Stibnite Gold Project EIS

Appendix J
Fish Resources and Fish Habitat (Including
Threatened, Endangered, Proposed, and
Sensitive Species)
This page intentionally left blank.
Contents
Appendix J-1: Supplemental Information
Appendix J-2: Stream Temperature Impacts on Fish Technical Memorandum

Appendix J-3: Barriers Technical Memorandum

Appendix J-4: Intrinsic Potential Technical Memoranda

Appendix J-5: Chinook Salmon Streamflow/Productivity Technical Memorandum

Appendix J-6: Chinook Salmon Critical Habitat Technical Memorandum

Appendix J-7: Occupancy Modeling Technical Memoranda
Appendix J-8: PHABSIM Technical Memorandum
Appendix J-9: Bull Trout Use of Lake Habitat Technical Memorandum
Appendix J-10: Fish Relative Species Abundance and Density
This page intentionally left blank.
Appendix J-1: Supplemental Information
This page intentionally left blank.
APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Table of Contents
FISH SPECIES ..........................................................................................................................J-1-1
J.1.1 All Fish Species ............................................................................................................. J-1-1
Brook Trout ................................................................................................... J-1-1
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON PROJECT-RELATED SURVEYS .....................................J-1-7
ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE MATRIX - WATERSHED CONDITION INDICATOR
TABLES ...................................................................................................................................J-1-13
CHANGES IN WATERSHED CONDITION INDICATORS ....................................................J-1-57
J.4.1 Alternative 1 ................................................................................................................ J-1-58
J.4.2 Alternative 2 ................................................................................................................ J-1-64
J.4.3 Alternative 3 ................................................................................................................ J-1-70
PREDICTED STREAMFLOWS ...............................................................................................J-1-76
LITERATURE CITED ............................................................................................................................J-1-81

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-i

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Tables
Table J1-1 Fish Species in the Analysis Area .................................................................................... J-1-2
Table J1-2 Listed and Sensitive Fish Species with a Documented Presence in the Mine Site
by Stream ......................................................................................................................... J-1-5
Table J1-3 Listed and Sensitive Fish Species Documented in Other Streams in the Analysis
Area .................................................................................................................................. J-1-5
Table J1-4 Aquatic Habitat and Biological Conditions Sampling Protocols ....................................... J-1-7
Table J1-5 Fisheries and Stream Habitat Data Collected Within and Near the Analysis Area,
1991-2019 ........................................................................................................................ J-1-8
Table J1-6 Waterbodies Surveyed for Fish and Aquatic Habitat within the Analysis Area, 1991
to 2017 ........................................................................................................................... J-1-11
Table J1-7 Matrix Table B-1 - List of WCI Pathways and Indicators ............................................... J-1-14
Table J1-8 Cross-reference Among the Six Reaches and Baseline Stream Functional
Assessment Reaches .................................................................................................... J-1-16
Table J1-9 Summary of Stream Functional Assessment Indicators, Elements, and Scoring
Criteria ............................................................................................................................ J-1-23
Table J1-10 Stream Reach 1 Matrix Existing (Baseline) Conditions ................................................. J-1-25
Table J1-11 Stream Reach 2 Matrix Existing (Baseline) Conditions ................................................. J-1-31
Table J1-12 Stream Reach 3 Matrix Existing (Baseline) Conditions ................................................. J-1-36
Table J1-13 Stream Reach 4 Matrix Existing (Baseline) Conditions ................................................. J-1-41
Table J1-14 Stream Reach 5 Matrix Existing (Baseline) Condition ................................................... J-1-46
Table J1-15 Stream Reach 6 Matrix Existing (Baseline) Condition ................................................... J-1-52
Table J1-16 Alternative 1 Predicted Monthly Discharge August-March Low Flow Period at
USGS Gaging Stations and one SFA Reach (MC-6) .................................................... J-1-77
Table J1-17 Alternative 2 Predicted Monthly Discharge August-March Low Flow Period at
USGS Gaging Stations and one SFA Reach (MC-6) .................................................... J-1-78
Table J1-18 Alternative 3 Predicted Monthly Discharge August-March Low Flow Period at
USGS Gaging Stations and one SFA Reach (MC-6) .................................................... J-1-79

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-ii

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Purpose
The purpose of this appendix is to provide additional information to support Sections 3.12
and 4.12 (Fish Resources and Fish Habitat) of the Stibnite Gold Project (SGP) Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS). While those sections focus on the three Endangered Species Act
(ESA)-listed and one U.S. Forest Service (Forest Service) sensitive species, this appendix
provides additional information regarding other fish species in the analysis area. The analysis
area is defined in Section 3.12, which also provides figures showing the locations referred to in
this appendix.

FISH SPECIES

J.1.1 ALL FISH SPECIES

This section provides additional detail on fish species occurrences in support of
Section 3.12.4.1, Fish Species, of the EIS. Table J1-1 lists all the fish species that occur within
the analysis area (defined in Section 3.12). Table J1-2 includes the listed and sensitive fish
species with a documented presence within the mine site. Table J1-3 includes listed and
sensitive fish species documented from other streams in the analysis area. Additional
information is provided regarding the presence of brook trout in the analysis area because of the
potential for Stibnite Gold Project (SGP)-related changes in its distribution.

Brook Trout
Brook trout are considered a threat to native bull trout. Since both fish are char, live in some of
the same habitats in Idaho, and spawn in the fall, they can interbreed. They also can threaten
native cutthroat trout and rainbow trout because brook trout tend to be larger as fry and can
outcompete for food resources when they co-occur in the same habitat. They can survive and
thrive at a range of water temperatures and habitat conditions. Although brook trout will
hybridize with bull trout, brook trout populations in the EFSFSR watershed appear to have
limited dispersal and tend to be established in areas near original stocking sites (Thurow, pers.
comm., 1996 in Kuzis 1997). They are more typically found in mountain lakes and beaver
ponds, where sediments make spawning conditions less than ideal for rainbow trout and
cutthroat trout

Brook trout were originally found in the eastern United States and Canada. They were stocked
in headwater mountain lakes and streams in Idaho in the late 1800s and early 1900s. Brook
trout are present in the South Fork Salmon River (SFSR) and Johnson Creek, where they were
found to be most abundant in low gradient areas (Platts and Partridge 1983 in Kuzis 1997;
Thurow 1987). They also have been recorded in the mainstem of the Secesh River, Lake Creek,
and Loon Lake (Thurow 1987 in Kuzis 1997). There is one record of brook trout occurring in the
East Fork South Fork Salmon River (EFSFSR) upstream of Tamarack Creek in 1989 (Kuzis
1997). Brook trout fry were observed in the Landmark Creek vicinity in 2012 (IDFG 2012).

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-1

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

MWH (2017) snorkeling surveys identified the potential presence of brook trout or bull
trout/brook trout hybrids in Sugar Creek and Cinnabar Creek. Juvenile bull trout and brook trout
are difficult to distinguish in the field so it is possible that some of these fish were actually brook
trout. MWH (2017) states that some fish originally identified as brook trout were later changed to
bull trout based on electrofishing surveys upstream of the Yellow Pine pit. Additional snorkeling
surveys conducted in 2018 detected the potential presence of brook trout in a tributary to Mud
Lake/Peanut Creek (Midas Gold 2019c).

Table J1-1 Fish Species in the Analysis Area

Fish Species Species Presence

Analysis Area
Analysis Area Status/Distribution in
Common Scientific Downstream
Upstream of South Fork of the Salmon
Name Name of Yellow Pine
Yellow Pine Pit River Subbasin
Pit
Native Anadromous Fish
Snake River Oncorhynchus Yes, Yes ESA Threatened, stable and
Spring/Summer- tshawytscha supplemented found throughout subbasin
run Chinook
Salmon
Evolutionarily
Significant Unit
(ESU)
Snake River Oncorhynchus No Yes ESA Threatened, stable and
Basin Steelhead mykiss found throughout subbasin
Trout Distinct
Population
Segment (DPS)
Snake River Oncorhynchus No No ESA Endangered, extirpated in
Sockeye Salmon nerka subbasin, historical runs into
ESU Warm and Loon lakes
Pacific Lamprey Entosphenus No Potential Uncommon, may be present in
tridentatus low densities

Native Resident Fish

Bull Trout Salvelinus Yes Yes ESA Threatened. South Fork
confluentus Salmon River core area is
increasing in population size
Kokanee Oncorhynchus No Yes Landlocked sockeye. Present in
nerka Warm and Loon lakes
Longnose Dace Rhinichthys Potential Yes Likely found throughout
cataractae subbasin
Mountain Prosopium Yes Yes Abundant in mainstem river and
Whitefish williamsoni larger tributaries
Northern Ptychocheilus No Yes Locally common in lower SFSR
Pikeminnow oregonensis downstream of the confluence
with the Secesh River
Redside Shiner Richardsonius No Yes Uncommon, found in lower
balteatus SFSR

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-2

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Fish Species Species Presence

Analysis Area
Analysis Area Status/Distribution in
Common Scientific Downstream
Upstream of South Fork of the Salmon
Name Name of Yellow Pine
Yellow Pine Pit River Subbasin
Pit
Sculpin Cottus spp. Yes Yes Present but spotty observation
record
Speckled Dace Rhinichthys Potential Potential Unknown
osculus
Suckers Catostomus Potential Yes Common throughout subbasin
spp.
Westslope Oncorhynchus Yes Yes Forest Service Sensitive
Cutthroat Trout clarkii lewisi Species. Widely distributed but
more common in higher
gradient tributaries
Introduced Resident Fish
Cutthroat Trout Oncorhynchus No Unlikely Typically only found in alpine
clarkii ssp. lakes-mixed stock
Rainbow Trout Oncorhynchus Unlikely Yes Present throughout subbasin
mykiss
Cutthroat Trout x NA Yes Unlikely Typically only found in alpine
Rainbow Trout lakes
Hybrid
Brook Trout Salvelinus No Yes Locally common in some
fontinalis tributaries, including Johnson
Creek; not common in East Fork
of the South Fork of the Salmon
River (EFSFSR) watershed
Lake Trout Salvelinus No No Found in Warm Lake
namaycush
Golden Trout Oncorhynchus Yes Unlikely Found in Meadow Creek Lake
mykiss and other alpine lakes
aguabonita

Arctic Grayling Thymallus Yes Unlikely Found in Meadow Creek Lake

arcticus and other alpine lakes
Table Source: Kuzis 1997; Idaho Department of Environmental Quality (IDEQ) 2002; Idaho Department of Fish and
Game (IDFG) 2013a; 2018a; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine
Fisheries Service (NMFS) 2016; U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) 2015a,b.
Table Notes:
DPS = Distinct Population Segment
ESU = Evolutionarily Significant Unit
ESA = Endangered Species Act
EFSFSR = East Fork South Fork Salmon River
SFSR = South Fork Salmon River

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-3

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

This page intentionally left blank

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-4

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Table J1-2 Listed and Sensitive Fish Species with a Documented Presence in the Mine Site by Stream
Fish Species Stream
EFSFSR
EFSFSR EFSFSR Upstream
Yellow
East Fork Downstream Upstream of Meadow West
Scientific Cane Cinnabar Fern Fiddle Garnet Hennessy Meadow Midnight Rabbit Sugar Pine
Common Name Meadow of the of the Confluence Creek End
Name Creek Creek Creek Creek Creek Creek Creek Creek Creek Creek Pit
Creek Yellow Pine Yellow with Lake Creek
Lake
Pit Pine Pit Meadow
Creek
Bull Trout Salvelinus 1,2,4,5 1,2,4,5 --- 1,2,3,4 1*,2,3,4,9* 1*,2,9*, 11* 1*,9* 1*,2,9* --- --- 1,2,4 --- --- n.d. 1,2,4,5 n.d. 2,7
confluentus
Chinook Salmon Oncorhynchus --- --- 1 1,2,3,4,6 1,2,6 1,2 --- --- --- --- 1,2,6 --- --- n.d. 1,2,4,5 n.d. 7
tshawytscha
Steelhead/Redband/ Oncorhynchus --- 1,4 1*(NPT),4,9* 1,2,3,4,5 --- --- --- 7 --- --- --- 1* (likely --- n.d. 1,2,4 n.d. ---
Rainbow Trout mykiss (hybrid) golden
trout),9*
Westslope Cutthroat Oncorhynchus 2,4 1,2 1 1,2,3,4,11* 1,2,3,4 1,2,3,4 1*,5,9*, 1,2 1*,9* --- 1,2,4,5 1*,9* --- n.d. 1,2,4 n.d. 2,7
Trout clarkii lewisi 11*
Table Notes:
Footnotes for Tables 2 and 3:
* = presence only detected by eDNA
NPT = Nez Perce Tribe study; n.d. = no data; WCT = Westslope Cutthroat Trout; RB = Rainbow Trout
In the MWH 2017 report, WCT/RB hybrids (predominantly WCT alleles) were reported during eDNA testing in lower EFSFSR (downstream of Yellow Pine pit), Upper EFSFSR (upstream of Meadow Creek), and Meadow Creek.
Numbers denote references listed in footnotes following Table 3.

Table J1-3 Listed and Sensitive Fish Species Documented in Other Streams in the Analysis Area
Fish Species River/ Stream
South
Warm
Scientific Burntlog Cabin Fourmile Goat Johnson Landmark Profile Riordan Fork Tamarack Trail Trapper Trout
Common Name Lake
Name Creek Creek Creek Creek Creek Creek Creek Creek Salmon Creek Creek Creek Creek
Creek
River
Bull Trout Salvelinus 2,10,11* 2 2 2 2 2 2,3,4 2,8* 2 1,2,3,4 2 2, 11* 2 2
confluentus
Chinook Salmon Oncorhynchus 2,10 2 2,8* 2 2 2 2 2 2 1,2,3,4 --- 2 --- 2
tshawytscha
Steelhead/Redband/ Oncorhynchus 2,8*,10,11* 2 2 2,8* 2 2 2,3,4 2 2 1,2,3,4 --- 2,11* --- 2
Rainbow Trout mykiss
Westslope Cutthroat Oncorhynchus 2,8*,10,11* 2 2 2 2 2 2,3,4 2 2 1,2,3,4,5 --- 2,11* 2 2
Trout clarkii lewisi
Table Source: 1 Montgomery Watson Harza (MWH) 2017; 2 StreamNet Fish Distribution (SNFD) no date; 3 Thurow 1987 4 in Kuzis 1997; 5 IDEQ 2018b in BioAnalysts 2018; 6 Idaho Fish and Wildlife Information System (IFWIS) 2018; 7 Zurstadt and Nelson 2010 in
BioAnalysts 2018; 8 Stantec 2017; 9 Carim et al. 2017; 10 Boise National Forest (BNF) Aquatic Database 2017; 11 Midas Gold 2019c.
Table Notes:
Footnotes for Tables 2 and 3:
* = presence only detected by eDNA
NPT = Nez Perce Tribe study; n.d. = no data; WCT = Westslope Cutthroat Trout; RB = Rainbow Trout
In the MWH 2017 report, WCT/RB hybrids (predominantly WCT alleles) were reported during eDNA testing in lower EFSFSR (downstream of Yellow Pine pit), Upper EFSFSR (upstream of Meadow Creek), and Meadow Creek.

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-5

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

This page intentionally left blank

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-6

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON PROJECT-

RELATED SURVEYS
SGP-related survey tables provide additional detail in support of Section 3.12.4.1, Fish Species,
of the EIS. This section (Tables J1-4 through J1-6) provides additional aquatic habitat and
biological conditions survey information conducted within the analysis area, including source
references. Table J1-5 provides a list of all the fish and stream habitat data collected in and
near the analysis area between 1991 and 2019.The locations of the surveys are illustrated on
Figures 3.12-4 and 3.12-5 in Section 3.12.4.1, Fish Species, of the EIS.

Table J1-4 Aquatic Habitat and Biological Conditions Sampling Protocols

Data type Sampling Protocol Parameters
Cobble embeddedness survey (Forest Substrate size (diameter)
Service 2007a in MWH 2017) Depth of embeddedness
Free matrix survey (Forest Service in MWH Fine sediment (surface fines)
2017) Free cobbles
Geomorphic assessment (HDR 2016) Stream gradient, confinement, and sediment
supply
Modified McNeil core and suspended Spawning sediment depth fines
sediment sampling (Forest Service 2007 in Overall sample particle size distribution (water
MWH 2017) displacement)
Suspended sediment concentrations
Aquatic Habitat PACFISH/INFISH Biological Opinion Bankfull width and depth
Monitoring Program (PIBO) habitat surveys Wetted width and depth
(Forest Service 2013, 2014, 2015; Henderson Bank stability/angle
et al. 2005 in MWH 2017) Bed sediment size
Reach gradient
Pool dimensions
Large woody debris
Water temperature (Forest Service 2013 in Continuous stream water temperature (15-minute
MWH 2017) intervals)
Water quality (MWH 2017) Water temperature, sediment/turbidity, and
chemical contaminants/nutrients
Fisheries surveys- PIBO and U.S. Forest Fish presence/absence, population abundance,
Service protocols (Heitke et al. 2011; Thurow and genetics. Sampling methods included
1994 in MWH 2017) snorkeling, electrofishing, eDNA, and
videography.
Macroinvertebrate surveys- PIBO and IDEQ Idaho Stream Macroinvertebrate Index (SMI)
protocols (Heitke et al. 2011; Grafe 2002 in metrics:
Biological MWH 2017) Richness
Conditions Evenness/diversity
Relative abundances
Functional feeding groups
Habitat/behavior
Pollution tolerance
Metals surveys (MWH 2017) using EPA Metal concentrations in sediment, fish, and
(2006) ecological screening-level benchmarks macroinvertebrates
Table Source: Cited in the table.

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-7

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

T a ble J1-5 F i s h e r i e s a n d S t r e a m H a b it a t D a t a C o ll e c t e d W it hi n a n d N e a r t h e A n a l y s i s A r e a , 1 9 9 1 - 2 0 1 9

Data Data D a t a C oll e cti o n S pecies

P r oj e c t/ S t u d y L o c atio n A v a i l a b l e D a t a1 R eference
Source Years M e t h o d s2 Inf or m a tio n

C hin o o k sal m o n,
E l e c tr o fi s hi n g , s n o r k e l,
B o i s e N a ti o n al B o i s e N a ti o n al F o r e st A n al y sis ar e a a n d 1991- H a b i t a t, fi s h b u ll tr o u t, w e s t sl o p e
e D N A, PI B O a n d oth er B N F (2017)
F ore st A q u a ti c D a t a b a s e vi ci nit y 2016 c o m m u nity c u tt h r o a t tro u t,
stre a m h a bitat s urv e y s
r ai n b o w tr o u t

C hin o o k sal m o n,
A q u a ti c R e s o u r c e s
M i n e sit e S t u d y Fis h c o m m u nity, E l e c tr o fi s hi n g / m a r k - b u ll tr o u t, w e s t sl o p e G e o E n gineers
G e o E n gineers 2 0 1 6 B a s eli n e S t u d y 2015
Area p o p u l a ti o n e s ti m a t e s recapture surveys c u tt h r o a t tro u t, (2017)
A d d e n d u m R e p ort
r ai n b o w tr o u t

S t r e a m F u n c ti o n a l M i n e sit e S t u d y 2015-
H D R H a bitat S tr e a m h a bitat s urv e y s H a bitat d ata o nl y H D R (2016)
Assess m e nt Area 2016

H a b i t a t, fi s h C hin o o k sal m o n,
E l e c tr o fi s hi n g , s n o r k e l,
A q u a ti c R e s o u r c e s M i n e sit e S t u d y 2012- c o m m u nity, b u ll tr o u t, w e s t sl o p e
M W H e D N A, PI B O a n d oth er M W H (2017)
2 0 1 6 B a s eli n e S t u d y Area 2016 m a croin v erte brate s, c u tt h r o a t tro u t,
stre a m h a bitat s urv e y s
fi s h ti s s u e r ai n b o w tr o u t

Jo h n so n Cre e k, R a b e and N elson

B u r n tl o g C r e e k , (2007, 2008,
S t at u s a n d M o nit o ri n g
EF SF S R, and W eir cou nts and 20 0 9, 2010, 2013,
N ez Perce of N at ur al a n d 2005- A d ult a n d s m olt d at a;
a s s o ciate d s p a w nin g gro u n d C hin o o k sal m o n 2 0 1 4);
T ri b e S u p ple m e nted 2017 redd cou nts
tri b u t a ri e s , survey R a b e e t al.
C hin o o k S al m o n
in clu di n g M e a d o w (20 1 6 a,b; 20 1 7,
Creek 2018)

Jo h n so n Cre e k,
B u r n tl o g C r e e k ,
C h i n o o k a n d B ull
N ez Perce EF SF S R, and 1998- GI S data on redd S p a w ning groun d C hin o o k sal m o n N e z P e r c e T ri b e
Trout R ed d C o u nt
T ri b e tri b u t a ri e s , 2018 cou nts survey a n d b u ll tr o u t (2018)
D ata
in clu di n g M e a d o w
Creek

M i n e sit e S t u d y C hin o o k sal m o n,

A q u a ti c R e s o u r c e s
A r e a , a s w ell a s H a b it a t a n d fi s h S tr e a m h a bitat a n d b u ll tr o u t, w e s t sl o p e
Stantec 2 0 1 7 B a s eli n e S t u d y 2017 Stantec (2017)
access roads and c o m m u nity e D N A surveys c u tt h r o a t tro u t,
Tech Me mo
c o n tr ol sit e s r ai n b o w tr o u t

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-8

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

Data Data D a t a C oll e cti o n S pecies

P r oj e c t/ S t u d y L o c atio n A v a i l a b l e D a t a1 R eference
Source Years M e t h o d s2 Inf or m a tio n

S u p pl e m e nt al Stre a m
M i n e sit e S t u d y
a n d W e tl a n d B a s eli n e G r e at E c olo gy
G r e at E c olo gy A r e a , a s w ell a s 2018 H a bitat S tr e a m h a bitat s urv e y s H a bitat d ata o nl y
D a t a R e p o rt for th e (2018)
access roads
S ti b nit e G o l d P r oj e ct

C hin o o k sal m o n,
b u ll tr o u t, w e s t sl o p e Bro wn and
Bro wn and Y e ll o w Pi n e Pit Fi s h 2018- S ei ni n g a n d h o o k- a n d -
Y e ll o w Pi n e Pit Fis h co m m u nity c u tt h r o a t tro u t, C a l d w e ll ( 2 0 1 9 ,
C a l d w e ll M o n it o ri n g S u m m a r y 2019 li n e a n g l i n g .
r ai n b o w tr o u t, 2020)
w h it e fi s h

C hin o o k sal m o n,
b u ll tr o u t, w e s t sl o p e
Midas M i n e sit e a r e a
e D N A S a m p li n g 2018 Fis h co m m u nity e D N A s a m plin g c u tt h r o a t tro u t, Mid as Gold 2019c
G old/ U S F S and access roads
r ai n b o w tr o u t, br o o k
tr o u t

T a bl e S o u rc e: Cite d in th e ta ble.

T a ble N otes:

1 A v a il a b l e d a t a : s t r e a m h a b i t a t ( e . g ., h a b i t a t u n i t, ri p a ri a n h a b i t a t , P I B O m e t h o d o l o g y , s u b s t r a t e t y p e , w a t e r t e m p e r a t u r e , w a t e r v e l o c i t y ) , fi s h c o m m u n i t y ( e . g .,

e D N A , p r e s e n c e / a b s e n c e , r e d d c o u n t s , j u v e n il e d e n s i t y ) , ti s s u e r e s i d u e s ( m e t a l s ) , p o p u l a ti o n e s ti m a t e s , e t c .

2 D a t a c o ll e c ti o n m e t h o d s a p p li e d ( e . g . , fi s h s u r v e y s , w e i r c o u n t s , s p a w n i n g g r o u n d s u r v e y s , s t r e a m h a b i t a t s u r v e y s ( e . g . , P I B O ) .

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-9

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

T h i s p a g e i nt e nti o n ally l eft bl a n k

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-10

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Table J1-6 Waterbodies Surveyed for Fish and Aquatic Habitat within the Analysis Area, 1991 to 2017
Fish Surveys Habitat Surveys1,2

Ground Survey (Redd

Habitat Assessment

Macroinvertebrates

Reconnaissance
Electrofishing

Aerial Survey
Videography

Weir Counts

Bathymetry

(e.g., PIBO)
Counts)

Snorkel
Waterbody SGP Component

eDNA
Burntlog Creek Access Roads X4 X3 X4 X X X
2
Cane Creek Mine Site X
Cinnabar Creek Mine Site X2 X2
East Fork Meadow Creek Mine Site X2 X2 X X X
3
East Fork South Fork Salmon Mine Site, Access Roads X X
X2 X2 X2 X X
River
Fiddle Creek Mine Site X2 X2 X X
4
Fourmile Creek None- Reference Stream X
2
Garnet Creek Mine Site X X
4 3 4
Goat Creek None- Reference Stream X X X
Hennessy Creek Mine Site X2 X
4 3 4 3
Johnson Creek Utilities, Access Roads X X X X
2 2 3 2
Meadow Creek Mine Site X X X X X X X
2 2 2
Midnight Creek Mine Site X X X X
Profile Creek None- Reference Stream X
Riordan Creek Access Roads X4 X3 X4 X X X
3
South Fork Snake River Utilities X X X
2 3
Sugar Creek Mine Site X X X2 X X X X
2
Tamarack Creek None- Reference Stream X X
4 3 4
Trapper Creek Access Roads X X X X X X
Yellow Pine Pit Mine Site X2 X
1 2 3 4
Table Source: HDR 2016; MWH 2017; Nez Perce Tribe; BNF Aquatic Database 2017

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-11

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

This page intentionally left blank

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-12

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE MATRIX -

WATERSHED CONDITION INDICATOR TABLES
This section provides additional supporting information for Section 3.12.4.7, Watershed
Condition Indicators.

The Southwest Idaho Ecogroup Matrix of Pathways and watershed condition indicators (WCI
Matrix or Matrix) (Forest Service 2003b) have been applied to evaluate the affected
environment for fish and fish habitat in the analysis area. The WCI Matrix evaluates stream
function by measuring elements that reflect water quality, habitat access, channel conditions
and dynamics, flow and hydrology, and watershed conditions. Furthermore, the WCI Matrix
comprises a series of “pathways” by which mining, reclamation, or restoration activities can
have potential effects on native and desired non-native fish species, their habitats, and the
associated ecological function. Finally, the WCI Matrix was developed specifically to assist in
project design and analysis during National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) assessments of
proposed projects, for application in the Payette and Boise National Forests (Forest Service
2003b, 2010).

The WCI Matrix can be an important tool in tracking how management actions, over time, are
trending: “functioning at unacceptable risk” (FUR), “functioning at risk” (FR), and “functioning
appropriately” (FA) condition, or are maintaining FA indicators at multiple scales. For each
stream reach that may be affected by the SGP, the environmental Baseline for each of the
relevant pathways and WCIs in the Matrix has been evaluated. For mine site streams, most of
the pathways and WCIs are described at the stream reach level where data are available. Other
pathways and WCIs (e.g., bull trout population characteristics, refugia, watershed conditions)
are designed to be evaluated at a higher level, so they have been described by subwatershed
or watershed. All locations of SGP components outside the mine site Study Area are described
at the subwatershed-level due to the lower level of impacts anticipated.

Description of the WCI Matrix

There are four tables in the Forest Plan Matrix: (1) Table B-1: Pathways for WCIs, “Reference
Conditions”; (2) Table B-2: Environmental Baseline, “Current Conditions”; (3) Table B-3: Effects
of Management Actions; and (4) Table B-4: Dichotomous Key for Making ESA Determinations
of Effect and Documentation of Expected Incidental Take for Listed Fish Species.

The first three tables are divided into eight pathways, with B-1 providing the criteria for the
evaluation in Tables B-2 and B-3. Table B-4 is a dichotomous key to assist in ESA
determinations. Each of the eight pathways (bull trout local population characteristics, water
quality, habitat access, habitat elements, channel conditions and dynamics, flow/hydrology,
watershed conditions, and integration of pathways) represents a way in which actions can have
potential effects on fish species, their habitats, and associated beneficial uses. Pathways are

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-13

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

further broken down into 26 WCIs. WCIs are described with respect to functionality (i.e., FA=
Functioning Appropriately, FR = Functioning at Risk, FUR = Functioning at Unacceptable Risk).
The FA rating represents the desired condition to strive toward for each particular WCI.
Table J1-7 is the Matrix Table B-1 – List of WCI Pathways and Indicators from the Forest
Service (2003b).

Table J1-7 Matrix Table B-1 - List of WCI Pathways and Indicators
Pathways Indicators
Bull Trout Local Population Characteristics within Subpopulation Size
Core Areas
Growth and Survival
Life History Diversity and Isolation
Persistence and Genetic Integrity
Water Quality Water Temperature (Chinook Salmon and Steelhead)
Water Temperature (Bull Trout)
Sediment/Turbidity (Chinook Salmon and Steelhead
Sediment/Turbidity (Bull Trout)
Chemical Contaminants/Nutrients
Habitat Access Physical Barriers
Habitat Elements Substrate Embeddedness
Large Woody Debris
Pool Frequency and Quality
Large Pools/Pool Quality
Off-Channel Habitat
Refugia (Chinook Salmon and Steelhead)
Refugia (Bull trout)
Channel Conditions and Dynamics Wetted Width/Maximum Depth Ratio
Streambank Condition
Floodplain Connectivity
Flow/Hydrology Change in Peak/Base Flows
Change in Drainage Network
Watershed Conditions Road Density and Location
Disturbance History
Riparian Conservation Areas
Disturbance Regime
Integration of Species and Habitat Conditions By species
Table Source: Forest Service 2003b

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-14

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Use of Stream Functional Assessment For Matrix WCI Evaluation

The Stream Functional Assessment (SFA) developed for the SGP by HDR (2016), Great
Ecology (2018), and finalized by Rio ASE (2019), was used in large part to evaluate the
Baseline condition of WCIs in the analysis area. The SFA is a reach-scale assessment tool
used to rate stream function by evaluating up to 20 discrete elements, each representing a
different physical, chemical, or biological condition collectively used as a surrogate for
evaluating stream function.

The SFA covers the streams at the mine site, divided into SFA reaches. Table J1-8 provides a
cross-reference between the six reaches described previously and the 42 SFA reaches. For
Reaches 1 through 4, the following analysis was conducted at the reach-scale (i.e., summarized
for the two subwatersheds); because the SFA does not cover all potentially affected streams
outside the mine site, Reaches 5 and 6 are analyzed at the subwatershed scale. In each reach
section discussed in the following narrative, a summary table is provided, which is Table B-2
from Appendix B of the Payette National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan (Payette
Forest Plan) (Forest Service 2003b).

Table J1-9 provides a summary of the SFA indicators, elements, and scoring criteria from Rio
ASE (2019).

Mine Site Streams: Reach-Level Pathways and WCIs

Tables J1-10 through J1-15 are summaries of the WCI ratings in each of the mine site reaches.
The ratings were derived from the SFA (Rio ASE 2019) by calculating a weighted average of the
ratings of the SFA reaches. Table B-2 of the Payette Forest Plan (Forest Service 2003b) for
each reach is provided in Rio ASE (2019), Appendix K.

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-15

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

T a ble J1-8 C r o s s-r ef er e n c e A m o n g t h e Si x R e a c h e s a n d B a s eli n e Str e a m F u n ctio n al A s s e s s m e nt R e a c h e s

SF A R e a c h I D s a n d D e s c ri p ti o n s

R elevant

M i n e Site Ar e a Strea m FA Seg m ent Length Strea m

D e s c ri p ti o n
Reaches Area N a m e (f e e t) Survey

Sites

R e a c h 1: E F S F S R EFSFSR E F2.1 2,180 - E F S F S R f r o m it s c o n fl u e n c e w it h M e a d o w C r e e k d o w n s t r e a m t o

( a n d tri b u t a ri e s ) fr o m it s c o n fl u e n c e w it h G a r n e t C r e e k .
S u g ar Creek to
M e a do w Creek

E F2.2 5,871 M W H-059 E F S F S R f r o m it s c o n fl u e n c e w it h G a r n e t C r e e k d o w n s t r e a m t o

it s c o n fl u e n c e w it h Fi d dl e C r e e k .

E F2.3 127 - E F S F S R f r o m it s c o n fl u e n c e w it h F i d d l e C r e e k d o w n s t r e a m t o it s
c o n fl u e n c e w it h t h e di v e rt e d M i d ni g h t C r e e k c h a n n e l d u ri n g
m i n i n g (i n t e ri m p h a s e ) .

E F2.4 759 - E F S F S R f r o m it s c o n fl u e n c e w it h t h e di v e r t e d M i d n i g h t C r e e k
(i n t e ri m p h a s e ) d o w n s t r e a m t o t h e u p p e r ( s o u t h e r n ) E F S F S R
t u n n e l p o rt a l (i n t e ri m p h a s e ) .

E F2.5 318 - E F S F S R fro m th e u p p e r (s o uth e r n) E F S F S R tu n n el p ortal

(i n t e ri m p h a s e ) d o w n s t r e a m t o t h e e d g e o f t h e p r o p o s e d Y e ll o w
P i n e pit a n d a s s o ci at e d a c c e s s r o a d .

EF3 2,713 - E F S F S R i m m e d i at el y u p str e a m a n d d o w n s tr e a m o f Y ell o w P i n e

p it.

E F3.1 727 - E F S F S R fro m th e u p stre a m b o u n d ary of th e pr o p o s e d e x p a n d e d

Y e ll o w P i n e pit d o w n s tr e a m t o t h e p r o p o s e d c o n fl u e n c e w it h
M i d n i g h t C r e e k (i m m e d i a t e l y u p s t r e a m o f t h e e x i s ti n g c a s c a d e
int o th e Y ell o w Pi n e pit l a k e ).

E F3.2 514 - E F S F S R fr o m t h e p r o p o s e d c o n fl u e n c e wit h Mi d ni g h t C r e e k

d o w n s tr e a m t o t h e e d g e o f t h e e xi s ti n g Y e ll o w P i n e pit l a k e
(i n cl u d e s t h e e xi sti n g c a s c a d e i n t o Y e ll o w P i n e p i t l a k e a n d
a s s o c i a t e d all u vi al f a n ) .

E F3.3 1,575 - E F S F S R i m m e d i a t e l y b e l o w t h e e x i s ti n g Y e ll o w P i n e p i t l a k e
d o w n str e a m t o t h e b o tt o m e d g e of t h e p r o p o s e d e x p a n d e d
Y e ll o w P i n e pit.

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-16

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

SF A R e a c h I D s a n d D e s c ri p ti o n s

R elevant

M i n e Site Ar e a Strea m FA Seg m ent Length Strea m

D e s c ri p ti o n
Reaches Area N a m e (f e e t) Survey

Sites

E F4.1 513 - E F S F S R fr o m t h e d o w n s tr e a m e xt e n t of t h e e x p a n d e d Y ell o w

P i n e pit t o t h e c o n fl u e n c e o f t h e p r o p o s e d E F S F S R t u n n e l a n d
a s s o c i a t e d tr a n s i ti o n c h a n n e l .

E F4.2 512 - E F S F S R fr o m t h e c o n fl u e n c e o f t h e p r o p o s e d E F S R S R t u n n e l
a n d a s s o c i a t e d tr a n s i ti o n c h a n n e l d o w n s t r e a m a p p r o x i m a t e l y t o
t h e E F S F S R b ri d g e .

EF5 1,109 - E F S F S R d o w n s tr e a m o f S u g a r C r e e k c o n fl u e n c e .

W e st End W L1 1,457 - R e a c h of mi d dl e W e st E n d C r e e k th at w o ul d b e ro ut e d ar o u n d
Lake W e s t E n d Pit d u ri n g m i ni n g a n d r e pl a c e d wit h a l a k e aft er m i ni n g .
( c u r r e n tl y
W e st End
C re e k)

Hennessy H C 0.01 4,240 - H e n n e s s y C r e e k u p s tr e a m o f th e m i n e di st u r b a n c e f o ot p ri nt.

Creek

H C 0.1 394 H1 H e n n e s s y C r e e k u p s tr e a m o f th e e x i sti n g a c c e s s r o a d , b u t w i t hi n

t h e m a xi m u m di st ur b a n c e a r e a p r o p o s e d d u ri n g m i ni n g .

H C 0.2 41 H e n n e s s y C r e e k u p s tr e a m o f th e e x i sti n g a c c e s s r o a d ( B a s e l i n e
c o n d i ti o n ) a n d t h a t li e s b e t w e e n t h e E F S F S R t u n n e l d i v e r s i o n
(i n t e ri m p h a s e ) a n d t h e p r o p o s e d h i g h w a ll o f t h e e x p a n d e d
Y e ll o w P i n e pit (r e s t o r a ti o n p h a s e ) .

H C 1.1 328 H e n n e s s y C r e e k B a s e li n e c o n d i ti o n fl o w s u p s t r e a m o f t h e a c c e s s
road.

H C 1.2 1,924 - H e n n e s s y C r e e k al o n g t h e e x i s ti n g r o a d d u ri n g t h e B a s e li n e
ph ase.

H C 1.3 1,515 - H e n n e s s y C r e e k ( B a s e li n e p h a s e ) fl o w s a l o n g t h e s i d e o f t h e
e x i s ti n g r o a d ( b o t h p e r e n n i a l a n d n o n - p e r e n n i a l c o n d i ti o n ) .

H C 1.4 244 - H e n n e s s y C r e e k c u r r e n tl y ( B a s e li n e ) i n cl u d e s t h e m o s t
d o w n s tr e a m 2 4 4 f e e t o f t h e s tr e a m l e a d i n g t o it s c o n fl u e n c e w i t h
th e E F S F S R d o w n stre a m of the m o ut h of S u g ar Cr e e k.

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-17

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

SF A R e a c h I D s a n d D e s c ri p ti o n s

R elevant

M i n e Site Ar e a Strea m FA Seg m ent Length Strea m

D e s c ri p ti o n
Reaches Area N a m e (f e e t) Survey

Sites

Y e ll o w Pi n e YP1 780 - P o r ti o n o f t h e E F S F S R t h a t fl o w s t h r o u g h t h e e x i s ti n g Y e ll o w
Pit P i n e pit.

M i d nig ht M N 0.1 2,566 - T h e u p p e r m o st re a c h of Mi d nig ht C r e e k u p stre a m of a n y

Creek p r o p o s e d i nt e ri m p h a s e di st u r b a n c e .

M i d nig ht M N 0.2 402 - M i d nig ht Cre e k loc ate d bet w e e n M N 0.1 an d M N 0. 3 that is
Creek c r o s s e d b y a a c c e s s r o u t e d u rin g t h e i nt eri m p h a s e of t h e S G P .

M i d nig ht M N 0.3 2,080 - U p p e r M i d ni g h t C r e e k l o c a t e d b e t w e e n M N 0 a n d M N 0 . 2 t h a t f all s

Creek b et w e e n a pro p o s e d a c c e s s ro ut e (u p stre a m ) a n d a pr o p o s e d
di v er si o n ( d o w n str e a m ) to r er o ut e Mi d ni g ht C r e e k to th e E F S F S R
u p s tr e a m o f t h e p r o p o s e d E F S R S R t u n n el d u ri n g t h e i nt e ri m
S G P p has e.

M i d nig ht M N 0.4 1,105 - M i d n i g h t C r e e k u p s t r e a m o f t h e e x i s ti n g Y e ll o w P i n e p i t t h a t

Creek w o ul d b e di v e rt e d a r o u n d t h e in t e ri m / e x p a n d e d Y ell o w Pi n e pit
d u ri n g t h e i nt eri m S G P p h a s e .

M i d nig ht M N1 442 - R e a c h o f M i d ni g h t C r e e k u p s tr e a m o f t h e e xi sti n g Y e ll o w P i n e pit.

Creek

M i d nig ht M N2 153 - R e a c h o f M i d ni g h t C r e e k w h e r e it c u r r e n tl y c a s c a d e s i n t o t h e
Creek e x i s ti n g Y e ll o w P i n e pit.

Fid dle Cre e k F C 0.1 2,245 M W H-062 T h e m o s t u p s tr e a m p o r ti o n o f F i d d l e C r e e k , w e ll u p s tr e a m o f t h e

pr o p o s e d mi n e i m p a cts.

F C 0.2 3,476 U p p e r Fi d dl e C r e e k l o c a t e d b e t w e e n t w o u n n a m e d tri b ut a ri e s

u p stre a m of th e pro p o s e d mi n e i m p a cts

F C 0.3 1,202 U p p e r Fi d dl e C r e e k l o c ate d i m m e di at ely u p stre a m of th e

p r o p o s e d Fi d dl e C r e e k D R S F .

FC1 4,126 P o r ti o n o f Fi d dl e C r e e k t h a t o v e rl a p s w it h t h e t o p o f t h e Fi d d l e
Creek D R S F.

FC2 2,220 P o r ti o n o f Fi d dl e C r e e k t h a t c o i n ci d e s w it h t h e s t e e p f a c e o f th e
F i d d l e C r e e k D R S F d u ri n g m i n e o p e r a ti o n s .

FC3 466 Fi d dle Cr e e k b et w e e n th e lo w e st p oint of th e pro p o s e d Fid dle

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-18

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

SF A R e a c h I D s a n d D e s c ri p ti o n s

R elevant

M i n e Site Ar e a Strea m FA Seg m ent Length Strea m

D e s c ri p ti o n
Reaches Area N a m e (f e e t) Survey

Sites

C r e e k D R S F a n d it s c o n fl u e n c e w it h t h e E F S F S R .

G arnet G C0 2,214 G1 P o r ti o n o f G a r n e t C r e e k u p s tr e a m o f t h e p r o p o s e d r e s t o r a ti o n
Creek re a c h ( G C 1 ).

G C 0.1 1,100 T h i s r e a c h i n cl u d e s t h e m o s t u p s tr e a m p o r ti o n o f G a r n e t C r e e k ,
u p stre a m of pro p o s e d mi n e i m p a ct ar e a s.

G C1 239 M o st d o w n str e a m r e a c h of G a rn et C r e e k, i m m e di at ely u p stre a m

o f its c o n fl u e n c e w it h t h e E F S F S R .

R e a c h 2: M e a d o w Lo w er M C5 275 M W H - 0 1 4, S h o r t s e g m e n t o f t h e p r e vi o u sl y r e s t o r e d s e c ti o n o f l o w e r
C re e k an d E a st Fork Meadow M W H-004 M e a d o w Cre e k.
M e a do w Creek Creek

M C6 2,357 L o w e r - m o s t p o r ti o n o f M e a d o w C r e e k d o w n s tr e a m t o it s
c o n fl u e n c e w it h t h e E F S F S R .

M i d dle M C3 2,133 M W H - 0 6 0, E x i s ti n g M e a d o w C r e e k w h e r e it i s di v e rt e d a r o u n d t h e u p p e r h alf

Meadow M W H-004 o f t h e S O D A w i t hi n a l o w - si n u o s it y, r o c k -li n e d c h a n n e l.
Creek
(S O D A)

M C 4.1 2,083 M W H - 0 6 0, P o r ti o n o f M e a d o w C r e e k t h a t fl o w s t h r o u g h a r o c k - li n e d c h a n n e l
M W H-004 a r o u n d t h e l o w e r h a l f o f t h e e x i s ti n g S O D A .

M C 4.2 208 M e a d o w Cr e e k at th e d o w n stre a m e n d of th e S O D A w h er e th e

c h a n n e l p a s s e s t h r o u g h a r e l a ti v e l y s t e e p , c o n s t r u c t e d
riffl e / c a s c a d e .

H a n g a r Fl at s HL1 552 M W H - 0 1 4, E x i s ti n g s e g m e n t o f M e a d o w C r e e k d o w n s tr e a m o f e xi s ti n g
Pit Lak e M W H-004 S O D A t h a t w o ul d b e r e pl a c e d d u ri n g a n d aft er mi ni n g .
( c u r r e n tl y
Meadow
C re e k)

HL2 2,595 E x i s ti n g s e g m e n t o f M e a d o w C r e e k fr o m K e y w a y M a r s h ,
d o w n s tr e a m t o a p p r o xi m a t el y 2 , 5 0 0 f e e t u p s tr e a m o f its
c o n fl u e n c e w it h t h e E F S F S R .

E a st Fork B C 0.1 6,274 T h i s i s t h e u p p e r m o s t p o r ti o n o f E F M C u p s tr e a m o f t h e p r o p o s e d

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-19

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

SF A R e a c h I D s a n d D e s c ri p ti o n s

R elevant

M i n e Site Ar e a Strea m FA Seg m ent Length Strea m

D e s c ri p ti o n
Reaches Area N a m e (f e e t) Survey

Sites

Meadow r e s t o r a ti o n r e a c h .
Creek

B C 0.2 1,530 T hi s i s a n o n - p e r e n ni al si d e c h a n n el of E F M C l o c a t e d i n t h e
l o w e r ( d o w n s t r e a m ) p o r ti o n o f t h e E F M C m e a d o w .

BC1 2,010 R e l a ti v el y l o w - g r a d i e n t m e a d o w a r e a u p s tr e a m o f t h e hi s t o ric a l

d a m f ail ur e sit e.

BC2 2,745 M i d dl e r e a c h of E F M C i n cl u d e s th e st e e p, er o di n g c h a n n el
d e s t a b i li z e d i n i ti a ll y b y h i s t o ri c a l d a m f a il u r e .

B C 2.1 1,904 T h i s r e a c h i s a t r a n s i ti o n f r o m t h e s t e e p , u n s t a b l e , c o n fi n e d
R e a c h B C 2 u p s tr e a m a n d t h e lo w g r a di e nt, si n u o u s , c h a n n el
fl o w i n g o n t h e v a ll e y b o tt o m r e p r e s e n t e d b y R e a c h B C 3 .

BC3 660 M W H-006 L o w e r p o rti o n o f E F M C fl o w s a c r o s s a n all u vi al f a n p ri o r t o jo i ni n g

M e a d o w Cre e k.

BC4 186 L o w e s t p o r ti o n o f E F M C t h a t w o u l d b e c o m e p a r t o f t h e p r o p o s e d
H a n g a r Fl a t s pit l a k e f oll o w i n g m i n e o p e r a ti o n s .

U p per M C0 1,235 - T h r e e br a n c h e s of u p p e r M e a d o w C r e e k i m m e di atel y u p stre a m

Meadow o f t h e p r o p o s e d T a i li n g s S t o r a g e F a c i lit y ( T S F ) f o o t p ri n t .
Creek

M C 1.1 4,407 M W H-034 M o s t s o u t h e r n b r a n c h of u p p e r M e a d o w C r e e k d o w n s tr e a m to its

c o n fl u e n c e w it h t h e n e x t b r a n c h o f M e a d o w C r e e k ( M C 1 . 2 ) .

M C 1.2 3,119 M i d dle ( w e st ern) br a n c h of u p p er M e a d o w Cr e e k d o w n str e a m t o

it s c o n fl u e n c e w it h t h e s o u t h e r n b r a n c h o f M e a d o w C r e e k
( M C 1.1).

M C 1.3 2,576 M o s t n o rt h e r n b r a n c h of u p p e r M e a d o w C r e e k d o w n s tr e a m to its

c o n fl u e n c e w it h t h e tr u n k s tr e a m o f M e a d o w C r e e k ( M C 1 . 4 ) .

M C 1.4 3,405 U p p e r M e a d o w C r e e k f o r m e d b y t h e c o n fl u e n c e of M C 1 . 1 a n d
M C 1 . 2 d o w n stre a m t o th e c o nflu e n c e with M C 1 . 3.

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-20

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

SF A R e a c h I D s a n d D e s c ri p ti o n s

R elevant

M i n e Site Ar e a Strea m FA Seg m ent Length Strea m

D e s c ri p ti o n
Reaches Area N a m e (f e e t) Survey

Sites

M C 1.5 2,516 M W H-016 M e a d o w C r e e k c h a n n e l d o w n s tr e a m o f t h e c o n fl u e n c e o f t h e

n orth er n br a n c h ( M C 1. 3) a n d u p stre a m of th e m e a d o w f or m e d
i m m e d i a t e l y u p s t r e a m o f t h e e x i s ti n g S O D A .

M C2 1,117 M W H - 0 4 7, E x i s ti n g m e a d o w s e c ti o n o f M e a d o w C r e e k i m m e d i a t el y
M W H-003 u p stre a m of S O D A .

R e a c h 3: E F S F S R U p per EF1 1,890 M W H-13 E F S F S R i m m e di at ely u p stre a m of th e M e a d o w C r e e k

u p stre a m of M e a d o w EFSFSR c o n fl u e n c e .
Creek

U p per E F 0.01- E F0.21 v ari e s M W H-013 T h e s e m u lti pl e r e a c h e s o f t h e U p p e r E F S F S R a r e u p s tr e a m o f

EFSFSR the prop o s e d min e i m p a ct area.

U p per EF1 1,918 - E F S F S R i m m e d i a t el y u p s tr e a m o f it s c o n fl u e n c e w it h M e a d o w

EFSFSR C re e k.

R e a c h 4: E F S F S R Lo w er None NA
d o w n stre a m of S u g ar EFSFSR
Creek

R e a c h 5: H e a d w aters EFSFSR A ll str e a m s i n

E F S F S R W atershed Reaches 1
thro u g h 4
co m bined.

R e a c h 6: W ater w a y s A ll str e a m TR1 844 - T h a t p o r ti o n o f t h e r o u t e fr o m t h e E F S F S R w e s t w a r d t o t h e

a djac e nt to Ac c e s s cr o s sin g s J o h n s o n C r e e k S u b s t a ti o n .
R o a d s , U tiliti e s , a n d w ithi n e a c h
O f f - s i t e F a c i liti e s seg m e nt
co m bined

TR2 5,974 - T h a t p o r ti o n o f t h e r o u t e fr o m t h e J o h n s o n C r e e k S u b s t a ti o n
g e n e r ally s o u t h a n d w e s t t o t h e t o w n of C a s c a d e , I D .

T R 2.1 2,311 - P o r ti o n s o f T r o u t C r e e k r o u g h l y i n b e t w e e n W a r m L a k e a n d
J o h n s o n C r e e k i m m e di ately u p stre a m of T R 2 . 2.

T R 2.2 718 - P o r ti o n s o f T r o u t C r e e k r o u g h l y b e t w e e n W a r m L a k e a n d
J o h n s o n C r e e k i m m e di ately d o w n str e a m of T R 2 . 1.

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-21

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

SF A R e a c h I D s a n d D e s c ri p ti o n s

R elevant

M i n e Site Ar e a Strea m FA Seg m ent Length Strea m

D e s c ri p ti o n
Reaches Area N a m e (f e e t) Survey

Sites

T R 2.3 398 - P o r ti o n s o f J o h n s o n C r e e k i m m e d i a t el y d o w n s tr e a m o f it s
c o n fl u e n c e w it h H a lf w a y C r e e k .

T R 2.4 130 - P o r ti o n s o f J o h n s o n C r e e k i m m e d i a t el y d o w n s tr e a m o f it s
c o n fl u e n c e w it h B u r n tl o g C r e e k .

T R 2.5 467 - P o r ti o n s o f C a b i n C r e e k i n b e t w e e n W a r m L a k e C r e e k a n d
Jo h n so n Cre e k.

T R 2.6 220 - P o r ti o n s o f C a b i n C r e e k i m m e d i a t el y u p s tr e a m o f it s c o n fl u e n c e
with W ar m L a k e Cre e k.

T a ble S o urc e: Rio A S E 2 0 1 9

T a ble N otes:

O n l y p er e n ni al S F A str e a m r e a c h e s w e r e i n cl u d e d.

B C = Blo w o ut Cr e e k ( E a st F ork M e a d o w Cr e e k); E F = E F S F S R ; F C = Fi d dle Cr e e k; G C = G a rn et Cr e e k; H C = H e n n e s s y Cre e k; H L = H a n g ar Flats L ak e; M C =

M e a d o w C r e e k; M N = Mi d ni g h t Cr e e k; S O D A = S p e nt Or e Dis p o s al Ar e a; W L = W e st E n d L a k e. N A = n o t a p pli c a bl e.

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-22

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

T a ble J1-9 S u m m a r y o f Str e a m F u n c ti o n al A s s e s s m e n t In d i c a t o r s, El e m e n t s, a n d S c o ri n g C rit e ri a

In dic at or Ele m e nt R atin g FA FR F U R

C hin o o k S al m o n/ Ste elh e a d M i g r a ti o n ≤1 3.9 > 1 4 ≤1 7.7 > 1 7.7

W ater Te m p erature
R e a ri n g ≤1 3.9 > 1 4 ≤1 7.7 > 1 7.7
(° C M a xi m u m 7- D a y A v er a g e)
S p a w ning ≤1 3.9 > 1 4 ≤1 5.5 > 1 5.5

B u ll Tr o u t/ C u tt h r o a t Tr o u t W a t e r R e a ri n g ≤12 >12 ≤15 >15

W a t e r Q u a lit y T e m p erature
S p a w ning ≤12 >9 ≤10 >10
(° C M a xi m u m 7- D a y A v er a g e)

G r a n i ti c B a s i n <12 12 % to 18 >18
Fin e S e di m e nt ( %)
N o n - G r a n i ti c B a s i n < 3 3 % to 6 >6

C h e mic al C o nta min a nts (# E x c e e din g T hres h old) < 2 2 to 4 >4

Access P h y si c al B a rri er s L o c a t e d D o w n s tr e a m No P a r ti al Yes

E mbeddedness G r a n i ti c B a s i n ≥ 27 27 % to 17 <17

( F r e e M a tri x % ) N o n - G r a n i ti c B a s i n ≥ 54 54 % to 43 <43

P i e c e s P e r M il e > 20 > 2 0 or <20 <20

L a r g e W o o d y D e b ris
H a bitat
R e c r u it m e n t P o t e n ti al Yes N o or Yes No
Ele m e nts

P o o l F r e q u e n c y ( % o f o p ti m a l ) ≥ 75 75 % to 25 <25

P o o l Q u a lit y ( Q u a lit y P o o l s / O p ti m a l # P o o l s ) > 1 4.1 6.7 to 14.1 < 6.7

O ff- C h a n n el H a bit at wit h C o v e r ( # of F e a t u r e s ) M a ny (>2) S o m e (1-2) N o n e (0)

W i d t h / D e p t h R a ti o ≤ 10 10< ≥20 >20

Strea m b a n k Pfankuch 1975 M ethod < 39 39 to 77 >77

C ha nnel
C o n d i ti o n ( S t a b ilit y )
C o n diti o n s a n d Q u a lit ati v e C S or U S C U U U
Dyna mics
Fl o o d pl ai n E n t r e n c h m e n t R a ti o > 2.2 2.2 to 1.4 < 1.4

C o n n e c ti vit y
Q u a lit ati v e S li g h tl y M o d e r at ely E ntre nc h e d

P e a k or Base Discharge < 10 10 to 20 >20

Flo w a n d
C h a n g e i n Fl o w ( % )
H y dr olog y
Ti min g < 10 10 to 20 >20

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-23

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

In dic at or Ele m e nt R atin g FA FR F U R

C h a n g e i n D r ai n a g e N e t w o r k (% I n cr e a s e ) < 15 15 to 25 >25

R o a d D e n sity ( F e e t/ M il e) < 0.7 ≥ 0.7 to 1.7 > 1.7

R o a d D e n sity a n d
D e n sity in R C A 0.0 ≤1.7 > 1.7
L o c a ti o n ( c o m b i n e
eith er to p 2 or
R o a d D e n sity ( F e e t/ M il e) < 0.7 <.07 ≥0.7
b otto m 2 ro w s)
D e n sity in R C A 0.0 ≤1.7 > 1.7
W atershe d
C o n diti o n s
R i p a ri a n C o n s e r v a ti o n A r e a s ( % I n t a c t) > 80 70 to 80 <70

Di stur b a n c e History % Di stur b e d ≤ 15 ≤15 >15

( C o m b i n e all t h r e e
In L a n d sli d e A r e a s No Y e s or No Yes
rows)

In R C A No Y e s or No Yes

Occupancy I ntri n si c P o t e n ti al ( C h i n o o k High M e diu m Low

S al m o n a n d Ste elh e a d)
P o t e n ti al

O c c u p a n c y M o d el ( B ull Tr o u t 10 0 to 90 90 to 33 33 to 0
a n d W e s tsl o p e C u tthr o at
F i s h Filt e r s
T r o ut)

C r i ti c a l H a b i t a t * * Yes No

Prese nce/ Absence** Yes No

T a ble S o urc e: Rio A S E 2 0 1 9

T a ble N otes:

B T = B ull Tr o u t N e g . = N e gli gibl e

C H = C hi n o o k S al m o n ; S T = S te el h e a d Tr o ut

C S = C o v ere d an d Sta ble

C U = C o v e r e d a n d U n st a bl e U S = U n c o v e r e d a n d St a bl e

F A = F u n c ti o n i n g A p p r o p ri a t ely U U = U n c o v e r e d a n d U n s t a b l e

F R = F u n c ti o n i n g a t R i s k

F U R = F u n c ti o ni n g a t U n a c c e p t a b l e R i s k

W C T = W e st sl o p e C utthr o at T r o ut

* * C r iti c a l H a b i t a t a n d P r e s e n c e / A b s e n c e fi s h u s e e l e m e n t s a r e u s e d a s d a t a filt e r s a n d a r e p o p u l a t e d w i t h s c o r e s .

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-24

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

Stream Reach 1: EFSFSR and Tributaries from Sugar Creek to Meadow Creek

T a ble J1-10 S tr e a m R e a c h 1 M a t ri x E x i sti n g ( B a s eli n e) C o n diti o n s

Path w ay
Category D e sir e d C o n diti o n B a s e li n e2 E x i sti n g C o n diti o n
I n d i c a t o r s 1,3

W a t e r Q u ality W ater 7- d a y a v er a g e m a xi m u m ° C FR T h e w a t e r t e m p e r a t u r e i n thi s re a c h e x c e e d s all fo u r

T e m p erature thre s h ol d s.
B u ll tr o u t:

In c u b a ti o n ( S e p t e m b e r- M a r c h ) : 2- 5 ° C

R e a ri n g ( y e ar-r o u n d ): 4- 1 2 ° C

S p a w ni n g ( S e pt e m b e r): 4- 9 ° C

M i g r a ti o n ( J u n e - S e p t e m b e r ): N o t T o
E xceed 15°C

W a t e r Q u ality W ater 7- d a y a v er a g e m a xi m u m ° C FA D e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n c u r r e n tl y e x i s t s .
T e m p erature
C hi n o o k sal m o n/ste elh e a d: S p a w ni n g,
r e a ri n g , a n d m i g r a ti o n : 1 0 - 1 3 . 9 ° C . A s
dire ct e d b y th e N O A A B O o n th e L R M P
( N M F S 2 0 0 3 ), th e s e d ef a ult W C I v al u e s
a r e b ei n g r e vis e d to a p p r o pri ate v al u e s for
t hi s s u b b a s i n b a s e d o n t h e b e s t a v a il a b l e
d a t a o n f u n c ti o n i n g h a b i t a t c o n d i ti o n s f o r
E S A - li st e d fi s h w it hi n t h e s u b b a s i n .

W a t e r Q u ality S e di m e nt L R M P d e fi n iti o n : FUR

< 1 2 % fi n e s ( < 0 . 8 5 m illi m e t e r s [ m m } ) i n

g r a v el.

S u r f a c e fi n e s ( < 6 m m ) < 2 0 %

W a t e r Q u ality C h e mic al L o w l e v e l s o f c h e m i c al c o n t a m i n a ti o n fr o m FUR E n tir e E F S F S R list e d u n d e r 3 0 3 ( d ) (I D E Q 2 0 1 7 a ).

C o nta mi n a nts/ a g ri c u l t u r a l , i n d u s t ri a l, a n d o t h e r s o u r c e s ; S e di m e n t a n d m e t al s ar e p ar a m e t e rs of c o n c e r n.
N u t ri e n t s n o e x c e s s n u t ri e n t s , n o 3 0 3 ( d ) w a t e r
q u a lit y li m it e d w a t e r b o d i e s .

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-25

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

Path w ay
Category D e sir e d C o n diti o n B a s e li n e2 E x i sti n g C o n diti o n
I n d i c a t o r s 1,3

H a bitat A c c e s s P h y si c al A n y m a n - m a d e b a rri er s p r e s e n t i n FUR T h e hi g h- gr a di e nt c a s c a d e o n th e E F S F S R j u st u p stre a m

B a r ri er s w a t e r s h e d all o w u p str e a m a n d o f t h e Y ell o w Pi n e pit is a b a rrie r t o a d ult C hi n o o k s al m o n
d o w n s t r e a m f i s h p a s s a g e a t a l l fl o w s . ( N M F S 2 0 1 7 ), a n d m a y b e a b a rri er t o st e el h e a d , b ut
s t e el h e a d p a s s a g e t h e r e m a y b e fl o w d e p e n d e n t. T h e r e i s
c u r r e n tl y n o e v i d e n c e t h a t s t e e l h e a d h a v e r e c ol o n i z e d t h e
E F S F S R u p s tr e a m si n c e t hi s b a rri er w a s f or m e d b y
m i n i n g . I n r e c e n t fi s h s u r v e y s a n d e D N A s a m p l e s t h e r e
h a s b e e n n o i n di c a ti o n t h a t n a t iv e s t e e l h e a d O . m y k i s s
o c c u r s n a t u r ally u p s tr e a m o f th e b a rri er ( M W H 2 0 1 7 ).

A b o u t 1.7 mile s u p stre a m fro m th e c a s c a d e is a c o n cr ete

b o x c ul v e rt l o c a t e d w h e r e Sti b nit e R o a d ( N F S R 5 0 4 1 2 )
c r o s s e s t h e E F S F S R ; t h e P N F cl a s s i fi e d t h i s s tr u c t u r e a s
a p a r ti a l b a r ri e r ( F o r e s t S e r v i c e 2 0 0 5 i n R i o A S E 2 0 1 9 ) .

A t t h e m o u t h of Fi d dl e C r e e k th e r e i s a hi g h- g r a di e nt
s e c ti o n o f s tr e a m f oll o w e d b y a c ul v e rt. T h e hi g h s tr e a m
g r a d i e n t i s a b a r ri e r t o fi s h m i g r a ti o n ( H D R 2 0 1 6 ; M W H
2 0 1 7).

H a bitat S u b strat e L R M P d e fi n iti o n : FA D e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n c u r r e n tl y e x i s t s .

Ele m ents E mbeddedness
D o m i n a nt s u b strate is gr a v el or c o b ble, or
e m b e d d ed n ess is <20 %

H a bitat Large W o ody > 2 0 pi e c e s p e r m il e, > 1 2 i n c h e s i n FA D e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n c u r r e n tl y e x i s t s .

Ele m ents D e b ris dia m eter, > 3 5 fe et in le n gth, an d a d e q u ate
s o u r c e s of lar g e w o o d y d e bris for b oth
lo n g a n d s h o rt-t er m r e cr uit m e n t.

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-26

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

Path w ay
Category D e sir e d C o n diti o n B a s e li n e2 E x i sti n g C o n diti o n
I n d i c a t o r s 1,3

H a bitat P o ol Fre q u e n c y B u ll tr o u t: FUR

Ele m ents
W e t t e d W i d t h (ft) x N u m b e r o f P o o l s / M il e

0-5 x39

5-10 x60

10-15 x48

15-20 x39

20-30 x23

C hi n o o k sal m o n/ste elh e a d:

C h a n n e l W i d t h (ft) x N u m b e r o f P o o l s / M il e

5 x184

5-10x96

10-15 x70

15-20 x56

25-50 x26

H a bitat P o o l Q u ality E a c h re a c h h as m a n y larg e po ols >3.2 8 FUR

Ele m ents fe et (1 m eter) d e e p. P o ols h a v e g o o d
c o v er a n d c o ol w at er, a n d o nly mi n or
r e d u c ti o n o f p o o l v ol u m e b y s e d i m e n t.

H a bitat O ff- C h a n n el W a tersh e d h as m a n y p o n d s, oxb o w s, FR U p p e r E F S F S R h a s e x p e ri e n c e d c o n ti n u a l r e r o u ti n g a n d

Ele m ents H a bitat b a c k w a t e r s, a n d o t h e r off-c h a n n el ar e a s d i v e r si o n s . R o a d e d R C A s h a v e c o n fi n e d o ff- c h a n n e l
w it h c o v e r; si d e c h a n n el s a r e lo w e n e r g y h a b it a t s ( E F S F S R , M e a d o w C r e e k , P r o fil e C r e e k , S u g a r
ar e a s. C r e e k, Q u artz Cr e e k).

H a bitat R efu gia B u ll tr o u t - H a b it a t s c a p a b l e o f s u p p o r ti n g FR W a g o n er a n d B urn s (2 0 0 1): FR

Ele m ents s t r o n g a n d s i g n ifi c a n t l o c a l p o p u l a ti o n s a r e
P e r e n ni al str e a m R C A s i n th e U p p e r E F S F S R 3 8 %
p r o t e c t e d a n d a r e w e ll di s tri b u t e d a n d
d i s t u r b e d ( K u z i s 1 9 9 7 ) , r o a d s h a v e s u b s t a n ti all y a ff e c t e d
c o n n e c t e d f o r a ll lif e s t a g e s a n d f o r m s o f
R C A s a l o n g E F S F S R , P r o fil e, S u g a r , a n d Q u a r t z C r e e k ,
th e s p e cie s.
a n d B u r n s et al. ( 2 0 0 5 ) a n d K u zi s ( 1 9 9 7 ) d o c u m e n t t h a t
C hi n o o k s al m o n /st e el h e a d - H a bitat th e Br a dl e y Pit is ol ate s th e u p p e r E F S F S R fro m u p stre a m
r ef u gi a e xi st a n d a r e a d e q u a t e ly b uff e r e d fi s h m i g r a ti o n s a n d t h a t p o r ti o n s o f t h i s w a t e r s h e d h a v e
( e . g . , b y i n t a c t R C A s ) ; e x i s ti n g r e f u g i a a r e h a d e x t e n s i v e h a b i t a t m o d i fi c a ti o n a n d d e g r a d a t i o n .
s u ffi ci e n t i n si z e , n u m b e r , a n d c o n n e c ti vit y
t o m a i n t ai n vi a bl e p o p u l a ti o n s .

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-27

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

Path w ay
Category D e sir e d C o n diti o n B a s e li n e2 E x i sti n g C o n diti o n
I n d i c a t o r s 1,3

C h a n n el Wi dth/De pth ≤ 10 FA D e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n c u r r e n tl y e x i s t s .
C o n d i ti o n a n d R a ti o
D yna mics

C h a n n el Strea m b a n k > 9 0 % o f a n y str e a m r e a c h h a s st a bl e FA D e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n c u r r e n tl y e x i s t s .

C o n d i ti o n a n d C o n d i ti o n b a n k s r el a ti v e t o t h e p e r c e n t o f i n h e r e n t
D yna mics st a bl e str e a m b a n k s a s s o ci at e d wit h a
si m il ar u n m a n a g e d str e a m s y s te m .

C h a n n el Fl o o d pl ai n W i t h i n R C A s , fl o o d p l a i n s a n d w e t l a n d s a r e FR S ti b n it e R o a d ( N F S R 5 0 4 1 2 ) h a s r e d u c e d li n k s t o
C o n d i ti o n a n d C o n n e c ti vit y h y d r ol o gi c all y li n k e d t o t h e m a i n c h a n n e l; fl o o d p l a i n a n d w e tl a n d s . S e v e r e l y r e d u c e d li n k a g e t o
D yna mics o v e r b a n k fl o w s o c c u r a n d m a i n t ai n fl o o d p l a i n s a n d w e t l a n d s d u e t o i m p a c t e d R C A s i n
w e tl a n d /fl o o d p l ai n f u n c ti o n s ; a n d ri p a ri a n S ti b n it e m i ni n g a r e a ( p e r s o n a l o b s e r v a ti o n ) ( F o r e s t
v e g e t a ti o n s u c c e s s i o n . S e r vic e 2 0 1 0 c).

E F S F S R W a t er s h e d A n al y si s ( K u zis 1 9 9 7 ):

M e a d o w C r e e k a n d t h e E F S F S R e x p e ri e n c e d al m o s t
c o n ti n u a l r e r o u ti n g a n d di v e r si o n b e g i n ni n g i n t h e e a rl y
1 9 0 0 s.

Fl o w / H y d r ol o g y C h ange in W a t ersh e d hy dro gra p h indicate s pe a k FA D e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n c u r r e n tl y e x i s t s .

P e a k/ B a se fl o w , b a s e fl o w , a n d fl o w ti m i n g
Flo w s c h a r a c t e ri s ti c s c o m p a r a b l e t o a n
u n di stur b e d w a t er s h e d of a sim il ar siz e,
g e o m o r p h ol o g y a n d cli m a t ol o g y.

Fl o w / H y d r ol o g y D r ain a g e Z e r o o r m i n i m u m c h a n g e i n a c ti v e c h a n n e l FA D e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n c u r r e n tl y e x i s t s .
N etwork le n gth c orr el ate d with h u m a n c a u s e d
Increa s e distur b a n c e.

W atershed R o a d D e n sity T o t al r o a d d e n sity < 0. 7 m il e s/ s q u a r e m il e FUR T ot al ro a d d e n sity = 0. 7 mi/s q. mi. R C A r o a d d e n sity = 2. 2

C o n d i ti o n s a n d L o c a ti o n of s u b w a t ers h e d, n o ro a d within R C A s. m i/s q mi, m a n y r o a d s within R C A s ( U. S. F o r e st S er vic e
2 0 1 0 c).

W atershed Di stur b a n c e < 1 5 % E C A ( e n tir e w a t e r s h e d ) w i t h n o FR E C A ≈ 2 5 % , (s e e A p p e n di x D of U. S. F o r e st S er vic e

C o n d i ti o n s Hi story c o n c e n tr a ti o n o f di st u r b a n c e i n a r e a s w it h 2 0 1 0 c)
la n d sli d e o r l a n d sli d e p r o n e a r e a s , a n d / o r
D i st ur b a n c e is c o n c e ntr at e d in R C A s (r o a d s, mi ni n g) in
refugia, an d/or R C A s.
u p p e r w a t e r s h e d . E x t e n si v e c h a n n e l r e r o u ti n g a n d
di v er si o n b e gi n ni n g i n th e e arly 1 9 0 0 s, a n d a hi g h
p e r c e nt a g e of ro a d s withi n R C A s, h a v e c h a n g e d c h a n n el
le n gth s in th e U p p e r E a st F o rk d u e to mi ni n g a n d R C A
r o a d s ( p e r s o n a l o b s e r v a ti o n ) ( F o r e s t S e r vi c e 2 0 1 0 c ) .

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-28

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

Path w ay
Category D e sir e d C o n diti o n B a s e li n e2 E x i sti n g C o n diti o n
I n d i c a t o r s 1,3

W atershed R i p ari a n T h e ri p a ri a n c o n s e r v a ti o n a r e a s w it hi n t h e FA D e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n c u r r e n tl y e x i s t s .
C o n d i ti o n s C o n s e r v a ti o n s u b w a t e r s h e d ( s ) h a v e hi st o ri c a n d
Areas o c c u p i e d r e f u g i a f o r li s t e d , s e n s i ti v e o r
n a t i v e / d e s i r e d n o n n a t i v e fi s h s p e c i e s
w hi c h ar e pr e s e nt a n d pr o vi d e : a d e q u at e
s h a d e , l ar g e w o o d y d e b ri s r e c r uit m e n t,
s e d i m e n t b u ff e ri n g , c o n n e c ti vity , a n d
h a b it a t p r o t e c ti o n a n d c o n n e c tivit y t o
a d e q u a t el y mi ni mi z e a d v e r s e e ff e ct s fr o m
l a n d m a n a g e m e n t a c ti viti e s ( > 8 0 % i n t a c t ) .

A ll v e g e t a ti v e c o m p o n e n t s a r e w it hi n
d e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n s i d e n tifi e d i n A p p e n d i x A
o f t h e F o r e s t P l a n . R C A f u n c tio n s a n d
p r o c e s s e s a r e i n t a c t, p r o vi di n g r e sili e n c y
fr o m a d v e r s e e ff e c t s a s s o c i a t e d w it h l a n d
m a n a g e m e n t a c ti viti e s .

W atershed Di stur b a n c e D i s t u r b a n c e r e s u lti n g f r o m l a n d FR A d j a c e n t r o a d h a s a ff e c t e d E F S F S R , Q u a r t z , P r o fil e, a n d

C o n d i ti o n s R e gi m e m a n a g e m e n t a c t i v i ti e s a r e n e g li g i b l e o r S u g a r c r e e k s ’ r e sili e n c y ( p e r s o n a l o b s e r v a ti o n ) ( F o r e s t
te m p o r a r y. Str e a m fl o w r e gi m e s a r e S e r vic e 2 0 1 0 c).
a p p r o p ri at e t o t h e l o c al g e o m o r p h ol o g y ,
D i s t u r b a n c e fr o m l a n d m a n a g e m e n t a c ti o n s s u c h a s
p o t e n ti al v e g e t a ti o n a n d cli m a t o l o g y
m i ni n g a n d r o a d s (ri p a ri a n ) is n o t n e gli gi bl e o r t e m p o r a r y.
r e s u lti n g i n a p p r o p r i a t e h i g h q u a lit y h a b i t a t
R e s ili e n c y o f h a b it a t t o r e c o v e r fr o m l a n d m a n a g e m e n t
a n d w a t er s h e d c o m pl e xity th at pr o vi d e
di stur b a n c e s is m o d e r at e thr o u g h o ut m o st of th e a n aly sis
r e f u g i a a n d r e a r i n g s p a c e f o r a ll li f e s t a g e s
a r e a , b u t l o w i n t h e S ti b nit e a r e a ( p e r s o n a l o b s e r v a ti o n )
o r m u lti pl e lif e - hi st o r y f o r m s .
( F or e st S e r vic e 2 0 1 0 c ).
E c ol o gi c al pr o c e s s e s a r e wit hin hi st o ri c al
r a n g e s . R e s i li e n c y o f h a b i t a t t o r e c o v e r
fr o m l a n d m a n a g e m e n t di s t u r b a n c e s i s
hig h.

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-29

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

Path w ay
Category D e sir e d C o n diti o n B a s e li n e2 E x i sti n g C o n diti o n
I n d i c a t o r s 1,3

I nt e g r a ti o n o f B u ll tr o u t - H a b it a t q u a lit y a n d c o n n e c ti vit y FR F o r e st S e r vic e ( 2 0 1 2 ): S e di m e nts a n d s uita bl e h a bitat

S p e cie s a n d a m o n g s u b p o p u l a ti o n s i s hi g h . a v a il a bilit y h a v e b e e n alt e r e d a n d m a y n o t r e t u r n t o p r e -
H a bitat D i st u r b a n c e h a s n o t alt er e d c h a n n el d i s t u r b a n c e c o n d i ti o n s w i t h i n 5 y e a r s ( s e e p r e v i o u s W C I s
C o n d i ti o n s e q u ili b ri u m . F i n e s e d i m e n t s a n d o t h e r a n d p e r s o n a l o b s e r v a ti o n ). S u r vi v al a n d g r o w t h r a t e s f o r
h a b i t a t c h a r a c t e ri s ti c s i n fl u e n c i n g s u r v i v a l b u ll tr o u t a r e r e d u c e d ( s e e p o p u l a ti o n c h a r a c t e r W C I s a n d
a n d gr o w t h are c o n si ste nt with th e d e sire d B u r n s e t al. 2 0 0 5 ) . L o c a l p o p u l a ti o n s a r e s t a b l e o r
c o n d i ti o n s f o r t h e h a b i t a t . fl u c t u a ti n g i n a d o w n w a r d t r e n d f o r a ll li s t e d s p e c i e s
( 5 7 F R 1 4 6 5 3 , 6 0 F R 4 3 9 3 7 , 6 3 F R 3 1 6 4 7 ) . C o n n e c ti vit y
T h e s u b p o p u l a t i o n h a s t h e r e s ili e n c e t o
a m o n g l o c al p o p u l a ti o n s o c c u r s b u t h a b it a t s a r e
r e c o v e r fr o m s h o rt-t er m di st u r b a n c e w it hi n
fr a g m e n t e d ( B u r n s e t al. 2 0 0 5 ) .
o n e t o t w o g e n e r a ti o n s ( 5 - 1 0 y e a r s ). T h e
s u b p o p u l a ti o n i s fl u c t u a ti n g a r o u n d a n
e q u ili b ri u m o r i s g r o w i n g .

T a ble N otes:

1 M a t ri x c h e c k li st a d a p t e d fr o m U S F W S a n d N M F S 1 9 9 8 .

2 F A = F u n c ti o n i n g A p p r o p ri a t ely , F R = F u n c ti o ni n g a t R i s k , F U R = F u n c ti o ni n g a t U n a c c e p t a b l e R i s k , N = N o t A p p li c a b l e . N o t e : ““ i n B a s e li n e di s c u s si o n

i n d i c a t e s a c t u a l d a t a w e r e u s e d a s t h e p ri m a r y s o u r c e o f B a s e li n e a s s e s s m e n t , o t h e r w i s e r e fl e c t s a p r o f e s s i o n a l e s ti m a t e o f c o n d i ti o n .

3 E v al u a t e d a g ai n st l o c al crit eri a w h e r e a p p r o p ri at e a n d a v ail a bl e.

A g e n c y / U n i t: P N F K r a s s el R a n g e r Di strict; H U C o d e a n d N a m e : 1 7 0 6 0 2 0 8 - 0 2 U p p e r E a s t F o r k S o u t h F o r k S al m o n Ri v e r; S p a ti al S c a l e o f M a t ri x : R e a c h ;

F i s h S p e c i e s P r e s e n t : C h i n o o k s a l m o n , s t e e l h e a d , b u ll tr o u t, c u tt h r o a t tr o u t; A n a d r o m o u s S p e c i e s P o p u l a t i o n : S o u t h F o r k S a l m o n R i v e r ; S u b p o p u l a t i o n :

E a st F or k S o ut h F o r k S al m o n R i v er a n al y sis ar e a; ( B ull tr o u t) C o r e A r e a: S o ut h F or k S alm o n Ri v er; L o c al P o p ul ati o n: S o ut h F or k S al m o n Ri v er;

M a n a g e m e n t A c t i o n ( s ) : S ti b n it e G o l d P r o j e c t.

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-30

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

Stream Reach 2: Meadow Creek and EFMC

T a ble J1-11 S tr e a m R e a c h 2 M a t ri x E x i sti n g ( B a s eli n e) C o n diti o n s

Path w ay
Category D e sir e d C o n diti o n B a s e li n e2 E x i sti n g C o n diti o n
I n d i c a t o r s 1.3

W a t e r Q u ality W ater 7- d a y a v er a g e m a xi m u m ° C FR T h e w a t e r t e m p e r a t u r e i n thi s re a c h e x c e e d s all fo u r

T e m p erature thre s h ol d s.
B u ll tr o u t:

In c u b a ti o n ( S e p t e m b e r- M a r c h ) : 2- 5 ° C

R e a ri n g ( y e ar-r o u n d ): 4- 1 2 ° C

S p a w ni n g ( S e pt e m b e r): 4- 9 ° C

M i g r a ti o n ( J u n e - S e p t e m b e r ): N o t T o
E xceed 15°C

W a t e r Q u ality W ater 7- d a y a v er a g e m a xi m u m ° C FR T h e w a t er te m p e r at ur e in this re a c h e x c e e d s th e

T e m p erature thres h old in lo w er M e a d o w Cre e k.
C hi n o o k s al m o n/ste elh e a d: S p a w ni n g,
r e a ri n g , a n d m i g r a ti o n : 1 0 - 1 3 . 9 ° C . A s
dire ct e d b y th e N O A A B O o n th e L R M P
( N M F S 2 0 0 3 ), th e s e d ef a ult W C I v al u e s
a r e b ei n g r e vis e d to a p p r o pri ate v al u e s
for this s u b b a si n b a s e d o n th e b e st
a v a il a bl e d a t a o n f u n c ti o ni n g h a b it a t
c o n d i ti o n s f o r E S A - li s t e d fi s h w i t h i n t h e
s u b b a sin.

W a t e r Q u ality S e di m e nt L R M P d e fi n iti o n : FUR S e d i m e n t i s a b o v e t h e d e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n .

< 1 2 % fi n e s ( < 0 . 8 5 m m ) i n g r a v e l.

S u r f a c e fi n e s ( < 6 m m ) < 2 0 %

W a t e r Q u ality C h e mic al L o w l e v e l s o f c h e m i c al c o n t a m i n a ti o n FR E n tir e E F S F S R list e d u n d e r 3 0 3 ( d ) (I D E Q 2 0 1 7 ).

C o nta mi n a nts/ fr o m a g ri c u l t u r a l , i n d u s t ri a l, a n d o t h e r S e di m e n t a n d m e t al s ar e p ar a m e t e rs of c o n c e r n.
N u t ri e n t s s o u r c e s; n o e x c e s s n u tri e nt s, n o 3 0 3 ( d )
w a t e r q u a l i t y li m i t e d w a t e r b o d i e s .

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-31

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

Path w ay
Category D e sir e d C o n diti o n B a s e li n e2 E x i sti n g C o n diti o n
I n d i c a t o r s 1.3

H a bitat A c c e s s P h y si c al A n y m a n - m a d e b a rri er s p r e s e n t i n FUR A s h o r t s e c ti o n o f M e a d o w C r e e k a t t h e S O D A m a y b e a

B a r ri er s w a t e r s h e d all o w u p str e a m a n d p a r ti al b a r ri e r a t l o w fl o w s b e c a u s e o f s h a ll o w d e p t h s a n d
d o w n s t r e a m f i s h p a s s a g e a t a l l fl o w s . 9 p e r c e n t gr a di e n t ( H D R 2 0 1 6 ).

I n E a s t F o r k M e a d o w C r e e k , th e r e i s s e c ti o n o f hi g h
str e a m g r a di e n t t h at m a y h a v e b e e n a n at u r al b a rri er
b e f o r e it w a s a lt e r e d b y m i n i n g a c ti viti e s . A s n o t e d i n
M W H ( 2 0 1 7 ) , a d a m f ail u r e o f a r e s e r v oir b uilt o n t h e
u p p e r E a st F o r k M e a d o w C r e e k e x a c e r b a t e d str e a m
c o n d i ti o n s , c r e a ti n g u n s t a b l e s l o p e s a l o n g t h e s t r e a m .
T h e E a s t F o r k M e a d o w C r e e k w a s o ri gi n ally a h a n gi n g
v all e y; t h e r ef o r e, hi g h str e a m g r a di e n t s a r e n a t u r al for t hi s
l o c a ti o n a n d m a y h a v e li m i t e d fi s h p a s s a g e p ri o r t o t h e
d a m o r t h e f ail u r e o f t h e d a m .

H a bitat El e m e n ts S u b strat e L R M P d e fi n iti o n : FA D e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n c u r r e n tl y e x i s t s .

E mbeddedness
D o m i n a nt s u b strate is gr a v el or c o b ble,
or e m b e d d e d ness is <20 %

H a bitat El e m e n ts Large W o ody > 2 0 pi e c e s p e r m il e, > 1 2 i n c h e s. i n FA D e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n c u r r e n tl y e x i s t s .

D e b ris dia m eter, > 3 5 fe et in le n gth, an d
a d e q u at e s o u r c e s of lar g e w o o d y d e b ris
f or b o t h l o n g a n d s h o rt-t er m r e c r uit m e n t.

H a bitat El e m e n ts P o ol B u ll tr o u t: FR
Frequency
W e t t e d W i d t h (ft) x N u m b e r o f P o o l s / M il e

0-5 x 39

5-10 x 60

10-15 x 48

15-20 x 39

20-30 x 23

C hi n o o k sal m o n/ste elh e a d:

C h a n n e l W i d t h (ft) x N u m b e r o f
P o o l s/ M il e

5 x 184

5-10 x 96

10-15 x 70

15-20 x 56

25-50 x 26

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-32

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

Path w ay
Category D e sir e d C o n diti o n B a s e li n e2 E x i sti n g C o n diti o n
I n d i c a t o r s 1.3

H a bitat El e m e n ts P o o l Q u ality E a c h re a c h h as m a n y larg e po ols >3.2 8 FUR 0 >1 m eter deep

fe et (1 m eter) d e e p. P o ols h a v e g o o d
c o v er a n d c o ol w at er, a n d o nly mi n or
r e d u c ti o n o f p o o l v ol u m e b y s e d i m e n t.

H a bitat El e m e n ts O ff- C h a n n el W a tersh e d h as m a n y p o n d s, oxb o w s, FR R o a d e d R C A s h a v e c o n fi n e d o ff- c h a n n e l h a b it a t s

H a bitat b a c k w a t e r s, a n d o t h e r off-c h a n n el ar e a s (i n cl u d e s M e a d o w C r e e k ) ( U . S . F o r e s t S e r vi c e 2 0 1 0 c ) .
w it h c o v e r; si d e c h a n n el s a r e lo w e n e r g y
ar e a s.

H a bitat El e m e n ts R efu gia B u ll tr o u t - H a bit at s c a p a bl e of FR W a g o n er a n d B urn s (2 0 0 1): FR

s u p p o r ti n g s t r o n g a n d s i g n ifi c a n t l o c a l
P e r e n ni al str e a m R C A s i n th e U p p e r E F S F S R 3 8 %
p o p u l a ti o n s a r e p r o t e c t e d a n d a r e w e ll
d i s t u r b e d ( K u z i s 1 9 9 7 ) , r o a d s h a v e s u b s t a n ti all y a ff e c t e d
d i s t ri b u t e d a n d c o n n e c t e d f o r a l l lif e
R C A s a l o n g E F S F S R , P r o fil e, S u g a r , a n d Q u a r t z C r e e k ,
sta g e s a n d for m s of th e s p e cies.
a n d B u r n s et al. ( 2 0 0 5 ) a n d K u zi s ( 1 9 9 7 ) d o c u m e n t t h a t
C hi n o o k s al m o n /st e el h e a d - H a bitat th e Br a dl e y Pit is ol ate s th e U p p e r E F S F S R fro m
r ef u gi a e xi st a n d a r e a d e q u a t e ly b uff e r e d u p s tr e a m fi s h m i g r a ti o n s , a n d t h a t p o r ti o n s o f t hi s
( e . g . , b y i n t a c t R C A s ) ; e x i s ti n g r e f u g i a w a t e r s h e d h a v e h a d e x t e n s i v e h a b it a t m o d ifi c a ti o n a n d
a r e s u ffi ci e n t i n si z e , n u m b e r , a n d d e g r a d a ti o n .
c o n n e c ti vit y t o m a i n t ai n vi a b l e
p o p u l a ti o n s .

C h a n n e l C o n d i ti o n Wi dth/De pth ≤ 10 FA L o w er M e a d o w Cre e k: 8

and Dyna mics R a ti o
U p p er M e a d o w Cre e k: 6

C h a n n e l C o n d i ti o n Strea m b a n k > 9 0 % o f a n y str e a m r e a c h h a s st a bl e FA L o w er M e a d o w C r e e k: c o v er e d a n d sta ble

and Dyna mics C o n d i ti o n b a n k s r el a ti v e t o t h e p e r c e n t o f i n h e r e n t
U p p er M e a d o w Cre e k: u nc o v e red a n d u nstable
st a bl e str e a m b a n k s a s s o ci at e d wit h a
si m il ar u n m a n a g e d str e a m s y s te m .

C h a n n e l C o n d i ti o n Fl o o d pl ai n W i t h i n R C A s , fl o o d p l a i n s a n d w e tl a n d s FA D e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n c u r r e n tl y e x i s t s .
and Dyna mics C o n n e c ti vit y a r e h y d r o l o g i c a ll y li n k e d t o t h e m a i n
c h a n n e l ; o v e r b a n k fl o w s o c c u r a n d
m a i n t a i n w e tl a n d / fl o o d p l a i n f u n c ti o n s ;
a n d ri p a ri a n v e g e t a ti o n s u c c e s si o n .

Fl o w / H y d r ol o g y C h ange in W a t ersh e d hy dro gra p h indicate s pe a k FA D e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n c u r r e n tl y e x i s t s .

P e a k/ B a se fl o w , b a s e fl o w , a n d fl o w ti m i n g
Flo w s c h a r a c t e ri s ti c s c o m p a r a b l e t o a n
u n di stur b e d w a t er s h e d of a sim il ar siz e,
g e o m o r p h ol o g y a n d cli m a t ol o g y.

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-33

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

Path w ay
Category D e sir e d C o n diti o n B a s e li n e2 E x i sti n g C o n diti o n
I n d i c a t o r s 1.3

Fl o w / H y d r ol o g y D r ain a g e Z e r o o r m i n i m u m c h a n g e i n a c ti v e FA D e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n c u r r e n tl y e x i s t s .
N etwork c h a n n el le n gt h c orr el ate d with h u m a n
Increa s e c a u s e d di stur b a n c e.

W atershed R o a d D e n sity T ot al ro a d d e n sity < 0. 7 mile s/sq u a r e FUR T ot al ro a d d e n sity = 0. 7 mi/s q. mi. R C A r o a d d e n sity = 2.2
C o n d i ti o n s a n d L o c a ti o n m il e of s u b w at er s h e d, n o ro a d withi n m i/s q. mi, m a n y r o a d s withi n R C A s ( U. S. F o r e st S er vic e
R C A s. 2 0 1 0 c).

W atershed Di stur b a n c e < 1 5 % E C A ( e n tir e w a t e r s h e d ) w i t h n o FR E C A ≈ 2 5 % , (s e e A p p e n di x D of U. S. F o r e st S er vic e

C o n d i ti o n s Hi story c o n c e n tr a ti o n o f di st u r b a n c e i n a r e a s 2 0 1 0 c)
w i t h l a n d sli d e o r l a n d s li d e p r o n e a r e a s ,
D i st ur b a n c e is c o n c e ntr at e d in R C A s (r o a d s, mi ni n g) in
a n d/or refugia, an d/or R C A s.
u p p e r w a t e r s h e d . E x t e n si v e c h a n n e l r e r o u ti n g a n d
di v er si o n b e gi n ni n g i n th e e arly 1 9 0 0 s a n d a hi g h
p e r c e nt a g e of ro a d s withi n R C A s h a v e c h a n g e d c h a n n el
le n gth s in th e U p p e r E F S F S R d u e to mi ni n g a n d R C A
r o a d s ( p e r s o n a l o b s e r v a ti o n ) ( U . S . F o r e s t S e r vi c e 2 0 1 0 c ) .

W atershed R i p ari a n T h e ri p a ri a n c o n s e r v a ti o n a r e a s w it hi n FA D e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n c u r r e n tl y e x i s t s .
C o n d i ti o n s C o n s e r v a ti o n t h e s u b w a t e r s h e d ( s ) h a v e hi sto ri c a n d
Areas o c c u p i e d r e f u g i a f o r li s t e d , s e n s i ti v e o r
n a t i v e / d e s i r e d n o n n a t i v e fi s h s p e c i e s
w hi c h ar e pr e s e nt a n d pr o vi d e : a d e q u at e
s h a d e , l ar g e w o o d y d e b ri s r e c r uit m e n t,
s e d i m e n t b u ff e ri n g , c o n n e c ti vity , a n d
h a b it a t p r o t e c ti o n a n d c o n n e c tivit y t o
a d e q u a t el y mi ni mi z e a d v e r s e e ff e ct s
fr o m l a n d m a n a g e m e n t a c ti vitie s ( > 8 0 %
inta ct).

A ll v e g e t a ti v e c o m p o n e n t s a r e w it hi n
d e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n s i d e n tifi e d i n A p p e n d i x
A o f t h e F o r e s t Pl a n . R C A f u n c ti o n s a n d
p r o c e s s e s a r e i n t a c t, p r o vi di n g r e sili e n c y
fr o m a d v e r s e e ff e c t s a s s o c i a t e d w it h
l a n d m a n a g e m e n t a c ti viti e s .

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-34

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

Path w ay
Category D e sir e d C o n diti o n B a s e li n e2 E x i sti n g C o n diti o n
I n d i c a t o r s 1.3

W atershed Di stur b a n c e D i s t u r b a n c e r e s u lti n g f r o m l a n d FR D i s t u r b a n c e fr o m l a n d m a n a g e m e n t a c ti o n s s u c h a s

C o n d i ti o n s R e gi m e m a n a g e m e n t a c t i v i ti e s a r e n e g li g i b l e o r m i ni n g a n d r o a d s (ri p a ri a n ) is n o t n e gli gi bl e o r t e m p o r a r y.
te m p o r a r y. Str e a m fl o w r e gi m e s a r e R e s ili e n c y o f h a b it a t t o r e c o v e r fr o m l a n d m a n a g e m e n t
a p p r o p ri at e t o t h e l o c al g e o m o r p h ol o g y , di stur b a n c e s is m o d e r at e thr o u g h o ut m o st of th e a n aly sis
p o t e n ti al v e g e t a ti o n a n d cli m a t o l o g y a r e a , b u t l o w i n t h e S ti b nit e a r e a ( p e r s o n a l o b s e r v a ti o n )
r e s u lti n g i n a p p r o p r i a t e h i g h q u a lit y ( F or e st S e r vic e 2 0 1 0 c ).
h a bit at a n d w at er s h e d c o m pl e xity t h at
p r o v i d e r e f u gi a a n d r e a ri n g s p a c e f o r all
li f e s t a g e s o r m u l ti p l e l i f e - h i s t o r y f o r m s .

E c ol o gi c al pr o c e s s e s a r e wit hin hi st o ri c al
r a n g e s . R e s i li e n c y o f h a b i t a t t o r e c o v e r
fr o m l a n d m a n a g e m e n t di s t u r b a n c e s i s
hig h.

I nt e g r a ti o n o f B u ll tr o u t - H a b it a t q u a lit y a n d FR U . S . F o r e s t S e r vi c e 2 0 1 2 : S e d i m e n t s a n d s uit a bl e h a bitat

S p e cie s a n d c o n n e c ti v it y a m o n g s u b p o p u l a ti o n s i s a v a il a bilit y h a v e b e e n alt e r e d a n d m a y n o t r e t u r n t o p r e -
H a bitat hi g h . Di st ur b a n c e h a s n o t alter e d d i s t u r b a n c e c o n d i ti o n s w i t h i n 5 y e a r s ( s e e a b o v e W C I s
C o n d i ti o n s c h a n n e l e q u ili b ri u m . Fi n e s e d i m e n t s a n d a n d p e r s o n a l o b s e r v a ti o n ). S u r vi v al a n d g r o w t h r a t e s f o r
o t h e r h a b i t a t c h a r a c t e ri s ti c s i n f l u e n c i n g b u ll tr o u t a r e r e d u c e d ( s e e p o p u l a ti o n c h a r a c t e r W C I s a n d
s ur viv al a n d gr o w t h ar e c o n si s te nt with B u r n s e t al. 2 0 0 5 ) . L o c a l p o p u l a ti o n s a r e s t a b l e , o r
t h e d e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n s f o r t h e h a b i t a t. fl u c t u a ti n g i n a d o w n w a r d t r e n d f o r a ll li s t e d s p e c i e s
( 5 7 F R 1 4 6 5 3 , 6 0 F R 4 3 9 3 7 , 6 3 F R 3 1 6 4 7 ) . C o n n e c ti vit y
T h e s u b p o p u l a t i o n h a s t h e r e s ili e n c e t o
a m o n g l o c al p o p u l a ti o n s o c c u r s , b u t h a b it at s a r e
r e c o v e r fr o m s h o rt-t er m di st u r b a n c e
fr a g m e n t e d ( B u r n s e t al. 2 0 0 5 ) .
w i t hi n o n e t o t w o g e n e r a ti o n s ( 5 - 1 0
y e a r s ) . T h e s u b p o p u l a ti o n i s flu c t u a ti n g
a r o u n d a n e q u ili bri u m o r i s g r o w i n g .

T a ble N otes:

1 M a t ri x c h e c k li st a d a p t e d fr o m U S F W S a n d N M F S 1 9 9 8 .

2 F A = F u n c ti o n i n g A p p r o p ri a t ely , F R = F u n c ti o ni n g a t R i s k , F U R = F u n c ti o ni n g a t U n a c c e p t a b l e R i s k , N = N o t A p p li c a b l e . N o t e : ““ i n B a s e li n e di s c u s si o n

i n d i c a t e s a c t u a l d a t a w e r e u s e d a s t h e p ri m a r y s o u r c e o f B a s e li n e a s s e s s m e n t , o t h e r w i s e r e fl e c t s a p r o f e s s i o n a l e s ti m a t e o f c o n d i ti o n .

3 E v al u a t e d a g ai n st l o c al crit eri a w h e r e a p p r o p ri at e a n d a v ail a bl e.

A g e n c y / U n i t: P N F K r a s s el R a n g e r Di strict; H U C o d e a n d N a m e : 1 7 0 6 0 2 0 8 - 0 2 U p p e r E a s t F o r k S o u t h F o r k S al m o n Ri v e r; S p a ti al S c a l e o f M a t ri x : R e a c h ; F i s h

S p e c i e s P r e s e n t : C h i n o o k s al m o n , s t e e l h e a d , b u ll tr o u t, c u tt h r o a t; A n a d r o m o u s S p e c i e s P o p u l a t i o n : S o u t h F o r k S a l m o n R i v e r ; S u b p o p u l a t i o n : E a s t F o r k

S o u t h F o r k S al m o n R i v e r a n al y si s a r e a ; ( B u ll tr o u t) C o r e A r e a : S o u t h F o r k S al m o n R i v e r; L o c a l P o p u l a ti o n : S o u t h F o r k S al m o n R i v e r; M a n a g e m e n t

A c t i o n ( s ) : S ti b nit e G o l d P r oj e c t.

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-35

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

Stream Reach 3: EFSFSR Upstream of Meadow Creek

T a ble J1-12 S tr e a m R e a c h 3 M a t ri x E x i sti n g ( B a s eli n e) C o n diti o n s

Path w ay
Category D e sir e d C o n diti o n B a s e li n e2 E x i sti n g C o n diti o n
I n d i c a t o r s 1,3

W a t e r Q u ality W ater 7- d a y a v er a g e m a xi m u m ° C FR W a t e r T e m p e r a t u r e d u ri n g i n c u b a ti o n p e ri o d e x c e e d s
T e m p erature t h r e s h o l d 5 4 % o f t h e ti m e .
B u ll tr o u t:

In c u b a ti o n ( S e p t e m b e r- M a r c h ) : 2- 5 ° C

R e a ri n g ( y e ar-r o u n d ): 4- 1 2 ° C

S p a w ni n g ( S e pt e m b e r): 4- 9 ° C

M i g r a ti o n ( J u n e - S e p t e m b e r ): N o t T o
E xceed 15°C

W a t e r Q u ality W ater 7- d a y a v er a g e m a xi m u m ° C FA D e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n c u r r e n tl y e x i s t s .
T e m p erature
C hi n o o k sal m o n/ste elh e a d: S p a w ni n g,
r e a ri n g , a n d m i g r a ti o n : 1 0 - 1 3 . 9 ° C . A s
dire ct e d b y th e N O A A B O o n th e L R M P
( N M F S 2 0 0 3 ), th e s e d ef a ult W C I v al u e s
a r e b ei n g r e vis e d to a p p r o pri ate v al u e s for
t hi s s u b b a s i n b a s e d o n t h e b e s t a v a il a b l e
d a t a o n f u n c ti o n i n g h a b i t a t c o n d i ti o n s f o r
E S A - li st e d fi s h w it hi n t h e s u b b a s i n .

W a t e r Q u ality S e di m e nt L R M P d e fi n iti o n : FUR

< 1 2 % fi n e s ( < 0 . 8 5 m m ) i n g r a v e l.

S u r f a c e fi n e s ( < 6 m m ) < 2 0 %

W a t e r Q u ality C h e mic al L o w l e v e l s o f c h e m i c al c o n t a m i n a ti o n fr o m FUR

C o nta mi n a nts/ a g ri c u l t u r a l , i n d u s t ri a l, a n d o t h e r s o u r c e s ;
N u t ri e n t s n o e x c e s s n u t ri e n t s , n o 3 0 3 ( d ) w a t e r
q u a lit y li m it e d w a t e r b o d i e s .

H a bitat A c c e s s P h y si c al A n y m a n - m a d e b a rri er s p r e s e n t i n FUR A si n g l e c u l v e r t l o c a t e d i n a trib u t a r y o f F e r n C r e e k h a s

B a r ri er s w a t e r s h e d all o w u p str e a m a n d b e e n d e t e r m i n e d t o b e a c o m p let e b a rri er ( P N F 2 0 0 5 ).
d o w n s t r e a m f i s h p a s s a g e a t a l l fl o w s .

H a bitat El e m e n ts S u b strat e L R M P d e fi n iti o n : FA D e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n c u r r e n tl y e x i s t s .

E mbeddedness
D o m i n a nt s u b strate is gr a v el or c o b ble, or
e m b e d d ed n ess is <20 %

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-36

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

Path w ay
Category D e sir e d C o n diti o n B a s e li n e2 E x i sti n g C o n diti o n
I n d i c a t o r s 1,3

H a bitat El e m e n ts Large W o ody > 2 0 pi e c e s p e r m il e, > 1 2 i n c h e s i n FA 2 6 p i e c e s p e r m il e w it h r e c r uitm e n t p o t e n ti al ( R i o A S E

D e b ris dia m eter, > 3 5 fe et in le n gth, an d 2 0 1 9).
a d e q u at e s o u r c e s of lar g e w o o d y d e b ris
f or b o t h l o n g a n d s h o rt-t er m r e c r uit m e n t.

H a bitat El e m e n ts P o ol Fre q u e n c y B u ll tr o u t: FR

W e t t e d W i d t h (ft) x N u m b e r o f P o o l s / M il e

0-5 x 39

5-10 x 60

10-15 x 48

15-20 x 39

20-30 x 23

C hi n o o k sal m o n/ste elh e a d:

C h a n n e l W i d t h (ft) x N u m b e r o f P o o l s / M il e

5 x 184

5-10 x 96

10-15 x 70

15-20 x 56

25-50 x 26

H a bitat El e m e n ts P o o l Q u ality E a c h re a c h h as m a n y larg e po ols >3.2 8 FUR

fe et (1 m eter) d e e p. P o ols h a v e g o o d
c o v er a n d c o ol w at er, a n d o nly mi n or
r e d u c ti o n o f p o o l v ol u m e b y s e d i m e n t.

H a bitat El e m e n ts O ff- C h a n n el W a tersh e d h as m a n y p o n d s, oxb o w s, FR R o a d e d R C A s h a v e c o n fi n e d o ff- c h a n n e l h a b it a t s

H a bitat b a c k w a t e r s, a n d o t h e r off-c h a n n el ar e a s ( E F S F S R , M e a d o w C r e e k , P r o fil e C r e e k , S u g a r C r e e k ,
w it h c o v e r; si d e c h a n n el s a r e lo w e n e r g y Q u a rt z C r e e k ) ( U . S . F o r e s t S e r vi c e 2 0 1 0 c ).
ar e a s.

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-37

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

Path w ay
Category D e sir e d C o n diti o n B a s e li n e2 E x i sti n g C o n diti o n
I n d i c a t o r s 1,3

H a bitat El e m e n ts R efu gia B u ll tr o u t - H a b it a t s c a p a b l e o f s u p p o r ti n g FR S u b w a t er s h e d a n al y sis: W a g o n e r a n d B u r n s ( 2 0 0 1 ): F R

s t r o n g a n d s i g n ifi c a n t l o c a l p o p u l a ti o n s P e r e n ni al str e a m R C A s i n th e U p p e r E F S F S R 3 8 %
a r e p r o t e c t e d a n d a r e w e ll di s t ri b u t e d a n d d i s t u r b e d ( K u z i s 1 9 9 7 ) , r o a d s h a v e s u b s t a n ti all y a ff e c t e d
c o n n e c t e d f o r a ll lif e s t a g e s a n d f o r m s o f R C A s a l o n g E F S F S R , P r o fil e, S u g a r , a n d Q u a r t z C r e e k ,
th e s p e cie s. a n d B u r n s et al. ( 2 0 0 5 ) a n d K u zi s ( 1 9 9 7 ) d o c u m e n t t h a t
th e Br a dl e y Pit is ol ate s th e U p p e r E F S F S R fro m u p stre a m
C hi n o o k s al m o n /st e el h e a d - H a bitat
fi s h m i g r a ti o n s , a n d t h a t p o r ti o n s o f t h i s w a t e r s h e d h a v e
r ef u gi a e xi st a n d a r e a d e q u a t e ly b uff e r e d
h a d e x t e n s i v e h a b i t a t m o d i fi c a ti o n a n d d e g r a d a t i o n .
( e . g . , b y i n t a c t R C A s ) ; e x i s ti n g r e f u g i a a r e
s u ffi ci e n t i n si z e , n u m b e r , a n d c o n n e c ti vit y
t o m a i n t ai n vi a bl e p o p u l a ti o n s .

C h a n n el Wi dth/De pth ≤ 10 FA D e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n c u r r e n tl y e x i s t s .
C o n d i ti o n a n d R a ti o
D yna mics

C h a n n el Strea m b a n k > 9 0 % o f a n y str e a m r e a c h h a s st a bl e FA D e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n c u r r e n tl y e x i s t s .

C o n d i ti o n a n d C o n d i ti o n b a n k s r el a ti v e t o t h e p e r c e n t o f i n h e r e n t
D yna mics st a bl e str e a m b a n k s a s s o ci at e d wit h a
si m il ar u n m a n a g e d str e a m s y s te m .

C h a n n el Fl o o d pl ai n W i t h i n R C A s , fl o o d p l a i n s a n d w e tl a n d s FR E F S F S R W a t er s h e d A n al y si s ( K u zis 1 9 9 7 ):
C o n d i ti o n a n d C o n n e c ti vit y a r e h y d r o l o g i c a ll y li n k e d t o t h e m a i n
M e a d o w C r e e k a n d t h e E F S F S R e x p e ri e n c e d al m o s t
D yna mics c h a n n e l ; o v e r b a n k fl o w s o c c u r a n d
c o n ti n u a l r e r o u ti n g a n d di v e r si o n b e g i n ni n g i n t h e e a rl y
m a i n t a i n w e tl a n d / fl o o d p l a i n f u n c ti o n s ; a n d
1 9 0 0 s.
ri p a ri a n v e g e t a ti o n s u c c e s s i o n .

Fl o w / H y d r ol o g y C h ange in W a t ersh e d hy dro gra p h indicate s pe a k D e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n c u r r e n tl y e x i s t s .

P e a k/ B a se fl o w , b a s e fl o w , a n d fl o w ti m i n g
Flo w s c h a r a c t e ri s ti c s c o m p a r a b l e t o a n
u n di stur b e d w a t er s h e d of a sim il ar siz e,
g e o m o r p h ol o g y a n d cli m a t ol o g y.

Fl o w / H y d r ol o g y D r ain a g e Z e r o o r m i n i m u m c h a n g e i n a c ti v e FA D e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n c u r r e n tl y e x i s t s .
N etwork c h a n n el le n gt h c orr el ate d with h u m a n
Increa s e c a u s e d di stur b a n c e.

W atershed R o a d D e n sity T o t al r o a d d e n sity < 0. 7 m il e s/ s q u a r e m il e FA T ot al ro a d d e n sity = 0. 7 mi/s q. mi. R C A r o a d d e n sity = 2. 2

C o n d i ti o n s a n d L o c a ti o n of s u b w a t ers h e d, n o ro a d within R C A s. m i/s q mi, m a n y r o a d s within R C A s ( U. S. F o r e st S er vic e
2 0 1 0 c).

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-38

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

Path w ay
Category D e sir e d C o n diti o n B a s e li n e2 E x i sti n g C o n diti o n
I n d i c a t o r s 1,3

W atershed Di stur b a n c e < 1 5 % E C A ( e n tir e w a t e r s h e d ) w i t h n o FUR E C A ≈ 2 5 % , (s e e A p p e n di x D of U. S. F o r e st S er vic e

C o n d i ti o n s Hi story c o n c e n tr a ti o n o f di st u r b a n c e i n a r e a s w it h 2 0 1 0 c).
la n d sli d e o r l a n d sli d e p r o n e a r e a s , a n d / o r
D i st ur b a n c e is c o n c e ntr at e d in R C A s (r o a d s, mi ni n g) in
refugia, an d/or R C A s.
u p p e r w a t e r s h e d . E x t e n si v e c h a n n e l r e r o u ti n g a n d
di v er si o n b e gi n ni n g i n th e e arly 1 9 0 0 s, a n d a hi g h
p e r c e nt a g e of ro a d s withi n R C A s, h a v e c h a n g e d c h a n n el
le n gth s in th e U p p e r E F S F S R d u e to mi ni n g a n d R C A
r o a d s ( p e r s o n a l o b s e r v a ti o n ) ( U . S . F o r e s t S e r vi c e 2 0 1 0 c ) .

W atershed R i p ari a n T h e ri p a ri a n c o n s e r v a ti o n a r e a s w it hi n t h e FR D e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n c u r r e n tl y e x i s t s .
C o n d i ti o n s C o n s e r v a ti o n s u b w a t e r s h e d ( s ) h a v e hi st o ri c a n d
Areas o c c u p i e d r e f u g i a f o r li s t e d , s e n s i ti v e o r
n a ti v e / d e s i r e d n o n n a t i v e fi s h s p e c i e s
w hi c h ar e pr e s e nt a n d pr o vi d e : a d e q u at e
s h a d e , l ar g e w o o d y d e b ri s r e c r uit m e n t,
s e d i m e n t b u ff e ri n g , c o n n e c ti vity , a n d
h a b it a t p r o t e c ti o n a n d c o n n e c tivit y t o
a d e q u a t el y mi ni mi z e a d v e r s e e ff e ct s fr o m
l a n d m a n a g e m e n t a c ti viti e s ( > 8 0 % i n t a c t ) .

A ll v e g e t a ti v e c o m p o n e n t s a r e w it hi n
d e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n s i d e n tifi e d i n A p p e n d i x A
o f t h e F o r e s t P l a n . R C A f u n c tio n s a n d
p r o c e s s e s a r e i n t a c t, p r o vi di n g r e sili e n c y
fr o m a d v e r s e e ff e c t s a s s o c i a t e d w it h l a n d
m a n a g e m e n t a c ti viti e s .

W atershed Di stur b a n c e D i s t u r b a n c e r e s u lti n g f r o m l a n d FA D i s t u r b a n c e fr o m l a n d m a n a g e m e n t a c ti o n s s u c h a s

C o n d i ti o n s R e gi m e m a n a g e m e n t a c t i v i ti e s a r e n e g li g i b l e o r m i ni n g a n d r o a d s (ri p a ri a n ) is n o t n e gli gi bl e o r t e m p o r a r y.
te m p o r a r y. Str e a m fl o w r e gi m e s a r e R e s ili e n c y o f h a b it a t t o r e c o v e r fr o m l a n d m a n a g e m e n t
a p p r o p ri at e t o t h e l o c al g e o m o r p h ol o g y , di stur b a n c e s is m o d e r at e thr o u g h o ut m o st of th e a n aly sis
p o t e n ti al v e g e t a ti o n a n d cli m a t o l o g y a r e a , b u t l o w i n t h e S ti b nit e a r e a ( p e r s o n a l o b s e r v a ti o n )
r e s u lti n g i n a p p r o p r i a t e h i g h q u a lit y h a b i t a t ( U. S. F o r e st S e r vi c e 2 0 1 0 c ).
a n d w a t er s h e d c o m pl e xity th at pr o vi d e
r e f u g i a a n d r e a r i n g s p a c e f o r a ll li f e
s t a g e s o r m u lti pl e lif e - hi s t o r y fo r m s .

E c ol o gi c al pr o c e s s e s a r e wit hin hi st o ri c al
r a n g e s . R e s i li e n c y o f h a b i t a t t o r e c o v e r
fr o m l a n d m a n a g e m e n t di s t u r b a n c e s i s
hig h.

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-39

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

Path w ay
Category D e sir e d C o n diti o n B a s e li n e2 E x i sti n g C o n diti o n
I n d i c a t o r s 1,3

I nt e g r a ti o n o f B u ll tr o u t - H a b it a t q u a lit y a n d c o n n e c ti vit y FR U . S . F o r e s t S e r vi c e 2 0 1 2 : S e d i m e n t s a n d s uit a bl e h a bitat

S p e cie s a n d a m o n g s u b p o p u l a ti o n s i s hi g h . a v a il a bilit y h a v e b e e n alt e r e d , a n d m a y n o t r e t u r n t o p r e -
H a bitat D i st u r b a n c e h a s n o t alt er e d c h a n n el d i s t u r b a n c e c o n d i ti o n s w i t h i n 5 y e a r s ( s e e a b o v e W C I s
C o n d i ti o n s e q u ili b ri u m . F i n e s e d i m e n t s a n d o t h e r a n d p e r s o n a l o b s e r v a ti o n ). S u r vi v al a n d g r o w t h r a t e s f o r
h a b i t a t c h a r a c t e ri s ti c s i n fl u e n c i n g s u r v i v a l b u ll tr o u t a r e r e d u c e d ( s e e p o p u l a ti o n c h a r a c t e r W C I s a n d
a n d gr o w t h are c o n si ste nt with th e d e sire d B u r n s e t al. 2 0 0 5 ) . L o c a l p o p u l a ti o n s a r e s t a b l e , o r
c o n d i ti o n s f o r t h e h a b i t a t . fl u c t u a ti n g i n a d o w n w a r d t r e n d f o r a ll li s t e d s p e c i e s
( 5 7 F R 1 4 6 5 3 , 6 0 F R 4 3 9 3 7 , 6 3 F R 3 1 6 4 7 ) . C o n n e c ti vit y
T h e s u b p o p u l a t i o n h a s t h e r e s ili e n c e t o
a m o n g l o c al p o p u l a ti o n s o c c u r s , b u t h a b it at s a r e
r e c o v e r fr o m s h o rt-t er m di st u r b a n c e w it hi n
fr a g m e n t e d ( B u r n s e t al. 2 0 0 5 ) .
o n e t o t w o g e n e r a ti o n s ( 5 - 1 0 y e a r s ). T h e
s u b p o p u l a ti o n i s fl u c t u a ti n g a r o u n d a n
e q u ili b ri u m o r i s g r o w i n g .

T a ble N otes:

1 M a t ri x c h e c k li st a d a p t e d fr o m U S F W S a n d N M F S 1 9 9 8 .

2 F A = F u n c ti o n i n g A p p r o p ri a t ely , F R = F u n c ti o ni n g a t R i s k , F U R = F u n c ti o ni n g a t U n a c c e p t a b l e R i s k , N = N o t A p p li c a b l e . N o t e : ““ i n B a s e li n e di s c u s si o n

i n d i c a t e s a c t u a l d a t a w e r e u s e d a s t h e p ri m a r y s o u r c e o f B a s e li n e a s s e s s m e n t , o t h e r w i s e r e fl e c t s a p r o f e s s i o n a l e s ti m a t e o f c o n d i ti o n .

3 E v al u a t e d a g ai n st l o c al crit eri a w h e r e a p p r o p ri at e a n d a v ail a bl e.

A g e n c y / U n i t: P N F K r a s s el R a n g e r Di strict; H U C o d e a n d N a m e : 1 7 0 6 0 2 0 8 - 0 2 U p p e r E a s t F o r k S o u t h F o r k S al m o n Ri v e r; S p a ti al S c a l e o f M a t ri x : R e a c h ; F i s h

S p e c i e s P r e s e n t : C h i n o o k s al m o n , s t e e l h e a d , b u ll tr o u t, c u tt h r o a t; A n a d r o m o u s S p e c i e s P o p u l a t i o n : S o u t h F o r k S a l m o n R i v e r ; S u b p o p u l a t i o n : E a s t F o r k

S o u t h F o r k S al m o n R i v e r a n al y si s a r e a ; ( B u ll tr o u t) C o r e A r e a : S o u t h F o r k S al m o n R i v e r; L o c a l P o p u l a ti o n : S o u t h F o r k S al m o n R i v e r; M a n a g e m e n t

A c t i o n ( s ) : S ti b nit e G o l d P r oj e c t.

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-40

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

Stream Reach 4: EFSFSR Downstream of Sugar Creek

T h e r e a r e n o S F A r e a c h e s i n t hi s s e g m e n t; i n f o r m a t i o n f o r t h e f oll o w i n g t a b l e w a s o b t ai n e d fr o m t h e lit e r a t u r e .

T a ble J1-13 S tr e a m R e a c h 4 M a t ri x E x i sti n g ( B a s eli n e) C o n diti o n s

Path w ay
Category D e sir e d C o n diti o n B a s e li n e2 E x i sti n g C o n diti o n
I n d i c a t o r s 1,3

W a t e r Q u ality W ater 7- d a y a v er a g e m a xi m u m ° C FUR N o d e s c ri pti o n

T e m p erature
B u ll tr o u t:

In c u b a ti o n ( S e p t e m b e r- M a r c h ) : 2- 5 ° C

R e a ri n g ( y e ar-r o u n d ): 4- 1 2 ° C

S p a w ni n g ( S e pt e m b e r): 4- 9 ° C

M i g r a ti o n ( J u n e - S e p t e m b e r ): N o t T o
E xceed 15°C

W a t e r Q u ality W ater 7- d a y a v er a g e m a xi m u m ° C FR N o d e s c ri pti o n

T e m p erature
C hi n o o k sal m o n/ste elh e a d: S p a w ni n g,
r e a ri n g , a n d m i g r a ti o n : 1 0 - 1 3 . 9 ° C . A s
dire ct e d b y th e N O A A B O o n th e L R M P
( N M F S 2 0 0 3 ), th e s e d ef a ult W C I v al u e s
a r e b ei n g r e vis e d to a p p r o pri ate v al u e s for
t hi s s u b b a s i n b a s e d o n t h e b e s t a v a il a b l e
d a t a o n f u n c ti o n i n g h a b i t a t c o n d i ti o n s f o r
E S A - li st e d fi s h w it hi n t h e s u b b a s i n .

W a t e r Q u ality S e di m e nt L R M P d e fi n iti o n : FA N o d e s c ri pti o n

< 1 2 % fi n e s ( < 0 . 8 5 m m ) i n g r a v e l.

S u r f a c e fi n e s ( < 6 m m ) < 2 0 %

W a t e r Q u ality C h e mic al L o w l e v e l s o f c h e m i c al c o n t a m i n a ti o n fr o m FR E n tir e E F S F S R list e d u n d e r 3 0 3 ( d ) (I D E Q 2 0 1 7 ).

C o nta mi n a nts/ a g ri c u l t u r a l , i n d u s t ri a l, a n d o t h e r s o u r c e s ; S e di m e n t a n d m e t al s ar e p ar a m e t e rs of c o n c e r n.
N u t ri e n t s n o e x c e s s n u t ri e n t s , n o 3 0 3 ( d ) w a t e r
q u a lit y li m it e d w a t e r b o d i e s .

H a bitat A c c e s s P h y si c al A n y m a n - m a d e b a rri er s p r e s e n t i n FA D e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n c u r r e n tl y e x i s t s .
B a r ri er s w a t e r s h e d all o w u p str e a m a n d
d o w n s t r e a m f i s h p a s s a g e a t a l l fl o w s .

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-41

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

Path w ay
Category D e sir e d C o n diti o n B a s e li n e2 E x i sti n g C o n diti o n
I n d i c a t o r s 1,3

H a bitat El e m e n ts S u b strat e L R M P d e fi n iti o n : FA D e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n c u r r e n tl y e x i s t s .

E mbeddedness
D o m i n a nt s u b strate is gr a v el or c o b ble, or
e m b e d d ed n ess is <20 %

H a bitat El e m e n ts Large W o ody > 2 0 pi e c e s p e r m il e, > 1 2 i n c h e s i n FA D e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n c u r r e n tl y e x i s t s .

D e b ris dia m eter, > 3 5 fe et in le n gth, an d
a d e q u at e s o u r c e s of lar g e w o o d y d e b ris
f or b o t h l o n g a n d s h o rt-t er m r e c r uit m e n t.

H a bitat El e m e n ts P o ol Fre q u e n c y B u ll tr o u t: FA D e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n c u r r e n tl y e x i s t s .

W e t t e d W i d t h (ft) x N u m b e r o f P o o l s / M il e

0-5 x 39

5-10 x 60

10-15 x 48

15-20 x 39

20-30 x 23

C hi n o o k sal m o n/ste elh e a d:

C h a n n e l W i d t h (ft) x N u m b e r o f P o o l s / M il e

5 x 184

5-10 x 96

10-15 x 70

15-20 x 56

25-50 x 26

H a bitat El e m e n ts P o o l Q u ality E a c h re a c h h as m a n y larg e po ols >3.2 8 FA D e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n c u r r e n tl y e x i s t s .

fe et (1 m eter) d e e p. P o ols h a v e g o o d
c o v er a n d c o ol w at er, a n d o nly mi n or
r e d u c ti o n o f p o o l v ol u m e b y s e d i m e n t.

H a bitat El e m e n ts O ff- C h a n n el W a tersh e d h as m a n y p o n d s, oxb o w s, FR D e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n c u r r e n tl y e x i s t s .

H a bitat b a c k w a t e r s, a n d o t h e r off-c h a n n el ar e a s
w it h c o v e r; si d e c h a n n el s a r e lo w e n e r g y
ar e a s.

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-42

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

Path w ay
Category D e sir e d C o n diti o n B a s e li n e2 E x i sti n g C o n diti o n
I n d i c a t o r s 1,3

H a bitat El e m e n ts R efu gia B u ll tr o u t - H a b it a t s c a p a b l e o f s u p p o r ti n g FR N o d e s c ri pti o n

s t r o n g a n d s i g n ifi c a n t l o c a l p o p u l a ti o n s
a r e p r o t e c t e d a n d a r e w e ll di s t ri b u t e d a n d
c o n n e c t e d f o r a ll lif e s t a g e s a n d f o r m s o f
th e s p e cie s.

C hi n o o k s al m o n /st e el h e a d - H a bitat
r ef u gi a e xi st a n d a r e a d e q u a t e ly b uff e r e d
( e . g . , b y i n t a c t R C A s ) ; e x i s ti n g r e f u g i a a r e
s u ffi ci e n t i n si z e , n u m b e r , a n d c o n n e c ti vit y
t o m a i n t ai n vi a bl e p o p u l a ti o n s .

C h a n n el Wi dth/De pth ≤ 10 FR N o d e s c ri pti o n

C o n d i ti o n a n d R a ti o
D yna mics

C h a n n el Strea m b a n k > 9 0 % o f a n y str e a m r e a c h h a s st a bl e FA D e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n c u r r e n tl y e x i s t s .

C o n d i ti o n a n d C o n d i ti o n b a n k s r el a ti v e t o t h e p e r c e n t o f i n h e r e n t
D yna mics st a bl e str e a m b a n k s a s s o ci at e d wit h a
si m il ar u n m a n a g e d str e a m s y s te m .

C h a n n el Fl o o d pl ai n W i t h i n R C A s , fl o o d p l a i n s a n d w e tl a n d s FR E F S F S R W a t er s h e d A n al y si s ( K u zis 1 9 9 7 ):
C o n d i ti o n a n d C o n n e c ti vit y a r e h y d r o l o g i c a ll y li n k e d t o t h e m a i n
M e a d o w C r e e k a n d t h e E F S F S R e x p e ri e n c e d al m o s t
D yna mics c h a n n e l ; o v e r b a n k fl o w s o c c u r a n d
c o n ti n u a l r e r o u ti n g a n d di v e r si o n b e g i n ni n g i n t h e e a rl y
m a i n t a i n w e tl a n d / fl o o d p l a i n f u n c ti o n s ; a n d
1 9 0 0 s.
ri p a ri a n v e g e t a ti o n s u c c e s s i o n .

Fl o w / H y d r ol o g y C h ange in W a t ersh e d hy dro gra p h indicate s pe a k FR R o a d s , t h e Y e ll o w P i n e pit, a n d o t h e r hi s t o ri c al di v e r si o n s

P e a k/ B a se fl o w , b a s e fl o w , a n d fl o w ti m i n g i n t h e S ti b nit e M i ni n g A r e a h a v e a ff e c t e d fl o w ti m i n g i n t h e
Flo w s c h a r a c t e ri s ti c s c o m p a r a b l e t o a n U p p e r E F S F S R , P r o fil e C r e e k , a n d al o n g t h e m a i n s t e m
u n di stur b e d w a t er s h e d of a sim il ar siz e, E F S F S R ( U . S. F o r e st S e r vic e 2 0 1 0 c).
g e o m o r p h ol o g y a n d cli m a t ol o g y.
E F S F S R W a t er s h e d A n al y si s ( K u zis 1 9 9 7 ):

“I n g e n e r a l, w a t e r fl o w v o l u m e a n d p e a k fl o w c o n d i ti o n s
h a v e b e e n littl e a ff e c t e d … ”

Fl o w / H y d r ol o g y D r ain a g e Z e r o o r m i n i m u m c h a n g e i n a c ti v e FUR E x t e n s i v e c h a n n e l r e r o u ti n g a n d d i v e r si o n b e g i n ni n g i n
N etwork c h a n n el le n gt h c orr el ate d with h u m a n t h e e a rl y 1 9 0 0 s , a n d a hi g h p e r c e n t a g e of r o a d s wit hi n
Increa s e c a u s e d di stur b a n c e. R C A s h a v e c h a n g e d c h a n n el le n g t h s i n t h e U p p e r
E F S F S R d u e to mi ni n g a n d R C A r o a d s (p ers o n al
o b s e r v a ti o n ) ( U . S . F o r e s t S e r v ic e 2 0 1 0 c ) .

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-43

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

Path w ay
Category D e sir e d C o n diti o n B a s e li n e2 E x i sti n g C o n diti o n
I n d i c a t o r s 1,3

W atershed R o a d D e n sity T o t al r o a d d e n sity < 0. 7 m il e s/ s q u a r e m il e FR T ot al ro a d d e n sity = 0. 7 mi/s q. mi. R C A r o a d d e n sity = 2. 2

C o n d i ti o n s a n d L o c a ti o n of s u b w a t ers h e d, n o ro a d within R C A s. m i/s q mi, m a n y r o a d s within R C A s ( U. S. F o r e st S er vic e
2 0 1 0 c).

W atershed Di stur b a n c e < 1 5 % E C A ( e n tir e w a t e r s h e d ) w i t h n o FUR E C A ≈ 2 5 % , (s e e A p p e n di x D of U. S. F o r e st S er vic e

C o n d i ti o n s Hi story c o n c e n tr a ti o n o f di st u r b a n c e i n a r e a s w it h 2 0 1 0 c)
la n d sli d e o r l a n d sli d e p r o n e a r e a s , a n d / o r
D i st ur b a n c e is c o n c e ntr at e d in R C A s (r o a d s, mi ni n g) in
refugia, an d/or R C A s.
u p p e r w a t e r s h e d . E x t e n si v e c h a n n e l r e r o u ti n g a n d
di v er si o n b e gi n ni n g i n th e e arly 1 9 0 0 s, a n d a hi g h
p e r c e nt a g e of ro a d s withi n R C A s, h a v e c h a n g e d c h a n n el
le n gth s in th e U p p e r E F S F S R d u e to mi ni n g a n d R C A
r o a d s ( p e r s o n a l o b s e r v a ti o n ) ( U . S . F o r e s t S e r vi c e 2 0 1 0 c ) .

W atershed R i p ari a n T h e ri p a ri a n c o n s e r v a ti o n a r e a s w it hi n t h e FR R o a d s al o n g E F S F S R , S u g a r , P r o fil e a n d Q u a r t z c r e e k s ,

C o n d i ti o n s C o n s e r v a ti o n s u b w a t e r s h e d ( s ) h a v e hi st o ri c a n d a n d mi ni n g i n t h e u p p e r w a t e rs h e d h a v e a ff e ct e d R C A
Areas o c c u p i e d r e f u g i a f o r li s t e d , s e n s i ti v e o r f u n c ti o n ( p e r s o n a l o b s e r v a ti o n ) ( U . S . F o r e s t S e r vi c e
n a ti v e / d e s i r e d n o n n a t i v e fi s h s p e c i e s 2 0 1 0 c).
w hi c h ar e pr e s e nt a n d pr o vi d e : a d e q u at e
R C A s o b s erv e d to b e 6 2 % inta ct for u p p er E F S F S R
s h a d e , l ar g e w o o d y d e b ri s r e c r uit m e n t,
( K u zis 1 9 9 7).
s e d i m e n t b u ff e ri n g , c o n n e c ti vity , a n d
h a b it a t p r o t e c ti o n a n d c o n n e c tivit y t o
a d e q u a t el y mi ni mi z e a d v e r s e e ff e ct s fr o m
l a n d m a n a g e m e n t a c ti viti e s ( > 8 0 % i n t a c t ) .

A ll v e g e t a ti v e c o m p o n e n t s a r e w it hi n
d e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n s i d e n tifi e d i n A p p e n d i x A
o f t h e F o r e s t P l a n . R C A f u n c tio n s a n d
p r o c e s s e s a r e i n t a c t, p r o vi di n g r e sili e n c y
fr o m a d v e r s e e ff e c t s a s s o c i a t e d w it h l a n d
m a n a g e m e n t a c ti viti e s .

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-44

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

Path w ay
Category D e sir e d C o n diti o n B a s e li n e2 E x i sti n g C o n diti o n
I n d i c a t o r s 1,3

W atershed Di stur b a n c e D i s t u r b a n c e r e s u lti n g f r o m l a n d FR D i s t u r b a n c e fr o m l a n d m a n a g e m e n t a c ti o n s s u c h a s

C o n d i ti o n s R e gi m e m a n a g e m e n t a c t i v i ti e s a r e n e g li g i b l e o r m i ni n g a n d r o a d s (ri p a ri a n ) is n o t n e gli gi bl e o r t e m p o r a r y.
te m p o r a r y. Str e a m fl o w r e gi m e s a r e R e s ili e n c y o f h a b it a t t o r e c o v e r fr o m l a n d m a n a g e m e n t
a p p r o p ri at e t o t h e l o c al g e o m o r p h ol o g y , di stur b a n c e s is m o d e r at e thr o u g h o ut m o st of th e a n aly sis
p o t e n ti al v e g e t a ti o n a n d cli m a t o l o g y a r e a , b u t l o w i n t h e S ti b nit e a r e a ( p e r s o n a l o b s e r v a ti o n )
r e s u lti n g i n a p p r o p r i a t e h i g h q u a lit y h a b i t a t ( U. S. F or e st S e r vic e 2 0 1 0 c).
a n d w a t er s h e d c o m pl e xity th at pr o vi d e
r e f u g i a a n d r e a r i n g s p a c e f o r a ll li f e
s t a g e s o r m u lti pl e lif e - hi s t o r y fo r m s .

E c ol o gi c al pr o c e s s e s a r e wit hin hi st o ri c al
r a n g e s . R e s i li e n c y o f h a b i t a t t o r e c o v e r
fr o m l a n d m a n a g e m e n t di s t u r b a n c e s i s
hig h.

I nt e g r a ti o n o f B u ll tr o u t - H a b it a t q u a lit y a n d c o n n e c ti vit y FR U . S . F o r e s t S e r vi c e 2 0 1 2 : S e d i m e n t s a n d s uit a bl e h a bitat

S p e cie s a n d a m o n g s u b p o p u l a ti o n s i s hi g h . a v a il a bilit y h a v e b e e n alt e r e d a n d m a y n o t r e t u r n t o p r e -
H a bitat D i st u r b a n c e h a s n o t alt er e d c h a n n el d i s t u r b a n c e c o n d i ti o n s w i t h i n 5 y e a r s ( s e e a b o v e W C I s
C o n d i ti o n s e q u ili b ri u m . F i n e s e d i m e n t s a n d o t h e r a n d p e r s o n a l o b s e r v a ti o n ). S u r vi v al a n d g r o w t h r a t e s f o r
h a b i t a t c h a r a c t e ri s ti c s i n fl u e n c i n g s u r v i v a l b u ll tr o u t a r e r e d u c e d ( s e e p o p u l a ti o n c h a r a c t e r W C I s a n d
a n d gr o w t h are c o n si ste nt with th e d e sire d B u r n s e t al. 2 0 0 5 ) . L o c a l p o p u l a ti o n s a r e s t a b l e , o r
c o n d i ti o n s f o r t h e h a b i t a t . fl u c t u a ti n g i n a d o w n w a r d t r e n d f o r a ll li s t e d s p e c i e s
( 5 7 F R 1 4 6 5 3 , 6 0 F R 4 3 9 3 7 , 6 3 F R 3 1 6 4 7 ) . C o n n e c ti vit y
T h e s u b p o p u l a t i o n h a s t h e r e s ili e n c e t o
a m o n g l o c al p o p u l a ti o n s o c c u r s b u t h a b it a t s a r e
r e c o v e r fr o m s h o rt-t er m di st u r b a n c e w it hi n
fr a g m e n t e d ( B u r n s e t al. 2 0 0 5 ) .
o n e t o t w o g e n e r a ti o n s ( 5 - 1 0 y e a r s ). T h e
s u b p o p u l a ti o n i s fl u c t u a ti n g a r o u n d a n
e q u ili b ri u m o r i s g r o w i n g .

T a bl e S o u r c e : Ri o A S E ( 2 0 1 9 ) a n d a s cit e d i n t a bl e.

T a ble N otes:

1 M a t ri x c h e c k li st a d a p t e d fr o m U S F W S a n d N M F S 1 9 9 8 .

2 F A = F u n c ti o n i n g A p p r o p ri a t ely , F R = F u n c ti o ni n g a t R i s k , F U R = F u n c ti o ni n g a t U n a c c e p t a b l e R i s k , N = N o t A p p li c a b l e . N n o t e : ““ i n B a s e li n e di s c u s si o n

i n d i c a t e s a c t u a l d a t a w e r e u s e d a s t h e p ri m a r y s o u r c e o f B a s e li n e a s s e s s m e n t , o t h e r w i s e r e fl e c t s a p r o f e s s i o n a l e s ti m a t e o f c o n d i ti o n .

3 E v al u a t e d a g ai n st l o c al crit eri a w h e r e a p p r o p ri at e a n d a v ail a bl e.

A g e n c y / U n i t: P N F K r a s s el R a n g e r Di strict; H U C o d e a n d N a m e : 1 7 0 6 0 2 0 8 - 0 2 U p p e r E a s t F o r k S o u t h F o r k S al m o n Ri v e r; S p a ti al S c a l e o f M a t ri x : R e a c h ; F i s h

S p e c i e s P r e s e n t : C h i n o o k s al m o n , s t e e l h e a d , b u ll tr o u t, c u tt h r o a t; A n a d r o m o u s S p e c i e s P o p u l a t i o n : S o u t h F o r k S a l m o n R i v e r ; S u b p o p u l a t i o n : E a s t F o r k

S o u t h F o r k S al m o n R i v e r a n al y si s a r e a ; ( B u ll tr o u t) C o r e A r e a : S o u t h F o r k S al m o n R i v e r; L o c a l P o p u l a ti o n : S o u t h F o r k S al m o n R i v e r; M a n a g e m e n t

A c t i o n ( s ) : S ti b nit e G o l d P r oj e c t.

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-45

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

Stream Reach 5: Headwaters EFSFSR Subwatershed

T a ble J1-14 S tr e a m R e a c h 5 M a t ri x E x i sti n g ( B a s eli n e) C o n diti o n

Path w ay
Category D e sir e d C o n diti o n B a s e li n e2 E x i sti n g C o n diti o n
I n d i c a t o r s 1,3

W a t e r Q u ality W ater 7- d a y a v er a g e m a xi m u m ° C FR N o d e s c ri pti o n

T e m p erature
B u ll tr o u t:

In c u b a ti o n ( S e p t e m b e r- M a r c h ) : 2- 5 ° C

R e a ri n g ( y e ar-r o u n d ): 4- 1 2 ° C

S p a w ni n g ( S e pt e m b e r): 4- 9 ° C

M i g r a ti o n ( J u n e - S e p t e m b e r ): N o t
To Exceed 15°C

W a t e r Q u ality W ater 7- d a y a v er a g e m a xi m u m ° C FR N o d e s c ri pti o n

T e m p erature
C hi n o o k s al m o n/ste elh e a d: S p a w ni n g,
r e a ri n g , a n d m i g r a ti o n : 1 0 - 1 3 . 9 ° C . A s
dire ct e d b y th e N O A A B O o n th e L R M P
( N M F S 2 0 0 3 ), th e s e d ef a ult W C I v al u e s
a r e b ei n g r e vis e d to a p p r o pri ate v al u e s for
t hi s s u b b a s i n b a s e d o n t h e b e s t a v a il a b l e
d a t a o n f u n c ti o n i n g h a b i t a t c o n d i ti o n s f o r
E S A - li st e d fi s h w it hi n t h e s u b b a s i n .

W a t e r Q u ality S e di m e nt L R M P d e fi n iti o n : FUR

< 1 2 % fi n e s ( < 0 . 8 5 m m ) i n g r a v e l.

S u r f a c e fi n e s ( < 6 m m ) < 2 0 %

W a t e r Q u ality C h e mic al L o w l e v e l s o f c h e m i c al c o n t a m i n a ti o n fr o m FUR E n tir e E F S F S R list e d u n d e r 3 0 3 ( d ) (I D E Q 2 0 1 7 ).

C o nta mi n a nts/ a g ri c u l t u r a l , i n d u s t ri a l, a n d o t h e r s o u r c e s ; S e di m e n t a n d m e t al s ar e p ar a m e t e rs of c o n c e r n.
N u t ri e n t s n o e x c e s s n u t ri e n t s , n o 3 0 3 ( d ) w a t e r
q u a lit y li m it e d w a t e r b o d i e s .

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-46

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

Path w ay
Category D e sir e d C o n diti o n B a s e li n e2 E x i sti n g C o n diti o n
I n d i c a t o r s 1,3

H a bitat A c c e s s P h y si c al A n y m a n - m a d e b a rri er s p r e s e n t i n FUR T h e hi g h- gr a di e nt c a s c a d e o n th e E F S F S R j u st u p stre a m

B a r ri er s w a t e r s h e d all o w u p str e a m a n d o f t h e Y ell o w Pi n e pit is a b a rrie r t o a d ult C hi n o o k ( N M F S
d o w n s t r e a m f i s h p a s s a g e a t a l l fl o w s . 2 0 1 7 ), a n d m a y b e a b a rri er t o st e el h e a d , b u t st e el h e a d
p a s s a g e t h e r e m a y b e fl o w - d e p e n d e n t. T h e r e i s c u r r e n tl y
n o e vid e n c e th at ste elh e a d h a v e re c olo niz e d th e E F S F S R
u p s tr e a m , si n c e t hi s b a rri er w a s f o r m e d b y m i ni n g. I n
r e c e n t fi s h s u r v e y s a n d e D N A s a m p l e s t h e r e h a s b e e n n o
i n di c a ti o n t h a t n a ti v e s t e e l h e a d o c c u r s n a t u r all y u p s t r e a m
o f t h e b a rri er ( M W H 2 0 1 7 ).

A b o u t 1.7 mile s u p stre a m fro m th e c a s c a d e is a c o n cr ete

b o x c ul v e rt l o c a t e d w h e r e Sti b nit e R o a d ( N F S R 5 0 4 1 2 )
c r o s s e s t h e E F S F S R ; t h e P N F cl a s s i fi e d t h i s s t r u c t u r e a s
a p a r ti a l b a r ri e r ( P N F 2 0 0 5 i n R i o A S E 2 0 1 9 ) .

A t t h e m o u t h of Fi d dl e C r e e k, th e r e i s a hi g h - g r a di e nt
s e c ti o n o f s tr e a m f oll o w e d b y a c ul v e rt. T h e hi g h s tr e a m
g r a d i e n t i s a b a r ri e r t o fi s h m i g r a ti o n ( H D R 2 0 1 6 ; M W H
2 0 1 7).

H a bitat El e m e n ts S u b strat e L R M P d e fi n iti o n : FA D e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n c u r r e n tl y e x i s t s .

E mbeddedness
D o m i n a nt s u b strate is gr a v el or c o b ble, or
e m b e d d ed n ess is <20 %

H a bitat El e m e n ts Large W o ody > 2 0 pi e c e s p e r m il e, > 1 2 i n c h e s i n FA D e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n c u r r e n tl y e x i s t s .

D e b ris dia m eter, > 3 5 fe et in le n gth, an d a d e q u ate
s o u r c e s of lar g e w o o d y d e bris for b oth l o n g
a n d s h o rt-ter m r e cr uit m e n t.

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-47

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

Path w ay
Category D e sir e d C o n diti o n B a s e li n e2 E x i sti n g C o n diti o n
I n d i c a t o r s 1,3

H a bitat El e m e n ts P o ol B u ll tr o u t: FR N o d e s c ri pti o n
Frequency
W e t t e d W i d t h (ft) x N u m b e r o f P o o l s / M il e

0-5 x 39

5-10 x 60

10-15 x 48

15-20 x 39

20-30 x 23

C hi n o o k s al m o n/ste elh e a d:

C h a n n e l W i d t h (ft) x N u m b e r o f P o o l s / M il e

5 x 184

5-10x 96

10-15 x 70

15-20 x 56

25-50 x 26

H a bitat El e m e n ts P o o l Q u ality E a c h re a c h h as m a n y larg e po ols >3.2 8 FUR R e a c h e s h a v e fe w larg e p o ols or in a d e q u ate c o v er/ w ater
fe et (1 m eter) d e e p. P o ols h a v e g o o d co v er te m p erature (se e w ater te m p e rature a n d R C A W C Is)
a n d c o o l w a t e r , a n d o n l y m i n o r r e d u c ti o n o f ( K u zis 1 9 9 7)
p o ol v olu m e b y s e di m e nt.

H a bitat El e m e n ts O ff- C h a n n el W a tersh e d h as m a n y p o n d s, oxb o w s, FR R o a d e d R C A s h a v e c o n fi n e d o ff- c h a n n e l h a b it a t s

H a bitat b a c k w a t e r s, a n d o t h e r off-c h a n n el ar e a s ( E F S F S R , M e a d o w C r e e k , P r o fil e C r e e k , S u g a r C r e e k ,
w it h c o v e r; si d e c h a n n el s a r e lo w e n e r g y Q u a rt z C r e e k ) ( U . S . F o r e s t S e r vi c e 2 0 1 0 c ).
ar e a s.

H a bitat El e m e n ts R efu gia B u ll tr o u t - H a b it a t s c a p a b l e o f s u p p o r ti n g FR W a g o n er a n d B urn s (2 0 0 1): FR

s t r o n g a n d s i g n ifi c a n t l o c a l p o p u l a ti o n s a r e
P e r e n ni al str e a m R C A s i n th e U p p e r E F S F S R 3 8 %
p r o t e c t e d a n d a r e w e ll di s tri b u t e d a n d
d i s t u r b e d ( K u z i s 1 9 9 7 ) , r o a d s h a v e s u b s t a n ti all y a ff e c t e d
c o n n e c t e d f o r a ll lif e s t a g e s a n d f o r m s o f
R C A s a l o n g E F S F S R , P r o fil e, S u g a r , a n d Q u a r t z C r e e k ,
th e s p e cie s.
a n d B u r n s et al. ( 2 0 0 5 ) a n d K u zi s ( 1 9 9 7 ) d o c u m e n t t h a t
C hi n o o k s al m o n /st e el h e a d - H a bitat refu gi a th e Br a dl e y Pit is ol ate s th e U p p e r E F S F S R fro m
e xi st a n d a r e a d e q u a t el y b uff e r e d ( e. g., b y u p s tr e a m fi s h m i g r a ti o n s , a n d t h a t p o r ti o n s o f t hi s
i nt a c t R C A s ) ; e xi s ti n g r e f u gi a a r e s u ffi ci e n t w a t e r s h e d h a v e h a d e x t e n s i v e h a b it a t m o d ifi c a ti o n a n d
i n si z e , n u m b e r , a n d c o n n e c ti v it y t o d e g r a d a ti o n .
m a i n t ai n vi a b l e p o p u l a ti o n s .

C h a n n e l C o n d i ti o n Wi dth/De pth ≤ 10 FA D e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n c u r r e n tl y e x i s t s .
and Dyna mics R a ti o

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-48

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

Path w ay
Category D e sir e d C o n diti o n B a s e li n e2 E x i sti n g C o n diti o n
I n d i c a t o r s 1,3

C h a n n e l C o n d i ti o n Strea m b a n k > 9 0 % o f a n y str e a m r e a c h h a s st a bl e FA D e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n c u r r e n tl y e x i s t s .

and Dyna mics C o n d i ti o n b a n k s r el a ti v e t o t h e p e r c e n t o f i n h e r e n t
st a bl e str e a m b a n k s a s s o ci at e d wit h a
si m il ar u n m a n a g e d str e a m s y s te m .

C h a n n e l C o n d i ti o n Fl o o d pl ai n W i t h i n R C A s , fl o o d p l a i n s a n d w e t l a n d s a r e FR S ti b n it e R o a d ( N F S R 5 0 4 1 2 ) h a s r e d u c e d li n k s t o
and Dyna mics C o n n e c ti vit y h y d r ol o gi c all y li n k e d t o t h e m a i n c h a n n e l; fl o o d p l a i n a n d w e tl a n d s . S e v e r e l y r e d u c e d li n k a g e t o
o v e r b a n k fl o w s o c c u r a n d m a i n t ai n fl o o d p l a i n s a n d w e tl a n d s d u e t o i m p a c t e d R C A s i n
w e tl a n d /fl o o d p l ai n f u n c ti o n s ; a n d ri p a ri a n S ti b n it e m i ni n g a r e a ( p e r s o n a l o b s e r v a ti o n ) ( U . S . F o r e s t
v e g e t a ti o n s u c c e s s i o n . S e r vic e 2 0 1 0 c).

E F S F S R W a t er s h e d A n al y si s ( K u zis 1 9 9 7 ):

M e a d o w C r e e k a n d t h e E F S F S R e x p e ri e n c e d al m o s t
c o n ti n u a l r e r o u ti n g a n d di v e r si o n b e g i n ni n g i n t h e e a rl y
1 9 0 0 s.

Fl o w / H y d r ol o g y C h ange in W a t e r s h e d h y d r o g r a p h i n d i c a t e s p e a k fl o w , FA D e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n c u r r e n tl y e x i s t s .
P e a k/ B a se b a s e fl o w , a n d fl o w ti m i n g c h a r a c t e ri s ti c s
Flo w s c o m p ar a ble to a n u n distur b e d w ater s h e d of
a si m il ar si z e, g e o m o r p h ol o g y a n d
cli m a t ol o g y .

Fl o w / H y d r ol o g y D r ain a g e Z e r o o r m i n i m u m c h a n g e i n a c ti v e c h a n n e l FA D e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n c u r r e n tl y e x i s t s .
N etwork le n gth c orr el ate d with h u m a n c a u s e d
Increa s e distur b a n c e.

W atershed R o a d D e n sity T o t al r o a d d e n sity < 0. 7 m il e s/ s q u a r e m il e FUR T ot al ro a d d e n sity = 0. 7 mi/s q. mi. R C A r o a d d e n sity = 2. 2

C o n d i ti o n s a n d L o c a ti o n of s u b w a t ers h e d, n o ro a d within R C A s. m i/s q mi, m a n y r o a d s within R C A s ( U. S. F o r e st S er vic e
2 0 1 0 c).

W atershed Di stur b a n c e < 1 5 % E C A ( e n tir e w a t e r s h e d ) w i t h n o FR E C A ≈ 2 5 % , (s e e A p p e n di x D of U. S. F o r e st S er vic e

C o n d i ti o n s Hi story c o n c e n tr a ti o n o f di st u r b a n c e i n a r e a s w it h 2 0 1 0 c)
la n d sli d e o r l a n d sli d e p r o n e a r e a s , a n d / o r
D i st ur b a n c e is c o n c e ntr at e d in R C A s (r o a d s, mi ni n g) in
refugia, an d/or R C A s.
u p p e r w a t e r s h e d . E x t e n si v e c h a n n e l r e r o u ti n g a n d
di v er si o n b e gi n ni n g i n th e e arly 1 9 0 0 s, a n d a hi g h
p e r c e nt a g e of ro a d s withi n R C A s, h a v e c h a n g e d c h a n n el
le n gth s in th e U p p e r E F S F S R d u e to mi ni n g a n d R C A
r o a d s ( p e r s o n a l o b s e r v a ti o n ) ( U . S . F o r e s t S e r vi c e 2 0 1 0 c ) .

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-49

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

Path w ay
Category D e sir e d C o n diti o n B a s e li n e2 E x i sti n g C o n diti o n
I n d i c a t o r s 1,3

W atershed R i p ari a n T h e ri p a ri a n c o n s e r v a ti o n a r e a s w it hi n t h e FA D e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n c u r r e n tl y e x i s t s .
C o n d i ti o n s C o n s e r v a ti o n s u b w a t e r s h e d ( s ) h a v e hi st o ri c a n d
Areas o c c u p i e d r e f u g i a f o r li s t e d , s e n s i ti v e o r
n a t i v e / d e s i r e d n o n n a t i v e fi s h s p e c i e s w h i c h
a r e pr e s e nt a n d pr o vi d e: a d e q u at e s h a d e,
l ar g e w o o d y d e b ri s r e c r uit m e n t, s e d i m e n t
b u ff e ri n g , c o n n e c ti vit y, a n d h a b it a t
p r o t e c ti o n a n d c o n n e c ti vit y t o a d e q u a t e l y
m i ni mi z e a d v e r s e eff e ct s fr o m la n d
m a n a g e m e n t a c ti viti e s ( > 8 0 % i n t a c t ).

A ll v e g e t a ti v e c o m p o n e n t s a r e w it hi n
d e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n s i d e n tifi e d i n A p p e n d i x A
o f t h e F o r e s t P l a n . R C A f u n c tio n s a n d
p r o c e s s e s a r e i n t a c t, p r o vi di n g r e sili e n c y
fr o m a d v e r s e e ff e c t s a s s o c i a t e d w it h l a n d
m a n a g e m e n t a c ti viti e s .

W atershed Di stur b a n c e D i s t u r b a n c e r e s u lti n g f r o m l a n d FR D i s t u r b a n c e fr o m l a n d m a n a g e m e n t a c ti o n s s u c h a s

C o n d i ti o n s R e gi m e m a n a g e m e n t a c t i v i ti e s a r e n e g li g i b l e o r m i ni n g a n d r o a d s (ri p a ri a n ) is n o t n e gli gi bl e o r t e m p o r a r y.
te m p o r a r y. Str e a m fl o w r e gi m e s a r e R e s ili e n c y o f h a b it a t t o r e c o v e r fr o m l a n d m a n a g e m e n t
a p p r o p ri at e t o t h e l o c al g e o m o r p h ol o g y , di stur b a n c e s is m o d e r at e thr o u g h o ut m o st of th e a n aly sis
p o t e n ti al v e g e t a ti o n a n d cli m a t o l o g y a r e a , b u t l o w i n t h e S ti b nit e a r e a ( p e r s o n a l o b s e r v a ti o n )
r e s u lti n g i n a p p r o p r i a t e h i g h q u a lit y h a b i t a t ( U. S. F or e st S e r vic e 2 0 1 0 c).
a n d w a t er s h e d c o m pl e xity th at pr o vi d e
r e f u g i a a n d r e a r i n g s p a c e f o r a ll li f e s t a g e s
o r m u lti pl e lif e - hi st o r y f o r m s .

E c ol o gi c al pr o c e s s e s a r e wit hin hi st o ri c al
r a n g e s . R e s i li e n c y o f h a b i t a t t o r e c o v e r
fr o m l a n d m a n a g e m e n t di s t u r b a n c e s i s
hig h.

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-50

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

Path w ay
Category D e sir e d C o n diti o n B a s e li n e2 E x i sti n g C o n diti o n
I n d i c a t o r s 1,3

I nt e g r a ti o n o f B u ll tr o u t - H a b it a t q u a lit y a n d c o n n e c ti vit y FR S e d i m e n t s a n d s u i t a b l e h a b i t a t a v a i l a b i lit y h a v e b e e n

S p e cie s a n d a m o n g s u b p o p u l a ti o n s i s hi g h . D i s t u r b a n c e a l t e r e d , a n d m a y n o t r e t u r n t o p r e - d i s t u r b a n c e c o n d i ti o n s
H a bitat h a s n o t a lt e r e d c h a n n e l e q u ili b ri u m . F i n e w ithi n 5 y e a r s ( s e e pr e vi o u s W C I s a n d p er s o n al
C o n d i ti o n s s e d i m e n t s a n d o t h e r h a b it a t c h a r a c t e ri sti c s o b s e r v a ti o n ) . S u r vi v al a n d g r o w t h r a t e s f o r b u ll tr o u t a r e
i n fl u e n c i n g s u r v i v a l a n d g r o w t h a r e r e d u c e d ( s e e p o p u l a ti o n c h a r a c t e r W C I s a n d B u r n s e t al.
c o n s i st e n t w it h t h e d e sir e d c o n d iti o n s f o r 2 0 0 5 ) . L o c a l p o p u l a ti o n s a r e s t a b l e , o r fl u c t u a ti n g i n a
th e h a bitat. d o w n w a r d t r e n d f o r a ll li s t e d s p e c i e s

T h e s u b p o p u l a t i o n h a s t h e r e s ili e n c e t o ( 5 7 F R 1 4 6 5 3 , 6 0 F R 4 3 9 3 7 , 6 3 F R 3 1 6 4 7 ) . C o n n e c ti vit y
r e c o v e r fr o m s h o rt-t er m di st u r b a n c e w it hi n a m o n g l o c al p o p u l a ti o n s o c c u r s b u t h a b it a t s a r e
o n e t o t w o g e n e r a ti o n s ( 5 - 1 0 y e a r s ). T h e fr a g m e n t e d ( B u r n s e t al. 2 0 0 5 ) .
s u b p o p u l a ti o n i s fl u c t u a ti n g a r o u n d a n
e q u ili b ri u m o r i s g r o w i n g .

T a bl e S o u r c e : Ri o A S E ( 2 0 2 9 ) a n d a s cit e d i n t a bl e.

T a ble N otes:

1 M a t ri x c h e c k li st a d a p t e d fr o m U S F W S a n d N M F S 1 9 9 8 .

2 F A = F u n c ti o n i n g A p p r o p ri a t ely , F R = F u n c ti o ni n g a t R i s k , F U R = F u n c ti o ni n g a t U n a c c e p t a b l e R i s k , N = N o t A p p li c a b l e . N o t e : ““ i n B a s e li n e di s c u s si o n

i n d i c a t e s a c t u a l d a t a w e r e u s e d a s t h e p ri m a r y s o u r c e o f B a s e li n e a s s e s s m e n t , o t h e r w i s e r e fl e c t s a p r o f e s s i o n a l e s ti m a t e o f c o n d i ti o n .

3 E v al u a t e d a g ai n st l o c al crit eri a w h e r e a p p r o p ri at e a n d a v ail a bl e.

A g e n c y / U n i t: P N F K r a s s el R a n g e r Di strict; H U C o d e a n d N a m e : 1 7 0 6 0 2 0 8 - 0 2 U p p e r E a s t F o r k S o u t h F o r k S al m o n Ri v e r; S p a ti al S c a l e o f M a t ri x :

S u b w a t e r s h e d ; F i s h S p e c i e s P r e s e n t : C h i n o o k s a l m o n , s t e e l h e a d , b u ll tr o u t, c u tt h r o a t; A n a d r o m o u s S p e c i e s P o p u l a t i o n : S o u t h F o r k S a l m o n R i v e r ;

S u b p o p ul ati o n: E a st F or k S o ut h F o r k S al m o n Ri v er a n al y sis ar e a; ( B ull tr o ut) C o r e A r e a : S o ut h F o r k S al m o n Ri v er; L o c al P o p ul ati o n: S o ut h F o r k S al m o n

R i v e r ; M a n a g e m e n t A c t i o n ( s ) : S ti b nit e G o l d P r oj e c t.

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-51

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

Stream Reach 6: Sugar Creek upstream of the EFSFSR

T a ble J1-15 S tr e a m R e a c h 6 M a t ri x E x i sti n g ( B a s eli n e) C o n diti o n

Path w ay
Category D e sir e d C o n diti o n B a s e li n e2 E x i sti n g C o n diti o n
I n d i c a t o r s 1,3

W a t e r Q u ality W ater 7- d a y a v er a g e m a xi m u m ° C FUR M W H 2 0 1 7 d o cu m e nts exce e d a n ce s.

T e m p erature
B u ll tr o u t:

In c u b a ti o n ( S e p t e m b e r- M a r c h ) : 2- 5 ° C

R e a ri n g ( y e ar-r o u n d ): 4- 1 2 ° C

S p a w ni n g ( S e pt e m b e r): 4- 9 ° C

M i g r a ti o n ( J u n e - S e p t e m b e r ): N o t T o
E xceed 15°C

W a t e r Q u ality W ater 7- d a y a v er a g e m a xi m u m ° C FR M W H 2 0 1 7 d o cu m e nts exce e d a n ce s.

T e m p erature
C hi n o o k s al m o n/ste elh e a d: S p a w ni n g,
r e a ri n g , a n d m i g r a ti o n : 1 0 - 1 3 . 9 ° C . A s
dire ct e d b y th e N O A A B O o n th e L R M P
( N M F S 2 0 0 3 ), th e s e d ef a ult W C I v al u e s
a r e b ei n g r e vis e d to a p p r o pri ate v al u e s for
t hi s s u b b a s i n b a s e d o n t h e b e s t a v a il a b l e
d a t a o n f u n c ti o n i n g h a b i t a t c o n d i ti o n s f o r
E S A - li st e d fi s h w it hi n t h e s u b b a s i n .

W a t e r Q u ality S e di m e nt L R M P d e fi n iti o n : FR At 1 4 %, the S u g ar Cre e k s u b w aters h e d is the only other

a r e a w h e r e m a n a g e m e n t pr a ctice s h a v e i n cre a s e d
< 1 2 % fi n e s ( < 0 . 8 5 m m ) i n g r a v e l.
s e di m e nt le v el s m o r e th a n 1 0 % o v e r b a c k gr o u n d ( K u zis
S u r f a c e fi n e s ( < 6 m m ) < 2 0 %
1 9 9 7).

W a t e r Q u ality C h e mic al L o w l e v e l s o f c h e m i c al c o n t a m i n a ti o n fr o m FR S e v e r a l p o s i ti v e d e t e c t s o c c u r i n S u g a r C r e e k w h i c h i s
C o nta mi n a nts/ a g ri c u l t u r a l , i n d u s t ri a l, a n d o t h e r s o u r c e s ; d o w n stre a m fro m t h e Ci n n a b a r Mi n e ar e a w h er e m er c ury
N u t ri e n t s n o e x c e s s n u t ri e n t s , n o 3 0 3 ( d ) w a t e r w a s h i s t o ri c all y m i n e d ( K u z i s 1 9 9 7 ) . M e r c u r y
q u a lit y li m it e d w a t e r b o d i e s . c o n c e n t r a ti o n s i n m a c r oi n v e r t e b r a t e s w e r e s u b s t a n ti all y
ele v ate d in S u g ar Cr e e k ( M W H 2 0 1 7).

H a bitat A c c e s s P h y si c al A n y m a n - m a d e b a rri er s p r e s e n t i n FA N o b a rri er s n o t e d i n M W H 2 0 1 7 .

B a r ri er s w a t e r s h e d all o w u p str e a m a n d
d o w n s t r e a m f i s h p a s s a g e a t a l l fl o w s .

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-52

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

Path w ay
Category D e sir e d C o n diti o n B a s e li n e2 E x i sti n g C o n diti o n
I n d i c a t o r s 1,3

H a bitat El e m e n ts S u b strat e L R M P d e fi n iti o n : FR N e l s o n et al. 2 0 0 6 d e s c ri b e t h e E F S F S R s a m p li n g sit e s

E mbeddedness a s f oll o w s : “ w e w o u l d cl a s sif y o n l y t h e T a m a r a c k C r e e k
D o m i n a nt s u b strate is gr a v el or c o b ble, or
s i t e a s F A , w i t h F R c l a s s i fi c a ti o n s a p p li e d t o E 0 5 0 a n d t h e
e m b e d d ed n ess is <20 %
t w o S u g a r C r e e k s it e s a n d F U R c l a s s ifi c a ti o n s f o r t h e t w o
m a i n st e m E F S F S R site s (fre e m a tri x).”

H a bitat El e m e n ts Large W o ody > 2 0 pi e c e s p e r m il e, > 1 2 i n c h e s i n FA 1 0 7 pi e c e s / m il e ( M W H 2 0 1 7 ).

D e b ris dia m eter, > 3 5 fe et in le n gth, an d a d e q u ate
s o u r c e s of lar g e w o o d y d e bris for b oth l o n g
a n d s h o rt-ter m r e cr uit m e n t.

H a bitat El e m e n ts P o ol B u ll tr o u t: FA M W H (2017)
Frequency
W e t t e d W i d t h (ft) x N u m b e r o f P o o l s / M il e

0-5 x 39

5-10 x 60

10-15 x 48

15-20 x 39

20-30 x 23

C hi n o o k s al m o n/ste elh e a d:

C h a n n e l W i d t h (ft) x N u m b e r o f P o o l s / M il e

5 x 184

5-10 x 96

10-15 x 70

15-20 x 56

25-50 x 26

H a bitat El e m e n ts P o o l Q u ality E a c h re a c h h as m a n y larg e po ols >3.2 8 FR M W H (2017)

fe et (1 m eter) d e e p. P o ols h a v e g o o d co v er
a n d c o o l w a t e r , a n d o n l y m i n o r r e d u c ti o n o f
p o ol v olu m e b y s e di m e nt.

H a bitat El e m e n ts O ff- C h a n n el W a tersh e d h as m a n y p o n d s, oxb o w s, FR U p p e r E F S F S R h a s e x p e ri e n c e d c o n ti n u a l r e r o u ti n g a n d

H a bitat b a c k w a t e r s, a n d o t h e r off-c h a n n el ar e a s d i v e r si o n s . R o a d e d R C A s h a v e c o n fi n e d o ff- c h a n n e l
w it h c o v e r; si d e c h a n n el s a r e lo w e n e r g y h a b it a t s ( E F S F S R , M e a d o w C r e e k , P r o fil e C r e e k , S u g a r
ar e a s. C r e e k, Q u artz Cre e k)

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-53

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

Path w ay
Category D e sir e d C o n diti o n B a s e li n e2 E x i sti n g C o n diti o n
I n d i c a t o r s 1,3

H a bitat El e m e n ts R efu gia B u ll tr o u t - H a b it a t s c a p a b l e o f s u p p o r ti n g FR P e r e n ni al str e a m R C A s i n th e U p p e r E F S F S R 3 8 %

s t r o n g a n d s i g n ifi c a n t l o c a l p o p u l a ti o n s a r e d i s t u r b e d ( K u z i s 1 9 9 7 ) , r o a d s h a v e s u b s t a n ti all y a ff e c t e d
p r o t e c t e d a n d a r e w e ll di s tri b u t e d a n d R C A s a l o n g E F S F S R , P r o fil e, S u g a r , a n d Q u a r t z c r e e k s ,
c o n n e c t e d f o r a ll lif e s t a g e s a n d f o r m s o f a n d B u r n s et al. ( 2 0 0 5 )
th e s p e cie s.

C hi n o o k s al m o n /st e el h e a d - H a bitat refu gi a

e xi st a n d a r e a d e q u a t el y b uff e r e d ( e. g., b y
i nt a c t R C A s ) ; e xi s ti n g r e f u gi a a r e s u ffi ci e n t
i n si z e , n u m b e r , a n d c o n n e c ti v it y t o
m a i n t ai n vi a b l e p o p u l a ti o n s .

C h a n n el Wi dth/De pth ≤ 10 FR W / D r a ti o 3 4 . 6 - 4 6 . 1 ( M W H 2 0 1 7 ) .
C o n d i ti o n a n d R a ti o
D yna mics

C h a n n el Strea m b a n k > 9 0 % o f a n y str e a m r e a c h h a s st a bl e FA C o v er e d a n d sta ble ( M W H 2 0 1 7)

C o n d i ti o n a n d C o n d i ti o n b a n k s r el a ti v e t o t h e p e r c e n t o f i n h e r e n t
D yna mics st a bl e str e a m b a n k s a s s o ci at e d wit h a
si m il ar u n m a n a g e d str e a m s y s te m .

C h a n n el Fl o o d pl ai n W i t h i n R C A s , fl o o d p l a i n s a n d w e t l a n d s a r e FR R o a d s al o n g E F S F S R , S u g a r , P r o fil e a n d Q u a r t z c r e e k s ,
C o n d i ti o n a n d C o n n e c ti vit y h y d r ol o gi c all y li n k e d t o t h e m a i n c h a n n e l; a n d mi ni n g i n t h e u p p e r w a t e rs h e d , h a v e aff e ct e d R C A
D yna mics o v e r b a n k fl o w s o c c u r a n d m a i n t ai n f u n c ti o n ( K u zi s 1 9 9 7 )
w e tl a n d /fl o o d p l ai n f u n c ti o n s ; a n d ri p a ri a n
v e g e t a ti o n s u c c e s s i o n .

