from Germany.
22
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:43:55, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157.003
THE BEGINNING
made American assistance seem more necessary. As a result, the memo-
randum never became the basis of action until events in the spring of 1940
made it, and a Keynes visit to America, redundant.15
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:43:55, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157.003
SHAPING OPINION
24
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:43:55, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157.003
THE BEGINNING
What is the religion which is in danger and for which there
is a duty to fight? I accept Dorothy Thompson's definition:
'It is the synthesis of three things: the Christian ethic; the
scientific spirit; and the rule of law.' And this is my corollary.
America shares this religion with us. It would be intolerable
for America and a cause of unappeasable shame if this cause
were to be overwhelmed. For this reason my third assumption
above is sure to turn out a big understatement. Perhaps
nearly half America sees the issue at least as clearly as we do.
But half the other half is deceived by the superficial
resemblance to the last war and walk like blind men. Thus
the national intention is unclear and it is difficult for the
Administration to move fast enough. So it may be useful
to be ahead, rather than behindhand, with a suggestion.
Whatever anyone may intend and with whatever firmness
they may intend it, the only way of keeping America out of
the war is to make sure that France and Great Britain do
not get into difficulties. The whole issue is whether public
opinion will allow the Administration to apply half measures
of assistance at the right date when, both psychologically
and materially, they will make all the difference.
II
Except in case of circumstances which cannot be foreseen and
do not now seem likely, the first assumption—that America
will not join in the war—is not questioned in what follows.
But in these days there are several kinds of neutrality, just
as there are several degrees of being at war. 'Neutrality'
(modern style) is inconsistent with joining in hostilities, but
it is not inconsistent with taking sides. If my fundamental
assumptions are right, it is fair to ask America deliberately
and in set terms to take sides. My proposals may be far-
reaching but they are simple.
(i) The United States should break off diplomatic relations
with Germany and declare a state of non-intercourse. This
25
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:43:55, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157.003
SHAPING OPINION
step should not be taken immediately, but Germany should
be informed now that it will be taken if Germany breaks any
of the undertakings she has given for the humanisation of
war, in particular her recent promise to the President about
the bombing of civilians from the air, and her undertaking
about the use of poison gas. Non-intercourse would include
the prohibition of imports of German origin. This threat is
a real one because there is at present no blockade or other
interference with the export of German goods to America in
neutral ships. It would be still better if the United States could
form a bloc for this purpose of all American countries. The
main importance of this measure would be of course, psy-
chological. Done at the right moment, its effect in this kind
might be crushing.
(2) Unless the war is a short one, financial assistance from
the United States is sooner or later indispensable. Never
before has this been considered inconsistent with neutrality.
Our default on last time's war debts is presumably the real
reason why the present law prohibits credits. The other
ostensible grounds are not convincing. Nevertheless it cannot
be reasonably defended except by those who reject the fun-
damental assumptions set forth above. The moral to be drawn
from last time's experience (and as one who was particularly
intimate with the details of that occasion this, and no other,
is the moral which with untroubled conscience I draw) is that
the arrangements for the credits should be quite different,
and should take the following form.
(a) All credit transactions should be from the outset be-
tween governments alone (private credit transactions remain-
ing prohibited) and, so far as munitions are concerned,
should be expended by a joint purchasing board for the
proper regulation of prices and profits.
(b) The credits should carry no interest.
(c) They should be repayable by annual instalments over
a short period of years, but they should not be repayable to
26
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:43:55, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157.003
THE BEGINNING
the United States. They should constitute a part of the
contribution of the United States to the post-war reconstruc-
tion of Europe. The instalments of repayment should be
allocated, that is to say, to the countries which have to be
reconstituted after the war17, to Poland, Bohemia and
Slovakia, to Germany herself and Austria. (This time it must
be clear from the beginning that the indemnity is paid by
the victor to the vanquished.)
These instalments should make up a part, but not the
whole, of America's contribution to the Reconstruction Fund.
On the assumption that the war lasts a year and a half to two
years, let us suppose that the United States Government
advances $2,000 million to the British and French Govern-
ments, repayable in ten annual instalments without interest.
