0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views10 pages

Output Factorial 2

The document details the results of an unrestricted factor analysis conducted on data from 697 participants and 34 variables using various statistical methods. The analysis utilized Hot-Deck Multiple Imputation for handling missing values and Robust Unweighted Least Squares for factor extraction, resulting in one identified factor. Additionally, univariate descriptive statistics and warnings regarding the presence of unobserved categories in several variables are provided.

Uploaded by

Marcelo Vaiman
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as TXT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
8 views10 pages

Output Factorial 2

The document details the results of an unrestricted factor analysis conducted on data from 697 participants and 34 variables using various statistical methods. The analysis utilized Hot-Deck Multiple Imputation for handling missing values and Robust Unweighted Least Squares for factor extraction, resulting in one identified factor. Additionally, univariate descriptive statistics and warnings regarding the presence of unobserved categories in several variables are provided.

Uploaded by

Marcelo Vaiman
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as TXT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10

F A C T O R

Unrestricted Factor Analysis

Release Version 10.10.01 x64bits


October, 2019
Rovira i Virgili University
Tarragona, SPAIN

Programming:
Urbano Lorenzo-Seva

Mathematical Specification:
Urbano Lorenzo-Seva
Pere J. Ferrando

Date: Saturday, January 11, 2020


Time: 18:14:56
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

DETAILS OF ANALYSIS

Participants' scores data file : C:\Users\Asus\Desktop\


ANALISIS TRI\base tri.dat
Method to handle missing values : Hot-Deck Multiple Imputation
in Exploratory Factor Analysis (Lorenzo-Seva & Van Ginkel, 2016)
Missing code value : 999
Number of participants : 697
Number of variables : 34
Variables included in the analysis : ALL
Variables excluded in the analysis : NONE
Number of factors : 1
Number of second order factors : 0
Procedure for determining the number of dimensions : Hull method for selecting
the number of common factors (Lorenzo-Seva, Timmerman, & Kiers, 2011)
Dispersion matrix : Polychoric Correlations
Robust analyses : Bias-corrected and
accelerated (BCa; Lambert, Wildt & Durand, 1991)
Number of bootstrap samples : 500
Asymptotic Covariance/Variance matrix : estimated using bootstrap
sampling
Bootstrap confidence intervals : 95%
Method for factor extraction : Robust Unweighted Least
Squares (RULS)
Correction for robust Chi square : Robust Mean and Variance-
scaled (Asparouhov & Muthen, 2010)
Rotation to achieve factor simplicity : Robust Promin (Lorenzo-Seva
& Ferrando, 2019c)
Clever rotation start : Weighted Varimax
Number of random starts : 100
Maximum mumber of iterations : 1000
Convergence value : 0.00001000
Factor scores estimates : Estimates based on linear
model

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNIVARIATE DESCRIPTIVES

Variable Mean Confidence Interval Variance Skewness Kurtosis


(95%) (Zero
centered)

V 1 4.030 ( 3.84 4.22) 3.949 -0.123 -1.190


V 2 0.000 ( 0.00 0.00) 0.000 -nan(ind) -nan(ind)
V 3 2.248 ( 2.08 2.42) 2.984 1.311 0.652
V 4 0.000 ( 0.00 0.00) 0.000 -nan(ind) -nan(ind)
V 5 2.290 ( 2.12 2.46) 2.946 1.257 0.520
V 6 0.000 ( 0.00 0.00) 0.000 -nan(ind) -nan(ind)
V 7 2.230 ( 2.07 2.39) 2.736 1.320 0.781
V 8 0.000 ( 0.00 0.00) 0.000 -nan(ind) -nan(ind)
V 9 2.439 ( 2.28 2.60) 2.717 1.056 0.213
V 10 0.000 ( 0.00 0.00) 0.000 -nan(ind) -nan(ind)
V 11 2.402 ( 2.24 2.56) 2.679 1.056 0.171
V 12 0.000 ( 0.00 0.00) 0.000 -nan(ind) -nan(ind)
V 13 2.953 ( 2.78 3.13) 3.296 0.565 -0.824
V 14 0.000 ( 0.00 0.00) 0.000 -nan(ind) -nan(ind)
V 15 3.696 ( 3.50 3.89) 3.939 0.042 -1.239
V 16 0.000 ( 0.00 0.00) 0.000 -nan(ind) -nan(ind)
V 17 2.412 ( 2.25 2.57) 2.655 1.027 0.125
V 18 0.000 ( 0.00 0.00) 0.000 -nan(ind) -nan(ind)
V 19 3.062 ( 2.88 3.25) 3.642 0.513 -0.940
V 20 0.000 ( 0.00 0.00) 0.000 -nan(ind) -nan(ind)
V 21 2.779 ( 2.60 2.96) 3.403 0.768 -0.571
V 22 0.000 ( 0.00 0.00) 0.000 -nan(ind) -nan(ind)
V 23 3.164 ( 2.98 3.34) 3.451 0.414 -0.972
V 24 0.000 ( 0.00 0.00) 0.000 -nan(ind) -nan(ind)
V 25 3.274 ( 3.09 3.46) 3.611 0.351 -1.078
V 26 0.000 ( 0.00 0.00) 0.000 -nan(ind) -nan(ind)
V 27 2.768 ( 2.60 2.93) 2.896 0.672 -0.594
V 28 0.000 ( 0.00 0.00) 0.000 -nan(ind) -nan(ind)
V 29 3.208 ( 3.03 3.39) 3.490 0.366 -1.103
V 30 0.000 ( 0.00 0.00) 0.000 -nan(ind) -nan(ind)
V 31 3.049 ( 2.88 3.22) 2.985 0.414 -0.898
V 32 0.000 ( 0.00 0.00) 0.000 -nan(ind) -nan(ind)
V 33 3.973 ( 3.79 4.16) 3.651 -0.072 -1.111
V 34 0.000 ( 0.00 0.00) 0.000 -nan(ind) -nan(ind)