Fl o w / H y d r ol o g y C h ange in W a t e r s h e d h y d r o g r a p h i n d i c a t e s p e a k fl o w , FA I n g e n e r a l, s u r f a c e w a t e r fl o w s i n t h e a n a l y s i s a r e a e x h i b it
P e a k/ B a se b a s e fl o w , a n d fl o w ti m i n g c h a r a c t e ri s ti c s the typical an n u al hy dro gra p h
Flo w s c o m p ar a ble to a n u n distur b e d w ater s h e d of
for a for e ste d n orth er n m o u nt a in re gi o n, with th e
a si m il ar si z e, g e o m o r p h ol o g y a n d
a c c u m u l a t e d w i n t e r s n o w p a c k m e l ti n g i n
cli m a t ol o g y .
t h e l a t e s p r i n g t o p r o d u c e t h e h i g h fl o w p e r i o d f o r t h e
y e a r. ( K u zi s 1 9 9 7 )

Fl o w / H y d r ol o g y D r ain a g e Z e r o o r m i n i m u m c h a n g e i n a c ti v e c h a n n e l FR E x t e n s i v e c h a n n e l r e r o u ti n g a n d d i v e r si o n b e g i n ni n g i n
N etwork le n gth c orr el ate d with h u m a n c a u s e d t h e e a rl y 1 9 0 0 s , a n d a hi g h p e r c e n t a g e of r o a d s wit hi n
Increa s e distur b a n c e. R C A s h a v e c h a n g e d c h a n n el le n g t h s i n t h e U p p e r
E F S F S R d u e to mi ni n g a n d R C A r o a d s (p ers o n al
o b s e r v a ti o n ) ( U . S . F o r e s t S e r v ic e 2 0 1 0 c ) .

W atershed R o a d D e n sity T o t al r o a d d e n sity < 0. 7 m il e s/ s q u a r e m il e FR R o a d d e n sity is 0.4 6, ( M W H 2 0 1 7 ), b ut S u g a r C r e e k

C o n d i ti o n s a n d L o c a ti o n of s u b w a t ers h e d, n o ro a d within R C A s. R o a d is withi n th e R C A .

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-54

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

Path w ay
Category D e sir e d C o n diti o n B a s e li n e2 E x i sti n g C o n diti o n
I n d i c a t o r s 1,3

W atershed Di stur b a n c e < 1 5 % E C A ( e n tir e w a t e r s h e d ) w i t h n o FUR H i s t o ri c a l m i n i n g a c ti viti e s h a v e s i g n i fi c a n tl y a lt e r e d t h e

C o n d i ti o n s Hi story c o n c e n tr a ti o n o f di st u r b a n c e i n a r e a s w it h u p p er E F S F a n d S u g ar Cr e e k ( K u zis 1 9 9 7)
la n d sli d e o r l a n d sli d e p r o n e a r e a s , a n d / o r
refugia, an d/or R C A s.

W atershed R i p ari a n T h e ri p a ri a n c o n s e r v a ti o n a r e a s w it hi n t h e FUR R o a d s al o n g E F S F S R , S u g a r , P r o fil e a n d Q u a r t z c r e e k s ,

C o n d i ti o n s C o n s e r v a ti o n s u b w a t e r s h e d ( s ) h a v e hi st o ri c a n d a n d mi ni n g i n t h e u p p e r w a t e rs h e d , h a v e aff e ct e d R C A
Areas o c c u p i e d r e f u g i a f o r li s t e d , s e n s i ti v e o r f u n c ti o n ( K u zi s 1 9 9 7 )
n a t i v e / d e s i r e d n o n n a t i v e fi s h s p e c i e s w h i c h
a r e pr e s e nt a n d pr o vi d e: a d e q u at e s h a d e,
l ar g e w o o d y d e b ri s r e c r uit m e n t, s e d i m e n t
b u ff e ri n g , c o n n e c ti vit y, a n d h a b it a t
p r o t e c ti o n a n d c o n n e c ti vit y t o a d e q u a t e l y
m i ni mi z e a d v e r s e eff e ct s fr o m la n d
m a n a g e m e n t a c ti viti e s ( > 8 0 % i n t a c t ).

A ll v e g e t a ti v e c o m p o n e n t s a r e w it hi n
d e s i r e d c o n d i ti o n s i d e n tifi e d i n A p p e n d i x A
o f t h e F o r e s t P l a n . R C A f u n c tio n s a n d
p r o c e s s e s a r e i n t a c t, p r o vi di n g r e sili e n c y
fr o m a d v e r s e e ff e c t s a s s o c i a t e d w it h l a n d
m a n a g e m e n t a c ti viti e s .

W atershed Di stur b a n c e D i s t u r b a n c e r e s u lti n g f r o m l a n d FR A d j a c e n t r o a d h a s a ff e c t e d E F S F S R , Q u a r t z , P r o fil e, a n d

C o n d i ti o n s R e gi m e m a n a g e m e n t a c t i v i ti e s a r e n e g li g i b l e o r S u g a r c r e e k s ’ r e sili e n c y ( p e r s o n a l o b s e r v a ti o n ).
te m p o r a r y. Str e a m fl o w r e gi m e s a r e
D i s t u r b a n c e fr o m l a n d m a n a g e m e n t a c ti o n s s u c h a s
a p p r o p ri at e t o t h e l o c al g e o m o r p h ol o g y ,
m i n i n g a n d r o a d s ( ri p a ri a n ) i s n o t i n s i g n i fi c a n t o r
p o t e n ti al v e g e t a ti o n a n d cli m a t o l o g y
t e m p o r a r y . R e s ili e n c y o f h a b ita t t o r e c o v e r fr o m l a n d
r e s u lti n g i n a p p r o p r i a t e h i g h q u a lit y h a b i t a t
m a n a g e m e n t distur b a n c e s is m o d e r at e thr o u g h o ut m o st
a n d w a t er s h e d c o m pl e xity th at pr o vi d e
o f t h e a n a l y si s a r e a , b u t l o w i n t h e S ti b n it e a r e a .
r e f u g i a a n d r e a r i n g s p a c e f o r a ll li f e s t a g e s
o r m u lti pl e lif e - hi st o r y f o r m s .

E c ol o gi c al pr o c e s s e s a r e wit hin hi st o ri c al
r a n g e s . R e s i li e n c y o f h a b i t a t t o r e c o v e r
fr o m l a n d m a n a g e m e n t di s t u r b a n c e s i s
hig h.

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-55

A P P E N DI X J-1 FI S H A N D A Q U A TI C R E S O U R C E S – S U P P L E M E N T A L I N F O R M A TI O N

Path w ay
Category D e sir e d C o n diti o n B a s e li n e2 E x i sti n g C o n diti o n
I n d i c a t o r s 1,3

I nt e g r a ti o n o f B u ll tr o u t - H a b it a t q u a lit y a n d c o n n e c ti vit y FR U . S . F o r e s t S e r vi c e 2 0 1 2 : S e d i m e n t s a n d s uit a bl e h a bitat

S p e cie s a n d a m o n g s u b p o p u l a ti o n s i s hi g h . D i s t u r b a n c e a v a il a bilit y h a v e b e e n alt e r e d , a n d m a y n o t r e t u r n t o p r e -
H a bitat h a s n o t a lt e r e d c h a n n e l e q u ili b ri u m . F i n e d i s t u r b a n c e c o n d i ti o n s w i t h i n 5 y e a r s ( s e e a b o v e W C I s
C o n d i ti o n s s e d i m e n t s a n d o t h e r h a b it a t c h a r a c t e ri sti c s a n d p e r s o n a l o b s e r v a ti o n ). S u r vi v al a n d g r o w t h r a t e s f o r
i n fl u e n c i n g s u r v i v a l a n d g r o w t h a r e b u ll tr o u t a r e r e d u c e d ( s e e p o p u l a ti o n c h a r a c t e r W C I s a n d
c o n s i st e n t w it h t h e d e sir e d c o n d iti o n s f o r B u r n s e t al. 2 0 0 5 ) . L o c a l p o p u l a ti o n s a r e s t a b l e , o r
th e h a bitat. fl u c t u a ti n g i n a d o w n w a r d t r e n d f o r a ll li s t e d s p e c i e s
( 5 7 F R 1 4 6 5 3 , 6 0 F R 4 3 9 3 7 , 6 3 F R 3 1 6 4 7 ) . C o n n e c ti vit y
T h e s u b p o p u l a t i o n h a s t h e r e s ili e n c e t o
a m o n g l o c al p o p u l a ti o n s o c c u r s , b u t h a b it at s a r e
r e c o v e r fr o m s h o rt-t er m di st u r b a n c e w it hi n
fr a g m e n t e d ( B u r n s e t al. 2 0 0 5 ) .
o n e t o t w o g e n e r a ti o n s ( 5 - 1 0 y e a r s ). T h e
s u b p o p u l a ti o n i s fl u c t u a ti n g a r o u n d a n
e q u ili b ri u m o r i s g r o w i n g .

T a bl e S o u r c e : Ri o A S E ( 2 0 1 9 ) a n d a s cit e d i n t a bl e.

T a ble N otes:

1 M a t ri x c h e c k li st a d a p t e d fr o m U S F W S a n d N M F S 1 9 9 8 .

2 F A = F u n c ti o n i n g A p p r o p ri a t ely , F R = F u n c ti o ni n g a t R i s k , F U R = F u n c ti o ni n g a t U n a c c e p t a b l e R i s k , N = N o t A p p li c a b l e . N o t e : ““ i n B a s e li n e di s c u s si o n

i n d i c a t e s a c t u a l d a t a w e r e u s e d a s t h e p ri m a r y s o u r c e o f B a s e li n e a s s e s s m e n t , o t h e r w i s e r e fl e c t s a p r o f e s s i o n a l e s ti m a t e o f c o n d i ti o n .

3 E v al u a t e d a g ai n st l o c al crit eri a w h e r e a p p r o p ri at e a n d a v ail a bl e.

A g e n c y / U n i t: P N F K r a s s el R a n g e r Di strict; H U C o d e a n d N a m e : 1 7 0 6 0 2 0 8 - 0 2 U p p e r E a s t F o r k S o u t h F o r k S al m o n Ri v e r; S p a ti al S c a l e o f M a t ri x :

S u b w a t e r s h e d ; F i s h S p e c i e s P r e s e n t : C h i n o o k s a l m o n , s t e e l h e a d , b u ll tr o u t, c u tt h r o a t; A n a d r o m o u s S p e c i e s P o p u l a t i o n : S o u t h F o r k S a l m o n R i v e r ;

S u b p o p ul ati o n: E a st F or k S o ut h F o r k S al m o n Ri v er a n al y sis ar e a; ( B ull tr o ut) C o r e A r e a : S o ut h F o r k S al m o n Ri v er; L o c al P o p ul ati o n: S o ut h F o r k S al m o n

R i v e r ; M a n a g e m e n t A c t i o n ( s ) : S ti b nit e G o l d P r oj e c t.

S ti b nite G ol d Pr oje ct Dr aft E n vir o n m e n t al I m p a ct St ate m e n t J-1-56

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

CHANGES IN WATERSHED CONDITION

INDICATORS
The additional information provided herein supports Section 4.12.2.3.3, Habitat
Elements/Watershed Condition Indicators. Alternative 4 is not presented herein because the
results are identical to Alternative 1.

This section consists of graphs displaying how the WCIs that would be affected by the SGP
would change over the life of the SGP. Note that the WCIs displayed here are only those not
analyzed in detail in the EIS, and those that would change as a result of the SGP. The graphs
are organized by action alternative.

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-57

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

J.4.1 ALTERNATIVE 1

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-58

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-59

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-60

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-61

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-62

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-63

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

J.4.2 ALTERNATIVE 2

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-64

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-65

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-66

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-67

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-68

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-69

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

J.4.3 ALTERNATIVE 3

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-70

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-71

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-72

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-73

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-74

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-75

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

PREDICTED STREAMFLOWS
Additional information is summarized in this section in support of Section 4.12.2.3.3.1, Changes
to WCIs at the Mine Site, and related subsections for each alternative.

Tables J1-16, J1-17, and J1-18 present the predicted monthly discharge from August-March
Low Flow Period at five USGS gaging stations and one SFA Reach (MC-6).

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-76

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Table J1-16 Alternative 1 Predicted Monthly Discharge August-March Low Flow Period at USGS Gaging Stations and one SFA Reach (MC-6)
Alternative 1

13310800 (EFSFSR above Meadow) 13311000 (EFSFSR at Stibnite) 13311250 (EFSFSR above Sugar) 13311450 (Sugar Creek) 13310850 (Meadow Creek) Meadow Creek MC-6
Simulated Simulated Simulated Simulated Simulated Simulated
Streamflow (cfs) Streamflow (cfs) Streamflow (cfs) Streamflow (cfs) Streamflow (cfs) Streamflow (cfs)
Long-term Long-term Long-term Long-term Long-term Long-term
No Proposed % % No Proposed % % No Proposed % % No Proposed % % No Proposed % % No Proposed % %
Mine Year Month Action Action Difference Difference Action Action Difference Difference Action Action Difference Difference Action Action Difference Difference Action Action Difference Difference Action Action Difference Difference

-1 low flow 4.3 4.3 0.0 -0.1% 9.1 8.1 -0.1 -11.3% 13.6 12.6 -0.1 -7.5% 10.2 10.3 0.0 1.1% 2.8 0.2 -0.9 -92.8% 4.6 3.6 -0.2 -23.0%

1 low flow 4.1 4.1 0.0 1.3% 8.5 8.9 0.0 4.9% 13.0 10.8 -0.2 -16.9% 9.6 9.9 0.0 3.3% 2.5 0.2 -0.9 -94.1% 4.2 3.7 -0.1 -12.6%

2 low flow 6.4 6.4 0.0 1.1% 13.6 14.0 0.0 4.5% 18.9 15.8 -0.2 -19.0% 14.2 14.5 0.0 2.5% 3.6 1.5 -0.7 -70.4% 6.8 6.2 -0.1 -9.6%

3 low flow 4.3 4.4 0.0 1.3% 8.9 9.3 0.0 4.8% 13.6 10.0 -0.3 -26.9% 10.1 10.4 0.0 3.7% 2.7 0.2 -0.9 -93.2% 4.4 3.9 -0.1 -11.0%

4 low flow 5.2 5.2 0.0 1.3% 10.9 11.4 0.1 6.1% 15.9 12.2 -0.3 -25.6% 11.8 12.2 0.0 4.0% 3.0 0.8 -0.8 -83.1% 5.4 4.9 -0.1 -10.0%

5 low flow 4.7 4.8 0.0 1.8% 9.8 10.9 0.1 12.1% 14.7 11.2 -0.2 -24.2% 11.0 11.4 0.0 3.6% 2.8 0.4 -0.9 -86.8% 4.8 4.4 -0.1 -8.7%

6 low flow 4.7 4.7 0.0 2.1% 9.6 10.9 0.1 14.6% 14.5 11.1 -0.2 -24.7% 10.8 11.2 0.0 3.8% 2.7 0.4 -0.9 -87.9% 4.7 4.3 -0.1 -8.3%

7 low flow 5.2 5.4 0.0 4.7% 10.9 12.7 0.2 20.4% 16.1 13.1 -0.2 -19.4% 12.0 12.4 0.0 3.7% 3.0 0.7 -0.8 -83.6% 5.4 3.3 -0.4 -41.6%

8 low flow 7.5 7.8 0.1 6.1% 16.0 18.2 0.2 23.2% 22.1 19.5 -0.1 -14.9% 16.2 16.4 0.0 3.0% 4.8 2.5 -0.8 -77.4% 8.1 5.0 -0.5 -52.3%

9 low flow 4.7 4.9 0.1 5.1% 9.7 10.3 0.1 7.0% 14.7 11.3 -0.2 -23.1% 11.0 11.4 0.0 3.9% 2.8 0.4 -0.9 -88.6% 4.8 1.7 -0.7 -65.5%

10 low flow 5.1 5.3 0.0 4.1% 10.9 10.5 0.0 -2.3% 15.6 12.2 -0.2 -22.8% 11.7 12.0 0.0 3.0% 3.0 0.7 -0.8 -83.6% 5.5 2.1 -0.7 -66.3%

11 low flow 6.1 6.3 0.0 4.1% 12.9 12.4 0.0 -1.8% 18.0 14.8 -0.2 -20.1% 13.2 13.7 0.0 3.7% 3.7 1.4 -0.8 -78.6% 6.4 2.9 -0.6 -64.3%

12 low flow 8.6 8.8 0.0 4.0% 18.1 18.8 0.1 8.1% 24.4 22.1 -0.1 -10.2% 17.7 18.5 0.1 5.5% 5.0 2.7 -0.6 -61.6% 8.9 5.1 -0.5 -49.7%

13 low flow 5.4 5.4 0.0 0.2% 11.3 6.6 -0.4 -43.5% 16.6 9.4 -0.5 -45.6% 12.7 10.6 -0.2 -19.3% 3.3 0.4 -0.9 -87.3% 5.6 1.1 -0.8 -83.9%

14 low flow 4.5 4.5 0.0 -0.1% 9.6 5.0 -0.5 -48.8% 13.9 8.6 -0.4 -39.3% 10.7 9.6 -0.1 -12.1% 2.9 0.2 -0.9 -92.5% 4.9 0.6 -0.9 -90.4%

15 low flow 6.5 6.5 0.0 -0.1% 13.8 9.7 -0.4 -39.2% 18.8 14.1 -0.3 -31.5% 14.2 13.4 -0.1 -9.0% 4.0 1.2 -0.8 -82.4% 7.0 3.1 -0.7 -71.7%

16 low flow 4.8 4.8 0.0 -0.1% 9.8 6.5 -0.3 -34.9% 14.7 10.3 -0.3 -30.4% 11.3 10.0 -0.1 -11.9% 2.9 0.3 -0.9 -91.2% 4.8 1.8 -0.6 -64.6%

17 low flow 4.0 4.0 0.0 -0.3% 8.4 6.1 -0.3 -28.1% 12.8 9.5 -0.3 -26.4% 9.8 8.7 -0.1 -11.0% 2.5 0.1 -1.0 -96.0% 4.1 2.0 -0.5 -53.1%

18 low flow 4.5 4.5 0.0 -0.7% 9.4 7.9 -0.2 -18.6% 14.0 11.5 -0.2 -19.3% 10.9 10.1 -0.1 -8.4% 2.6 0.2 -0.9 -92.6% 4.6 3.1 -0.4 -36.7%

19 low flow 4.4 4.4 0.0 0.0% 9.6 8.6 -0.1 -11.4% 13.3 12.0 -0.1 -11.6% 10.0 9.7 -0.1 -6.3% 2.8 0.3 -0.9 -92.4% 4.9 3.9 -0.2 -23.7%

20 low flow 4.5 4.5 0.0 0.0% 9.3 9.5 0.0 2.9% 13.7 13.0 0.0 -4.0% 10.4 9.5 -0.1 -8.8% 2.8 0.3 -0.9 -91.8% 4.6 4.8 0.0 4.6%

Post Closure low flow 5.0 5.0 0.0 -0.3% 10.6 10.7 0.0 1.9% 15.4 14.7 0.0 -4.7% 11.7 11.3 0.0 -4.7% 3.1 0.5 -0.9 -90.4% 5.3 5.4 0.0 2.9%

Table Source: data from Rio-ASE spreadsheet: Modflow_Alternatives_Summary_08192019.xls

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-77

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Table J1-17 Alternative 2 Predicted Monthly Discharge August-March Low Flow Period at USGS Gaging Stations and one SFA Reach (MC-6)
Alternative 2

13310800 (EFSFSR above Meadow) 13311000 (EFSFSR at Stibnite) 13311250 (EFSFSR above Sugar) 13311450 (Sugar Creek) 13310850 (Meadow Creek) Meadow Creek MC-6
Simulated Simulated Simulated Simulated Simulated Simulated
Streamflow (cfs) Streamflow (cfs) Streamflow (cfs) Streamflow (cfs) Streamflow (cfs) Streamflow (cfs)
Long-term Long-term Long-term Long-term Long-term Long-term
No Proposed % % No Proposed % % No Proposed % % No Proposed % % No Proposed % % No Proposed % %
Mine Year Month Action Action Difference Difference Action Action Difference Difference Action Action Difference Difference Action Action Difference Difference Action Action Difference Difference Action Action Difference Difference

-2 low flow 6.5 6.6 0.0 1.8% 13.6 13.4 0.0 -1.4% 19.3 19.2 0.0 -0.4% 14.7 14.9 0.0 1.6% 3.8 1.3 -0.7 -74.1% 6.7 6.3 -0.1 -6.7%

-1 low flow 4.3 4.4 0.0 2.2% 9.1 8.2 -0.1 -9.9% 13.6 12.8 -0.1 -5.2% 10.2 10.5 0.0 2.9% 2.8 0.2 -0.9 -92.8% 4.6 3.2 -0.3 -31.0%

1 low flow 4.1 4.2 0.0 3.5% 8.5 9.0 0.1 6.5% 13.0 11.0 -0.2 -15.3% 9.6 10.0 0.0 4.9% 2.5 0.2 -0.9 -94.1% 4.2 3.1 -0.3 -26.3%

2 low flow 6.4 6.5 0.0 3.3% 13.6 14.2 0.1 6.7% 18.9 16.1 -0.2 -16.7% 14.2 14.7 0.0 4.4% 3.6 1.5 -0.7 -70.4% 6.8 5.0 -0.3 -25.9%

3 low flow 4.3 4.4 0.0 3.0% 8.9 9.5 0.1 6.6% 13.6 10.3 -0.2 -24.7% 10.1 10.5 0.0 4.4% 2.7 0.2 -0.9 -93.2% 4.4 3.3 -0.2 -24.8%

4 low flow 5.2 5.3 0.0 3.5% 10.9 11.6 0.1 8.5% 15.9 12.5 -0.2 -23.0% 11.8 12.3 0.1 5.3% 3.0 0.8 -0.8 -83.1% 5.4 4.0 -0.3 -25.3%

5 low flow 4.7 4.9 0.0 4.1% 9.8 11.1 0.1 14.7% 14.7 11.6 -0.2 -21.3% 11.0 11.5 0.0 4.9% 2.8 0.4 -0.9 -86.8% 4.8 3.7 -0.2 -23.4%

6 low flow 4.7 4.8 0.0 4.4% 9.6 11.1 0.2 17.2% 14.5 11.4 -0.2 -21.7% 10.8 11.3 0.1 5.2% 2.7 0.4 -0.9 -87.9% 4.7 3.6 -0.2 -23.2%

7 low flow 5.2 5.5 0.1 6.3% 10.9 13.4 0.3 28.0% 16.1 13.9 -0.1 -13.3% 12.0 12.4 0.0 4.3% 3.0 0.7 -0.8 -83.6% 5.4 3.8 -0.3 -28.4%

8 low flow 7.5 8.0 0.1 7.4% 16.0 18.9 0.3 29.3% 22.1 20.4 -0.1 -9.7% 16.2 16.7 0.0 4.1% 4.8 2.5 -0.8 -77.4% 8.1 5.9 -0.3 -29.3%

9 low flow 4.7 4.9 0.1 6.1% 9.7 10.6 0.1 11.0% 14.7 11.8 -0.2 -19.7% 11.0 11.4 0.0 4.7% 2.8 0.4 -0.9 -88.6% 4.8 3.1 -0.4 -36.6%

10 low flow 5.1 5.3 0.1 5.2% 10.9 10.9 0.0 2.2% 15.6 12.7 -0.2 -19.0% 11.7 12.0 0.0 2.9% 3.0 0.7 -0.8 -83.6% 5.5 3.3 -0.4 -38.9%

11 low flow 6.1 6.3 0.0 4.9% 12.9 12.9 0.0 3.3% 18.0 15.3 -0.2 -15.9% 13.2 13.3 0.0 1.4% 3.7 1.4 -0.8 -78.6% 6.4 4.1 -0.4 -37.8%

12 low flow 8.6 8.9 0.1 5.4% 18.1 19.4 0.1 12.7% 24.4 22.7 -0.1 -6.8% 17.7 18.0 0.0 1.9% 5.0 2.7 -0.6 -61.6% 8.9 6.0 -0.3 -32.8%

13 low flow 5.4 5.5 0.0 2.4% 11.3 10.1 -0.1 -10.7% 16.6 14.3 -0.1 -13.8% 12.7 10.8 -0.2 -17.6% 3.3 0.4 -0.9 -87.3% 5.6 4.2 -0.3 -26.6%

14 low flow 4.5 4.6 0.0 2.1% 9.6 9.1 -0.1 -5.2% 13.9 13.1 -0.1 -5.2% 10.7 9.7 -0.1 -10.2% 2.9 0.2 -0.9 -92.5% 4.9 3.7 -0.2 -23.9%

15 low flow 6.5 6.6 0.0 1.7% 13.8 14.1 0.0 3.2% 18.8 18.8 0.0 0.5% 14.2 13.6 -0.1 -7.5% 4.0 1.2 -0.8 -82.4% 7.0 6.7 -0.1 -7.5%

16 low flow 4.8 4.8 0.0 2.0% 9.8 10.1 0.0 3.5% 14.7 14.9 0.0 2.1% 11.3 10.2 -0.1 -10.1% 2.9 0.3 -0.9 -91.2% 4.8 4.9 0.0 1.4%

17 low flow 4.0 4.1 0.0 1.9% 8.4 8.6 0.0 3.9% 12.8 13.1 0.0 2.8% 9.8 8.9 -0.1 -9.1% 2.5 0.1 -1.0 -96.0% 4.1 4.2 0.0 1.8%

18 low flow 4.5 4.6 0.0 1.4% 9.4 9.6 0.0 3.2% 14.0 14.1 0.0 2.6% 10.9 10.3 -0.1 -6.5% 2.6 0.2 -0.9 -92.6% 4.6 4.6 0.0 1.3%

19 low flow 4.4 4.5 0.0 1.6% 9.6 9.7 0.0 2.5% 13.3 13.7 0.0 3.7% 10.0 9.8 0.0 -4.9% 2.8 0.3 -0.9 -92.4% 4.9 4.9 0.0 0.1%

20 low flow 4.5 4.6 0.0 2.2% 9.3 9.6 0.0 4.5% 13.7 13.9 0.0 3.5% 10.4 9.7 -0.1 -6.8% 2.8 0.3 -0.9 -91.8% 4.6 4.7 0.0 3.0%

Post-closure low flow 5.5 5.6 0.0 0.0 11.5 11.8 0.0 0.0 16.5 16.8 0.0 0.0 12.6 12.5 0.0 0.0 3.4 0.7 -0.9 -0.9 5.8 5.8 0.0 0.0

Table Source: data from Rio-ASE spreadsheet: Modflow_Alternatives_Summary_08192019.xls

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-78

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Table J1-18 Alternative 3 Predicted Monthly Discharge August-March Low Flow Period at USGS Gaging Stations and one SFA Reach (MC-6)
Alternative 3

13310800 (EFSFSR above Meadow) 13311000 (EFSFSR at Stibnite) 13311250 (EFSFSR above Sugar) 13311450 (Sugar Creek) 13310850 (Meadow Creek) Meadow Creek MC-6
Simulated Simulated Simulated Simulated Simulated Simulated
Streamflow (cfs) Streamflow (cfs) Streamflow (cfs) Streamflow (cfs) Streamflow (cfs) Streamflow (cfs)
Long-term Long-term Long-term Long-term Long-term Long-term
No Proposed % % No Proposed % % No Proposed % % No Proposed % % No Proposed % % No Proposed % %
Mine Year Month Action Action Difference Difference Action Action Difference Difference Action Action Difference Difference Action Action Difference Difference Action Action Difference Difference Action Action Difference Difference

-2 low flow 6.5 5.4 -0.2 -18.4% 13.6 12.6 -0.1 -8.7% 19.3 18.3 -0.1 -5.9% 14.7 14.7 0.0 0.0% 3.8 3.9 0.0 2.7% 6.7 6.7 0.0 0.2%

-1 low flow 4.3 3.5 -0.2 -18.9% 9.1 7.9 -0.1 -13.1% 13.6 12.4 -0.1 -8.7% 10.2 10.2 0.0 0.0% 2.8 2.8 0.0 2.3% 4.6 4.2 -0.1 -9.0%

1 low flow 4.1 3.1 -0.2 -21.6% 8.5 8.5 0.0 0.5% 13.0 10.4 -0.2 -19.7% 9.6 9.6 0.0 0.0% 2.5 2.6 0.0 2.2% 4.2 4.3 0.0 1.2%

2 low flow 6.4 5.5 -0.2 -16.6% 13.6 13.7 0.0 1.5% 18.9 15.5 -0.2 -21.1% 14.2 14.2 0.0 0.0% 3.6 3.6 0.0 1.6% 6.8 6.8 0.0 1.6%

3 low flow 4.3 3.4 -0.2 -21.4% 8.9 8.9 0.0 -0.2% 13.6 9.5 -0.3 -30.2% 10.1 10.1 0.0 0.0% 2.7 2.7 0.0 2.5% 4.4 4.5 0.0 1.6%

4 low flow 5.2 4.2 -0.2 -20.7% 10.9 10.9 0.0 1.3% 15.9 11.7 -0.3 -28.8% 11.8 11.8 0.0 0.0% 3.0 3.1 0.0 1.4% 5.4 5.5 0.0 2.0%

5 low flow 4.7 3.7 -0.2 -21.3% 9.8 10.3 0.1 6.7% 14.7 10.7 -0.3 -27.8% 11.0 11.0 0.0 0.0% 2.8 2.9 0.0 2.7% 4.8 4.9 0.0 3.4%

6 low flow 4.7 3.7 -0.2 -21.0% 9.6 10.4 0.1 9.2% 14.5 10.5 -0.3 -28.2% 10.8 10.8 0.0 0.0% 2.7 2.8 0.0 2.0% 4.7 4.9 0.0 4.1%

7 low flow 5.2 4.3 -0.2 -17.9% 10.9 12.1 0.1 14.5% 16.1 12.4 -0.2 -23.4% 12.0 12.0 0.0 0.0% 3.0 3.1 0.0 2.1% 5.4 3.6 -0.3 -33.9%

8 low flow 7.5 6.6 -0.2 -15.4% 16.0 17.2 0.1 14.9% 22.1 18.5 -0.2 -20.5% 16.2 16.2 0.0 0.0% 4.8 4.9 0.0 1.5% 8.1 5.2 -0.5 -50.8%

9 low flow 4.7 3.9 -0.2 -16.6% 9.7 9.5 0.0 -1.8% 14.7 10.5 -0.3 -28.9% 11.0 11.0 0.0 0.0% 2.8 2.9 0.0 2.1% 4.8 1.7 -0.7 -67.1%

10 low flow 5.1 4.3 -0.2 -15.5% 10.9 9.8 -0.1 -9.7% 15.6 11.5 -0.3 -27.7% 11.7 11.7 0.0 0.0% 3.0 3.1 0.0 1.8% 5.5 2.1 -0.7 -67.6%

11 low flow 6.1 5.1 -0.2 -17.3% 12.9 11.6 -0.1 -9.5% 18.0 13.9 -0.3 -25.3% 13.2 13.2 0.0 0.0% 3.7 3.7 0.0 1.6% 6.4 3.0 -0.6 -64.8%

12 low flow 8.6 7.3 -0.2 -17.1% 18.1 17.8 0.0 0.6% 24.4 21.1 -0.2 -15.4% 17.7 17.7 0.0 0.1% 5.0 5.1 0.0 2.1% 8.9 5.5 -0.5 -47.4%

13 low flow 5.4 5.4 0.0 0.2% 11.3 6.0 -0.5 -46.9% 16.6 10.4 -0.4 -37.3% 12.7 10.8 -0.2 -17.6% 3.3 3.2 0.0 -1.5% 5.6 0.5 -0.9 -94.3%

14 low flow 4.5 4.6 0.0 2.2% 9.6 4.7 -0.5 -51.0% 13.9 9.1 -0.3 -34.0% 10.7 9.7 -0.1 -10.2% 2.9 2.8 0.0 -1.3% 4.9 0.1 -1.0 -97.9%

15 low flow 6.5 6.4 0.0 0.0% 13.8 9.1 -0.4 -42.5% 18.8 14.2 -0.3 -28.6% 14.2 13.6 -0.1 -7.4% 4.0 3.8 0.0 -2.5% 7.0 2.6 -0.8 -78.7%

16 low flow 4.8 4.7 0.0 0.2% 9.8 6.5 -0.4 -35.3% 14.7 11.3 -0.2 -23.4% 11.3 10.2 -0.1 -10.0% 2.9 2.9 0.0 0.2% 4.8 1.6 -0.7 -69.6%

17 low flow 4.0 4.1 0.0 1.1% 8.4 6.8 -0.2 -20.0% 12.8 11.2 -0.1 -12.7% 9.8 8.9 -0.1 -9.0% 2.5 2.5 0.0 0.6% 4.1 2.4 -0.4 -42.3%

18 low flow 4.5 4.5 0.0 -0.1% 9.4 9.5 0.0 1.6% 14.0 14.0 0.0 1.6% 10.9 10.3 -0.1 -6.4% 2.6 2.6 0.0 -1.4% 4.6 4.6 0.0 -0.1%

19 low flow 4.4 4.4 0.0 0.4% 9.6 9.8 0.0 3.0% 13.3 13.7 0.0 4.0% 10.0 9.8 0.0 -4.8% 2.8 2.7 0.0 -1.9% 4.9 5.0 0.0 2.4%

20 low flow 4.5 4.4 0.0 0.1% 9.3 9.6 0.0 4.3% 13.7 13.9 0.0 3.3% 10.4 9.7 -0.1 -6.7% 2.8 2.8 0.0 -0.1% 4.6 4.8 0.1 5.0%

Post-closure low flow 5.0 5.0 0.0 0.4% 10.6 10.9 0.0 3.9% 15.4 15.7 0.0 3.4% 11.7 11.5 0.0 -2.7% 3.1 3.0 0.0 -0.8% 5.3 5.5 0.0 4.0%

Table Source: data from Rio-ASE spreadsheet: Modflow_Alternatives_Summary_08192019.xls

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-79

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

This page intentionally left blank

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-80

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

LITERATURE CITED
Boise National Forest.
2017. Boise National Forest Aquatic Geospatial Database. Acquired on 5/9/2017 and
last updated on 2/16/2017.

Brown and Caldwell

2019. 2018 Yellow Pine Pit Lake Fish Sampling Summary Report. Prepared for Midas
Gold Idaho, Inc., Valley County, Idaho. January 11, 2019.
2020. 2019 Yellow Pine Pit Lake Fish Sampling Summary Report. Prepared for Midas
Gold Idaho, Inc., Valley County, Idaho. January 2020.

Carim, K., Young, M., Ledger, K., Franklin, T., and M. Schwartz.
2017. Investigation into fish presence and distribution in upper East Fork of the South
Fork of the Salmon River basin and Meadow Creek Lake by the Payette National
Forest. 20 May 2017.

GeoEngineers, Inc.
2017. Aquatic Resources 2016 Baseline Study – Addendum Report.

Great Ecology, Inc.

2018. Revised Stream Functional Assessment Methodology Report for the Stibnite
Gold Project. Submitted to Midas Gold Idaho, Inc. May 2018.

HDR, Inc.
2016. Stream Functional Assessment. Stibnite Gold Project, Midas Gold, Inc.
September 2016.

Idaho Department of Fish and Game (IDFG)

2012. Brook Trout Observation Report. Website: https://idfg.idaho.gov/species/
observation/603302
2018. Historical Stocking Records. Website:
https://idfg.idaho.gov/ifwis/fishingplanner/stocking/ (accessed 12/4/2018).

Kuzis, K.
1997. Watershed Analysis of the Upper East Fork South Fork of the Salmon River.
August 1997.

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-81

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

MWH, Inc.
2017. Aquatic Resources 2016 Baseline Study. Stibnite Gold Project, Midas Gold
Idaho, Inc. April 2017.

Midas Gold.
2019b. Table 13. 2018 eDNA Results for the Burntlog Road Access Sites and 2017
Resampled Sites.

National Marine Fisheries Service

2017. ESA Recovery Plan for Snake River Spring/Summer Chinook Salmon
(Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and Snake River Basin Steelhead (Oncorhynchus
mykiss). November 2017. Portland, Oregon. 284 p.

Nelson, R.
2009. Biological Assessment for the Potential Effects of Managing the Payette National
Forest in the South Fork Salmon River Section 7 Watershed on Snake River
Spring/Summer Chinook Salmon, Snake River Steelhead, and Columbia River
Bull Trout and Biological Evaluation for Westslope Cutthroat Trout. Volume 31
East Fork South Fork Salmon River Bridge Repair. 26 May 2009. Payette
National Forest McCall, Idaho.

Nez Perce Tribe

2018. Unpublished Geospatial Data - Redd Locations.

Platts, W.S. and F.E. Partridge.

1983. Inventory of Salmon, Steelhead, and Bull Trout: South Fork Salmon River, Idaho.
Intermountain research Station Research Note. INT-324. 9p.

Rabe, C.D. and D.D. Nelson.

2007. Status and Monitoring of Natural and Supplemented Chinook Salmon in Johnson
Creek, Idaho Annual Report. Period Covered: 2005 to 2006. Nez Perce Tribe,
Department of Fisheries Resources Management. BPA Project No. 9604300.
BPA Contract No. 25637. October 2007.
2008. Status and Monitoring of Natural and Supplemented Chinook Salmon in Johnson
Creek, Idaho Annual Progress Report: 2006 to 2007. Nez Perce Tribe,
Department of Fisheries Resources Management. BPA Project No. 199604300
BPA Contract No. 35880. May 2008
2009. Status and Monitoring of Natural and Supplemented Chinook Salmon in Johnson
Creek, Idaho. Annual Progress Report: 2007 to 2008. Nez Perce Tribe,
Department of Fisheries Resources Management. BPA Project No. 199604300.
BPA Contract No. 40388. December 2009.

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-82

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

2010. Status and Monitoring of Natural and Supplemented Chinook Salmon in Johnson
Creek, Idaho. Annual Progress Report: 2008 to 2009. Nez Perce Tribe,
Department of Fisheries Resources Management. BPA Project No. 199604300.
BPA Contract No. 40388. December 2010.
2013. Status and Monitoring of Natural and Supplemented Chinook Salmon in Johnson
Creek, Idaho. Annual Progress Report: 2009 to 2010. Nez Perce Tribe,
Department of Fisheries Resources Management. BPA Project No. 199604300.
BPA Contract No. 40388. October 2013.
2014. Status and Monitoring of Natural and Supplemented Chinook Salmon in Johnson
Creek, Idaho. Annual Progress Report: 2010 to 2012. Nez Perce Tribe,
Department of Fisheries Resources Management. BPA Project No. 199604300.
BPA Contract No. 40388. July 2014.

Rabe, C.D., D.D. Nelson, and T. Covel.

2016a. Status and Monitoring of Natural and Supplemented Chinook Salmon in Johnson
Creek, Idaho Annual Progress Report. Report covers work performed from:
March 2013 – December 2014. Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries
Resources Management, 14054 Burr Rd., McCall, ID. February 2016
2016b. Status and Monitoring of Natural and Supplemented Chinook Salmon in Johnson
Creek, Idaho Annual Progress Report. Report covers work performed from:
March 2014 – December 2015. Nez Perce Tribe Department of Fisheries
Resources Management, 14054 Burr Rd., McCall, ID. November 2016.

Rabe, C.D., Douglas D. Nelson, and Travis Hodsdon.

2017. Status and Monitoring of Natural and Supplemented Chinook Salmon in Johnson
Creek, Idaho Annual Progress Report Project Number 199604300 Report covers
work performed from: March, 2015 – December, 2016
2018. Status and Monitoring of Natural and Supplemented Chinook Salmon in Johnson
Creek, Idaho Annual Progress Report Project Number 199604300. Report covers
work performed from: March, 2016 – December, 2017.

Stantec.
2017. 2017 Aquatics Baseline Study for the Stibnite Gold Project. Prepared for Midas
Gold Idaho, Inc. April 17, 2017

Thurow, R.F.
1987. Evaluation of the South Fork Salmon River Steelhead Trout Fishery Restoration
Program. Performed for US Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service
Lower Snake River Fish and Wildlife Compensation Plan Contract No. 14-16-
0001-86505 Period Covered: March 1, 1984 to February 28, 1986.

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-83

APPENDIX J-1 FISH AND AQUATIC RESOURCES – SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

United States Fish and Wildlife Service.

2015a. Recovery Plan for Coterminous United States Populations of Bull Trout
(Salvelinus confluentus). Portland, Oregon. xii + 179 pages.
2015b. Draft Upper Snake Recovery Unit Implementation Plan for Bull Trout Recovery
Plan. June 2015. Boise, Idaho. 110 pages.

United States Forest Service (Forest Service)

2012. Biological Assessment on the Effects on Endangered, Threatened, or Proposed
Fish, Wildlife and Plant Species for the Idaho Power Company Transmission Line
328 Project. Cascade Ranger District, Boise National Forest. December 17,
2012.
2013. A Simple Protocol Using Underwater Epoxy to Install Annual Temperature
Monitoring Sites in Rivers and Streams. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-314 Fort
Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain
Research Station.

Wagoner, L. and D. C. Burns.

2001. Biological Assessment for the Potential Effects of Managing the Payette National
Forest in the South Fork Salmon River Section 7 Watershed on Snake River
spring/summer and fall Chinook salmon, Snake River steelhead, and Columbia
River bull trout and Biological Evaluation for westslope cutthroat trout. Volume
24: Ongoing and new actions.

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-1-84

 Appendix J-2: Stream Temperature Impacts on Fish Technical
Memorandum

This TM was developed and finalized for the Draft EIS in December 2019. There may be differences in the data
presented in the figures and tables as compared to the Draft EIS
This page intentionally left blank.
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Technical Memorandum

Stream Temperature Impacts on Fish:

Chinook Salmon, Steelhead Trout,
Westslope Cutthroat Trout
and Bull Trout

Technical Memorandum
Stibnite Gold Project, Idaho

December 2019

Ecosystem Sciences, LLC

Science . Planning . Design
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Ecosystem Sciences
Science . Planning . Design

Ecosystem Sciences
202 N. 9th Street, Suite 400
Boise, ID 83702
T: 208.383.0226

Prepared for: AECOM

Project Title: Stibnite Gold Project

Technical Memorandum
Subject: Stream Temperature Impacts on Fish: Chinook Salmon, Steelhead, Westslope
Cuttroat Trout and Bull Trout

Date: December 2019

To: AECOM

From: Ecosystem Sciences

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 1
2.0 STUDY AREA .................................................................................................................................. 1
3.0 METHODS ....................................................................................................................................... 3
3.1 LIFE STAGE PERIODICITY AND STREAM TEMPERATURE THRESHOLDS ...................................... 3
3.2 MODELED STREAM TEMPERATURE DATA ................................................................................ 4
3.3 INTERPRETING MODELED STREAM TEMPERATURES AS THEY RELATE TO CLIMATE CHANGE ...... 9
4.0 RESULTS ...................................................................................................................................... 10
4.1 SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 10
4.2 ALTERNATIVE ONE .............................................................................................................. 10
4.2.1 Stream Segment 1: EFSFSR and tributaries from Sugar Creek upstream to
Meadow Creek ..................................................................................................... 15
4.2.2 Stream Segment 2: Meadow Creek and East Fork Meadow Creek .................... 15
4.2.3 Stream Segment 3: EFSFSR Upstream of Meadow Creek ................................. 15
4.2.4 Stream Segment 4: EFSFSR Downstream of Sugar Creek ................................ 15
4.3 ALTERNATIVE 2 ................................................................................................................... 16
4.3.1 Stream Segment 1: EFSFSR and tributaries from Sugar Creek upstream to
Meadow Creek ..................................................................................................... 21
4.3.2 Stream Segment 2: Meadow Creek and East Fork Meadow Creek .................... 21
4.3.3 Stream Segment 3: EFSFSR Upstream of Meadow Creek ................................. 21
4.3.4 Stream Segment 4: EFSFSR Downstream of Sugar Creek ................................ 21
4.4 ALTERNATIVE 3 ................................................................................................................... 21
4.4.1 Stream Segment 1: EFSFSR and tributaries from Sugar Creek upstream to
Meadow Creek ..................................................................................................... 26
4.4.2 Stream Segment 2: Meadow Creek and East Fork Meadow Creek .................... 26
4.4.3 Stream Segment 3: EFSFSR Upstream of Meadow Creek ................................. 26
4.4.4 Stream Segment 4: EFSFSR Downstream of Sugar Creek ................................ 27
5.0 LITERATURE CITED..................................................................................................................... 27

LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A - Temperature Analysis Results Tables

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | i

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Map of the Water Temperature Analysis Study Area and each Mine Site Stream
Segment ...................................................................................................................................... 2

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Life-stage Periodicity and Stream Temperature Thresholds Associated with Various
Categories of Health for Chinook Salmon ................................................................................... 5
Table 2. Life-stage Periodicity and Stream Temperature Thresholds Associated with Various
Categories of Health for Steelhead ............................................................................................. 6
Table 3. Life-stage Periodicity and Stream Temperature Thresholds for Various Categories of
Health for Westslope Cutthroat Trout .......................................................................................... 7
Table 4. Life-stage Periodicity and Stream Temperature Thresholds Associated with Various
Categories of Health for Bull Trout .............................................................................................. 8
Table 5. Comparison of Baseline SPLNT Model Temperatures with NorWeST Model Stream
Temperatures for Multiple Timeframes ....................................................................................... 9
Table 6. Alternative 1: All Stream Segments – Chinook salmon ............................................................ 11
Table 7. Alternative 1: All Stream Segments – Steelhead ...................................................................... 12
Table 8. Alternative 1: All Stream Segments – Westslope Cutthroat Trout ............................................ 13
Table 9. Alternative 1: All Stream Segments – Bull Trout ....................................................................... 14
Table 10. Alternative 2: All Stream Segments – Chinook salmon ............................................................ 17
Table 11. Alternative 2: All Stream Segments – Steelhead ...................................................................... 18
Table 12. Alternative 2: All Stream Segments – Westslope Cutthroat Trout ............................................ 19
Table 13. Alternative 2: All Stream Segments – Bull Trout ....................................................................... 20
Table 14. Alternative 3: All Stream Segments – Chinook salmon ............................................................ 22
Table 15. Alternative 3: All Stream Segments – Steelhead ...................................................................... 23
Table 16. Alternative 3: All Stream Segments – Westslope Cutthroat Trout ............................................ 24
Table 17. Alternative 3: All Stream Segments – Bull Trout ....................................................................... 25

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | ii

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS

Baseline Existing conditions in the Stibnite Gold Project area
°C Degrees Celsius
EFSFSR East Fork of the South Fork of the Salmon River
EIS Environmental Impact Statement
EOY End of Year
HUC Hydrologic Unit Code
IP Intrinsic Potential – the reach-scale stream attributes (gradient, stream
size, and valley constraint) that influence availability of the fine-scale
habitat features (e.g., pools, spawning gravel, and large wood) preferred
by salmonids
Modified PRO Alternative 2 in the Midas Stibnite Gold Project
MWH Montgomery, Watson, and Harza Engineering Company
NHD-Plus National Hydrography Dataset
NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service
OM Occupancy Model
RMRS U.S. Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station
PRO Stibnite Plan of Restoration and Operations
Project Midas Stibnite Gold Project
Proposed Action Alternative 1 in the Midas Stibnite Gold Project
Rio ASE Rio Applied Science and Engineering Company
QUAL2k River and Stream Water Quality Model
SPLNT Stream and Pit Lake Network Temperature
TSF Tailing Storage Facility
Upper
EFSFSR TSF Alternative 3 in the Midas Stibnite Gold Project
EPA U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Forest Service U.S. Forest Service

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | iii

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

This page intentionally left blank

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | iv

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

1.0 INTRODUCTION
Stream temperatures are an important component to the habitat and biological processes of cold-
water salmonid species. This Technical Memorandum describes the methods and results of an
analysis of stream temperatures for four salmonid species that occur in the Stibnite Gold Project
(project) mine site study area in the headwaters of the Upper East Fork of the South Fork of the
Salmon River (EFSFSR) watershed (see Section 2.0). The four species of interest are Snake
River spring-/summer-run Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha); Snake River Basin
steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss); westslope cutthroat trout (Onchorhynchus clarkia lewisi); and
bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus). The analysis was completed for existing conditions (Baseline)
and each of the three alternative proposed actions—Alternative 1 (Proposed Action), Alternative 2
(Modified PRO), and Alternative 3 (Upper EFSFSR TSF). The three individual alternatives are
described in separate reports (Brown and Caldwell 2018, 2019a,b,c).
Section 2.0 provides detail about the geographic extent of the study area. Section 3.0 explains
the methods that were used to analyze stream temperatures for the four salmonid species. The
results are summarized in Section 4.0. The full results are included in Appendix A.

2.0 STUDY AREA

The study area for this stream temperature analysis is defined by the extent of the stream network
used in the Stream and Pit Lake Network Temperature (SPLNT) modeling for each of the selected
mine years in each alternative (Brown and Caldwell 2018, 2019a,b,c). The mine site study area
encompasses approximately 111 square kilometers at the headwaters of the EFSFSR. The
Headwaters East Fork South Fork Salmon River (HUC 12 – 170602080201) contains the mine
site impact areas (Figure 1). Stream temperature modeling was completed for four mine site
stream segments in the project mine site study area. These include:
• Stream Segment 1: EFSFSR and tributaries from Sugar Creek to Meadow Creek
• Stream Segment 2: Meadow Creek and East Fork Meadow Creek
• Stream Segment 3: EFSFSR upstream of Meadow Creek
• Stream Segment 4: EFSFSR downstream of Sugar Creek.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 1

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 1. Map of the Water Temperature Analysis Study Area and each Mine Site Stream Segment

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 2

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

3.0 METHODS
Section 3.0 details the workflow that was used in the stream temperature analysis. The two
general steps that were used in this analysis are described in the following narrative.
Stream temperature ranges/thresholds associated with the life stages of each of the four fish
species were gathered from existing regulatory standards and the relevant literature (Montgomery
Watson Harza, 2017; National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine
Fisheries Service 2017; Poole et al. 2001; Rio Applied Science and Engineering [Rio ASE] 2018,
2019; U.S. Environmental Projection Agency [EPA] 2003). The guidance from these sources is
detailed and summarized in Tables 1 through 4. For example, the field-observed spawning
temperature for Chinook salmon, steelhead, and westslope cutthroat trout adults is 4 to
14 degrees Celsius (°C) (EPA 2003); while the appropriately functioning stream temperature
range for bull trout spawning adults is 4 to 9°C (U.S. Forest Service [Forest Service] 2003).
The selected species-specific water temperature thresholds/ranges were then applied to
reach-based, modeled stream temperature values from the SPLNT models (Brown and Caldwell,
2018) for existing conditions (Baseline) and each of the three alternatives (see Chapter 3 of the
Environmental Impact Statement [EIS] for descriptions of the proposed action and alternatives).
The length of stream in kilometers per species that fell within each selected range/threshold (or
greater than a threshold water temperature) were reported by mine site stream segment. The
temporal and spatial structure of the SPLNT data were detailed, and are summarized in
Section 3.2.
The mine life is defined as 2 years before mining activities would commence (Year -2) and lasting
for the 20 years that mining operations and reclamation are scheduled to occur. By Year 20, all
streams are proposed to be recreated or enhanced, and are in their permanent locations. Four
mine years were chosen by Midas Gold and their consultants as being representative of the
different stages of the mine life, and were selected for the water temperature analysis: end-of-
year (EOY) 6, EOY 12, EOY 18, and EOY 112. Year 112 represents the long-term reclamation
environmental conditions after the closure of the mine in Year 20. Results from each alternative
are compared to existing conditions results (Baseline), and a difference between the mine year
of interest and Baseline values reported. This Technical Memorandum provides a quantitative
measure from which to gauge how proposed actions from each alternative would affect the
availability of habitat from a stream temperature perspective.

3.1 LIFE STAGE PERIODICITY AND STREAM TEMPERATURE THRESHOLDS

The fish species in this analysis have different thermal requirements/limitations for their various
life stages. The periodicity of each life stage and the accepted stream temperature
thresholds/ranges for various water temperature considerations (lethal, functioning appropriately,
functioning at risk, etc.) for each species were compiled from regulatory standards and other
relevant literature. Life-stage periodicity for the four salmonid species came from one of three
sources (MWH 2017; NOAA NMFS 2017; Rio ASE 2018). Water temperature thresholds/ranges
for the various temperature considerations came from one of four sources (EPA 2003; Forest
Service 2003; Poole et al. 2001; Rio ASE 2019). Tables 1 through 4 show life-stage periodicity
and water temperature thresholds/ranges for the various temperature considerations for Chinook
salmon, steelhead trout, westslope cutthroat trout, and bull trout, respectively. Each water
temperature threshold/range found in the guidance documents is in a statistical unit (maximum,
average, or constant daily stream temperature) that is specific to the characterized life stage. The
term “constant” is defined as the midpoint between the daily maximum and the daily average
water temperatures.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 3

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

3.2 MODELED STREAM TEMPERATURE DATA

Stream temperature values and stream segment lengths were sourced from the SPLNT models
produced for existing conditions (Baseline) and each of the three alternatives. The number of
SPLNT reaches in each mine site stream segment varies by alternative and modeled mine year.
Stream reaches that are not considered to be available fish habitat, based on the habitat limitation
criteria used in the Intrinsic Potential (IP) model for Chinook salmon and steelhead and the
Occupancy Model (OM) for westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout, were eliminated from this
water temperature analysis (Ecosystem Sciences 2019a,b).
The SPLNT models (specifically QUAL2K modeling results) output stream temperature values
representing three different conditions (Brown and Caldwell 2018): maximum weekly summer;
mean August; and maximum weekly fall. For each of these conditions, minimum, mean, and
maximum stream temperatures were determined. The constant stream water temperature was
calculated to match the statistical unit used in water temperature thresholds/ranges found in the
guidance documents. The seasonality of each life stage dictated which of the SPLNT model water
temperature conditions were applied in the stream temperature analysis (see “Time Stamp Used”
column in Tables 1 through 4). A conservative approach was used when deciding how the
guidance-based stream temperature thresholds/ranges were applied to the SPLNT data (e.g., the
lower water temperature value was chosen for non-optimal temperature ranges in the guidance;
and maximum water temperature was used from the modeling results). In general, based on the
timing of the temperature modeling, the analysis focused on examining the predicted stream
temperatures in relation to the effects of increased stream temperatures on the species of interest
and their life-stage periodicity, shown in Tables 1 through 4. For example, the guidance from the
literature for adult migration blockage and delay for Chinook salmon is 21°C to 22°C (daily
average). The analysis used the summer maximum time period modeling runs (end of July) for
water temperatures greater than 21°C. Therefore, the results for these criteria would be the
number of kilometers of stream in the analysis area that would have average water temperatures
during the summer maximum period of over 21°C. The amount of available habitat also was
calculated, based on access, IP modeling (Ecosystem Sciences 2019a), and Occupancy
Modeling (Ecosystem Sciences 2019b). Therefore, the number of kilometers of stream analyzed
varies among fish species, mine year, and alternative.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 4

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 1. Life-stage Periodicity and Stream Temperature Thresholds Associated with

Various Categories of Health for Chinook Salmon

Table Sources: 1 EPA 2003; 2 Poole et al. 2001; 3 Rio ASE 2019; 4 Forest Service 2003

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 5

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 2. Life-stage Periodicity and Stream Temperature Thresholds Associated with Various Categories of Health for Steelhead

Table Sources: 1 EPA 2003; 2 Poole et al. 2001; 3 Rio ASE 2019; 4 Forest Service 2003

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 6

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 3. Life-stage Periodicity and Stream Temperature Thresholds for Various Categories of Health for Westslope Cutthroat Trout

Table Sources: 1 EPA 2003; 2 Poole et al. 2001; 3 Rio ASE 2019; 4 Forest Service 2003

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 7

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 4. Life-stage Periodicity and Stream Temperature Thresholds Associated with Various Categories of Health for Bull Trout

Table Sources: 1 EPA 2003; 2 Poole et al. 2001; 3 Rio ASE 2019; 4 Forest Service 2003

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 8

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

3.3 INTERPRETING MODELED STREAM TEMPERATURES AS THEY RELATE TO

CLIMATE CHANGE
The SPLNT models (Brown and Caldwell 2018) for existing conditions and each alternative
(Brown and Caldwell 2019 a,b,c) do not account for changes to stream temperatures caused by
changing climate conditions. This means that modeled future water temperatures (e.g., mine
year 112) assume that without the proposed action, stream temperatures will be similar to the
historic water temperature data on which the model was calibrated (Brown and Caldwell 2018).
In an effort to inform the interpretation of stream modeling results in respect to the possibility of
changing conditions into this analysis, NorWeST-modeled stream temperatures are presented
(Isaak et al. 2016) alongside the SPLNT stream temperatures (Table 5).
The NorWeST model, produced by the U.S. Forest Service Rocky Mountain Research Station
(RMRS), provides a variety of scenario-based parameters that represent future stream
temperatures for National Hydrography Dataset (NHD-Plus) reaches across the western United
States. The stream temperatures from the most downstream NHD-Plus reach in each stream
segment and the equivalent SPLNT reach water temperatures are presented in Table 5. Mean
August stream temperature is used in both datasets.
Of the NorWeST parameters, modeled stream temperatures for 1993-2011 and 2015 are the
most appropriate for comparison to existing condition (Baseline) SPLNT modeled stream
temperatures. There are two parameters in the NorWeST dataset that predict stream
temperatures based on future scenarios; they are represented by the A1B warming trajectories
2040 (2030-2059), and 2080 (2070-2099). There are differences between the 1993-2011 or 2015
stream temperatures and the future scenario stream temperatures in the NorWeSTmodeled
outputs. The timeline of the proposed project is unknown, but if the proposed action or one of the
alternatives was to be implemented in 2025, then Year 20 would happen in 2042, well within the
NorWeST 2045 (2030-2059) prediction timeframe. Year 112 is outside of the predicted
timeframes the NorWeST models provide. These factors should be considered when interpreting
modeled future temperatures, especially the further into the future the modeled water
temperatures represent.

Table 5. Comparison of Baseline SPLNT Model Temperatures with NorWeST Model Stream
Temperatures for Multiple Timeframes

Stream Baseline SPLNT Model NorWeST Model Stream Temperature (°C)

Segment Modeled Stream
Number SPLNT Reach 1993-2011 2015 2030-2059 2070-2099
Temperature (°C)
1 YPPLakeHeadwater 11.72 11.57 12.18 12.86 13.7
2 MC10 11.57 10.38 10.99 11.64 12.46
3 EFSFSR4_atRabbitCreek 9.24 9.95 10.56 11.2 12.01
4 SC7 10.64 10.83 11.43 12.1 12.92

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 9

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

4.0 RESULTS

4.1 SUMMARY
In general, the impacts associated with the proposed project on stream temperatures would be
an increase in stream temperatures in various reaches in the mine site study area. Fish would be
affected by these water temperature changes. In general, bull trout and Chinook salmon would
be the most negatively affected species, because they migrate and spawn in the summer and fall,
when lower flows and higher air temperatures would amplify the impacts of the project on stream
temperatures. Steelhead would have the most positive benefits, because their amount if habitat
would increase from baseline.
The results of the stream temperature analysis (in number of stream kilometers in each threshold
temperature consideration derived from the literature) are presented for all four stream segments
combined (1 through 4) by alternative and by species in Tables 6 through 17. Results by stream
segment for each species per alternative are provided in Appendix A. A brief discussion of
selected results for the stream segments is presented herein; refer to Appendix A for detailed
results. It is important to understand that some of the temperature criteria can be viewed as
positive if there are increased stream kilometers that fall within them, while increases in kilometers
within other thresholds can be viewed as negative for that species.
Note that the guidance-based temperature thresholds and their corresponding criteria for each
life stage/temperature consideration used in the analysis are presented in Tables 1 through 4. In
general, a more conservative approach to analyzing the temperatures was used (the highest
modeled temperature within the appropriate timeframe). Therefore, the interpretation of the
results in Tables 6 through 17 and the tables in Appendix A must be accompanied by an
understanding of the criteria, timestamps, and applied temperature thresholds that are presented
in Tables 1 through 4. Further, the change in available habitat found at the bottom of the results
tables in Appendix A is important to consider when interpreting stream lengths presented for any
species, life stage, or mine year.

4.2 ALTERNATIVE ONE

The results of the stream temperature analysis (in number of stream kilometers within each
threshold temperature consideration derived from the literature) for all four stream segments
combined are summarize by species in the tables below (Tables 6 through 9) under the proposed
action (Alternative 1). Selected results by stream segments are discussed in the following the
tables; the full results by stream segment are contained in Appendix A.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 10

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 6. Alternative 1: All Stream Segments – Chinook salmon

Chinook Salmon (Spring/Summer-Run) Stream Length within Threshold (kilometer)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
Adult Migration
Lethal (1 week exposure) 0 1.83 1.83 3.06 3.06 3.99 3.99 2.65 2.65
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 3.66 3.66 0.86 0.86
Optimal Adult Swimming Performance 2.44 6.20 3.76 6.84 4.4 5.09 2.65 5.96 3.52
Reduced Adult Swimming Performance 0 0 0 0 0 0.87 0.87 0 0
Migration blockage & delay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Overall reduction in migration fitness due to
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
cumulative stress
Adult Spawning
Field Observed Spawning Temp 16.72 9.36 -7.36 11.50 -5.22 9.97 -6.75 11.09 -5.63
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 1.51 1.83 0.32 1.83 0.32 1.98 0.47 0.86 -0.65
Incubation/Emergence
Optimal 4.99 3.08 -1.91 2.88 -2.11 2.88 -2.11 7.57 2.58
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 1.51 1.83 0.32 1.83 0.32 1.98 0.47 0.86 -0.65
Juvenile Rearing
Optimal 16.72 9.36 -7.36 8.98 -7.74 5.65 -11.07 7.67 -9.05
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 10.23 6.20 -4.03 7.50 -2.73 5.95 -4.28 6.82 -3.41
Optimal Growth (limited food) 15.22 6.54 -8.68 7.83 -7.39 5.65 -9.57 5.65 -9.57
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0
Impairment to Smoltification 11.13 6.78 -4.35 8.08 -3.05 7.40 -3.73 7.40 -3.73
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 3.66 3.66 0.86 0.86
Common Summer Habitat Use
Optimal 16.72 4.37 -12.35 3.10 -13.62 5.65 -11.07 7.67 -9.05
Total Available Habitat 16.72 8.03 -8.69 12.49 -4.23 12.70 -4.02 12.70 -4.02

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 11

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 7. Alternative 1: All Stream Segments – Steelhead

Steelhead Stream Length within Threshold (kilometer)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
Incubation/Emergence
Optimal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 2.13 6.2 4.07 7.5 5.37 6.82 4.69 6.82 4.69
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Juvenile Rearing
Optimal 2.13 9.36 7.23 8.98 6.85 5.65 3.52 7.67 5.54
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 2.13 6.2 4.07 7.5 5.37 5.95 3.82 6.82 4.69
Optimal Growth (limited food) 2.13 6.54 4.41 7.83 5.7 5.65 3.52 5.65 3.52
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Impairment to Smoltification 2.13 6.78 4.65 8.08 5.95 7.4 5.27 7.4 5.27
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 3.66 3.66 0.86 0.86
Common Summer Habitat Use
Optimal 2.13 5.88 3.75 8.98 6.85 6.31 4.18 7.67 5.54
Total Available Habitat 2.13 11.19 9.06 12.49 10.36 12.7 10.57 12.7 10.57

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 12

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 8. Alternative 1: All Stream Segments – Westslope Cutthroat Trout

Cutthroat Trout Stream Length within Threshold (kilometer)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline

Adult Spawning
Field Observed Spawning Temp 0.85 0.89 0.04 0.52 -0.33 0.52 -0.33 0.52 -0.33

Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 12.5 6.34 -6.16 11.14 -1.36 20.12 7.62 16.71 4.21
Juvenile Rearing
Functioning appropriately 5.01 2.29 -2.72 2.29 -2.72 2.37 -2.64 2.37 -2.64
Functioning at risk 15.1 7.32 -7.78 7.32 -7.78 5.81 -9.29 8.09 -7.01
Unacceptable risk 8.87 6.34 -2.53 10.18 1.31 20.12 11.25 17.84 8.97
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 12.5 6.34 -6.16 11.14 -1.36 18.61 6.11 16.71 4.21
Optimal Growth (limited food) 26.62 10.77 -15.85 14.5 -12.12 14.43 -12.19 16.21 -10.41
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Impairment to Smoltification 15.33 7.88 -7.45 11.72 -3.61 20.7 5.37 20.7 5.37

High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 7.37 7.37 1.75 1.75

Total Available Habitat 28.98 15.95 -13.03 19.79 -9.19 28.3 -0.68 28.3 -0.68

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 13

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 9. Alternative 1: All Stream Segments – Bull Trout

Bull Trout Stream Length within Threshold (kilometer)

EOY EOY EOY
Baseline Δ Baseline Δ Baseline Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
6 12 18
Adult Spawning
Functioning appropriately 1.61 0 -0.76 0 -0.76 0 -0.76 0 -0.76
Functioning at risk 8.69 3.08 -2.25 5.45 0.12 3.67 -1.66 4.41 -0.92
Unacceptable risk 18.69 10.25 -12.42 11.72 -11.56 12.42 -12.55 11.68 -13.29
Spawning Initiation 1.61 0 -1.61 3.23 1.62 0 -1.61 0 -1.61
Temp at which Peak Spawning Occurs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Incubation/Emergence
Functioning appropriately 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Functioning at risk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Unacceptable risk 28.99 13.33 -15.16 17.17 -11.32 16.09 -12.4 16.09 -12.4
Substantially Reduced Egg Survival and Size 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Juvenile Rearing
Functioning appropriately 13.66 6.41 -7.25 6.41 -7.25 5.86 -7.8 5.86 -7.8
Functioning at risk 12.89 0.83 -12.06 3.81 -9.08 1.61 -11.75 2.58 -11.75
Unacceptable risk 2.44 6.09 3.65 6.95 4.51 8.61 0.37 7.65 0.37
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 13.82 2.63 -11.19 5.99 -7.83 2.27 -12.68 4.05 -11.87
Optimal Growth (limited food) 13.66 6.41 -7.25 6.41 -7.25 5.86 -7.8 10.23 -7.8
Optimal temp to occur in field 4.03 3.87 -0.16 3.73 -0.3 10.23 -2.97 1.53 -2.5
Competition Disadvantage 15.33 6.92 -8.41 10.76 -4.57 3.95 -11.38 3.95 -11.38
Emigration
Spawning Initiation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Common Summer Habitat Use
Spawning Initiation 8.66 6.41 -2.25 6.41 -2.25 5.86 -2.8 5.86 -2.8
Total Available Habitat 28.99 13.33 -15.66 17.17 -11.82 16.09 -12.9 16.09 -12.9

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 14

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

4.2.1 Stream Segment 1: EFSFSR and tributaries from Sugar Creek upstream to Meadow Creek
• There would be an increase in kilometers of stream in the field-observed spawning
temperature range for Chinook salmon after Year 12. There also would be more kilometers
of stream in the optimal water temperature range for incubation/emergence after Year 12.
However, more kilometers of stream would reach water temperatures that are considered
lethal over prolonged timeframes 1. Stream length in the optimal water temperature range
for juvenile rearing would decline from 4.26 kilometers to 0.66 kilometer by Year 18, but
would be 2.43 kilometers by Year 112.
• Steelhead would have increased stream length in the optimal temperature range for adult
common summer use in Years 12 and 112. Stream length in the optimal water temperature
range for juvenile rearing would increase in all years except Year 18.
• Cutthroat would have increased stream kilometers functioning at an unacceptable risk
water temperature range for juvenile rearing, and a corresponding decrease in stream
length in the functioning appropriately/functioning at risk water temperature ranges for
juvenile rearing.

4.2.2 Stream Segment 2: Meadow Creek and East Fork Meadow Creek
• For Chinook salmon at Baseline, all 6.46 kilometers of available habitat are in the field-
observed spawning water temperature range. During mine operations, this would drop to
between zero and 0.84 kilometer, depending on the mine year. By EOY 112, there would
be 1.26 kilometers of stream in the field-observed spawning water temperature range.
Incubation and emergence temperatures are not at optimal temperatures at Baseline, and
would remain outside this range. Temperatures for juvenile rearing would change from
6.46 kilometers of stream in the optimal water temperature range at Baseline, to 0 to
0.25 kilometer during mine operations and post-closure.
• Steelhead would have increased habitat from Baseline conditions.
• For westslope cutthroat trout, there would be an increase in stream kilometers in the
functioning at unacceptable risk water temperature range. There also would be a decrease
in stream kilometers in the functioning appropriately/functioning at risk water temperature
ranges.
• Bull trout would have fewer kilometers of available habitat; however, much of the existing
habitat is in the functioning at unacceptable risk water temperature range for spawning
and emergence.

4.2.3 Stream Segment 3: EFSFSR Upstream of Meadow Creek

• Largely unaffected by proposed action for all species, except for an increase in steelhead
access to habitat.

4.2.4 Stream Segment 4: EFSFSR Downstream of Sugar Creek

• This is a short reach of approximately 1 kilometer that would experience few changes from
Baseline for all species.

1 The lethal temperature criterion for Chinook is set for a 1-week exposure to water temperatures 21 to 22°C. If the
maximum water temperature in a day or week reaches that temperature, it does not mean it would be lethal to fish.
However, it is a measure of stress on fish.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 15

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

4.3 ALTERNATIVE 2
The results of the stream temperature analysis (in number of stream kilometers in each threshold
temperature consideration derived from the literature) for all four stream segments combined are
summarized by species in the tables below (Tables 10 through 13) under the Modified Proposed
Action (Alternative 2). Selected results by stream segments are discussed in the following the
tables; the full results by stream segment are contained in Appendix A.
In general, impacts associated with Alternative 2 are similar to those under Alternative 1, with
small changes in stream lengths that fall within various water temperature considerations.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 16

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 10. Alternative 2: All Stream Segments – Chinook salmon

Chinook Salmon (Spring/Summer-Run) Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

EOY
Baseline Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
6
Adult Migration
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 1.23 1.23 1.83 1.83 0 0
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 1.83 1.83 0 0
Optimal Adult Swimming Performance 2.44 3.54 1.1 6.2 3.76 7.13 4.69 7.13 4.69
Reduced Adult Swimming Performance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Migration blockage & delay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Overall reduction in migration fitness due to
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
cumulative stress
Adult Spawning
Field-Observed Spawning Temp 16.72 11.19 -5.53 12.96 -3.76 9.49 -7.23 12.12 -4.6
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 1.51 0.72 -0.79 3.28 1.77 6.47 4.96 1.56 0.05
Incubation/Emergence
Optimal 4.99 4.41 -0.58 3.08 -1.91 4.41 -0.58 4.41 -0.58
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 1.51 0.72 -0.79 3.28 1.77 6.47 4.96 1.56 0.05
Juvenile Rearing
Optimal 16.72 11.19 -5.53 11.28 -5.44 6.54 -10.18 10.29 -6.43
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 10.23 5.93 -4.3 7.7 -2.53 7.13 -3.1 7.13 -3.1
Optimal Growth (limited food) 15.22 10.58 -4.64 10.19 -5.03 4.99 -10.23 4.99 -10.23
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Impairment to Smoltification 11.13 6.78 -4.35 8.55 -2.58 7.71 -3.42 7.71 -3.42
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 1.83 1.83 0 0
Common Summer Habitat Use
Optimal 16.72 11.19 -5.53 3.1 -13.62 6.54 -10.18 10.29 -6.43
Total Available Habitat 16.72 11.19 -5.53 12.96 -3.76 13.5 -3.22 12.12 -4.6

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 17

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 11. Alternative 2: All Stream Segments – Steelhead

Steelhead Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
Incubation/Emergence
Optimal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 2.13 5.93 3.8 7.7 5.57 7.13 5.00 7.13 5.00
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Juvenile Rearing
Optimal 2.13 11.19 9.06 11.28 9.15 6.54 4.41 10.29 8.16
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 2.13 5.93 3.8 7.7 5.57 7.13 5.00 7.13 5.00
Optimal Growth (limited food) 2.13 10.58 8.45 10.19 8.06 4.99 2.86 4.99 2.86
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Impairment to Smoltification 2.13 6.78 4.65 8.55 6.42 7.71 5.58 7.71 5.58
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 1.83 1.83 0 0.00
Common Summer Habitat Use
Optimal 2.13 7.71 5.58 11.28 9.15 6.54 4.41 9.11 6.98
Total Available Habitat 2.13 11.19 9.06 12.96 10.83 12.12 9.99 12.12 9.99

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 18

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 12. Alternative 2: All Stream Segments – Westslope Cutthroat Trout

Cutthroat Trout Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

EOY
Baseline Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
6
Adult Spawning
Field-Observed Spawning Temp 0.85 0.89 0.04 0.52 -0.33 0.52 -0.33 0.52 -0.33

Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 12.5 5.93 -6.57 10.27 -2.23 18.51 6.01 15.1 2.6
Juvenile Rearing
Functioning appropriately 5.01 2.54 -2.47 2.29 -2.72 2.37 -2.64 2.37 -2.64
Functioning at risk 15.1 7.59 -7.51 7.59 -7.51 6.76 -8.34 9.04 -6.06
Unacceptable risk 8.87 5.93 -2.94 10.27 1.4 18.51 9.64 16.23 7.36
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 12.5 5.93 -6.57 10.27 -2.23 18.51 6.01 15.1 2.6
Optimal Growth (limited food) 26.62 14.56 -12.06 16.86 -9.76 15.5 -11.12 17.31 -9.31
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Impairment to Smoltification 15.33 7.74 -7.59 12.08 -3.25 19.49 4.16 19.49 4.16

High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 1.83 1.83 0 0

Total Available Habitat 28.98 16.06 -12.92 20.15 -8.83 27.64 -1.34 27.64 -1.34

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 19

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 13. Alternative 2: All Stream Segments – Bull Trout

Bull Trout Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline

Adult Spawning
Functioning appropriately 1.61 0 -0.76 0 0.13 0 -0.76 0 -0.76
Functioning at risk 8.69 4.66 -0.92 3.08 1.4 4.41 -0.92 4.41 -0.92
Unacceptable risk 18.69 8.78 -13.39 2.59 1.95 11.71 -6.98 11.71 -6.98
Spawning Initiation 1.61 0 -1.61 0 -0.72 0 -1.61 0 -1.61
Temp at which Peak Spawning Occurs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Incubation/Emergence
Functioning appropriately 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Functioning at risk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Unacceptable risk 28.99 13.44 -14.8 15.67 1.1 16.12 -12.37 16.12 -12.37

Substantially Reduced Egg Survival and Size 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Juvenile Rearing
Functioning appropriately 13.66 6.66 -7.25 6.41 -7.25 6.41 -7.25 6.41 -7.25
Functioning at risk 12.89 3.49 -10.06 3.06 -9.83 2.54 -10.35 3.04 -9.85
Unacceptable risk 2.44 3.29 2.01 6.2 3.76 7.17 4.73 6.67 4.23
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 13.82 6.17 -9.72 6.49 -7.33 3.68 -11.03 3.04 -10.78
Optimal Growth (limited food) 13.66 6.66 -7.25 6.41 -7.25 6.41 -7.25 6.41 -7.25
Optimal temp to occur in field 4.03 3.29 -0.33 4.05 0.02 1.86 -3.06 0 -4.03
Competition Disadvantage 15.33 6.78 -8.05 9.26 -6.07 9.71 -5.62 9.71 -5.62
Emigration
Spawning Initiation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Common Summer Habitat Use
Spawning Initiation 8.66 6.41 -2.25 6.41 -2.25 6.41 -2.25 6.41 -2.25
Total Available Habitat 28.99 13.44 -15.55 18.42 -10.57 16.12 -12.87 16.12 -12.87

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 20

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

4.3.1 Stream Segment 1: EFSFSR and tributaries from Sugar Creek upstream to Meadow Creek
• Effects on Chinook salmon would be similar to Alternative 1; however, summer maximum
water temperatures would only reach the lethal threshold in 1.23 kilometers in 1 year
(EOY 12)—a reduction from those predicted for Alternative 1. There also would be an
increase in stream kilometers in the optimal summer habitat use water temperature range.
Fewer kilometers of stream would reach temperatures that are considered lethal over
prolonged timeframes (this does not mean temperatures would be lethal to Chinook
salmon 2) than under Alternative 1.
• Steelhead impacts would be similar to Alternative 1, with a few variations in stream lengths
in various criteria.
• Cutthroat trout would have increased stream kilometers functioning at unacceptable risk
water temperature range for juvenile rearing (similar to Alternative 1).

4.3.2 Stream Segment 2: Meadow Creek and East Fork Meadow Creek
• In general, impacts are similar to Alternative 1, but with fewer stream kilometers in
negative criteria thresholds, and more kilometers of streams in positive water temperature
consideration thresholds.

4.3.3 Stream Segment 3: EFSFSR Upstream of Meadow Creek

• Effects would be similar to Alternative 1. This segment would be largely unaffected by the
proposed action for all species, except the increase in steelhead access to habitat.

4.3.4 Stream Segment 4: EFSFSR Downstream of Sugar Creek

• This is a short reach of approximately 1 kilometer that would experience few changes from
baseline for all species.

4.4 ALTERNATIVE 3
The results of the stream temperature analysis (in number of stream kilometers in each threshold
temperature consideration derived from the literature) for all four stream segments combined are
summarized by species in the tables below (Tables 10 through 13) under the Upper East Fork
TSF/DRSF alternative (Alternative 3). Selected results by stream segments are discussed in the
following the tables; the full results by stream segment are provided in Appendix A.
In general, results are similar to Alternative 1 below the confluence of Meadow Creek and the
EFSFSR confluence (Stream Segments 1 and 4). Above the confluence, the impacts are quite
different from the other alternatives, because impacts to Meadow Creek (Stream Segment 2) are
lower, and impacts the EFSFSR above Meadow Creek are greater than Alternatives 1 or 2.

2 The lethal water temperature criteria for Chinook salmon is set to a 1-week exposure to temperatures 21°C to
22°C. If the maximum water temperature in a day or week reaches that temperature, it does not mean it would be
lethal to fish. However, it is a measure of stress on fish.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 21

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 14. Alternative 3: All Stream Segments – Chinook salmon

Chinook Salmon (Spring/Summer-Run) Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

EOY
Baseline Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
6
Adult Migration
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 3.84 3.84 4.18 4.18 6.49 6.49 6.49 6.49
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0.00 0 2.15 2.15 6.63 6.63 5.70 5.7
Optimal Adult Swimming Performance 2.44 7.79 5.35 9.15 6.71 2.17 -0.27 6.17 3.73
Reduced Adult Swimming Performance 0 0 0 0 0 0.39 0.39 0 0
Migration blockage & delay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Overall reduction in migration fitness due to
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
cumulative stress
Adult Spawning
Field-Observed Spawning Temp 16.72 10.49 -6.23 12.57 -4.15 4.84 -11.88 10.61 -6.11
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 1.51 4.76 3.25 6.67 5.16 7.91 6.4 6.32 4.81
Incubation/Emergence
Optimal 4.99 0.00 -4.99 0.00 -4.99 0.00 -4.99 0.00 -4.99
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 1.51 4.76 3.25 6.67 5.16 7.91 6.4 6.32 4.81
Juvenile Rearing
Optimal 16.72 7.01 -9.71 7.01 -9.71 5.59 -11.13 5.59 -11.13
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 10.23 10.31 0.08 11.67 1.44 10.93 0.7 11.32 1.09
Optimal Growth (limited food) 15.22 4.97 -10.25 4.08 -11.14 4.08 -11.14 4.08 -11.14
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0
Impairment to Smoltification 11.13 11.21 0.08 12.57 1.44 12.22 1.09 12.22 1.09
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0.00 0 2.15 2.15 6.63 6.63 5.70 5.7
Common Summer Habitat Use
Optimal 16.72 7.01 -9.71 3.10 -13.62 5.59 -11.13 5.59 -11.13
Total Available Habitat 16.72 11.21 -5.51 12.57 -4.15 12.22 -4.5 12.22 -4.5

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 22

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 15. Alternative 3: All Stream Segments – Steelhead

Steelhead Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
Incubation/Emergence
Optimal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 2.13 10.31 8.18 11.67 9.54 11.32 9.19 11.32 9.19
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Juvenile Rearing
Optimal 2.13 7.01 4.88 7.01 4.88 5.59 3.46 5.59 3.46
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 2.13 10.31 8.18 11.67 9.54 4.69 2.56 5.62 3.49
Optimal Growth (limited food) 2.13 4.97 2.84 4.08 1.95 4.08 1.95 4.08 1.95
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 7.52 8 7.52 8
Impairment to Smoltification 2.13 11.21 9.08 12.57 10.44 12.22 10.09 12.22 10.09
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 2.15 2.15 6.63 6.63 5.7 5.70
Common Summer Habitat Use
Optimal 2.13 7.01 4.88 7.01 4.88 5.59 3.46 5.59 3.46
Total Available Habitat 2.13 11.21 9.08 12.57 10.44 12.22 10.09 12.22 10.09

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 23

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 16. Alternative 3: All Stream Segments – Westslope Cutthroat Trout

Cutthroat Trout Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

EOY
Baseline Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
6
Adult Spawning
Field-Observed Spawning Temp 0.85 0.89 0.04 0.85 0 0.52 -0.33 0.52 -0.33
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 12.5 16.37 3.87 20.05 7.55 26.12 13.62 26.12 13.62
Juvenile Rearing
Functioning appropriately 5.01 2.48 -2.53 2.44 -2.57 2.53 -2.48 2.53 -2.48
Functioning at risk 15.1 8.2 -6.9 8.2 -6.9 6.94 -8.16 6.94 -8.16
Unacceptable risk 8.87 14.63 5.76 18.31 9.44 24.56 15.69 24.56 15.69
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 12.5 16.37 3.87 20.05 7.55 16.52 4.02 16.52 4.02
Optimal Growth (limited food) 26.62 18.57 -8.05 19.75 -6.87 0 -26.62 0 -26.62
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Impairment to Smoltification 15.33 18.65 3.32 22.33 7 27.2 11.87 27.2 11.87
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 2.4 2.4 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.6
Total Available Habitat 28.98 25.31 -3.67 28.95 -0.03 34.03 5.05 34.03 5.05

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 24

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 17. Alternative 3: All Stream Segments – Bull Trout

Bull Trout Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
Adult Spawning
Functioning appropriately 1.61 0.76 0 0.76 0 0 -0.76 0 -0.76
Functioning at risk 8.69 0.83 -4.5 0.83 -4.5 1.59 -3.74 1.59 -3.74
Unacceptable risk 18.69 16.7 -1.99 18.52 -0.17 18.82 0.13 18.82 0.13
Spawning Initiation 1.61 0.76 -0.85 0.76 -0.85 0 -1.61 0 -1.61
Temp at which Peak Spawning Occurs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Incubation/Emergence
Functioning appropriately 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Functioning at risk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Unacceptable risk 28.99 18.29 -10.2 20.11 -8.38 20.41 -8.08 20.41 -8.08
Substantially Reduced Egg Survival and Size 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Juvenile Rearing
Functioning appropriately 13.66 4.95 -8.71 4.95 -8.71 4.95 -8.71 4.95 -8.71
Functioning at risk 12.89 5.69 -7.2 6.15 -6.74 5.94 -6.95 5.94 -6.95
Unacceptable risk 2.44 7.65 5.21 9.01 6.57 9.52 7.08 9.52 7.08
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 13.82 7.49 -6.33 6.81 -7.01 0 -13.82 0 -13.82
Optimal Growth (limited food) 13.66 4.95 -8.71 4.95 -8.71 4.95 -8.71 4.95 -8.71
Optimal temp to occur in field 4.03 2.09 -1.94 1.2 -2.83 2.25 -1.78 2.25 -1.78
Competition Disadvantage 15.33 13.34 -1.99 15.16 -0.17 15.46 0.13 15.46 0.13
Emigration
Spawning Initiation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Common Summer Habitat Use
Spawning Initiation 8.66 4.95 -3.71 4.95 -3.71 4.95 -3.71 4.95 -3.71
Total Available Habitat 28.99 18.29 -10.7 20.11 -8.88 20.41 -8.58 20.41 -8.58

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 25

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

4.4.1 Stream Segment 1: EFSFSR and tributaries from Sugar Creek upstream to Meadow Creek
• For Chinook salmon, stream kilometers in the field-observed spawning water temperature
range would increase as they do in Alternative 1. However, more kilometers of stream
would reach water temperatures that are considered lethal over prolonged timeframes
(this does not mean water temperatures would be lethal to Chinook salmon 3) than they
would under Alternative 1. Unlike Alternative 1, all of the optimal juvenile rearing and
common summer habitat use stream length would be lost.
• Steelhead would lose all optimal juvenile rearing and common summer stream use stream
length, in contrast to the gains in these categories under Alternative 1.
• Cutthroat trout would have a greater increase in stream kilometers in the functioning at
unacceptable risk water temperature range for juvenile rearing than would those under
Alternative 1.
• Bull trout would lose 3.71 kilometers of stream in the functioning appropriately water
temperature range for juvenile rearing, similar to the other alternatives.

4.4.2 Stream Segment 2: Meadow Creek and East Fork Meadow Creek
• For Chinook salmon at Baseline, all 6.46 kilometers of available habitat are in the field-
observed spawning water temperature range. This stream length would be reduced by
between 0.55 and 1.62 kilometers during mining operations and post-closure. There also
would be reductions in the length of stream in the optimal water temperature ranges for
juvenile rearing and common summer habitat use.
• Steelhead would have increased habitat from Baseline, because there is no access at
Baseline.
• Stream water temperatures for Westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout would have juvenile
rearing temperature impacts on approximately 1 kilometer of stream.

4.4.3 Stream Segment 3: EFSFSR Upstream of Meadow Creek

• For Chinook salmon, the length of stream in the field-observed spawning water
temperature range would be reduced from 4.99 kilometers at Baseline to less than
1 kilometer during mine operations and post-closure. All of the 4.99 kilometers of stream
in the optimal water temperature ranges for incubation/emergence and juvenile rearing
would be lost during mine operations and post-closure (except for 0.93 kilometer in
EOY 12).
• Steelhead would gain 0.93 kilometer of additional habitat in the optimal water temperature
range for incubation/emergence and juvenile rearing.
• Cutthroat trout would have increases in stream length in the functioning at unacceptable
risk water temperature range.

3
The lethal water temperature criteria Chinook salmon is set for a 1-week exposure to temperatures 21 to 22°C. If
the maximum temperature in a day or week reaches that water temperature, it does not mean it would be lethal
to fish. However, it is a measure of stress on fish.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 26

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

4.4.4 Stream Segment 4: EFSFSR Downstream of Sugar Creek

• This is a short reach of approximately 1 kilometer that would experience few changes from
Baseline for all species.

5.0 LITERATURE CITED

Brown and Caldwell. 2018. Final Stibnite Gold Project Stream and Pit Lake Network Temperature
Model Existing Conditions Report. Stibnite Gold Project, Valley County, Idaho. Prepared
for Midas Gold Idaho, Inc. Donnelly, ID. March 6.
Brown and Caldwell. 2019a. Stibnite Gold Project Stream and Pit Lake Network Temperature
Model Proposed Action and Proposed Action with Modifications Report. Stibnite Gold
Project, Valley County, Idaho. Prepared by Midas Gold Idaho, Inc. Donnelly, ID. March 15.
Brown and Caldwell. 2019b. East Fork South Fork Salmon River TSF/DRSF Alternative Modeling
Report. Stibnite Gold Project, Valley County, Idaho. Prepared by Midas Gold Idaho, Inc.
Donnelly, ID. May 2019.
Brown and Caldwell. 2019c. East Fork South Fork Salmon River TSF/DRSF Alternative Modeling
Report. Stibnite Gold Project, Valley County, Idaho. Prepared by Midas Gold Idaho, Inc.
Donnelly, ID. May 2019.
Ecosystem Sciences. 2019a. Habitat occupancy model: Westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout.
Technical memorandum Stibnite Gold EIS, Idaho.
Ecosystem Sciences. 2019b. Intrinsic Potential model: Chinook Salmon and steelhead trout.
Technical memorandum Stibnite Gold EIS, Idaho.
Isaak, D.J.; S. J. Wenger, E. E. Peterson, J. M. Ver Hoef, S. W. Hostetler, C. H. Luce, J. B.
Dunham, J. L. Kershner, B. B. Roper, D. E. Nagel, G. L. Chandler, S. P. Wollrab, S. L.
Parkes, and D. L. Horan. 2016. NorWeST modeled summer stream temperature scenarios
for the western U.S. Fort Collins, CO: Forest Service Research Data Archive. Available:
https://doi.org/10.2737/RDS-2016-0033.
MWH. 2017. Aquatic Resources 2016 Baseline Study. Prepared for Midas Gold Idaho, Inc.
Donnelly, ID. April.
NOAA National Marine Fisheries Service. 2017. ESA Recovery Plan for Snake River
Spring/Summer Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) & Snake River Basin
Steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss). November.
Poole, G., J. Dunham, M. Hicks, D. Keenan, J. Lockwood, E. Materna, D. McCullough, C.
Mebane, J. Risley, S. Sauter, and S. Spaulding. 2001. Scientific issues relating to
temperature criteria for salmon, trout, char native to the Pacific Northwest. Environmental
Policy Agency.
Rio ASE. 2018. Stream Design Report: Stibnite Gold Project. Section 3: Periodicity. Prepared
for Midas Gold Idaho, Inc. Donnelly, ID. May.
Rio ASE. 2019. Stream Functional Assessment (SFA) Report: Stibnite Gold Project. Section 4:
Water Quality. Prepared for Midas Gold Idaho, Inc. Donnelly, ID. February.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 27

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). 2003. EPA Region 10 Guidance for
Pacific Northwest State and Tribal Temperature Water Quality Standards. EPA 910-B-03-
002. Region 10 Office of Water. Seattle, WA.
United States Forest Service (Forest Service). 2003. Appendix B: Watershed Indicators and
Pathways in the Payette National Forest. Amended 2010. U.S. Forest Service, Boise, Idaho.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 28

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Appendix A: Temperature Analysis Results Tables

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 29

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

This page intentionally left blank

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 30

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

The tables below are the results of applying the SPLNT modeled stream temperatures at the
time stamps listed in Tables 1 through 4 to the criteria listed in Tables 1 through 4 and
outputting the number of stream kilometers that are in each criterion. They are organized
hierarchically by alternative, then by stream segment, then by species.

Note that there may be small differences in habitat values not as a result of the project, but of
the configuration and length of SPLNT modeling reaches, because they vary between
alternatives and within alternatives between mine year scenarios (and there can be multiple
models within a given mine year).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 31

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

This page intentionally left blank

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 32

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Alternative 1

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 33

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

This page intentionally left blank

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 34

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Chinook Salmon (Spring/Summer-Run) Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Δ
Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112
Baseline
Adult Migration
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 1.23 1.23 2.15 2.15 1.68 1.68
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 1.68 1.68 0 0
Optimal Adult Swimming Performance 0 3.48 3.48 4.12 4.12 4.84 4.84 4.84 4.84
Reduced Adult Swimming Performance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Migration blockage & delay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Overall reduction in migration fitness due to
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
cumulative stress
Adult Spawning

Field Observed Spawning Temp 4.26 3.48 -0.78 4.78 0.52 4.84 0.58 4.84 0.58

Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Incubation/Emergence
Optimal 0 0 0 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 3.16 3.16
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Juvenile Rearing
Optimal 4.26 3.48 -0.78 3.1 -1.16 0.66 -3.6 2.43 -1.83
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 4.26 3.48 -0.78 4.78 0.52 4.84 0.58 4.84 0.58
Optimal Growth (limited food) 4.26 0.66 -3.6 2.84 -1.42 0.66 -3.6 0.66 -3.6
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Impairment to Smoltification 4.26 3.48 -0.78 4.78 0.52 4.84 0.58 4.84 0.58
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 1.68 1.68 0 0
Common Summer Habitat Use
Optimal 4.26 3.48 -0.78 3.1 -1.16 0.66 -3.6 2.43 -1.83
Total Available Habitat 4.26 3.48 -0.78 4.78 0.52 4.84 0.58 4.84 0.58

Alternative 1 – Stream Segment 1: EFSFSR and tributaries from Sugar Creek to Meadow Creek – Chinook

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 35

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Steelhead Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline

Incubation/Emergence
Optimal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 1.12 3.48 2.36 4.78 3.66 4.84 3.72 4.84 3.72
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Juvenile Rearing
Optimal 1.12 3.48 2.36 3.1 1.98 0.66 -0.46 2.43 1.31
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 1.12 3.48 2.36 4.78 3.66 4.84 3.72 4.84 3.72
Optimal Growth (limited food) 1.12 0.66 -0.46 2.84 1.72 0.66 -0.46 0.66 -0.46
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Impairment to Smoltification 1.12 3.48 2.36 4.78 3.66 4.84 3.72 4.84 3.72
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 1.68 1.68 0 0
Common Summer Habitat Use
Optimal 1.12 0 -1.12 3.1 1.98 0.66 -0.46 2.43 1.31
Total Available Habitat 1.12 3.48 2.36 4.78 3.66 4.84 3.72 4.84 3.72

Alternative 1 – Stream Segment 1: EFSFSR and tributaries from Sugar Creek to Meadow Creek – Steelhead

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 36

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Cutthroat Trout Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline

Adult Spawning
Field Observed Spawning Temp 0.85 0.89 0.04 0.52 -0.33 0.52 -0.33 0.52 -0.33
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 4.88 3.98 -0.9 7.82 2.94 8.09 3.21 5.81 0.93
Juvenile Rearing
Functioning appropriately 2.79 0.89 -1.9 0.89 -1.9 0.94 -1.85 0.94 -1.85
Functioning at risk 2.57 0 -2.57 0 -2.57 0 -2.57 2.28 -0.29
Unacceptable risk 3.76 3.98 0.22 7.82 4.06 8.09 4.33 5.81 2.05
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 4.88 3.98 -0.9 7.82 2.94 8.09 3.21 5.81 0.93
Optimal Growth (limited food) 8.27 1.16 -7.11 5.78 -2.49 3.36 -4.91 4.33 -3.94
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Impairment to Smoltification 5.41 3.98 -1.43 7.82 2.41 8.09 2.68 8.09 2.68
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 1.68 1.68 0 0

Total Available Habitat 9.12 4.87 -4.25 8.71 -0.41 9.03 -0.09 9.03 -0.09

Alternative 1 – Stream Segment 1: EFSFSR and tributaries from Sugar Creek to Meadow Creek – Westslope Cutthroat Trout

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 37

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Bull Trout Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
Adult Spawning
Functioning appropriately 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Functioning at risk 0 0 0 3.23 3.23 0 0 0 0
Unacceptable risk 5.41 0 -5.41 0 -5.41 0 -5.41 0 -5.41
Spawning Initiation 0.85 0 -0.85 3.23 2.38 0 -0.85 0 -0.85
Temp at which Peak Spawning Occurs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Incubation/Emergence
Functioning appropriately 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Functioning at risk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Unacceptable risk 9.12 3.98 -5.14 7.82 -1.3 6.28 -2.84 6.28 -2.84
Substantially Reduced Egg Survival and Size 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Juvenile Rearing
Functioning appropriately 3.71 0 -3.71 0 -3.71 0 -3.71 0 -3.71
Functioning at risk 5.41 0.25 -5.16 3.23 -2.18 0 -5.41 0 -5.41
Unacceptable risk 0 3.73 3.73 4.59 4.59 0 0 0 0
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 5.41 1.16 -4.25 5.41 0 0 -5.41 0 -5.41
Optimal Growth (limited food) 3.71 0 -3.71 0 -3.71 0 -3.71 0 -3.71
Optimal temp to occur in field 3.02 2.98 -0.04 2.84 -0.18 0.25 -2.77 0.47 -2.55
Competition Disadvantage 5.41 3.98 -1.43 7.82 2.41 0 -5.41 0 -5.41
Emigration
Spawning Initiation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Common Summer Habitat Use
Spawning Initiation 3.71 0 -3.71 0 -3.71 0 -3.71 0 -3.71
Total Available Habitat 9.12 3.98 -5.14 7.82 -1.3 6.28 -2.84 6.28 -2.84

Alternative 1 – Stream Segment 1: EFSFSR and tributaries from Sugar Creek to Meadow Creek – Bull Trout

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 38

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Chinook Salmon (Spring/Summer-Run) Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
Adult Migration
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 1.83 1.83 1.83 1.83 1.84 1.84 0.97 0.97
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 1.98 1.98 0.86 0.86
Optimal Adult Swimming Performance 2.44 1.83 -0.61 1.83 -0.61 0.25 -2.19 1.12 -1.32
Reduced Adult Swimming Performance 0 0 0 0 0 0.87 0.87 0 0
Migration blockage & delay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Overall reduction in migration fitness due to
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
cumulative stress
Adult Spawning
Field Observed Spawning Temp 6.46 0 -6.46 0.84 -5.62 0.14 -6.32 1.26 -5.2

Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 1.51 1.83 0.32 1.83 0.32 1.98 0.47 0.86 -0.65
Incubation/Emergence
Optimal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 1.51 1.83 0.32 1.83 0.32 1.98 0.47 0.86 -0.65
Juvenile Rearing
Optimal 6.46 0 -6.46 0 -6.46 0 -6.46 0.25 -6.21
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 4.96 1.83 -3.13 1.83 -3.13 1.11 -3.85 1.98 -2.98
Optimal Growth (limited food) 4.95 0 -4.95 0 -4.95 0 -4.95 0 -4.95
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Impairment to Smoltification 5.86 1.83 -4.03 1.83 -4.03 1.98 -3.88 1.98 -3.88
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 1.98 1.98 0.86 0.86
Common Summer Habitat Use
Optimal 6.46 0 -6.46 0 -6.46 0 -6.46 0.25 -6.21
Total Available Habitat 6.46 1.83 -4.63 1.83 -4.63 1.98 -4.48 1.98 -4.48

Alternative 1 – Stream Segment 2: Meadow Creek and East Fork Meadow Creek – Chinook

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 39

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Steelhead Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline

Incubation/Emergence
Optimal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 0 1.83 1.83 1.83 1.83 1.98 1.98 1.98 1.98
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Juvenile Rearing
Optimal 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.25
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 0 1.83 1.83 1.83 1.83 1.11 1.11 1.98 1.98
Optimal Growth (limited food) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Impairment to Smoltification 0 1.83 1.83 1.83 1.83 1.98 1.98 1.98 1.98
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 1.98 1.98 0.86 0.86
Common Summer Habitat Use
Optimal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.25 0.25
Total Available Habitat 0 1.83 1.83 1.83 1.83 1.98 1.98 1.98 1.98

Alternative 1 – Stream Segment 2: Meadow Creek and East Fork Meadow Creek – Steelhead

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 40

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Cutthroat Trout Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline

Adult Spawning
Field Observed Spawning Temp 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 6.61 1.47 -5.14 2.43 -4.18 11.14 4.53 10.01 3.40
Juvenile Rearing
Functioning appropriately 1.59 0.77 -0.82 0.77 -0.82 0.80 -0.79 0.80 -0.79
Functioning at risk 7.16 2.96 -4.2 2.96 -4.2 1.45 -5.71 1.45 -5.71
Unacceptable risk 5.11 1.47 -3.64 1.47 -3.64 11.14 6.03 11.14 6.03
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 6.61 1.47 -5.14 2.43 -4.18 9.63 3.02 10.01 3.40
Optimal Growth (limited food) 12.35 3.73 -8.62 3.73 -8.62 6.08 -6.27 6.89 -5.46
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Impairment to Smoltification 8.91 2.43 -6.48 2.43 -6.48 11.14 2.23 11.14 2.23

High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.63 4.80 4.80 0.86 0.86

Total Available Habitat 13.86 5.2 -8.66 5.2 -8.66 13.39 -0.47 13.39 -0.47

Alternative 1 – Stream Segment 2: Meadow Creek and East Fork Meadow Creek – Westslope Cutthroat Trout

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 41

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Bull Trout Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
Adult Spawning
Functioning appropriately 0.76 0 -0.76 0 -0.76 0 -0.76 0 -0.76
Functioning at risk 0.83 0 -0.83 0 -0.83 1.45 0.62 0 -0.83
Unacceptable risk 12.27 3.47 -8.8 3.47 -8.8 2.48 -9.79 3.93 -8.34
Spawning Initiation 0.76 0 -0.76 0 -0.76 0 -0.76 0 -0.76
Temp at which Peak Spawning Occurs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Incubation/Emergence
Functioning appropriately 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Functioning at risk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Unacceptable risk 13.86 3.47 -10.39 3.47 -10.39 3.93 -9.93 3.93 -9.93
Substantially Reduced Egg Survival and
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Size
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Juvenile Rearing
Functioning appropriately 4.95 2 -2.95 2 -2.95 1.45 -3.5 1.45 -3.5
Functioning at risk 6.47 0 -6.47 0 -6.47 0.56 -5.91 0.56 -5.91
Unacceptable risk 2.44 1.47 -0.97 1.47 -0.97 1.92 -0.52 1.92 -0.52
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 7.4 0 -7.4 0 -7.4 0.56 -6.84 1.37 -6.03
Optimal Growth (limited food) 4.95 2 -2.95 2 -2.95 1.45 -3.5 1.45 -3.5
Optimal temp to occur in field 0 0 0 0 0 0.81 0.81 1.06 1.06
Competition Disadvantage 8.91 1.47 -7.44 1.47 -7.44 2.48 -6.43 2.48 -6.43
Emigration
Spawning Initiation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Common Summer Habitat Use
Spawning Initiation 4.95 2 -2.95 2 -2.95 1.45 -3.5 1.45 -3.5
Total Available Habitat 13.86 3.47 -10.39 3.47 -10.39 3.93 -9.93 3.93 -9.93

Alternative 1 – Stream Segment 2: Meadow Creek and East Fork Meadow Creek – Bull Trout

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 42

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Chinook Salmon (Spring/Summer-Run) Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

EOY
Baseline Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
6
Adult Migration
Lethal (1 week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal Adult Swimming Performance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Adult Swimming Performance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Migration blockage & delay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Overall reduction in migration fitness due to
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
cumulative stress
Adult Spawning
Field Observed Spawning Temp 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99 0.00 4.99 0.00 4.99 0.00

Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Incubation/Emergence
Optimal 4.99 3.08 3.08 2.22 -2.77 2.22 -2.77 4.41 -0.58
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Juvenile Rearing
Optimal 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99 0 4.99 0 4.99 0
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal Growth (limited food) 5.00 4.99 4.99 4.99 -0.01 4.99 -0.01 4.99 -0.01
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Impairment to Smoltification 0 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Common Summer Habitat Use
Optimal 4.99 0 4.99 4.99 0 4.99 0 4.99 0
Total Available Habitat 4.99 1.83 4.99 4.99 0 4.99 0 4.99 0

Alternative 1 – Stream Segment 3: EFSFSR Upstream of Meadow Creek – Chinook

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 43

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Steelhead Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

EOY
Baseline Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
6
Incubation/Emergence
Optimal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Juvenile Rearing
Optimal 0 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal Growth (limited food) 0 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Impairment to Smoltification 0 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Common Summer Habitat Use
Optimal 0 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99
Total Available Habitat 0 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99

Alternative 1 – Stream Segment 3: EFSFSR Upstream of Meadow Creek – Steelhead

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 44

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Cutthroat Trout Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

EOY
Baseline Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
6
Adult Spawning
Field Observed Spawning Temp 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Juvenile Rearing
Functioning appropriately 0.63 0.63 0 0.63 0 0.63 0 0.63 0
Functioning at risk 4.36 4.36 0 4.36 0 4.36 0 4.36 0
Unacceptable risk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal Growth (limited food) 4.99 4.99 0 4.99 0 4.99 0 4.99 0
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Impairment to Smoltification 0 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Available Habitat 4.99 4.99 0 4.99 0 4.99 0 4.99 0

Alternative 1 – Stream Segment 3: EFSFSR Upstream of Meadow Creek – Westslope Cutthroat Trout

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 45

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Bull Trout Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
Adult Spawning
Functioning appropriately 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Functioning at risk 4.5 3.08 -1.42 2.22 -2.28 2.22 -2.28 4.41 -0.09
Unacceptable risk 0 1.91 1.91 2.77 2.77 2.77 2.77 0.58 0.58
Spawning Initiation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Temp at which Peak Spawning Occurs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Incubation/Emergence
Functioning appropriately 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Functioning at risk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Unacceptable risk 4.5 4.99 0.49 4.99 0.49 4.99 0.49 4.99 0.49
Substantially Reduced Egg Survival and Size 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Juvenile Rearing
Functioning appropriately 5 4.41 -0.59 4.41 -0.59 4.41 -0.59 4.41 -0.59
Functioning at risk 0 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58
Unacceptable risk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 0 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58
Optimal Growth (limited food) 5 4.41 -0.59 4.41 -0.59 4.41 -0.59 4.41 -0.59
Optimal temp to occur in field 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Competition Disadvantage 0 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58
Emigration
Spawning Initiation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Common Summer Habitat Use
Spawning Initiation 0 4.41 4.41 4.41 4.41 4.41 4.41 4.41 4.41
Total Available Habitat 5 4.99 -0.01 4.99 -0.01 4.99 -0.01 4.99 -0.01

Alternative 1 – Stream Segment 3: EFSFSR Upstream of Meadow Creek – Bull Trout

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 46

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Chinook Salmon (Spring/Summer-Run) Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
Adult Migration
Lethal (1 week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal Adult Swimming Performance 0 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0 0 0 0
Reduced Adult Swimming Performance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Migration blockage & delay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Overall reduction in migration fitness due to
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
cumulative stress
Adult Spawning

Field Observed Spawning Temp 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0 -1.01 0 -1.01

Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Incubation/Emergence
Optimal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Juvenile Rearing
Optimal 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0 -1.01 0 -1.01
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0 -1.01 0 -1.01
Optimal Growth (limited food) 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0 -1.01 0 -1.01 0 -1.01
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Impairment to Smoltification 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0 -1.01 0 -1.01
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Common Summer Habitat Use
Optimal 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0 -1.01 0 -1.01
Total Available Habitat 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12

Alternative 1 – Stream Segment 4: EFSFSR Downstream of Sugar Creek – Chinook

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 47

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Steelhead Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline

Incubation/Emergence
Optimal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0 -1.01 0 -1.01
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0.00
Juvenile Rearing
Optimal 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0 -1.01 0 -1.01
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0 -1.01 0 -1.01
Optimal Growth (limited food) 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0 -1.01 0 -1.01 0 -1.01
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Impairment to Smoltification 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0 -1.01 0 -1.01
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Common Summer Habitat Use
Optimal 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.66 -0.35 0 -1.01
Total Available Habitat 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12

Alternative 1 – Stream Segment 4: EFSFSR Downstream of Sugar Creek – Steelhead

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 48

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Cutthroat Trout Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline

Adult Spawning
Field Observed Spawning Temp 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12
Juvenile Rearing
Functioning appropriately 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Functioning at risk 1.01 0 -1.01 0 -1.01 0 -1.01 0 -1.01
Unacceptable risk 0 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12
Optimal Growth (limited food) 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0 -1.01 0 -1.01 0 -1.01
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Impairment to Smoltification 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12

High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89

Total Available Habitat 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12

Alternative 1 – Stream Segment 4: EFSFSR Downstream of Sugar Creek – Westslope Cutthroat Trout

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 49

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Bull Trout Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
Adult Spawning
Functioning appropriately 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Functioning at risk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Unacceptable risk 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12
Spawning Initiation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Temp at which Peak Spawning Occurs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Incubation/Emergence
Functioning appropriately 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Functioning at risk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Unacceptable risk 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12
Substantially Reduced Egg Survival and Size 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Juvenile Rearing
Functioning appropriately 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Functioning at risk 1.01 0 -1.01 0 -1.01 0 -1.01 0 -1.01
Unacceptable risk 0 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0 -1.01 0 -1.01 0 -1.01
Optimal Growth (limited food) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal temp to occur in field 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0 -1.01 0 -1.01
Competition Disadvantage 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12
Emigration
Spawning Initiation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Common Summer Habitat Use
Spawning Initiation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Available Habitat 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12

Alternative 1 – Stream Segment 4: EFSFSR Downstream of Sugar Creek – Bull Trout

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 50

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Alternative 2

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 51

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

This page intentionally left blank

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 52

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Chinook Salmon (Spring/Summer-Run) Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
Adult Migration
Lethal (1 week exposure) 0 0 0 1.23 1.23 0 0 0 0
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal Adult Swimming Performance 0 2.82 2.82 4.59 4.59 3.61 3.61 3.61 3.61
Reduced Adult Swimming Performance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Migration blockage & delay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Overall reduction in migration fitness due to
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
cumulative stress
Adult Spawning

Field Observed Spawning Temp 4.26 3.48 -0.78 5.25 0.99 3.61 -0.65 3.61 -0.65

Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 0 0 0 2.56 2.56 2.95 2.95 0 0

Incubation/Emergence
Optimal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 0 0 0 2.56 2.56 2.95 2.95 0 0
Juvenile Rearing
Optimal 4.26 3.48 -0.78 3.57 -0.69 0.66 -3.6 3.61 -0.65
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 4.26 3.48 -0.78 5.25 0.99 3.61 -0.65 3.61 -0.65
Optimal Growth (limited food) 4.26 3.23 -1.03 2.84 -1.42 0 -4.26 0 -4.26
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Impairment to Smoltification 4.26 3.48 -0.78 5.25 0.99 3.61 -0.65 3.61 -0.65
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Common Summer Habitat Use
Optimal 4.26 3.48 -0.78 3.57 -0.69 0.66 -3.6 3.61 -0.65
Total Available Habitat 4.26 3.48 -0.78 5.25 0.99 4.99 0.73 3.61 -0.65

Alternative 2 – Stream Segment 1: EFSFSR and tributaries from Sugar Creek to Meadow Creek – Chinook

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 53

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Steelhead Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline

Incubation/Emergence
Optimal 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 1.12 3.48 2.36 5.25 4.13 3.61 2.49 3.61 2.49
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Juvenile Rearing
Optimal 1.12 3.48 2.36 3.57 2.45 0.66 -0.46 3.61 2.49
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 1.12 3.48 2.36 5.25 4.13 3.61 2.49 3.61 2.49
Optimal Growth (limited food) 1.12 3.23 2.11 2.84 1.72 0 -1.12 0 -1.12
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Impairment to Smoltification 1.12 3.48 2.36 5.25 4.13 3.61 2.49 3.61 2.49
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Common Summer Habitat Use
Optimal 1.12 0 -1.12 3.57 2.45 0.66 -0.46 2.43 1.31
Total Available Habitat 1.12 3.48 2.36 5.25 4.13 3.61 2.49 3.61 2.49

Alternative 2 – Stream Segment 1: EFSFSR and tributaries from Sugar Creek to Meadow Creek – Steelhead

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 54

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Cutthroat Trout Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline

Adult Spawning
Field Observed Spawning Temp 0.85 0.89 0.04 0.52 -0.33 0.52 0.48 0.52 0.85
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 4.88 3.48 -1.4 7.82 2.94 7.20 2.32 4.92 0.04
Juvenile Rearing
Functioning appropriately 2.79 1.14 -1.65 0.89 -1.9 0.94 -1.85 0.94 -1.85
Functioning at risk 2.57 0 -2.57 0 -2.57 0.00 -2.57 2.28 -0.29
Unacceptable risk 3.76 3.48 -0.28 7.82 4.06 7.20 3.44 4.92 1.16

Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 4.88 3.48 -1.4 7.82 2.94 7.20 2.32 4.92 0.04

Optimal Growth (limited food) 8.27 3.48 -4.79 5.78 -2.49 3.42 -4.85 3.67 -4.60

Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Impairment to Smoltification 5.41 3.48 -1.93 7.82 2.41 7.20 1.79 7.20 1.79

High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Available Habitat 9.12 4.62 -4.5 8.71 -0.41 8.14 -0.98 8.14 -0.98

Alternative 2 – Stream Segment 1: EFSFSR and tributaries from Sugar Creek to Meadow Creek – Westslope Cutthroat Trout

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 55

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Bull Trout Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
Adult Spawning
Functioning appropriately 0 0 0 0.89 0.89 0 0 0 0
Functioning at risk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Unacceptable risk 5.41 0 -5.41 7.18 1.77 5.39 -0.02 5.39 -0.02
Spawning Initiation 0.85 0 -0.85 0.89 0.04 0 -0.85 0 -0.85

Temp at which Peak Spawning Occurs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Incubation/Emergence
Functioning appropriately 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Functioning at risk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Unacceptable risk 9.12 3.98 -5.14 8.07 -1.05 5.39 -3.73 5.39 -3.73
Substantially Reduced Egg Survival and Size 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Juvenile Rearing
Functioning appropriately 3.71 0 -3.71 0 -3.71 0 -3.71 0 -3.71
Functioning at risk 5.41 0.25 -5.16 1.37 -4.04 0.94 -4.47 1.44 -3.97
Unacceptable risk 0 3.73 3.73 4.59 4.59 4.45 4.45 3.95 3.95
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 5.41 1.16 -4.25 3.55 -1.86 1.19 -4.22 1.44 -3.97
Optimal Growth (limited food) 3.71 0 -3.71 0 -3.71 0 -3.71 0 -3.71
Optimal temp to occur in field 3.02 2.98 -0.04 2.44 -0.58 0.97 -2.05 0 -3.02
Competition Disadvantage 5.41 3.98 -1.43 5.96 0.55 5.39 -0.02 5.39 -0.02
Emigration
Spawning Initiation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Common Summer Habitat Use
Spawning Initiation 3.71 0 -3.71 0 -3.71 0 -3.71 0 -3.71
Total Available Habitat 9.12 3.73 -5.39 8.71 -0.41 5.39 -3.73 5.39 -3.73

Alternative 2 – Stream Segment 1: EFSFSR and tributaries from Sugar Creek to Meadow Creek – Bull Trout

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 56

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Chinook Salmon (Spring/Summer-Run) Stream Length within/outside Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
Adult Migration
Lethal (1 week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 1.83 1.83 0 0
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 1.83 1.83 0 0
Optimal Adult Swimming Performance 2.44 0.72 -1.72 0.72 -1.72 2.63 0.19 2.63 0.19
Reduced Adult Swimming Performance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Migration blockage & delay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Overall reduction in migration fitness due

to cumulative stress 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Adult Spawning

Field Observed Spawning Temp 6.46 1.83 -4.63 1.83 -4.63 0 -6.46 2.63 -3.83

Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 1.51 0.72 -0.79 0.72 -0.79 2.63 1.12 1.56 0.05
Incubation/Emergence
Optimal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 1.51 0.72 -0.79 0.72 -0.79 2.63 1.12 1.56 0.05
Juvenile Rearing
Optimal 6.46 1.83 -4.63 1.83 -4.63 0 -6.46 0.8 -5.66
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 4.96 1.56 -3.4 1.56 -3.4 2.63 -2.33 2.63 -2.33
Optimal Growth (limited food) 4.95 1.47 -3.48 1.47 -3.48 0 -4.95 0 -4.95
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Impairment to Smoltification 5.86 1.83 -4.03 1.83 -4.03 2.63 -3.23 2.63 -3.23
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 1.83 1.83 0 0
Common Summer Habitat Use
Optimal 6.46 1.83 -4.63 1.83 -4.63 0 -6.46 0.8 -5.66
Total Available Habitat 6.46 1.83 -4.63 1.83 -4.63 2.63 -3.83 2.63 -3.83

Alternative 2 – Stream Segment 2: EFSFSR and tributaries from Sugar Creek to Meadow Creek – Chinook

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 57

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Steelhead Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
Incubation/Emergence
Optimal 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 0 1.56 1.56 1.56 1.56 2.63 2.63 2.63 2.63
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Juvenile Rearing
Optimal 0 1.83 1.83 1.83 1.83 0 0 0.8 0.8
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 0 1.56 1.56 1.56 1.56 2.63 2.63 2.63 2.63
Optimal Growth (limited food) 0 1.47 1.47 1.47 1.47 0 0 0 0
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Impairment to Smoltification 0 1.83 1.83 1.83 1.83 2.63 2.63 2.63 2.63
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 1.83 1.83 0 0
Common Summer Habitat Use
Optimal 0 1.83 1.83 1.83 1.83 0 0 0.80 0.8
Total Available Habitat 0 1.83 1.83 1.83 1.83 2.63 2.63 2.63 2.63

Alternative 2 – Stream Segment 2: Meadow Creek and East Fork Meadow Creek – Steelhead

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 58

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Cutthroat Trout Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
Adult Spawning
Field Observed Spawning Temp 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 6.61 1.56 -5.05 1.56 -5.05 10.42 3.81 9.29 2.68
Juvenile Rearing
Functioning appropriately 1.59 0.77 -0.82 0.77 -0.82 0.80 -0.79 0.80 -0.79
Functioning at risk 7.16 3.23 -3.93 3.23 -3.93 2.40 -4.76 2.40 -4.76
Unacceptable risk 5.11 1.56 -3.55 1.56 -3.55 10.42 5.31 10.42 5.31
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 6.61 1.56 -5.05 1.56 -5.05 10.42 3.81 9.29 2.68
Optimal Growth (limited food) 12.35 5.2 -7.15 5.2 -7.15 7.09 -5.26 8.65 -3.7
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Impairment to Smoltification 8.91 2.79 -6.12 2.79 -6.12 10.82 1.91 10.82 1.91
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 1.83 1.83 0.00 0
Total Available Habitat 13.86 5.56 -8.3 5.56 -8.3 13.62 -0.24 13.62 -0.24

Alternative 2 – Stream Segment 2: Meadow Creek and East Fork Meadow Creek – Westslope Cutthroat Trout

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 59

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Bull Trout Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
Adult Spawning
Functioning appropriately 0.76 0 -0.76 0 -0.76 0 -0.76 0 -0.76
Functioning at risk 0.83 0 -0.83 3.65 2.82 0 -0.83 0 -0.83
Unacceptable risk 12.27 3.83 -8.44 11.99 -0.28 4.85 -7.42 4.85 -7.42
Spawning Initiation 0.76 0 -0.76 0 -0.76 0 -0.76 0 -0.76
Temp at which Peak Spawning
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Occurs
Incubation/Emergence
Functioning appropriately 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Functioning at risk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Unacceptable risk 13.86 3.83 -10.03 15.64 1.78 4.85 -9.01 4.85 -9.01
Substantially Reduced Egg Survival
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
and Size
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Juvenile Rearing
Functioning appropriately 4.95 2 -2.95 2 -2.95 2 -2.95 2 -2.95
Functioning at risk 6.47 1.11 -5.36 1.11 -5.36 1.02 -5.45 1.02 -5.45
Unacceptable risk 2.44 0.72 -1.72 0.72 -1.72 1.83 -0.61 1.83 -0.61
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 7.4 1.47 -5.93 1.47 -5.93 1.02 -6.38 1.02 -6.38
Optimal Growth (limited food) 4.95 2 -2.95 2 -2.95 2 -2.95 2 -2.95
Optimal temp to occur in field 0 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0 0 0 0
Competition Disadvantage 8.91 1.83 -7.08 1.83 -7.08 2.85 -6.06 2.85 -6.06
Emigration
Spawning Initiation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Common Summer Habitat Use
Spawning Initiation 4.95 2 -2.95 2 -2.95 2 -2.95 2 -2.95
Total Available Habitat 13.86 3.83 -10.03 3.83 -10.03 4.85 -9.01 4.85 -9.01

Alternative 2 – Stream Segment 2: Meadow Creek and East Fork Meadow Creek – Bull Trout

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 60

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Chinook Salmon (Spring/Summer-Run) Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
Adult Migration
Lethal (1 week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal Adult Swimming Performance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced Adult Swimming Performance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Migration blockage & delay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Overall reduction in migration fitness due to
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
cumulative stress
Adult Spawning

Field Observed Spawning Temp 4.99 4.99 0 4.99 0 4.99 0 4.99 0

Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Incubation/Emergence
Optimal 4.99 4.41 -0.58 3.08 -1.91 4.41 -0.58 4.41 -0.58
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Juvenile Rearing
Optimal 4.99 4.99 0 4.99 0 4.99 0 4.99 0
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal Growth (limited food) 5.00 4.99 -0.01 4.99 -0.01 4.99 -0.01 4.99 -0.01
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Impairment to Smoltification 0 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Common Summer Habitat Use
Optimal 4.99 4.99 0 4.99 0 4.99 0 4.99 0
Total Available Habitat 4.99 4.99 0 4.99 0 4.99 0 4.99 0

Alternative 2 – Stream Segment 3: EFSFSR Upstream of Meadow Creek – Chinook

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 61

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Steelhead Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
Incubation/Emergence
Optimal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Juvenile Rearing
Optimal 0 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal Growth (limited food) 0 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Impairment to Smoltification 0 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Common Summer Habitat Use
Optimal 0 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99
Total Available Habitat 0 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99 4.99

Alternative 2 – Stream Segment 3: EFSFSR Upstream of Meadow Creek – Steelhead

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 62

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Cutthroat Trout Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
Adult Spawning
Field Observed Spawning Temp 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Juvenile Rearing
Functioning appropriately 0.63 0.63 0 0.63 0 0.63 0 0.63 0
Functioning at risk 4.36 4.36 0 4.36 0 4.36 0 4.36 0
Unacceptable risk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal Growth (limited food) 4.99 4.99 0 4.99 0 4.99 0 4.99 0
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Impairment to Smoltification 0 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Available Habitat 4.99 4.99 0 4.99 0 4.99 0 4.99 0

Alternative 2 – Stream Segment 3: EFSFSR Upstream of Meadow Creek – Westslope Cutthroat Trout

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 63

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Bull Trout Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
Adult Spawning
Functioning appropriately 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Functioning at risk 4.5 4.41 -0.09 3.08 -1.42 4.41 -0.09 4.41 -0.09
Unacceptable risk 0 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58
Spawning Initiation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Temp at which Peak Spawning Occurs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Incubation/Emergence
Functioning appropriately 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Functioning at risk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Unacceptable risk 4.5 4.99 0.49 4.99 0.49 4.99 0.49 4.99 0.49
Substantially Reduced Egg Survival and Size 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Juvenile Rearing
Functioning appropriately 5 4.41 -0.59 4.41 -0.59 4.41 -0.59 4.41 -0.59
Functioning at risk 0 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58
Unacceptable risk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 0 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58
Optimal Growth (limited food) 5 4.41 -0.59 4.41 -0.59 4.41 -0.59 4.41 -0.59
Optimal temp to occur in field 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Competition Disadvantage 0 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58 0.58
Emigration
Spawning Initiation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Common Summer Habitat Use
Spawning Initiation 0 4.41 4.41 4.41 4.41 4.41 4.41 4.41 4.41
Total Available Habitat 5 4.99 -0.01 4.99 -0.01 4.99 -0.01 4.99 -0.01

Alternative 2 – Stream Segment 3 EFSFSR Upstream of Meadow Creek – Bull Trout

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 64

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Chinook Salmon (Spring/Summer-Run) Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
Adult Migration
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal Adult Swimming Performance 0 0 0 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Reduced Adult Swimming Performance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Migration blockage & delay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Overall reduction in migration fitness due to
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
cumulative stress
Adult Spawning
Field Observed Spawning Temp 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 0 0 0 0 0 0.89 0.89 0 0
Incubation/Emergence
Optimal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 0 0 0 0 0 0.89 0.89 0 0
Juvenile Rearing
Optimal 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12
Optimal Growth (limited food) 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0 -1.01 0 -1.01
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Impairment to Smoltification 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Common Summer Habitat Use
Optimal 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12
Total Available Habitat 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12

Alternative 2 – Stream Segment 4: EFSFSR Downstream of Sugar Creek – Chinook

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 65

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Steelhead Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline

Incubation/Emergence
Optimal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Juvenile Rearing
Optimal 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12
Optimal Growth (limited food) 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0 -1.01 0 -1.01
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Impairment to Smoltification 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Common Summer Habitat Use
Optimal 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12
Total Available Habitat 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12

Alternative 2 – Stream Segment 4: EFSFSR Downstream of Sugar Creek – Steelhead

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 66

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Cutthroat Trout Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline

Adult Spawning
Field Observed Spawning Temp 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12
Juvenile Rearing
Functioning appropriately 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Functioning at risk 1.01 0 -1.01 0 -1.01 0 -1.01 0 -1.01
Unacceptable risk 0 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12
Optimal Growth (limited food) 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0 -1.01 0 -1.01
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Impairment to Smoltification 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12

High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total Available Habitat 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12

Alternative 2 – Stream Segment 4: EFSFSR Downstream of Sugar Creek – Westslope Cutthroat Trout

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 67

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Bull Trout Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
Adult Spawning
Functioning appropriately 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Functioning at risk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Unacceptable risk 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12
Spawning Initiation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Temp at which Peak Spawning Occurs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Incubation/Emergence
Functioning appropriately 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Functioning at risk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Unacceptable risk 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12
Substantially Reduced Egg Survival and Size 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Juvenile Rearing
Functioning appropriately 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Functioning at risk 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0 -1.01 0 -1.01 0 -1.01
Unacceptable risk 0 0 0 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0 -1.01 0 -1.01
Optimal Growth (limited food) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal temp to occur in field 1.01 0 -1.01 0.89 -0.12 0 -1.01 0 -1.01
Competition Disadvantage 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12
Emigration
Spawning Initiation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Common Summer Habitat Use
Spawning Initiation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Available Habitat 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12

Alternative 2 – Stream Segment 4: EFSFSR Downstream of Sugar Creek – Bull Trout

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 68

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Alternative 3

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 69

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

This page intentionally left blank

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 70

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Chinook Salmon (Spring/Summer-Run) Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
Adult Migration
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 3.48 3.48 4.18 4.18 4.84 4.84 4.84 4.84
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 2.15 2.15 4.84 4.84 4.84 4.84
Optimal Adult Swimming Performance 0 3.48 3.48 4.84 4.84 0 0 3.07 3.07
Reduced Adult Swimming Performance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Migration blockage & delay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Overall reduction in migration fitness due to
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
cumulative stress
Adult Spawning

Field Observed Spawning Temp 4.26 3.48 -0.78 4.84 0.58 0 -4.26 4.84 0.58

Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 0 2.93 2.93 4.84 4.84 4.84 4.84 4.18 4.18
Incubation/Emergence
Optimal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 0 2.93 2.93 4.84 4.84 4.84 4.84 4.18 4.18
Juvenile Rearing
Optimal 4.26 0 -4.26 0 -4.26 0 -4.26 0 -4.26
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 4.26 3.48 -0.78 4.84 0.58 4.84 0.58 4.84 0.58
Optimal Growth (limited food) 4.26 0 -4.26 0 -4.26 0 -4.26 0 -4.26
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Impairment to Smoltification 4.26 3.48 -0.78 4.84 0.58 4.84 0.58 4.84 0.58
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 2.15 2.15 4.84 4.84 4.84 4.84
Common Summer Habitat Use
Optimal 4.26 0 -4.26 0 -4.26 0 -4.26 0 -4.26
Total Available Habitat 4.26 3.48 -0.78 4.84 0.58 4.84 0.58 4.84 0.58

Alternative 3 – Stream Segment 1: EFSFSR and tributaries from Sugar Creek to Meadow Creek – Chinook

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 71

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Steelhead Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline

Incubation/Emergence
Optimal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 1.12 3.48 2.36 4.84 3.72 4.84 3.72 4.84 3.72
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00
Juvenile Rearing
Optimal 1.12 0 -1.12 0 -1.12 0 -1.12 0 -1.12
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 1.12 3.48 2.36 4.84 3.72 0 -1.12 0 -1.12
Optimal Growth (limited food) 1.12 0 -1.12 0 -1.12 0 -1.12 0 -1.12
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 4.84 4.84 4.84 4.84
Impairment to Smoltification 1.12 3.48 2.36 4.84 3.72 4.84 3.72 4.84 3.72
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 2.15 2.15 4.84 4.84 4.84 4.84
Common Summer Habitat Use
Optimal 1.12 0 -1.12 0 -1.12 0 -1.12 0 -1.12
Total Available Habitat 1.12 3.48 2.36 4.84 3.72 4.84 3.72 4.84 3.72

Alternative 3 – Stream Segment 1: EFSFSR and tributaries from Sugar Creek to Meadow Creek – Steelhead

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 72

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Cutthroat Trout Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline

Adult Spawning
Field Observed Spawning Temp 0.85 0.89 0.04 0.85 0 0.52 -0.33 0.52 -0.33
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 4.88 3.98 -0.9 7.66 2.78 8.09 3.21 8.09 3.21
Juvenile Rearing
Functioning appropriately 2.79 0.89 -1.9 0.85 -1.94 0.94 -1.85 0.94 -1.85
Functioning at risk 2.57 0 -2.57 0 -2.57 0 -2.57 0 -2.57
Unacceptable risk 3.76 3.98 0.22 7.66 3.9 8.09 4.33 8.09 4.33

Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 4.88 3.98 -0.9 7.66 2.78 3.25 -1.63 3.25 -1.63

Optimal Growth (limited food) 8.27 0.5 -7.77 2.57 -5.7 0 -8.27 0.00 -8.27

Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Impairment to Smoltification 5.41 3.98 -1.43 7.66 2.25 8.09 2.68 8.09 2.68
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 2.4 2.4 4.84 4.84 4.84 4.84

Total Available Habitat 9.12 4.87 -4.25 8.51 -0.61 9.03 -0.09 9.03 -0.09

Alternative 3 – Stream Segment 1: EFSFSR and tributaries from Sugar Creek to Meadow Creek – Westslope Cutthroat Trout

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 73

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Bull Trout Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
Adult Spawning
Functioning appropriately 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Functioning at risk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Unacceptable risk 5.41 3.98 -1.43 5.8 0.39 6.28 0.87 6.28 0.87
Spawning Initiation 0.85 0 -0.85 0 -0.85 0 -0.85 0 -0.85
Temp at which Peak Spawning Occurs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Incubation/Emergence
Functioning appropriately 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Functioning at risk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Unacceptable risk 9.12 3.98 -5.14 5.8 -3.32 6.28 -2.84 6.28 -2.84
Substantially Reduced Egg Survival and Size 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Juvenile Rearing
Functioning appropriately 3.71 0 -3.71 0 -3.71 0 -3.71 0 -3.71
Functioning at risk 5.41 0.25 -5.16 0.71 -4.7 0.72 -4.69 0.72 -4.69
Unacceptable risk 0 3.73 3.73 5.09 5.09 5.56 5.56 5.56 5.56
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 5.41 0.5 -4.91 0.71 -4.7 0 -5.41 0 -5.41
Optimal Growth (limited food) 3.71 0 -3.71 0 -3.71 0 -3.71 0 -3.71
Optimal temp to occur in field 3.02 0 -3.02 0 -3.02 0.97 -2.05 0.97 -2.05
Competition Disadvantage 5.41 3.98 -1.43 5.8 0.39 6.28 0.87 6.28 0.87
Emigration
Spawning Initiation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Common Summer Habitat Use
Spawning Initiation 3.71 0 -3.71 0 -3.71 0 -3.71 0 -3.71
Total Available Habitat 9.12 3.98 -5.14 5.8 -3.32 6.28 -2.84 6.28 -2.84

Alternative 3 – Stream Segment 1: EFSFSR and tributaries from Sugar Creek to Meadow Creek – Bull Trout

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 74

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Chinook Salmon (Spring/Summer-Run) Stream Length within/outside Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
Adult Migration
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0.36 0.36 0 0 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86
Optimal Adult Swimming Performance 2.44 2.49 0.05 2.49 0.05 1.28 -1.16 1.28 -1.16
Reduced Adult Swimming Performance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Migration blockage & delay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Overall reduction in migration fitness due to
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
cumulative stress
Adult Spawning
Field Observed Spawning Temp 6.46 5.19 -1.27 5.91 -0.55 4.84 -1.62 4.84 -1.62

Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 1.51 1.83 0.32 1.83 0.32 2.14 0.63 2.14 0.63
Incubation/Emergence
Optimal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 1.51 1.83 0.32 1.83 0.32 2.14 0.63 2.14 0.63
Juvenile Rearing
Optimal 6.46 5.19 -1.27 5.19 -1.27 4.7 -1.76 4.7 -1.76
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 4.96 5.01 0.05 5.01 0.05 4.66 -0.3 4.66 -0.3
Optimal Growth (limited food) 4.95 4.08 -0.87 4.08 -0.87 4.08 -0.87 4.08 -0.87
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Impairment to Smoltification 5.86 5.91 0.05 5.91 0.05 5.56 -0.3 5.56 -0.3
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86
Common Summer Habitat Use
Optimal 6.46 5.19 -1.27 5.19 -1.27 4.7 -1.76 4.7 -1.76
Total Available Habitat 6.46 5.91 -0.55 5.91 -0.55 5.56 -0.9 5.56 -0.9

Alternative 3 – Stream Segment 2: Meadow Creek and East Fork Meadow Creek – Chinook

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 75

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Steelhead Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline

Incubation/Emergence
Optimal 0 0 0 0 0 0.00 0 0 0
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 0 5.01 5.01 5.01 5.01 4.66 4.66 4.66 4.66
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Juvenile Rearing
Optimal 0 5.19 5.19 5.19 5.19 4.70 4.70 4.7 4.70
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 0 5.01 5.01 5.01 5.01 3.80 3.80 3.8 3.80
Optimal Growth (limited food) 0 4.08 4.08 4.08 4.08 4.08 4.08 4.08 4.08
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86
Impairment to Smoltification 0 5.91 5.91 5.91 5.91 5.56 5.56 5.56 5.56
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86
Common Summer Habitat Use
Optimal 0 5.19 5.19 5.19 5.19 4.70 4.70 4.70 4.70
Total Available Habitat 0 5.91 5.91 5.91 5.91 5.56 5.56 5.56 5.56

Alternative 3 – Stream Segment 2: Meadow Creek and East Fork Meadow Creek – Steelhead

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 76

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Cutthroat Trout Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline

Adult Spawning
Field Observed Spawning Temp 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 6.61 7.03 0.42 7.03 0.42 6.46 -0.15 6.46 -0.15
Juvenile Rearing
Functioning appropriately 1.59 1.59 0 1.59 0 1.59 0 1.59 0
Functioning at risk 7.16 6 -1.16 6 -1.16 6.00 -1.16 6.00 -1.16
Unacceptable risk 5.11 5.29 0.18 5.29 0.18 4.72 -0.39 4.72 -0.39
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 6.61 7.03 0.42 7.03 0.42 5.60 -1.01 5.60 -1.01
Optimal Growth (limited food) 12.35 11.05 -1.3 11.05 -1.3 0.00 -12.35 0 -12.35
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Impairment to Smoltification 8.91 7.93 -0.98 7.93 -0.98 7.36 -1.55 7.36 -1.55
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 0.86 0.86 0.86 0.86
Total Available Habitat 13.86 12.88 -0.98 12.88 -0.98 12.31 -1.55 12.31 -1.55

Alternative 3 – Stream Segment 2: Meadow Creek and East Fork Meadow Creek – Westslope Cutthroat Trout

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 77

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Bull Trout Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
Adult Spawning
Functioning appropriately 0.76 0.76 0 0.76 0 0 -0.76 0 -0.76
Functioning at risk 0.83 0.83 0 0.83 0 1.59 0.76 1.59 0.76
Unacceptable risk 12.27 11.29 -0.98 11.29 -0.98 10.72 -1.55 10.72 -1.55
Spawning Initiation 0.76 0.76 0 0.76 0 0 -0.76 0 -0.76
Temp at which Peak Spawning Occurs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Incubation/Emergence
Functioning appropriately 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Functioning at risk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Unacceptable risk 13.86 12.88 -0.98 12.88 -0.98 12.31 -1.55 12.31 -1.55
Substantially Reduced Egg Survival and Size 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Juvenile Rearing
Functioning appropriately 4.95 4.95 0 4.95 0 4.95 0 4.95 0
Functioning at risk 6.47 5.44 -1.03 5.44 -1.03 5.22 -1.25 5.22 -1.25

Unacceptable risk 2.44 2.49 0.05 2.49 0.05 2.14 -0.3 2.14 -0.3
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 7.4 6.1 -1.3 6.1 -1.3 0 -7.4 0 -7.4

Optimal Growth (limited food) 4.95 4.95 0 4.95 0 4.95 0 4.95 0

Optimal temp to occur in field 0 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 1.28 1.28 1.28 1.28
Competition Disadvantage 8.91 7.93 -0.98 7.93 -0.98 7.36 -1.55 7.36 -1.55
Emigration
Spawning Initiation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Common Summer Habitat Use
Spawning Initiation 4.95 4.95 0 4.95 0 4.95 0 4.95 0
Total Available Habitat 13.86 12.88 -0.98 12.88 -0.98 12.31 -1.55 12.31 -1.55

Alternative 3 – Stream Segment 2: Meadow Creek and East Fork Meadow Creek – Bull Trout

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 78

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Chinook Salmon (Spring/Summer-Run) Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
Adult Migration
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 0.93 0.93 0 0
Optimal Adult Swimming Performance 0 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0 0 0.93 0.93
Reduced Adult Swimming Performance 0 0 0 0 0 0.39 0.39 0 0
Migration blockage & delay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Overall reduction in migration fitness due to
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
cumulative stress
Adult Spawning
Field Observed Spawning Temp 4.99 0.93 -4.06 0.93 -4.06 0.00 -4.99 0.93 -4.06

Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 0 0 0 0 0 0.93 0.93 0 0

Incubation/Emergence
Optimal 4.99 0.00 -4.99 0 -4.99 0.00 -4.99 0.00 -4.99
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 0 0 0 0 0 0.93 0.93 0 0
Juvenile Rearing
Optimal 4.99 0.93 -4.06 0.93 -4.06 0.00 -4.99 0 -4.99
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 0 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.54 0.54 0.93 0.93
Optimal Growth (limited food) 5.00 0 -5.00 0 -5.00 0 -5.00 0 -5.00
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Impairment to Smoltification 0 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 0.93 0.93 0 0
Common Summer Habitat Use
Optimal 4.99 0.93 -4.06 0.93 -4.06 0 -4.99 0 -4.99
Total Available Habitat 4.99 0.93 -4.06 0.93 -4.06 0.93 -4.06 0.93 -4.06

Alternative 3 – Stream Segment 3: EFSFSR Upstream of Meadow Creek – Chinook

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 79

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Steelhead Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Δ EOY EOY
Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
Baseline 12 18
Incubation/Emergence
Optimal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 0 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Juvenile Rearing
Optimal 0 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0 0 0 0
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 0 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0 0 0.93 0.93
Optimal Growth (limited food) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Impairment to Smoltification 0 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 0.93 0.93 0 0
Common Summer Habitat Use
Optimal 0 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0 0 0 0
Total Available Habitat 0 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93

Alternative 3 – Stream Segment 3: EFSFSR Upstream of Meadow Creek – Steelhead

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 80

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Cutthroat Trout Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline

Adult Spawning
Field Observed Spawning Temp 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 0 4.47 4.47 4.47 4.47 10.68 10.68 10.68 10.68
Juvenile Rearing
Functioning appropriately 0.63 0 -0.63 0 -0.63 0 -0.63 0 -0.63
Functioning at risk 4.36 2.2 -2.16 2.2 -2.16 0.94 -3.42 0.94 -3.42
Unacceptable risk 0 4.47 4.47 4.47 4.47 10.86 10.86 10.86 10.86
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 0 4.47 4.47 4.47 4.47 6.78 6.78 6.78 6.78
Optimal Growth (limited food) 4.99 6.13 1.14 6.13 1.14 0 -4.99 0 -4.99
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Impairment to Smoltification 0 5.85 5.85 5.85 5.85 10.86 10.86 10.86 10.86
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 3.90 3.9 3.90 3.9
Total Available Habitat 4.99 6.67 1.68 6.67 1.68 11.80 6.81 11.80 6.81

Alternative 3 – Stream Segment 3: EFSFSR Upstream of Meadow Creek – Westslope Cutthroat Trout

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 81

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Bull Trout Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
Adult Spawning
Functioning appropriately 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Functioning at risk 4.5 0 -4.5 0 -4.5 0 -4.5 0 -4.5
Unacceptable risk 0 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Spawning Initiation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Temp at which Peak Spawning Occurs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Incubation/Emergence
Functioning appropriately 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Functioning at risk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Unacceptable risk 4.5 0.54 -3.96 0.54 -3.96 0.93 -3.57 0.93 -3.57
Substantially Reduced Egg Survival and Size 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Juvenile Rearing
Functioning appropriately 5 0 -5 0 -5 0 -5 0 -5
Functioning at risk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Unacceptable risk 0 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal Growth (limited food) 5 0 -5 0 -5 0 -5 0 -5
Optimal temp to occur in field 0 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0 0 0 0
Competition Disadvantage 0 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.54 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93
Emigration
Spawning Initiation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Common Summer Habitat Use
Spawning Initiation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Available Habitat 5 0.54 -4.46 0.54 -4.46 0.93 -4.07 0.93 -4.07

Alternative 3 – Stream Segment 3: EFSFSR Upstream of Meadow Creek – Bull Trout

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 82

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Chinook Salmon (Spring/Summer-Run) Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
Adult Migration
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal Adult Swimming Performance 0 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Reduced Adult Swimming Performance 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Migration blockage & delay 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Overall reduction in migration fitness due to
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
cumulative stress
Adult Spawning
Field Observed Spawning Temp 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0 -1.01 0 -1.01

Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Incubation/Emergence 0 0 0 0
Optimal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Juvenile Rearing
Optimal 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12
Optimal Growth (limited food) 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0 -1.01 0 -1.01 0 -1.01
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Impairment to Smoltification 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Common Summer Habitat Use
Optimal 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12
Total Available Habitat 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12

Alternative 3 – Stream Segment 4: EFSFSR Downstream of Sugar Creek – Chinook

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 83

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Steelhead Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

EOY
Baseline Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
6
Incubation/Emergence
Optimal 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Juvenile Rearing
Optimal 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12
Optimal Growth (limited food) 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0 -1.01 0 -1.01 0 -1.01
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Impairment to Smoltification 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Common Summer Habitat Use
Optimal 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12
Total Available Habitat 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12

Alternative 3 – Stream Segment 4: EFSFSR Downstream of Sugar Creek – Steelhead

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 84

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Cutthroat Trout Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

Baseline EOY 6 Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline

Adult Spawning
Field Observed Spawning Temp 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Reduced visibility of gametes in adults 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12
Juvenile Rearing
Functioning appropriately 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Functioning at risk 1.01 0 -1.01 0 -1.01 0 -1.01 0 -1.01
Unacceptable risk 0 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12
Optimal Growth (limited food) 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0 -1.01 0 -1.01 0 -1.01
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Impairment to Smoltification 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12
High Disease risk (lab studies) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Available Habitat 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12

Alternative 3 – Stream Segment 4: EFSFSR Downstream of Sugar Creek – Westslope Cutthroat Trout

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 85

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
STREAM TEMPERATURE IMPACTS TO FISH – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Bull Trout Stream Length within Threshold (kilometers)

EOY
Baseline Δ Baseline EOY 12 Δ Baseline EOY 18 Δ Baseline EOY 112 Δ Baseline
6
Adult Spawning
Functioning appropriately 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Functioning at risk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Unacceptable risk 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12
Spawning Initiation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Temp at which Peak Spawning Occurs 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Incubation/Emergence
Functioning appropriately 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Functioning at risk 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Unacceptable risk 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12
Substantially Reduced Egg Survival and Size 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal egg incubation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Juvenile Rearing
Functioning appropriately 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Functioning at risk 1.01 0 -1.01 0 -1.01 0 -1.01 0 -1.01
Unacceptable risk 0 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89 0.89
Lethal (1-week exposure) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal Growth (unlimited food) 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0 -1.01 0 -1.01 0 -1.01
Optimal Growth (limited food) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Optimal temp to occur in field 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0 -1.01 0 -1.01 0 -1.01
Competition Disadvantage 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12
Emigration
Spawning Initiation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Common Summer Habitat Use
Spawning Initiation 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Total Available Habitat 1.01 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12 0.89 -0.12

Alternative 3 – Stream Segment 4: EFSFSR Downstream of Sugar Creek – Bull Trout

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 86

 Appendix J-3: Barriers Technical Memorandum

This TM was developed and finalized for the Draft EIS in December 2019. There may be differences in the data
presented in the figures and tables as compared to the Draft EIS
This page intentionally left blank.
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
FISH PASSAGE BARRIERS, CRITICAL HABITAT, INTRINSIC POTENTIAL, AND OCCUPANCY MODELS IMPACTS –
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

FISH PASSAGE
BARRIERS,
CRITICAL HABITAT,
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL,
AND OCCUPANCY
MODELS IMPACTS
Technical Memorandum
Stibnite Gold Project, Idaho
December
2019

Ecosystem Sciences, LLC

Science . Planning . Design
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
FISH PASSAGE BARRIERS, CRITICAL HABITAT, INTRINSIC POTENTIAL, AND OCCUPANCY MODELS IMPACTS –
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Technical Memorandum

Ecosystem Sciences
Science . Planning . Design

Ecosystem Sciences
202 N. 9th Street, Suite 400
Boise, ID 83702
T: 208.383.0226

Prepared for: AECOM

Project Title: Stibnite Gold Project

Technical Memorandum
Subject: Fish Passage Barriers, Critical Habitat, Intrinsic Potential, and Occupancy
Models Impacts

Date: December 2019

To: AECOM

From: Ecosystem Sciences

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
FISH PASSAGE BARRIERS, CRITICAL HABITAT, INTRINSIC POTENTIAL, AND OCCUPANCY MODELS IMPACTS –
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION AND METHODS.................................................................................................. II
RESULTS ........................................................................................................................................ 6
2.1 CRITICAL HABITAT – CHINOOK SALMON AND BULL TROUT ....................................................... 6
2.2 INTRINSIC POTENTIAL – CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD .................................................. 12
2.3 OCCUPANCY MODEL – WEST SLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT .............................. 18
DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................................. 22
REFERENCES............................................................................................................................... 25

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Potential Fish Passage Barriers Stibnite Gold Project Study Area ............................................. 2
Figure 2. Alternatives 1 and 2 Potential Fish Passage Barriers in the Stibnite Gold Study Area .............. 3
Figure 3. Alternative 3 Potential Fish Passage Barriers in the Stibnite Gold Study Area .......................... 4
Figure 4. Critical Habitat (Chinook Salmon and Bull Trout Combined) per Barrier per Alternative
per Year. .................................................................................................................................... 23
Figure 5. Intrinsic Potential Habitat (Chinook Salmon and Steelhead Combined) per Barrier per
Alternative per Year ................................................................................................................... 24

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Fish Passage Barriers in the Stibnite Gold Project Study Area .................................................. 5
Table 2. Alternative 1 Chinook Salmon and Bull Trout Critical Habitat per Fish Passage Barrier ............ 7
Table 3. Alternative 2 Chinook Salmon and Bull Trout Critical Habitat per Fish Passage Barrier ............ 9
Table 4. Alternative 3 Chinook Salmon and Bull Trout Critical Habitat per Fish Passage Barrier .......... 11
Table 5. Alternative 1 Chinook Salmon and Steelhead IP Habitat per Fish Passage Barrier................. 13
Table 6. Alternative 2 Chinook salmon and steelhead IP habitat per fish passage barrier. ................... 15
Table 7. Alternative 3 Chinook Salmon and Steelhead IP Habitat per Fish Passage Barrier................. 17
Table 8. Alternative 1 Fish Habitat for Cutthroat and Bull Trout per Fish Passage Barrier and
Total Habitat Available .............................................................................................................. 19
Table 9. Alternative 2 Available Habitat for Cutthroat Trout and Bull Trout per Fish Passage
Barrier and Available Habitat..................................................................................................... 20
Table 10. Alternative 3 Available Habitat for Cutthroat Trout and Bull Trout per Fish Passage
Barrier ........................................................................................................................................ 21

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | i

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
FISH PASSAGE BARRIERS, CRITICAL HABITAT, INTRINSIC POTENTIAL, AND OCCUPANCY MODELS IMPACTS –
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

EFSFSR East Fork of the South Fork of the Salmon River

OM Occupancy Modeling
GIS Geographic Information System
Midas Gold Midas Gold Idaho, Inc.
EOY End of Year
Mine Site OM The occupancy model produced for the study area with mine site scale data
inputs for stream temperature, stream discharge, and channel slope.
USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service
TM Technical Memorandum
TSF/DRSF Tailing Storage Facility/ Development Rock Storage Facility
IP Intrinsic Potential
YPP Yellow Pine Pit

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | ii

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
FISH PASSAGE BARRIERS, CRITICAL HABITAT, INTRINSIC POTENTIAL, AND OCCUPANCY MODELS IMPACTS –
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

INTRODUCTION AND METHODS

The purpose of this Technical Memorandum (TM) is to quantify the changes in the amount of
available habitat for Snake River spring-/summer-run Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus
tshawytscha), Snake River Basin steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss), bull trout (Salvelinus
conflentus), and westslope cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkia lewisi) due to barriers to fish
movement that exist prior to project implementation, and some that will be created by project
activities.
The extent of available habitat, as well as important life-stage habitat (Intrinsic Potential [IP] and
Critical), for Chinook salmon, steelhead, bull trout, and westslope cutthroat trout is expected to
change throughout the mine’s life as a result of the proposed Stibnite Gold Project (project) and
project alternatives in relation to existing and future fish passage barriers. Several other habitat-
related TMs (Ecosystem Sciences 2019a,b,c) describe the quantity and quality of habitat at the
mine site, but do not examine existing (Baseline) or future predicted access to that habitat. This
TM integrates those analyses with information on existing and predicted fish passage barriers to
more fully describe existing and expected future fish habitat conditions.
Fish passage barriers can negatively impact fish species population dynamics by reducing, or
completely blocking, available habitat during certain life stages. Fish passage barriers in the
project mine site study area (i.e., Upper East Fork of the South Fork Salmon River [EFSFSR]
upstream of the confluence with Sugar Creek) were identified and mapped by BioAnalysts
(BioAnalysts 2019) (Figure 1 and Table 1). The fish passage barriers were identified as either
complete (no species can pass the barrier at any time of year), or partial (the barrier may not
exist at high flows; but at certain flows, some fish may not be able to pass). Passage barriers
are further described as natural, not caused by human action (rock dam, log jam, steep slope,
etc.); and artificial, or caused by human action (culverts, stream alteration due to human action,
etc.) (BioAnalysts 2019).
BioAnalysts (2019) identified three major barriers to fish movement in the Study Area:
1) EFSFSR upstream of the Yellow Pine Pit Lake (YPP) high gradient (location 02); 2) EFSFSR
box culvert (location 203); and 3) Meadow Creek (location 05) (Figure 1). The EFSFSR
upstream of the YPP Lake is a high-gradient cascade, which is a complete barrier to fish
passage upstream of the cascade. The other two barriers, the EFSFSR box culvert and
Meadow Creek, are partial barriers that block migration seasonally (i.e., flow-dependent), and
only hinder migration of fish that reside in or were stocked upstream of the YPP barrier
(Figure 1).
Three additional barriers were added to this report that were not identified by BioAnalysts
(2019). The three additional barriers are alternative-dependent, and relate to excessive slopes
(>25 percent) on potential Tailing Storage Facility/Development Rock Storage Facility
(TSF/DRSF) embankment areas (Figures 2 and 3). These embankments occur at the following
three areas: 1) in the Meadow Creek drainage area at the base of the proposed TSF/DRSF
(Alternatives 1 and 2) (Figure 2); 2) the Fiddle Creek drainage area at the base of the Fiddle
TSF (Alternatives 1, 2, and 3) (Figure 2); and 3) the base of the Upper EFSFSR TSF/DRSF
embankment (Alternative 3) (Figure 3). All of these barriers are “artificial” and “complete,” and
they restrict upstream migration to all species at all times of year due to excessive slope.
Table 1 details all the barriers analyzed in this TM.
Impacts to fish habitat resulting from passage barriers were assessed in ArcGIS Pro
(Version 2.4) by quantifying the extent (meters of habitat) of fish habitat upstream of each
barrier.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 1

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
FISH PASSAGE BARRIERS, CRITICAL HABITAT, INTRINSIC POTENTIAL, AND OCCUPANCY MODELS IMPACTS –
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure Source: BioAnalysts 2019

Figure 1. Potential Fish Passage Barriers Stibnite Gold Project Study Area

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 2

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
FISH PASSAGE BARRIERS, CRITICAL HABITAT, INTRINSIC POTENTIAL, AND OCCUPANCY MODELS IMPACTS –
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 2. Alternatives 1 and 2 Potential Fish Passage Barriers in the Stibnite Gold Study Area

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 3

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
FISH PASSAGE BARRIERS, CRITICAL HABITAT, INTRINSIC POTENTIAL, AND OCCUPANCY MODELS IMPACTS –
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 3. Alternative 3 Potential Fish Passage Barriers in the Stibnite Gold Study Area

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 4

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
FISH PASSAGE BARRIERS, CRITICAL HABITAT, INTRINSIC POTENTIAL, AND OCCUPANCY MODELS IMPACTS –
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Fish habitat evaluated by this analysis includes:

1. Critical habitat – for Chinook salmon (as defined by Ecosystem Sciences 2019a) and
bull trout (USFWS 2010). There is no critical habitat for steelhead in the study area.
2. Intrinsic Potential (IP) – Spawning and early-rearing habitat for Chinook salmon and
steelhead (Ecosystem Sciences 2019b). Useable habitat equates to all habitat ratings
(High, Medium, Low, Negligible [only Chinook salmon]) per species summed to one
number (meters of habitat).
3. Occupancy Model (OM) – Cutthroat trout and bull trout (Ecosystem Sciences 2019c).
Used as a surrogate for available fish habitat for the two species.
Changes in the amount of available fish habitat were quantified for Baseline conditions, and per
alternative (1, 2, and 3) for Years -2, -1, Year 12, Year 17, and Year 20 for Critical habitat and
IP habitat. The occupancy model was performed for Baseline conditions, Year 6, Year 12, Year
18, and Year 112.

Table 1. Fish Passage Barriers in the Stibnite Gold Project Study Area

Stream (Location Number) Latitude Longitude Type Status

EFSFSR YPP High Gradient (02) 44.9260 -115.3348 Artificial Complete
EFSFSR Box Culvert (203) 44.9024 -115.3281 Artificial Partial
Hennessy Creek (01) 44.9357 -115.3384 Artificial Complete
Hennessy Creek (199) 44.9332 -115.3372 Artificial Complete
Hennessy Creek (202) 44.9318 -115.3383 Artificial Complete

Existing Barriers
Midnight Creek (03) 44.9357 -115.3384 Artificial Complete
Fiddle Creek (04) 44.9208 -115.3329 Artificial Complete
Fiddle Creek (200) 44.9189 -115.3321 Artificial Complete
Garnet Creek (201) 44.9062 -115.3279 Artificial Partial
Rabbit Creek (204) 44.8931 -115.3096 Artificial No Barrier
Fern Creek (205) 44.9014 -115.2813 Artificial No Barrier
Fern Creek Tributary (206) 44.9044 -115.2759 Artificial Complete
Meadow Creek (05) 44.8940 -115.3416 Artificial Partial
East Fork Meadow Creek (06) 44.8885 -115.3388 Natural Partial
Fiddle Creek TSF 44.9207 -115.3330 Artificial Complete
Barriers
Future

Meadow Creek TSF/DRSF 44.8926 -115.3475 Artificial Complete

Upper EFSFSR TSF/DRSF 44.8975 -115.3210 Artificial Complete

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 5

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
FISH PASSAGE BARRIERS, CRITICAL HABITAT, INTRINSIC POTENTIAL, AND OCCUPANCY MODELS IMPACTS –
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

RESULTS
Mine year changes equate to changes in habitat based on mine activity (e.g., DRSF/TSF
creation, Hangar Flat Pit Lake filling, etc.) or stream enhancement/restoration. Results are
summarized by habitat type (Critical, IP, and OM and by species, except for the results for the
OM. The OM results are summarized for both species (cutthroat and bull trout), and labeled as
available habitat. In the tables below, a zero (0) indicates that there is no habitat above the
blockage, and NB (No Barrier) indicates that the barrier no longer exists due to mining
activity (e.g., EFSFSR tunnel) or through restoration and enhancement (e.g., YPP restoration).
There is some question regarding the effectiveness and efficacy of the EFSFSR tunnel to pass
fish (USFWS 2019). The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) notes, in a letter to Midas
Gold dated October 3, 2019, “[E]ven after close consultation and collaboration with NMFS,
meeting applicable NMFS passage criteria and guidelines, and executing all potential adaptive
management measures, there exists a reasonable probability that the project will not be able to
volitionally pass fish safely, timely, or effectively” (USFWS 2019). The results presented in this
TM must be viewed in light of the USFWS’s assessment of the effectiveness of the EFSFSR
tunnel. Results are presented, with the assumption that the tunnel would allow volitional
passage; however, other entities involved in the project have questioned the tunnel’s ability to
pass fish.