On the conclusion of the war the United States Government
would allocate to the Reconstruction Fund the benefit of these
instalments (which would be collectible, not in cash, but only
in the exports of the countries discharging the debt), and in
addition a further $2,500 million18 in gold out of its lunatic
and redundant stock to provide the bank reserves in the
countries to be reconstructed. The detailed allocation of these
funds between the recipients would be settled by the United
States herself.
(3) This participation by the United States in the task of
reconstruction makes essential, what would be desirable
without it, namely some measure of responsibility by the
United States for the terms of peace. The nature of this
17
After completing the first draft Keynes changed the words: 'To Poland,
Bohemia.. .annual instalments without interest', in the following manner: 'That
is to say, to all the countries which have to be reconstituted after the war. That
is to say, they should be paid to the credit of a Reconstruction Board which would
be concerned with the financial side of the reparation of damage and the
rehabilitation of financial credit in all the allied and associated countries.
(d) These instalments should make up part, but not whole, of America's
contribution to the Reconstruction Fund. Let us suppose that the United States
Government advances $5,000 million to the British and French Governments,
repayable in annual instalments without interest.'
18
Keynes changed the figure $2,500 million to $5,000 million and the word 'lunatic',
in the same line, to 'useless', after completing the original draft.
27
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:43:55, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157.003
SHAPING OPINION
responsibility and of these terms lies outside the scope of these
notes. I find it difficult myself to concentrate at this stage on
the political and constitutional issues, on frontiers and
disarmament and the future government of Europe, not
because these issues are not of the first importance but be-
cause there are too many unknowns yet to be disclosed. I am
more exercised over a preliminary anxiety. If this war is
fought to a finish, nothing is more likely than that it will end
in a Communist revolution in Germany. What will happen
then to the plans of us liberals and federalists?
The important thing—and this is my last plea to the
President—is that, the minute after the Hitler gang seems ripe
for disappearance, the President should instantly intervene
with a view to the offer of peace terms of unprecedented
generosity (in which the Reconstruction Fund would play a
prominent part).
This leads up to a word about timing. It is evident that the
time for American financial assistance on these lines is not yet.
British and French financial resources are still largely intact;
there are no present difficulties and the true character of the
war itself is not yet disclosed; and public opinion in the United
States has not yet had time to settle down after the bitterness
of the recent debate. What is important to the conduct of the
war is that the British Treasury should have some assurance
that they will not have to depend indefinitely on their own
resources. I am afraid, however, that there is no possibility
of giving them such an assurance at present and they must
be asked to budget on faith. When will the time come? Only
events can show. But I suggest that the order of events may
perhaps turn out roughly as follows. First of all, on the
assumption that all goes fairly well: (i) It is useless to discuss
peace until the balance of forces has disclosed itself more
clearly than at present. (2) It is useless to discuss peace until
the prestige of the Hitler regime is suffering eclipse in
Germany itself. (3) As soon as these two conditions are satis-
factorily settled, generous peace terms should be offered on
28
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:43:55, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157.003
THE BEGINNING
lines which the President approves and the President should
take that opportunity of announcing the alternative to their
acceptance, which should include financial assistance on the
above lines. Secondly on the assumption that all does not
go well, (i) In this case a somewhat rapid change is possible
in American public opinion. (2) This movement should be
accelerated by a more explicit statement of war aims and
peace terms, made after consultation with the President. (3)
On the assumption that these aims and terms are acceptable
to American opinion, the President should stake his authority
on securing powers for non-intercourse and financial
assistance.
Our prime purpose must be to prevent the disappearance
of the few stable elements in German life which still remain.
If they can be rallied and supported, the evil of the post-war
years may yet be undone and Western civilisation reprieved.
If they are submerged, all the fine plans for the future
boundaries and government of Europe will belong, in spite
of our resounding victory, to a world which has disappeared.
2.11.39 J.M.K.
However, all of Keynes's early war activities were not as 'private' as those
already outlined. Thus Keynes wrote to The Times on the first war budget.