Polychoric correlation is advised when the univariate distributions of ordinal


items are
asymmetric or with excess of kurtosis. If both indices are lower than one in
absolute value,
then Pearson correlation is advised. You can read more about this subject in:

Muth�n, B., & Kaplan D. (1985). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor
analysis of non-normal Likert variables. British Journal of Mathematical and
Statistical Psychology, 38, 171-189. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1985.tb00832.x
Muth�n, B., & Kaplan D. (1992). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor
analysis of non-normal Likert variables: A note on the size of the model. British
Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 45, 19-30. doi:10.1111/j.2044-
8317.1992.tb00975.x

BAR CHARTS FOR ORDINAL VARIABLES


Variable 1

Value Freq
|
1 114 | **************************************
2 79 | **************************
3 73 | ************************
4 120 | ****************************************
5 117 | ***************************************
6 105 | ***********************************
7 89 | *****************************
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 30.0 60.0 90.0 120.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 1


You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 2

Value Freq
|
-nan(ind) 0 |
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 2


You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 3

Value Freq
|
1 373 | ****************************************
2 101 | **********
3 72 | *******
4 59 | ******
5 39 | ****
6 26 | **
7 27 | **
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 93.3 186.5 279.8 373.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 3


You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 4

Value Freq
|
-nan(ind) 0 |
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 4


You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 5

Value Freq
|
1 353 | ****************************************
2 115 | *************
3 78 | ********
4 52 | *****
5 48 | *****
6 26 | **
7 25 | **
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 88.3 176.5 264.8 353.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 5


You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 6

Value Freq
|
-nan(ind) 0 |
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 6


You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 7

Value Freq
|
1 354 | ****************************************
2 128 | **************
3 67 | *******
4 63 | *******
5 41 | ****
6 22 | **
7 22 | **
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 88.5 177.0 265.5 354.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 7


You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 8

Value Freq
|
-nan(ind) 0 |
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 8


You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 9

Value Freq
|
1 289 | ****************************************
2 139 | *******************
3 103 | **************
4 73 | **********
5 45 | ******
6 29 | ****
7 19 | **
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 72.3 144.5 216.8 289.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 9


You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 10

Value Freq
|
-nan(ind) 0 |
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 10


You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 11

Value Freq
|
1 298 | ****************************************
2 146 | *******************
3 79 | **********
4 81 | **********
5 53 | *******
6 22 | **
7 18 | **
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 74.5 149.0 223.5 298.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 11


You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 12

Value Freq
|
-nan(ind) 0 |
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 12


You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 13

Value Freq
|
1 215 | ****************************************
2 123 | **********************
3 103 | *******************
4 100 | ******************
5 74 | *************
6 56 | **********
7 26 | ****
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 53.8 107.5 161.3 215.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 13


You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 14

Value Freq
|
-nan(ind) 0 |
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 14


You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 15

Value Freq
|
1 152 | ****************************************
2 79 | ********************
3 84 | **********************
4 112 | *****************************
5 116 | ******************************
6 92 | ************************
7 62 | ****************
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 38.0 76.0 114.0 152.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 15


You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 16

Value Freq
|
-nan(ind) 0 |
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 16


You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 17

Value Freq
|
1 297 | ****************************************
2 138 | ******************
3 87 | ***********
4 87 | ***********
5 45 | ******
6 27 | ***
7 16 | **
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 74.3 148.5 222.8 297.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 17


You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 18

Value Freq
|
-nan(ind) 0 |
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 18


You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 19

Value Freq
|
1 217 | ****************************************
2 111 | ********************
3 93 | *****************
4 99 | ******************
5 82 | ***************
6 55 | **********
7 40 | *******
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 54.3 108.5 162.8 217.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 19


You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 20

Value Freq
|
-nan(ind) 0 |
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 20


You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 21

Value Freq
|
1 250 | ****************************************
2 135 | *********************
3 82 | *************
4 90 | **************
5 62 | *********
6 45 | *******
7 33 | *****
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 62.5 125.0 187.5 250.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 21


You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 22

Value Freq
|
-nan(ind) 0 |
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 22


You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 23

Value Freq
|
1 190 | ****************************************
2 108 | **********************
3 109 | **********************
4 109 | **********************
5 84 | *****************
6 63 | *************
7 34 | *******
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 47.5 95.0 142.5 190.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 23


You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 24

Value Freq
|
-nan(ind) 0 |
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 24


You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 25

Value Freq
|
1 178 | ****************************************
2 111 | ************************
3 104 | ***********************
4 101 | **********************
5 91 | ********************
6 73 | ****************
7 39 | ********
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 44.5 89.0 133.5 178.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 25


You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 26
Value Freq
|
-nan(ind) 0 |
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 26


You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 27

Value Freq
|
1 224 | ****************************************
2 146 | **************************
3 96 | *****************
4 102 | ******************
5 75 | *************
6 36 | ******
7 18 | ***
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 56.0 112.0 168.0 224.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 27


You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 28

Value Freq
|
-nan(ind) 0 |
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 28


You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 29

Value Freq
|
1 178 | ****************************************
2 130 | *****************************
3 93 | ********************
4 91 | ********************
5 105 | ***********************
6 70 | ***************
7 30 | ******
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 44.5 89.0 133.5 178.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 29


You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 30

Value Freq
|
-nan(ind) 0 |
+-----------+---------+---------+-----------+
0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Warning: Not all the categories are observed in variable 30


You should consider to remove this variable from the analysis

Variable 31

Value

You might also like