2.1 CRITICAL HABITAT – CHINOOK SALMON AND BULL TROUT

Access to Chinook salmon and bull trout critical habitat is currently blocked by several fish
passage barriers identified in the study area (Table 2). Most notably, the YPP blocks over
26,000 meters of the 27,663 meters of available Chinook salmon habitat; and 17,000 meters of
the 18,390 meters of existing bull trout habitat at Baseline (Table 2). Under Alternative 1
(proposed action), the YPP barrier would be removed in Year -1 with the construction of the
EFSFSR tunnel. Similarly, the EFSFSR box culvert and Meadow Creek barriers would be
removed in Year -1, resulting in a decrease in the amount of critical habitat blocked for Chinook
salmon and bull trout. The Fern Creek (205) blockage (Chinook salmon) would remain
throughout the mine’s life. Post-closure, only the human-caused (artificial) Meadow Creek
TSF/DRSF blockage would limit access to fish (Table 2).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 6

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
FISH PASSAGE BARRIERS, CRITICAL HABITAT, INTRINSIC POTENTIAL, AND OCCUPANCY MODELS IMPACTS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 2. Alternative 1 Chinook Salmon and Bull Trout Critical Habitat per Fish Passage Barrier
ALTERNATIVE 1 PRO Chinook Salmon – Critical Habitat (meters) Bull Trout – Critical Habitat (meters)
EOY EOY EOY EOY EOY EOY EOY EOY EOY EOY
Block ID Baseline -2 -1 12 17 20 Baseline -2 -1 12 17 20
EFSFSR YPP (02) 26,493 19,695 NB NB NB NB 17,111 11,710 NB NB NB NB
EFSFSR Box Culvert (203) 22,962 16,165 NB NB NB NB 13,785 9,118 NB NB NB NB
Hennessy Creek (01) 0 0 0 NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB NB
Hennessy Creek (199) 0 0 0 NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB NB
Hennessy Creek (202) 0 0 0 NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB NB
Midnight Creek (03) 0 0 NB NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB NB
Fiddle Creek (04) 0 0 0 NB NB NB 0 0 0 NB NB NB
Fiddle Creek (200) 0 0 0 NB NB NB 0 0 0 NB NB NB
Garnet Creek (201) 0 0 0 0 NB NB 0 0 0 0 NB NB
Rabbit Creek (204) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fern Creek (205) 166 166 166 166 166 166 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fern Creek Tributary (206) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Meadow Creek (05) 6,797 NB NB NB NB NB 5,393 NB NB NB NB NB
East Fork Meadow Creek (06) 0 0 NB NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB NB
Fiddle Creek TSF NB NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB NB 0 0
Meadow Creek TSF/DRSF NB NB NB NB 5,509 5,509 NB NB NB NB 4,667 4,667
Upper EFSFSR TSF/DRSF NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB
Total Habitat (meters) 27,663 27,663 27,663 27,663 27,663 27,663 18,390 18,390 18,390 18,390 18,390 18,390

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 7

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
FISH PASSAGE BARRIERS, CRITICAL HABITAT, INTRINSIC POTENTIAL, AND OCCUPANCY MODELS IMPACTS –
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Under Alternative 2, the amount of critical habitat for Chinook salmon and bull trout upstream of
barriers would be the same as under Alternative 1. The YPP, box culvert, and steep section of
Meadow Creek (near the Spent Ore Disposal Area) block access to critical habitat for Chinook
salmon and bull trout (Table 3). By Year -1, these barriers would be removed (Table 3). The
Fern Creek (205) blockage would remain throughout the mine’s life (Chinook salmon). Post-
closure, only the human-created (artificial) Meadow Creek TSF/DRSF blockage would limit
access to Chinook salmon and bull trout (Table 3).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 8

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
FISH PASSAGE BARRIERS, CRITICAL HABITAT, INTRINSIC POTENTIAL, AND OCCUPANCY MODELS IMPACTS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 3. Alternative 2 Chinook Salmon and Bull Trout Critical Habitat per Fish Passage Barrier

ALTERNATIVE 2 MOD PRO Chinook Salmon – Critical Habitat (meters) Bull Trout – Critical Habitat (meters)
EOY EOY EOY EOY EOY EOY EOY EOY EOY EOY
Block ID Baseline -2 -1 12 17 20 Baseline -2 -1 12 17 20
EFSFSR YPP (02) 26,493 19,695 NB NB NB NB 17,111 11,710 NB NB NB NB
EFSFSR Box Culvert (203) 22,962 16,165 NB NB NB NB 13,785 9,118 NB NB NB NB
Hennessy Creek (01) 0 0 NB NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB NB
Hennessy Creek (199) 0 0 NB NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB NB
Hennessy Creek (202) 0 0 NB NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB NB
Midnight Creek (03) 0 0 NB NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB NB
Fiddle Creek (04) 0 0 0 NB NB NB 0 0 0 NB NB NB
Fiddle Creek (200) 0 0 0 NB NB NB 0 0 0 NB NB NB
Garnet Creek (201) 0 0 0 0 NB NB 0 0 0 0 NB NB
Rabbit Creek (204) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fern Creek (205) 166 166 166 166 166 166 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fern Creek Tributary (206) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Meadow Creek (05) 6,797 NB NB NB NB NB 5,393 NB NB NB NB NB
East Fork Meadow Creek (06) 0 0 NB NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB NB
Fiddle Creek TSF NB NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB NB 0 0
Meadow Creek TSF/DRSF NB NB NB NB 5,509 5,509 NB NB NB NB 4,667 4,667
Upper EFSFSR TSF/DRSF NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB
Total Habitat (meters) 27,663 27,663 27,663 27,663 27,663 27,663 18,390 18,390 18,390 18,390 18,390 18,390

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 9

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
FISH PASSAGE BARRIERS, CRITICAL HABITAT, INTRINSIC POTENTIAL, AND OCCUPANCY MODELS IMPACTS –
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Under Alternative 3, the amount of critical habitat for Chinook salmon and bull trout upstream of
barriers varies from the conditions under Alternative 1 and Alternative 2. For example, with no
mining activity occurring in Meadow Creek under Alternative 3, the barrier (location 05) that is
preventing access to 6,797 meters of Chinook salmon critical habitat and 5,393 meters of bull
trout critical habitat would remain in place for the duration of the mine’s life (Table 4). Similar to
Alternative 1 and Alternative 2, by Year -1, the major barriers along the EFSFSR (YPP [02] and
box culvert [203]) would be removed, and critical habitat upstream of these barriers would be
accessible (Table 4). The Fern Creek (205) barrier would remain throughout the life of the mine,
and block access for Chinook salmon to potential critical habitat areas. Under Alternative 3, the
Upper EFSFSR TSF/DRSF would block access to critical habitat for Chinook salmon
(11,584 meters) and bull trout (6,520 meters) in perpetuity (Table 4).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 10

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
FISH PASSAGE BARRIERS, CRITICAL HABITAT, INTRINSIC POTENTIAL, AND OCCUPANCY MODELS IMPACTS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 4. Alternative 3 Chinook Salmon and Bull Trout Critical Habitat per Fish Passage Barrier

Alternative 3EFSFSR TSF Chinook Salmon – Critical Habitat (meters) Bull Trout – Critical Habitat (meters)
EOY EOY EOY EOY EOY EOY EOY EOY EOY EOY
Block ID Baseline -2 -1 12 17 20 Baseline -2 -1 12 17 20
EFSFSR YPP (02) 26,493 12,991 NB NB NB NB 17,111 10,754 NB NB NB NB
EFSFSR Box Culvert (203) 22,962 10,049 NB NB NB NB 13,785 8,154 NB NB NB NB
Hennessy Creek (01) 0 0 NB NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB NB
Hennessy Creek (199) 0 0 NB NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB NB
Hennessy Creek (202) 0 0 NB NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB NB
Midnight Creek (03) 0 0 NB NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB NB
Fiddle Creek (04) 0 0 0 NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB 0
Fiddle Creek (200) 0 0 0 NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB 0
Garnet Creek (201) 0 0 0 0 NB NB 0 0 0 NB NB 0
Rabbit Creek (204) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fern Creek (205) 166 166 166 166 166 166 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fern Creek Tributary (206) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Meadow Creek (05) 6,797 6,797 6,797 6,797 6,797 6,797 5,393 5,393 5,393 5,393 5,393 5,393
East Fork Meadow Creek (06) 0 0 NB NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB NB
Fiddle Creek TSF NB NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB NB 0 0
Meadow Creek TSF/DRSF NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB
Upper EFSFSR TSF/DRSF NB NB NB NB 11,584 11,584 NB NB NB NB 6,520 6,520
Total Habitat (meters) 27,663 27,663 27,663 27,663 27,663 27,663 18,390 18,390 18,390 18,390 18,390 18,390

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 11

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
FISH PASSAGE BARRIERS, CRITICAL HABITAT, INTRINSIC POTENTIAL, AND OCCUPANCY MODELS IMPACTS –
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

2.2 INTRINSIC POTENTIAL – CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD

Access to IP habitat (spawning and early-rearing habitat) for Chinook salmon and steelhead is
blocked under Baseline conditions by three fish passage barriers found in the study area
(Table 5). It is noted that the EFSFSR box culvert and the Meadow Creek (05) barrier are
“partial” barriers, indicating that these barriers may not exist at all flows for all fish. Therefore,
steelhead IP habitat may not be blocked by these barriers, because they spawn when flows are
higher. The YPP blocks over 10,000 meters of Chinook salmon and nearly 9,000 meters of
steelhead IP habitat at Baseline (Table 5). Under Alternative 1 (Proposed Action), the YPP
barrier would be removed in Year -1 with the construction of the EFSFSR tunnel. Similarly, the
EFSFSR box culvert and Meadow Creek barriers would be removed in Year -1, resulting in a
decrease in the amount of spawning and early-rearing habitat blocked for Chinook salmon and
steelhead. By the end of Year -1, there would be no IP habitat blocked by barriers in the study
area until the construction of the embankments for the Meadow Creek TSF in Year 17. In that
year, 1,909 meters of steelhead IP habitat would be blocked by the excessive gradient of
Meadow Creek as it cascades off the TSF/DRSF (Table 5). No Chinook salmon habitat is
blocked by the TSF/DRSF, because flows are insufficient to meet the wetted width minimum
threshold for IP habitat (Table 5).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 12

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
FISH PASSAGE BARRIERS, CRITICAL HABITAT, INTRINSIC POTENTIAL, AND OCCUPANCY MODELS IMPACTS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 5. Alternative 1 Chinook Salmon and Steelhead IP Habitat per Fish Passage Barrier

ALTERNATIVE 1 PRO Chinook Salmon – Useable Habitat (meters) Steelhead – Useable Habitat (meters)
EOY EOY EOY EOY EOY EOY EOY EOY EOY EOY
Block ID Baseline -2 -1 12 17 20 Baseline -2 -1 12 17 20
EFSFSR YPP (02) 10,209 7,986 NB NB NB NB 8,530 6,936 NB NB NB NB
EFSFSR Box Culvert (203) * 7,630 5,377 NB NB NB NB 6,940 5,107 NB NB NB NB
Hennessy Creek (01) 0 0 NB NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB NB
Hennessy Creek (199) 0 0 NB NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB NB
Hennessy Creek (202) 0 0 NB NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB NB
Midnight Creek (03) 0 0 NB NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB NB
Fiddle Creek (04) 0 0 0 NB NB NB 0 0 0 NB NB NB
Fiddle Creek (200) 0 0 0 NB NB NB 0 0 0 NB NB NB
Garnet Creek (201) 0 NB NB NB NB NB 0 NB NB NB NB NB
Rabbit Creek (204) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fern Creek (205) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fern Creek Tributary (206) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Meadow Creek (05) * 2,219 NB NB NB NB NB 1,830 NB NB NB NB NB
East Fork Meadow Creek (06) 0 0 NB NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB NB
Fiddle Creek TSF NB NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB NB 0 0
Meadow Creek TSF/DRSF NB NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB NB 1,909 1,909
Upper EFSFSR TSF/DRSF NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB
Total Habitat (meters) 11,409 9,156 8,094 9,750 9,407 9,629 9,670 7,836 7,614 9,270 11,846 11,846
Table Notes:
*partial barriers may not be barriers to steelhead passage.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 13

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
FISH PASSAGE BARRIERS, CRITICAL HABITAT, INTRINSIC POTENTIAL, AND OCCUPANCY MODELS IMPACTS –
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
IP habitat for Chinook salmon and steelhead upstream of barriers under Alternative 2 would be
the same as under Alternative 1. The YPP, box culvert, and steep section of Meadow Creek
block access to IP habitat for Chinook salmon and steelhead (Table 6) under existing
conditions. As mentioned previously, steelhead habitat may not be blocked at the EFSFSR box
culvert or the Meadow Creek barrier, because these barriers are partial (Table 6). Like
Alternative 1, under Alternative 2 by Year -1, all existing habitat barriers would be removed; or
there is no IP habitat upstream of the remaining barriers (Table 6). In Year 17, the TSF/DRSF in
Meadow Creek would be finalized, and a new barrier to fish passage would be created
(Table 6). In Year 17, 1,909 meters of steelhead IP habitat would be blocked by the excessive
gradient of Meadow Creek at the TSF/DRSF (Table 6). No Chinook salmon habitat would be
blocked by the TSF/DRSF, because flows are insufficient to meet the wetted width minimum
threshold for IP habitat (Table 6).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 14

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
FISH PASSAGE BARRIERS, CRITICAL HABITAT, INTRINSIC POTENTIAL, AND OCCUPANCY MODELS IMPACTS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 6. Alternative 2 Chinook Salmon and Steelhead IP Habitat per Fish Passage Barrier

ALTERNATIVE 2 MOD PRO Chinook Salmon – Useable Habitat (meters) Steelhead – Useable Habitat (meters)
EOY EOY EOY EOY EOY EOY EOY EOY EOY EOY
Block ID Baseline -2 -1 12 17 20 Baseline -2 -1 12 17 20
EFSFSR YPP (02) 10,209 7,986 NB NB NB NB 8,530 6,936 NB NB NB NB
EFSFSR Box Culvert (203) * 7,630 5,377 NB NB NB NB 6,940 5,107 NB NB NB NB
Hennessy Creek (01) 0 0 NB NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB NB
Hennessy Creek (199) 0 0 NB NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB NB
Hennessy Creek (202) 0 0 NB NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB NB
Midnight Creek (03) 0 0 NB NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB NB
Fiddle Creek (04) 0 0 0 NB NB NB 0 0 0 NB NB NB
Fiddle Creek (200) 0 0 0 NB NB NB 0 0 0 NB NB NB
Garnet Creek (201) 0 NB NB NB NB NB 0 NB NB NB NB NB
Rabbit Creek (204) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fern Creek (205) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fern Creek Tributary (206) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Meadow Creek (05) * 2,219 NB NB NB NB NB 1,830 NB NB NB NB NB
East Fork Meadow Creek (06) 0 0 NB NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB NB
Fiddle Creek TSF NB NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB NB 0 0
Meadow Creek TSF/DRSF NB NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB NB 1,909 1,909
Upper EFSFSR TSF/DRSF NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB
Total Habitat (meters) 11,409 9,156 8,094 9,750 9,407 9,629 9,670 7,836 7,614 9,270 11,846 11,846
Table Notes:
*partial barriers may not be barriers to steelhead passage.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 15

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
FISH PASSAGE BARRIERS, CRITICAL HABITAT, INTRINSIC POTENTIAL, AND OCCUPANCY MODELS IMPACTS –
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Under Alternative 3, IP habitat upstream of barriers for Chinook salmon and steelhead would be
different than under Alternative 1 and Alternative 2. For example, with no mining activity
occurring in Meadow Creek under Alternative 3, 1,830 meters of steelhead IP habitat would
remain blocked for the duration of the mine’s life (Table 7). Again, this is a partial barrier, so this
may not be a blockage to steelhead if flows are sufficient. Based on the IP results for Chinook
salmon, Meadow Creek wetted widths would be insufficient to support spawning and early-
rearing habitat for the species under Alternative 3 (red highlighted cell in Table 7). Therefore,
there is no Chinook salmon IP habitat upstream of the Meadow Creek barrier (Table 7). Similar
to Alternative 1 and Alternative 2, by Year -1, the major barriers along the EFSFSR (YPP and
box culvert) would be removed, and IP habitat upstream of these barriers would be accessible
(Table 7). Due to the Upper EFSFSR TSF/DRSF, starting in Year 17, 1,930 meters of steelhead
spawning and early-rearing habitat would be blocked by the high-gradient section of the
EFSFSR flowing off the TSF/DRSF embankment (Table 7).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 16

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
FISH PASSAGE BARRIERS, CRITICAL HABITAT, INTRINSIC POTENTIAL, AND OCCUPANCY MODELS IMPACTS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 7. Alternative 3 Chinook Salmon and Steelhead IP Habitat per Fish Passage Barrier

Alternative 3EFSFSR TSF Chinook Salmon – Useable Habitat (meters) Steelhead – Useable Habitat (meters)
EOY EOY EOY EOY EOY EOY EOY EOY EOY EOY
Block ID Baseline -2 -1 12 17 20 Baseline -2 -1 12 17 20
EFSFSR YPP (02) 10,209 5,410 NB NB NB NB 8,530 4,719 NB NB NB NB
EFSFSR Box Culvert (203) * 7,630 2,831 NB NB NB NB 6,940 4,660 NB NB NB NB
Hennessy Creek (01) 0 0 NB NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB NB
Hennessy Creek (199) 0 0 NB NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB NB
Hennessy Creek (202) 0 0 NB NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB NB
Midnight Creek (03) 0 0 NB NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB NB
Fiddle Creek (04) 0 0 0 NB NB NB 0 0 0 NB NB NB
Fiddle Creek (200) 0 0 0 NB NB NB 0 0 0 NB NB NB
Garnet Creek (201) 0 NB NB NB NB NB 0 NB NB NB NB NB
Rabbit Creek (204) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fern Creek (205) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Fern Creek Tributary (206) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Meadow Creek (05) * 2,219 0 0 0 0 0 1,830 1,830 1,830 1,830 1,830 1,830
East Fork Meadow Creek (06) 0 0 NB NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB NB
Fiddle Creek TSF NB NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB NB 0 0
Meadow Creek TSF/DRSF NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB NB
Upper EFSFSR TSF/DRSF NB NB NB NB 0 0 NB NB NB NB 1,930 1,930
Total Habitat (meters) 11,409 6,611 5,702 7,351 6,238 6,238 9,670 7,389 7,171 8,820 9,743 9,743
Table Notes:
*partial barriers may not be barriers to steelhead passage.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 17

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
FISH PASSAGE BARRIERS, CRITICAL HABITAT, INTRINSIC POTENTIAL, AND OCCUPANCY MODELS IMPACTS –
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

2.3 OCCUPANCY MODEL – WEST SLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
The OM (Ecosystem Sciences 2019c) results show available fish habitat for westslope cutthroat
trout and bull trout (and a surrogate for all other fish species’ maximum extent of habitat).
Available habitat for these species is more abundant than Critical and IP habitats, and therefore,
the barriers impact a greater extent of available habitat. Under Alternative 1 (proposed action),
available habitat for cutthroat and bull trout would be blocked throughout the study area
(Table 8). Major barriers associated with the YPP and the box culvert would be removed by
Year 6 (Table 8). By Year 18, following mine actions (e.g., EFSFSR tunnel) and stream
enhancement and restoration, the major blockages would be removed, and available habitat
would be blocked only in non-enhanced reaches (Fern Creek) and TSF/DRSF (Meadow Creek
and Fiddle Creek) high-gradient areas (Table 8). These two areas, Fiddle Creek and Upper
Meadow Creek, would remain blocked in perpetuity due to the high-gradient stream segments
flowing off the TSF/DRSF (Table 8).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 18

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
FISH PASSAGE BARRIERS, CRITICAL HABITAT, INTRINSIC POTENTIAL, AND OCCUPANCY MODELS IMPACTS –
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 8. Alternative 1 Fish Habitat for Cutthroat and Bull Trout

per Fish Passage Barrier and Total Habitat Available
Alternative 1 PRO Available Fish Habitat (meters)
Block ID Baseline Year 6 Year 12 Year 18 Year 112
EFSFSR YPP (02) 39,737 NB NB NB NB
EFSFSR Box Culvert (203) 31,575 NB NB NB NB
Hennessy Creek (01) 1,048 1,048 NB NB NB
Hennessy Creek (199) 1,048 1,048 NB NB NB
Hennessy Creek (202) 1,048 1,048 NB NB NB
Midnight Creek (03) 0 NB NB NB NB
Fiddle Creek (04) 4,143 2,110 NB NB NB
Fiddle Creek (200) 4,143 2,110 NB NB NB
Garnet Creek (201) 518 NB NB NB NB
Rabbit Creek (204) 0 0 0 0 0
Fern Creek (205) 166 166 166 166 166
Fern Creek Tributary (206) 0 0 0 0 0
Meadow Creek (05) 9,637 2,132 2,132 NB NB
East Fork Meadow Creek (06) 2,398 2,398 2,398 2,398 2,398
Fiddle Creek TSF NB NB 3,949 3,949 3,949
Meadow Creek TSF/DRSF NB NB NB 9,247 9,247
Upper EFSFSR TSF/DRSF NB NB NB NB NB
Total Habitat (meters) 41,700 28,913 33,068 41,190 41,190

Under Alternative 2, blocked available habitat for cutthroat trout and bull trout would be the
same as under Alternative 1, with one notable exception; Hennessey Creek (Table 9). Under
Alternative 2, Hennessey Creek would not be routed into the EFSFSR tunnel; therefore, no
available habitat would be blocked by Year 6 (Table 9). Major barriers associated with the YPP
and the box culvert would be removed by Year 6 (Table 9). By Year 18, following mine actions
(e.g., EFSFSR tunnel) and stream enhancement and restoration, available habitat would only
be blocked by fish passage barriers associated with the TSF/DRSF (Table 9). These two
barriers (Fiddle Creek and Upper Meadow Creek TSF/DRSFs) would hinder access to cutthroat
trout and bull trout (Table 9).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 19

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
FISH PASSAGE BARRIERS, CRITICAL HABITAT, INTRINSIC POTENTIAL, AND OCCUPANCY MODELS IMPACTS –
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 9. Alternative 2 Available Habitat for Cutthroat Trout and Bull Trout
per Fish Passage Barrier and Available Habitat
ALTERNATIVE 2 MOD PRO Available Fish Habitat (meters)
Block ID Baseline Year 6 Year 12 Year 18 Year 112
EFSFSR YPP (02) 39,737 NB NB NB NB
EFSFSR Box Culvert (203) 31,575 NB NB NB NB
Hennessy Creek (01) 1,048 NB NB NB NB
Hennessy Creek (199) 1,048 NB NB NB NB
Hennessy Creek (202) 1,048 NB NB NB NB
Midnight Creek (03) 0 NB NB NB NB
Fiddle Creek (04) 4,143 2,110 NB NB NB
Fiddle Creek (200) 4,143 2,110 NB NB NB
Garnet Creek (201) 518 NB NB NB NB
Rabbit Creek (204) 0 0 0 0 0
Fern Creek (205) 166 166 166 166 166
Fern Creek Tributary (206) 0 0 0 0 0
Meadow Creek (05) 9,637 2,132 2,132 NB NB
East Fork Meadow Creek (06) 2,398 NB NB NB NB
Fiddle Creek TSF NB NB 3,895 3,895 3,895
Meadow Creek TSF/DRSF NB NB NB 9,145 9,145
Upper EFSFSR TSF/DRSF NB NB NB NB NB
Total Habitat (meters) 41,700 28,830 32,600 41,801 41,801

Under Alternative 3, available habitat for cutthroat trout and bull trout would be different than
under Alternative 1 and Alternative 2. For example, with no mining activity occurring in Meadow
Creek under Alternative 3, over 9,000 meters of available habitat would remain blocked for the
duration of the mine’s life (Table 10). By Year 6, the major blockages along the EFSFSR would
be removed. Overall, under Alternative 3, by Year 18, all available habitat that was blocked by a
fish passage barrier would be available, except for the aforementioned Meadow Creek area
upstream of the existing fish passage barrier Meadow Creek (05) and Fern Creek (205)
(Table 10). Also, in Year 18, the Upper EFSFSR upstream of Meadow Creek would experience
a significant blockage due to the TSF/DRSF. This facility would block access to over
15,000 meters of fish habitat (Table 10).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 20

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
FISH PASSAGE BARRIERS, CRITICAL HABITAT, INTRINSIC POTENTIAL, AND OCCUPANCY MODELS IMPACTS –
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 10. Alternative 3 Available Habitat for Cutthroat Trout and Bull Trout
per Fish Passage Barrier
Alternative 3 EFSFSR TSF Available Fish Habitat (meters)
Block ID Baseline Year 6 Year 12 Year 18 Year 112
EFSFSR YPP (02) 39,737 NB NB NB NB
EFSFSR Box Culvert (203) 31,575 NB NB NB NB
Hennessy Creek (01) 1,048 NB NB NB NB
Hennessy Creek (199) 1,048 NB NB NB NB
Hennessy Creek (202) 1,048 NB NB NB NB
Midnight Creek (03) 0 NB NB NB NB
Fiddle Creek (04) 4,143 2,110 NB NB NB
Fiddle Creek (200) 4,143 2,110 NB NB NB
Garnet Creek (201) 518 518 518 NB NB
Rabbit Creek (204) 0 0 0 0 0
Fern Creek (205) 166 166 166 166 166
Fern Creek Tributary (206) 0 0 0 0 0
Meadow Creek (05) 9,637 9,453 9,453 9,453 9,453
East Fork Meadow Creek (06) 2,398 2,398 2,398 NA NA
Fiddle Creek TSF NB NB 3,895 3,895 3,895
Meadow Creek TSF/DRSF NB NB NB NB NB
Upper EFSFSR TSF/DRSF NB NB NB 15,649 15,649
Total Habitat (meters) 41,700 28,200 31,949 41,871 41,941

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 21

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
FISH PASSAGE BARRIERS, CRITICAL HABITAT, INTRINSIC POTENTIAL, AND OCCUPANCY MODELS IMPACTS –
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DISCUSSION
There are three major barriers to fish movement in the Study Area Upper EFSFSR upstream of
the confluence with Sugar Creek: 1) EFSFSR YPP high gradient (02); 2) EFSFSR box culvert
(203); and 3) Meadow Creek (05) (Figure 1). The EFSFSR YPP high gradient is a complete
barrier to fish passage, restricting all species from accessing the Upper EFSFSR upstream of
the existing cascade. Additionally, the YPP barrier “available fish habitat” values cited in Table 2
through Table 10 (Section 2.0, Results) include all other barriers, because those barriers are
upstream of the YPP (Figure 1). Therefore, the other two barriers, the EFSRSR box culvert and
Meadow Creek, which are partial barriers that block migration seasonally (i.e., flow-dependent),
only hinder migration of fish that reside or were stocked upstream of the YPP barrier. These
three barriers are “major,” because they have an impact on critical habitat, IP habitat, and OM
habitat availability, while other barriers do not.
Under all three alternatives, Chinook salmon and bull trout critical habitat access is restricted by
the three primary barriers, two of which are seasonally restricted (Figure 4). Most notably, the
YPP blocks over 26,000 meters of Chinook salmon and 17,000 meters of bull trout habitat under
Baseline conditions, for a total of 43,000 meters of critical habitat that are not accessible to the
two species (Figure 4). Under Alternatives 1, 2, and 3, by Year -1, the EFSFSR tunnel would be
operating, so the YPP would no longer block access to upstream Chinook salmon and bull trout
critical habitat (Figure 4). Additionally, under Alternatives 1 and 2, the EFSFSR box culvert and
Meadow Creek barriers would be removed due to stream enhancement by Year -1. Therefore,
barriers to critical habitat for Chinook salmon and bull trout would no longer exist (Figure 4).
Under Alternative 3, no action occurs in the Meadow Creek watershed; therefore, the Meadow
Creek barrier would continue to block Chinook salmon and bull trout habitat in perpetuity
(Figure 4).
The Fiddle Creek TSF does not block critical habitat for Chinook salmon or bull trout under any
alternative. The Meadow Creek TSF/DRSF blocks Chinook salmon and bull trout critical habitat
starting in Year 18 (Tables 2 and 3) (Figure 4). Under Alternatives 1 and 2, the Meadow Creek
TSF/DRSF blocks 5,509 meters of Chinook salmon critical habitat and 4,667 meters of bull trout
habitat (Tables 2 and 3) (Figure 4). These areas are blocked in perpetuity. Under Alternative 3,
only the Upper EFSFSR TSF/DRSF is a barrier to fish movement, starting in Year 18, when this
barrier blocks access to 11,584 meters of Chinook salmon critical habitat and 6,520 meters of
bull trout critical habitat (Table 4 and Figure 4).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 22

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
FISH PASSAGE BARRIERS, CRITICAL HABITAT, INTRINSIC POTENTIAL, AND OCCUPANCY MODELS IMPACTS –
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

50,000

45,000

40,000

35,000
Stream Length (m)

30,000

25,000

20,000

15,000

10,000

5,000

0
Baseline Year -2 Year - 1 Year 12 Year 17 Year 20

EFSFSR YPP - ALT1 EFSFSR YPP - ALT2 EFSFSR YPP - ALT3

EFSFSR Box Culvert - ALT1 EFSFSR Box Culvert - ALT2 EFSFSR Box Culvert - ALT3
Meadow Creek - ALT1 Meadow Creek - ALT2 Meadow Creek - ALT3
Meadow Creek TSF/DRSF - Alt1 Meadow Creek TSF/DRSF - Alt2 Upper EFSFSR TSF/DRSF - ALT3

Figure 4. Critical Habitat (Chinook Salmon and Bull Trout Combined)

per Barrier per Alternative per Year

Under all three alternatives, Chinook salmon and steelhead IP habitat is blocked by the three
primary barriers; two (Meadow Creek and EFSFSR Box Culvert) of which are seasonal, and
may not impact steelhead IP habitat (Figure 5). The primary barrier, the YPP high gradient,
blocks over 10,000 meters of Chinook salmon and nearly 8,800 meters of steelhead IP habitat
under Baseline conditions; a total of nearly 18,800 meters of IP habitat that are not accessible to
the two species (Tables 5 through 7) (Figure 5). Under Alternatives 1, 2, and 3, by Year -1, the
EFSFSR tunnel would be operating, and the YPP would no longer block access to upstream
Chinook salmon and steelhead IP habitat (Figure 5). Again, similar to the critical habitat results,
under Alternatives 1 and 2, the EFSFSR box culvert and Meadow Creek barriers would be
removed due to stream enhancement by Year -1, indicating that barriers to critical habitat for the
two species would no longer persist in the study area. Under Alternative 3, no action would
occur in the Meadow Creek watershed; therefore, the Meadow Creek barrier would continue to

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 23

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
FISH PASSAGE BARRIERS, CRITICAL HABITAT, INTRINSIC POTENTIAL, AND OCCUPANCY MODELS IMPACTS –
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

hinder access to Chinook salmon and steelhead IP habitat beyond the life of the mine
(Figure 5).
The extent of IP habitat is less than critical habitat; therefore, the extent of IP habitat blocked by
the TSF/DRSFs is much less than critical habitat. Fiddle Creek does not support IP habitat, so
the Fiddle Creek TSF does not block spawning and early rearing for Chinook salmon and
steelhead under any alternative. The Meadow Creek TSF/DRSF does not block Chinook
salmon IP habitat under any alternative, because flows are too low to support the species (i.e.,
flows do not meet the minimum wetted width of 3.6 meters [Cooney and Holzer 2006]). Starting
in Year 18 under Alternatives 1 and 2, the Meadow Creek TSF/DRSF blocks 1,909 meters of
steelhead IP (Tables 5 and 6, and Figure 5). These areas are blocked in perpetuity. Under
Alternative 3, only the Upper EFSFSR TSF/DRSF is a barrier to fish movement; and starting in
Year 18, blocks access to 1,930 meters of steelhead IP habitat (Table 7) (Figure 5). This
blockage of steelhead IP habitat remains in perpetuity.
20000

18000

16000

14000
Stream Length in Meters

12000

10000

8000

6000

4000

2000

0
Baseline Year -2 Year - 1 Year 12 Year 17 Year 20

EFSFSR YPP - ALT1 EFSFSR YPP - ALT2 EFSFSR YPP - ALT3

EFSFSR Box Culvert - ALT1 EFSFSR Box Culvert - ALT2 EFSFSR Box Culvert - ALT3
Meadow Creek - ALT1 Meadow Creek - ALT2 Meadow Creek - ALT3
Meadow Creek TSF/DRSF - ALT1 Meadow Creek TSF/DRSF - ALT2 Upper EFSFSR TSF/DRSF - ALT3

Figure 5. Intrinsic Potential Habitat (Chinook Salmon and Steelhead Combined)

per Barrier per Alternative per Year

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 24

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
FISH PASSAGE BARRIERS, CRITICAL HABITAT, INTRINSIC POTENTIAL, AND OCCUPANCY MODELS IMPACTS –
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

The OM (Ecosystem Sciences 2019c) results show “available fish habitat” for westslope
cutthroat trout and bull trout (and a surrogate for all other fish species’ maximum extent of
habitat). Overall, general “available fish habitat” is more abundant than Critical and IP habitats;
therefore, the barriers impact a greater extent of available habitat. Barriers in Hennessey Creek,
Fiddle Creek, Fern Creek, and Garnet Creek, for example, exist and block access to fish habitat
(Tables 8 through 10). Under Alternatives 1 and 2, available habitat for cutthroat trout and bull
trout (or all fish species) would be blocked throughout the study area (Tables 8 and 9). Major
barriers associated with the YPP and the box culvert would be removed by Year 6 (Table 8).
Following mine actions (e.g., EFSFSR tunnel) and stream enhancement and restoration, by
Year 12, only Fern Creek (205), Meadow Creek (05), and the Fiddle Creek TSF would block
available fish habitat under Alternatives 1 and 2 (Tables 8 and 9). Post-Year 18, only small
portions of the upper watershed (Fern Creek), the Fiddle Creek TSF, and the Meadow Creek
TSF/DRSF would block available fish habitat (Tables 8 and 9).
Under Alternative 3, available fish habitat would be blocked throughout the study area. Similar
to the critical habitat and IP results, under Alternative 3, available fish habitat upstream of the
Meadow Creek barrier would remain blocked beyond the mine’s life (Table 10). The Upper
EFSFSR TSF/DRSF blocks 15,649 meters of available fish habitat in perpetuity (Table 10).
Overall, the actions that would occur during the project would increase access to fish habitat
throughout the study area. Under Alternatives 1 and 2, only habitat upstream of the TSF/DRSFs
would remain blocked once the mining activity ceases. Under Alternative 3, the Meadow Creek
blockage would remain in perpetuity, as well as the fish habitat upstream of the Upper EFSFSR
TSF/DRSF. It is reiterated that there are some questions regarding the efficacy of the EFSFSR
tunnel to allow volitional fish passage (USFWS 2019). Therefore, all results presented herein
must be viewed in the context that the EFSFSR tunnel may not improve fish passage in the
EFSFSR; in fact, it may be a barrier to fish passage (USFWS 2019).

REFERENCES
BioAnalysts. (2019). Evaluation of Upper EFSFSR Fish Passage Barriers Technical
Memorandum. May 30, 2019.
Cooney T., and D. M. Holzer. 2006. Appendix C: Interior Columbia Basin Stream Type Chinook
Salmon and Steelhead Populations: Habitat Intrinsic Potential Analysis. Preliminary draft
of the viability criteria for Interior Columbia domain.
Ecosystem Sciences. 2019a. Stibnite Gold Project – Chinook Salmon Critical Habitat.
Ecosystem Sciences. 2019b. Proposed Action Intrinsic Potential Model – Stibnite Gold Project.
Ecosystem Sciences 2019c. Occupancy Model – Stibnite Gold Project.
USFWS. 2010. Final Bull Trout Critical Habitat Designation GIS Data “BT_FCH_Streams.”
Available: https://www.fws.gov/pacific/bulltrout/Habitat.cfm. Accessed June 2019.
USFWS. 2019. Comments on the Proposed Stibnite Gold Project – Tunnel Design, Operation,
and Management. Letter dated October 3, 2019 from Christopher Swanson (USFWS) to
Alan Haslam (Midas Gold) and Tawnya Brummett (Payette National Forest).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 25

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
FISH PASSAGE BARRIERS, CRITICAL HABITAT, INTRINSIC POTENTIAL, AND OCCUPANCY MODELS IMPACTS –
TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

This page intentionally left blank

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 26

 Appendix J-4: Intrinsic Potential Technical Memoranda

This TM was developed and finalized for the Draft EIS in December 2019. There may be differences in the data
presented in the figures and tables as compared to the Draft EIS
This page intentionally left blank.
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

INTRINSIC POTENTIAL
MODEL
CHINOOK SALMON
AND STEELHEAD
Technical Memorandum
Stibnite Gold Project, Idaho

December 2019

Ecosystem Sciences, LLC

Science . Planning . Design
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Ecosystem Sciences
Science . Planning . Design

Ecosystem Sciences
202 N. 9th Street, Suite 400
Boise, ID 83702
T: 208.383.0226

Prepared for: AECOM

Project Title: Stibnite Gold Project

Technical Memorandum
Subject: Intrinsic Potential Model Chinook Salmon and Steelhead

Date: November 22, 2019

To: AECOM

From: Ecosystem Sciences, LLC

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 1
1.1 CONSULTATION ..................................................................................................................... 1
2.0 STUDY AREA .................................................................................................................................. 2
3.0 EXISTING REGIONAL INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL AND METHODOLOGY ....................... 2
3.1 INTRINSIC POTENTIAL RESULTS – COONEY AND HOLZER 2006 ................................................ 3
4.0 METHODS ....................................................................................................................................... 8
4.1 ASSUMPTIONS ....................................................................................................................... 8
4.2 MODELING PROCEDURE ........................................................................................................ 9
4.3 DATA EMPLOYED ................................................................................................................... 9
4.4 STREAMLINES ..................................................................................................................... 10
4.5 THIRTY-METER SEGMENTS................................................................................................... 11
4.6 STREAM FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT REACHES...................................................................... 12
4.7 BANKFULL W IDTH ................................................................................................................ 12
4.7.1 Drainage Area ...................................................................................................... 12
4.8 W ETTED W IDTH .................................................................................................................. 13
4.9 SLOPE (STREAM GRADIENT) ................................................................................................ 13
4.10 VALLEY BOTTOM W IDTH – VALLEY BOTTOM EXTRACTION TOOL ............................................ 14
4.11 VALLEY W IDTH RATIO .......................................................................................................... 15
5.0 RESULTS ...................................................................................................................................... 15
5.1 STUDY AREA ....................................................................................................................... 16
5.2 STREAM FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT REACHES...................................................................... 20
5.3 STREAM SEGMENT 2 (MEADOW CREEK) ............................................................................... 20
5.4 STREAM SEGMENT 1 (UPPER EFSFSR UPSTREAM OF SUGAR CREEK AND
DOWNSTREAM OF MEADOW CREEK) ..................................................................................... 21
5.5 STREAM SEGMENT 3 (UPPER EFSFSR ABOVE MEADOW CREEK CONFLUENCE) ..................... 24
5.6 STREAM SEGMENT 4 (UPPER EFSFSR BELOW SUGAR CREEK) ............................................ 27
6.0 QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL – REDD OCCURRENCE PER IP
RATING.......................................................................................................................................... 30
7.0 DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................................. 33
7.1 COMPARISON TO COONEY AND HOLZER (2006) .................................................................... 33
7.2 STUDY AREA IP................................................................................................................... 34
7.3 STREAM SEGMENT 5 VERSUS STREAM SEGMENT 6 ............................................................... 35
7.4 STREAM SEGMENT 2 (MEADOW CREEK) VERSUS STREAM SEGMENT 3 (UPPER
EFSFSR ABOVE MEADOW CREEK CONFLUENCE) ................................................................. 35
8.0 SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................... 38
9.0 LITERATURE CITED..................................................................................................................... 39

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | i

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A – Mine Life Year Intrinsic Potential Maps
Appendix B – Stream Segment Map and Description
Appendix C – SFA Reach Results Chinook Salmon and Steelhead

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Intrinsic Potential Model Study Area ........................................................................................... 4
Figure 2. Cooney and Holzer 2006 Categorical Intrinsic Potential Models for Chinook Salmon
and Steelhead ............................................................................................................................. 5
Figure 3. Cooney and Holzer (2006) IP Model Results for Chinook Salmon and Steelhead in
the Study Area ............................................................................................................................. 7
Figure 4. Overlapping Streamlines in Sugar Creek .................................................................................. 11
Figure 5. Example Streamline Split into 30-meter Segments................................................................... 12
Figure 6. Chinook Salmon Intrinsic Potential Rating for the Study Area .................................................. 18
Figure 7. Steelhead Intrinsic Potential Ratings for the Study Area .......................................................... 19
Figure 8. Stream Segment 2 (Meadow Creek) Chinook Salmon Intrinsic Potential Rating ..................... 22
Figure 9. Stream Segment 2 (Meadow Creek) Steelhead Intrinsic Potential Rating ............................... 23
Figure 10. Stream Segment 1 (EFSFSR from Sugar Creek to Meadow Creek) Chinook Salmon
Intrinsic Potential Rating ............................................................................................................ 25
Figure 11. Stream Segment 1 (EFSFSR from Sugar Creek to Meadow Creek) Steelhead
Intrinsic Potential Rating ............................................................................................................ 26
Figure 12. Stream Segment 3 (Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek Confluence) Chinook
Salmon Intrinsic Potential Rating .............................................................................................. 28
Figure 13. Stream Segment 3 (Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek Confluence) Steelhead
Intrinsic Potential Rating ............................................................................................................ 29
Figure 14. Chinook Salmon Redd Locations in the Intrinsic Potential Model Study Area .......................... 32
Figure 15. Comparison of Cooney and Holzer (2006) IP Results to Stibnite Gold IP Model for
Chinook Salmon ........................................................................................................................ 33
Figure 16. Comparison of Cooney and Holzer (2006) IP Results to Stibnite Gold IP Model for
Steelhead .................................................................................................................................. 34
Figure 17. Chinook Salmon and Steelhead IP Results for the Stibnite Gold Study Area .......................... 35
Figure 18. Comparison of Chinook Salmon IP Results for Stream Segments 5 and 6 .............................. 36
Figure 19. Comparison of Steelhead IP Results for Stream Segments 5 and 6 ........................................ 37
Figure 20. Comparison of Chinook Salmon IP Habitat; Meadow Creek (Stream segment 2) and
Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek Confluence (Stream Segment 3) ................................ 37
Figure 21. Comparison of Steelhead IP Habitat; Meadow Creek (Stream Segment 2) and Upper
EFSFSR above Meadow Creek Confluence (Stream Segment 3) ........................................... 38

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | ii

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Cooney and Holzer 2006 Intrinsic Potential Results for Chinook Salmon in the Study
Area ............................................................................................................................................. 6
Table 2. Cooney and Holzer 2006 Intrinsic Potential Results for Steelhead in the Study Area................ 6
Table 3. Goal, Life Stage, Analysis Extent, and Suitability Criteria for Study Area Intrinsic
Potential Model ............................................................................................................................ 9
Table 4. Data Employed to Create the Intrinsic Potential Model for Chinook Salmon and
Steelhead .................................................................................................................................. 10
Table 5. Bankfull Data used in IP Model (Model-derived and Field-measured Comparison) ................. 13
Table 6. Wetted Width Data used in IP Model (Model-derived and Field-measured
Comparison) .............................................................................................................................. 13
Table 7. Average Slope per 30-meter Stream Segment Descriptive Statistics....................................... 14
Table 8. Valley Bottom Width (V-BET) Data used in the IP Model ......................................................... 15
Table 9. Valley Width Ratio Data used in the IP Model .......................................................................... 15
Table 10. Chinook salmon IP results for study area (includes Sugar Creek) ........................................... 16
Table 11. Steelhead IP results for the study area (includes Sugar Creek) ............................................... 16
Table 12. Chinook Salmon and Steelhead IP Ratings for Streamlines in Stream Segment 6
(Sugar Creek) and Stream Segment 5 (Headwaters EFSFSR) ................................................ 20
Table 13. Chinook Salmon IP Ratings for Stream Segment 2 (Meadow Creek) ...................................... 21
Table 14. Steelhead IP Ratings for Stream Segment 2 (Meadow Creek) ................................................ 21
Table 15. Chinook salmon IP ratings for Stream Segment 1 .................................................................... 24
Table 16. Steelhead IP ratings for Stream Segment 1.............................................................................. 24
Table 17. Chinook Salmon IP Ratings for Stream Segment 3 (Upper EFSFSR above Meadow
Creek) ........................................................................................................................................ 27
Table 18. Steelhead IP Ratings for Stream Segment 3 (Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek) ........... 27
Table 19. Chinook Salmon IP Ratings for Stream Segment 4 (Upper EFSFSR below Sugar
Creek) ........................................................................................................................................ 30
Table 20. Steelhead IP Ratings for Stream Segment 4 (Upper EFSFSR below Sugar Creek) ................ 30
Table 21. Field-verified (2008 – 2018) Redds per Year ............................................................................ 31
Table 22. Field-verified (2008 – 2018) Redds per IP-rated Stream Segment........................................... 31

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | iii

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Definitions
Assessment (SFA) Mine site area for which the Stream Functional Assessment was performed or for the
ESRI shapefile with the same name.
Bankfull width The difference (length) between the banks at bankfull discharge.
DEM Digital Elevation model.
ESA group Organizations consistently involved in approximately monthly meetings during the
informal consultation process. The principal agencies were USFS, USFWS, USACE,
NOAA Fisheries, and Midas Gold. There were occasional members and numerous
consultants who all participated in the group.
ESA Endangered Species Act.
GIS Geographic Information System.
Intrinsic Potential (IP) The potential for a stream reach to contain spawning and early rearing habitat for the
species of interest based on the reach’s geomorphic characteristics. For this report
IP categories are defined by Cooney and Holzer (2006).
Lidar Light detection and ranging.
Midas Gold Midas Gold Idaho, Inc.
NHD National Hydrography Dataset.
NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. This acronym generally refers to
NOAA Fisheries.
PIBO data Baseline data collected according to the PACFISH/INFISH Biological Opinion
Monitoring (PIBO) program protocol as part of the Stibnite Gold Project Aquatic
Resources 2016 Baseline Study (MWH 2017) and supplied in excel spreadsheet
form by Midas Gold.
Rio ASE data Data collected by Rio ASE as part of the Stibnite Gold Project Stream Design Report
(Rio ASE 2018).
Streamlines The ESRI ArcMap shapefile that estimates the precise location of the stream
watercourses within the study area.
USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
USFS U.S. Forest Service.
Valley Bottom Ratio The ratio between the width of the valley bottom and the bankfull width.
V-BET Valley Bottom Extraction Tool – a GIS tool developed to determine the width of the
valley bottom of a stream (Gilbert et al. 2016).
Wetted width The wetted width of the stream during the late-summer to early fall baseflow season.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | iv

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

This Technical Memorandum presents the methods and results of the baseline conditions Intrinsic
Potential (IP) model for Spring/Summer Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and
Interior Columbia Basin (Snake River) steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in the mine site (see
Study Area section for details on the model domain). The goal of the analysis was to derive the
IP rating for streams in the study area that support spawning and early-rearing habitat for the two
species. The IP model classifies the quality of spawning and rearing habitat for the two species
in the stream reaches; from the confluence of Sugar Creek and the Upper East Fork South Fork
Salmon River (EFSFSR) upstream to the headwaters of both streams (Hydrologic Unit Code
[HUC] 12s: Sugar Creek and Headwaters East Fork South Fork Salmon River – Figure 1. This
modeling effort and results support the analysis of impacts to fish and fish habitat based on the
proposed project actions in the project mine site.
Section 1 describes the process through which the model domain and site-specific modeling
methods were determined (through a consultation process and adaptation of an existing regional
IP model to the project scale and potential impacts). Section 2 then defines the model domain.
Section 3 describes the existing regional model’s methods, errata, and results. Section 4
describes the study area’s final model methods, including assumptions, modeling procedure, data
sources, and tools employed. Section 5 presents the results of the study area model for reaches
and sub-watersheds of interest. Section 6 describes the Quality Assurance and Quality Control
procedures. Section 7 discusses the study area results in relation to the exiting regional model,
and between key sub-watersheds.

1.1 CONSULTATION
This modeling effort is a result of an extensive consultation process involving members of the
Endangered Species Act (ESA) fish informal consultation group (ESA group 1) involved in the
Stibnite Gold EIS. The original concept and approach to adapting an existing IP model for the
region, which is documented in the publication “Appendix C: Interior Columbia Basin Stream Type
Chinook Salmon and Steelhead Populations: Habitat Intrinsic Potential Analysis” (Cooney and
Holzer 2006), was originally presented to the ESA group on February 7, 2018. Over the course
of the next year and half, the methods, data inputs, analysis, and results were discussed on
numerous conference calls, in-person meetings, and via email correspondence. Numerous
presentations were made at informal ESA consultation meetings beginning in June 2018, and
generally reoccurring monthly. Information presented at these meetings included, but was not
limited to: categorical scoring of Cooney and Holzer (2006); derivation and refinement of the
streamlines (the geographic information system [GIS] shapefile used to represent the specific
location of the streams in the landscape) to be used; stream segmentation process; derivation of
bankfull width; derivation of wetted width; slope calculations; valley bottom width tool (V-BET);
sensitivity analysis of V-BET; the utility of applying intrinsic or extrinsic screens; results for
example reaches; comparison between Cooney and Holzer (2006) results in Sugar Creek with
preliminary modeling results; and the preliminary baseline modeling results (the subject of this
memo). Numerous modeling decisions regarding scale, data inputs, etc., were made based on
ESA group input. For example, the decision not to apply any intrinsic or extrinsic screens to the
IP model was based on feedback from the ESA Group provided during meetings and
presentations.

1 ESA group consisted of USFS, USFWS, NOAA Fisheries, Midas Gold, and USACE. These entities constituted the
core group of participants; however, other entities occasionally attended meetings.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 1

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

The study area for the IP model includes the stream courses in the Upper East Fork South Fork
Salmon River watershed (HUC 10 – 1706020802). Two HUC 12s are included in the study area:
Headwaters East Fork South Fork Salmon River (HUC 12 – 170602080201); and Sugar Creek
(HUC 12 – 1706020803) (Figure 1). Special attention was paid to the stream reaches delineated
by the Stream Functional Assessment (SFA), focusing on specific impact areas in the mine site.
A portion of the EFSFSR downstream of the confluence with Sugar Creek was rated for intrinsic
potential to ensure full coverage of project-related impacts at the mine site (Figure 1).

Following consultation with the U.S. Forest Service (USFS), National Oceanographic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and other members of the ESA group, it was decided that
building an IP Model for the mine site could provide information needed to support the analysis of
project impacts and other associated environmental documentation and determinations. The
approach to modeling is based primarily on existing IP modeling efforts and summary reports
(e.g., Cooney and Holzer 2006; and a review by Sheer et al. 2009). Where the existing regional
models were designed to characterize large areas and were based on coarse data sets (Cooney
and Holzer [2006] relied on 200-meter stream segments and 10-meter digital elevation models),
the IP model for this project builds off Cooney and Holzer’s IP model for the Interior Columbia
Basin (Cooney and Holzer 2006), and adapts it to the local scale (Upper EFSFSR), granularity of
study area data sets, and its pre-defined reaches; which will enable future efforts to evaluate the
proposed actions and alternatives associated with the project. Using both GIS-derived and
empirical field observations, the modeling effort evaluates stream-reach geomorphic conditions
(i.e., wetted width, bankfull width, stream gradient, and floodplain width) and their ability to support
spawning and early-rearing habitat for Chinook salmon and steelhead.
Historically, IP models have been commonly used to estimate the historic distribution of species,
and to identify areas for strategic implementation of conservation actions or habitat restoration.
Such analysis is generally applied at larger scales than this study area (e.g., South Fork of the
Salmon River or larger). However, due to the availability of high-resolution data for the mine site
( light detection and ranging [LiDAR] and extensive field data for multiple parameters, [i.e.,
PACFISH/INFISH Biological Opinion Monitoring Program (PIBO) data], as well as field data
collected by Rio ASE), the application of an IP approach provides a valuable reach-specific
analysis of Chinook and steelhead habitat conditions that can be used to compare existing
conditions to interim and post-closure conditions (i.e., the Proposed Action).
The study area methodology detailed below (in Section 5.0) follows the physical habitat IP
approach developed by Cooney and Holzer (2006) for the Interior Columbia Basin (Figure 2).
This modeling effort was developed and revised by many experts, and forms the basis of the
modeling effort adapted to the study area scale. Figure 2 details Cooney and Holzer’s (2006)
matrix for determining the IP classification per stream reach. The IP model is a categorical
classification of habitat quality, rather than a continuous classification of habitat (e.g., index
values, habitat suitability criteria); therefore, it has a limited number of categories into which each
reach is classified. Classifications for each stream reach range from None (no intrinsic potential
to support habitat) to High (likely to provide habitat), with low and medium classifications in
between (with the additional classification of Negligible for Chinook salmon). During the course of
the consultation process, NOAA (via personal communication from Johanna Sandow – email

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 2

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

dated August 28, 2018) provided edits to the matrix in Figure 2, noted in red. The changes NOAA
provided relate only to Chinook salmon, in which the first category is wetted width, not bankfull
width (an errata in the original model documentation). Minimum wetted width for Chinook salmon
is 3.6 meters. The Chinook salmon IP also has a category termed Negligible; this category is not
found in the steelhead IP model (Figure 2).

3.1 INTRINSIC POTENTIAL RESULTS – COONEY AND HOLZER 2006

The Cooney and Holzer (2006) model results depict no Chinook habitat upstream of the Yellow
Pine Pit (YPP), but do indicate suitable habitat conditions for steelhead above the YPP (Figure 3).
The Cooney and Holzer (2006) modeling effort was developed and revised by many experts, and
forms the basis for the modeling effort adapted to the project-scale study area.
In the study area (Sugar Creek and the Upper EFSFSR), Cooney and Holzer’s IP model indicated
that roughly 1,803 meters (4 percent of the study area) of stream are rated as having High IP for
spawning and early-rearing for Chinook salmon (Table 1). For steelhead, the Cooney and Holzer
(2006) model indicated that the study area supports more than 12,800 meters (28 percent of the
study area) of stream that are rated as High IP (Table 2). The difference between High IP for
spawning and early-rearing for the two species is attributed to the YPP being considered a
migration blockage for Chinook salmon. Cooney and Holzer (2006) note that no habitat upstream
of the YPP is considered habitat for Chinook salmon.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 3

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 1. Intrinsic Potential Model Study Area

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 4

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Adapted from Cooney and Holzer (2006) Table 7. Relative potential for Interior
Columbia basin steelhead spawning and initial Rearing as a function of stream
reach physical characteristics.
Valley Width Ratio
Stream Width/ Gradient Categories
(Ratio of valley width to bankfull stream width)
Confined Moderate Wide
Bankfull Width
Gradient
(BF) (≤4 x BF (> 20 x BF
(4-20 x BF width)
width) width)
BF < 3.8 m ≥0 None None None
0 – 0.5 None Medium Medium
0.5 – 4.0 Low High High
BF 3.8m to 25 m
4.0 – 7.0 None Low Low
> 7.0 None None None
0 – 4.0 Low Medium Medium
BF 25 m to 50 m
> 4.0 None None None
BF> 50 m ≥0 None Low Low

Adapted from Cooney and Holzer (2006) Table 3. Relative potential for Interior
Columbia basin Spring/Summer Chinook salmon spawning and initial rearing as a
function of stream reach physical characteristics.
Valley Width Ratio
Stream Width/ Gradient Categories
(Ratio of valley width to bankfull stream width)
Confined Moderate Wide
Wetted Width
Gradient (≤4 x BF (> 20 x BF
(WW) (4-20 x BF width)
width) width)
WW < 3.7 m ≥0 None None None
0 – 0.5 Medium High High
0.5 – 1.5 Low Medium High
WW 3.6 m to 25 m 1.5 – 4.0 Low Low Medium
4.0 – 7.0 Negligible Low Low
> 7.0 None None None
0 – 0.5 None Medium Medium
WW 25 m to 50 m 0.5 – 10 None None None
≥ 10 None None None
WW> 50 m ≥0 None None None
Table Notes:
*red items were modified from the original publication.
Note the correction to the table for Chinook salmon: wetted width was substituted for bankfull width and the called-out category was
corrected to 3.6 meters to 25 meters, per NOAA consultation. 2 Criteria that were modified based on consultation with NOAA are called
out in red text.

Figure 2. Cooney and Holzer 2006 Categorical Intrinsic Potential Models

for Chinook Salmon and Steelhead

2 Johnna Sandow, NOAA Fisheries, personal consultation. The authors of the original table were consulted, and the
correction sent via Johnna Sandow to the ESA group.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 5

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 1. Cooney and Holzer 2006 Intrinsic Potential Results for Chinook Salmon in the Study Area

Chinook IP Segments Length (meters) % Study Area

High 9 1,802.5 4.0
Medium 4 800.7 1.8
Low 19 3,805.2 8.4
Useable Habitat 32 6,408.4 14.1
Total Area 230 45,484.5 100.0

Overall, according to Cooney and Holzer (2006), the study area provides roughly 6,408 linear
meters of useable stream habitat (14.1 percent of the study area) that meet the minimum (Low,
Medium, High) requirements for spawning and early-rearing IP for Chinook salmon. The entire
potential spawning and early-rearing habitat occurs downstream of the YPP, and within the Sugar
Creek drainage (Figure 3).

Table 2. Cooney and Holzer 2006 Intrinsic Potential Results for Steelhead in the Study Area

Steelhead IP Segments Length (meters) % Study Area

High 64 12816.0 28.2
Medium 1 200.2 0.4
Low 59 11814.4 26.0
Useable Habitat 106 24,830.6 54.6
Total Area 230 45,484.5 100.0

The Cooney and Holzer (2006) IP model for steelhead identifies roughly 24,831 meters of useable
stream habitat (54.6 percent of study area) as providing at least the minimum (Low, Medium,
High) requirements for spawning and early-rearing habitat (Table 2).The Cooney and Holzer
(2006) IP model does not recognize the reach immediately above Yellow Pine Pit (high-gradient
reach) as a fish barrier, therefore, much of the Upper EFSFSR and Meadow Creek provides
steelhead spawning and early-rearing habitat (Figure 3).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 6

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 3. Cooney and Holzer (2006) IP Model Results for Chinook Salmon and Steelhead in the Study Area

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 7

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

The mine site IP model methodology follows the physical habitat potential IP approach developed
by Cooney and Holzer (2006) for the Interior Columbia Basin, but has been modified to address
the scale of the proposed project’s existing data and impacts.

4.1 ASSUMPTIONS
The IP modeling effort uses key landscape characteristics (i.e., gradient, channel characteristics,
and valley confinement) to determine the potential of stream reaches to support spawning and
early-rearing habitat for the two species. Field data (e.g., PIBO and Rio ASE) and modeled
parameters (e.g., bankfull and wetted width) for reaches that lacked field data (i.e., most of the
study area) were used as inputs to the model. Other key definitions and assumptions include:
1. The model extent is from the confluence of Sugar Creek and the EFSFSR upstream to
their headwaters.

2. Field-collected data: PIBO data (collected 2012 – 2015 [MWH 2017]), Rio ASE data
(collected 2017 [Rio ASE 2018]), and spawning survey results (collected 2008 – 2018,
[Nez Perce Tribe 2018]) were used as inputs to the model where data were available;
primarily, bankfull and wetted widths.

3. Wetted width is the first category for Chinook salmon, while bankfull width was employed
for steelhead. PIBO data and Rio ASE collected data and documented wetted and
bankfull widths in the study area (Figure 2).

4. Modeling was performed at a 30-meter-reach scale; however, results have been

summarized by tributary (i.e., Meadow Creek, Upper EFSFSR, Upper EFSFSR above
Meadow Creek confluence) according to project-specific areas of interest.

5. The study area IP model results documented Chinook salmon spawning and
early-rearing habitat potential above the YPP, even though those reaches are not
currently accessible to the species due to a high-gradient section directly above the YPP
(no volitional passage, although hatchery fish have been released above the barrier).

Table 3 below identifies the goal, life stage, analysis extent, and habitat suitability criteria used to
determine the intrinsic potential of the study area (Upper EFSFSR) to support spawning and early-
rearing habitat for Chinook salmon and steelhead.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 8

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 2. Goal, Life Stage, Analysis Extent, and Suitability Criteria for
Study Area Intrinsic Potential Model

Goal Evaluate the potential spawning and rearing habitat for Chinook salmon and steelhead in the
reaches of the study area. Assign classes (High, Medium, Low, Negligible, and None) to reaches
that describe that reach’s potential to support Chinook salmon and steelhead spawning and early
rearing.
Model Components
Life Stage Spawning and early rearing (focus on yearling).
Analysis Reaches in the study area (confluence of EFSFSR and Sugar Creek upstream to headwaters).
Extent Summarize the Intrinsic Potential for Chinook salmon and steelhead using site-specific and fine-
scale data in the Upper EFSFSR, Meadow Creek, and Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek
confluence).
Habitat
Suitability Cooney and Holzer 2006.
Criteria

4.2 MODELING PROCEDURE

The IP model methods followed the general approach described below:
1. Gathered all pertinent data from baseline reports, past IP modeling efforts, etc.
(consulted available models, including those listed in Sheer et al. [2009]).
2. Reviewed literature sources for relationships between fish density and habitat
characteristics in the Interior Columbia Basin.
3. Determined initial parameters and index values, based on Cooney and Holzer (2006).
4. Identified available field data (PIBO and Rio ASE) and location of reaches.
5. Performed preliminary IP model for reaches with field data, and presented to ESA group
at July 19, 2018, informal ESA consultation meeting.
6. Created a streamlines Geographic Information System (GIS) shapefile for all IP
modeling efforts, and segmented streamlines into 30-meter segments (see Streamlines
section below for more information).
7. Created modeled input parameters and attributed 30-meter segments with modeled
parameters and field parameters for applicable segments.
8. Performed all IP modeling for all reaches (modeled parameter reaches and field data
reaches).
9. Presented results to ESA group (October 24, 2018, and November 28, 2018).
10. Finalized modeling results, summarized by SFA reach, sub-watershed (e.g., Meadow
Creek), or other pertinent geographic extents based on project needs.

4.3 DATA EMPLOYED

Creating the Stibnite Gold IP model required several steps and model inputs. Table 4 documents
the input parameters for the IP model, the pertinent values per species, and the data sources.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 9

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Field data for wetted width and bankfull width parameters were available for several reaches of
the study area, primarily through PIBO data. Rio ASE also performed some field data collection
in the study area in support of their Stream Design Report (Rio ASE 2018). Rio ASE field data
provided bankfull and wetted width measurements as well.

Table 3. Data Employed to Create the Intrinsic Potential Model for Chinook Salmon and Steelhead

Parameter Chinook Steelhead Source

Wetted Width (m) ≥3.6m N/A PIBO and Rio ASE field data
Rio ASE wetted width calculation
WW = BF*0.799
Bankfull (m) N/A ≥3.8m PIBO and Rio ASE field data
Rio ASE bankfull (BF) calculation based on drainage
area (DA) and then converted to meters:
BF(ft) = 6.868*DA0.407
Gradient (% Slope) <7% <7% Derived in ESRI ArcGIS based on Lidar data and
streamline segment
Valley Bottom Width Reach Reach Derived in ESRI ArcGIS using the Valley Bottom
(m) Dependent Dependent Extraction Tool (VBET)
Valley Width Ratio Valley Bottom Valley Bottom Derived in ESRI ArcGIS by dividing the Valley
Width/Bank Width/Bank Full Bottom Width by its corresponding segments
Full bankfull width (VWR = VBW/BF)

4.4 STREAMLINES
Cooney and Holzer (2006) employed 200-meter segments derived from the National Hydrography
Dataset (NHD) plus flow lines to perform the Interior Columbia Basin Intrinsic Potential Model
(Cooney and Holzer 2006); however, the NHD dataset does not accurately reflect the drainage
lines in the study area. Several streamline datasets existed for other analyses in the study area
(e.g., Aquatic Resources Study Area streams, delineated streams from wetland delineation, and
Qual2K stream segmentation). Ecosystem Sciences created a streamline file based on Lidar data
for the study area using ESRI’s ArcHydro application. The ArcHydro-based and other streamline
datasets were merged and analyzed to create one layer that accurately represents the stream
courses in the study area. Ecosystem Sciences provided this revised stream layer to the ESA
group for edits. Midas Gold Idaho, Inc. (Midas Gold) made edits, and suggested other edits to the
streamlines provided to them by Ecosystem Sciences. Ecosystem Sciences made the following
edits to the streamlines provided by Midas Gold.
1. Added line segments through culverts – To create study-area-wide 30-meter stream
segments, each stream course needed to be one continuous line. Therefore, streamlines
through culverts were included in the final 30-meter segment dataset.
2. Removed overlapping stream segments in Sugar Creek – A portion of Sugar Creek had
overlapping streamlines, which were removed from the dataset so that only a single
streamline remained to represent Sugar Creek. See Figure 4 below.
3. Only perennial streams were used for the Stibnite Gold IP model. Where streams had
multiple channels, the main channel, or larger channel, was used in the model.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 10

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 4. Overlapping Streamlines in Sugar Creek

4.5 THIRTY-METER SEGMENTS

The ESA group determined that 30-meter stream segments were biologically appropriate for the
baseline analysis of IP for Chinook salmon and steelhead. Therefore, the agreed-on streamlines
were split into 30-meter segments in ESRI ArcGIS 10.6 using the Split command; this command,
found on the Editor toolbar, allows users to split a line into an equal number of new features. For
example, it was used to split the 15,870-meter-long EFSFSR into 528 segments (roughly
30.1 meters per segment).
Figure 5 below depicts a portion of the EFSFSR split into 30-meter segments. More information
on the Split command in ESRI ArcGIS 10.6 can be found here:
http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/10.3/manage-data/editing-existing-features/splitting-a-line-
into-an-equal-number-of-parts.htm.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 11

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 5. Example Streamline Split into 30-meter Segments

4.6 STREAM FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT REACHES

SFA reaches were provided to Ecosystem Sciences by Midas Gold, and the SFA reach names
were attributed to the streamlines used in the IP model in ESRI ArcGIS 10.6. This was done to
facilitate future modeling efforts focused on the impacts associated with the proposed action,
allowing IP results for Chinook salmon and steelhead to be summarized per SFA reach.

4.7 BANKFULL WIDTH

Bankfull width was calculated for every stream segment using the equation provided by Rio ASE,
based on that segment’s upstream drainage area. The bankfull (BF) width equation is: BF(ft) =
6.868*DA0.407, where DA = Drainage Area. The resultant bankfull width in feet was converted to
meters and attributed to the streamline dataset used in the IP model. PIBO data were used as
the bankfull width measurements when available.

4.7.1 Drainage Area

Drainage area was calculated via an ESRI ArcHydro-derived flow accumulation raster (FAC) in
ArcGIS 10.6. Each 30-meter segment start point was intersected with the FAC, which

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 12

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

documented in square meters, the upstream area that drains to that point. Several of the 30-meter
segment start points did not intersect the highest FAC pixel, because the actual streamline did
not follow the ArcHydro-derived flow path. For these points, the ArcGIS tool, Snap Pour Point,
was used to ensure that the correct upstream drainage area was attributed to the 30-meter
segment’s start point. The drainage area, defined by the FAC, was attributed to the 30-meter
stream segment start point, and then joined to the segmented 30-meter streamlines.

Table 4. Bankfull Data used in IP Model (Model-derived and Field-measured Comparison)

Bankfull Data Modeled Field

Count 3,874 120
Min 0.2m 2.4m
Mean 2.5m 6.2m
Median 1.9m 6.0m
Max 9.7m 10.7m
SD 1.9m 2.5m

4.8 WETTED WIDTH

Wetted width was calculated for every stream segment based on that segment’s bankfull width.
Midas Gold performed an analysis of the relationship between bankfull width and wetted widths,
and provided those results to Ecosystem Sciences. The following is from a Midas Gold/Brown
and Caldwell (Paul Leonard) email dated September 10, 2018: “Based on the close relationship
between the PIBO data and the restoration design it is believed that wetted width can accurately
be estimated throughout the study area as approximately 79.9% of the bankfull width for that
reach.” Therefore, wetted width (WW) was derived for each segment by multiplying the bankfull
width by 0.799 (WW = BF*0.799). PIBO and Rio ASE–collected field data were also used in the
model. Field-collected data superseded modeled data throughout the analysis. Table 6 details
the wetted widths used to model the IP of Chinook salmon.

Table 5. Wetted Width Data used in IP Model (Model-derived and Field-measured Comparison)

Wetted Width Modeled Field

Count 3,874 91
Min 0.1m 1.9m
Mean 2.0m 4.9m
Median 1.5m 4.6m
Max 7.8m 9.8m
SD 1.5m 2.1m

4.9 SLOPE (STREAM GRADIENT)

Stream gradient for each 30-meter segment was delineated in ArcGIS 10.6 by subtracting the
elevation at the end of the 30-meter segment from the elevation at the top of the 30-meter
segment and dividing the difference by the length of the segment (usually 30 meters). This is the

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 13

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

typical rise (high – low = difference) over run (length of segment) equation used to define a line
segments slope or gradient (slope = rise/run). The 1-meter Lidar-derived Digital Elevation Model
(DEM) provided elevation information (start z & end z). The 30-meter stream segments (see the
Streamlines and Thirty-meter Segments sections) were the polyline features to which the slope
derivation was attributed, and the lengths used to derive the run (length of segment). Stream
gradient in the EFSFSR ranged from -4 percent to nearly 78 percent, with a mean of
approximately 12 percent change over the 30-meter section. Negative stream gradients were
categorized as falling within the 0.0 to 0.5 class for inclusion in the IP model. Researchers have
found that Lidar-derived slope measurements can cause negative slopes (essentially water
flowing uphill) (Tonina et al. 2018). Therefore, such slopes were regarded as less than 0.5 percent
slope for inclusion in the IP models. Cooney and Holzer (2006) suggest that a stream gradient
greater than 7 percent, regardless of bankfull / stream width or valley width ratio, is too steep for
either Chinook salmon or steelhead spawning and early rearing (Figure 2). In general, most of
the stream segments in the study area are too steep to support Chinook salmon or steelhead
spawning and early-rearing life stages. Therefore, most of the spawning and early-rearing habitat
for the two species in the study area is limited to the main trunk streams: EFSFSR, Meadow
Creek, and Sugar Creek.

Table 6. Average Slope per 30-meter Stream Segment Descriptive Statistics

Slope Modeled
Count 3,874
Min -4.2%
Mean 12.0%
Median 11.5%
Max 77.6%
SD 11.4%

4.10 VALLEY BOTTOM WIDTH – VALLEY BOTTOM EXTRACTION TOOL

Valley width was derived using the Valley Bottom Extraction Tool (V-BET), an open-source
ArcGIS toolbox that provides the scripts needed to delineate valley bottoms across entire
drainage networks (Gilbert et al. 2016). The V-BET derives valley bottoms based on terrain data
from 1 to 10 meters (Gilbert et al. 2016); 1-meter Lidar data were used. The V-BET tool results in
a polygon (vector) feature class depicting the width of the valley bottoms in the study area (see
Appendix A). The resultant feature class required hand-editing post-process because roads and
low slope areas outside of valley bottom areas pose a problem for the V-BET tool. More
information pertaining to the V-BET tool can be found in Appendix A: Valley Bottom Extraction
Tool Sensitivity Analysis.
Valley width per 30-meter stream segment was derived through a GIS process that results in an
average valley bottom width per 30-meter segment. The GIS process is described herein:
1. Create cross-valley bottom lines for every 10 meters of stream that are perpendicular to
the streamline. Each 30-meter stream segment has three cross-valley bottom lines used
to evaluate that segment’s average valley bottom width.
2. Clip the cross-valley bottom lines created in step 1 using the feature class (valley bottom
width) created using the V-BET. Derive each cross-valley bottom line’s length.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 14

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

3. Create the average length of the cross-valley bottom line per 30-meter stream segment,
which is the average of the three clipped cross-valley bottom lines created in step 2.
4. Attribute the average length of the cross-valley bottom lines, or valley width, to each
30-meter stream segment.
Valley widths for the 30-meter segments in the study area ranged from 5 to 180 meters, with a
mean of 28.7 meters (Table 8). Similar to slope, the narrow valley bottoms in the study area limit
the habitat available to Chinook salmon and steelhead to the main trunk streams (Upper EFSFSR,
Meadow Creek, and Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek confluence).

Table 7. Valley Bottom Width (V-BET) Data used in the IP Model

Valley Bottom Width Modeled

Count 3,874
Min 5.0m
Mean 28.7m
Median 17.0m
Max 180.0m
SD 26.5m

4.11 VALLEY WIDTH RATIO

The valley width ratio was derived in ArcGIS 10.6 by dividing each 30-meter segment’s average
valley width by that same segment’s bankfull width. Valley width ratios ranged from 1.5 to 318.8,
with a mean of 17.3 (Table 9).

Table 8. Valley Width Ratio Data used in the IP Model

Valley Width Ratio Modeled

Count 3,874
Min 1.5
Mean 17.3
Median 9.8
Max 318.8
SD 25.5

The following sections detail the results of the study area baseline IP model. Results are
summarized by stream segment (Appendix B). Stream segment 1 includes the Upper EFSFSR
and its tributaries from its confluence with Sugar Creek upstream to its confluence with Meadow
Creek. Stream segment 2 includes the entirety of the Meadow Creek drainage area. Stream
segment 3 includes the Upper EFSFSR and its tributaries upstream of its confluence with Meadow
Creek. Stream segment 4 includes the modeled portion of the Upper EFSFSR downstream of its

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 15

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

confluence with Sugar Creek. Stream segment 5 covers the entirety of the HUC 12 “Headwaters
East Fork South Fork Salmon River” (Figure 1). Stream segment 5 is the summation of stream
segments 1, 2 and 3. Stream segment 6 includes the Sugar Creek drainage area, or the HUC 12
“Sugar Creek” (Figure 1). A map of the stream segments can be found in the Appendix B. SFA
reach results are summarized in paragraph form below and presented in full in Appendix C.

5.1 STUDY AREA

The study area (summation of all stream segments) includes spawning and early-rearing habitat
for Chinook salmon and steelhead. The study area supports a total of approximately
18,610 meters of potential spawning and early-rearing habitat for Chinook salmon, including all
potential ratings from High to Negligible, and a total of 17,898 meters (High-, Medium-, and Low-
rated) of potential habitat for steelhead (Table 10 and Table 11). The study area includes more
spawning and rearing habitat for Chinook salmon than steelhead (Table 10 and Table 11)
(Figure 6 and Figure 7). The majority of potential steelhead spawning and early-rearing habitat
is split between High and Low categories (Table 11 and Figure 7). The major difference between
the two species’ IP ratings in the study area is that the streams of the area offer more High-rated
spawning and early-rearing habitat for steelhead than for Chinook – 839 meters for Chinook
compared to 8,043 meters for steelhead (Table 10 and Table 11). Subsequent results are
presented by stream segment (1 through 6).

Table 9. Chinook salmon IP results for study area (includes Sugar Creek)

Chinook Salmon IP 30m Segments Length (m) % of Study Area

High 32 838.8 0.7
Medium 256 7,287.3 6.5
Low 300 8,744.3 7.7
Negligible 59 1,739.7 1.5
Useable Habitat 647 18,610.2 16.5
Total Area 3,874 113,001.3 100

Table 10. Steelhead IP results for the study area (includes Sugar Creek)

Steelhead IP 30-meter Segments Length (meters) % of Study Area

High 281 8,042.5 7.1
Medium 21 301.6 0.5
Low 316 9,254.2 8.2
Useable Habitat 618 17,898.3 15.8
Total Area 3,874 113,001.3 100

Stream segment 5 (aka HUC 12 Headwaters of the East Fork South Fork Salmon River, as well
as the summation of stream segments 1, 2, and 3), provides more stream habitat than stream
segment 6 (HUC 12 Sugar Creek) (total length stream segment 5 = 65,250 meters, stream
segment 6 = 46,641 meters) (Table 12). IP results follow this trend, because stream segment 5
(Headwaters EFSFSR) has more High, Medium, Low, and Negligible habitat for Chinook salmon
than stream segment 6 (Sugar Creek) (Table 12). Stream segment 5 contains 11,409 meters of

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 16

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

useable IP habitat for Chinook salmon, while stream segment 6 provides only 6,091 meters. More
High-rated Chinook salmon spawning and early-rearing habitat occurs in stream segment 5 than
stream segment 6 (Table 12). Steelhead results are similar, because stream segment 5 has more
steelhead spawning and early-rearing habitat than stream segment 6, and the Headwaters
EFSFSR (stream segment 5) has more Medium- and High-rated steelhead IP habitat than stream
segment 6 (Sugar Creek) (Table 12). Stream segment 5 contains 9,760 meters of useable IP
habitat for steelhead, while stream segment 6 provides roughly 7,179 meters (Table 12).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 17

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 6. Chinook Salmon Intrinsic Potential Rating for the Study Area

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 18

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 7. Steelhead Intrinsic Potential Ratings for the Study Area

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 19

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 11. Chinook Salmon and Steelhead IP Ratings for Streamlines in Stream Segment 6
(Sugar Creek) and Stream Segment 5 (Headwaters EFSFSR)

Stream Segment 6 – Sugar Creek HUC 12 Stream Segment 5 – Headwaters EFSFSR HUC 12

% of % of
Length Length
Chinook IP Segments Sugar Chinook IP Segments Upper
(meters) (meters)
Creek EFSFSR

High 4 117.4 0.3% High 28 721.4 1.1%

Medium 99 2,958.2 6.3% Medium 156 4,299.1 6.6%
Low 88 2,625.6 5.6% Low 178 5,098.6 7.8%
Negligible 13 389.7 0.8% Negligible 44 1,290.0 2.0%
Useable Hab. 204 6,090.9 13.1% Useable Hab. 406 11,409.2 17.5%
Total Area 1,557 46,640.9 100.0% Total Area 2,280 65,250.3 100.0%

% of % of
Length Length
Steelhead IP Segments Sugar Steelhead IP Segments Upper
(meters) (meters)
Creek EFSFSR

High 116 3,473.8 7.5% High 164 4,538.7 7.0%

Medium 0 0 0.0% Medium 21 601.6 0.9%
Low 124 3,704.8 7.9% Low 158 4,529.3 6.9%
Useable Hab. 240 7,178.6 15.3% Useable Hab. 343 9,669.6 14.8%
Total Area 1,557 46,640.9 100.0% Total Area 2,280 65,250.3 100.0%

5.2 STREAM FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT REACHES

The SFA reach results are presented in Appendix C: SFA Reach Intrinsic Potential for Chinook
salmon and steelhead. Several SFA reaches provide Chinook salmon and steelhead spawning
and early-rearing habitat (Appendix C). For example, Hangar Lake Reach 2 (HL2) provides
baseline Chinook salmon High- and Medium-rated IP habitat (360 meters of High and 330 meters
of Medium IP habitat) (Appendix C). Similar conditions exist in HL2 for steelhead, because the
reach supports 390 meters of High potential for spawning and early-rearing steelhead habitat,
and 300 meters of Medium-rated IP habitat (Appendix C). In general, the SFA reaches found
along Meadow Creek and the Upper EFSFSR (below Meadow Creek confluence) contain much
of the spawning and early-rearing habitat in the study area (excluding Sugar Creek). See
Appendix C for more information regarding IP results per SFA reach.

5.3 STREAM SEGMENT 2 (MEADOW CREEK)

Stream segment 2, Meadow Creek drainage area, contains spawning and early-rearing habitat
for Chinook salmon and steelhead (Table 13 and Table 14) (Figure 8 and Figure 9). Overall,
stream segment 2 provides more IP habitat for Chinook salmon (4,209.1 meters) than for
steelhead (3,789.6 meters), regardless of IP rating (includes High, Medium, Low, and Negligible).
Meadow Creek provides more High-rated steelhead (2,259 meters) spawning and early-rearing
habitat than for Chinook salmon (721 meters) (Table 13 and Table 14).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 20

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 12. Chinook Salmon IP Ratings for Stream Segment 2 (Meadow Creek)

Chinook IP Segments Length (meters) % Meadow Creek

High 28 721.4 3.1
Medium 70 1,959.4 8.5
Low 49 1,438.4 6.3
Negligible 3 89.9 0.4
Useable Habitat 150 4,209.1 18.4
Total Area 798 22,922.1 100.0

Table 13. Steelhead IP Ratings for Stream Segment 2 (Meadow Creek)

Steelhead IP Segments Length (meters) % Meadow Creek

High 84 2,259.0 9.9
Medium 21 601.6 2.6
Low 31 929.0 4.1
Useable Habitat 136 3,789.6 16.5
Total Area 798 22,922.1 100.0

5.4 STREAM SEGMENT 1 (UPPER EFSFSR UPSTREAM OF SUGAR CREEK AND

DOWNSTREAM OF MEADOW CREEK)
Stream segment 1 is defined for the IP analysis as the portion of the Upper EFSFSR in the study
area that is upstream of Sugar Creek and downstream of the Meadow Creek confluence
(Figure 10 and Figure 11). Stream segment 1 contains spawning and early-rearing habitat for
the two species, although most of the Chinook salmon habitat is of Low or Negligible quality
(21.2 percent of the available stream area; Low = 3,540.2 meters and Negligible = 930.1 meters)
(Table 15 and Figure 10). Conversely, stream segment 1 supports 495 meters of High-rated
spawning and early-rearing habitat for steelhead, and an additional 3,480 meters of Low-rated
habitat (Table 16), which amounts to roughly 19 percent of available habitat that is useable to
steelhead for spawning and early rearing in stream segment 1 (Figure 11).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 21

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 8. Stream Segment 2 (Meadow Creek) Chinook Salmon Intrinsic Potential Rating

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 22

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 9. Stream Segment 2 (Meadow Creek) Steelhead Intrinsic Potential Rating

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 23

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 14. Chinook salmon IP ratings for Stream Segment 1

Chinook IP Segments Length (meters) % Upper EFSFSR

High 0 0.0 0.0
Medium 28 675.0 3.2
Low 124 3,540.2 16.8
Negligible 32 930.1 4.4
Useable Habitat 175 4,935.4 23.5
Total Area 752 21,038 100.0

Table 15. Steelhead IP ratings for Stream Segment 1

Steelhead IP Segments Length (meters) % Upper EFSFSR

High 19 495.0 2.4
Medium 0 0.0 0.0
Low 122 3,480.3 16.5
Useable Habitat 141 3,975.3 18.9
Total 752 21,038 100.0

5.5 STREAM SEGMENT 3 (UPPER EFSFSR ABOVE MEADOW CREEK

CONFLUENCE)
Stream segment 3 is defined for the IP analysis as the portion of the Upper EFSFSR that is
upstream from the Meadow Creek confluence (Figure 12 and Figure 13). This area contains
spawning and early-rearing habitat for the two species, with most of the Chinook salmon habitat
of Medium and Low quality (12.7 percent of the available stream area; Medium= 1,695 meters,
and Low = 1,140 meters), with eleven segments rated as Negligible (330 meters, or 1.5 percent)
(Table 17) (Figure 12). However, stream segment 3 supports 1,815 meters of High-rated
spawning and early-rearing habitat for steelhead, and an additional 1,140 meters of Low-rated
habitat (Table 18), amounting to 13.2 percent of available habitat in the Upper EFSFSR above
Meadow Creek confluence (Table 18 and Figure 13).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 24

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 10. Stream Segment 1 (EFSFSR from Sugar Creek to Meadow Creek)
Chinook Salmon Intrinsic Potential Rating

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 25

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 11. Stream Segment 1 (EFSFSR from Sugar Creek to Meadow Creek)
Steelhead Intrinsic Potential Rating

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 26

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 16. Chinook Salmon IP Ratings for Stream Segment 3 (Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek)

% Upper EFSFSR above

Chinook IP Segments Length (meters) Meadow Creek
confluence
High 0 0.0 0.0
Medium 59 1,694.7 7.6
Low 39 1,140.1 5.1
Negligible 11 330.0 1.5
Useable Habitat 109 3,164.8 14.1
Total Area 767 22,400.2 100.0

Table 17. Steelhead IP Ratings for Stream Segment 3 (Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek)

% Upper EFSFSR above

Steelhead IP Segments Length (meters) Meadow Creek
confluence
High 62 1,814.7 8.1
Medium 0 0.0 0.0
Low 39 1,140.1 5.1
Useable Habitat 101 2,954.8 13.2
Total Area 767 22,400.2 100.0

5.6 STREAM SEGMENT 4 (UPPER EFSFSR BELOW SUGAR CREEK)

A small portion of the Upper EFSFSR downstream of Sugar Creek was modeled for IP habitat.
This small section of the Upper EFSFSR is known as stream segment 4. Stream segment 4
includes roughly 1,110 meters of the Upper EFSFSR (Table 19 and Table 20). Stream segment 4
supports primarily (92 percent of stream segment) low-rated Chinook salmon spawning and early-
rearing habitat (Table 19). One hundred percent of the riverine habitat in stream segment 4 is
useable for Chinook salmon spawning and early rearing (Table 19). Stream segment 4 supports
30 meters of high-rated and 1,020 meters of low-rated steelhead IP habitat, equating to 95 percent
of the segment’s riverine habitat being useable for spawning and early rearing (Table 20).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 27

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 12. Stream Segment 3 (Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek Confluence)
Chinook Salmon Intrinsic Potential Rating

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 28

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 13. Stream Segment 3 (Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek Confluence)
Steelhead Intrinsic Potential Rating

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 29

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 19. Chinook Salmon IP Ratings for Stream Segment 4 (Upper EFSFSR below Sugar Creek)

% Upper EFSFSR above

Chinook IP Segments Length (meters) Meadow Creek
confluence
High 0 0.0 0.0
Medium 1 30.0 2.7
Low 34 1,020.1 91.9
Negligible 2 60.0 5.4
Useable Habitat 37 1,110.1 100.0
Total Area 37 1,110.1 100.0

Table 20. Steelhead IP Ratings for Stream Segment 4 (Upper EFSFSR below Sugar Creek)

% Upper EFSFSR above

Steelhead IP Segments Length (meters) Meadow Creek
confluence
High 62 1,814.7 8.1
Medium 0 0.0 0.0
Low 39 1,140.1 5.1
Useable Habitat 101 2,954.8 13.2
Total Area 767 22,400.2 100.0

To understand the real-world applicability of the study area IP model, the results were compared
to field-identified Chinook salmon redd locations. The data, gathered by the Nez Perce Tribe
(2018), documents Chinook salmon redds in the study area from 2008 through 2018. Because
fish did not pass volitionally to the area above YPP, the selection of specific sites for spawning
must be viewed carefully; the fish were planted at the site and likely selected sites close to the
release location. However, these results provide the best available data on spawning locations
under current conditions. In the study area, 867 redds were documented (Table 21). In years
2009, 2010, 2011, and 2016, over 100 redds were counted, with over 190 documented in 2016
(Table 21). Of these redds, 281 occurred in High IP-rated stream segments (Figure 14)
(Table 22). High-rated stream segments harbor roughly 0.34 Chinook salmon redds per meter of
stream, the densest occurrence of redds for any of the IP-rated areas in the study area (2).
Medium-rated Chinook salmon IP stream segments contain the majority of field-verified redds
(362), with a density of 0.05 redds per meter (Table 22). Low-rated IP segments harbor roughly
0.02 redds per stream meter. In short, field-verified redd locations compared to IP-rated stream
segments demonstrate that the study area IP model accurately reflects real-world conditions. The
densest occurrence of redds occurred in High- and Medium-rated IP stream segments (Table 22),
and Low, Negligible, and None IP-rated stream segments contain a significantly lower density of
redds per stream meter (Table 22) (Figure 14). As mentioned above, this information needs to
be understood in the context of how Chinook salmon arrived at these spawning locations. They

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 30

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

were planted in the study area, and then selected their spawning location, meaning that spawning
site selection may be influenced by where the fish were planted.

Table 21. Field-verified (2008 – 2018) Redds per Year

Year Chinook Salmon Redds1

2008 3
2009 106
2010 143
2011 134
2012 97
2013 64
2014 24
2015 87
2016 193
2017 0
2018 16
Total 867
Table Notes:
1 Nez Perce Tribe 2018.

Table 22. Field-verified (2008 – 2018) Redds per IP-rated Stream Segment

Chinook Salmon
IP Rating Length (meters) Redds per meter
Redds1
High 838.8 281 0.34
Medium 7,287.3 362 0.05
Low 8,714.4 214 0.02
Negligible 1,739.7 6 0.003
None 1,276.1 4 0.003
Total 19,668.8 867
Table Notes:
1 Nez Perce Tribe 2018.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 31

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 14. Chinook Salmon Redd Locations in the Intrinsic Potential Model Study Area

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 32

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

This Technical Memorandum explains the methods used and documents the results of the IP
Model focused on spawning and early-rearing habitat for Spring/Summer Chinook salmon and
Interior Columbia Basin (Snake River) steelhead in the study area. The IP model classifies the
quality of spawning and early-rearing habitat for the two species in the Headwaters of the EFSFSR
watershed from the confluence of Sugar Creek and the Upper EFSFSR upstream to the
headwaters of both streams (HUC 12s; Sugar Creek and Headwaters of East Fork South Fork
Salmon River). The methods used to determine the IP rating per stream segment follow the
approach that Cooney and Holzer (2006) used for the Interior Columbia basin, in which the study
area is located. The study area IP model differs from Cooney and Holzer’s (2006) methodology
by using mine site-scale data, consisting of 30-meter stream segments and other variables
derived using 1-meter resolution Lidar data, field-verified metrics (PIBO and Rio ASE), and locally
derived modeled parameters (Rio ASE derived equations for bankfull and wetted width). This
scale of data varies considerably from the Cooney and Holzer (2006) regional model, which relied
on 200-meter stream segments and 10-meter digital elevation models.

7.1 COMPARISON TO COONEY AND HOLZER (2006)

Cooney and Holzer’s (2006) results differ from the study area IP model for Chinook salmon
(Figure 15). One of the differences is Cooney and Holzer (2006) identified the YPP as a migration
barrier for Chinook salmon. Therefore, the majority of the study area (Upper EFSFSR) is not rated
for spawning and early rearing for Chinook salmon in the Cooney and Holzer (2006) model
(Figure 3). Another difference between the two models is the presence of nearly 2,000 meters of
stream rated as High for spawning and early-rearing habitat for Chinook salmon in the Cooney
and Holzer (2006) model (Figure 15). This High-rated area occurs in the Sugar Creek drainage
(Figure 3). Most of the High-rated Chinook IP habitat from the Stibnite Gold IP model occurs in
stream segment 2 (Meadow Creek drainage) (Figure 3). The Stibnite Gold IP model identified
significantly more Medium and Low-rated IP habitat in the study area than Cooney and Holzer
(2006) (Figure 15). This is not surprising, because much of the Medium- and Low-rated IP habitat
occurs upstream of the YPP.
10,000
9,000
8,000
Stream Length (m)

7,000
6,000
5,000
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
High Medium Low Negligible
Intrinsic Potential

Cooney and Holzer (2006) Stibnite Gold IP

Figure 15. Comparison of Cooney and Holzer (2006) IP Results to Stibnite Gold IP
Model for Chinook Salmon

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 33

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

For steelhead, the YPP was not considered a migration barrier in the Cooney and Holzer (2006)
model. Therefore, the entire study area was analyzed by Cooney and Holzer (2006) for its intrinsic
potential for steelhead. The major differences between Cooney and Holzer’s (2006) results and
the Stibnite Gold IP results are: 1) Cooney and Holzer (2006) identified more IP habitat than the
study area model identified; and 2) Cooney and Holzer modeled more High- and Low-rated habitat
for spawning and early rearing for steelhead (Figure 16). These differences in model results are
attributed to different model inputs and the greater resolution of the data employed in the Stibnite
Gold IP model. Primarily, the NHD streamlines and 10-meter DEM employed by Cooney and
Holzer (2006) do not accurately reflect the on-the-ground conditions as noted by the ESA group,
and the GIS analysis performed as part of the modeling process. This issue exemplifies the
rationale for creating the Stibnite Gold IP model using ground-verified streamlines and 1-meter-
resolution Lidar. Cooney and Holzer (2006) identify the headwater areas of Sugar Creek, Upper
EFSFSR, and Meadow Creek as supporting spawning and early-rearing habitat for steelhead
(Figure 3). Based on the 1-meter–derived slope calculations for these areas, all slopes are
greater than 7 percent, which does not support IP habitat for steelhead (Figure 2). Therefore,
these headwater areas, which are identified as potential spawning and rearing habitat in the
Cooney and Holzer (2006) model, are not considered usable habitat in the study area IP model.

Figure 16. Comparison of Cooney and Holzer (2006) IP Results to Stibnite Gold IP
Model for Steelhead

7.2 STUDY AREA IP

Overall, the study area supports roughly 18,610 meters of useable spawning and rearing habitat
for Chinook salmon, and 17,898 meters for steelhead. Usable habitat is considered habitat rated
as High, Medium, Low, and Negligible in the IP model. Although the study area offers more total
Chinook salmon spawning and early-rearing habitat than total IP habitat for steelhead, the quality
of that habitat is better for steelhead (Figure 17). The study area IP model indicates that over
8,000 meters of stream are rated as High for steelhead spawning and early-rearing habitat,
compared to less than 1,000 meters of habitat for Chinook salmon (Figure 17). Chinook salmon’s
limited High-rated spawning and early-rearing habitat occurs primarily in the Meadow Creek
drainage (Figure 8). High-rated steelhead spawning and early-rearing habitat occurs throughout
the study area. Portions of Sugar Creek contain High-rated IP habitat; specifically, downstream

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 34

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

of Cinnabar Creek (Figure 7). In Meadow Creek, High-rated steelhead habitat occurs above and
below the Spent Ore Disposal Area (Figure 9). Additionally, the Upper EFSFSR above the
Meadow Creek confluence contains High-rated steelhead spawning and early-rearing habitat
(Figure 13).

7.3 STREAM SEGMENT 5 VERSUS STREAM SEGMENT 6

Stream segment 5 (Headwaters EFSFSR HUC 12), which includes stream segments 1, 2, and 3,
contains more usable habitat for Chinook salmon and steelhead than stream segment 6 (Sugar
Creek) (Figure 18 and Figure 19). Stream segment 5 contains 11,409 meters of useable Chinook
salmon spawning and early-rearing habitat; while stream segment 6 provides 6,091 meters
(Figure 18). Similarly, stream segment 5’s drainage supports 9,670 meters of steelhead useable
spawning and early-rearing habitat; while stream segment 6 supports 7,179 meters (Figure 19).
Stream segment 5 also contains the majority of the High-rated Chinook salmon IP habitat in the
study area (Figure 18). Additionally, stream segment 5 contains more High-rated steelhead IP
habitat than stream segment 6, nearly 1,100 meters more in the Headwaters EFSFSR (stream
segment 5) (Figure 19).

20,000

18,000

16,000

14,000
Stream Length (m)

12,000

10,000

8,000

6,000

4,000

2,000

0
Chinook Steelhead
IP Habitat Rating
Negligible Low Medium High

Figure 17. Chinook Salmon and Steelhead IP Results for the Stibnite Gold Study Area

7.4 STREAM SEGMENT 2 (MEADOW CREEK) VERSUS STREAM SEGMENT 3

(UPPER EFSFSR ABOVE MEADOW CREEK CONFLUENCE)
Stream segment 2 contains more usable Chinook salmon spawning and early-rearing habitat than
stream segment 3 – there are over 4,200 meters of habitat in Meadow Creek, and roughly 3,160
meters of habitat in the Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek confluence (Figure 20). In addition,

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 35

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

the existing IP habitat for Chinook salmon is rated higher in stream segment 2 (Figure 20). Stream
segment 2 is home to the only High-rated spawning and early-rearing habitat for Chinook salmon
found in the two stream segments (Meadow Creek and Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek)
(Figure 20).

12,000.0

10,000.0
Stream Length (m)

8,000.0

6,000.0

4,000.0

2,000.0

0.0
Stream Segment 6 Stream Segment 5
Species
Negligible Low Medium High

Figure 18. Comparison of Chinook Salmon IP Results for Stream Segments 5 and 6

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 36

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

12,000.0

10,000.0

Stream Length (m) 8,000.0

6,000.0

4,000.0

2,000.0

0.0
Stream Segment 6 Stream Segment 5
Species
Low Medium High

Figure 19. Comparison of Steelhead IP Results for Stream Segments 5 and 6

4,500

4,000

3,500
Stream Length (m)

3,000

2,500

2,000

1,500

1,000

500

0
Stream Segment 2 Stream Segment 3
Species
Negligible Low Medium High

Figure 20. Comparison of Chinook Salmon IP Habitat; Meadow Creek (Stream segment 2) and
Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek Confluence (Stream Segment 3)

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 37

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Similarly, for steelhead, stream segment 2 provides more usable IP habitat than the Upper stream
segment 3 – there are 3,790 meters of useable steelhead habitat in Meadow Creek, and 2,955
meters of useable habitat in the Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek confluence. Stream
segment 2’s drainage provides more than 400 meters of High-rated steelhead IP habitat than
stream segment 3 (Figure 21). Meadow Creek (stream segment 2) is home to the only Medium-
rated IP habitat for steelhead in the stream segments (Meadow Creek [2] and Upper EFSFSR
above Meadow Creek [3]) (Figure 21). Both stream segments provide significant stream lengths
of Low-rated spawning and early-rearing habitat for steelhead (Figure 21).
Overall, the study area (Headwaters of the EFSFSR and Sugar Creek) provides spawning and
early-rearing habitat for Chinook salmon and steelhead. The tributaries to the Upper EFSFSR
(Meadow Creek and Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek confluence) provide significant stream
lengths of useable IP habitat for the two species.

4,000

3,500

3,000
Stream Length (m)

2,500

2,000

1,500

1,000

500

0
Stream Segment 2 Stream Segment 3
Species
Low Medium High

Figure 21. Comparison of Steelhead IP Habitat; Meadow Creek (Stream Segment 2) and Upper
EFSFSR above Meadow Creek Confluence (Stream Segment 3)

This document describes the approach, data, and methods for determining the variables needed
to perform the IP model for Spring/Summer Chinook salmon and steelhead in the study area. The
document also provides the IP model results for stream segments in the study area (e.g., Meadow
Creek [stream segment 2] and Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek confluence [stream
segment 3]). Overall, roughly 113,001 meters of the Upper EFSFSR were evaluated for IP. The
study area supports 18,610 meters of potential spawning and early-rearing habitat for Chinook

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 38

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

salmon across all potential ratings from High to Negligible, and a total of 17,898 meters (High-,
Medium-, and Low-rated) of potential habitat for steelhead. The model identified more total usable
habitat for Chinook salmon, but higher-quality steelhead habitat. The IP model results also
indicate that there are slight differences in the baseline IP results between stream segment 2
(Meadow Creek) and stream segment 3 (Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek confluence);
Meadow Creek contains more usable spawning and rearing habitat than the Upper EFSFSR
above Meadow Creek confluence for both Chinook salmon and steelhead.

Brown and Caldwell. 2018. Personal Communication from Paul Leonard. Email dated September
10, 2018 re: Wetted width calculation.
Cooney T., and D.M. Holzer. 2006. Appendix C: Interior Columbia Basin Stream Type Chinook
Salmon and Steelhead Populations: Habitat Intrinsic Potential Analysis. Preliminary draft
of the viability criteria for Interior Columbia domain.
ESRI. 2018. Arc Hydro Overview., Available: http://resources.arcgis.com/en/communities/
hydro/01vn0000000s000000.htm. Accessed June 24, 2018.
Gilbert, J.T., W. McFarlane, and J.M. Wheaton. 2016. The Valley Bottom Extraction Tool (V-BET):
A GIS tool for delineating valley bottoms across entire drainage networks. Computers and
Geosciences v97, December 2016.
MWH. 2017. Aquatic Resources 2016 Baseline Study. Stibnite Gold Project, Midas Gold Idaho,
Inc. Dated April, 2017.
Nez Perce Tribe. 2018. Chinook Salmon redd data from 2008 to 2018, delivered in an email dated
November 20, 2018 from Craig Rabe, JCAPE M&E Project Leader Nez Perce Tribe
DFRM, McCall Field Office to Johnna Sandow, NOAA Fisheries, and Clayton Nalder,
USFS.
Rio ASE. 2018. Draft Stream Design Report. Stibnite Gold Project, Midas Gold Idaho, Inc.
Sheer, M.B., D.S. Busch, E. Gilbert, J.M. Bayer, S. Lanigan, J.L. Schei, K.M. Burnett, and D.
Miller. 2009. Development and management of fish intrinsic potential data and
methodologies. State of the IP 2008 summary report. Pacific Northwest Aquatic
Partnership Series 2009-004, 56 pp.
Tonina, D., J.A. McKean, R.M. Benjankar, W. Wright, J.R. Goode, Q. Chen, W.J. Reeder, R.A.
Carmichael, and M.R. Edmondson. 2018. Mapping river bathymetries: evaluating
topobathymetric LiDAR survey. Earth Surf. Process. Landforms. doi:10.1002/esp.4513.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 39

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

This page intentionally left blank

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 40

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

APPENDIX A

V-BET SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

This page intentionally left blank.

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

APPENDIX B

STREAM SEGMENT MAP AND CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD RESULTS

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

This page intentionally left blank

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure B1. Mine Site Stream Segment Map

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | B-1

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table B1. Chinook salmon IP habitat per Stream Segment

Stream Stream Stream Stream Stream Stream

Segment 1 Segment 2 Segment 3 Segment 4 Segment 5 Segment 6
IP Rating (meters) (meters) (meters) (meters) (meters) (meters)
High 0.0 721.4 0.0 0.0 721.4 117.4
Medium 645.0 1,959.4 1,694.7 30.0 4,299.1 2,958.2
Low 2,520.1 1,438.4 1,140.1 1,020.1 5,098.6 2,625.6
Negligible 870.1 89.9 330.0 60.0 1,290.0 389.7
Useable 4,035.2 4,209.1 3,164.8 1,110.1 11,409.2 6,090.9
Total Area 19,928.0 22,922.1 22,400.2 1,110.1 65,250.3 46,640.9

Table B2. Steelhead IP habitat per Stream Segment

Stream Stream Stream Stream Stream Stream

Segment 1 Segment 2 Segment 3 Segment 4 Segment 5 Segment 6
IP Rating (meters) (meters) (meters) (meters) (meters) (meters)
High 465.0 2,259.0 1,814.7 30.0 4,538.70 3,473.8
Medium 0.0 601.6 0.0 0.0 601.6 0.0
Low 2,460.2 929.0 1,140.1 1,020.1 4,529.30 3,704.8
Useable 2,925.2 3,789.6 2,954.8 1,050.1 9,669.60 7,178.6
Total Area 19,928.0 22,922.1 22,400.2 1,110.1 65,250.30 46,640.9

• Stream segment 1 includes the Upper EFSFSR and its tributaries from its confluence
with Sugar Creek upstream to its confluence with Meadow Creek.
• Stream segment 2 includes the entirety of the Meadow Creek drainage area.
• Stream segment 3 includes the Upper EFSFSR and its tributaries upstream of its
confluence with Meadow Creek.
• Stream segment 4 includes the modeled portion of the Upper EFSFSR downstream of
its confluence with Sugar Creek.
• Stream segment 5 covers the entirety of the HUC 12 “Headwaters East Fork South Fork
Salmon River” (Figure 1). Stream segment 5 is the summation of stream segments 1, 2,
and 3.
• Stream segment 6 includes the Sugar Creek drainage area, or the HUC 12 “Sugar Creek”
(Figure 1).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | B-2

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

APPENDIX C

SFA REACH INTRINSIC POTENTIAL RESULTS;

CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

This page intentionally left blank

DECEMBER 2019
 1

Chinook IP by SFA Reach Steelhead IP by SFA Reach

SFA Reach Chin IP Segments Length (m) SFA Reach Steel IP Segments Length (m)
NON-SFA High 4 117.4 NON-SFA High 117 3,503.8
NON-SFA Low 119 3555.7 NON-SFA Low 158 4,724.9
NON-SFA Medium 103 3078.2 NON-SFA Medium NA NA
NON-SFA Negligible 15 449.7 NON-SFA Negligible NA NA
NON-SFA None 1875 56200.6 NON-SFA None 1841 55,172.9
BC0.1 None 65 1917.0 BC0.1 None 65 1,917.0
BC1 None 22 629.8 BC1 None 22 629.8
BC2 None 17 479.2 BC2 None 17 479.2
BC2.1 None 21 571.2 BC2.1 None 21 571.2
BC3 High NA NA BC3 High 2 59.9
BC3 Low NA NA BC3 Low 3 89.9
BC3 None 9 209.7 BC3 None 4 59.9
BC4 None 2 59.9 BC4 None 2 59.9
BL1 None 2 30.2 BL1 None 2 30.2
BL2 None 10 149.6 BL2 None 10 149.6
EF0.01 None 40 1196.4 EF0.01 None 40 1,196.4
EF0.02 None 68 2040.2 EF0.02 None 68 2,040.2
EF0.03 None 15 420.0 EF0.03 None 15 420.0
EF0.04 None 30 870.1 EF0.04 None 30 870.1
EF0.05 None 57 1702.5 EF0.05 None 57 1,702.5
EF0.06 None 24 687.0 EF0.06 None 24 687.0
EF0.07 None 32 931.4 EF0.07 None 32 931.4
EF0.08 None 27 783.1 EF0.08 None 27 783.1
EF0.09 None 53 1580.6 EF0.09 None 53 1,580.6
EF0.10 None 37 1114.4 EF0.10 None 37 1,114.4
EF0.11 None 44 1278.8 EF0.11 None 44 1,278.8
EF0.12 High NA NA EF0.12 High 35 1,050.1
EF0.12 Low 5 150.0 EF0.12 Low NA NA
EF0.12 Medium 30 900.1 EF0.12 Medium NA NA
EF0.12 Negligible NA NA EF0.12 Negligible NA NA
EF0.12 None 2 30.0 EF0.12 None 2 30.0
EF0.14 High NA NA EF0.14 High 6 180.0
EF0.14 Low 1 30.0 EF0.14 Low 1 30.0
EF0.14 Medium 6 180.0 EF0.14 Medium NA NA
EF0.15 High NA NA EF0.15 High 7 210.0
EF0.15 Low 2 60.0 EF0.15 Low 2 60.0
EF0.15 Medium 7 210.0 EF0.15 Medium NA NA
EF0.16 None 20 604.0 EF0.16 None 20 604.0
EF0.17 High NA NA EF0.17 High 9 240.0
EF0.17 Low 17 510.0 EF0.17 Low 17 510.0
EF0.17 Medium 9 240.0 EF0.17 Medium NA NA
EF0.17 Negligible 8 240.0 EF0.17 Negligible NA NA
EF0.17 None 1 30.0 EF0.17 None 9 270.0
EF0.18 High NA NA EF0.18 High 1 30.0
EF0.18 Low 7 210.0 EF0.18 Low 7 210.0
EF0.18 Medium 3 60.0 EF0.18 Medium NA NA
EF0.18 Negligible 3 90.0 EF0.18 Negligible NA NA
EF0.18 None 0 0.0 EF0.18 None 5 120.0
EF0.19 None 13 386.6 EF0.19 None 13 386.6
EF0.20 None 26 724.9 EF0.20 None 26 724.9
EF0.21 None 7 208.5 EF0.21 None 7 208.5
EF1 High NA NA EF1 High 3 90.0
EF1 Low 12 330.0 EF1 Low 12 330.0
EF1 Medium 3 90.0 EF1 Medium NA NA
EF1 None 5 150.0 EF1 None 5 150.0
EF2.1 High NA NA EF2.1 High 7 180.1
EF2.1 Low 10 300.0 EF2.1 Low 10 300.0
EF2.1 Medium 9 240.1 EF2.1 Medium NA NA
EF2.1 Negligible 3 90.0 EF2.1 Negligible NA NA
EF2.1 None 1 30.0 EF2.1 None 6 180.0
EF2.2 High NA NA EF2.2 High 5 119.4
EF2.2 Low 47 1410.1 EF2.2 Low 47 1,410.1
EF2.2 Medium 5 119.4 EF2.2 Medium NA NA
EF2.2 Negligible 9 270.0 EF2.2 Negligible NA NA

STHD_CHIN_SFA_REVISED.xlsx
 2

Chinook IP by SFA Reach Steelhead IP by SFA Reach

SFA Reach Chin IP Segments Length (m) SFA Reach Steel IP Segments Length (m)
EF2.2 None EF2.2 None 9 270.0
EF2.3 Negligible 2 30.0 EF2.3 Negligible NA NA
EF2.3 None 2 30.0 EF2.3 None 4 60.0
EF2.4 Negligible 5 150.0 EF2.4 Negligible NA NA
EF2.4 None 2 60.0 EF2.4 None 7 210.0
EF2.5 Medium 3 30.0 EF2.5 Medium NA NA
EF2.5 Negligible 2 60.0 EF2.5 Negligible NA NA
EF2.5 None 2 30.0 EF2.5 None 7 120.0
EF3.1 Low 1 30.0 EF3.1 Low 1 30.0
EF3.1 Negligible 4 120.0 EF3.1 Negligible NA NA
EF3.1 None 3 60.0 EF3.1 None 7 180.0
EF3.2 None 5 150.0 EF3.2 None 5 150.0
EF3.3 Low 15 390.0 EF3.3 Low 15 390.0
EF3.3 Medium 3 90.0 EF3.3 Medium NA NA
EF3.3 None NA NA EF3.3 None 3 90.0
EF4.1 Low 3 90.0 EF4.1 Low 3 90.0
EF4.1 Medium 2 30.0 EF4.1 Medium NA NA
EF4.1 Negligible 1 30.0 EF4.1 Negligible NA NA
EF4.1 None NA NA EF4.1 None 3 60.0
EF4.2 Low 9 150.0 EF4.2 Low 9 150.0
EF4.2 Negligible 1 30.0 EF4.2 Negligible NA NA
EF4.2 None NA NA EF4.2 None 1 30.0
EF4.3 High NA NA EF4.3 High 4 120.0
EF4.3 Low 3 90.0 EF4.3 Low 3 90.0
EF4.3 Medium 4 120.0 EF4.3 Medium NA NA
EF4.3 Negligible 3 90.0 EF4.3 Negligible NA NA
EF4.3 None 2 60.0 EF4.3 None 5 150.0
FC0 None 4 59.8 FC0 None 4 59.8
FC0.1 None 24 688.0 FC0.1 None 24 688.0
FC0.2 None 37 1076.8 FC0.2 None 37 1,076.8
FC0.3 None 11 329.0 FC0.3 None 11 329.0
FC1 None 51 1341.3 FC1 None 51 1,341.3
FC2 None 26 717.1 FC2 None 26 717.1
FC3 None 3 89.7 FC3 None 3 89.7
GC0 None 21 631.4 GC0 None 21 631.4
GC0.1 None 13 360.8 GC0.1 None 13 360.8
GC1 None 4 90.2 GC1 None 4 90.2
HC0.01 None 44 1291.8 HC0.01 None 44 1,291.8
HC0.1 None 3 60.1 HC0.1 None 3 60.1
HC0.2 None 5 30.0 HC0.2 None 5 30.0
HC1.1 None 5 90.1 HC1.1 None 5 90.1
HC1.2 None 21 600.8 HC1.2 None 21 600.8
HC1.3 None 23 600.8 HC1.3 None 23 600.8
HC1.4 None 2 60.1 HC1.4 None 2 60.1
HL1 High 3 89.9 HL1 High 6 149.8
HL1 Medium 6 149.8 HL1 Medium 3 89.9
HL2 High 13 359.6 HL2 High 14 389.6
HL2 Medium 11 329.6 HL2 Medium 10 299.7
MC0.01 None 24 719.2 MC0.01 None 24 719.2
MC0.02 None 16 419.6 MC0.02 None 16 419.6
MC0.03 None 22 662.8 MC0.03 None 22 662.8
MC0.04 None 9 268.3 MC0.04 None 9 268.3
MC0.05 None 18 542.5 MC0.05 None 18 542.5
MC0.06 None 29 775.2 MC0.06 None 29 775.2
MC0.7 None 7 120.5 MC0.7 None 7 120.5
MC0.8 None 4 59.6 MC0.8 None 4 59.6
MC0.9 None 18 509.5 MC0.9 None 18 509.5
MC1.1 None 40 1168.8 MC1.1 None 40 1,168.8
MC1.2 None 30 891.9 MC1.2 None 30 891.9
MC1.3 None 28 805.0 MC1.3 None 28 805.0
MC1.4 High NA NA MC1.4 High 3 89.9
MC1.4 Low NA NA MC1.4 Low 1 30.0
MC1.4 None 40 1153.9 MC1.4 None 36 1,034.1
MC1.5 High 1 32.2 MC1.5 High 25 688.8

STHD_CHIN_SFA_REVISED.xlsx
 3

Chinook IP by SFA Reach Steelhead IP by SFA Reach

SFA Reach Chin IP Segments Length (m) SFA Reach Steel IP Segments Length (m)
MC1.5 Low 9 269.7 MC1.5 Low 3 89.9
MC1.5 Medium 9 239.3 MC1.5 Medium 1 32.2
MC1.5 None 19 495.8 MC1.5 None 9 226.1
MC2 High NA NA MC2 High 6 149.8
MC2 Low 2 30.0 MC2 Low NA NA
MC2 Medium NA NA MC2 Medium 4 119.9
MC2 None 8 239.7 MC2 None NA NA
MC3 Low 5 149.8 MC3 Low 5 149.8
MC3 Medium 15 449.5 MC3 Medium NA NA
MC3 None NA NA MC3 None 15 449.5
MC4.1 Low 16 479.5 MC4.1 Low 16 479.5
MC4.1 Medium 4 89.9 MC4.1 Medium NA NA
MC4.1 Negligible 2 59.9 MC4.1 Negligible NA NA
MC4.1 None 1 30.0 MC4.1 None 7 179.8
MC4.2 High 2 30.0 MC4.2 High 1 30.0
MC4.2 Low 1 30.0 MC4.2 Low NA NA
MC4.2 Medium NA NA MC4.2 Medium 2 30.0
MC5 High 3 30.0 MC5 High 7 119.9
MC5 Medium 4 89.9 MC5 Medium NA NA
MC6 High 1 30.0 MC6 High 20 581.3
MC6 Low 3 89.9 MC6 Low 3 89.9
MC6 Medium 20 581.3 MC6 Medium 1 30.0
MN0 None 5 149.6 MN0 None 5 149.6
MN0.1 None 26 778.0 MN0.1 None 26 778.0
MN0.2 None 7 149.6 MN0.2 None 7 149.6
MN0.3 None 23 628.4 MN0.3 None 23 628.4
MN0.4 None 15 359.1 MN0.4 None 15 359.1
MN1 None 7 149.6 MN1 None 7 149.6
MN2 None 1 29.9 MN2 None 1 29.9
YP1 Medium 3 60.0 YP1 High 3 60.0
YP1 None 8 240.0 YP1 None 8 240.0
Total 3874 113001 Total 3874 113001

STHD_CHIN_SFA_REVISED.xlsx
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

PROPOSED ACTION
INTRINSIC POTENTIAL
MODEL
Technical Memorandum
Stibnite Gold Project, Idaho

December 2019

Ecosystem Sciences, LLC

Science . Planning . Design
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Ecosystem Sciences
Science . Planning . Design

Ecosystem Sciences
202 N. 9th Street, Suite 400
Boise, ID 83702
T: 208.383.0226

Prepared for: AECOM

Project Title: Stibnite Gold Project

Technical Memorandum
Subject: Proposed Action Intrinsic Potential Model

Date: November 22, 2019

To: AECOM

From: Ecosystem Sciences, LLC

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 1
1.1 CONSULTATION ..................................................................................................................... 1
STUDY AREA .................................................................................................................................. 2
METHODS ....................................................................................................................................... 4
3.1 PROPOSED ACTION PERTINENT EVENTS................................................................................. 4
3.2 DATA EMPLOYED ................................................................................................................... 7
3.3 W ETTED W IDTH .................................................................................................................... 7
3.4 BANKFULL W IDTH .................................................................................................................. 9
3.5 GRADIENT ............................................................................................................................. 9
3.6 VALLEY BOTTOM W IDTH ...................................................................................................... 10
3.7 VALLEY W IDTH RATIO .......................................................................................................... 10
3.8 GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM (GIS) METHODOLOGY .................................................. 11
RESULTS ...................................................................................................................................... 13
4.1 STUDY AREA ....................................................................................................................... 13
4.1.1 Chinook Salmon ................................................................................................... 13
4.1.2 Steelhead ............................................................................................................. 15
4.2 STREAM FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT (SFA) REACH RESULTS ................................................ 18
4.3 STREAM SEGMENT 5 - UPPER EFSFSR ABOVE SUGAR CREEK ............................................. 19
4.3.1 Chinook Salmon ................................................................................................... 19
4.3.2 Steelhead ............................................................................................................. 20
4.4 STREAM SEGMENT 2 - MEADOW CREEK ............................................................................... 21
4.4.1 Chinook Salmon ................................................................................................... 21
4.4.2 Steelhead ............................................................................................................. 22
4.5 STREAM SEGMENT 1 - UPPER EFSFSR ABOVE SUGAR CREEK AND BELOW MEADOW CREEK 23
4.5.1 Chinook Salmon ................................................................................................... 23
4.5.2 Steelhead ............................................................................................................. 24
4.6 STREAM SEGMENT 3 - UPPER EFSFSR ABOVE MEADOW CREEK CONFLUENCE ..................... 25
4.6.1 Chinook Salmon ................................................................................................... 25
4.6.2 Steelhead ............................................................................................................. 26
4.7 STREAM SEGMENT 4 - UPPER EFSFSR DOWNSTREAM OF SUGAR CREEK ............................. 27
4.7.1 Chinook Salmon ................................................................................................... 27
4.7.2 Steelhead ............................................................................................................. 27
DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................................. 28
5.1 STUDY AREA ....................................................................................................................... 28
5.1.1 Chinook Salmon ................................................................................................... 28
5.1.2 Steelhead ............................................................................................................. 29
5.2 UPPER EFSFSR ABOVE SUGAR CREEK (STREAM SEGMENT 5) ............................................. 30
5.2.1 Chinook Salmon ................................................................................................... 31
5.2.2 Steelhead ............................................................................................................. 31

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | i

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

5.3 MEADOW CREEK (STREAM SEGMENT 2) V. UPPER EFSFSR ABOVE MEADOW CREEK (STREAM
SEGMENT 3) ........................................................................................................................ 32
5.3.1 Chinook Salmon................................................................................................... 33
5.3.2 Steelhead ............................................................................................................. 33
SUMMARY..................................................................................................................................... 35
LITERATURE CITED..................................................................................................................... 36

LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A – Mine Life Year Intrinsic Potential Maps
Appendix B – Stream Segment Map and Description
Appendix C – SFA Reach Results Chinook Salmon and Steelhead

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Study Area Stibnite Gold Project Proposed Action Intrinsic Potential (IP) Model....................... 3
Figure 2. Example SFA Reaches Wetted Width Changes During Mine Life Operations ........................... 8
Figure 3. Example of Stream Design Report (Rio ASE 2018, Appendix D) Bankfull Design
Estimates (highlighted in red) used to Populate the Bankfull Width per SFA Reach.................. 9
Figure 4. Example of Stream Design Report (Rio ASE 2018, Appendix D) Gradient (slope)
Design Estimates (highlighted in red) used to Populate the Gradient Category per
SFA Reach ................................................................................................................................ 10
Figure 5. Example of Stream Design Report (Rio ASE 2018, Appendix D) Floodplain Width
Design Guidelines (highlighted in red) used to Populate Valley Bottom Width
Category per SFA Reach .......................................................................................................... 11
Figure 6. GIS Methods used to Create each Mine Life Year (-2 to 20) IP Model for Chinook
Salmon and Steelhead .............................................................................................................. 12
Figure 7. Chinook Salmon Usable Habitat in the Study Area, Broken Down by Upper EFSFSR,
Meadow Creek, Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek, and Sugar Creek for 22
Years (Year -2 to Year 20) ....................................................................................................... 14
Figure 8. Chinook Salmon Intrinsic Potential Habitat in the Study Area per IP Rating for 22
Years (Year -2 to Year 20). ....................................................................................................... 15
Figure 9. Steelhead Usable Habitat in the Study Area and Broken Down for the Upper
EFSFSR, Meadow Creek, Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek, and Sugar Creek
for 22 Years (Year -2 to Year 20) .............................................................................................. 17
Figure 10. Steelhead Intrinsic Potential Habitat in the Study Area and per IP Rating for 22 Years
(Year -2 to Year 20)................................................................................................................... 17
Figure 11. SFA Reach HL2 Changes in Chinook Salmon Intrinsic Potential Habitat throughout
the Mine Life (Baseline through Mine Life Year 20 – Post-closure Channel
Configuration) ............................................................................................................................ 18
Figure 12. SFA Reach EF2.2 Changes in Steelhead Intrinsic Potential Habitat throughout the
Mine Life (Baseline through Mine Life Year 20 – Post-closure Channel Configuration)........... 19
Figure 13. Chinook Salmon Intrinsic Potential Habitat per IP Rating in Stream Segment 5 (Upper
EFSFSR above Sugar Creek) for 22 Years (Mine Life Year -2 to Year 20) ............................. 20
Figure 14. Steelhead Intrinsic Potential Habitat per IP Rating in Stream Segment 5 (Upper
EFSFSR above Sugar Creek) for 22 Years (Mine Life Year -2 to Year 20) ............................. 21

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | ii

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 15. Chinook Salmon Intrinsic Potential Habitat per IP Rating in Stream Segment 2
(Meadow Creek) for 22 Years (Mine Life Year -2 to Year 20) .................................................. 22
Figure 16. Steelhead Intrinsic Potential Habitat per IP Rating within Stream Segment 2
(Meadow Creek) for 22 Years (Year -2 to Year 20) .................................................................. 23
Figure 17. Chinook salmon Intrinsic Potential habitat per IP rating in stream segment 1 (Upper
EFSFSR above Sugar Creek and below Meadow Creek) for 22 years (Year -2 to
Year 20). .................................................................................................................................... 24
Figure 18. Steelhead Intrinsic Potential Habitat per IP Rating in Stream Segment 1 (Upper
EFSFSR above Sugar Creek and below Meadow Creek) for 22 Years (Year -2 to
Year 20) ..................................................................................................................................... 25
Figure 19. Chinook Salmon Intrinsic Potential Habitat per IP Rating in Stream Segment 3 (Upper
EFSFSR above the Meadow Creek Confluence) for 22 Years (Year -2 to Year 20) ................ 26
Figure 20. Steelhead Intrinsic Potential Habitat per IP Rating in Segment 3 (Upper EFSFSR
above the Meadow Creek Confluence) for 22 Years (Year -2 to Year 20) ............................... 27
Figure 21. Percent Change in Usable Chinook Salmon Spawning and Early-rearing Habitat per
Mine Life Year Compared to Baseline Conditions .................................................................... 29
Figure 22. Percent Change in Usable Steelhead Spawning and Early-rearing Habitat per Mine
Life Year Compared to Baseline Conditions ............................................................................. 30
Figure 23. Percent Change in Usable Chinook Salmon IP Habitat in Stream Segment 5 (Upper
EFSFSR above Sugar Creek) ................................................................................................... 31
Figure 24. Percent Change in Usable Steelhead IP Habitat in Stream Segment 5 (Upper
EFSFSR above Sugar Creek) ................................................................................................... 32
Figure 25. Comparison of Stream Segment 2 (Meadow Creek) and 3 (Upper EFSFR above
Meadow Creek) Percent Change (Compared to Baseline) in Usable Chinook Salmon
IP Habitat per Mine Life Year .................................................................................................... 33
Figure 26. Comparison of Meadow Creek and the Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek
Percent Change (Compared to Baseline) in Usable Steelhead IP Habitat per Mine
Life Year .................................................................................................................................... 34

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Cooney and Holzer Categorical Intrinsic Potential (IP) Models for Chinook Salmon
and Steelhead ............................................................................................................................. 5
Table 2. Proposed Action Pertinent Events Per Year that Affect Stream Configuration (SFA
Reach) and IP Habitat Adapted from SPLNT Report .................................................................. 6
Table 3. Data Employed to Create the Proposed Action Intrinsic Potential Model for Chinook
Salmon and Steelhead – SFA Impacted Reaches ...................................................................... 7
Table 4. Chinook Salmon Meters of Stream Habitat per IP Rating and Percent Change
Between Baseline and Year 20 (% Change = [Year 20 – baseline]/baseline) .......................... 15
Table 5. Steelhead Meters of Stream Habitat per IP Rating and Percent Change between
Baseline and Year 20 (% Change = [year 20 – baseline]/baseline) ......................................... 18

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | iii

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Definitions
Bankfull width The difference (length) between the banks at bankfull discharge.
DRSF Development Rock Storage Facility.
ESA group Organizations consistently involved in approximately monthly meetings
during the informal ESA consultation process. The principal agencies
were USFS, USFWS, USACE, NOAA Fisheries, and Midas Gold.
ESA Endangered Species Act.
GIS Geographic Information System.
Intrinsic Potential (IP) The potential for a stream reach to contain spawning and early-rearing
habitat for the species of interest based on the reach’s geomorphic
characteristics.
Midas Gold Midas Gold Idaho, Inc.
Mine Life The timeframe that the mine is operational. For this study, mine life is
defined by the Plan of Operations (Midas Gold 2016) and the SPLNT
model (Brown and Caldwell 2019).
NOAA Fisheries National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Fisheries.
PA Proposed action as defined by the PRO.
PRO Project plan as described in the Midas Gold Plan of Restoration and
Operations, dated September 2016.
Rio ASE data Data collected by Rio ASE as part of the Stibnite Gold Project Stream
Design Report (Rio ASE 2018).
Stream Functional Assessment (SFA) Stream Functional Assessment.
Streamlines The ESRI ArcMap shapefile that estimates the precise location of the
stream watercourses within the study area.
TSF Tailings Storage Facility.
USACE United States Army Corps of Engineers.
USFS United States Forest Service.
USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Valley Bottom Ratio The ratio between the width of the valley bottom and the bankfull width.
Wetted width The wetted width of the stream during the late-summer to early- fall
baseflow season.
Year Negative 2 (-2) The first year that mine activities take place.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | iv

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

This Technical Memorandum presents the methods and results of the Stibnite Gold Project
Proposed Action Intrinsic Potential (IP) model for Spring/Summer Chinook salmon
(Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and Interior Columbia Basin (Snake River) steelhead
(Oncorhynchus mykiss) in the Stibnite Gold Study Area, or study area (as defined in Section 2.0).
The Proposed Action (PA) is defined by the Midas Gold Plan of Restoration and Operations
(PRO), dated September 2016 (Midas Gold 2016). The goal of the analysis was to derive the IP
of streams in the study area to support spawning and early-rearing habitat for the two species
throughout the life of the proposed Stibnite Gold Project. The “mine life” in this context is defined
as 2 years before mining takes place (Year -2), and for the 20 years that mining operations and
reclamation are scheduled to occur. Therefore, this report presents 22 years of IP model results.
Results are compared to existing conditions, or baseline, IP results (reported in a separate
technical memorandum titled, “Existing Conditions (Baseline) Intrinsic Potential Model Technical
Memorandum” (Ecosystem Sciences 2019). The end of the proposed mine IP model coincides
with the completion of all the restoration and enhancement of stream reaches in the study area.
Following end-of-year (EOY) 20, all stream channels would be located in their permanent
locations.
The IP model classifies the quality of spawning and early-rearing habitat for the two species in
the study area reaches (Figure 1); from the confluence of Sugar Creek and the Upper East Fork
South Fork Salmon River (EFSFSR) upstream to the headwaters of both streams (Hydrologic
Unit Code [HUC] 12s; Sugar Creek and Headwaters East Fork South Fork Salmon River). This
technical memorandum continues the analysis presented in the Existing Conditions (Baseline)
Intrinsic Potential Model Technical Memorandum (Ecosystem Sciences 2019). These two memos
combined describe the baseline IP habitat, and IP habitat throughout the 22-year mine life.
The IP model is a categorical classification of habitat quality, rather than a continuous
classification of habitat (e.g., index values, habitat suitability criteria). Classification for each reach
ranges from None (no intrinsic potential to support habitat) to High (likely to provide spawning and
early-rearing habitat). Chinook salmon IP includes a negligible category that is not included for
steelhead. This modeling effort and results support the analysis of impacts to fish and fish habitat
based on proposed project actions in the study area from 2 years prior (years -2 and -1) to project
actions through the mining phase and post-restoration; a total of 22 years.

1.1 CONSULTATION
This modeling effort is a result of an extensive consultation process involving members of the
Endangered Species Act (ESA) fish informal consultation group (ESA group 1) involved in the
Stibnite Gold Project. The original concept and approach to adapting an existing IP model for the
region, which is documented in the publication “Appendix C: Interior Columbia Basin Stream Type
Chinook Salmon and Steelhead Populations: Habitat Intrinsic Potential Analysis” (Cooney and
Holzer 2006), was originally presented to the ESA group on February 7, 2018. Over the course
of the next year and half, the methods, data inputs, analysis, and results were discussed during
numerous conference calls, in-person meetings, and via email correspondence. Numerous
presentations were made at informal ESA consultation meetings beginning in June 2018; and
generally reoccurred monthly. Information presented at these meetings included, but was not
limited to: categorical scoring of Cooney and Holzer (2006); derivation and refinement of the
1 ESA group consisted of USFS, NOAA, USFWS, Midas Gold, and USACE. These entities constituted the core
group of participants; however, other entities occasionally attended meetings.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 1

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

streamlines (the GIS shapefile used to represent the specific location of the streams in the
landscape) to be used; stream segmentation process; derivation of bankfull width; derivation of
wetted width; slope calculations; valley bottom width tool (V-BET); sensitivity analysis of V-BET;
the utility of applying intrinsic or extrinsic screens; results for example reaches; comparison
between Cooney and Holzer (2006) results in Sugar Creek with preliminary modeling results; and
the preliminary baseline modeling results and preliminary PA results. Numerous modeling
decisions regarding scale, data inputs, etc., were made based on ESA group input. For example,
the decision not to apply any intrinsic or extrinsic screens to the IP model was based on feedback
from the ESA Group provided during meetings and presentations.

The Stibnite Gold Project study area for the Proposed Action IP model is the same as the Baseline
(Existing Conditions) Model (Ecosystem Sciences 2019). The study area includes the stream
courses in the Upper East Fork South Fork Salmon River watershed (HUC 10 – 1706020802).
Two sub-watersheds are included in the study area: Headwaters East Fork South Fork Salmon
River (HUC 12 – 170602080201) and Sugar Creek (HUC 12 – 1706020803) (Figure 1). Special
emphasis is on the stream reaches delineated by the Stream Functional Assessment (SFA, Rio-
ASE 2019), focusing on the Stibnite Gold Project impact areas. A portion of the EFSFSR
downstream of the confluence with Sugar Creek was rated for IP to ensure full coverage of the
study area–related impacts (Figure 1). To facilitate comparison of model results, the study area
is broken into six stream segments. The stream segments are described below:
• Stream segment 1 includes the Upper EFSFSR and its tributaries from its confluence
with Sugar Creek upstream to its confluence with Meadow Creek.
• Stream segment 2 includes the entirety of the Meadow Creek drainage area.
• Stream segment 3 includes the Upper EFSFSR and its tributaries upstream of its
confluence with Meadow Creek.
• Stream segment 4 includes the modeled portion of the Upper EFSFSR downstream of
its confluence with Sugar Creek.
• Stream segment 5 covers the entirety of the HUC 12 “Headwaters East Fork South
Fork Salmon River” (Figure 1). Stream segment 5 is the summation of stream
segments 1, 2, and 3.
• Stream segment 6 includes the Sugar Creek drainage area, or the HUC 12 “Sugar
Creek” (Figure 1).
Appendix B presents a map of the stream segments.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 2

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 1. Study Area Stibnite Gold Project Proposed Action Intrinsic Potential (IP) Model

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 3

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Similar to the Baseline IP model (Ecosystem Sciences 2019), the Proposed Action IP Model
approach is based on an existing IP model for the Interior Columbia Basin, developed by Cooney
and Holzer (2006) (Table 1). The Proposed Action IP model builds off methods used in Cooney
and Holzer’s (2006) model; and adapts it to the study area and the impacted reaches (collectively
termed SFA reaches, because they are located where a Stream Functional Assessment was
performed). Using GIS-derived and enhanced, restored, and interim channel design (Rio ASE
2018) the Proposed Action IP model evaluates stream-reach geomorphic conditions (i.e., wetted
width, bankfull width, stream gradient, and floodplain width) and the ability of modeled stream
segments to support spawning and early-rearing habitat for Chinook salmon and steelhead.

3.1 PROPOSED ACTION PERTINENT EVENTS

The stream configuration in the study area would be changed throughout the mine life as Project
activities are implemented; some actions would be permanent, while others would be temporary
during the mine life, only to be reactivated at a later time. Table 2 describes the pertinent events
that would occur throughout the mine life and the SFA reaches (stream segments) that would be
affected. The mine life events and stream configuration (SFA reaches affected) changes shown
in Table 2 were obtained from the “Stibnite Gold Project Stream and Pit Lake Network
Temperature Model (SPLNT) Proposed Action and Proposed Action with Modifications Report”
(Brown and Caldwell 2019), herein referred to as the SPLNT report. The PRO also provided
information on mine life actions (Midas Gold 2016). Section 10 of the SPLNT report graphically
(map based) documents the year-to-year changes during mine life (Brown and Caldwell 2019).
On each map in Section 10, the following note appears: “Activities are depicted in the earliest
possible year of implementation. Actual implementation will be phased to accommodate site
construction activities, material availability (earth, rock and vegetation), lodging for workforce,
mine plan, and general leveling of contractor and internal resources” (Brown and Caldwell 2019).
Therefore, there may be changes to the schedule as the project progresses; however, impacts to
IP habitat would be consistent with the event that causes those changes to occur. For example,
the filling of Hangar Flats Lake may take more or less time, based on the water years (i.e., low-
water years or high-water years) during the pit-filling time period. Regardless of the duration of
the pit being filled, the resultant IP changes when the pit is totally filled would be the same (e.g.,
SFA reaches HL1 and HL2 go away [see Mine Year 19, Table 2]).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 4

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 1. Cooney and Holzer Categorical Intrinsic Potential (IP) Models for
Chinook Salmon and Steelhead

Note the correction to the table for Chinook salmon: wetted width was substituted for bankfull width and the called-out category was
corrected to 3.6 to 25 meters, per NOAA Fisheries consultation. 2 Criteria that were modified based on consultation with NOAA
Fisheries are called out in red text.
Adapted from Cooney and Holzer (2006) “Table 7. Relative potential for Interior Columbia basin steelhead spawning and
initial Rearing as a function of stream reach physical characteristics.”
Valley Width Ratio
Stream Width/ Gradient Categories
(Ratio of valley width to bankfull stream width)
Confined Moderate Wide
Bankfull Width
Gradient (>20 x BF
(BF) (≤4 x BF width) (4-20 x BF width)
width)
BF < 3.8 m ≥0 None None None
0 – 0.5 None Medium Medium
0.5 – 4.0 Low High High
BF 3.8 m to 25 m
4.0 – 7.0 None Low Low
> 7.0 None None None
0 – 4.0 Low Medium Medium
BF 25 m to 50 m
> 4.0 None None None
BF > 50 m ≥0 None Low Low

Adapted from Cooney and Holzer (2006) “Table 3. Relative potential for Interior Columbia basin Spring/Summer Chinook
salmon spawning and initial rearing as a function of stream reach physical characteristics.”

Valley Width Ratio

Stream Width/ Gradient Categories
(Ratio of valley width to bankfull stream width)
Confined Moderate Wide
Wetted Width
Gradient (≤4 x BF (4-20 x BF (>20 x BF
(WW)
width) width) width)
WW < 3.7 m ≥0 None None None
0 – 0.5 Medium High High
0.5 – 1.5 Low Medium High
WW 3.6 m to 25 m 1.5 – 4.0 Low Low Medium
4.0 – 7.0 Negligible Low Low
> 7.0 None None None
0 – 0.5 None Medium Medium
WW 25 m to 50 m 0.5 – 10 None None None
≥ 10 None None None
WW> 50 m ≥0 None None None
Table Notes:
*red items were modified from the original publication.
> = greater than
< = less than
≥ = equal to or greater than
BF = bankfull
M = meter

2 Johnna Sandow, NOAA Fisheries, personal consultation. The authors of the original table were consulted, and the
correction sent via Johnna Sandow to the ESA group.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 5

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 2. Proposed Action Pertinent Events Per Year that Affect Stream Configuration (SFA Reach)
and IP Habitat Adapted from SPLNT Report

Mine Year Proposed Action Events Impacting IP Streams SFA Reach/s Affected
Meadow Creek and tributaries diverted around both sides of TSF
MC0.7 to MC1.5, MC2, MC3,
Neg. 2 (-2) and Hangar Flats DRSF. EFSFSR tunnel construction begun, but
MC4.1
no water diverted.
EFSFSR Tunnel completed water diversion initiated, Hennessy BC2, BC2.1, BC3, EF1, EF2.1
and Midnight Creek diverted into tunnel, EFSFSR and Meadow – EF2.4, EF3.2, EF3.3, EF4.1,
Neg. 1 (-1) Creek enhancement, Meadow Creek restored around Hangar HL1 and HL2, MN0, MC4.2,
Flats pit, EF Meadow Creek (Blowout Creek) engineered MC 5, MC6, WE1, WE2, WE3,
channel/rock drain, West End diversion completed. WL1
YPP dewatered (EFSFSR flow in tunnel), rapid infiltration basins
1
(Hangar Flats) initiated.
2 Fiddle Creek diverted around DRSF FC0, FC1, FC2
3 Same configuration as Mine Year 2
4 Same configuration as Mine Year 2
5 Same configuration as Mine Year 2
6 Same configuration as Mine Year 2
7 West End Creek restored atop DRSF WE1
8 Fiddle Creek restoration begun, but no flow diverted
9 Initial flow diverted into restored Fiddle Creek channel FCO, FC1, FC2
10 All flow diverted into restored Fiddle Creek channel FCO, FC1, FC2
EFSFSR, Hennessy Creek, and Midnight Creek restoration
11
begun, but no flow diverted
EF2.5, EF3.1, EF3.2, EF3.3,
Portion of flow diverted into EFSFSR, Hennessy Creek, and
12 EF4.1, HC1.1, HC1.2, MN0,
Midnight Creek restored channels
MN0.4, MN1, MN2
All flow diverted in EFSFSR, Hennessy Creek, and Midnight
Creek restored channels. Hangar Flats (HF) Lake begins to fill. EF2.5, EF3.1, EF3.2, EF3.3,
Entrance and exit channels constructed connecting Meadow EF4.1, HC1.1, HC1.2, MN0,
13 Creek and EF Meadow Creek (Blowout Creek) to HF lake. MN0.4, MN1, MN2, BC1, BC2,
Restore EF Meadow Creek (blowout Creek) from upper meadow BC2.1, BC3, MC4.2, MC5,
to confluence with Meadow Creek. West End Rock chute WE2, WE3
constructed
14 Same configuration as Mine Year 13
EFSFSR Tunnel decommissioned, HF lake continues to fill.
15 G1
Garnett Creek restored.
16 Same configuration as Mine Year 15
Meadow Creek constructed on TSF and DRSF. Portion of flow MC0.7, MC0.8, MC0.8, MC1.1
17
diverted intro restored channel. – MC1.5, MC2, MC3, MC4.1
All flow diverted into Meadow Creek restored channels on TSF MC0.7, MC0.8, MC0.8, MC1.1
18
and DRSF – MC1.5, MC2, MC3, MC4.1
Hanger Flats Lake is full. HL1 and HL2 are abandoned, and
19 Meadow Creek and E. Fork of Meadow Creek are routed into the HL1, HL2, MC4.2, MC5, BC3
Lake.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 6

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Mine Year Proposed Action Events Impacting IP Streams SFA Reach/s Affected
Same configuration as Mine Year 19 – (Figure 3.3 SPLNT Model
20
and Proposed Action Report)
Table Source: Brown and Caldwell 2019

3.2 DATA EMPLOYED

Creating the Proposed Action IP model required numerous steps and model inputs. Table 3
documents the input parameters for the Proposed Action IP model, the pertinent values per
species, and the data sources. No field data were employed in the Proposed Action IP model.
Only stream segments that would be impacted by mine activities were modeled per year.
Non-impacted stream segments IP remained the same as the Baseline Model (existing
conditions). Non-impacted stream segments include most of the Sugar Creek drainage (excluding
West End Creek) and the Upper EFSFSR above the confluence with Meadow Creek; excluding,
roughly, the first 600 meters of the EFSFSR directly upstream of the confluence with Meadow
Creek (SFA reach EF1, enhanced in mine life Year negative 1 [-1]). Impacted stream segments
correspond to the SFA reaches; areas in the study area that would be enhanced, restored, or
impacted by flow reductions, or lost altogether (Meadow Creek through Hangar Flats Lake).
Wetted width for impacted reaches was derived by Rio ASE (Rio ASE 2019), and is further
described in Table 3. Bankfull width, gradient, and valley bottom width parameters for restored
and enhanced SFA reaches are described in Rio ASE’s Stream Design Report (Rio ASE 2018)
(Table 3). Valley Bottom Width Ratio for SFA reaches was derived in ArcGIS by dividing the valley
bottom width by the bankfull width (Table 3).

Table 3. Data Employed to Create the Proposed Action Intrinsic Potential Model for Chinook
Salmon and Steelhead – SFA Impacted Reaches

Parameter Chinook Steelhead Source

Wetted Width (m) ≥3.6m N/A Wetted Width Calculation workbook Rio ASE (2019)
Bankfull (m) N/A ≥3.8m Stream Design Report (Appendix D) Rio ASE (2018)
Gradient (% Slope) <7% <7% Stream Design Report (Appendix D) Rio ASE (2018)
Valley Bottom Width Reach Reach
Stream Design Report (Appendix D) Rio ASE (2018)
(m) Dependent Dependent
Valley Width Ratio Valley Bottom Valley Bottom Derived in ESRI ArcGIS by dividing the Valley
Width/Bank Width/Bank Full Bottom Width by the corresponding segments
Full bankfull width (VWR = VBW/BF)

3.3 WETTED WIDTH

Wetted widths were used to support just the Chinook salmon IP analyses, not steelhead (Table 1,
Table 3). Wetted widths for SFA-impacted reaches were derived from Rio ASE (2019). Wetted
widths were derived through a hydrologic analysis based on September discharge from 1929 –
2017 (Rio ASE 2019). September flow values were used because they represent low-flow
conditions Chinook salmon experience during their spawning period in the study area. Wetted
widths derived by Rio ASE (2019) were attributed to each SFA reach per year in ArcGIS 10.6.
Wetted widths varied throughout the mine life due to mining operations (i.e., filling Hangar Flat

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 7

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Lake) and stream design (enhanced and restored reaches). Figure 2 depicts the wetted width
changes in three SFA reaches (EF2.2, EF2.5, and HL2).
SFA reach EF2.2, located on the EFSFSR below the confluence of Garnet Creek, would
experience minimal flow fluctuations throughout the mine life, resulting in consistent wetted widths
during low-flow periods (Figure 2). SFA reach EF2.5 would experience significant reductions in
wetted width from Year 1 to Year 11 (Figure 2). This reduction is attributed to the construction
and use of the EFSFSR Tunnel, causing EF2.5 to be dry during that time period. EF2.2 and EF2.5
would experience a slight increase in wetted width in the initial mine years. This increase is a
function of the computational methods employed to project wetted widths throughout the mine life
using target geometries for these stream design enhancement reaches. The baseline wetted
width of the EFSFSR through SFA reaches EF2.2 and EF2.5 are within the categorical limits for
Chinook salmon IP habitat (3.6 meters to 25 meters); therefore, this slight increase does not affect
the IP rating for these reaches.
SFA reach HL2 (Hangar Lake 2) is a section of Meadow Creek that is relocated to accommodate
the footprint of Hangar Flats Pit Lake, but then is eventually decommissioned when Meadow
Creek and the east fork of Meadow Creek are routed into Hangar Flats Pit Lake. As seen in
Figure 2, HL2 wetted width goes to zero in mine Year 20, due to the reach being decommissioned
(Figure 2).
8.0

7.0

6.0
Wetted Width (m)

5.0

4.0

3.0

2.0

1.0

0.0

Mine Life Year

EF2.5 HL2 EF2.2

Figure Source: Rio ASE 2019

Figure 2. Example SFA Reaches Wetted Width Changes During Mine Life Operations

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 8

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

3.4 BANKFULL WIDTH

Bankfull width for SFA reaches are defined in Rio ASE’s Stream Design Report (Rio ASE 2018).
Specific stream design requirements are found in Appendix D of that report: Reach-Scale Design
Summary. Figure 3 depicts an example of the stream design criteria (calculated design
estimates) (Rio ASE 2018). Bankfull width estimates are presented in feet in the Stream Design
Report (Rio ASE 2018), and were converted to meters for inclusion in the Proposed Action IP
model. SFA reach bankfull widths ranged from less than 2 meters to greater than 8.7 meters (Rio
ASE 2018).

Figure 3. Example of Stream Design Report (Rio ASE 2018, Appendix D) Bankfull Design
Estimates (highlighted in red) used to Populate the Bankfull Width per SFA Reach

3.5 GRADIENT
Gradients for SFA reaches are defined in Rio ASE’s Stream Design Report, Appendix D:
Reach-Scale Design Summary (Rio ASE 2018). Figure 4 shows an example of the stream design
criteria (calculated design estimates) with the slope estimate highlighted in red (Rio ASE 2018).
Slope estimates are presented as a calculation of rise over run in the Stream Design Report. The
calculated slope (rise/run) was converted to a percentage ([rise/run] *100) for inclusion in the
Proposed Action IP model. Percent slope (gradient) ranges from 0.1 percent to 24 percent
(24 percent is from SFA reach MC3, the steep slope draining the TSF/DRSF in Meadow Creek)
(Rio ASE 2018).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 9

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 4. Example of Stream Design Report (Rio ASE 2018, Appendix D) Gradient (slope) Design
Estimates (highlighted in red) used to Populate the Gradient Category per SFA Reach

3.6 VALLEY BOTTOM WIDTH

Valley Bottom Width (VBW) for SFA reaches are defined in Rio ASE’s Stream Design Report,
Appendix D: Reach-Scale Design Summary (Rio ASE 2018). Figure 5 shows an example of the
stream design criteria (design guidelines/input) with the average floodplain width (VBW) estimate
highlighted in red (Rio ASE 2018). VBW estimates are in feet in the Stream Design Report (Rio
ASE 2018), and were converted to meters for inclusion in the Proposed Action IP model. VBW
width for SFA reaches ranged from less than 5 meters to greater than 110 meters (Rio ASE 2018).

3.7 VALLEY WIDTH RATIO

The valley width ratio was derived in ArcGIS 10.6 by dividing each SFA reach’s valley width by
that same reach’s bankfull width (Valley width ration = VBW/BF). Valley width ratio ranged from
1 to 22.8 for the SFA reaches.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 10

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 5. Example of Stream Design Report (Rio ASE 2018, Appendix D) Floodplain Width Design
Guidelines (highlighted in red) used to Populate Valley Bottom Width Category per SFA Reach

3.8 GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM (GIS) METHODOLOGY

The GIS methods used to derive the IP of stream segments to support spawning and early-rearing
habitat for Chinook salmon and steelhead per mine life year followed a four-step process
(Figure 6). This process was repeated for each modeled year beginning in Year -2, and ending
in mine life Year 20, a total of 22 years.
The Baseline IP streamlines (Ecosystem Sciences 2019) form the foundation of the Proposed
Action IP modeling. The first step in the process was to insert each mine life year’s interim (e.g.,
diversions around the TSF/DRSF), or restored SFA reaches into the Baseline IP streamlines GIS
dataset. The stream segments that are “inserted” into the IP streamlines data set replace the
30-meter segments from the Baseline IP model. In most instances, the inserted interim or restored
SFA reach segments are longer than 30 meters in length. Therefore, one interim or restored reach
replaces several 30-meter baseline segments. Baseline IP model stream segments that are not
interim (diversions) or restored (SFA reaches) during mine activities do not change throughout
the Proposed Action IP model, except for enhancement reaches. Enhancement reaches
(e.g., EF1) bankfull widths and floodplain width change based on stream design criteria (and
enhancement actions), but slope would not be changed (Rio ASE 2018). No channel grading
would occur in enhancement reaches; therefore, the slope of enhancement reaches does not
change. Non-impacted stream segments include most of the Sugar Creek drainage (excluding
West End Creek) and the majority of the Upper EFSFSR above the confluence with Meadow
Creek; excluding roughly the first 600 meters of the EFSFSR directly upstream of the confluence
with Meadow Creek (SFA reach EF1).
The second step in the Proposed Action IP modeling procedure is to attribute (add information to
the GIS data [line segments] attribute table) each mine life year’s SFA altered reaches (interim,
enhanced, or restored) with the IP-related categorical data (e.g., wetted width, bankfull width,
slope, and valley bottom width). As mentioned above, this information is derived from Rio ASE

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 11

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

(2018) Stream Design Report. Interim diversions (e.g., around TSF/DRSF in Meadow Creek)
were deemed non-IP habitat.
The third step in the modeling procedure is to calculate the valley width ratio for that mine life
year’s SFA altered reaches (interim, enhanced, or restored). This was performed in ArcGIS 10.6
using the calculate field tool.
The final step is to calculate the IP rating of each stream segment or SFA reach for supporting
spawning and early habitat for Chinook salmon and steelhead. The categorical values, described
by Cooney and Holzer (2006) and documented in Table 1, were added to each stream segment
using the calculate field tool in ArcGIS 10.6.

Figure 6. GIS Methods used to Create each Mine Life Year (-2 to 20) IP Model for
Chinook Salmon and Steelhead

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 12

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

The following sections detail the results of the Proposed Action IP model. Results are summarized
by stream segment, and include the entire study area (all stream segments); Upper EFSFSR
(stream segment 5 – HUC 12 headwaters of the EFSFSR [Figure 1]); Sugar Creek (stream
segment 6); Upper EFSFSR from its confluence with Sugar Creek upstream to the confluence
with Meadow Creek (stream segment 1); Meadow Creek (stream segment 2); Upper EFSFSR
above Meadow Creek confluence (stream segment 3); and Upper EFSFSR below Sugar Creek
(stream segment 4). Usable habitat for Chinook salmon is defined as the sum of stream segments
length (m) with intrinsic potential ratings of High, Medium, Low, and Negligible. For steelhead,
usable habitat is defined as the sum of the stream segments length (m) with intrinsic potential
ratings of High, Medium, and Low. Discrete results for each stream segment (Upper EFSFSR,
Meadow Creek, and Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek) include the summation of stream
reaches (m) for each intrinsic potential rating for both species. Map results for each species per
mine year are presented in Appendix A. Selected SFA reach results are summarized below, and
presented in tabular form in Appendix C.

4.1 STUDY AREA

4.1.1 Chinook Salmon
Change in Habitat Quantity
The study area (includes all stream segments) currently (existing conditions) provides
18,610 meters of usable habitat for Chinook salmon (Figure 7). At Year 20, or under the
post-mine closure channel configuration, the study area would support 16,830 meters of usable
Chinook salmon IP habitat; the proposed action would therefore result in a 9.6 percent reduction
in total Chinook IP habitat from post-closure onward. There would be additional changes in
available habitat during the construction, mining, and reclamation phases. Notable decreases in
Chinook salmon IP habitat would occur in Year -2 (Meadow Creek diverted around TSF/DRSF);
Year -1 (EFSFSR Tunnel constructed and water diversion initiated); years 13 through 15 (Hangar
Lake filling); and years 19 and 20 (Hangar Lake is filled and SFA reaches HL1 and HL2 are
abandoned) (Figure 7). Increases in usable Chinook salmon IP habitat would occur in Year -1
(restoration and enhancement in Meadow Creek [stream segment 2] and enhancement in Upper
EFSFSR [stream segment 1] and Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek [stream segment 3]),
and Year 12 (EFSFSR restoration on YPP – stream segment 1) (Figure 8).
Chinook salmon IP habitat in the Upper EFSFSR between Sugar Creek and Meadow Creek
(stream segment 1) would decrease while the EFSFSR Tunnel is functioning (mine life years -1
to Year 11). Decommissioning of the tunnel and subsequent YPP (EFSFSR) reclamation and
enhancement would result in an overall increase (18 percent) in habitat (4,035 meters at baseline,
compared to 4,754 meters post-closure) (Figure 7).
Meadow Creek (stream segment 2) would experience a reduction in Chinook salmon IP habitat
during mine life; 4,209 meters at baseline, compared to 1,710 meters post closure, a 59 percent
reduction (Figure 7). Decreases in Chinook salmon IP habitat in stream segment 2 (Meadow
Creek) occur in mine life years -2, 13, 14, and 19 (Figure 7). In addition, sections of Meadow
Creek that qualify as IP habitat may not be accessible due to low flows below those sections. In
mine years 13 and 14, areas of IP habitat in Meadow Creek are above sections that do not have
IP habitat (due to low flows). Based on the analysis of minimum depths required for Chinook use,

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 13

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

the minimum wetted width associated with IP habitat coincides with the minimum depth used by
Chinook; they may not be able to access certain sections of IP habitat.
The Upper EFSFSR above the Meadow Creek confluence (stream segment 3) would experience
no change in usable Chinook salmon IP habitat during mine life (Figure 7). The major change in
the area related to Chinook salmon is 104.6 meters of IP habitat changes from low-rated to
medium due to enhancement actions. Otherwise, there is no change to the extent of Chinook
salmon spawning and early-rearing habitat in stream segment 3 during mine life (Figure 7).
Change in Habitat Quality
In general, the study area consists of a mix of IP habitat conditions for Chinook salmon;
approximately 8,744 meters of stream were rated as low at baseline conditions, and 9,356 meters
at post-closure channel configuration (Year 20) (Figure 8 and Table 4)—a 7.0 percent increase
in low IP habitat for Chinook salmon in the study area. The study area supports less than
1,000 meters of high-rated IP habitat at baseline, and only 350 meters at Year 20, a 58 percent
reduction (Table 4). Medium-rated IP habitat for Chinook salmon decreases 15 percent over the
life of the mine, beginning with 7,287 meters at baseline, and ending with 6,223 meters at Year 20
(Table 4). Negligible Chinook salmon IP habitat decreases (48 percent) post-restoration, and
enhancement of the EFSFSR (Year -1) (Figure 8). This decrease corresponds with an increase
in low IP habitat (Figure 8 and Table 4).

20000
18000
16000
Stream length (m)

14000
12000
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
-2
-1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Baseline

Mine Life Year

Upper EFSFSR Meadow Creek Upper EFSFSR above M.C. Sugar Creek

CHINOOK SALMON USABLE HABITAT

Figure 7. Chinook Salmon Usable Habitat in the Study Area, Broken Down by Upper EFSFSR,
Meadow Creek, Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek, and Sugar Creek for 22 Years
(Year -2 to Year 20)

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 14

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

20000
18000
Stream length (m)

16000
14000
12000
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
0

Mine Life Year

Negligible Low Medium High

STUDY AREA

Figure 8. Chinook Salmon Intrinsic Potential Habitat in the Study Area per IP Rating for 22 Years
(Year -2 to Year 20)

Table 4. Chinook Salmon Meters of Stream Habitat per IP Rating and Percent Change Between
Baseline and Year 20 (% Change = [Year 20 – baseline]/baseline)

Habitat Rating Baseline (m) Year 20 (m) Loss/Gain (m) % Change

High 838.8 349.8 -489.0 -58.3
Medium 7,287.3 6,223.8 -1,063.5 -14.6
Low 8,744.3 9,356.3 612.0 7.0
Negligible 1,739.7 899.8 -840.0 -48.3
None 94,594.5 96,098.2 1,503.7 1.6
Useable 18,610.2 16,829.7 -1,780.5 -9.6

4.1.2 Steelhead
Change in Habitat Quantity
The study area currently provides 17,898 meters of usable habitat for steelhead (Figure 9). At
Year 20, or post-closure channel configuration, the study area would support 19,304 meters of
usable steelhead IP habitat; resulting in a 7.9 percent increase in IP habitat (Figure 9 and
Table 5). Decreases in steelhead IP habitat would occur in Year -2 (Meadow Creek diverted
around TSF/DRSF), and years -1 through 11 (EFSFSR Tunnel) (Figure 9). Notable increases in
usable steelhead IP habitat would occur in Year 12 (EFSFSR restoration on YPP) and Year 17
(restoration of Meadow Creek on TSF/DRSF) (Figure 9). However, the restored sections on top
of the TSF/DRSF would not have volitional access. The amount of habitat without volitional
access can be found in the Fish Passage Barrier Tech Memo.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 15

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Steelhead IP habitat in the Upper EFSFSR (stream segment 1 – Sugar Creek confluence
upstream to Meadow Creek confluence) would experience a slight decrease while the EFSFSR
Tunnel is functioning (mine life Year -1 to Year 11) (Figure 9). Decommissioning of the tunnel
and subsequent Yellow Pine Pit (YPP) and EFSFSR reclamation and enhancement would result
in a 56.4 percent increase over baseline conditions in useable Steelhead IP habitat (2,925 meters
at baseline, compared to 4,574 meters post-closure) (Figure 9).
Meadow Creek (stream segment 2) would experience a slight loss in Steelhead IP habitat during
mine life; 3,790 meters at baseline, compared to 3,636 meters post-closure: a 4.0 percent
decrease (Figure 9). An initial decrease in Steelhead IP habitat in stream, segment 2 would occur
in mine life Year -2, because the creek would be diverted around the TSF/DRSF. Once Meadow
Creek is restored through this area (Year 17), steelhead IP habitat would return to near baseline
conditions (Figure 9). However, as noted above, the restored sections on top of the TSF/DRSF
would not have volitional access.
The Upper EFSFSR above the Meadow Creek confluence (stream segment 3) would experience
a slight decrease (2,955 meters to 2,864 meters) in steelhead IP habitat during mine life
(Figure 9). The 3.0 percent decrease is a result of stream enhancement that occurs in Year -1
(Figure 10).
Change in Habitat Quality
Existing conditions in the study area consists of a mix of IP habitat for steelhead (Figure 10 and
Table 5). High-rated steelhead IP habitat would increase 35.3 percent over baseline conditions;
8,043 meters at baseline compared to 10,883 meters post-closure (Year 20) (Figure 10 and
Table 5). At closure, over 1,500 meters of medium-rated IP habitat are available to steelhead in
the study area: a 150 percent increase (Table 5). The converse occurs with low-rated steelhead
IP habitat, because 9,254 meters are available at baseline, and 6,919 meters would be available
post-closure: a 25.2 percent reduction (Figure 10 and Table 5). The loss of low-rated IP habitat
is attributed to stream enhancement and reclamation that would improve the steelhead IP habitat,
where once low-rated areas are improved to high- or medium-rated IP habitat.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 16

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

25,000
Stream length (m)

20,000

15,000

10,000

5,000

Mine Life Year

Upper EFSFSR Meadow Creek Upper EFSFSR above M.C. Sugar Creek

STEELHEAD USUABLE HABITAT

Figure 9. Steelhead Usable Habitat in the Study Area and Broken Down for the Upper EFSFSR,
Meadow Creek, Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek, and Sugar Creek for 22 Years
(Year -2 to Year 20)

25,000

20,000
Stream Length (m)

15,000

10,000

5,000

Mine Life Year

Low Medium High

STUDY AREA
Figure 10. Steelhead Intrinsic Potential Habitat in the Study Area and per IP Rating for 22 Years
(Year -2 to Year 20)

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 17

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 5. Steelhead Meters of Stream Habitat per IP Rating and Percent Change between Baseline
and Year 20 (% Change = [year 20 – baseline]/baseline)

Habitat Rating Baseline (m) Year 20 (m) Loss/Gain (m) % Change

High 8,042.5 10,883.2 2,840.8 35.3
Medium 601.6 1,501.4 899.9 149.6
Low 9,254.2 6,918.9 -2,335.3 -25.2
None 95,103.0 93,678.7 -1,424.3 -1.5
Useable 17,898.3 19,303.6 1,405.3 7.9

4.2 STREAM FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT (SFA) REACH RESULTS

Stream Functional Assessment (SFA) reaches would experience changes to Chinook salmon and
steelhead IP habitat throughout the life of the mine. Appendix B presents the Proposed Action
IP habitat results for SFA reaches in tabular form.
Alterations to IP habitat would be caused by mine activity (e.g., diversions) and flow changes
(e.g., wetted width reductions from flow reductions while filling Hangar Lake). Two examples of
changes to Chinook salmon and steelhead IP habitat during mine life are SFA reaches HL2
(Meadow Creek through Hangar Flats Lake) and EF2.2 (Upper EFSFSR below the Meadow
Creek confluence) (Figures 11 and 12, respectively). HL2 would experience reclamation
(Year -1); then habitat loss due to Hangar Flats Lake filling (Year 14); and then complete loss due
to Hangar Flat Lake being full (Year 19) and the decommissioning of the reach. EF2.2 would be
enhanced in Year -1, resulting in low IP habitat for steelhead being replaced by high IP habitat.

800

700

600
Stream Length (m)

500

400

300

200

100

Mine Life Year

Low Medium High Negligible

HL2
Figure 11. SFA Reach HL2 Changes in Chinook Salmon Intrinsic Potential Habitat throughout the
Mine Life (Baseline through Mine Life Year 20 – Post-closure Channel Configuration)

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 18

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

2,000
1,800
1,600
Stream Length (m)

1,400
1,200
1,000
800
600
400
200
0

Mine Life Year

Low Medium High

HL2

Figure 12. SFA Reach EF2.2 Changes in Steelhead Intrinsic Potential Habitat throughout the Mine
Life (Baseline through Mine Life Year 20 – Post-closure Channel Configuration)

4.3 STREAM SEGMENT 5 – UPPER EFSFSR ABOVE SUGAR CREEK

4.3.1 Chinook Salmon
Change in Habitat Quantity
During the life of the mine, stream segment 5 would lose nearly 16 percent of its useable Chinook
salmon habitat, a loss of 1,781 meters (Figure 13). Events that impact Chinook salmon IP habitat
in stream segment 5 include the diversions around the DRSF/TSF (Year -2), the EFSFSR Tunnel
(Year -1 through Year 12), and the filling of Hangar Flats pit lake (Years 13 through 17). The
reclamation of the EFSFSR on the filled YPP would improve conditions for Chinook salmon (post-
Year 12) (Figure 13). The same issues associated with access to some IP segments as described
in Section 4.1.1 apply here.
Change in Habitat Quality
Low-rated stream reaches are the only IP rating that would increase in extent in stream segment 5
over the course of the mine’s life. Low-rated stream reaches would increase from 5,099 meters
at baseline to 5,711 meters post-closure (Figure 13). The 4,299 meters of existing medium-rated
IP stream segments would decrease to 3,236 meters, a 25 percent reduction (Figure 13). High-
rated Chinook salmon IP habitat in Meadow Creek would decrease nearly 490 meters during the
life of the mine, a 68 percent reduction (Figure 13).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 19

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Upper EFSFSR
Meadow Creek MC4.2,
12000 reclaimed
TSF/DRSF HL1, HL2
Low flows in full flow
10000 MC4.1 & HL1
Intrinsic Potential (m)

EFSFSR tunnel in operation

8000

6000

4000

2000

Mine Life Year

Negligible Low Medium High

STREAM SEGMENT 5 - UPPER EFSFSR ABOVE SUGAR

CREEK

Figure 13. Chinook Salmon Intrinsic Potential Habitat per IP Rating in Stream Segment 5 (Upper
EFSFSR above Sugar Creek) for 22 Years (Mine Life Year -2 to Year 20)

4.3.2 Steelhead
Change in Habitat Quantity
Steelhead IP habitat in stream segment 5 (Upper EFSFSR above Sugar Creek) would experience
an initial decrease due to the loss of stream habitat on the DRSF/TSF (Year -2) (Figure 14).
Steelhead habitat would remain relatively consistent in stream segment 5 from Year -2 to Year 12
(Figure 14). In Year 12, with the reclamation of the EFSFSR on the filled YPP, useable steelhead
habitat would increase over previous years, but not over baseline conditions (Figure 14). By
Year 20, steelhead habitat in stream segment 5 would increase 1,405 meters over baseline
conditions, resulting in 14.5 percent increase in steelhead habitat. However, as noted above, the
restored sections on top of the TSF/DRSF would not have volitional access.
Change in Habitat Quality
Low-rated stream segments would decrease from 4,529 meters at baseline to 2,194 meters at
post-closure, a 63 percent reduction (Figure 14). The 602 meters of existing medium-rated IP
stream segments would increase to 1,501 meters, a 150 percent increase (Figure 14). High-rated
Chinook salmon IP habitat in stream segment 5 would increase nearly 2,841 meters during the
life of the mine, a 63 percent increase (Figure 14).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 20

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

12,000
Upper EFSFSR Meadow Creek
Meadow Creek reclaimed on
reclaimed
10,000 TSF/DRSF TSF/DRSF
Stream Length (m)

8,000 EFSFSR tunnel in operation

6,000

4,000

2,000

Mine Life Year

Low Medium High

STREAM SEGMENT 5 - UPPER EFSFSR ABOVE SUGAR

CREEK
Figure 14. Steelhead Intrinsic Potential Habitat per IP Rating in Stream Segment 5 (Upper EFSFSR
above Sugar Creek) for 22 Years (Mine Life Year -2 to Year 20)

4.4 STREAM SEGMENT 2 – MEADOW CREEK

4.4.1 Chinook Salmon
Change in Habitat Quantity
During the life of the mine, stream segment 2 would lose nearly 60 percent of its useable Chinook
salmon habitat, a loss of nearly 2,500 meters (Figure 15). The key events that would impact
Chinook salmon IP habitat in Meadow Creek are the diversions around the DRSF/TSF (Year -2),
and the filling of Hangar Flats pit lake (Years 13 through 17). The existing conditions Negligible-
rated stream segments (90 meters) would be completely removed by the TSF/DRSF (Figure 15).
The same issues associated with access to some IP segments as described in Section 4.1.1
apply here.
Change in Habitat Quality
Low-rated stream reaches in stream segment 2 (Meadow Creek) would decrease from
1,438 meters at baseline to 432 meters post-closure; a 70 percent reduction (Figure 15). The
1,959 meters of existing medium-rated IP stream segments would decrease to 1,106 meters, a
44 percent reduction (Figure 13). High-rated Chinook salmon IP habitat in Meadow Creek would
decrease nearly 550 meters during the life of the mine, a 76 percent reduction (Figure 15).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 21

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

4500
4000
3500
Stream Length (m)

Meadow Creek
3000 TSF/DRSF
Reclaimed
2500 Meadow
Hangar Flats Creek
2000
Lake filling
1500
1000
500
0

Mine Life Year

Negligible Low Medium High

STREAM SEGMENT 2 - MEADOW CREEK

Figure 15. Chinook Salmon Intrinsic Potential Habitat per IP Rating in Stream Segment 2
(Meadow Creek) for 22 Years (Mine Life Year -2 to Year 20)

4.4.2 Steelhead
Change in Habitat Quantity
Steelhead IP habitat in stream segment 2 would experience an initial decrease due to the loss of
stream habitat on the DRSF/TSF (Year -2) (Figure 16). Steelhead habitat would remain relatively
consistent in Meadow Creek from Year -2 to Year 16 (Figure 16). In Year 17, with the re-creation
of Meadow Creek on the DRSF/TSF, useable steelhead habitat would increase by over
600 meters in stream segment 2 above baseline conditions, a 16 percent increase. By Year 20,
steelhead habitat in Meadow Creek would decrease over 150 meters compared to baseline
conditions, resulting in 4 percent loss of steelhead habitat. The final overall loss would be
attributable to the complete loss of SFA reaches HL1 and HL2, which would be de-commissioned
when Meadow Creek and the East Fork of Meadow Creek are routed into Hangar Flats Pit Lake.
Change in Habitat Quality
Low-rated stream segments would decrease from 929 meters at baseline to 90 meters
post-closure, a 90 percent reduction (Figure 16). The 602 meters of existing medium-rated IP
stream segments would increase to 1,441 meters, a 140 percent increase (Figure 16). High-rated
Chinook salmon IP habitat in Meadow Creek would decrease nearly 154 meters during the life of
the mine, a 6.8 percent reduction (Figure 16).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 22

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

5,000 Meadow Creek

reclaimed on TSF/DRSF
4,500

4,000 Decommissioning
3,500 of HL1, HL2
Stream Length (m)

Meadow Creek
3,000 TSF/DRSF

2,500

2,000

1,500

1,000

500

Mine Life Year

Low Medium High

STREAM SEGMENT 2 - MEADOW CREEK

Figure 16. Steelhead Intrinsic Potential Habitat per IP Rating within Stream Segment 2
(Meadow Creek) for 22 Years (Year -2 to Year 20)

4.5 STREAM SEGMENT 1 – UPPER EFSFSR ABOVE SUGAR CREEK AND

BELOW MEADOW CREEK
4.5.1 Chinook Salmon
Stream segment 1 would experience changes in the quantity and quality of Chinook salmon
spawning and early-rearing habitat during the life of the mine (Figure 15).
Change in Habitat Quantity
Overall, useable Chinook salmon IP habitat would increase 18 percent in stream segment 1, the
Upper EFSFSR above Sugar Creek and below Meadow Creek, an increase of 700 meters of
spawning and early-rearing habitat (Figure 17). The changes are associated with the installation
of the tunnel (Year -1) and the reclamation of the UEFSFSR on top of the former YPP site
(Year 12).
Change in Habitat Quality
The existing 870 meters of negligible-rated IP habitat would be reduced to 120 meters at the
post-closure channel configuration, an 86 percent reduction (Figure 17). The extent of low-rated
IP habitat, which is currently the most abundant Chinook salmon IP habitat in stream segment 1,
would increase from 2,520 meters to 4,035 meters post-closure, a 60 percent increase
(Figure 17). High-rated IP habitat would increase from 0 to 60 meters, while medium-rated

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 23

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Chinook salmon IP habitat would decrease from 645 meters at baseline to 539 meters
post-closure (Figure 17).

5000
4500
4000
Stream Length (m)

3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0

Mine Life Year

Negligible Low Medium High

STREAM SEGMENT 1 - UPPER EFSFSR ABOVE SUGAR

CREEK AND BELOW MEADOW CREEK
Figure 17. Chinook salmon Intrinsic Potential habitat per IP rating in stream segment 1 (Upper
EFSFSR above Sugar Creek and below Meadow Creek) for 22 years (Year -2 to Year 20).

4.5.2 Steelhead
The quantity and quality of steelhead habitat in stream segment 1, the Upper EFSFSR upstream
of the confluence with Sugar Creek and downstream of Meadow Creek, would change during
mining activities (Figure 18). The changes are associated with those described in Section 4.5.1.
Change in Habitat Quantity
Overall, stream enhancement and recreation of the Upper EFSFSR would equate to a 56 percent
increase in usable steelhead habitat, an increase of approximately 1,650 meters over baseline
conditions in the Upper EFSFSR above Sugar Creek and below Meadow Creek (Figure 18).
Change in Habitat Quality
Following enhancement (Year -1) and re-creation (Year 12) of the Upper EFSFSR in stream
segment 1, high-rated IP habitat would increase nearly 3,000 meters during the mine’s life
(Figure 18). Medium-rated IP habitat would increase 60 meters (Figure 16). Low-rated IP habitat
for steelhead would be reduced by over 1,400 meters, a 57 percent reduction (Figure 18). The
significant loss of low-rated habitat is offset by the gains in high-rated habitat (Figure 18).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 24

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

5,000
4,500
4,000
Stream Length (m)

3,500
3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0

Mine Life Year

Low Medium High
STREAM SEGMENT 1 - UPPER EFSFSR ABOVE SUGAR
CREEK AND BELOW MEADOW CREEK

Figure 18. Steelhead Intrinsic Potential Habitat per IP Rating in Stream Segment 1 (Upper EFSFSR
above Sugar Creek and below Meadow Creek) for 22 Years (Year -2 to Year 20)

4.6 STREAM SEGMENT 3 – UPPER EFSFSR ABOVE MEADOW CREEK

CONFLUENCE
Mine activities would not affect stream segment 3 (Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek) as
much as other analysis areas. The only event that would affect IP habitat for the two species in
the Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek is the enhancement of SFA reach EF1. EF1 is a
570-meter reach extending upstream from the confluence with Meadow Creek. Enhancement
would not change the slope of the 30 segments in the reach, so changes to IP habitat for both
species would be minimal (Figure 19 and Figure 20).

4.6.1 Chinook Salmon

There would be no change in the extent of usable habitat for Chinook salmon, only a change in
habitat classification from Medium-rated to Low. The change would occur in Year -1 during
enhancement; and would result in 105 meters of medium-rated habitat changing to low-rated
habitat (Figure 19). This change would remain in Year 20.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 25

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

4.6.2 Steelhead
Steelhead IP habitat in the Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek would experience a slight
decrease in quantity, because 90 meters of low-rated habitat would be changed to “none” in
Year -1 (Figure 10). This loss of low-rated IP habitat would result in a 4.0 percent decrease in
useable steelhead IP habitat in the Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek (Figure 10).

3500

3000
Intrinsic Potential (m)

2500

2000

1500

1000

500

Mine Life Year

Negligble Low Medium High

STREAM SEGMENT 3 - UPPER EFSFSR ABOVE MEADOW

CREEK

Figure 19. Chinook Salmon Intrinsic Potential Habitat per IP Rating in Stream Segment 3 (Upper
EFSFSR above the Meadow Creek Confluence) for 22 Years (Year -2 to Year 20)

The cause of these small changes in IP habitat for the two species in stream segment 3 is the
enhancement design’s average bankfull width for SFA reach EF1 (Rio ASE 2018). The
enhancement design for SFA Reach EF1 has an average bankfull width of 5.3 meters (Rio ASE
2018), which is roughly 0.3 meter more than the baseline bankfull width (Ecosystem Sciences
2019). Applying this bankfull measure changes the Valley Width Ratio to below 4 (Table 1) for
several of the enhanced 30-meter segments of EF1, causing changes in the IP habitat
classifications for the two species.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 26

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

3,500

3,000
Intrinsic Potential (m)

2,500

2,000

1,500

1,000

500

Mine Life Year

Low Medium High

UPPER EFSFSR ABOVE MEADOW CREEK

Figure 20. Steelhead Intrinsic Potential Habitat per IP Rating in Segment 3 (Upper EFSFSR above
the Meadow Creek Confluence) for 22 Years (Year -2 to Year 20)

4.7 STREAM SEGMENT 4 – UPPER EFSFSR DOWNSTREAM OF SUGAR CREEK

Stream segment 4 includes the modeled portion of the EFSFSR downstream of its confluence
with Sugar Creek. Stream segment 4 includes only 1,110 meters of the EFSFSR. Stream
segment 4 is not impacted by mine activities; therefore, the baseline IP habitat for the two species
remains the same throughout the mine life.

4.7.1 Chinook Salmon

Stream segment 4 harbors 1,110 meters of usable Chinook salmon spawning and early-rearing
habitat. The Upper EFSFSR downstream of Sugar Creek supports 30 meters of medium-rated,
1,020 meters of low-rated, and 60 meters of negligible Chinook salmon IP habitat. These
quantities of Chinook IP habitat persist throughout the mine life.