To the Editor o/The Times, 28 September iggg
Sir,
That part of the cost of the war which we meet by parting
with gold and foreign assets, by borrowing abroad, by using
up stocks of materials, and by failing to make good physical
deterioration in houses and other capital goods at home, must
necessarily fall on posterity. The nation will emerge from the
war that much poorer, and the loss can only be made good
by future efforts. In the aggregate these items will amount
to a very large sum. This part of the cost of war it is clearly
right to borrow.
The remaining part of the cost can only be met by increased
29
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:43:55, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157.003
SHAPING OPINION
current effort and diminished current consumption, and,
taking the nation as a whole, must necessarily fall on us here
and now. But the Treasury have the choice between bringing
the contributions to account against individual taxpayers
either forthwith or by instalments.
The following figures show that the level of the rate of
interest is overwhelmingly important in deciding between
these alternatives. The Chancellor proposes this year to raise
£107 million extra by taxation and to borrow £938 million.
Next year the heavier taxes, apart from the excess profits tax,
will yield £226 million, and substantially more than £1,000
million is likely to be borrowed. The effect of these loans on
future Budgets, taking the annual sinking fund at, say, x/% per
cent compound, will depend on the rate of interest payable.
Thus the future burden of £1,500 million borrowed at 2V1 per
cent will be the same as the burden of £1,280 million
borrowed at 3 per cent and of £1,000 million borrowed at 4
per cent, since in each case the annual service of the loan
including sinking fund will be £45 million per annum. That
is to say, the gain of borrowing at 3 per cent rather than 4
per cent is greater than the whole of the proceeds of the new
rates of taxation in a full year; and the gain of borrowing at
2lA per cent rather than 3 per cent would help the Treasury
as much as would doubling all the increases announced
yesterday.
I suggest that it will cause less disturbance, injustice, and
suffering to find methods of borrowing during the war at an
average rate of interest not exceeding 2V2 per cent, than will
be caused by any other fiscal expedient open to us which is
of equal financial efficacy. Indeed to restrict the rate of
interest on current savings to 2V2 per cent will cause no
disturbance, injustice, or suffering worth mention.
The reader should not infer that I consider the new
burdens excessive. Quite the contrary What strikes me about
this Budget is the utter futility of the old imposts to solve
the problem, even when pushed almost to the limits of
3°
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:43:55, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157.003
THE BEGINNING
endurance. Apart from the excess profits tax, the increased
taxation comes to less than 5 per cent of our pre-war income.
But our national income should increase in due course,
through greater employment, longer hours, and the bringing
in of women and others not previously available for employ-
ment, by some 10 per cent-20 per cent, at pre-war wages and
prices. Thus the purchasing power left in the hands of the
public after deducting the new taxation will be considerably
more than before.
In these circumstances the idea apparently prevalent in
government circles that prices can be kept more or less at
pre-war levels is fanciful and highly unrealistic. The sterling
exchange has depreciated about 15 per cent; world prices
have risen, and so have the costs of shipping goods here;
purchasing power is certain to increase, while supplies will be
diminishing. In a free community a deliberate price rise on
a reasonable scale, which leaves the consumers' choice as much
unimpeded as possible, is the right solution. An average
increase of 20 per cent at least in wholesale prices, which
would mean a much smaller increase in the cost of living, is
necessary and desirable; and would greatly facilitate the
Treasury's task. This brings us to the excess profits tax, which
in the long run is the most interesting and important of the
Chancellor's proposals. The rest, however appalling it may
seem to individuals, is chicken-feed to the dragons of war.
Yours, etc.,
J. M. KEYNES
This led to a letter from Professor J. R. Hicks19 suggesting that Keynes was
unfair to Sir John Simon20 in his emphasis on the problems of voluntary
19
John Richard Hicks (b. 1904), Kt. 1964; Lecturer, London School of Economics,
1926-35, Cambridge, 1935-8; Professor of Political Economy, Manchester, 1938-46;
Official Fellow, Nuffield College, Oxford, 1946-52; Drummond Professor of
Political Economy, Oxford, 1952-65.