4.7.2 Steelhead
Stream segment 4 includes 1,050 meters of usable steelhead spawning and early-rearing habitat.
The Upper EFSFSR downstream of Sugar Creek supports 30 meters of high-rated and
1,020 meters of low-rated steelhead IP habitat. These quantities of steelhead IP habitat persist
throughout the mine life.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 27

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Throughout the life of the mine, alterations to stream channel configuration and flow volumes
(i.e., filling pit lakes) in streams would occur as a result of mining activities (Table 2). Year -2 is
the first year that mine activities would occur under the proposed action. Year 20 equates to the
mine’s post-closure channel configuration. Post-closure, all enhancement and restoration
activities would be complete, and the stream courses would be in their final configuration.
Concurrent with mine activities, enhancement and reclamation activities would occur in stream
reaches throughout the study area that would improve Chinook salmon and steelhead IP habitat.
The concurrent nature of mining activity and stream enhancement/reclamation would make the
habitat changes throughout the mine life happen in a non-linear way (i.e., one segment in the
study area would experience a degradation of IP habitat; while at the same time, other areas
would experience an improvement to IP habitat through enhancement or reclamation).
IP habitat for the two species is limited to the main trunk streams of the study area: Meadow
Creek from roughly 1 kilometer above the Spent Ore Disposal Area (SODA) to the confluence
with EFSFSR; and the EFSFSR from its confluence with Fern Creek downstream to the
confluence with Sugar Creek (Figure 1). Sugar Creek contains Chinook salmon and steelhead
IP habitat, but would not be affected by mine activities (no SFA reaches on Sugar Creek);
therefore, its IP habitat would not change throughout the life of the mine.
Key Mine activities that alter stream habitat would occur in the following years:
• Year -2: Meadow Creek diverted around TSF/DRSF;
• Year -1: EFSFSR Tunnel completed and water diversion initiated, stream enhancement
and restoration in EFSFSR [stream segments 1 and 3] and Meadow Creek [stream
segment 2];
• Year 12: EFSFSR Tunnel [stream segment 1] decommissioning and flow initiated in
restored reaches;
• Year 13: all flow diverted back into stream reaches that were dewatered by EFSFSR
Tunnel [stream segment 1]; Hangar Flats Lake [stream segment 2] begins to fill;
• Year 17: Meadow Creek [stream segment 2] constructed [restored on TSF/DRSF];
• Year 18: all flow diverted into Meadow Creek [stream segment 2] on TSF/DRSF;
• Years 13 through 19: Hangar Lake fills from Year 13 through Year 19, resulting in flow
volume reductions (e.g., reduced wetted width) for Meadow Creek (Rio ASE 2019). Flow
volume changes impact Chinook salmon IP habitat, because reduced flow volumes would
equate to reduced wetted widths, a significant variable in the derivation of IP habitat rating
for the species; and
• Year 19: Hangar Lake is full, and SFA reaches HL1 and HL2 are de-commissioned [stream
segment 2].

5.1 STUDY AREA

5.1.1 Chinook Salmon
The quantity of Chinook salmon usable IP habitat would vary throughout the life of the mine.
Compared to baseline conditions, IP habitat for Chinook salmon would be reduced by 9.6 percent
at the proposed action’s post-closure channel configuration (Year 20) (Figure 21), equating to a
loss of 1,781 meters of habitat. In mine life Year -1 through Year 11, there would be a reduction

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 28

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

in Chinook salmon IP habitat of 17.8 percent (Figure 21). This timeframe includes the EFSFSR
Tunnel diversion (stream segment 1); enhancement activities in the EFSFSR (stream segments
1 and 3) and Meadow Creek (stream segment 2); and the reclamation of Meadow Creek near
Hangar Flats (stream segment 2). In Year 12, following the initiation of flow into the reclaimed
channel on the filled YPP, the reduction in Chinook salmon usable IP habitat, compared to
baseline conditions, is roughly 9 percent (Figure 19).
In Year 13, reductions in Chinook salmon usable IP habitat would begin to increase as Hangar
Flats Lake begins to fill, and less water is dedicated to instream flow.
By Year 14, Chinook salmon spawning and early-rearing habitat in the study area would
experience an 18.3 percent loss compared to baseline conditions (Figure 21). This loss would be
attributed to flow volume decreases in Meadow Creek (stream segment 2) as Hangar Flats Lake
fills, which would result in wetted width changes that impact the categorical IP habitat ratings (Rio
ASE 2019).
In Years 15 through 18, there would be a less than 10.6 percent reduction in usable Chinook
salmon IP habitat in the study area, attributable to reduced flows to Hangar Flats Lake and more
flow dedicated to Meadow Creek SFA reaches HL1 and HL2 (Rio ASE 2019).
In Year 20, when Hangar Flats Lake is full, SFA reaches HL1 and HL2 are decommissioned,
resulting in these reaches experiencing a complete loss of Chinook salmon IP habitat. The loss
of these two reaches would result in a 9.6 percent reduction in Chinook salmon IP habitat in the
study area, compared to baseline conditions (Figure 21).

Mine Life Year

-2 -1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
0.0%

-2.0%

-4.0%
% Change from Baseline

-6.0%

-8.0%

-10.0%

-12.0%

-14.0%

-16.0%

-18.0%

-20.0%

Figure 21. Percent Change in Usable Chinook Salmon Spawning and Early-rearing Habitat per
Mine Life Year Compared to Baseline Conditions

5.1.2 Steelhead
The quantity of available steelhead usable IP habitat would vary throughout the life of the mine.
Unlike Chinook salmon, the amount of steelhead IP habitat would increase 7.9 percent at the
post-closure channel configuration compared to baseline conditions (Figure 22), with an increase

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 29

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

of 1,405 meters of steelhead IP habitat (although some of that IP habitat would not have volitional
access). During mine Years -1 through 11, there would be an 11 percent decrease in usable
habitat. This timeframe includes the EFSFSR Tunnel diversion (loss of IP habitat); the
enhancement to the EFSFSR and Meadow Creek (improved habitat); and the reclamation of
Meadow Creek near Hangar Flats (improved habitat).
In Years 12 through 16, there would be varying (2.7 percent to 2.8 percent) decreases over
baseline conditions in steelhead IP habitat following the initiation of flow into the restored channels
on the reclaimed YPP (Figure 22).
In Years 17 through 19 there would be maximum steelhead IP habitat gains, compared to baseline
conditions, following the construction of Meadow Creek on the TSF/DRSF and initiation of flows
into the new channels (although these would not have volitional access). In these years steelhead
IP habitat increases 12 percent over baseline conditions. (Figure 22).
In mine Year 20 when Hangar Flats Pit Lake is full, SFA reaches HL1 and HL2 are
decommissioned, resulting in a total loss of steelhead IP habitat through these reaches. The loss
of these two reaches decreases usable habitat from gains over baseline conditions between Year
19 and Year 20; resulting in the final net increase of 7.9 percent in steelhead IP habitat
(Figure 22). The final net increase of 7.9 percent would expand the extent of usable steelhead IP
by 1,405 meters over baseline conditions.

Mine Life Year

-2 -1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
15.0%

10.0%
% Change from Baseline

5.0%

0.0%

-5.0%

-10.0%

-15.0%

Figure 22. Percent Change in Usable Steelhead Spawning and Early-rearing Habitat per Mine Life
Year Compared to Baseline Conditions

5.2 UPPER EFSFSR ABOVE SUGAR CREEK (STREAM SEGMENT 5)

Stream segment 5 (Upper EFSFSR above Sugar Creek), which includes stream segments 1
(Upper EFSFSR above Sugar Creek and below Meadow Creek), 2 (Meadow Creek), and 3
(Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek), harbors the majority of mining and reclamation activity
in the study area (only West End Creek is outside of stream segment 5). Therefore, this area
reflects the impacts that mining and reclamation activities have on spawning and early-rearing for
the Chinook salmon and steelhead.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 30

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

5.2.1 Chinook Salmon

In stream segment 5, the quantity of Chinook salmon usable IP habitat would vary throughout the
life of the mine. Compared to baseline conditions, IP habitat for Chinook salmon, in stream
segment 5 would be reduced by 15.6 percent at post-closure channel configuration (Year 20)
(Figure 23), equating to a loss of 1,781 meters of habitat. In mine Year -1 through Year 11, there
would be a reduction in Chinook salmon IP habitat of 29.1 percent (Figure 23). This timeframe
includes the EFSFSR Tunnel diversion (stream segment 1); enhancement activities in the
EFSFSR (stream segments 1 and 3) and Meadow Creek (stream segment 2); and the reclamation
of Meadow Creek near Hangar Flats (stream segment 2). In mine Year 12, following the initiation
of flow into the reclaimed channel on the filled YPP, the reduction in Chinook salmon usable IP
habitat, compared to baseline conditions, is roughly 14.5 percent (Figure 23).
In Years 13 through 19, reductions in Chinook salmon usable IP habitat fluctuate, based on
dedicating flow to filling Hangar Flats Lake, which begins to fill; and less water is dedicated to
instream flow (Figure 23). As noted, several times in this document, access may be limited to
certain segments of Meadow Creek due to low flows below those reaches.
In mine Year 20, when Hangar Flats Lake is full, SFA reaches HL1 and HL2 are decommissioned,
resulting in these reaches experiencing a complete loss of Chinook salmon IP habitat. The loss
of these two reaches would result in the final 15.6 percent reduction in Chinook salmon IP habitat
in the study area compared to baseline conditions (Figure 23).

Mine Life Year

-2 -1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
0.0%

-5.0%

-10.0%
% Change from Baseline

-15.0%

-20.0%

-25.0%

-30.0%

-35.0%

Figure 23. Percent Change in Usable Chinook Salmon IP Habitat in Stream Segment 5
(Upper EFSFSR above Sugar Creek)

5.2.2 Steelhead
The quantity of available steelhead usable IP habitat in stream segment 5 would vary throughout
the life of the mine. The amount of steelhead IP habitat would increase 14.5 percent post-closure
for the channel configuration compared to baseline conditions (Figure 24), with an increase of

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 31

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

1,405m of steelhead IP habitat. During mine years negative 1 through 11 there would be a
21.3 percent decrease in usable habitat (Figure 24). This timeframe includes the EFSFSR Tunnel
diversion (loss of IP habitat), the enhancement to the EFSFSR and Meadow Creek (improved
habitat), and the reclamation of Meadow Creek near Hangar Flats (improved habitat).
In mine years 12 through 16, there would be varying (4.1 percent to 5.1 percent) decreases over
baseline conditions in steelhead IP habitat following the initiation of flow into the restored channels
on the reclaimed YPP (Figure 24).
In mine years 17 through 19, there would be maximum steelhead IP habitat gains, compared to
baseline conditions, following the construction of Meadow Creek on the TSF/DRSF and initiation
of flows into the new channels. In these years, steelhead IP habitat increases 22.5 percent over
baseline conditions (Figure 24). It is important to note that the steelhead IP habitat on top of the
TSF/DRSF will not have volitional passage.
In mine year 20, when Hangar Flats Pit Lake is full, SFA reaches HL1 and HL2 will be
decommissioned, resulting in a total loss of steelhead IP habitat through these reaches. The loss
of these two reaches decreases usable habitat from gains over baseline conditions between Year
19 and Year 20; resulting in the final net increase of 9.6 percent in steelhead IP habitat
(Figure 24). The final net increase of 9.6 percent would expand the extent of usable steelhead IP
by 1,405 meters over baseline conditions.

Mine Life Year

-2 -1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
25.0%

20.0%

15.0%
% Change from Baseline

10.0%

5.0%

0.0%

-5.0%

-10.0%

-15.0%

-20.0%

-25.0%

Figure 24. Percent Change in Usable Steelhead IP Habitat in Stream Segment 5

(Upper EFSFSR above Sugar Creek)

5.3 MEADOW CREEK (STREAM SEGMENT 2) VERSUS UPPER EFSFSR ABOVE

MEADOW CREEK (STREAM SEGMENT 3)
As described in the PRO and SPLNT reports, stream segment 2 would experience more
modification in physical habitat and discharge than stream segment 3 (Midas Gold 2016; Brown

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 32

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

and Caldwell 2019). Notably, the TSF/DRSF, Hangar Flats Pit, and subsequent Hangar Flats Pit
Lake would be constructed in the Meadow Creek (stream segment 2) drainage (Midas Gold
2016). These activities would impact the stream segments in the Meadow Creek drainage.
Conversely, the only identified action that would impact stream habitat in the Upper EFSFSR
above the Meadow Creek confluence (stream segment 3) would be stream enhancement
(Year -1). Impacts to Chinook salmon and steelhead IP habitat would be greater in the Meadow
Creek (stream segment 2) drainage than in the Upper EFSFSR above the Meadow Creek
confluence (stream segment 3).

5.3.1 Chinook Salmon

The quantity of Chinook salmon IP habitat in stream segment 2 would decrease 59.4 percent over
the life of the mine compared to baseline conditions (Figure 25). Conversely, Chinook salmon
usable IP habitat in stream segment 3 would not change over the life of the mine compared to
baseline conditions (Figure 25). Mine activities that impact habitat conditions in stream segment 2
would occur in Year -2 (TSF/DRSF diversion), resulting in a 56 percent reduction; Years 13
through 19 (Hangar Flat Lake filling), with a maximum 98 percent reduction; and Year 20 with the
loss of SFA reaches HL1 and HL2, inducing a 59.4 percent reduction (Figure 25) over baseline
conditions. Mine activities that improve stream habitat conditions in stream segment 2 would
occur in Year -1 (enhancement/restoration of stream segments downstream of the TSF/DRSF
diversions) and Year 17 (construction of Meadow Creek on TSF/DRSF); the latter does not impact
Chinook salmon IP Habitat, because wetted widths are insufficient to support IP habitat. SFA
reach EF1, in stream segment 3, would be enhanced in Year -1, resulting in a change in Chinook
IP habitat, where 104.6 meters of medium-rated Chinook salmon IP habitat would change to low-
rated. This change does not affect the overall amount of “usable” Chinook salmon IP habitat in
the Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek confluence (Figure 25).

Mine Life Year

-2 -1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
0.0%
% Change from Baseline

-20.0%

-40.0%

-60.0%

-80.0%

-100.0%

-120.0%

Meadow Creek Upper EFSFSR above MC

Figure 25. Comparison of Stream Segment 2 (Meadow Creek) and 3 (Upper EFSFR above
Meadow Creek) Percent Change (Compared to Baseline) in
Usable Chinook Salmon IP Habitat per Mine Life Year

5.3.2 Steelhead
The quantity of steelhead IP habitat in stream segment 2 would decrease 4.0 percent over the life
of the mine, compared to baseline conditions (Figure 26). Steelhead IP habitat in stream

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 33

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

segment 3 would decrease 3.0 percent over the life of the mine (Figure 26). As mentioned above,
habitat losses and gains are not linear for steelhead IP habitat in stream segment 2. Mine activities
that impact steelhead IP habitat conditions in Meadow Creek (stream segment 2) would occur in
Year -2 (TSF/DRSF diversion), resulting in a 48.4 percent reduction; and Years 13 through 16
(Hangar Flat Lake filling), with a maximum 54.2 percent reduction over baseline conditions
(Figure 22). Mine activities that improve stream habitat conditions in stream segment 2 would
occur in Year negative 1 (enhancement/restoration of stream segments downstream of the
TSF/DRSF diversions) and Year 17 (construction of Meadow Creek on TSF/DRSF, no volitional
passage). The construction of Meadow Creek on the TSF/DRSF would benefit steelhead IP
habitat in Meadow Creek, because stream design criteria for the reclaimed reaches are beneficial
to IP habitat. The restoration of Meadow Creek on the TSF/DRSF (Years 17 through 19)
increases the IP habitat for steelhead to 16.3 percent above baseline conditions (Figure 26). This
increase in habitat should be viewed as similar to the existing conditions IP habitat above YPP,
because the TSF/DRSF would likely be a barrier to volitional (choose to) passage. This increase
in IP habitat would be temporary, because in Year 19 SFA, reaches HL1 and HL2 would be
decommissioned in Hangar Flats Pit Lake, reducing steelhead IP habitat in Meadow Creek to 4.0
percent below baseline conditions (Figure 26). The 3.0 percent decrease in steelhead IP habitat
in stream segment 3 (Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek confluence) would be a result of the
enhancement of SFA reach EF1 in Year -1 (Figure 26). Steelhead IP habitat in the Upper
EFSFSR above Meadow Creek would experience a slight decrease in habitat in Year -1, because
90 meters of low-rated habitat would be changed to “none.” This loss of low-rated IP habitat would
result in a 3.0 percent decrease in useable steelhead IP habitat in stream segment 3 throughout
the mine life (Figure 26).

Mine Life Year

-2 -1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
20.0%

10.0%
% Change from Baseline

0.0%

-10.0%

-20.0%

-30.0%

-40.0%

-50.0%

-60.0%

Meadow Creek Upper EFSFSR above MC

Figure 26. Comparison of Meadow Creek and the Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek Percent
Change (Compared to Baseline) in Usable Steelhead IP Habitat per Mine Life Year

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 34

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Mining activities in the study area would affect both the quantity and quality of spawning and early-
rearing habitat (as measured by IP habitat) for Chinook salmon and steelhead. Enhancement and
reclamation of stream reaches throughout the study area would improve the quality of IP habitat
for the two species in some reaches. Mining activities, dewatering, and storage facilitates would
reduce IP habitat. Mining activities would occur at the same time as enhancement and
reclamation actions, making the accounting of IP habitat changes non-linear; habitat losses per
year due to mining activity may be greater than enhancement/reclamation gains and vice versa.
The following are the main outcomes of this analysis.
Chinook Salmon
• In the entire study area, the proposed action would decrease the total amount of Chinook
salmon spawning and early-rearing habitat by 1,780.5 meters (9.6 percent) as shown by
the comparison of baseline conditions to the post-closure stream configuration.
• In stream segment 5 (upper EFSFSR above Sugar Creek) Chinook salmon habitat would
decrease 1,781 meters (15.6 percent) compared to baseline conditions.
• Over the life of the mine (baseline to post-closure), the amount of high-rated Chinook
salmon IP habitat would decrease by 489 meters (58.3 percent).
• The amount of medium-rated Chinook Salmon IP habitat would decrease by 1,063 meters
(14.6 percent).
• The amount of low-rated Chinook salmon IP habitat would increase by 612 meters
(7.0 percent).
• The amount of negligible-rated Chinook salmon IP habitat would decrease by 840 meters
(48.3 percent).
Overall, the proposed action would reduce the total amount of Chinook IP habitat and increase
the amount of low-rated habitat in the study area.
Steelhead
• In the study area, the proposed action would increase the amount of steelhead IP habitat
by 1,405.3 meters (7.9 percent) under the post-closure stream configuration compared to
baseline conditions. However, some of this habitat would not have volitional passage.
• In stream segment 5 (upper EFSFSR above Sugar Creek), steelhead habitat would
increase 1,405.3 meters (14.5 percent) compared to baseline conditions. However, some
of this habitat would not have volitional passage.
• Over the life of the mine (baseline to post-closure), high-rated steelhead IP habitat would
increase by 2,841 meters (35.3 percent).
• Medium-rated steelhead IP habitat would increase 890 meters (150 percent).
• Low-rated Steelhead IP habitat would decrease by 2,335.3 meters (25.2 percent).
The proposed action would therefore result in a net increase in the extent and quality of steelhead
IP habitat in the study area.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 35

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Brown and Caldwell. 2019. Stibnite Gold Project Stream and Pit Lake Network Temperature
Model Proposed Action and Proposed Action with Modifications Report. Prepared for
Midas Gold, Inc.
Cooney T., and D.M. Holzer. 2006. Appendix C: Interior Columbia Basin Stream Type Chinook
Salmon and Steelhead Populations: Habitat Intrinsic Potential Analysis. Preliminary draft
of the viability criteria for Interior Columbia domain.
Ecosystem Sciences. 2019. Intrinsic Potential Model Chinook Salmon and Steelhead. Technical
Memorandum Stibnite Gold Project, Idaho.
Midas Gold. 2016. Stibnite Gold Project, Valley County, Idaho. Plan of Operations. Prepared by
Midas Gold Idaho, Inc., Donnelly, Idaho.
Rio ASE. 2018. Draft Stream Design Report; Stibnite Gold Project Midas Gold Idaho, Inc.
Rio ASE. 2019. IP Model Baseflow SFA Summary 011719.xlsm.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 36

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

APPENDIX A – PROPOSED ACTION MINE LIFE YEAR INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MAPS

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

This page intentionally left blank

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-1

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-2

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-3

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-4

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-5

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-6

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-7

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-8

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-9

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-10

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-11

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-12

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-13

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-14

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-15

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-16

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-17

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-18

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-19

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-20

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-21

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-22

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-23

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-24

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-25

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-26

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-27

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-28

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-29

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-30

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-31

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-32

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-33

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-34

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-35

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-36

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-37

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-38

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-39

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-40

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-41

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-42

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-43

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-44

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-45

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-46

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

APPENDIX B – STREAM SEGMENT DELINEATION AND DESCRIPTION

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

This page intentionally left blank

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | B-1

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

• Stream segment 1 includes the Upper EFSFSR and its tributaries from its confluence
with Sugar Creek upstream to its confluence with Meadow Creek.
• Stream segment 2 includes the entirety of the Meadow Creek drainage area.
• Stream segment 3 includes the Upper EFSFSR and its tributaries upstream of its
confluence with Meadow Creek.
• Stream segment 4 includes the modeled portion of the Upper EFSFSR downstream of
its confluence with Sugar Creek.
• Stream segment 5 covers the entirety of the HUC 12 “Headwaters East Fork South Fork
Salmon River” (Figure 1). Stream segment 5 is the summation of stream segments 1, 2,
and 3.
• Stream segment 6 includes the Sugar Creek drainage area, or the HUC 12 “Sugar Creek”
(Figure 1).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | B-2

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

APPENDIX C – SFA REACH RESULTS CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

This page intentionally left blank

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table C1. SFA Reach Results for Chinook Salmon Intrinsic Potential during Mine Life for Proposed Action (results are in meters)

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | C-1

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | C-2

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | C-3

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table C2. SFA Reach Results for Steelhead Intrinsic Potential during Mine Life for Proposed Action (results are length in meters)

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | C-4

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | C-5

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | C-6

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
IP MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD; ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

INTRINSIC POTENTIAL
MODEL
CHINOOK SALMON AND
STEELHEAD
ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3
Technical Memorandum
Stibnite Gold Project, Idaho

December 2019

Ecosystem Sciences, LLC

Science . Planning . Design
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
IP MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD; ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Technical Memorandum

Ecosystem Sciences
Science . Planning . Design

Ecosystem Sciences
202 N. 9th Street, Suite 400
Boise, ID 83702
T: 208.383.0226

Prepared for: AECOM

Project Title: Stibnite Gold Project

Technical Memorandum
Subject: Intrinsic Potential Model for Chinook and Steelhead Alternatives 2 and 3

Date: December 2019

To: AECOM

From: Ecosystem Sciences

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
IP MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD; ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION AND METHODS.................................................................................................. 1
2.0 RESULTS ........................................................................................................................................ 4
2.1 ALTERNATIVE 2 (MODIFIED PRO) STUDY AREA RESULTS......................................................... 4
2.2 ALTERNATIVE 3 (UPPER EFSFSR TSF) STUDY AREA RESULTS .............................................. 6
2.3 ALTERNATIVE 2 (MODIFIED PRO) STREAM SEGMENT 5 - UPPER EFSFSR ABOVE
SUGAR CREEK RESULTS........................................................................................................ 8
2.4 ALTERNATIVE 3 (UPPER EFSFSR TSF) STREAM SEGMENT 5 - UPPER EFSFSR
ABOVE SUGAR CREEK RESULTS .......................................................................................... 10
2.5 ALTERNATIVE 2 (MODIFIED PRO) STREAM SEGMENT 1 - UPPER EFSFSR ABOVE
SUGAR CREEK AND BELOW MEADOW CREEK RESULTS ......................................................... 12
2.6 ALTERNATIVE 3 (UPPER EFSFSR TSF) STREAM SEGMENT 1 - UPPER EFSFSR
ABOVE SUGAR CREEK AND BELOW MEADOW CREEK RESULTS.............................................. 14
2.7 ALTERNATIVE 2 (MODIFIED PRO) STREAM SEGMENT 2 - MEADOW CREEK RESULTS ............... 16
2.8 ALTERNATIVE 3 (UPPER EFSFSR TSF) STREAM SEGMENT 2 - MEADOW CREEK
RESULTS ............................................................................................................................ 17
2.9 ALTERNATIVE 2 (MODIFIED PRO) STREAM SEGMENT 3 - UPPER EFSFSR ABOVE
MEADOW CREEK RESULTS .................................................................................................. 19
2.10 ALTERNATIVE 3 (UPPER EFSFSR TSF) STREAM SEGMENT 3 - UPPER EFSFSR
ABOVE MEADOW CREEK RESULTS........................................................................................ 21

3.0 SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................... 23

4.0 REFERENCES............................................................................................................................... 24

LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A – Stream Segment Delineation and Description

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Cooney and Holzer Categorical Intrinsic Potential (IP) Models for Chinook Salmon
and Steelhead ............................................................................................................................. 2
Table 2. Alternative 2 Study Area Comparison of Chinook Salmon IP Habitat Baseline to
Year 20 (%Change = [Year 20 – Baseline]/Baseline) ................................................................. 4
Table 3. Alternative 2 Study Area Comparison of Steelhead IP Habitat Baseline to Year 20
(%Change = [Year 20 – Baseline]/Baseline) ............................................................................... 5
Table 4. Alternative 3 Study Area Comparison of Chinook Salmon IP Habitat Baseline to
Year 20 (% Change = [Year 20 – Baseline]/Baseline) ................................................................ 6
Table 5. Alternative 3 Study Area Comparison of Steelhead IP Habitat Baseline to Year 20
(% Change = [Year 20 – Baseline]/Baseline) .............................................................................. 7
Table 6. Comparison of change in Chinook salmon IP habitat between Alternative 2 and
Alternative 3............................................................................................................................... 23
Table 7. Comparison of change in steelhead IP habitat between Alternative 2 and Alternative 3 ......... 24

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | i

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
IP MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD; ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Study Area Stibnite Gold Project Intrinsic Potential (IP) Model Domain (All
Alternatives)................................................................................................................................. 3
Figure 2. Alternative 2 Study Area IP Habitat for Chinook Salmon from Baseline to Year 20 ................... 5
Figure 3. Alternative 2 Study Area IP Habitat for Steelhead from Baseline to Year 20 ............................. 6
Figure 4. Alternative 3 Study Area IP Habitat for Chinook Salmon from Baseline to Year 20 ................... 7
Figure 5. Alternative 3 Study Area IP Habitat for Steelhead from Baseline to Year 20 ............................. 8
Figure 6. Alternative 2 Chinook Salmon IP Habitat in Stream Segment 5 (Upper EFSFSR
above Sugar Creek) from Baseline to Year 20 ........................................................................... 9
Figure 7. Alternative 2 Steelhead IP Habitat in the Stream Segment 5 (Upper EFSFSR above
Sugar Creek from Baseline to Year 20) .................................................................................... 10
Figure 8. Alternative 3 Chinook Salmon IP Habitat in the Stream Segment 5 (Upper EFSFSR
above Sugar Creek) from Baseline to Year 20 ......................................................................... 11
Figure 9. Steelhead IP Habitat in Stream Segment 3 (Upper EFSFSR above Sugar Creek)
Baseline to Year 20 ................................................................................................................... 12
Figure 10. Alternative 2 Stream Segment 1 (Upper EFSFSR above Sugar Creek and below
Meadow Creek) Intrinsic Potential Rating Results for Chinook Salmon during the Life
of the Mine (Baseline through Year 20) ................................................................................... 13
Figure 11. Alternative 2 Stream Segment 1 (Upper EFSFSR above Sugar Creek and below
Meadow Creek) Intrinsic Potential Rating Results for Steelhead during the Life of the
Mine (Baseline through Year 20).............................................................................................. 14
Figure 12. Alternative 3 Stream Segment 1 (Upper EFSFSR above Sugar Creek and below
Meadow Creek) IP Rating Results for Chinook Salmon during the Life of the Mine
(Baseline through Year 20) ....................................................................................................... 15
Figure 13. Alternative 3 Stream Segment 1 (Upper EFSFSR above Sugar Creek and below
Meadow Creek) IP Rating Results for Chinook Salmon during the Life of the Mine
(Baseline through Year 20) ....................................................................................................... 15
Figure 14. Alternative 2 Stream Segment 2 (Meadow Creek) Intrinsic Potential Rating Results
for Chinook Salmon during the Life of the Mine (Baseline through Year 20) ............................ 16
Figure 15. Alternative 2 Stream Segment 2 (Meadow Creek) Intrinsic Potential Rating Results
for Steelhead during the Life of the Mine (Baseline through Year 20) ...................................... 17
Figure 16. Alternative 3 Stream Segment 2 (Meadow Creek) Intrinsic Potential Rating Results
for Chinook Salmon during the Life of the Mine (Baseline through Year 20) ............................ 18
Figure 17. Alternative 3 Meadow Creek Intrinsic Potential Rating Results for Steelhead during
the Life of the Mine (Baseline through Year 20)........................................................................ 19
Figure 18. Alternative 2 Stream Segment 3 (Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek) Intrinsic
Potential Rating Results for Chinook Salmon during the Life of the Mine (Baseline
through Year 20)........................................................................................................................ 20
Figure 19. Alternative 2 Stream Segment 3 (Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek) Intrinsic
Potential Rating Results for Steelhead during the Life of the Mine (Baseline through
Year 20) ..................................................................................................................................... 21
Figure 20. Alternative 3 Stream Segment 3 (Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek) Intrinsic
Potential Rating Results for Chinook Salmon during the Life of the Mine (Baseline
through Year 20)........................................................................................................................ 22
Figure 21. Alternative 3 Stream Segment 3 (Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek) Intrinsic
Potential Rating Results for Steelhead during the Life of the Mine (Baseline through
Year 20) ..................................................................................................................................... 23

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | ii

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
IP MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD; ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

An Intrinsic Potential (IP) model for the Interior Columbia Basin spring and spring/summer
Chinook Salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) was
developed for the Stibnite Gold mine site study area, located in the headwaters of the Upper East
Fork South Fork of the Salmon River (EFSFSR) watershed (Ecosystem Sciences 2019a).
Following the same methodology and criteria of the baseline IP model (Ecosystem Sciences
2019a) and the Proposed Action (PA) IP model (Ecosystem Sciences 2019b), the Alternative 2
(modified PRO) and Alternative 3 (Upper EFSFSR TSF) IP models examine the physical
characteristics of stream reaches to assess the potential for supporting spawning and early
rearing habitat for the two species. The proposed action and alternatives models differ from the
baseline IP model in that several years of IP habitat is modeled for the two species, examining
how the mine activity would change the quantity and quality of spawning and early rearing habitat.
The life of the mine includes Year -2 through Year 20. Year -2 is the first year that stream
configuration changes occur. At Year 20, all streams are proposed to be recreated or enhanced
and are in their permanent location. Like the baseline model, the alternatives model builds off a
regionally derived model developed for the two species in the Interior Columbia Basin (Cooney
and Holzer 2006). The Stibnite Gold study area is located in the Interior Columbia Basin. The
Stibnite Gold study area baseline IP model employed shorter reaches (30 meters [m] versus
200m) and higher resolution data (1m derived LiDAR data versus 30m DEM) than the Cooney
and Holzer (2006) model. The alternatives models (proposed action, modified PRO, and Upper
EFSFSR TSF) retain much of the baseline model reaches, but changes to reaches (e.g., length,
sinuosity, slope) occur within the model timeframe due to mining activities and the proposed
stream channel re-creation and enhancement. Species specific IP ratings follow the
classifications defined by Cooney and Holzer 2006 (Table 1).
The Alternative 2 and Alternative 3 IP models’ study area matches the baseline and proposed
action IP (Alternative 1) models study area, which includes Sugar Creek and the Upper EFSFSR
above its confluence with Sugar Creek (Figure 1). Stream Functional Assessment (SFA) reach
information (name and if needed IP variables [e.g., bank full width, wetted width]) was attributed
to the 30-meter (m) segments (Rio ASE 2018) or replaced the 30m segments entirely. Re-creation
reaches replaced the 30m segments, while enhancement reaches retained and updated the
attributes of the 30m segments created during the baseline model. IP ratings were derived for all
perennial streams in the study area.
Like the other IP models, the Stibnite Gold Alternatives (2 and 3) IP models employ the same
variables as those used by Cooney and Holzer (2006): bank full width, wetted width, gradient (i.e.,
percent slope), and valley confinement (valley width/bank full width) (Table 1). The data for each
variable were either retained from the baseline model (no change to the 30m segment based on
mine activity) or provided by project proponent (e.g., wetted width, bank full width, valley bottom
width and slope) (Rio ASE 2019). Changes in yearly IP habitat lengths correspond to changes in
stream physical characteristics. Changes in stream physical characteristics correspond to
enhancement actions, stream restoration or re-creation, and flow changes due to mine activity
(e.g., filling Hangar Flats pit lake). The IP model is a categorical model in which thresholds per
variable indicate changes in IP habitat (Table 1) (Cooney and Holzer 2006).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 1

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
IP MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD; ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 1. Cooney and Holzer Categorical Intrinsic Potential (IP) Models for
Chinook Salmon and Steelhead
Note the correction to the table for Chinook salmon: wetted width was substituted for bankfull width and the called-out category was
corrected to 3.6m-25m, per NOAA Fisheries consultation. 1 Criteria that were modified based on consultation with NOAA Fisheries
are called out in red text.

Adapted from Cooney and Holzer (2006) “Table 7.-Relative potential for Interior Columbia
basin steelhead spawning and initial Rearing as a function of stream reach physical
characteristics.”
Valley Width Ratio
Stream Width/ Gradient Categories
(Ratio of valley width to bankfull stream width)
Bankfull Width Gradient Confined Moderate Wide
(≤4 x BF (> 20 x BF
(BF)
width) (4-20 x BF width) width)
BF < 3.8 m ≥0 None None None
0 - 0.5 None Medium Medium
0.5 - 4.0 Low High High
BF 3.8m to 25 m
4.0 - 7.0 None Low Low
> 7.0 None None None
0- 4.0 Low Medium Medium
BF 25 m to 50 m
> 4.0 None None None
BF> 50m ≥0 None Low Low
Adapted from Cooney and Holzer (2006) “Table 3- Relative potential for Interior Columbia
basin Spring/Summer Chinook salmon spawning and initial rearing as a function of stream
reach physical characteristics.”
Valley Width Ratio
Stream Width/ Gradient Categories
(Ratio of valley width to bankfull stream width)
Wetted Width Gradient Confined Moderate Wide
(≤4 x BF (> 20 x BF
(WW)
width) (4-20 x BF width) width)
WW < 3.6 m ≥0 None None None
0 - 0.5 Medium High High
0.5 - 1.5 Low Medium High
WW 3.6m to 25 m 1.5 - 4.0 Low Low Medium
4.0 - 7.0 Negligible Low Low
> 7.0 None None None
0 - 0.5 None Medium Medium
WW 25 m to 50 m 0.5 – 10 None None None
≥ 10 None None None
WW> 50m ≥0 None None None
*red items were modified from the original publication.

1 Johnna Sandow, NOAA Fisheries, personal consultation. The authors of the original table were consulted, and the
correction sent via Johnna Sandow to the ESA group.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 2

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
IP MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD; ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 1: Study Area Stibnite Gold Project Intrinsic Potential (IP) Model Domain (All Alternatives)

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-3

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
IP MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD; ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Alternative 2 and Alternative 3 IP results are summarized from mine site construction through
closure and reclamation (baseline, and Year -2 through Year 20, respectively) for the entire
Stibnite Gold Mine Site study area (HUC 12s—Headwaters of the EFSFSR and Sugar Creek)
(Figure 1). Additionally, IP results are summarized for several stream segments (1 through 6).
Stream Segment 5 includes the Upper EFSFSR upstream of its Sugar Creek confluence. Stream
segment 5 is further broken down into stream segment 1 (Upper EFSFSR from Sugar Creek to
the confluence with Meadow Creek), stream segment 2 (Meadow Creek drainage area), and
stream segment 3 (Upper EFSFSR above the confluence with Meadow Creek). Stream segment
6 describes the Sugar Creek drainage area. Stream segment 4 includes the modeled portion of
the EFSFSR downstream of its confluence with Sugar Creek. A map and description of the stream
segments can be found in Appendix A.
Results are presented as the length (m) of IP habitat per year and the percent change from
baseline conditions for each year. For Chinook salmon the habitat is rated as high, medium, low,
and negligible. For steelhead the habitat is rated as high, medium, and low. None means the
habitat is not useable for the species for spawning and early rearing. Percent change per mine
year is based on the difference between that year and baseline conditions (% Change = [Year 20
– Baseline]/Baseline). Useable habitat is defined as all IP classes except none.

2.1 ALTERNATIVE 2 (MODIFIED PRO) STUDY AREA RESULTS

Under the Alternative 2 scenario, Chinook salmon’s useable habitat would decrease 5 percent
over the life of the mine, a loss of over 1,500m (Table 2). High rated IP habitat would increase 19
percent over the life of the mine (Table 2). This increase in high-rated IP habitat is offset by large
losses in Medium and Negligible-rated habitat (Table 2). Reductions in Chinook salmon IP habitat
occur in Year -2 (stream segment 2—Meadow Creek diversions), EFSFSR Tunnel operation
(stream segment 1) (year -1 – 12) and during the filling of Hangar Flats pit lake (stream segment
2) (Year 13 – 20) (Figure 2).

Table 2. Alternative 2 Study Area Comparison of Chinook Salmon IP Habitat Baseline

to Year 20 (%Change = [Year 20 – Baseline]/Baseline)

Baseline Length Year 20 Length

IP Rating Loss/Gain % Change
(m) (m)
High 838.8 994.5 155.7 18.6
Medium 7,287.3 5,700.5 -1,586.8 -21.8
Low 8,744.4 9,997.4 1,253.0 14.3
Negligible 1,739.7 989.8 -750.0 -43.1
None 94,594.5 96,128.8 1,534.3 1.6
Useable 18,610.3 17,682.2 -928.1 -5.0

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-4

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
IP MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD; ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

20000
18000
16000
Intrinsic Potential (m)

14000
12000
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
0

Mine Life Year

Negligible Low Medium High

STUDY AREA

Figure 2. Alternative 2 Study Area IP Habitat for Chinook Salmon from Baseline to Year 20

Under the Alternative 2 scenario, Steelhead useable habitat would increase 12.7 percent over the
life of the mine, a gain of over 2,250m (Table 3). The length of high and medium-rated stream
segments would increase over the life of the mine, while the length of low-rated segments would
decrease (Table 3). An increase in steelhead IP habitat would occur in years 12
(decommissioning of EFSFSR Tunnel—stream segment 1) and year 17 (Meadow Creek
DRSF/TSF re-creation—stream segment 2) (Figure 3).

Table 3. Alternative 2 Study Area Comparison of Steelhead IP Habitat Baseline to Year 20

(%Change = [Year 20 – Baseline]/Baseline)

Baseline Length Year 20 Length

IP Rating Loss/Gain % Change
(m) (m)

High 8042.5 11103.7 3061.3 38.1

Medium 601.6 2146.2 1544.6 256.8
Low 9254.2 6918.9 -2335.3 -25.2
None 95103.0 93642.2 -1460.8 -1.5
Useable 17898.3 20168.8 2270.6 12.7

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-5

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
IP MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD; ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

25,000

20,000
Intrinsic Potential (m)

15,000

10,000

5,000

Mine Life Year

Low Medium High

STUDY AREA
Figure 3. Alternative 2 Study Area IP Habitat for Steelhead from Baseline to Year 20

2.2 ALTERNATIVE 3 (UPPER EFSFSR TSF) STUDY AREA RESULTS

Chinook salmon useable habitat, under the Alternative 3 scenario, would decrease nearly
28 percent over the life of the mine, a loss of over 5,000m (Table 4). High and medium-rated IP
habitat would decrease 73 percent and 48 percent respectively, over the life of the mine (Table 2).
Reductions in Chinook salmon IP habitat would occur in years negative 2 (diversions in the Upper
EFSFSR above Meadow Creek—stream segment 3), EFSFSR Tunnel operation (stream
segment 1) (Year -1 to 12), during the filling of Hangar Flats pit lake (Year 13 to 17) (stream
segment 2), and the loss of SFA reaches HL1 and HL2 due to Hangar Lake filling (Years 17 to 20)
(stream segment 2) (Figure 4).

Table 4. Alternative 3 Study Area Comparison of Chinook Salmon IP Habitat Baseline to Year 20
(% Change = [Year 20 – Baseline]/Baseline)

Baseline Length Year 20 Length

IP Rating Loss/Gain % Change
(m) (m)

High 838.8 224.5 -614.3 -73.2

Medium 7,287.3 3,798.0 -3,489.3 -47.9
Low 8,744.4 8,666.3 -78.1 -0.9
Negligible 1,739.7 749.8 -990.0 -56.9
None 94,594.5 99,824.8 5,230.3 5.5
Useable 18,610.3 13,438.6 -5,171.7 -27.8

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-6

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
IP MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD; ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

20000
18000
16000
Intrinsic Potential (m)

14000
12000
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
0

Mine Life Year

Negligible Low Medium High

STUDY AREA

Figure 4. Alternative 3 Study Area IP Habitat for Chinook Salmon from Baseline to Year 20

Under the Alternative 3 scenario, steelhead useable habitat would increase 0.4 percent over the
life of the mine, a gain of 73m (Table 5). The length of high-rated stream segments would increase
(26 percent) over the life of the mine, while the length of medium and low rated segments would
decrease (57 percent and 18 percent respectively) (Table 5). An increase in steelhead IP habitat
would occur in years 12 (decommissioning of EFSFSR Tunnel—stream segment 1) and year 17
(Upper EFSFSR re-creation on filled TSF—stream segment 3) (Figure 5).

Table 5. Alternative 3 Study Area Comparison of Steelhead IP Habitat Baseline to Year 20

(% Change = [Year 20 – Baseline]/Baseline)

Baseline Length Year 20 Length

IP Rating Loss/Gain % Change
(m) (m)

High 8,042.5 10,155.5 2,113.1 26.3

Medium 601.6 259.2 -342.4 -56.9
Low 9,254.2 7,556.9 -1,697.3 -18.3
None 95,103.0 95,291.8 188.8 0.2
Useable 17,898.3 17,971.6 73.3 0.4

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-7

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
IP MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD; ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

20,000
18,000
16,000
Stream Length (m)

14,000
12,000
10,000
8,000
6,000
4,000
2,000
0

Mine Life Year

Low Medium High

STUDY AREA
Figure 5. Alternative 3 Study Area IP Habitat for Steelhead from Baseline to Year 20

2.3 ALTERNATIVE 2 (MODIFIED PRO) STREAM SEGMENT 5 - UPPER EFSFSR

ABOVE SUGAR CREEK RESULTS
Under Alternative 2, the Upper EFSFSR above Sugar Creek would experience changes in
Chinook salmon and steelhead IP habitat during mining activities (Figure 6). Declines in Chinook
salmon useable habitat would occur in Year -2 (stream segment 2—Meadow Creek DRSF/TSF
diversions), Year -1 (stream segment 1—EFSFSR tunnel in operation), and Year 16 to 19
(streamflow declines while Hangar Flats pit lake fills—stream segment 2) (Figure 6). In Year 20,
once flows in Meadow Creek stabilize, Chinook salmon’s usable habitat would increase slightly
over previous years (Figure 3). Overall, Chinook salmon habitat in stream segment 5 (Upper
EFSFSR above Sugar Creek) would decline 7.9 percent over the life of the mine; a loss of roughly
900m (Figure 6).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-8

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
IP MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD; ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Upper EFSFSR HL1 & HL2

12000 Meadow Creek
reclaimed full flow
TSF/DRSF
10000 Hangar Flats
Lake filling
Stream Length (m)

EFSFSR tunnel in operation

8000

6000

4000

2000

Mine Life Year

Negligible Low Medium High

STREAM SEGMENT 5 - UPPER EFSFSR ABOVE SUGAR

CREEK

Figure 6. Alternative 2 Chinook Salmon IP Habitat in Stream Segment 5

(Upper EFSFSR above Sugar Creek) from Baseline to Year 20

Under Alternative 2, steelhead habitat in stream segment 5 (Upper EFSFSR above Sugar Creek)
would experience changes during mining activities (Figure 7). Declines in steelhead IP habitat
would occur in conjunction with Chinook salmon habitat declines; in Year -2 (stream segment 2—
Meadow Creek DRSF/TSF diversions), Year -1 (stream segment 1—EFSFSR tunnel in
operation), and Year 13 to 17 prior to re-creation of the TRSF/DRSF (Figure 7). Unlike Chinook
salmon, stream re-creation and enhancements would improve stream conditions for steelhead in
stream segment 5 (Upper EFSFSR above Sugar Creek), resulting in an overall gain in useable
habitat. The re-creation of the EFSFSR through the filled YPP (stream segment 1) (Year 12) and
Meadow Creek (stream segment 2) on the DRSF/TSF (Years 17 to 20) would result in a
23.5 percent increase in useable steelhead habitat, an increase of 2,270m of habitat (Figure 7).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-9

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
IP MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD; ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

14,000 Upper ESFSFSR

reclaimed on TSF/DRSF
Meadow Creek Upper EFSFSR
12,000 reclaimed
TSF/DRSF

10,000
Stream Length (m)

8,000 EFSFSR tunnel in operation

6,000

4,000

2,000

Mine Life Year

Low Medium High
STREAM SEGMENT 2 - UPPER EFSFSR ABOVE SUGAR
CREEK

Figure 7. Alternative 2 Steelhead IP Habitat in the Stream Segment 5

(Upper EFSFSR above Sugar Creek from Baseline to Year 20)

2.4 ALTERNATIVE 3 (UPPER EFSFSR TSF) STREAM SEGMENT 5 - UPPER

EFSFSR ABOVE SUGAR CREEK RESULTS
Based on the Alternative 3 scenario, stream segment 5 (Upper EFSFSR above Sugar Creek)
would experience changes in Chinook salmon IP habitat during mining activities (Figure 8).
Declines in Chinook salmon’s useable habitat would occur in Year -2 (stream segment 3—Upper
EFSFSR above Meadow Creek TSF diversions) and Year -1 (stream segment 1—Upper EFSFSR
tunnel in operation) through year 12 (Figure 8). Post EFSFSR tunnel closure, in year 12, there
would be a slight increase to Chinook salmon habitat due to re-creation of the EFSFSR on the
filled YPP. The overall increase is variable due to streamflow changes associated with Hangar
Lakes filling (i.e., wetted width declines below 3.6m threshold for Chinook salmon useable habitat)
(Figure 8). In year 17, SFA reaches HL1 and HL2 would be lost due rerouting of Meadow Creek
into Hangar Flats Lake, which would result in a loss of Chinook salmon’s usable habitat in stream
segment 5 (Figure 8). Overall, Chinook salmon habitat in stream segment 5 (Upper EFSFSR
above Sugar Creek would decline 45 percent over the life of the mine; a loss of over 5,170m.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-10

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
IP MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD; ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Upper EFSFSR TSF/DRSF

Upper EFSFSR
reclaimed

Hangar Flats
Lake filling
HL1 and HL2
EFSFSR tunnel in operation decommissioned

Figure 8. Alternative 3 Chinook Salmon IP Habitat in the Stream Segment 5

(Upper EFSFSR above Sugar Creek) from Baseline to Year 20

The Alternative 3 scenario would induce changes to steelhead habitat in stream segment 5 (Upper
EFSFSR above Sugar Creek) due to mining activities (Figure 9). Declines in steelhead IP habitat
would occur in Year -2 (stream segment 3—Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek TSF
diversions) and Year -1 (stream segment 1—EFSFSR tunnel in operation) through Year 12
(Figure 9). Post EFSFSR tunnel closure in Year 12 to 17, steelhead habitat would increase due
to re-creation of the EFSFSR on the filled YPP. In Year 17, the Upper EFSFSR above Meadow
Creek would be restored on top of the TSF. The restoration of Meadow Creek on top of the TSF
would result in an increase in steelhead usable habitat in stream segment 5 (Figure 9). Stream
re-creation and enhancements would improve conditions for steelhead in the Upper EFSFSR
above Sugar Creek (stream segment 5), resulting in an overall gain in useable habitat. The re-
creation of the EFSFSR through the filled YPP (Year 12) and Upper EFSFSR above Meadow
Creek on the TSF (Years 17 – 20) would result in an 0.8 percent increase in useable steelhead
habitat, an increase of over 73m (Figure 9).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-11

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
IP MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD; ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Upper EFSFSR Upper EFSFSR

Upper EFSFSR TSF/DRSF reclaimed reclaimed on TSF/DRSF

EFSFSR tunnel in operation

Figure 9. Steelhead IP Habitat in Stream Segment 3

(Upper EFSFSR above Sugar Creek) Baseline to Year 20

2.5 ALTERNATIVE 2 (MODIFIED PRO) STREAM SEGMENT 1 - UPPER EFSFSR

ABOVE SUGAR CREEK AND BELOW MEADOW CREEK RESULTS
Chinook salmon and steelhead IP habitat changes in stream segment 1 (Upper EFSFSR,
upstream of the confluence with Sugar Creek and downstream of Meadow Creek) are tied to the
EFSFSR Tunnel (Year -1 to 12) and the recreation of the EFSFSR on the filled YPP (Year 12
to 20) (Figures 10 and 11).
Overall, under Alternative 2 useable Chinook salmon IP habitat would increase in stream
segment 1 (i.e., Upper EFSFSR upstream of Sugar Creek and downstream of Meadow Creek).
Specifically, useable Chinook salmon IP habitat would increase 18 percent over baseline
conditions in stream segment 1, an increase of over 700m (Figure 10).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-12

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
IP MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD; ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

5000
4500
4000
Stream Length (m)

3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0

Mine Life Year

Negligible Low Medium High

STREAM SEGMENT 1 - UPPER EFSFSR ABOVE SUGAR

CREEK AND BELOW MEADOW CREEK
Figure 10. Alternative 2 Stream Segment 1 (Upper EFSFSR above Sugar Creek and below Meadow
Creek) Intrinsic Potential Rating Results for Chinook Salmon during the Life of the Mine
(Baseline through Year 20)

The quantity and quality of steelhead habitat in stream segment 1 (Upper EFSFSR upstream of
the confluence with Sugar Creek and downstream of Meadow Creek), under the Alternative 2
scenario, would change during mining activities (Figure 11). Following enhancement in stream
segment 1 in Year -1, high-rated IP habitat would increase by nearly 1,500m (Figure 11). Overall,
the re-creation of the EFSFSR on the filled YPP (Year 12) would equate to a 56 percent increase
in usable steelhead habitat, an increase of approximately 1,650m over baseline conditions in the
stream segment 1 (Upper EFSFSR above Sugar Creek and below Meadow Creek) (Figure 11).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-13

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
IP MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD; ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

5,000
4,500
4,000
Stream Length (m)

3,500
3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0

Mine Life Year

Low Medium High

STREAM SEGMENT 1 - UPPER EFSFSR ABOVE SUGAR

CREEK AND BELOW MEADOW CREEK

Figure 11. Alternative 2 Stream Segment 1 (Upper EFSFSR above Sugar Creek and below Meadow
Creek) Intrinsic Potential Rating Results for Steelhead during the Life of the Mine
(Baseline through Year 20)

2.6 ALTERNATIVE 3 (UPPER EFSFSR TSF) STREAM SEGMENT 1 - UPPER

EFSFSR ABOVE SUGAR CREEK AND BELOW MEADOW CREEK RESULTS
Under Alternative 3, useable Chinook salmon IP habitat would increase, in the Upper EFSFSR
upstream of Sugar Creek and downstream of Meadow Creek, 18 percent over baseline
conditions, an increase of over 720m (Figure 12).
The quantity and quality of steelhead habitat in the Upper EFSFSR upstream of the confluence
with Sugar Creek and downstream of Meadow Creek, under the Alternative 3 scenario, would
change during mining activities (Figure 13). Following enhancement of the Upper EFSFSR in
stream segment 1 (EFSFSR above Sugar Creek and below Meadow Creek) in Year -1, high-rated
IP habitat would increase by nearly 1,500m (Figure 13). Following the re-creation of the EFSFSR
on the filled YPP (Year 12), useable IP would increase 1,650m over baseline conditions in stream
segment 1 (Upper EFSFSR above Sugar Creek and below Meadow Creek), a 56 percent increase
(Figure 13).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-14

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
IP MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD; ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

5000
4500
4000
Stream Length (m)

3500
3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0

Mine Life Year

Neglible Low Medium High

STREAM SEGMENT 1 - UPPER EFSFSR ABOVE SUGAR

CREEK AND BELOW MEADOW CREEK

Figure 12. Alternative 3 Stream Segment 1 (Upper EFSFSR above Sugar Creek and below Meadow
Creek) IP Rating Results for Chinook Salmon during the Life of the Mine
(Baseline through Year 20)

5,000
4,500
4,000
Stream Length (m)

3,500
3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0

Mine Life Year

Low Medium High

STREAM SEGMENT 1 - UPPER EFSFSR ABOVE SUGAR

CREEK AND BELOW MEADOW CREEK

Figure 13. Alternative 3 Stream Segment 1 (Upper EFSFSR above Sugar Creek and below Meadow
Creek) IP Rating Results for Chinook Salmon during the Life of the Mine
(Baseline through Year 20)

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-15

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
IP MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD; ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

2.7 ALTERNATIVE 2 (MODIFIED PRO) STREAM SEGMENT 2 - MEADOW CREEK

RESULTS
Under Alternative 2, stream segment 2 (Meadow Creek) would lose nearly 38 percent of useable
Chinook salmon habitat during the life of the mine, a loss of over 1,600m (Figure 14). Two events
would impact Chinook salmon IP habitat in Meadow Creek (stream segment 2) under the
Alternative 2 scenario: the diversions around the DRSF/TSF (Year -2) and the flow fluctuations
during the filling of Hangar Flats pit lake (Years 13 to 19) (Figure 14).

4500
4000
MC4.2,
3500
Intrinsic Potential (m)

Meadow Creek HL1, HL2

3000 TSF/DRSF full flow

2500 Low flow in

2000 MC4.1 & HL1

1500 Hangar Flats

1000 Lake filling

500
0

Mine Life Year

Negligible Low Medium High

STREAM SEGMENT 2 - MEADOW CREEK

Figure 14. Alternative 2 Stream Segment 2 (Meadow Creek) Intrinsic Potential Rating Results for
Chinook Salmon during the Life of the Mine (Baseline through Year 20)

Steelhead IP habitat in stream segment 2, under Alt 2, would experience an initial decrease due
to the loss of stream habitat on the DRSF/TSF (Year -2) (Figure 15). Steelhead habitat would
remain relatively consistent within Meadow Creek from years negative 2 to 16 (Figure 15). In
Year 17, with the reclamation of Meadow Creek on the DRSF/TSF, useable steelhead habitat
would increase by over 700m in stream segment 2 above baseline conditions, a 16 percent
increase (Figure 15). However, the reclaimed portions of Meadow Creek on top of the TSF would
not have any volitional passage.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-16

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
IP MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD; ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

5,000 Meadow Creek

reclaimed on TSF/DRSF
4,500
4,000
Meadow Creek
Stream Length (m)

3,500
TSF/DRSF
3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0

Mine Life Year

Low Medium High

STREAM SEGEMNT 2 - MEADOW CREEK

Figure 15. Alternative 2 Stream Segment 2 (Meadow Creek) Intrinsic Potential Rating Results for
Steelhead during the Life of the Mine (Baseline through Year 20)

2.8 ALTERNATIVE 3 (UPPER EFSFSR TSF) STREAM SEGMENT 2 - MEADOW

CREEK RESULTS
Under Alternative 3, stream segment 2 would lose nearly 83 percent of useable Chinook salmon
habitat, a loss of over 3,000m (Figure 16). Streamflow alterations beginning in Year -2, equating
to wetted width decreases, would limit Chinook salmon IP habitat in stream segment 2 (Meadow
Creek) (Rio ASE 2019—Alternative 3 data) (Figure 16). Flow fluctuations associated with the
filling of Hangar Lake (Years 13 to 17) cause further Chinook salmon useable IP habitat reductions
in stream segment 2 (Figure 16). Finally, the loss of SFA reaches HL1 and HL2 due to rerouting
of Meadow Creek into Hangar Flats Lake in Year 17 would further limit the available useable
Chinook salmon IP habitat in Meadow Creek (stream segment 2) (Figure 16).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-17

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
IP MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD; ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

4500
4000
3500
Intrinsic Potential (m)

3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0

Mine Life Year

Negligible Low Medium High

STREAM SEGMENT 2 - MEADOW CREEK

Figure 16. Alternative 3 Stream Segment 2 (Meadow Creek) Intrinsic Potential Rating Results for
Chinook Salmon during the Life of the Mine (Baseline through Year 20)

Steelhead habitat would decrease in stream segment 2 (Meadow Creek) under Alternative 3. In
stream segment 2, from Year -2 to Year 16 (Figure 17), steelhead IP habitat would remain
relatively consistent. Once Hangar Lake is filled in Year 17, useable steelhead habitat would
decrease roughly 1,200m (33 percent) in Meadow Creek from baseline conditions (Figure 17).
This loss would be primarily associated with HL1 and HL2 being decommissioned and Meadow
Creek being routed into Hangar Flats lake.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-18

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
IP MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD; ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

4,000

3,500
Intrinsic Potential (m)

3,000

2,500

2,000

1,500

1,000

500

Mine Life Year

Low Medium High

STREAM SEGMENT 2 - MEADOW CREEK

Figure 17. Alternative 3 Meadow Creek Intrinsic Potential Rating Results for Steelhead
during the Life of the Mine (Baseline through Year 20)

2.9 ALTERNATIVE 2 (MODIFIED PRO) STREAM SEGMENT 3 - UPPER EFSFSR

ABOVE MEADOW CREEK RESULTS
Under Alternative 2, mine activities would not impact the stream segment 3 (Upper EFSFSR
above Meadow Creek) as much as other stream segments; habitat would be almost unchanged.
The only event that would affect habitat for the two species in stream segment 3 is the
enhancement of SFA reach EF1. EF1 is a 570m reach extending upstream from the confluence
with Meadow Creek. Enhancement would not change the slope of the 30 segments in the reach;
therefore, changes to IP habitat for both species would be minimal (Figures 18 and 19).
Under Alternative 2 scenario, there would be no change in usable habitat for Chinook salmon in
stream segment 3, only a shift in habitat classification; 105m of medium habitat would be reduced
to low in Year -1 (Figure 18). This 105m change would remain in year 20.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-19

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
IP MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD; ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

3500

3000
Intrinsic Potential (m)

2500

2000

1500

1000

500

Mine Life Year

Negligble Low Medium High
STREAM SEGMENT 3 - UPPER EFSFSR ABOVE MEADOW
CREEK

Figure 18. Alternative 2 Stream Segment 3 (Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek) Intrinsic
Potential Rating Results for Chinook Salmon during the Life of the Mine
(Baseline through Year 20)

Under Alternative 2, Steelhead IP habitat in stream segment 3 (Upper EFSFSR above Meadow
Creek) would experience a slight decrease in habitat as 90m of low-rated habitat would be
changed to “none” in Year -1 (Figure 19). This loss of low rated IP habitat would result in a
4 percent decrease in useable steelhead IP habitat in stream segment 3 (Upper EFSFSR above
Meadow Creek) (Figure 19).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-20

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
IP MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD; ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

3,500

3,000
Intrinsic Potential (m)

2,500

2,000

1,500

1,000

500

Mine Life Year

Low Medium High
STREAM SEGMENT 3 - UPPER EFSFSR ABOVE MEADOW
CREEK

Figure 19. Alternative 2 Stream Segment 3 (Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek) Intrinsic
Potential Rating Results for Steelhead during the Life of the Mine
(Baseline through Year 20)

The cause of these slight shifts in IP habitat for the two species is the enhancement design’s
average bank full width for SFA reach EF1 (Rio ASE 2018). The enhancement design for SFA
Reach EF1 has an average bank full width of 5.3 (Rio ASE 2018), which is roughly 0.3m more
than the baseline bank full width (Ecosystem Sciences 2019a). Applying this bank full measure
changes the Valley Width Ratio to below 4.0 (Table 1) for several of the enhanced 30m segments
of EF1 initiating shifts in IP habitat classifications for the two species.

2.10 ALTERNATIVE 3 (UPPER EFSFSR TSF) STREAM SEGMENT 3 - UPPER

EFSFSR ABOVE MEADOW CREEK RESULTS
Alternative 3 mine activities impact stream segment 3 (Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek)
considerably, as the TSF is proposed to be constructed in the drainage. To accommodate the
TSF, portions of the Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek (stream segment 3) would be diverted
for much of the life of the mine (Years -2 to 17) (Figures 20 and 21). The Upper EFSFSR above
Meadow Creek would experience enhancement in Year -1, which would alter IP habitat
classifications for the two species. Re-creation of the Upper EFSFSR through stream segment 3,
in Year 17 would impact Chinook salmon IP habitat more than steelhead IP habitat (Figures 20
and 21). Streamflow projections indicate that wetted widths in the restored portions of the Upper
EFSFSR above Meadow Creek would be insufficient to support Chinook salmon spawning and
early rearing habitat (Rio ASE 2019 – Alternative 3 data, Cooney and Holzer 2006).
Under Alternative 3, stream segment 3 (Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek) would lose nearly
76 percent of its useable Chinook salmon habitat, a loss of over 2,700m (Figure 20). As
mentioned above diversions (Year -2 to Year 17) and insufficient streamflow (post re-creation—

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-21

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
IP MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD; ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Year 17 to Year 20), equate to wetted width decreases, limit Chinook salmon IP habitat in stream
segment 3 (Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek) (Rio ASE 2019 – Alternative 3 data)
(Figure 20).

3500

3000
Intrinsic Potential (m)

2500

2000 Upper EFSFSR

TSF/DRSF
1500

1000

500

Mine Life Year

Negligble Low Medium High
STREAM SEGMENT 3 - UPPER EFSFSR ABOVE MEADOW
CREEK

Figure 20. Alternative 3 Stream Segment 3 (Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek) Intrinsic
Potential Rating Results for Chinook Salmon during the Life of the Mine
(Baseline through Year 20)

Steelhead IP habitat in stream segment 3 (Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek) would
decrease 334m over the life of the mine under Alternative 3, an 11.3 percent decrease over
baseline conditions (Figure 21). Re-creation of the Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek (stream
segment 3) increases the extent steelhead IP habitat, in the stream segment over previous mine
years, but not over baseline condition (Figure 21). Diversions in support of the TSF limit steelhead
IP habitat in Year -2 through Year 17 (Figure 21). Following recreation of the Upper EFSFSR on
the TSF in stream segment 3, the amount of useable steelhead IP habitat increases yet less than
baseline conditions (Figure 21). However, the reclaimed Upper EFSFSR on top of the TSF would
not have volitional passage.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-22

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
IP MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD; ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

3,500
Upper ESFSFSR
3,000 reclaimed on TSF/DRSF
Intrinsic Potential (m)

2,500

2,000
Upper EFSFSR
1,500 TSF/DRSF

1,000

500

Mine Life Year

Low Medium High

STREAM SEGMENT 3 - UPPER EFSFSR ABOVE MEADOW

CREEK
Figure 21. Alternative 3 Stream Segment 3 (Upper EFSFSR above Meadow Creek) Intrinsic
Potential Rating Results for Steelhead during the Life of the Mine
(Baseline through Year 20)

Overall, at the end of the life of the mine, once all streams are in their final location, Alternative 2
would provide greater quantity and quality of IP habitat for Chinook salmon and steelhead than
Alternative 3 (Tables 6 and 7). In terms of Chinook salmon, Alternative 2 would provide roughly
4,244m more usable IP habitat than under the Alternative 3 scenario (Table 6). Alternative 2 mine
and stream recreation/enhancement actions would result in an additional 770m of high-rated IP
habitat, 1,903m more medium-rated habitat, an additional 1,331m of low-rated habitat, and an
additional 240m of negligible-rated IP habitat than Alternative 3 (Table 6).

Table 6. Comparison of change in Chinook salmon IP habitat between Alternative 2 and

Alternative 3.

Alt 2 Alt 3 Alt 2 – Alt 3

Chinook IP Baseline (m)
Year 20 (m) Year 20 (m) Difference (m)
High 838.8 994.5 224.5 770.0
Medium 7287.3 5700.5 3798 1,902.5
Low 8744.4 9997.4 8666.3 1,331.1
Negligible 1739.7 989.8 749.8 240.0
Useable 18610.3 17682.2 13438.6 4,243.6

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-23

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
IP MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD; ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Similar to Chinook salmon, Alternative 2 would provide more usable steelhead IP habitat (1,488m)
than Alternative 3 (Table 7). Alternative 2 would provide a greater extent of high and medium
rated IP habitat (Table 7). Alternative 3 would provide a greater extent of low-rated IP habitat
compared to Alternative 2, but the overall extent of usable IP habitat is less in Alternative 3
(Table 7). However, the reclaimed streams from each alternative on top of the TSF would not
have volitional passage.

Table 7. Comparison of change in steelhead IP habitat between Alternative 2 and Alternative 3

Alt 2 Alt 3 At2 – Alt 3

Steelhead IP Baseline
Year 20 Year 20 Difference
High 8042.5 11103.7 10155.5 948.2
Medium 601.6 2146.2 259.2 1,887.0
Low 9254.2 6918.9 7556.9 -638.0
Useable 17898.3 20168.8 17971.6 2,197.2

Cooney T., and Holzer, D.M. 2006. Appendix C: Interior Columbia Basin Stream Type Chinook
Salmon and Steelhead Populations: Habitat Intrinsic Potential Analysis. Preliminary draft
of the viability criterias for Interior Columbia domain.
Ecosystem Sciences. 2019a. Existing Conditions Intrinsic Potential Model – Stibnite Gold Project.
Ecosystem Sciences. 2019b. Proposed Action Intrinsic Potential Model – Stibnite Gold Project.
Rio ASE. 2018. Draft Stream Design Report; Stibnite Gold Project Midas Gold Idaho, Inc.
Rio ASE. 2019. IP Model Baseflow SFA Summary 011719.xlsm.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-24

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
IP MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD; ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

APPENDIX A – STREAM SEGMENT DELINEATION AND DESCRIPTION

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
IP MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD; ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

This page intentionally left blank

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-26

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
IP MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD; ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-1

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
IP MODEL CHINOOK SALMON AND STEELHEAD; ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

• Stream segment 1 includes the Upper EFSFSR and its tributaries from its confluence
with Sugar Creek upstream to its confluence with Meadow Creek.
• Stream segment 2 includes the entirety of the Meadow Creek drainage area.
• Stream segment 3 includes the Upper EFSFSR and its tributaries upstream of its
confluence with Meadow Creek.
• Stream segment 4 includes the modeled portion of the Upper EFSFSR downstream of
its confluence with Sugar Creek.
• Stream segment 5 covers the entirety of the HUC 12 “Headwaters East Fork South Fork
Salmon River” (Figure 1). Stream segment 5 is the summation of stream segments 1, 2
and 3.
• Stream segment 6 includes the Sugar Creek drainage area, or the HUC 12 “Sugar Creek”
(Figure 1).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-2

 Appendix J-5: Chinook Salmon Streamflow/Productivity Technical
Memorandum

This TM was developed and finalized for the Draft EIS in December 2019. There may be differences in the data
presented in the figures and tables as compared to the Draft EIS
This page intentionally left blank.
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

CHINOOK SALMON
FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY
ANALYSIS
Technical Memorandum
Stibnite Gold Project, Idaho

December 2019

Ecosystem Sciences, LLC

Science . Planning . Design
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Technical Memorandum

Ecosystem Sciences
Science . Planning . Design

Ecosystem Sciences
202 N. 9th Street, Suite 400
Boise, ID 83702
T: 208.383.0226

Prepared for: AECOM

Project Title: Stibnite Gold Stibnite Project

Technical Memorandum
Subject: Chinook Salmon Flow-Productivity Analysis

Date: December 2019

To: AECOM

From: Ecosystem Sciences

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 1
2.0 METHODS ....................................................................................................................................... 2
3.0 MODEL RESULTS .......................................................................................................................... 5
3.1 ALTERNATIVE 1 ..................................................................................................................... 6
3.1.1 Stream Segment 1 ................................................................................................. 6
3.1.2 Stream Segment 2 ................................................................................................. 6
3.1.3 Stream Segment 3 ................................................................................................. 6
3.1.4 Stream Segment 6 ................................................................................................. 7
3.2 ALTERNATIVE 2 ................................................................................................................... 10
3.2.1 Stream Segment 1 ............................................................................................... 10
3.2.2 Stream Segment 2 ............................................................................................... 10
3.2.3 Stream Segment 3 ............................................................................................... 10
3.2.4 Stream Segment 6 ............................................................................................... 10
3.3 ALTERNATIVE 3 ................................................................................................................... 13
3.3.1 Stream Segment 1 ............................................................................................... 13
3.3.2 Stream Segment 2 ............................................................................................... 13
3.3.3 Stream Segment 3 ............................................................................................... 13
3.3.4 Stream Segment 6 ............................................................................................... 13
4.0 SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................... 16

LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A – NOAA Flow-Productivity Memorandum
Appendix B – Flow-Productivity Spreadsheet from NOAA
Appendix C – Monthly Change in Discharge Spreadsheet from Rio ASE

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | i

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Map of USGS Gage Sites and Location of MC-6 ........................................................................ 3
Figure 2. Histogram of Site-specific Changes in Chinook Productivity under Alternative 1 ....................... 9
Figure 4. Histogram of Site-specific Changes in Chinook Productivity under Alternative 3 ..................... 15
Figure 5. Histogram of Modeled Changes in Chinook Productivity for MC-6 under Alternatives
1, 2, and 3.................................................................................................................................. 17
Figure 6. Histogram of Modeled Changes in Chinook Productivity for EFSFSR near Stibnite
under Alternatives 1, 2, and 3 ................................................................................................... 18
Figure 7. Histogram of Modeled Changes in Chinook Productivity for EFSFSR Upstream of
Sugar Creek under Alternatives 1, 2, and 3 .............................................................................. 19
Figure 8. Histogram of Modeled changes in Chinook Productivity for EFSFSR Upstream of
Meadow Creek under Alternatives 1, 2, and 3 .......................................................................... 20
Figure 9. Histogram of Modeled Changes in Chinook Productivity for Sugar Creek under
Alternatives 1, 2, and 3 .............................................................................................................. 21
Figure 10. Histogram of Modeled Changes in Chinook Productivity for Meadow Creek under
Alternatives 1, 2, and 3 .............................................................................................................. 22

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Long-term (1929-2017) Average Monthly Discharge (in cubic feet per second [cfs]),
Location, and Watershed Area (square miles) at USGS Gaging Stations and One
SFA Reach (MC-6) where the Productivity Model was Applied to the Percent Change
in Monthly Flow Predicted to Occur as a Result of each Alternative .......................................... 4
Table 2. Flow-productivity Modeling Results for USGS Gaging Stations and SFA Reach MC-6
over the Life of the Mine and in Post-closure for Alternative 1. The Numbers
Represent Annual Percent Change in Productivity from Baseline. The Post-closure
Value Represents an Average Annual Percent Change in Productivity for Year 21
through Year 118 ......................................................................................................................... 8
Table 3. Flow-productivity Modeling Results for USGS Gaging Stations and SFA Reach MC-6
over the Life of the Mine and in Post-closure for Alternative 2. The Numbers
Represent Annual Percent Change in Productivity from Baseline. The Post-closure
Value Represents an Average Annual Percent Change in Productivity for Year 21
through Year 118 ....................................................................................................................... 11
Table 4. Flow-productivity Modeling Results for USGS Gaging Stations and SFA Reach MC-6
over the Life of the Mine and in Post-closure for Alternative 3. The Numbers
Represent Annual Percent Change in Productivity ................................................................... 14
Table 5. Difference in Modeled Chinook Percent Change in Productivity between Alternative 2
and Alternative 1 (Alternative 2 minus Alternative 1 Productivity Percent Change) ................. 23
Table 6. Difference in Modeled Chinook Percent Change in Productivity between Alternative 3
and Alternative 2 (Alternative 3 minus Alternative 2 Productivity Percent Change) ................. 24
Table 7. Difference in Modeled Chinook Percent Change in Productivity between Alternative 3
and Alternative 1 (Alternative 3 minus Alternative 1 Productivity Percent Change) ................. 25

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | ii

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS

cfs Cubic Feet per Second
EFSFSR East Fork of the South Fork of the Salmon River
ESU Evolutionary Significant Unit – a population of organisms that is considered distinct
for purposes of conservation
IP Intrinsic Potential – the reach-scale stream attributes (gradient, stream size, and
valley constraint) that influence availability of the fine-scale habitat features (e.g.,
pools, spawning gravel, and large wood) preferred by salmonids
MC-6 Stream Functional Assessment reach on Meadow Creek site in the Stibnite Gold
Project area
NMFS National Marine Fisheries Service
NOAA National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Project Stibnite Gold Project
SFA Stream Functional Assessment
SODA Spent Heap Leach Ore Disposal Area
TSF/DRSF Tailing Storage Facility/ Development Rock Storage Facility
USGS U.S. Geological Survey
YPP Yellow Pine Pit

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | iii

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

This page intentionally left blank

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | iv

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

To examine the effects of predicted flow changes associated with the Stibnite Gold Project
(project) on Snake River spring/summer-run Chinook salmon evolutionarily significant unit (ESU)
(Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), a flow-productivity model developed by the National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), was employed.
The NOAA model was developed based on detailed data collected in a nearby watershed. As it
was applied to this project, the flow-productivity model examines Chinook salmon productivity
based on predicted streamflow changes associated with each of the project’s alternatives in the
mine site area. The NOAA flow-productivity model’s methods, data employed, regression
equations, and other details are included in the October 9, 2018 memorandum from Jim Morrow
to Johnna Sandow (NOAA, 2018a). The memorandum states that flow during summer month may
be most critical for rearing Chinook salmon, and that flow during the fall/winter may also be
important (NOAA 2018a). The NOAA memorandum (Appendix A) was accompanied by a
spreadsheet (Appendix B) that contained the regression equations, and calculated the percent
change in productivity based on flow changes (NOAA 2018b).
The results of this analysis provide a tool to evaluate the likely impacts of flow modification that
would result from the project on Chinook salmon productivity. The output of this model is the
predicted percent change in productivity. This is not an absolute measure; rather, it provides a
relative measure of the effect of modified stream flows on Chinook salmon productivity under
each alternative.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 1

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

The regression equations used in the analysis were derived from detailed data collected on
Johnson Creek, a nearby watershed where Chinook salmon have been intensively monitored by
the Nez Perce Tribe. The flow-productivity relationships in the model reflect those that have been
observed on Johnson Creek. No such data exist in the project mine site; therefore, the Johnson
Creek model was applied to monthly percent change in flow at U.S. Geological Survey (USGS)
gage locations and one Stream Functional Assessment (SFA) reach (Meadow Creek: MC-6) in a
strategic location in the mine site (Table 1 and Figure 1). Each site represents all or part of a
stream segment depicted in Figure 1. A description of how to apply each site’s data to a
geographic area is described in Section 3.0.
Flow data were obtained from modeling data associated with the project and supplied to
Ecosystem Sciences by Rio ASE (Appendix C). The monthly percent change in flow from existing
conditions (Baseline) (based on the long-term record) for each mine year (Year -2 to Year 20)
were used in the analysis. For the post-closure mine years (Year 21 to Year 118), the mean
change in flow for each month over the post-closure period was used to represent this time period.
Therefore, the post-closure productivity is reduced to one value, rather than 97 values (Year 21
to Year 118). For each mine year, the 12-month period began in March (based on the March after-
spawning, brood year +1) and ended the following February (brood year +2). The reported change
in productivity is associated with the mine year in which the 12-month period begins.
The regression equations and final change in adult productivity (also referred to as whole life-
cycle productivity) were computed by adapting the flow data to the Johnson Creek Worksheet
supplied by NOAA1. The monthly percent change in flow from the long-term average 2 for each
mine year was used, while the annual flow change was not. The equations and computation of
change in annual productivity were not modified from the NOAA spreadsheet; only the percent
change in monthly flow was modified to fit the modeled changes in flow associated with the
project. The NOAA memorandum details changes in flow in certain months (e.g., July, August,
and October) that have a stronger relationship with whole life-cycle productivity than other
months; that annual flow can be used, and that the relationship is density-dependent. Estimating
the number of spawners in each reach of the mine site would be difficult to accurately produce.
Scaling the number of spawners based on the amount of Intrinsic Potential (IP) habitat of each
reach in relation to Johnson Creek was considered, but not employed. Rather than modify the
NOAA spreadsheet, and select only those months with the strongest relationships, all 12 months
were used. Therefore, the changes in productivity should be viewed as relative measures, not
precise estimates. One could interpret the results as how Johnson Creek would respond to the
predicted changes in the mine site for each project alternative, rather than an absolute measure
of mine site reach productivity changes.

1 Flow-productivity relationships were computed by using the equations and computations in

“20181009JohnsonFlowWorksheet.xlsx,” supplied by NOAA.
2 Percent change flow data were obtained from Rio ASE in a spreadsheet titled
“Modflow_Alternatives_Summary_08192019.xlsx,” which integrated the MODFLOW modeling data (Brown and
Caldwell, 2018; 2019) with the long-term monthly flow values for six USGS gaging stations and one SFA reach
(MC-6).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 2

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 1. Map of USGS Gage Sites and Location of MC-6

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 3

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 1: Long-term (1929-2017) Average Monthly Discharge (in cubic feet per second [cfs]), Location, and
Watershed Area (square miles) at USGS Gaging Stations and One SFA Reach (MC-6) where the Productivity Model
was Applied to the Percent Change in Monthly Flow Predicted to Occur as a Result of each Alternative

USGS Gage ID 13311250 13311000 13311450 13310800 13310850 N/A

Latitude 44.93476 44.90578 44.93566 44.90211 44.88955 44.900575
Longitude -115.33668 -115.32962 -115.3361 -115.32576 -115.36018 -115.329301
Watershed Area 24.07 19.28 17.94 9.06 5.66 10.09
Month EFSFSR US of SC EFSFSR DS of MC SC US of EFSFSR EFSFSR US of MC MC US of EFSFSR MC-6
January 9.9 8.0 6.5 3.5 2.3 4.2
February 9.5 7.7 6.4 3.3 1.9 3.8
Average Monthly Discarge

March 10.5 8.7 7.3 3.4 2.2 4.3

April 24.3 19.8 15.8 6.5 6.7 11.0
1929-2017

May 116.4 82.8 66.2 40.7 37.5 52.2

June 138.9 116.8 80.6 48.2 48.8 70.9
July 42.6 38.7 29.9 14.8 13.9 22.0
August 17.3 15.4 12.5 7.3 4.1 7.7
September 13.1 11.9 9.0 5.7 3.0 5.9
October 12.6 11.5 8.3 5.3 3.1 5.8
November 12.8 10.8 8.3 4.6 3.4 5.8
December 11.0 9.0 7.2 3.7 2.8 4.8

*Data from Rio ASE spreadsheet: Modflow_Alternatives_Summary_08192019.xlsx (Brown and Caldwell, 2018; 2019).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 4

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

The location of flow change calculation sites in the mine site and the mine site stream segments
should be considered in an interpretation of the results: mine site stream segments may contain
two flow sites, and the availability of habitat in those segments would vary depending on mine
year and alternative (for a description of the alternatives, refer to Chapter 3 of the EIS). These
sites may be predicted to change by various degrees (i.e., one may be predicted to increase,
while another may be predicted to decrease). For example, the Meadow Creek gage is upstream
of the Spent Heap Leach Ore Disposal Area (SODA) on Meadow Creek (Stream Segment 2); and
under Alternative 1 and Alternative 2, would be above the Tailing Storage Facility/ Development
Rock Storage Facility (TSF/DRSF); therefore, the predicted reductions in productivity would be
100 percent, because the TSF/DRSF would be a total barrier to upstream fish passage. In the
East Fork of the South Fork of the Salmon River (EFSFSR), the gage near Stibnite is at the
upstream boundary of the stream segment (Stream Segment 1), upstream of the Yellow Pine Pit
(YPP) and the bypass tunnel; while the EFSFSR upstream of Sugar Creek is downstream of these
two features (Stream Segment 1) (Figure 1). Under certain alternatives, Stream Segment 1 is
predicted to have increased flows at the top of the reach and decreased flows at the bottom of
the reach in the same month. The access, amount of spawning habitat, and number of spawning
fish all vary between sites and stream segments. However, the predicted change in productivity
provides a relative measure of the effect of modified streamflows on Chinook salmon productivity
under each alternative. It is also important to understand how flows in downstream reaches would
be experienced by juvenile migrants. Therefore, none of the flows or productivity estimates can
be viewed without placing juvenile migrants in the context of the greater mine site conditions.
Some general guidelines for the spatial application of productivity modeling results include:
1. The productivity analysis used was designed to represent the productivity of the Johnson
Creek watershed, a relatively unaltered watershed compared to the Headwaters of the
East Fork of the South Fork. It is also based on the number of spawning fish estimated to
exist in Johnson Creek (this is important because changes in productivity are density
dependent).
2. In Stream Segment 1 [Upper EFSFSR between Sugar Creek and Meadow Creek], the
EFSFSR upstream of the Sugar Creek USGS gage approximately represents flows
downstream of the YPP in this segment and the Upper EFSFSR at the site of Stibnite
represents the part of this stream segment that is upstream of the YPP. Due to the Rapid
Infiltration Basins, in certain mine years and alternatives, flows would be elevated at the
Stibnite site; while due to the dewatering of the YPP, flows would be reduced upstream of
the confluence with Sugar Creek.
3. In Meadow Creek, the Meadow Creek USGS Gage is where the TSF/DRSF would be
under Alternative 1 and Alternative 2. Therefore, the productivity would go to zero, based
on the slope of the face of the TSF preventing volitional fish passage. It roughly represents
the Upper Meadow Creek area, which would be in and upstream of the TSF/DRSF. The
MC-6 (SFA reach number) location approximately represents lower Meadow Creek
downstream of the TSF and upstream of the confluence with Upper EFSFSR (although
flows can vary in this reach due to groundwater pumping to dewater and then fill Hangar
Flats Pit during mine operations).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 5

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

4. The productivity estimates do not account for changes in quality or quantity of habitat, both
of which would change through the mine life. The analysis is based on changes in flow,
and assumes all other factors are held equal.
5. Changes in productivity are presented in percent change from existing conditions
(Baseline). The results are generally rounded to the nearest tenth of a percent for ease of
interpretation.
6. No measure of error in the estimates is provided. The R2, F-statistic, and P-values are
supplied in the NOAA memorandum (Appendix A).

3.1 ALTERNATIVE 1
3.1.1 Stream Segment 1
The model predicts Stream Segment 1 downstream of the YPP (represented by the EFSFSR
upstream of Sugar Creek USGS gage) would have an average productivity decline of
approximately 17.9 percent during the life of the mine (Table 2 and Figure 2). The average
change in productivity over the post-closure period would be 4.6 percent (Table 2). This reach
would also experience changes in available habitat under the Proposed Action (PA, or
Alternative 1).
Upstream of the YPP, represented by the EFSFSR at USGS Stibnite gage, the model predicts
this part of the stream segment would have increased productivity for much of the first half of the
mine life (Years 1 through 9, and Year 11); and would decrease the first two mine years and over
much of the second half of the mine life (Table 2: note that all changes in productivity are in
percent change from Baseline). Over the life of the mine, the average annual productivity would
decrease 2.8 percent (Table 2). Post-closure, the productivity would increase 2.3 percent. The
filling of the YPP and construction of a bypass tunnel, followed by a new channel being created
over the current YPP location, further complicate the changes in this stream segment’s
productivity.

3.1.2 Stream Segment 2

Under Alternative 1, the largest impacts to productivity (Table 2) would be in Meadow Creek
(Stream Segment 2, containing both the MC-6 site and the Meadow Creek site). The Meadow
Creek site would be within the footprint of the TSF/DRSF, and therefore, the productivity would
be reduced by 100 percent, because there would be no volitional fish passage to Upper Meadow
Creek. Lower Meadow Creek, represented by the MC-6 site, would have an average annual
decline of 24.9 percent over the life of the mine, with a maximum decrease of 50.8 percent. Post-
closure, the productivity would increase by 3.5 percent (Table 2 and Figure 2).

3.1.3 Stream Segment 3

The EFSFSR upstream of Meadow Creek (Stream Segment 3) is predicted to have an average
annual increase in productivity of 1.8 percent over the mine life, and remain largely unchanged
post-closure (Table 2 and Figure 2).

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 6

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

3.1.4 Stream Segment 6

Sugar Creek follows the pattern of the EFSFSR upstream of Sugar Creek, with increased
productivity in the first half of the mine life, and decreased productivity in the second half. The
average annual change in productivity would be a decrease of 1.9 percent, and an average annual
decrease of 4.9 percent post-closure (Table 2 and Figure 2).

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 7

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 2. Flow-productivity Modeling Results for USGS Gaging Stations and SFA Reach MC-6 over
the Life of the Mine and in Post-closure for Alternative 1. The Numbers Represent Annual Percent
Change in Productivity from Baseline. The Post-closure Value Represents an Average Annual
Percent Change in Productivity for Year 21 through Year 118

Alternative 1 Gage Location

13310800 13311250
Meadow
(EFSFSR 13311000 (EFSFSR 13311450
13310850 Creek at
Mine Year upstream (EFSFSR upstream (Sugar
(Meadow Creek) SFA Reach
of Meadow at Stibnite) of Sugar Creek)
MC-6
Creek) Creek)
-2 0.0 -7.2 -5.1 0.0 -100 -12.7
-1 0.4 -4.8 -9.2 1.6 -100 -16.2
1 1.5 6.9 -17.2 4.3 -100 -11.0
2 1.0 4.0 -18.0 2.0 -100 -9.2
3 1.6 6.5 -23.7 4.8 -100 -10.5
4 1.6 9.3 -21.7 3.9 -100 -9.1
5 2.1 15.9 -21.6 4.1 -100 -8.5
6 3.5 24.1 -20.1 4.2 -100 -15.0
7 5.9 31.6 -16.6 4.0 -100 -33.9
8 6.3 20.5 -17.0 3.6 -100 -38.4
9 5.2 3.8 -20.6 3.9 -100 -43.3
10 5.0 -1.2 -19.6 3.3 -100 -43.6
11 4.7 4.6 -15.9 4.9 -100 -41.1
12 2.8 -6.2 -19.4 -4.9 -100 -38.2
13 0.0 -34.3 -31.8 -12.8 -100 -49.6
14 -0.1 -36.0 -30.9 -11.1 -100 -50.8
15 -0.1 -31.2 -25.4 -9.5 -100 -42.9
16 -0.1 -24.5 -24.5 -10.5 -100 -41.1
17 -0.3 -21.3 -21.3 -10.1 -100 -35.6
18 -0.5 -16.1 -16.1 -8.9 -100 -26.5
19 0.5 -4.6 -4.6 -6.1 -100 -2.7
20 -0.2 -5.7 -5.7 -8.7 -100 3.3
Post-Closure -0.2 2.3 -4.6 -4.9 -100 3.5
Mine Life Max 6.3 31.6 -4.6 4.9 -100 3.5
Mine Life Mean 1.9 -2.8 -17.9 -1.9 -100 -24.9
Mine Life Min -0.5 -36.0 -31.8 -12.8 -100 -50.8

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 8

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 2. Histogram of Site-specific Changes in Chinook Productivity under Alternative 1

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 9

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

3.2 ALTERNATIVE 2
3.2.1 Stream Segment 1
The model predicts Stream Segment 1 downstream of the YPP (represented by the EFSFSR
upstream of Sugar Creek gage) would have an average productivity decline of 8.5 percent during
the life of the mine (Table 3 and Figure 3). There would be reductions in productivity from
Year -2 until Year 14, when productivity would be increased for the remainder of the life of the
mine. The average change in productivity over the post-closure period would be an increase of
3.4 percent. This reach would also experience changes in available habitat under this alternative.
Upstream of the YPP, represented by the EFSFSR at Stibnite USGS gage, the model predicts a
decrease in productivity for Years -2 and -1, followed by increased productivity for much of the
first half of the mine life (Years 1 through 12). Years 13 through 20 would have 2 years with
decreases, and 5 years of increases in productivity (Table 3). Over the life of the mine, the
average annual productivity would increase 7.5 percent. Post-closure, the productivity would
increase 4.0 percent. As noted previously, the filling of the YPP and construction of a bypass
tunnel, followed by a new channel being created over the current YPP location, further complicate
the changes in this stream segment’s productivity.

3.2.2 Stream Segment 2

Under Alternative 2, the largest impacts to productivity (Table 3 and Figure 3) would be in
Meadow Creek (Stream Segment 2, containing both the SFA reach MC-6 and the Meadow Creek
site). The Meadow Creek site would be within the footprint of the TSF/DRSF, and therefore, the
productivity would be reduced by 100 percent, because there would be no volitional fish passage
to Upper Meadow Creek. Lower Meadow Creek, represented by the MC-6 site, would have an
average annual decline of 16.5 percent over the life of the mine, with a maximum decrease of just
over 30.8 percent. There would be a decrease in productivity between Years -2 and 14.
Productivity would increase for Years 15 through 20. Post-closure, the productivity would increase
by 1.5 percent.

3.2.3 Stream Segment 3

The EFSFSR upstream of Meadow Creek (Stream Segment 3) would have increased productivity
throughout the mine life and post-closure under Alternative 2. It would have an average annual
increase in productivity of 4 percent over the mine life, and average annual increase in productivity
of 2.3 percent post-closure (Table 3 and Figure 3).

3.2.4 Stream Segment 6

Sugar Creek follows the pattern of the EFSFSR upstream of Sugar Creek gage with increased
productivity in the first half of the mine life, and decreases in the second half of the mine life
(Table 3 and Figure 3). The average annual change in productivity would be a decrease of
0.8 percent, with an average annual decrease of 2.5 percent post-closure.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 10

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 3. Flow-productivity Modeling Results for USGS Gaging Stations and SFA Reach MC-6
over the Life of the Mine and in Post-closure for Alternative 2. The Numbers Represent Annual
Percent Change in Productivity from Baseline. The Post-closure Value Represents an Average
Annual Percent Change in Productivity for Year 21 through Year 118

Alternative 2 Gage Location

13310800 13311250
Meadow
(EFSFSR 13311000 (EFSFSR 13311450 13310850
Creek at
Mine Year upstream (EFSFSR upstream (Sugar (Meadow
SFA Reach
of Meadow at Stibnite) of Sugar Creek) Creek)
MC-6
Creek) Creek)
-2 2.3 -5.4 -2.3 2.2 -100 -13.2
-1 2.9 -3.3 -8.1 3.7 -100 -25.0
1 4.2 9.5 -15.6 6.2 -100 -23.5
2 2.7 5.8 -16.5 3.3 -100 -22.1
3 4.1 9.5 -21.7 6.3 -100 -23.0
4 4.2 12.6 -19.6 5.3 -100 -22.2
5 4.8 19.8 -19.3 5.6 -100 -21.8
6 5.6 33.2 -16.6 4.9 -100 -22.4
7 8.1 45.1 -11.2 5.1 -100 -25.2
8 7.7 27.7 -13.3 4.8 -100 -27.0
9 6.4 8.3 -18.0 4.9 -100 -30.6
10 5.5 3.8 -16.6 1.8 -100 -30.9
11 6.2 11.7 -12.2 1.8 -100 -29.7
12 4.8 3.9 -10.1 -7.8 -100 -27.7
13 2.5 -12.5 -13.2 -11.1 -100 -27.3
14 1.6 -4.3 -4.8 -9.8 -100 -21.3
15 2.6 4.8 2.3 -7.7 -100 0.2
16 2.4 -18.4 2.2 -8.6 -100 0.4
17 2.1 4.2 4.2 -8.1 -100 3.7
18 1.3 2.1 2.1 -7.4 -100 0.2
19 2.8 6.7 6.7 -4.3 -100 3.7
20 2.2 3.0 3.0 -6.7 -100 2.3
Post-Closure 2.3 4.0 3.4 -2.5 -100 1.5
Mine Life Max 8.1 45.1 6.7 6.3 -100 3.7
Mine Life Mean 3.9 7.5 -8.5 -0.8 -100 -16.5
Mine Life Min 1.3 -18.4 -21.7 -11.1 -100 -30.9

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 11

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Percent Change in Chinook Productivity, Alt 2

60.00

40.00
PERCENT CHANGE IN PRODUCTIVITY

20.00

0.00

-20.00

-40.00

-60.00

-80.00

-100.00

-120.00

MINE LIFE YEAR

13310800 (EFSFSR above Meadow) 13311000 (EFSFSR at Stibnite)

13311250 (EFSFSR above Sugar) 13311450 (Sugar Creek)
13310850 (Meadow Creek) Meadow Creek MC-6

Figure 3. Histogram of Site-specific Changes in Chinook Productivity under Alternative 2

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 12

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

3.3 ALTERNATIVE 3
3.3.1 Stream Segment 1
The model predicts Stream Segment 1 downstream of the YPP (represented by the EFSFSR
upstream of Sugar Creek USGS gage) would have an average productivity decline of 16.3 percent
during the life of the mine (Table 4 and Figure 4). There would be reductions in productivity from
Year -2 until Year 17, when productivity would be increased for the remainder of the life of the
mine. This reach would also experience changes in available habitat under this alternative. The
average change in productivity over the post-closure period would be an increase of 4.0 percent.
Upstream of the YPP, represented by the EFSFSR at Stibnite USGS gage, the model predicts a
decrease in productivity for Years -2 and -1, followed by increased productivity for much of the
first half of the mine life (Years 1 through 8). Years 9 through 17 would have decreased
productivity before an increase in productivity for Years 18 through 20 (Table 4). Over the life of
the mine, the average annual productivity would decrease at this gage by 4.3 percent. Post-
closure, the productivity would decrease 4.3 percent. The filling of the YPP and construction of a
bypass tunnel, followed by a new channel being created over the current YPP location, further
complicate the changes in this stream segment’s productivity.

3.3.2 Stream Segment 2

Under Alternative 3, although the TSF/DRSF is not in Meadow Creek, there would still be impacts
to Lower Meadow Creek (Table 4 and Figure 4) due to the dewatering and subsequent filling of
the Hangar Flats Pit. In Years 1 through 5 and 18 through 20, productivity would increase between
1.5 and 6.8 percent, with productivity reductions in all other mine years, with a maximum reduction
of 53.2 percent. Post-closure productivity would increase by 4.8 percent. The Meadow Creek site
would not be within the footprint of the TSF/DRSF under Alternative 3, and therefore, the
productivity would be nearly unchanged from Baseline, with an average change in productivity of
0.8 percent.

3.3.3 Stream Segment 3

The EFSFSR upstream of Meadow Creek (Stream Segment 3) would have decreased
productivity for Years -2 through 12 under Alternative 3. Years 13 through 20, productivity would
be closer to Baseline (Table 4 and Figure 4). This site would have an average annual decrease
in productivity of 10.4 percent over the mine life, and an average annual increase in productivity
of 0.6 percent post-closure (Table 4).

3.3.4 Stream Segment 6

Sugar Creek follows the pattern of the EFSFSR upstream of the Sugar Creek USGS gage with
increased productivity in the first half of the mine life, and decreased productivity in the second
half of the mine life (Table 4 and Figure 4). The average annual change in productivity would be
a decrease of 1.8 percent, with an average annual decrease of 2.5 percent post-closure.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 13

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 4. Flow-productivity Modeling Results for USGS Gaging Stations and SFA Reach MC-6 over
the Life of the Mine and in Post-closure for Alternative 3. The Numbers Represent Annual Percent
Change in Productivity

Alternative 3 Gage Location

13310800 13311250
Meadow
(EFSFSR 13311000 (EFSFSR 13311450 13310850
Creek at
Mine Year upstream (EFSFSR upstream (Sugar (Meadow
SFA Reach
of Meadow at Stibnite) of Sugar Creek) Creek)
MC-6
Creek) Creek)
-2 -16.9 -11.2 -7.9 0.0 2.8 -5.7
-1 -16.9 -6.2 -10.3 0.0 2.5 -3.5
1 -20.3 1.4 -19.9 4.3 2.0 2.1
2 -15.4 0.9 -19.5 2.0 1.8 1.5
3 -19.7 0.9 -26.1 4.8 2.0 2.0
4 -19.1 3.5 -24.1 3.9 2.6 2.8
5 -19.3 9.5 -24.1 4.1 2.8 4.3
6 -18.4 17.1 -22.7 4.2 1.7 -5.0
7 -16.3 20.7 -20.4 4.0 1.2 -30.8
8 -15.3 8.9 -21.4 3.6 2.8 -37.8
9 -15.8 -4.9 -24.6 3.9 1.8 -43.3
10 -13.9 -7.7 -22.9 3.3 1.6 -43.7
11 -17.4 -5.2 -20.7 4.9 1.9 -40.6
12 -10.2 -11.5 -19.2 -4.9 2.0 -36.6
13 0.8 -36.3 -29.7 -12.8 -1.6 -52.8
14 1.7 -37.5 -28.3 -11.1 -1.2 -53.3
15 0.9 -34.1 -24.2 -9.5 -2.3 -46.5
16 -0.1 -18.4 -18.4 -10.5 -0.8 -41.0
17 1.7 -5.9 -5.9 -10.1 -0.5 -21.3
18 -0.3 2.3 2.3 -8.9 -1.7 2.7
19 1.5 7.1 7.1 -6.1 -1.2 6.8
20 0.1 2.9 2.9 -8.7 -0.8 4.2
Post-Closure 0.6 4.7 4.0 -2.5 -1.3 4.8
Mine Life Max 1.7 20.7 7.1 4.9 2.8 6.8
Mine Life Mean -10.4 -4.3 -16.3 -1.8 0.8 -18.7
Mine Life Min -20.3 -37.5 -29.7 -12.8 -2.3 -53.3

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 14

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Percent Change in Chinook Productivity, Alt 3

60.00

40.00
PERCENT CHANGE IN PRODUCTIVITY

20.00

0.00

-20.00

-40.00

-60.00

MINE LIFE YEAR

13310800 (EFSFSR above Meadow) 13311000 (EFSFSR at Stibnite)

13311250 (EFSFSR above Sugar) 13311450 (Sugar Creek)
13310850 (Meadow Creek) Meadow Creek MC-6

Figure 4. Histogram of Site-specific Changes in Chinook Productivity under Alternative 3

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 15

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Each alternative has effects on modeled productivity that vary in both space and time as a result
of predicted changes in discharge. The productivity estimates show that the flow changes
predicted to result from the proposed project and alternatives would likely change the productivity
of Chinook salmon in the project area. However, the analysis does not incorporate barriers,
habitat availability, water temperature, number of spawning fish, or other factors that affect
productivity. However, they provide a measure by which to assess the effects flow changes may
have on Chinook productivity.
To examine the modeled changes in Chinook productivity for each alternative throughout the mine
site, examine Tables 2 through 4 and Figures 2 through 4. To examine the modeled changes in
Chinook productivity among alternatives for a given stream segment, refer to Figures 5
through 10. These figures illustrate how the changes in flow would affect each site though time
and among alternatives.
To aid in comparison of the alternatives, the differences (subtraction) in percent change in
productivity (the values presented in Tables 2 through 4) were computed between each of the
alternatives (Tables 5 through 7). These differences illustrate the comparative impact of each
alternative on Chinook productivity. They are not formal comparisons for differences between
modeling results, but rather a comparative tool that aids in examination of the modeling results
tables; the discussion that follows should be viewed in that context.
When comparing Alternative 2 to Alternative 1 (Table 5), the differences are mainly positive (i.e.,
productivity would be higher under Alternative 2). The differences show that Alternative 2 has a
higher productivity (more positive values) when compared to Alternative 1 for all reaches except
for Lower Meadow Creek SFA reach MC-6 in Years -2 through 6 (Table 5). Consequently,
Alternative 2 would be better for Chinook productivity (positive differences in productivity in
Table 5) for all sites, based on average annual change in productivity during the mine life. Post-
closure, Chinook productivity would be higher at all sites except for Lower Meadow Creek SFA
reach MC-6 (-2.0 percent difference).
When comparing Alternative 3 to Alternative 2 (Table 6), Alternative 2 would have higher Chinook
productivity than Alternative 3 at all locations (negative differences from Table 6) except for Upper
Meadow Creek, because the TSF/DRSF would not be in that watershed.
When comparing Alternative 3 to Alternative 1 (Table 7), differences in productivity are more
variable than the other comparisons. Alternative 3 would be better for Upper Meadow Creek,
because the TSF/DRSF would be in the Upper EFSFSR watershed. However, it should be noted
that no sites are in the Upper EFSFSR watershed as there are in Meadow Creek; therefore, a
comparison site is missing.
The Chinook productivity analysis provides a tool for assessing the impacts of the PA
(Alternative 1) and the other alternatives on Chinook salmon. The analysis does not incorporate
habitat availability or quality into the productivity estimates; the estimates are solely based on flow
changes, and on data from Johnson Creek. They should be viewed as relative to each other, and
not absolute in nature. Comparisons between alternatives were made through arithmetic
differences in modeling results, and not through a statistical comparison, and therefore aid in the
interpretation of the results of the productivity modeling.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 16

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Percent Change in Chinook Productivity

Meadow Creek MC-6
60.00

40.00
PERCENT CHANGE IN PRODUCTIVITY

20.00

0.00

-20.00

-40.00

-60.00

MINE LIFE YEAR

Alt1 Alt2 Alt3

Figure 5. Histogram of Modeled Changes in Chinook Productivity for

MC-6 under Alternatives 1, 2, and 3

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 17

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Percent Change in Chinook Productivity

EFSFSR near Stibnite
60.00

40.00
PERCENT CHANGE IN PRODUCTIVITY

20.00

0.00

-20.00

-40.00

-60.00

MINE LIFE YEAR

Alt1 Alt2 Alt3

Figure 6. Histogram of Modeled Changes in Chinook Productivity for EFSFSR

near Stibnite under Alternatives 1, 2, and 3

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 18

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Percent Change in Chinook Productivity

EFSFSR Upstream of Sugar Creek
60.00

40.00
PERCENT CHANGE IN PRODUCTIVITY

20.00

0.00

-20.00

-40.00

-60.00

MINE LIFE YEAR

Alt1 Alt2 Alt3

Figure 7. Histogram of Modeled Changes in Chinook Productivity for EFSFSR

Upstream of Sugar Creek under Alternatives 1, 2, and 3

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 19

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Percent Change in Chinook Productivity

EFSFSR upstream of Meadow Creek
60.00

40.00
PERCENT CHANGE IN PRODUCTIVITY

20.00

0.00

-20.00

-40.00

-60.00

MINE LIFE YEAR

Alt1 Alt2 Alt3

Figure 8. Histogram of Modeled changes in Chinook Productivity for EFSFSR

Upstream of Meadow Creek under Alternatives 1, 2, and 3

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 20

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Percent Change in Chinook Productivity

Sugar Creek
60.00

40.00
PERCENT CHANGFE IN PRODUCTIVITY

20.00

0.00

-20.00

-40.00

-60.00

MINE LIFE YEAR

Alt1 Alt2 Alt3

Figure 9. Histogram of Modeled Changes in Chinook Productivity for Sugar Creek

under Alternatives 1, 2, and 3

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 21

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Percent Change in Chinook Productivity

Meadow Creek
60.00

40.00
PERCENT CHANGE IN PRODUCTIVITY

20.00

0.00

-20.00

-40.00

-60.00

-80.00

-100.00

MINE LIFE YEAR

Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alt3

Figure 10. Histogram of Modeled Changes in Chinook Productivity for Meadow Creek
under Alternatives 1, 2, and 3

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 22

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 5. Difference in Modeled Chinook Percent Change in Productivity between Alternative 2 and
Alternative 1 (Alternative 2 minus Alternative 1 Productivity Percent Change)

Alternative 2
and and Gage Location
Alternative 1

13310800 13311000 13311250

13311450 13310850 Meadow
(EFSFSR (EFSFSR (EFSFSR
Mine Year (Sugar (Meadow Creek MC-
above at above
Creek) Creek) 6
Meadow) Stibnite) Sugar)

-2 2.3 1.8 2.8 2.2 0.0 -0.5

-1 2.5 1.5 1.1 2.1 0.0 -8.8
1 2.7 2.6 1.6 1.9 0.0 -12.5
2 1.7 1.8 1.5 1.2 0.0 -12.9
3 2.5 3.0 2.0 1.4 0.0 -12.6
4 2.6 3.4 2.1 1.4 0.0 -13.2
5 2.6 3.9 2.3 1.5 0.0 -13.2
6 2.0 9.1 3.5 0.8 0.0 -7.4
7 2.2 13.4 5.3 1.1 0.0 8.8
8 1.4 7.2 3.7 1.3 0.0 11.4
9 1.2 4.5 2.6 1.0 0.0 12.7
10 0.4 5.0 3.0 -1.5 0.0 12.7
11 1.5 7.1 3.7 -3.0 0.0 11.4
12 2.0 10.2 9.3 -2.9 0.0 10.4
13 2.5 21.9 18.6 1.7 0.0 22.3
14 1.7 31.7 26.1 1.3 0.0 29.6
15 2.7 36.0 27.7 1.9 0.0 43.1
16 2.5 6.1 26.7 2.0 0.0 41.5
17 2.4 25.5 25.5 1.9 0.0 39.4
18 1.8 18.2 18.2 1.4 0.0 26.7
19 2.3 11.3 11.3 1.8 0.0 6.4
20 2.4 8.7 8.7 2.0 0.0 -1.0
Post-Closure 2.6 1.7 8.1 2.4 0.0 -2.0
Mine Life Max 2.7 36.0 27.7 2.2 0.0 43.1
Mine Life Mean 2.1 10.6 9.4 1.0 0.0 8.8
Mine Life Min 0.4 1.5 1.1 -3.0 0.0 -13.2

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 23

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 6. Difference in Modeled Chinook Percent Change in Productivity between Alternative 3 and
Alternative 2 (Alternative 3 minus Alternative 2 Productivity Percent Change)

Alternative 3
and Gage Location
Alternative 2

13310800 13311250
13311000 13311450 13310850 Meadow
(EFSFSR (EFSFSR
Mine Year (EFSFSR (Sugar (Meadow Creek MC-
above above
at Stibnite) Creek) Creek) 6
Meadow) Sugar)

-2 -19.2 -5.7 -5.7 -2.2 102.8 7.5

-1 -19.8 -2.9 -2.2 -3.7 102.5 21.5
1 -24.5 -8.2 -4.3 -1.9 102.0 25.6
2 -18.1 -4.9 -3.0 -1.2 101.8 23.6
3 -23.8 -8.6 -4.3 -1.4 102.0 25.1
4 -23.2 -9.2 -4.5 -1.4 102.6 25.0
5 -24.1 -10.3 -4.8 -1.5 102.8 26.0
6 -23.9 -16.1 -6.1 -0.8 101.7 17.4
7 -24.4 -24.4 -9.1 -1.1 101.2 -5.6
8 -23.0 -18.8 -8.1 -1.3 102.8 -10.8
9 -22.2 -13.2 -6.6 -1.0 101.8 -12.7
10 -19.4 -11.5 -6.3 1.5 101.6 -12.8
11 -23.6 -17.0 -8.4 3.0 101.9 -10.9
12 -15.0 -15.4 -9.1 2.9 102.0 -8.9
13 -1.7 -23.9 -16.5 -1.7 98.4 -25.5
14 0.2 -33.2 -23.5 -1.3 98.8 -32.0
15 -1.7 -39.0 -26.5 -1.9 97.7 -46.7
16 -2.6 0.0 -20.6 -2.0 99.2 -41.4
17 -0.5 -10.1 -10.1 -1.9 99.5 -25.1
18 -1.6 0.3 0.3 -1.4 98.3 2.5
19 -1.2 0.4 0.4 -1.8 98.8 3.1
20 -2.1 -0.1 -0.1 -2.0 99.2 2.0
Post-Closure -1.7 0.7 0.5 0.0 98.7 3.3
Mine Life Max 0.2 0.4 0.4 3.0 102.8 26.0
Mine Life
-14.3 -12.3 -8.1 -1.1 100.9 -2.4
Mean
Mine Life Min -24.5 -39.0 -26.5 -3.7 97.7 -46.7

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 24

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 7. Difference in Modeled Chinook Percent Change in Productivity between Alternative 3 and
Alternative 1 (Alternative 3 minus Alternative 1 Productivity Percent Change)

Alternative 3
and Gage Location
Alternative 1

13310800 13311000 13311250

13311450 13310850 Meadow
(EFSFSR (EFSFSR (EFSFSR
Mine Year (Sugar (Meadow Creek MC-
above at above
Creek) Creek) 6
Meadow) Stibnite) Sugar)

-2 -16.9 -4.0 -2.9 0.0 102.8 7.1

-1 -17.3 -1.4 -1.1 -1.6 102.5 12.6
1 -21.8 -5.6 -2.7 0.0 102.0 13.1
2 -16.4 -3.2 -1.5 0.0 101.8 10.8
3 -21.3 -5.6 -2.4 0.0 102.0 12.5
4 -20.6 -5.8 -2.4 0.0 102.6 11.8
5 -21.4 -6.4 -2.5 0.0 102.8 12.8
6 -21.9 -7.0 -2.6 0.0 101.7 10.0
7 -22.2 -10.9 -3.8 0.0 101.2 3.2
8 -21.6 -11.6 -4.4 0.0 102.8 0.6
9 -21.0 -8.7 -4.0 0.0 101.8 0.0
10 -19.0 -6.5 -3.3 0.0 101.6 -0.1
11 -22.1 -9.8 -4.7 0.0 101.9 0.5
12 -13.0 -5.2 0.2 0.0 102.0 1.5
13 0.8 -2.0 2.1 0.0 98.4 -3.2
14 1.9 -1.4 2.6 0.0 98.8 -2.4
15 1.0 -2.9 1.2 0.0 97.7 -3.6
16 -0.1 6.1 6.1 0.0 99.2 0.1
17 1.9 15.4 15.4 0.0 99.5 14.3
18 0.2 18.5 18.5 0.0 98.3 29.2
19 1.1 11.7 11.7 0.0 98.8 9.5
20 0.3 8.6 8.6 0.0 99.2 1.0
Post-Closure 0.8 2.4 8.6 2.4 98.7 1.3
Mine Life Max 1.9 18.5 18.5 2.4 102.8 29.2
Mine Life
-11.7 -1.5 1.6 0.0 100.8 6.2
Mean
Mine Life Min -22.2 -11.6 -4.7 -1.6 97.7 -3.6

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 25

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

This page intentionally left blank

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 26

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

APPENDIX A – NOAA FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

This page intentionally left blank

DECEMBER 2019
 October 9, 2018

MEMORANDUM FOR: Johnna Sandow; File

FROM: Jim M o r r o w ~ ~

SUBJECT: Johnson Creek Chinook salmon and flow data for quantifying
effects of altering streamflow

This memorandum documents the preliminary analysis to determine statistical relationships

between year class strength, of naturally spawned I Johnson Creek Chinook salmon, and Johnson
Creek flow. The Nez Perce Tribe has been extensively monitoring Chinook salmon in Johnson
Creek since 1998, when the Johnson Creek Artificial Propagation and Enhancement (JCAPE)
program began. This monitoring includes enumerating adult returns, differentiating between
hatchery and naturally produced fish, aging adult returns, estimating whole life cycle recruit
(returns) to stock (spawners) ratios, estimating total number ofjuveniles migrating past the
Johnson Creek screw trap, and estimating the total number of smolts surviving to Lower Granite
Dam (LGD). The results, for brood years 1998 through 2012, are presented in Rabe et al.
(2018). All fish population data used in the comparisons are from Rabe et al. (2018). All flow
data used in the comparisons are from the Johnson Creek gage near Yellowpine, Idaho (Johnson
gage).

Measures of year class strength included total number of returning adults (including 3-year-olds),
total number of outmigrating juveniles, and total number ofjuveniles reaching LGD as smolts.
Estimates ofjuvenile productivity were calculated by dividing the year class strength measures
by the number ofredds counted upstream from the Johnson Creek screw trap during the brood
year. Adult productivity (also referred to as whole life cycle productivity) was estimated by
dividing the number of returning adults by the total number of fish allowed to spawn naturally
during the brood year. The flow metrics were mean monthly flow and mean annual flow for the
twelve months beginning the March after spawning (brood year+ 1) and ending the following
February (brood year+ 2). This was done to include freshwater rearing from approximately the
time of emergence to the beginning of the smolt migration downstream.

All three measures of productivity were compared to population density, using simple regression,
to investigate effects of density dependence. Population density was expressed as redds counted
upstream from the Johnson Creek screw trap for juveniles, and as total number of natural
spawners for adults. Adult production was also compared to number of spawners during the
stock year, total juvenile migrants, and number of smolts reaching LGD, using simple regression.
This was done to determine if number of returning adults was related to earlier measures of year
class strength.

We used the method of exploratory regression, similar to that used by Henry (1953) and
described in Ricker (1975), to identify possible relationships of year class strength (production

1
All hatchery releases were tagged with coded wire tags which were used to differentiate hatchery from naturally
produced fish.
and productivity) and Johnson Creek flow. Adult production, whole life cycle productivity, and
both measures of juvenile productivity were regressed against the flow metrics using simple
regression. Measures of productivity were also compared to flow and population density using
multivariate regression. Productivity and population density were log transformed in all
comparisons.

Because many factors may affect year class strength and we were only considering flow and
population density, we considered all relationships that were suggestive (P = 0.15) or better, as
recommended in Ricker (1975). This methodology risks identifying relationships due to random
chance alone (i.e., false positive). However, given the “noisy” data, it is also possibly the best
method to initially identify which aspects of the annual hydrograph are most important for
rearing juveniles.

Adult production

Number of natural spawners for the 1998 – 2012 brood years ranged from 56 in 1999 to 1,396 in
2001. Number of natural returns ranged from 157 (1999 brood year) to 1,353 (2010 brood year).
There was no apparent statistical relationship between number of spawners and number of
natural returns (Figure 1). The relationships of number of natural juveniles migrating
downstream past the screw trap and the number of natural returns was positive but it was not
suggestive (P ≤ 0.15). The relationship of the number of natural smolts reaching LGD and the
number of natural returns was also positive, and somewhat stronger, but it was also not
suggestive (Figure 1). Although number of adult returns is biologically related to earlier
measures of year class strength, we did not identify obvious statistical relationships.

Results of simple regressions of adult production (total natural returns) versus flow (cfs) for
March through February following the brood year, are in Table (1). Regressions were significant
(P ≤ 0.05) for mean June, mean July, mean August, and mean annual flow, and were suggestive
(P ≤ 0.15) for mean October flow. These results suggest that flow in Johnson Creek during
summer rearing is a better predictor of natural returns than the number of spawners, number of
natural juveniles migrating downstream past the screw trap, or the number of natural smolts
reaching LGD.

Adult productivity

Whole life cycle productivity for naturally spawning Chinook salmon in Johnson Creek ranged
from 0.12 in 2001 to 9.19 in 1998. Recruit to stock ratio was strongly, and negatively, related to
number of stock year spawners (Figure 2). Simple regression of whole life cycle productivity
versus flow for March through February following the brood year did not reveal any significant
relationships. However, incorporating population density into the models revealed significant
relationships for mean July, mean August, mean October, and for mean annual flow; and
suggestive relationships for mean June, mean November, mean December, and mean January
flow (Table 2).

2
Table 1. Results of simple regressions of naturally produced spawners returning to
Johnson Creek versus flow measured at the Johnson Creek near Yellowpine gage
during March through February following the brood year. Monthly flows are
mean monthly flows in cfs and annual flow is mean annual flow in cfs.
Independent Probability of
Regression Equation R2
Variable Greater F
March flow y = 5.63*x – 52.21 0.09 0.27
April flow y = -0.0917*x + 535.85 0.0017 0.88
May flow y = 0.1179*x + 343.27 0.016 0.66
June flow y = 0.3597*x + 71.46 0.30 0.03
July flow y = 1.6172*x + 39.51 0.56 0.001
August flow y = 7.8553*x – 373.53 0.49 0.004
September flow y = 6.3883*x - 53.01 0.09 0.25
October flow y = 5.1948*x – 14.15 0.22 0.08
November flow y = 3.5054*x + 124.98 0.12 0.21
December flow y = 3.6531*x + 165.57 0.08 0.30
January flow y = 8.3031*x - 202.56 0.11 0.23
February flow y = 5.0189*x + 85.7269 0.03 0.51
Mean Annual flow y = 2.5109*x – 326.14 0.32 0.03

Table 2. Multivariate regression of whole life cycle population productivity (returning

adults / brood year spawners) against population density and flow. Monthly flows
are mean monthly flows in cfs and annual flow is mean annual flow in cfs.
Independent Probability of Greater F
Regression Equation R2
Variable1 x1 x1 x2 Model
March flow Ln y = 0.0141*x1 – 0.949*Ln x2 + 4.268 0.69 0.16 0.0004 0.0009
April flow Ln y = 0.0008*x1 – 0.958*Ln x2 + 5.689 0.63 0.94 0.0007 0.003
May flow Ln y = 0.0004*x1 – 0.966*Ln x2 + 5.272 0.64 0.50 0.0006 0.002
June flow Ln y = 0.0006*x1 – 1.068*Ln x2 + 5.664 0.70 0.11 0.0002 0.0007
July flow Ln y = 0.0027*x1 – 1.088*Ln x2 + 5.713 0.78 0.02 <0.0001 0.0001
August flow Ln y = 0.0155*x1 – 1.144*Ln x2 + 5.104 0.79 0.009 <0.0001 <0.0001
September flow Ln y = 0.0144*x1 – 1.062*Ln x2 + 5.080 0.67 0.23 0.0003 0.001
October flow Ln y = 0.0122*x1 – 1.033*Ln x2 + 4.946 0.74 0.01 <0.0001 0.0003
November flow Ln y = 0.0106*x1 – 0.867*Ln x2 + 4.024 0.73 0.053 0.0005 0.0004
December flow Ln y = 0.0113*x1 – 0.983*Ln x2 + 4.826 0.71 0.10 0.0002 0.0006
January flow Ln y = 0.0266*x1 – 1.063*Ln x2 + 4.091 0.73 0.055 0.0001 0.0004
February flow Ln y = 0.0184*x1 – 1.076*Ln x2 + 4.890 0.67 0.29 0.0005 0.014
Annual flow Ln y = 0.0005*x1 – 1.078*Ln x2 + 4.819 0.74 0.04 <0.0001 0.0003
1. Dependent variable x2 is brood year spawners for all regressions.

Juvenile productivity

The Johnson Creek juvenile screw trap (JOHTRP) has been operated at creek mile 4.3 (km 7)
since 1998. Estimates of the number of naturally produced juvenile Chinook salmon migrating
past the trap and number surviving to Lower Granite Dam, for the 1998 through 2015 year
classes, are presented in Rabe et al. (2018). Production, measured as total number of juveniles,

3
ranged from 19,486 (1999 brood year) to 428,604 (2003 brood year); and production, measured
as smolts reaching LGD, ranged from 6,789 (2000 brood year) to 79,480 (2010 brood year).
Number of redds counted upstream from the screw trap ranged from 27 in 1999 to 407 in 2014;
productivity, measured as total juveniles per redd, ranged from 273 (2004 brood year) to 1,207
(2003 brood year); and productivity, measured as smolts at LGD per redd ranged from 49 (2013
brood year) to 289 (1999 brood year). None of the regressions of juvenile productivity,
measured either as total juveniles per redd or smolts per redd, versus any of the flow metrics,
were significant. Smolts at LGD per redd exhibited density dependence but total juveniles per
redd did not (Figure 2). Regardless, incorporating population density (brood year redds) into the
regression models did not improve relationships for juvenile productivity (total juveniles or
smolts at LGD) versus flow.

Discussion

The lack of an apparent statistical relationship between brood year spawners and adult returns is
not unusual. Although the biological relationship is obvious (i.e. parents and offspring), and
strong statistical relationships between brood year spawners and whole life cycle productivity are
typical, relationships between spawners and production, measured as returning adults, is often
obscured by variations in egg to parr, parr to smolt, and smolt to adult survival. The
relationships between juveniles migrating past the screw trap and adult returns, and between
smolts reaching LGD and adult returns, are weaker than expected based on populations with
which we are familiar. However, a comparison to all Snake River Chinook salmon populations,
with available screw trap data, will be needed to determine if the relationships of juveniles to
adult returns for Johnson Creek are unusually weak.

It is interesting that number of adult returns are better predicted by streamflow volume during the
rearing year than by number of juveniles migrating downstream, or by the number of juveniles
reaching LGD. It could be that flow influences size, condition, and migrating timing of juvenile
migrants and that, over the range of observed juvenile migrant numbers, those factors are better
descriptors of year class strength than number alone. Whatever the mechanism, it appears that
effects of rearing streamflow continue to have consequences for juvenile survival well into the
downstream migration life stage.

There was no apparent effect of population density on number of juveniles migrating past the
screw trap. This is likely because most juveniles migrate past the screw trap during the very
early life stages (i.e. parr and presmolt), before density effects appreciably affect mortality.
There was a significant, but relatively weak, effect of population density on numbers of smolts
reaching LGD, and a strong relationship between population density and whole life cycle
productivity. Stronger density dependent relationships in older life stages is normal for Snake
River spring/summer Chinook salmon and is possibly due to early effects of density on size
and/or condition that subsequently affect survival throughout the freshwater rearing, downstream
migration, and early saltwater life stages.

There were no detectable relationships between rearing streamflow and juvenile productivity
(i.e., total juveniles past the trap/redd and smolts at LGD/redd) but there were significant

4
relationships between rearing streamflow and whole life cycle productivity. This is evidence that
rearing streamflow affects Johnson Creek Chinook salmon in ways that are not apparent when
measured as number of migrating juveniles. The results in Table (2) also indicate that flow
during summer may be the most critical for rearing Chinook salmon, and that flow during
fall/winter may also be important.

Investigating multiple factors through “exploratory regression” is an established methodology for

identifying factors affecting year class strength (Ricker 1975). However, running multiple
individual regressions does increase risk of finding “significant” relationships entirely due to
random chance. Nevertheless, the preponderance of positive relationships and the general
pattern of flow being most important during months in which it is likely to be the most limited
(i.e. during base flow conditions) suggests that rearing streamflow is an important factor
influencing Johnson Creek Chinook salmon year class strength.

Quantifying impacts of altering flow

Until comparisons of juvenile length, migration timing, etc. and rearing streamflow can be made,
the relationships of whole life cycle productivity, to flow and population density, will likely be
the most useful for quantifying effects of proposed streamflow alterations on Chinook salmon.
However, the flow measures should be normalized to facilitate application of the relationships to
different stream reaches. Table (3) has relationships of whole life cycle population productivity
to population density and streamflow expressed as percent of mean monthly and percent of mean
annual streamflow. These relationships are essentially the same as in Table (2) but, because flow
has been normalized, they will be more useful for quantifying effects of altering streamflow in
different stream reaches.

Table 3. Multivariate regression of whole life cycle population productivity (return

spawners / stock year spawners) against population density and flow. Monthly
flows are percent of mean monthly flow and annual flow is the percent of mean
annual flow.
Independent Probability of Greater F
Regression Equation R2
Variable1 x1 x1 x2 Model
March flow Ln y = 0.0141*x1 – 0.947*Ln x2 + 4.268 0.69 0.16 0.0004 0.0009
April flow Ln y = 0.0003*x1 – 0.958*Ln x2 + 5.689 0.63 0.95 0.0007 0.003
May flow Ln y = 0.0047*x1 – 0.966*Ln x2 + 5.272 0.64 0.50 0.0006 0.002
June flow Ln y = 0.0080*x1 – 1.068*Ln x2 + 5.664 0.70 0.11 0.0002 0.0007
July flow Ln y = 0.0099*x1 – 1.088*Ln x2 + 5.713 0.78 0.02 <0.0001 0.0001
August flow Ln y = 0.0184*x1 – 1.144*Ln x2 + 5.104 0.79 0.009 <0.0001 <0.0001
September flow Ln y = 0.0129*x1 – 1.062*Ln x2 + 5.080 0.67 0.23 0.0003 0.001
October flow Ln y = 0.0121*x1 – 1.034*Ln x2 + 4.946 0.75 0.04 <0.0001 0.0003
November flow Ln y = 0.0112*x1 – 0.868*Ln x2 + 4.024 0.73 0.053 0.0005 0.0004
December flow Ln y = 0.0109*x1 – 0.983*Ln x2 + 4.826 0.71 0.10 0.0002 0.0006
January flow Ln y = 0.0237*x1 – 1.063*Ln x2 + 4.091 0.73 0.055 0.0001 0.0004
February flow Ln y = 0.0161*x1 – 1.076*Ln x2 + 4.890 0.67 0.29 0.0005 0.014
Mean Annual flow Ln y = 0.0169*x1 – 1.078*Ln x2 + 4.819 0.74 0.04 <0.0001 0.0003
1. Independent variable x2 is brood year spawners for all regressions.

5
Figure 1. Total number of natural returning adults (including three-year-olds) versus total
brood year spawners, total number of natural juveniles migrating past the screw
trap, and total number of natural smolts surviving to Lower Granite Dam.

6
Figure 2. Productivity versus population density for juveniles migrating past the Johnson
Creek screw trap (no apparent density dependence), juveniles surviving to
Lower Granite Dam (moderate density dependence), and returning adults
(strong density dependence).

7
 References

Henry, K. A. 1953. Analysis of the factors affecting the production of chum salmon
(Oncorhynchus keta) in Tillamook Bay. Oregon Fish Commission. Contribution 18. 37
pp.

Rabe, C. D., D. D. Nelson, and T. Hodson. 2018. Status and monitoring of natural and
supplemented Chinook salmon in Johnson Creek, Idaho. Annual Progress Report,
Project Number 199604300. Bonneville Power Association contracts 67412-7107 and
74017 REL 10. 113 pp.

Ricker W. E. 1975. Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations.

Bulletin of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada. Bulletin 191. 382 pp.

8
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

APPENDIX B – FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY SPREADSHEET FROM NOAA

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

This page intentionally left blank

DECEMBER 2019
Population Percent of average Percent of average Productivity Productivity
size monthly flow, without Amount of reduction monthly flow, with without the without the
(spawners) Month the action (pecrent of average) the action action action
389.56 March 100 10 90 1.018425593 0.884075245
April 100 10 90 1.004523053 1.001514
May 100 10 90 0.97999551 0.935001366
June 100 10 90 1.097857865 1.013450541
July 100 10 90 1.23745955 1.120819964
August 100 10 90 1.127518867 0.938023315
September 100 10 90 1.035776092 0.910420219
October 100 10 90 0.988241176 0.875615242
November 100 10 90 0.966923851 0.864472716
December 100 10 90 1.053783907 0.944960083
January 100 10 90 1.127706558 0.88975065
February 100 10 90 1.085065922 0.923708016
1.060273162 0.941817613
Impact of the
flow reduction on
productivity (% 11.2
reduction in
productivity)

Put the estimated amount of flow reduction (expressed as percent of monthly average) in the appropriate cell in column E.
Productivity without the proposed reduction is in cell G14, productivity with the proposed flow reduction is in cell H14, and the
impact of the flow reduction is in cell H15. Change cell B2 to see how population size affects productivity.

Full year 100 10 90 1.081891293 0.91366683

This page intentionally left blank
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

APPENDIX C – MONTHLY CHANGE IN DISCHARGE SPREADSHEET FROM RIO ASE

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON FLOW-PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

This page intentionally left blank

DECEMBER 2019
 13310800 (EFSFSR above Meadow) 13311000 (EFSFSR at Stibnite) 13311250 (EFSFSR above Sugar) 13311450 (Sugar Creek) 13310850 (Meadow Creek) Meadow Creek MC-6
Simulated Streamflow Simulated Streamflow Simulated Streamflow Simulated Streamflow Simulated Streamflow Simulated Streamflow
No Proposed Long-term % No Proposed Long-term % No Proposed Long-term % No Proposed Long-term % No Proposed Long-term % No Proposed Long-term %
Mine Year Month Action Action % Difference Difference Action Action % Difference Difference Action Action % Difference Difference Action Action % Difference Difference Action Action % Difference Difference Action Action % Difference Difference
-2 January 5.0 5.0 0% 0% 10.4 10.1 -3% -3% 15.8 15.5 -2% -2% 11.6 11.6 0% 0% 3.2 0.4 -87% -87% 5.0 4.7 -6% -6%
-2 February 4.1 4.1 0% 0% 8.6 8.3 -3% -3% 13.3 13.0 -2% -2% 9.9 9.9 0% 0% 2.8 0.2 -93% -93% 4.5 4.2 -7% -7%
-2 March 13.1 13.1 0% 0% 28.6 28.2 -1% -1% 36.3 35.9 -1% -1% 27.8 27.8 0% 0% 6.9 5.7 -17% -17% 14.1 13.8 -2% -2%
-2 April 29.1 29.1 0% 0% 62.7 62.2 -1% -1% 76.5 76.0 -1% -1% 51.4 51.4 0% 0% 19.6 19.3 -1% -1% 32.5 32.0 -2% -2%
-2 May 55.3 55.3 0% 0% 119.9 119.2 -1% -1% 148.6 148.0 0% 0% 105.6 105.7 0% 0% 37.1 39.3 6% 6% 60.7 60.1 -1% -1%
-2 June 13.3 13.3 0% 0% 27.4 26.8 -2% 0% 36.5 36.0 -2% 0% 28.4 28.4 0% 0% 7.2 4.8 -34% -5% 13.6 13.0 -4% -1%
-2 July 6.7 6.7 0% 0% 14.2 13.6 -4% -1% 20.7 20.2 -3% -1% 15.7 15.6 0% 0% 4.1 1.1 -73% -21% 6.9 6.4 -7% -2%
-2 August 5.8 5.8 0% 0% 12.0 11.6 -3% -3% 17.8 17.4 -2% -2% 13.4 13.4 0% 0% 3.6 0.7 -81% -81% 5.8 5.4 -7% -7%
-2 September 7.0 7.0 0% 0% 14.5 14.1 -3% -3% 20.6 20.3 -2% -2% 16.3 16.3 0% 0% 3.7 1.2 -67% -67% 7.2 6.8 -5% -5%
-2 October 6.9 6.9 0% 0% 14.3 13.9 -3% -3% 20.4 20.0 -2% -2% 15.9 15.9 0% 0% 3.7 1.0 -73% -73% 6.9 6.5 -6% -6%
-2 November 5.2 5.2 0% 0% 10.8 10.4 -4% -4% 15.9 15.5 -3% -3% 12.1 12.1 0% 0% 3.3 0.5 -85% -85% 5.5 5.1 -8% -8%
-2 December 4.6 4.6 0% 0% 9.8 9.4 -4% -4% 14.6 14.2 -3% -3% 11.0 11.0 0% 0% 3.0 0.3 -90% -90% 4.9 4.5 -8% -8%
-1 January 4.1 4.1 0% 0% 8.7 7.1 -18% -18% 13.2 11.6 -12% -12% 9.9 9.9 0% 0% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.4 2.8 -36% -36%
-1 February 3.3 3.3 0% 0% 7.2 5.9 -17% -17% 10.9 9.7 -11% -11% 8.2 8.2 0% 0% 2.4 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 2.7 -33% -33%
-1 March 3.7 3.7 0% 0% 8.0 6.8 -15% -15% 12.1 10.8 -10% -10% 9.1 9.1 0% 0% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 2.8 -31% -31%
-1 April 11.0 11.0 0% 0% 24.1 22.9 -5% -5% 30.6 29.4 -4% -4% 23.1 23.1 0% 0% 5.5 4.4 -19% -16% 12.2 11.0 -10% -10%
-1 May 32.9 32.9 0% 0% 71.4 69.8 -2% -2% 84.4 82.9 -2% -1% 57.6 56.2 -2% -2% 21.5 21.8 1% 1% 36.0 34.4 -4% -3%
-1 June 14.9 14.9 0% 0% 31.4 30.0 -4% -1% 39.1 37.8 -4% -1% 28.6 28.4 -1% 0% 8.6 6.6 -23% -4% 15.8 14.3 -9% -2%
-1 July 6.3 6.3 0% 0% 13.4 12.3 -8% -3% 19.0 18.0 -5% -2% 13.8 13.8 0% 0% 3.8 1.0 -74% -20% 6.6 5.5 -17% -5%
-1 August 5.4 5.4 0% 0% 11.4 10.5 -8% -8% 16.6 15.7 -5% -5% 12.1 12.3 1% 1% 3.5 0.7 -80% -80% 5.6 4.7 -16% -16%
-1 September 4.6 4.6 0% 0% 9.7 8.9 -8% -8% 14.4 13.6 -5% -5% 10.8 11.0 2% 2% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 5.0 4.1 -18% -18%
-1 October 5.2 5.2 0% 0% 10.9 10.2 -6% -6% 16.0 15.3 -4% -4% 12.5 12.7 2% 2% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 5.3 4.5 -14% -14%
-1 November 4.2 4.2 0% 0% 8.9 8.1 -9% -9% 13.2 12.4 -6% -6% 10.0 10.2 1% 1% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.6 3.7 -19% -19%
-1 December 3.7 3.7 0% 0% 8.1 7.4 -9% -9% 12.2 11.5 -6% -6% 9.1 9.3 2% 2% 2.5 0.0 -100% -100% 4.2 3.4 -18% -18%
1 January 3.4 3.4 1% 1% 7.5 7.6 2% 2% 11.2 9.3 -17% -17% 8.3 8.4 2% 2% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 3.2 -16% -16%
1 February 2.8 2.9 1% 1% 6.3 6.6 6% 6% 9.4 7.8 -17% -17% 6.8 7.0 3% 3% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.1 -14% -14%
1 March 2.9 2.9 2% 2% 6.5 6.9 6% 6% 9.7 7.9 -18% -18% 6.9 7.0 2% 2% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 2.9 -15% -15%
1 April 52.6 52.6 0% 0% 116.8 116.9 0% 0% 138.0 137.0 -1% -1% 95.1 92.2 -3% -3% 36.8 41.2 12% 12% 61.7 60.9 -1% -1%
1 May 85.6 85.7 0% 0% 184.1 183.6 0% 0% 227.2 229.0 1% 1% 167.8 165.7 -1% -1% 56.3 62.3 11% 11% 92.7 91.3 -1% -1%
1 June 50.6 50.6 0% 0% 106.8 106.3 -1% 0% 135.2 133.7 -1% -1% 100.0 100.3 0% 0% 32.9 34.6 5% 4% 54.7 53.2 -3% -2%
1 July 7.1 7.1 1% 0% 14.2 14.3 1% 0% 21.5 17.8 -17% -9% 15.4 16.2 6% 3% 3.7 0.9 -75% -20% 6.6 5.8 -12% -4%
1 August 5.9 5.9 1% 1% 11.9 12.3 4% 4% 18.0 15.2 -15% -15% 13.1 13.7 5% 5% 3.4 0.7 -79% -79% 5.6 5.1 -9% -9%
1 September 5.0 5.0 1% 1% 10.0 10.4 5% 5% 15.3 12.9 -16% -16% 11.4 11.9 4% 4% 2.9 0.4 -86% -86% 4.9 4.4 -10% -10%
1 October 4.8 4.8 1% 1% 9.6 10.1 4% 4% 14.9 12.5 -17% -17% 11.3 11.7 4% 4% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.6 4.0 -13% -13%
1 November 4.1 4.2 1% 1% 8.4 8.8 5% 5% 13.1 10.9 -17% -17% 9.8 10.2 3% 3% 2.4 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 3.6 -12% -12%
1 December 3.8 3.9 1% 1% 7.8 8.4 7% 7% 12.4 10.2 -18% -18% 9.0 9.4 4% 4% 2.3 0.1 -96% -96% 3.8 3.4 -12% -12%
2 January 3.4 3.4 1% 1% 7.1 7.7 9% 9% 11.3 8.6 -24% -24% 8.1 8.5 4% 4% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.2 -11% -11%
2 February 2.7 2.8 3% 3% 5.9 6.5 10% 10% 9.4 7.1 -25% -25% 6.7 7.0 4% 4% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.0 -11% -11%
2 March 10.4 10.4 0% 0% 22.6 23.1 2% 2% 29.4 26.7 -9% -9% 22.7 23.0 1% 1% 4.8 4.0 -16% -16% 10.9 10.3 -5% -5%
2 April 24.5 24.5 0% 0% 53.1 52.8 0% 0% 62.3 60.2 -3% -3% 43.5 42.9 -1% -1% 15.9 15.7 -1% -1% 27.5 26.3 -4% -4%
2 May 33.5 33.5 0% 0% 72.0 71.5 -1% -1% 87.9 84.5 -4% -3% 61.9 60.5 -2% -2% 21.7 21.7 0% 0% 36.1 34.6 -4% -3%
2 June 7.1 7.1 1% 0% 14.9 15.0 0% 0% 21.2 16.9 -20% -3% 15.7 15.7 0% 0% 4.1 1.2 -70% -6% 7.5 6.5 -13% -1%
2 July 5.9 6.0 1% 0% 12.3 12.8 3% 1% 18.0 14.2 -21% -9% 13.2 13.4 2% 1% 3.6 0.8 -78% -20% 6.0 5.4 -10% -3%
2 August 5.0 5.1 1% 1% 10.4 11.0 5% 5% 15.7 12.1 -23% -23% 11.6 11.9 3% 3% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 5.1 4.6 -10% -10%
2 September 6.1 6.1 1% 1% 12.5 13.0 3% 3% 18.1 14.6 -19% -19% 14.1 14.5 2% 2% 3.3 0.9 -73% -73% 6.2 5.6 -10% -10%
2 October 13.2 13.2 0% 0% 28.4 28.3 0% 0% 35.9 32.1 -11% -11% 27.6 27.9 1% 1% 6.7 5.0 -25% -25% 13.9 12.9 -8% -8%
2 November 5.5 5.6 1% 1% 11.6 12.0 3% 3% 16.7 13.3 -20% -20% 12.2 12.4 2% 2% 3.5 0.8 -77% -77% 5.9 5.3 -11% -11%
2 December 4.9 4.9 1% 1% 10.4 10.9 5% 5% 15.1 11.9 -22% -22% 10.9 11.2 2% 2% 3.3 0.5 -85% -85% 5.2 4.6 -11% -11%
3 January 4.3 4.3 1% 1% 9.1 9.6 5% 5% 13.5 10.2 -24% -24% 10.0 10.2 2% 2% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.6 4.1 -11% -11%
3 February 3.5 3.6 1% 1% 7.7 8.1 6% 6% 11.5 8.4 -27% -27% 8.5 8.7 2% 2% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 3.8 -11% -11%
3 March 3.4 3.5 1% 1% 7.5 8.0 7% 7% 11.2 8.0 -29% -29% 8.2 8.4 2% 2% 2.3 0.1 -96% -96% 3.9 3.5 -11% -11%
3 April 4.2 4.2 1% 1% 8.9 9.2 4% 2% 12.9 9.6 -26% -14% 9.9 10.1 2% 1% 2.6 0.4 -84% -32% 4.5 3.9 -13% -5%
3 May 67.6 67.7 0% 0% 149.4 149.4 0% 0% 177.8 177.4 0% 0% 124.6 121.0 -3% -3% 46.2 51.4 11% 11% 76.5 75.7 -1% -1%
3 June 53.2 53.2 0% 0% 113.2 112.7 0% 0% 141.0 138.4 -2% -2% 103.3 102.5 -1% -1% 35.1 37.4 7% 5% 58.3 57.0 -2% -2%
3 July 6.8 6.9 1% 0% 13.7 13.9 1% 0% 20.5 15.4 -25% -12% 14.6 15.6 7% 3% 3.6 0.8 -78% -20% 6.4 5.6 -12% -3%
3 August 5.7 5.8 2% 2% 11.6 12.0 4% 4% 17.5 13.1 -25% -25% 12.7 13.4 5% 5% 3.4 0.6 -82% -82% 5.4 5.0 -9% -9%
3 September 4.9 5.0 1% 1% 9.8 10.3 4% 4% 15.1 11.1 -26% -26% 11.2 11.7 5% 5% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.8 4.3 -10% -10%
3 October 4.5 4.5 1% 1% 9.0 9.4 5% 5% 14.1 10.2 -28% -28% 10.5 11.0 4% 4% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 3.8 -11% -11%
3 November 4.3 4.4 1% 1% 8.7 9.0 4% 4% 13.5 9.7 -28% -28% 10.1 10.5 4% 4% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 3.7 -13% -13%
3 December 3.9 3.9 1% 1% 8.0 8.4 5% 5% 12.6 8.9 -29% -29% 9.2 9.6 5% 5% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 3.4 -12% -12%
4 January 3.4 3.5 2% 2% 7.2 7.8 8% 8% 11.4 8.1 -29% -29% 8.2 8.6 5% 5% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.2 -11% -11%
4 February 2.8 2.8 2% 2% 6.0 6.6 10% 10% 9.4 6.6 -30% -30% 6.7 7.1 5% 5% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.0 -11% -11%
4 March 2.8 2.8 2% 2% 6.1 6.8 11% 11% 9.6 6.7 -31% -31% 6.8 7.1 5% 5% 1.8 0.0 -100% -100% 3.2 2.8 -11% -11%
4 April 15.8 15.8 0% 0% 35.0 35.4 1% 1% 42.6 39.8 -7% -7% 31.2 31.2 0% 0% 9.0 9.2 2% 2% 17.9 17.3 -3% -3%
4 May 57.7 57.7 0% 0% 125.7 125.4 0% 0% 150.2 148.8 -1% -1% 105.6 102.5 -3% -3% 38.7 42.2 9% 9% 63.8 62.6 -2% -2%
4 June 38.5 38.5 0% 0% 81.8 81.3 -1% 0% 102.4 98.5 -4% -3% 75.5 74.8 -1% -1% 25.0 25.6 2% 1% 42.0 40.5 -4% -2%
4 July 6.6 6.7 1% 0% 13.5 13.8 2% 1% 20.2 15.2 -25% -12% 14.5 15.4 6% 3% 3.6 0.9 -75% -19% 6.4 5.7 -12% -3%
4 August 5.6 5.6 1% 1% 11.3 11.9 5% 5% 17.1 12.8 -25% -25% 12.5 13.2 5% 5% 3.3 0.5 -85% -85% 5.4 4.9 -9% -9%
4 September 4.7 4.8 1% 1% 9.6 10.1 6% 6% 14.7 10.9 -26% -26% 10.9 11.4 4% 4% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 4.2 -10% -10%
4 October 12.3 12.4 0% 0% 26.4 26.5 0% 0% 34.1 29.9 -12% -12% 27.0 27.5 2% 2% 6.0 4.6 -23% -23% 12.8 11.9 -7% -7%
4 November 5.3 5.3 1% 1% 10.8 11.2 4% 4% 16.1 12.1 -24% -24% 11.6 12.0 3% 3% 3.2 0.6 -81% -81% 5.3 4.8 -11% -11%
4 December 4.7 4.7 1% 1% 9.8 10.2 5% 5% 14.7 10.8 -26% -26% 10.6 10.9 3% 3% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 4.2 -11% -11%
5 January 4.1 4.2 2% 2% 8.6 9.7 13% 13% 13.2 9.9 -25% -25% 9.6 9.9 3% 3% 2.6 0.3 -88% -88% 4.3 3.9 -8% -8%
5 February 3.3 3.3 2% 2% 7.0 8.1 16% 16% 10.8 8.0 -26% -26% 7.9 8.1 3% 3% 2.4 0.1 -96% -96% 3.9 3.6 -8% -8%
5 March 3.4 3.5 3% 3% 7.4 8.6 16% 16% 11.5 8.3 -27% -27% 8.4 8.7 3% 3% 2.3 0.1 -96% -96% 3.8 3.4 -9% -9%
5 April 13.8 13.9 1% 1% 30.4 31.2 3% 3% 37.6 34.5 -8% -8% 27.8 28.0 1% 1% 7.8 7.2 -7% -7% 15.5 14.9 -4% -4%
5 May 38.4 38.5 0% 0% 83.1 83.4 0% 0% 99.3 96.7 -3% -2% 67.6 66.0 -2% -2% 25.4 26.5 4% 3% 41.9 40.6 -3% -2%
5 June 68.5 68.6 0% 0% 148.3 148.4 0% 0% 183.4 181.0 -1% -1% 134.6 132.4 -2% -2% 47.3 51.4 9% 8% 77.6 76.2 -2% -2%
5 July 6.9 7.0 1% 1% 14.0 14.9 6% 2% 20.8 15.9 -24% -11% 14.9 15.8 6% 3% 3.7 0.9 -76% -20% 6.6 5.9 -11% -3%
5 August 5.7 5.8 1% 1% 11.7 12.9 10% 10% 17.6 13.5 -23% -23% 12.8 13.5 5% 5% 3.4 0.7 -79% -79% 5.6 5.1 -8% -8%
5 September 4.9 5.0 2% 2% 9.9 11.0 12% 12% 15.1 11.5 -24% -24% 11.2 11.7 4% 4% 2.9 0.4 -86% -86% 4.8 4.4 -8% -8%
5 October 7.2 7.3 1% 1% 14.9 15.9 7% 7% 21.2 17.4 -18% -18% 16.9 17.4 3% 3% 3.3 1.2 -64% -64% 6.9 6.4 -8% -8%
5 November 4.8 4.9 2% 2% 9.8 10.8 11% 11% 14.8 11.2 -24% -24% 11.0 11.4 4% 4% 2.9 0.2 -93% -93% 4.8 4.3 -10% -10%
5 December 4.3 4.4 2% 2% 8.9 10.0 13% 13% 13.6 10.1 -26% -26% 9.9 10.3 3% 3% 2.6 0.2 -92% -92% 4.3 3.9 -10% -10%
6 January 3.8 3.8 2% 2% 7.9 9.2 17% 17% 12.3 9.0 -26% -26% 8.9 9.2 4% 4% 2.3 0.1 -96% -96% 3.9 3.6 -8% -8%
6 February 3.0 3.1 3% 3% 6.5 7.8 20% 20% 10.1 7.3 -28% -28% 7.3 7.6 4% 4% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.4 -8% -8%
6 March 3.0 3.1 3% 3% 6.6 8.0 22% 22% 10.3 7.4 -28% -28% 7.4 7.7 4% 4% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.1 -8% -8%
6 April 6.9 7.0 1% 1% 15.0 16.3 9% 7% 20.5 17.7 -14% -11% 16.8 17.0 2% 2% 3.0 1.9 -37% -16% 7.4 7.1 -4% -3%
6 May 57.8 57.9 0% 0% 127.3 127.8 0% 0% 150.6 149.3 -1% -1% 103.6 100.8 -3% -3% 39.6 43.2 9% 9% 65.1 64.0 -2% -2%
6 June 64.8 64.9 0% 0% 139.1 139.4 0% 0% 172.9 170.9 -1% -1% 127.1 125.9 -1% -1% 43.8 47.5 8% 8% 72.2 70.9 -2% -2%
6 July 6.8 6.9 1% 1% 13.6 14.7 8% 3% 20.6 15.6 -24% -12% 14.6 15.5 6% 3% 3.6 0.9 -75% -19% 6.3 5.7 -10% -3%
6 August 5.7 5.8 2% 2% 11.4 12.8 12% 12% 17.4 13.2 -24% -24% 12.7 13.3 5% 5% 3.3 0.5 -85% -85% 5.4 5.0 -7% -7%
6 September 4.8 4.9 2% 2% 9.7 10.9 13% 13% 14.9 11.2 -25% -25% 11.1 11.6 4% 4% 2.9 0.4 -86% -86% 4.7 4.3 -8% -8%
6 October 7.8 7.9 1% 1% 16.1 17.2 7% 7% 22.6 18.8 -17% -17% 18.4 18.8 2% 2% 3.4 1.4 -59% -59% 7.5 6.9 -7% -7%
6 November 4.9 4.9 2% 2% 9.9 11.1 12% 12% 14.9 11.3 -24% -24% 11.0 11.4 4% 4% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.8 4.4 -10% -10%
6 December 4.3 4.4 2% 2% 9.0 10.2 14% 14% 13.7 10.2 -26% -26% 10.0 10.3 4% 4% 2.7 0.3 -89% -89% 4.4 3.9 -10% -10%
7 January 3.8 4.0 5% 5% 8.0 10.2 28% 28% 12.4 9.9 -20% -20% 9.0 9.3 4% 4% 2.4 0.1 -96% -96% 4.0 2.5 -37% -37%
7 February 3.1 3.4 7% 7% 6.7 8.9 33% 33% 10.5 8.5 -19% -19% 7.6 7.9 4% 4% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 2.0 -44% -44%
7 March 3.2 3.4 7% 7% 6.9 9.2 33% 33% 10.7 8.6 -20% -20% 7.7 8.0 4% 4% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 1.8 -48% -48%
7 April 42.4 42.6 0% 0% 94.1 95.0 1% 1% 111.3 110.0 -1% -1% 77.0 75.1 -2% -2% 29.4 32.5 11% 11% 49.6 46.5 -6% -6%
7 May 60.6 60.8 0% 0% 130.8 131.3 0% 0% 161.1 158.8 -1% -1% 117.8 115.5 -2% -2% 39.9 43.1 8% 8% 66.0 62.6 -5% -5%
7 June 30.2 30.5 1% 0% 63.2 63.6 1% 0% 80.9 76.4 -6% -3% 59.4 59.8 1% 0% 18.8 18.3 -3% -1% 32.0 28.3 -11% -5%
7 July 6.7 6.9 4% 2% 13.7 14.9 8% 3% 20.7 15.8 -24% -12% 14.7 15.7 6% 3% 3.7 0.9 -75% -20% 6.5 3.7 -44% -13%
7 August 5.6 5.8 4% 4% 11.5 13.1 14% 14% 17.4 13.6 -22% -22% 12.6 13.3 5% 5% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.5 3.1 -44% -44%
7 September 4.8 5.0 4% 4% 9.7 11.5 19% 19% 14.9 11.8 -21% -21% 11.0 11.5 4% 4% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 2.7 -44% -44%
7 October 11.1 11.3 2% 2% 23.6 24.5 4% 4% 31.2 27.2 -13% -13% 25.1 25.6 2% 2% 5.2 3.6 -30% -30% 11.4 8.2 -28% -28%
7 November 5.4 5.7 4% 4% 11.1 12.6 13% 13% 16.4 13.0 -21% -21% 11.9 12.3 3% 3% 3.1 0.5 -84% -84% 5.4 2.9 -46% -46%
7 December 4.8 5.0 5% 5% 10.0 11.9 20% 20% 15.0 12.0 -20% -20% 10.8 11.2 3% 3% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.9 2.8 -43% -43%
8 January 4.2 4.5 7% 7% 8.8 11.8 34% 34% 13.4 11.6 -13% -13% 9.8 10.1 3% 3% 2.8 0.2 -93% -93% 4.4 2.1 -51% -51%
8 February 3.3 3.6 8% 8% 7.1 9.7 37% 37% 11.0 9.4 -14% -14% 8.0 8.2 3% 3% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.0 1.6 -59% -59%
8 March 3.6 3.9 9% 9% 7.8 10.6 36% 36% 11.9 10.1 -15% -15% 8.7 9.0 3% 3% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 1.4 -64% -64%
8 April 21.2 21.5 1% 1% 46.7 47.2 1% 1% 55.4 52.5 -5% -5% 39.8 39.5 -1% -1% 13.4 13.5 1% 1% 24.2 19.4 -20% -20%
8 May 44.0 44.3 1% 1% 95.2 95.7 1% 1% 115.5 112.4 -3% -3% 80.3 78.4 -2% -2% 29.2 30.6 5% 4% 48.0 43.3 -10% -9%
8 June 27.3 27.6 1% 1% 57.9 58.3 1% 0% 73.0 68.4 -6% -3% 53.6 53.1 -1% -1% 17.5 16.6 -5% -2% 29.6 24.8 -16% -7%
8 July 6.6 7.0 5% 2% 13.8 15.3 10% 4% 20.2 16.2 -20% -10% 14.5 14.8 2% 1% 3.8 1.0 -74% -20% 6.7 2.9 -57% -17%
8 August 5.6 5.9 6% 6% 11.6 13.7 19% 19% 17.3 14.2 -18% -18% 12.6 13.1 4% 4% 3.4 0.7 -79% -79% 5.6 2.5 -56% -56%
8 September 27.4 27.7 1% 1% 59.1 59.6 1% 1% 73.1 69.1 -6% -6% 53.8 53.4 -1% -1% 17.6 17.4 -1% -1% 30.5 25.7 -16% -16%
8 October 6.3 6.6 5% 5% 13.1 14.8 13% 13% 19.3 15.6 -19% -19% 13.9 14.2 3% 3% 3.6 0.8 -78% -78% 6.3 2.7 -57% -57%
8 November 5.2 5.5 6% 6% 10.7 12.9 20% 20% 16.2 13.3 -18% -18% 11.6 12.0 4% 4% 3.4 0.6 -82% -82% 5.4 2.4 -56% -56%
8 December 4.7 5.0 7% 7% 9.7 12.3 26% 26% 14.9 12.4 -17% -17% 11.0 11.4 4% 4% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 2.0 -58% -58%
9 January 4.1 4.4 6% 6% 8.6 9.7 13% 13% 13.5 10.0 -26% -26% 10.0 10.4 4% 4% 2.6 0.2 -92% -92% 4.3 1.4 -66% -66%
9 February 3.3 3.5 6% 6% 7.0 8.0 13% 13% 11.1 8.4 -24% -24% 8.2 8.5 4% 4% 2.3 0.1 -96% -96% 3.9 1.2 -69% -69%
9 March 3.6 3.9 6% 6% 7.8 8.6 11% 11% 12.1 9.2 -24% -24% 8.9 9.3 4% 4% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 1.1 -73% -73%
9 April 20.1 20.3 1% 1% 44.2 42.6 -4% -4% 52.9 48.6 -8% -8% 38.6 38.5 0% 0% 12.2 12.3 1% 1% 22.9 17.5 -23% -23%
9 May 46.3 46.6 0% 0% 100.4 99.0 -1% -1% 122.0 118.0 -3% -3% 85.6 83.5 -2% -2% 30.9 32.5 5% 4% 50.7 45.6 -10% -10%
9 June 19.5 19.7 1% 0% 40.8 39.5 -3% -1% 52.1 46.5 -11% -4% 38.5 38.5 0% 0% 11.7 10.0 -14% -3% 20.6 15.5 -25% -7%
9 July 6.5 6.8 4% 2% 13.6 13.3 -2% -1% 19.9 15.0 -24% -11% 14.4 14.7 2% 1% 3.7 0.9 -76% -20% 6.6 2.6 -61% -18%
9 August 5.5 5.7 4% 4% 11.4 11.8 3% 3% 17.0 13.2 -23% -23% 12.4 12.9 4% 4% 3.4 0.7 -79% -79% 5.6 2.2 -60% -60%
9 September 4.7 4.9 5% 5% 9.7 10.3 6% 6% 14.7 11.5 -22% -22% 11.0 11.4 4% 4% 3.0 0.4 -86% -86% 4.9 1.8 -63% -63%
9 October 7.2 7.4 3% 3% 14.9 14.4 -3% -3% 21.1 16.6 -21% -21% 16.7 17.2 3% 3% 3.5 1.2 -65% -65% 7.0 2.9 -60% -60%
9 November 4.7 4.9 5% 5% 9.7 10.2 4% 4% 14.5 11.3 -23% -23% 10.8 11.1 4% 4% 2.9 0.2 -93% -93% 4.9 1.7 -66% -66%
9 December 4.1 4.4 5% 5% 8.8 9.5 9% 9% 13.3 10.4 -22% -22% 9.8 10.1 4% 4% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.4 1.5 -67% -67%
10 January 3.6 3.8 6% 6% 7.8 8.1 3% 3% 12.0 9.0 -25% -25% 8.8 9.1 4% 4% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.0 1.1 -72% -72%
10 February 3.9 4.1 4% 4% 8.3 8.2 -1% -1% 12.3 9.5 -23% -23% 9.5 9.8 3% 3% 2.6 0.3 -88% -88% 4.5 1.4 -69% -69%
10 March 11.3 11.5 2% 2% 24.7 22.4 -9% -9% 31.4 26.3 -16% -16% 23.4 23.8 1% 1% 5.6 4.4 -21% -21% 12.2 6.9 -43% -43%
10 April 19.0 19.2 1% 1% 40.9 38.6 -5% -5% 48.4 43.9 -9% -9% 33.8 33.9 0% 0% 12.1 10.7 -11% -11% 21.0 15.7 -25% -25%
10 May 35.4 35.6 1% 0% 76.3 73.9 -3% -3% 92.8 88.2 -5% -4% 64.1 62.7 -2% -2% 23.4 23.5 1% 0% 38.4 33.0 -14% -10%
10 June 6.4 6.6 3% 0% 13.4 12.3 -9% -1% 19.1 14.5 -24% -3% 13.7 13.8 1% 0% 4.0 1.0 -75% -6% 6.8 2.6 -62% -6%
10 July 5.6 5.8 3% 1% 11.6 11.1 -5% -1% 17.0 13.1 -23% -9% 12.3 12.6 3% 1% 3.5 0.7 -80% -20% 5.7 2.2 -62% -16%
10 August 4.8 5.0 4% 4% 10.1 9.9 -2% -2% 15.1 11.6 -23% -23% 11.3 11.6 3% 3% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.9 1.8 -65% -65%
10 September 5.1 5.3 4% 4% 10.7 10.2 -4% -4% 15.8 12.1 -23% -23% 12.3 12.6 3% 3% 3.2 0.5 -84% -84% 5.3 1.9 -65% -65%
10 October 4.6 4.8 4% 4% 9.6 9.2 -4% -4% 14.3 10.8 -24% -24% 10.8 11.1 3% 3% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.7 1.4 -71% -71%
10 November 3.8 4.0 5% 5% 8.1 8.0 -1% -1% 12.3 9.4 -24% -24% 9.1 9.4 3% 3% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 1.2 -72% -72%
10 December 3.5 3.7 5% 5% 7.6 7.6 1% 1% 11.5 8.8 -24% -24% 8.5 8.8 4% 4% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 1.0 -75% -75%
11 January 3.2 3.4 6% 6% 7.0 7.2 2% 2% 10.6 8.3 -22% -22% 7.7 8.0 4% 4% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 0.8 -78% -78%
11 February 2.7 2.9 7% 7% 6.1 6.4 5% 5% 9.2 7.4 -20% -20% 6.5 6.8 4% 4% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 0.7 -79% -79%
11 March 3.9 4.1 5% 5% 8.4 8.4 0% 0% 12.1 9.9 -19% -19% 9.2 9.4 2% 2% 2.2 0.4 -82% -82% 4.1 1.1 -73% -73%
11 April 58.8 59.0 0% 0% 130.2 127.4 -2% -2% 153.9 151.6 -1% -1% 107.0 103.9 -3% -3% 41.2 45.9 12% 12% 68.8 63.0 -8% -8%
11 May 48.3 48.5 0% 0% 102.9 100.6 -2% -2% 127.1 123.8 -3% -3% 93.6 92.3 -1% -1% 30.6 32.4 6% 5% 51.3 46.0 -10% -10%
11 June 16.6 16.8 1% 0% 34.0 31.9 -6% -2% 44.2 38.8 -12% -4% 33.0 34.1 3% 1% 9.2 7.1 -23% -4% 16.7 11.5 -31% -7%
11 July 6.6 6.8 3% 1% 13.6 12.6 -8% -3% 20.1 15.3 -24% -11% 14.3 15.3 7% 3% 3.7 0.9 -76% -20% 6.5 2.5 -62% -18%
11 August 5.6 5.8 4% 4% 11.5 11.1 -4% -4% 17.3 13.4 -22% -22% 12.4 13.1 6% 6% 3.4 0.6 -82% -82% 5.5 2.1 -63% -63%
11 September 4.8 5.0 4% 4% 9.8 9.6 -2% -2% 15.0 11.7 -22% -22% 10.9 11.5 6% 6% 3.0 0.4 -86% -86% 4.8 1.7 -65% -65%
11 October 17.2 17.4 1% 1% 37.3 34.9 -6% -6% 46.0 41.0 -11% -11% 34.7 35.2 2% 2% 9.8 8.5 -13% -13% 18.5 13.1 -29% -29%
11 November 6.0 6.1 3% 3% 12.3 11.4 -7% -7% 18.1 13.9 -23% -23% 12.9 13.2 3% 3% 3.6 0.7 -81% -81% 6.1 2.2 -65% -65%
11 December 5.2 5.4 4% 4% 10.8 10.5 -3% -3% 16.2 12.6 -22% -22% 11.5 12.0 4% 4% 3.2 0.5 -84% -84% 5.3 1.9 -63% -63%
12 January 4.5 4.8 6% 6% 9.4 10.9 15% 15% 14.4 12.8 -12% -12% 10.4 10.8 5% 5% 2.9 0.2 -93% -93% 4.6 1.7 -63% -63%
12 February 3.6 3.8 6% 6% 7.6 9.3 21% 21% 11.8 10.8 -9% -9% 8.4 8.9 6% 6% 2.6 0.2 -92% -92% 4.2 1.5 -65% -65%
12 March 18.5 18.7 1% 1% 40.3 39.7 -2% -2% 48.9 45.9 -6% -6% 35.3 35.8 1% 1% 10.8 10.2 -6% -6% 20.1 14.9 -26% -26%
12 April 38.1 38.3 1% 1% 82.3 81.8 -1% -1% 100.4 98.1 -2% -2% 69.2 68.0 -2% -2% 26.1 26.9 3% 3% 42.8 37.7 -12% -12%
12 May 92.4 92.6 0% 0% 199.5 198.9 0% 0% 248.5 248.9 0% 0% 182.4 181.1 -1% -1% 61.8 68.0 10% 10% 101.0 95.9 -5% -5%
12 June 65.8 66.0 0% 0% 139.7 139.1 0% 0% 176.6 175.8 0% 0% 130.0 130.9 1% 1% 43.7 46.8 7% 6% 72.0 66.8 -7% -7%
12 July 7.5 7.8 4% 2% 15.3 15.7 3% 1% 22.9 19.0 -17% -9% 16.0 17.3 8% 4% 4.1 1.1 -73% -21% 7.2 3.1 -57% -19%
12 August 6.2 6.5 4% 4% 12.7 13.8 9% 9% 19.0 16.4 -13% -13% 13.3 14.4 9% 9% 3.6 0.8 -78% -78% 6.1 2.6 -58% -58%
12 September 12.7 13.0 2% 2% 26.6 26.5 0% 0% 34.9 31.6 -9% -9% 27.4 28.4 4% 4% 6.3 4.4 -30% -30% 13.1 8.4 -36% -36%
12 October 11.6 11.9 2% 2% 24.0 24.0 0% 0% 31.7 28.3 -11% -11% 23.4 24.4 4% 4% 6.1 3.7 -39% -39% 11.4 6.8 -40% -40%
12 November 6.0 6.3 4% 4% 12.6 13.7 8% 8% 18.3 16.2 -12% -12% 12.5 13.5 8% 8% 3.9 1.0 -74% -74% 6.4 2.9 -55% -55%
12 December 5.3 5.6 5% 5% 11.2 12.7 14% 14% 16.6 14.9 -10% -10% 11.3 12.2 8% 8% 3.5 0.7 -80% -80% 5.5 2.4 -56% -56%
13 January 4.7 4.8 2% 2% 9.9 6.3 -36% -36% 15.0 4.1 -72% -72% 11.1 5.4 -52% -52% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 4.9 0.8 -84% -84%
13 February 3.8 3.8 0% 0% 8.0 4.2 -48% -48% 12.3 5.7 -54% -54% 9.2 6.8 -26% -26% 2.8 0.2 -93% -93% 4.4 0.3 -94% -94%
13 March 4.0 4.0 -1% -1% 8.5 4.3 -50% -50% 13.1 6.5 -50% -50% 9.8 7.8 -20% -20% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 0.1 -97% -97%
13 April 11.1 11.0 -1% -1% 24.2 18.5 -24% -24% 31.5 24.9 -21% -21% 24.1 27.4 13% 13% 5.7 1.9 -67% -57% 12.7 7.4 -41% -41%
13 May 31.4 31.3 0% 0% 67.9 61.6 -9% -8% 82.3 76.7 -7% -5% 54.8 55.9 2% 2% 20.6 15.3 -26% -14% 34.9 28.6 -18% -12%
13 June 49.7 49.7 0% 0% 107.6 101.5 -6% -5% 133.8 128.0 -4% -4% 94.9 93.9 -1% -1% 34.4 27.3 -21% -14% 57.5 50.6 -12% -10%
13 July 6.8 7.0 2% 1% 14.2 8.8 -38% -14% 21.0 13.2 -37% -18% 15.3 13.1 -14% -7% 4.0 1.0 -75% -22% 6.9 2.0 -71% -22%
13 August 5.8 5.8 1% 1% 12.0 6.8 -43% -43% 17.9 10.7 -40% -40% 13.2 11.1 -16% -16% 3.6 0.7 -80% -80% 5.8 1.2 -80% -80%
13 September 5.1 5.1 0% 0% 10.5 5.6 -47% -47% 15.8 9.2 -42% -42% 12.1 10.2 -16% -16% 3.2 0.4 -88% -88% 5.2 0.6 -88% -88%
13 October 9.7 9.7 0% 0% 20.6 15.0 -27% -27% 27.9 21.4 -23% -23% 22.9 24.3 6% 6% 4.4 0.8 -82% -82% 10.1 5.0 -51% -51%
13 November 5.3 5.3 0% 0% 11.0 5.8 -47% -47% 16.0 9.4 -41% -41% 12.1 10.3 -15% -15% 3.3 0.5 -85% -85% 5.5 0.7 -87% -87%
13 December 4.8 4.8 0% 0% 10.0 5.1 -49% -49% 14.7 8.5 -42% -42% 11.0 9.2 -16% -16% 3.2 0.4 -87% -87% 5.0 0.4 -91% -91%
14 January 4.2 4.2 -1% -1% 8.9 4.4 -51% -51% 13.2 7.6 -42% -42% 10.0 8.4 -16% -16% 2.8 0.2 -93% -93% 4.4 0.2 -95% -95%
14 February 3.4 3.4 0% 0% 7.2 3.5 -52% -52% 10.8 6.2 -42% -42% 8.2 7.0 -15% -15% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 0.1 -98% -98%
14 March 3.3 3.3 0% 0% 7.3 3.4 -54% -54% 11.0 6.3 -42% -42% 8.3 7.1 -14% -14% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 0.0 -99% -99%
14 April 21.5 21.3 -1% -1% 47.2 40.8 -14% -14% 56.2 52.0 -8% -8% 39.6 44.9 13% 13% 13.5 8.7 -36% -36% 25.2 19.3 -23% -23%
14 May 34.0 34.1 0% 0% 73.2 67.0 -9% -8% 89.6 85.1 -5% -4% 60.2 61.0 1% 1% 22.1 16.7 -24% -14% 37.5 31.1 -17% -12%
14 June 8.9 9.0 1% 0% 18.5 12.9 -30% -5% 25.1 18.6 -26% -5% 19.5 18.9 -3% -1% 4.6 1.3 -71% -7% 9.2 3.9 -58% -7%
14 July 6.0 6.0 0% 0% 12.5 7.1 -43% -14% 18.0 11.3 -37% -16% 13.4 11.5 -15% -7% 3.7 0.9 -76% -20% 6.1 1.3 -78% -22%
14 August 5.2 5.1 -1% -1% 10.7 5.6 -48% -48% 15.6 9.4 -40% -40% 11.7 10.0 -15% -15% 3.3 0.5 -85% -85% 5.2 0.7 -87% -87%
14 September 4.3 4.4 1% 1% 9.1 4.6 -49% -49% 13.5 8.1 -40% -40% 10.4 8.8 -15% -15% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 0.4 -92% -92%
14 October 7.3 7.3 0% 0% 15.4 9.9 -35% -35% 21.1 15.5 -27% -27% 17.2 18.2 6% 6% 3.4 0.2 -94% -94% 7.5 2.7 -64% -64%
14 November 4.5 4.5 0% 0% 9.5 4.8 -49% -49% 13.7 8.2 -40% -40% 10.5 9.0 -14% -14% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.9 0.4 -92% -92%
14 December 4.0 4.0 0% 0% 8.6 4.2 -52% -52% 12.5 7.4 -41% -41% 9.5 8.2 -14% -14% 2.7 0.2 -93% -93% 4.4 0.2 -95% -95%
15 January 3.5 3.5 -1% -1% 7.8 3.6 -53% -53% 11.3 6.7 -41% -41% 8.6 7.5 -13% -13% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.0 0.1 -97% -97%
15 February 3.0 3.0 0% 0% 6.7 3.1 -54% -54% 9.8 5.7 -41% -41% 7.3 6.5 -12% -12% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 0.1 -99% -99%
15 March 3.0 2.9 -1% -1% 6.6 3.0 -55% -55% 9.6 5.7 -41% -41% 7.1 6.3 -10% -10% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 0.0 -99% -99%
15 April 6.7 6.7 0% 0% 14.3 8.9 -38% -27% 19.2 14.5 -25% -20% 15.9 19.1 20% 20% 3.0 0.0 -100% -44% 7.2 2.8 -61% -40%
15 May 29.6 29.5 0% 0% 64.9 59.1 -9% -7% 75.9 73.2 -4% -2% 49.8 53.8 8% 6% 19.1 13.9 -27% -14% 33.6 27.8 -17% -11%
15 June 42.2 42.2 0% 0% 91.3 85.8 -6% -5% 111.6 108.2 -3% -2% 76.9 77.0 0% 0% 29.0 22.7 -22% -13% 48.7 42.5 -13% -9%
15 July 6.4 6.5 2% 1% 13.2 8.6 -35% -12% 19.0 13.1 -31% -14% 14.0 12.2 -13% -6% 3.7 0.9 -76% -20% 6.4 2.1 -67% -19%
15 August 5.4 5.4 0% 0% 11.1 6.8 -39% -39% 16.4 10.8 -34% -34% 12.4 10.6 -15% -15% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.4 1.5 -72% -72%
15 September 7.7 7.7 0% 0% 16.1 11.9 -26% -26% 22.2 17.4 -22% -22% 18.1 18.5 2% 2% 3.7 0.5 -87% -87% 8.0 4.0 -50% -50%
15 October 18.4 18.4 0% 0% 39.4 34.3 -13% -13% 48.2 43.6 -10% -10% 35.7 37.1 4% 4% 10.8 6.5 -40% -40% 19.8 14.9 -25% -25%
15 November 5.8 5.8 0% 0% 12.2 8.0 -35% -35% 17.6 12.2 -31% -31% 12.9 11.1 -14% -14% 3.8 0.9 -76% -76% 6.2 2.3 -63% -63%
15 December 5.1 5.1 0% 0% 10.6 6.7 -38% -38% 15.6 10.6 -32% -32% 11.6 10.0 -14% -14% 3.4 0.7 -79% -79% 5.3 1.7 -68% -68%
16 January 4.4 4.4 0% 0% 9.4 5.5 -41% -41% 13.9 9.2 -34% -34% 10.5 9.0 -15% -15% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.7 1.2 -74% -74%
16 February 3.5 3.5 -1% -1% 7.5 4.1 -45% -45% 11.3 7.2 -36% -36% 8.7 7.5 -14% -14% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 0.9 -80% -80%
16 March 3.5 3.5 0% 0% 7.5 3.9 -48% -48% 11.4 7.1 -37% -37% 8.7 7.6 -13% -13% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 0.7 -83% -83%
16 April 7.3 7.3 0% 0% 15.5 12.5 -19% -15% 21.0 18.4 -12% -11% 17.5 20.1 15% 15% 3.2 0.0 -100% -48% 7.8 4.8 -38% -27%
16 May 81.7 81.6 0% 0% 179.7 175.2 -3% -3% 217.5 218.8 1% 1% 149.8 151.9 1% 1% 56.5 46.5 -18% -18% 94.3 88.0 -7% -7%
16 June 68.5 68.5 0% 0% 146.0 141.7 -3% -3% 183.2 178.9 -2% -2% 133.9 131.8 -2% -2% 45.9 37.5 -18% -17% 77.1 71.2 -8% -8%
16 July 7.0 7.2 2% 1% 14.1 10.7 -24% -9% 21.1 16.0 -24% -12% 16.0 13.6 -14% -8% 3.8 0.9 -76% -21% 6.6 3.4 -49% -15%
16 August 5.8 5.9 0% 0% 11.8 8.7 -27% -27% 17.8 13.0 -27% -27% 13.4 11.5 -14% -14% 3.4 0.7 -79% -79% 5.6 2.7 -52% -52%
16 September 6.1 6.2 1% 1% 12.5 9.5 -24% -24% 18.3 14.1 -23% -23% 14.7 13.7 -6% -6% 3.4 0.4 -88% -88% 6.1 3.2 -48% -48%
16 October 5.4 5.3 -1% -1% 10.8 7.5 -30% -30% 16.2 11.6 -28% -28% 12.6 11.0 -13% -13% 3.0 0.3 -90% -90% 5.0 2.1 -58% -58%
16 November 4.9 4.9 0% 0% 9.8 6.8 -31% -31% 14.9 10.7 -28% -28% 11.6 10.4 -10% -10% 2.9 0.2 -93% -93% 4.8 1.9 -60% -60%
16 December 4.4 4.4 -1% -1% 9.0 6.0 -33% -33% 13.7 9.6 -30% -30% 10.5 9.4 -11% -11% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 1.6 -63% -63%
17 January 3.9 3.8 -1% -1% 8.1 5.2 -35% -35% 12.4 8.6 -30% -30% 9.4 8.5 -10% -10% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 1.4 -65% -65%
17 February 3.1 3.1 0% 0% 6.7 4.2 -36% -36% 10.2 7.1 -30% -30% 7.7 7.0 -9% -9% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 1.3 -66% -66%
17 March 3.1 3.1 0% 0% 6.8 4.2 -38% -38% 10.4 7.2 -31% -31% 7.8 7.1 -8% -8% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 1.1 -68% -68%
17 April 5.4 5.4 0% 0% 11.4 9.6 -16% -9% 16.1 14.5 -10% -7% 13.4 15.6 17% 14% 2.7 0.0 -100% -40% 5.7 3.9 -32% -16%
17 May 47.4 47.3 0% 0% 104.5 101.2 -3% -3% 124.8 125.9 1% 1% 83.5 88.2 6% 6% 31.3 24.3 -22% -19% 54.6 50.2 -8% -8%
17 June 57.4 57.5 0% 0% 123.5 120.3 -3% -3% 152.9 151.5 -1% -1% 110.7 110.5 0% 0% 38.9 31.4 -19% -15% 65.8 61.0 -7% -7%
17 July 6.7 6.8 1% 1% 13.6 11.1 -18% -6% 20.2 16.1 -20% -9% 14.9 13.2 -12% -6% 3.6 0.8 -78% -20% 6.3 3.9 -38% -11%
17 August 5.7 5.7 1% 1% 11.5 9.3 -19% -19% 17.2 13.5 -22% -22% 13.1 11.4 -13% -13% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.4 3.3 -39% -39%
17 September 4.8 4.8 -1% -1% 9.7 7.6 -22% -22% 14.8 11.3 -24% -24% 11.5 9.9 -13% -13% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 2.7 -42% -42%
17 October 4.4 4.4 0% 0% 8.9 6.9 -23% -23% 13.8 10.5 -24% -24% 10.8 9.4 -13% -13% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 2.3 -46% -46%
17 November 3.9 3.8 -1% -1% 7.9 5.9 -25% -25% 12.2 9.1 -25% -25% 9.5 8.4 -12% -12% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 2.0 -49% -49%
17 December 3.6 3.5 -1% -1% 7.4 5.5 -26% -26% 11.5 8.6 -25% -25% 8.8 7.9 -10% -10% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 1.8 -50% -50%
18 January 3.1 3.1 0% 0% 6.7 4.9 -27% -27% 10.5 7.8 -25% -25% 8.0 7.3 -9% -9% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 1.7 -51% -51%
18 February 2.6 2.5 -1% -1% 5.6 4.1 -26% -26% 8.7 6.6 -24% -24% 6.6 6.1 -8% -8% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.2 1.6 -50% -50%
18 March 2.6 2.6 0% 0% 5.8 4.3 -26% -26% 8.9 6.9 -22% -22% 6.6 6.1 -7% -7% 1.7 0.0 -100% -100% 3.0 1.6 -46% -46%
18 April 15.1 15.0 -1% -1% 33.6 32.4 -4% -4% 41.3 41.7 1% 1% 30.3 37.0 22% 22% 8.3 4.5 -46% -46% 17.8 16.2 -9% -9%
18 May 47.8 47.9 0% 0% 104.1 101.5 -2% -2% 124.9 126.3 1% 1% 84.3 86.0 2% 2% 31.8 25.4 -20% -17% 53.9 50.1 -7% -7%
18 June 52.8 52.9 0% 0% 113.5 111.0 -2% -2% 140.9 139.7 -1% -1% 102.9 102.4 -1% -1% 35.6 28.6 -20% -14% 60.3 56.3 -7% -6%
18 July 6.5 6.6 2% 1% 13.3 11.5 -13% -4% 19.8 16.4 -17% -8% 14.7 12.9 -12% -6% 3.6 0.8 -77% -20% 6.2 4.4 -29% -8%
18 August 5.6 5.5 -1% -1% 11.2 9.6 -14% -14% 16.9 13.8 -18% -18% 12.8 11.1 -13% -13% 3.2 0.6 -81% -81% 5.2 3.8 -28% -28%
18 September 4.7 4.7 0% 0% 9.4 8.0 -15% -15% 14.4 11.7 -19% -19% 11.2 9.7 -14% -14% 2.8 0.3 -89% -89% 4.6 3.2 -31% -31%
18 October 8.2 8.2 0% 0% 17.1 15.6 -9% -9% 23.8 21.7 -9% -9% 19.8 21.2 7% 7% 3.5 0.2 -94% -94% 8.1 6.5 -20% -20%
18 November 5.1 5.0 -2% -2% 10.3 8.6 -17% -17% 15.2 12.3 -19% -19% 11.7 10.3 -12% -12% 3.0 0.4 -86% -86% 5.0 3.3 -33% -33%
18 December 4.4 4.4 0% 0% 9.2 7.8 -16% -16% 13.7 11.3 -18% -18% 10.5 9.2 -12% -12% 2.8 0.3 -89% -89% 4.5 3.0 -33% -33%
19 January 3.9 3.9 -1% -1% 8.2 6.8 -17% -17% 12.3 10.1 -18% -18% 9.3 8.3 -11% -11% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 2.7 -33% -33%
19 February 3.2 3.2 -1% -1% 6.9 5.7 -17% -17% 10.4 8.6 -18% -18% 8.0 7.2 -10% -10% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 2.5 -34% -34%
19 March 3.1 3.1 0% 0% 6.7 5.6 -17% -17% 10.2 8.5 -17% -17% 7.7 7.0 -8% -8% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 2.3 -33% -33%
19 April 5.7 5.7 0% 0% 11.9 11.6 -3% -2% 16.6 16.6 0% 0% 14.0 16.3 17% 15% 2.8 0.1 -96% -40% 5.9 5.3 -10% -5%
19 May 11.7 11.6 0% 0% 25.8 24.1 -7% -2% 32.2 31.2 -3% -1% 23.0 26.9 17% 6% 6.1 2.5 -59% -10% 13.2 11.2 -15% -4%
19 June 5.2 5.2 0% 0% 10.8 9.3 -14% -1% 14.8 12.8 -13% -1% 11.1 10.3 -7% -1% 3.1 0.4 -87% -6% 5.4 3.8 -30% -2%
19 July 4.7 4.7 0% 0% 9.9 8.6 -13% -3% 13.5 11.8 -13% -4% 10.1 9.0 -10% -4% 3.0 0.4 -87% -19% 4.9 3.5 -28% -6%
19 August 4.0 4.1 0% 0% 8.7 7.5 -13% -13% 12.1 10.5 -13% -13% 9.1 8.0 -11% -11% 2.8 0.2 -93% -93% 4.4 3.2 -27% -27%
19 September 3.5 3.5 0% 0% 7.5 6.6 -13% -13% 10.6 9.3 -13% -13% 7.8 7.1 -9% -9% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.0 2.9 -27% -27%
19 October 9.5 9.5 0% 0% 20.6 20.2 -2% -2% 26.4 26.7 1% 1% 20.1 23.9 19% 19% 4.7 1.1 -76% -76% 10.3 9.5 -8% -8%
19 November 4.4 4.4 0% 0% 9.3 6.4 -31% -31% 12.8 9.4 -26% -26% 9.3 8.4 -10% -10% 2.8 0.3 -89% -89% 4.8 1.7 -65% -65%
19 December 3.9 4.0 1% 1% 8.6 10.3 20% 20% 11.8 13.1 11% 11% 8.5 7.6 -11% -11% 2.8 0.3 -89% -89% 4.4 6.1 38% 38%
20 January 3.6 3.6 1% 1% 7.8 8.5 9% 9% 10.8 11.2 3% 3% 7.7 7.0 -10% -10% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.0 4.6 16% 16%
20 February 2.9 2.9 1% 1% 6.4 7.1 11% 11% 9.0 9.4 5% 5% 6.4 5.9 -8% -8% 2.2 0.1 -96% -96% 3.7 4.4 21% 21%
20 March 2.9 2.9 0% 0% 6.5 6.8 4% 4% 9.2 9.2 0% 0% 6.4 6.0 -7% -7% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.6 6% 6%
20 April 39.5 39.5 0% 0% 87.5 87.6 0% 0% 103.1 108.0 5% 5% 67.2 73.5 9% 9% 27.4 20.8 -24% -24% 47.3 46.1 -2% -2%
20 May 80.4 80.4 0% 0% 173.9 175.2 1% 1% 213.5 218.2 2% 2% 152.2 151.8 0% 0% 53.6 44.3 -17% -17% 90.1 89.3 -1% -1%
20 June 42.2 42.3 0% 0% 88.8 89.7 1% 1% 112.4 112.6 0% 0% 83.2 81.8 -2% -2% 27.2 21.1 -22% -12% 46.3 46.1 -1% 0%
20 July 6.8 6.9 2% 1% 13.7 14.1 3% 1% 20.5 19.1 -7% -3% 15.4 13.4 -13% -7% 3.7 0.9 -76% -20% 6.5 6.6 2% 1%
20 August 5.6 5.6 0% 0% 11.4 11.4 -1% -1% 17.3 15.6 -10% -10% 13.1 11.4 -13% -13% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.4 5.3 -2% -2%
20 September 6.5 6.5 0% 0% 13.2 13.0 -1% -1% 19.2 17.9 -7% -7% 15.4 15.1 -2% -2% 3.4 0.4 -88% -88% 6.4 6.1 -5% -5%
20 October 5.6 5.6 0% 0% 11.3 11.1 -1% -1% 16.8 15.3 -9% -9% 13.0 11.7 -10% -10% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 5.3 5.1 -3% -3%
20 November 4.6 4.6 0% 0% 9.4 9.4 1% 1% 14.2 13.1 -8% -8% 11.0 9.8 -11% -11% 2.8 0.3 -89% -89% 4.6 4.7 1% 1%
20 December 4.2 4.1 -1% -1% 8.6 8.7 2% 2% 13.1 12.2 -7% -7% 10.0 9.1 -10% -10% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 4.3 3% 3%
21 January 3.7 3.7 0% 0% 7.7 7.9 2% 2% 11.9 11.2 -6% -6% 9.0 8.2 -8% -8% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 4.0 3% 3%
21 February 3.0 2.9 -1% -1% 6.4 7.0 9% 9% 9.8 9.7 -1% -1% 7.4 6.9 -7% -7% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 4.2 17% 17%
21 March 3.4 3.4 0% 0% 7.3 7.2 -2% -2% 11.1 10.4 -6% -6% 8.4 8.1 -4% -4% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 3.5 -5% -5%
21 April 21.3 21.2 -1% -1% 47.0 46.3 -1% -1% 56.3 57.9 3% 3% 40.2 46.7 16% 16% 13.0 8.2 -37% -37% 25.0 23.7 -5% -5%
21 May 28.1 28.3 1% 0% 60.0 60.2 0% 0% 73.3 75.0 2% 1% 49.9 51.5 3% 2% 17.5 12.7 -28% -13% 30.5 29.8 -2% -1%
21 June 8.2 8.2 1% 0% 17.0 16.8 -1% 0% 23.5 22.5 -4% -1% 17.9 17.7 -1% 0% 4.2 1.0 -76% -7% 8.5 8.1 -5% -1%
21 July 6.0 6.0 0% 0% 12.4 12.2 -1% 0% 17.8 16.5 -7% -3% 13.1 11.7 -11% -5% 3.7 0.9 -76% -20% 6.0 5.8 -3% -1%
21 August 5.1 5.1 -1% -1% 10.6 10.4 -1% -1% 15.4 14.3 -7% -7% 11.7 10.4 -11% -11% 3.3 0.5 -85% -85% 5.2 5.0 -3% -3%
21 September 5.5 5.5 0% 0% 11.5 11.2 -2% -2% 16.4 15.6 -5% -5% 13.0 12.7 -2% -2% 3.3 0.4 -88% -88% 5.7 5.4 -6% -6%
21 October 4.9 4.9 0% 0% 10.3 10.1 -1% -1% 14.8 14.0 -6% -6% 11.5 10.6 -8% -8% 3.0 0.3 -90% -90% 5.0 4.8 -4% -4%
21 November 5.2 5.2 0% 0% 10.8 11.2 4% 4% 15.3 15.4 1% 1% 12.2 12.1 -1% -1% 3.1 0.2 -93% -93% 5.4 5.8 7% 7%
21 December 4.4 4.3 0% 0% 9.2 9.4 1% 1% 13.2 12.8 -3% -3% 10.1 9.4 -7% -7% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.6 4.7 3% 3%
22 January 3.8 3.7 -1% -1% 8.2 8.5 4% 4% 11.8 11.7 -1% -1% 8.9 8.4 -6% -6% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 4.5 6% 6%
22 February 3.1 3.1 1% 1% 6.8 7.5 11% 11% 9.8 10.3 4% 4% 7.4 7.0 -5% -5% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 4.6 19% 19%
22 March 3.1 3.1 0% 0% 7.0 7.2 3% 3% 10.1 10.0 -1% -1% 7.4 7.1 -3% -3% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.8 4% 4%
22 April 6.3 6.3 0% 0% 13.5 13.2 -2% -1% 18.3 18.5 1% 1% 14.9 18.1 21% 20% 2.9 0.0 -100% -44% 6.8 6.3 -8% -5%
22 May 72.1 72.0 0% 0% 158.9 159.5 0% 0% 190.4 197.3 4% 4% 129.0 132.8 3% 3% 49.2 40.0 -19% -19% 83.4 82.0 -2% -2%
22 June 88.2 88.2 0% 0% 188.6 190.1 1% 1% 235.1 237.4 1% 1% 171.8 169.4 -1% -1% 59.6 49.4 -17% -17% 100.0 99.2 -1% -1%
22 July 7.1 7.3 2% 1% 14.2 14.9 5% 2% 21.2 20.0 -6% -3% 16.1 14.1 -12% -7% 3.8 0.9 -76% -21% 6.5 7.1 8% 2%
22 August 6.0 6.0 1% 1% 12.0 11.9 -1% -1% 18.0 16.2 -10% -10% 13.7 12.0 -12% -12% 3.4 0.6 -82% -82% 5.6 5.4 -3% -3%
22 September 25.6 25.6 0% 0% 54.5 54.7 0% 0% 68.3 68.6 0% 0% 51.1 53.2 4% 4% 15.7 10.7 -32% -32% 28.4 27.8 -2% -2%
22 October 9.8 9.9 1% 1% 20.2 20.3 1% 1% 27.8 26.9 -3% -3% 21.9 21.5 -2% -2% 4.9 1.5 -69% -69% 9.6 9.6 -1% -1%
22 November 6.1 6.1 0% 0% 12.6 13.4 7% 7% 18.4 18.0 -3% -3% 13.6 12.1 -11% -11% 3.9 0.9 -77% -77% 6.3 7.1 13% 13%
22 December 5.4 5.4 0% 0% 11.1 11.2 1% 1% 16.6 15.4 -7% -7% 12.3 10.9 -12% -12% 3.4 0.7 -80% -80% 5.4 5.5 2% 2%
23 January 4.7 4.8 1% 1% 9.8 10.1 3% 3% 14.8 14.3 -4% -4% 11.2 9.9 -11% -11% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 5.0 5% 5%
23 February 4.0 3.9 -1% -1% 8.2 8.2 -1% -1% 12.6 11.5 -8% -8% 9.5 8.6 -10% -10% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.3 -2% -2%
23 March 3.7 3.7 -1% -1% 7.9 8.5 7% 7% 12.2 11.9 -3% -3% 9.2 8.4 -9% -9% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 4.5 14% 14%
23 April 7.3 7.3 0% 0% 15.3 15.3 0% 0% 21.2 21.3 0% 0% 17.6 20.3 15% 15% 3.2 0.0 -100% -48% 7.7 7.3 -4% -3%
23 May 101.0 100.8 0% 0% 221.1 221.9 0% 0% 270.0 276.4 2% 2% 188.5 190.1 1% 1% 69.3 57.6 -17% -17% 115.8 113.9 -2% -2%
23 June 30.4 30.5 0% 0% 63.3 64.1 1% 1% 81.0 81.0 0% 0% 59.8 59.3 -1% -1% 18.9 13.8 -27% -10% 32.5 32.6 0% 0%
23 July 6.9 7.0 2% 1% 14.0 14.1 0% 0% 20.9 19.2 -8% -4% 15.6 13.8 -11% -6% 3.8 0.9 -77% -21% 6.6 6.5 -2% 0%
23 August 5.8 5.8 0% 0% 11.8 11.7 -1% -1% 17.7 16.1 -9% -9% 13.3 11.8 -12% -12% 3.5 0.7 -80% -80% 5.6 5.5 -2% -2%
23 September 4.9 4.9 0% 0% 10.0 9.9 0% 0% 15.2 13.8 -9% -9% 11.6 10.3 -12% -12% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.9 4.8 -2% -2%
23 October 6.3 6.4 1% 1% 12.9 12.7 -1% -1% 18.9 17.9 -5% -5% 15.3 15.4 0% 0% 3.2 0.2 -94% -94% 6.1 5.8 -6% -6%
23 November 4.7 4.7 0% 0% 9.6 9.6 0% 0% 14.4 13.3 -8% -8% 11.1 10.0 -10% -10% 2.8 0.2 -93% -93% 4.7 4.7 0% 0%
23 December 4.2 4.2 -1% -1% 8.7 8.8 2% 2% 13.2 12.3 -7% -7% 10.0 9.1 -9% -9% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 4.3 3% 3%
24 January 3.7 3.6 -1% -1% 7.8 8.0 3% 3% 12.0 11.3 -5% -5% 9.0 8.3 -7% -7% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 4.1 6% 6%
24 February 3.0 3.0 0% 0% 6.4 6.6 2% 2% 9.9 9.4 -5% -5% 7.4 7.0 -6% -6% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.7 3% 3%
24 March 3.0 3.0 -1% -1% 6.6 6.7 2% 2% 10.1 9.6 -4% -4% 7.5 7.1 -5% -5% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.5 4% 4%
24 April 5.8 5.8 0% 0% 12.2 12.2 0% 0% 17.1 17.4 1% 1% 14.3 17.2 21% 19% 2.7 0.0 -100% -41% 6.1 5.8 -5% -3%
24 May 19.9 19.8 -1% 0% 43.5 42.8 -2% -1% 51.8 52.6 1% 1% 35.8 40.7 14% 7% 11.4 7.1 -38% -12% 22.3 21.1 -5% -2%
24 June 27.6 27.7 1% 0% 59.3 59.3 0% 0% 71.6 73.7 3% 1% 48.4 49.7 3% 2% 18.2 13.4 -26% -10% 31.3 30.4 -3% -1%
24 July 6.1 6.1 0% 0% 12.7 12.8 1% 0% 18.3 17.2 -6% -3% 13.1 11.8 -10% -4% 3.6 0.8 -78% -20% 6.2 6.2 0% 0%
24 August 5.2 5.1 -1% -1% 10.7 10.6 -1% -1% 15.7 14.6 -7% -7% 11.5 10.3 -11% -11% 3.3 0.5 -85% -85% 5.2 5.1 -2% -2%
24 September 4.3 4.4 1% 1% 9.1 9.1 0% 0% 13.5 12.6 -6% -6% 10.2 9.1 -11% -11% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.6 4.6 -2% -2%
24 October 4.1 4.1 -1% -1% 8.6 8.5 -1% -1% 12.8 12.0 -6% -6% 9.9 9.1 -9% -9% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.2 -2% -2%
24 November 3.5 3.4 -1% -1% 7.5 7.4 -1% -1% 11.2 10.5 -6% -6% 8.7 8.0 -8% -8% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 3.8 -1% -1%
24 December 3.2 3.2 0% 0% 7.1 7.5 7% 7% 10.5 10.6 0% 0% 8.1 7.6 -6% -6% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 4.0 11% 11%
25 January 2.9 2.9 -1% -1% 6.5 6.7 4% 4% 9.7 9.5 -2% -2% 7.3 7.0 -4% -4% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.6 6% 6%
25 February 2.4 2.4 0% 0% 5.5 5.8 7% 7% 8.1 8.2 1% 1% 6.0 5.8 -2% -2% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.2 3.6 12% 12%
25 March 2.5 2.4 -1% -1% 5.6 5.8 3% 3% 8.4 8.3 -1% -1% 6.0 5.9 -1% -1% 1.7 0.0 -100% -100% 3.0 3.2 6% 6%
25 April 30.1 30.0 0% 0% 66.9 66.8 0% 0% 78.9 83.0 5% 5% 53.5 60.8 14% 14% 19.8 14.4 -27% -27% 36.1 34.9 -3% -3%
25 May 38.8 38.9 0% 0% 83.7 84.1 1% 1% 101.9 104.6 3% 2% 70.2 71.7 2% 2% 24.9 19.3 -22% -15% 43.0 42.4 -1% -1%
25 June 20.2 20.3 1% 0% 42.3 42.3 0% 0% 53.2 53.1 0% 0% 40.0 40.5 1% 1% 12.0 8.0 -34% -8% 21.7 21.1 -3% -1%
25 July 6.2 6.2 1% 0% 12.8 12.7 -1% 0% 18.7 17.3 -7% -3% 13.9 12.5 -10% -5% 3.6 0.8 -77% -20% 6.2 6.0 -3% -1%
25 August 5.2 5.2 0% 0% 10.8 10.7 -1% -1% 16.0 14.7 -8% -8% 12.1 10.7 -12% -12% 3.2 0.6 -81% -81% 5.2 5.1 -3% -3%
25 September 4.8 4.8 0% 0% 9.8 9.7 -1% -1% 14.6 13.5 -8% -8% 11.4 10.3 -10% -10% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 4.7 -4% -4%
25 October 7.3 7.4 0% 0% 15.2 15.0 -2% -2% 21.3 20.6 -3% -3% 17.3 18.4 7% 7% 3.4 0.2 -94% -94% 7.3 6.9 -6% -6%
25 November 4.7 4.6 0% 0% 9.7 9.8 2% 2% 14.2 13.4 -5% -5% 11.0 9.9 -9% -9% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.9 5.0 3% 3%
25 December 4.1 4.1 0% 0% 8.7 8.7 0% 0% 12.9 12.1 -6% -6% 9.9 9.0 -9% -9% 2.7 0.2 -92% -92% 4.4 4.3 -1% -1%
26 January 3.6 3.6 -1% -1% 7.8 8.0 3% 3% 11.6 11.2 -3% -3% 8.9 8.2 -8% -8% 2.4 0.1 -96% -96% 4.0 4.2 5% 5%
26 February 2.9 2.9 0% 0% 6.4 6.6 2% 2% 9.6 9.3 -3% -3% 7.4 6.9 -6% -6% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 3.8 3% 3%
26 March 3.0 2.9 -1% -1% 6.6 7.1 7% 7% 9.8 9.9 1% 1% 7.3 7.0 -4% -4% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.9 13% 13%
26 April 10.3 10.3 0% 0% 22.7 22.3 -2% -2% 29.0 29.7 2% 2% 22.0 27.3 25% 25% 5.2 1.7 -67% -52% 11.9 11.0 -7% -7%
26 May 28.5 28.5 0% 0% 62.0 61.6 -1% 0% 73.0 75.3 3% 2% 49.1 52.0 6% 4% 18.4 13.5 -27% -13% 31.9 30.8 -4% -2%
26 June 15.4 15.5 1% 0% 32.5 32.3 -1% 0% 40.3 40.1 0% 0% 29.0 29.5 2% 1% 9.1 5.3 -42% -8% 16.7 16.1 -4% -1%
26 July 5.9 5.9 0% 0% 12.4 12.4 0% 0% 17.8 16.8 -6% -2% 12.9 11.5 -11% -5% 3.7 0.9 -76% -20% 6.1 6.0 -1% 0%
26 August 5.0 5.0 0% 0% 10.5 10.4 0% 0% 15.2 14.3 -6% -6% 11.3 10.1 -11% -11% 3.3 0.5 -85% -85% 5.1 5.1 -2% -2%
26 September 5.9 5.9 1% 1% 12.3 12.1 -2% -2% 17.3 16.6 -4% -4% 13.8 13.8 1% 1% 3.4 0.4 -88% -88% 6.2 5.8 -6% -6%
26 October 8.5 8.5 0% 0% 18.1 17.9 -1% -1% 24.2 23.9 -1% -1% 19.5 20.9 7% 7% 4.1 0.6 -85% -85% 8.9 8.5 -4% -4%
26 November 4.9 4.9 0% 0% 10.5 10.8 2% 2% 14.9 14.4 -3% -3% 11.2 10.2 -9% -9% 3.4 0.6 -82% -82% 5.5 5.7 3% 3%
26 December 4.4 4.4 0% 0% 9.5 9.9 4% 4% 13.5 13.4 -1% -1% 10.1 9.2 -10% -10% 3.1 0.5 -84% -84% 4.9 5.2 7% 7%
27 January 3.9 3.9 0% 0% 8.4 8.7 3% 3% 12.1 11.9 -2% -2% 9.1 8.4 -8% -8% 2.7 0.2 -93% -93% 4.3 4.5 4% 4%
27 February 3.3 3.2 -1% -1% 7.1 7.3 3% 3% 10.4 10.2 -2% -2% 7.8 7.3 -7% -7% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.0 4.1 4% 4%
27 March 3.2 3.1 -2% -2% 7.1 7.6 8% 8% 10.3 10.6 3% 3% 7.5 7.1 -5% -5% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 4.3 15% 15%
27 April 17.8 17.6 -1% -1% 39.2 38.9 -1% -1% 47.0 48.5 3% 3% 33.0 38.9 18% 18% 10.9 6.4 -41% -41% 20.9 20.0 -4% -4%
27 May 71.2 71.3 0% 0% 155.5 156.6 1% 1% 188.9 195.5 3% 3% 129.5 130.4 1% 1% 48.7 39.9 -18% -18% 81.2 80.2 -1% -1%
27 June 57.5 57.6 0% 0% 122.4 123.3 1% 1% 153.4 154.7 1% 1% 112.3 111.0 -1% -1% 38.3 30.8 -20% -15% 64.6 63.9 -1% -1%
27 July 6.9 7.0 2% 1% 14.0 14.4 3% 1% 20.9 19.6 -6% -3% 15.6 13.8 -12% -6% 3.8 0.9 -76% -21% 6.6 6.8 4% 1%
27 August 5.8 5.7 0% 0% 11.7 11.6 -1% -1% 17.6 15.9 -9% -9% 13.3 11.7 -12% -12% 3.4 0.7 -79% -79% 5.5 5.4 -2% -2%
27 September 4.9 4.9 -1% -1% 9.9 9.8 0% 0% 15.0 13.6 -9% -9% 11.6 10.2 -12% -12% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 4.7 -1% -1%
27 October 5.6 5.6 -1% -1% 11.3 11.1 -2% -2% 16.8 16.0 -5% -5% 13.6 13.1 -3% -3% 3.0 0.2 -93% -93% 5.3 5.0 -5% -5%
27 November 4.5 4.5 0% 0% 9.1 9.3 2% 2% 13.8 12.9 -7% -7% 10.8 9.8 -9% -9% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.5 4.7 4% 4%
27 December 4.0 4.0 0% 0% 8.3 8.5 3% 3% 12.7 12.0 -6% -6% 9.7 8.9 -8% -8% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 4.2 5% 5%
28 January 3.6 3.5 -1% -1% 7.5 8.0 6% 6% 11.6 11.2 -3% -3% 8.7 8.1 -7% -7% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 4.2 12% 12%
28 February 2.9 2.8 0% 0% 6.2 6.5 5% 5% 9.6 9.2 -3% -3% 7.2 6.8 -5% -5% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.8 10% 10%
28 March 2.9 2.8 -1% -1% 6.4 6.5 2% 2% 9.7 9.3 -4% -4% 7.4 6.9 -6% -6% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.4 3% 3%
28 April 3.4 3.4 0% 0% 7.3 7.2 -1% 0% 10.8 10.5 -3% -1% 8.3 8.9 8% 4% 2.1 0.0 -100% -30% 3.8 3.6 -5% -2%
28 May 36.5 36.4 0% 0% 80.7 80.5 0% 0% 96.0 100.0 4% 3% 64.8 71.6 10% 10% 23.5 17.4 -26% -16% 42.1 40.7 -3% -3%
28 June 74.7 74.7 0% 0% 161.7 162.6 1% 1% 199.1 203.2 2% 2% 142.4 142.5 0% 0% 51.3 42.3 -17% -17% 86.5 85.4 -1% -1%
28 July 6.6 6.7 2% 1% 13.0 13.7 6% 2% 19.5 18.6 -5% -2% 14.5 13.1 -10% -5% 3.3 0.6 -82% -20% 5.9 6.5 9% 2%
28 August 5.6 5.6 0% 0% 11.1 11.0 -1% -1% 16.8 15.2 -10% -10% 12.9 11.5 -11% -11% 3.1 0.5 -84% -84% 5.1 5.0 -3% -3%
28 September 5.3 5.3 0% 0% 10.5 10.3 -2% -2% 15.8 14.3 -9% -9% 12.5 11.5 -8% -8% 3.0 0.3 -90% -90% 5.0 4.8 -5% -5%
28 October 9.0 9.0 0% 0% 18.5 18.3 -1% -1% 25.5 24.6 -4% -4% 21.3 23.1 8% 8% 3.7 0.2 -95% -95% 8.8 8.3 -5% -5%
28 November 5.2 5.2 -1% -1% 10.6 10.5 0% 0% 15.5 14.4 -7% -7% 12.0 10.8 -10% -10% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 5.1 5.1 0% 0%
28 December 4.6 4.7 0% 0% 9.6 10.1 5% 5% 14.2 13.6 -4% -4% 10.8 9.8 -10% -10% 2.9 0.4 -86% -86% 4.7 5.1 8% 8%
29 January 4.1 4.1 0% 0% 8.6 8.9 3% 3% 12.8 12.2 -5% -5% 9.7 8.9 -9% -9% 2.6 0.2 -92% -92% 4.2 4.5 5% 5%
29 February 3.6 3.6 -1% -1% 7.6 7.5 -1% -1% 11.3 10.6 -7% -7% 8.6 8.2 -5% -5% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 4.0 -3% -3%
29 March 10.1 10.0 0% 0% 21.8 21.5 -1% -1% 28.4 28.7 1% 1% 22.2 26.2 18% 18% 4.8 1.2 -75% -75% 10.9 10.3 -5% -5%
29 April 28.5 28.5 0% 0% 61.7 61.5 0% 0% 73.4 75.5 3% 3% 49.7 52.4 5% 5% 19.1 13.9 -27% -27% 32.7 31.8 -3% -3%
29 May 17.1 17.2 1% 0% 36.2 36.0 -1% 0% 45.4 45.2 0% 0% 32.7 33.1 1% 1% 10.1 6.1 -39% -11% 18.1 17.4 -4% -1%
29 June 7.8 7.9 1% 0% 16.7 16.4 -2% 0% 23.0 21.9 -5% -1% 17.5 17.0 -2% -1% 4.6 1.3 -72% -7% 8.5 8.1 -5% -1%
29 July 6.1 6.0 0% 0% 12.7 12.6 -1% 0% 18.2 17.0 -7% -3% 13.4 12.1 -10% -4% 3.9 1.0 -75% -21% 6.3 6.1 -3% -1%
29 August 5.1 5.2 1% 1% 10.8 10.8 0% 0% 15.7 14.8 -6% -6% 11.8 10.7 -10% -10% 3.5 0.5 -86% -86% 5.4 5.3 -2% -2%
29 September 4.4 4.4 0% 0% 9.3 9.3 0% 0% 13.6 12.8 -6% -6% 10.4 9.4 -9% -9% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 4.7 -1% -1%
29 October 8.8 8.8 0% 0% 18.7 18.5 -1% -1% 24.9 25.0 0% 0% 20.1 22.6 12% 12% 4.1 0.5 -88% -88% 9.2 8.7 -5% -5%
29 November 5.1 5.1 0% 0% 10.8 11.1 2% 2% 15.3 14.9 -2% -2% 11.6 10.8 -7% -7% 3.3 0.5 -85% -85% 5.5 5.7 4% 4%
29 December 4.6 4.5 -1% -1% 9.8 9.9 1% 1% 13.9 13.5 -3% -3% 10.4 9.6 -8% -8% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 5.0 5.1 2% 2%
30 January 4.0 4.0 0% 0% 8.7 9.0 3% 3% 12.4 12.3 -1% -1% 9.3 8.7 -7% -7% 2.8 0.2 -93% -93% 4.5 4.7 5% 5%
30 February 3.3 3.3 0% 0% 7.1 7.2 0% 0% 10.3 10.0 -3% -3% 7.7 7.3 -5% -5% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 4.1 -1% -1%
30 March 3.3 3.3 0% 0% 7.3 7.5 3% 3% 10.5 10.5 -1% -1% 7.7 7.5 -4% -4% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 4.0 4% 4%
30 April 14.5 14.4 -1% -1% 31.8 31.6 -1% -1% 38.8 40.2 3% 3% 27.8 33.6 21% 21% 8.4 4.2 -50% -50% 16.8 16.1 -4% -4%
30 May 33.3 33.4 0% 0% 72.0 72.1 0% 0% 86.1 89.1 3% 3% 56.9 59.0 4% 3% 21.8 16.4 -25% -14% 37.0 36.1 -2% -2%
30 June 31.0 31.1 0% 0% 66.5 66.4 0% 0% 82.2 83.3 1% 1% 58.4 58.7 0% 0% 20.6 15.4 -25% -11% 35.1 34.2 -2% -1%
30 July 6.5 6.6 1% 0% 13.7 13.8 1% 0% 19.6 18.6 -6% -3% 14.5 13.0 -10% -5% 3.9 0.9 -77% -21% 6.7 6.6 0% 0%
30 August 5.5 5.5 0% 0% 11.4 11.4 -1% -1% 16.7 15.5 -7% -7% 12.5 11.2 -10% -10% 3.5 0.7 -80% -80% 5.6 5.5 -2% -2%
30 September 4.7 4.7 -1% -1% 9.7 9.7 0% 0% 14.4 13.4 -7% -7% 11.0 9.9 -10% -10% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.9 4.8 -1% -1%
30 October 5.0 5.0 0% 0% 10.3 10.2 -1% -1% 15.2 14.4 -5% -5% 12.0 11.4 -5% -5% 3.0 0.2 -93% -93% 5.0 4.8 -4% -4%
30 November 4.2 4.1 -1% -1% 8.7 8.6 -1% -1% 12.9 12.0 -7% -7% 10.1 9.3 -8% -8% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.4 4.3 -2% -2%
30 December 3.7 3.7 -1% -1% 8.0 8.0 1% 1% 11.9 11.3 -5% -5% 9.2 8.6 -6% -6% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 4.1 1% 1%
31 January 3.3 3.3 0% 0% 7.2 8.1 12% 12% 10.8 11.1 3% 3% 8.3 7.9 -6% -6% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 4.5 22% 22%
31 February 2.8 2.8 0% 0% 6.3 6.9 10% 10% 9.3 9.9 6% 6% 7.1 6.8 -4% -4% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 4.1 19% 19%
31 March 2.8 2.7 -1% -1% 6.2 6.4 3% 3% 9.3 9.1 -2% -2% 6.8 6.7 -1% -1% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.5 6% 6%
31 April 24.2 24.1 0% 0% 53.5 53.4 0% 0% 63.2 66.4 5% 5% 44.1 51.2 16% 16% 15.3 10.2 -33% -33% 28.6 27.6 -3% -3%
31 May 73.5 73.6 0% 0% 160.0 161.0 1% 1% 195.6 200.9 3% 3% 136.4 137.2 1% 1% 49.5 40.8 -18% -18% 83.3 82.2 -1% -1%
31 June 41.6 41.7 0% 0% 87.9 88.7 1% 1% 110.8 111.5 1% 0% 81.9 81.2 -1% -1% 26.8 20.9 -22% -12% 45.9 45.6 -1% 0%
31 July 6.8 6.9 1% 1% 13.7 14.1 2% 1% 20.4 19.1 -6% -3% 15.3 13.6 -11% -6% 3.7 0.9 -76% -20% 6.5 6.7 3% 1%
31 August 5.7 5.7 -1% -1% 11.6 11.4 -1% -1% 17.4 15.7 -10% -10% 13.1 11.6 -11% -11% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.4 5.3 -2% -2%
31 September 4.8 4.8 0% 0% 9.7 9.7 0% 0% 14.8 13.4 -9% -9% 11.5 10.2 -11% -11% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 4.7 -1% -1%
31 October 4.4 4.4 -1% -1% 8.9 8.9 0% 0% 13.8 12.5 -10% -10% 10.7 9.6 -10% -10% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.2 -1% -1%
31 November 3.8 3.8 -1% -1% 7.8 7.8 0% 0% 12.2 11.1 -9% -9% 9.5 8.6 -9% -9% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 3.9 0% 0%
31 December 3.5 3.5 -1% -1% 7.4 7.5 1% 1% 11.5 10.7 -7% -7% 8.8 8.1 -8% -8% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.7 3% 3%
32 January 3.1 3.1 -1% -1% 6.7 7.0 6% 6% 10.5 10.1 -4% -4% 8.0 7.5 -6% -6% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.7 11% 11%
32 February 2.5 2.5 -2% -2% 5.5 6.0 9% 9% 8.7 8.6 0% 0% 6.5 6.2 -5% -5% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.2 3.7 17% 17%
32 March 2.5 2.5 0% 0% 5.7 5.8 2% 2% 8.9 8.5 -4% -4% 6.5 6.4 -2% -2% 1.7 0.0 -100% -100% 3.0 3.1 3% 3%
32 April 8.2 8.1 0% 0% 17.8 17.8 0% 0% 23.8 24.8 4% 4% 19.3 24.9 29% 29% 3.4 0.3 -91% -45% 9.2 8.8 -5% -4%
32 May 41.7 41.7 0% 0% 91.4 91.3 0% 0% 108.3 112.3 4% 3% 71.4 74.9 5% 5% 27.8 21.8 -21% -16% 47.6 46.3 -3% -2%
32 June 39.3 39.4 0% 0% 84.6 85.0 1% 0% 104.2 106.3 2% 1% 75.3 75.7 1% 0% 26.2 20.4 -22% -12% 44.8 44.2 -1% -1%
32 July 6.3 6.4 2% 1% 12.9 13.1 2% 1% 19.0 17.8 -6% -3% 14.1 12.6 -10% -5% 3.5 0.8 -77% -19% 6.1 6.2 1% 0%
32 August 5.4 5.3 -1% -1% 10.9 10.8 -1% -1% 16.3 14.8 -9% -9% 12.4 11.0 -11% -11% 3.2 0.6 -81% -81% 5.1 5.0 -2% -2%
32 September 4.5 4.5 0% 0% 9.2 9.2 0% 0% 14.0 12.7 -9% -9% 10.8 9.6 -11% -11% 2.8 0.3 -89% -89% 4.5 4.5 -2% -2%
32 October 4.6 4.6 0% 0% 9.3 9.2 -1% -1% 14.1 12.9 -8% -8% 11.2 10.3 -8% -8% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.4 4.2 -3% -3%
32 November 3.9 3.9 -1% -1% 8.0 8.3 4% 4% 12.2 11.7 -4% -4% 9.6 8.9 -8% -8% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 4.3 9% 9%
32 December 3.5 3.5 -1% -1% 7.4 7.8 6% 6% 11.4 11.0 -3% -3% 8.8 8.2 -6% -6% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 4.1 11% 11%
33 January 3.1 3.1 0% 0% 6.7 7.1 5% 5% 10.3 10.0 -3% -3% 8.0 7.6 -5% -5% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.7 9% 9%
33 February 2.5 2.5 -1% -1% 5.6 6.0 7% 7% 8.6 8.5 0% 0% 6.5 6.3 -3% -3% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.2 3.6 13% 13%
33 March 2.6 2.6 0% 0% 5.8 6.5 12% 12% 8.8 9.2 4% 4% 6.5 6.4 -1% -1% 1.8 0.0 -100% -100% 3.1 3.7 22% 22%
33 April 29.3 29.2 0% 0% 65.2 65.2 0% 0% 77.1 81.2 5% 5% 53.0 60.3 14% 14% 19.1 13.8 -28% -28% 35.2 34.1 -3% -3%
33 May 72.7 72.7 0% 0% 158.0 159.0 1% 1% 193.5 198.5 3% 3% 136.5 137.2 1% 1% 48.6 40.0 -18% -18% 82.1 81.2 -1% -1%
33 June 91.8 91.8 0% 0% 195.9 197.5 1% 1% 245.8 247.2 1% 1% 181.2 177.7 -2% -2% 61.8 51.4 -17% -17% 103.7 102.9 -1% -1%
33 July 6.9 7.1 2% 1% 13.7 14.5 6% 2% 20.9 19.6 -6% -3% 15.9 14.0 -12% -6% 3.6 0.8 -78% -20% 6.3 6.9 9% 3%
33 August 5.7 5.8 1% 1% 11.4 11.4 0% 0% 17.4 15.7 -10% -10% 13.4 11.8 -12% -12% 3.2 0.6 -81% -81% 5.3 5.2 -2% -2%
33 September 4.8 4.8 0% 0% 9.6 9.6 0% 0% 14.8 13.4 -10% -10% 11.6 10.3 -11% -11% 2.8 0.3 -89% -89% 4.6 4.5 -2% -2%
33 October 6.8 6.8 0% 0% 13.8 13.6 -2% -2% 20.1 18.9 -6% -6% 16.7 17.3 3% 3% 3.2 0.2 -94% -94% 6.5 6.1 -6% -6%
33 November 4.7 4.8 2% 2% 9.4 9.8 4% 4% 14.3 13.4 -6% -6% 11.1 10.0 -10% -10% 2.7 0.2 -92% -92% 4.6 4.8 5% 5%
33 December 4.2 4.1 -1% -1% 8.5 8.6 1% 1% 13.2 12.1 -8% -8% 10.0 9.1 -9% -9% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 4.2 1% 1%
34 January 3.7 3.6 0% 0% 7.6 7.9 3% 3% 11.9 11.2 -6% -6% 9.0 8.3 -7% -7% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 4.0 6% 6%
34 February 2.9 2.9 0% 0% 6.3 6.7 6% 6% 9.8 9.5 -4% -4% 7.4 7.0 -5% -5% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.9 11% 11%
34 March 2.9 2.9 -1% -1% 6.4 6.6 3% 3% 9.9 9.5 -4% -4% 7.4 7.1 -4% -4% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.5 6% 6%
34 April 14.2 14.1 -1% -1% 31.6 31.1 -2% -2% 39.3 40.1 2% 2% 29.1 35.3 22% 22% 8.0 4.1 -49% -49% 16.8 15.7 -7% -7%
34 May 32.5 32.6 0% 0% 70.2 70.1 0% 0% 84.2 86.8 3% 2% 56.5 58.8 4% 3% 21.0 15.9 -24% -14% 36.0 35.0 -3% -2%
34 June 15.8 15.9 1% 0% 33.2 33.2 0% 0% 41.9 41.8 0% 0% 30.8 31.3 2% 1% 9.3 5.4 -42% -8% 17.0 16.6 -3% -1%
34 July 6.0 6.0 0% 0% 12.4 12.4 -1% 0% 18.2 16.9 -8% -3% 13.3 12.0 -10% -4% 3.6 0.9 -75% -19% 6.0 5.9 -2% -1%
34 August 5.0 5.0 -1% -1% 10.5 10.4 -1% -1% 15.6 14.4 -8% -8% 11.6 10.4 -10% -10% 3.2 0.6 -81% -81% 5.1 5.0 -2% -2%
34 September 4.6 4.6 0% 0% 9.5 9.4 -1% -1% 14.1 13.1 -7% -7% 10.9 10.0 -8% -8% 3.0 0.4 -86% -86% 4.8 4.6 -3% -3%
34 October 7.2 7.2 0% 0% 15.1 14.9 -2% -2% 21.0 20.5 -2% -2% 17.0 18.5 9% 9% 3.4 0.2 -94% -94% 7.3 6.9 -6% -6%
34 November 4.5 4.5 0% 0% 9.6 9.5 -1% -1% 13.9 13.1 -6% -6% 10.6 9.7 -8% -8% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.9 4.8 -2% -2%
34 December 4.0 4.0 0% 0% 8.6 8.9 3% 3% 12.6 12.3 -3% -3% 9.6 8.9 -7% -7% 2.7 0.2 -93% -93% 4.4 4.6 5% 5%
35 January 3.5 3.5 -1% -1% 7.7 8.1 5% 5% 11.3 11.3 0% 0% 8.7 8.1 -6% -6% 2.4 0.1 -96% -96% 4.0 4.3 10% 10%
35 February 3.0 3.0 0% 0% 6.6 7.4 12% 12% 9.8 10.2 5% 5% 7.3 7.1 -4% -4% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 4.5 22% 22%
35 March 5.5 5.5 0% 0% 11.4 11.7 3% 3% 15.9 16.5 4% 4% 13.1 15.2 16% 16% 2.7 0.0 -100% -100% 5.4 5.6 3% 3%
35 April 39.1 39.1 0% 0% 86.6 86.6 0% 0% 102.7 107.0 4% 4% 67.6 72.7 8% 8% 27.0 20.5 -24% -24% 46.9 45.7 -2% -2%
35 May 67.3 67.3 0% 0% 145.6 146.4 1% 1% 179.3 183.2 2% 2% 128.4 128.3 0% 0% 44.9 36.6 -18% -18% 75.4 74.4 -1% -1%
35 June 32.6 32.6 0% 0% 68.4 68.7 0% 0% 87.0 86.8 0% 0% 64.6 63.9 -1% -1% 20.7 15.4 -25% -11% 35.4 34.9 -1% -1%
35 July 6.9 7.0 1% 0% 14.3 14.4 1% 0% 21.0 19.6 -7% -3% 15.6 14.0 -10% -5% 4.0 1.0 -75% -21% 6.8 6.9 1% 0%
35 August 5.8 5.9 3% 3% 11.9 12.0 1% 1% 17.7 16.3 -8% -8% 13.3 11.9 -11% -11% 3.5 0.7 -80% -80% 5.7 5.6 -2% -2%
35 September 28.5 28.5 0% 0% 61.2 61.3 0% 0% 76.4 77.2 1% 1% 56.1 58.3 4% 4% 18.1 12.8 -29% -29% 32.2 31.5 -2% -2%
35 October 13.6 13.7 0% 0% 28.3 28.5 1% 1% 37.2 36.8 -1% -1% 28.6 28.5 0% 0% 7.3 3.6 -51% -51% 13.8 13.7 0% 0%
35 November 6.1 6.1 0% 0% 12.7 13.0 2% 2% 18.8 17.7 -6% -6% 13.7 12.3 -10% -10% 3.9 0.9 -77% -77% 6.4 6.7 4% 4%
35 December 5.4 5.4 0% 0% 11.2 11.3 1% 1% 16.7 15.6 -7% -7% 12.3 11.0 -10% -10% 3.5 0.7 -80% -80% 5.5 5.6 1% 1%
36 January 4.7 4.7 0% 0% 9.9 10.2 3% 3% 14.9 14.1 -6% -6% 11.2 10.1 -10% -10% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 5.1 6% 6%
36 February 3.8 3.8 -1% -1% 8.0 8.2 2% 2% 12.2 11.5 -6% -6% 9.3 8.4 -9% -9% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.4 4.5 4% 4%
36 March 4.2 4.2 0% 0% 8.8 8.7 -1% -1% 13.4 12.6 -6% -6% 10.4 9.8 -5% -5% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.2 -4% -4%
36 April 17.8 17.7 -1% -1% 39.0 38.6 -1% -1% 47.7 48.5 2% 2% 35.2 40.1 14% 14% 10.7 6.2 -42% -42% 20.7 19.8 -5% -5%
36 May 60.4 60.5 0% 0% 131.6 132.4 1% 1% 161.9 166.5 3% 3% 112.2 112.8 1% 1% 41.0 33.1 -19% -19% 68.4 67.6 -1% -1%
36 June 37.8 37.9 0% 0% 80.2 80.9 1% 1% 101.4 102.3 1% 1% 74.5 74.1 -1% 0% 24.7 18.8 -24% -12% 42.0 41.7 -1% 0%
36 July 7.0 7.1 1% 0% 14.4 14.7 2% 1% 21.3 20.0 -6% -3% 15.8 14.3 -10% -5% 4.0 1.0 -75% -22% 6.9 7.1 2% 1%
36 August 5.9 5.9 0% 0% 12.2 12.0 -1% -1% 18.1 16.5 -9% -9% 13.5 12.1 -10% -10% 3.6 0.7 -81% -81% 5.9 5.7 -4% -4%
36 September 5.8 5.8 0% 0% 11.9 11.7 -2% -2% 17.5 16.2 -8% -8% 13.6 12.8 -6% -6% 3.4 0.5 -85% -85% 5.9 5.6 -5% -5%
36 October 7.1 7.1 0% 0% 14.6 14.3 -2% -2% 20.7 19.6 -5% -5% 16.5 16.7 1% 1% 3.6 0.4 -89% -89% 6.9 6.6 -5% -5%
36 November 5.2 5.2 0% 0% 10.6 10.8 2% 2% 15.6 14.8 -5% -5% 12.1 11.1 -8% -8% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 5.3 5.4 3% 3%
36 December 4.6 4.6 0% 0% 9.6 10.1 5% 5% 14.2 13.9 -2% -2% 10.9 10.1 -7% -7% 2.9 0.2 -93% -93% 4.7 5.1 10% 10%
37 January 4.1 4.0 -1% -1% 8.6 8.7 2% 2% 12.8 12.2 -5% -5% 9.8 9.2 -6% -6% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 4.4 3% 3%
37 February 3.3 3.2 -1% -1% 7.0 7.3 3% 3% 10.6 10.3 -3% -3% 8.1 7.7 -5% -5% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 4.2 6% 6%
37 March 3.3 3.3 0% 0% 7.2 7.3 1% 1% 10.8 10.4 -3% -3% 8.1 7.9 -3% -3% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 3.7 1% 1%
37 April 29.7 29.6 0% 0% 65.5 65.5 0% 0% 78.2 81.6 4% 4% 53.7 60.1 12% 12% 19.5 13.9 -29% -29% 35.2 34.2 -3% -3%
37 May 59.6 59.6 0% 0% 129.4 130.5 1% 1% 159.1 163.4 3% 3% 112.0 112.7 1% 1% 39.7 32.1 -19% -19% 67.1 66.6 -1% -1%
37 June 37.5 37.6 0% 0% 79.2 79.7 1% 0% 100.0 100.6 1% 0% 73.8 73.4 -1% -1% 24.1 18.4 -24% -12% 41.3 40.9 -1% -1%
37 July 6.9 7.0 1% 1% 14.1 14.2 1% 0% 20.9 19.4 -7% -4% 15.5 14.0 -10% -5% 3.9 0.9 -77% -21% 6.7 6.7 -1% 0%
37 August 5.8 5.8 0% 0% 11.8 11.7 -1% -1% 17.7 16.1 -9% -9% 13.2 11.9 -10% -10% 3.5 0.7 -80% -80% 5.7 5.6 -2% -2%
37 September 4.9 4.9 -1% -1% 10.0 9.9 -1% -1% 15.2 13.7 -9% -9% 11.6 10.4 -10% -10% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.9 4.9 -1% -1%
37 October 4.9 4.9 1% 1% 9.9 9.8 -1% -1% 15.1 13.8 -8% -8% 11.8 10.9 -8% -8% 2.9 0.2 -93% -93% 4.7 4.6 -3% -3%
37 November 4.2 4.1 -1% -1% 8.6 9.1 6% 6% 13.1 12.7 -3% -3% 10.2 9.4 -7% -7% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.8 13% 13%
37 December 3.8 3.8 -1% -1% 8.0 8.6 8% 8% 12.3 12.1 -1% -1% 9.4 8.9 -6% -6% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 4.6 16% 16%
38 January 3.4 3.4 0% 0% 7.2 7.9 9% 9% 11.2 11.1 -1% -1% 8.5 8.1 -4% -4% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 4.3 16% 16%
38 February 2.7 2.7 0% 0% 6.0 6.2 3% 3% 9.3 8.9 -4% -4% 7.0 6.8 -2% -2% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.6 6% 6%
38 March 2.8 2.8 -1% -1% 6.2 6.5 4% 4% 9.5 9.3 -2% -2% 7.0 7.0 -1% -1% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.2 3.5 7% 7%
38 April 56.9 56.8 0% 0% 126.1 126.7 1% 1% 151.2 157.9 4% 4% 103.0 109.7 6% 6% 39.6 31.5 -20% -20% 68.4 67.3 -2% -2%
38 May 56.9 57.1 0% 0% 121.8 123.0 1% 1% 151.2 154.1 2% 2% 110.2 110.8 1% 1% 36.5 29.4 -19% -19% 62.3 61.9 -1% -1%
38 June 66.6 66.6 0% 0% 141.7 142.7 1% 1% 178.8 179.1 0% 0% 131.7 129.7 -2% -2% 44.2 36.1 -18% -17% 74.7 74.0 -1% -1%
38 July 11.6 11.8 1% 1% 23.4 23.6 1% 1% 32.5 31.0 -5% -4% 26.0 25.2 -3% -3% 5.5 2.0 -64% -25% 11.0 10.9 -1% 0%
38 August 6.6 6.6 0% 0% 13.5 13.4 -1% -1% 20.0 18.4 -8% -8% 15.0 13.5 -10% -10% 3.9 0.9 -77% -77% 6.4 6.2 -3% -3%
38 September 5.5 5.4 0% 0% 11.1 11.1 -1% -1% 16.7 15.2 -9% -9% 12.6 11.3 -10% -10% 3.4 0.7 -80% -80% 5.5 5.4 -1% -1%
38 October 9.1 9.0 0% 0% 19.0 18.8 -1% -1% 26.3 25.2 -4% -4% 21.7 23.0 6% 6% 4.2 0.7 -83% -83% 9.2 8.8 -4% -4%
38 November 5.4 5.3 -1% -1% 11.1 11.2 1% 1% 16.4 15.2 -7% -7% 12.3 11.1 -10% -10% 3.4 0.6 -82% -82% 5.5 5.6 1% 1%
38 December 4.8 4.9 0% 0% 10.1 10.1 0% 0% 15.0 13.9 -8% -8% 11.2 10.2 -9% -9% 3.2 0.5 -84% -84% 4.9 4.9 -1% -1%
39 January 4.3 4.3 0% 0% 8.9 8.9 0% 0% 13.5 12.5 -8% -8% 10.1 9.3 -8% -8% 2.8 0.2 -93% -93% 4.4 4.4 0% 0%
39 February 3.5 3.5 -1% -1% 7.5 7.7 3% 3% 11.5 10.8 -5% -5% 8.5 8.0 -6% -6% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.0 4.2 5% 5%
39 March 3.3 3.3 0% 0% 7.3 7.4 2% 2% 11.2 10.6 -5% -5% 8.3 7.9 -5% -5% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 3.8 3% 3%
39 April 9.9 9.9 0% 0% 21.6 21.3 -1% -1% 28.1 28.5 1% 1% 21.6 26.4 22% 22% 4.9 1.3 -74% -54% 11.1 10.5 -6% -6%
39 May 17.2 17.2 0% 0% 37.0 36.5 -1% -1% 44.6 44.8 0% 0% 31.2 33.8 9% 4% 10.3 6.3 -39% -11% 18.7 17.8 -5% -2%
39 June 26.5 26.6 0% 0% 57.0 57.0 0% 0% 69.5 71.4 3% 1% 46.8 48.1 3% 2% 17.7 12.9 -27% -10% 30.0 29.3 -2% -1%
39 July 6.1 6.2 1% 0% 12.9 13.1 1% 0% 18.7 17.8 -5% -2% 13.3 12.2 -8% -4% 3.8 0.9 -76% -21% 6.3 6.4 1% 0%
39 August 5.2 5.2 1% 1% 10.9 10.8 0% 0% 15.9 14.9 -6% -6% 11.6 10.5 -9% -9% 3.4 0.7 -79% -79% 5.3 5.2 -2% -2%
39 September 4.5 4.5 0% 0% 9.5 9.4 -1% -1% 14.0 13.1 -6% -6% 10.6 9.8 -8% -8% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 4.7 -2% -2%
39 October 4.3 4.3 0% 0% 9.1 8.9 -1% -1% 13.4 12.6 -6% -6% 10.6 9.7 -8% -8% 2.8 0.2 -93% -93% 4.5 4.4 -3% -3%
39 November 3.6 3.6 0% 0% 7.8 8.1 4% 4% 11.6 11.3 -2% -2% 9.0 8.5 -6% -6% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 4.3 7% 7%
39 December 3.3 3.3 0% 0% 7.3 7.4 1% 1% 10.9 10.5 -4% -4% 8.4 8.1 -4% -4% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 3.8 1% 1%
40 January 3.0 3.0 0% 0% 6.8 6.9 2% 2% 10.1 9.9 -2% -2% 7.5 7.4 -1% -1% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.7 3% 3%
40 February 2.5 2.5 -1% -1% 5.7 6.1 8% 8% 8.4 8.6 2% 2% 6.2 6.2 0% 0% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.8 15% 15%
40 March 2.6 2.6 0% 0% 5.9 6.3 7% 7% 8.7 8.9 2% 2% 6.2 6.3 2% 2% 1.8 0.0 -100% -100% 3.1 3.5 11% 11%
40 April 4.0 4.0 0% 0% 8.6 8.6 0% 0% 12.1 12.4 2% 1% 9.6 11.6 21% 13% 2.2 0.0 -100% -33% 4.4 4.2 -4% -1%
40 May 72.9 72.8 0% 0% 161.3 162.0 0% 0% 193.0 201.2 4% 4% 131.3 137.1 4% 4% 49.3 40.2 -19% -19% 84.8 83.4 -2% -2%
40 June 56.5 56.6 0% 0% 120.2 121.4 1% 1% 149.5 151.7 1% 1% 109.1 109.1 0% 0% 37.1 29.9 -19% -15% 63.2 62.9 -1% 0%
40 July 6.6 6.7 2% 1% 13.1 13.4 2% 1% 19.5 18.2 -7% -3% 14.8 13.3 -10% -5% 3.4 0.7 -79% -19% 6.0 6.1 3% 1%
40 August 5.6 5.6 -1% -1% 11.1 11.0 -1% -1% 16.8 15.1 -10% -10% 12.9 11.6 -10% -10% 3.1 0.5 -84% -84% 5.1 5.0 -3% -3%
40 September 5.2 5.3 0% 0% 10.4 10.2 -2% -2% 15.7 14.2 -10% -10% 12.5 11.4 -8% -8% 3.0 0.3 -90% -90% 4.9 4.7 -4% -4%
40 October 4.8 4.8 0% 0% 9.7 9.6 -1% -1% 14.8 13.3 -10% -10% 11.7 10.8 -8% -8% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.5 4.4 -4% -4%
40 November 4.1 4.1 0% 0% 8.3 8.8 5% 5% 12.8 12.2 -5% -5% 10.0 9.3 -7% -7% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.1 4.5 11% 11%
40 December 3.8 3.8 -1% -1% 7.8 8.2 5% 5% 12.1 11.5 -5% -5% 9.3 8.8 -5% -5% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 4.1 10% 10%
41 January 3.4 3.3 -1% -1% 7.1 7.4 4% 4% 11.0 10.5 -5% -5% 8.4 8.1 -4% -4% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.8 9% 9%
41 February 2.7 2.7 0% 0% 5.9 6.2 7% 7% 9.1 8.9 -2% -2% 6.9 6.7 -3% -3% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.7 13% 13%
41 March 2.7 2.7 -1% -1% 6.0 6.3 3% 3% 9.3 9.0 -4% -4% 6.9 6.8 -1% -1% 1.8 0.0 -100% -100% 3.2 3.3 5% 5%
41 April 30.7 30.7 0% 0% 68.2 68.1 0% 0% 81.1 84.9 5% 5% 55.8 63.2 13% 13% 20.1 14.6 -27% -27% 36.8 35.6 -3% -3%
41 May 63.7 63.8 0% 0% 138.3 139.1 1% 1% 169.7 173.9 2% 2% 120.0 120.9 1% 1% 42.3 34.5 -18% -18% 71.7 70.8 -1% -1%
41 June 36.5 36.6 0% 0% 76.8 77.3 1% 0% 97.2 97.3 0% 0% 72.1 71.7 -1% -1% 23.2 17.8 -23% -11% 40.0 39.4 -1% -1%
41 July 6.6 6.7 1% 1% 13.5 13.5 1% 0% 20.1 18.5 -8% -4% 15.0 13.6 -10% -5% 3.6 0.8 -78% -20% 6.4 6.3 0% 0%
41 August 5.6 5.6 0% 0% 11.3 11.2 -1% -1% 17.1 15.4 -10% -10% 12.9 11.6 -10% -10% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.3 5.2 -2% -2%
41 September 8.6 8.6 0% 0% 18.0 17.8 -1% -1% 25.0 24.8 -1% -1% 20.8 22.1 6% 6% 4.0 0.6 -85% -85% 9.0 8.6 -5% -5%
41 October 18.5 18.4 0% 0% 39.1 39.1 0% 0% 48.5 48.6 0% 0% 36.3 37.6 4% 4% 10.9 6.7 -38% -38% 19.5 19.2 -2% -2%
41 November 5.8 5.8 0% 0% 12.2 13.0 6% 6% 17.9 17.4 -3% -3% 13.1 11.9 -10% -10% 3.7 0.9 -76% -76% 6.1 6.9 13% 13%
41 December 5.2 5.1 -1% -1% 10.7 10.9 1% 1% 16.0 14.9 -7% -7% 11.7 10.6 -9% -9% 3.4 0.7 -79% -79% 5.2 5.4 3% 3%
42 January 4.5 4.5 1% 1% 9.4 9.7 3% 3% 14.3 13.4 -6% -6% 10.7 9.7 -9% -9% 3.0 0.4 -86% -86% 4.6 4.8 4% 4%
42 February 3.6 3.6 -1% -1% 7.6 7.7 2% 2% 11.6 10.9 -6% -6% 8.8 8.1 -8% -8% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 4.3 4% 4%
42 March 6.0 6.1 0% 0% 12.5 12.6 1% 1% 17.9 17.7 -1% -1% 14.8 16.2 10% 10% 3.0 0.1 -97% -97% 6.0 5.9 -2% -2%
42 April 26.0 25.9 0% 0% 56.9 56.6 -1% -1% 68.4 70.1 3% 3% 46.9 51.1 9% 9% 16.9 11.8 -30% -30% 30.4 29.4 -3% -3%
42 May 74.1 74.1 0% 0% 161.1 162.0 1% 1% 199.2 203.2 2% 2% 140.8 140.5 0% 0% 50.4 41.3 -18% -18% 83.8 82.7 -1% -1%
42 June 39.1 39.2 0% 0% 82.6 83.5 1% 1% 105.2 105.3 0% 0% 77.6 76.5 -1% -1% 25.4 19.4 -24% -12% 43.2 43.0 0% 0%
42 July 7.1 7.2 1% 1% 14.6 14.8 1% 1% 21.6 20.2 -7% -3% 16.1 14.5 -10% -5% 4.1 1.1 -73% -21% 7.0 7.1 1% 0%
42 August 5.9 5.9 0% 0% 12.2 12.1 -1% -1% 18.1 16.6 -9% -9% 13.6 12.2 -10% -10% 3.6 0.7 -81% -81% 5.9 5.7 -2% -2%
42 September 5.8 5.8 0% 0% 11.9 11.7 -2% -2% 17.6 16.2 -8% -8% 13.7 13.0 -5% -5% 3.4 0.5 -85% -85% 5.9 5.6 -5% -5%
42 October 17.9 17.8 0% 0% 38.3 38.2 0% 0% 48.0 48.2 1% 1% 37.1 39.7 7% 7% 10.0 5.6 -44% -44% 19.3 18.8 -3% -3%
42 November 5.9 5.9 0% 0% 12.3 12.6 2% 2% 18.1 17.2 -5% -5% 13.3 12.1 -9% -9% 3.7 0.8 -78% -78% 6.1 6.4 4% 4%
42 December 5.2 5.3 1% 1% 10.9 10.9 1% 1% 16.2 15.1 -7% -7% 11.9 10.9 -9% -9% 3.4 0.6 -82% -82% 5.3 5.3 -1% -1%
43 January 4.6 4.6 0% 0% 9.6 10.0 4% 4% 14.5 13.9 -5% -5% 10.9 10.0 -9% -9% 3.0 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 5.0 7% 7%
43 February 3.8 3.8 -1% -1% 8.1 8.4 5% 5% 12.3 11.9 -3% -3% 9.3 8.6 -7% -7% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.7 9% 9%
43 March 3.6 3.6 -1% -1% 7.8 8.1 4% 4% 11.9 11.5 -3% -3% 8.9 8.5 -5% -5% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 4.2 8% 8%
43 April 23.4 23.4 0% 0% 51.5 51.6 0% 0% 61.9 64.5 4% 4% 43.6 49.3 13% 13% 14.9 9.9 -34% -34% 27.5 26.8 -2% -2%
43 May 73.1 73.1 0% 0% 159.0 160.2 1% 1% 196.1 201.1 3% 3% 137.6 137.9 0% 0% 49.6 40.6 -18% -18% 82.8 81.9 -1% -1%
43 June 66.1 66.1 0% 0% 140.7 141.9 1% 1% 177.4 178.3 1% 1% 130.3 128.3 -1% -1% 44.2 35.9 -19% -17% 74.3 73.8 -1% -1%
43 July 7.2 7.3 2% 1% 14.4 15.1 5% 2% 21.6 20.5 -5% -3% 16.2 14.5 -11% -6% 3.9 1.0 -74% -21% 6.7 7.2 8% 2%
43 August 5.9 5.9 1% 1% 12.0 11.9 -1% -1% 18.1 16.4 -9% -9% 13.6 12.2 -10% -10% 3.5 0.7 -80% -80% 5.7 5.6 -3% -3%
43 September 5.0 5.0 -1% -1% 10.1 10.0 -1% -1% 15.4 14.0 -9% -9% 11.9 10.7 -10% -10% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 4.9 4.9 -1% -1%
43 October 5.0 5.0 1% 1% 10.0 9.9 -1% -1% 15.3 14.1 -8% -8% 12.0 11.1 -8% -8% 2.9 0.2 -93% -93% 4.7 4.6 -3% -3%
43 November 4.3 4.2 -1% -1% 8.6 8.9 4% 4% 13.3 12.5 -6% -6% 10.4 9.7 -7% -7% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 4.6 8% 8%
43 December 3.9 3.9 -1% -1% 8.0 8.4 5% 5% 12.5 11.9 -5% -5% 9.5 9.0 -5% -5% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 4.3 10% 10%
44 January 3.5 3.4 0% 0% 7.3 7.3 1% 1% 11.4 10.6 -7% -7% 8.6 8.3 -4% -4% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.6 0% 0%
44 February 2.8 2.8 0% 0% 6.0 6.8 12% 12% 9.5 9.5 1% 1% 7.1 6.9 -2% -2% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 4.2 24% 24%
44 March 2.8 2.8 -1% -1% 6.2 6.2 1% 1% 9.6 9.1 -5% -5% 7.1 7.1 -1% -1% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.2 3.2 1% 1%
44 April 29.4 29.3 0% 0% 65.2 64.9 0% 0% 77.7 81.1 4% 4% 53.7 60.9 14% 14% 19.1 13.7 -28% -28% 35.0 33.7 -4% -4%
44 May 65.3 65.4 0% 0% 141.9 142.8 1% 1% 174.4 178.7 3% 3% 122.9 123.8 1% 1% 43.5 35.5 -18% -18% 73.6 72.8 -1% -1%
44 June 14.7 14.9 1% 0% 30.0 30.3 1% 0% 39.2 38.7 -1% 0% 30.4 30.7 1% 0% 7.8 4.2 -46% -7% 14.9 14.7 -1% 0%
44 July 6.3 6.4 0% 0% 12.9 12.8 -1% 0% 19.2 17.5 -9% -4% 14.3 13.0 -9% -4% 3.6 0.8 -78% -20% 6.1 6.0 -3% -1%
44 August 5.4 5.4 -1% -1% 11.0 10.9 -1% -1% 16.6 15.2 -8% -8% 12.6 11.4 -9% -9% 3.2 0.6 -81% -81% 5.2 5.1 -1% -1%
44 September 4.9 4.8 0% 0% 9.8 9.7 -1% -1% 14.9 13.5 -9% -9% 11.5 10.6 -8% -8% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 4.7 -3% -3%
44 October 6.1 6.2 1% 1% 12.5 12.2 -2% -2% 18.2 17.1 -6% -6% 14.8 15.2 3% 3% 3.1 0.2 -94% -94% 5.9 5.5 -7% -7%
44 November 5.3 5.3 0% 0% 10.8 10.8 0% 0% 15.8 15.0 -6% -6% 12.4 12.1 -2% -2% 3.0 0.2 -93% -93% 5.3 5.3 -1% -1%
44 December 4.6 4.6 0% 0% 9.4 9.6 1% 1% 14.0 13.2 -6% -6% 10.7 10.2 -5% -5% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.6 4.7 2% 2%
45 January 3.9 3.9 -1% -1% 8.3 8.8 6% 6% 12.4 12.2 -2% -2% 9.4 9.0 -4% -4% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 4.7 12% 12%
45 February 3.2 3.1 -1% -1% 6.8 7.0 3% 3% 10.2 9.9 -3% -3% 7.7 7.5 -2% -2% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 4.0 5% 5%
45 March 3.2 3.1 0% 0% 7.0 7.4 7% 7% 10.4 10.5 1% 1% 7.8 7.7 -1% -1% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 4.0 13% 13%
45 April 16.1 15.9 -1% -1% 35.7 35.2 -2% -2% 43.5 44.5 2% 2% 31.4 37.8 20% 20% 9.4 5.1 -45% -45% 19.0 18.0 -6% -6%
45 May 38.8 38.9 0% 0% 84.0 84.1 0% 0% 101.1 104.5 3% 3% 67.5 69.6 3% 3% 25.6 19.7 -23% -16% 43.3 42.3 -2% -2%
45 June 66.5 66.5 0% 0% 143.7 144.5 1% 1% 178.1 181.3 2% 2% 128.9 128.4 0% 0% 45.7 37.3 -18% -17% 76.9 75.9 -1% -1%
45 July 6.9 7.0 2% 1% 14.0 14.5 3% 1% 20.7 19.6 -5% -3% 15.4 14.0 -9% -5% 3.8 0.9 -76% -21% 6.6 6.9 5% 1%
45 August 5.8 5.8 0% 0% 11.8 11.7 -1% -1% 17.6 16.0 -9% -9% 13.3 12.0 -10% -10% 3.4 0.6 -82% -82% 5.6 5.5 -2% -2%
45 September 5.4 5.4 0% 0% 11.0 10.8 -2% -2% 16.5 15.0 -9% -9% 12.9 12.0 -7% -7% 3.2 0.4 -88% -88% 5.4 5.1 -5% -5%
45 October 22.7 22.6 0% 0% 48.9 48.8 0% 0% 60.5 61.2 1% 1% 45.4 48.6 7% 7% 13.3 8.5 -36% -36% 24.8 24.2 -3% -3%
45 November 6.0 6.0 1% 1% 12.3 12.7 3% 3% 18.1 17.3 -4% -4% 13.5 12.3 -8% -8% 3.6 0.7 -80% -80% 6.1 6.5 6% 6%
45 December 5.3 5.3 0% 0% 10.9 11.1 2% 2% 16.3 15.3 -6% -6% 12.1 11.0 -9% -9% 3.3 0.5 -85% -85% 5.3 5.5 3% 3%
46 January 4.6 4.7 0% 0% 9.6 10.2 6% 6% 14.5 14.0 -3% -3% 11.0 10.1 -8% -8% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 5.2 11% 11%
46 February 3.7 3.7 -1% -1% 7.8 8.1 5% 5% 11.9 11.4 -4% -4% 9.0 8.4 -7% -7% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 4.6 9% 9%
46 March 3.7 3.6 -1% -1% 7.8 8.1 4% 4% 12.0 11.5 -4% -4% 9.1 8.6 -5% -5% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 4.2 7% 7%
46 April 34.0 34.0 0% 0% 75.0 74.8 0% 0% 90.4 93.5 3% 3% 61.9 67.4 9% 9% 23.0 16.9 -26% -26% 40.3 39.0 -3% -3%
46 May 57.7 57.7 0% 0% 124.9 125.6 1% 1% 154.6 157.9 2% 2% 110.7 111.1 0% 0% 38.3 30.9 -19% -19% 64.6 63.8 -1% -1%
46 June 30.7 30.7 0% 0% 64.5 64.8 1% 0% 82.2 82.2 0% 0% 61.0 60.7 0% 0% 19.4 14.2 -27% -11% 33.4 33.0 -1% -1%
46 July 6.8 6.9 1% 0% 14.0 14.1 0% 0% 20.8 19.3 -7% -3% 15.4 14.0 -9% -5% 3.9 1.0 -74% -21% 6.7 6.7 -1% 0%
46 August 5.7 5.7 0% 0% 11.7 11.6 -1% -1% 17.5 15.9 -9% -9% 13.2 11.9 -10% -10% 3.5 0.7 -80% -80% 5.6 5.5 -3% -3%
46 September 4.8 4.9 1% 1% 9.9 9.9 0% 0% 15.0 13.8 -8% -8% 11.5 10.4 -9% -9% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.9 4.8 -1% -1%
46 October 21.7 21.6 0% 0% 46.9 47.0 0% 0% 58.1 59.1 2% 2% 43.2 46.7 8% 8% 12.8 8.1 -37% -37% 24.0 23.5 -2% -2%
46 November 5.6 5.6 0% 0% 11.6 12.1 4% 4% 17.3 16.5 -4% -4% 12.7 11.6 -9% -9% 3.4 0.6 -82% -82% 5.8 6.2 7% 7%
46 December 5.0 5.0 0% 0% 10.3 11.0 6% 6% 15.5 15.0 -3% -3% 11.5 10.5 -9% -9% 3.2 0.5 -84% -84% 5.0 5.6 12% 12%
47 January 4.4 4.4 0% 0% 9.1 9.4 4% 4% 13.9 13.2 -5% -5% 10.5 9.6 -8% -8% 2.8 0.3 -89% -89% 4.5 4.7 7% 7%
47 February 3.6 3.6 0% 0% 7.6 7.8 3% 3% 11.6 11.1 -5% -5% 8.9 8.3 -7% -7% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.0 4.3 6% 6%
47 March 3.4 3.4 0% 0% 7.4 7.6 3% 3% 11.3 10.8 -5% -5% 8.6 8.2 -5% -5% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 3.9 4% 4%
47 April 29.7 29.7 0% 0% 65.5 65.2 -1% -1% 78.7 81.5 3% 3% 54.3 60.0 11% 11% 19.7 14.1 -29% -29% 35.1 33.8 -4% -4%
47 May 67.9 68.0 0% 0% 147.5 148.6 1% 1% 182.1 186.5 2% 2% 129.5 129.8 0% 0% 45.6 37.3 -18% -18% 76.6 75.9 -1% -1%
47 June 58.2 58.2 0% 0% 123.8 125.0 1% 1% 156.3 157.2 1% 1% 114.9 113.3 -1% -1% 38.6 31.1 -19% -15% 65.2 64.9 0% 0%
47 July 7.0 7.1 2% 1% 14.1 14.6 4% 1% 21.3 19.9 -6% -3% 15.8 14.2 -10% -5% 3.8 0.9 -76% -21% 6.6 7.0 5% 2%
47 August 5.7 5.7 0% 0% 11.7 11.6 -1% -1% 17.7 16.0 -9% -9% 13.3 12.0 -10% -10% 3.4 0.7 -79% -79% 5.5 5.4 -2% -2%
47 September 4.9 4.9 -1% -1% 9.9 9.8 0% 0% 15.1 13.7 -9% -9% 11.7 10.5 -10% -10% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 4.8 -1% -1%
47 October 4.4 4.4 0% 0% 9.0 9.0 0% 0% 14.0 12.7 -9% -9% 10.9 10.0 -9% -9% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.3 -1% -1%
47 November 3.9 3.8 -1% -1% 7.9 7.9 0% 0% 12.4 11.2 -9% -9% 9.6 8.9 -7% -7% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 3.9 0% 0%
47 December 3.6 3.6 -1% -1% 7.4 7.7 3% 3% 11.7 11.0 -6% -6% 8.9 8.4 -5% -5% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.8 6% 6%
48 January 3.3 3.3 0% 0% 7.0 7.8 11% 11% 11.0 11.0 0% 0% 8.4 8.2 -3% -3% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 4.2 22% 22%
48 February 2.6 2.6 -1% -1% 5.8 6.1 7% 7% 9.0 8.8 -2% -2% 6.8 6.7 -1% -1% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.7 12% 12%
48 March 2.6 2.6 -1% -1% 5.9 6.2 5% 5% 9.2 9.0 -2% -2% 6.8 6.9 1% 1% 1.8 0.0 -100% -100% 3.1 3.3 9% 9%
48 April 11.2 11.2 0% 0% 24.7 24.5 -1% -1% 31.5 32.6 3% 3% 24.0 30.7 28% 28% 5.4 1.9 -65% -52% 12.9 12.2 -5% -5%
48 May 59.7 59.6 0% 0% 130.7 131.3 0% 0% 156.9 162.8 4% 4% 106.7 109.0 2% 2% 40.5 32.9 -19% -19% 68.2 67.2 -1% -1%
48 June 69.6 69.7 0% 0% 149.2 150.3 1% 1% 186.1 188.2 1% 1% 136.0 135.0 -1% -1% 47.0 38.5 -18% -17% 79.2 78.4 -1% -1%
48 July 6.7 6.9 2% 1% 13.5 13.8 2% 1% 20.3 18.9 -7% -3% 15.3 13.7 -10% -5% 3.6 0.8 -77% -20% 6.2 6.4 2% 1%
48 August 5.6 5.6 0% 0% 11.3 11.2 -1% -1% 17.1 15.4 -10% -10% 13.0 11.8 -10% -10% 3.2 0.6 -81% -81% 5.3 5.1 -3% -3%
48 September 4.8 4.8 1% 1% 9.5 9.6 1% 1% 14.6 13.3 -9% -9% 11.4 10.3 -10% -10% 2.8 0.3 -89% -89% 4.6 4.6 -1% -1%
48 October 4.3 4.3 0% 0% 8.7 8.7 0% 0% 13.6 12.3 -10% -10% 10.7 9.8 -8% -8% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 4.1 -1% -1%
48 November 4.1 4.0 0% 0% 8.2 8.3 2% 2% 12.7 11.7 -8% -8% 9.9 9.4 -5% -5% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 4.1 3% 3%
48 December 3.7 3.7 0% 0% 7.6 7.8 3% 3% 11.8 11.2 -5% -5% 9.1 8.7 -5% -5% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 3.8 5% 5%
49 January 3.2 3.2 -1% -1% 6.8 7.6 12% 12% 10.7 10.6 0% 0% 8.2 7.9 -3% -3% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 4.1 22% 22%
49 February 2.6 2.6 -1% -1% 5.7 6.0 6% 6% 8.9 8.6 -3% -3% 6.7 6.6 -1% -1% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.2 3.6 12% 12%
49 March 2.6 2.6 -1% -1% 5.8 5.9 2% 2% 9.0 8.6 -4% -4% 6.7 6.7 1% 1% 1.7 0.0 -100% -100% 3.0 3.1 4% 4%
49 April 22.8 22.7 0% 0% 50.3 50.6 1% 1% 59.9 63.3 6% 6% 42.8 50.3 17% 17% 14.1 9.4 -33% -33% 26.8 26.2 -2% -2%
49 May 61.8 61.8 0% 0% 134.5 135.2 1% 1% 164.1 168.8 3% 3% 114.0 115.3 1% 1% 41.4 33.7 -19% -19% 69.9 68.8 -2% -2%
49 June 61.9 61.9 0% 0% 132.0 133.2 1% 1% 165.6 167.1 1% 1% 121.5 120.4 -1% -1% 41.3 33.5 -19% -16% 69.7 69.3 -1% -1%
49 July 6.7 6.8 2% 1% 13.4 13.8 3% 1% 20.3 18.9 -7% -3% 15.3 13.7 -10% -5% 3.6 0.8 -78% -20% 6.2 6.5 4% 1%
49 August 5.6 5.6 -1% -1% 11.3 11.1 -2% -2% 17.1 15.3 -10% -10% 13.0 11.7 -10% -10% 3.2 0.6 -81% -81% 5.2 5.1 -2% -2%
49 September 4.7 4.7 0% 0% 9.5 9.4 0% 0% 14.6 13.2 -10% -10% 11.4 10.3 -9% -9% 2.8 0.3 -89% -89% 4.6 4.5 -1% -1%
49 October 4.3 4.3 0% 0% 8.7 8.6 0% 0% 13.5 12.2 -10% -10% 10.7 9.7 -9% -9% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 4.0 -1% -1%
49 November 3.9 3.9 -1% -1% 7.8 7.8 0% 0% 12.3 11.2 -9% -9% 9.6 9.0 -6% -6% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 3.8 -1% -1%
49 December 3.6 3.5 -1% -1% 7.3 7.4 2% 2% 11.5 10.6 -8% -8% 8.8 8.4 -5% -5% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.6 2% 2%
50 January 3.1 3.1 -1% -1% 6.6 6.7 2% 2% 10.4 9.9 -5% -5% 8.0 7.8 -3% -3% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.4 3% 3%
50 February 2.5 2.5 -2% -2% 5.5 5.7 3% 3% 8.6 8.2 -5% -5% 6.6 6.5 -1% -1% 1.8 0.0 -100% -100% 3.1 3.3 6% 6%
50 March 2.5 2.5 0% 0% 5.6 6.0 7% 7% 8.8 8.7 -1% -1% 6.5 6.6 1% 1% 1.7 0.0 -100% -100% 3.0 3.3 12% 12%
50 April 11.4 11.3 0% 0% 25.3 25.4 0% 0% 32.2 33.5 4% 4% 24.4 31.3 28% 28% 5.6 2.2 -61% -50% 13.3 12.9 -3% -3%
50 May 39.5 39.5 0% 0% 86.0 86.1 0% 0% 102.3 106.2 4% 3% 68.4 71.2 4% 4% 26.0 20.4 -22% -15% 44.5 43.5 -2% -2%
50 June 34.4 34.4 0% 0% 73.7 73.8 0% 0% 91.2 92.5 1% 1% 66.1 66.7 1% 1% 22.6 17.3 -24% -11% 38.9 38.1 -2% -1%
50 July 6.2 6.3 1% 1% 12.8 13.0 1% 0% 18.9 17.6 -7% -3% 14.0 12.8 -8% -4% 3.5 0.8 -77% -19% 6.1 6.1 0% 0%
50 August 5.3 5.3 0% 0% 10.7 10.7 -1% -1% 16.1 14.7 -9% -9% 12.2 11.1 -9% -9% 3.1 0.6 -81% -81% 5.1 5.0 -2% -2%
50 September 4.8 4.8 0% 0% 9.8 9.7 -1% -1% 14.8 13.5 -9% -9% 11.5 10.7 -7% -7% 3.0 0.4 -86% -86% 4.8 4.6 -4% -4%
50 October 7.2 7.2 0% 0% 14.8 14.6 -2% -2% 20.8 20.1 -4% -4% 17.1 18.3 7% 7% 3.3 0.2 -94% -94% 7.1 6.6 -6% -6%
50 November 4.7 4.6 0% 0% 9.6 10.1 5% 5% 14.1 13.7 -3% -3% 11.0 10.2 -7% -7% 2.8 0.2 -93% -93% 4.8 5.2 9% 9%
50 December 4.1 4.1 0% 0% 8.6 9.4 9% 9% 12.8 12.9 0% 0% 9.9 9.3 -6% -6% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 5.0 18% 18%
51 January 3.6 3.6 -1% -1% 7.7 8.2 7% 7% 11.5 11.5 -1% -1% 8.9 8.5 -4% -4% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 4.4 14% 14%
51 February 3.0 3.0 0% 0% 6.6 6.9 5% 5% 9.8 9.7 -2% -2% 7.5 7.4 -2% -2% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.9 8% 8%
51 March 2.9 2.9 -1% -1% 6.5 6.8 5% 5% 9.7 9.6 -1% -1% 7.3 7.3 0% 0% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.7 9% 9%
51 April 34.5 34.4 0% 0% 76.3 76.4 0% 0% 90.7 95.0 5% 5% 61.3 68.1 11% 11% 23.5 17.4 -26% -26% 41.1 40.0 -3% -3%
51 May 102.5 102.4 0% 0% 221.9 223.7 1% 1% 273.8 279.5 2% 2% 196.6 195.8 0% 0% 68.7 57.4 -16% -16% 115.1 114.2 -1% -1%
51 June 58.5 58.6 0% 0% 123.8 125.1 1% 1% 156.7 157.0 0% 0% 115.9 114.0 -2% -2% 38.4 30.9 -20% -15% 64.9 64.7 0% 0%
51 July 7.0 7.1 2% 1% 13.9 14.4 3% 1% 21.1 19.6 -7% -4% 16.0 14.3 -11% -6% 3.7 0.9 -76% -20% 6.4 6.8 5% 2%
51 August 5.8 5.8 0% 0% 11.6 11.5 -1% -1% 17.6 15.8 -10% -10% 13.4 12.1 -10% -10% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.4 5.3 -2% -2%
51 September 4.9 4.8 0% 0% 9.7 9.7 0% 0% 15.0 13.5 -10% -10% 11.7 10.5 -10% -10% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 4.6 -1% -1%
51 October 19.1 19.1 0% 0% 41.1 41.1 0% 0% 51.3 51.8 1% 1% 39.5 42.9 8% 8% 10.8 6.4 -41% -41% 20.8 20.3 -3% -3%
51 November 5.5 5.5 0% 0% 11.3 11.6 2% 2% 17.0 16.0 -6% -6% 12.5 11.4 -9% -9% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.5 5.8 4% 4%
51 December 4.9 4.9 0% 0% 10.0 10.2 2% 2% 15.3 14.2 -8% -8% 11.3 10.3 -9% -9% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 4.9 3% 3%
52 January 4.3 4.3 0% 0% 8.9 9.1 3% 3% 13.8 12.8 -7% -7% 10.3 9.5 -8% -8% 2.7 0.2 -93% -93% 4.3 4.5 5% 5%
52 February 3.4 3.4 -1% -1% 7.2 7.6 6% 6% 11.2 10.7 -4% -4% 8.5 7.9 -7% -7% 2.4 0.1 -96% -96% 3.9 4.3 12% 12%
52 March 3.4 3.3 0% 0% 7.2 7.6 6% 6% 11.3 10.9 -4% -4% 8.5 8.1 -5% -5% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 4.0 11% 11%
52 April 17.5 17.4 -1% -1% 38.4 38.0 -1% -1% 46.9 47.9 2% 2% 34.4 40.0 16% 16% 10.4 6.1 -42% -42% 20.4 19.4 -5% -5%
52 May 81.4 81.4 0% 0% 177.4 178.7 1% 1% 217.9 224.1 3% 3% 151.9 152.5 0% 0% 55.5 45.9 -17% -17% 92.5 91.5 -1% -1%
52 June 33.6 33.7 0% 0% 70.5 71.2 1% 1% 90.0 90.0 0% 0% 66.5 66.1 -1% -1% 21.3 16.0 -25% -11% 36.5 36.3 -1% 0%
52 July 6.7 6.8 1% 1% 13.6 13.9 2% 1% 20.5 19.0 -7% -3% 15.2 13.8 -9% -5% 3.7 0.9 -76% -20% 6.4 6.6 2% 1%
52 August 5.6 5.6 0% 0% 11.4 11.3 -1% -1% 17.2 15.6 -9% -9% 13.0 11.8 -10% -10% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.4 5.3 -2% -2%
52 September 4.7 4.7 0% 0% 9.6 9.6 0% 0% 14.7 13.3 -9% -9% 11.3 10.3 -9% -9% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 4.6 -1% -1%
52 October 5.5 5.5 0% 0% 11.2 11.0 -2% -2% 16.8 15.6 -7% -7% 13.6 13.5 0% 0% 3.0 0.2 -93% -93% 5.3 5.0 -5% -5%
52 November 4.4 4.4 -1% -1% 8.9 8.9 0% 0% 13.5 12.4 -8% -8% 10.5 9.8 -7% -7% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.4 4.4 0% 0%
52 December 3.9 3.9 -1% -1% 8.1 8.4 4% 4% 12.5 11.8 -5% -5% 9.5 9.1 -5% -5% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 4.2 7% 7%
53 January 3.4 3.4 0% 0% 7.3 7.5 3% 3% 11.3 10.7 -5% -5% 8.5 8.3 -3% -3% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 3.9 5% 5%
53 February 2.8 2.7 -1% -1% 6.0 6.3 5% 5% 9.3 9.0 -3% -3% 7.1 7.0 -1% -1% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.7 9% 9%
53 March 2.8 2.7 -1% -1% 6.2 6.3 2% 2% 9.5 9.1 -4% -4% 7.0 7.1 0% 0% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.2 3.3 3% 3%
53 April 9.9 9.9 0% 0% 21.7 21.7 0% 0% 28.1 29.2 4% 4% 21.7 27.8 28% 28% 4.6 1.2 -74% -50% 11.2 10.8 -4% -4%
53 May 65.5 65.5 0% 0% 143.8 144.1 0% 0% 172.8 178.8 3% 3% 117.6 120.2 2% 2% 44.8 36.6 -18% -18% 75.3 73.8 -2% -2%
53 June 32.5 32.6 0% 0% 68.5 69.2 1% 1% 86.0 87.0 1% 1% 63.2 63.7 1% 1% 20.7 15.6 -25% -10% 35.7 35.5 0% 0%
53 July 6.5 6.6 1% 1% 13.3 13.5 2% 1% 19.7 18.4 -7% -3% 14.6 13.4 -8% -4% 3.6 0.8 -78% -20% 6.3 6.4 2% 0%
53 August 5.5 5.5 -1% -1% 11.1 11.0 -1% -1% 16.8 15.2 -10% -10% 12.7 11.7 -8% -8% 3.2 0.6 -81% -81% 5.3 5.1 -2% -2%
53 September 4.8 4.8 0% 0% 9.7 9.7 -1% -1% 14.8 13.4 -9% -9% 11.5 10.5 -8% -8% 2.9 0.4 -86% -86% 4.8 4.6 -3% -3%
53 October 4.8 4.9 0% 0% 9.7 9.6 -1% -1% 14.8 13.6 -8% -8% 11.7 11.0 -6% -6% 2.8 0.1 -96% -96% 4.6 4.4 -4% -4%
53 November 4.1 4.1 -2% -2% 8.4 8.7 3% 3% 12.8 12.1 -6% -6% 10.0 9.4 -5% -5% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 4.4 8% 8%
53 December 3.7 3.7 -1% -1% 7.7 7.9 2% 2% 11.9 11.2 -6% -6% 9.1 8.8 -4% -4% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 4.0 4% 4%
54 January 3.3 3.2 -1% -1% 7.0 7.6 8% 8% 10.8 10.6 -2% -2% 8.3 8.1 -2% -2% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 4.1 15% 15%
54 February 2.7 2.6 -1% -1% 5.8 6.1 6% 6% 8.9 8.7 -2% -2% 6.8 6.8 0% 0% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.6 10% 10%
54 March 2.7 2.7 -1% -1% 6.0 6.2 5% 5% 9.1 9.0 -2% -2% 6.8 6.9 2% 2% 1.8 0.0 -100% -100% 3.1 3.4 8% 8%
54 April 24.6 24.4 0% 0% 54.6 54.4 0% 0% 64.6 67.9 5% 5% 45.4 52.9 16% 16% 15.4 10.5 -32% -32% 29.3 28.2 -4% -4%
54 May 58.4 58.5 0% 0% 127.0 128.0 1% 1% 155.2 159.7 3% 3% 107.7 109.0 1% 1% 38.9 31.6 -19% -19% 65.9 65.2 -1% -1%
54 June 72.6 72.6 0% 0% 155.3 156.3 1% 1% 194.4 196.0 1% 1% 142.6 141.1 -1% -1% 48.9 40.1 -18% -18% 82.3 81.4 -1% -1%
54 July 6.8 7.0 2% 1% 13.7 14.3 5% 2% 20.7 19.5 -6% -3% 15.6 14.0 -10% -5% 3.6 0.8 -78% -20% 6.3 6.9 8% 2%
54 August 5.7 5.7 0% 0% 11.4 11.3 -1% -1% 17.3 15.6 -10% -10% 13.2 11.9 -10% -10% 3.2 0.6 -81% -81% 5.3 5.2 -2% -2%
54 September 21.7 21.7 0% 0% 46.2 46.2 0% 0% 58.1 58.1 0% 0% 44.2 46.7 6% 6% 13.0 8.4 -35% -35% 24.0 23.4 -3% -3%
54 October 18.6 18.7 0% 0% 38.9 39.2 1% 1% 50.4 50.1 -1% -1% 37.3 37.7 1% 1% 10.8 6.7 -38% -38% 19.3 19.1 -1% -1%
54 November 6.0 6.1 0% 0% 12.6 12.7 1% 1% 18.7 17.5 -7% -7% 13.6 12.4 -9% -9% 3.8 0.9 -76% -76% 6.3 6.4 1% 1%
54 December 5.3 5.3 -1% -1% 11.0 11.0 0% 0% 16.6 15.2 -8% -8% 12.2 11.1 -9% -9% 3.4 0.7 -79% -79% 5.3 5.3 0% 0%
55 January 4.6 4.7 1% 1% 9.6 9.8 3% 3% 14.7 13.7 -7% -7% 11.1 10.1 -9% -9% 3.0 0.4 -86% -86% 4.7 4.8 3% 3%
55 February 3.9 3.8 -1% -1% 8.0 8.3 4% 4% 12.4 11.8 -5% -5% 9.5 8.8 -7% -7% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 4.5 8% 8%
55 March 3.6 3.6 -1% -1% 7.7 8.2 6% 6% 12.0 11.7 -3% -3% 9.1 8.6 -6% -6% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 4.3 13% 13%
55 April 21.2 21.1 0% 0% 46.8 46.5 -1% -1% 56.5 58.4 3% 3% 40.8 46.2 13% 13% 13.4 8.6 -36% -36% 24.9 24.0 -4% -4%
55 May 54.5 54.6 0% 0% 118.5 119.3 1% 1% 146.3 150.1 3% 3% 101.6 102.3 1% 1% 36.8 29.6 -19% -19% 61.5 60.8 -1% -1%
55 June 29.8 29.8 0% 0% 62.9 63.0 0% 0% 80.0 80.1 0% 0% 59.0 59.5 1% 1% 19.0 14.0 -26% -10% 32.8 32.1 -2% -1%
55 July 6.7 6.7 1% 0% 13.8 13.9 1% 0% 20.4 19.0 -7% -3% 15.0 13.7 -8% -4% 3.8 0.9 -76% -21% 6.6 6.6 0% 0%
55 August 5.5 5.6 1% 1% 11.4 11.4 -1% -1% 17.2 15.7 -9% -9% 12.9 11.7 -9% -9% 3.4 0.7 -79% -79% 5.5 5.4 -3% -3%
55 September 4.7 4.7 0% 0% 9.7 9.6 0% 0% 14.7 13.4 -9% -9% 11.3 10.3 -9% -9% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 4.7 -1% -1%
55 October 5.4 5.4 0% 0% 11.1 10.9 -2% -2% 16.5 15.4 -7% -7% 13.2 13.1 -1% -1% 3.0 0.2 -93% -93% 5.2 5.0 -5% -5%
55 November 4.4 4.3 0% 0% 8.9 9.3 5% 5% 13.4 13.0 -4% -4% 10.5 9.8 -6% -6% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.4 4.9 10% 10%
55 December 3.9 3.8 -1% -1% 8.1 8.1 0% 0% 12.4 11.6 -6% -6% 9.4 9.0 -4% -4% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 4.0 0% 0%
56 January 3.4 3.4 0% 0% 7.3 7.4 1% 1% 11.2 10.6 -5% -5% 8.6 8.3 -3% -3% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 3.8 2% 2%
56 February 2.8 2.8 0% 0% 6.1 6.5 8% 8% 9.3 9.2 0% 0% 7.0 7.0 -1% -1% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.9 14% 14%
56 March 2.8 2.8 -1% -1% 6.2 6.7 7% 7% 9.4 9.5 1% 1% 7.0 7.1 1% 1% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.2 3.7 13% 13%
56 April 14.4 14.3 -1% -1% 31.8 31.7 0% 0% 39.2 40.8 4% 4% 28.9 35.7 23% 23% 7.9 4.0 -50% -50% 16.7 16.2 -3% -3%
56 May 72.3 72.3 0% 0% 158.0 158.9 1% 1% 191.2 197.8 3% 3% 131.7 133.3 1% 1% 49.2 40.5 -18% -18% 82.5 81.3 -1% -1%
56 June 50.9 51.0 0% 0% 108.1 108.9 1% 1% 135.5 136.6 1% 1% 99.6 99.4 0% 0% 33.5 26.6 -21% -14% 56.8 56.2 -1% -1%
56 July 6.7 6.8 1% 1% 13.6 14.1 4% 1% 20.4 19.4 -5% -2% 15.3 13.9 -9% -5% 3.7 0.8 -78% -21% 6.4 6.7 6% 2%
56 August 5.7 5.7 0% 0% 11.4 11.3 -1% -1% 17.2 15.6 -10% -10% 13.1 11.8 -9% -9% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.3 5.2 -2% -2%
56 September 8.0 7.9 0% 0% 16.4 16.2 -1% -1% 23.0 21.9 -5% -5% 18.9 19.9 5% 5% 3.7 0.4 -89% -89% 8.0 7.6 -5% -5%
56 October 15.6 15.6 0% 0% 32.9 32.8 0% 0% 41.5 40.9 -1% -1% 31.9 33.6 5% 5% 8.6 4.6 -46% -46% 16.3 15.9 -3% -3%
56 November 5.8 5.8 0% 0% 12.0 12.4 3% 3% 17.6 16.7 -5% -5% 12.9 11.8 -9% -9% 3.7 0.9 -76% -76% 6.0 6.4 6% 6%
56 December 5.1 5.1 0% 0% 10.6 10.8 2% 2% 15.8 14.9 -6% -6% 11.6 10.7 -8% -8% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.2 5.4 4% 4%
57 January 4.5 4.5 0% 0% 9.3 9.6 3% 3% 14.1 13.3 -6% -6% 10.6 9.8 -8% -8% 2.9 0.4 -86% -86% 4.6 4.8 4% 4%
57 February 3.6 3.6 -2% -2% 7.6 7.9 4% 4% 11.5 11.0 -5% -5% 8.7 8.1 -6% -6% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 4.5 8% 8%
57 March 3.5 3.5 -1% -1% 7.5 7.8 4% 4% 11.6 11.1 -4% -4% 8.7 8.3 -4% -4% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 4.1 7% 7%
57 April 31.7 31.6 0% 0% 69.9 69.7 0% 0% 84.1 87.2 4% 4% 57.4 63.1 10% 10% 21.4 15.6 -27% -27% 37.6 36.4 -3% -3%
57 May 55.9 55.9 0% 0% 121.2 122.1 1% 1% 149.7 153.5 2% 2% 106.1 106.7 1% 1% 37.2 29.9 -20% -20% 62.8 62.2 -1% -1%
57 June 35.7 35.8 0% 0% 75.6 75.9 0% 0% 95.8 96.1 0% 0% 70.6 71.1 1% 1% 23.1 17.5 -24% -11% 39.4 38.9 -1% -1%
57 July 6.8 6.8 1% 0% 13.9 14.1 1% 0% 20.7 19.3 -7% -3% 15.3 13.9 -9% -4% 3.8 0.9 -77% -21% 6.6 6.7 1% 0%
57 August 5.6 5.6 0% 0% 11.6 11.5 -1% -1% 17.4 15.8 -9% -9% 13.1 11.9 -9% -9% 3.4 0.7 -79% -79% 5.6 5.4 -2% -2%
57 September 4.8 4.8 -1% -1% 9.8 9.7 -1% -1% 14.9 13.5 -9% -9% 11.4 10.4 -9% -9% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 4.7 -1% -1%
57 October 35.0 35.0 0% 0% 76.2 76.7 1% 1% 94.1 96.4 2% 2% 67.5 70.9 5% 5% 22.5 16.5 -27% -27% 39.3 38.8 -1% -1%
57 November 5.9 5.9 1% 1% 12.1 12.9 7% 7% 18.1 17.6 -3% -3% 13.3 12.2 -8% -8% 3.4 0.7 -79% -79% 5.9 6.7 13% 13%
57 December 5.2 5.2 -1% -1% 10.7 10.8 1% 1% 16.2 14.9 -8% -8% 12.1 11.0 -9% -9% 3.2 0.5 -84% -84% 5.1 5.2 1% 1%
58 January 4.6 4.6 0% 0% 9.4 9.5 1% 1% 14.4 13.3 -8% -8% 11.0 10.1 -9% -9% 2.8 0.3 -89% -89% 4.5 4.6 1% 1%
58 February 4.1 4.1 0% 0% 8.4 8.6 3% 3% 12.8 12.2 -5% -5% 10.0 9.5 -5% -5% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.4 4.7 5% 5%
58 March 4.0 3.9 -1% -1% 8.2 8.4 3% 3% 12.6 12.0 -5% -5% 9.8 9.4 -4% -4% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 4.2 5% 5%
58 April 13.2 13.2 -1% -1% 29.0 28.8 -1% -1% 36.5 37.2 2% 2% 28.0 33.0 18% 18% 7.1 3.1 -56% -56% 15.2 14.6 -4% -4%
58 May 66.8 66.8 0% 0% 145.7 146.3 0% 0% 177.8 182.9 3% 3% 123.6 124.8 1% 1% 45.6 37.2 -18% -18% 75.9 74.8 -2% -2%
58 June 61.2 61.2 0% 0% 130.6 131.8 1% 1% 164.1 165.6 1% 1% 120.3 122.9 2% 2% 41.0 33.1 -19% -16% 69.0 68.7 0% 0%
58 July 7.1 7.2 1% 1% 14.4 14.8 3% 1% 21.4 20.1 -6% -3% 16.0 14.6 -9% -5% 3.9 0.9 -77% -22% 6.7 7.1 5% 1%
58 August 5.9 5.9 0% 0% 11.9 11.9 -1% -1% 17.9 16.3 -9% -9% 13.5 12.2 -9% -9% 3.5 0.7 -80% -80% 5.7 5.5 -2% -2%
58 September 5.0 4.9 -1% -1% 10.1 10.0 -1% -1% 15.3 13.9 -9% -9% 11.9 10.8 -9% -9% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 4.9 4.8 -2% -2%
58 October 5.3 5.4 0% 0% 10.8 10.7 -1% -1% 16.3 15.2 -7% -7% 13.0 12.6 -3% -3% 3.0 0.2 -93% -93% 5.1 4.9 -5% -5%
58 November 4.5 4.5 0% 0% 9.1 9.3 3% 3% 13.8 13.0 -6% -6% 10.8 10.1 -6% -6% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.5 4.7 6% 6%
58 December 4.0 4.0 -1% -1% 8.3 8.4 0% 0% 12.8 11.8 -8% -8% 9.7 9.3 -4% -4% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.1 4.1 0% 0%
59 January 3.6 3.5 -1% -1% 7.5 8.1 7% 7% 11.6 11.3 -3% -3% 8.8 8.5 -3% -3% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 4.3 14% 14%
59 February 3.0 2.9 0% 0% 6.4 6.5 1% 1% 9.9 9.3 -6% -6% 7.5 7.4 -1% -1% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.5 1% 1%
59 March 2.9 2.8 -1% -1% 6.3 6.7 6% 6% 9.8 9.6 -2% -2% 7.3 7.3 0% 0% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.7 11% 11%
59 April 4.9 4.9 0% 0% 10.3 10.4 1% 0% 14.7 15.3 4% 2% 12.3 15.0 23% 18% 2.5 0.0 -100% -36% 5.1 5.0 -3% -1%
59 May 42.8 42.6 0% 0% 94.3 94.1 0% 0% 112.2 116.4 4% 4% 74.9 80.7 8% 8% 27.8 21.4 -23% -17% 49.3 47.8 -3% -3%
59 June 78.3 78.3 0% 0% 169.1 170.5 1% 1% 209.1 213.2 2% 2% 151.0 150.7 0% 0% 53.7 44.3 -18% -18% 90.4 89.7 -1% -1%
59 July 6.7 6.9 2% 1% 13.4 13.9 4% 1% 20.1 18.9 -6% -3% 15.0 13.7 -9% -5% 3.5 0.8 -77% -19% 6.1 6.5 6% 2%
59 August 5.7 5.7 -1% -1% 11.4 11.2 -1% -1% 17.2 15.4 -10% -10% 13.0 11.9 -9% -9% 3.2 0.5 -84% -84% 5.3 5.1 -3% -3%
59 September 4.9 4.9 0% 0% 9.7 9.7 -1% -1% 14.9 13.4 -10% -10% 11.7 10.7 -9% -9% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 4.6 -2% -2%
59 October 4.4 4.5 0% 0% 8.9 8.9 0% 0% 13.8 12.5 -10% -10% 10.9 10.0 -8% -8% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 4.1 -2% -2%
59 November 3.9 3.8 -1% -1% 7.8 8.2 4% 4% 12.2 11.7 -4% -4% 9.5 8.9 -6% -6% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 4.2 9% 9%
59 December 3.6 3.6 0% 0% 7.4 8.5 15% 15% 11.6 11.6 1% 1% 8.8 8.4 -4% -4% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 4.7 30% 30%
60 January 3.1 3.1 -1% -1% 6.7 7.5 13% 13% 10.5 10.5 0% 0% 8.0 7.8 -2% -2% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 4.2 24% 24%
60 February 2.5 2.5 -1% -1% 5.5 5.7 2% 2% 8.7 8.2 -6% -6% 6.6 6.5 -1% -1% 1.8 0.0 -100% -100% 3.1 3.3 4% 4%
60 March 2.6 2.5 -1% -1% 5.7 5.7 1% 1% 8.8 8.4 -6% -6% 6.5 6.7 2% 2% 1.7 0.0 -100% -100% 3.0 3.0 0% 0%
60 April 42.2 42.1 0% 0% 93.4 94.4 1% 1% 111.4 117.4 5% 5% 75.5 83.0 10% 10% 28.7 22.1 -23% -23% 50.4 50.1 -1% -1%
60 May 68.3 68.4 0% 0% 147.4 148.6 1% 1% 181.9 185.8 2% 2% 131.4 132.0 1% 1% 44.8 36.7 -18% -18% 76.0 75.4 -1% -1%
60 June 94.6 94.6 0% 0% 201.7 203.3 1% 1% 253.5 254.5 0% 0% 187.0 189.6 1% 1% 63.6 53.0 -17% -17% 106.7 105.9 -1% -1%
60 July 12.9 13.1 2% 1% 25.9 26.4 2% 1% 35.5 34.2 -4% -3% 28.6 28.1 -2% -2% 6.2 2.7 -56% -25% 12.1 12.3 1% 1%
60 August 6.6 6.6 1% 1% 13.4 13.2 -1% -1% 19.9 18.1 -9% -9% 15.1 13.7 -9% -9% 3.8 0.9 -76% -76% 6.3 6.1 -4% -4%
60 September 6.7 6.7 0% 0% 13.6 13.4 -2% -2% 19.9 18.4 -7% -7% 15.5 15.2 -3% -3% 3.8 0.7 -82% -82% 6.7 6.4 -5% -5%
60 October 5.6 5.5 -1% -1% 11.3 11.1 -1% -1% 16.9 15.3 -9% -9% 12.9 11.8 -9% -9% 3.3 0.5 -85% -85% 5.3 5.2 -2% -2%
60 November 4.7 4.7 0% 0% 9.6 9.8 2% 2% 14.6 13.6 -7% -7% 11.3 10.4 -8% -8% 3.0 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 4.8 3% 3%
60 December 4.3 4.3 -1% -1% 8.9 8.9 0% 0% 13.7 12.5 -8% -8% 10.5 9.8 -6% -6% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.3 0% 0%
61 January 3.8 3.8 -1% -1% 8.0 8.4 6% 6% 12.4 11.9 -5% -5% 9.4 8.9 -5% -5% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 4.3 11% 11%
61 February 3.1 3.1 0% 0% 6.6 6.7 2% 2% 10.3 9.6 -6% -6% 7.7 7.5 -3% -3% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.7 2% 2%
61 March 3.0 3.0 -1% -1% 6.6 7.0 5% 5% 10.4 10.1 -3% -3% 7.8 7.7 -1% -1% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.7 9% 9%
61 April 8.0 8.0 0% 0% 17.0 16.6 -2% -2% 23.0 23.3 1% 1% 19.0 23.7 25% 25% 3.3 0.0 -100% -48% 8.5 7.8 -8% -6%
61 May 35.6 35.6 0% 0% 78.0 77.7 0% 0% 93.0 95.9 3% 2% 61.4 65.3 6% 6% 23.7 18.0 -24% -15% 40.5 39.2 -3% -3%
61 June 22.2 22.3 1% 0% 46.9 46.9 0% 0% 58.5 59.0 1% 0% 41.8 42.8 2% 1% 13.8 9.5 -31% -9% 24.3 23.7 -2% -1%
61 July 6.2 6.2 0% 0% 12.9 12.9 0% 0% 18.9 17.6 -7% -3% 13.8 12.7 -8% -4% 3.7 0.8 -78% -21% 6.3 6.2 -1% 0%
61 August 5.3 5.2 -1% -1% 10.9 10.8 -1% -1% 16.2 14.9 -8% -8% 12.0 11.0 -8% -8% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.3 5.2 -2% -2%
61 September 4.4 4.4 1% 1% 9.2 9.2 0% 0% 13.8 12.8 -7% -7% 10.6 9.8 -8% -8% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 4.6 -2% -2%
61 October 5.3 5.3 -1% -1% 11.0 10.8 -2% -2% 16.0 15.2 -5% -5% 13.0 13.2 2% 2% 3.0 0.2 -93% -93% 5.3 5.0 -5% -5%
61 November 4.1 4.1 -1% -1% 8.6 8.8 2% 2% 12.8 12.3 -4% -4% 9.9 9.4 -5% -5% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.4 4.6 5% 5%
61 December 3.6 3.7 2% 2% 7.8 8.2 5% 5% 11.7 11.4 -2% -2% 9.0 8.7 -3% -3% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 4.2 7% 7%
62 January 3.2 3.2 0% 0% 7.1 7.9 11% 11% 10.6 11.0 4% 4% 8.1 8.0 -1% -1% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 4.4 20% 20%
62 February 2.7 2.7 0% 0% 5.9 6.1 3% 3% 8.9 8.7 -2% -2% 6.7 6.7 1% 1% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.6 3% 3%
62 March 2.7 2.7 -1% -1% 6.1 6.4 5% 5% 9.1 9.1 0% 0% 6.7 6.8 3% 3% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.5 8% 8%
62 April 6.4 6.4 0% 0% 14.0 14.0 0% 0% 19.0 19.7 4% 3% 15.9 20.3 28% 28% 2.9 0.0 -100% -42% 7.2 6.8 -5% -3%
62 May 58.0 58.0 0% 0% 127.8 128.0 0% 0% 152.1 158.0 4% 4% 101.2 105.5 4% 4% 39.3 31.5 -20% -20% 66.9 65.5 -2% -2%
62 June 82.4 82.4 0% 0% 176.9 178.3 1% 1% 219.6 222.9 1% 1% 160.0 158.9 -1% -1% 56.1 46.5 -17% -17% 94.2 93.4 -1% -1%
62 July 6.8 7.0 2% 1% 13.6 14.2 4% 2% 20.3 19.1 -6% -3% 15.4 13.8 -10% -5% 3.6 0.8 -78% -20% 6.2 6.7 7% 2%
62 August 5.7 5.7 0% 0% 11.4 11.3 -1% -1% 17.2 15.5 -10% -10% 13.2 11.9 -10% -10% 3.2 0.5 -84% -84% 5.3 5.2 -2% -2%
62 September 4.8 4.8 0% 0% 9.6 9.6 0% 0% 14.7 13.2 -10% -10% 11.5 10.4 -10% -10% 2.9 0.3 -89% -89% 4.6 4.5 -2% -2%
62 October 19.4 19.4 0% 0% 41.8 41.8 0% 0% 51.7 52.3 1% 1% 39.8 43.2 9% 9% 11.0 6.7 -39% -39% 21.2 20.6 -3% -3%
62 November 5.5 5.5 0% 0% 11.3 11.6 3% 3% 16.9 15.9 -6% -6% 12.5 11.4 -9% -9% 3.2 0.6 -81% -81% 5.5 5.8 6% 6%
62 December 4.9 4.9 0% 0% 10.0 10.3 3% 3% 15.2 14.2 -7% -7% 11.3 10.3 -9% -9% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 5.0 4% 4%
63 January 4.3 4.3 0% 0% 8.8 9.1 3% 3% 13.7 12.7 -7% -7% 10.3 9.4 -8% -8% 2.7 0.2 -92% -92% 4.3 4.5 5% 5%
63 February 3.6 3.5 -1% -1% 7.4 7.9 7% 7% 11.5 11.1 -3% -3% 8.7 8.2 -6% -6% 2.4 0.1 -96% -96% 3.9 4.4 14% 14%
63 March 3.8 3.8 0% 0% 7.9 8.0 0% 0% 12.2 11.5 -6% -6% 9.4 9.1 -3% -3% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 3.9 -1% -1%
63 April 6.1 6.1 0% 0% 12.6 12.4 -2% -1% 17.9 17.7 -1% -1% 15.0 17.3 15% 15% 2.9 0.0 -100% -43% 6.2 5.8 -7% -4%
63 May 47.0 46.9 0% 0% 103.2 103.2 0% 0% 124.0 128.0 3% 3% 83.5 87.8 5% 5% 31.3 24.4 -22% -18% 53.9 52.5 -2% -2%
63 June 47.4 47.5 0% 0% 101.9 102.4 1% 0% 126.7 128.8 2% 2% 91.6 92.0 0% 0% 32.0 25.2 -21% -14% 54.1 53.4 -1% -1%
63 July 6.7 6.8 1% 1% 13.7 14.0 2% 1% 20.3 19.1 -6% -3% 15.0 13.7 -8% -4% 3.8 0.9 -76% -21% 6.5 6.7 3% 1%
63 August 5.8 5.9 0% 0% 11.9 11.7 -1% -1% 17.7 16.1 -9% -9% 13.3 12.2 -8% -8% 3.4 0.7 -80% -80% 5.6 5.4 -4% -4%
63 September 9.7 9.7 0% 0% 20.4 20.2 -1% -1% 27.7 26.8 -3% -3% 22.9 24.5 7% 7% 4.6 1.0 -78% -78% 10.2 9.8 -4% -4%
63 October 12.2 12.2 0% 0% 25.0 24.9 0% 0% 32.5 31.7 -2% -2% 24.7 25.6 3% 3% 6.3 2.6 -58% -58% 12.0 11.7 -3% -3%
63 November 5.8 5.8 0% 0% 12.1 12.4 3% 3% 17.4 16.6 -4% -4% 12.9 11.8 -9% -9% 3.8 0.9 -77% -77% 6.1 6.4 5% 5%
63 December 5.2 5.1 -1% -1% 10.8 11.1 3% 3% 15.7 15.0 -4% -4% 11.7 10.7 -8% -8% 3.5 0.7 -80% -80% 5.3 5.6 5% 5%
64 January 4.5 4.5 0% 0% 9.5 10.4 10% 10% 14.0 14.2 1% 1% 10.6 9.8 -7% -7% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.7 5.6 19% 19%
64 February 3.6 3.6 0% 0% 7.6 7.9 3% 3% 11.4 11.0 -4% -4% 8.7 8.2 -6% -6% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.5 6% 6%
64 March 3.5 3.5 0% 0% 7.6 7.7 1% 1% 11.5 11.0 -4% -4% 8.8 8.4 -4% -4% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 3.9 1% 1%
64 April 37.5 37.4 0% 0% 82.8 82.7 0% 0% 99.6 103.2 4% 4% 67.0 72.7 8% 8% 25.9 19.4 -25% -25% 44.7 43.4 -3% -3%
64 May 74.9 74.9 0% 0% 162.1 163.2 1% 1% 200.6 204.7 2% 2% 144.1 144.0 0% 0% 50.0 41.1 -18% -18% 84.0 83.1 -1% -1%
64 June 44.8 44.9 0% 0% 94.6 95.4 1% 1% 120.3 120.4 0% 0% 88.7 87.6 -1% -1% 29.1 22.8 -22% -13% 49.5 49.1 -1% 0%
64 July 7.0 7.1 1% 1% 14.3 14.6 2% 1% 21.3 19.9 -6% -3% 15.9 14.4 -10% -5% 3.9 1.0 -74% -21% 6.7 6.9 3% 1%
64 August 5.8 5.8 0% 0% 11.9 11.8 -1% -1% 17.8 16.4 -8% -8% 13.4 12.1 -9% -9% 3.5 0.7 -80% -80% 5.6 5.5 -2% -2%
64 September 5.3 5.3 0% 0% 10.6 10.5 -1% -1% 16.1 14.6 -9% -9% 12.5 11.5 -8% -8% 3.2 0.4 -87% -87% 5.2 5.0 -3% -3%
64 October 7.5 7.5 0% 0% 15.3 15.1 -1% -1% 21.8 20.7 -5% -5% 17.7 18.6 5% 5% 3.5 0.3 -91% -91% 7.3 6.9 -5% -5%
64 November 5.0 5.0 -1% -1% 10.2 10.2 0% 0% 15.2 14.1 -8% -8% 11.7 10.9 -7% -7% 3.0 0.3 -90% -90% 5.0 5.0 0% 0%
64 December 4.5 4.5 0% 0% 9.3 9.5 3% 3% 14.0 13.2 -6% -6% 10.6 9.9 -6% -6% 2.8 0.2 -93% -93% 4.5 4.8 6% 6%
65 January 3.9 3.9 0% 0% 8.3 9.5 15% 15% 12.6 13.8 10% 10% 9.5 9.1 -5% -5% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 5.2 28% 28%
65 February 3.2 3.1 -1% -1% 6.8 7.0 3% 3% 10.4 9.9 -5% -5% 7.9 7.6 -3% -3% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 4.0 4% 4%
65 March 3.2 3.2 0% 0% 6.9 7.2 4% 4% 10.6 10.3 -3% -3% 7.9 7.8 -1% -1% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.8 8% 8%
65 April 6.0 6.0 0% 0% 12.8 12.7 -1% -1% 17.8 17.9 1% 1% 14.8 17.9 21% 20% 2.9 0.0 -100% -42% 6.4 6.0 -5% -3%
65 May 73.8 73.7 0% 0% 162.7 163.2 0% 0% 196.0 202.5 3% 3% 134.0 138.3 3% 3% 50.4 40.9 -19% -19% 85.5 83.9 -2% -2%
65 June 98.9 98.9 0% 0% 211.4 213.4 1% 1% 264.3 266.5 1% 1% 193.4 194.4 1% 1% 66.9 55.8 -17% -17% 112.1 111.5 -1% -1%
65 July 7.1 7.2 2% 1% 14.0 14.9 6% 2% 21.2 20.1 -5% -3% 16.0 14.5 -9% -5% 3.7 0.8 -78% -21% 6.4 7.2 12% 3%
65 August 5.9 5.9 0% 0% 11.8 11.7 -1% -1% 17.8 16.0 -10% -10% 13.6 12.3 -9% -9% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.4 5.3 -2% -2%
65 September 23.0 23.0 0% 0% 48.8 48.9 0% 0% 61.4 61.3 0% 0% 46.6 49.0 5% 5% 13.8 9.1 -34% -34% 25.4 24.8 -2% -2%
65 October 13.1 13.2 0% 0% 27.1 27.2 1% 1% 35.8 35.0 -2% -2% 27.7 27.9 1% 1% 6.9 3.3 -52% -52% 13.1 13.0 -1% -1%
65 November 6.0 6.0 0% 0% 12.5 13.0 4% 4% 18.6 17.7 -5% -5% 13.6 12.4 -9% -9% 3.9 0.9 -77% -77% 6.3 6.7 7% 7%
65 December 5.3 5.3 -1% -1% 11.0 11.5 4% 4% 16.6 15.7 -5% -5% 12.2 11.1 -9% -9% 3.5 0.7 -80% -80% 5.4 5.8 9% 9%
66 January 4.7 4.7 0% 0% 9.7 10.5 8% 8% 14.8 14.5 -3% -3% 11.1 10.2 -8% -8% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.7 5.5 15% 15%
66 February 3.8 3.8 -1% -1% 7.9 8.1 2% 2% 12.2 11.4 -7% -7% 9.2 8.5 -7% -7% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.5 4% 4%
66 March 3.7 3.7 -1% -1% 7.9 8.4 7% 7% 12.2 11.9 -3% -3% 9.2 8.7 -5% -5% 2.4 0.1 -96% -96% 3.9 4.4 13% 13%
66 April 13.6 13.6 0% 0% 29.8 29.5 -1% -1% 37.6 38.0 1% 1% 28.4 33.4 18% 18% 7.6 3.6 -53% -53% 15.7 14.9 -5% -5%
66 May 109.3 109.3 0% 0% 238.0 239.5 1% 1% 293.0 299.6 2% 2% 206.3 209.5 2% 2% 74.8 62.7 -16% -16% 124.1 122.7 -1% -1%
66 June 91.4 91.5 0% 0% 194.5 196.7 1% 1% 244.9 246.4 1% 1% 180.9 183.5 1% 1% 61.4 50.9 -17% -17% 102.7 102.6 0% 0%
66 July 7.5 7.6 2% 1% 14.9 15.4 4% 1% 22.4 20.9 -7% -3% 17.0 15.4 -9% -5% 3.9 1.0 -75% -21% 6.8 7.2 5% 2%
66 August 6.1 6.1 0% 0% 12.3 12.2 -1% -1% 18.5 16.8 -10% -10% 14.0 12.7 -10% -10% 3.5 0.7 -80% -80% 5.8 5.6 -3% -3%
66 September 5.2 5.1 -1% -1% 10.3 10.2 -1% -1% 15.7 14.2 -9% -9% 12.2 11.0 -9% -9% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 4.9 4.9 -1% -1%
66 October 5.1 5.1 0% 0% 10.2 10.0 -1% -1% 15.6 14.1 -9% -9% 12.3 11.4 -7% -7% 2.9 0.2 -93% -93% 4.7 4.6 -3% -3%
66 November 4.4 4.3 0% 0% 8.8 8.9 2% 2% 13.6 12.6 -7% -7% 10.6 9.9 -6% -6% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.4 4% 4%
66 December 4.0 4.0 -1% -1% 8.2 8.6 5% 5% 12.8 12.1 -5% -5% 9.7 9.3 -5% -5% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 4.3 10% 10%
67 January 3.6 3.5 -1% -1% 7.4 7.9 7% 7% 11.7 11.3 -3% -3% 8.7 8.5 -3% -3% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 4.1 13% 13%
67 February 2.9 2.9 0% 0% 6.3 6.8 7% 7% 10.0 9.7 -3% -3% 7.5 7.4 -1% -1% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.9 13% 13%
67 March 2.8 2.8 -1% -1% 6.2 6.6 5% 5% 9.8 9.5 -3% -3% 7.2 7.3 0% 0% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.2 3.5 10% 10%
67 April 9.0 9.0 0% 0% 19.4 19.4 0% 0% 25.8 26.7 3% 3% 20.6 26.3 28% 28% 3.8 0.6 -84% -47% 9.9 9.5 -4% -4%
67 May 78.6 78.5 0% 0% 172.6 173.2 0% 0% 208.6 215.2 3% 3% 143.4 146.0 2% 2% 53.9 44.5 -17% -17% 90.4 88.9 -2% -2%