20
Sir John Simon (1873-1954), 1st Viscount 1940; Liberal M.P. for Walthamstow,
igo6-i8, for Spen Valley, 1922-3, as Liberal National, 1931-40; Solicitor-General,
1910-13; Attorney-General, 1913-15; Home Secretary, 1915-16; Foreign Secre-
tary, 1931—5; Home Secretary and leader of the House, 1935-7; Chancellor of the
Exchequer, 1937-40; Lord Chancellor, 1940-5.
31
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. University of Minnesota Libraries, on 21 Mar 2018 at 03:43:55, subject to the Cambridge
Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/UPO9781139520157.003
Another Random Scribd Document
with Unrelated Content
minä sain vaihtokaupassa toisen kylän päämieheltä rautaisen veitsen
ja eilen luiskahti rautaveitsi kädestäni ja painui mereen. Kaikella on
lakinsa, ei ole mitään lakien ulkopuolella olevaa. Sen me tiedämme.
Ja sitäpaitsi me tiedämme, että samanlaatuisilla esineillä on sama
laki ja että kaikella raudalla on sama laki. Siis peruuta sanasi, Nam-
Bok, että me voisimme sinua vielä kunnioittaa."
"Mutta kuinka?"
"Minulla oli vähän voimia jäljellä, enkä voinut soutaa tieheni. Siispä
minut otettiin laivaan ja kurkkuuni kaadettiin vettä ja minulle
annettiin hyvää ruokaa. Kahdesti, veljeni, olette te nähneet valkoisen
miehen, ja nämä miehet olivat kaikki valkoisia ja heitä oli niin monta,
kuin minulla on sormia ja varpaita. Ja kun minä huomasin, että he
olivat hyvin ystävällisiä, tulin rohkeammaksi ja päätin itsekseni
painaa mieleeni kaikki mitä näin. Ja he opettivat minut tekemään
mitä hekin tekivät, ja antoivat minulle hyvää ruokaa ja makuupaikan.
Ja päivän toisensa jälkeen kuljimme merellä ja joka päivä päämies
otti auringon taivaalta ja pani sen sanomaan, missä me olimme. Ja
kun aallot olivat hyvällä päällä, pyydystimme hylkeitä ja minä
ihmettelin kovin, sillä he heittivät aina pois lihan ja rasvan ja pitivät
ainoastaan nahan."
"Pitkän ajan päästä, kun aurinko oli kadonnut ja ilmaan oli tullut
purevaa pakkasta, käänsi päämies kuunarin keulan etelään. Päivän
toisensa jälkeen kuljimme kohti etelää ja itää, emmekä koskaan
nähneet maata ja olimme likellä sitä kylää, josta miehet olivat
kotoisin — —"
"Niin, se oli vaikeata uskoa, vaikka sen omin silmin näin, mutta
enhän voinut kieltää silmieni todistusta. Ja katsellessani kuulin…"
Hän kääntyi äkkiä päällikköön päin. "Opee-Kwan, sinä olet kuullut
merileijonan vihoissaan karjuvan. Kuvittele mielessäsi, että löytyisi
yhtä monta merileijonaa, kuin meressä on aaltoja ja kuvittele, että
kaikki nämä merileijonat olisivat yksi merileijona ja tämä yksi
merileijona ärjyisi. Niin ärjyi kuulemani vehje."
"Ja kaukaa näin hirviön, joka oli niin suuri kuin tuhannen
valaskalaa. Sillä oli yksi silmä ja se sylki sauhua ja ähki suureen
ääneen. Minä pelkäsin ja juoksin vapisevin jaloin tietä pitkin, joka oli
kankien välissä. Mutta se tuli tuulen nopeudella, tuo hirviö, ja minä
hyppäsin rautakangen yli, tuntien sen kuuman hengityksen
kasvoissani…"
"Ja samaten, sinä tyhmyri, sanoin minä, että raha oli jotakin, josta
te ette mitään tiedä. Niinkuin sanoin, kuljin hirviöllä halki maan ja
monen kylän kautta, kunnes tulin suolaisen merenlahden rannalla
olevaan suureen kylään. Ja talojen katot ulottuivat taivaan tähtiin ja
pilvet ympäröivät niitä ja jokapaikassa oli paljon sauhua. Ja tämän
kylän pauhina oli kuin meren pauhina myrskyssä ja ihmisiä oli niin
paljon, että minä heitin pois keppini, enkä enää muistanut siinä
olevia viiruja."