67 June 74.1 74.1 0% 0% 157.8 159.0 1% 1% 197.9 199.1 1% 1% 145.0 145.7 0% 0% 49.5 40.6 -18% -18% 83.4 82.7 -1% -1%
67 July 6.9 7.1 2% 1% 13.8 14.4 5% 2% 20.8 19.5 -6% -3% 15.8 14.2 -10% -5% 3.6 0.8 -78% -20% 6.3 6.8 7% 2%
67 August 5.8 5.8 1% 1% 11.5 11.5 0% 0% 17.5 15.8 -10% -10% 13.3 12.0 -10% -10% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.4 5.2 -2% -2%
67 September 5.0 5.0 0% 0% 10.1 10.0 -1% -1% 15.4 13.9 -10% -10% 12.0 11.0 -9% -9% 3.0 0.4 -86% -86% 4.8 4.7 -2% -2%
67 October 4.8 4.8 0% 0% 9.7 9.6 -1% -1% 14.9 13.5 -9% -9% 11.7 10.9 -7% -7% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.5 4.4 -3% -3%
67 November 4.1 4.1 0% 0% 8.4 8.4 1% 1% 13.0 12.0 -8% -8% 10.1 9.5 -6% -6% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.1 4.1 1% 1%
67 December 3.8 3.8 -1% -1% 7.8 8.3 6% 6% 12.2 11.6 -5% -5% 9.3 8.9 -4% -4% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 4.2 11% 11%
68 January 3.4 3.3 -1% -1% 7.1 7.4 5% 5% 11.1 10.6 -5% -5% 8.4 8.2 -3% -3% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.8 9% 9%
68 February 2.7 2.7 0% 0% 5.9 5.9 1% 1% 9.2 8.6 -7% -7% 6.9 6.9 -1% -1% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.3 1% 1%
68 March 2.7 2.7 -1% -1% 6.0 6.1 2% 2% 9.4 8.9 -5% -5% 7.0 7.0 1% 1% 1.8 0.0 -100% -100% 3.1 3.2 3% 3%
68 April 8.0 8.0 0% 0% 17.2 16.9 -2% -2% 23.2 24.5 6% 5% 19.1 24.7 29% 29% 3.1 0.1 -97% -45% 8.8 8.0 -8% -7%
68 May 30.6 30.5 0% 0% 66.8 66.5 -1% 0% 78.7 81.3 3% 2% 52.6 56.7 8% 6% 19.7 14.8 -25% -13% 34.5 33.4 -3% -2%
68 June 20.0 20.2 1% 0% 42.4 42.4 0% 0% 52.4 52.7 1% 0% 37.1 38.3 3% 1% 12.3 8.3 -32% -8% 22.0 21.3 -3% -1%
68 July 6.0 6.0 1% 0% 12.5 12.5 0% 0% 18.2 16.9 -7% -3% 13.1 12.1 -8% -4% 3.5 0.8 -77% -19% 6.0 6.0 -1% 0%
68 August 5.1 5.0 -1% -1% 10.6 10.4 -1% -1% 15.6 14.4 -8% -8% 11.6 10.7 -8% -8% 3.2 0.6 -81% -81% 5.1 5.0 -2% -2%
68 September 6.2 6.2 0% 0% 12.8 12.6 -2% -2% 18.2 17.3 -5% -5% 14.5 15.0 4% 4% 3.4 0.4 -88% -88% 6.4 6.0 -6% -6%
68 October 5.1 5.1 0% 0% 10.6 10.5 -1% -1% 15.4 14.4 -6% -6% 11.9 11.3 -5% -5% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 5.2 5.0 -3% -3%
68 November 4.2 4.2 -1% -1% 8.9 9.7 9% 9% 13.0 13.1 1% 1% 10.0 9.5 -5% -5% 2.8 0.2 -93% -93% 4.6 5.4 17% 17%
68 December 3.8 3.8 0% 0% 8.1 8.5 5% 5% 12.0 11.8 -1% -1% 9.2 8.9 -4% -4% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 4.5 10% 10%
69 January 3.4 3.4 -1% -1% 7.4 8.3 12% 12% 10.9 11.3 4% 4% 8.3 8.2 -2% -2% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 4.7 22% 22%
69 February 2.8 2.8 0% 0% 6.2 6.5 5% 5% 9.1 9.1 0% 0% 6.9 6.9 0% 0% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.9 9% 9%
69 March 3.2 3.2 0% 0% 7.1 7.6 7% 7% 10.3 10.6 3% 3% 7.7 8.0 4% 4% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 4.1 12% 12%
69 April 46.5 46.4 0% 0% 103.1 103.3 0% 0% 122.8 128.2 4% 4% 82.0 88.8 8% 8% 32.2 24.9 -23% -23% 55.8 54.6 -2% -2%
69 May 85.1 85.1 0% 0% 183.4 184.8 1% 1% 226.7 230.9 2% 2% 164.5 164.2 0% 0% 56.2 46.5 -17% -17% 94.7 93.8 -1% -1%
69 June 122.1 122.2 0% 0% 260.3 262.5 1% 1% 326.8 328.3 0% 0% 242.3 241.1 0% 0% 82.4 69.3 -16% -16% 137.8 136.8 -1% -1%
69 July 7.5 7.6 2% 1% 14.7 15.8 8% 3% 22.1 21.1 -4% -2% 16.8 15.3 -9% -5% 3.8 0.9 -76% -21% 6.7 7.6 14% 4%
69 August 6.1 6.1 0% 0% 12.2 12.1 -1% -1% 18.3 16.6 -10% -10% 14.0 12.6 -10% -10% 3.4 0.7 -80% -80% 5.7 5.5 -3% -3%
69 September 5.2 5.1 -1% -1% 10.3 10.2 0% 0% 15.6 14.1 -10% -10% 12.2 11.0 -9% -9% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.9 4.8 -1% -1%
69 October 4.7 4.6 0% 0% 9.3 9.3 0% 0% 14.5 13.1 -10% -10% 11.3 10.3 -8% -8% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.4 4.3 -1% -1%
69 November 4.0 4.0 0% 0% 8.1 8.3 2% 2% 12.8 11.7 -9% -9% 10.0 9.3 -7% -7% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 4.1 3% 3%
69 December 3.8 3.7 -1% -1% 7.7 8.0 4% 4% 12.2 11.3 -7% -7% 9.3 8.8 -5% -5% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 3.9 6% 6%
70 January 3.3 3.3 -1% -1% 7.0 7.4 6% 6% 11.1 10.6 -5% -5% 8.4 8.1 -3% -3% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.8 11% 11%
70 February 2.7 2.6 -1% -1% 5.8 6.2 8% 8% 9.2 9.0 -3% -3% 6.9 6.8 -2% -2% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.7 15% 15%
70 March 2.7 2.7 0% 0% 5.9 6.2 5% 5% 9.4 9.0 -4% -4% 6.9 6.9 0% 0% 1.8 0.0 -100% -100% 3.1 3.3 8% 8%
70 April 4.8 4.8 0% 0% 10.1 10.2 0% 0% 14.7 14.9 1% 1% 12.2 15.2 25% 19% 2.3 0.0 -100% -35% 5.1 4.9 -4% -2%
70 May 37.6 37.6 0% 0% 83.1 82.8 0% 0% 98.8 102.7 4% 3% 66.3 72.2 9% 9% 24.1 18.3 -24% -15% 43.4 41.9 -3% -3%
70 June 54.5 54.6 0% 0% 117.9 118.5 0% 0% 145.3 148.3 2% 2% 103.6 104.3 1% 1% 37.1 29.9 -19% -15% 63.0 62.0 -1% -1%
70 July 6.4 6.5 2% 1% 12.9 13.1 2% 1% 19.4 18.0 -7% -3% 14.3 13.2 -8% -4% 3.4 0.7 -79% -19% 6.0 6.1 1% 0%
70 August 5.6 5.6 0% 0% 11.2 11.0 -2% -2% 16.9 15.2 -10% -10% 12.9 11.8 -8% -8% 3.2 0.5 -84% -84% 5.2 5.0 -4% -4%
70 September 4.7 4.7 0% 0% 9.5 9.4 -1% -1% 14.5 13.0 -10% -10% 11.2 10.3 -9% -9% 2.8 0.3 -89% -89% 4.6 4.5 -2% -2%
70 October 22.4 22.3 0% 0% 48.4 48.4 0% 0% 59.4 60.4 2% 2% 44.3 48.0 8% 8% 13.2 8.4 -36% -36% 24.6 24.1 -2% -2%
70 November 5.5 5.5 0% 0% 11.3 11.7 4% 4% 16.8 16.0 -5% -5% 12.5 11.4 -9% -9% 3.2 0.6 -81% -81% 5.5 5.9 7% 7%
70 December 4.9 4.9 -1% -1% 10.1 10.3 3% 3% 15.2 14.2 -6% -6% 11.3 10.3 -9% -9% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 5.1 5% 5%
71 January 4.3 4.3 0% 0% 8.9 9.2 4% 4% 13.6 12.9 -5% -5% 10.3 9.5 -8% -8% 2.7 0.2 -93% -93% 4.3 4.6 8% 8%
71 February 3.5 3.5 0% 0% 7.4 7.8 5% 5% 11.4 10.9 -4% -4% 8.8 8.2 -6% -6% 2.4 0.1 -96% -96% 3.9 4.2 9% 9%
71 March 3.3 3.3 0% 0% 7.2 7.4 3% 3% 11.1 10.6 -4% -4% 8.5 8.1 -4% -4% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.8 6% 6%
71 April 19.0 18.9 -1% -1% 41.8 41.5 -1% -1% 50.5 52.0 3% 3% 36.9 42.6 15% 15% 11.6 7.1 -39% -39% 22.2 21.3 -4% -4%
71 May 60.0 60.1 0% 0% 130.7 131.4 1% 1% 160.0 164.7 3% 3% 110.8 111.8 1% 1% 40.7 33.0 -19% -19% 68.0 67.0 -2% -2%
71 June 38.9 38.9 0% 0% 82.5 83.1 1% 1% 103.9 104.8 1% 1% 76.4 76.2 0% 0% 25.4 19.6 -23% -12% 43.2 42.8 -1% -1%
71 July 6.7 6.7 1% 1% 13.6 13.8 1% 0% 20.3 18.8 -7% -3% 15.0 13.7 -9% -5% 3.7 0.9 -76% -20% 6.5 6.5 0% 0%
71 August 5.5 5.5 0% 0% 11.4 11.3 -1% -1% 17.1 15.5 -9% -9% 12.9 11.7 -10% -10% 3.4 0.6 -82% -82% 5.4 5.3 -3% -3%
71 September 4.8 4.8 -1% -1% 9.7 9.6 -1% -1% 14.8 13.4 -9% -9% 11.4 10.4 -9% -9% 3.0 0.4 -86% -86% 4.8 4.7 -2% -2%
71 October 4.4 4.4 0% 0% 8.9 8.9 0% 0% 13.7 12.5 -9% -9% 10.7 9.9 -8% -8% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.2 -1% -1%
71 November 3.8 3.8 -1% -1% 7.8 7.8 0% 0% 12.1 11.1 -9% -9% 9.4 8.8 -6% -6% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 3.8 -1% -1%
71 December 3.5 3.5 -1% -1% 7.3 7.3 0% 0% 11.4 10.5 -8% -8% 8.7 8.3 -4% -4% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.6 -2% -2%
72 January 3.1 3.1 -1% -1% 6.6 6.7 1% 1% 10.3 9.7 -7% -7% 7.9 7.8 -2% -2% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.4 1% 1%
72 February 2.5 2.5 -1% -1% 5.5 5.5 0% 0% 8.6 8.0 -6% -6% 6.5 6.5 -1% -1% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.2 3.1 -1% -1%
72 March 2.5 2.5 0% 0% 5.7 6.0 6% 6% 8.8 8.7 -1% -1% 6.5 6.6 2% 2% 1.7 0.0 -100% -100% 3.0 3.3 11% 11%
72 April 3.5 3.5 0% 0% 7.7 7.5 -3% -1% 11.3 11.0 -2% -1% 8.9 10.6 19% 11% 2.0 0.0 -100% -30% 4.0 3.6 -9% -3%
72 May 9.4 9.4 0% 0% 20.4 20.0 -2% -1% 26.5 27.1 2% 0% 20.5 26.3 28% 9% 3.8 0.8 -79% -8% 10.2 9.3 -9% -2%
72 June 4.0 4.0 0% 0% 8.1 8.0 -2% 0% 11.5 10.9 -5% 0% 8.5 8.3 -3% 0% 2.0 0.0 -100% -4% 4.0 3.8 -5% 0%
72 July 3.7 3.7 0% 0% 7.8 7.6 -2% 0% 10.9 10.3 -5% -1% 8.0 7.7 -4% -1% 2.3 0.1 -96% -15% 3.9 3.7 -5% -1%
72 August 3.3 3.3 0% 0% 7.1 7.1 -1% -1% 10.0 9.6 -4% -4% 7.4 7.2 -3% -3% 2.2 0.1 -95% -95% 3.6 3.5 -4% -4%
72 September 13.4 13.4 -1% -1% 29.7 29.4 -1% -1% 36.2 37.3 3% 3% 26.1 31.4 20% 20% 7.8 3.9 -50% -50% 15.7 15.0 -5% -5%
72 October 5.7 5.8 1% 1% 12.0 12.0 0% 0% 16.1 15.7 -2% -2% 12.1 12.2 1% 1% 3.1 0.3 -90% -90% 5.8 5.6 -3% -3%
72 November 4.5 4.5 0% 0% 9.5 9.8 3% 3% 12.8 12.7 -1% -1% 9.5 8.9 -6% -6% 3.0 0.4 -86% -86% 4.8 5.1 5% 5%
72 December 4.0 4.0 0% 0% 8.5 9.1 7% 7% 11.8 12.0 2% 2% 8.8 8.2 -6% -6% 2.7 0.2 -93% -93% 4.3 4.8 12% 12%
73 January 3.5 3.5 -1% -1% 7.6 8.0 4% 4% 10.7 10.7 0% 0% 7.9 7.6 -4% -4% 2.4 0.1 -96% -96% 3.9 4.2 8% 8%
73 February 2.9 2.9 0% 0% 6.3 6.6 5% 5% 8.9 9.0 1% 1% 6.5 6.4 -2% -2% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.9 8% 8%
73 March 4.0 4.0 -1% -1% 8.5 8.4 -1% -1% 11.9 11.8 -1% -1% 9.1 10.0 10% 10% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.2 4.1 -4% -4%
73 April 24.5 24.4 0% 0% 53.8 53.4 -1% -1% 62.8 65.7 4% 4% 42.6 48.7 14% 14% 15.6 10.5 -33% -33% 28.7 27.5 -4% -4%
73 May 52.7 52.8 0% 0% 114.4 115.1 1% 1% 138.9 143.1 3% 3% 94.4 95.5 1% 1% 35.3 28.3 -20% -19% 59.3 58.5 -1% -1%
73 June 46.7 46.8 0% 0% 99.7 100.2 0% 0% 124.3 125.6 1% 1% 91.0 90.7 0% 0% 31.1 24.5 -21% -13% 52.6 51.9 -1% -1%
73 July 6.9 7.0 1% 1% 14.2 14.3 1% 0% 20.7 19.3 -7% -3% 15.5 14.1 -9% -5% 3.9 0.9 -77% -21% 6.7 6.7 0% 0%
73 August 5.7 5.8 0% 0% 11.8 11.7 -1% -1% 17.5 15.9 -9% -9% 13.2 12.0 -10% -10% 3.5 0.7 -80% -80% 5.6 5.5 -3% -3%
73 September 5.1 5.1 -1% -1% 10.4 10.2 -2% -2% 15.6 14.1 -10% -10% 12.1 11.1 -8% -8% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 5.1 4.9 -3% -3%
73 October 4.6 4.6 0% 0% 9.4 9.4 0% 0% 14.4 13.1 -9% -9% 11.2 10.3 -8% -8% 2.8 0.2 -93% -93% 4.5 4.4 -2% -2%
73 November 4.0 4.0 -1% -1% 8.2 8.2 0% 0% 12.6 11.6 -8% -8% 9.7 9.1 -7% -7% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 4.1 0% 0%
73 December 3.7 3.6 -1% -1% 7.7 7.8 2% 2% 11.8 11.2 -5% -5% 9.1 8.6 -5% -5% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 3.9 5% 5%
74 January 3.2 3.2 -1% -1% 6.9 7.1 2% 2% 10.8 10.1 -6% -6% 8.2 8.0 -3% -3% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.6 3% 3%
74 February 2.6 2.6 -1% -1% 5.8 6.2 8% 8% 8.9 8.8 -1% -1% 6.8 6.6 -2% -2% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.8 14% 14%
74 March 2.6 2.6 0% 0% 5.9 6.0 1% 1% 9.1 8.7 -4% -4% 6.7 6.8 1% 1% 1.8 0.0 -100% -100% 3.1 3.1 2% 2%
74 April 6.3 6.3 0% 0% 13.6 13.7 1% 1% 18.8 19.8 5% 4% 16.2 20.7 28% 28% 2.8 0.0 -100% -41% 6.8 6.6 -4% -2%
74 May 24.8 24.8 0% 0% 54.0 53.6 -1% 0% 63.2 65.5 4% 2% 43.0 47.9 11% 7% 14.9 10.4 -30% -12% 27.6 26.6 -4% -2%
74 June 15.5 15.6 1% 0% 32.8 32.5 -1% 0% 40.0 40.1 0% 0% 28.8 30.1 4% 2% 9.1 5.4 -40% -8% 16.8 16.1 -4% -1%
74 July 5.7 5.8 1% 0% 11.9 11.9 0% 0% 17.1 16.0 -7% -3% 12.4 11.3 -9% -4% 3.4 0.8 -77% -19% 5.8 5.7 -2% -1%
74 August 4.8 4.8 0% 0% 10.1 10.0 -1% -1% 14.7 13.7 -7% -7% 10.9 10.0 -9% -9% 3.1 0.5 -84% -84% 4.9 4.8 -3% -3%
74 September 4.3 4.1 -4% -4% 8.8 8.6 -2% -2% 13.0 12.0 -8% -8% 9.7 8.9 -8% -8% 2.8 0.3 -89% -89% 4.4 4.4 -2% -2%
74 October 8.2 8.2 0% 0% 17.4 17.2 -1% -1% 23.4 23.4 0% 0% 19.0 21.6 14% 14% 3.7 0.4 -89% -89% 8.5 8.1 -5% -5%
74 November 4.5 4.5 0% 0% 9.5 9.6 1% 1% 13.6 13.0 -5% -5% 10.3 9.5 -8% -8% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.9 4.9 1% 1%
74 December 4.0 4.0 0% 0% 8.7 8.8 1% 1% 12.4 12.0 -4% -4% 9.3 8.6 -7% -7% 2.8 0.3 -89% -89% 4.4 4.5 2% 2%
75 January 3.6 3.6 0% 0% 7.8 8.3 6% 6% 11.2 12.1 7% 7% 8.4 8.0 -5% -5% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.0 4.4 11% 11%
75 February 3.0 3.0 0% 0% 6.6 6.9 5% 5% 9.6 9.6 0% 0% 7.1 6.9 -3% -3% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 4.0 8% 8%
75 March 2.9 2.9 -1% -1% 6.5 6.9 5% 5% 9.5 9.5 0% 0% 6.9 6.8 -1% -1% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.7 9% 9%
75 April 24.6 24.4 0% 0% 54.2 54.1 0% 0% 63.8 67.0 5% 5% 43.7 50.3 15% 15% 16.1 11.0 -32% -32% 29.0 28.1 -3% -3%
75 May 62.6 62.7 0% 0% 136.4 137.4 1% 1% 166.4 171.2 3% 3% 114.3 115.4 1% 1% 42.3 34.5 -18% -18% 71.0 70.2 -1% -1%
75 June 36.4 36.5 0% 0% 76.9 77.5 1% 1% 96.5 97.3 1% 1% 71.1 70.9 0% 0% 23.4 17.9 -24% -11% 40.1 39.8 -1% 0%
75 July 6.6 6.7 1% 0% 13.5 13.7 1% 0% 20.0 18.6 -7% -3% 14.9 13.4 -10% -5% 3.7 0.9 -76% -20% 6.4 6.5 1% 0%
75 August 5.5 5.5 0% 0% 11.3 11.2 -1% -1% 16.9 15.4 -9% -9% 12.8 11.5 -10% -10% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.4 5.3 -2% -2%
75 September 7.6 7.6 0% 0% 15.6 15.4 -1% -1% 22.1 20.9 -5% -5% 17.9 18.7 4% 4% 3.7 0.4 -89% -89% 7.7 7.3 -5% -5%
75 October 5.2 5.2 -1% -1% 10.7 10.7 -1% -1% 16.0 14.6 -9% -9% 12.2 11.1 -9% -9% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 5.1 5.1 -1% -1%
75 November 4.4 4.4 0% 0% 9.0 9.3 3% 3% 13.6 12.8 -6% -6% 10.4 9.5 -9% -9% 2.8 0.3 -89% -89% 4.6 4.8 4% 4%
75 December 4.0 4.0 -1% -1% 8.4 8.8 5% 5% 12.7 12.2 -4% -4% 9.7 9.0 -7% -7% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 4.5 11% 11%
76 January 3.5 3.5 -1% -1% 7.5 7.6 1% 1% 11.5 10.7 -6% -6% 8.7 8.2 -6% -6% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 3.8 2% 2%
76 February 2.8 2.8 0% 0% 6.2 6.5 5% 5% 9.5 9.2 -3% -3% 7.2 6.9 -4% -4% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.8 9% 9%
76 March 3.2 3.2 -1% -1% 7.0 7.0 0% 0% 10.5 10.1 -4% -4% 8.0 8.0 1% 1% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.5 -1% -1%
76 April 21.8 21.7 -1% -1% 48.3 47.9 -1% -1% 57.5 59.8 4% 4% 40.6 47.4 17% 17% 13.6 8.7 -36% -36% 25.8 24.8 -4% -4%
76 May 55.6 55.7 0% 0% 121.0 121.7 1% 1% 147.7 152.1 3% 3% 101.5 102.7 1% 1% 37.3 30.1 -19% -19% 62.8 61.9 -1% -1%
76 June 50.5 50.6 0% 0% 107.8 108.7 1% 1% 135.0 136.6 1% 1% 99.0 98.4 -1% -1% 33.6 26.8 -20% -14% 56.9 56.5 -1% -1%
76 July 6.8 6.9 1% 1% 13.9 14.2 2% 1% 20.6 19.3 -6% -3% 15.4 13.9 -9% -5% 3.8 0.9 -76% -21% 6.5 6.7 3% 1%
76 August 5.7 5.7 -1% -1% 11.6 11.5 -1% -1% 17.4 15.8 -9% -9% 13.2 11.9 -10% -10% 3.4 0.6 -82% -82% 5.5 5.4 -2% -2%
76 September 4.8 4.8 0% 0% 9.8 9.7 -1% -1% 14.9 13.5 -9% -9% 11.5 10.4 -10% -10% 3.0 0.4 -86% -86% 4.8 4.7 -1% -1%
76 October 6.8 6.8 0% 0% 14.0 13.7 -2% -2% 20.1 19.0 -5% -5% 16.4 17.1 5% 5% 3.3 0.2 -94% -94% 6.6 6.2 -5% -5%
76 November 5.0 5.0 0% 0% 10.1 10.6 4% 4% 15.0 14.4 -4% -4% 11.7 10.8 -7% -7% 2.9 0.2 -93% -93% 4.9 5.4 9% 9%
76 December 4.4 4.4 0% 0% 9.0 9.4 4% 4% 13.6 13.0 -4% -4% 10.4 9.7 -7% -7% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.4 4.7 8% 8%
77 January 3.8 3.8 -1% -1% 8.0 8.5 5% 5% 12.2 11.8 -3% -3% 9.3 8.8 -5% -5% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 4.4 11% 11%
77 February 3.1 3.1 0% 0% 6.6 7.1 8% 8% 10.0 10.0 -1% -1% 7.6 7.4 -3% -3% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 4.2 15% 15%
77 March 3.0 3.0 0% 0% 6.7 7.1 6% 6% 10.2 10.1 -1% -1% 7.7 7.5 -2% -2% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.8 10% 10%
77 April 11.9 11.8 -1% -1% 26.2 26.2 0% 0% 33.1 34.3 4% 4% 25.0 31.0 24% 24% 6.2 2.4 -61% -56% 13.7 13.3 -3% -3%
77 May 83.7 83.6 0% 0% 182.9 183.9 1% 1% 221.7 228.7 3% 3% 153.3 154.8 1% 1% 57.3 47.5 -17% -17% 95.6 94.3 -1% -1%
77 June 112.5 112.6 0% 0% 240.4 242.7 1% 1% 301.0 303.3 1% 1% 221.8 217.3 -2% -2% 76.2 63.9 -16% -16% 127.4 126.8 0% 0%
77 July 10.2 10.4 2% 1% 20.3 21.1 4% 2% 29.0 27.9 -4% -3% 23.3 22.4 -4% -3% 4.8 1.4 -71% -24% 9.5 9.9 5% 2%
77 August 6.7 6.8 0% 0% 13.6 13.4 -1% -1% 20.0 18.2 -9% -9% 15.2 13.7 -10% -10% 3.9 0.9 -77% -77% 6.4 6.2 -3% -3%
77 September 8.4 8.4 0% 0% 17.4 17.2 -1% -1% 24.4 23.1 -5% -5% 20.1 20.4 2% 2% 4.3 0.9 -79% -79% 8.6 8.2 -4% -4%
77 October 32.0 32.0 0% 0% 67.4 67.8 1% 1% 84.4 85.1 1% 1% 60.5 61.8 2% 2% 19.8 14.4 -27% -27% 33.9 33.5 -1% -1%
77 November 6.5 6.5 0% 0% 13.5 13.9 3% 3% 19.8 18.9 -5% -5% 14.4 13.2 -9% -9% 4.1 1.1 -73% -73% 6.8 7.2 6% 6%
77 December 5.6 5.6 0% 0% 11.7 12.1 3% 3% 17.5 16.5 -6% -6% 13.0 11.7 -10% -10% 3.6 0.7 -81% -81% 5.7 6.1 6% 6%
78 January 4.9 4.9 0% 0% 10.2 10.5 3% 3% 15.5 14.6 -6% -6% 11.7 10.7 -9% -9% 3.2 0.4 -87% -87% 5.0 5.3 6% 6%
78 February 4.0 4.0 0% 0% 8.3 8.7 5% 5% 12.8 12.2 -5% -5% 9.7 8.9 -8% -8% 2.8 0.3 -89% -89% 4.5 4.9 10% 10%
78 March 3.9 3.9 -1% -1% 8.2 8.8 6% 6% 12.8 12.4 -3% -3% 9.7 9.1 -6% -6% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 4.6 12% 12%
78 April 6.9 6.9 0% 0% 14.5 14.4 -1% -1% 20.3 20.1 -1% -1% 16.8 19.2 15% 15% 3.2 0.0 -100% -47% 7.2 6.9 -5% -3%
78 May 68.2 68.1 0% 0% 150.0 150.3 0% 0% 182.3 187.6 3% 3% 126.0 128.9 2% 2% 46.7 37.7 -19% -19% 78.6 77.1 -2% -2%
78 June 76.3 76.3 0% 0% 163.3 164.5 1% 1% 204.9 206.5 1% 1% 149.6 147.9 -1% -1% 51.6 42.4 -18% -18% 86.6 85.9 -1% -1%
78 July 19.0 19.1 1% 1% 38.8 39.3 1% 1% 51.5 50.5 -2% -2% 39.3 38.7 -2% -2% 10.5 6.3 -40% -30% 18.9 18.8 0% 0%
78 August 6.9 7.0 1% 1% 14.3 14.3 -1% -1% 21.2 19.5 -8% -8% 15.8 14.3 -9% -9% 4.1 1.1 -73% -73% 6.9 6.7 -2% -2%
78 September 5.9 5.9 0% 0% 12.2 12.0 -1% -1% 18.1 16.6 -8% -8% 13.6 12.5 -8% -8% 3.7 0.7 -81% -81% 6.0 5.8 -3% -3%
78 October 6.4 6.4 1% 1% 13.1 12.9 -2% -2% 19.2 17.8 -7% -7% 14.9 14.5 -3% -3% 3.6 0.5 -86% -86% 6.2 5.9 -5% -5%
78 November 5.2 5.1 0% 0% 10.5 11.0 5% 5% 15.8 15.0 -5% -5% 12.1 11.2 -7% -7% 3.2 0.4 -87% -87% 5.2 5.7 9% 9%
78 December 4.6 4.6 0% 0% 9.5 9.9 4% 4% 14.5 13.8 -5% -5% 11.1 10.4 -6% -6% 2.8 0.1 -96% -96% 4.6 5.0 8% 8%
79 January 4.1 4.1 -1% -1% 8.5 8.6 1% 1% 13.1 12.2 -7% -7% 9.9 9.5 -5% -5% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 4.3 2% 2%
79 February 3.4 3.4 -1% -1% 7.3 7.5 3% 3% 11.2 10.7 -5% -5% 8.4 8.2 -3% -3% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 4.1 6% 6%
79 March 3.3 3.3 -1% -1% 7.1 7.5 5% 5% 11.0 10.8 -2% -2% 8.3 8.1 -2% -2% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 4.0 10% 10%
79 April 9.0 9.0 0% 0% 19.3 19.1 -1% -1% 25.6 26.2 2% 2% 20.5 25.4 24% 24% 3.9 0.5 -87% -50% 9.8 9.2 -6% -5%
79 May 69.3 69.2 0% 0% 152.2 153.1 1% 1% 183.9 190.3 3% 3% 125.6 128.3 2% 2% 47.6 38.9 -18% -18% 79.8 78.7 -1% -1%
79 June 78.3 78.3 0% 0% 167.4 168.8 1% 1% 209.6 211.6 1% 1% 153.2 152.3 -1% -1% 52.8 43.4 -18% -18% 88.7 88.2 -1% -1%
79 July 11.8 12.0 2% 1% 23.6 24.1 2% 1% 32.7 31.4 -4% -3% 26.1 25.6 -2% -2% 5.6 2.1 -62% -25% 11.1 11.2 1% 0%
79 August 6.8 6.8 0% 0% 13.8 13.7 -1% -1% 20.3 18.7 -8% -8% 15.3 13.9 -9% -9% 4.0 1.1 -73% -73% 6.6 6.4 -4% -4%
79 September 7.0 7.0 0% 0% 14.4 14.2 -2% -2% 20.7 19.2 -7% -7% 16.1 16.0 -1% -1% 4.0 0.9 -78% -78% 7.1 6.8 -5% -5%
79 October 9.3 9.3 0% 0% 19.4 19.2 -1% -1% 26.7 25.6 -4% -4% 21.9 22.5 3% 3% 4.6 1.0 -78% -78% 9.4 9.1 -4% -4%
79 November 5.8 5.8 -1% -1% 12.0 12.4 3% 3% 17.5 16.6 -5% -5% 13.1 12.0 -8% -8% 3.7 0.8 -78% -78% 6.0 6.4 6% 6%
79 December 5.2 5.3 1% 1% 10.8 11.1 2% 2% 16.0 15.0 -6% -6% 11.8 11.0 -7% -7% 3.4 0.5 -85% -85% 5.3 5.4 3% 3%
80 January 4.6 4.6 0% 0% 9.6 9.5 -1% -1% 14.4 13.3 -8% -8% 10.8 10.1 -6% -6% 3.0 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 4.6 -2% -2%
80 February 3.7 3.7 -1% -1% 7.8 8.0 2% 2% 11.8 11.2 -5% -5% 8.8 8.4 -5% -5% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.5 4% 4%
80 March 3.6 3.6 0% 0% 7.9 8.1 3% 3% 11.9 11.5 -4% -4% 8.9 8.6 -3% -3% 2.5 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 4.2 4% 4%
80 April 16.3 16.2 -1% -1% 35.7 35.1 -2% -2% 43.8 44.8 2% 2% 31.8 37.5 18% 18% 9.6 5.2 -46% -46% 18.9 17.8 -6% -6%
80 May 35.0 35.1 0% 0% 75.5 75.6 0% 0% 92.0 94.6 3% 2% 61.4 63.3 3% 3% 22.9 17.4 -24% -15% 38.7 37.8 -2% -2%
80 June 8.2 8.3 1% 0% 17.3 17.1 -1% 0% 23.9 22.9 -4% -1% 18.2 18.3 1% 0% 4.4 1.1 -75% -7% 8.7 8.3 -4% -1%
80 July 6.0 6.1 0% 0% 12.6 12.5 -1% 0% 18.2 16.9 -7% -3% 13.4 12.4 -8% -3% 3.8 0.9 -76% -21% 6.2 6.0 -4% -1%
80 August 5.2 5.1 -1% -1% 10.7 10.7 -1% -1% 15.8 14.7 -7% -7% 11.8 10.9 -8% -8% 3.3 0.5 -85% -85% 5.2 5.2 -1% -1%
80 September 28.2 28.1 0% 0% 61.2 61.4 0% 0% 74.8 76.6 2% 2% 53.0 56.3 6% 6% 18.4 13.0 -29% -29% 32.5 31.9 -2% -2%
80 October 12.7 12.8 0% 0% 26.5 26.7 1% 1% 34.3 34.1 -1% -1% 26.3 26.7 2% 2% 6.8 3.2 -53% -53% 12.9 12.9 0% 0%
80 November 6.0 6.0 0% 0% 12.6 12.7 1% 1% 18.1 17.2 -5% -5% 13.3 12.2 -8% -8% 3.9 0.9 -77% -77% 6.4 6.5 1% 1%
80 December 5.2 5.2 0% 0% 11.0 11.1 0% 0% 16.2 15.2 -6% -6% 12.0 11.0 -8% -8% 3.5 0.7 -80% -80% 5.5 5.5 0% 0%
81 January 4.6 4.6 0% 0% 9.7 10.1 3% 3% 14.4 13.9 -4% -4% 10.9 10.1 -7% -7% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 4.9 5.2 6% 6%
81 February 3.7 3.6 -1% -1% 7.9 8.6 9% 9% 11.7 12.3 4% 4% 9.0 8.5 -6% -6% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.4 5.2 18% 18%
81 March 16.2 16.1 -1% -1% 35.5 35.2 -1% -1% 43.5 44.2 2% 2% 32.4 37.0 14% 14% 9.3 5.0 -46% -46% 18.2 17.5 -4% -4%
81 April 32.5 32.6 0% 0% 70.1 70.4 0% 0% 86.1 88.5 3% 3% 58.3 59.8 3% 3% 22.1 16.6 -25% -25% 37.2 36.6 -2% -2%
81 May 56.3 56.3 0% 0% 122.1 122.6 0% 0% 151.7 154.3 2% 2% 109.3 109.0 0% 0% 37.8 30.3 -20% -20% 63.2 62.3 -1% -1%
81 June 39.4 39.4 0% 0% 83.6 84.0 0% 0% 106.1 106.3 0% 0% 78.2 77.3 -1% -1% 25.8 19.8 -23% -12% 43.8 43.3 -1% -1%
81 July 7.2 7.2 1% 1% 15.0 15.2 2% 1% 21.9 20.9 -5% -2% 16.2 14.8 -9% -5% 4.2 1.1 -74% -23% 7.3 7.4 2% 1%
81 August 6.0 6.0 0% 0% 12.5 12.4 -1% -1% 18.5 17.0 -8% -8% 13.7 12.6 -9% -9% 3.7 0.8 -78% -78% 6.1 5.9 -3% -3%
81 September 16.4 16.4 0% 0% 35.1 35.0 0% 0% 44.3 44.3 0% 0% 34.8 36.8 6% 6% 9.4 5.1 -46% -46% 18.2 17.7 -3% -3%
81 October 6.3 6.3 0% 0% 13.1 13.1 0% 0% 19.2 18.0 -7% -7% 14.1 12.9 -8% -8% 3.8 0.9 -76% -76% 6.4 6.3 -1% -1%
81 November 5.2 5.2 0% 0% 10.8 10.9 1% 1% 16.0 15.0 -6% -6% 11.8 10.9 -8% -8% 3.5 0.6 -83% -83% 5.5 5.6 2% 2%
81 December 4.8 4.8 0% 0% 9.9 9.9 0% 0% 14.9 13.8 -8% -8% 11.1 10.2 -8% -8% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 4.8 -2% -2%
82 January 4.2 4.2 0% 0% 8.8 9.0 2% 2% 13.4 12.6 -6% -6% 10.1 9.5 -7% -7% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.4 4.5 3% 3%
82 February 3.4 3.3 -1% -1% 7.2 7.3 2% 2% 11.0 10.4 -5% -5% 8.3 7.9 -5% -5% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 4.1 4% 4%
82 March 3.3 3.3 0% 0% 7.3 7.5 3% 3% 11.2 11.0 -2% -2% 8.4 8.1 -3% -3% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 4.0 6% 6%
82 April 12.5 12.5 0% 0% 27.5 26.9 -2% -2% 34.7 35.1 1% 1% 26.2 31.7 21% 21% 6.7 2.8 -58% -58% 14.4 13.4 -7% -7%
82 May 22.8 22.8 0% 0% 49.0 48.7 -1% 0% 58.7 60.0 2% 1% 40.3 42.7 6% 4% 14.2 9.8 -31% -12% 24.9 24.1 -3% -2%
82 June 5.6 5.6 0% 0% 11.7 11.7 0% 0% 16.8 15.8 -6% -1% 12.0 11.1 -7% -1% 3.4 0.7 -80% -6% 5.9 5.8 -2% 0%
82 July 4.9 4.9 0% 0% 10.2 10.1 -1% 0% 14.9 14.0 -6% -2% 10.9 10.1 -8% -3% 3.2 0.5 -84% -19% 5.0 4.9 -2% -1%
82 August 4.2 4.3 1% 1% 9.0 9.0 0% 0% 13.3 12.5 -6% -6% 10.0 9.2 -7% -7% 2.8 0.3 -89% -89% 4.5 4.4 -2% -2%
82 September 3.6 3.6 0% 0% 7.7 7.8 0% 0% 11.5 11.0 -5% -5% 8.8 8.2 -6% -6% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.0 4.0 0% 0%
82 October 3.3 3.3 0% 0% 7.3 7.3 0% 0% 10.9 10.4 -5% -5% 8.2 7.9 -4% -4% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 3.7 -1% -1%
82 November 2.9 2.9 0% 0% 6.5 6.6 1% 1% 9.7 9.4 -3% -3% 7.2 7.1 -1% -1% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.5 1% 1%
82 December 2.8 2.7 -1% -1% 6.2 6.5 4% 4% 9.3 9.3 0% 0% 6.7 6.8 1% 1% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.5 7% 7%
83 January 2.5 2.5 0% 0% 5.8 6.1 5% 5% 8.6 8.6 1% 1% 6.1 6.3 3% 3% 1.8 0.0 -100% -100% 3.1 3.3 8% 8%
83 February 2.2 2.2 0% 0% 5.1 5.2 1% 1% 7.5 7.4 -1% -1% 5.1 5.4 6% 6% 1.7 0.0 -100% -100% 2.9 3.0 1% 1%
83 March 2.2 2.2 0% 0% 5.1 5.3 3% 3% 7.5 7.6 1% 1% 5.0 5.4 7% 7% 1.6 0.0 -100% -100% 2.8 2.9 4% 4%
83 April 20.1 20.0 -1% -1% 44.8 44.7 0% 0% 53.2 55.9 5% 5% 36.5 44.8 23% 23% 12.0 7.8 -35% -35% 23.9 23.1 -3% -3%
83 May 37.0 37.1 0% 0% 79.9 80.2 0% 0% 95.3 99.2 4% 3% 63.4 65.7 4% 3% 23.8 18.5 -22% -14% 41.1 40.2 -2% -2%
83 June 16.2 16.3 1% 0% 33.9 33.9 0% 0% 42.3 42.1 0% 0% 31.9 32.8 3% 1% 9.3 5.6 -40% -8% 17.3 16.8 -3% -1%
83 July 5.9 5.9 1% 0% 12.2 12.2 0% 0% 17.6 16.5 -7% -3% 13.2 12.1 -9% -4% 3.4 0.8 -77% -19% 5.9 5.8 -2% -1%
83 August 5.0 5.0 -1% -1% 10.3 10.3 -1% -1% 15.2 14.0 -8% -8% 11.6 10.6 -9% -9% 3.1 0.5 -84% -84% 5.0 4.9 -2% -2%
83 September 4.2 4.2 0% 0% 8.8 8.8 0% 0% 13.2 12.2 -8% -8% 10.2 9.4 -9% -9% 2.8 0.3 -89% -89% 4.4 4.3 -2% -2%
83 October 3.9 3.9 -1% -1% 8.1 8.1 0% 0% 12.2 11.4 -7% -7% 9.6 8.9 -7% -7% 2.4 0.1 -96% -96% 4.0 3.9 -1% -1%
83 November 3.3 3.3 -1% -1% 7.0 7.6 7% 7% 10.7 10.5 -2% -2% 8.4 7.9 -5% -5% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 4.2 14% 14%
83 December 3.0 3.0 -1% -1% 6.7 6.8 1% 1% 10.2 9.7 -5% -5% 7.9 7.6 -3% -3% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.5 2% 2%
84 January 2.7 2.7 -1% -1% 6.1 6.4 6% 6% 9.3 9.1 -2% -2% 7.0 7.0 -1% -1% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.2 3.5 10% 10%
84 February 2.3 2.3 0% 0% 5.1 5.2 2% 2% 7.8 7.5 -3% -3% 5.7 5.8 2% 2% 1.8 0.0 -100% -100% 3.0 3.1 3% 3%
84 March 2.3 2.2 -2% -2% 5.3 5.8 8% 8% 8.0 8.1 2% 2% 5.7 5.9 4% 4% 1.7 0.0 -100% -100% 2.9 3.3 16% 16%
84 April 26.3 26.2 0% 0% 58.1 58.4 0% 0% 68.5 72.7 6% 6% 47.5 55.3 16% 16% 16.9 11.9 -30% -30% 31.1 30.5 -2% -2%
84 May 45.9 46.0 0% 0% 99.5 100.0 1% 1% 121.0 124.4 3% 3% 82.9 84.6 2% 2% 30.1 23.9 -21% -16% 51.4 50.6 -2% -1%
84 June 36.1 36.1 0% 0% 76.8 77.1 0% 0% 95.8 96.7 1% 1% 70.7 71.0 0% 0% 23.5 18.1 -23% -11% 40.4 39.6 -2% -1%
84 July 6.3 6.4 1% 1% 12.9 13.1 2% 1% 19.1 17.8 -6% -3% 14.2 13.0 -9% -4% 3.5 0.8 -77% -19% 6.1 6.2 2% 1%
84 August 5.3 5.3 -1% -1% 10.8 10.7 -1% -1% 16.3 14.7 -10% -10% 12.4 11.1 -10% -10% 3.1 0.5 -84% -84% 5.1 5.0 -3% -3%
84 September 4.7 4.8 0% 0% 9.6 9.5 -1% -1% 14.6 13.2 -9% -9% 11.4 10.4 -8% -8% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 4.5 -3% -3%
84 October 6.6 6.7 1% 1% 13.6 13.4 -2% -2% 19.5 18.6 -5% -5% 16.1 16.9 5% 5% 3.2 0.2 -94% -94% 6.5 6.1 -6% -6%
84 November 4.6 4.6 0% 0% 9.3 9.4 1% 1% 13.9 12.9 -7% -7% 10.8 9.9 -8% -8% 2.7 0.2 -93% -93% 4.6 4.6 1% 1%
84 December 4.0 4.0 -1% -1% 8.4 8.3 -1% -1% 12.6 11.6 -8% -8% 9.7 9.0 -7% -7% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 4.0 -2% -2%
85 January 3.5 3.5 -1% -1% 7.5 7.8 4% 4% 11.4 11.0 -3% -3% 8.7 8.3 -5% -5% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 4.0 7% 7%
85 February 2.8 2.8 0% 0% 6.2 6.4 4% 4% 9.4 9.1 -3% -3% 7.2 7.0 -3% -3% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.8 7% 7%
85 March 3.0 3.0 -1% -1% 6.5 6.6 1% 1% 9.8 9.4 -4% -4% 7.5 7.4 -1% -1% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.4 1% 1%
85 April 22.6 22.5 -1% -1% 50.2 49.9 -1% -1% 59.5 62.2 4% 4% 41.9 48.8 16% 16% 14.3 9.5 -34% -34% 26.9 25.9 -4% -4%
85 May 33.6 33.7 0% 0% 72.2 72.7 1% 1% 88.1 90.5 3% 2% 59.5 61.3 3% 3% 21.6 16.3 -25% -14% 37.0 36.4 -1% -1%
85 June 6.7 6.8 1% 0% 13.9 13.8 -1% 0% 19.7 18.5 -6% -1% 14.9 14.4 -3% -1% 3.6 0.8 -78% -6% 6.9 6.6 -4% 0%
85 July 5.6 5.6 -1% 0% 11.5 11.3 -1% 0% 16.7 15.4 -8% -3% 12.7 11.6 -8% -4% 3.3 0.7 -79% -19% 5.5 5.3 -3% -1%
85 August 4.8 4.8 0% 0% 9.8 9.8 -1% -1% 14.6 13.4 -8% -8% 11.3 10.3 -8% -8% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 4.6 -2% -2%
85 September 4.1 4.1 0% 0% 8.4 8.4 0% 0% 12.6 11.7 -7% -7% 9.9 9.1 -8% -8% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.2 -1% -1%
85 October 5.4 5.4 0% 0% 11.1 11.0 -2% -2% 16.0 15.5 -3% -3% 13.3 14.1 6% 6% 2.9 0.1 -97% -97% 5.3 5.0 -6% -6%
85 November 3.9 3.9 0% 0% 8.3 8.3 0% 0% 12.1 11.5 -5% -5% 9.4 9.0 -5% -5% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.2 4.2 0% 0%
85 December 3.5 3.5 0% 0% 7.6 7.6 0% 0% 11.1 10.6 -5% -5% 8.6 8.3 -3% -3% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 3.8 -1% -1%
86 January 3.1 3.1 0% 0% 6.9 7.1 2% 2% 10.2 10.0 -2% -2% 7.7 7.6 -1% -1% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.7 3% 3%
86 February 2.7 2.6 -1% -1% 5.9 5.9 0% 0% 8.7 8.3 -4% -4% 6.4 6.5 1% 1% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.4 -1% -1%
86 March 2.7 2.7 0% 0% 6.0 6.3 5% 5% 8.9 8.9 0% 0% 6.4 6.6 2% 2% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.2 3.5 8% 8%
86 April 7.9 7.9 0% 0% 17.1 17.0 -1% -1% 22.6 24.2 7% 7% 18.2 23.6 29% 29% 3.3 0.2 -94% -46% 8.7 8.1 -7% -5%
86 May 23.7 23.6 0% 0% 51.6 51.3 -1% 0% 60.2 62.1 3% 2% 40.1 44.2 10% 6% 14.8 10.4 -30% -12% 26.6 25.6 -3% -2%
86 June 16.1 16.2 1% 0% 34.3 34.1 -1% 0% 41.3 41.8 1% 0% 29.7 30.9 4% 1% 9.7 5.9 -39% -8% 17.7 17.0 -4% -1%
86 July 5.8 5.8 1% 0% 12.1 12.1 0% 0% 17.1 16.0 -6% -3% 12.4 11.3 -9% -4% 3.5 0.8 -77% -20% 5.9 5.8 -3% -1%
86 August 4.9 4.9 0% 0% 10.2 10.1 -1% -1% 14.7 13.8 -6% -6% 10.9 9.9 -9% -9% 3.2 0.5 -84% -84% 5.0 4.9 -2% -2%
86 September 4.1 4.1 0% 0% 8.7 8.7 0% 0% 12.8 12.0 -6% -6% 9.6 8.8 -9% -9% 2.8 0.3 -89% -89% 4.5 4.4 -2% -2%
86 October 4.1 4.1 0% 0% 8.6 8.6 -1% -1% 12.7 12.0 -5% -5% 9.8 9.2 -6% -6% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.2 -3% -3%
86 November 3.5 3.4 -1% -1% 7.5 7.7 4% 4% 11.0 10.8 -2% -2% 8.5 8.1 -4% -4% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 4.2 7% 7%
86 December 3.2 3.2 0% 0% 7.0 7.1 2% 2% 10.4 10.1 -3% -3% 7.8 7.6 -3% -3% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.7 3% 3%
87 January 2.9 2.9 -1% -1% 6.4 6.5 1% 1% 9.5 9.2 -3% -3% 7.0 7.0 0% 0% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.4 1% 1%
87 February 2.5 2.5 0% 0% 5.6 5.8 3% 3% 8.3 8.2 -1% -1% 5.9 6.0 1% 1% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.2 3.3 4% 4%
87 March 5.4 5.4 0% 0% 11.6 11.4 -2% -2% 16.1 16.4 2% 2% 13.4 16.8 25% 25% 2.6 0.0 -100% -100% 5.7 5.2 -9% -9%
87 April 19.3 19.2 -1% -1% 42.3 42.0 -1% -1% 50.0 51.4 3% 3% 33.9 39.1 15% 15% 11.4 7.2 -37% -37% 22.5 21.5 -4% -4%
87 May 11.2 11.3 1% 0% 23.4 23.1 -1% 0% 29.2 29.0 -1% 0% 21.3 22.6 6% 2% 5.7 2.3 -59% -9% 11.4 10.7 -6% -1%
87 June 6.1 6.1 1% 0% 12.7 12.4 -3% 0% 17.2 16.4 -5% -1% 12.8 12.3 -4% -1% 3.7 0.8 -79% -6% 6.4 6.0 -7% -1%
87 July 5.2 5.2 0% 0% 10.9 10.8 -1% 0% 15.0 14.3 -5% -2% 11.3 10.3 -8% -3% 3.4 0.7 -79% -19% 5.4 5.2 -3% -1%
87 August 4.5 4.5 0% 0% 9.5 9.4 -1% -1% 13.3 12.7 -4% -4% 9.9 9.1 -8% -8% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 4.6 -2% -2%
87 September 3.8 3.8 -1% -1% 8.1 8.0 -1% -1% 11.6 11.1 -4% -4% 8.8 8.1 -7% -7% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.2 -2% -2%
87 October 3.7 3.7 0% 0% 8.0 7.9 -1% -1% 11.5 11.0 -4% -4% 8.7 8.3 -4% -4% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 3.9 -3% -3%
87 November 3.2 3.2 0% 0% 7.0 7.1 1% 1% 10.2 9.9 -2% -2% 7.5 7.3 -3% -3% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 3.8 2% 2%
87 December 3.0 3.0 -1% -1% 6.7 7.0 4% 4% 9.6 9.7 0% 0% 6.9 6.9 -1% -1% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.7 7% 7%
88 January 2.7 2.7 0% 0% 6.2 6.6 6% 6% 9.0 9.1 1% 1% 6.2 6.3 1% 1% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.6 11% 11%
88 February 2.3 2.3 0% 0% 5.3 5.4 3% 3% 7.6 7.6 0% 0% 5.2 5.3 2% 2% 1.8 0.0 -100% -100% 3.1 3.2 5% 5%
88 March 4.0 4.0 0% 0% 8.6 8.7 2% 2% 12.0 12.4 3% 3% 9.1 11.0 21% 21% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 4.3 4.3 0% 0%
88 April 19.5 19.4 -1% -1% 43.0 42.9 0% 0% 51.0 53.0 4% 4% 34.8 41.4 19% 19% 11.5 7.2 -37% -37% 22.9 22.1 -3% -3%
88 May 62.4 62.5 0% 0% 136.0 136.6 0% 0% 163.9 169.6 4% 4% 111.5 112.7 1% 1% 42.1 34.3 -19% -19% 70.8 69.6 -2% -2%
88 June 47.6 47.7 0% 0% 101.2 102.1 1% 1% 126.2 127.8 1% 1% 92.7 92.1 -1% -1% 31.3 24.8 -21% -13% 53.3 52.9 -1% 0%
88 July 6.8 6.9 2% 1% 13.9 14.2 2% 1% 20.3 19.1 -6% -3% 15.3 13.8 -10% -5% 3.7 0.9 -76% -20% 6.5 6.7 2% 1%
88 August 5.7 5.7 0% 0% 11.6 11.5 -1% -1% 17.3 15.7 -10% -10% 13.1 11.7 -10% -10% 3.4 0.6 -82% -82% 5.5 5.3 -3% -3%
88 September 4.8 4.8 -1% -1% 9.8 9.8 0% 0% 14.9 13.4 -10% -10% 11.5 10.3 -10% -10% 3.0 0.4 -86% -86% 4.8 4.7 -1% -1%
88 October 4.4 4.4 0% 0% 9.0 9.0 0% 0% 13.8 12.5 -9% -9% 10.8 9.7 -10% -10% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.2 -1% -1%
88 November 3.9 3.8 -1% -1% 7.9 7.8 0% 0% 12.2 11.1 -9% -9% 9.5 8.7 -8% -8% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 3.9 -1% -1%
88 December 3.5 3.5 -1% -1% 7.4 7.5 1% 1% 11.5 10.8 -7% -7% 8.8 8.2 -6% -6% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.7 2% 2%
89 January 3.1 3.1 0% 0% 6.7 6.9 3% 3% 10.5 9.8 -6% -6% 8.0 7.6 -5% -5% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.5 5% 5%
89 February 2.5 2.5 -2% -2% 5.6 5.8 3% 3% 8.7 8.3 -5% -5% 6.6 6.3 -4% -4% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.2 3.4 6% 6%
89 March 2.9 2.9 0% 0% 6.4 6.2 -3% -3% 9.7 9.1 -6% -6% 7.3 7.4 1% 1% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.1 -6% -6%
89 April 6.3 6.3 0% 0% 13.6 13.4 -1% -1% 18.8 19.2 2% 2% 16.1 20.3 26% 26% 2.8 0.0 -100% -41% 6.8 6.4 -7% -4%
89 May 13.1 13.0 -1% 0% 28.1 27.6 -2% -1% 34.7 35.8 3% 1% 24.5 28.8 18% 6% 6.3 3.0 -53% -9% 14.0 13.2 -6% -2%
89 June 4.8 4.8 0% 0% 9.9 9.7 -1% 0% 13.6 12.9 -5% -1% 10.1 9.4 -7% -1% 2.8 0.3 -89% -5% 4.9 4.7 -4% 0%
89 July 4.3 4.3 0% 0% 9.2 9.0 -1% 0% 12.6 12.0 -5% -1% 9.4 8.6 -8% -3% 2.8 0.4 -86% -18% 4.6 4.4 -4% -1%
89 August 3.8 3.8 1% 1% 8.1 8.1 0% 0% 11.5 11.0 -4% -4% 8.7 8.0 -8% -8% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 4.0 -2% -2%
89 September 3.3 3.3 1% 1% 7.1 7.1 0% 0% 10.2 9.8 -4% -4% 7.6 7.1 -5% -5% 2.3 0.1 -96% -96% 3.8 3.7 -2% -2%
89 October 4.7 4.7 0% 0% 9.8 9.8 0% 0% 13.7 13.7 0% 0% 10.9 12.0 10% 10% 2.6 0.0 -100% -100% 4.8 4.6 -4% -4%
89 November 3.4 3.4 0% 0% 7.3 7.5 3% 3% 10.2 10.1 -1% -1% 7.5 7.3 -3% -3% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 3.9 5% 5%
89 December 3.1 3.1 0% 0% 6.9 7.0 2% 2% 9.7 9.5 -2% -2% 6.8 6.7 -2% -2% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.6 1% 1%
90 January 2.8 2.8 -1% -1% 6.4 6.8 6% 6% 9.0 9.2 1% 1% 6.2 6.2 0% 0% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.7 10% 10%
90 February 3.2 3.2 1% 1% 7.0 7.1 1% 1% 9.8 9.9 1% 1% 7.2 8.0 12% 12% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 3.9 -1% -1%
90 March 2.9 2.8 -1% -1% 6.3 6.8 7% 7% 8.9 9.2 3% 3% 6.1 6.2 2% 2% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.7 13% 13%
90 April 17.9 17.8 -1% -1% 39.5 39.4 0% 0% 47.1 49.0 4% 4% 32.5 39.4 21% 21% 10.6 6.3 -40% -40% 21.0 20.3 -4% -4%
90 May 67.7 67.8 0% 0% 147.8 148.7 1% 1% 177.5 184.0 4% 4% 120.9 122.2 1% 1% 46.0 37.6 -18% -18% 77.1 76.0 -1% -1%
90 June 65.3 65.4 0% 0% 139.4 140.6 1% 1% 173.8 175.4 1% 1% 127.3 125.9 -1% -1% 43.7 35.6 -19% -17% 73.7 73.2 -1% -1%
90 July 7.0 7.2 2% 1% 14.1 14.5 3% 1% 20.9 19.5 -7% -3% 15.8 14.1 -11% -6% 3.7 0.9 -76% -20% 6.5 6.8 4% 1%
90 August 5.8 5.8 0% 0% 11.8 11.7 -1% -1% 17.6 15.9 -10% -10% 13.4 11.9 -11% -11% 3.4 0.6 -82% -82% 5.5 5.4 -3% -3%
90 September 4.9 4.9 -1% -1% 9.8 9.8 0% 0% 15.0 13.5 -10% -10% 11.7 10.4 -11% -11% 3.0 0.4 -86% -86% 4.8 4.7 -1% -1%
90 October 7.4 7.4 0% 0% 15.1 15.0 -1% -1% 21.5 20.5 -5% -5% 17.7 18.6 5% 5% 3.4 0.2 -94% -94% 7.2 6.8 -6% -6%
90 November 5.1 5.0 -1% -1% 10.3 10.6 3% 3% 15.3 14.4 -6% -6% 11.8 10.8 -9% -9% 3.0 0.3 -90% -90% 5.0 5.3 7% 7%
90 December 4.5 4.5 0% 0% 9.2 9.6 4% 4% 13.9 13.2 -5% -5% 10.5 9.6 -8% -8% 2.7 0.2 -93% -93% 4.5 4.8 8% 8%
91 January 3.9 3.9 -1% -1% 8.2 8.5 5% 5% 12.4 11.9 -4% -4% 9.4 8.8 -7% -7% 2.4 0.1 -96% -96% 4.0 4.4 9% 9%
91 February 3.2 3.2 -1% -1% 6.9 7.3 6% 6% 10.6 10.3 -3% -3% 8.0 7.6 -6% -6% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 4.1 10% 10%
91 March 3.1 3.1 0% 0% 6.8 7.0 3% 3% 10.3 9.9 -4% -4% 7.7 7.4 -4% -4% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.7 5% 5%
91 April 38.8 38.7 0% 0% 86.0 86.3 0% 0% 102.8 107.3 4% 4% 69.3 75.7 9% 9% 26.6 20.1 -24% -24% 46.5 45.6 -2% -2%
91 May 75.1 75.2 0% 0% 162.5 164.0 1% 1% 200.8 205.3 2% 2% 144.2 144.2 0% 0% 49.9 41.1 -18% -18% 84.1 83.6 -1% -1%
91 June 61.3 61.3 0% 0% 130.1 131.0 1% 1% 164.5 164.6 0% 0% 121.2 119.3 -2% -2% 40.5 32.8 -19% -16% 68.5 67.8 -1% -1%
91 July 7.0 7.1 2% 1% 14.1 14.5 3% 1% 21.2 19.8 -7% -3% 16.0 14.1 -11% -6% 3.7 0.9 -76% -20% 6.5 6.8 4% 1%
91 August 5.8 5.8 0% 0% 11.7 11.6 -1% -1% 17.7 16.0 -10% -10% 13.4 11.9 -11% -11% 3.4 0.6 -82% -82% 5.5 5.4 -2% -2%
91 September 4.9 4.9 0% 0% 9.8 9.8 0% 0% 15.1 13.7 -9% -9% 11.7 10.4 -11% -11% 2.9 0.4 -86% -86% 4.7 4.7 -1% -1%
91 October 6.6 6.7 0% 0% 13.5 13.4 -1% -1% 19.7 18.5 -6% -6% 16.1 16.6 3% 3% 3.2 0.2 -94% -94% 6.4 6.0 -5% -5%
91 November 4.7 4.7 0% 0% 9.6 10.0 5% 5% 14.4 13.7 -5% -5% 11.2 10.2 -9% -9% 2.8 0.2 -93% -93% 4.7 5.1 9% 9%
91 December 4.2 4.2 -1% -1% 8.6 9.4 9% 9% 13.2 13.0 -2% -2% 10.1 9.3 -8% -8% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 5.0 19% 19%
92 January 3.7 3.7 -1% -1% 7.7 8.3 7% 7% 12.0 11.7 -3% -3% 9.0 8.5 -6% -6% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 4.4 14% 14%
92 February 3.0 2.9 -1% -1% 6.4 6.5 2% 2% 9.9 9.3 -6% -6% 7.5 7.1 -5% -5% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.7 4% 4%
92 March 3.0 2.9 -1% -1% 6.5 6.7 4% 4% 10.0 9.7 -4% -4% 7.5 7.3 -3% -3% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.5 6% 6%
92 April 16.3 16.2 -1% -1% 36.1 35.8 -1% -1% 44.2 45.5 3% 3% 32.2 38.7 20% 20% 9.5 5.3 -44% -44% 19.2 18.3 -5% -5%
92 May 91.9 91.8 0% 0% 200.3 201.3 1% 1% 244.7 251.4 3% 3% 170.7 171.3 0% 0% 62.6 52.2 -17% -17% 104.4 103.0 -1% -1%
92 June 58.5 58.6 0% 0% 124.0 125.3 1% 1% 156.5 157.1 0% 0% 115.2 113.5 -1% -1% 38.6 31.1 -19% -15% 65.2 64.9 0% 0%
92 July 6.9 7.0 1% 1% 13.9 14.3 3% 1% 20.9 19.5 -7% -3% 15.8 14.0 -11% -6% 3.7 0.9 -76% -20% 6.4 6.7 4% 1%
92 August 5.7 5.8 1% 1% 11.5 11.5 0% 0% 17.5 15.8 -9% -9% 13.3 11.8 -11% -11% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.4 5.3 -2% -2%
92 September 5.0 5.0 0% 0% 9.9 9.9 -1% -1% 15.2 13.7 -10% -10% 11.9 10.7 -10% -10% 3.0 0.4 -86% -86% 4.8 4.7 -3% -3%
92 October 7.7 7.7 0% 0% 15.9 15.7 -1% -1% 22.5 22.4 -1% -1% 18.6 19.8 6% 6% 3.4 0.2 -94% -94% 7.5 7.1 -5% -5%
92 November 4.9 4.9 -1% -1% 9.9 10.1 1% 1% 14.9 13.8 -7% -7% 11.5 10.5 -9% -9% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.9 5.0 2% 2%
92 December 4.4 4.4 0% 0% 9.0 9.1 1% 1% 13.7 12.7 -8% -8% 10.4 9.5 -8% -8% 2.7 0.2 -93% -93% 4.4 4.4 1% 1%
93 January 3.9 3.8 -1% -1% 8.0 8.5 6% 6% 12.3 11.8 -4% -4% 9.3 8.7 -7% -7% 2.4 0.1 -96% -96% 4.0 4.4 11% 11%
93 February 3.1 3.1 -1% -1% 6.6 6.8 3% 3% 10.2 9.7 -5% -5% 7.7 7.3 -5% -5% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 3.9 6% 6%
93 March 3.1 3.0 -1% -1% 6.7 6.9 3% 3% 10.3 9.9 -4% -4% 7.7 7.4 -4% -4% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.6 6% 6%
93 April 10.3 10.3 0% 0% 22.6 22.2 -2% -2% 29.2 29.7 2% 2% 22.3 27.8 24% 24% 5.2 1.6 -69% -53% 11.8 11.0 -7% -7%
93 May 55.8 55.8 0% 0% 122.3 122.8 0% 0% 147.0 152.0 3% 3% 99.1 101.5 2% 2% 38.1 30.7 -19% -19% 63.9 62.8 -2% -2%
93 June 39.5 39.6 0% 0% 84.3 85.0 1% 1% 105.3 106.7 1% 1% 76.9 77.1 0% 0% 26.1 20.2 -23% -12% 44.4 44.0 -1% -1%
93 July 6.6 6.6 1% 0% 13.5 13.6 1% 0% 20.0 18.6 -7% -3% 14.8 13.4 -10% -5% 3.7 0.9 -76% -20% 6.4 6.4 0% 0%
93 August 5.5 5.6 1% 1% 11.3 11.2 0% 0% 17.0 15.4 -9% -9% 12.8 11.5 -10% -10% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.4 5.3 -2% -2%
93 September 8.5 8.5 0% 0% 17.8 17.6 -1% -1% 24.6 23.6 -4% -4% 20.4 21.6 6% 6% 4.0 0.6 -85% -85% 8.9 8.4 -5% -5%
93 October 5.3 5.3 -1% -1% 11.0 11.0 0% 0% 16.3 15.0 -8% -8% 12.4 11.2 -10% -10% 3.3 0.5 -85% -85% 5.3 5.3 0% 0%
93 November 4.5 4.5 0% 0% 9.4 9.9 5% 5% 14.0 13.4 -4% -4% 10.6 9.6 -9% -9% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.7 5.2 10% 10%
93 December 4.1 4.1 0% 0% 8.6 9.0 5% 5% 13.0 12.4 -4% -4% 9.9 9.1 -8% -8% 2.6 0.2 -92% -92% 4.2 4.6 10% 10%
94 January 3.6 3.6 -1% -1% 7.7 8.1 5% 5% 11.7 11.3 -4% -4% 8.9 8.3 -6% -6% 2.4 0.1 -96% -96% 3.9 4.2 9% 9%
94 February 2.9 2.9 0% 0% 6.3 7.0 11% 11% 9.6 9.7 1% 1% 7.3 7.0 -4% -4% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 4.3 20% 20%
94 March 2.9 2.9 -1% -1% 6.5 6.7 3% 3% 9.8 9.5 -3% -3% 7.4 7.2 -3% -3% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.5 5% 5%
94 April 3.7 3.8 0% 0% 8.0 8.0 -1% 0% 11.7 11.5 -1% -1% 9.2 10.3 12% 7% 2.2 0.0 -100% -33% 4.1 4.0 -4% -2%
94 May 55.9 55.8 0% 0% 123.6 123.7 0% 0% 147.9 153.7 4% 4% 99.5 105.5 6% 6% 37.6 29.8 -21% -21% 64.9 63.3 -2% -2%
94 June 90.6 90.6 0% 0% 194.6 196.2 1% 1% 241.6 245.3 2% 2% 175.9 174.8 -1% -1% 61.6 51.3 -17% -17% 103.5 102.8 -1% -1%
94 July 7.3 7.5 2% 1% 14.3 14.7 3% 1% 21.4 20.0 -6% -3% 16.5 14.9 -9% -5% 3.6 0.8 -78% -20% 6.4 6.7 4% 1%
94 August 6.0 6.0 0% 0% 11.9 11.8 -1% -1% 17.9 16.2 -10% -10% 13.8 12.5 -10% -10% 3.3 0.5 -85% -85% 5.5 5.3 -3% -3%
94 September 5.0 5.0 0% 0% 10.0 9.9 0% 0% 15.2 13.7 -10% -10% 12.0 10.8 -10% -10% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.8 4.7 -1% -1%
94 October 4.9 4.9 0% 0% 9.7 9.6 -1% -1% 14.9 13.5 -10% -10% 11.8 10.9 -8% -8% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.5 4.4 -4% -4%
94 November 4.6 4.6 0% 0% 9.1 9.1 1% 1% 13.9 13.2 -5% -5% 11.0 10.4 -5% -5% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.4 4.4 0% 0%
94 December 4.1 4.1 -1% -1% 8.4 8.5 2% 2% 12.9 12.0 -7% -7% 10.0 9.5 -5% -5% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 4.1 3% 3%
95 January 3.6 3.6 0% 0% 7.5 7.9 5% 5% 11.7 11.1 -5% -5% 8.8 8.5 -4% -4% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 4.0 9% 9%
95 February 3.0 3.0 0% 0% 6.4 6.8 5% 5% 10.0 9.6 -4% -4% 7.5 7.4 -2% -2% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.8 10% 10%
95 March 2.9 2.9 -1% -1% 6.3 6.5 2% 2% 9.8 9.3 -5% -5% 7.3 7.3 -1% -1% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.4 3% 3%
95 April 25.2 25.1 0% 0% 55.9 55.5 -1% -1% 66.5 69.2 4% 4% 46.9 54.1 15% 15% 15.8 10.8 -32% -32% 29.9 28.7 -4% -4%
95 May 42.3 42.4 0% 0% 91.4 91.8 0% 0% 112.0 114.6 2% 2% 77.1 78.6 2% 2% 27.5 21.5 -22% -16% 47.0 46.2 -2% -1%
95 June 19.0 19.2 1% 0% 39.7 39.7 0% 0% 50.6 50.4 0% 0% 38.0 38.6 2% 1% 11.2 7.2 -36% -8% 20.3 19.8 -3% -1%
95 July 6.3 6.4 1% 0% 13.1 13.1 0% 0% 19.3 17.8 -8% -3% 14.2 13.0 -9% -4% 3.7 0.8 -78% -21% 6.3 6.2 -1% 0%
95 August 5.4 5.3 0% 0% 11.0 10.9 -1% -1% 16.5 15.1 -9% -9% 12.4 11.2 -9% -9% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.3 5.2 -2% -2%
95 September 5.9 6.0 1% 1% 12.2 12.0 -2% -2% 17.8 16.7 -6% -6% 14.1 14.0 -1% -1% 3.4 0.4 -88% -88% 6.1 5.7 -6% -6%
95 October 11.5 11.4 0% 0% 24.3 24.2 -1% -1% 31.8 31.4 -1% -1% 25.5 27.9 9% 9% 5.4 1.7 -69% -69% 12.0 11.6 -3% -3%
95 November 5.4 5.4 0% 0% 11.3 11.4 1% 1% 16.3 15.3 -6% -6% 12.2 11.2 -9% -9% 3.5 0.7 -80% -80% 5.7 5.7 1% 1%
95 December 4.8 4.8 0% 0% 10.1 10.2 1% 1% 14.7 13.9 -5% -5% 11.0 10.1 -8% -8% 3.2 0.5 -85% -85% 5.0 5.1 0% 0%
96 January 4.2 4.2 0% 0% 9.0 9.0 0% 0% 13.1 12.4 -5% -5% 10.0 9.2 -8% -8% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.5 4.5 0% 0%
96 February 3.3 3.3 0% 0% 7.2 7.3 1% 1% 10.7 10.2 -4% -4% 8.2 7.7 -6% -6% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 4.1 0% 0%
96 March 3.6 3.6 0% 0% 7.9 7.9 0% 0% 11.6 11.2 -3% -3% 8.8 8.6 -3% -3% 2.5 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 4.0 -1% -1%
96 April 8.5 8.5 0% 0% 18.2 17.9 -1% -1% 24.0 24.4 2% 2% 19.1 23.2 21% 21% 3.9 0.4 -90% -52% 9.3 8.7 -6% -5%
96 May 16.7 16.6 -1% 0% 36.1 35.5 -2% -1% 43.3 43.6 1% 0% 30.0 33.1 10% 5% 10.0 6.0 -40% -11% 18.3 17.4 -5% -2%
96 June 6.0 6.0 1% 0% 12.6 12.5 -2% 0% 17.3 16.6 -4% -1% 12.7 12.2 -4% -1% 3.8 0.8 -79% -6% 6.4 6.1 -5% 0%
96 July 5.2 5.2 0% 0% 11.0 10.9 -1% 0% 15.3 14.6 -5% -2% 11.3 10.5 -7% -3% 3.4 0.6 -83% -20% 5.4 5.3 -3% -1%
96 August 4.5 4.5 0% 0% 9.5 9.5 0% 0% 13.5 13.1 -3% -3% 10.0 9.3 -7% -7% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 4.7 -2% -2%
96 September 3.8 3.8 0% 0% 8.2 8.1 -1% -1% 11.7 11.3 -4% -4% 8.9 8.3 -7% -7% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.2 -2% -2%
96 October 7.6 7.6 0% 0% 16.0 15.8 -1% -1% 21.4 21.6 1% 1% 17.1 19.8 16% 16% 3.4 0.1 -97% -97% 7.7 7.3 -6% -6%
96 November 4.7 4.8 0% 0% 10.0 10.2 2% 2% 13.8 13.6 -1% -1% 10.2 9.7 -4% -4% 3.0 0.2 -93% -93% 5.1 5.2 2% 2%
96 December 4.2 4.2 -1% -1% 9.1 9.4 3% 3% 12.7 13.6 7% 7% 9.2 8.8 -5% -5% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 4.9 6% 6%
97 January 3.7 3.7 1% 1% 8.1 8.4 4% 4% 11.4 11.4 0% 0% 8.2 8.0 -3% -3% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 4.4 5% 5%
97 February 3.1 3.0 0% 0% 6.8 6.8 1% 1% 9.5 9.4 -2% -2% 6.8 6.7 -2% -2% 2.4 0.1 -96% -96% 3.9 4.0 2% 2%
97 March 3.1 3.1 -1% -1% 6.9 7.2 4% 4% 9.8 9.8 0% 0% 6.9 6.9 0% 0% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.8 6% 6%
97 April 21.8 21.7 -1% -1% 48.2 47.9 -1% -1% 56.8 59.1 4% 4% 38.5 45.2 17% 17% 13.9 8.9 -36% -36% 25.8 24.8 -4% -4%
97 May 34.9 35.0 0% 0% 75.2 75.3 0% 0% 90.7 93.4 3% 2% 60.1 61.9 3% 3% 22.7 17.2 -24% -15% 38.6 37.7 -2% -2%
97 June 31.6 31.6 0% 0% 67.6 67.5 0% 0% 83.8 84.5 1% 1% 60.5 60.8 1% 0% 20.8 15.5 -25% -11% 35.6 34.8 -2% -1%
97 July 6.5 6.6 1% 0% 13.6 13.8 1% 0% 19.6 18.6 -5% -2% 14.6 13.2 -10% -5% 3.8 0.9 -76% -21% 6.6 6.7 1% 0%
97 August 5.5 5.5 0% 0% 11.4 11.3 -1% -1% 16.8 15.5 -8% -8% 12.6 11.3 -10% -10% 3.4 0.7 -79% -79% 5.5 5.4 -2% -2%
97 September 4.7 4.7 0% 0% 9.7 9.6 0% 0% 14.4 13.3 -8% -8% 11.0 10.0 -10% -10% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 4.8 -1% -1%
97 October 4.3 4.3 0% 0% 8.9 8.9 0% 0% 13.4 12.4 -8% -8% 10.4 9.5 -9% -9% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.3 -1% -1%
97 November 3.7 3.7 -1% -1% 7.8 7.8 1% 1% 11.8 11.0 -7% -7% 9.2 8.5 -7% -7% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 4.0 2% 2%
97 December 3.4 3.4 -1% -1% 7.3 7.8 7% 7% 11.1 10.9 -2% -2% 8.6 8.1 -5% -5% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 4.1 13% 13%
98 January 3.0 3.0 0% 0% 6.6 7.1 7% 7% 10.1 10.0 -1% -1% 7.8 7.5 -4% -4% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.9 13% 13%
98 February 2.5 2.5 -1% -1% 5.6 5.8 3% 3% 8.5 8.2 -3% -3% 6.3 6.2 -2% -2% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.2 3.4 5% 5%
98 March 2.7 2.7 0% 0% 6.1 6.5 6% 6% 9.2 9.2 0% 0% 6.8 6.9 2% 2% 1.8 0.0 -100% -100% 3.2 3.5 11% 11%
98 April 28.6 28.5 0% 0% 63.4 63.4 0% 0% 75.0 78.8 5% 5% 51.5 58.9 14% 14% 18.5 13.2 -29% -29% 34.1 33.1 -3% -3%
98 May 66.0 66.1 0% 0% 143.5 144.4 1% 1% 175.5 180.0 3% 3% 123.1 124.1 1% 1% 44.0 36.0 -18% -18% 74.5 73.6 -1% -1%
98 June 40.3 40.4 0% 0% 85.1 85.6 0% 0% 107.2 107.6 0% 0% 79.4 78.9 -1% -1% 25.9 20.1 -22% -12% 44.4 43.8 -1% -1%
98 July 6.7 6.8 1% 0% 13.6 13.9 2% 1% 20.2 18.9 -7% -3% 15.1 13.6 -10% -5% 3.7 0.8 -78% -20% 6.4 6.6 2% 1%
98 August 5.6 5.7 1% 1% 11.4 11.3 0% 0% 17.1 15.6 -9% -9% 13.0 11.6 -10% -10% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.4 5.2 -2% -2%
98 September 4.8 4.7 0% 0% 9.6 9.6 0% 0% 14.7 13.3 -10% -10% 11.4 10.2 -10% -10% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 4.6 -1% -1%
98 October 4.4 4.3 -1% -1% 8.8 8.8 0% 0% 13.7 12.4 -10% -10% 10.6 9.6 -9% -9% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 4.1 -1% -1%
98 November 3.8 3.8 -1% -1% 7.7 7.9 2% 2% 12.1 11.2 -7% -7% 9.4 8.6 -8% -8% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 4.0 5% 5%
98 December 3.5 3.5 -1% -1% 7.3 7.7 6% 6% 11.4 10.9 -5% -5% 8.7 8.1 -6% -6% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.9 10% 10%
99 January 3.0 3.0 -1% -1% 6.6 6.9 6% 6% 10.3 9.9 -4% -4% 7.9 7.6 -4% -4% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.7 10% 10%
99 February 2.6 2.5 -1% -1% 5.7 5.9 4% 4% 8.9 8.5 -4% -4% 6.7 6.5 -3% -3% 1.8 0.0 -100% -100% 3.1 3.3 7% 7%
99 March 9.2 9.2 0% 0% 20.1 19.7 -2% -2% 26.5 27.0 2% 2% 21.2 26.8 27% 27% 3.9 0.7 -82% -82% 10.0 9.1 -9% -9%
99 April 25.6 25.5 0% 0% 55.7 55.5 0% 0% 65.6 67.8 3% 3% 44.8 48.1 8% 8% 16.7 12.1 -28% -28% 29.6 28.7 -3% -3%
99 May 53.6 53.7 0% 0% 116.5 117.3 1% 1% 143.1 146.8 3% 3% 99.8 100.1 0% 0% 36.0 29.0 -19% -19% 60.4 59.7 -1% -1%
99 June 12.4 12.6 1% 0% 25.5 25.7 1% 0% 33.5 33.0 -2% 0% 26.2 26.2 0% 0% 6.6 3.0 -54% -7% 12.7 12.6 -1% 0%
99 July 6.3 6.3 0% 0% 13.0 12.9 -1% 0% 19.1 17.6 -8% -4% 14.2 12.9 -10% -5% 3.8 0.9 -76% -21% 6.3 6.1 -3% -1%
99 August 5.4 5.3 -1% -1% 11.0 10.9 -1% -1% 16.5 15.0 -9% -9% 12.3 11.1 -10% -10% 3.4 0.7 -79% -79% 5.3 5.2 -3% -3%
99 September 6.5 6.6 0% 0% 13.5 13.2 -2% -2% 19.3 18.2 -5% -5% 15.4 15.6 2% 2% 3.5 0.5 -86% -86% 6.7 6.3 -6% -6%
99 October 6.5 6.5 0% 0% 13.4 13.2 -2% -2% 19.1 18.1 -6% -6% 15.0 14.9 0% 0% 3.5 0.5 -86% -86% 6.5 6.1 -5% -5%
99 November 4.8 4.8 0% 0% 10.1 10.1 0% 0% 14.7 13.8 -7% -7% 11.2 10.3 -8% -8% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 5.1 5.1 -1% -1%
99 December 4.3 4.2 0% 0% 9.0 9.2 2% 2% 13.3 12.7 -5% -5% 10.2 9.4 -7% -7% 2.8 0.2 -93% -93% 4.5 4.6 3% 3%
100 January 3.7 3.7 0% 0% 8.0 8.1 1% 1% 12.0 11.4 -5% -5% 9.1 8.6 -6% -6% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 4.1 2% 2%
100 February 3.0 3.0 -1% -1% 6.6 6.6 -1% -1% 9.9 9.4 -5% -5% 7.5 7.2 -4% -4% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 3.7 -2% -2%
100 March 3.5 3.5 0% 0% 7.5 7.7 2% 2% 11.0 10.9 -1% -1% 8.3 8.3 0% 0% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 4.0 4% 4%
100 April 10.5 10.4 0% 0% 22.8 22.4 -2% -2% 29.1 29.8 2% 2% 22.1 27.5 24% 24% 5.1 1.5 -71% -54% 11.8 11.0 -7% -7%
100 May 32.2 32.2 0% 0% 69.9 69.9 0% 0% 83.0 85.9 4% 3% 55.3 58.4 6% 5% 21.1 15.7 -26% -14% 36.1 35.1 -3% -2%
100 June 14.6 14.7 1% 0% 30.7 30.7 0% 0% 38.3 38.4 0% 0% 28.0 28.6 2% 1% 8.4 4.6 -45% -8% 15.7 15.3 -2% 0%
100 July 6.1 6.2 0% 0% 12.9 12.8 0% 0% 18.4 17.3 -6% -3% 13.4 12.2 -9% -4% 3.8 0.9 -76% -21% 6.3 6.2 -1% 0%
100 August 5.3 5.2 -1% -1% 11.0 10.9 -1% -1% 15.9 14.9 -6% -6% 11.9 10.8 -9% -9% 3.4 0.7 -79% -79% 5.4 5.3 -2% -2%
100 September 4.4 4.4 1% 1% 9.3 9.3 0% 0% 13.7 12.9 -6% -6% 10.5 9.6 -9% -9% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 4.7 -1% -1%
100 October 5.0 5.0 -1% -1% 10.5 10.3 -2% -2% 15.1 14.5 -5% -5% 12.1 12.0 -1% -1% 3.0 0.2 -93% -93% 5.1 4.9 -5% -5%
100 November 4.0 4.0 0% 0% 8.5 8.8 3% 3% 12.5 12.2 -3% -3% 9.7 9.1 -6% -6% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.4 4.7 6% 6%
100 December 3.6 3.6 -1% -1% 7.9 8.4 6% 6% 11.6 11.6 0% 0% 8.8 8.4 -4% -4% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 4.5 12% 12%
101 January 3.3 3.3 0% 0% 7.2 7.9 10% 10% 10.6 11.0 4% 4% 8.0 7.8 -2% -2% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 4.4 19% 19%
101 February 2.7 2.7 0% 0% 6.0 6.2 3% 3% 8.9 8.8 -1% -1% 6.5 6.5 0% 0% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.6 5% 5%
101 March 2.7 2.7 -1% -1% 6.2 6.5 5% 5% 9.1 9.2 1% 1% 6.6 6.6 1% 1% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.6 9% 9%
101 April 52.2 52.1 0% 0% 115.9 116.4 0% 0% 138.2 144.8 5% 5% 92.1 98.9 7% 7% 36.4 28.6 -21% -21% 62.9 61.8 -2% -2%
101 May 85.4 85.4 0% 0% 183.5 185.0 1% 1% 227.1 231.3 2% 2% 165.1 164.6 0% 0% 56.1 46.4 -17% -17% 94.6 93.8 -1% -1%
101 June 50.4 50.5 0% 0% 106.5 107.4 1% 1% 135.1 135.1 0% 0% 100.1 98.5 -2% -2% 32.7 26.0 -21% -14% 55.7 55.3 -1% 0%
101 July 7.0 7.1 2% 1% 14.0 14.5 4% 1% 21.1 19.9 -6% -3% 15.9 14.1 -11% -6% 3.7 0.9 -76% -20% 6.5 6.8 5% 2%
101 August 5.8 5.7 0% 0% 11.6 11.5 -1% -1% 17.6 15.9 -10% -10% 13.3 11.9 -11% -11% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.5 5.4 -2% -2%
101 September 4.9 4.9 1% 1% 9.8 9.9 1% 1% 15.0 13.7 -9% -9% 11.7 10.4 -11% -11% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 4.7 -1% -1%
101 October 4.7 4.7 0% 0% 9.5 9.4 -1% -1% 14.7 13.2 -10% -10% 11.5 10.5 -8% -8% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.5 4.3 -3% -3%
101 November 4.1 4.0 -1% -1% 8.2 8.7 5% 5% 12.8 12.1 -6% -6% 10.0 9.2 -8% -8% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 4.5 11% 11%
101 December 3.7 3.7 -1% -1% 7.7 8.0 4% 4% 12.1 11.3 -6% -6% 9.2 8.7 -6% -6% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 4.0 8% 8%
102 January 3.3 3.3 0% 0% 7.0 7.1 1% 1% 11.0 10.2 -8% -8% 8.3 7.9 -4% -4% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.5 1% 1%
102 February 2.7 2.6 -1% -1% 5.8 6.1 5% 5% 9.1 8.7 -4% -4% 6.9 6.6 -3% -3% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.5 9% 9%
102 March 10.3 10.2 0% 0% 22.5 21.9 -2% -2% 29.4 29.6 1% 1% 22.9 28.6 25% 25% 4.5 1.2 -73% -73% 11.3 10.3 -9% -9%
102 April 24.3 24.3 0% 0% 52.7 52.5 0% 0% 62.4 64.3 3% 3% 43.0 46.1 7% 7% 15.7 11.2 -29% -29% 27.9 27.1 -3% -3%
102 May 33.4 33.5 0% 0% 71.7 71.8 0% 0% 88.6 90.1 2% 1% 61.1 61.7 1% 1% 21.6 16.3 -25% -14% 36.7 35.8 -2% -2%
102 June 7.0 7.1 1% 0% 14.7 14.6 -1% 0% 21.1 19.9 -6% -1% 15.8 15.1 -4% -1% 4.0 0.9 -78% -6% 7.4 7.1 -4% 0%
102 July 5.9 5.8 0% 0% 12.2 12.0 -1% 0% 17.8 16.4 -8% -3% 13.3 12.1 -9% -4% 3.6 0.7 -81% -21% 5.9 5.7 -3% -1%
102 August 5.0 5.0 0% 0% 10.3 10.3 -1% -1% 15.3 14.2 -7% -7% 11.7 10.6 -9% -9% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 5.0 4.9 -2% -2%
102 September 6.0 6.0 1% 1% 12.4 12.1 -2% -2% 17.7 16.9 -4% -4% 14.2 14.6 3% 3% 3.3 0.2 -94% -94% 6.1 5.8 -6% -6%
102 October 13.1 13.0 -1% -1% 28.2 28.0 -1% -1% 35.7 35.7 0% 0% 27.7 30.6 10% 10% 6.7 2.8 -58% -58% 14.2 13.7 -3% -3%
102 November 5.5 5.5 0% 0% 11.5 11.9 3% 3% 16.4 15.9 -3% -3% 12.3 11.3 -8% -8% 3.6 0.7 -80% -80% 5.8 6.2 6% 6%
102 December 4.8 4.8 0% 0% 10.3 10.6 4% 4% 14.7 14.3 -2% -2% 11.0 10.0 -8% -8% 3.3 0.5 -85% -85% 5.1 5.4 6% 6%
103 January 4.2 4.2 0% 0% 9.1 9.5 5% 5% 13.1 13.0 -1% -1% 9.9 9.1 -8% -8% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.6 5.0 9% 9%
103 February 3.5 3.5 0% 0% 7.6 7.9 4% 4% 11.1 11.0 -1% -1% 8.4 7.9 -6% -6% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 4.4 7% 7%
103 March 3.4 3.3 -1% -1% 7.4 7.6 3% 3% 10.9 10.7 -2% -2% 8.2 7.9 -4% -4% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 4.0 4% 4%
103 April 4.1 4.1 0% 0% 8.8 8.8 0% 0% 12.6 12.5 -1% 0% 9.9 10.7 9% 5% 2.5 0.0 -100% -38% 4.5 4.4 -3% -1%
103 May 67.6 67.5 0% 0% 149.2 149.4 0% 0% 179.3 185.9 4% 4% 121.7 126.9 4% 4% 46.0 37.1 -19% -19% 78.4 76.6 -2% -2%
103 June 53.1 53.2 0% 0% 113.0 114.0 1% 1% 140.8 142.9 2% 2% 102.4 102.5 0% 0% 35.1 28.1 -20% -14% 59.6 59.1 -1% -1%
103 July 6.8 6.9 1% 1% 13.6 14.0 3% 1% 20.2 19.0 -6% -3% 15.2 13.7 -10% -5% 3.6 0.8 -78% -20% 6.3 6.6 4% 1%
103 August 5.7 5.7 0% 0% 11.5 11.4 0% 0% 17.3 15.7 -9% -9% 13.1 11.8 -10% -10% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.4 5.3 -3% -3%
103 September 4.9 4.8 -1% -1% 9.8 9.7 -1% -1% 14.9 13.4 -10% -10% 11.5 10.3 -10% -10% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 4.7 -2% -2%
103 October 4.5 4.4 -1% -1% 9.0 9.0 0% 0% 13.9 12.5 -10% -10% 10.8 9.8 -9% -9% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.2 -1% -1%
103 November 4.3 4.3 0% 0% 8.6 8.7 1% 1% 13.2 12.3 -7% -7% 10.4 9.8 -6% -6% 2.5 0.0 -100% -100% 4.2 4.3 1% 1%
103 December 3.9 3.8 -1% -1% 7.9 8.2 4% 4% 12.3 11.6 -5% -5% 9.5 9.0 -5% -5% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 4.1 7% 7%
104 January 3.4 3.4 -1% -1% 7.2 7.4 2% 2% 11.1 10.5 -6% -6% 8.4 8.1 -4% -4% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.7 4% 4%
104 February 2.7 2.7 -1% -1% 5.9 6.0 1% 1% 9.2 8.6 -6% -6% 7.0 6.8 -3% -3% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.4 1% 1%
104 March 2.8 2.7 -1% -1% 6.2 6.5 6% 6% 9.4 9.3 -1% -1% 7.0 6.9 -1% -1% 1.8 0.0 -100% -100% 3.2 3.5 11% 11%
104 April 15.7 15.6 -1% -1% 34.9 34.5 -1% -1% 42.8 44.1 3% 3% 31.3 38.3 22% 22% 8.8 4.8 -45% -45% 18.5 17.6 -5% -5%
104 May 57.6 57.7 0% 0% 125.6 126.2 0% 0% 151.5 156.9 4% 4% 103.5 105.2 2% 2% 38.7 31.3 -19% -19% 65.3 64.3 -2% -2%
104 June 38.4 38.5 0% 0% 81.6 82.3 1% 1% 102.1 103.3 1% 1% 75.1 75.2 0% 0% 25.0 19.3 -23% -12% 42.8 42.4 -1% -1%
104 July 6.6 6.6 1% 1% 13.4 13.7 2% 1% 19.9 18.6 -6% -3% 14.8 13.4 -9% -5% 3.6 0.8 -78% -20% 6.4 6.5 2% 1%
104 August 5.6 5.6 0% 0% 11.3 11.2 -1% -1% 17.0 15.4 -10% -10% 12.9 11.5 -10% -10% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.4 5.2 -3% -3%
104 September 4.7 4.7 0% 0% 9.5 9.5 0% 0% 14.6 13.2 -9% -9% 11.3 10.1 -11% -11% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 4.6 -1% -1%
104 October 12.3 12.2 0% 0% 26.3 26.2 -1% -1% 34.3 34.0 -1% -1% 27.4 30.4 11% 11% 6.0 2.2 -63% -63% 13.1 12.6 -4% -4%
104 November 5.2 5.2 0% 0% 10.8 11.0 2% 2% 15.8 14.9 -6% -6% 11.9 10.7 -10% -10% 3.2 0.6 -81% -81% 5.3 5.5 4% 4%
104 December 4.7 4.7 0% 0% 9.7 9.8 1% 1% 14.3 13.4 -6% -6% 10.8 9.7 -10% -10% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.7 4.8 1% 1%
105 January 4.2 4.1 -3% -3% 8.7 8.9 2% 2% 12.9 12.3 -5% -5% 9.8 8.9 -9% -9% 2.7 0.3 -89% -89% 4.3 4.5 6% 6%
105 February 3.3 3.3 0% 0% 6.9 7.0 1% 1% 10.5 10.0 -4% -4% 8.0 7.4 -7% -7% 2.4 0.1 -96% -96% 3.9 3.9 1% 1%
105 March 3.4 3.4 0% 0% 7.4 7.6 2% 2% 11.1 10.7 -4% -4% 8.5 8.2 -4% -4% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 3.9 3% 3%
105 April 13.8 13.8 0% 0% 30.4 30.0 -1% -1% 37.7 38.5 2% 2% 28.0 33.5 20% 20% 7.8 3.8 -51% -51% 16.0 15.2 -5% -5%
105 May 38.3 38.4 0% 0% 83.0 83.4 0% 0% 100.0 103.5 3% 3% 66.5 68.5 3% 3% 25.5 19.6 -23% -16% 42.8 42.1 -2% -1%
105 June 68.5 68.5 0% 0% 148.2 149.4 1% 1% 183.6 187.4 2% 2% 132.7 131.9 -1% -1% 47.3 38.7 -18% -18% 79.3 78.7 -1% -1%
105 July 6.8 7.0 2% 1% 13.9 14.6 5% 2% 20.7 19.8 -4% -2% 15.3 13.8 -10% -5% 3.8 0.9 -76% -21% 6.6 7.1 7% 2%
105 August 5.7 5.7 0% 0% 11.7 11.6 -1% -1% 17.5 15.9 -9% -9% 13.2 11.8 -10% -10% 3.4 0.7 -79% -79% 5.5 5.4 -2% -2%
105 September 4.9 4.8 -1% -1% 9.8 9.8 0% 0% 14.9 13.6 -9% -9% 11.5 10.3 -10% -10% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 4.7 -1% -1%
105 October 7.2 7.2 0% 0% 14.8 14.6 -1% -1% 21.1 20.1 -5% -5% 17.3 18.2 5% 5% 3.3 0.2 -94% -94% 7.1 6.7 -6% -6%
105 November 4.8 4.8 0% 0% 9.8 10.0 2% 2% 14.6 13.7 -6% -6% 11.3 10.3 -9% -9% 2.9 0.2 -93% -93% 4.8 5.0 4% 4%
105 December 4.3 4.3 0% 0% 8.8 9.2 5% 5% 13.3 12.8 -4% -4% 10.2 9.3 -8% -8% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.6 8% 8%
106 January 3.7 3.7 -1% -1% 7.9 8.1 3% 3% 12.0 11.4 -5% -5% 9.1 8.5 -6% -6% 2.4 0.1 -96% -96% 3.9 4.1 5% 5%
106 February 3.0 3.0 0% 0% 6.5 6.6 2% 2% 9.9 9.4 -5% -5% 7.5 7.1 -5% -5% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.8 3% 3%
106 March 3.0 3.0 -1% -1% 6.6 7.1 8% 8% 10.0 10.1 0% 0% 7.6 7.3 -3% -3% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.9 15% 15%
106 April 6.9 7.0 0% 0% 14.9 14.9 0% 0% 20.3 20.9 3% 3% 17.0 21.0 24% 24% 3.0 0.0 -100% -45% 7.5 7.2 -5% -3%
106 May 57.8 57.7 0% 0% 127.3 127.5 0% 0% 152.2 157.7 4% 4% 101.7 105.5 4% 4% 39.4 31.6 -20% -20% 66.7 65.4 -2% -2%
106 June 64.7 64.8 0% 0% 139.0 140.2 1% 1% 172.8 175.5 2% 2% 125.8 125.2 -1% -1% 43.9 35.7 -19% -17% 73.8 73.3 -1% -1%
106 July 6.8 6.9 1% 1% 13.6 14.0 3% 1% 20.3 19.0 -6% -3% 15.2 13.6 -10% -5% 3.6 0.8 -78% -20% 6.3 6.6 4% 1%
106 August 5.7 5.7 0% 0% 11.4 11.3 -1% -1% 17.2 15.5 -10% -10% 13.1 11.7 -10% -10% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.3 5.2 -2% -2%
106 September 4.8 4.8 -1% -1% 9.6 9.6 0% 0% 14.7 13.3 -10% -10% 11.4 10.2 -10% -10% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 4.6 -1% -1%
106 October 7.8 7.8 0% 0% 16.1 15.9 -1% -1% 22.6 22.1 -2% -2% 18.8 20.2 8% 8% 3.4 0.2 -94% -94% 7.6 7.2 -5% -5%
106 November 4.8 4.8 -1% -1% 9.9 10.0 1% 1% 14.7 13.6 -7% -7% 11.3 10.3 -9% -9% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.8 5.0 3% 3%
106 December 4.3 4.3 0% 0% 8.9 9.0 1% 1% 13.5 12.5 -7% -7% 10.2 9.4 -8% -8% 2.7 0.2 -93% -93% 4.3 4.4 2% 2%
107 January 3.8 3.8 -1% -1% 8.0 8.3 5% 5% 12.1 11.6 -4% -4% 9.2 8.6 -7% -7% 2.4 0.1 -96% -96% 4.0 4.3 9% 9%
107 February 3.1 3.1 0% 0% 6.7 6.9 3% 3% 10.3 9.8 -5% -5% 7.8 7.4 -5% -5% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 3.8 4% 4%
107 March 3.2 3.1 0% 0% 6.9 7.6 11% 11% 10.4 10.6 1% 1% 7.9 7.8 -2% -2% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 4.2 19% 19%
107 April 42.4 42.3 0% 0% 94.1 94.1 0% 0% 112.5 116.9 4% 4% 75.6 82.0 8% 8% 29.4 22.5 -23% -23% 51.0 49.7 -2% -2%
107 May 60.6 60.7 0% 0% 130.7 131.9 1% 1% 161.5 165.1 2% 2% 116.3 116.9 0% 0% 39.8 32.2 -19% -19% 67.5 66.9 -1% -1%
107 June 30.2 30.3 0% 0% 63.2 63.4 0% 0% 80.7 80.3 0% 0% 60.1 59.7 -1% 0% 18.8 13.8 -27% -10% 32.6 32.1 -1% -1%
107 July 6.7 6.8 1% 0% 13.7 13.8 1% 0% 20.4 18.9 -7% -4% 15.2 13.7 -10% -5% 3.7 0.9 -76% -20% 6.5 6.5 0% 0%
107 August 5.6 5.6 1% 1% 11.4 11.4 0% 0% 17.2 15.8 -8% -8% 13.0 11.7 -10% -10% 3.4 0.6 -82% -82% 5.5 5.4 -2% -2%
107 September 4.8 4.7 -1% -1% 9.7 9.6 0% 0% 14.8 13.4 -9% -9% 11.3 10.2 -10% -10% 2.9 0.4 -86% -86% 4.7 4.7 0% 0%
107 October 11.1 11.1 0% 0% 23.7 23.5 -1% -1% 31.4 30.8 -2% -2% 25.5 28.3 11% 11% 5.2 1.4 -73% -73% 11.7 11.2 -4% -4%
107 November 5.4 5.4 0% 0% 11.1 11.4 3% 3% 16.2 15.4 -5% -5% 12.3 11.2 -9% -9% 3.2 0.5 -85% -85% 5.4 5.7 4% 4%
107 December 4.8 4.8 0% 0% 10.0 10.5 6% 6% 14.7 14.6 -1% -1% 11.0 10.0 -9% -9% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 4.9 5.4 10% 10%
108 January 4.2 4.2 -1% -1% 8.8 9.0 2% 2% 13.1 12.4 -5% -5% 9.9 9.2 -8% -8% 2.7 0.2 -93% -93% 4.4 4.5 3% 3%
108 February 3.3 3.3 -1% -1% 7.1 7.1 0% 0% 10.7 10.1 -6% -6% 8.1 7.6 -6% -6% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.0 4.0 0% 0%
108 March 3.6 3.6 0% 0% 7.8 7.8 0% 0% 11.7 11.1 -5% -5% 8.9 8.6 -3% -3% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 3.9 -2% -2%
108 April 21.2 21.1 -1% -1% 46.7 46.3 -1% -1% 55.8 57.6 3% 3% 39.7 45.6 15% 15% 13.3 8.5 -36% -36% 24.9 23.8 -4% -4%
108 May 44.0 44.0 0% 0% 95.1 95.4 0% 0% 116.6 119.4 2% 2% 79.2 80.5 2% 2% 29.2 22.9 -22% -17% 49.1 48.2 -2% -2%
108 June 27.3 27.4 0% 0% 57.9 58.0 0% 0% 72.8 73.7 1% 1% 53.7 54.0 1% 0% 17.5 12.6 -28% -10% 30.2 29.7 -2% -1%
108 July 6.6 6.7 1% 0% 13.8 14.0 1% 0% 20.2 19.0 -6% -3% 14.8 13.5 -9% -4% 3.9 0.9 -77% -21% 6.7 6.7 0% 0%
108 August 5.5 5.6 0% 0% 11.5 11.4 -1% -1% 17.1 15.7 -8% -8% 12.8 11.6 -10% -10% 3.5 0.7 -80% -80% 5.6 5.5 -3% -3%
108 September 27.4 27.3 0% 0% 59.1 59.2 0% 0% 73.2 74.3 1% 1% 53.6 56.1 5% 5% 17.6 12.3 -30% -30% 31.2 30.6 -2% -2%
108 October 6.3 6.3 1% 1% 13.0 13.3 2% 2% 19.1 18.1 -5% -5% 14.1 12.8 -9% -9% 3.7 0.8 -78% -78% 6.3 6.5 2% 2%
108 November 5.2 5.2 0% 0% 10.7 10.8 1% 1% 16.0 14.8 -7% -7% 11.8 10.7 -9% -9% 3.4 0.6 -82% -82% 5.4 5.4 1% 1%
108 December 4.7 4.7 1% 1% 9.7 9.8 1% 1% 14.6 13.7 -7% -7% 11.2 10.1 -9% -9% 3.0 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 4.8 1% 1%
109 January 4.1 4.1 -1% -1% 8.6 8.7 1% 1% 13.1 12.3 -6% -6% 10.1 9.3 -8% -8% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.4 2% 2%
109 February 3.3 3.3 -1% -1% 7.0 7.3 4% 4% 10.8 10.4 -4% -4% 8.3 7.8 -6% -6% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 4.2 8% 8%
109 March 3.6 3.6 0% 0% 7.8 8.3 7% 7% 11.7 11.7 0% 0% 9.2 8.9 -3% -3% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 4.4 12% 12%
109 April 20.1 20.0 0% 0% 44.3 43.9 -1% -1% 53.2 55.0 3% 3% 38.6 44.4 15% 15% 12.3 7.5 -39% -39% 23.6 22.6 -4% -4%
109 May 46.3 46.4 0% 0% 100.4 100.6 0% 0% 123.0 126.2 3% 3% 84.4 85.6 1% 1% 30.9 24.3 -21% -17% 51.9 50.9 -2% -2%
109 June 19.5 19.6 1% 0% 40.8 40.9 0% 0% 51.9 52.0 0% 0% 38.9 39.4 1% 1% 11.7 7.5 -36% -9% 20.9 20.4 -2% -1%
109 July 6.5 6.5 0% 0% 13.6 13.5 0% 0% 19.8 18.6 -6% -3% 14.6 13.3 -9% -4% 3.9 0.9 -77% -21% 6.6 6.5 -2% 0%
109 August 5.5 5.5 0% 0% 11.4 11.3 -1% -1% 16.9 15.5 -8% -8% 12.6 11.5 -9% -9% 3.5 0.7 -80% -80% 5.5 5.4 -3% -3%
109 September 4.7 4.7 0% 0% 9.7 9.6 0% 0% 14.5 13.4 -8% -8% 11.1 10.1 -9% -9% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 4.8 -2% -2%
109 October 7.2 7.2 0% 0% 14.9 14.7 -1% -1% 20.9 20.2 -3% -3% 17.0 18.2 7% 7% 3.4 0.2 -94% -94% 7.2 6.8 -6% -6%
109 November 4.7 4.6 0% 0% 9.7 10.1 4% 4% 14.2 13.7 -4% -4% 11.0 10.1 -8% -8% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.9 5.3 7% 7%
109 December 4.1 4.1 0% 0% 8.8 9.1 4% 4% 13.0 12.5 -3% -3% 9.9 9.2 -7% -7% 2.7 0.2 -93% -93% 4.4 4.7 6% 6%
110 January 3.6 3.6 -1% -1% 7.8 8.0 2% 2% 11.7 11.2 -4% -4% 9.0 8.5 -6% -6% 2.4 0.1 -96% -96% 4.0 4.1 4% 4%
110 February 3.9 3.9 0% 0% 8.3 8.4 1% 1% 12.0 11.9 -1% -1% 9.6 10.1 5% 5% 2.6 0.0 -100% -100% 4.5 4.5 0% 0%
110 March 11.3 11.3 0% 0% 24.8 24.3 -2% -2% 31.4 31.8 1% 1% 23.8 28.3 19% 19% 5.6 1.9 -66% -66% 12.6 11.8 -7% -7%
110 April 19.0 19.0 0% 0% 40.8 40.5 -1% -1% 48.5 49.4 2% 2% 34.0 36.4 7% 7% 12.1 7.8 -35% -35% 21.4 20.6 -4% -4%
110 May 35.4 35.5 0% 0% 76.3 76.3 0% 0% 93.5 95.7 2% 2% 63.3 64.3 1% 1% 23.4 17.8 -24% -15% 39.2 38.2 -2% -2%
110 June 6.3 6.4 1% 0% 13.3 13.3 0% 0% 19.0 17.9 -6% -1% 13.9 12.8 -8% -1% 4.0 1.0 -75% -6% 6.7 6.7 -1% 0%
110 July 5.5 5.5 0% 0% 11.6 11.5 -1% 0% 16.8 15.6 -7% -3% 12.5 11.4 -9% -4% 3.6 0.7 -80% -20% 5.7 5.5 -3% -1%
110 August 4.8 4.8 0% 0% 10.1 10.1 0% 0% 14.9 13.9 -7% -7% 11.4 10.4 -9% -9% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 4.9 4.9 -1% -1%
110 September 5.1 5.1 0% 0% 10.7 10.5 -2% -2% 15.5 14.7 -5% -5% 12.4 12.3 -1% -1% 3.1 0.2 -94% -94% 5.3 5.1 -5% -5%
110 October 4.6 4.5 0% 0% 9.6 9.4 -2% -2% 14.0 13.2 -6% -6% 10.9 10.3 -6% -6% 2.8 0.1 -96% -96% 4.7 4.5 -4% -4%
110 November 3.8 3.8 -1% -1% 8.1 8.2 1% 1% 11.9 11.5 -4% -4% 9.2 8.8 -4% -4% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 4.3 2% 2%
110 December 3.5 3.5 0% 0% 7.6 8.3 9% 9% 11.2 11.4 2% 2% 8.6 8.4 -3% -3% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 4.5 16% 16%
111 January 3.2 3.2 -1% -1% 7.0 7.3 4% 4% 10.3 10.3 0% 0% 7.8 7.7 -1% -1% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.9 7% 7%
111 February 2.7 2.7 -1% -1% 6.1 6.3 3% 3% 9.0 8.8 -1% -1% 6.6 6.6 1% 1% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.6 4% 4%
111 March 3.9 3.9 0% 0% 8.4 8.7 4% 4% 12.0 12.4 4% 4% 9.3 10.6 14% 14% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 4.2 4.4 6% 6%
111 April 58.8 58.7 0% 0% 130.2 130.4 0% 0% 155.4 162.0 4% 4% 104.8 110.9 6% 6% 40.9 32.6 -20% -20% 70.6 69.1 -2% -2%
111 May 48.3 48.4 0% 0% 102.9 103.8 1% 1% 127.3 129.7 2% 2% 92.9 93.6 1% 1% 30.6 24.2 -21% -17% 52.4 52.0 -1% -1%
111 June 16.6 16.7 1% 0% 33.9 34.0 0% 0% 44.1 43.3 -2% -1% 34.1 34.0 0% 0% 9.1 5.2 -43% -8% 17.0 16.6 -2% -1%
111 July 6.6 6.6 0% 0% 13.6 13.5 -1% 0% 19.9 18.4 -8% -4% 14.9 13.6 -9% -4% 3.8 0.9 -76% -21% 6.5 6.4 -2% -1%
111 August 5.7 5.6 0% 0% 11.6 11.5 -1% -1% 17.2 15.6 -9% -9% 12.9 11.7 -10% -10% 3.5 0.7 -80% -80% 5.5 5.4 -2% -2%
111 September 4.8 4.7 -1% -1% 9.8 9.7 -1% -1% 14.8 13.4 -9% -9% 11.3 10.2 -9% -9% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 4.8 -2% -2%
111 October 17.2 17.2 0% 0% 37.3 37.2 0% 0% 46.5 47.3 2% 2% 35.4 38.7 10% 10% 9.7 5.4 -45% -45% 18.9 18.3 -3% -3%
111 November 6.0 6.0 0% 0% 12.3 12.4 1% 1% 17.9 16.8 -6% -6% 13.2 12.2 -8% -8% 3.6 0.6 -83% -83% 6.0 6.1 2% 2%
111 December 5.2 5.2 0% 0% 10.7 11.0 2% 2% 15.9 15.1 -5% -5% 11.8 10.8 -9% -9% 3.3 0.5 -85% -85% 5.2 5.4 4% 4%
112 January 4.5 4.5 0% 0% 9.4 9.8 4% 4% 14.1 13.6 -4% -4% 10.6 9.8 -8% -8% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 5.0 7% 7%
112 February 3.6 3.6 -1% -1% 7.6 8.4 10% 10% 11.5 11.6 0% 0% 8.7 8.1 -7% -7% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 5.0 21% 21%
112 March 18.5 18.4 -1% -1% 40.4 40.6 1% 1% 49.1 50.6 3% 3% 35.8 40.7 13% 13% 10.8 6.3 -42% -42% 20.6 20.4 -1% -1%
112 April 38.1 38.1 0% 0% 82.2 82.9 1% 1% 101.2 104.0 3% 3% 68.7 69.8 2% 2% 26.1 20.1 -23% -23% 43.7 43.3 -1% -1%
112 May 92.3 92.2 0% 0% 199.5 200.7 1% 1% 248.6 251.8 1% 1% 180.5 178.5 -1% -1% 61.9 51.3 -17% -17% 103.3 102.3 -1% -1%
112 June 65.7 65.7 0% 0% 139.7 140.9 1% 1% 177.0 177.2 0% 0% 130.8 127.9 -2% -2% 43.8 35.5 -19% -17% 73.6 73.2 -1% -1%
112 July 7.5 7.7 2% 1% 15.3 15.9 4% 2% 22.8 21.7 -5% -2% 17.1 15.3 -11% -6% 4.2 1.1 -74% -22% 7.2 7.7 7% 2%
112 August 6.2 6.2 0% 0% 12.7 12.6 0% 0% 18.9 17.3 -9% -9% 14.2 12.7 -10% -10% 3.7 0.7 -81% -81% 6.1 5.9 -2% -2%
112 September 12.7 12.7 0% 0% 26.6 26.5 0% 0% 35.0 34.1 -2% -2% 28.5 30.1 6% 6% 6.4 2.5 -61% -61% 13.4 12.9 -4% -4%
112 October 11.6 11.6 0% 0% 24.0 23.9 0% 0% 31.8 30.9 -3% -3% 24.5 24.7 1% 1% 6.1 2.5 -59% -59% 11.6 11.3 -2% -2%
112 November 6.0 6.0 0% 0% 12.6 13.0 3% 3% 18.3 17.5 -5% -5% 13.4 12.4 -8% -8% 4.0 1.0 -75% -75% 6.3 6.7 6% 6%
112 December 5.3 5.3 0% 0% 11.1 11.2 0% 0% 16.5 15.4 -7% -7% 12.1 11.0 -9% -9% 3.6 0.7 -80% -80% 5.5 5.5 0% 0%
 13310800 (EFSFSR above Meadow) 13311000 (EFSFSR at Stibnite) 13311250 (EFSFSR above Sugar) 13311450 (Sugar Creek) 13310850 (Meadow Creek) Meadow Creek MC-6
Simulated Streamflow Simulated Streamflow Simulated Streamflow Simulated Streamflow Simulated Streamflow Simulated Streamflow
No Proposed Long-term % No Proposed Long-term % No Proposed Long-term % No Proposed Long-term % No Proposed Long-term % No Proposed Long-term %
Mine Year Month Action Action % Difference Difference Action Action % Difference Difference Action Action % Difference Difference Action Action % Difference Difference Action Action % Difference Difference Action Action % Difference Difference
-2 January 5.0 5.0 0% 0% 10.4 10.1 -3% -3% 15.8 15.5 -2% -2% 11.6 11.6 0% 0% 3.2 0.4 -87% -87% 5.0 4.7 -6% -6%
-2 February 4.1 4.4 7% 7% 8.6 8.9 3% 3% 13.3 13.9 5% 5% 9.9 10.6 7% 7% 2.8 0.2 -93% -93% 4.5 4.2 -7% -7%
-2 March 13.1 13.1 0% 0% 28.6 28.2 -1% -1% 36.3 35.9 -1% -1% 27.8 27.8 0% 0% 6.9 5.7 -17% -17% 14.1 13.5 -4% -4%
-2 April 29.1 30.1 3% 3% 62.7 64.3 3% 3% 76.5 78.5 3% 3% 51.4 53.1 3% 3% 19.6 19.3 -1% -1% 32.5 31.5 -3% -3%
-2 May 55.3 55.3 0% 0% 119.9 119.2 -1% -1% 148.6 147.8 0% 0% 105.6 105.8 0% 0% 37.1 39.3 6% 6% 60.7 59.3 -2% -2%
-2 June 13.3 13.7 3% 1% 27.4 27.7 1% 0% 36.5 37.1 2% 0% 28.4 29.4 3% 1% 7.2 4.8 -34% -5% 13.6 12.9 -5% -1%
-2 July 6.7 6.7 0% 0% 14.2 13.6 -4% -1% 20.7 20.2 -3% -1% 15.7 15.6 0% 0% 4.1 1.1 -73% -21% 6.9 6.4 -7% -2%
-2 August 5.8 5.8 0% 0% 12.0 11.6 -3% -3% 17.8 17.4 -2% -2% 13.4 13.4 0% 0% 3.6 0.7 -81% -81% 5.8 5.4 -7% -7%
-2 September 7.0 7.2 3% 3% 14.5 14.6 1% 1% 20.6 20.9 1% 1% 16.3 16.8 3% 3% 3.7 1.2 -67% -67% 7.2 6.7 -6% -6%
-2 October 6.9 6.9 0% 0% 14.3 13.9 -3% -3% 20.4 20.0 -2% -2% 15.9 15.9 0% 0% 3.7 1.0 -73% -73% 6.9 6.4 -7% -7%
-2 November 5.2 5.4 3% 3% 10.8 10.8 -1% -1% 15.9 16.0 1% 1% 12.1 12.5 3% 3% 3.3 0.5 -85% -85% 5.5 5.1 -8% -8%
-2 December 4.6 4.6 0% 0% 9.8 9.4 -4% -4% 14.6 14.2 -3% -3% 11.0 11.0 0% 0% 3.0 0.3 -90% -90% 4.9 4.5 -8% -8%
-1 January 4.1 4.1 0% 0% 8.7 7.2 -17% -17% 13.2 12.0 -9% -9% 9.9 9.9 0% 0% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.4 2.8 -35% -35%
-1 February 3.3 3.6 10% 10% 7.2 6.6 -8% -8% 10.9 11.0 1% 1% 8.2 9.0 10% 10% 2.4 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 2.7 -34% -34%
-1 March 3.7 3.7 0% 0% 8.0 6.7 -16% -16% 12.1 11.0 -9% -9% 9.1 9.0 0% 0% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 2.7 -33% -33%
-1 April 11.0 11.4 3% 3% 24.1 23.6 -2% -2% 30.6 30.7 0% 0% 23.1 23.9 3% 3% 5.5 4.4 -19% -16% 12.2 8.8 -28% -28%
-1 May 32.9 32.9 0% 0% 71.4 69.6 -2% -2% 84.4 83.4 -1% -1% 57.6 56.2 -2% -2% 21.5 21.8 1% 1% 36.0 28.8 -20% -14%
-1 June 14.9 15.4 3% 1% 31.4 30.8 -2% 0% 39.1 39.2 0% 0% 28.6 29.5 3% 1% 8.6 6.6 -23% -4% 15.8 11.7 -26% -6%
-1 July 6.3 6.3 0% 0% 13.4 12.2 -9% -3% 19.0 17.8 -6% -3% 13.8 13.9 1% 0% 3.8 1.0 -74% -20% 6.6 4.6 -30% -9%
-1 August 5.4 5.4 0% 0% 11.4 10.4 -8% -8% 16.6 15.6 -6% -6% 12.1 12.3 1% 1% 3.5 0.7 -80% -80% 5.6 4.1 -27% -27%
-1 September 4.6 4.7 3% 3% 9.7 9.1 -6% -6% 14.4 13.9 -3% -3% 10.8 11.3 5% 5% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 5.0 3.5 -29% -29%
-1 October 5.2 5.2 0% 0% 10.9 10.1 -7% -7% 16.0 15.1 -5% -5% 12.5 12.6 1% 1% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 5.3 3.8 -27% -27%
-1 November 4.2 4.3 3% 3% 8.9 8.3 -7% -7% 13.2 12.7 -4% -4% 10.0 10.5 5% 5% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.6 3.1 -32% -32%
-1 December 3.7 3.8 1% 1% 8.1 7.4 -9% -9% 12.2 11.4 -7% -7% 9.1 9.2 1% 1% 2.5 0.0 -100% -100% 4.2 2.9 -30% -30%
1 January 3.4 3.4 1% 1% 7.5 7.5 1% 1% 11.2 9.2 -18% -18% 8.3 8.4 2% 2% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 2.8 -28% -28%
1 February 2.8 3.2 12% 12% 6.3 7.2 16% 16% 9.4 8.6 -9% -9% 6.8 7.6 13% 13% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 2.6 -28% -28%
1 March 2.9 2.9 2% 2% 6.5 6.8 5% 5% 9.7 7.9 -18% -18% 6.9 6.9 1% 1% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 2.5 -27% -27%
1 April 52.6 54.4 3% 3% 116.8 120.6 3% 3% 138.0 141.0 2% 2% 95.1 95.2 0% 0% 36.8 41.2 12% 12% 61.7 50.6 -18% -18%
1 May 85.6 85.7 0% 0% 184.1 183.5 0% 0% 227.2 229.3 1% 1% 167.8 166.9 -1% -1% 56.3 62.3 11% 11% 92.7 75.6 -18% -18%
1 June 50.6 52.3 3% 3% 106.8 109.7 3% 2% 135.2 138.0 2% 2% 100.0 103.3 3% 3% 32.9 34.6 5% 4% 54.7 43.8 -20% -15%
1 July 7.1 7.1 1% 0% 14.2 14.3 1% 0% 21.5 17.8 -17% -9% 15.4 15.7 3% 1% 3.7 0.9 -75% -20% 6.6 4.6 -30% -9%
1 August 5.9 5.9 1% 1% 11.9 12.3 3% 3% 18.0 15.2 -16% -16% 13.1 13.5 3% 3% 3.4 0.7 -79% -79% 5.6 4.2 -25% -25%
1 September 5.0 5.2 4% 4% 10.0 10.8 8% 8% 15.3 13.3 -13% -13% 11.4 12.2 7% 7% 2.9 0.4 -86% -86% 4.9 3.7 -24% -24%
1 October 4.8 4.8 1% 1% 9.6 10.0 4% 4% 14.9 12.4 -17% -17% 11.3 11.6 3% 3% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.6 3.3 -27% -27%
1 November 4.1 4.3 5% 5% 8.4 9.1 9% 9% 13.1 11.2 -14% -14% 9.8 10.5 7% 7% 2.4 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 3.1 -25% -25%
1 December 3.8 3.9 1% 1% 7.8 8.3 7% 7% 12.4 10.2 -18% -18% 9.0 9.4 4% 4% 2.3 0.1 -96% -96% 3.8 2.9 -25% -25%
2 January 3.4 3.4 2% 2% 7.1 7.7 8% 8% 11.3 8.7 -23% -23% 8.1 8.4 4% 4% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 2.7 -25% -25%
2 February 2.7 3.1 14% 14% 5.9 7.2 22% 22% 9.4 7.9 -15% -15% 6.7 7.7 15% 15% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 2.5 -26% -26%
2 March 10.4 10.4 0% 0% 22.6 23.0 2% 2% 29.4 26.6 -9% -9% 22.7 22.9 1% 1% 4.8 4.0 -16% -16% 10.9 7.9 -27% -27%
2 April 24.5 25.3 4% 4% 53.1 54.5 3% 3% 62.3 62.0 0% 0% 43.5 44.3 2% 2% 15.9 15.7 -1% -1% 27.5 21.6 -22% -22%
2 May 33.5 33.5 0% 0% 72.0 71.4 -1% -1% 87.9 84.3 -4% -3% 61.9 60.6 -2% -2% 21.7 21.7 0% 0% 36.1 28.7 -20% -14%
2 June 7.1 7.4 4% 1% 14.9 15.4 4% 0% 21.2 17.5 -17% -3% 15.7 16.4 4% 1% 4.1 1.2 -70% -6% 7.5 5.2 -31% -3%
2 July 5.9 6.0 1% 0% 12.3 12.7 3% 1% 18.0 14.3 -21% -9% 13.2 13.5 2% 1% 3.6 0.8 -78% -20% 6.0 4.5 -26% -7%
2 August 5.0 5.1 1% 1% 10.4 10.9 5% 5% 15.7 12.3 -22% -22% 11.6 11.9 2% 2% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 5.1 3.8 -25% -25%
2 September 6.1 6.3 4% 4% 12.5 13.4 7% 7% 18.1 15.2 -16% -16% 14.1 14.9 5% 5% 3.3 0.9 -73% -73% 6.2 4.5 -26% -26%
2 October 13.2 13.2 0% 0% 28.4 28.3 0% 0% 35.9 32.1 -11% -11% 27.6 27.8 1% 1% 6.7 5.0 -25% -25% 13.9 10.0 -28% -28%
2 November 5.5 5.7 4% 4% 11.6 12.4 6% 6% 16.7 13.9 -17% -17% 12.2 12.8 5% 5% 3.5 0.8 -77% -77% 5.9 4.4 -26% -26%
2 December 4.9 4.9 1% 1% 10.4 10.8 5% 5% 15.1 12.0 -21% -21% 10.9 11.1 2% 2% 3.3 0.5 -85% -85% 5.2 4.0 -24% -24%
3 January 4.3 4.3 1% 1% 9.1 9.6 5% 5% 13.5 10.4 -23% -23% 10.0 10.1 1% 1% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.6 3.5 -24% -24%
3 February 3.5 3.8 8% 8% 7.7 8.6 13% 13% 11.5 9.2 -20% -20% 8.5 9.2 8% 8% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 3.2 -24% -24%
3 March 3.4 3.4 1% 1% 7.5 8.0 7% 7% 11.2 8.2 -27% -27% 8.2 8.3 1% 1% 2.3 0.1 -96% -96% 3.9 3.0 -24% -24%
3 April 4.2 4.3 5% 3% 8.9 9.5 7% 3% 12.9 10.0 -22% -12% 9.9 10.4 4% 3% 2.6 0.4 -84% -32% 4.5 3.3 -26% -10%
3 May 67.6 67.7 0% 0% 149.4 149.3 0% 0% 177.8 177.0 0% 0% 124.6 121.4 -3% -3% 46.2 51.4 11% 11% 76.5 62.8 -18% -18%
3 June 53.2 55.0 3% 3% 113.2 116.4 3% 3% 141.0 143.4 2% 2% 103.3 106.3 3% 3% 35.1 37.4 7% 5% 58.3 47.0 -19% -16%
3 July 6.8 6.9 1% 0% 13.7 13.9 1% 0% 20.5 15.4 -24% -12% 14.6 15.0 3% 1% 3.6 0.8 -78% -20% 6.4 4.5 -29% -8%
3 August 5.7 5.8 1% 1% 11.6 12.0 4% 4% 17.5 13.2 -24% -24% 12.7 13.2 4% 4% 3.4 0.6 -82% -82% 5.4 4.1 -25% -25%
3 September 4.9 5.1 5% 5% 9.8 10.6 8% 8% 15.1 11.6 -23% -23% 11.2 12.0 7% 7% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.8 3.6 -25% -25%
3 October 4.5 4.5 1% 1% 9.0 9.4 5% 5% 14.1 10.3 -27% -27% 10.5 10.9 4% 4% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 3.2 -25% -25%
3 November 4.3 4.5 4% 4% 8.7 9.3 7% 7% 13.5 10.2 -25% -25% 10.1 10.8 7% 7% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 3.1 -27% -27%
3 December 3.9 3.9 1% 1% 8.0 8.4 5% 5% 12.6 9.0 -28% -28% 9.2 9.5 4% 4% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 2.9 -26% -26%
4 January 3.4 3.5 2% 2% 7.2 7.8 8% 8% 11.4 8.2 -28% -28% 8.2 8.5 4% 4% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 2.7 -25% -25%
4 February 2.8 3.1 13% 13% 6.0 7.3 22% 22% 9.4 7.5 -21% -21% 6.7 7.7 15% 15% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 2.6 -25% -25%
4 March 2.8 2.8 2% 2% 6.1 6.8 11% 11% 9.6 6.9 -29% -29% 6.8 7.0 3% 3% 1.8 0.0 -100% -100% 3.2 2.4 -26% -26%
4 April 15.8 16.3 4% 4% 35.0 36.5 4% 4% 42.6 41.0 -4% -4% 31.2 32.1 3% 3% 9.0 9.2 2% 2% 17.9 13.8 -23% -23%
4 May 57.7 57.7 0% 0% 125.7 125.3 0% 0% 150.2 148.5 -1% -1% 105.6 102.9 -3% -3% 38.7 42.2 9% 9% 63.8 52.0 -19% -19%
4 June 38.5 39.8 4% 3% 81.8 83.9 3% 2% 102.4 102.0 0% 0% 75.5 77.8 3% 3% 25.0 25.6 2% 1% 42.0 33.3 -21% -12%
4 July 6.6 6.7 1% 0% 13.5 13.8 2% 1% 20.2 15.2 -24% -12% 14.5 14.8 3% 1% 3.6 0.9 -75% -19% 6.4 4.6 -29% -8%
4 August 5.6 5.6 1% 1% 11.3 11.9 5% 5% 17.1 12.9 -25% -25% 12.5 12.9 3% 3% 3.3 0.5 -85% -85% 5.4 4.0 -25% -25%
4 September 4.7 4.9 5% 5% 9.6 10.5 9% 9% 14.7 11.3 -23% -23% 10.9 11.7 7% 7% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 3.6 -24% -24%
4 October 12.3 12.4 0% 0% 26.4 26.5 0% 0% 34.1 29.9 -12% -12% 27.0 27.4 1% 1% 6.0 4.6 -23% -23% 12.8 9.2 -28% -28%
4 November 5.3 5.5 4% 4% 10.8 11.6 7% 7% 16.1 12.6 -21% -21% 11.6 12.3 6% 6% 3.2 0.6 -81% -81% 5.3 4.0 -26% -26%
4 December 4.7 4.7 1% 1% 9.8 10.3 5% 5% 14.7 11.0 -25% -25% 10.6 10.9 3% 3% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 3.6 -24% -24%
5 January 4.1 4.2 2% 2% 8.6 9.7 13% 13% 13.2 10.1 -24% -24% 9.6 9.8 2% 2% 2.6 0.3 -88% -88% 4.3 3.3 -21% -21%
5 February 3.3 3.7 13% 13% 7.0 9.0 28% 28% 10.8 9.0 -16% -16% 7.9 8.9 13% 13% 2.4 0.1 -96% -96% 3.9 3.0 -22% -22%
5 March 3.4 3.5 3% 3% 7.4 8.6 16% 16% 11.5 8.5 -25% -25% 8.4 8.6 3% 3% 2.3 0.1 -96% -96% 3.8 2.9 -22% -22%
5 April 13.8 14.4 4% 4% 30.4 32.2 6% 6% 37.6 35.6 -5% -5% 27.8 28.8 4% 4% 7.8 7.2 -7% -7% 15.5 11.8 -24% -24%
5 May 38.4 38.4 0% 0% 83.1 83.3 0% 0% 99.3 96.6 -3% -2% 67.6 65.9 -2% -2% 25.4 26.5 4% 3% 41.9 33.9 -19% -15%
5 June 68.5 70.9 3% 3% 148.3 153.3 3% 3% 183.4 187.3 2% 2% 134.6 137.5 2% 2% 47.3 51.4 9% 8% 77.6 63.2 -19% -19%
5 July 6.9 7.0 1% 1% 14.0 14.9 6% 2% 20.8 16.1 -23% -11% 14.9 15.2 2% 1% 3.7 0.9 -76% -20% 6.6 4.8 -28% -8%
5 August 5.7 5.8 1% 1% 11.7 12.9 10% 10% 17.6 13.7 -23% -23% 12.8 13.2 3% 3% 3.4 0.7 -79% -79% 5.6 4.3 -23% -23%
5 September 4.9 5.1 5% 5% 9.9 11.4 15% 15% 15.1 12.0 -21% -21% 11.2 12.0 7% 7% 2.9 0.4 -86% -86% 4.8 3.7 -22% -22%
5 October 7.2 7.3 1% 1% 14.9 15.9 7% 7% 21.2 17.5 -17% -17% 16.9 17.3 2% 2% 3.3 1.2 -64% -64% 6.9 5.0 -28% -28%
5 November 4.8 5.0 5% 5% 9.8 11.2 15% 15% 14.8 11.7 -20% -20% 11.0 11.7 6% 6% 2.9 0.2 -93% -93% 4.8 3.6 -26% -26%
5 December 4.3 4.4 2% 2% 8.9 10.0 13% 13% 13.6 10.3 -24% -24% 9.9 10.2 3% 3% 2.6 0.2 -92% -92% 4.3 3.3 -23% -23%
6 January 3.8 3.8 2% 2% 7.9 9.2 17% 17% 12.3 9.2 -25% -25% 8.9 9.1 3% 3% 2.3 0.1 -96% -96% 3.9 3.1 -21% -21%
6 February 3.0 3.4 14% 14% 6.5 8.6 33% 33% 10.1 8.3 -18% -18% 7.3 8.3 14% 14% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 2.9 -21% -21%
6 March 3.0 3.1 3% 3% 6.6 8.0 22% 22% 10.3 7.6 -26% -26% 7.4 7.6 3% 3% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 2.7 -22% -22%
6 April 6.9 7.2 5% 5% 15.0 16.9 12% 9% 20.5 18.4 -10% -8% 16.8 17.5 4% 4% 3.0 1.9 -37% -16% 7.4 5.4 -26% -18%
6 May 57.8 57.9 0% 0% 127.3 127.8 0% 0% 150.6 149.0 -1% -1% 103.6 100.9 -3% -3% 39.6 43.2 9% 9% 65.1 53.2 -18% -18%
6 June 64.8 67.0 3% 3% 139.1 144.0 4% 4% 172.9 177.1 2% 2% 127.1 130.7 3% 3% 43.8 47.5 8% 8% 72.2 58.7 -19% -19%
6 July 6.8 6.9 1% 1% 13.6 14.7 8% 3% 20.6 15.7 -24% -11% 14.6 14.9 2% 1% 3.6 0.9 -75% -19% 6.3 4.6 -27% -8%
6 August 5.7 5.8 2% 2% 11.4 12.8 12% 12% 17.4 13.4 -23% -23% 12.7 13.1 3% 3% 3.3 0.5 -85% -85% 5.4 4.1 -23% -23%
6 September 4.8 5.0 5% 5% 9.7 11.3 17% 17% 14.9 11.7 -21% -21% 11.1 11.8 7% 7% 2.9 0.4 -86% -86% 4.7 3.6 -22% -22%
6 October 7.8 7.9 1% 1% 16.1 17.2 7% 7% 22.6 18.9 -16% -16% 18.4 18.7 2% 2% 3.4 1.4 -59% -59% 7.5 5.4 -28% -28%
6 November 4.9 5.1 5% 5% 9.9 11.4 16% 16% 14.9 11.8 -21% -21% 11.0 11.7 6% 6% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.8 3.6 -25% -25%
6 December 4.3 4.4 2% 2% 9.0 10.2 14% 14% 13.7 10.4 -24% -24% 10.0 10.2 3% 3% 2.7 0.3 -89% -89% 4.4 3.4 -22% -22%
7 January 3.8 4.0 5% 5% 8.0 10.7 34% 34% 12.4 10.6 -14% -14% 9.0 9.2 3% 3% 2.4 0.1 -96% -96% 4.0 3.0 -24% -24%
7 February 3.1 3.6 14% 14% 6.7 10.2 51% 51% 10.5 9.9 -6% -6% 7.6 8.4 10% 10% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 2.8 -25% -25%
7 March 3.2 3.4 6% 6% 6.9 9.7 41% 41% 10.7 9.4 -12% -12% 7.7 7.9 3% 3% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 2.5 -27% -27%
7 April 42.4 44.0 4% 4% 94.1 98.6 5% 5% 111.3 113.9 2% 2% 77.0 77.4 1% 1% 29.4 32.5 11% 11% 49.6 40.1 -19% -19%
7 May 60.6 60.8 0% 0% 130.8 131.8 1% 1% 161.1 159.4 -1% -1% 117.8 116.5 -1% -1% 39.9 43.1 8% 8% 66.0 53.1 -20% -20%
7 June 30.2 31.5 4% 3% 63.2 66.1 5% 2% 80.9 79.5 -2% -1% 59.4 61.5 4% 3% 18.8 18.3 -3% -1% 32.0 24.6 -23% -10%
7 July 6.7 6.9 3% 2% 13.7 15.4 12% 4% 20.7 16.4 -21% -10% 14.7 15.1 2% 1% 3.7 0.9 -75% -20% 6.5 4.3 -34% -10%
7 August 5.6 5.8 3% 3% 11.5 13.6 18% 18% 17.4 14.2 -18% -18% 12.6 13.0 3% 3% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.5 3.8 -30% -30%
7 September 4.8 5.1 7% 7% 9.7 12.4 28% 28% 14.9 12.8 -14% -14% 11.0 11.7 6% 6% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 3.4 -29% -29%
7 October 11.1 11.3 2% 2% 23.6 24.9 6% 6% 31.2 27.7 -11% -11% 25.1 25.4 1% 1% 5.2 3.6 -30% -30% 11.4 7.6 -33% -33%
7 November 5.4 5.8 7% 7% 11.1 13.4 21% 21% 16.4 14.0 -15% -15% 11.9 12.6 6% 6% 3.1 0.5 -84% -84% 5.4 3.7 -32% -32%
7 December 4.8 5.0 5% 5% 10.0 12.4 24% 24% 15.0 12.6 -15% -15% 10.8 11.1 2% 2% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.9 3.6 -27% -27%
8 January 4.2 4.4 6% 6% 8.8 12.1 37% 37% 13.4 12.1 -10% -10% 9.8 10.0 2% 2% 2.8 0.2 -93% -93% 4.4 3.2 -26% -26%
8 February 3.3 3.9 19% 19% 7.1 11.2 59% 59% 11.0 11.1 1% 1% 8.0 9.0 13% 13% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.0 2.9 -26% -26%
8 March 3.6 3.9 7% 7% 7.8 11.0 41% 41% 11.9 10.8 -10% -10% 8.7 8.9 2% 2% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 2.8 -29% -29%
8 April 21.2 22.1 4% 4% 46.7 49.1 5% 5% 55.4 54.6 -1% -1% 39.8 40.7 2% 2% 13.4 13.5 1% 1% 24.2 18.2 -25% -25%
8 May 44.0 44.2 1% 1% 95.2 96.0 1% 1% 115.5 112.7 -2% -2% 80.3 78.3 -3% -3% 29.2 30.6 5% 4% 48.0 38.1 -21% -19%
8 June 27.3 28.5 4% 2% 57.9 60.5 4% 2% 73.0 71.2 -2% -1% 53.6 55.2 3% 2% 17.5 16.6 -5% -2% 29.6 22.4 -25% -10%
8 July 6.6 6.9 4% 2% 13.8 15.6 13% 5% 20.2 16.7 -17% -8% 14.5 14.9 2% 1% 3.8 1.0 -74% -20% 6.7 4.2 -37% -11%
8 August 5.6 5.8 5% 5% 11.6 14.0 21% 21% 17.3 14.6 -15% -15% 12.6 12.9 3% 3% 3.4 0.7 -79% -79% 5.6 3.8 -32% -32%
8 September 27.4 28.5 4% 4% 59.1 61.8 5% 5% 73.1 71.7 -2% -2% 53.8 54.9 2% 2% 17.6 17.4 -1% -1% 30.5 23.2 -24% -24%
8 October 6.3 6.6 5% 5% 13.1 15.0 15% 15% 19.3 16.0 -17% -17% 13.9 14.1 2% 2% 3.6 0.8 -78% -78% 6.3 4.0 -36% -36%
8 November 5.2 5.6 8% 8% 10.7 13.7 27% 27% 16.2 14.2 -12% -12% 11.6 12.3 6% 6% 3.4 0.6 -82% -82% 5.4 3.7 -31% -31%
8 December 4.7 5.0 6% 6% 9.7 12.6 29% 29% 14.9 12.9 -14% -14% 11.0 11.3 3% 3% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 3.3 -30% -30%
9 January 4.1 4.3 5% 5% 8.6 10.0 16% 16% 13.5 10.3 -23% -23% 10.0 10.2 3% 3% 2.6 0.2 -92% -92% 4.3 2.8 -34% -34%
9 February 3.3 3.8 16% 16% 7.0 9.0 28% 28% 11.1 9.6 -14% -14% 8.2 9.3 14% 14% 2.3 0.1 -96% -96% 3.9 2.6 -34% -34%
9 March 3.6 3.8 5% 5% 7.8 8.8 13% 13% 12.1 9.4 -22% -22% 8.9 9.2 3% 3% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 2.4 -38% -38%
9 April 20.1 20.9 4% 4% 44.2 44.1 0% 0% 52.9 50.1 -5% -5% 38.6 39.6 3% 3% 12.2 12.3 1% 1% 22.9 16.5 -28% -28%
9 May 46.3 46.5 0% 0% 100.4 99.0 -1% -1% 122.0 117.9 -3% -3% 85.6 83.5 -2% -2% 30.9 32.5 5% 4% 50.7 40.0 -21% -20%
9 June 19.5 20.3 4% 2% 40.8 40.9 0% 0% 52.1 48.1 -8% -3% 38.5 39.9 4% 2% 11.7 10.0 -14% -3% 20.6 14.5 -29% -8%
9 July 6.5 6.7 3% 1% 13.6 13.4 -1% 0% 19.9 15.3 -23% -11% 14.4 14.6 2% 1% 3.7 0.9 -76% -20% 6.6 3.9 -41% -12%
9 August 5.5 5.7 3% 3% 11.4 11.9 4% 4% 17.0 13.4 -22% -22% 12.4 12.7 3% 3% 3.4 0.7 -79% -79% 5.6 3.6 -36% -36%
9 September 4.7 5.0 7% 7% 9.7 10.8 11% 11% 14.7 12.1 -18% -18% 11.0 11.6 6% 6% 3.0 0.4 -86% -86% 4.9 3.2 -35% -35%
9 October 7.2 7.4 2% 2% 14.9 14.5 -3% -3% 21.1 16.8 -20% -20% 16.7 17.0 2% 2% 3.5 1.2 -65% -65% 7.0 4.1 -42% -42%
9 November 4.7 5.0 7% 7% 9.7 10.6 9% 9% 14.5 11.9 -18% -18% 10.8 11.3 6% 6% 2.9 0.2 -93% -93% 4.9 3.1 -38% -38%
9 December 4.1 4.3 4% 4% 8.8 9.7 10% 10% 13.3 10.7 -20% -20% 9.8 10.0 2% 2% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.4 2.8 -37% -37%
10 January 3.6 3.8 4% 4% 7.8 8.3 6% 6% 12.0 9.3 -22% -22% 8.8 9.0 2% 2% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.0 2.5 -37% -37%
10 February 3.9 4.5 14% 14% 8.3 9.3 12% 12% 12.3 10.8 -12% -12% 9.5 10.7 13% 13% 2.6 0.3 -88% -88% 4.5 2.8 -38% -38%
10 March 11.3 11.4 1% 1% 24.7 22.6 -9% -9% 31.4 26.4 -16% -16% 23.4 23.6 1% 1% 5.6 4.4 -21% -21% 12.2 7.5 -38% -38%
10 April 19.0 19.8 4% 4% 40.9 40.1 -2% -2% 48.4 45.4 -6% -6% 33.8 34.9 3% 3% 12.1 10.7 -11% -11% 21.0 15.0 -29% -29%
10 May 35.4 35.5 0% 0% 76.3 74.1 -3% -3% 92.8 88.2 -5% -4% 64.1 62.5 -2% -2% 23.4 23.5 1% 0% 38.4 29.6 -23% -17%
10 June 6.4 6.7 5% 1% 13.4 12.8 -4% -1% 19.1 15.2 -20% -3% 13.7 14.0 2% 0% 4.0 1.0 -75% -6% 6.8 3.9 -42% -4%
10 July 5.6 5.7 2% 1% 11.6 11.3 -3% -1% 17.0 13.3 -22% -9% 12.3 12.3 0% 0% 3.5 0.7 -80% -20% 5.7 3.6 -37% -10%
10 August 4.8 5.0 3% 3% 10.1 10.1 0% 0% 15.1 11.9 -21% -21% 11.3 11.3 0% 0% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.9 3.1 -37% -37%
10 September 5.1 5.4 6% 6% 10.7 10.8 1% 1% 15.8 12.8 -19% -19% 12.3 12.7 3% 3% 3.2 0.5 -84% -84% 5.3 3.2 -40% -40%
10 October 4.6 4.7 3% 3% 9.6 9.4 -2% -2% 14.3 11.1 -22% -22% 10.8 10.8 0% 0% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.7 2.7 -42% -42%
10 November 3.8 4.0 7% 7% 8.1 8.5 5% 5% 12.3 10.0 -19% -19% 9.1 9.4 4% 4% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 2.6 -39% -39%
10 December 3.5 3.6 4% 4% 7.6 7.9 4% 4% 11.5 9.2 -20% -20% 8.5 8.5 0% 0% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 2.4 -39% -39%
11 January 3.2 3.3 5% 5% 7.0 7.5 7% 7% 10.6 8.7 -18% -18% 7.7 7.7 0% 0% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 2.2 -40% -40%
11 February 2.7 3.0 12% 12% 6.1 7.1 16% 16% 9.2 8.3 -10% -10% 6.5 7.0 7% 7% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 2.1 -39% -39%
11 March 3.9 4.0 4% 4% 8.4 8.7 4% 4% 12.1 10.3 -15% -15% 9.2 9.2 0% 0% 2.2 0.4 -82% -82% 4.1 2.5 -40% -40%
11 April 58.8 60.9 4% 4% 130.2 132.0 1% 1% 153.9 156.5 2% 2% 107.0 107.3 0% 0% 41.2 45.9 12% 12% 68.8 54.8 -20% -20%
11 May 48.3 48.4 0% 0% 102.9 100.9 -2% -2% 127.1 124.2 -2% -2% 93.6 92.3 -1% -1% 30.6 32.4 6% 5% 51.3 40.0 -22% -22%
11 June 16.6 17.3 4% 1% 34.0 33.3 -2% -1% 44.2 40.5 -8% -3% 33.0 34.1 3% 1% 9.2 7.1 -23% -4% 16.7 11.3 -33% -8%
11 July 6.6 6.8 2% 1% 13.6 12.9 -5% -2% 20.1 15.7 -22% -10% 14.3 14.3 0% 0% 3.7 0.9 -76% -20% 6.5 3.8 -41% -12%
11 August 5.6 5.8 3% 3% 11.5 11.4 -1% -1% 17.3 13.8 -20% -20% 12.4 12.4 0% 0% 3.4 0.6 -82% -82% 5.5 3.4 -38% -38%
11 September 4.8 5.1 6% 6% 9.8 10.3 5% 5% 15.0 12.5 -17% -17% 10.9 11.2 3% 3% 3.0 0.4 -86% -86% 4.8 3.1 -36% -36%
11 October 17.2 17.4 1% 1% 37.3 35.2 -5% -5% 46.0 41.2 -10% -10% 34.7 34.6 0% 0% 9.8 8.5 -13% -13% 18.5 12.6 -32% -32%
11 November 6.0 6.3 6% 6% 12.3 12.1 -1% -1% 18.1 14.7 -18% -18% 12.9 13.1 2% 2% 3.6 0.7 -81% -81% 6.1 3.5 -42% -42%
11 December 5.2 5.3 3% 3% 10.8 10.8 1% 1% 16.2 13.0 -20% -20% 11.5 11.4 -1% -1% 3.2 0.5 -84% -84% 5.3 3.3 -37% -37%
12 January 4.5 4.7 4% 4% 9.4 11.1 17% 17% 14.4 13.0 -10% -10% 10.4 10.3 -1% -1% 2.9 0.2 -93% -93% 4.6 3.1 -34% -34%
12 February 3.6 4.2 16% 16% 7.6 10.5 37% 37% 11.8 12.2 4% 4% 8.4 9.2 10% 10% 2.6 0.2 -92% -92% 4.2 2.9 -32% -32%
12 March 18.5 18.7 1% 1% 40.3 40.0 -1% -1% 48.9 46.0 -6% -6% 35.3 35.1 -1% -1% 10.8 10.2 -6% -6% 20.1 14.4 -28% -28%
12 April 38.1 39.6 4% 4% 82.3 84.8 3% 3% 100.4 101.4 1% 1% 69.2 69.6 1% 1% 26.1 26.9 3% 3% 42.8 33.6 -21% -21%
12 May 92.4 92.6 0% 0% 199.5 199.2 0% 0% 248.5 249.6 0% 0% 182.4 179.5 -2% -2% 61.8 68.0 10% 10% 101.0 81.7 -19% -19%
12 June 65.8 68.2 4% 4% 139.7 144.0 3% 3% 176.6 182.0 3% 3% 130.0 132.9 2% 2% 43.7 46.8 7% 6% 72.0 57.4 -20% -20%
12 July 7.5 7.7 3% 2% 15.3 16.0 5% 2% 22.9 19.3 -16% -9% 16.0 16.0 0% 0% 4.1 1.1 -73% -21% 7.2 4.4 -39% -13%
12 August 6.2 6.4 4% 4% 12.7 14.1 11% 11% 19.0 16.7 -12% -12% 13.3 13.2 0% 0% 3.6 0.8 -78% -78% 6.1 3.9 -35% -35%
12 September 12.7 13.4 5% 5% 26.6 27.7 4% 4% 34.9 32.9 -6% -6% 27.4 28.2 3% 3% 6.3 4.4 -30% -30% 13.1 8.6 -35% -35%
12 October 11.6 11.8 2% 2% 24.0 24.4 2% 2% 31.7 28.6 -10% -10% 23.4 23.4 0% 0% 6.1 3.7 -39% -39% 11.4 7.5 -34% -34%
12 November 6.0 6.4 7% 7% 12.6 14.4 14% 14% 18.3 17.0 -7% -7% 12.5 12.9 3% 3% 3.9 1.0 -74% -74% 6.4 4.2 -34% -34%
12 December 5.3 5.6 4% 4% 11.2 13.0 16% 16% 16.6 15.3 -8% -8% 11.3 11.3 0% 0% 3.5 0.7 -80% -80% 5.5 3.8 -30% -30%
13 January 4.7 4.8 2% 2% 9.9 9.2 -7% -7% 15.0 12.5 -17% -17% 11.1 5.4 -52% -52% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 4.9 3.6 -26% -26%
13 February 3.8 4.2 11% 11% 8.0 7.7 -4% -4% 12.3 10.8 -13% -13% 9.2 7.5 -18% -18% 2.8 0.2 -93% -93% 4.4 3.1 -30% -30%
13 March 4.0 4.0 -1% -1% 8.5 7.4 -13% -13% 13.1 10.3 -21% -21% 9.8 7.8 -20% -20% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 2.9 -31% -31%
13 April 11.1 11.4 3% 3% 24.2 20.4 -16% -16% 31.5 26.1 -17% -17% 24.1 28.3 17% 17% 5.7 1.9 -67% -57% 12.7 8.5 -32% -32%
13 May 31.4 31.3 0% 0% 67.9 42.0 -38% -31% 82.3 54.6 -34% -24% 54.8 55.9 2% 2% 20.6 15.3 -26% -14% 34.9 9.6 -72% -48%
13 June 49.7 51.4 3% 3% 107.6 64.2 -40% -37% 133.8 88.2 -34% -33% 94.9 97.0 2% 2% 34.4 27.3 -21% -14% 57.5 10.9 -81% -66%
13 July 6.8 7.0 2% 1% 14.2 12.1 -15% -5% 21.0 17.4 -17% -8% 15.3 13.0 -15% -7% 4.0 1.0 -75% -22% 6.9 5.1 -27% -8%
13 August 5.8 5.8 1% 1% 12.0 10.2 -15% -15% 17.9 15.1 -15% -15% 13.2 11.1 -16% -16% 3.6 0.7 -80% -80% 5.8 4.3 -25% -25%
13 September 5.1 5.3 3% 3% 10.5 9.3 -11% -11% 15.8 13.9 -12% -12% 12.1 10.5 -13% -13% 3.2 0.4 -88% -88% 5.2 3.8 -27% -27%
13 October 9.7 9.7 0% 0% 20.6 18.6 -10% -10% 27.9 24.9 -11% -11% 22.9 24.3 6% 6% 4.4 0.8 -82% -82% 10.1 8.5 -16% -16%
13 November 5.3 5.5 3% 3% 11.0 9.6 -13% -13% 16.0 14.2 -11% -11% 12.1 10.6 -12% -12% 3.3 0.5 -85% -85% 5.5 3.9 -29% -29%
13 December 4.8 4.8 0% 0% 10.0 8.8 -12% -12% 14.7 13.0 -11% -11% 11.0 9.2 -16% -16% 3.2 0.4 -87% -87% 5.0 3.6 -27% -27%
14 January 4.2 4.2 -1% -1% 8.9 8.1 -9% -9% 13.2 12.0 -9% -9% 10.0 8.4 -16% -16% 2.8 0.2 -93% -93% 4.4 3.2 -27% -27%
14 February 3.4 3.7 11% 11% 7.2 7.5 4% 4% 10.8 11.1 3% 3% 8.2 7.7 -6% -6% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 3.0 -27% -27%
14 March 3.3 3.3 0% 0% 7.3 7.2 -3% -3% 11.0 10.4 -5% -5% 8.3 7.1 -14% -14% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 2.8 -26% -26%
14 April 21.5 22.0 3% 3% 47.2 32.8 -31% -31% 56.2 41.7 -26% -26% 39.6 46.4 17% 17% 13.5 8.7 -36% -36% 25.2 9.3 -63% -63%
14 May 34.0 34.1 0% 0% 73.2 45.5 -38% -33% 89.6 60.6 -32% -25% 60.2 60.9 1% 1% 22.1 16.7 -24% -14% 37.5 9.8 -74% -53%
14 June 8.9 9.3 4% 1% 18.5 17.2 -7% -1% 25.1 22.8 -9% -2% 19.5 19.5 0% 0% 4.6 1.3 -71% -7% 9.2 7.3 -20% -3%
14 July 6.0 6.0 0% 0% 12.5 11.1 -12% -4% 18.0 15.8 -12% -5% 13.4 11.4 -15% -7% 3.7 0.9 -76% -20% 6.1 4.7 -24% -7%
14 August 5.2 5.1 -1% -1% 10.7 9.5 -11% -11% 15.6 14.0 -11% -11% 11.7 10.0 -15% -15% 3.3 0.5 -85% -85% 5.2 4.0 -24% -24%
14 September 4.3 4.5 4% 4% 9.1 8.8 -4% -4% 13.5 12.9 -4% -4% 10.4 9.1 -12% -12% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 3.6 -24% -24%
14 October 7.3 7.3 0% 0% 15.4 14.4 -6% -6% 21.1 19.8 -6% -6% 17.2 18.2 6% 6% 3.4 0.2 -94% -94% 7.5 6.5 -14% -14%
14 November 4.5 4.6 3% 3% 9.5 8.9 -7% -7% 13.7 13.1 -4% -4% 10.5 9.3 -11% -11% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.9 3.6 -27% -27%
14 December 4.0 4.0 0% 0% 8.6 8.2 -5% -5% 12.5 11.9 -5% -5% 9.5 8.2 -14% -14% 2.7 0.2 -93% -93% 4.4 3.3 -24% -24%
15 January 3.5 3.5 0% 0% 7.8 7.7 -1% -1% 11.3 11.1 -2% -2% 8.6 7.5 -13% -13% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.0 3.1 -21% -21%
15 February 3.0 3.2 7% 7% 6.7 7.4 11% 11% 9.8 10.5 7% 7% 7.3 6.9 -5% -5% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 3.0 -20% -20%
15 March 3.0 2.9 -1% -1% 6.6 7.1 7% 7% 9.6 9.9 2% 2% 7.1 6.3 -11% -11% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 2.8 -17% -17%
15 April 6.7 6.9 3% 3% 14.3 15.4 8% 6% 19.2 20.1 5% 4% 15.9 19.7 24% 24% 3.0 0.0 -100% -44% 7.2 7.6 6% 4%
15 May 29.6 29.5 0% 0% 64.9 63.8 -2% -1% 75.9 74.6 -2% -1% 49.8 53.8 8% 6% 19.1 13.9 -27% -14% 33.6 32.6 -3% -2%
15 June 42.2 43.6 3% 3% 91.3 94.6 4% 3% 111.6 113.7 2% 1% 76.9 79.5 3% 3% 29.0 22.7 -22% -13% 48.7 48.9 0% 0%
15 July 6.4 6.5 2% 1% 13.2 12.7 -4% -1% 19.0 17.5 -8% -4% 14.0 12.1 -14% -6% 3.7 0.9 -76% -20% 6.4 5.7 -10% -3%
15 August 5.4 5.5 1% 1% 11.1 10.9 -3% -3% 16.4 15.4 -6% -6% 12.4 10.6 -15% -15% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.4 4.9 -8% -8%
15 September 7.7 8.0 4% 4% 16.1 16.4 2% 2% 22.2 22.0 -1% -1% 18.1 19.1 6% 6% 3.7 0.5 -87% -87% 8.0 7.8 -3% -3%
15 October 18.4 18.4 0% 0% 39.4 39.5 0% 0% 48.2 47.7 -1% -1% 35.7 37.1 4% 4% 10.8 6.5 -40% -40% 19.8 20.0 1% 1%
15 November 5.8 6.0 3% 3% 12.2 12.9 6% 6% 17.6 18.0 3% 3% 12.9 11.5 -11% -11% 3.8 0.9 -76% -76% 6.2 6.4 4% 4%
15 December 5.1 5.1 0% 0% 10.6 11.0 4% 4% 15.6 15.8 1% 1% 11.6 9.9 -14% -14% 3.4 0.7 -79% -79% 5.3 5.6 6% 6%
16 January 4.4 4.4 0% 0% 9.4 9.9 5% 5% 13.9 14.4 3% 3% 10.5 9.0 -15% -15% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.7 5.1 9% 9%
16 February 3.5 3.9 10% 10% 7.5 8.7 15% 15% 11.3 13.0 15% 15% 8.7 8.3 -5% -5% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 4.5 6% 6%
16 March 3.5 3.5 0% 0% 7.5 7.8 3% 3% 11.4 11.9 4% 4% 8.7 7.6 -13% -13% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 4.0 5% 5%
16 April 7.3 7.6 3% 3% 15.5 15.9 3% 2% 21.0 21.6 3% 2% 17.5 20.8 19% 19% 3.2 0.0 -100% -48% 7.8 7.7 -1% -1%
16 May 81.7 81.6 0% 0% 179.7 181.4 1% 1% 217.5 219.1 1% 1% 149.8 151.8 1% 1% 56.5 46.5 -18% -18% 94.3 95.9 2% 2%
16 June 68.5 70.8 3% 3% 146.0 152.0 4% 4% 183.2 189.7 4% 4% 133.9 136.2 2% 2% 45.9 37.5 -18% -17% 77.1 78.0 1% 1%
16 July 7.0 7.2 2% 1% 14.1 13.7 -3% -1% 21.1 20.1 -5% -2% 16.0 13.6 -15% -8% 3.8 0.9 -76% -21% 6.6 6.0 -9% -3%
16 August 5.8 5.9 0% 0% 11.8 11.4 -3% -3% 17.8 16.9 -5% -5% 13.4 11.5 -14% -14% 3.4 0.7 -79% -79% 5.6 5.1 -7% -7%
16 September 6.1 6.4 4% 4% 12.5 12.6 1% 1% 18.3 18.2 -1% -1% 14.7 14.2 -3% -3% 3.4 0.4 -88% -88% 6.1 5.7 -5% -5%
16 October 5.4 5.3 -1% -1% 10.8 10.6 -1% -1% 16.2 15.7 -3% -3% 12.6 11.0 -13% -13% 3.0 0.3 -90% -90% 5.0 4.9 -2% -2%
16 November 4.9 5.1 3% 3% 9.8 10.4 6% 6% 14.9 15.4 3% 3% 11.6 10.8 -7% -7% 2.9 0.2 -93% -93% 4.8 5.0 5% 5%
16 December 4.4 4.4 -1% -1% 9.0 9.1 1% 1% 13.7 13.7 0% 0% 10.5 9.4 -11% -11% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.4 1% 1%
17 January 3.9 3.8 0% 0% 8.1 8.2 1% 1% 12.4 12.5 1% 1% 9.4 8.4 -10% -10% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 4.0 1% 1%
17 February 3.1 3.4 10% 10% 6.7 7.7 16% 16% 10.2 11.8 15% 15% 7.7 7.8 1% 1% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 4.0 7% 7%
17 March 3.1 3.1 0% 0% 6.8 7.2 6% 6% 10.4 11.0 6% 6% 7.8 7.1 -8% -8% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.8 10% 10%
17 April 5.4 5.6 3% 3% 11.4 11.7 3% 2% 16.1 16.6 3% 2% 13.4 16.1 20% 17% 2.7 0.0 -100% -40% 5.7 5.6 -2% -1%
17 May 47.4 47.3 0% 0% 104.5 105.1 1% 1% 124.8 124.8 0% 0% 83.5 88.2 6% 6% 31.3 24.3 -22% -19% 54.6 55.2 1% 1%
17 June 57.4 59.4 4% 4% 123.5 128.4 4% 4% 152.9 158.2 3% 3% 110.7 114.1 3% 3% 38.9 31.4 -19% -15% 65.8 66.2 1% 1%
17 July 6.7 6.8 1% 1% 13.6 13.1 -4% -1% 20.2 19.2 -5% -2% 14.9 13.2 -12% -6% 3.6 0.8 -78% -20% 6.3 5.7 -10% -3%
17 August 5.7 5.7 1% 1% 11.5 11.2 -2% -2% 17.2 16.5 -4% -4% 13.1 11.4 -13% -13% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.4 5.0 -7% -7%
17 September 4.8 4.9 2% 2% 9.7 9.8 1% 1% 14.8 14.7 -1% -1% 11.5 10.3 -10% -10% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 4.5 -5% -5%
17 October 4.4 4.4 1% 1% 8.9 8.9 0% 0% 13.8 13.5 -2% -2% 10.8 9.4 -13% -13% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.1 -3% -3%
17 November 3.9 4.0 2% 2% 7.9 8.1 3% 3% 12.2 12.5 3% 3% 9.5 8.6 -9% -9% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 3.9 0% 0%
17 December 3.6 3.5 -1% -1% 7.4 7.9 6% 6% 11.5 12.0 4% 4% 8.8 7.9 -10% -10% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 4.0 11% 11%
18 January 3.1 3.1 0% 0% 6.7 7.2 7% 7% 10.5 11.1 6% 6% 8.0 7.3 -9% -9% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.8 12% 12%
18 February 2.6 2.8 9% 9% 5.6 6.3 13% 13% 8.7 10.0 15% 15% 6.6 6.7 2% 2% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.2 3.3 4% 4%
18 March 2.6 2.6 0% 0% 5.8 6.0 4% 4% 8.9 9.3 6% 6% 6.6 6.1 -7% -7% 1.7 0.0 -100% -100% 3.0 3.2 6% 6%
18 April 15.1 15.5 3% 3% 33.6 34.8 4% 4% 41.3 42.3 3% 3% 30.3 38.2 26% 26% 8.3 4.5 -46% -46% 17.8 18.1 1% 1%
18 May 47.8 47.9 0% 0% 104.1 104.8 1% 1% 124.9 125.1 0% 0% 84.3 86.0 2% 2% 31.8 25.4 -20% -17% 53.9 54.5 1% 1%
18 June 52.8 54.7 4% 4% 113.5 118.3 4% 4% 140.9 146.3 4% 4% 102.9 105.8 3% 3% 35.6 28.6 -20% -14% 60.3 61.1 1% 1%
18 July 6.5 6.6 2% 1% 13.3 12.9 -3% -1% 19.8 18.9 -4% -2% 14.7 12.9 -12% -6% 3.6 0.8 -77% -20% 6.2 5.7 -8% -2%
18 August 5.6 5.5 -1% -1% 11.2 10.8 -3% -3% 16.9 16.1 -5% -5% 12.8 11.1 -13% -13% 3.2 0.6 -81% -81% 5.2 4.9 -6% -6%
18 September 4.7 4.8 3% 3% 9.4 9.5 1% 1% 14.4 14.3 -1% -1% 11.2 10.0 -11% -11% 2.8 0.3 -89% -89% 4.6 4.3 -6% -6%
18 October 8.2 8.2 0% 0% 17.1 16.8 -1% -1% 23.8 23.0 -3% -3% 19.8 21.2 7% 7% 3.5 0.2 -94% -94% 8.1 7.9 -2% -2%
18 November 5.1 5.1 1% 1% 10.3 10.6 3% 3% 15.2 15.5 2% 2% 11.7 10.6 -9% -9% 3.0 0.4 -86% -86% 5.0 5.1 2% 2%
18 December 4.4 4.4 0% 0% 9.2 9.4 2% 2% 13.7 13.9 1% 1% 10.5 9.2 -12% -12% 2.8 0.3 -89% -89% 4.5 4.6 1% 1%
19 January 3.9 3.9 -1% -1% 8.2 8.3 2% 2% 12.3 12.6 2% 2% 9.3 8.3 -11% -11% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 4.2 2% 2%
19 February 3.2 3.4 6% 6% 6.9 7.6 10% 10% 10.4 11.6 11% 11% 8.0 7.7 -3% -3% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 3.9 5% 5%
19 March 3.1 3.1 0% 0% 6.7 6.8 1% 1% 10.2 10.5 4% 4% 7.7 7.0 -8% -8% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.5 0% 0%
19 April 5.7 5.9 3% 3% 11.9 12.1 1% 1% 16.6 17.0 2% 2% 14.0 16.9 21% 18% 2.8 0.1 -96% -40% 5.9 5.6 -5% -3%
19 May 11.7 11.6 0% 0% 25.8 25.1 -3% -1% 32.2 31.3 -3% -1% 23.0 26.9 17% 6% 6.1 2.5 -59% -10% 13.2 12.6 -4% -1%
19 June 5.2 5.3 4% 0% 10.8 10.7 -1% 0% 14.8 14.8 0% 0% 11.1 10.7 -4% -1% 3.1 0.4 -87% -6% 5.4 4.9 -9% -1%
19 July 4.7 4.7 0% 0% 9.9 9.4 -5% -1% 13.5 13.2 -3% -1% 10.1 9.0 -10% -4% 3.0 0.4 -87% -19% 4.9 4.3 -11% -2%
19 August 4.0 4.0 0% 0% 8.7 8.3 -4% -4% 12.1 12.0 -1% -1% 9.1 8.0 -11% -11% 2.8 0.2 -93% -93% 4.4 4.0 -10% -10%
19 September 3.5 3.6 3% 3% 7.5 7.6 2% 2% 10.6 11.2 5% 5% 7.8 7.4 -6% -6% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.0 3.8 -4% -4%
19 October 9.5 9.5 0% 0% 20.6 20.4 -1% -1% 26.4 26.0 -1% -1% 20.1 23.8 19% 19% 4.7 1.1 -76% -76% 10.3 10.1 -2% -2%
19 November 4.4 4.5 4% 4% 9.3 10.0 7% 7% 12.8 13.6 7% 7% 9.3 8.6 -7% -7% 2.8 0.3 -89% -89% 4.8 5.1 7% 7%
19 December 3.9 4.0 1% 1% 8.6 8.8 3% 3% 11.8 12.2 3% 3% 8.5 7.6 -11% -11% 2.8 0.3 -89% -89% 4.4 4.5 3% 3%
20 January 3.6 3.6 1% 1% 7.8 8.3 7% 7% 10.8 11.6 7% 7% 7.7 7.0 -10% -10% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.0 4.4 11% 11%
20 February 2.9 3.2 11% 11% 6.4 7.8 22% 22% 9.0 10.9 22% 22% 6.4 6.5 2% 2% 2.2 0.1 -96% -96% 3.7 4.3 17% 17%
20 March 2.9 2.9 -1% -1% 6.5 6.8 4% 4% 9.2 9.8 6% 6% 6.4 6.0 -7% -7% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.6 6% 6%
20 April 39.5 40.8 3% 3% 87.5 91.1 4% 4% 103.1 107.3 4% 4% 67.2 75.9 13% 13% 27.4 20.8 -24% -24% 47.3 47.9 1% 1%
20 May 80.4 80.4 0% 0% 173.9 175.5 1% 1% 213.5 214.4 0% 0% 152.2 151.8 0% 0% 53.6 44.3 -17% -17% 90.1 91.4 2% 2%
20 June 42.2 43.7 4% 3% 88.8 92.3 4% 3% 112.4 115.5 3% 2% 83.2 84.5 2% 2% 27.2 21.1 -22% -12% 46.3 46.6 1% 0%
20 July 6.8 6.9 2% 1% 13.7 13.3 -3% -1% 20.5 19.4 -5% -3% 15.4 13.4 -13% -7% 3.7 0.9 -76% -20% 6.5 5.8 -10% -3%
20 August 5.6 5.6 0% 0% 11.4 11.2 -2% -2% 17.3 16.4 -5% -5% 13.1 11.3 -13% -13% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.4 5.1 -6% -6%
20 September 6.5 6.7 4% 4% 13.2 13.3 1% 1% 19.2 18.9 -1% -1% 15.4 15.5 1% 1% 3.4 0.4 -88% -88% 6.4 6.1 -5% -5%
20 October 5.6 5.6 0% 0% 11.3 11.1 -1% -1% 16.8 16.2 -4% -4% 13.0 11.7 -10% -10% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 5.3 5.2 -2% -2%
20 November 4.6 4.7 3% 3% 9.4 9.7 4% 4% 14.2 14.5 2% 2% 11.0 10.1 -8% -8% 2.8 0.3 -89% -89% 4.6 4.6 0% 0%
20 December 4.2 4.1 -1% -1% 8.6 8.7 2% 2% 13.1 13.2 1% 1% 10.0 9.0 -10% -10% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 4.3 4% 4%
21 January 3.7 3.6 0% 0% 7.7 7.9 2% 2% 11.9 12.1 2% 2% 9.0 8.2 -9% -9% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 4.0 3% 3%
21 February 3.0 3.3 10% 10% 6.4 7.7 21% 21% 9.8 11.7 19% 19% 7.4 7.6 3% 3% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 4.1 15% 15%
21 March 3.4 3.4 0% 0% 7.3 7.2 -1% -1% 11.1 11.1 0% 0% 8.4 8.1 -4% -4% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 3.5 -3% -3%
21 April 21.3 21.9 3% 3% 47.0 48.1 2% 2% 56.3 57.6 2% 2% 40.2 48.2 20% 20% 13.0 8.2 -37% -37% 25.0 24.8 -1% -1%
21 May 28.1 28.3 1% 0% 60.0 60.2 0% 0% 73.3 72.7 -1% 0% 49.9 51.5 3% 2% 17.5 12.7 -28% -13% 30.5 30.4 0% 0%
21 June 8.2 8.5 4% 1% 17.0 17.1 0% 0% 23.5 23.0 -2% 0% 17.9 18.2 2% 0% 4.2 1.0 -76% -7% 8.5 7.9 -7% -1%
21 July 6.0 6.0 0% 0% 12.4 11.9 -4% -1% 17.8 16.9 -5% -2% 13.1 11.7 -11% -5% 3.7 0.9 -76% -20% 6.0 5.4 -10% -3%
21 August 5.1 5.1 -1% -1% 10.6 10.3 -2% -2% 15.4 15.0 -3% -3% 11.7 10.4 -11% -11% 3.3 0.5 -85% -85% 5.2 4.9 -5% -5%
21 September 5.5 5.7 4% 4% 11.5 11.6 1% 1% 16.4 16.6 1% 1% 13.0 13.1 1% 1% 3.3 0.4 -88% -88% 5.7 5.4 -6% -6%
21 October 4.9 4.9 0% 0% 10.3 10.1 -2% -2% 14.8 14.7 -1% -1% 11.5 10.6 -8% -8% 3.0 0.3 -90% -90% 5.0 4.8 -5% -5%
21 November 5.2 5.3 3% 3% 10.8 11.5 7% 7% 15.3 16.3 7% 7% 12.2 12.5 3% 3% 3.1 0.2 -93% -93% 5.4 5.8 7% 7%
21 December 4.4 4.3 0% 0% 9.2 9.4 2% 2% 13.2 13.6 3% 3% 10.1 9.4 -7% -7% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.6 4.8 4% 4%
22 January 3.8 3.7 -1% -1% 8.2 8.5 4% 4% 11.8 12.4 5% 5% 8.9 8.4 -6% -6% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 4.4 6% 6%
22 February 3.1 3.5 12% 12% 6.8 8.3 23% 23% 9.8 12.0 22% 22% 7.4 7.8 5% 5% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 4.6 18% 18%