"Mikä sinä olet sanomaan, mitä voi olla tai ei voi olla?"
"Mitä sitten vielä?" kysyi Keesh. "Enkö minä ole tarjonnut sinulle
täyttä hintaa? Onko kestään Tana-naw-tytöstä koskaan maksettu niin
paljon? Sano siinä tapauksessa hänen nimensä!"
"Niin —"
"Ja vielä vähän", jatkoi nainen. "Löytyy vanha tapa, jonka sekä
sinun että minun isäni tunsivat. Jos mies kaatuu taistelussa, viedään
hänen päänahkansa voiton merkiksi. Hyvä on. Mutta sinun, joka olet
Korpin jättänyt, on tehtävä enemmän. Sinun tulee tuoda minulle, ei
päänahkoja vaan pääkalloja, kaksi pääkalloa, ja tuotuasi ne, en anna
sinulle kuituja, vaan koristellun vyön tuppineen ja pitkän venäläisen
veitsen. Silloin silmäilen sinua taas ystävällisesti, ja silloin on kaikki
taas hyvin."
"Vai niin", sanoi mies tyynesti. "Vai niin." Sitten hän kääntyi ja
poistui valon piiristä.
"Ei, oi Keesh." huusi tyttö hänen jälkeensä. "Ei kahta päätä, vaan
vähintäin kolme!"
Mutta Keesh oli uudelle uskolleen kuuliainen, eli vanhurskaasti ja
vaati heimonsa kansan tottelemaan pastori Jackson Brownin käskyjä.
Koko kalastusaikana hän ei välittänyt Tana-naw'sta eikä huolinut
heidän pilkastaan, eikä eri heimojen naisten nauruista. Kalastuksen
jälkeen lähti Gnob ja hänen kansansa, mukanaan suuret varastot
sekä auringossa kuivattua että savustettua lohta, metsästämään
Tana-naw heimon sydänmaille. Keesh näki heidän lähtevän, mutta
kävi siitä huolimatta Lähetyksen jumalanpalveluksissa, joissa hän
säännöllisesti rukoili ja johti laulua syvällä bassoäänellään.
Mutta eräänä päivänä kun talven tullen lumi oli niin tarpeeksi
kattanut maan että päästiin kulkemaan, kuultiin uutisia. Tana naw-
mies tuli St. George Missioniin ostamaan ampumavaroja ja kertoi,
että Su-Su oli luonut silmänsä Nee-Koo'hon joka oli mainio, nuori
metsästäjä ja oli hänestä vanhan Gnobin nuotiolla tarjonnut
suurenmoisen hinnan. Jotenkin samaan aikaan tapasi pastori
Jackson Brown Keesh'in joelle vievällä metsätiellä. Keeshin parhaat
koirat olivat valjastettuina hänen rekensä eteen, johonka hän oli
sitonut parhaimman lumikenkäparinsa.
*****
"Ovat."
"Ne ovat varmaan ihan tuoreita, sillä muuten olisi veri jäätynyt."
"Niin, sinulle."
Tulen sulattama lumi painui Gnobin pään alta ja se vieri kuin olisi
se ollut elävä olento, pysähtyen tytön jalkojen juureen. Mutta hän ei
liikahtanutkaan. Keesh istui myöskin liikkumatta, hän ei räpäyttänyt
silmiään, katsoi vaan taukoamatta tyttöön.
Kaunis Li-Wan.
"Ja sinäkin, Bash, joka olet yhtä villi kuin isäntäsi, etkä tahdo elää
sovussa sen käden kanssa joka sinua ruokkii! Tämä riita ei kuulu
sinuun, niin että tästä saat! ja tästä!"
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
ebookultra.com