22 March 3.1 3.1 0% 0% 7.0 7.2 4% 4% 10.1 10.7 6% 6% 7.4 7.1 -3% -3% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.8 5% 5%
22 April 6.3 6.6 3% 3% 13.5 13.6 1% 1% 18.3 18.6 2% 1% 14.9 18.6 25% 24% 2.9 0.0 -100% -44% 6.8 6.5 -5% -3%
22 May 72.1 72.0 0% 0% 158.9 160.4 1% 1% 190.4 191.4 1% 1% 129.0 132.8 3% 3% 49.2 40.0 -19% -19% 83.4 84.8 2% 2%
22 June 88.2 91.2 3% 3% 188.6 196.5 4% 4% 235.1 244.3 4% 4% 171.8 175.1 2% 2% 59.6 49.4 -17% -17% 100.0 101.4 1% 1%
22 July 7.1 7.3 2% 1% 14.2 13.8 -3% -1% 21.2 20.1 -6% -3% 16.1 14.0 -13% -7% 3.8 0.9 -76% -21% 6.5 6.0 -8% -2%
22 August 6.0 6.0 1% 1% 12.0 11.6 -3% -3% 18.0 17.0 -6% -6% 13.7 12.0 -12% -12% 3.4 0.6 -82% -82% 5.6 5.1 -8% -8%
22 September 25.6 26.5 3% 3% 54.5 56.7 4% 4% 68.3 70.0 2% 2% 51.1 54.9 7% 7% 15.7 10.7 -32% -32% 28.4 28.7 1% 1%
22 October 9.8 9.9 0% 0% 20.2 20.0 -1% -1% 27.8 27.1 -3% -3% 21.9 21.5 -2% -2% 4.9 1.5 -69% -69% 9.6 9.4 -2% -2%
22 November 6.1 6.3 3% 3% 12.6 13.8 9% 9% 18.4 19.4 5% 5% 13.6 12.5 -8% -8% 3.9 0.9 -77% -77% 6.3 7.0 12% 12%
22 December 5.4 5.3 -1% -1% 11.1 11.3 2% 2% 16.6 16.4 -1% -1% 12.3 10.9 -12% -12% 3.4 0.7 -80% -80% 5.4 5.5 3% 3%
23 January 4.7 4.7 0% 0% 9.8 10.1 3% 3% 14.8 14.9 1% 1% 11.2 9.9 -11% -11% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 5.0 4% 4%
23 February 4.0 4.2 6% 6% 8.2 8.8 6% 6% 12.6 13.4 6% 6% 9.5 9.1 -4% -4% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.2 -2% -2%
23 March 3.7 3.7 -1% -1% 7.9 8.4 7% 7% 12.2 12.8 5% 5% 9.2 8.4 -9% -9% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 4.5 13% 13%
23 April 7.3 7.5 4% 4% 15.3 15.8 3% 2% 21.2 21.7 2% 2% 17.6 20.9 19% 19% 3.2 0.0 -100% -48% 7.7 7.6 -1% -1%
23 May 101.0 100.8 0% 0% 221.1 222.9 1% 1% 270.0 271.6 1% 1% 188.5 190.1 1% 1% 69.3 57.6 -17% -17% 115.8 117.4 1% 1%
23 June 30.4 31.6 4% 2% 63.3 65.5 4% 2% 81.0 82.7 2% 1% 59.8 61.2 2% 2% 18.9 13.8 -27% -10% 32.5 32.5 0% 0%
23 July 6.9 7.0 2% 1% 14.0 13.6 -3% -1% 20.9 19.9 -5% -2% 15.6 13.8 -12% -6% 3.8 0.9 -77% -21% 6.6 5.9 -10% -3%
23 August 5.8 5.8 0% 0% 11.8 11.4 -3% -3% 17.7 16.9 -5% -5% 13.3 11.8 -12% -12% 3.5 0.7 -80% -80% 5.6 5.2 -7% -7%
23 September 4.9 5.1 4% 4% 10.0 10.2 2% 2% 15.2 15.3 1% 1% 11.6 10.6 -9% -9% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.9 4.7 -3% -3%
23 October 6.3 6.4 1% 1% 12.9 12.7 -2% -2% 18.9 18.2 -3% -3% 15.3 15.4 0% 0% 3.2 0.2 -94% -94% 6.1 5.8 -5% -5%
23 November 4.7 4.8 3% 3% 9.6 9.9 4% 4% 14.4 14.7 2% 2% 11.1 10.3 -7% -7% 2.8 0.2 -93% -93% 4.7 4.7 0% 0%
23 December 4.2 4.2 -1% -1% 8.7 8.8 2% 2% 13.2 13.3 1% 1% 10.0 9.1 -9% -9% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 4.4 5% 5%
24 January 3.7 3.6 -1% -1% 7.8 8.0 3% 3% 12.0 12.3 3% 3% 9.0 8.3 -7% -7% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 4.1 5% 5%
24 February 3.0 3.3 10% 10% 6.4 7.3 14% 14% 9.9 11.3 14% 14% 7.4 7.7 4% 4% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.7 4% 4%
24 March 3.0 3.0 -1% -1% 6.6 6.7 2% 2% 10.1 10.5 4% 4% 7.5 7.1 -5% -5% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.5 2% 2%
24 April 5.8 6.0 3% 3% 12.2 12.5 3% 2% 17.1 17.6 3% 2% 14.3 17.8 25% 22% 2.7 0.0 -100% -41% 6.1 6.0 -2% -1%
24 May 19.9 19.8 -1% 0% 43.5 43.1 -1% 0% 51.8 50.9 -2% -1% 35.8 40.7 14% 7% 11.4 7.1 -38% -12% 22.3 22.1 -1% 0%
24 June 27.6 28.7 4% 2% 59.3 61.3 3% 2% 71.6 73.8 3% 2% 48.4 51.4 6% 4% 18.2 13.4 -26% -10% 31.3 31.1 0% 0%
24 July 6.1 6.1 1% 0% 12.7 12.1 -5% -2% 18.3 17.1 -6% -3% 13.1 11.8 -10% -5% 3.6 0.8 -78% -20% 6.2 5.5 -11% -3%
24 August 5.2 5.1 -1% -1% 10.7 10.3 -4% -4% 15.7 15.0 -4% -4% 11.5 10.3 -11% -11% 3.3 0.5 -85% -85% 5.2 4.7 -9% -9%
24 September 4.3 4.5 4% 4% 9.1 9.2 2% 2% 13.5 13.7 2% 2% 10.2 9.4 -8% -8% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.6 4.4 -6% -6%
24 October 4.1 4.0 -1% -1% 8.6 8.5 -1% -1% 12.8 12.8 0% 0% 9.9 9.0 -9% -9% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.1 -2% -2%
24 November 3.5 3.5 2% 2% 7.5 7.7 3% 3% 11.2 11.7 5% 5% 8.7 8.2 -5% -5% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 3.9 0% 0%
24 December 3.2 3.2 0% 0% 7.1 7.5 6% 6% 10.5 11.3 7% 7% 8.1 7.6 -6% -6% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 4.0 11% 11%
25 January 2.9 2.9 -1% -1% 6.5 6.7 4% 4% 9.7 10.3 6% 6% 7.3 7.0 -4% -4% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.6 6% 6%
25 February 2.4 2.7 10% 10% 5.5 6.4 18% 18% 8.1 9.7 20% 20% 6.0 6.4 8% 8% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.2 3.5 11% 11%
25 March 2.5 2.4 -1% -1% 5.6 5.9 5% 5% 8.4 9.0 7% 7% 6.0 5.9 -1% -1% 1.7 0.0 -100% -100% 3.0 3.2 7% 7%
25 April 30.1 31.0 3% 3% 66.9 69.5 4% 4% 78.9 82.2 4% 4% 53.5 62.8 18% 18% 19.8 14.4 -27% -27% 36.1 36.5 1% 1%
25 May 38.8 38.8 0% 0% 83.7 84.1 0% 0% 101.9 100.9 -1% -1% 70.2 71.7 2% 2% 24.9 19.3 -22% -15% 43.0 43.3 1% 1%
25 June 20.2 21.0 4% 2% 42.3 43.4 3% 1% 53.2 53.8 1% 0% 40.0 41.8 5% 2% 12.0 8.0 -34% -8% 21.7 21.3 -2% -1%
25 July 6.2 6.2 1% 0% 12.8 12.2 -4% -1% 18.7 17.7 -5% -2% 13.9 12.5 -11% -5% 3.6 0.8 -77% -20% 6.2 5.5 -11% -3%
25 August 5.2 5.2 0% 0% 10.8 10.3 -4% -4% 16.0 15.3 -4% -4% 12.1 10.7 -12% -12% 3.2 0.6 -81% -81% 5.2 4.7 -9% -9%
25 September 4.8 5.0 4% 4% 9.8 9.9 1% 1% 14.6 14.8 1% 1% 11.4 10.6 -7% -7% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 4.6 -5% -5%
25 October 7.3 7.3 0% 0% 15.2 15.0 -2% -2% 21.3 20.7 -2% -2% 17.3 18.4 7% 7% 3.4 0.2 -94% -94% 7.3 7.0 -4% -4%
25 November 4.7 4.8 3% 3% 9.7 10.2 5% 5% 14.2 14.8 4% 4% 11.0 10.2 -7% -7% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.9 5.0 4% 4%
25 December 4.1 4.1 0% 0% 8.7 8.7 0% 0% 12.9 13.1 1% 1% 9.9 9.0 -9% -9% 2.7 0.2 -92% -92% 4.4 4.3 -1% -1%
26 January 3.6 3.6 -1% -1% 7.8 8.0 3% 3% 11.6 12.1 4% 4% 8.9 8.2 -8% -8% 2.4 0.1 -96% -96% 4.0 4.2 6% 6%
26 February 2.9 3.2 10% 10% 6.4 7.3 14% 14% 9.6 11.1 16% 16% 7.4 7.6 4% 4% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 3.8 3% 3%
26 March 3.0 2.9 -1% -1% 6.6 7.1 8% 8% 9.8 10.6 8% 8% 7.3 7.0 -4% -4% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.9 13% 13%
26 April 10.3 10.6 3% 3% 22.7 23.2 2% 2% 29.0 29.4 2% 2% 22.0 28.2 29% 29% 5.2 1.7 -67% -52% 11.9 11.6 -2% -2%
26 May 28.5 28.5 0% 0% 62.0 61.8 0% 0% 73.0 73.0 0% 0% 49.1 52.0 6% 4% 18.4 13.5 -27% -13% 31.9 31.8 0% 0%
26 June 15.4 16.0 4% 1% 32.5 33.1 2% 1% 40.3 40.4 0% 0% 29.0 30.5 5% 2% 9.1 5.3 -42% -8% 16.7 16.2 -3% -1%
26 July 5.9 5.9 0% 0% 12.4 11.9 -5% -1% 17.8 16.8 -6% -2% 12.9 11.5 -11% -5% 3.7 0.9 -76% -20% 6.1 5.5 -10% -3%
26 August 5.0 5.0 0% 0% 10.5 10.0 -4% -4% 15.2 14.7 -4% -4% 11.3 10.1 -11% -11% 3.3 0.5 -85% -85% 5.1 4.7 -9% -9%
26 September 5.9 6.1 4% 4% 12.3 12.4 1% 1% 17.3 17.5 1% 1% 13.8 14.3 4% 4% 3.4 0.4 -88% -88% 6.2 5.8 -6% -6%
26 October 8.5 8.5 0% 0% 18.1 17.9 -1% -1% 24.2 23.8 -2% -2% 19.5 20.8 7% 7% 4.1 0.6 -85% -85% 8.9 8.8 -2% -2%
26 November 4.9 5.1 3% 3% 10.5 11.1 5% 5% 14.9 15.7 6% 6% 11.2 10.5 -6% -6% 3.4 0.6 -82% -82% 5.5 5.6 3% 3%
26 December 4.4 4.4 0% 0% 9.5 9.9 4% 4% 13.5 14.1 4% 4% 10.1 9.1 -10% -10% 3.1 0.5 -84% -84% 4.9 5.2 7% 7%
27 January 3.9 3.9 0% 0% 8.4 8.7 3% 3% 12.1 12.7 5% 5% 9.1 8.3 -9% -9% 2.7 0.2 -93% -93% 4.3 4.5 4% 4%
27 February 3.3 3.5 6% 6% 7.1 7.8 10% 10% 10.4 11.6 12% 12% 7.8 7.8 0% 0% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.0 4.1 5% 5%
27 March 3.2 3.1 -1% -1% 7.1 7.6 8% 8% 10.3 11.2 9% 9% 7.5 7.1 -5% -5% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 4.2 14% 14%
27 April 17.8 18.2 3% 3% 39.2 40.5 3% 3% 47.0 48.1 2% 2% 33.0 40.2 22% 22% 10.9 6.4 -41% -41% 20.9 21.0 0% 0%
27 May 71.2 71.3 0% 0% 155.5 157.1 1% 1% 188.9 190.2 1% 1% 129.5 130.4 1% 1% 48.7 39.9 -18% -18% 81.2 82.5 2% 2%
27 June 57.5 59.5 3% 3% 122.4 127.3 4% 4% 153.4 158.9 4% 4% 112.3 114.6 2% 2% 38.3 30.8 -20% -15% 64.6 65.1 1% 1%
27 July 6.9 7.0 2% 1% 14.0 13.7 -2% -1% 20.9 20.0 -5% -2% 15.6 13.8 -12% -6% 3.8 0.9 -76% -21% 6.6 6.1 -8% -2%
27 August 5.8 5.7 0% 0% 11.7 11.3 -3% -3% 17.6 16.7 -5% -5% 13.3 11.7 -12% -12% 3.4 0.7 -79% -79% 5.5 5.1 -7% -7%
27 September 4.9 5.0 3% 3% 9.9 10.0 1% 1% 15.0 14.9 -1% -1% 11.6 10.6 -9% -9% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 4.5 -6% -6%
27 October 5.6 5.6 0% 0% 11.3 11.0 -2% -2% 16.8 16.2 -4% -4% 13.6 13.1 -3% -3% 3.0 0.2 -93% -93% 5.3 5.1 -5% -5%
27 November 4.5 4.6 3% 3% 9.1 9.6 6% 6% 13.8 14.3 3% 3% 10.8 10.1 -6% -6% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.5 4.7 4% 4%
27 December 4.0 4.0 0% 0% 8.3 8.6 4% 4% 12.7 13.0 2% 2% 9.7 8.9 -8% -8% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 4.2 5% 5%
28 January 3.6 3.5 -1% -1% 7.5 8.0 6% 6% 11.6 12.1 5% 5% 8.7 8.1 -7% -7% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 4.2 12% 12%
28 February 2.9 3.1 10% 10% 6.2 7.2 17% 17% 9.6 11.1 16% 16% 7.2 7.6 5% 5% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.8 10% 10%
28 March 2.9 2.8 -1% -1% 6.4 6.5 2% 2% 9.7 10.1 4% 4% 7.4 6.9 -6% -6% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.4 3% 3%
28 April 3.4 3.5 4% 2% 7.3 7.5 2% 1% 10.8 11.3 4% 2% 8.3 9.2 11% 6% 2.1 0.0 -100% -30% 3.8 3.7 -4% -1%
28 May 36.5 36.4 0% 0% 80.7 81.0 0% 0% 96.0 96.3 0% 0% 64.8 71.6 10% 10% 23.5 17.4 -26% -16% 42.1 42.4 1% 1%
28 June 74.7 77.2 3% 3% 161.7 168.3 4% 4% 199.1 206.4 4% 4% 142.4 147.2 3% 3% 51.3 42.3 -17% -17% 86.5 87.6 1% 1%
28 July 6.6 6.7 2% 1% 13.0 12.6 -3% -1% 19.5 18.5 -5% -2% 14.5 13.1 -10% -5% 3.3 0.6 -82% -20% 5.9 5.4 -9% -3%
28 August 5.6 5.6 1% 1% 11.1 10.8 -3% -3% 16.8 16.0 -5% -5% 12.9 11.4 -11% -11% 3.1 0.5 -84% -84% 5.1 4.7 -8% -8%
28 September 5.3 5.4 3% 3% 10.5 10.6 1% 1% 15.8 15.7 -1% -1% 12.5 11.9 -5% -5% 3.0 0.3 -90% -90% 5.0 4.8 -5% -5%
28 October 9.0 9.0 0% 0% 18.5 18.2 -1% -1% 25.5 24.6 -4% -4% 21.3 23.0 8% 8% 3.7 0.2 -95% -95% 8.8 8.5 -3% -3%
28 November 5.2 5.4 3% 3% 10.6 10.9 3% 3% 15.5 15.8 2% 2% 12.0 11.2 -7% -7% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 5.1 5.1 0% 0%
28 December 4.6 4.7 1% 1% 9.6 10.0 5% 5% 14.2 14.6 3% 3% 10.8 9.8 -10% -10% 2.9 0.4 -86% -86% 4.7 5.0 8% 8%
29 January 4.1 4.1 0% 0% 8.6 8.9 3% 3% 12.8 13.2 3% 3% 9.7 8.9 -9% -9% 2.6 0.2 -92% -92% 4.2 4.4 5% 5%
29 February 3.6 4.0 10% 10% 7.6 8.4 10% 10% 11.3 12.6 11% 11% 8.6 9.0 5% 5% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 4.1 -1% -1%
29 March 10.1 10.0 0% 0% 21.8 21.6 -1% -1% 28.4 27.9 -2% -2% 22.2 26.3 18% 18% 4.8 1.2 -75% -75% 10.9 10.7 -1% -1%
29 April 28.5 29.5 3% 3% 61.7 63.9 3% 3% 73.4 75.8 3% 3% 49.7 54.2 9% 9% 19.1 13.9 -27% -27% 32.7 32.8 0% 0%
29 May 17.1 17.2 1% 0% 36.2 35.8 -1% 0% 45.4 44.3 -2% -1% 32.7 33.1 1% 1% 10.1 6.1 -39% -11% 18.1 17.6 -3% -1%
29 June 7.8 8.1 4% 1% 16.7 16.8 1% 0% 23.0 22.8 -1% 0% 17.5 17.6 1% 0% 4.6 1.3 -72% -7% 8.5 8.0 -5% -1%
29 July 6.1 6.0 0% 0% 12.7 12.2 -4% -1% 18.2 17.4 -4% -2% 13.4 12.1 -10% -4% 3.9 1.0 -75% -21% 6.3 5.8 -8% -2%
29 August 5.1 5.1 0% 0% 10.8 10.4 -3% -3% 15.7 15.3 -2% -2% 11.8 10.7 -10% -10% 3.5 0.5 -86% -86% 5.4 4.9 -8% -8%
29 September 4.4 4.5 3% 3% 9.3 9.4 1% 1% 13.6 14.0 3% 3% 10.4 9.7 -6% -6% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 4.5 -6% -6%
29 October 8.8 8.8 0% 0% 18.7 18.4 -1% -1% 24.9 24.6 -1% -1% 20.1 22.5 12% 12% 4.1 0.5 -88% -88% 9.2 9.0 -2% -2%
29 November 5.1 5.3 4% 4% 10.8 11.4 5% 5% 15.3 16.1 5% 5% 11.6 11.1 -4% -4% 3.3 0.5 -85% -85% 5.5 5.7 4% 4%
29 December 4.6 4.5 -1% -1% 9.8 10.0 1% 1% 13.9 14.3 3% 3% 10.4 9.5 -8% -8% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 5.0 5.1 2% 2%
30 January 4.0 4.0 0% 0% 8.7 8.9 3% 3% 12.4 13.0 5% 5% 9.3 8.6 -7% -7% 2.8 0.2 -93% -93% 4.5 4.7 5% 5%
30 February 3.3 3.6 11% 11% 7.1 8.0 12% 12% 10.3 11.8 15% 15% 7.7 8.0 5% 5% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 4.1 1% 1%
30 March 3.3 3.3 0% 0% 7.3 7.5 3% 3% 10.5 11.1 6% 6% 7.7 7.4 -4% -4% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 4.0 4% 4%
30 April 14.5 14.9 3% 3% 31.8 32.8 3% 3% 38.8 39.9 3% 3% 27.8 34.7 25% 25% 8.4 4.2 -50% -50% 16.8 16.9 1% 1%
30 May 33.3 33.4 0% 0% 72.0 72.3 0% 0% 86.1 86.3 0% 0% 56.9 59.0 4% 3% 21.8 16.4 -25% -14% 37.0 37.1 0% 0%
30 June 31.0 32.1 3% 2% 66.5 68.6 3% 2% 82.2 83.5 2% 1% 58.4 60.6 4% 3% 20.6 15.4 -25% -11% 35.1 34.9 -1% 0%
30 July 6.5 6.6 1% 0% 13.7 13.2 -4% -1% 19.6 18.7 -5% -2% 14.5 13.0 -10% -5% 3.9 0.9 -77% -21% 6.7 6.0 -9% -3%
30 August 5.5 5.5 0% 0% 11.4 11.0 -3% -3% 16.7 16.2 -3% -3% 12.5 11.2 -11% -11% 3.5 0.7 -80% -80% 5.6 5.1 -9% -9%
30 September 4.7 4.8 3% 3% 9.7 9.8 1% 1% 14.4 14.6 1% 1% 11.0 10.2 -8% -8% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.9 4.6 -6% -6%
30 October 5.0 5.0 0% 0% 10.3 10.1 -2% -2% 15.2 15.0 -1% -1% 12.0 11.4 -5% -5% 3.0 0.2 -93% -93% 5.0 4.8 -4% -4%
30 November 4.2 4.3 3% 3% 8.7 8.9 3% 3% 12.9 13.4 4% 4% 10.1 9.6 -5% -5% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.4 4.3 -3% -3%
30 December 3.7 3.7 -1% -1% 8.0 8.1 1% 1% 11.9 12.2 3% 3% 9.2 8.5 -7% -7% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 4.0 1% 1%
31 January 3.3 3.3 0% 0% 7.2 8.0 11% 11% 10.8 12.0 11% 11% 8.3 7.9 -6% -6% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 4.5 21% 21%
31 February 2.8 3.0 7% 7% 6.3 7.4 18% 18% 9.3 11.1 19% 19% 7.1 7.3 3% 3% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 4.1 18% 18%
31 March 2.8 2.7 -1% -1% 6.2 6.5 4% 4% 9.3 9.9 7% 7% 6.8 6.7 -2% -2% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.5 7% 7%
31 April 24.2 24.9 3% 3% 53.5 55.5 4% 4% 63.2 65.9 4% 4% 44.1 52.9 20% 20% 15.3 10.2 -33% -33% 28.6 29.0 1% 1%
31 May 73.5 73.6 0% 0% 160.0 161.4 1% 1% 195.6 196.3 0% 0% 136.4 137.2 1% 1% 49.5 40.8 -18% -18% 83.3 84.4 1% 1%
31 June 41.6 43.1 4% 3% 87.9 91.3 4% 3% 110.8 114.3 3% 3% 81.9 83.8 2% 2% 26.8 20.9 -22% -12% 45.9 46.2 1% 0%
31 July 6.8 6.8 1% 1% 13.7 13.3 -4% -1% 20.4 19.4 -5% -2% 15.3 13.6 -11% -6% 3.7 0.9 -76% -20% 6.5 5.8 -10% -3%
31 August 5.7 5.7 -1% -1% 11.6 11.2 -3% -3% 17.4 16.5 -5% -5% 13.1 11.6 -12% -12% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.4 5.0 -8% -8%
31 September 4.8 4.9 3% 3% 9.7 9.9 2% 2% 14.8 14.8 0% 0% 11.5 10.5 -9% -9% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 4.6 -3% -3%
31 October 4.4 4.4 -1% -1% 8.9 8.8 -1% -1% 13.8 13.5 -2% -2% 10.7 9.6 -11% -11% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.1 -3% -3%
31 November 3.8 3.9 2% 2% 7.8 8.1 3% 3% 12.2 12.5 3% 3% 9.5 8.9 -6% -6% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 3.9 0% 0%
31 December 3.5 3.5 -1% -1% 7.4 7.5 2% 2% 11.5 11.7 1% 1% 8.8 8.1 -8% -8% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.7 3% 3%
32 January 3.1 3.1 -1% -1% 6.7 7.0 6% 6% 10.5 11.0 5% 5% 8.0 7.5 -6% -6% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.7 9% 9%
32 February 2.5 2.7 9% 9% 5.5 6.7 20% 20% 8.7 10.4 20% 20% 6.5 6.9 5% 5% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.2 3.7 17% 17%
32 March 2.5 2.5 0% 0% 5.7 5.9 3% 3% 8.9 9.3 5% 5% 6.5 6.4 -3% -3% 1.7 0.0 -100% -100% 3.0 3.1 3% 3%
32 April 8.2 8.4 3% 3% 17.8 18.4 3% 3% 23.8 24.4 3% 3% 19.3 25.7 33% 33% 3.4 0.3 -91% -45% 9.2 9.1 0% 0%
32 May 41.7 41.7 0% 0% 91.4 91.8 0% 0% 108.3 108.5 0% 0% 71.4 74.9 5% 5% 27.8 21.8 -21% -16% 47.6 47.9 1% 1%
32 June 39.3 40.7 3% 3% 84.6 87.7 4% 3% 104.2 107.1 3% 2% 75.3 78.2 4% 4% 26.2 20.4 -22% -12% 44.8 45.1 1% 0%
32 July 6.3 6.4 2% 1% 12.9 12.4 -3% -1% 19.0 18.1 -5% -2% 14.1 12.6 -10% -5% 3.5 0.8 -77% -19% 6.1 5.5 -10% -3%
32 August 5.4 5.3 -1% -1% 10.9 10.4 -4% -4% 16.3 15.6 -5% -5% 12.4 11.0 -11% -11% 3.2 0.6 -81% -81% 5.1 4.7 -9% -9%
32 September 4.5 4.7 4% 4% 9.2 9.3 1% 1% 14.0 14.0 0% 0% 10.8 9.9 -8% -8% 2.8 0.3 -89% -89% 4.5 4.3 -6% -6%
32 October 4.6 4.6 0% 0% 9.3 9.1 -2% -2% 14.1 13.8 -2% -2% 11.2 10.3 -8% -8% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.4 4.2 -4% -4%
32 November 3.9 4.0 2% 2% 8.0 8.6 8% 8% 12.2 13.0 7% 7% 9.6 9.1 -5% -5% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 4.3 8% 8%
32 December 3.5 3.5 -1% -1% 7.4 7.8 6% 6% 11.4 12.0 5% 5% 8.8 8.2 -6% -6% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 4.0 10% 10%
33 January 3.1 3.1 0% 0% 6.7 7.1 5% 5% 10.3 10.9 6% 6% 8.0 7.5 -5% -5% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.8 9% 9%
33 February 2.5 2.8 9% 9% 5.6 6.7 19% 19% 8.6 10.2 20% 20% 6.5 7.0 7% 7% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.2 3.6 13% 13%
33 March 2.6 2.5 0% 0% 5.8 6.5 12% 12% 8.8 9.8 12% 12% 6.5 6.4 -2% -2% 1.8 0.0 -100% -100% 3.1 3.7 21% 21%
33 April 29.3 30.2 3% 3% 65.2 67.8 4% 4% 77.1 80.4 4% 4% 53.0 62.3 18% 18% 19.1 13.8 -28% -28% 35.2 35.7 1% 1%
33 May 72.7 72.7 0% 0% 158.0 159.4 1% 1% 193.5 194.3 0% 0% 136.5 137.2 1% 1% 48.6 40.0 -18% -18% 82.1 83.3 1% 1%
33 June 91.8 94.9 3% 3% 195.9 204.2 4% 4% 245.8 254.9 4% 4% 181.2 183.6 1% 1% 61.8 51.4 -17% -17% 103.7 105.2 1% 1%
33 July 6.9 7.1 2% 1% 13.7 13.5 -2% -1% 20.9 19.8 -5% -2% 15.9 13.9 -12% -6% 3.6 0.8 -78% -20% 6.3 5.8 -7% -2%
33 August 5.7 5.7 1% 1% 11.4 11.1 -3% -3% 17.4 16.5 -5% -5% 13.4 11.8 -12% -12% 3.2 0.6 -81% -81% 5.3 4.9 -7% -7%
33 September 4.8 5.0 4% 4% 9.6 9.8 2% 2% 14.8 14.8 -1% -1% 11.6 10.6 -9% -9% 2.8 0.3 -89% -89% 4.6 4.4 -5% -5%
33 October 6.8 6.8 0% 0% 13.8 13.5 -2% -2% 20.1 19.3 -4% -4% 16.7 17.2 3% 3% 3.2 0.2 -94% -94% 6.5 6.2 -5% -5%
33 November 4.7 4.8 4% 4% 9.4 10.0 7% 7% 14.3 14.8 4% 4% 11.1 10.3 -7% -7% 2.7 0.2 -92% -92% 4.6 4.8 6% 6%
33 December 4.2 4.1 -1% -1% 8.5 8.6 1% 1% 13.2 13.1 -1% -1% 10.0 9.1 -9% -9% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 4.1 1% 1%
34 January 3.7 3.6 -1% -1% 7.6 7.9 3% 3% 11.9 12.1 2% 2% 9.0 8.3 -7% -7% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 4.0 6% 6%
34 February 2.9 3.2 10% 10% 6.3 7.4 18% 18% 9.8 11.4 16% 16% 7.4 7.7 5% 5% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.9 11% 11%
34 March 2.9 2.9 -1% -1% 6.4 6.6 4% 4% 9.9 10.3 4% 4% 7.4 7.1 -4% -4% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.5 6% 6%
34 April 14.2 14.6 3% 3% 31.6 32.3 2% 2% 39.3 39.7 1% 1% 29.1 36.5 26% 26% 8.0 4.1 -49% -49% 16.8 16.5 -2% -2%
34 May 32.5 32.6 0% 0% 70.2 70.3 0% 0% 84.2 84.0 0% 0% 56.5 58.7 4% 3% 21.0 15.9 -24% -14% 36.0 36.0 0% 0%
34 June 15.8 16.4 4% 1% 33.2 34.1 2% 1% 41.9 42.2 1% 0% 30.8 32.3 5% 2% 9.3 5.4 -42% -8% 17.0 16.6 -2% -1%
34 July 6.0 6.0 0% 0% 12.4 11.9 -4% -1% 18.2 17.2 -5% -2% 13.3 12.0 -10% -4% 3.6 0.9 -75% -19% 6.0 5.5 -9% -3%
34 August 5.0 5.0 -1% -1% 10.5 10.0 -4% -4% 15.6 14.9 -4% -4% 11.6 10.4 -10% -10% 3.2 0.6 -81% -81% 5.1 4.6 -9% -9%
34 September 4.6 4.7 4% 4% 9.5 9.6 2% 2% 14.1 14.5 3% 3% 10.9 10.3 -5% -5% 3.0 0.4 -86% -86% 4.8 4.5 -4% -4%
34 October 7.2 7.2 0% 0% 15.1 14.8 -2% -2% 21.0 20.5 -2% -2% 17.0 18.5 8% 8% 3.4 0.2 -94% -94% 7.3 7.0 -4% -4%
34 November 4.5 4.7 3% 3% 9.6 9.8 3% 3% 13.9 14.4 4% 4% 10.6 10.1 -5% -5% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.9 4.8 -1% -1%
34 December 4.0 4.0 0% 0% 8.6 8.9 3% 3% 12.6 13.1 4% 4% 9.6 8.8 -8% -8% 2.7 0.2 -93% -93% 4.4 4.6 4% 4%
35 January 3.5 3.5 -1% -1% 7.7 8.1 5% 5% 11.3 12.1 7% 7% 8.7 8.1 -6% -6% 2.4 0.1 -96% -96% 4.0 4.3 9% 9%
35 February 3.0 3.2 7% 7% 6.6 7.9 20% 20% 9.8 11.6 19% 19% 7.3 7.5 3% 3% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 4.5 22% 22%
35 March 5.5 5.5 0% 0% 11.4 11.7 3% 3% 15.9 16.4 3% 3% 13.1 15.2 16% 16% 2.7 0.0 -100% -100% 5.4 5.8 7% 7%
35 April 39.1 40.4 3% 3% 86.6 90.0 4% 4% 102.7 106.6 4% 4% 67.6 75.1 11% 11% 27.0 20.5 -24% -24% 46.9 47.4 1% 1%
35 May 67.3 67.3 0% 0% 145.6 146.6 1% 1% 179.3 179.9 0% 0% 128.4 128.3 0% 0% 44.9 36.6 -18% -18% 75.4 76.2 1% 1%
35 June 32.6 33.7 4% 2% 68.4 70.6 3% 2% 87.0 89.2 2% 2% 64.6 66.0 2% 2% 20.7 15.4 -25% -11% 35.4 35.2 -1% 0%
35 July 6.9 7.0 1% 0% 14.3 13.7 -4% -1% 21.0 20.0 -5% -2% 15.6 14.0 -10% -5% 4.0 1.0 -75% -21% 6.8 6.2 -10% -3%
35 August 5.8 5.8 0% 0% 11.9 11.5 -3% -3% 17.7 16.9 -5% -5% 13.3 11.8 -11% -11% 3.5 0.7 -80% -80% 5.7 5.2 -9% -9%
35 September 28.5 29.4 3% 3% 61.2 63.6 4% 4% 76.4 78.7 3% 3% 56.1 60.3 7% 7% 18.1 12.8 -29% -29% 32.2 32.6 1% 1%
35 October 13.6 13.7 0% 0% 28.3 28.2 0% 0% 37.2 36.8 -1% -1% 28.6 28.5 0% 0% 7.3 3.6 -51% -51% 13.8 13.7 0% 0%
35 November 6.1 6.3 3% 3% 12.7 13.3 5% 5% 18.8 19.2 2% 2% 13.7 12.7 -7% -7% 3.9 0.9 -77% -77% 6.4 6.6 2% 2%
35 December 5.4 5.4 0% 0% 11.2 11.3 1% 1% 16.7 16.6 -1% -1% 12.3 11.0 -10% -10% 3.5 0.7 -80% -80% 5.5 5.6 2% 2%
36 January 4.7 4.7 0% 0% 9.9 10.1 3% 3% 14.9 15.1 1% 1% 11.2 10.1 -10% -10% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 5.1 5% 5%
36 February 3.8 4.2 10% 10% 8.0 9.0 13% 13% 12.2 13.7 13% 13% 9.3 9.3 0% 0% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.4 4.5 4% 4%
36 March 4.2 4.2 0% 0% 8.8 8.7 -1% -1% 13.4 13.4 0% 0% 10.4 9.8 -5% -5% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.2 -3% -3%
36 April 17.8 18.2 3% 3% 39.0 40.1 3% 3% 47.7 48.7 2% 2% 35.2 41.4 18% 18% 10.7 6.2 -42% -42% 20.7 20.6 -1% -1%
36 May 60.4 60.5 0% 0% 131.6 132.9 1% 1% 161.9 162.5 0% 0% 112.2 112.8 1% 1% 41.0 33.1 -19% -19% 68.4 69.5 2% 2%
36 June 37.8 39.1 4% 3% 80.2 83.3 4% 3% 101.4 105.0 4% 3% 74.5 76.6 3% 3% 24.7 18.8 -24% -12% 42.0 42.3 1% 0%
36 July 7.0 7.1 1% 1% 14.4 14.0 -3% -1% 21.3 20.5 -4% -2% 15.8 14.2 -10% -5% 4.0 1.0 -75% -22% 6.9 6.3 -9% -3%
36 August 5.9 5.9 0% 0% 12.2 11.9 -2% -2% 18.1 17.5 -3% -3% 13.5 12.1 -10% -10% 3.6 0.7 -81% -81% 5.9 5.6 -5% -5%
36 September 5.8 6.0 3% 3% 11.9 12.0 1% 1% 17.5 17.5 0% 0% 13.6 13.3 -3% -3% 3.4 0.5 -85% -85% 5.9 5.6 -5% -5%
36 October 7.1 7.1 0% 0% 14.6 14.3 -2% -2% 20.7 20.1 -3% -3% 16.5 16.7 1% 1% 3.6 0.4 -89% -89% 6.9 6.6 -4% -4%
36 November 5.2 5.3 3% 3% 10.6 11.2 5% 5% 15.6 16.2 4% 4% 12.1 11.5 -5% -5% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 5.3 5.5 4% 4%
36 December 4.6 4.6 0% 0% 9.6 10.1 5% 5% 14.2 14.8 4% 4% 10.9 10.1 -7% -7% 2.9 0.2 -93% -93% 4.7 5.1 10% 10%
37 January 4.1 4.0 -1% -1% 8.6 8.7 2% 2% 12.8 13.2 3% 3% 9.8 9.2 -6% -6% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 4.4 4% 4%
37 February 3.3 3.6 10% 10% 7.0 8.1 14% 14% 10.6 12.3 16% 16% 8.1 8.5 6% 6% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 4.2 5% 5%
37 March 3.3 3.3 0% 0% 7.2 7.3 1% 1% 10.8 11.2 4% 4% 8.1 7.9 -3% -3% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 3.7 0% 0%
37 April 29.7 30.6 3% 3% 65.5 68.1 4% 4% 78.2 81.2 4% 4% 53.7 62.1 16% 16% 19.5 13.9 -29% -29% 35.2 35.6 1% 1%
37 May 59.6 59.6 0% 0% 129.4 130.7 1% 1% 159.1 159.5 0% 0% 112.0 112.7 1% 1% 39.7 32.1 -19% -19% 67.1 68.2 2% 2%
37 June 37.5 38.8 4% 3% 79.2 82.1 4% 3% 100.0 103.3 3% 2% 73.8 75.8 3% 2% 24.1 18.4 -24% -12% 41.3 41.5 0% 0%
37 July 6.9 7.0 1% 1% 14.1 13.6 -4% -1% 20.9 19.9 -5% -2% 15.5 14.0 -10% -5% 3.9 0.9 -77% -21% 6.7 6.0 -10% -3%
37 August 5.8 5.7 0% 0% 11.8 11.4 -4% -4% 17.7 16.9 -5% -5% 13.2 11.9 -10% -10% 3.5 0.7 -80% -80% 5.7 5.2 -8% -8%
37 September 4.9 5.0 2% 2% 10.0 10.1 1% 1% 15.2 15.1 0% 0% 11.6 10.8 -7% -7% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.9 4.7 -5% -5%
37 October 4.9 4.9 1% 1% 9.9 9.8 -1% -1% 15.1 14.7 -2% -2% 11.8 10.9 -8% -8% 2.9 0.2 -93% -93% 4.7 4.5 -4% -4%
37 November 4.2 4.3 2% 2% 8.6 9.4 10% 10% 13.1 14.1 7% 7% 10.2 9.7 -4% -4% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.8 12% 12%
37 December 3.8 3.8 -1% -1% 8.0 8.6 8% 8% 12.3 13.0 6% 6% 9.4 8.8 -6% -6% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 4.5 15% 15%
38 January 3.4 3.4 0% 0% 7.2 7.9 9% 9% 11.2 12.0 8% 8% 8.5 8.1 -5% -5% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 4.2 16% 16%
38 February 2.7 3.0 11% 11% 6.0 6.9 15% 15% 9.3 10.8 16% 16% 7.0 7.5 8% 8% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.7 7% 7%
38 March 2.8 2.8 -1% -1% 6.2 6.5 5% 5% 9.5 10.0 6% 6% 7.0 6.9 -1% -1% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.2 3.5 8% 8%
38 April 56.9 58.7 3% 3% 126.1 131.6 4% 4% 151.2 157.1 4% 4% 103.0 113.3 10% 10% 39.6 31.5 -20% -20% 68.4 69.8 2% 2%
38 May 56.9 57.1 0% 0% 121.8 122.9 1% 1% 151.2 152.2 1% 1% 110.2 110.8 0% 0% 36.5 29.4 -19% -19% 62.3 63.2 1% 1%
38 June 66.6 68.8 3% 3% 141.7 147.5 4% 4% 178.8 184.7 3% 3% 131.7 134.0 2% 2% 44.2 36.1 -18% -17% 74.7 75.6 1% 1%
38 July 11.6 11.8 1% 1% 23.4 23.0 -2% -1% 32.5 31.2 -4% -3% 26.0 25.2 -3% -3% 5.5 2.0 -64% -25% 11.0 10.4 -5% -3%
38 August 6.6 6.6 0% 0% 13.5 13.1 -3% -3% 20.0 19.0 -5% -5% 15.0 13.5 -10% -10% 3.9 0.9 -77% -77% 6.4 5.9 -8% -8%
38 September 5.5 5.6 3% 3% 11.1 11.2 1% 1% 16.7 16.5 -1% -1% 12.6 11.7 -7% -7% 3.4 0.7 -80% -80% 5.5 5.1 -6% -6%
38 October 9.1 9.0 0% 0% 19.0 18.8 -1% -1% 26.3 25.3 -3% -3% 21.7 23.0 6% 6% 4.2 0.7 -83% -83% 9.2 9.0 -2% -2%
38 November 5.4 5.5 3% 3% 11.1 11.5 4% 4% 16.4 16.7 2% 2% 12.3 11.4 -7% -7% 3.4 0.6 -82% -82% 5.5 5.6 1% 1%
38 December 4.8 4.8 0% 0% 10.1 10.1 0% 0% 15.0 14.9 -1% -1% 11.2 10.2 -9% -9% 3.2 0.5 -84% -84% 4.9 4.9 -1% -1%
39 January 4.3 4.3 -1% -1% 8.9 8.9 0% 0% 13.5 13.5 0% 0% 10.1 9.3 -8% -8% 2.8 0.2 -93% -93% 4.4 4.3 -1% -1%
39 February 3.5 3.7 6% 6% 7.5 8.2 10% 10% 11.5 12.6 10% 10% 8.5 8.5 0% 0% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.0 4.2 4% 4%
39 March 3.3 3.3 0% 0% 7.3 7.4 2% 2% 11.2 11.5 3% 3% 8.3 7.9 -5% -5% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 3.8 3% 3%
39 April 9.9 10.2 3% 3% 21.6 22.1 2% 2% 28.1 28.6 2% 2% 21.6 27.2 26% 26% 4.9 1.3 -74% -54% 11.1 11.0 -2% -2%
39 May 17.2 17.2 0% 0% 37.0 36.6 -1% 0% 44.6 43.7 -2% -1% 31.2 33.8 8% 4% 10.3 6.3 -39% -11% 18.7 18.4 -2% -1%
39 June 26.5 27.5 4% 2% 57.0 58.9 3% 2% 69.5 71.8 3% 2% 46.8 49.7 6% 4% 17.7 12.9 -27% -10% 30.0 30.0 0% 0%
39 July 6.1 6.2 1% 0% 12.9 12.5 -4% -1% 18.7 17.8 -5% -2% 13.3 12.1 -9% -4% 3.8 0.9 -76% -21% 6.3 5.8 -9% -3%
39 August 5.2 5.2 1% 1% 10.9 10.6 -3% -3% 15.9 15.5 -3% -3% 11.6 10.5 -9% -9% 3.4 0.7 -79% -79% 5.3 4.9 -8% -8%
39 September 4.5 4.7 4% 4% 9.5 9.7 2% 2% 14.0 14.3 2% 2% 10.6 10.1 -5% -5% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 4.6 -4% -4%
39 October 4.3 4.3 0% 0% 9.1 8.9 -2% -2% 13.4 13.4 0% 0% 10.6 9.7 -9% -9% 2.8 0.2 -93% -93% 4.5 4.3 -4% -4%
39 November 3.6 3.7 3% 3% 7.8 8.4 7% 7% 11.6 12.6 8% 8% 9.0 8.7 -3% -3% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 4.3 6% 6%
39 December 3.3 3.3 0% 0% 7.3 7.4 1% 1% 10.9 11.3 4% 4% 8.4 8.1 -4% -4% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 3.8 1% 1%
40 January 3.0 3.0 0% 0% 6.8 6.9 2% 2% 10.1 10.6 5% 5% 7.5 7.4 -1% -1% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.7 3% 3%
40 February 2.5 2.8 10% 10% 5.7 6.8 20% 20% 8.4 10.2 21% 21% 6.2 6.9 11% 11% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.7 13% 13%
40 March 2.6 2.6 0% 0% 5.9 6.3 7% 7% 8.7 9.5 9% 9% 6.2 6.3 2% 2% 1.8 0.0 -100% -100% 3.1 3.5 11% 11%
40 April 4.0 4.1 3% 2% 8.6 8.8 3% 1% 12.1 12.7 5% 2% 9.6 12.0 25% 15% 2.2 0.0 -100% -33% 4.4 4.3 -1% 0%
40 May 72.9 72.8 0% 0% 161.3 162.9 1% 1% 193.0 194.4 1% 1% 131.3 137.1 4% 4% 49.3 40.2 -19% -19% 84.8 86.3 2% 2%
40 June 56.5 58.5 4% 4% 120.2 125.2 4% 4% 149.5 155.0 4% 4% 109.1 112.7 3% 3% 37.1 29.9 -19% -15% 63.2 64.0 1% 1%
40 July 6.6 6.7 2% 1% 13.1 12.7 -3% -1% 19.5 18.5 -5% -2% 14.8 13.2 -10% -5% 3.4 0.7 -79% -19% 6.0 5.4 -9% -2%
40 August 5.6 5.5 -1% -1% 11.1 10.7 -4% -4% 16.8 15.8 -6% -6% 12.9 11.5 -10% -10% 3.1 0.5 -84% -84% 5.1 4.7 -9% -9%
40 September 5.2 5.4 3% 3% 10.4 10.5 1% 1% 15.7 15.5 -1% -1% 12.5 11.8 -5% -5% 3.0 0.3 -90% -90% 4.9 4.7 -5% -5%
40 October 4.8 4.8 0% 0% 9.7 9.5 -2% -2% 14.8 14.2 -4% -4% 11.7 10.8 -8% -8% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.5 4.3 -5% -5%
40 November 4.1 4.3 3% 3% 8.3 9.0 8% 8% 12.8 13.5 5% 5% 10.0 9.6 -4% -4% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.1 4.5 9% 9%
40 December 3.8 3.8 -1% -1% 7.8 8.2 5% 5% 12.1 12.4 3% 3% 9.3 8.8 -5% -5% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 4.2 11% 11%
41 January 3.4 3.3 -1% -1% 7.1 7.4 5% 5% 11.0 11.4 3% 3% 8.4 8.0 -4% -4% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.8 9% 9%
41 February 2.7 3.0 10% 10% 5.9 6.9 18% 18% 9.1 10.6 17% 17% 6.9 7.4 8% 8% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.7 12% 12%
41 March 2.7 2.7 -1% -1% 6.0 6.3 4% 4% 9.3 9.7 5% 5% 6.9 6.8 -1% -1% 1.8 0.0 -100% -100% 3.2 3.4 6% 6%
41 April 30.7 31.7 3% 3% 68.2 70.8 4% 4% 81.1 84.3 4% 4% 55.8 65.2 17% 17% 20.1 14.6 -27% -27% 36.8 37.1 1% 1%
41 May 63.7 63.7 0% 0% 138.3 139.4 1% 1% 169.7 169.8 0% 0% 120.0 120.9 1% 1% 42.3 34.5 -18% -18% 71.7 72.6 1% 1%
41 June 36.5 37.8 4% 3% 76.8 79.5 4% 2% 97.2 99.9 3% 2% 72.1 74.1 3% 2% 23.2 17.8 -23% -11% 40.0 39.9 0% 0%
41 July 6.6 6.7 1% 1% 13.5 13.0 -4% -1% 20.1 19.1 -5% -2% 15.0 13.5 -10% -5% 3.6 0.8 -78% -20% 6.4 5.8 -9% -3%
41 August 5.6 5.6 0% 0% 11.3 10.9 -3% -3% 17.1 16.3 -5% -5% 12.9 11.6 -10% -10% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.3 4.9 -7% -7%
41 September 8.6 8.9 3% 3% 18.0 18.4 2% 2% 25.0 24.9 0% 0% 20.8 22.8 9% 9% 4.0 0.6 -85% -85% 9.0 8.8 -3% -3%
41 October 18.5 18.4 0% 0% 39.1 39.2 0% 0% 48.5 48.3 0% 0% 36.3 37.6 4% 4% 10.9 6.7 -38% -38% 19.5 19.7 1% 1%
41 November 5.8 6.0 3% 3% 12.2 13.2 8% 8% 17.9 18.8 5% 5% 13.1 12.2 -7% -7% 3.7 0.9 -76% -76% 6.1 6.7 9% 9%
41 December 5.2 5.1 -1% -1% 10.7 10.9 2% 2% 16.0 16.1 0% 0% 11.7 10.6 -9% -9% 3.4 0.7 -79% -79% 5.2 5.4 4% 4%
42 January 4.5 4.5 1% 1% 9.4 9.7 3% 3% 14.3 14.5 1% 1% 10.7 9.7 -10% -10% 3.0 0.4 -86% -86% 4.6 4.8 3% 3%
42 February 3.6 3.9 10% 10% 7.6 8.6 13% 13% 11.6 13.1 13% 13% 8.8 9.0 2% 2% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 4.3 4% 4%
42 March 6.0 6.1 0% 0% 12.5 12.6 0% 0% 17.9 18.0 0% 0% 14.8 16.2 10% 10% 3.0 0.1 -97% -97% 6.0 6.0 1% 1%
42 April 26.0 26.7 3% 3% 56.9 58.9 3% 3% 68.4 70.5 3% 3% 46.9 52.8 13% 13% 16.9 11.8 -30% -30% 30.4 30.6 1% 1%
42 May 74.1 74.1 0% 0% 161.1 162.4 1% 1% 199.2 200.0 0% 0% 140.8 140.5 0% 0% 50.4 41.3 -18% -18% 83.8 84.9 1% 1%
42 June 39.1 40.5 4% 3% 82.6 85.9 4% 3% 105.2 108.3 3% 2% 77.6 79.0 2% 2% 25.4 19.4 -24% -12% 43.2 43.5 1% 0%
42 July 7.1 7.2 1% 1% 14.6 14.1 -4% -1% 21.6 20.6 -4% -2% 16.1 14.4 -10% -5% 4.1 1.1 -73% -21% 7.0 6.3 -10% -3%
42 August 5.9 5.9 0% 0% 12.2 11.8 -3% -3% 18.1 17.4 -4% -4% 13.6 12.2 -10% -10% 3.6 0.7 -81% -81% 5.9 5.4 -8% -8%
42 September 5.8 6.0 3% 3% 11.9 12.0 1% 1% 17.6 17.6 0% 0% 13.7 13.4 -2% -2% 3.4 0.5 -85% -85% 5.9 5.6 -5% -5%
42 October 17.9 17.8 0% 0% 38.3 38.4 0% 0% 48.0 47.5 -1% -1% 37.1 39.7 7% 7% 10.0 5.6 -44% -44% 19.3 19.4 0% 0%
42 November 5.9 6.1 3% 3% 12.3 12.8 4% 4% 18.1 18.5 3% 3% 13.3 12.5 -6% -6% 3.7 0.8 -78% -78% 6.1 6.1 0% 0%
42 December 5.2 5.3 1% 1% 10.9 10.9 1% 1% 16.2 16.3 1% 1% 11.9 10.8 -9% -9% 3.4 0.6 -82% -82% 5.3 5.3 0% 0%
43 January 4.6 4.6 0% 0% 9.6 10.0 3% 3% 14.5 14.8 2% 2% 10.9 9.9 -9% -9% 3.0 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 5.0 5% 5%
43 February 3.8 4.1 6% 6% 8.1 9.0 12% 12% 12.3 13.6 11% 11% 9.3 9.2 -1% -1% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.6 8% 8%
43 March 3.6 3.6 -1% -1% 7.8 8.1 4% 4% 11.9 12.4 5% 5% 8.9 8.4 -5% -5% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 4.2 8% 8%
43 April 23.4 24.1 3% 3% 51.5 53.6 4% 4% 61.9 64.4 4% 4% 43.6 50.9 17% 17% 14.9 9.9 -34% -34% 27.5 27.9 2% 2%
43 May 73.1 73.1 0% 0% 159.0 160.6 1% 1% 196.1 197.1 1% 1% 137.6 137.8 0% 0% 49.6 40.6 -18% -18% 82.8 84.1 2% 2%
43 June 66.1 68.3 3% 3% 140.7 146.5 4% 4% 177.4 183.7 4% 4% 130.3 132.6 2% 2% 44.2 35.9 -19% -17% 74.3 75.2 1% 1%
43 July 7.2 7.3 2% 1% 14.4 14.1 -2% -1% 21.6 20.7 -4% -2% 16.2 14.5 -11% -6% 3.9 1.0 -74% -21% 6.7 6.3 -7% -2%
43 August 5.9 5.9 0% 0% 12.0 11.7 -3% -3% 18.1 17.3 -4% -4% 13.6 12.2 -10% -10% 3.5 0.7 -80% -80% 5.7 5.3 -7% -7%
43 September 5.0 5.1 2% 2% 10.1 10.3 2% 2% 15.4 15.4 0% 0% 11.9 11.1 -7% -7% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 4.9 4.7 -3% -3%
43 October 5.0 5.0 1% 1% 10.0 9.9 -1% -1% 15.3 14.9 -3% -3% 12.0 11.1 -8% -8% 2.9 0.2 -93% -93% 4.7 4.5 -4% -4%
43 November 4.3 4.4 3% 3% 8.6 9.2 7% 7% 13.3 14.0 5% 5% 10.4 10.0 -4% -4% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 4.5 8% 8%
43 December 3.9 3.9 -1% -1% 8.0 8.4 5% 5% 12.5 12.9 3% 3% 9.5 9.0 -5% -5% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 4.3 10% 10%
44 January 3.5 3.4 0% 0% 7.3 7.4 1% 1% 11.4 11.6 2% 2% 8.6 8.3 -4% -4% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.6 0% 0%
44 February 2.8 3.1 10% 10% 6.0 7.4 23% 23% 9.5 11.4 20% 20% 7.1 7.7 8% 8% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 4.1 20% 20%
44 March 2.8 2.8 -1% -1% 6.2 6.3 2% 2% 9.6 10.0 4% 4% 7.1 7.1 -1% -1% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.2 3.2 1% 1%
44 April 29.4 30.3 3% 3% 65.2 67.5 4% 4% 77.7 80.5 4% 4% 53.7 63.0 17% 17% 19.1 13.7 -28% -28% 35.0 35.2 0% 0%
44 May 65.3 65.4 0% 0% 141.9 143.1 1% 1% 174.4 174.6 0% 0% 122.9 123.8 1% 1% 43.5 35.5 -18% -18% 73.6 74.6 1% 1%
44 June 14.7 15.4 5% 1% 30.0 30.7 2% 1% 39.2 39.8 1% 0% 30.4 31.6 4% 2% 7.8 4.2 -46% -7% 14.9 14.4 -3% -1%
44 July 6.3 6.4 1% 0% 12.9 12.4 -4% -1% 19.2 18.1 -6% -3% 14.3 13.0 -9% -4% 3.6 0.8 -78% -20% 6.1 5.5 -10% -3%
44 August 5.4 5.4 -1% -1% 11.0 10.6 -4% -4% 16.6 15.7 -5% -5% 12.6 11.4 -10% -10% 3.2 0.6 -81% -81% 5.2 4.8 -8% -8%
44 September 4.9 5.0 3% 3% 9.8 9.9 1% 1% 14.9 14.9 0% 0% 11.5 10.9 -5% -5% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 4.6 -5% -5%
44 October 6.1 6.1 1% 1% 12.5 12.2 -2% -2% 18.2 17.6 -3% -3% 14.8 15.2 3% 3% 3.1 0.2 -94% -94% 5.9 5.6 -6% -6%
44 November 5.3 5.5 3% 3% 10.8 11.2 3% 3% 15.8 16.2 2% 2% 12.4 12.5 1% 1% 3.0 0.2 -93% -93% 5.3 5.3 -1% -1%
44 December 4.6 4.6 0% 0% 9.4 9.6 1% 1% 14.0 14.1 1% 1% 10.7 10.2 -5% -5% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.6 4.6 1% 1%
45 January 3.9 3.9 -1% -1% 8.3 8.8 6% 6% 12.4 13.0 5% 5% 9.4 9.0 -4% -4% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 4.7 12% 12%
45 February 3.2 3.5 10% 10% 6.8 7.8 15% 15% 10.2 11.8 16% 16% 7.7 8.3 8% 8% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 4.1 6% 6%
45 March 3.2 3.1 0% 0% 7.0 7.5 7% 7% 10.4 11.2 8% 8% 7.8 7.7 -1% -1% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 4.1 14% 14%
45 April 16.1 16.5 3% 3% 35.7 36.6 2% 2% 43.5 44.2 2% 2% 31.4 39.0 24% 24% 9.4 5.1 -45% -45% 19.0 18.9 -1% -1%
45 May 38.8 38.9 0% 0% 84.0 84.3 0% 0% 101.1 101.2 0% 0% 67.5 69.6 3% 3% 25.6 19.7 -23% -16% 43.3 43.5 1% 1%
45 June 66.5 68.7 3% 3% 143.7 149.6 4% 4% 178.1 184.8 4% 4% 128.9 132.6 3% 3% 45.7 37.3 -18% -17% 76.9 77.7 1% 1%
45 July 6.9 7.0 2% 1% 14.0 13.6 -3% -1% 20.7 19.9 -4% -2% 15.4 14.0 -9% -5% 3.8 0.9 -76% -21% 6.6 6.0 -9% -3%
45 August 5.8 5.8 0% 0% 11.8 11.4 -3% -3% 17.6 16.8 -4% -4% 13.3 12.0 -10% -10% 3.4 0.6 -82% -82% 5.6 5.2 -8% -8%
45 September 5.4 5.6 3% 3% 11.0 11.1 1% 1% 16.5 16.4 0% 0% 12.9 12.4 -4% -4% 3.2 0.4 -88% -88% 5.4 5.1 -5% -5%
45 October 22.7 22.6 0% 0% 48.9 49.1 0% 0% 60.5 60.1 -1% -1% 45.4 48.6 7% 7% 13.3 8.5 -36% -36% 24.8 25.0 1% 1%
45 November 6.0 6.3 5% 5% 12.3 12.9 5% 5% 18.1 18.7 3% 3% 13.5 12.7 -6% -6% 3.6 0.7 -80% -80% 6.1 6.2 1% 1%
45 December 5.3 5.3 0% 0% 10.9 11.2 2% 2% 16.3 16.3 0% 0% 12.1 11.0 -9% -9% 3.3 0.5 -85% -85% 5.3 5.5 4% 4%
46 January 4.6 4.7 0% 0% 9.6 10.2 6% 6% 14.5 15.0 3% 3% 11.0 10.1 -8% -8% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 5.1 10% 10%
46 February 3.7 4.1 10% 10% 7.8 9.0 16% 16% 11.9 13.6 15% 15% 9.0 9.3 3% 3% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 4.6 9% 9%
46 March 3.7 3.6 -1% -1% 7.8 8.1 4% 4% 12.0 12.5 4% 4% 9.1 8.6 -5% -5% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 4.2 8% 8%
46 April 34.0 35.2 3% 3% 75.0 77.8 4% 4% 90.4 93.4 3% 3% 61.9 69.6 12% 12% 23.0 16.9 -26% -26% 40.3 40.6 1% 1%
46 May 57.7 57.7 0% 0% 124.9 125.8 1% 1% 154.6 154.9 0% 0% 110.7 111.1 0% 0% 38.3 30.9 -19% -19% 64.6 65.3 1% 1%
46 June 30.7 31.8 4% 2% 64.5 66.7 3% 2% 82.2 84.6 3% 2% 61.0 62.7 3% 2% 19.4 14.2 -27% -11% 33.4 33.3 0% 0%
46 July 6.8 6.9 1% 0% 14.0 13.5 -4% -1% 20.8 19.9 -4% -2% 15.4 13.9 -9% -5% 3.9 1.0 -74% -21% 6.7 6.0 -10% -3%
46 August 5.7 5.7 0% 0% 11.7 11.4 -2% -2% 17.5 16.9 -3% -3% 13.2 11.9 -10% -10% 3.5 0.7 -80% -80% 5.6 5.3 -6% -6%
46 September 4.8 5.0 4% 4% 9.9 10.1 2% 2% 15.0 15.1 1% 1% 11.5 10.7 -7% -7% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.9 4.7 -5% -5%
46 October 21.7 21.6 0% 0% 46.9 47.2 1% 1% 58.1 57.8 -1% -1% 43.2 46.6 8% 8% 12.8 8.1 -37% -37% 24.0 24.3 1% 1%
46 November 5.6 5.8 3% 3% 11.6 12.2 5% 5% 17.3 17.8 3% 3% 12.7 11.9 -6% -6% 3.4 0.6 -82% -82% 5.8 5.9 2% 2%
46 December 5.0 5.0 0% 0% 10.3 10.9 6% 6% 15.5 16.1 4% 4% 11.5 10.4 -9% -9% 3.2 0.5 -84% -84% 5.0 5.6 11% 11%
47 January 4.4 4.4 0% 0% 9.1 9.5 4% 4% 13.9 14.2 3% 3% 10.5 9.6 -9% -9% 2.8 0.3 -89% -89% 4.5 4.7 6% 6%
47 February 3.6 3.8 7% 7% 7.6 8.4 11% 11% 11.6 12.9 11% 11% 8.9 8.9 0% 0% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.0 4.3 7% 7%
47 March 3.4 3.4 0% 0% 7.4 7.6 3% 3% 11.3 11.8 4% 4% 8.6 8.2 -5% -5% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 3.9 4% 4%
47 April 29.7 30.7 3% 3% 65.5 67.8 3% 3% 78.7 81.3 3% 3% 54.3 62.0 14% 14% 19.7 14.1 -29% -29% 35.1 35.2 0% 0%
47 May 67.9 68.0 0% 0% 147.5 148.9 1% 1% 182.1 183.0 1% 1% 129.5 129.8 0% 0% 45.6 37.3 -18% -18% 76.6 77.8 2% 2%
47 June 58.2 60.2 3% 3% 123.8 129.0 4% 4% 156.3 161.8 4% 4% 114.9 117.1 2% 2% 38.6 31.1 -19% -15% 65.2 66.1 1% 1%
47 July 7.0 7.1 2% 1% 14.1 13.7 -2% -1% 21.3 20.3 -5% -2% 15.8 14.2 -10% -5% 3.8 0.9 -76% -21% 6.6 6.1 -8% -2%
47 August 5.7 5.7 0% 0% 11.7 11.3 -4% -4% 17.7 16.8 -5% -5% 13.3 12.0 -10% -10% 3.4 0.7 -79% -79% 5.5 5.0 -9% -9%
47 September 4.9 5.0 3% 3% 9.9 9.9 1% 1% 15.1 15.0 0% 0% 11.7 10.8 -7% -7% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 4.5 -6% -6%
47 October 4.4 4.4 0% 0% 9.0 8.9 -2% -2% 14.0 13.7 -3% -3% 10.9 9.9 -9% -9% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.1 -5% -5%
47 November 3.9 4.0 2% 2% 7.9 8.2 3% 3% 12.4 12.7 3% 3% 9.6 9.2 -4% -4% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 3.9 0% 0%
47 December 3.6 3.6 -1% -1% 7.4 7.7 3% 3% 11.7 12.0 2% 2% 8.9 8.4 -5% -5% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.8 6% 6%
48 January 3.3 3.3 0% 0% 7.0 7.7 11% 11% 11.0 11.8 8% 8% 8.4 8.1 -3% -3% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 4.2 21% 21%
48 February 2.6 2.9 9% 9% 5.8 6.8 19% 19% 9.0 10.7 18% 18% 6.8 7.4 9% 9% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.7 13% 13%
48 March 2.6 2.6 -1% -1% 5.9 6.2 6% 6% 9.2 9.8 7% 7% 6.8 6.9 1% 1% 1.8 0.0 -100% -100% 3.1 3.3 9% 9%
48 April 11.2 11.5 3% 3% 24.7 25.4 3% 3% 31.5 32.2 2% 2% 24.0 31.7 32% 32% 5.4 1.9 -65% -52% 12.9 12.9 0% 0%
48 May 59.7 59.6 0% 0% 130.7 131.9 1% 1% 156.9 157.5 0% 0% 106.7 108.9 2% 2% 40.5 32.9 -19% -19% 68.2 69.3 2% 2%
48 June 69.6 72.0 3% 3% 149.2 155.3 4% 4% 186.1 193.4 4% 4% 136.0 139.5 3% 3% 47.0 38.5 -18% -17% 79.2 80.1 1% 1%
48 July 6.7 6.9 2% 1% 13.5 13.1 -3% -1% 20.3 19.3 -5% -3% 15.3 13.7 -10% -5% 3.6 0.8 -77% -20% 6.2 5.6 -10% -3%
48 August 5.6 5.6 0% 0% 11.3 10.9 -3% -3% 17.1 16.3 -5% -5% 13.0 11.7 -10% -10% 3.2 0.6 -81% -81% 5.3 4.8 -8% -8%
48 September 4.8 5.0 5% 5% 9.5 9.6 1% 1% 14.6 14.6 -1% -1% 11.4 10.6 -7% -7% 2.8 0.3 -89% -89% 4.6 4.3 -7% -7%
48 October 4.3 4.3 0% 0% 8.7 8.6 -1% -1% 13.6 13.3 -2% -2% 10.7 9.8 -9% -9% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 4.0 -4% -4%
48 November 4.1 4.2 3% 3% 8.2 8.5 5% 5% 12.7 13.1 3% 3% 9.9 9.7 -2% -2% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 4.1 3% 3%
48 December 3.7 3.7 0% 0% 7.6 7.8 3% 3% 11.8 12.1 2% 2% 9.1 8.7 -5% -5% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 3.8 5% 5%
49 January 3.2 3.2 0% 0% 6.8 7.6 11% 11% 10.7 11.5 8% 8% 8.2 7.9 -3% -3% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 4.1 20% 20%
49 February 2.6 2.8 10% 10% 5.7 6.7 18% 18% 8.9 10.4 18% 18% 6.7 7.3 9% 9% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.2 3.6 13% 13%
49 March 2.6 2.6 -1% -1% 5.8 5.9 3% 3% 9.0 9.4 5% 5% 6.7 6.7 1% 1% 1.7 0.0 -100% -100% 3.0 3.1 4% 4%
49 April 22.8 23.4 3% 3% 50.3 52.6 5% 5% 59.9 62.7 5% 5% 42.8 52.0 21% 21% 14.1 9.4 -33% -33% 26.8 27.6 3% 3%
49 May 61.8 61.9 0% 0% 134.5 135.5 1% 1% 164.1 164.2 0% 0% 114.0 115.3 1% 1% 41.4 33.7 -19% -19% 69.9 70.7 1% 1%
49 June 61.9 64.0 3% 3% 132.0 137.6 4% 4% 165.6 171.9 4% 4% 121.5 124.4 2% 2% 41.3 33.5 -19% -16% 69.7 70.7 1% 1%
49 July 6.7 6.8 2% 1% 13.4 13.1 -3% -1% 20.3 19.4 -5% -2% 15.3 13.7 -10% -5% 3.6 0.8 -78% -20% 6.2 5.7 -8% -2%
49 August 5.6 5.6 -1% -1% 11.3 10.9 -3% -3% 17.1 16.3 -5% -5% 13.0 11.7 -10% -10% 3.2 0.6 -81% -81% 5.2 4.9 -6% -6%
49 September 4.7 4.9 3% 3% 9.5 9.6 1% 1% 14.6 14.5 0% 0% 11.4 10.6 -7% -7% 2.8 0.3 -89% -89% 4.6 4.4 -4% -4%
49 October 4.3 4.3 0% 0% 8.7 8.6 0% 0% 13.5 13.3 -2% -2% 10.7 9.7 -9% -9% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 4.0 -2% -2%
49 November 3.9 4.0 2% 2% 7.8 8.1 3% 3% 12.3 12.6 2% 2% 9.6 9.3 -3% -3% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 3.8 -1% -1%
49 December 3.6 3.5 -1% -1% 7.3 7.4 2% 2% 11.5 11.7 1% 1% 8.8 8.4 -5% -5% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.7 3% 3%
50 January 3.1 3.1 0% 0% 6.6 6.7 2% 2% 10.4 10.7 2% 2% 8.0 7.8 -3% -3% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.4 3% 3%
50 February 2.5 2.7 9% 9% 5.5 6.3 15% 15% 8.6 10.0 15% 15% 6.6 7.2 9% 9% 1.8 0.0 -100% -100% 3.1 3.3 5% 5%
50 March 2.5 2.5 0% 0% 5.6 6.0 8% 8% 8.8 9.5 8% 8% 6.5 6.6 1% 1% 1.7 0.0 -100% -100% 3.0 3.3 12% 12%
50 April 11.4 11.7 3% 3% 25.3 26.3 4% 4% 32.2 33.1 3% 3% 24.4 32.4 33% 33% 5.6 2.2 -61% -50% 13.3 13.6 2% 2%
50 May 39.5 39.5 0% 0% 86.0 86.5 1% 1% 102.3 102.7 0% 0% 68.4 71.2 4% 4% 26.0 20.4 -22% -15% 44.5 45.0 1% 1%
50 June 34.4 35.5 3% 2% 73.7 76.2 3% 2% 91.2 93.2 2% 1% 66.1 68.9 4% 4% 22.6 17.3 -24% -11% 38.9 38.8 0% 0%
50 July 6.2 6.3 1% 1% 12.8 12.5 -3% -1% 18.9 18.1 -4% -2% 14.0 12.8 -9% -4% 3.5 0.8 -77% -19% 6.1 5.6 -8% -2%
50 August 5.3 5.2 0% 0% 10.7 10.3 -4% -4% 16.1 15.4 -5% -5% 12.2 11.1 -9% -9% 3.1 0.6 -81% -81% 5.1 4.6 -9% -9%
50 September 4.8 5.0 4% 4% 9.8 9.9 1% 1% 14.8 14.8 0% 0% 11.5 11.0 -4% -4% 3.0 0.4 -86% -86% 4.8 4.5 -6% -6%
50 October 7.2 7.2 0% 0% 14.8 14.5 -2% -2% 20.8 20.3 -3% -3% 17.1 18.3 7% 7% 3.3 0.2 -94% -94% 7.1 6.8 -4% -4%
50 November 4.7 4.8 3% 3% 9.6 10.4 8% 8% 14.1 15.0 6% 6% 11.0 10.5 -4% -4% 2.8 0.2 -93% -93% 4.8 5.2 9% 9%
50 December 4.1 4.1 0% 0% 8.6 9.4 9% 9% 12.8 13.8 7% 7% 9.9 9.3 -6% -6% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 5.0 17% 17%
51 January 3.6 3.6 -1% -1% 7.7 8.3 8% 8% 11.5 12.4 8% 8% 8.9 8.5 -4% -4% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 4.5 15% 15%
51 February 3.0 3.2 7% 7% 6.6 7.4 12% 12% 9.8 11.2 14% 14% 7.5 7.9 4% 4% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.9 9% 9%
51 March 2.9 2.9 -1% -1% 6.5 6.8 6% 6% 9.7 10.4 8% 8% 7.3 7.2 0% 0% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.7 9% 9%
51 April 34.5 35.6 3% 3% 76.3 79.4 4% 4% 90.7 94.4 4% 4% 61.3 70.4 15% 15% 23.5 17.4 -26% -26% 41.1 41.7 1% 1%
51 May 102.5 102.4 0% 0% 221.9 224.1 1% 1% 273.8 275.9 1% 1% 196.6 195.8 0% 0% 68.7 57.4 -16% -16% 115.1 117.1 2% 2%
51 June 58.5 60.5 3% 3% 123.8 128.9 4% 4% 156.7 161.5 3% 3% 115.9 117.7 2% 2% 38.4 30.9 -20% -15% 64.9 65.6 1% 1%
51 July 7.0 7.1 2% 1% 13.9 13.6 -3% -1% 21.1 20.0 -5% -3% 16.0 14.3 -11% -6% 3.7 0.9 -76% -20% 6.4 5.9 -8% -2%
51 August 5.8 5.8 0% 0% 11.6 11.3 -2% -2% 17.6 16.8 -5% -5% 13.4 12.0 -10% -10% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.4 5.1 -6% -6%
51 September 4.9 5.0 3% 3% 9.7 9.9 2% 2% 15.0 14.9 -1% -1% 11.7 10.9 -7% -7% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 4.4 -5% -5%
51 October 19.1 19.1 0% 0% 41.1 41.3 0% 0% 51.3 50.7 -1% -1% 39.5 42.9 8% 8% 10.8 6.4 -41% -41% 20.8 21.0 1% 1%
51 November 5.5 5.7 3% 3% 11.3 11.7 4% 4% 17.0 17.3 2% 2% 12.5 11.8 -6% -6% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.5 5.6 1% 1%
51 December 4.9 4.9 0% 0% 10.0 10.2 2% 2% 15.3 15.2 0% 0% 11.3 10.3 -9% -9% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 4.9 3% 3%
52 January 4.3 4.3 0% 0% 8.9 9.1 3% 3% 13.8 13.8 0% 0% 10.3 9.4 -8% -8% 2.7 0.2 -93% -93% 4.3 4.4 4% 4%
52 February 3.4 3.8 10% 10% 7.2 8.4 18% 18% 11.2 12.9 15% 15% 8.5 8.7 3% 3% 2.4 0.1 -96% -96% 3.9 4.3 11% 11%
52 March 3.4 3.3 0% 0% 7.2 7.6 6% 6% 11.3 11.8 5% 5% 8.5 8.1 -5% -5% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 4.0 10% 10%
52 April 17.5 17.9 3% 3% 38.4 39.5 3% 3% 46.9 47.8 2% 2% 34.4 41.4 20% 20% 10.4 6.1 -42% -42% 20.4 20.3 0% 0%
52 May 81.4 81.4 0% 0% 177.4 179.3 1% 1% 217.9 219.6 1% 1% 151.9 152.5 0% 0% 55.5 45.9 -17% -17% 92.5 94.1 2% 2%
52 June 33.6 34.8 4% 3% 70.5 73.1 4% 2% 90.0 92.2 3% 2% 66.5 68.2 3% 2% 21.3 16.0 -25% -11% 36.5 36.6 0% 0%
52 July 6.7 6.8 1% 1% 13.6 13.1 -4% -1% 20.5 19.5 -5% -2% 15.2 13.7 -10% -5% 3.7 0.9 -76% -20% 6.4 5.8 -10% -3%
52 August 5.6 5.6 0% 0% 11.4 11.0 -3% -3% 17.2 16.5 -4% -4% 13.0 11.7 -10% -10% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.4 5.0 -7% -7%
52 September 4.7 4.9 3% 3% 9.6 9.7 2% 2% 14.7 14.8 0% 0% 11.3 10.6 -6% -6% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 4.5 -5% -5%
52 October 5.5 5.5 0% 0% 11.2 11.0 -2% -2% 16.8 16.2 -3% -3% 13.6 13.5 0% 0% 3.0 0.2 -93% -93% 5.3 5.0 -4% -4%
52 November 4.4 4.5 3% 3% 8.9 9.2 4% 4% 13.5 13.9 3% 3% 10.5 10.1 -4% -4% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.4 4.3 -1% -1%
52 December 3.9 3.9 0% 0% 8.1 8.4 4% 4% 12.5 12.8 3% 3% 9.5 9.0 -5% -5% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 4.2 6% 6%
53 January 3.4 3.4 0% 0% 7.3 7.5 4% 4% 11.3 11.7 4% 4% 8.5 8.2 -3% -3% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 3.8 5% 5%
53 February 2.8 3.0 10% 10% 6.0 7.0 17% 17% 9.3 10.9 17% 17% 7.1 7.7 9% 9% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.7 8% 8%
53 March 2.8 2.7 -1% -1% 6.2 6.3 2% 2% 9.5 9.9 5% 5% 7.0 7.0 0% 0% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.2 3.3 4% 4%
53 April 9.9 10.3 3% 3% 21.7 22.5 4% 4% 28.1 28.9 3% 3% 21.7 28.7 32% 32% 4.6 1.2 -74% -50% 11.2 11.3 1% 1%
53 May 65.5 65.5 0% 0% 143.8 144.8 1% 1% 172.8 173.3 0% 0% 117.6 120.1 2% 2% 44.8 36.6 -18% -18% 75.3 76.2 1% 1%
53 June 32.5 33.7 4% 2% 68.5 71.1 4% 2% 86.0 88.8 3% 2% 63.2 65.8 4% 3% 20.7 15.6 -25% -10% 35.7 35.8 0% 0%
53 July 6.5 6.6 1% 1% 13.3 12.8 -3% -1% 19.7 18.8 -4% -2% 14.6 13.3 -9% -4% 3.6 0.8 -78% -20% 6.3 5.7 -8% -2%
53 August 5.5 5.4 -1% -1% 11.1 10.7 -4% -4% 16.8 15.9 -5% -5% 12.7 11.5 -9% -9% 3.2 0.6 -81% -81% 5.3 4.8 -8% -8%
53 September 4.8 5.0 3% 3% 9.7 9.9 2% 2% 14.8 14.8 0% 0% 11.5 10.9 -5% -5% 2.9 0.4 -86% -86% 4.8 4.6 -4% -4%
53 October 4.8 4.9 0% 0% 9.7 9.6 -2% -2% 14.8 14.4 -2% -2% 11.7 11.0 -6% -6% 2.8 0.1 -96% -96% 4.6 4.4 -4% -4%
53 November 4.1 4.2 2% 2% 8.4 8.9 7% 7% 12.8 13.5 5% 5% 10.0 9.7 -2% -2% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 4.4 6% 6%
53 December 3.7 3.7 -1% -1% 7.7 7.9 3% 3% 11.9 12.2 3% 3% 9.1 8.8 -4% -4% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 4.0 5% 5%
54 January 3.3 3.2 -1% -1% 7.0 7.5 8% 8% 10.8 11.5 7% 7% 8.3 8.1 -2% -2% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 4.0 14% 14%
54 February 2.7 2.9 10% 10% 5.8 6.8 17% 17% 8.9 10.5 18% 18% 6.8 7.5 10% 10% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.6 10% 10%
54 March 2.7 2.7 -1% -1% 6.0 6.3 5% 5% 9.1 9.7 7% 7% 6.8 6.9 2% 2% 1.8 0.0 -100% -100% 3.1 3.4 9% 9%
54 April 24.6 25.2 3% 3% 54.6 56.5 4% 4% 64.6 67.3 4% 4% 45.4 54.6 20% 20% 15.4 10.5 -32% -32% 29.3 29.5 1% 1%
54 May 58.4 58.5 0% 0% 127.0 128.2 1% 1% 155.2 155.2 0% 0% 107.7 109.0 1% 1% 38.9 31.6 -19% -19% 65.9 66.9 2% 2%
54 June 72.6 75.1 3% 3% 155.3 161.6 4% 4% 194.4 201.9 4% 4% 142.6 145.8 2% 2% 48.9 40.1 -18% -18% 82.3 83.2 1% 1%
54 July 6.8 6.9 2% 1% 13.7 13.3 -3% -1% 20.7 19.6 -5% -3% 15.6 14.0 -10% -5% 3.6 0.8 -78% -20% 6.3 5.8 -9% -3%
54 August 5.7 5.7 0% 0% 11.4 11.1 -3% -3% 17.3 16.5 -5% -5% 13.2 11.9 -10% -10% 3.2 0.6 -81% -81% 5.3 4.9 -7% -7%
54 September 21.7 22.4 3% 3% 46.2 47.9 4% 4% 58.1 59.4 2% 2% 44.2 48.2 9% 9% 13.0 8.4 -35% -35% 24.0 24.2 1% 1%
54 October 18.6 18.6 0% 0% 38.9 39.0 0% 0% 50.4 49.9 -1% -1% 37.3 37.6 1% 1% 10.8 6.7 -38% -38% 19.3 19.3 0% 0%
54 November 6.0 6.3 4% 4% 12.6 13.0 3% 3% 18.7 18.9 1% 1% 13.6 12.8 -6% -6% 3.8 0.9 -76% -76% 6.3 6.2 -2% -2%
54 December 5.3 5.3 -1% -1% 11.0 11.0 0% 0% 16.6 16.3 -2% -2% 12.2 11.0 -9% -9% 3.4 0.7 -79% -79% 5.3 5.3 0% 0%
55 January 4.6 4.7 1% 1% 9.6 9.8 2% 2% 14.7 14.8 1% 1% 11.1 10.1 -9% -9% 3.0 0.4 -86% -86% 4.7 4.8 3% 3%
55 February 3.9 4.1 6% 6% 8.0 8.9 11% 11% 12.4 13.6 9% 9% 9.5 9.4 -1% -1% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 4.5 8% 8%
55 March 3.6 3.6 -1% -1% 7.7 8.2 7% 7% 12.0 12.6 5% 5% 9.1 8.6 -6% -6% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 4.3 12% 12%
55 April 21.2 21.8 3% 3% 46.8 48.4 3% 3% 56.5 58.4 3% 3% 40.8 47.7 17% 17% 13.4 8.6 -36% -36% 24.9 25.1 1% 1%
55 May 54.5 54.6 0% 0% 118.5 119.6 1% 1% 146.3 146.4 0% 0% 101.6 102.3 1% 1% 36.8 29.6 -19% -19% 61.5 62.4 1% 1%
55 June 29.8 30.8 4% 2% 62.9 64.9 3% 2% 80.0 82.3 3% 2% 59.0 61.1 4% 3% 19.0 14.0 -26% -10% 32.8 32.5 -1% 0%
55 July 6.7 6.7 1% 0% 13.8 13.1 -4% -2% 20.4 19.4 -5% -2% 15.0 13.7 -9% -4% 3.8 0.9 -76% -21% 6.6 5.9 -11% -3%
55 August 5.5 5.6 1% 1% 11.4 11.2 -2% -2% 17.2 16.7 -3% -3% 12.9 11.7 -9% -9% 3.4 0.7 -79% -79% 5.5 5.2 -5% -5%
55 September 4.7 4.9 3% 3% 9.7 9.8 2% 2% 14.7 15.0 2% 2% 11.3 10.6 -6% -6% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 4.6 -4% -4%
55 October 5.4 5.4 0% 0% 11.1 10.9 -2% -2% 16.5 16.1 -2% -2% 13.2 13.1 -1% -1% 3.0 0.2 -93% -93% 5.2 5.0 -4% -4%
55 November 4.4 4.5 3% 3% 8.9 9.6 8% 8% 13.4 14.3 6% 6% 10.5 10.1 -3% -3% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.4 4.8 9% 9%
55 December 3.9 3.8 -1% -1% 8.1 8.2 1% 1% 12.4 12.6 2% 2% 9.4 9.0 -5% -5% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 4.1 2% 2%
56 January 3.4 3.4 0% 0% 7.3 7.4 2% 2% 11.2 11.5 3% 3% 8.6 8.3 -3% -3% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 3.8 2% 2%
56 February 2.8 3.0 11% 11% 6.1 7.2 19% 19% 9.3 11.1 20% 20% 7.0 7.7 9% 9% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.9 13% 13%
56 March 2.8 2.8 -1% -1% 6.2 6.7 8% 8% 9.4 10.3 9% 9% 7.0 7.1 1% 1% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.2 3.7 13% 13%
56 April 14.4 14.8 3% 3% 31.8 33.0 4% 4% 39.2 40.4 3% 3% 28.9 36.9 28% 28% 7.9 4.0 -50% -50% 16.7 17.0 2% 2%
56 May 72.3 72.3 0% 0% 158.0 159.4 1% 1% 191.2 192.5 1% 1% 131.7 133.2 1% 1% 49.2 40.5 -18% -18% 82.5 83.7 2% 2%
56 June 50.9 52.7 4% 4% 108.1 112.3 4% 4% 135.5 140.2 3% 3% 99.6 102.2 3% 3% 33.5 26.6 -21% -14% 56.8 57.2 1% 1%
56 July 6.7 6.8 1% 1% 13.6 13.2 -3% -1% 20.4 19.4 -5% -2% 15.3 13.8 -10% -5% 3.7 0.8 -78% -21% 6.4 5.8 -9% -3%
56 August 5.7 5.7 0% 0% 11.4 11.0 -4% -4% 17.2 16.4 -5% -5% 13.1 11.8 -9% -9% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.3 4.9 -9% -9%
56 September 8.0 8.2 3% 3% 16.4 16.6 2% 2% 23.0 22.8 -1% -1% 18.9 20.6 9% 9% 3.7 0.4 -89% -89% 8.0 7.8 -3% -3%
56 October 15.6 15.6 0% 0% 32.9 32.9 0% 0% 41.5 40.8 -2% -2% 31.9 33.6 5% 5% 8.6 4.6 -46% -46% 16.3 16.4 0% 0%
56 November 5.8 5.9 3% 3% 12.0 12.6 5% 5% 17.6 18.1 3% 3% 12.9 12.2 -6% -6% 3.7 0.9 -76% -76% 6.0 6.2 3% 3%
56 December 5.1 5.1 0% 0% 10.6 10.8 2% 2% 15.8 15.9 1% 1% 11.6 10.7 -8% -8% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.2 5.4 5% 5%
57 January 4.5 4.5 0% 0% 9.3 9.6 3% 3% 14.1 14.3 2% 2% 10.6 9.8 -8% -8% 2.9 0.4 -86% -86% 4.6 4.8 4% 4%
57 February 3.6 3.9 9% 9% 7.6 8.7 15% 15% 11.5 13.2 14% 14% 8.7 9.0 4% 4% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 4.4 7% 7%
57 March 3.5 3.5 -1% -1% 7.5 7.8 4% 4% 11.6 12.1 5% 5% 8.7 8.3 -5% -5% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 4.1 7% 7%
57 April 31.7 32.7 3% 3% 69.9 72.5 4% 4% 84.1 87.0 4% 4% 57.4 65.2 14% 14% 21.4 15.6 -27% -27% 37.6 37.9 1% 1%
57 May 55.9 55.9 0% 0% 121.2 122.3 1% 1% 149.7 150.1 0% 0% 106.1 106.6 1% 1% 37.2 29.9 -20% -20% 62.8 63.7 1% 1%
57 June 35.7 37.0 4% 3% 75.6 78.2 3% 2% 95.8 98.8 3% 2% 70.6 72.7 3% 3% 23.1 17.5 -24% -11% 39.4 39.4 0% 0%
57 July 6.8 6.8 1% 1% 13.9 13.4 -3% -1% 20.7 19.8 -4% -2% 15.3 13.9 -9% -5% 3.8 0.9 -77% -21% 6.6 6.0 -9% -3%
57 August 5.6 5.6 0% 0% 11.6 11.2 -3% -3% 17.4 16.7 -4% -4% 13.1 12.0 -8% -8% 3.4 0.7 -79% -79% 5.6 5.1 -7% -7%
57 September 4.8 4.9 3% 3% 9.8 10.0 2% 2% 14.9 15.0 1% 1% 11.4 10.7 -6% -6% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 4.6 -3% -3%
57 October 35.0 35.0 0% 0% 76.2 77.1 1% 1% 94.1 94.3 0% 0% 67.5 70.9 5% 5% 22.5 16.5 -27% -27% 39.3 40.1 2% 2%
57 November 5.9 6.1 4% 4% 12.1 12.8 6% 6% 18.1 18.7 4% 4% 13.3 12.6 -5% -5% 3.4 0.7 -79% -79% 5.9 6.2 5% 5%
57 December 5.2 5.2 -1% -1% 10.7 10.8 1% 1% 16.2 16.0 -1% -1% 12.1 11.0 -9% -9% 3.2 0.5 -84% -84% 5.1 5.2 2% 2%
58 January 4.6 4.6 0% 0% 9.4 9.5 1% 1% 14.4 14.4 0% 0% 11.0 10.1 -9% -9% 2.8 0.3 -89% -89% 4.5 4.5 0% 0%
58 February 4.1 4.6 11% 11% 8.4 9.5 14% 14% 12.8 14.3 12% 12% 10.0 10.5 5% 5% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.4 4.7 6% 6%
58 March 4.0 3.9 -1% -1% 8.2 8.5 3% 3% 12.6 13.0 3% 3% 9.8 9.4 -4% -4% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 4.2 5% 5%
58 April 13.2 13.6 3% 3% 29.0 29.9 3% 3% 36.5 37.3 2% 2% 28.0 34.1 22% 22% 7.1 3.1 -56% -56% 15.2 15.3 0% 0%
58 May 66.8 66.8 0% 0% 145.7 146.9 1% 1% 177.8 178.8 1% 1% 123.6 124.7 1% 1% 45.6 37.2 -18% -18% 75.9 76.9 1% 1%
58 June 61.2 63.2 3% 3% 130.6 136.1 4% 4% 164.1 170.4 4% 4% 120.3 123.0 2% 2% 41.0 33.1 -19% -16% 69.0 70.0 1% 1%
58 July 7.1 7.2 1% 1% 14.4 14.0 -3% -1% 21.4 20.5 -4% -2% 16.0 14.5 -10% -5% 3.9 0.9 -77% -22% 6.7 6.2 -8% -3%
58 August 5.9 5.9 0% 0% 11.9 11.6 -3% -3% 17.9 17.1 -4% -4% 13.5 12.2 -9% -9% 3.5 0.7 -80% -80% 5.7 5.2 -8% -8%
58 September 5.0 5.1 2% 2% 10.1 10.2 2% 2% 15.3 15.4 0% 0% 11.9 11.1 -6% -6% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 4.9 4.7 -3% -3%
58 October 5.3 5.4 0% 0% 10.8 10.6 -2% -2% 16.3 15.8 -3% -3% 13.0 12.6 -3% -3% 3.0 0.2 -93% -93% 5.1 4.9 -4% -4%
58 November 4.5 4.6 3% 3% 9.1 9.6 6% 6% 13.8 14.4 4% 4% 10.8 10.4 -3% -3% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.5 4.7 5% 5%
58 December 4.0 4.0 -1% -1% 8.3 8.4 1% 1% 12.8 12.9 1% 1% 9.7 9.3 -4% -4% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.1 4.1 2% 2%
59 January 3.6 3.5 -1% -1% 7.5 8.0 7% 7% 11.6 12.3 6% 6% 8.8 8.5 -3% -3% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 4.2 13% 13%
59 February 3.0 3.1 6% 6% 6.4 7.0 9% 9% 9.9 10.9 10% 10% 7.5 7.9 6% 6% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.5 2% 2%
59 March 2.9 2.8 -1% -1% 6.3 6.7 6% 6% 9.8 10.4 7% 7% 7.3 7.3 0% 0% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.6 10% 10%
59 April 4.9 5.0 4% 3% 10.3 10.7 4% 2% 14.7 15.4 5% 3% 12.3 15.5 27% 21% 2.5 0.0 -100% -36% 5.1 5.1 1% 0%
59 May 42.8 42.6 0% 0% 94.3 94.6 0% 0% 112.2 112.3 0% 0% 74.9 80.7 8% 8% 27.8 21.4 -23% -17% 49.3 49.7 1% 1%
59 June 78.3 80.9 3% 3% 169.1 176.4 4% 4% 209.1 217.4 4% 4% 151.0 155.7 3% 3% 53.7 44.3 -18% -18% 90.4 91.9 2% 2%
59 July 6.7 6.9 2% 1% 13.4 13.1 -2% -1% 20.1 19.2 -5% -2% 15.0 13.7 -9% -5% 3.5 0.8 -77% -19% 6.1 5.7 -7% -2%
59 August 5.7 5.7 -1% -1% 11.4 11.1 -3% -3% 17.2 16.4 -5% -5% 13.0 11.9 -9% -9% 3.2 0.5 -84% -84% 5.3 4.9 -6% -6%
59 September 4.9 5.0 3% 3% 9.7 9.9 2% 2% 14.9 14.8 0% 0% 11.7 11.0 -6% -6% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 4.5 -3% -3%
59 October 4.4 4.4 0% 0% 8.9 8.9 0% 0% 13.8 13.6 -2% -2% 10.9 10.0 -8% -8% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 4.1 -2% -2%
59 November 3.9 4.0 2% 2% 7.8 8.4 8% 8% 12.2 12.8 5% 5% 9.5 9.2 -3% -3% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 4.2 8% 8%
59 December 3.6 3.6 0% 0% 7.4 8.5 15% 15% 11.6 12.6 9% 9% 8.8 8.5 -4% -4% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 4.6 29% 29%
60 January 3.1 3.1 -1% -1% 6.7 7.6 13% 13% 10.5 11.5 9% 9% 8.0 7.8 -2% -2% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 4.1 24% 24%
60 February 2.5 2.8 9% 9% 5.5 6.3 15% 15% 8.7 10.0 15% 15% 6.6 7.3 10% 10% 1.8 0.0 -100% -100% 3.1 3.3 5% 5%
60 March 2.6 2.5 -1% -1% 5.7 5.7 1% 1% 8.8 9.2 4% 4% 6.5 6.7 2% 2% 1.7 0.0 -100% -100% 3.0 3.0 0% 0%
60 April 42.2 43.5 3% 3% 93.4 98.1 5% 5% 111.4 116.6 5% 5% 75.5 85.7 14% 14% 28.7 22.1 -23% -23% 50.4 52.0 3% 3%
60 May 68.3 68.4 0% 0% 147.4 148.8 1% 1% 181.9 182.7 0% 0% 131.4 132.0 1% 1% 44.8 36.7 -18% -18% 76.0 77.2 2% 2%
60 June 94.6 97.7 3% 3% 201.7 210.3 4% 4% 253.5 262.7 4% 4% 187.0 194.5 4% 4% 63.6 53.0 -17% -17% 106.7 108.3 1% 1%
60 July 12.9 13.1 2% 1% 25.9 25.6 -1% -1% 35.5 34.2 -4% -3% 28.6 28.8 1% 1% 6.2 2.7 -56% -25% 12.1 11.6 -4% -2%
60 August 6.6 6.6 1% 1% 13.4 13.1 -2% -2% 19.9 19.1 -4% -4% 15.1 13.8 -8% -8% 3.8 0.9 -76% -76% 6.3 5.9 -6% -6%
60 September 6.7 6.9 4% 4% 13.6 13.8 1% 1% 19.9 19.7 -1% -1% 15.5 15.7 1% 1% 3.8 0.7 -82% -82% 6.7 6.4 -4% -4%
60 October 5.6 5.5 -1% -1% 11.3 11.1 -1% -1% 16.9 16.4 -3% -3% 12.9 11.7 -9% -9% 3.3 0.5 -85% -85% 5.3 5.2 -2% -2%
60 November 4.7 4.9 4% 4% 9.6 10.1 5% 5% 14.6 15.0 3% 3% 11.3 10.8 -4% -4% 3.0 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 4.8 2% 2%
60 December 4.3 4.3 -1% -1% 8.9 8.9 1% 1% 13.7 13.6 -1% -1% 10.5 9.8 -6% -6% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.3 0% 0%
61 January 3.8 3.8 -1% -1% 8.0 8.4 6% 6% 12.4 12.8 3% 3% 9.4 9.0 -4% -4% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 4.3 11% 11%
61 February 3.1 3.4 10% 10% 6.6 7.4 13% 13% 10.3 11.6 13% 13% 7.7 8.3 8% 8% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.8 3% 3%
61 March 3.0 3.0 -1% -1% 6.6 7.0 5% 5% 10.4 10.9 5% 5% 7.8 7.7 -1% -1% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.7 9% 9%
61 April 8.0 8.2 3% 3% 17.0 17.2 2% 1% 23.0 23.3 1% 1% 19.0 24.5 29% 29% 3.3 0.0 -100% -48% 8.5 8.2 -4% -3%
61 May 35.6 35.6 0% 0% 78.0 78.1 0% 0% 93.0 92.8 0% 0% 61.4 65.3 6% 6% 23.7 18.0 -24% -15% 40.5 40.6 0% 0%
61 June 22.2 23.0 4% 2% 46.9 48.3 3% 1% 58.5 59.2 1% 1% 41.8 44.2 6% 3% 13.8 9.5 -31% -9% 24.3 24.0 -1% 0%
61 July 6.2 6.2 0% 0% 12.9 12.3 -5% -2% 18.9 17.8 -6% -3% 13.8 12.7 -8% -4% 3.7 0.8 -78% -21% 6.3 5.6 -11% -3%
61 August 5.3 5.2 -1% -1% 10.9 10.4 -4% -4% 16.2 15.4 -4% -4% 12.0 11.0 -8% -8% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.3 4.8 -9% -9%
61 September 4.4 4.6 4% 4% 9.2 9.4 2% 2% 13.8 14.1 2% 2% 10.6 10.1 -5% -5% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 4.4 -5% -5%
61 October 5.3 5.3 -1% -1% 11.0 10.7 -2% -2% 16.0 15.8 -2% -2% 13.0 13.2 2% 2% 3.0 0.2 -93% -93% 5.3 5.0 -4% -4%
61 November 4.1 4.2 2% 2% 8.6 9.1 6% 6% 12.8 13.5 6% 6% 9.9 9.7 -2% -2% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.4 4.5 3% 3%
61 December 3.6 3.7 2% 2% 7.8 8.2 5% 5% 11.7 12.3 6% 6% 9.0 8.7 -3% -3% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 4.2 6% 6%
62 January 3.2 3.2 0% 0% 7.1 7.9 11% 11% 10.6 11.8 11% 11% 8.1 8.0 -1% -1% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 4.4 19% 19%
62 February 2.7 2.9 10% 10% 5.9 6.8 15% 15% 8.9 10.4 18% 18% 6.7 7.4 12% 12% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.6 5% 5%
62 March 2.7 2.7 -1% -1% 6.1 6.4 5% 5% 9.1 9.8 8% 8% 6.7 6.8 3% 3% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.5 7% 7%
62 April 6.4 6.7 3% 3% 14.0 14.4 3% 2% 19.0 19.6 3% 2% 15.9 20.9 32% 32% 2.9 0.0 -100% -42% 7.2 7.1 -1% 0%
62 May 58.0 57.9 0% 0% 127.8 128.7 1% 1% 152.1 152.6 0% 0% 101.2 105.5 4% 4% 39.3 31.5 -20% -20% 66.9 67.8 1% 1%
62 June 82.4 85.1 3% 3% 176.9 184.4 4% 4% 219.6 228.6 4% 4% 160.0 164.2 3% 3% 56.1 46.5 -17% -17% 94.2 95.5 1% 1%
62 July 6.8 7.0 2% 1% 13.6 13.2 -3% -1% 20.3 19.3 -5% -2% 15.4 13.8 -10% -5% 3.6 0.8 -78% -20% 6.2 5.7 -9% -3%
62 August 5.7 5.7 0% 0% 11.4 10.9 -4% -4% 17.2 16.2 -6% -6% 13.2 11.9 -10% -10% 3.2 0.5 -84% -84% 5.3 4.7 -10% -10%
62 September 4.8 5.0 3% 3% 9.6 9.8 2% 2% 14.7 14.6 -1% -1% 11.5 10.8 -6% -6% 2.9 0.3 -89% -89% 4.6 4.4 -4% -4%
62 October 19.4 19.4 0% 0% 41.8 42.0 0% 0% 51.7 51.1 -1% -1% 39.8 43.3 9% 9% 11.0 6.7 -39% -39% 21.2 21.3 1% 1%
62 November 5.5 5.7 3% 3% 11.3 11.7 4% 4% 16.9 17.2 2% 2% 12.5 11.8 -6% -6% 3.2 0.6 -81% -81% 5.5 5.6 1% 1%
62 December 4.9 4.9 0% 0% 10.0 10.3 3% 3% 15.2 15.2 0% 0% 11.3 10.3 -9% -9% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 5.0 3% 3%
63 January 4.3 4.3 0% 0% 8.8 9.1 3% 3% 13.7 13.8 1% 1% 10.3 9.5 -8% -8% 2.7 0.2 -92% -92% 4.3 4.5 5% 5%
63 February 3.6 3.8 6% 6% 7.4 8.5 15% 15% 11.5 12.9 12% 12% 8.7 8.7 0% 0% 2.4 0.1 -96% -96% 3.9 4.4 13% 13%
63 March 3.8 3.8 0% 0% 7.9 8.0 1% 1% 12.2 12.3 1% 1% 9.4 9.1 -3% -3% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 3.9 1% 1%
63 April 6.1 6.3 3% 3% 12.6 12.8 1% 1% 17.9 18.1 1% 1% 15.0 17.9 19% 18% 2.9 0.0 -100% -43% 6.2 5.9 -5% -3%
63 May 47.0 46.9 0% 0% 103.2 103.8 1% 1% 124.0 123.9 0% 0% 83.5 87.8 5% 5% 31.3 24.4 -22% -18% 53.9 54.4 1% 1%
63 June 47.4 49.0 4% 3% 101.9 105.8 4% 3% 126.7 131.0 3% 3% 91.6 95.0 4% 4% 32.0 25.2 -21% -14% 54.1 54.4 1% 0%
63 July 6.7 6.8 1% 1% 13.7 13.2 -4% -1% 20.3 19.4 -5% -2% 15.0 13.7 -8% -4% 3.8 0.9 -76% -21% 6.5 5.9 -10% -3%
63 August 5.8 5.8 0% 0% 11.9 11.6 -2% -2% 17.7 17.1 -3% -3% 13.3 12.2 -8% -8% 3.4 0.7 -80% -80% 5.6 5.4 -4% -4%
63 September 9.7 10.0 3% 3% 20.4 20.9 2% 2% 27.7 27.7 0% 0% 22.9 25.3 11% 11% 4.6 1.0 -78% -78% 10.2 10.1 -2% -2%
63 October 12.2 12.2 0% 0% 25.0 24.9 0% 0% 32.5 31.8 -2% -2% 24.7 25.6 4% 4% 6.3 2.6 -58% -58% 12.0 11.9 -1% -1%
63 November 5.8 5.9 3% 3% 12.1 12.8 6% 6% 17.4 18.1 4% 4% 12.9 12.2 -5% -5% 3.8 0.9 -77% -77% 6.1 6.3 4% 4%
63 December 5.2 5.1 0% 0% 10.8 11.1 3% 3% 15.7 16.1 2% 2% 11.7 10.7 -8% -8% 3.5 0.7 -80% -80% 5.3 5.6 6% 6%
64 January 4.5 4.5 0% 0% 9.5 10.4 10% 10% 14.0 15.1 7% 7% 10.6 9.8 -7% -7% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.7 5.6 18% 18%
64 February 3.6 4.0 10% 10% 7.6 8.8 15% 15% 11.4 13.2 16% 16% 8.7 9.0 4% 4% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.5 6% 6%
64 March 3.5 3.5 -1% -1% 7.6 7.7 1% 1% 11.5 11.9 4% 4% 8.8 8.4 -4% -4% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 4.0 1% 1%
64 April 37.5 38.6 3% 3% 82.8 86.0 4% 4% 99.6 103.1 4% 4% 67.0 75.1 12% 12% 25.9 19.4 -25% -25% 44.7 45.1 1% 1%
64 May 74.9 74.9 0% 0% 162.1 163.4 1% 1% 200.6 201.8 1% 1% 144.1 144.0 0% 0% 50.0 41.1 -18% -18% 84.0 85.1 1% 1%
64 June 44.8 46.3 4% 3% 94.6 98.3 4% 3% 120.3 123.8 3% 3% 88.7 90.5 2% 2% 29.1 22.8 -22% -13% 49.5 49.8 1% 0%
64 July 7.0 7.1 2% 1% 14.3 13.8 -3% -1% 21.3 20.4 -4% -2% 15.9 14.4 -10% -5% 3.9 1.0 -74% -21% 6.7 6.1 -9% -3%
64 August 5.8 5.8 0% 0% 11.9 11.4 -4% -4% 17.8 16.9 -5% -5% 13.4 12.2 -9% -9% 3.5 0.7 -80% -80% 5.6 5.1 -9% -9%
64 September 5.3 5.4 3% 3% 10.6 10.8 2% 2% 16.1 16.1 0% 0% 12.5 11.9 -5% -5% 3.2 0.4 -87% -87% 5.2 4.9 -5% -5%
64 October 7.5 7.5 0% 0% 15.3 15.1 -2% -2% 21.8 21.1 -3% -3% 17.7 18.6 5% 5% 3.5 0.3 -91% -91% 7.3 7.0 -4% -4%
64 November 5.0 5.2 3% 3% 10.2 10.6 4% 4% 15.2 15.6 2% 2% 11.7 11.2 -4% -4% 3.0 0.3 -90% -90% 5.0 5.0 1% 1%
64 December 4.5 4.5 0% 0% 9.3 9.5 3% 3% 14.0 14.2 2% 2% 10.6 10.0 -6% -6% 2.8 0.2 -93% -93% 4.5 4.7 5% 5%
65 January 3.9 3.9 0% 0% 8.3 9.4 14% 14% 12.6 13.9 10% 10% 9.5 9.1 -4% -4% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 5.2 27% 27%
65 February 3.2 3.5 10% 10% 6.8 7.8 15% 15% 10.4 12.0 15% 15% 7.9 8.4 8% 8% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 4.1 7% 7%
65 March 3.2 3.1 0% 0% 6.9 7.2 5% 5% 10.6 11.1 5% 5% 7.9 7.8 -1% -1% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.8 7% 7%
65 April 6.0 6.2 3% 3% 12.8 13.0 2% 1% 17.8 18.3 3% 2% 14.8 18.5 25% 24% 2.9 0.0 -100% -42% 6.4 6.2 -2% -1%
65 May 73.8 73.7 0% 0% 162.7 164.1 1% 1% 196.0 197.1 1% 1% 134.0 138.3 3% 3% 50.4 40.9 -19% -19% 85.5 86.7 1% 1%
65 June 98.9 102.2 3% 3% 211.4 220.6 4% 4% 264.3 274.7 4% 4% 193.4 198.6 3% 3% 66.9 55.8 -17% -17% 112.1 114.0 2% 2%
65 July 7.1 7.2 2% 1% 14.0 13.8 -2% -1% 21.2 20.1 -5% -3% 16.0 15.0 -6% -3% 3.7 0.8 -78% -21% 6.4 5.9 -7% -2%
65 August 5.9 5.9 0% 0% 11.8 11.3 -4% -4% 17.8 16.8 -6% -6% 13.6 12.5 -8% -8% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.4 4.9 -9% -9%
65 September 23.0 23.8 3% 3% 48.8 50.7 4% 4% 61.4 62.8 2% 2% 46.6 50.6 9% 9% 13.8 9.1 -34% -34% 25.4 25.6 1% 1%
65 October 13.1 13.2 0% 0% 27.1 27.0 0% 0% 35.8 35.2 -2% -2% 27.7 28.1 1% 1% 6.9 3.3 -52% -52% 13.1 13.0 -1% -1%
65 November 6.0 6.2 3% 3% 12.5 13.3 7% 7% 18.6 19.1 3% 3% 13.6 12.8 -6% -6% 3.9 0.9 -77% -77% 6.3 6.6 5% 5%
65 December 5.3 5.3 -1% -1% 11.0 11.5 4% 4% 16.6 16.8 1% 1% 12.2 11.1 -9% -9% 3.5 0.7 -80% -80% 5.4 5.8 8% 8%
66 January 4.7 4.7 0% 0% 9.7 10.5 8% 8% 14.8 15.4 4% 4% 11.1 10.2 -8% -8% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.7 5.4 15% 15%
66 February 3.8 4.2 9% 9% 7.9 9.0 14% 14% 12.2 13.7 12% 12% 9.2 9.5 3% 3% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.5 5% 5%
66 March 3.7 3.7 -1% -1% 7.9 8.4 7% 7% 12.2 12.8 5% 5% 9.2 8.7 -5% -5% 2.4 0.1 -96% -96% 3.9 4.4 13% 13%
66 April 13.6 14.0 3% 3% 29.8 30.6 3% 3% 37.6 38.2 1% 1% 28.4 34.5 22% 22% 7.6 3.6 -53% -53% 15.7 15.6 -1% -1%
66 May 109.3 109.3 0% 0% 238.0 240.4 1% 1% 293.0 295.3 1% 1% 206.3 208.5 1% 1% 74.8 62.7 -16% -16% 124.1 126.2 2% 2%
66 June 91.4 94.5 3% 3% 194.5 203.1 4% 4% 244.9 253.8 4% 4% 180.9 189.5 5% 5% 61.4 50.9 -17% -17% 102.7 104.5 2% 2%
66 July 7.5 7.6 2% 1% 14.9 14.5 -2% -1% 22.4 21.2 -5% -3% 17.0 15.9 -6% -4% 3.9 1.0 -75% -21% 6.8 6.3 -8% -3%
66 August 6.1 6.1 -1% -1% 12.3 11.8 -4% -4% 18.5 17.5 -5% -5% 14.0 12.7 -10% -10% 3.5 0.7 -80% -80% 5.8 5.2 -10% -10%
66 September 5.2 5.3 2% 2% 10.3 10.5 2% 2% 15.7 15.7 0% 0% 12.2 11.4 -6% -6% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 4.9 4.8 -3% -3%
66 October 5.1 5.1 0% 0% 10.2 10.0 -1% -1% 15.6 15.1 -3% -3% 12.3 11.4 -7% -7% 2.9 0.2 -93% -93% 4.7 4.6 -3% -3%
66 November 4.4 4.5 3% 3% 8.8 9.3 6% 6% 13.6 14.0 4% 4% 10.6 10.2 -3% -3% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.4 4% 4%
66 December 4.0 4.0 -1% -1% 8.2 8.6 5% 5% 12.8 13.1 2% 2% 9.7 9.3 -5% -5% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 4.3 9% 9%
67 January 3.6 3.5 -1% -1% 7.4 7.9 7% 7% 11.7 12.2 4% 4% 8.7 8.5 -3% -3% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 4.1 13% 13%
67 February 2.9 3.1 6% 6% 6.3 7.3 15% 15% 10.0 11.2 13% 13% 7.5 7.9 6% 6% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.9 13% 13%
67 March 2.8 2.8 -1% -1% 6.2 6.6 6% 6% 9.8 10.3 5% 5% 7.2 7.3 0% 0% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.2 3.5 10% 10%
67 April 9.0 9.3 3% 3% 19.4 20.1 4% 4% 25.8 26.4 2% 2% 20.6 27.2 32% 32% 3.8 0.6 -84% -47% 9.9 10.0 1% 1%
67 May 78.6 78.5 0% 0% 172.6 174.0 1% 1% 208.6 209.7 1% 1% 143.4 146.0 2% 2% 53.9 44.5 -17% -17% 90.4 91.8 1% 1%
67 June 74.1 76.5 3% 3% 157.8 164.3 4% 4% 197.9 204.8 3% 3% 145.0 149.8 3% 3% 49.5 40.6 -18% -18% 83.4 84.3 1% 1%
67 July 6.9 7.1 2% 1% 13.8 13.4 -3% -1% 20.8 19.7 -5% -3% 15.8 14.7 -6% -3% 3.6 0.8 -78% -20% 6.3 5.8 -9% -2%
67 August 5.8 5.8 1% 1% 11.5 11.2 -3% -3% 17.5 16.6 -5% -5% 13.3 12.1 -9% -9% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.4 4.9 -9% -9%
67 September 5.0 5.2 3% 3% 10.1 10.2 2% 2% 15.4 15.3 -1% -1% 12.0 11.4 -5% -5% 3.0 0.4 -86% -86% 4.8 4.7 -3% -3%
67 October 4.8 4.8 0% 0% 9.7 9.5 -1% -1% 14.9 14.4 -3% -3% 11.7 10.9 -7% -7% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.5 4.4 -3% -3%
67 November 4.1 4.3 3% 3% 8.4 8.7 4% 4% 13.0 13.3 2% 2% 10.1 9.9 -3% -3% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.1 4.1 -1% -1%
67 December 3.8 3.8 -1% -1% 7.8 8.2 5% 5% 12.2 12.6 3% 3% 9.3 8.9 -4% -4% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 4.2 11% 11%
68 January 3.4 3.3 -1% -1% 7.1 7.5 5% 5% 11.1 11.5 4% 4% 8.4 8.2 -2% -2% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.8 10% 10%
68 February 2.7 3.0 10% 10% 5.9 6.6 12% 12% 9.2 10.4 13% 13% 6.9 7.6 10% 10% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.3 0% 0%
68 March 2.7 2.7 -1% -1% 6.0 6.1 2% 2% 9.4 9.7 3% 3% 7.0 7.0 1% 1% 1.8 0.0 -100% -100% 3.1 3.2 2% 2%
68 April 8.0 8.2 3% 3% 17.2 17.4 1% 1% 23.2 23.5 1% 1% 19.1 25.5 33% 33% 3.1 0.1 -97% -45% 8.8 8.4 -4% -4%
68 May 30.6 30.5 0% 0% 66.8 66.8 0% 0% 78.7 78.8 0% 0% 52.6 56.7 8% 6% 19.7 14.8 -25% -13% 34.5 34.6 0% 0%
68 June 20.0 20.9 4% 2% 42.4 43.6 3% 1% 52.4 52.9 1% 0% 37.1 39.5 7% 3% 12.3 8.3 -32% -8% 22.0 21.6 -2% -1%
68 July 6.0 6.0 1% 0% 12.5 12.0 -4% -1% 18.2 17.1 -6% -3% 13.1 12.1 -8% -4% 3.5 0.8 -77% -19% 6.0 5.5 -9% -2%
68 August 5.1 5.0 -1% -1% 10.6 10.1 -4% -4% 15.6 14.9 -4% -4% 11.6 10.7 -8% -8% 3.2 0.6 -81% -81% 5.1 4.7 -8% -8%
68 September 6.2 6.4 4% 4% 12.8 12.9 1% 1% 18.2 18.2 0% 0% 14.5 15.5 7% 7% 3.4 0.4 -88% -88% 6.4 6.0 -6% -6%
68 October 5.1 5.1 0% 0% 10.6 10.5 -1% -1% 15.4 15.2 -1% -1% 11.9 11.3 -5% -5% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 5.2 5.0 -3% -3%
68 November 4.2 4.3 2% 2% 8.9 9.9 12% 12% 13.0 14.3 10% 10% 10.0 9.9 -2% -2% 2.8 0.2 -93% -93% 4.6 5.3 16% 16%
68 December 3.8 3.8 0% 0% 8.1 8.6 6% 6% 12.0 12.7 6% 6% 9.2 8.9 -4% -4% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 4.5 10% 10%
69 January 3.4 3.3 -1% -1% 7.4 8.2 11% 11% 10.9 12.1 11% 11% 8.3 8.2 -2% -2% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 4.6 22% 22%
69 February 2.8 3.1 10% 10% 6.2 7.2 17% 17% 9.1 10.9 19% 19% 6.9 7.6 11% 11% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.9 10% 10%
69 March 3.2 3.2 0% 0% 7.1 7.5 7% 7% 10.3 11.1 8% 8% 7.7 8.0 4% 4% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 4.0 12% 12%
69 April 46.5 47.9 3% 3% 103.1 107.4 4% 4% 122.8 127.6 4% 4% 82.0 91.8 12% 12% 32.2 24.9 -23% -23% 55.8 56.8 2% 2%
69 May 85.1 85.1 0% 0% 183.4 185.0 1% 1% 226.7 228.2 1% 1% 164.5 164.2 0% 0% 56.2 46.5 -17% -17% 94.7 96.1 2% 2%
69 June 122.1 126.3 3% 3% 260.3 271.6 4% 4% 326.8 338.9 4% 4% 242.3 247.8 2% 2% 82.4 69.3 -16% -16% 137.8 139.9 2% 2%
69 July 7.5 7.6 2% 1% 14.7 14.4 -1% -1% 22.1 21.0 -5% -3% 16.8 15.9 -6% -3% 3.8 0.9 -76% -21% 6.7 6.2 -7% -2%
69 August 6.1 6.1 0% 0% 12.2 11.9 -3% -3% 18.3 17.4 -5% -5% 14.0 12.7 -9% -9% 3.4 0.7 -80% -80% 5.7 5.3 -7% -7%
69 September 5.2 5.3 2% 2% 10.3 10.3 1% 1% 15.6 15.4 -1% -1% 12.2 11.4 -6% -6% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.9 4.6 -5% -5%
69 October 4.7 4.6 0% 0% 9.3 9.3 -1% -1% 14.5 14.1 -3% -3% 11.3 10.4 -8% -8% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.4 4.2 -4% -4%
69 November 4.0 4.2 3% 3% 8.1 8.6 5% 5% 12.8 13.1 3% 3% 10.0 9.6 -4% -4% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 4.1 3% 3%
69 December 3.8 3.7 -1% -1% 7.7 8.0 4% 4% 12.2 12.3 1% 1% 9.3 8.8 -5% -5% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 3.9 5% 5%
70 January 3.3 3.3 -1% -1% 7.0 7.4 6% 6% 11.1 11.5 3% 3% 8.4 8.1 -3% -3% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.8 10% 10%
70 February 2.7 2.9 10% 10% 5.8 6.9 19% 19% 9.2 10.7 17% 17% 6.9 7.5 9% 9% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.7 13% 13%
70 March 2.7 2.6 -1% -1% 5.9 6.2 5% 5% 9.4 9.8 5% 5% 6.9 6.9 0% 0% 1.8 0.0 -100% -100% 3.1 3.3 9% 9%
70 April 4.8 4.9 3% 2% 10.1 10.5 4% 2% 14.7 15.2 3% 2% 12.2 15.7 29% 22% 2.3 0.0 -100% -35% 5.1 5.1 0% 0%
70 May 37.6 37.6 0% 0% 83.1 83.3 0% 0% 98.8 98.8 0% 0% 66.3 72.2 9% 9% 24.1 18.3 -24% -15% 43.4 43.6 1% 0%
70 June 54.5 56.4 3% 3% 117.9 122.5 4% 4% 145.3 149.8 3% 3% 103.6 107.8 4% 4% 37.1 29.9 -19% -15% 63.0 63.5 1% 1%
70 July 6.4 6.5 2% 1% 12.9 12.5 -3% -1% 19.4 18.3 -5% -2% 14.3 13.2 -8% -4% 3.4 0.7 -79% -19% 6.0 5.4 -9% -3%
70 August 5.6 5.6 0% 0% 11.2 11.0 -2% -2% 16.9 16.2 -4% -4% 12.9 11.8 -8% -8% 3.2 0.5 -84% -84% 5.2 5.0 -4% -4%
70 September 4.7 4.8 3% 3% 9.5 9.5 1% 1% 14.5 14.4 -1% -1% 11.2 10.6 -5% -5% 2.8 0.3 -89% -89% 4.6 4.4 -5% -5%
70 October 22.4 22.3 0% 0% 48.4 48.6 1% 1% 59.4 59.1 -1% -1% 44.3 48.0 8% 8% 13.2 8.4 -36% -36% 24.6 25.0 1% 1%
70 November 5.5 5.7 4% 4% 11.3 11.8 5% 5% 16.8 17.3 2% 2% 12.5 11.8 -6% -6% 3.2 0.6 -81% -81% 5.5 5.7 2% 2%
70 December 4.9 4.9 -1% -1% 10.1 10.3 3% 3% 15.2 15.3 1% 1% 11.3 10.3 -8% -8% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 5.1 5% 5%
71 January 4.3 4.3 0% 0% 8.9 9.2 4% 4% 13.6 13.9 2% 2% 10.3 9.5 -8% -8% 2.7 0.2 -93% -93% 4.3 4.6 7% 7%
71 February 3.5 3.8 7% 7% 7.4 8.3 12% 12% 11.4 12.7 12% 12% 8.8 8.8 0% 0% 2.4 0.1 -96% -96% 3.9 4.2 8% 8%
71 March 3.3 3.3 0% 0% 7.2 7.4 4% 4% 11.1 11.6 4% 4% 8.5 8.1 -4% -4% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.9 6% 6%
71 April 19.0 19.5 3% 3% 41.8 43.2 3% 3% 50.5 51.9 3% 3% 36.9 44.0 19% 19% 11.6 7.1 -39% -39% 22.2 22.3 0% 0%
71 May 60.0 60.1 0% 0% 130.7 131.8 1% 1% 160.0 160.5 0% 0% 110.8 111.8 1% 1% 40.7 33.0 -19% -19% 68.0 68.8 1% 1%
71 June 38.9 40.2 4% 3% 82.5 85.6 4% 3% 103.9 107.6 4% 3% 76.4 78.8 3% 3% 25.4 19.6 -23% -12% 43.2 43.5 1% 0%
71 July 6.7 6.7 1% 1% 13.6 13.2 -3% -1% 20.3 19.5 -4% -2% 15.0 13.7 -9% -5% 3.7 0.9 -76% -20% 6.5 5.9 -8% -2%
71 August 5.5 5.5 0% 0% 11.4 11.2 -2% -2% 17.1 16.5 -3% -3% 12.9 11.7 -10% -10% 3.4 0.6 -82% -82% 5.4 5.2 -4% -4%
71 September 4.8 4.9 2% 2% 9.7 9.9 2% 2% 14.8 14.9 1% 1% 11.4 10.8 -6% -6% 3.0 0.4 -86% -86% 4.8 4.6 -4% -4%
71 October 4.4 4.4 0% 0% 8.9 8.8 -1% -1% 13.7 13.6 -1% -1% 10.7 9.9 -8% -8% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.1 -3% -3%
71 November 3.8 3.9 2% 2% 7.8 8.0 3% 3% 12.1 12.5 4% 4% 9.4 9.2 -3% -3% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 3.9 0% 0%
71 December 3.5 3.5 -1% -1% 7.3 7.3 0% 0% 11.4 11.5 1% 1% 8.7 8.4 -4% -4% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.5 -2% -2%
72 January 3.1 3.0 -1% -1% 6.6 6.7 1% 1% 10.3 10.6 3% 3% 7.9 7.8 -2% -2% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.3 0% 0%
72 February 2.5 2.7 9% 9% 5.5 6.1 11% 11% 8.6 9.8 14% 14% 6.5 7.2 10% 10% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.2 3.1 -1% -1%
72 March 2.5 2.5 0% 0% 5.7 6.0 6% 6% 8.8 9.4 8% 8% 6.5 6.6 2% 2% 1.7 0.0 -100% -100% 3.0 3.3 10% 10%
72 April 3.5 3.6 3% 2% 7.7 7.7 0% 0% 11.3 11.6 3% 2% 8.9 10.9 23% 13% 2.0 0.0 -100% -30% 4.0 3.7 -6% -2%
72 May 9.4 9.4 0% 0% 20.4 20.0 -2% -1% 26.5 25.9 -2% -1% 20.5 26.3 28% 9% 3.8 0.8 -79% -8% 10.2 9.8 -4% -1%
72 June 4.0 4.1 3% 0% 8.1 8.2 0% 0% 11.5 11.7 2% 0% 8.5 8.6 1% 0% 2.0 0.0 -100% -4% 4.0 3.7 -7% 0%
72 July 3.7 3.7 0% 0% 7.8 7.4 -5% -1% 10.9 10.7 -2% -1% 8.0 7.7 -4% -1% 2.3 0.1 -96% -15% 3.9 3.5 -10% -2%
72 August 3.3 3.3 0% 0% 7.1 6.9 -4% -4% 10.0 10.0 0% 0% 7.4 7.2 -2% -2% 2.2 0.1 -95% -95% 3.6 3.3 -9% -9%
72 September 13.4 13.8 3% 3% 29.7 30.5 3% 3% 36.2 36.9 2% 2% 26.1 32.5 24% 24% 7.8 3.9 -50% -50% 15.7 15.7 0% 0%
72 October 5.7 5.8 1% 1% 12.0 11.7 -2% -2% 16.1 15.8 -2% -2% 12.1 12.2 1% 1% 3.1 0.3 -90% -90% 5.8 5.5 -4% -4%
72 November 4.5 4.7 4% 4% 9.5 10.1 6% 6% 12.8 13.6 6% 6% 9.5 9.2 -3% -3% 3.0 0.4 -86% -86% 4.8 5.1 5% 5%
72 December 4.0 4.0 0% 0% 8.5 9.1 7% 7% 11.8 12.5 6% 6% 8.8 8.2 -6% -6% 2.7 0.2 -93% -93% 4.3 4.8 11% 11%
73 January 3.5 3.5 0% 0% 7.6 8.0 5% 5% 10.7 11.3 5% 5% 7.9 7.6 -4% -4% 2.4 0.1 -96% -96% 3.9 4.3 9% 9%
73 February 2.9 3.2 11% 11% 6.3 7.3 16% 16% 8.9 10.5 18% 18% 6.5 7.0 9% 9% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.9 9% 9%
73 March 4.0 4.0 0% 0% 8.5 8.5 -1% -1% 11.9 12.0 0% 0% 9.1 10.1 10% 10% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.2 4.1 -2% -2%
73 April 24.5 25.2 3% 3% 53.8 55.5 3% 3% 62.8 65.1 4% 4% 42.6 50.3 18% 18% 15.6 10.5 -33% -33% 28.7 28.7 0% 0%
73 May 52.7 52.8 0% 0% 114.4 115.3 1% 1% 138.9 138.3 0% 0% 94.4 95.5 1% 1% 35.3 28.3 -20% -19% 59.3 60.0 1% 1%
73 June 46.7 48.3 4% 3% 99.7 103.4 4% 3% 124.3 128.6 4% 3% 91.0 93.7 3% 3% 31.1 24.5 -21% -13% 52.6 52.8 0% 0%
73 July 6.9 7.0 1% 1% 14.2 13.7 -3% -1% 20.7 19.8 -4% -2% 15.5 14.1 -9% -5% 3.9 0.9 -77% -21% 6.7 6.2 -8% -2%
73 August 5.7 5.8 0% 0% 11.8 11.5 -2% -2% 17.5 16.8 -4% -4% 13.2 12.0 -10% -10% 3.5 0.7 -80% -80% 5.6 5.3 -6% -6%
73 September 5.1 5.2 2% 2% 10.4 10.5 1% 1% 15.6 15.5 -1% -1% 12.1 11.4 -5% -5% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 5.1 4.9 -4% -4%
73 October 4.6 4.6 0% 0% 9.4 9.3 -1% -1% 14.4 14.0 -2% -2% 11.2 10.3 -8% -8% 2.8 0.2 -93% -93% 4.5 4.3 -4% -4%
73 November 4.0 4.1 2% 2% 8.2 8.5 4% 4% 12.6 12.9 3% 3% 9.7 9.4 -3% -3% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 4.1 0% 0%
73 December 3.7 3.6 -1% -1% 7.7 7.8 2% 2% 11.8 12.1 2% 2% 9.1 8.6 -5% -5% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 3.9 4% 4%
74 January 3.2 3.2 -1% -1% 6.9 7.1 2% 2% 10.8 11.0 3% 3% 8.2 8.0 -3% -3% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.6 2% 2%
74 February 2.6 2.9 9% 9% 5.8 6.9 19% 19% 8.9 10.6 18% 18% 6.8 7.4 9% 9% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.7 13% 13%
74 March 2.6 2.6 -1% -1% 5.9 6.0 2% 2% 9.1 9.5 4% 4% 6.7 6.8 1% 1% 1.8 0.0 -100% -100% 3.1 3.2 3% 3%
74 April 6.3 6.5 3% 3% 13.6 14.1 4% 3% 18.8 19.4 3% 3% 16.2 21.3 32% 32% 2.8 0.0 -100% -41% 6.8 6.9 1% 0%
74 May 24.8 24.7 0% 0% 54.0 53.9 0% 0% 63.2 63.3 0% 0% 43.0 47.9 11% 7% 14.9 10.4 -30% -12% 27.6 27.7 0% 0%
74 June 15.5 16.1 4% 1% 32.8 33.4 2% 1% 40.0 40.3 1% 0% 28.8 31.1 8% 3% 9.1 5.4 -40% -8% 16.8 16.3 -3% -1%
74 July 5.7 5.8 1% 1% 11.9 11.5 -4% -1% 17.1 16.1 -6% -2% 12.4 11.3 -9% -4% 3.4 0.8 -77% -19% 5.8 5.2 -9% -2%
74 August 4.8 4.8 0% 0% 10.1 9.8 -3% -3% 14.7 14.3 -3% -3% 10.9 10.0 -9% -9% 3.1 0.5 -84% -84% 4.9 4.6 -7% -7%
74 September 4.3 4.2 -1% -1% 8.8 8.7 -2% -2% 13.0 12.9 0% 0% 9.7 9.2 -5% -5% 2.8 0.3 -89% -89% 4.4 4.1 -8% -8%
74 October 8.2 8.2 0% 0% 17.4 17.2 -1% -1% 23.4 23.0 -2% -2% 19.0 21.6 14% 14% 3.7 0.4 -89% -89% 8.5 8.3 -3% -3%
74 November 4.5 4.6 3% 3% 9.5 9.9 4% 4% 13.6 14.2 4% 4% 10.3 9.8 -4% -4% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.9 4.9 1% 1%
74 December 4.0 4.0 0% 0% 8.7 8.8 1% 1% 12.4 12.8 3% 3% 9.3 8.6 -7% -7% 2.8 0.3 -89% -89% 4.4 4.5 2% 2%
75 January 3.6 3.5 0% 0% 7.8 8.2 6% 6% 11.2 12.0 7% 7% 8.4 8.0 -5% -5% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.0 4.4 11% 11%
75 February 3.0 3.2 7% 7% 6.6 7.4 13% 13% 9.6 11.0 14% 14% 7.1 7.4 4% 4% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 4.0 8% 8%
75 March 2.9 2.9 -1% -1% 6.5 6.9 5% 5% 9.5 10.2 7% 7% 6.9 6.8 -1% -1% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.7 9% 9%
75 April 24.6 25.3 3% 3% 54.2 56.3 4% 4% 63.8 66.5 4% 4% 43.7 52.0 19% 19% 16.1 11.0 -32% -32% 29.0 29.4 1% 1%
75 May 62.6 62.7 0% 0% 136.4 137.7 1% 1% 166.4 166.5 0% 0% 114.3 115.3 1% 1% 42.3 34.5 -18% -18% 71.0 72.1 2% 2%
75 June 36.4 37.7 4% 3% 76.9 79.7 4% 2% 96.5 99.8 3% 2% 71.1 73.3 3% 3% 23.4 17.9 -24% -11% 40.1 40.3 0% 0%
75 July 6.6 6.7 1% 0% 13.5 13.1 -3% -1% 20.0 19.1 -4% -2% 14.9 13.4 -10% -5% 3.7 0.9 -76% -20% 6.4 5.9 -8% -2%
75 August 5.5 5.5 0% 0% 11.3 11.0 -3% -3% 16.9 16.2 -4% -4% 12.8 11.5 -10% -10% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.4 5.0 -7% -7%
75 September 7.6 7.8 3% 3% 15.6 15.9 2% 2% 22.1 21.9 -1% -1% 17.9 19.3 8% 8% 3.7 0.4 -89% -89% 7.7 7.4 -3% -3%
75 October 5.2 5.2 -1% -1% 10.7 10.6 -1% -1% 16.0 15.6 -2% -2% 12.2 11.1 -9% -9% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 5.1 5.0 -1% -1%
75 November 4.4 4.5 4% 4% 9.0 9.6 6% 6% 13.6 14.2 5% 5% 10.4 9.8 -6% -6% 2.8 0.3 -89% -89% 4.6 4.7 3% 3%
75 December 4.0 4.0 -1% -1% 8.4 8.8 5% 5% 12.7 13.2 4% 4% 9.7 9.0 -7% -7% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 4.5 12% 12%
76 January 3.5 3.5 -1% -1% 7.5 7.6 2% 2% 11.5 11.7 3% 3% 8.7 8.2 -6% -6% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 3.8 2% 2%
76 February 2.8 3.1 10% 10% 6.2 7.2 16% 16% 9.5 11.0 17% 17% 7.2 7.7 7% 7% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.8 8% 8%
76 March 3.2 3.2 -1% -1% 7.0 7.0 0% 0% 10.5 10.8 2% 2% 8.0 8.0 1% 1% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.5 -1% -1%
76 April 21.8 22.4 3% 3% 48.3 49.8 3% 3% 57.5 59.3 3% 3% 40.6 49.0 21% 21% 13.6 8.7 -36% -36% 25.8 25.9 0% 0%
76 May 55.6 55.7 0% 0% 121.0 122.0 1% 1% 147.7 147.6 0% 0% 101.5 102.7 1% 1% 37.3 30.1 -19% -19% 62.8 63.6 1% 1%
76 June 50.5 52.3 4% 4% 107.8 112.2 4% 4% 135.0 140.3 4% 4% 99.0 101.7 3% 3% 33.6 26.8 -20% -14% 56.9 57.5 1% 1%
76 July 6.8 6.9 1% 1% 13.9 13.5 -3% -1% 20.6 19.8 -4% -2% 15.4 13.9 -9% -5% 3.8 0.9 -76% -21% 6.5 6.0 -7% -2%
76 August 5.7 5.7 0% 0% 11.6 11.2 -4% -4% 17.4 16.6 -5% -5% 13.2 11.8 -10% -10% 3.4 0.6 -82% -82% 5.5 5.0 -9% -9%
76 September 4.8 5.0 3% 3% 9.8 9.9 2% 2% 14.9 14.9 0% 0% 11.5 10.7 -7% -7% 3.0 0.4 -86% -86% 4.8 4.6 -4% -4%
76 October 6.8 6.8 0% 0% 14.0 13.7 -2% -2% 20.1 19.4 -4% -4% 16.4 17.1 5% 5% 3.3 0.2 -94% -94% 6.6 6.3 -4% -4%
76 November 5.0 5.1 3% 3% 10.1 10.9 8% 8% 15.0 15.8 5% 5% 11.7 11.2 -4% -4% 2.9 0.2 -93% -93% 4.9 5.4 9% 9%
76 December 4.4 4.4 0% 0% 9.0 9.4 4% 4% 13.6 14.0 3% 3% 10.4 9.7 -7% -7% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.4 4.7 8% 8%
77 January 3.8 3.8 -1% -1% 8.0 8.5 6% 6% 12.2 12.8 5% 5% 9.3 8.8 -5% -5% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 4.4 11% 11%
77 February 3.1 3.4 10% 10% 6.6 7.9 20% 20% 10.0 11.9 19% 19% 7.6 8.1 7% 7% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 4.2 14% 14%
77 March 3.0 3.0 0% 0% 6.7 7.1 6% 6% 10.2 10.9 7% 7% 7.7 7.5 -2% -2% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.8 10% 10%
77 April 11.9 12.2 3% 3% 26.2 27.1 4% 4% 33.1 34.0 3% 3% 25.0 32.0 28% 28% 6.2 2.4 -61% -56% 13.7 13.9 2% 2%
77 May 83.7 83.6 0% 0% 182.9 184.6 1% 1% 221.7 223.5 1% 1% 153.3 154.8 1% 1% 57.3 47.5 -17% -17% 95.6 97.1 2% 2%
77 June 112.5 116.3 3% 3% 240.4 251.0 4% 4% 301.0 312.7 4% 4% 221.8 224.6 1% 1% 76.2 63.9 -16% -16% 127.4 129.6 2% 2%
77 July 10.2 10.3 2% 1% 20.3 20.1 -1% -1% 29.0 27.8 -4% -3% 23.3 22.4 -4% -3% 4.8 1.4 -71% -24% 9.5 9.0 -5% -2%
77 August 6.7 6.8 0% 0% 13.6 13.1 -3% -3% 20.0 19.0 -5% -5% 15.2 13.7 -10% -10% 3.9 0.9 -77% -77% 6.4 5.8 -9% -9%
77 September 8.4 8.7 3% 3% 17.4 17.7 2% 2% 24.4 24.2 -1% -1% 20.1 21.1 5% 5% 4.3 0.9 -79% -79% 8.6 8.3 -3% -3%
77 October 32.0 32.0 0% 0% 67.4 68.1 1% 1% 84.4 84.2 0% 0% 60.5 61.8 2% 2% 19.8 14.4 -27% -27% 33.9 34.5 2% 2%
77 November 6.5 6.7 4% 4% 13.5 14.0 4% 4% 19.8 20.2 2% 2% 14.4 13.6 -6% -6% 4.1 1.1 -73% -73% 6.8 6.7 0% 0%
77 December 5.6 5.6 0% 0% 11.7 12.1 3% 3% 17.5 17.5 0% 0% 13.0 11.8 -9% -9% 3.6 0.7 -81% -81% 5.7 6.0 5% 5%
78 January 4.9 4.9 0% 0% 10.2 10.5 3% 3% 15.5 15.6 1% 1% 11.7 10.7 -9% -9% 3.2 0.4 -87% -87% 5.0 5.2 5% 5%
78 February 4.0 4.4 11% 11% 8.3 9.6 16% 16% 12.8 14.4 13% 13% 9.7 9.9 2% 2% 2.8 0.3 -89% -89% 4.5 4.9 9% 9%
78 March 3.9 3.9 0% 0% 8.2 8.8 7% 7% 12.8 13.4 4% 4% 9.7 9.1 -6% -6% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 4.5 12% 12%
78 April 6.9 7.1 3% 3% 14.5 14.8 2% 2% 20.3 20.7 2% 1% 16.8 19.9 18% 18% 3.2 0.0 -100% -47% 7.2 7.1 -2% -1%
78 May 68.2 68.1 0% 0% 150.0 151.1 1% 1% 182.3 182.8 0% 0% 126.0 128.9 2% 2% 46.7 37.7 -19% -19% 78.6 79.7 1% 1%
78 June 76.3 78.8 3% 3% 163.3 170.0 4% 4% 204.9 212.6 4% 4% 149.6 152.8 2% 2% 51.6 42.4 -18% -18% 86.6 87.7 1% 1%
78 July 19.0 19.1 1% 1% 38.8 38.7 0% 0% 51.5 50.4 -2% -2% 39.3 38.7 -2% -2% 10.5 6.3 -40% -30% 18.9 18.5 -2% -1%
78 August 6.9 7.0 1% 1% 14.3 14.0 -2% -2% 21.2 20.4 -4% -4% 15.8 14.3 -9% -9% 4.1 1.1 -73% -73% 6.9 6.5 -6% -6%
78 September 5.9 6.1 3% 3% 12.2 12.4 2% 2% 18.1 18.1 0% 0% 13.6 12.9 -5% -5% 3.7 0.7 -81% -81% 6.0 5.8 -3% -3%
78 October 6.4 6.4 1% 1% 13.1 12.9 -2% -2% 19.2 18.5 -3% -3% 14.9 14.5 -3% -3% 3.6 0.5 -86% -86% 6.2 6.0 -4% -4%
78 November 5.2 5.3 3% 3% 10.5 11.3 8% 8% 15.8 16.5 5% 5% 12.1 11.6 -4% -4% 3.2 0.4 -87% -87% 5.2 5.7 9% 9%
78 December 4.6 4.6 0% 0% 9.5 9.9 4% 4% 14.5 14.8 2% 2% 11.1 10.4 -6% -6% 2.8 0.1 -96% -96% 4.6 4.9 7% 7%
79 January 4.1 4.1 -1% -1% 8.5 8.7 2% 2% 13.1 13.3 1% 1% 9.9 9.5 -5% -5% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 4.3 2% 2%
79 February 3.4 3.6 6% 6% 7.3 8.0 10% 10% 11.2 12.3 10% 10% 8.4 8.7 4% 4% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 4.1 5% 5%
79 March 3.3 3.3 -1% -1% 7.1 7.5 6% 6% 11.0 11.6 5% 5% 8.3 8.1 -2% -2% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 4.0 9% 9%
79 April 9.0 9.3 3% 3% 19.3 19.8 3% 2% 25.6 26.1 2% 2% 20.5 26.2 28% 28% 3.9 0.5 -87% -50% 9.8 9.7 -1% -1%
79 May 69.3 69.2 0% 0% 152.2 153.8 1% 1% 183.9 184.9 1% 1% 125.6 128.3 2% 2% 47.6 38.9 -18% -18% 79.8 81.2 2% 2%
79 June 78.3 80.9 3% 3% 167.4 174.5 4% 4% 209.6 217.7 4% 4% 153.2 156.5 2% 2% 52.8 43.4 -18% -18% 88.7 90.1 2% 2%
79 July 11.8 12.0 2% 1% 23.6 23.3 -1% -1% 32.7 31.5 -4% -3% 26.1 25.5 -3% -2% 5.6 2.1 -62% -25% 11.1 10.6 -5% -2%
79 August 6.8 6.8 0% 0% 13.8 13.4 -3% -3% 20.3 19.4 -5% -5% 15.3 13.9 -9% -9% 4.0 1.1 -73% -73% 6.6 6.1 -8% -8%
79 September 7.0 7.3 4% 4% 14.4 14.6 1% 1% 20.7 20.5 -1% -1% 16.1 16.4 2% 2% 4.0 0.9 -78% -78% 7.1 6.8 -5% -5%
79 October 9.3 9.3 0% 0% 19.4 19.3 -1% -1% 26.7 25.9 -3% -3% 21.9 22.5 3% 3% 4.6 1.0 -78% -78% 9.4 9.3 -1% -1%
79 November 5.8 6.0 2% 2% 12.0 12.7 6% 6% 17.5 18.1 4% 4% 13.1 12.4 -5% -5% 3.7 0.8 -78% -78% 6.0 6.3 5% 5%
79 December 5.2 5.3 0% 0% 10.8 11.1 2% 2% 16.0 16.1 1% 1% 11.8 11.0 -7% -7% 3.4 0.5 -85% -85% 5.3 5.4 3% 3%
80 January 4.6 4.6 0% 0% 9.6 9.6 -1% -1% 14.4 14.3 -1% -1% 10.8 10.1 -6% -6% 3.0 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 4.6 -3% -3%
80 February 3.7 4.1 10% 10% 7.8 8.8 13% 13% 11.8 13.4 13% 13% 8.8 9.3 6% 6% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.4 4% 4%
80 March 3.6 3.6 0% 0% 7.9 8.1 3% 3% 11.9 12.3 3% 3% 8.9 8.6 -3% -3% 2.5 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 4.2 5% 5%
80 April 16.3 16.7 3% 3% 35.7 36.5 2% 2% 43.8 44.4 1% 1% 31.8 38.8 22% 22% 9.6 5.2 -46% -46% 18.9 18.6 -1% -1%
80 May 35.0 35.1 0% 0% 75.5 75.7 0% 0% 92.0 91.9 0% 0% 61.4 63.3 3% 3% 22.9 17.4 -24% -15% 38.7 38.8 0% 0%
80 June 8.2 8.6 4% 1% 17.3 17.3 0% 0% 23.9 23.6 -1% 0% 18.2 18.9 4% 1% 4.4 1.1 -75% -7% 8.7 8.0 -8% -1%
80 July 6.0 6.0 0% 0% 12.6 12.1 -4% -1% 18.2 17.3 -5% -2% 13.4 12.4 -8% -3% 3.8 0.9 -76% -21% 6.2 5.6 -10% -3%
80 August 5.2 5.1 -1% -1% 10.7 10.4 -3% -3% 15.8 15.3 -3% -3% 11.8 10.9 -7% -7% 3.3 0.5 -85% -85% 5.2 4.9 -7% -7%
80 September 28.2 29.1 3% 3% 61.2 63.7 4% 4% 74.8 77.1 3% 3% 53.0 58.2 10% 10% 18.4 13.0 -29% -29% 32.5 33.0 1% 1%
80 October 12.7 12.8 0% 0% 26.5 26.5 0% 0% 34.3 33.8 -2% -2% 26.3 26.7 2% 2% 6.8 3.2 -53% -53% 12.9 12.8 -1% -1%
80 November 6.0 6.2 4% 4% 12.6 13.0 4% 4% 18.1 18.6 3% 3% 13.3 12.6 -5% -5% 3.9 0.9 -77% -77% 6.4 6.4 0% 0%
80 December 5.2 5.2 0% 0% 11.0 11.1 1% 1% 16.2 16.3 1% 1% 12.0 11.0 -8% -8% 3.5 0.7 -80% -80% 5.5 5.5 0% 0%
81 January 4.6 4.6 0% 0% 9.7 10.0 3% 3% 14.4 14.9 3% 3% 10.9 10.1 -7% -7% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 4.9 5.1 5% 5%
81 February 3.7 4.0 10% 10% 7.9 9.5 21% 21% 11.7 14.0 20% 20% 9.0 9.4 4% 4% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.4 5.1 17% 17%
81 March 16.2 16.1 -1% -1% 35.5 35.5 0% 0% 43.5 43.2 -1% -1% 32.4 37.0 14% 14% 9.3 5.0 -46% -46% 18.2 18.3 0% 0%
81 April 32.5 33.7 4% 4% 70.1 73.0 4% 4% 86.1 89.2 4% 4% 58.3 61.8 6% 6% 22.1 16.6 -25% -25% 37.2 37.5 1% 1%
81 May 56.3 56.3 0% 0% 122.1 122.8 1% 1% 151.7 152.5 1% 1% 109.3 109.0 0% 0% 37.8 30.3 -20% -20% 63.2 63.9 1% 1%
81 June 39.4 40.7 3% 3% 83.6 86.6 4% 3% 106.1 109.4 3% 2% 78.2 79.8 2% 2% 25.8 19.8 -23% -12% 43.8 43.9 0% 0%
81 July 7.2 7.2 1% 1% 15.0 14.6 -2% -1% 21.9 21.3 -3% -2% 16.2 14.8 -9% -5% 4.2 1.1 -74% -23% 7.3 6.7 -7% -2%
81 August 6.0 6.0 0% 0% 12.5 12.1 -3% -3% 18.5 17.8 -4% -4% 13.7 12.6 -8% -8% 3.7 0.8 -78% -78% 6.1 5.6 -7% -7%
81 September 16.4 16.9 3% 3% 35.1 36.3 3% 3% 44.3 45.5 3% 3% 34.8 38.0 9% 9% 9.4 5.1 -46% -46% 18.2 18.2 0% 0%
81 October 6.3 6.3 0% 0% 13.1 12.9 -1% -1% 19.2 18.8 -2% -2% 14.1 12.9 -8% -8% 3.8 0.9 -76% -76% 6.4 6.1 -4% -4%
81 November 5.2 5.3 3% 3% 10.8 11.3 5% 5% 16.0 16.6 3% 3% 11.8 11.2 -5% -5% 3.5 0.6 -83% -83% 5.5 5.5 2% 2%
81 December 4.8 4.8 0% 0% 9.9 9.9 0% 0% 14.9 14.9 0% 0% 11.1 10.3 -8% -8% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 4.8 -1% -1%
82 January 4.2 4.2 0% 0% 8.8 8.9 2% 2% 13.4 13.6 2% 2% 10.1 9.5 -6% -6% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.4 4.5 2% 2%
82 February 3.4 3.7 10% 10% 7.2 8.1 13% 13% 11.0 12.6 14% 14% 8.3 8.7 6% 6% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 4.2 5% 5%
82 March 3.3 3.3 0% 0% 7.3 7.5 4% 4% 11.2 11.7 5% 5% 8.4 8.1 -3% -3% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 3.9 5% 5%
82 April 12.5 12.9 3% 3% 27.5 28.0 2% 2% 34.7 35.1 1% 1% 26.2 32.8 25% 25% 6.7 2.8 -58% -58% 14.4 14.1 -2% -2%
82 May 22.8 22.8 0% 0% 49.0 48.8 0% 0% 58.7 58.5 0% 0% 40.3 42.7 6% 4% 14.2 9.8 -31% -12% 24.9 24.7 -1% 0%
82 June 5.6 5.8 4% 0% 11.7 11.8 1% 0% 16.8 16.8 0% 0% 12.0 11.5 -4% -1% 3.4 0.7 -80% -6% 5.9 5.5 -6% -1%
82 July 4.9 4.9 0% 0% 10.2 10.0 -2% -1% 14.9 14.7 -2% -1% 10.9 10.1 -8% -3% 3.2 0.5 -84% -19% 5.0 4.7 -6% -1%
82 August 4.2 4.2 1% 1% 9.0 8.7 -3% -3% 13.3 13.1 -1% -1% 10.0 9.2 -7% -7% 2.8 0.3 -89% -89% 4.5 4.1 -8% -8%
82 September 3.6 3.7 3% 3% 7.7 7.7 0% 0% 11.5 11.9 3% 3% 8.8 8.5 -3% -3% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.0 3.8 -7% -7%
82 October 3.3 3.3 0% 0% 7.3 7.1 -2% -2% 10.9 11.0 1% 1% 8.2 7.9 -4% -4% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 3.5 -6% -6%
82 November 2.9 3.0 3% 3% 6.5 6.8 5% 5% 9.7 10.5 8% 8% 7.2 7.3 2% 2% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.6 2% 2%
82 December 2.8 2.7 -1% -1% 6.2 6.5 4% 4% 9.3 9.8 6% 6% 6.7 6.8 1% 1% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.4 5% 5%
83 January 2.5 2.5 0% 0% 5.8 6.1 6% 6% 8.6 9.3 9% 9% 6.1 6.3 3% 3% 1.8 0.0 -100% -100% 3.1 3.4 9% 9%
83 February 2.2 2.3 6% 6% 5.1 5.5 9% 9% 7.5 8.5 14% 14% 5.1 5.8 13% 13% 1.7 0.0 -100% -100% 2.9 3.0 1% 1%
83 March 2.2 2.1 -1% -1% 5.1 5.3 3% 3% 7.5 8.1 8% 8% 5.0 5.4 7% 7% 1.6 0.0 -100% -100% 2.8 2.9 4% 4%
83 April 20.1 20.6 3% 3% 44.8 46.4 4% 4% 53.2 55.0 3% 3% 36.5 46.2 27% 27% 12.0 7.8 -35% -35% 23.9 24.2 1% 1%
83 May 37.0 37.1 0% 0% 79.9 80.3 0% 0% 95.3 95.6 0% 0% 63.4 65.7 4% 3% 23.8 18.5 -22% -14% 41.1 41.2 0% 0%
83 June 16.2 16.9 4% 1% 33.9 34.7 2% 1% 42.3 42.1 0% 0% 31.9 33.8 6% 2% 9.3 5.6 -40% -8% 17.3 16.9 -3% -1%
83 July 5.9 5.9 0% 0% 12.2 11.6 -5% -2% 17.6 16.3 -8% -3% 13.2 12.1 -9% -4% 3.4 0.8 -77% -19% 5.9 5.2 -11% -3%
83 August 5.0 5.0 -1% -1% 10.3 9.9 -4% -4% 15.2 14.4 -5% -5% 11.6 10.6 -9% -9% 3.1 0.5 -84% -84% 5.0 4.5 -9% -9%
83 September 4.2 4.4 3% 3% 8.8 8.9 1% 1% 13.2 13.3 1% 1% 10.2 9.7 -5% -5% 2.8 0.3 -89% -89% 4.4 4.2 -5% -5%
83 October 3.9 3.9 -1% -1% 8.1 8.0 -2% -2% 12.2 12.1 -1% -1% 9.6 8.9 -7% -7% 2.4 0.1 -96% -96% 4.0 3.8 -5% -5%
83 November 3.3 3.4 3% 3% 7.0 7.8 10% 10% 10.7 11.7 9% 9% 8.4 8.2 -2% -2% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 4.1 11% 11%
83 December 3.0 3.0 -1% -1% 6.7 6.9 2% 2% 10.2 10.6 4% 4% 7.9 7.6 -3% -3% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.6 3% 3%
84 January 2.7 2.7 -1% -1% 6.1 6.4 6% 6% 9.3 9.9 7% 7% 7.0 7.0 -1% -1% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.2 3.5 9% 9%
84 February 2.3 2.5 11% 11% 5.1 5.8 14% 14% 7.8 9.1 18% 18% 5.7 6.4 12% 12% 1.8 0.0 -100% -100% 3.0 3.1 3% 3%
84 March 2.3 2.2 -2% -2% 5.3 5.7 8% 8% 8.0 8.8 10% 10% 5.7 5.9 4% 4% 1.7 0.0 -100% -100% 2.9 3.3 15% 15%
84 April 26.3 27.0 3% 3% 58.1 60.7 5% 5% 68.5 71.9 5% 5% 47.5 57.1 20% 20% 16.9 11.9 -30% -30% 31.1 31.9 2% 2%
84 May 45.9 45.9 0% 0% 99.5 100.1 1% 1% 121.0 120.1 -1% -1% 82.9 84.6 2% 2% 30.1 23.9 -21% -16% 51.4 51.9 1% 1%
84 June 36.1 37.3 4% 3% 76.8 79.5 3% 2% 95.8 98.7 3% 2% 70.7 73.4 4% 3% 23.5 18.1 -23% -11% 40.4 40.3 0% 0%
84 July 6.3 6.4 1% 1% 12.9 12.4 -4% -1% 19.1 18.1 -5% -2% 14.2 12.9 -9% -4% 3.5 0.8 -77% -19% 6.1 5.4 -11% -3%
84 August 5.3 5.3 -1% -1% 10.8 10.5 -3% -3% 16.3 15.6 -4% -4% 12.4 11.3 -9% -9% 3.1 0.5 -84% -84% 5.1 4.8 -7% -7%
84 September 4.7 4.9 4% 4% 9.6 9.8 2% 2% 14.6 14.6 0% 0% 11.4 10.8 -5% -5% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 4.5 -4% -4%
84 October 6.6 6.7 1% 1% 13.6 13.4 -2% -2% 19.5 18.9 -3% -3% 16.1 16.9 5% 5% 3.2 0.2 -94% -94% 6.5 6.2 -5% -5%
84 November 4.6 4.7 4% 4% 9.3 9.7 5% 5% 13.9 14.3 3% 3% 10.8 10.3 -5% -5% 2.7 0.2 -93% -93% 4.6 4.6 1% 1%
84 December 4.0 4.0 -1% -1% 8.4 8.3 -1% -1% 12.6 12.6 0% 0% 9.7 9.1 -6% -6% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 4.0 -2% -2%
85 January 3.5 3.5 -1% -1% 7.5 7.8 4% 4% 11.4 11.8 4% 4% 8.7 8.3 -5% -5% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 4.0 6% 6%
85 February 2.8 3.1 10% 10% 6.2 7.1 16% 16% 9.4 11.0 17% 17% 7.2 7.7 8% 8% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.8 7% 7%
85 March 3.0 3.0 0% 0% 6.5 6.6 2% 2% 9.8 10.2 4% 4% 7.5 7.4 -1% -1% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.4 2% 2%
85 April 22.6 23.2 3% 3% 50.2 51.8 3% 3% 59.5 61.7 4% 4% 41.9 50.4 20% 20% 14.3 9.5 -34% -34% 26.9 27.0 0% 0%
85 May 33.6 33.7 0% 0% 72.2 72.7 1% 1% 88.1 87.6 -1% 0% 59.5 61.3 3% 3% 21.6 16.3 -25% -14% 37.0 37.3 1% 1%
85 June 6.7 7.0 5% 1% 13.9 13.8 0% 0% 19.7 19.2 -3% 0% 14.9 14.9 0% 0% 3.6 0.8 -78% -6% 6.9 6.2 -9% -1%
85 July 5.6 5.6 -1% 0% 11.5 11.0 -4% -1% 16.7 15.9 -5% -2% 12.7 11.6 -8% -4% 3.3 0.7 -79% -19% 5.5 5.0 -8% -2%
85 August 4.8 4.8 0% 0% 9.8 9.6 -2% -2% 14.6 14.2 -2% -2% 11.3 10.3 -8% -8% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 4.5 -5% -5%
85 September 4.1 4.2 3% 3% 8.4 8.4 0% 0% 12.6 12.8 2% 2% 9.9 9.4 -4% -4% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 3.9 -8% -8%
85 October 5.4 5.4 0% 0% 11.1 10.9 -2% -2% 16.0 15.8 -1% -1% 13.3 14.1 6% 6% 2.9 0.1 -97% -97% 5.3 5.1 -4% -4%
85 November 3.9 4.0 3% 3% 8.3 8.6 4% 4% 12.1 12.7 5% 5% 9.4 9.3 -2% -2% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.2 4.2 0% 0%
85 December 3.5 3.5 0% 0% 7.6 7.6 0% 0% 11.1 11.4 3% 3% 8.6 8.3 -3% -3% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 3.8 -1% -1%
86 January 3.1 3.1 0% 0% 6.9 7.1 3% 3% 10.2 10.8 6% 6% 7.7 7.6 -1% -1% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.7 3% 3%
86 February 2.7 2.9 10% 10% 5.9 6.5 11% 11% 8.7 10.0 15% 15% 6.4 7.2 12% 12% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.4 -1% -1%
86 March 2.7 2.6 0% 0% 6.0 6.3 5% 5% 8.9 9.5 7% 7% 6.4 6.6 2% 2% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.2 3.4 7% 7%
86 April 7.9 8.2 3% 3% 17.1 17.6 2% 2% 22.6 23.1 2% 2% 18.2 24.4 34% 34% 3.3 0.2 -94% -46% 8.7 8.6 -2% -2%
86 May 23.7 23.6 0% 0% 51.6 51.5 0% 0% 60.2 60.1 0% 0% 40.1 44.2 10% 6% 14.8 10.4 -30% -12% 26.6 26.6 0% 0%
86 June 16.1 16.8 4% 1% 34.3 35.1 2% 1% 41.3 42.1 2% 1% 29.7 31.9 7% 3% 9.7 5.9 -39% -8% 17.7 17.3 -2% -1%
86 July 5.8 5.8 1% 0% 12.1 11.6 -4% -1% 17.1 16.1 -5% -2% 12.4 11.3 -9% -4% 3.5 0.8 -77% -20% 5.9 5.3 -10% -3%
86 August 4.9 4.9 0% 0% 10.2 9.8 -4% -4% 14.7 14.1 -4% -4% 10.9 9.9 -9% -9% 3.2 0.5 -84% -84% 5.0 4.5 -10% -10%
86 September 4.1 4.3 4% 4% 8.7 8.8 1% 1% 12.8 13.0 2% 2% 9.6 9.1 -6% -6% 2.8 0.3 -89% -89% 4.5 4.2 -7% -7%
86 October 4.1 4.1 0% 0% 8.6 8.5 -1% -1% 12.7 12.6 0% 0% 9.8 9.2 -6% -6% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.1 -4% -4%
86 November 3.5 3.6 3% 3% 7.5 8.0 7% 7% 11.0 11.9 8% 8% 8.5 8.4 -1% -1% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 4.2 7% 7%
86 December 3.2 3.2 0% 0% 7.0 7.2 2% 2% 10.4 10.8 4% 4% 7.8 7.5 -3% -3% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.7 4% 4%
87 January 2.9 2.9 -1% -1% 6.4 6.5 2% 2% 9.5 9.9 4% 4% 7.0 6.9 -1% -1% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.4 1% 1%
87 February 2.5 2.6 7% 7% 5.6 6.2 10% 10% 8.3 9.3 13% 13% 5.9 6.4 8% 8% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.2 3.3 4% 4%
87 March 5.4 5.4 0% 0% 11.6 11.4 -2% -2% 16.1 15.9 -1% -1% 13.4 16.7 25% 25% 2.6 0.0 -100% -100% 5.7 5.4 -5% -5%
87 April 19.3 19.8 3% 3% 42.3 43.6 3% 3% 50.0 51.1 2% 2% 33.9 40.4 19% 19% 11.4 7.2 -37% -37% 22.5 22.5 0% 0%
87 May 11.2 11.3 1% 0% 23.4 22.9 -2% -1% 29.2 28.3 -3% -1% 21.3 22.6 6% 2% 5.7 2.3 -59% -9% 11.4 10.8 -5% -1%
87 June 6.1 6.3 4% 1% 12.7 12.7 0% 0% 17.2 17.1 0% 0% 12.8 12.7 0% 0% 3.7 0.8 -79% -6% 6.4 6.0 -7% -1%
87 July 5.2 5.2 0% 0% 10.9 10.6 -3% -1% 15.0 14.6 -3% -1% 11.3 10.3 -8% -3% 3.4 0.7 -79% -19% 5.4 5.0 -7% -2%
87 August 4.5 4.5 0% 0% 9.5 9.1 -4% -4% 13.3 13.0 -2% -2% 9.9 9.1 -8% -8% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 4.3 -10% -10%
87 September 3.8 3.9 3% 3% 8.1 8.2 2% 2% 11.6 12.0 3% 3% 8.8 8.4 -4% -4% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.1 -4% -4%
87 October 3.7 3.7 0% 0% 8.0 7.9 -1% -1% 11.5 11.6 1% 1% 8.7 8.3 -4% -4% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 3.9 -3% -3%
87 November 3.2 3.3 3% 3% 7.0 7.4 5% 5% 10.2 10.8 6% 6% 7.5 7.5 1% 1% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 3.8 1% 1%
87 December 3.0 3.0 0% 0% 6.7 7.0 4% 4% 9.6 10.2 6% 6% 6.9 6.9 -1% -1% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.7 6% 6%
88 January 2.7 2.7 -1% -1% 6.2 6.6 6% 6% 9.0 9.6 7% 7% 6.2 6.3 1% 1% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.6 11% 11%
88 February 2.3 2.5 11% 11% 5.3 6.0 15% 15% 7.6 8.9 18% 18% 5.2 5.8 13% 13% 1.8 0.0 -100% -100% 3.1 3.3 6% 6%
88 March 4.0 4.0 0% 0% 8.6 8.7 1% 1% 12.0 12.3 2% 2% 9.1 11.0 21% 21% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 4.3 4.4 2% 2%
88 April 19.5 20.1 3% 3% 43.0 44.6 4% 4% 51.0 52.3 3% 3% 34.8 42.8 23% 23% 11.5 7.2 -37% -37% 22.9 23.2 1% 1%
88 May 62.4 62.5 0% 0% 136.0 137.0 1% 1% 163.9 164.4 0% 0% 111.5 112.7 1% 1% 42.1 34.3 -19% -19% 70.8 71.6 1% 1%
88 June 47.6 49.3 4% 3% 101.2 105.4 4% 4% 126.2 130.7 4% 3% 92.7 95.2 3% 3% 31.3 24.8 -21% -13% 53.3 53.8 1% 1%
88 July 6.8 6.9 2% 1% 13.9 13.6 -2% -1% 20.3 19.5 -4% -2% 15.3 13.7 -10% -5% 3.7 0.9 -76% -20% 6.5 6.1 -6% -2%
88 August 5.7 5.7 0% 0% 11.6 11.4 -2% -2% 17.3 16.6 -5% -5% 13.1 11.7 -11% -11% 3.4 0.6 -82% -82% 5.5 5.2 -5% -5%
88 September 4.8 5.0 2% 2% 9.8 9.8 0% 0% 14.9 14.6 -2% -2% 11.5 10.6 -8% -8% 3.0 0.4 -86% -86% 4.8 4.5 -6% -6%
88 October 4.4 4.4 0% 0% 9.0 8.9 -1% -1% 13.8 13.4 -3% -3% 10.8 9.7 -10% -10% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.1 -3% -3%
88 November 3.9 3.9 2% 2% 7.9 8.1 3% 3% 12.2 12.4 2% 2% 9.5 9.0 -5% -5% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 3.9 0% 0%
88 December 3.5 3.5 -1% -1% 7.4 7.5 1% 1% 11.5 11.6 1% 1% 8.8 8.2 -7% -7% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.7 2% 2%
89 January 3.1 3.1 0% 0% 6.7 6.9 3% 3% 10.5 10.7 2% 2% 8.0 7.6 -5% -5% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.5 3% 3%
89 February 2.5 2.8 9% 9% 5.6 6.4 14% 14% 8.7 10.0 15% 15% 6.6 7.0 7% 7% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.2 3.3 5% 5%
89 March 2.9 2.9 0% 0% 6.4 6.2 -2% -2% 9.7 9.8 1% 1% 7.3 7.4 1% 1% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.1 -6% -6%
89 April 6.3 6.5 3% 3% 13.6 13.8 2% 1% 18.8 19.1 2% 1% 16.1 21.0 31% 31% 2.8 0.0 -100% -41% 6.8 6.6 -3% -2%
89 May 13.1 13.0 -1% 0% 28.1 27.7 -1% 0% 34.7 33.9 -2% -1% 24.5 28.8 18% 6% 6.3 3.0 -53% -9% 14.0 13.8 -1% 0%
89 June 4.8 4.9 3% 0% 9.9 9.8 0% 0% 13.6 13.6 0% 0% 10.1 9.7 -4% 0% 2.8 0.3 -89% -5% 4.9 4.5 -8% -1%
89 July 4.3 4.3 0% 0% 9.2 8.7 -5% -1% 12.6 12.3 -3% -1% 9.4 8.6 -8% -3% 2.8 0.4 -86% -18% 4.6 4.1 -10% -2%
89 August 3.8 3.8 0% 0% 8.1 7.7 -5% -5% 11.5 11.2 -2% -2% 8.7 8.0 -8% -8% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 3.6 -11% -11%
89 September 3.3 3.4 4% 4% 7.1 7.1 0% 0% 10.2 10.5 3% 3% 7.6 7.4 -2% -2% 2.3 0.1 -96% -96% 3.8 3.4 -9% -9%
89 October 4.7 4.7 0% 0% 9.8 9.7 -1% -1% 13.7 13.7 0% 0% 10.9 12.0 10% 10% 2.6 0.0 -100% -100% 4.8 4.6 -3% -3%
89 November 3.4 3.5 3% 3% 7.3 7.7 6% 6% 10.2 11.0 7% 7% 7.5 7.5 0% 0% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 3.9 5% 5%
89 December 3.1 3.1 0% 0% 6.9 7.0 2% 2% 9.7 10.1 4% 4% 6.8 6.7 -2% -2% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.6 1% 1%
90 January 2.8 2.8 -1% -1% 6.4 6.7 6% 6% 9.0 9.7 7% 7% 6.2 6.2 -1% -1% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.7 9% 9%
90 February 3.2 3.6 11% 11% 7.0 7.8 11% 11% 9.8 11.1 14% 14% 7.2 8.8 24% 24% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 3.9 0% 0%
90 March 2.9 2.8 -1% -1% 6.3 6.8 7% 7% 8.9 9.6 8% 8% 6.1 6.2 2% 2% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.7 13% 13%
90 April 17.9 18.3 3% 3% 39.5 40.9 4% 4% 47.1 48.3 3% 3% 32.5 40.7 25% 25% 10.6 6.3 -40% -40% 21.0 21.3 1% 1%
90 May 67.7 67.8 0% 0% 147.8 149.1 1% 1% 177.5 178.7 1% 1% 120.9 122.2 1% 1% 46.0 37.6 -18% -18% 77.1 78.1 1% 1%
90 June 65.3 67.6 3% 3% 139.4 145.3 4% 4% 173.8 180.2 4% 4% 127.3 130.1 2% 2% 43.7 35.6 -19% -17% 73.7 74.7 1% 1%
90 July 7.0 7.1 2% 1% 14.1 13.8 -2% -1% 20.9 19.8 -5% -3% 15.8 14.1 -11% -6% 3.7 0.9 -76% -20% 6.5 6.1 -6% -2%
90 August 5.8 5.8 0% 0% 11.8 11.4 -3% -3% 17.6 16.6 -6% -6% 13.4 11.9 -11% -11% 3.4 0.6 -82% -82% 5.5 5.1 -7% -7%
90 September 4.9 5.0 3% 3% 9.8 9.9 1% 1% 15.0 14.7 -2% -2% 11.7 10.7 -8% -8% 3.0 0.4 -86% -86% 4.8 4.5 -6% -6%
90 October 7.4 7.4 0% 0% 15.1 14.9 -2% -2% 21.5 20.6 -4% -4% 17.7 18.6 5% 5% 3.4 0.2 -94% -94% 7.2 6.9 -4% -4%
90 November 5.1 5.2 2% 2% 10.3 10.9 6% 6% 15.3 15.7 3% 3% 11.8 11.1 -6% -6% 3.0 0.3 -90% -90% 5.0 5.3 6% 6%
90 December 4.5 4.5 0% 0% 9.2 9.6 4% 4% 13.9 14.1 2% 2% 10.5 9.6 -8% -8% 2.7 0.2 -93% -93% 4.5 4.8 7% 7%
91 January 3.9 3.9 -1% -1% 8.2 8.6 5% 5% 12.4 12.8 3% 3% 9.4 8.7 -7% -7% 2.4 0.1 -96% -96% 4.0 4.4 10% 10%
91 February 3.2 3.4 6% 6% 6.9 7.8 13% 13% 10.6 11.8 12% 12% 8.0 8.1 1% 1% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 4.1 10% 10%
91 March 3.1 3.1 0% 0% 6.8 7.0 4% 4% 10.3 10.8 4% 4% 7.7 7.4 -4% -4% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.6 4% 4%
91 April 38.8 40.0 3% 3% 86.0 89.7 4% 4% 102.8 106.7 4% 4% 69.3 78.2 13% 13% 26.6 20.1 -24% -24% 46.5 47.3 2% 2%
91 May 75.1 75.2 0% 0% 162.5 164.2 1% 1% 200.8 202.0 1% 1% 144.2 144.1 0% 0% 49.9 41.1 -18% -18% 84.1 85.6 2% 2%
91 June 61.3 63.4 3% 3% 130.1 135.3 4% 4% 164.5 169.6 3% 3% 121.2 123.2 2% 2% 40.5 32.8 -19% -16% 68.5 69.1 1% 1%
91 July 7.0 7.1 2% 1% 14.1 13.6 -3% -1% 21.2 20.1 -5% -3% 16.0 14.1 -12% -6% 3.7 0.9 -76% -20% 6.5 5.9 -9% -3%
91 August 5.8 5.8 0% 0% 11.7 11.3 -3% -3% 17.7 16.8 -5% -5% 13.4 11.9 -11% -11% 3.4 0.6 -82% -82% 5.5 5.0 -9% -9%
91 September 4.9 5.0 3% 3% 9.8 10.0 2% 2% 15.1 15.1 0% 0% 11.7 10.8 -8% -8% 2.9 0.4 -86% -86% 4.7 4.6 -3% -3%
91 October 6.6 6.7 0% 0% 13.5 13.3 -2% -2% 19.7 19.0 -4% -4% 16.1 16.6 3% 3% 3.2 0.2 -94% -94% 6.4 6.1 -4% -4%
91 November 4.7 4.9 3% 3% 9.6 10.3 8% 8% 14.4 15.2 5% 5% 11.2 10.5 -6% -6% 2.8 0.2 -93% -93% 4.7 5.1 9% 9%
91 December 4.2 4.2 -1% -1% 8.6 9.4 9% 9% 13.2 14.0 6% 6% 10.1 9.3 -8% -8% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 5.0 20% 20%
92 January 3.7 3.6 -1% -1% 7.7 8.3 8% 8% 12.0 12.6 5% 5% 9.0 8.5 -6% -6% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 4.4 15% 15%
92 February 3.0 3.3 10% 10% 6.4 7.2 14% 14% 9.9 11.3 14% 14% 7.5 7.8 5% 5% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.7 4% 4%
92 March 3.0 2.9 -1% -1% 6.5 6.7 4% 4% 10.0 10.5 5% 5% 7.5 7.2 -4% -4% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.5 6% 6%
92 April 16.3 16.7 3% 3% 36.1 37.2 3% 3% 44.2 45.1 2% 2% 32.2 39.9 24% 24% 9.5 5.3 -44% -44% 19.2 19.2 0% 0%
92 May 91.9 91.8 0% 0% 200.3 202.0 1% 1% 244.7 246.5 1% 1% 170.7 171.3 0% 0% 62.6 52.2 -17% -17% 104.4 106.0 1% 1%
92 June 58.5 60.5 4% 4% 124.0 129.1 4% 4% 156.5 161.4 3% 3% 115.2 117.3 2% 2% 38.6 31.1 -19% -15% 65.2 65.9 1% 1%
92 July 6.9 7.0 1% 1% 13.9 13.6 -2% -1% 20.9 20.0 -5% -2% 15.8 14.0 -11% -6% 3.7 0.9 -76% -20% 6.4 6.0 -6% -2%
92 August 5.7 5.8 1% 1% 11.5 11.3 -2% -2% 17.5 16.7 -4% -4% 13.3 11.8 -11% -11% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.4 5.1 -6% -6%
92 September 5.0 5.1 3% 3% 9.9 10.1 2% 2% 15.2 15.2 0% 0% 11.9 11.0 -7% -7% 3.0 0.4 -86% -86% 4.8 4.6 -3% -3%
92 October 7.7 7.7 0% 0% 15.9 15.6 -1% -1% 22.5 21.7 -4% -4% 18.6 19.8 6% 6% 3.4 0.2 -94% -94% 7.5 7.3 -3% -3%
92 November 4.9 5.0 3% 3% 9.9 10.4 5% 5% 14.9 15.3 3% 3% 11.5 10.8 -6% -6% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.9 5.0 2% 2%
92 December 4.4 4.4 0% 0% 9.0 9.1 1% 1% 13.7 13.7 0% 0% 10.4 9.5 -8% -8% 2.7 0.2 -93% -93% 4.4 4.4 1% 1%
93 January 3.9 3.8 -1% -1% 8.0 8.5 6% 6% 12.3 12.8 4% 4% 9.3 8.7 -7% -7% 2.4 0.1 -96% -96% 4.0 4.4 11% 11%
93 February 3.1 3.4 10% 10% 6.6 7.6 15% 15% 10.2 11.7 15% 15% 7.7 8.0 5% 5% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 4.0 7% 7%
93 March 3.1 3.0 -1% -1% 6.7 6.9 4% 4% 10.3 10.8 4% 4% 7.7 7.4 -4% -4% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.6 5% 5%
93 April 10.3 10.6 3% 3% 22.6 23.1 2% 2% 29.2 29.6 1% 1% 22.3 28.7 28% 28% 5.2 1.6 -69% -53% 11.8 11.5 -2% -2%
93 May 55.8 55.8 0% 0% 122.3 123.3 1% 1% 147.0 147.2 0% 0% 99.1 101.5 2% 2% 38.1 30.7 -19% -19% 63.9 64.8 1% 1%
93 June 39.5 40.9 4% 3% 84.3 87.6 4% 3% 105.3 109.1 4% 3% 76.9 79.6 4% 3% 26.1 20.2 -23% -12% 44.4 44.7 1% 0%
93 July 6.6 6.6 1% 0% 13.5 13.0 -3% -1% 20.0 19.1 -4% -2% 14.8 13.4 -10% -5% 3.7 0.9 -76% -20% 6.4 5.8 -9% -3%
93 August 5.5 5.6 1% 1% 11.3 10.9 -4% -4% 17.0 16.2 -5% -5% 12.8 11.5 -10% -10% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.4 4.9 -9% -9%
93 September 8.5 8.8 3% 3% 17.8 18.1 2% 2% 24.6 24.5 0% 0% 20.4 22.3 10% 10% 4.0 0.6 -85% -85% 8.9 8.6 -3% -3%
93 October 5.3 5.3 -1% -1% 11.0 11.0 0% 0% 16.3 16.0 -2% -2% 12.4 11.1 -10% -10% 3.3 0.5 -85% -85% 5.3 5.3 0% 0%
93 November 4.5 4.7 3% 3% 9.4 10.2 8% 8% 14.0 14.9 7% 7% 10.6 9.9 -6% -6% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.7 5.1 9% 9%
93 December 4.1 4.1 0% 0% 8.6 9.0 5% 5% 13.0 13.5 4% 4% 9.9 9.1 -8% -8% 2.6 0.2 -92% -92% 4.2 4.6 10% 10%
94 January 3.6 3.6 0% 0% 7.7 8.1 5% 5% 11.7 12.3 5% 5% 8.9 8.3 -6% -6% 2.4 0.1 -96% -96% 3.9 4.2 9% 9%
94 February 2.9 3.2 10% 10% 6.3 7.7 22% 22% 9.6 11.7 21% 21% 7.3 7.8 6% 6% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 4.2 19% 19%
94 March 2.9 2.9 -1% -1% 6.5 6.7 3% 3% 9.8 10.4 6% 6% 7.4 7.2 -3% -3% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.6 6% 6%
94 April 3.7 3.9 4% 2% 8.0 8.2 2% 1% 11.7 12.3 5% 2% 9.2 10.6 15% 9% 2.2 0.0 -100% -33% 4.1 4.0 -3% -1%
94 May 55.9 55.8 0% 0% 123.6 124.4 1% 1% 147.9 148.1 0% 0% 99.5 105.5 6% 6% 37.6 29.8 -21% -21% 64.9 65.6 1% 1%
94 June 90.6 93.6 3% 3% 194.6 202.9 4% 4% 241.6 251.6 4% 4% 175.9 180.6 3% 3% 61.6 51.3 -17% -17% 103.5 105.2 2% 2%
94 July 7.3 7.5 2% 1% 14.3 13.8 -3% -1% 21.4 20.2 -6% -3% 16.5 14.9 -10% -5% 3.6 0.8 -78% -20% 6.4 5.8 -10% -3%
94 August 6.0 6.0 0% 0% 11.9 11.5 -4% -4% 17.9 16.9 -6% -6% 13.8 12.5 -10% -10% 3.3 0.5 -85% -85% 5.5 5.0 -9% -9%
94 September 5.0 5.2 3% 3% 10.0 10.0 0% 0% 15.2 15.0 -1% -1% 12.0 11.1 -7% -7% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.8 4.4 -7% -7%
94 October 4.9 4.9 0% 0% 9.7 9.6 -2% -2% 14.9 14.4 -3% -3% 11.8 10.9 -8% -8% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.5 4.3 -5% -5%
94 November 4.6 4.7 3% 3% 9.1 9.4 4% 4% 13.9 14.2 2% 2% 11.0 10.8 -2% -2% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.4 4.4 0% 0%
94 December 4.1 4.1 -1% -1% 8.4 8.5 2% 2% 12.9 12.9 0% 0% 10.0 9.5 -5% -5% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 4.1 3% 3%
95 January 3.6 3.6 0% 0% 7.5 7.9 5% 5% 11.7 12.1 3% 3% 8.8 8.5 -4% -4% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 4.0 9% 9%
95 February 3.0 3.2 6% 6% 6.4 7.2 13% 13% 10.0 11.1 12% 12% 7.5 7.9 5% 5% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.8 9% 9%
95 March 2.9 2.9 -1% -1% 6.3 6.5 2% 2% 9.8 10.1 3% 3% 7.3 7.2 -1% -1% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.4 3% 3%
95 April 25.2 26.0 3% 3% 55.9 57.8 3% 3% 66.5 68.8 4% 4% 46.9 55.9 19% 19% 15.8 10.8 -32% -32% 29.9 30.0 0% 0%
95 May 42.3 42.4 0% 0% 91.4 91.9 1% 1% 112.0 110.9 -1% -1% 77.1 78.6 2% 2% 27.5 21.5 -22% -16% 47.0 47.4 1% 1%
95 June 19.0 19.8 4% 2% 39.7 40.7 3% 1% 50.6 51.5 2% 1% 38.0 39.9 5% 2% 11.2 7.2 -36% -8% 20.3 19.9 -2% -1%
95 July 6.3 6.4 1% 0% 13.1 12.5 -4% -1% 19.3 18.3 -5% -2% 14.2 13.0 -9% -4% 3.7 0.8 -78% -21% 6.3 5.6 -11% -3%
95 August 5.4 5.3 0% 0% 11.0 10.6 -4% -4% 16.5 15.7 -5% -5% 12.4 11.2 -9% -9% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.3 4.8 -10% -10%
95 September 5.9 6.2 4% 4% 12.2 12.3 1% 1% 17.8 17.8 0% 0% 14.1 14.5 3% 3% 3.4 0.4 -88% -88% 6.1 5.7 -6% -6%
95 October 11.5 11.4 0% 0% 24.3 24.2 0% 0% 31.8 31.1 -2% -2% 25.5 27.9 9% 9% 5.4 1.7 -69% -69% 12.0 11.9 0% 0%
95 November 5.4 5.6 3% 3% 11.3 11.7 3% 3% 16.3 16.7 3% 3% 12.2 11.5 -6% -6% 3.5 0.7 -80% -80% 5.7 5.7 0% 0%
95 December 4.8 4.8 0% 0% 10.1 10.2 1% 1% 14.7 14.9 1% 1% 11.0 10.1 -8% -8% 3.2 0.5 -85% -85% 5.0 5.1 1% 1%
96 January 4.2 4.2 0% 0% 9.0 9.0 0% 0% 13.1 13.4 2% 2% 10.0 9.2 -8% -8% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.5 4.5 -1% -1%
96 February 3.3 3.7 11% 11% 7.2 8.1 12% 12% 10.7 12.3 15% 15% 8.2 8.5 4% 4% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 4.1 1% 1%
96 March 3.6 3.6 0% 0% 7.9 7.9 0% 0% 11.6 12.0 3% 3% 8.8 8.6 -3% -3% 2.5 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 4.0 -1% -1%
96 April 8.5 8.8 3% 3% 18.2 18.5 2% 2% 24.0 24.5 2% 2% 19.1 23.9 25% 25% 3.9 0.4 -90% -52% 9.3 9.0 -2% -2%
96 May 16.7 16.6 0% 0% 36.1 35.7 -1% -1% 43.3 42.5 -2% -1% 30.0 33.1 10% 5% 10.0 6.0 -40% -11% 18.3 18.0 -2% -1%
96 June 6.0 6.2 4% 1% 12.6 12.7 0% 0% 17.3 17.4 1% 0% 12.7 12.6 -1% 0% 3.8 0.8 -79% -6% 6.4 6.0 -7% -1%
96 July 5.2 5.2 0% 0% 11.0 10.6 -3% -1% 15.3 15.0 -2% -1% 11.3 10.5 -7% -3% 3.4 0.6 -83% -20% 5.4 5.1 -7% -2%
96 August 4.5 4.5 0% 0% 9.5 9.1 -4% -4% 13.5 13.3 -1% -1% 10.0 9.3 -7% -7% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 4.3 -10% -10%
96 September 3.8 3.9 3% 3% 8.2 8.3 2% 2% 11.7 12.3 5% 5% 8.9 8.5 -3% -3% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.1 -4% -4%
96 October 7.6 7.6 0% 0% 16.0 15.8 -1% -1% 21.4 21.2 -1% -1% 17.1 19.7 16% 16% 3.4 0.1 -97% -97% 7.7 7.5 -3% -3%
96 November 4.7 4.9 4% 4% 10.0 10.5 5% 5% 13.8 14.6 6% 6% 10.2 10.0 -1% -1% 3.0 0.2 -93% -93% 5.1 5.2 3% 3%
96 December 4.2 4.2 -1% -1% 9.1 9.4 3% 3% 12.7 13.2 4% 4% 9.2 8.8 -5% -5% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 4.9 6% 6%
97 January 3.7 3.7 1% 1% 8.1 8.4 4% 4% 11.4 12.0 5% 5% 8.2 8.0 -3% -3% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 4.4 5% 5%
97 February 3.1 3.4 11% 11% 6.8 7.6 13% 13% 9.5 11.0 15% 15% 6.8 7.4 9% 9% 2.4 0.1 -96% -96% 3.9 4.0 3% 3%
97 March 3.1 3.1 0% 0% 6.9 7.2 4% 4% 9.8 10.4 6% 6% 6.9 6.8 0% 0% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.8 6% 6%
97 April 21.8 22.4 3% 3% 48.2 49.8 3% 3% 56.8 58.6 3% 3% 38.5 46.7 21% 21% 13.9 8.9 -36% -36% 25.8 25.9 0% 0%
97 May 34.9 35.0 0% 0% 75.2 75.4 0% 0% 90.7 90.4 0% 0% 60.1 61.9 3% 3% 22.7 17.2 -24% -15% 38.6 38.6 0% 0%
97 June 31.6 32.7 3% 2% 67.6 69.7 3% 2% 83.8 85.1 2% 1% 60.5 62.8 4% 3% 20.8 15.5 -25% -11% 35.6 35.4 -1% 0%
97 July 6.5 6.6 1% 0% 13.6 13.1 -4% -1% 19.6 18.6 -5% -2% 14.6 13.2 -10% -5% 3.8 0.9 -76% -21% 6.6 5.9 -10% -3%
97 August 5.5 5.5 0% 0% 11.4 11.1 -3% -3% 16.8 16.2 -4% -4% 12.6 11.3 -10% -10% 3.4 0.7 -79% -79% 5.5 5.2 -7% -7%
97 September 4.7 4.8 3% 3% 9.7 9.8 2% 2% 14.4 14.6 1% 1% 11.0 10.3 -7% -7% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 4.6 -4% -4%
97 October 4.3 4.3 0% 0% 8.9 8.8 -1% -1% 13.4 13.3 -1% -1% 10.4 9.5 -9% -9% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.2 -3% -3%
97 November 3.7 3.8 3% 3% 7.8 8.1 5% 5% 11.8 12.4 5% 5% 9.2 8.8 -4% -4% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 4.0 2% 2%
97 December 3.4 3.4 0% 0% 7.3 7.7 7% 7% 11.1 11.8 6% 6% 8.6 8.1 -5% -5% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 4.1 11% 11%
98 January 3.0 3.0 0% 0% 6.6 7.1 8% 8% 10.1 10.9 8% 8% 7.8 7.5 -4% -4% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.9 14% 14%
98 February 2.5 2.7 9% 9% 5.6 6.4 15% 15% 8.5 9.9 17% 17% 6.3 6.9 9% 9% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.2 3.4 7% 7%
98 March 2.7 2.7 0% 0% 6.1 6.5 6% 6% 9.2 9.8 7% 7% 6.8 6.9 2% 2% 1.8 0.0 -100% -100% 3.2 3.5 9% 9%
98 April 28.6 29.4 3% 3% 63.4 65.9 4% 4% 75.0 78.3 4% 4% 51.5 60.8 18% 18% 18.5 13.2 -29% -29% 34.1 34.6 1% 1%
98 May 66.0 66.1 0% 0% 143.5 144.7 1% 1% 175.5 175.8 0% 0% 123.1 124.1 1% 1% 44.0 36.0 -18% -18% 74.5 75.5 1% 1%
98 June 40.3 41.8 4% 3% 85.1 88.1 4% 3% 107.2 110.4 3% 2% 79.4 81.5 3% 3% 25.9 20.1 -22% -12% 44.4 44.4 0% 0%
98 July 6.7 6.8 1% 0% 13.6 13.0 -4% -1% 20.2 19.1 -5% -3% 15.1 13.6 -10% -5% 3.7 0.8 -78% -20% 6.4 5.7 -11% -3%
98 August 5.6 5.7 1% 1% 11.4 11.0 -3% -3% 17.1 16.3 -5% -5% 13.0 11.6 -11% -11% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.4 4.9 -8% -8%
98 September 4.8 4.9 3% 3% 9.6 9.7 1% 1% 14.7 14.6 -1% -1% 11.4 10.5 -8% -8% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 4.4 -6% -6%
98 October 4.4 4.3 -1% -1% 8.8 8.7 -2% -2% 13.7 13.3 -3% -3% 10.6 9.6 -10% -10% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 4.0 -4% -4%
98 November 3.8 3.9 2% 2% 7.7 8.2 6% 6% 12.1 12.6 4% 4% 9.4 8.9 -5% -5% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 4.0 4% 4%
98 December 3.5 3.5 0% 0% 7.3 7.7 6% 6% 11.4 11.8 4% 4% 8.7 8.1 -6% -6% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.9 9% 9%
99 January 3.0 3.0 -1% -1% 6.6 6.9 6% 6% 10.3 10.8 5% 5% 7.9 7.5 -5% -5% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.6 9% 9%
99 February 2.6 2.7 6% 6% 5.7 6.3 12% 12% 8.9 10.0 12% 12% 6.7 6.9 3% 3% 1.8 0.0 -100% -100% 3.1 3.4 8% 8%
99 March 9.2 9.2 0% 0% 20.1 19.7 -2% -2% 26.5 25.9 -2% -2% 21.2 26.8 26% 26% 3.9 0.7 -82% -82% 10.0 9.6 -4% -4%
99 April 25.6 26.4 3% 3% 55.7 57.5 3% 3% 65.6 67.9 3% 3% 44.8 49.7 11% 11% 16.7 12.1 -28% -28% 29.6 29.7 0% 0%
99 May 53.6 53.7 0% 0% 116.5 117.5 1% 1% 143.1 143.0 0% 0% 99.8 100.0 0% 0% 36.0 29.0 -19% -19% 60.4 61.3 1% 1%
99 June 12.4 13.0 5% 1% 25.5 26.1 2% 1% 33.5 34.0 1% 0% 26.2 27.0 3% 1% 6.6 3.0 -54% -7% 12.7 12.3 -3% -1%
99 July 6.3 6.3 1% 0% 13.0 12.6 -3% -1% 19.1 18.3 -4% -2% 14.2 12.8 -10% -5% 3.8 0.9 -76% -21% 6.3 5.8 -8% -2%
99 August 5.4 5.3 -1% -1% 11.0 10.9 -2% -2% 16.5 16.0 -3% -3% 12.3 11.1 -10% -10% 3.4 0.7 -79% -79% 5.3 5.1 -4% -4%
99 September 6.5 6.8 4% 4% 13.5 13.6 1% 1% 19.3 19.3 0% 0% 15.4 16.1 5% 5% 3.5 0.5 -86% -86% 6.7 6.3 -5% -5%
99 October 6.5 6.5 0% 0% 13.4 13.2 -2% -2% 19.1 18.6 -3% -3% 15.0 14.9 -1% -1% 3.5 0.5 -86% -86% 6.5 6.2 -4% -4%
99 November 4.8 5.0 3% 3% 10.1 10.4 3% 3% 14.7 15.2 3% 3% 11.2 10.6 -5% -5% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 5.1 5.1 0% 0%
99 December 4.3 4.2 0% 0% 9.0 9.1 2% 2% 13.3 13.6 2% 2% 10.2 9.4 -7% -7% 2.8 0.2 -93% -93% 4.5 4.6 2% 2%
100 January 3.7 3.7 0% 0% 8.0 8.2 2% 2% 12.0 12.4 3% 3% 9.1 8.6 -6% -6% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.1 4.2 3% 3%
100 February 3.0 3.3 10% 10% 6.6 7.3 10% 10% 9.9 11.3 14% 14% 7.5 8.0 6% 6% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 3.7 -1% -1%
100 March 3.5 3.4 0% 0% 7.5 7.6 2% 2% 11.0 11.5 4% 4% 8.3 8.3 -1% -1% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 3.9 3% 3%
100 April 10.5 10.8 3% 3% 22.8 23.2 2% 2% 29.1 29.6 2% 2% 22.1 28.4 28% 28% 5.1 1.5 -71% -54% 11.8 11.5 -2% -2%
100 May 32.2 32.2 0% 0% 69.9 70.2 0% 0% 83.0 83.2 0% 0% 55.3 58.4 6% 5% 21.1 15.7 -26% -14% 36.1 36.3 1% 0%
100 June 14.6 15.2 4% 1% 30.7 31.5 3% 1% 38.3 38.7 1% 0% 28.0 29.5 5% 2% 8.4 4.6 -45% -8% 15.7 15.3 -2% 0%
100 July 6.1 6.1 0% 0% 12.9 12.3 -4% -1% 18.4 17.4 -5% -2% 13.4 12.2 -9% -4% 3.8 0.9 -76% -21% 6.3 5.7 -10% -3%
100 August 5.3 5.2 0% 0% 11.0 10.5 -4% -4% 15.9 15.3 -4% -4% 11.9 10.8 -9% -9% 3.4 0.7 -79% -79% 5.4 4.9 -9% -9%
100 September 4.4 4.6 5% 5% 9.3 9.4 2% 2% 13.7 14.0 2% 2% 10.5 9.9 -6% -6% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 4.5 -5% -5%
100 October 5.0 5.0 -1% -1% 10.5 10.2 -2% -2% 15.1 15.0 -1% -1% 12.1 12.0 -1% -1% 3.0 0.2 -93% -93% 5.1 4.9 -4% -4%
100 November 4.0 4.1 3% 3% 8.5 9.1 7% 7% 12.5 13.4 7% 7% 9.7 9.4 -3% -3% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.4 4.7 6% 6%
100 December 3.6 3.6 -1% -1% 7.9 8.4 6% 6% 11.6 12.4 7% 7% 8.8 8.4 -4% -4% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 4.5 10% 10%
101 January 3.3 3.3 0% 0% 7.2 7.9 10% 10% 10.6 11.7 10% 10% 8.0 7.8 -2% -2% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 4.4 18% 18%
101 February 2.7 3.0 10% 10% 6.0 6.9 15% 15% 8.9 10.4 18% 18% 6.5 7.2 10% 10% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.7 5% 5%
101 March 2.7 2.7 -1% -1% 6.2 6.5 5% 5% 9.1 9.8 8% 8% 6.6 6.6 1% 1% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.6 9% 9%
101 April 52.2 53.8 3% 3% 115.9 121.0 4% 4% 138.2 143.8 4% 4% 92.1 102.2 11% 11% 36.4 28.6 -21% -21% 62.9 64.1 2% 2%
101 May 85.4 85.4 0% 0% 183.5 185.2 1% 1% 227.1 228.7 1% 1% 165.1 164.6 0% 0% 56.1 46.4 -17% -17% 94.6 96.0 2% 2%
101 June 50.4 52.2 4% 4% 106.5 110.7 4% 4% 135.1 138.9 3% 3% 100.1 101.8 2% 2% 32.7 26.0 -21% -14% 55.7 56.1 1% 1%
101 July 7.0 7.1 2% 1% 14.0 13.5 -4% -1% 21.1 19.9 -6% -3% 15.9 14.1 -11% -6% 3.7 0.9 -76% -20% 6.5 5.8 -11% -3%
101 August 5.8 5.7 0% 0% 11.6 11.2 -4% -4% 17.6 16.7 -5% -5% 13.3 11.9 -11% -11% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.5 5.0 -8% -8%
101 September 4.9 5.1 4% 4% 9.8 10.1 3% 3% 15.0 15.0 0% 0% 11.7 10.8 -8% -8% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 4.6 -3% -3%
101 October 4.7 4.7 0% 0% 9.5 9.4 -1% -1% 14.7 14.2 -3% -3% 11.5 10.5 -9% -9% 2.7 0.1 -96% -96% 4.5 4.3 -4% -4%
101 November 4.1 4.2 2% 2% 8.2 8.9 9% 9% 12.8 13.5 5% 5% 10.0 9.5 -5% -5% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 4.0 4.4 10% 10%
101 December 3.7 3.7 0% 0% 7.7 8.0 5% 5% 12.1 12.3 2% 2% 9.2 8.6 -6% -6% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 4.1 9% 9%
102 January 3.3 3.3 0% 0% 7.0 7.1 1% 1% 11.0 11.1 1% 1% 8.3 7.9 -5% -5% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 3.5 1% 1%
102 February 2.7 2.9 9% 9% 5.8 6.7 16% 16% 9.1 10.5 15% 15% 6.9 7.3 7% 7% 1.9 0.0 -100% -100% 3.3 3.5 7% 7%
102 March 10.3 10.2 0% 0% 22.5 22.0 -2% -2% 29.4 28.6 -3% -3% 22.9 28.6 25% 25% 4.5 1.2 -73% -73% 11.3 10.9 -4% -4%
102 April 24.3 25.1 3% 3% 52.7 54.4 3% 3% 62.4 64.4 3% 3% 43.0 47.6 11% 11% 15.7 11.2 -29% -29% 27.9 28.0 0% 0%
102 May 33.4 33.5 0% 0% 71.7 71.8 0% 0% 88.6 87.5 -1% -1% 61.1 61.7 1% 1% 21.6 16.3 -25% -14% 36.7 36.6 0% 0%
102 June 7.0 7.3 4% 1% 14.7 14.7 0% 0% 21.1 20.6 -2% 0% 15.8 15.6 -1% 0% 4.0 0.9 -78% -6% 7.4 6.7 -9% -1%
102 July 5.9 5.8 0% 0% 12.2 11.6 -5% -2% 17.8 16.8 -6% -2% 13.3 12.1 -9% -4% 3.6 0.7 -81% -21% 5.9 5.3 -11% -3%
102 August 5.0 5.0 0% 0% 10.3 9.9 -4% -4% 15.3 14.8 -4% -4% 11.7 10.6 -9% -9% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 5.0 4.6 -9% -9%
102 September 6.0 6.2 4% 4% 12.4 12.5 1% 1% 17.7 17.8 1% 1% 14.2 15.0 6% 6% 3.3 0.2 -94% -94% 6.1 5.8 -6% -6%
102 October 13.1 13.0 -1% -1% 28.2 28.1 0% 0% 35.7 35.2 -1% -1% 27.7 30.6 10% 10% 6.7 2.8 -58% -58% 14.2 14.2 0% 0%
102 November 5.5 5.6 3% 3% 11.5 12.2 5% 5% 16.4 17.2 5% 5% 12.3 11.6 -5% -5% 3.6 0.7 -80% -80% 5.8 6.0 4% 4%
102 December 4.8 4.8 0% 0% 10.3 10.6 4% 4% 14.7 15.2 4% 4% 11.0 10.0 -8% -8% 3.3 0.5 -85% -85% 5.1 5.4 6% 6%
103 January 4.2 4.2 0% 0% 9.1 9.5 5% 5% 13.1 13.9 6% 6% 9.9 9.1 -8% -8% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.6 5.0 8% 8%
103 February 3.5 3.7 7% 7% 7.6 8.4 12% 12% 11.1 12.6 14% 14% 8.4 8.4 0% 0% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 4.4 7% 7%
103 March 3.4 3.3 -1% -1% 7.4 7.6 3% 3% 10.9 11.5 6% 6% 8.2 7.9 -4% -4% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 4.0 4% 4%
103 April 4.1 4.3 3% 2% 8.8 9.1 3% 1% 12.6 13.3 5% 3% 9.9 11.0 12% 8% 2.5 0.0 -100% -38% 4.5 4.4 -2% -1%
103 May 67.6 67.4 0% 0% 149.2 150.2 1% 1% 179.3 179.7 0% 0% 121.7 126.9 4% 4% 46.0 37.1 -19% -19% 78.4 79.3 1% 1%
103 June 53.1 54.9 4% 4% 113.0 117.5 4% 4% 140.8 146.2 4% 4% 102.4 105.8 3% 3% 35.1 28.1 -20% -14% 59.6 60.1 1% 1%
103 July 6.8 6.9 1% 1% 13.6 13.2 -3% -1% 20.2 19.3 -5% -2% 15.2 13.6 -10% -5% 3.6 0.8 -78% -20% 6.3 5.7 -9% -3%
103 August 5.7 5.7 0% 0% 11.5 11.1 -3% -3% 17.3 16.4 -5% -5% 13.1 11.8 -10% -10% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.4 4.9 -9% -9%
103 September 4.9 5.0 2% 2% 9.8 9.9 2% 2% 14.9 14.8 0% 0% 11.5 10.7 -7% -7% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 4.6 -3% -3%
103 October 4.5 4.4 -1% -1% 9.0 8.9 -1% -1% 13.9 13.6 -2% -2% 10.8 9.8 -9% -9% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.1 -2% -2%
103 November 4.3 4.4 3% 3% 8.6 9.0 4% 4% 13.2 13.6 3% 3% 10.4 10.1 -3% -3% 2.5 0.0 -100% -100% 4.2 4.2 0% 0%
103 December 3.9 3.8 -1% -1% 7.9 8.2 4% 4% 12.3 12.5 2% 2% 9.5 8.9 -5% -5% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 4.1 7% 7%
104 January 3.4 3.4 -1% -1% 7.2 7.4 3% 3% 11.1 11.4 3% 3% 8.4 8.1 -4% -4% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.8 5% 5%
104 February 2.7 3.0 10% 10% 5.9 6.7 12% 12% 9.2 10.4 14% 14% 7.0 7.5 7% 7% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.4 2% 2%
104 March 2.8 2.7 -1% -1% 6.2 6.5 6% 6% 9.4 10.0 7% 7% 7.0 6.9 -1% -1% 1.8 0.0 -100% -100% 3.2 3.5 10% 10%
104 April 15.7 16.1 3% 3% 34.9 35.9 3% 3% 42.8 43.6 2% 2% 31.3 39.6 26% 26% 8.8 4.8 -45% -45% 18.5 18.5 0% 0%
104 May 57.6 57.7 0% 0% 125.6 126.6 1% 1% 151.5 151.9 0% 0% 103.5 105.2 2% 2% 38.7 31.3 -19% -19% 65.3 66.2 1% 1%
104 June 38.4 39.8 4% 3% 81.6 84.8 4% 3% 102.1 105.7 4% 3% 75.1 77.7 3% 3% 25.0 19.3 -23% -12% 42.8 43.1 1% 0%
104 July 6.6 6.6 1% 1% 13.4 12.9 -4% -1% 19.9 19.0 -5% -2% 14.8 13.4 -10% -5% 3.6 0.8 -78% -20% 6.4 5.8 -9% -3%
104 August 5.6 5.6 0% 0% 11.3 11.0 -2% -2% 17.0 16.3 -4% -4% 12.9 11.5 -10% -10% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.4 5.0 -6% -6%
104 September 4.7 4.8 3% 3% 9.5 9.6 1% 1% 14.6 14.5 -1% -1% 11.3 10.4 -8% -8% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 4.4 -7% -7%
104 October 12.3 12.2 0% 0% 26.3 26.2 0% 0% 34.3 33.4 -3% -3% 27.4 30.4 11% 11% 6.0 2.2 -63% -63% 13.1 13.1 0% 0%
104 November 5.2 5.4 3% 3% 10.8 11.3 5% 5% 15.8 16.3 3% 3% 11.9 11.1 -7% -7% 3.2 0.6 -81% -81% 5.3 5.4 1% 1%
104 December 4.7 4.7 0% 0% 9.7 9.8 1% 1% 14.3 14.5 1% 1% 10.8 9.7 -10% -10% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.7 4.8 1% 1%
105 January 4.2 4.1 -2% -2% 8.7 8.9 2% 2% 12.9 13.3 3% 3% 9.8 8.9 -9% -9% 2.7 0.3 -89% -89% 4.3 4.5 6% 6%
105 February 3.3 3.6 10% 10% 6.9 7.8 13% 13% 10.5 12.0 14% 14% 8.0 8.2 3% 3% 2.4 0.1 -96% -96% 3.9 4.0 3% 3%
105 March 3.4 3.4 0% 0% 7.4 7.6 2% 2% 11.1 11.6 4% 4% 8.5 8.2 -4% -4% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.8 3.9 4% 4%
105 April 13.8 14.7 6% 6% 30.4 32.3 6% 6% 37.7 39.8 6% 6% 28.0 35.8 28% 28% 7.8 3.8 -51% -51% 16.0 15.9 -1% -1%
105 May 38.3 37.2 -3% -3% 83.0 81.0 -2% -2% 100.0 97.2 -3% -2% 66.5 66.4 0% 0% 25.5 19.6 -23% -16% 42.8 43.3 1% 1%
105 June 68.5 73.2 7% 7% 148.2 160.0 8% 8% 183.6 197.7 8% 8% 132.7 141.0 6% 6% 47.3 38.7 -18% -18% 79.3 80.7 2% 2%
105 July 6.8 7.0 2% 1% 13.9 13.6 -2% -1% 20.7 19.9 -4% -2% 15.3 13.8 -10% -5% 3.8 0.9 -76% -21% 6.6 6.1 -8% -2%
105 August 5.7 5.7 0% 0% 11.7 11.3 -3% -3% 17.5 16.7 -4% -4% 13.2 11.8 -11% -11% 3.4 0.7 -79% -79% 5.5 5.1 -7% -7%
105 September 4.9 5.0 3% 3% 9.8 9.9 1% 1% 14.9 14.9 0% 0% 11.5 10.7 -8% -8% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 4.5 -6% -6%
105 October 7.2 7.2 0% 0% 14.8 14.6 -2% -2% 21.1 20.4 -3% -3% 17.3 18.2 5% 5% 3.3 0.2 -94% -94% 7.1 6.8 -4% -4%
105 November 4.8 4.9 3% 3% 9.8 10.3 6% 6% 14.6 15.1 4% 4% 11.3 10.6 -6% -6% 2.9 0.2 -93% -93% 4.8 5.0 3% 3%
105 December 4.3 4.3 0% 0% 8.8 9.2 5% 5% 13.3 13.7 3% 3% 10.2 9.3 -8% -8% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.6 8% 8%
106 January 3.7 3.7 -1% -1% 7.9 8.1 3% 3% 12.0 12.4 3% 3% 9.1 8.5 -6% -6% 2.4 0.1 -96% -96% 3.9 4.1 5% 5%
106 February 3.0 3.3 10% 10% 6.5 7.4 14% 14% 9.9 11.3 15% 15% 7.5 7.9 5% 5% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.8 3% 3%
106 March 3.0 3.0 -1% -1% 6.6 7.1 8% 8% 10.0 10.8 8% 8% 7.6 7.3 -3% -3% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.9 15% 15%
106 April 6.9 7.2 4% 4% 14.9 15.3 3% 2% 20.3 20.9 3% 3% 17.0 21.7 27% 27% 3.0 0.0 -100% -45% 7.5 7.4 -1% -1%
106 May 57.8 57.7 0% 0% 127.3 128.2 1% 1% 152.2 152.4 0% 0% 101.7 105.5 4% 4% 39.4 31.6 -20% -20% 66.7 67.6 1% 1%
106 June 64.7 67.0 3% 3% 139.0 144.8 4% 4% 172.8 179.9 4% 4% 125.8 129.3 3% 3% 43.9 35.7 -19% -17% 73.8 74.8 1% 1%
106 July 6.8 6.9 2% 1% 13.6 13.2 -3% -1% 20.3 19.4 -5% -2% 15.2 13.6 -11% -5% 3.6 0.8 -78% -20% 6.3 5.8 -9% -2%
106 August 5.7 5.7 0% 0% 11.4 10.9 -4% -4% 17.2 16.3 -5% -5% 13.1 11.7 -11% -11% 3.3 0.6 -82% -82% 5.3 4.8 -9% -9%
106 September 4.8 4.9 3% 3% 9.6 9.7 0% 0% 14.7 14.6 -1% -1% 11.4 10.6 -8% -8% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 4.4 -7% -7%
106 October 7.8 7.8 0% 0% 16.1 15.8 -2% -2% 22.6 21.8 -4% -4% 18.8 20.2 7% 7% 3.4 0.2 -94% -94% 7.6 7.4 -3% -3%
106 November 4.8 5.0 3% 3% 9.9 10.3 5% 5% 14.7 15.1 3% 3% 11.3 10.7 -6% -6% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.8 5.0 3% 3%
106 December 4.3 4.3 0% 0% 8.9 9.0 1% 1% 13.5 13.5 1% 1% 10.2 9.4 -9% -9% 2.7 0.2 -93% -93% 4.3 4.4 2% 2%
107 January 3.8 3.8 -1% -1% 8.0 8.3 5% 5% 12.1 12.6 4% 4% 9.2 8.5 -7% -7% 2.4 0.1 -96% -96% 4.0 4.3 8% 8%
107 February 3.1 3.3 7% 7% 6.7 7.4 10% 10% 10.3 11.4 11% 11% 7.8 7.9 1% 1% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.7 3.8 5% 5%
107 March 3.2 3.1 0% 0% 6.9 7.6 10% 10% 10.4 11.3 9% 9% 7.9 7.7 -2% -2% 2.1 0.0 -100% -100% 3.5 4.1 18% 18%
107 April 42.4 43.7 3% 3% 94.1 97.9 4% 4% 112.5 116.6 4% 4% 75.6 84.7 12% 12% 29.4 22.5 -23% -23% 51.0 51.7 1% 1%
107 May 60.6 60.7 0% 0% 130.7 131.9 1% 1% 161.5 162.2 0% 0% 116.3 116.9 0% 0% 39.8 32.2 -19% -19% 67.5 68.4 1% 1%
107 June 30.2 31.3 3% 2% 63.2 65.2 3% 2% 80.7 82.5 2% 1% 60.1 61.6 3% 2% 18.8 13.8 -27% -10% 32.6 32.4 -1% 0%
107 July 6.7 6.8 1% 0% 13.7 13.1 -4% -1% 20.4 19.4 -5% -2% 15.2 13.7 -10% -5% 3.7 0.9 -76% -20% 6.5 5.8 -10% -3%
107 August 5.6 5.6 1% 1% 11.4 11.0 -4% -4% 17.2 16.4 -5% -5% 13.0 11.7 -10% -10% 3.4 0.6 -82% -82% 5.5 4.9 -10% -10%
107 September 4.8 4.9 3% 3% 9.7 9.7 0% 0% 14.8 14.7 -1% -1% 11.3 10.5 -7% -7% 2.9 0.4 -86% -86% 4.7 4.4 -7% -7%
107 October 11.1 11.1 0% 0% 23.7 23.5 -1% -1% 31.4 30.5 -3% -3% 25.5 28.2 11% 11% 5.2 1.4 -73% -73% 11.7 11.5 -1% -1%
107 November 5.4 5.6 4% 4% 11.1 11.6 5% 5% 16.2 16.8 3% 3% 12.3 11.6 -6% -6% 3.2 0.5 -85% -85% 5.4 5.6 3% 3%
107 December 4.8 4.8 0% 0% 10.0 10.5 5% 5% 14.7 15.2 4% 4% 11.0 10.0 -9% -9% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 4.9 5.4 11% 11%
108 January 4.2 4.2 -1% -1% 8.8 9.0 2% 2% 13.1 13.5 2% 2% 9.9 9.1 -8% -8% 2.7 0.2 -93% -93% 4.4 4.5 3% 3%
108 February 3.3 3.6 10% 10% 7.1 7.9 12% 12% 10.7 12.1 14% 14% 8.1 8.4 3% 3% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.0 4.0 0% 0%
108 March 3.6 3.6 0% 0% 7.8 7.8 0% 0% 11.7 11.9 2% 2% 8.9 8.6 -3% -3% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 3.9 -1% -1%
108 April 21.2 21.8 3% 3% 46.7 48.1 3% 3% 55.8 57.6 3% 3% 39.7 47.1 19% 19% 13.3 8.5 -36% -36% 24.9 24.9 0% 0%
108 May 44.0 44.0 0% 0% 95.1 95.6 0% 0% 116.6 115.9 -1% -1% 79.2 80.5 2% 2% 29.2 22.9 -22% -17% 49.1 49.4 1% 1%
108 June 27.3 28.3 4% 2% 57.9 59.8 3% 2% 72.8 75.1 3% 2% 53.7 55.8 4% 3% 17.5 12.6 -28% -10% 30.2 30.0 -1% 0%
108 July 6.6 6.7 1% 0% 13.8 13.2 -4% -2% 20.2 19.3 -4% -2% 14.8 13.5 -9% -4% 3.9 0.9 -77% -21% 6.7 5.9 -11% -3%
108 August 5.5 5.6 0% 0% 11.5 11.1 -3% -3% 17.1 16.5 -4% -4% 12.8 11.5 -10% -10% 3.5 0.7 -80% -80% 5.6 5.1 -9% -9%
108 September 27.4 28.2 3% 3% 59.1 61.4 4% 4% 73.2 75.6 3% 3% 53.6 58.0 8% 8% 17.6 12.3 -30% -30% 31.2 31.6 1% 1%
108 October 6.3 6.3 1% 1% 13.0 12.9 -1% -1% 19.1 18.8 -2% -2% 14.1 12.8 -9% -9% 3.7 0.8 -78% -78% 6.3 6.1 -3% -3%
108 November 5.2 5.3 3% 3% 10.7 11.1 4% 4% 16.0 16.4 3% 3% 11.8 11.0 -7% -7% 3.4 0.6 -82% -82% 5.4 5.4 0% 0%
108 December 4.7 4.7 1% 1% 9.7 9.8 1% 1% 14.6 14.7 1% 1% 11.2 10.1 -9% -9% 3.0 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 4.8 2% 2%
109 January 4.1 4.1 -1% -1% 8.6 8.7 1% 1% 13.1 13.4 2% 2% 10.1 9.3 -8% -8% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.3 4.4 2% 2%
109 February 3.3 3.6 10% 10% 7.0 8.1 15% 15% 10.8 12.5 16% 16% 8.3 8.6 4% 4% 2.4 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 4.2 8% 8%
109 March 3.6 3.6 0% 0% 7.8 8.2 6% 6% 11.7 12.5 6% 6% 9.2 8.8 -3% -3% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 4.3 12% 12%
109 April 20.1 20.6 3% 3% 44.3 45.7 3% 3% 53.2 54.9 3% 3% 38.6 45.9 19% 19% 12.3 7.5 -39% -39% 23.6 23.6 0% 0%
109 May 46.3 46.4 0% 0% 100.4 100.9 0% 0% 123.0 122.4 -1% -1% 84.4 85.6 1% 1% 30.9 24.3 -21% -17% 51.9 52.2 1% 1%
109 June 19.5 20.3 4% 2% 40.8 41.9 3% 1% 51.9 53.3 3% 1% 38.9 40.6 4% 2% 11.7 7.5 -36% -9% 20.9 20.5 -2% -1%
109 July 6.5 6.5 1% 0% 13.6 12.9 -5% -2% 19.8 18.8 -5% -2% 14.6 13.3 -9% -4% 3.9 0.9 -77% -21% 6.6 5.8 -11% -3%
109 August 5.5 5.5 0% 0% 11.4 11.1 -2% -2% 16.9 16.4 -3% -3% 12.6 11.4 -10% -10% 3.5 0.7 -80% -80% 5.5 5.2 -6% -6%
109 September 4.7 4.8 3% 3% 9.7 9.8 1% 1% 14.5 14.8 2% 2% 11.1 10.4 -6% -6% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 4.6 -4% -4%
109 October 7.2 7.2 0% 0% 14.9 14.6 -2% -2% 20.9 20.5 -2% -2% 17.0 18.1 7% 7% 3.4 0.2 -94% -94% 7.2 6.9 -4% -4%
109 November 4.7 4.8 3% 3% 9.7 10.4 7% 7% 14.2 15.1 6% 6% 11.0 10.4 -5% -5% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.9 5.2 7% 7%
109 December 4.1 4.1 0% 0% 8.8 9.1 4% 4% 13.0 13.5 4% 4% 9.9 9.2 -7% -7% 2.7 0.2 -93% -93% 4.4 4.7 7% 7%
110 January 3.6 3.6 0% 0% 7.8 8.0 3% 3% 11.7 12.2 4% 4% 9.0 8.5 -6% -6% 2.4 0.1 -96% -96% 4.0 4.1 4% 4%
110 February 3.9 4.3 11% 11% 8.3 9.3 12% 12% 12.0 13.7 14% 14% 9.6 11.2 16% 16% 2.6 0.0 -100% -100% 4.5 4.6 1% 1%
110 March 11.3 11.2 -1% -1% 24.8 24.4 -2% -2% 31.4 30.9 -2% -2% 23.8 28.3 19% 19% 5.6 1.9 -66% -66% 12.6 12.3 -2% -2%
110 April 19.0 19.6 3% 3% 40.8 42.0 3% 3% 48.5 49.8 3% 3% 34.0 37.6 10% 10% 12.1 7.8 -35% -35% 21.4 21.2 -1% -1%
110 May 35.4 35.5 0% 0% 76.3 76.5 0% 0% 93.5 93.0 -1% 0% 63.3 64.3 1% 1% 23.4 17.8 -24% -15% 39.2 39.2 0% 0%
110 June 6.3 6.6 4% 1% 13.3 13.4 0% 0% 19.0 18.8 -1% 0% 13.9 13.2 -5% -1% 4.0 1.0 -75% -6% 6.7 6.2 -8% -1%
110 July 5.5 5.5 0% 0% 11.6 11.2 -3% -1% 16.8 16.3 -3% -1% 12.5 11.3 -9% -4% 3.6 0.7 -80% -20% 5.7 5.3 -7% -2%
110 August 4.8 4.8 0% 0% 10.1 9.7 -4% -4% 14.9 14.5 -3% -3% 11.4 10.4 -9% -9% 3.1 0.4 -87% -87% 4.9 4.5 -8% -8%
110 September 5.1 5.3 3% 3% 10.7 10.7 1% 1% 15.5 15.7 2% 2% 12.4 12.6 2% 2% 3.1 0.2 -94% -94% 5.3 5.1 -5% -5%
110 October 4.6 4.5 -1% -1% 9.6 9.4 -2% -2% 14.0 13.9 0% 0% 10.9 10.3 -6% -6% 2.8 0.1 -96% -96% 4.7 4.5 -4% -4%
110 November 3.8 3.9 3% 3% 8.1 8.5 5% 5% 11.9 12.7 7% 7% 9.2 9.1 -1% -1% 2.5 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 4.3 3% 3%
110 December 3.5 3.5 0% 0% 7.6 8.2 8% 8% 11.2 12.2 9% 9% 8.6 8.3 -3% -3% 2.3 0.0 -100% -100% 3.9 4.5 15% 15%
111 January 3.2 3.2 -1% -1% 7.0 7.3 5% 5% 10.3 11.1 7% 7% 7.8 7.7 -1% -1% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 3.6 3.9 8% 8%
111 February 2.7 2.9 6% 6% 6.1 6.7 10% 10% 9.0 10.1 13% 13% 6.6 7.1 8% 8% 2.0 0.0 -100% -100% 3.4 3.6 5% 5%
111 March 3.9 3.9 0% 0% 8.4 8.7 4% 4% 12.0 12.5 5% 5% 9.3 10.6 14% 14% 2.2 0.0 -100% -100% 4.2 4.5 7% 7%
111 April 58.8 60.7 3% 3% 130.2 135.6 4% 4% 155.4 161.2 4% 4% 104.8 114.6 9% 9% 40.9 32.6 -20% -20% 70.6 71.7 2% 2%
111 May 48.3 48.4 0% 0% 102.9 103.6 1% 1% 127.3 127.7 0% 0% 92.9 93.6 1% 1% 30.6 24.2 -21% -17% 52.4 52.9 1% 1%
111 June 16.6 17.3 4% 1% 33.9 34.7 2% 1% 44.1 44.7 1% 0% 34.1 35.1 3% 1% 9.1 5.2 -43% -8% 17.0 16.5 -3% -1%
111 July 6.6 6.6 0% 0% 13.6 13.1 -4% -1% 19.9 18.9 -5% -2% 14.9 13.7 -8% -4% 3.8 0.9 -76% -21% 6.5 5.9 -9% -3%
111 August 5.7 5.6 0% 0% 11.6 11.1 -4% -4% 17.2 16.3 -5% -5% 12.9 11.7 -10% -10% 3.5 0.7 -80% -80% 5.5 5.1 -8% -8%
111 September 4.8 4.9 3% 3% 9.8 9.9 2% 2% 14.8 14.8 0% 0% 11.3 10.5 -7% -7% 3.0 0.4 -87% -87% 4.8 4.6 -4% -4%
111 October 17.2 17.2 0% 0% 37.3 37.3 0% 0% 46.5 45.6 -2% -2% 35.4 38.7 9% 9% 9.7 5.4 -45% -45% 18.9 19.0 0% 0%
111 November 6.0 6.2 3% 3% 12.3 12.6 3% 3% 17.9 18.1 1% 1% 13.2 12.6 -5% -5% 3.6 0.6 -83% -83% 6.0 6.0 -1% -1%
111 December 5.2 5.2 0% 0% 10.7 11.0 2% 2% 15.9 16.0 1% 1% 11.8 10.8 -9% -9% 3.3 0.5 -85% -85% 5.2 5.4 4% 4%
112 January 4.5 4.5 0% 0% 9.4 9.8 4% 4% 14.1 14.5 3% 3% 10.6 9.7 -9% -9% 2.9 0.3 -90% -90% 4.7 5.0 7% 7%
112 February 3.6 4.0 10% 10% 7.6 9.3 22% 22% 11.5 13.7 19% 19% 8.7 8.9 3% 3% 2.6 0.1 -96% -96% 4.2 5.0 19% 19%
112 March 18.5 18.4 -1% -1% 40.4 40.8 1% 1% 49.1 49.3 0% 0% 35.8 40.6 13% 13% 10.8 6.3 -42% -42% 20.6 21.2 3% 3%
112 April 38.1 39.4 4% 4% 82.2 85.8 4% 4% 101.2 104.6 3% 3% 68.7 72.1 5% 5% 26.1 20.1 -23% -23% 43.7 44.4 2% 2%
112 May 92.3 92.2 0% 0% 199.5 201.2 1% 1% 248.6 250.5 1% 1% 180.5 178.5 -1% -1% 61.9 51.3 -17% -17% 103.3 104.8 1% 1%
112 June 65.7 67.9 3% 3% 139.7 145.3 4% 4% 177.0 182.6 3% 3% 130.8 132.1 1% 1% 43.8 35.5 -19% -17% 73.6 74.4 1% 1%
112 July 7.5 7.6 2% 1% 15.3 14.8 -3% -1% 22.8 21.6 -5% -3% 17.1 15.2 -11% -6% 4.2 1.1 -74% -22% 7.2 6.5 -10% -3%
112 August 6.2 6.2 1% 1% 12.7 12.2 -4% -4% 18.9 18.0 -5% -5% 14.2 12.7 -11% -11% 3.7 0.7 -81% -81% 6.1 5.5 -9% -9%
112 September 12.7 13.2 4% 4% 26.6 27.4 3% 3% 35.0 35.3 1% 1% 28.5 31.1 9% 9% 6.4 2.5 -61% -61% 13.4 13.3 -1% -1%
112 October 11.6 11.6 0% 0% 24.0 23.9 0% 0% 31.8 31.2 -2% -2% 24.5 24.7 1% 1% 6.1 2.5 -59% -59% 11.6 11.4 -1% -1%
112 November 6.0 6.2 3% 3% 12.6 13.3 6% 6% 18.3 19.0 4% 4% 13.4 12.6 -6% -6% 4.0 1.0 -75% -75% 6.3 6.6 5% 5%
112 December 5.3 5.3 0% 0% 11.1 11.2 1% 1% 16.5 16.5 0% 0% 12.1 11.0 -9% -9% 3.6 0.7 -80% -80% 5.5 5.5 0% 0%
 13310800 (EFSFSR above Meadow) 13311000 (EFSFSR at Stibnite) 13311250 (EFSFSR above Sugar) 13311450 (Sugar Creek) 13310850 (Meadow Creek) Meadow Creek MC-6
Simulated Streamflow Simulated Streamflow Simulated Streamflow Simulated Streamflow Simulated Streamflow Simulated Streamflow
No Proposed Long-term % No Proposed Long-term % No Proposed Long-term % No Proposed Long-term % No Proposed Long-term % No Proposed Long-term %
Mine Year Month Action Action % Difference Difference Action Action % Difference Difference Action Action % Difference Difference Action Action % Difference Difference Action Action % Difference Difference Action Action % Difference Difference
-2 January 5.0 4.0 -20% -20% 10.4 9.4 -10% -10% 15.8 14.8 -6% -6% 11.6 11.6 0% 0% 3.2 3.2 2% 2% 5.0 5.1 1% 1%
-2 February 4.1 3.3 -20% -20% 8.6 7.8 -9% -9% 13.3 12.5 -6% -6% 9.9 9.9 0% 0% 2.8 2.9 2% 2% 4.5 4.5 0% 0%
-2 March 13.1 12.4 -6% -6% 28.6 27.8 -3% -3% 36.3 35.5 -2% -2% 27.8 27.8 0% 0% 6.9 7.0 3% 3% 14.1 14.1 0% 0%
-2 April 29.1 27.9 -4% -4% 62.7 61.5 -2% -2% 76.5 75.3 -2% -2% 51.4 51.4 0% 0% 19.6 19.8 1% 1% 32.5 32.5 0% 0%
-2 May 55.3 54.6 -1% -1% 119.9 119.2 -1% -1% 148.6 147.9 0% 0% 105.6 105.6 0% 0% 37.1 37.5 1% 1% 60.7 60.7 0% 0%
-2 June 13.3 11.3 -14% -4% 27.4 25.5 -7% -2% 36.5 34.6 -5% -1% 28.4 28.4 0% 0% 7.2 7.4 2% 0% 13.6 13.6 0% 0%
-2 July 6.7 5.0 -26% -12% 14.2 12.4 -12% -4% 20.7 19.0 -8% -4% 15.7 15.7 0% 0% 4.1 4.2 4% 1% 6.9 6.9 0% 0%
-2 August 5.8 4.4 -24% -24% 12.0 10.6 -12% -12% 17.8 16.4 -8% -8% 13.4 13.4 0% 0% 3.6 3.7 2% 2% 5.8 5.9 0% 0%
-2 September 7.0 5.8 -17% -17% 14.5 13.3 -8% -8% 20.6 19.5 -6% -6% 16.3 16.3 0% 0% 3.7 3.9 5% 5% 7.2 7.2 0% 0%
-2 October 6.9 5.7 -18% -18% 14.3 13.1 -9% -9% 20.4 19.2 -6% -6% 15.9 15.9 0% 0% 3.7 3.8 3% 3% 6.9 6.9 0% 0%
-2 November 5.2 4.0 -22% -22% 10.8 9.7 -11% -11% 15.9 14.8 -7% -7% 12.1 12.1 0% 0% 3.3 3.4 4% 4% 5.5 5.5 0% 0%
-2 December 4.6 3.7 -20% -20% 9.8 8.9 -9% -9% 14.6 13.7 -6% -6% 11.0 11.0 0% 0% 3.0 3.0 1% 1% 4.9 4.9 0% 0%
-1 January 4.1 3.3 -19% -19% 8.7 7.0 -20% -20% 13.2 11.4 -13% -13% 9.9 9.9 0% 0% 2.7 2.7 1% 1% 4.4 3.4 -22% -22%
-1 February 3.3 2.7 -17% -17% 7.2 6.0 -17% -17% 10.9 9.7 -11% -11% 8.2 8.2 0% 0% 2.4 2.5 2% 2% 4.1 3.3 -18% -18%
-1 March 3.7 3.1 -16% -16% 8.0 6.8 -15% -15% 12.1 10.9 -10% -10% 9.1 9.1 0% 0% 2.4 2.4 1% 1% 4.0 3.4 -15% -15%
-1 April 11.0 10.2 -7% -7% 24.1 22.9 -5% -5% 30.6 29.4 -4% -4% 23.1 23.1 0% 0% 5.5 5.5 1% 1% 12.2 11.7 -4% -4%
-1 May 32.9 31.6 -4% -3% 71.4 69.5 -3% -2% 84.4 82.5 -2% -2% 57.6 57.6 0% 0% 21.5 21.7 1% 1% 36.0 35.3 -2% -1%
-1 June 14.9 13.1 -13% -4% 31.4 29.1 -7% -2% 39.1 36.9 -6% -2% 28.6 28.6 0% 0% 8.6 8.8 2% 0% 15.8 15.4 -3% -1%
-1 July 6.3 4.7 -25% -11% 13.4 11.6 -13% -5% 19.0 17.3 -9% -4% 13.8 13.8 0% 0% 3.8 4.0 5% 1% 6.6 6.4 -3% -1%
-1 August 5.4 4.2 -23% -23% 11.4 10.0 -12% -12% 16.6 15.2 -8% -8% 12.1 12.1 0% 0% 3.5 3.6 3% 3% 5.6 5.4 -3% -3%
-1 September 4.6 3.6 -21% -21% 9.7 8.5 -12% -12% 14.4 13.3 -8% -8% 10.8 10.8 0% 0% 3.0 3.2 4% 4% 5.0 4.8 -4% -4%
-1 October 5.2 4.3 -17% -17% 10.9 9.9 -9% -9% 16.0 15.0 -6% -6% 12.5 12.5 0% 0% 3.1 3.1 2% 2% 5.3 5.2 -2% -2%
-1 November 4.2 3.4 -20% -20% 8.9 8.0 -11% -11% 13.2 12.3 -7% -7% 10.0 10.0 0% 0% 2.7 2.7 2% 2% 4.6 4.4 -4% -4%
-1 December 3.7 3.1 -17% -17% 8.1 7.4 -9% -9% 12.2 11.5 -6% -6% 9.1 9.1 0% 0% 2.5 2.5 2% 2% 4.2 4.0 -3% -3%
1 January 3.4 2.9 -15% -15% 7.5 7.6 2% 2% 11.2 9.3 -17% -17% 8.3 8.3 0% 0% 2.3 2.4 2% 2% 3.9 3.8 0% 0%
1 February 2.8 2.4 -14% -14% 6.3 6.7 6% 6% 9.4 7.8 -17% -17% 6.8 6.8 0% 0% 2.1 2.2 1% 1% 3.6 3.6 1% 1%
1 March 2.9 2.5 -14% -14% 6.5 7.0 8% 8% 9.7 8.0 -18% -18% 6.9 6.9 0% 0% 2.0 2.0 1% 1% 3.4 3.5 1% 1%
1 April 52.6 52.7 0% 0% 116.8 117.6 1% 1% 138.0 137.7 0% 0% 95.1 95.1 0% 0% 36.8 37.0 1% 1% 61.7 61.7 0% 0%
1 May 85.6 85.8 0% 0% 184.1 185.0 0% 0% 227.2 230.3 1% 1% 167.8 167.8 0% 0% 56.3 56.7 1% 1% 92.7 92.6 0% 0%
1 June 50.6 48.3 -4% -4% 106.8 105.3 -1% -1% 135.2 132.7 -2% -2% 100.0 100.0 0% 0% 32.9 33.2 1% 1% 54.7 54.6 0% 0%
1 July 7.1 4.8 -32% -15% 14.2 12.9 -9% -3% 21.5 16.4 -24% -12% 15.4 15.4 0% 0% 3.7 3.8 4% 1% 6.6 6.7 2% 0%
1 August 5.9 4.2 -29% -29% 11.9 11.2 -5% -5% 18.0 14.1 -22% -22% 13.1 13.1 0% 0% 3.4 3.4 2% 2% 5.6 5.7 3% 3%
1 September 5.0 3.6 -27% -27% 10.0 9.6 -4% -4% 15.3 12.0 -21% -21% 11.4 11.4 0% 0% 2.9 3.0 3% 3% 4.9 4.9 2% 2%
1 October 4.8 3.6 -25% -25% 9.6 9.4 -3% -3% 14.9 11.8 -21% -21% 11.3 11.3 0% 0% 2.7 2.8 4% 4% 4.6 4.6 1% 1%
1 November 4.1 3.1 -25% -25% 8.4 8.3 -1% -1% 13.1 10.3 -21% -21% 9.8 9.8 0% 0% 2.4 2.5 3% 3% 4.1 4.2 1% 1%
1 December 3.8 2.9 -23% -23% 7.8 8.0 2% 2% 12.4 9.8 -21% -21% 9.0 9.0 0% 0% 2.3 2.3 2% 2% 3.8 3.9 3% 3%
2 January 3.4 2.7 -20% -20% 7.1 7.5 5% 5% 11.3 8.4 -26% -26% 8.1 8.1 0% 0% 2.1 2.1 1% 1% 3.6 3.6 3% 3%
2 February 2.7 2.2 -17% -17% 5.9 6.4 8% 8% 9.4 6.9 -26% -26% 6.7 6.7 0% 0% 1.9 2.0 1% 1% 3.3 3.4 3% 3%
2 March 10.4 9.7 -7% -7% 22.6 23.0 1% 1% 29.4 26.6 -9% -9% 22.7 22.7 0% 0% 4.8 4.7 -2% -2% 10.9 11.0 1% 1%
2 April 24.5 23.2 -5% -5% 53.1 52.6 -1% -1% 62.3 59.9 -4% -4% 43.5 43.5 0% 0% 15.9 16.0 1% 1% 27.5 27.4 0% 0%
2 May 33.5 31.7 -5% -4% 72.0 71.1 -1% -1% 87.9 84.0 -4% -3% 61.9 61.9 0% 0% 21.7 21.9 1% 1% 36.1 36.0 0% 0%
2 June 7.1 5.3 -25% -4% 14.9 14.1 -5% -1% 21.2 16.1 -24% -4% 15.7 15.7 0% 0% 4.1 4.1 1% 0% 7.5 7.6 1% 0%
2 July 5.9 4.4 -25% -10% 12.3 11.9 -3% -1% 18.0 13.4 -26% -11% 13.2 13.2 0% 0% 3.6 3.7 2% 0% 6.0 6.1 2% 1%
2 August 5.0 3.9 -23% -23% 10.4 10.3 -1% -1% 15.7 11.5 -27% -27% 11.6 11.6 0% 0% 3.1 3.2 2% 2% 5.1 5.2 2% 2%
2 September 6.1 5.1 -17% -17% 12.5 12.6 0% 0% 18.1 14.2 -21% -21% 14.1 14.1 0% 0% 3.3 3.4 1% 1% 6.2 6.3 2% 2%
2 October 13.2 12.0 -9% -9% 28.4 28.1 -1% -1% 35.9 31.8 -11% -11% 27.6 27.6 0% 0% 6.7 6.9 3% 3% 13.9 13.9 0% 0%
2 November 5.5 4.3 -22% -22% 11.6 11.5 -1% -1% 16.7 12.8 -23% -23% 12.2 12.2 0% 0% 3.5 3.6 4% 4% 5.9 6.0 2% 2%
2 December 4.9 4.0 -19% -19% 10.4 10.5 1% 1% 15.1 11.5 -24% -24% 10.9 10.9 0% 0% 3.3 3.3 3% 3% 5.2 5.3 1% 1%
3 January 4.3 3.5 -17% -17% 9.1 9.4 2% 2% 13.5 10.0 -26% -26% 10.0 10.0 0% 0% 2.9 3.0 1% 1% 4.6 4.7 2% 2%
3 February 3.5 3.0 -14% -14% 7.7 8.0 4% 4% 11.5 8.3 -28% -28% 8.5 8.5 0% 0% 2.6 2.7 3% 3% 4.2 4.3 1% 1%
3 March 3.4 2.9 -14% -14% 7.5 7.9 6% 6% 11.2 8.0 -29% -29% 8.2 8.2 0% 0% 2.3 2.4 4% 4% 3.9 4.0 2% 2%
3 April 4.2 3.7 -12% -7% 8.9 9.2 4% 2% 12.9 9.6 -25% -13% 9.9 9.9 0% 0% 2.6 2.6 2% 1% 4.5 4.5 1% 0%
3 May 67.6 68.1 1% 1% 149.4 150.7 1% 1% 177.8 178.7 1% 1% 124.6 124.6 0% 0% 46.2 46.5 1% 1% 76.5 76.6 0% 0%
3 June 53.2 51.9 -2% -2% 113.2 112.6 -1% -1% 141.0 138.3 -2% -2% 103.3 103.3 0% 0% 35.1 35.5 1% 1% 58.3 58.3 0% 0%
3 July 6.8 4.7 -31% -14% 13.7 12.5 -9% -3% 20.5 14.0 -32% -15% 14.6 14.6 0% 0% 3.6 3.7 1% 0% 6.4 6.5 2% 0%
3 August 5.7 4.1 -28% -28% 11.6 10.9 -6% -6% 17.5 12.0 -31% -31% 12.7 12.7 0% 0% 3.4 3.4 0% 0% 5.4 5.6 2% 2%
3 September 4.9 3.6 -27% -27% 9.8 9.4 -4% -4% 15.1 10.3 -32% -32% 11.2 11.2 0% 0% 2.9 3.0 1% 1% 4.8 4.8 1% 1%
3 October 4.5 3.3 -25% -25% 9.0 8.8 -3% -3% 14.1 9.5 -32% -32% 10.5 10.5 0% 0% 2.6 2.7 3% 3% 4.3 4.3 1% 1%
3 November 4.3 3.3 -24% -24% 8.7 8.5 -2% -2% 13.5 9.2 -32% -32% 10.1 10.1 0% 0% 2.5 2.6 4% 4% 4.2 4.3 1% 1%
3 December 3.9 3.0 -23% -23% 8.0 8.0 0% 0% 12.6 8.5 -32% -32% 9.2 9.2 0% 0% 2.3 2.4 3% 3% 3.9 4.0 2% 2%
4 January 3.4 2.8 -19% -19% 7.2 7.6 5% 5% 11.4 7.8 -31% -31% 8.2 8.2 0% 0% 2.1 2.2 1% 1% 3.6 3.7 2% 2%
4 February 2.8 2.3 -17% -17% 6.0 6.4 8% 8% 9.4 6.5 -31% -31% 6.7 6.7 0% 0% 2.0 2.0 1% 1% 3.4 3.5 3% 3%
4 March 2.8 2.3 -16% -16% 6.1 6.8 10% 10% 9.6 6.6 -31% -31% 6.8 6.8 0% 0% 1.8 1.9 1% 1% 3.2 3.3 3% 3%
4 April 15.8 15.0 -5% -5% 35.0 35.2 0% 0% 42.6 39.6 -7% -7% 31.2 31.2 0% 0% 9.0 8.9 -1% -1% 17.9 18.0 1% 1%
4 May 57.7 56.9 -1% -1% 125.7 125.8 0% 0% 150.2 149.2 -1% -1% 105.6 105.6 0% 0% 38.7 39.1 1% 1% 63.8 63.8 0% 0%
4 June 38.5 36.6 -5% -4% 81.8 80.7 -1% -1% 102.4 97.9 -4% -3% 75.5 75.5 0% 0% 25.0 25.3 1% 1% 42.0 41.9 0% 0%
4 July 6.6 4.6 -31% -14% 13.5 12.6 -7% -2% 20.2 14.0 -31% -15% 14.5 14.5 0% 0% 3.6 3.7 3% 1% 6.4 6.6 2% 1%
4 August 5.6 4.0 -28% -28% 11.3 10.9 -4% -4% 17.1 11.8 -31% -31% 12.5 12.5 0% 0% 3.3 3.3 1% 1% 5.4 5.5 3% 3%
4 September 4.7 3.5 -26% -26% 9.6 9.3 -2% -2% 14.7 10.1 -32% -32% 10.9 10.9 0% 0% 2.9 2.9 2% 2% 4.7 4.8 2% 2%
4 October 12.3 10.8 -13% -13% 26.4 25.8 -2% -2% 34.1 29.2 -14% -14% 27.0 27.0 0% 0% 6.0 6.1 2% 2% 12.8 12.8 0% 0%
4 November 5.3 3.9 -25% -25% 10.8 10.5 -3% -3% 16.1 11.4 -29% -29% 11.6 11.6 0% 0% 3.2 3.2 2% 2% 5.3 5.4 2% 2%
4 December 4.7 3.6 -22% -22% 9.8 9.7 -1% -1% 14.7 10.3 -30% -30% 10.6 10.6 0% 0% 3.0 3.1 3% 3% 4.8 4.8 1% 1%
5 January 4.1 3.3 -20% -20% 8.6 9.3 8% 8% 13.2 9.5 -28% -28% 9.6 9.6 0% 0% 2.6 2.7 6% 6% 4.3 4.4 4% 4%
5 February 3.3 2.7 -17% -17% 7.0 7.9 13% 13% 10.8 7.8 -28% -28% 7.9 7.9 0% 0% 2.4 2.5 1% 1% 3.9 4.0 4% 4%
5 March 3.4 2.9 -15% -15% 7.4 8.5 15% 15% 11.5 8.2 -28% -28% 8.4 8.4 0% 0% 2.3 2.3 4% 4% 3.8 3.9 5% 5%
5 April 13.8 12.8 -7% -7% 30.4 31.0 2% 2% 37.6 34.2 -9% -9% 27.8 27.8 0% 0% 7.8 7.9 2% 2% 15.5 15.7 1% 1%
5 May 38.4 36.8 -4% -4% 83.1 83.0 0% 0% 99.3 96.2 -3% -3% 67.6 67.6 0% 0% 25.4 25.7 1% 1% 41.9 41.9 0% 0%
5 June 68.5 68.0 -1% -1% 148.3 149.2 1% 1% 183.4 181.7 -1% -1% 134.6 134.6 0% 0% 47.3 47.8 1% 1% 77.6 77.6 0% 0%
5 July 6.9 4.8 -30% -14% 14.0 13.6 -3% -1% 20.8 14.7 -30% -15% 14.9 14.9 0% 0% 3.7 3.8 4% 1% 6.6 6.8 3% 1%
5 August 5.7 4.1 -28% -28% 11.7 11.8 1% 1% 17.6 12.5 -29% -29% 12.8 12.8 0% 0% 3.4 3.4 2% 2% 5.6 5.8 4% 4%
5 September 4.9 3.6 -26% -26% 9.9 10.2 3% 3% 15.1 10.6 -30% -30% 11.2 11.2 0% 0% 2.9 3.0 2% 2% 4.8 4.9 3% 3%
5 October 7.2 5.9 -18% -18% 14.9 15.2 2% 2% 21.2 16.7 -21% -21% 16.9 16.9 0% 0% 3.3 3.4 2% 2% 6.9 7.1 2% 2%
5 November 4.8 3.6 -24% -24% 9.8 10.2 4% 4% 14.8 10.5 -29% -29% 11.0 11.0 0% 0% 2.9 2.9 0% 0% 4.8 4.9 2% 2%
5 December 4.3 3.3 -22% -22% 8.9 9.5 8% 8% 13.6 9.6 -29% -29% 9.9 9.9 0% 0% 2.6 2.7 4% 4% 4.3 4.4 3% 3%
6 January 3.8 3.0 -19% -19% 7.9 8.9 13% 13% 12.3 8.7 -29% -29% 8.9 8.9 0% 0% 2.3 2.4 4% 4% 3.9 4.1 5% 5%
6 February 3.0 2.5 -16% -16% 6.5 7.6 17% 17% 10.1 7.2 -29% -29% 7.3 7.3 0% 0% 2.2 2.2 1% 1% 3.6 3.8 5% 5%
6 March 3.0 2.6 -15% -15% 6.6 8.0 20% 20% 10.3 7.3 -29% -29% 7.4 7.4 0% 0% 2.0 2.1 1% 1% 3.4 3.6 6% 6%
6 April 6.9 6.2 -10% -10% 15.0 16.2 8% 6% 20.5 17.5 -14% -12% 16.8 16.8 0% 0% 3.0 3.1 4% 2% 7.4 7.7 4% 3%
6 May 57.8 57.3 -1% -1% 127.3 128.3 1% 1% 150.6 149.8 -1% -1% 103.6 103.6 0% 0% 39.6 39.7 0% 0% 65.1 65.1 0% 0%
6 June 64.8 63.8 -1% -1% 139.1 139.6 0% 0% 172.9 171.1 -1% -1% 127.1 127.1 0% 0% 43.8 44.3 1% 1% 72.2 72.2 0% 0%
6 July 6.8 4.7 -31% -14% 13.6 13.3 -2% -1% 20.6 14.2 -31% -15% 14.6 14.6 0% 0% 3.6 3.7 3% 1% 6.3 6.6 4% 1%
6 August 5.7 4.1 -28% -28% 11.4 11.7 2% 2% 17.4 12.1 -30% -30% 12.7 12.7 0% 0% 3.3 3.3 1% 1% 5.4 5.6 4% 4%
6 September 4.8 3.5 -26% -26% 9.7 10.1 4% 4% 14.9 10.3 -31% -31% 11.1 11.1 0% 0% 2.9 2.9 3% 3% 4.7 4.8 3% 3%
6 October 7.8 6.5 -17% -17% 16.1 16.5 3% 3% 22.6 18.1 -20% -20% 18.4 18.4 0% 0% 3.4 3.5 2% 2% 7.5 7.7 3% 3%
6 November 4.9 3.7 -25% -25% 9.9 10.4 5% 5% 14.9 10.6 -29% -29% 11.0 11.0 0% 0% 2.9 2.9 2% 2% 4.8 5.0 3% 3%
6 December 4.3 3.4 -22% -22% 9.0 9.7 9% 9% 13.7 9.7 -29% -29% 10.0 10.0 0% 0% 2.7 2.7 2% 2% 4.4 4.5 3% 3%
7 January 3.8 3.2 -17% -17% 8.0 9.9 25% 25% 12.4 9.7 -22% -22% 9.0 9.0 0% 0% 2.4 2.5 1% 1% 4.0 3.0 -24% -24%
7 February 3.1 2.7 -13% -13% 6.7 8.7 29% 29% 10.5 8.2 -22% -22% 7.6 7.6 0% 0% 2.2 2.3 2% 2% 3.7 2.3 -37% -37%
7 March 3.2 2.8 -11% -11% 6.9 8.9 30% 30% 10.7 8.3 -22% -22% 7.7 7.7 0% 0% 2.1 2.1 1% 1% 3.5 2.0 -42% -42%
7 April 42.4 41.9 -1% -1% 94.1 94.9 1% 1% 111.3 109.9 -1% -1% 77.0 77.0 0% 0% 29.4 29.6 1% 1% 49.6 47.1 -5% -5%
7 May 60.6 60.0 -1% -1% 130.8 131.7 1% 1% 161.1 159.1 -1% -1% 117.8 117.8 0% 0% 39.9 40.2 1% 1% 66.0 63.6 -4% -4%
7 June 30.2 27.7 -9% -5% 63.2 62.1 -2% -1% 80.9 74.9 -7% -4% 59.4 59.4 0% 0% 18.8 19.0 1% 0% 32.0 29.6 -8% -3%
7 July 6.7 4.8 -28% -13% 13.7 13.5 -1% 0% 20.7 14.5 -30% -15% 14.7 14.7 0% 0% 3.7 3.8 4% 1% 6.5 4.3 -33% -10%
7 August 5.6 4.2 -25% -25% 11.5 12.0 5% 5% 17.4 12.5 -28% -28% 12.6 12.6 0% 0% 3.3 3.4 2% 2% 5.5 3.5 -36% -36%
7 September 4.8 3.7 -23% -23% 9.7 10.7 10% 10% 14.9 10.9 -27% -27% 11.0 11.0 0% 0% 2.9 3.0 3% 3% 4.7 3.0 -37% -37%
7 October 11.1 9.7 -13% -13% 23.6 23.6 0% 0% 31.2 26.3 -16% -16% 25.1 25.1 0% 0% 5.2 5.2 1% 1% 11.4 8.8 -22% -22%
7 November 5.4 4.2 -23% -23% 11.1 11.7 6% 6% 16.4 12.1 -26% -26% 11.9 11.9 0% 0% 3.1 3.3 5% 5% 5.4 3.5 -36% -36%
7 December 4.8 3.9 -19% -19% 10.0 11.2 12% 12% 15.0 11.3 -25% -25% 10.8 10.8 0% 0% 3.0 3.1 3% 3% 4.9 3.1 -37% -37%
8 January 4.2 3.6 -14% -14% 8.8 11.2 27% 27% 13.4 11.0 -18% -18% 9.8 9.8 0% 0% 2.8 2.8 -2% -2% 4.4 2.2 -48% -48%
8 February 3.3 3.0 -11% -11% 7.1 9.2 29% 29% 11.0 8.8 -20% -20% 8.0 8.0 0% 0% 2.5 2.5 0% 0% 4.0 1.5 -62% -62%
8 March 3.6 3.2 -11% -11% 7.8 9.9 27% 27% 11.9 9.5 -21% -21% 8.7 8.7 0% 0% 2.3 2.4 3% 3% 3.9 1.3 -66% -66%
8 April 21.2 20.4 -4% -4% 46.7 46.7 0% 0% 55.4 52.1 -6% -6% 39.8 39.8 0% 0% 13.4 13.5 1% 1% 24.2 20.0 -17% -17%
8 May 44.0 42.6 -3% -3% 95.2 95.1 0% 0% 115.5 111.8 -3% -3% 80.3 80.3 0% 0% 29.2 29.5 1% 1% 48.0 44.2 -8% -7%
8 June 27.3 25.4 -7% -4% 57.9 57.3 -1% -1% 73.0 67.4 -8% -4% 53.6 53.6 0% 0% 17.5 17.6 1% 0% 29.6 25.9 -13% -5%
8 July 6.6 4.9 -25% -11% 13.8 13.9 1% 0% 20.2 14.8 -27% -13% 14.5 14.5 0% 0% 3.8 3.9 3% 1% 6.7 3.4 -49% -15%
8 August 5.6 4.4 -22% -22% 11.6 12.5 8% 8% 17.3 13.0 -25% -25% 12.6 12.6 0% 0% 3.4 3.5 3% 3% 5.6 2.7 -53% -53%
8 September 27.4 25.7 -6% -6% 59.1 58.5 -1% -1% 73.1 68.0 -7% -7% 53.8 53.8 0% 0% 17.6 17.7 1% 1% 30.5 26.5 -13% -13%
8 October 6.3 4.8 -23% -23% 13.1 13.5 3% 3% 19.3 14.3 -26% -26% 13.9 13.9 0% 0% 3.6 3.7 4% 4% 6.3 3.1 -51% -51%
8 November 5.2 4.2 -19% -19% 10.7 11.9 11% 11% 16.2 12.2 -24% -24% 11.6 11.6 0% 0% 3.4 3.4 1% 1% 5.4 2.5 -54% -54%
8 December 4.7 3.9 -17% -17% 9.7 11.2 15% 15% 14.9 11.4 -24% -24% 11.0 11.0 0% 0% 2.9 3.0 2% 2% 4.7 1.9 -60% -60%
9 January 4.1 3.5 -16% -16% 8.6 8.9 3% 3% 13.5 9.1 -32% -32% 10.0 10.0 0% 0% 2.6 2.7 3% 3% 4.3 1.3 -70% -70%
9 February 3.3 2.9 -13% -13% 7.0 7.3 3% 3% 11.1 7.7 -30% -30% 8.2 8.2 0% 0% 2.3 2.4 3% 3% 3.9 0.9 -77% -77%
9 March 3.6 3.2 -13% -13% 7.8 8.0 3% 3% 12.1 8.5 -30% -30% 8.9 8.9 0% 0% 2.3 2.4 1% 1% 3.9 0.8 -78% -78%
9 April 20.1 19.1 -5% -5% 44.2 42.3 -4% -4% 52.9 48.2 -9% -9% 38.6 38.6 0% 0% 12.2 12.4 1% 1% 22.9 18.2 -21% -21%
9 May 46.3 45.0 -3% -3% 100.4 98.6 -2% -2% 122.0 117.7 -4% -4% 85.6 85.6 0% 0% 30.9 31.1 1% 1% 50.7 46.6 -8% -8%
9 June 19.5 17.4 -11% -4% 40.8 38.4 -6% -2% 52.1 45.4 -13% -5% 38.5 38.5 0% 0% 11.7 11.8 1% 0% 20.6 16.5 -20% -6%
9 July 6.5 4.9 -26% -11% 13.6 12.1 -11% -4% 19.9 13.8 -31% -14% 14.4 14.4 0% 0% 3.7 3.9 5% 1% 6.6 3.0 -54% -16%
9 August 5.5 4.3 -22% -22% 11.4 10.7 -6% -6% 17.0 12.1 -29% -29% 12.4 12.4 0% 0% 3.4 3.5 2% 2% 5.6 2.4 -58% -58%
9 September 4.7 3.7 -20% -20% 9.7 9.3 -4% -4% 14.7 10.5 -29% -29% 11.0 11.0 0% 0% 3.0 3.1 4% 4% 4.9 1.8 -63% -63%
9 October 7.2 6.1 -15% -15% 14.9 13.5 -10% -10% 21.1 15.7 -26% -26% 16.7 16.7 0% 0% 3.5 3.5 1% 1% 7.0 3.0 -57% -57%
9 November 4.7 3.8 -19% -19% 9.7 9.4 -4% -4% 14.5 10.5 -28% -28% 10.8 10.8 0% 0% 2.9 2.9 1% 1% 4.9 1.8 -64% -64%
9 December 4.1 3.5 -15% -15% 8.8 8.8 0% 0% 13.3 9.7 -27% -27% 9.8 9.8 0% 0% 2.6 2.7 3% 3% 4.4 1.4 -69% -69%
10 January 3.6 3.2 -13% -13% 7.8 7.4 -5% -5% 12.0 8.3 -31% -31% 8.8 8.8 0% 0% 2.5 2.5 0% 0% 4.0 0.9 -78% -78%
10 February 3.9 3.3 -15% -15% 8.3 7.6 -9% -9% 12.3 8.8 -28% -28% 9.5 9.5 0% 0% 2.6 2.6 3% 3% 4.5 1.3 -71% -71%
10 March 11.3 10.2 -10% -10% 24.7 21.9 -11% -11% 31.4 25.8 -18% -18% 23.4 23.4 0% 0% 5.6 5.6 1% 1% 12.2 7.5 -38% -38%
10 April 19.0 17.3 -9% -9% 40.9 38.0 -7% -7% 48.4 43.2 -11% -11% 33.8 33.8 0% 0% 12.1 12.2 1% 1% 21.0 16.7 -20% -20%
10 May 35.4 33.2 -6% -5% 76.3 73.0 -4% -4% 92.8 87.3 -6% -5% 64.1 64.1 0% 0% 23.4 23.6 1% 1% 38.4 34.2 -11% -8%
10 June 6.4 4.6 -28% -4% 13.4 11.0 -18% -2% 19.1 13.3 -30% -4% 13.7 13.7 0% 0% 4.0 4.0 1% 0% 6.8 3.1 -54% -5%
10 July 5.6 4.3 -22% -8% 11.6 10.1 -13% -4% 17.0 12.1 -29% -12% 12.3 12.3 0% 0% 3.5 3.6 4% 1% 5.7 2.4 -58% -15%
10 August 4.8 3.9 -20% -20% 10.1 9.0 -11% -11% 15.1 10.7 -29% -29% 11.3 11.3 0% 0% 3.0 3.1 4% 4% 4.9 1.8 -64% -64%
10 September 5.1 4.1 -20% -20% 10.7 9.3 -12% -12% 15.8 11.2 -29% -29% 12.3 12.3 0% 0% 3.2 3.1 0% 0% 5.3 2.0 -63% -63%
10 October 4.6 3.7 -19% -19% 9.6 8.4 -12% -12% 14.3 10.0 -30% -30% 10.8 10.8 0% 0% 2.7 2.8 3% 3% 4.7 1.4 -70% -70%
10 November 3.8 3.2 -15% -15% 8.1 7.4 -9% -9% 12.3 8.7 -29% -29% 9.1 9.1 0% 0% 2.5 2.6 4% 4% 4.2 1.0 -76% -76%
10 December 3.5 3.0 -12% -12% 7.6 7.1 -7% -7% 11.5 8.3 -28% -28% 8.5 8.5 0% 0% 2.3 2.4 1% 1% 3.9 0.8 -80% -80%
11 January 3.2 2.8 -11% -11% 7.0 6.8 -3% -3% 10.6 7.9 -25% -25% 7.7 7.7 0% 0% 2.2 2.2 1% 1% 3.6 0.6 -83% -83%
11 February 2.7 2.5 -10% -10% 6.1 6.1 0% 0% 9.2 7.1 -23% -23% 6.5 6.5 0% 0% 2.0 2.0 0% 0% 3.4 0.5 -85% -85%
11 March 3.9 3.4 -14% -14% 8.4 7.5 -11% -11% 12.1 9.0 -26% -26% 9.2 9.2 0% 0% 2.2 2.3 1% 1% 4.1 0.8 -82% -82%
11 April 58.8 58.7 0% 0% 130.2 128.2 -2% -2% 153.9 152.3 -1% -1% 107.0 107.0 0% 0% 41.2 41.3 0% 0% 68.8 63.7 -7% -7%
11 May 48.3 46.7 -3% -3% 102.9 100.1 -3% -3% 127.1 123.3 -3% -3% 93.6 93.6 0% 0% 30.6 30.9 1% 1% 51.3 47.0 -8% -8%
11 June 16.6 14.0 -15% -5% 34.0 30.4 -11% -3% 44.2 37.4 -15% -5% 33.0 33.0 0% 0% 9.2 9.3 1% 0% 16.7 12.6 -25% -6%
11 July 6.6 4.8 -28% -12% 13.6 11.2 -18% -6% 20.1 14.0 -31% -14% 14.3 14.3 0% 0% 3.7 3.9 5% 1% 6.5 2.9 -56% -17%
11 August 5.6 4.3 -24% -24% 11.5 10.0 -14% -14% 17.3 12.3 -29% -29% 12.4 12.4 0% 0% 3.4 3.5 2% 2% 5.5 2.2 -60% -60%
11 September 4.8 3.7 -23% -23% 9.8 8.6 -12% -12% 15.0 10.7 -29% -29% 10.9 10.9 0% 0% 3.0 3.1 3% 3% 4.8 1.7 -65% -65%
11 October 17.2 15.4 -10% -10% 37.3 34.0 -9% -9% 46.0 40.1 -13% -13% 34.7 34.7 0% 0% 9.8 9.8 0% 0% 18.5 13.9 -25% -25%
11 November 6.0 4.4 -26% -26% 12.3 10.3 -16% -16% 18.1 12.8 -29% -29% 12.9 12.9 0% 0% 3.6 3.6 1% 1% 6.1 2.6 -57% -57%
11 December 5.2 4.1 -21% -21% 10.8 9.5 -11% -11% 16.2 11.7 -28% -28% 11.5 11.5 0% 0% 3.2 3.3 5% 5% 5.3 2.1 -61% -61%
12 January 4.5 3.8 -17% -17% 9.4 10.0 6% 6% 14.4 11.9 -18% -18% 10.4 10.4 0% 0% 2.9 2.9 1% 1% 4.6 1.6 -65% -65%
12 February 3.6 3.1 -14% -14% 7.6 8.5 11% 11% 11.8 10.0 -15% -15% 8.4 8.4 0% 0% 2.6 2.6 2% 2% 4.2 1.3 -70% -70%
12 March 18.5 17.3 -6% -6% 40.3 39.2 -3% -3% 48.9 45.3 -7% -7% 35.3 35.3 0% 0% 10.8 10.9 1% 1% 20.1 15.6 -23% -23%
12 April 38.1 36.3 -5% -5% 82.3 81.0 -2% -2% 100.4 97.3 -3% -3% 69.2 69.2 0% 0% 26.1 26.3 1% 1% 42.8 38.8 -9% -9%
12 May 92.4 92.2 0% 0% 199.5 199.9 0% 0% 248.5 249.8 1% 1% 182.4 182.4 0% 0% 61.8 62.4 1% 1% 101.0 97.1 -4% -4%
12 June 65.8 63.4 -4% -4% 139.7 137.9 -1% -1% 176.6 174.6 -1% -1% 130.0 130.0 0% 0% 43.7 44.2 1% 1% 72.0 68.1 -5% -5%
12 July 7.5 5.2 -30% -15% 15.3 13.9 -9% -4% 22.9 17.2 -25% -13% 16.0 16.0 0% 0% 4.1 4.2 4% 1% 7.2 3.7 -49% -16%
12 August 6.2 4.6 -26% -26% 12.7 12.4 -3% -3% 19.0 15.0 -21% -21% 13.3 13.3 0% 0% 3.6 3.7 3% 3% 6.1 2.8 -54% -54%
12 September 12.7 10.8 -15% -15% 26.6 25.2 -5% -5% 34.9 30.2 -13% -13% 27.4 27.4 0% 0% 6.3 6.4 2% 2% 13.1 9.1 -30% -30%
12 October 11.6 9.7 -17% -17% 24.0 22.7 -5% -5% 31.7 27.0 -15% -15% 23.4 23.4 0% 0% 6.1 6.2 2% 2% 11.4 7.6 -33% -33%
12 November 6.0 4.7 -23% -23% 12.6 12.5 -1% -1% 18.3 15.0 -18% -18% 12.5 12.6 0% 0% 3.9 4.0 3% 3% 6.4 3.2 -50% -50%
12 December 5.3 4.3 -19% -19% 11.2 11.7 5% 5% 16.6 13.9 -16% -16% 11.3 11.3 0% 0% 3.5 3.6 3% 3% 5.5 2.5 -54% -54%
13 January 4.7 4.7 0% 0% 9.9 6.0 -40% -40% 15.0 9.3 -38% -38% 11.1 5.4 -52% -52% 3.1 3.2 0% 0% 4.9 0.3 -95% -95%
13 February 3.8 4.2 11% 11% 8.0 4.6 -43% -43% 12.3 7.8 -36% -36% 9.2 7.5 -18% -18% 2.8 2.8 1% 1% 4.4 0.0 -99% -99%
13 March 4.0 3.9 -3% -3% 8.5 4.1 -52% -52% 13.1 7.3 -44% -44% 9.8 7.8 -20% -20% 2.6 2.6 0% 0% 4.2 0.0 -100% -100%
13 April 11.1 10.7 -4% -4% 24.2 15.8 -35% -35% 31.5 21.5 -32% -32% 24.1 28.3 17% 17% 5.7 4.6 -20% -17% 12.7 5.6 -56% -56%
13 May 31.4 30.2 -4% -3% 67.9 58.9 -13% -11% 82.3 71.5 -13% -9% 54.8 55.9 2% 2% 20.6 18.3 -11% -6% 34.9 27.4 -21% -14%
13 June 49.7 50.9 2% 2% 107.6 102.8 -5% -4% 133.8 126.6 -5% -5% 94.9 97.0 2% 2% 34.4 30.6 -11% -8% 57.5 49.5 -14% -11%
13 July 6.8 6.6 -3% -1% 14.2 7.2 -49% -18% 21.0 12.6 -40% -20% 15.3 13.1 -14% -7% 4.0 4.0 1% 0% 6.9 0.7 -90% -28%
13 August 5.8 5.8 -1% -1% 12.0 6.1 -49% -49% 17.9 11.1 -38% -38% 13.2 11.1 -16% -16% 3.6 3.6 0% 0% 5.8 0.3 -96% -96%
13 September 5.1 5.2 1% 1% 10.5 5.4 -49% -49% 15.8 10.2 -36% -36% 12.1 10.5 -13% -13% 3.2 3.2 1% 1% 5.2 0.1 -98% -98%
13 October 9.7 9.2 -6% -6% 20.6 11.6 -44% -44% 27.9 17.9 -36% -36% 22.9 24.3 6% 6% 4.4 3.7 -16% -16% 10.1 3.0 -71% -71%
13 November 5.3 5.3 0% 0% 11.0 5.6 -49% -49% 16.0 10.4 -35% -35% 12.1 10.6 -12% -12% 3.3 3.3 1% 1% 5.5 0.2 -97% -97%
13 December 4.8 4.8 0% 0% 10.0 4.9 -51% -51% 14.7 9.4 -36% -36% 11.0 9.2 -16% -16% 3.2 3.2 0% 0% 5.0 0.1 -99% -99%
14 January 4.2 4.2 0% 0% 8.9 4.3 -52% -52% 13.2 8.5 -35% -35% 10.0 8.4 -15% -15% 2.8 2.8 1% 1% 4.4 0.0 -100% -100%
14 February 3.4 3.8 13% 13% 7.2 3.8 -48% -48% 10.8 7.8 -28% -28% 8.2 7.7 -6% -6% 2.5 2.6 1% 1% 4.1 0.0 -100% -100%
14 March 3.3 3.4 1% 1% 7.3 3.3 -55% -55% 11.0 7.1 -35% -35% 8.3 7.1 -14% -14% 2.3 2.3 0% 0% 3.8 0.0 -100% -100%
14 April 21.5 21.3 -1% -1% 47.2 38.2 -19% -19% 56.2 47.4 -16% -16% 39.6 46.4 17% 17% 13.5 11.2 -17% -17% 25.2 17.4 -31% -31%
14 May 34.0 32.9 -3% -3% 73.2 64.1 -12% -11% 89.6 79.4 -11% -9% 60.2 61.0 1% 1% 22.1 19.6 -11% -7% 37.5 29.9 -20% -15%
14 June 8.9 8.5 -5% -1% 18.5 11.1 -40% -6% 25.1 17.1 -32% -6% 19.5 19.5 0% 0% 4.6 4.3 -6% -1% 9.2 2.7 -71% -9%
14 July 6.0 5.8 -4% -1% 12.5 6.2 -51% -16% 18.0 11.2 -38% -16% 13.4 11.5 -15% -7% 3.7 3.8 1% 0% 6.1 0.3 -94% -26%
14 August 5.2 5.1 -1% -1% 10.7 5.3 -50% -50% 15.6 10.1 -36% -36% 11.7 10.0 -15% -15% 3.3 3.3 1% 1% 5.2 0.1 -98% -98%
14 September 4.3 4.6 6% 6% 9.1 4.7 -48% -48% 13.5 9.2 -32% -32% 10.4 9.1 -12% -12% 2.9 3.0 0% 0% 4.7 0.0 -99% -99%
14 October 7.3 7.0 -5% -5% 15.4 7.2 -53% -53% 21.1 12.8 -39% -39% 17.2 18.2 6% 6% 3.4 3.0 -14% -14% 7.5 0.9 -88% -88%
14 November 4.5 4.6 2% 2% 9.5 4.8 -50% -50% 13.7 9.2 -33% -33% 10.5 9.3 -11% -11% 2.9 2.9 1% 1% 4.9 0.0 -99% -99%
14 December 4.0 4.0 2% 2% 8.6 4.1 -52% -52% 12.5 8.2 -34% -34% 9.5 8.2 -14% -14% 2.7 2.8 1% 1% 4.4 0.0 -100% -100%
15 January 3.5 3.6 1% 1% 7.8 3.6 -54% -54% 11.3 7.5 -34% -34% 8.6 7.5 -13% -13% 2.5 2.5 0% 0% 4.0 0.0 -99% -99%
15 February 3.0 3.3 9% 9% 6.7 3.2 -52% -52% 9.8 6.9 -30% -30% 7.3 6.9 -5% -5% 2.3 2.3 0% 0% 3.7 0.0 -100% -100%
15 March 3.0 3.0 1% 1% 6.6 2.9 -56% -56% 9.6 6.3 -35% -35% 7.1 6.3 -10% -10% 2.1 2.1 0% 0% 3.5 0.0 -100% -100%
15 April 6.7 6.3 -5% -5% 14.3 6.7 -53% -38% 19.2 11.8 -39% -30% 15.9 19.7 24% 24% 3.0 2.3 -24% -11% 7.2 1.3 -82% -54%
15 May 29.6 28.5 -4% -3% 64.9 56.7 -13% -10% 75.9 67.8 -11% -7% 49.8 53.8 8% 6% 19.1 16.5 -13% -7% 33.6 26.9 -20% -13%
15 June 42.2 42.8 2% 1% 91.3 87.0 -5% -4% 111.6 106.2 -5% -4% 76.9 79.5 3% 3% 29.0 25.7 -11% -7% 48.7 42.0 -14% -9%
15 July 6.4 6.1 -5% -2% 13.2 7.3 -45% -15% 19.0 12.4 -34% -15% 14.0 12.2 -13% -6% 3.7 3.7 1% 0% 6.4 1.3 -79% -23%
15 August 5.4 5.3 -2% -2% 11.1 5.8 -48% -48% 16.4 10.7 -34% -34% 12.4 10.6 -15% -15% 3.3 3.3 1% 1% 5.4 0.6 -90% -90%
15 September 7.7 7.6 -2% -2% 16.1 11.0 -32% -32% 22.2 16.9 -24% -24% 18.1 19.1 6% 6% 3.7 3.3 -12% -12% 8.0 3.2 -60% -60%
15 October 18.4 17.5 -5% -5% 39.4 33.0 -16% -16% 48.2 41.4 -14% -14% 35.7 37.1 4% 4% 10.8 9.6 -11% -11% 19.8 14.6 -27% -27%
15 November 5.8 5.7 -1% -1% 12.2 7.4 -39% -39% 17.6 12.7 -27% -27% 12.9 11.5 -11% -11% 3.8 3.8 1% 1% 6.2 1.6 -73% -73%
15 December 5.1 5.1 0% 0% 10.6 6.0 -44% -44% 15.6 11.0 -30% -30% 11.6 10.0 -14% -14% 3.4 3.4 1% 1% 5.3 1.0 -82% -82%
16 January 4.4 4.5 1% 1% 9.4 5.0 -47% -47% 13.9 9.6 -31% -31% 10.5 9.0 -15% -15% 3.0 3.0 1% 1% 4.7 0.5 -89% -89%
16 February 3.5 4.0 13% 13% 7.5 4.3 -44% -44% 11.3 8.7 -23% -23% 8.7 8.3 -5% -5% 2.6 2.7 1% 1% 4.2 0.2 -95% -95%
16 March 3.5 3.5 2% 2% 7.5 3.8 -50% -50% 11.4 7.9 -31% -31% 8.7 7.6 -13% -13% 2.4 2.4 1% 1% 3.9 0.1 -96% -96%
16 April 7.3 7.1 -4% -4% 15.5 11.9 -23% -18% 21.0 17.6 -16% -14% 17.5 20.8 19% 19% 3.2 2.5 -23% -11% 7.8 4.4 -43% -31%
16 May 81.7 82.2 1% 1% 179.7 175.2 -3% -3% 217.5 212.4 -2% -2% 149.8 151.9 1% 1% 56.5 49.3 -13% -13% 94.3 88.2 -6% -6%
16 June 68.5 70.3 3% 3% 146.0 145.8 0% 0% 183.2 183.2 0% 0% 133.9 136.2 2% 2% 45.9 40.5 -12% -11% 77.1 71.7 -7% -7%
16 July 7.0 6.9 -3% -1% 14.1 10.6 -25% -9% 21.1 17.0 -20% -10% 16.0 13.6 -14% -8% 3.8 3.8 1% 0% 6.6 3.4 -47% -14%
16 August 5.8 5.8 -1% -1% 11.8 8.6 -27% -27% 17.8 14.1 -21% -21% 13.4 11.5 -14% -14% 3.4 3.4 1% 1% 5.6 2.6 -53% -53%
16 September 6.1 6.1 -1% -1% 12.5 9.7 -23% -23% 18.3 15.2 -17% -17% 14.7 14.2 -3% -3% 3.4 3.3 -3% -3% 6.1 3.2 -47% -47%
16 October 5.4 5.1 -5% -5% 10.8 7.5 -31% -31% 16.2 12.5 -23% -23% 12.6 11.0 -13% -13% 3.0 3.0 1% 1% 5.0 2.1 -57% -57%
16 November 4.9 4.7 -3% -3% 9.8 7.0 -29% -29% 14.9 11.9 -20% -20% 11.6 10.8 -7% -7% 2.9 2.9 0% 0% 4.8 2.1 -57% -57%
16 December 4.4 4.2 -4% -4% 9.0 6.0 -33% -33% 13.7 10.6 -22% -22% 10.5 9.4 -11% -11% 2.6 2.6 1% 1% 4.3 1.6 -62% -62%
17 January 3.9 3.8 -3% -3% 8.1 5.3 -34% -34% 12.4 9.7 -22% -22% 9.4 8.5 -10% -10% 2.4 2.4 0% 0% 4.0 1.4 -65% -65%
17 February 3.1 3.4 9% 9% 6.7 5.0 -25% -25% 10.2 9.1 -11% -11% 7.7 7.8 1% 1% 2.2 2.3 2% 2% 3.7 1.5 -60% -60%
17 March 3.1 3.1 -1% -1% 6.8 4.5 -34% -34% 10.4 8.3 -21% -21% 7.8 7.1 -8% -8% 2.1 2.1 0% 0% 3.5 1.3 -63% -63%
17 April 5.4 5.1 -5% -4% 11.4 10.0 -12% -7% 16.1 14.9 -8% -5% 13.4 16.1 20% 17% 2.7 2.2 -19% -8% 5.7 4.3 -24% -12%
17 May 47.4 46.5 -2% -2% 104.5 101.0 -3% -3% 124.8 120.5 -3% -3% 83.5 88.2 6% 6% 31.3 26.8 -14% -12% 54.6 51.1 -6% -6%
17 June 57.4 59.4 3% 3% 123.5 125.1 1% 1% 152.9 154.6 1% 1% 110.7 114.2 3% 3% 38.9 34.3 -12% -9% 65.8 62.3 -5% -5%
17 July 6.7 6.4 -4% -2% 13.6 11.7 -14% -5% 20.2 17.8 -12% -6% 14.9 13.2 -12% -6% 3.6 3.6 1% 0% 6.3 4.8 -24% -7%
17 August 5.7 5.6 -1% -1% 11.5 10.0 -13% -13% 17.2 15.3 -11% -11% 13.1 11.4 -13% -13% 3.3 3.3 1% 1% 5.4 4.0 -26% -26%
17 September 4.8 4.9 1% 1% 9.7 8.6 -12% -12% 14.8 13.5 -9% -9% 11.5 10.3 -10% -10% 2.9 3.0 0% 0% 4.7 3.3 -29% -29%
17 October 4.4 4.4 0% 0% 8.9 7.6 -15% -15% 13.8 12.2 -11% -11% 10.8 9.4 -13% -13% 2.6 2.6 1% 1% 4.3 2.9 -33% -33%
17 November 3.9 3.9 2% 2% 7.9 6.8 -14% -14% 12.2 11.2 -8% -8% 9.5 8.7 -9% -9% 2.3 2.4 1% 1% 3.9 2.6 -34% -34%
17 December 3.6 3.6 0% 0% 7.4 6.4 -14% -14% 11.5 10.5 -9% -9% 8.8 7.9 -10% -10% 2.2 2.2 -1% -1% 3.6 2.6 -29% -29%
18 January 3.1 3.1 0% 0% 6.7 6.4 -5% -5% 10.5 10.3 -2% -2% 8.0 7.3 -9% -9% 2.0 2.0 1% 1% 3.4 3.0 -11% -11%
18 February 2.6 2.8 10% 10% 5.6 6.2 11% 11% 8.7 9.8 13% 13% 6.6 6.7 2% 2% 1.9 1.9 1% 1% 3.2 3.1 -2% -2%
18 March 2.6 2.6 1% 1% 5.8 6.0 4% 4% 8.9 9.4 6% 6% 6.6 6.1 -7% -7% 1.7 1.8 1% 1% 3.0 3.2 5% 5%
18 April 15.1 14.8 -2% -2% 33.6 35.6 6% 6% 41.3 43.1 4% 4% 30.3 38.3 26% 26% 8.3 6.3 -24% -24% 17.8 19.0 7% 7%
18 May 47.8 47.0 -2% -2% 104.1 102.3 -2% -2% 124.9 122.4 -2% -2% 84.3 86.0 2% 2% 31.8 27.9 -12% -10% 53.9 52.1 -3% -3%
18 June 52.8 54.5 3% 3% 113.5 118.3 4% 4% 140.9 145.9 4% 4% 102.9 105.8 3% 3% 35.6 31.5 -12% -8% 60.3 60.5 0% 0%
18 July 6.5 6.3 -3% -1% 13.3 13.6 2% 1% 19.8 19.5 -1% -1% 14.7 12.9 -12% -6% 3.6 3.6 1% 0% 6.2 6.7 8% 2%
18 August 5.6 5.4 -3% -3% 11.2 11.1 -1% -1% 16.9 16.3 -3% -3% 12.8 11.1 -13% -13% 3.2 3.2 1% 1% 5.2 5.2 0% 0%
18 September 4.7 4.8 3% 3% 9.4 9.7 3% 3% 14.4 14.6 1% 1% 11.2 10.0 -11% -11% 2.8 2.9 1% 1% 4.6 4.6 0% 0%
18 October 8.2 7.7 -6% -6% 17.1 16.7 -2% -2% 23.8 22.8 -4% -4% 19.8 21.2 7% 7% 3.5 2.9 -16% -16% 8.1 8.1 -1% -1%
18 November 5.1 4.9 -4% -4% 10.3 10.5 2% 2% 15.2 15.4 1% 1% 11.7 10.7 -9% -9% 3.0 3.0 1% 1% 5.0 5.2 5% 5%
18 December 4.4 4.4 -2% -2% 9.2 9.3 1% 1% 13.7 13.8 1% 1% 10.5 9.2 -12% -12% 2.8 2.8 1% 1% 4.5 4.7 3% 3%
19 January 3.9 3.9 -1% -1% 8.2 8.3 1% 1% 12.3 12.5 2% 2% 9.3 8.3 -11% -11% 2.5 2.5 1% 1% 4.1 4.2 3% 3%
19 February 3.2 3.4 7% 7% 6.9 7.6 11% 11% 10.4 11.6 11% 11% 8.0 7.7 -3% -3% 2.3 2.3 1% 1% 3.8 4.0 5% 5%
19 March 3.1 3.1 0% 0% 6.7 6.8 1% 1% 10.2 10.5 3% 3% 7.7 7.0 -8% -8% 2.1 2.1 1% 1% 3.5 3.4 -1% -1%
19 April 5.7 5.4 -5% -4% 11.9 11.8 -1% 0% 16.6 16.8 1% 1% 14.0 16.9 21% 18% 2.8 2.2 -20% -8% 5.9 5.7 -3% -2%
19 May 11.7 10.7 -8% -2% 25.8 24.6 -5% -1% 32.2 30.7 -5% -1% 23.0 26.9 17% 6% 6.1 5.0 -17% -3% 13.2 12.7 -4% -1%
19 June 5.2 4.8 -8% -1% 10.8 10.6 -2% 0% 14.8 14.7 -1% 0% 11.1 10.7 -4% -1% 3.1 3.1 1% 0% 5.4 5.4 -1% 0%
19 July 4.7 4.6 -2% -1% 9.9 9.8 -1% 0% 13.5 13.6 0% 0% 10.1 9.1 -10% -3% 3.0 3.1 1% 0% 4.9 4.9 -1% 0%
19 August 4.0 4.0 0% 0% 8.7 8.7 0% 0% 12.1 12.3 2% 2% 9.1 8.0 -11% -11% 2.8 2.8 0% 0% 4.4 4.3 -1% -1%
19 September 3.5 3.7 6% 6% 7.5 7.8 4% 4% 10.6 11.3 6% 6% 7.8 7.4 -6% -6% 2.5 2.5 1% 1% 4.0 3.9 -2% -2%
19 October 9.5 8.9 -7% -7% 20.6 20.1 -2% -2% 26.4 25.7 -3% -3% 20.1 23.9 19% 19% 4.7 3.7 -21% -21% 10.3 10.2 -1% -1%
19 November 4.4 4.3 -2% -2% 9.3 10.0 7% 7% 12.8 13.6 7% 7% 9.3 8.6 -7% -7% 2.8 2.8 1% 1% 4.8 5.4 12% 12%
19 December 3.9 3.9 0% 0% 8.6 8.8 3% 3% 11.8 12.2 3% 3% 8.5 7.6 -11% -11% 2.8 2.8 1% 1% 4.4 4.6 4% 4%
20 January 3.6 3.6 0% 0% 7.8 8.3 7% 7% 10.8 11.6 7% 7% 7.7 7.0 -10% -10% 2.5 2.5 1% 1% 4.0 4.5 13% 13%
20 February 2.9 3.2 12% 12% 6.4 7.8 22% 22% 9.0 10.9 22% 22% 6.4 6.5 2% 2% 2.2 2.3 1% 1% 3.7 4.3 18% 18%
20 March 2.9 3.0 1% 1% 6.5 6.7 3% 3% 9.2 9.7 5% 5% 6.4 6.0 -7% -7% 2.1 2.1 1% 1% 3.4 3.5 4% 4%
20 April 39.5 40.1 1% 1% 87.5 90.0 3% 3% 103.1 106.1 3% 3% 67.2 75.9 13% 13% 27.4 23.2 -15% -15% 47.3 46.7 -1% -1%
20 May 80.4 81.0 1% 1% 173.9 175.7 1% 1% 213.5 214.1 0% 0% 152.2 151.8 0% 0% 53.6 47.1 -12% -12% 90.1 90.0 0% 0%
20 June 42.2 42.6 1% 1% 88.8 91.9 3% 3% 112.4 114.9 2% 2% 83.2 84.6 2% 2% 27.2 24.2 -11% -6% 46.3 46.7 1% 1%
20 July 6.8 6.7 -2% -1% 13.7 14.1 2% 1% 20.5 20.2 -2% -1% 15.4 13.4 -13% -7% 3.7 3.7 1% 0% 6.5 6.9 6% 2%
20 August 5.6 5.6 -1% -1% 11.4 11.4 0% 0% 17.3 16.7 -3% -3% 13.1 11.4 -13% -13% 3.3 3.4 1% 1% 5.4 5.4 0% 0%
20 September 6.5 6.4 -2% -2% 13.2 13.3 1% 1% 19.2 18.9 -2% -2% 15.4 15.6 1% 1% 3.4 3.2 -6% -6% 6.4 6.3 -2% -2%
20 October 5.6 5.2 -7% -7% 11.3 11.0 -3% -3% 16.8 16.0 -5% -5% 13.0 11.7 -10% -10% 3.1 3.2 1% 1% 5.3 5.4 1% 1%
20 November 4.6 4.6 0% 0% 9.4 9.7 4% 4% 14.2 14.4 2% 2% 11.0 10.1 -8% -8% 2.8 2.8 1% 1% 4.6 4.8 3% 3%
20 December 4.2 4.1 -2% -2% 8.6 8.7 1% 1% 13.1 13.1 0% 0% 10.0 9.1 -10% -10% 2.5 2.5 1% 1% 4.1 4.3 4% 4%
21 January 3.7 3.6 -1% -1% 7.7 7.9 2% 2% 11.9 12.1 1% 1% 9.0 8.2 -8% -8% 2.3 2.4 1% 1% 3.8 4.0 3% 3%
21 February 3.0 3.3 10% 10% 6.4 7.7 20% 20% 9.8 11.6 18% 18% 7.4 7.6 3% 3% 2.1 2.2 1% 1% 3.6 4.2 16% 16%
21 March 3.4 3.2 -7% -7% 7.3 7.0 -4% -4% 11.1 10.9 -1% -1% 8.4 8.1 -4% -4% 2.1 2.2 1% 1% 3.7 3.6 -2% -2%
21 April 21.3 21.0 -1% -1% 47.0 47.4 1% 1% 56.3 56.7 1% 1% 40.2 48.2 20% 20% 13.0 10.6 -18% -18% 25.0 24.3 -3% -3%
21 May 28.1 27.0 -4% -3% 60.0 59.5 -1% -1% 73.3 71.9 -2% -1% 49.9 51.5 3% 2% 17.5 15.6 -11% -5% 30.5 30.5 0% 0%
21 June 8.2 7.7 -5% -1% 17.0 17.1 0% 0% 23.5 23.0 -2% 0% 17.9 18.3 2% 1% 4.2 4.0 -5% 0% 8.5 8.6 1% 0%
21 July 6.0 5.7 -4% -2% 12.4 12.2 -1% 0% 17.8 17.3 -3% -1% 13.1 11.7 -11% -5% 3.7 3.7 1% 0% 6.0 6.0 1% 0%
21 August 5.1 5.0 -1% -1% 10.6 10.5 0% 0% 15.4 15.2 -1% -1% 11.7 10.4 -11% -11% 3.3 3.3 1% 1% 5.2 5.1 -1% -1%
21 September 5.5 5.5 -1% -1% 11.5 11.6 1% 1% 16.4 16.6 1% 1% 13.0 13.1 1% 1% 3.3 3.2 -4% -4% 5.7 5.6 -2% -2%
21 October 4.9 4.7 -4% -4% 10.3 10.1 -2% -2% 14.8 14.7 -1% -1% 11.5 10.6 -8% -8% 3.0 3.0 1% 1% 5.0 5.0 0% 0%
21 November 5.2 5.0 -3% -3% 10.8 11.5 7% 7% 15.3 16.3 6% 6% 12.2 12.5 3% 3% 3.1 3.0 -3% -3% 5.4 6.1 12% 12%
21 December 4.4 4.2 -3% -3% 9.2 9.4 2% 2% 13.2 13.6 3% 3% 10.1 9.4 -7% -7% 2.7 2.7 1% 1% 4.6 4.8 5% 5%
22 January 3.8 3.7 -1% -1% 8.2 8.5 4% 4% 11.8 12.4 5% 5% 8.9 8.4 -6% -6% 2.5 2.5 1% 1% 4.2 4.5 8% 8%
22 February 3.1 3.4 11% 11% 6.8 8.3 22% 22% 9.8 12.0 22% 22% 7.4 7.8 5% 5% 2.3 2.4 1% 1% 3.9 4.6 20% 20%
22 March 3.1 3.1 0% 0% 7.0 7.2 3% 3% 10.1 10.6 5% 5% 7.4 7.1 -4% -4% 2.2 2.2 1% 1% 3.6 3.8 4% 4%
22 April 6.3 6.0 -5% -5% 13.5 13.5 0% 0% 18.3 18.4 1% 0% 14.9 18.7 25% 24% 2.9 2.3 -21% -9% 6.8 6.7 -2% -1%
22 May 72.1 72.3 0% 0% 158.9 159.8 1% 1% 190.4 190.3 0% 0% 129.0 132.8 3% 3% 49.2 42.7 -13% -13% 83.4 82.8 -1% -1%
22 June 88.2 91.2 3% 3% 188.6 196.4 4% 4% 235.1 243.6 4% 4% 171.8 175.1 2% 2% 59.6 52.4 -12% -12% 100.0 100.0 0% 0%
22 July 7.1 6.9 -3% -1% 14.2 14.8 4% 2% 21.2 21.0 -1% -1% 16.1 14.1 -12% -7% 3.8 3.8 1% 0% 6.5 7.4 12% 4%
22 August 6.0 5.9 0% 0% 12.0 12.0 0% 0% 18.0 17.3 -4% -4% 13.7 12.0 -12% -12% 3.4 3.4 1% 1% 5.6 5.5 0% 0%
22 September 25.6 25.2 -2% -2% 54.5 55.6 2% 2% 68.3 68.7 1% 1% 51.1 55.0 7% 7% 15.7 13.7 -13% -13% 28.4 28.4 0% 0%
22 October 9.8 9.2 -6% -6% 20.2 20.1 -1% -1% 27.8 27.1 -3% -3% 21.9 21.5 -2% -2% 4.9 4.6 -6% -6% 9.6 10.0 4% 4%
22 November 6.1 6.1 -1% -1% 12.6 13.8 10% 10% 18.4 19.4 5% 5% 13.6 12.5 -8% -8% 3.9 3.9 0% 0% 6.3 7.3 16% 16%
22 December 5.4 5.3 -1% -1% 11.1 11.3 2% 2% 16.6 16.4 -1% -1% 12.3 10.9 -12% -12% 3.4 3.4 0% 0% 5.4 5.6 4% 4%
23 January 4.7 4.7 0% 0% 9.8 10.1 3% 3% 14.8 15.0 1% 1% 11.2 9.9 -11% -11% 3.0 3.1 0% 0% 4.8 5.0 5% 5%
23 February 4.0 4.2 7% 7% 8.2 8.8 7% 7% 12.6 13.4 6% 6% 9.5 9.1 -4% -4% 2.7 2.7 -1% -1% 4.3 4.3 -2% -2%
23 March 3.7 3.8 1% 1% 7.9 8.5 7% 7% 12.2 12.8 5% 5% 9.2 8.4 -9% -9% 2.4 2.5 1% 1% 4.0 4.5 13% 13%
23 April 7.3 7.1 -3% -3% 15.3 15.6 2% 1% 21.2 21.4 1% 1% 17.6 20.9 19% 19% 3.2 2.5 -21% -10% 7.7 7.6 0% 0%
23 May 101.0 101.9 1% 1% 221.1 222.5 1% 1% 270.0 271.0 0% 0% 188.5 190.1 1% 1% 69.3 60.5 -13% -13% 115.8 114.5 -1% -1%
23 June 30.4 30.1 -1% -1% 63.3 65.3 3% 2% 81.0 82.4 2% 1% 59.8 61.2 2% 2% 18.9 17.0 -10% -4% 32.5 33.2 2% 1%
23 July 6.9 6.7 -3% -1% 14.0 14.1 0% 0% 20.9 20.3 -3% -1% 15.6 13.8 -11% -6% 3.8 3.9 1% 0% 6.6 6.8 2% 1%
23 August 5.8 5.7 -1% -1% 11.8 11.8 0% 0% 17.7 17.2 -3% -3% 13.3 11.8 -12% -12% 3.5 3.5 1% 1% 5.6 5.6 0% 0%
23 September 4.9 5.0 2% 2% 10.0 10.2 3% 3% 15.2 15.3 1% 1% 11.6 10.6 -9% -9% 3.0 3.1 0% 0% 4.9 4.8 -1% -1%
23 October 6.3 6.0 -5% -5% 12.9 12.6 -3% -3% 18.9 18.1 -4% -4% 15.3 15.4 0% 0% 3.2 3.0 -7% -7% 6.1 6.0 -2% -2%
23 November 4.7 4.7 0% 0% 9.6 9.9 3% 3% 14.4 14.7 2% 2% 11.1 10.3 -7% -7% 2.8 2.8 1% 1% 4.7 4.8 2% 2%
23 December 4.2 4.1 -2% -2% 8.7 8.8 1% 1% 13.2 13.3 1% 1% 10.0 9.1 -9% -9% 2.5 2.6 1% 1% 4.2 4.4 4% 4%
24 January 3.7 3.6 -2% -2% 7.8 8.0 3% 3% 12.0 12.3 3% 3% 9.0 8.3 -7% -7% 2.3 2.4 1% 1% 3.9 4.1 6% 6%
24 February 3.0 3.3 10% 10% 6.4 7.2 13% 13% 9.9 11.2 14% 14% 7.4 7.7 4% 4% 2.2 2.2 1% 1% 3.6 3.7 2% 2%
24 March 3.0 3.0 0% 0% 6.6 6.7 2% 2% 10.1 10.4 4% 4% 7.5 7.1 -5% -5% 2.0 2.0 1% 1% 3.4 3.5 3% 3%
24 April 5.8 5.5 -5% -4% 12.2 12.4 1% 1% 17.1 17.4 2% 1% 14.3 17.8 25% 22% 2.7 2.1 -22% -9% 6.1 6.1 0% 0%
24 May 19.9 18.7 -6% -3% 43.5 42.2 -3% -2% 51.8 50.0 -4% -2% 35.8 40.7 14% 7% 11.4 9.7 -15% -5% 22.3 21.8 -2% -1%
24 June 27.6 27.4 -1% 0% 59.3 60.5 2% 1% 71.6 73.0 2% 1% 48.4 51.4 6% 4% 18.2 16.3 -11% -4% 31.3 31.1 0% 0%
24 July 6.1 5.7 -6% -2% 12.7 12.7 0% 0% 18.3 17.7 -3% -1% 13.1 11.8 -10% -4% 3.6 3.6 1% 0% 6.2 6.5 5% 1%
24 August 5.2 5.1 -2% -2% 10.7 10.7 0% 0% 15.7 15.4 -1% -1% 11.5 10.3 -11% -11% 3.3 3.3 1% 1% 5.2 5.2 0% 0%
24 September 4.3 4.6 6% 6% 9.1 9.5 5% 5% 13.5 14.0 4% 4% 10.2 9.4 -8% -8% 2.9 2.9 1% 1% 4.6 4.6 0% 0%
24 October 4.1 4.1 0% 0% 8.6 8.6 0% 0% 12.8 12.9 1% 1% 9.9 9.1 -9% -9% 2.6 2.7 1% 1% 4.3 4.2 -1% -1%
24 November 3.5 3.6 5% 5% 7.5 7.7 4% 4% 11.2 11.8 6% 6% 8.7 8.3 -5% -5% 2.4 2.4 1% 1% 3.9 3.8 -1% -1%
24 December 3.2 3.3 2% 2% 7.1 7.6 7% 7% 10.5 11.4 8% 8% 8.1 7.6 -6% -6% 2.2 2.2 1% 1% 3.6 4.0 11% 11%
25 January 2.9 2.9 1% 1% 6.5 6.7 4% 4% 9.7 10.3 6% 6% 7.3 7.0 -4% -4% 2.0 2.0 1% 1% 3.4 3.5 5% 5%
25 February 2.4 2.7 12% 12% 5.5 6.5 19% 19% 8.1 9.8 20% 20% 6.0 6.5 8% 8% 1.9 1.9 0% 0% 3.2 3.5 11% 11%
25 March 2.5 2.5 1% 1% 5.6 5.9 4% 4% 8.4 9.0 7% 7% 6.0 5.9 -1% -1% 1.7 1.8 1% 1% 3.0 3.2 6% 6%
25 April 30.1 30.4 1% 1% 66.9 68.7 3% 3% 78.9 81.2 3% 3% 53.5 62.9 18% 18% 19.8 16.3 -18% -18% 36.1 35.5 -2% -2%
25 May 38.8 37.9 -2% -2% 83.7 83.6 0% 0% 101.9 100.3 -2% -1% 70.2 71.7 2% 2% 24.9 21.9 -12% -8% 43.0 43.1 0% 0%
25 June 20.2 20.0 -1% 0% 42.3 43.2 2% 1% 53.2 53.9 1% 1% 40.0 41.8 5% 2% 12.0 10.9 -10% -2% 21.7 21.8 0% 0%
25 July 6.2 5.9 -4% -2% 12.8 12.7 -1% 0% 18.7 18.2 -3% -1% 13.9 12.5 -10% -5% 3.6 3.6 2% 0% 6.2 6.3 2% 0%
25 August 5.2 5.2 -1% -1% 10.8 10.7 0% 0% 16.0 15.7 -2% -2% 12.1 10.7 -12% -12% 3.2 3.2 1% 1% 5.2 5.2 0% 0%
25 September 4.8 4.8 0% 0% 9.8 10.0 2% 2% 14.6 14.8 1% 1% 11.4 10.7 -7% -7% 3.0 3.0 1% 1% 4.8 4.8 0% 0%
25 October 7.3 6.9 -6% -6% 15.2 14.9 -2% -2% 21.3 20.6 -3% -3% 17.3 18.4 7% 7% 3.4 3.0 -12% -12% 7.3 7.2 -1% -1%
25 November 4.7 4.7 0% 0% 9.7 10.2 5% 5% 14.2 14.8 5% 5% 11.0 10.3 -6% -6% 2.9 2.9 1% 1% 4.9 5.1 6% 6%
25 December 4.1 4.1 0% 0% 8.7 8.8 0% 0% 12.9 13.1 1% 1% 9.9 9.0 -9% -9% 2.7 2.7 1% 1% 4.4 4.3 0% 0%
26 January 3.6 3.6 0% 0% 7.8 8.1 4% 4% 11.6 12.1 5% 5% 8.9 8.2 -8% -8% 2.4 2.5 1% 1% 4.0 4.2 6% 6%
26 February 2.9 3.3 12% 12% 6.4 7.3 13% 13% 9.6 11.1 16% 16% 7.4 7.7 5% 5% 2.2 2.3 1% 1% 3.7 3.8 2% 2%
26 March 3.0 3.0 1% 1% 6.6 7.1 8% 8% 9.8 10.6 9% 9% 7.3 7.0 -4% -4% 2.1 2.1 1% 1% 3.5 3.9 12% 12%
26 April 10.3 9.9 -4% -4% 22.7 22.8 0% 0% 29.0 29.0 0% 0% 22.0 28.3 29% 29% 5.2 3.9 -24% -19% 11.9 11.6 -3% -3%
26 May 28.5 27.4 -4% -3% 62.0 61.0 -2% -1% 73.0 72.0 -1% -1% 49.1 52.0 6% 4% 18.4 16.2 -12% -6% 31.9 31.4 -1% -1%
26 June 15.4 14.9 -3% -1% 32.5 32.8 1% 0% 40.3 40.1 0% 0% 29.0 30.5 5% 2% 9.1 8.3 -9% -2% 16.7 16.7 0% 0%
26 July 5.9 5.6 -5% -2% 12.4 12.4 -1% 0% 17.8 17.3 -3% -1% 12.9 11.5 -11% -5% 3.7 3.7 1% 0% 6.1 6.3 3% 1%
26 August 5.0 5.0 0% 0% 10.5 10.5 0% 0% 15.2 15.1 0% 0% 11.3 10.1 -11% -11% 3.3 3.3 1% 1% 5.1 5.2 0% 0%
26 September 5.9 5.9 0% 0% 12.3 12.4 1% 1% 17.3 17.5 1% 1% 13.8 14.3 4% 4% 3.4 3.2 -6% -6% 6.2 6.0 -2% -2%
26 October 8.5 8.0 -7% -7% 18.1 17.7 -2% -2% 24.2 23.6 -3% -3% 19.5 20.9 7% 7% 4.1 3.5 -13% -13% 8.9 8.9 0% 0%
26 November 4.9 4.9 0% 0% 10.5 11.1 6% 6% 14.9 15.6 5% 5% 11.2 10.5 -6% -6% 3.4 3.4 1% 1% 5.5 5.8 7% 7%
26 December 4.4 4.4 0% 0% 9.5 9.9 4% 4% 13.5 14.2 5% 5% 10.1 9.2 -10% -10% 3.1 3.1 1% 1% 4.9 5.2 8% 8%
27 January 3.9 3.9 1% 1% 8.4 8.7 3% 3% 12.1 12.7 5% 5% 9.1 8.4 -8% -8% 2.7 2.8 1% 1% 4.3 4.5 5% 5%
27 February 3.3 3.5 7% 7% 7.1 7.9 10% 10% 10.4 11.7 12% 12% 7.8 7.8 0% 0% 2.5 2.5 2% 2% 4.0 4.1 4% 4%
27 March 3.2 3.2 0% 0% 7.1 7.7 9% 9% 10.3 11.2 9% 9% 7.5 7.1 -5% -5% 2.3 2.3 0% 0% 3.7 4.2 15% 15%
27 April 17.8 17.4 -2% -2% 39.2 39.7 1% 1% 47.0 47.3 1% 1% 33.0 40.2 22% 22% 10.9 8.9 -18% -18% 20.9 20.5 -2% -2%
27 May 71.2 71.4 0% 0% 155.5 156.7 1% 1% 188.9 189.7 0% 0% 129.5 130.5 1% 1% 48.7 42.8 -12% -12% 81.2 80.9 0% 0%
27 June 57.5 58.8 2% 2% 122.4 126.9 4% 4% 153.4 158.4 3% 3% 112.3 114.7 2% 2% 38.3 33.9 -11% -9% 64.6 64.6 0% 0%
27 July 6.9 6.7 -3% -1% 14.0 14.4 3% 1% 20.9 20.7 -1% -1% 15.6 13.8 -12% -6% 3.8 3.8 1% 0% 6.6 7.1 8% 2%
27 August 5.8 5.7 -1% -1% 11.7 11.7 0% 0% 17.6 17.1 -3% -3% 13.3 11.7 -12% -12% 3.4 3.4 1% 1% 5.5 5.5 0% 0%
27 September 4.9 5.0 2% 2% 9.9 10.2 3% 3% 15.0 15.1 1% 1% 11.6 10.6 -9% -9% 3.0 3.0 1% 1% 4.8 4.8 0% 0%
27 October 5.6 5.3 -6% -6% 11.3 11.0 -3% -3% 16.8 16.1 -4% -4% 13.6 13.1 -3% -3% 3.0 2.9 -4% -4% 5.3 5.2 -1% -1%
27 November 4.5 4.5 0% 0% 9.1 9.6 5% 5% 13.8 14.3 3% 3% 10.8 10.1 -6% -6% 2.6 2.6 1% 1% 4.5 4.8 6% 6%
27 December 4.0 3.9 -2% -2% 8.3 8.5 3% 3% 12.7 12.9 1% 1% 9.7 9.0 -8% -8% 2.4 2.5 2% 2% 4.0 4.3 5% 5%
28 January 3.6 3.5 -1% -1% 7.5 8.0 6% 6% 11.6 12.1 4% 4% 8.7 8.2 -7% -7% 2.2 2.3 1% 1% 3.7 4.2 11% 11%
28 February 2.9 3.1 10% 10% 6.2 7.2 16% 16% 9.6 11.1 16% 16% 7.2 7.6 5% 5% 2.1 2.1 1% 1% 3.5 3.8 8% 8%
28 March 2.9 2.8 -1% -1% 6.4 6.5 2% 2% 9.7 10.1 4% 4% 7.4 6.9 -6% -6% 1.9 1.9 0% 0% 3.3 3.4 3% 3%
28 April 3.4 3.2 -4% -2% 7.3 7.3 0% 0% 10.8 11.2 3% 1% 8.3 9.3 11% 6% 2.1 2.0 -5% -1% 3.8 3.8 -1% 0%
28 May 36.5 35.6 -2% -2% 80.7 80.0 -1% -1% 96.0 95.1 -1% -1% 64.8 71.6 11% 10% 23.5 19.7 -16% -10% 42.1 41.4 -2% -1%
28 June 74.7 77.6 4% 4% 161.7 168.4 4% 4% 199.1 206.3 4% 4% 142.4 147.2 3% 3% 51.3 45.0 -12% -12% 86.5 86.2 0% 0%
28 July 6.6 6.3 -4% -2% 13.0 13.6 5% 2% 19.5 19.5 0% 0% 14.5 13.1 -10% -5% 3.3 3.4 2% 0% 5.9 6.8 15% 4%
28 August 5.6 5.5 -1% -1% 11.1 11.1 0% 0% 16.8 16.3 -3% -3% 12.9 11.5 -11% -11% 3.1 3.1 1% 1% 5.1 5.1 0% 0%
28 September 5.3 5.2 -2% -2% 10.5 10.6 1% 1% 15.8 15.6 -1% -1% 12.5 11.9 -5% -5% 3.0 3.0 1% 1% 5.0 5.0 0% 0%
28 October 9.0 8.4 -7% -7% 18.5 18.0 -3% -3% 25.5 24.3 -5% -5% 21.3 23.1 8% 8% 3.7 3.1 -16% -16% 8.8 8.7 -1% -1%
28 November 5.2 5.1 -2% -2% 10.6 10.8 2% 2% 15.5 15.7 1% 1% 12.0 11.2 -7% -7% 3.1 3.1 1% 1% 5.1 5.3 3% 3%
28 December 4.6 4.6 -1% -1% 9.6 10.0 5% 5% 14.2 14.6 3% 3% 10.8 9.8 -10% -10% 2.9 3.0 1% 1% 4.7 5.1 10% 10%
29 January 4.1 4.1 -1% -1% 8.6 8.8 3% 3% 12.8 13.2 2% 2% 9.7 8.9 -9% -9% 2.6 2.7 1% 1% 4.2 4.5 6% 6%
29 February 3.6 3.8 4% 4% 7.6 8.2 8% 8% 11.3 12.4 10% 10% 8.6 9.1 5% 5% 2.5 2.6 1% 1% 4.1 4.1 0% 0%
29 March 10.1 9.3 -8% -8% 21.8 21.2 -3% -3% 28.4 27.5 -3% -3% 22.2 26.3 19% 19% 4.8 3.8 -20% -20% 10.9 10.8 -1% -1%
29 April 28.5 28.4 -1% -1% 61.7 62.9 2% 2% 73.4 74.8 2% 2% 49.7 54.2 9% 9% 19.1 16.9 -12% -12% 32.7 32.5 -1% -1%
29 May 17.1 16.1 -6% -2% 36.2 35.4 -2% -1% 45.4 43.9 -3% -1% 32.7 33.1 1% 1% 10.1 9.2 -9% -2% 18.1 18.0 0% 0%
29 June 7.8 7.5 -4% -1% 16.7 16.7 0% 0% 23.0 22.8 -1% 0% 17.5 17.6 1% 0% 4.6 4.5 -3% 0% 8.5 8.5 1% 0%
29 July 6.1 5.8 -4% -2% 12.7 12.6 -1% 0% 18.2 17.8 -2% -1% 13.4 12.2 -9% -4% 3.9 4.0 1% 0% 6.3 6.3 0% 0%
29 August 5.1 5.2 0% 0% 10.8 10.9 0% 0% 15.7 15.7 0% 0% 11.8 10.7 -10% -10% 3.5 3.5 1% 1% 5.4 5.3 0% 0%
29 September 4.4 4.6 5% 5% 9.3 9.7 4% 4% 13.6 14.3 5% 5% 10.4 9.7 -6% -6% 3.0 3.1 1% 1% 4.8 4.7 -1% -1%
29 October 8.8 8.3 -5% -5% 18.7 18.3 -2% -2% 24.9 24.5 -2% -2% 20.1 22.6 12% 12% 4.1 3.4 -17% -17% 9.2 9.1 -1% -1%
29 November 5.1 5.0 -3% -3% 10.8 11.3 5% 5% 15.3 16.0 5% 5% 11.6 11.1 -4% -4% 3.3 3.3 1% 1% 5.5 6.0 8% 8%
29 December 4.6 4.5 -2% -2% 9.8 10.0 2% 2% 13.9 14.3 3% 3% 10.4 9.6 -8% -8% 3.1 3.1 0% 0% 5.0 5.2 4% 4%
30 January 4.0 4.0 0% 0% 8.7 9.0 3% 3% 12.4 13.1 5% 5% 9.3 8.7 -7% -7% 2.8 2.8 1% 1% 4.5 4.7 6% 6%
30 February 3.3 3.6 11% 11% 7.1 8.0 11% 11% 10.3 11.8 15% 15% 7.7 8.0 5% 5% 2.5 2.6 1% 1% 4.1 4.1 -1% -1%
30 March 3.3 3.3 0% 0% 7.3 7.5 3% 3% 10.5 11.1 6% 6% 7.7 7.5 -4% -4% 2.3 2.4 1% 1% 3.8 4.0 4% 4%
30 April 14.5 14.0 -3% -3% 31.8 32.2 1% 1% 38.8 39.2 1% 1% 27.8 34.7 25% 25% 8.4 6.8 -19% -19% 16.8 16.7 -1% -1%
30 May 33.3 32.3 -3% -3% 72.0 71.3 -1% -1% 86.1 85.2 -1% -1% 56.9 59.0 4% 3% 21.8 19.3 -11% -7% 37.0 36.7 -1% 0%
30 June 31.0 31.1 0% 0% 66.5 68.1 2% 1% 82.2 82.9 1% 0% 58.4 60.6 4% 3% 20.6 18.5 -10% -4% 35.1 34.9 0% 0%
30 July 6.5 6.2 -4% -2% 13.7 13.7 0% 0% 19.6 19.3 -2% -1% 14.5 13.0 -10% -5% 3.9 3.9 1% 0% 6.7 6.9 4% 1%
30 August 5.5 5.4 -1% -1% 11.4 11.4 0% 0% 16.7 16.6 -1% -1% 12.5 11.2 -10% -10% 3.5 3.5 1% 1% 5.6 5.6 0% 0%
30 September 4.7 4.8 3% 3% 9.7 10.0 4% 4% 14.4 14.9 3% 3% 11.0 10.2 -8% -8% 3.0 3.1 0% 0% 4.9 4.9 0% 0%
30 October 5.0 4.8 -4% -4% 10.3 10.1 -2% -2% 15.2 15.0 -1% -1% 12.0 11.4 -5% -5% 3.0 2.9 -1% -1% 5.0 4.9 0% 0%
30 November 4.2 4.3 2% 2% 8.7 9.0 3% 3% 12.9 13.5 4% 4% 10.1 9.6 -5% -5% 2.6 2.6 1% 1% 4.4 4.4 -1% -1%
30 December 3.7 3.7 1% 1% 8.0 8.1 2% 2% 11.9 12.3 3% 3% 9.2 8.6 -7% -7% 2.4 2.4 1% 1% 4.0 4.1 1% 1%
31 January 3.3 3.4 2% 2% 7.2 8.1 12% 12% 10.8 12.1 11% 11% 8.3 7.9 -5% -5% 2.2 2.2 1% 1% 3.7 4.5 21% 21%
31 February 2.8 3.1 9% 9% 6.3 7.4 18% 18% 9.3 11.1 19% 19% 7.1 7.3 3% 3% 2.0 2.1 1% 1% 3.5 4.1 18% 18%
31 March 2.8 2.8 0% 0% 6.2 6.5 4% 4% 9.3 9.9 7% 7% 6.8 6.7 -1% -1% 1.9 2.0 1% 1% 3.3 3.4 5% 5%
31 April 24.2 24.2 0% 0% 53.5 54.7 2% 2% 63.2 64.9 3% 3% 44.1 52.9 20% 20% 15.3 12.4 -19% -19% 28.6 28.2 -1% -1%
31 May 73.5 73.8 0% 0% 160.0 161.2 1% 1% 195.6 195.9 0% 0% 136.4 137.2 1% 1% 49.5 43.4 -12% -12% 83.3 82.9 0% 0%
31 June 41.6 42.1 1% 1% 87.9 91.0 3% 3% 110.8 113.9 3% 2% 81.9 83.9 2% 2% 26.8 23.9 -11% -6% 45.9 46.3 1% 1%
31 July 6.8 6.6 -3% -1% 13.7 14.1 2% 1% 20.4 20.2 -1% 0% 15.3 13.6 -11% -6% 3.7 3.7 1% 0% 6.5 7.0 8% 2%
31 August 5.7 5.6 -2% -2% 11.6 11.5 0% 0% 17.4 16.8 -3% -3% 13.1 11.6 -11% -11% 3.3 3.3 1% 1% 5.4 5.4 0% 0%
31 September 4.8 4.9 3% 3% 9.7 10.0 3% 3% 14.8 14.9 1% 1% 11.5 10.5 -8% -8% 2.9 2.9 1% 1% 4.7 4.7 0% 0%
31 October 4.4 4.4 -1% -1% 8.9 8.9 0% 0% 13.8 13.6 -2% -2% 10.7 9.6 -10% -10% 2.6 2.6 1% 1% 4.3 4.2 -1% -1%
31 November 3.8 3.9 3% 3% 7.8 8.0 3% 3% 12.2 12.5 2% 2% 9.5 8.9 -6% -6% 2.3 2.4 1% 1% 3.9 3.8 -1% -1%
31 December 3.5 3.5 0% 0% 7.4 7.4 1% 1% 11.5 11.6 1% 1% 8.8 8.1 -8% -8% 2.2 2.2 1% 1% 3.6 3.7 2% 2%
32 January 3.1 3.1 0% 0% 6.7 7.0 5% 5% 10.5 10.9 4% 4% 8.0 7.5 -6% -6% 2.0 2.0 1% 1% 3.4 3.7 9% 9%
32 February 2.5 2.8 10% 10% 5.5 6.7 21% 21% 8.7 10.4 20% 20% 6.5 6.9 6% 6% 1.9 1.9 1% 1% 3.2 3.7 16% 16%
32 March 2.5 2.6 1% 1% 5.7 5.8 3% 3% 8.9 9.3 5% 5% 6.5 6.4 -2% -2% 1.7 1.7 1% 1% 3.0 3.1 2% 2%
32 April 8.2 7.9 -4% -4% 17.8 18.3 2% 2% 23.8 24.2 2% 2% 19.3 25.8 33% 33% 3.4 2.2 -35% -17% 9.2 9.2 1% 1%
32 May 41.7 40.6 -3% -3% 91.4 90.5 -1% -1% 108.3 107.1 -1% -1% 71.4 74.9 5% 5% 27.8 24.1 -13% -10% 47.6 47.0 -1% -1%
32 June 39.3 40.2 2% 2% 84.6 87.7 4% 3% 104.2 107.6 3% 2% 75.3 78.2 4% 4% 26.2 23.3 -11% -6% 44.8 44.9 0% 0%
32 July 6.3 6.0 -4% -2% 12.9 13.0 1% 0% 19.0 18.7 -1% -1% 14.1 12.6 -10% -5% 3.5 3.5 1% 0% 6.1 6.5 6% 2%
32 August 5.4 5.2 -2% -2% 10.9 10.8 -1% -1% 16.3 15.9 -3% -3% 12.4 11.0 -11% -11% 3.2 3.2 1% 1% 5.1 5.2 0% 0%
32 September 4.5 4.7 3% 3% 9.2 9.5 4% 4% 14.0 14.3 2% 2% 10.8 10.0 -8% -8% 2.8 2.8 1% 1% 4.5 4.5 0% 0%
32 October 4.6 4.4 -4% -4% 9.3 9.1 -2% -2% 14.1 13.8 -2% -2% 11.2 10.3 -8% -8% 2.7 2.7 1% 1% 4.4 4.4 -1% -1%
32 November 3.9 4.0 2% 2% 8.0 8.6 8% 8% 12.2 13.0 7% 7% 9.6 9.2 -4% -4% 2.4 2.4 1% 1% 4.0 4.4 9% 9%
32 December 3.5 3.5 0% 0% 7.4 7.9 6% 6% 11.4 12.0 5% 5% 8.8 8.2 -6% -6% 2.2 2.2 1% 1% 3.7 4.1 11% 11%
33 January 3.1 3.1 1% 1% 6.7 7.1 5% 5% 10.3 10.9 6% 6% 8.0 7.6 -5% -5% 2.0 2.1 1% 1% 3.4 3.7 8% 8%
33 February 2.5 2.8 11% 11% 5.6 6.7 19% 19% 8.6 10.3 20% 20% 6.5 7.0 7% 7% 1.9 1.9 1% 1% 3.2 3.6 13% 13%
33 March 2.6 2.6 1% 1% 5.8 6.5 13% 13% 8.8 9.9 12% 12% 6.5 6.4 -1% -1% 1.8 1.8 1% 1% 3.1 3.7 22% 22%
33 April 29.3 29.6 1% 1% 65.2 66.5 2% 2% 77.1 79.0 2% 2% 53.0 62.3 18% 18% 19.1 15.7 -18% -18% 35.2 34.2 -3% -3%
33 May 72.7 73.0 0% 0% 158.0 159.3 1% 1% 193.5 194.2 0% 0% 136.5 137.3 1% 1% 48.6 42.6 -12% -12% 82.1 81.9 0% 0%
33 June 91.8 94.9 3% 3% 195.9 203.9 4% 4% 245.8 254.4 3% 3% 181.2 183.7 1% 1% 61.8 54.3 -12% -12% 103.7 103.6 0% 0%
33 July 6.9 6.8 -2% -1% 13.7 14.5 6% 2% 20.9 20.9 0% 0% 15.9 14.0 -12% -6% 3.6 3.6 1% 0% 6.3 7.2 14% 4%
33 August 5.7 5.8 1% 1% 11.4 11.5 1% 1% 17.4 16.9 -3% -3% 13.4 11.8 -12% -12% 3.2 3.2 1% 1% 5.3 5.3 0% 0%
33 September 4.8 5.0 3% 3% 9.6 9.9 3% 3% 14.8 14.9 0% 0% 11.6 10.6 -9% -9% 2.8 2.9 1% 1% 4.6 4.6 -1% -1%
33 October 6.8 6.4 -6% -6% 13.8 13.5 -3% -3% 20.1 19.2 -5% -5% 16.7 17.3 3% 3% 3.2 2.8 -10% -10% 6.5 6.4 -2% -2%
33 November 4.7 4.7 0% 0% 9.4 9.9 6% 6% 14.3 14.7 3% 3% 11.1 10.4 -7% -7% 2.7 2.7 1% 1% 4.6 4.9 7% 7%
33 December 4.2 4.1 -3% -3% 8.5 8.5 0% 0% 13.2 13.0 -1% -1% 10.0 9.1 -9% -9% 2.5 2.5 1% 1% 4.1 4.2 2% 2%
34 January 3.7 3.6 -2% -2% 7.6 7.8 2% 2% 11.9 12.1 2% 2% 9.0 8.3 -7% -7% 2.3 2.3 1% 1% 3.8 4.0 6% 6%
34 February 2.9 3.2 9% 9% 6.3 7.3 17% 17% 9.8 11.3 15% 15% 7.4 7.7 5% 5% 2.1 2.1 1% 1% 3.5 3.9 10% 10%
34 March 2.9 2.9 -1% -1% 6.4 6.6 3% 3% 9.9 10.3 4% 4% 7.4 7.1 -4% -4% 1.9 2.0 1% 1% 3.3 3.4 5% 5%
34 April 14.2 13.8 -3% -3% 31.6 31.7 0% 0% 39.3 39.1 -1% -1% 29.1 36.5 26% 26% 8.0 6.3 -22% -22% 16.8 16.3 -3% -3%
34 May 32.5 31.4 -3% -3% 70.2 69.4 -1% -1% 84.2 83.0 -1% -1% 56.5 58.8 4% 3% 21.0 18.6 -12% -7% 36.0 35.7 -1% -1%
34 June 15.8 15.3 -3% -1% 33.2 33.7 2% 0% 41.9 41.8 0% 0% 30.8 32.4 5% 2% 9.3 8.4 -9% -2% 17.0 17.2 1% 0%
34 July 6.0 5.7 -5% -2% 12.4 12.3 -1% 0% 18.2 17.6 -3% -1% 13.3 12.0 -10% -4% 3.6 3.6 1% 0% 6.0 6.2 2% 1%
34 August 5.0 5.0 -1% -1% 10.5 10.5 0% 0% 15.6 15.4 -1% -1% 11.6 10.4 -10% -10% 3.2 3.3 0% 0% 5.1 5.1 0% 0%
34 September 4.6 4.7 2% 2% 9.5 9.7 3% 3% 14.1 14.5 3% 3% 10.9 10.3 -5% -5% 3.0 3.0 1% 1% 4.8 4.7 -1% -1%
34 October 7.2 6.9 -5% -5% 15.1 14.8 -2% -2% 21.0 20.5 -2% -2% 17.0 18.5 9% 9% 3.4 3.0 -13% -13% 7.3 7.2 -2% -2%
34 November 4.5 4.6 1% 1% 9.6 9.9 3% 3% 13.9 14.4 4% 4% 10.6 10.1 -5% -5% 2.9 2.9 1% 1% 4.9 5.0 1% 1%
34 December 4.0 4.0 0% 0% 8.6 9.0 4% 4% 12.6 13.2 5% 5% 9.6 8.9 -7% -7% 2.7 2.7 1% 1% 4.4 4.6 6% 6%
35 January 3.5 3.6 1% 1% 7.7 8.2 6% 6% 11.3 12.2 7% 7% 8.7 8.1 -6% -6% 2.4 2.5 1% 1% 4.0 4.4 10% 10%
35 February 3.0 3.2 7% 7% 6.6 7.9 20% 20% 9.8 11.7 19% 19% 7.3 7.5 3% 3% 2.2 2.3 1% 1% 3.7 4.4 21% 21%
35 March 5.5 5.1 -8% -8% 11.4 11.5 1% 1% 15.9 16.1 2% 2% 13.1 15.2 16% 16% 2.7 2.3 -15% -15% 5.4 5.8 8% 8%
35 April 39.1 39.5 1% 1% 86.6 88.9 3% 3% 102.7 105.3 3% 3% 67.6 75.1 11% 11% 27.0 23.2 -14% -14% 46.9 46.4 -1% -1%
35 May 67.3 67.5 0% 0% 145.6 146.7 1% 1% 179.3 179.9 0% 0% 128.4 128.4 0% 0% 44.9 39.6 -12% -12% 75.4 75.1 0% 0%
35 June 32.6 32.5 0% 0% 68.4 70.2 3% 2% 87.0 88.8 2% 1% 64.6 66.0 2% 2% 20.7 18.6 -10% -4% 35.4 35.6 1% 0%
35 July 6.9 6.7 -3% -1% 14.3 14.5 2% 1% 21.0 20.8 -1% -1% 15.6 14.1 -10% -5% 4.0 4.0 1% 0% 6.8 7.2 6% 2%
35 August 5.8 5.7 -1% -1% 11.9 11.9 0% 0% 17.7 17.3 -2% -2% 13.3 11.9 -11% -11% 3.5 3.5 0% 0% 5.7 5.7 0% 0%
35 September 28.5 28.3 -1% -1% 61.2 62.4 2% 2% 76.4 77.5 1% 1% 56.1 60.3 7% 7% 18.1 15.9 -13% -13% 32.2 32.0 0% 0%
35 October 13.6 12.9 -6% -6% 28.3 28.1 0% 0% 37.2 36.7 -1% -1% 28.6 28.5 0% 0% 7.3 6.7 -8% -8% 13.8 14.2 3% 3%
35 November 6.1 6.1 0% 0% 12.7 13.5 6% 6% 18.8 19.3 3% 3% 13.7 12.7 -7% -7% 3.9 4.0 1% 1% 6.4 6.9 7% 7%
35 December 5.4 5.4 0% 0% 11.2 11.4 2% 2% 16.7 16.7 0% 0% 12.3 11.0 -10% -10% 3.5 3.5 0% 0% 5.5 5.6 3% 3%
36 January 4.7 4.8 0% 0% 9.9 10.2 4% 4% 14.9 15.2 2% 2% 11.2 10.1 -10% -10% 3.1 3.1 0% 0% 4.8 5.1 6% 6%
36 February 3.8 4.3 12% 12% 8.0 9.1 14% 14% 12.2 13.8 13% 13% 9.3 9.3 1% 1% 2.7 2.8 1% 1% 4.4 4.5 4% 4%
36 March 4.2 4.1 -4% -4% 8.8 8.7 -2% -2% 13.4 13.3 0% 0% 10.4 9.8 -5% -5% 2.6 2.7 1% 1% 4.3 4.3 -1% -1%
36 April 17.8 17.4 -2% -2% 39.0 39.5 1% 1% 47.7 48.0 1% 1% 35.2 41.4 18% 18% 10.7 8.9 -16% -16% 20.7 20.3 -2% -2%
36 May 60.4 60.2 0% 0% 131.6 132.3 1% 1% 161.9 161.8 0% 0% 112.2 112.9 1% 1% 41.0 36.2 -12% -12% 68.4 68.3 0% 0%
36 June 37.8 38.3 1% 1% 80.2 83.1 4% 2% 101.4 104.7 3% 2% 74.5 76.6 3% 3% 24.7 22.1 -11% -5% 42.0 42.4 1% 1%
36 July 7.0 6.8 -3% -1% 14.4 14.7 2% 1% 21.3 21.2 -1% 0% 15.8 14.3 -10% -5% 4.0 4.1 1% 0% 6.9 7.4 6% 2%
36 August 5.9 5.8 -1% -1% 12.2 12.1 -1% -1% 18.1 17.6 -3% -3% 13.5 12.1 -10% -10% 3.6 3.6 1% 1% 5.9 5.8 -2% -2%
36 September 5.8 5.9 1% 1% 11.9 12.1 2% 2% 17.5 17.6 1% 1% 13.6 13.3 -2% -2% 3.4 3.4 -1% -1% 5.9 5.8 -1% -1%
36 October 7.1 6.7 -6% -6% 14.6 14.2 -3% -3% 20.7 19.9 -4% -4% 16.5 16.7 1% 1% 3.6 3.3 -6% -6% 6.9 6.9 -1% -1%
36 November 5.2 5.1 -1% -1% 10.6 11.1 5% 5% 15.6 16.2 3% 3% 12.1 11.5 -5% -5% 3.1 3.2 1% 1% 5.3 5.6 6% 6%
36 December 4.6 4.6 -1% -1% 9.6 10.1 5% 5% 14.2 14.8 4% 4% 10.9 10.1 -7% -7% 2.9 2.9 1% 1% 4.7 5.2 11% 11%
37 January 4.1 4.0 -1% -1% 8.6 8.7 2% 2% 12.8 13.2 3% 3% 9.8 9.2 -6% -6% 2.6 2.6 1% 1% 4.2 4.4 4% 4%
37 February 3.3 3.6 10% 10% 7.0 8.0 14% 14% 10.6 12.3 15% 15% 8.1 8.5 6% 6% 2.4 2.4 1% 1% 4.0 4.2 6% 6%
37 March 3.3 3.3 0% 0% 7.2 7.2 1% 1% 10.8 11.2 3% 3% 8.1 7.9 -3% -3% 2.2 2.2 0% 0% 3.7 3.7 0% 0%
37 April 29.7 29.9 1% 1% 65.5 67.2 3% 3% 78.2 80.2 3% 3% 53.7 62.2 16% 16% 19.5 16.4 -16% -16% 35.2 34.7 -1% -1%
37 May 59.6 59.5 0% 0% 129.4 130.5 1% 1% 159.1 159.2 0% 0% 112.0 112.7 1% 1% 39.7 35.0 -12% -12% 67.1 67.2 0% 0%
37 June 37.5 37.8 1% 1% 79.2 81.7 3% 2% 100.0 102.9 3% 2% 73.8 75.9 3% 3% 24.1 21.6 -11% -5% 41.3 41.6 1% 0%
37 July 6.9 6.7 -2% -1% 14.1 14.2 1% 0% 20.9 20.6 -2% -1% 15.5 14.0 -10% -5% 3.9 3.9 1% 0% 6.7 7.0 3% 1%
37 August 5.8 5.7 -1% -1% 11.8 11.8 0% 0% 17.7 17.2 -3% -3% 13.2 11.9 -10% -10% 3.5 3.5 1% 1% 5.7 5.7 0% 0%
37 September 4.9 5.0 2% 2% 10.0 10.3 3% 3% 15.2 15.3 1% 1% 11.6 10.8 -7% -7% 3.0 3.1 0% 0% 4.9 4.9 0% 0%
37 October 4.9 4.7 -3% -3% 9.9 9.8 -2% -2% 15.1 14.7 -2% -2% 11.8 10.9 -8% -8% 2.9 2.9 1% 1% 4.7 4.7 -1% -1%
37 November 4.2 4.2 0% 0% 8.6 9.4 9% 9% 13.1 14.0 7% 7% 10.2 9.8 -4% -4% 2.5 2.6 1% 1% 4.3 4.8 14% 14%
37 December 3.8 3.8 0% 0% 8.0 8.6 8% 8% 12.3 13.0 6% 6% 9.4 8.9 -6% -6% 2.3 2.4 1% 1% 3.9 4.6 16% 16%
38 January 3.4 3.4 0% 0% 7.2 7.9 9% 9% 11.2 12.0 7% 7% 8.5 8.1 -4% -4% 2.2 2.2 1% 1% 3.7 4.2 16% 16%
38 February 2.7 3.0 11% 11% 6.0 6.9 14% 14% 9.3 10.7 16% 16% 7.0 7.6 8% 8% 2.0 2.0 1% 1% 3.4 3.6 5% 5%
38 March 2.8 2.8 0% 0% 6.2 6.5 5% 5% 9.5 10.0 6% 6% 7.0 7.0 -1% -1% 1.9 1.9 0% 0% 3.2 3.4 7% 7%
38 April 56.9 58.7 3% 3% 126.1 130.8 4% 4% 151.2 155.8 3% 3% 103.0 113.4 10% 10% 39.6 33.6 -15% -15% 68.4 67.8 -1% -1%
38 May 56.9 56.8 0% 0% 121.8 122.9 1% 1% 151.2 152.3 1% 1% 110.2 110.8 1% 1% 36.5 32.1 -12% -12% 62.3 62.6 0% 0%
38 June 66.6 68.4 3% 3% 141.7 147.1 4% 4% 178.8 184.1 3% 3% 131.7 134.1 2% 2% 44.2 39.1 -12% -11% 74.7 74.7 0% 0%
38 July 11.6 11.0 -5% -4% 23.4 23.4 0% 0% 32.5 31.6 -3% -2% 26.0 25.2 -3% -3% 5.5 5.1 -7% -3% 11.0 11.4 4% 2%
38 August 6.6 6.5 -2% -2% 13.5 13.5 0% 0% 20.0 19.4 -3% -3% 15.0 13.5 -10% -10% 3.9 3.9 0% 0% 6.4 6.5 1% 1%
38 September 5.5 5.5 1% 1% 11.1 11.4 3% 3% 16.7 16.8 1% 1% 12.6 11.7 -7% -7% 3.4 3.5 1% 1% 5.5 5.5 0% 0%
38 October 9.1 8.5 -6% -6% 19.0 18.6 -2% -2% 26.3 25.1 -4% -4% 21.7 23.0 6% 6% 4.2 3.7 -13% -13% 9.2 9.2 -1% -1%
38 November 5.4 5.3 -1% -1% 11.1 11.5 3% 3% 16.4 16.7 2% 2% 12.3 11.5 -7% -7% 3.4 3.4 1% 1% 5.5 5.7 4% 4%
38 December 4.8 4.8 -1% -1% 10.1 10.1 0% 0% 15.0 14.9 -1% -1% 11.2 10.2 -9% -9% 3.2 3.2 0% 0% 4.9 4.9 0% 0%
39 January 4.3 4.2 -1% -1% 8.9 8.9 0% 0% 13.5 13.5 0% 0% 10.1 9.3 -8% -8% 2.8 2.8 1% 1% 4.4 4.4 0% 0%
39 February 3.5 3.8 6% 6% 7.5 8.2 9% 9% 11.5 12.6 10% 10% 8.5 8.6 0% 0% 2.5 2.5 1% 1% 4.0 4.2 4% 4%
39 March 3.3 3.4 0% 0% 7.3 7.4 2% 2% 11.2 11.5 3% 3% 8.3 7.9 -5% -5% 2.3 2.3 1% 1% 3.7 3.8 3% 3%
39 April 9.9 9.5 -4% -4% 21.6 21.7 1% 1% 28.1 28.2 0% 0% 21.6 27.2 26% 26% 4.9 3.8 -22% -16% 11.1 11.0 -2% -2%
39 May 17.2 16.2 -6% -3% 37.0 36.0 -3% -1% 44.6 43.0 -4% -1% 31.2 33.8 9% 4% 10.3 9.1 -12% -3% 18.7 18.4 -1% 0%
39 June 26.5 26.3 -1% 0% 57.0 58.2 2% 1% 69.5 71.0 2% 1% 46.8 49.7 6% 4% 17.7 15.9 -10% -4% 30.0 30.0 0% 0%
39 July 6.1 5.8 -5% -2% 12.9 13.0 0% 0% 18.7 18.4 -2% -1% 13.3 12.1 -9% -4% 3.8 3.8 1% 0% 6.3 6.7 5% 2%
39 August 5.2 5.2 0% 0% 10.9 10.9 0% 0% 15.9 15.8 0% 0% 11.6 10.5 -9% -9% 3.4 3.4 1% 1% 5.3 5.3 0% 0%
39 September 4.5 4.7 4% 4% 9.5 9.8 3% 3% 14.0 14.5 3% 3% 10.6 10.1 -5% -5% 3.0 3.1 0% 0% 4.8 4.8 -1% -1%
39 October 4.3 4.2 -2% -2% 9.1 9.0 -1% -1% 13.4 13.5 0% 0% 10.6 9.7 -8% -8% 2.8 2.8 1% 1% 4.5 4.4 -1% -1%
39 November 3.6 3.8 4% 4% 7.8 8.4 7% 7% 11.6 12.6 8% 8% 9.0 8.7 -2% -2% 2.5 2.5 1% 1% 4.1 4.3 7% 7%
39 December 3.3 3.4 1% 1% 7.3 7.4 2% 2% 10.9 11.3 4% 4% 8.4 8.1 -4% -4% 2.3 2.3 1% 1% 3.8 3.8 1% 1%
40 January 3.0 3.1 1% 1% 6.8 7.0 2% 2% 10.1 10.6 5% 5% 7.5 7.4 -1% -1% 2.1 2.1 0% 0% 3.6 3.6 2% 2%
40 February 2.5 2.8 11% 11% 5.7 6.8 20% 20% 8.4 10.2 21% 21% 6.2 6.9 11% 11% 1.9 2.0 1% 1% 3.3 3.8 15% 15%
40 March 2.6 2.6 1% 1% 5.9 6.3 7% 7% 8.7 9.5 9% 9% 6.2 6.3 2% 2% 1.8 1.9 1% 1% 3.1 3.5 11% 11%
40 April 4.0 3.7 -6% -4% 8.6 8.7 1% 0% 12.1 12.5 3% 2% 9.6 12.0 25% 15% 2.2 1.9 -14% -5% 4.4 4.4 1% 0%
40 May 72.9 73.3 0% 0% 161.3 162.3 1% 1% 193.0 193.7 0% 0% 131.3 137.1 4% 4% 49.3 42.3 -14% -14% 84.8 84.0 -1% -1%
40 June 56.5 57.8 2% 2% 120.2 125.0 4% 4% 149.5 154.7 4% 4% 109.1 112.7 3% 3% 37.1 32.7 -12% -9% 63.2 63.7 1% 1%
40 July 6.6 6.3 -4% -2% 13.1 13.3 2% 1% 19.5 19.1 -2% -1% 14.8 13.3 -10% -5% 3.4 3.4 2% 0% 6.0 6.4 8% 2%
40 August 5.6 5.5 -2% -2% 11.1 11.0 0% 0% 16.8 16.2 -4% -4% 12.9 11.6 -10% -10% 3.1 3.1 1% 1% 5.1 5.1 0% 0%
40 September 5.2 5.1 -2% -2% 10.4 10.4 1% 1% 15.7 15.4 -2% -2% 12.5 11.8 -5% -5% 3.0 3.0 1% 1% 4.9 4.9 0% 0%
40 October 4.8 4.7 -4% -4% 9.7 9.5 -2% -2% 14.8 14.2 -4% -4% 11.7 10.8 -8% -8% 2.7 2.7 1% 1% 4.5 4.5 -1% -1%
40 November 4.1 4.2 0% 0% 8.3 9.0 8% 8% 12.8 13.4 5% 5% 10.0 9.6 -4% -4% 2.4 2.5 1% 1% 4.1 4.5 11% 11%
40 December 3.8 3.7 -2% -2% 7.8 8.2 4% 4% 12.1 12.4 2% 2% 9.3 8.8 -5% -5% 2.3 2.3 1% 1% 3.8 4.2 10% 10%
41 January 3.4 3.3 -1% -1% 7.1 7.3 4% 4% 11.0 11.3 3% 3% 8.4 8.0 -4% -4% 2.1 2.1 1% 1% 3.5 3.8 7% 7%
41 February 2.7 3.0 10% 10% 5.9 6.9 18% 18% 9.1 10.6 17% 17% 6.9 7.5 8% 8% 1.9 2.0 1% 1% 3.3 3.7 12% 12%
41 March 2.7 2.7 -1% -1% 6.0 6.3 4% 4% 9.3 9.8 5% 5% 6.9 6.9 -1% -1% 1.8 1.8 1% 1% 3.2 3.3 6% 6%
41 April 30.7 31.1 1% 1% 68.2 70.0 3% 3% 81.1 83.2 3% 3% 55.8 65.3 17% 17% 20.1 16.6 -17% -17% 36.8 36.1 -2% -2%
41 May 63.7 63.7 0% 0% 138.3 139.3 1% 1% 169.7 169.7 0% 0% 120.0 120.9 1% 1% 42.3 37.1 -12% -12% 71.7 71.6 0% 0%
41 June 36.5 36.7 0% 0% 76.8 79.2 3% 2% 97.2 99.5 2% 2% 72.1 74.1 3% 2% 23.2 20.7 -11% -5% 40.0 40.2 1% 0%
41 July 6.6 6.4 -3% -1% 13.5 13.6 1% 0% 20.1 19.7 -2% -1% 15.0 13.6 -10% -5% 3.6 3.7 1% 0% 6.4 6.6 4% 1%
41 August 5.6 5.5 -1% -1% 11.3 11.3 0% 0% 17.1 16.6 -3% -3% 12.9 11.6 -10% -10% 3.3 3.3 1% 1% 5.3 5.3 0% 0%
41 September 8.6 8.4 -3% -3% 18.0 18.2 1% 1% 25.0 24.7 -1% -1% 20.8 22.8 10% 10% 4.0 3.4 -14% -14% 9.0 8.9 -1% -1%
41 October 18.5 17.4 -6% -6% 39.1 38.5 -1% -1% 48.5 47.7 -2% -2% 36.3 37.7 4% 4% 10.9 9.7 -11% -11% 19.5 19.7 1% 1%
41 November 5.8 5.8 -1% -1% 12.2 13.4 10% 10% 17.9 19.1 6% 6% 13.1 12.3 -7% -7% 3.7 3.8 1% 1% 6.1 7.1 17% 17%
41 December 5.2 5.1 -2% -2% 10.7 10.9 2% 2% 16.0 16.1 0% 0% 11.7 10.6 -9% -9% 3.4 3.4 1% 1% 5.2 5.5 4% 4%
42 January 4.5 4.5 1% 1% 9.4 9.7 3% 3% 14.3 14.5 2% 2% 10.7 9.7 -9% -9% 3.0 3.0 1% 1% 4.6 4.8 4% 4%
42 February 3.6 4.0 11% 11% 7.6 8.6 13% 13% 11.6 13.2 13% 13% 8.8 9.0 2% 2% 2.6 2.7 1% 1% 4.2 4.3 3% 3%
42 March 6.0 5.7 -6% -6% 12.5 12.4 -1% -1% 17.9 17.8 -1% -1% 14.8 16.2 10% 10% 3.0 2.7 -12% -12% 6.0 6.1 2% 2%
42 April 26.0 25.8 -1% -1% 56.9 58.0 2% 2% 68.4 69.5 2% 2% 46.9 52.8 13% 13% 16.9 14.6 -14% -14% 30.4 30.0 -1% -1%
42 May 74.1 74.2 0% 0% 161.1 162.1 1% 1% 199.2 199.6 0% 0% 140.8 140.5 0% 0% 50.4 44.5 -12% -12% 83.8 83.4 -1% -1%
42 June 39.1 39.4 1% 1% 82.6 85.6 4% 3% 105.2 108.0 3% 2% 77.6 79.1 2% 2% 25.4 22.8 -10% -5% 43.2 43.7 1% 1%
42 July 7.1 6.9 -3% -1% 14.6 14.8 1% 1% 21.6 21.4 -1% -1% 16.1 14.5 -10% -5% 4.1 4.1 1% 0% 7.0 7.3 5% 2%
42 August 5.9 5.8 -1% -1% 12.2 12.1 0% 0% 18.1 17.7 -2% -2% 13.6 12.2 -10% -10% 3.6 3.6 1% 1% 5.9 5.8 0% 0%
42 September 5.8 5.7 -2% -2% 11.9 12.0 1% 1% 17.6 17.6 0% 0% 13.7 13.4 -2% -2% 3.4 3.4 -1% -1% 5.9 5.8 -1% -1%
42 October 17.9 16.8 -6% -6% 38.3 37.6 -2% -2% 48.0 46.7 -3% -3% 37.1 39.8 7% 7% 10.0 8.7 -13% -13% 19.3 19.3 0% 0%
42 November 5.9 5.8 -2% -2% 12.3 12.9 5% 5% 18.1 18.7 3% 3% 13.3 12.5 -6% -6% 3.7 3.7 1% 1% 6.1 6.6 8% 8%
42 December 5.2 5.2 -1% -1% 10.9 10.9 1% 1% 16.2 16.2 0% 0% 11.9 10.9 -9% -9% 3.4 3.4 1% 1% 5.3 5.4 1% 1%
43 January 4.6 4.6 0% 0% 9.6 10.0 4% 4% 14.5 14.9 3% 3% 10.9 10.0 -9% -9% 3.0 3.0 1% 1% 4.7 5.0 7% 7%
43 February 3.8 4.1 6% 6% 8.1 9.0 12% 12% 12.3 13.6 11% 11% 9.3 9.2 -1% -1% 2.7 2.7 1% 1% 4.3 4.6 9% 9%
43 March 3.6 3.6 1% 1% 7.8 8.1 5% 5% 11.9 12.4 5% 5% 8.9 8.5 -5% -5% 2.4 2.5 1% 1% 3.9 4.2 7% 7%
43 April 23.4 23.4 0% 0% 51.5 52.9 3% 3% 61.9 63.6 3% 3% 43.6 50.9 17% 17% 14.9 12.5 -16% -16% 27.5 27.3 0% 0%
43 May 73.1 73.3 0% 0% 159.0 160.3 1% 1% 196.1 196.7 0% 0% 137.6 137.9 0% 0% 49.6 43.6 -12% -12% 82.8 82.6 0% 0%
43 June 66.1 67.8 3% 3% 140.7 146.2 4% 4% 177.4 183.2 3% 3% 130.3 132.6 2% 2% 44.2 39.1 -12% -10% 74.3 74.5 0% 0%
43 July 7.2 7.0 -2% -1% 14.4 15.1 5% 2% 21.6 21.7 0% 0% 16.2 14.5 -11% -6% 3.9 3.9 1% 0% 6.7 7.5 12% 4%
43 August 5.9 5.9 0% 0% 12.0 12.0 0% 0% 18.1 17.6 -3% -3% 13.6 12.2 -10% -10% 3.5 3.5 1% 1% 5.7 5.7 -1% -1%
43 September 5.0 5.1 2% 2% 10.1 10.4 3% 3% 15.4 15.5 1% 1% 11.9 11.1 -7% -7% 3.1 3.1 0% 0% 4.9 4.9 0% 0%
43 October 5.0 4.8 -4% -4% 10.0 9.8 -2% -2% 15.3 14.8 -3% -3% 12.0 11.1 -8% -8% 2.9 2.9 1% 1% 4.7 4.7 -1% -1%
43 November 4.3 4.3 1% 1% 8.6 9.2 7% 7% 13.3 13.9 5% 5% 10.4 10.0 -4% -4% 2.5 2.6 1% 1% 4.2 4.6 8% 8%
43 December 3.9 3.8 -2% -2% 8.0 8.4 5% 5% 12.5 12.9 3% 3% 9.5 9.0 -5% -5% 2.3 2.4 1% 1% 3.9 4.3 10% 10%
44 January 3.5 3.4 -1% -1% 7.3 7.3 0% 0% 11.4 11.5 1% 1% 8.6 8.3 -4% -4% 2.1 2.2 1% 1% 3.6 3.6 0% 0%
44 February 2.8 3.1 10% 10% 6.0 7.5 24% 24% 9.5 11.4 21% 21% 7.1 7.7 8% 8% 2.0 2.0 1% 1% 3.4 4.2 23% 23%
44 March 2.8 2.8 0% 0% 6.2 6.2 1% 1% 9.6 9.9 3% 3% 7.1 7.1 -1% -1% 1.9 1.9 0% 0% 3.2 3.2 0% 0%
44 April 29.4 29.7 1% 1% 65.2 66.5 2% 2% 77.7 79.4 2% 2% 53.7 63.0 17% 17% 19.1 15.8 -18% -18% 35.0 34.2 -2% -2%
44 May 65.3 65.4 0% 0% 141.9 142.9 1% 1% 174.4 174.4 0% 0% 122.9 123.8 1% 1% 43.5 38.1 -12% -12% 73.6 73.5 0% 0%
44 June 14.7 14.3 -2% -1% 30.0 30.8 3% 1% 39.2 39.9 2% 0% 30.4 31.7 4% 2% 7.8 7.1 -9% -1% 14.9 15.3 3% 1%
44 July 6.3 6.1 -3% -1% 12.9 12.8 -1% 0% 19.2 18.6 -3% -1% 14.3 13.0 -9% -4% 3.6 3.6 1% 0% 6.1 6.2 2% 0%
44 August 5.4 5.3 -2% -2% 11.0 10.9 -1% -1% 16.6 16.1 -3% -3% 12.6 11.4 -9% -9% 3.2 3.3 1% 1% 5.2 5.2 1% 1%
44 September 4.9 4.8 0% 0% 9.8 10.0 2% 2% 14.9 15.0 0% 0% 11.5 10.9 -5% -5% 3.0 3.0 1% 1% 4.8 4.8 -1% -1%
44 October 6.1 5.7 -6% -6% 12.5 12.1 -3% -3% 18.2 17.5 -4% -4% 14.8 15.2 3% 3% 3.1 2.9 -6% -6% 5.9 5.8 -2% -2%
44 November 5.3 5.0 -5% -5% 10.8 11.0 2% 2% 15.8 16.0 1% 1% 12.4 12.5 1% 1% 3.0 3.0 -1% -1% 5.3 5.6 4% 4%
44 December 4.6 4.4 -3% -3% 9.4 9.5 1% 1% 14.0 14.1 0% 0% 10.7 10.2 -5% -5% 2.7 2.7 1% 1% 4.6 4.8 4% 4%
45 January 3.9 3.8 -2% -2% 8.3 8.8 6% 6% 12.4 13.0 5% 5% 9.4 9.0 -4% -4% 2.5 2.5 1% 1% 4.2 4.7 13% 13%
45 February 3.2 3.5 10% 10% 6.8 7.8 14% 14% 10.2 11.8 15% 15% 7.7 8.3 8% 8% 2.3 2.3 1% 1% 3.8 4.0 6% 6%
45 March 3.2 3.1 0% 0% 7.0 7.4 7% 7% 10.4 11.2 7% 7% 7.8 7.7 -1% -1% 2.1 2.2 1% 1% 3.6 4.0 12% 12%
45 April 16.1 15.7 -3% -3% 35.7 36.1 1% 1% 43.5 43.6 0% 0% 31.4 39.1 25% 25% 9.4 7.5 -20% -20% 19.0 18.7 -2% -2%
45 May 38.8 37.7 -3% -3% 84.0 83.3 -1% -1% 101.1 100.0 -1% -1% 67.5 69.7 3% 3% 25.6 22.5 -12% -8% 43.3 43.0 -1% 0%
45 June 66.5 68.9 4% 4% 143.7 149.6 4% 4% 178.1 184.8 4% 4% 128.9 132.7 3% 3% 45.7 40.4 -12% -11% 76.9 76.6 0% 0%
45 July 6.9 6.7 -3% -1% 14.0 14.4 3% 1% 20.7 20.7 0% 0% 15.4 14.0 -9% -5% 3.8 3.8 1% 0% 6.6 7.2 9% 3%
45 August 5.8 5.7 -1% -1% 11.8 11.7 0% 0% 17.6 17.1 -3% -3% 13.3 12.0 -9% -9% 3.4 3.4 1% 1% 5.6 5.6 0% 0%
45 September 5.4 5.3 -2% -2% 11.0 11.1 1% 1% 16.5 16.4 -1% -1% 12.9 12.4 -4% -4% 3.2 3.3 1% 1% 5.4 5.4 -1% -1%
45 October 22.7 21.5 -5% -5% 48.9 48.1 -2% -2% 60.5 59.1 -2% -2% 45.4 48.6 7% 7% 13.3 11.5 -13% -13% 24.8 24.7 0% 0%
45 November 6.0 5.9 -1% -1% 12.3 13.1 7% 7% 18.1 18.8 4% 4% 13.5 12.7 -5% -5% 3.6 3.6 1% 1% 6.1 6.7 9% 9%
45 December 5.3 5.2 -2% -2% 10.9 11.2 2% 2% 16.3 16.3 0% 0% 12.1 11.0 -9% -9% 3.3 3.3 1% 1% 5.3 5.6 5% 5%
46 January 4.6 4.7 0% 0% 9.6 10.2 6% 6% 14.5 15.1 4% 4% 11.0 10.1 -8% -8% 2.9 3.0 0% 0% 4.7 5.2 11% 11%
46 February 3.7 4.2 11% 11% 7.8 9.1 16% 16% 11.9 13.6 15% 15% 9.0 9.3 3% 3% 2.6 2.6 1% 1% 4.2 4.6 9% 9%
46 March 3.7 3.7 1% 1% 7.8 8.1 4% 4% 12.0 12.4 4% 4% 9.1 8.6 -5% -5% 2.4 2.4 1% 1% 3.9 4.2 7% 7%
46 April 34.0 34.5 1% 1% 75.0 76.8 2% 2% 90.4 92.2 2% 2% 61.9 69.6 12% 12% 23.0 19.5 -15% -15% 40.3 39.5 -2% -2%
46 May 57.7 57.6 0% 0% 124.9 125.7 1% 1% 154.6 154.8 0% 0% 110.7 111.1 0% 0% 38.3 33.8 -12% -12% 64.6 64.5 0% 0%
46 June 30.7 30.6 0% 0% 64.5 66.3 3% 2% 82.2 84.2 2% 1% 61.0 62.7 3% 2% 19.4 17.4 -10% -4% 33.4 33.7 1% 0%
46 July 6.8 6.6 -3% -1% 14.0 14.1 0% 0% 20.8 20.5 -1% -1% 15.4 14.0 -9% -5% 3.9 3.9 1% 0% 6.7 6.9 3% 1%
46 August 5.7 5.6 -1% -1% 11.7 11.6 -1% -1% 17.5 17.1 -3% -3% 13.2 11.9 -10% -10% 3.5 3.5 1% 1% 5.6 5.6 -1% -1%
46 September 4.8 5.0 2% 2% 9.9 10.2 3% 3% 15.0 15.2 1% 1% 11.5 10.7 -6% -6% 3.0 3.1 0% 0% 4.9 4.9 -1% -1%
46 October 21.7 20.7 -5% -5% 46.9 46.4 -1% -1% 58.1 56.9 -2% -2% 43.2 46.7 8% 8% 12.8 11.0 -14% -14% 24.0 23.9 0% 0%
46 November 5.6 5.6 -1% -1% 11.6 12.4 7% 7% 17.3 18.1 5% 5% 12.7 11.9 -6% -6% 3.4 3.4 1% 1% 5.8 6.4 11% 11%
46 December 5.0 5.0 0% 0% 10.3 11.0 7% 7% 15.5 16.1 4% 4% 11.5 10.5 -9% -9% 3.2 3.2 1% 1% 5.0 5.7 13% 13%
47 January 4.4 4.4 2% 2% 9.1 9.5 5% 5% 13.9 14.3 3% 3% 10.5 9.6 -8% -8% 2.8 2.8 1% 1% 4.5 4.7 7% 7%
47 February 3.6 3.9 8% 8% 7.6 8.4 11% 11% 11.6 12.9 11% 11% 8.9 8.9 0% 0% 2.5 2.5 1% 1% 4.0 4.2 5% 5%
47 March 3.4 3.5 2% 2% 7.4 7.6 4% 4% 11.3 11.8 5% 5% 8.6 8.2 -5% -5% 2.3 2.3 1% 1% 3.7 3.9 4% 4%
47 April 29.7 30.0 1% 1% 65.5 66.9 2% 2% 78.7 80.3 2% 2% 54.3 62.0 14% 14% 19.7 16.6 -16% -16% 35.1 34.3 -2% -2%
47 May 67.9 68.1 0% 0% 147.5 148.8 1% 1% 182.1 182.8 0% 0% 129.5 129.8 0% 0% 45.6 40.1 -12% -12% 76.6 76.5 0% 0%
47 June 58.2 59.5 2% 2% 123.8 128.6 4% 4% 156.3 161.3 3% 3% 114.9 117.1 2% 2% 38.6 34.2 -11% -9% 65.2 65.6 1% 1%
47 July 7.0 6.8 -2% -1% 14.1 14.7 4% 1% 21.3 21.2 0% 0% 15.8 14.3 -9% -5% 3.8 3.8 1% 0% 6.6 7.3 10% 3%
47 August 5.7 5.7 -1% -1% 11.7 11.7 0% 0% 17.7 17.2 -3% -3% 13.3 12.0 -10% -10% 3.4 3.4 1% 1% 5.5 5.5 0% 0%
47 September 4.9 5.0 2% 2% 9.9 10.2 3% 3% 15.1 15.3 1% 1% 11.7 10.9 -7% -7% 3.0 3.0 1% 1% 4.8 4.8 0% 0%
47 October 4.4 4.4 0% 0% 9.0 9.0 0% 0% 14.0 13.8 -1% -1% 10.9 10.0 -9% -9% 2.6 2.7 1% 1% 4.3 4.2 -1% -1%
47 November 3.9 4.0 2% 2% 7.9 8.1 3% 3% 12.4 12.7 2% 2% 9.6 9.2 -4% -4% 2.3 2.4 1% 1% 3.9 3.9 -1% -1%
47 December 3.6 3.6 0% 0% 7.4 7.7 3% 3% 11.7 12.0 2% 2% 8.9 8.4 -5% -5% 2.2 2.2 1% 1% 3.6 3.8 5% 5%
48 January 3.3 3.2 -2% -2% 7.0 7.7 10% 10% 11.0 11.8 7% 7% 8.4 8.2 -3% -3% 2.0 2.1 1% 1% 3.5 4.2 21% 21%
48 February 2.6 2.9 9% 9% 5.8 6.8 18% 18% 9.0 10.6 17% 17% 6.8 7.5 9% 9% 1.9 1.9 1% 1% 3.3 3.6 12% 12%
48 March 2.6 2.6 0% 0% 5.9 6.2 5% 5% 9.2 9.8 6% 6% 6.8 6.8 1% 1% 1.8 1.8 2% 2% 3.1 3.3 8% 8%
48 April 11.2 10.8 -3% -3% 24.7 25.0 1% 1% 31.5 31.7 1% 1% 24.0 31.7 32% 32% 5.4 3.9 -27% -22% 12.9 12.8 -1% -1%
48 May 59.7 59.2 -1% -1% 130.7 131.0 0% 0% 156.9 156.6 0% 0% 106.7 109.0 2% 2% 40.5 35.4 -13% -13% 68.2 67.9 0% 0%
48 June 69.6 71.8 3% 3% 149.2 155.2 4% 4% 186.1 193.2 4% 4% 136.0 139.5 3% 3% 47.0 41.4 -12% -11% 79.2 79.1 0% 0%
48 July 6.7 6.5 -3% -1% 13.5 13.8 2% 1% 20.3 19.9 -2% -1% 15.3 13.7 -10% -5% 3.6 3.6 2% 0% 6.2 6.7 7% 2%
48 August 5.6 5.6 -1% -1% 11.3 11.2 0% 0% 17.1 16.6 -3% -3% 13.0 11.8 -10% -10% 3.2 3.2 1% 1% 5.3 5.2 0% 0%
48 September 4.8 4.9 3% 3% 9.5 9.9 3% 3% 14.6 14.8 1% 1% 11.4 10.7 -7% -7% 2.8 2.9 1% 1% 4.6 4.6 0% 0%
48 October 4.3 4.3 -1% -1% 8.7 8.7 0% 0% 13.6 13.3 -2% -2% 10.7 9.8 -8% -8% 2.5 2.5 1% 1% 4.1 4.1 -1% -1%
48 November 4.1 4.0 -1% -1% 8.2 8.5 4% 4% 12.7 13.0 2% 2% 9.9 9.7 -2% -2% 2.4 2.4 1% 1% 4.0 4.1 4% 4%
48 December 3.7 3.6 -2% -2% 7.6 7.7 2% 2% 11.8 12.0 1% 1% 9.1 8.7 -5% -5% 2.2 2.2 0% 0% 3.7 3.8 5% 5%
49 January 3.2 3.2 -1% -1% 6.8 7.5 11% 11% 10.7 11.5 8% 8% 8.2 8.0 -3% -3% 2.0 2.0 1% 1% 3.4 4.1 22% 22%
49 February 2.6 2.8 9% 9% 5.7 6.6 17% 17% 8.9 10.4 17% 17% 6.7 7.3 9% 9% 1.9 1.9 0% 0% 3.2 3.6 11% 11%
49 March 2.6 2.6 0% 0% 5.8 5.9 2% 2% 9.0 9.4 4% 4% 6.7 6.7 1% 1% 1.7 1.8 1% 1% 3.0 3.1 3% 3%
49 April 22.8 22.8 0% 0% 50.3 51.4 2% 2% 59.9 61.3 2% 2% 42.8 52.0 21% 21% 14.1 11.3 -20% -20% 26.8 26.3 -2% -2%
49 May 61.8 61.7 0% 0% 134.5 135.1 0% 0% 164.1 163.8 0% 0% 114.0 115.3 1% 1% 41.4 36.3 -12% -12% 69.9 69.5 0% 0%
49 June 61.9 63.5 3% 3% 132.0 137.3 4% 4% 165.6 171.4 4% 4% 121.5 124.4 2% 2% 41.3 36.4 -12% -10% 69.7 70.1 0% 0%
49 July 6.7 6.5 -2% -1% 13.4 13.8 3% 1% 20.3 20.1 -1% -1% 15.3 13.7 -10% -5% 3.6 3.6 1% 0% 6.2 6.8 8% 2%
49 August 5.6 5.5 -2% -2% 11.3 11.2 -1% -1% 17.1 16.5 -3% -3% 13.0 11.7 -10% -10% 3.2 3.2 1% 1% 5.2 5.2 0% 0%
49 September 4.7 4.8 2% 2% 9.5 9.8 3% 3% 14.6 14.7 1% 1% 11.4 10.6 -6% -6% 2.8 2.9 1% 1% 4.6 4.6 0% 0%
49 October 4.3 4.3 0% 0% 8.7 8.6 0% 0% 13.5 13.3 -2% -2% 10.7 9.7 -9% -9% 2.5 2.5 1% 1% 4.1 4.0 -1% -1%
49 November 3.9 3.9 1% 1% 7.8 8.0 3% 3% 12.3 12.5 2% 2% 9.6 9.3 -3% -3% 2.3 2.4 1% 1% 3.8 3.8 0% 0%
49 December 3.6 3.5 -1% -1% 7.3 7.4 1% 1% 11.5 11.6 0% 0% 8.8 8.4 -5% -5% 2.1 2.1 1% 1% 3.6 3.6 2% 2%
50 January 3.1 3.1 -1% -1% 6.6 6.6 1% 1% 10.4 10.6 2% 2% 8.0 7.8 -3% -3% 1.9 2.0 1% 1% 3.3 3.3 1% 1%
50 February 2.5 2.7 10% 10% 5.5 6.3 14% 14% 8.6 9.9 15% 15% 6.6 7.2 9% 9% 1.8 1.9 1% 1% 3.1 3.3 6% 6%
50 March 2.5 2.5 1% 1% 5.6 6.0 8% 8% 8.8 9.5 8% 8% 6.5 6.6 2% 2% 1.7 1.7 1% 1% 3.0 3.3 12% 12%
50 April 11.4 11.0 -3% -3% 25.3 26.0 3% 3% 32.2 32.7 2% 2% 24.4 32.4 33% 33% 5.6 4.0 -28% -23% 13.3 13.4 1% 1%
50 May 39.5 38.3 -3% -3% 86.0 85.2 -1% -1% 102.3 101.2 -1% -1% 68.4 71.2 4% 4% 26.0 22.7 -13% -9% 44.5 44.2 -1% -1%
50 June 34.4 34.9 1% 1% 73.7 76.0 3% 2% 91.2 93.1 2% 1% 66.1 68.9 4% 4% 22.6 20.2 -11% -5% 38.9 38.8 0% 0%
50 July 6.2 5.9 -5% -2% 12.8 12.9 1% 0% 18.9 18.6 -2% -1% 14.0 12.8 -8% -4% 3.5 3.5 1% 0% 6.1 6.4 5% 2%
50 August 5.3 5.2 -2% -2% 10.7 10.7 0% 0% 16.1 15.8 -2% -2% 12.2 11.1 -9% -9% 3.1 3.2 1% 1% 5.1 5.1 1% 1%
50 September 4.8 4.8 -1% -1% 9.8 10.0 2% 2% 14.8 14.9 1% 1% 11.5 11.1 -4% -4% 3.0 3.0 1% 1% 4.8 4.8 -1% -1%
50 October 7.2 6.8 -6% -6% 14.8 14.4 -3% -3% 20.8 22.1 6% 6% 17.1 18.3 7% 7% 3.3 2.9 -12% -12% 7.1 7.0 -2% -2%
50 November 4.7 4.7 0% 0% 9.6 10.4 9% 9% 14.1 15.1 7% 7% 11.0 10.6 -4% -4% 2.8 2.8 1% 1% 4.8 5.4 12% 12%
50 December 4.1 4.1 -1% -1% 8.6 9.4 9% 9% 12.8 13.8 8% 8% 9.9 9.3 -6% -6% 2.6 2.6 1% 1% 4.3 5.1 18% 18%
51 January 3.6 3.6 0% 0% 7.7 8.3 8% 8% 11.5 12.4 8% 8% 8.9 8.5 -4% -4% 2.4 2.4 1% 1% 3.9 4.4 14% 14%
51 February 3.0 3.2 8% 8% 6.6 7.4 12% 12% 9.8 11.2 14% 14% 7.5 7.9 4% 4% 2.2 2.2 1% 1% 3.6 3.9 7% 7%
51 March 2.9 2.9 0% 0% 6.5 6.8 5% 5% 9.7 10.4 8% 8% 7.3 7.3 0% 0% 2.0 2.0 1% 1% 3.4 3.6 8% 8%
51 April 34.5 34.9 1% 1% 76.3 78.2 2% 2% 90.7 93.0 3% 3% 61.3 70.4 15% 15% 23.5 19.7 -16% -16% 41.1 40.4 -2% -2%
51 May 102.5 103.5 1% 1% 221.9 224.3 1% 1% 273.8 275.4 1% 1% 196.6 195.8 0% 0% 68.7 60.2 -12% -12% 115.1 114.9 0% 0%
51 June 58.5 59.6 2% 2% 123.8 128.5 4% 4% 156.7 160.8 3% 3% 115.9 117.8 2% 2% 38.4 34.0 -12% -9% 64.9 65.4 1% 1%
51 July 7.0 6.9 -1% -1% 13.9 14.4 4% 1% 21.1 20.9 -1% -1% 16.0 14.3 -11% -6% 3.7 3.7 1% 0% 6.4 7.0 9% 3%
51 August 5.8 5.7 0% 0% 11.6 11.6 0% 0% 17.6 17.0 -3% -3% 13.4 12.1 -10% -10% 3.3 3.3 1% 1% 5.4 5.4 0% 0%
51 September 4.9 5.0 3% 3% 9.7 10.0 3% 3% 15.0 15.1 1% 1% 11.7 10.9 -7% -7% 2.9 2.9 1% 1% 4.7 4.7 0% 0%
51 October 19.1 18.1 -5% -5% 41.1 40.5 -2% -2% 51.3 49.8 -3% -3% 39.5 42.9 8% 8% 10.8 9.3 -14% -14% 20.8 20.8 0% 0%
51 November 5.5 5.5 -1% -1% 11.3 11.9 5% 5% 17.0 17.5 3% 3% 12.5 11.8 -6% -6% 3.3 3.3 1% 1% 5.5 6.0 8% 8%
51 December 4.9 4.8 -1% -1% 10.0 10.2 2% 2% 15.3 15.2 -1% -1% 11.3 10.3 -9% -9% 3.0 3.1 0% 0% 4.8 5.0 4% 4%
52 January 4.3 4.3 0% 0% 8.9 9.1 3% 3% 13.8 13.8 1% 1% 10.3 9.5 -8% -8% 2.7 2.7 1% 1% 4.3 4.5 5% 5%
52 February 3.4 3.8 10% 10% 7.2 8.4 17% 17% 11.2 12.8 15% 15% 8.5 8.8 4% 4% 2.4 2.4 1% 1% 3.9 4.3 11% 11%
52 March 3.4 3.4 1% 1% 7.2 7.6 6% 6% 11.3 11.8 5% 5% 8.5 8.1 -5% -5% 2.2 2.2 1% 1% 3.6 4.0 10% 10%
52 April 17.5 17.2 -2% -2% 38.4 38.9 1% 1% 46.9 47.1 0% 0% 34.4 41.4 20% 20% 10.4 8.5 -18% -18% 20.4 19.9 -2% -2%
52 May 81.4 81.8 1% 1% 177.4 179.0 1% 1% 217.9 218.7 0% 0% 151.9 152.5 0% 0% 55.5 48.7 -12% -12% 92.5 92.2 0% 0%
52 June 33.6 33.6 0% 0% 70.5 72.8 3% 2% 90.0 91.8 2% 1% 66.5 68.3 3% 2% 21.3 19.1 -11% -5% 36.5 37.0 1% 1%
52 July 6.7 6.5 -3% -1% 13.6 13.8 1% 1% 20.5 20.2 -1% -1% 15.2 13.8 -9% -5% 3.7 3.7 1% 0% 6.4 6.8 6% 2%
52 August 5.6 5.5 -1% -1% 11.4 11.4 0% 0% 17.2 16.8 -2% -2% 13.0 11.8 -10% -10% 3.3 3.4 1% 1% 5.4 5.4 0% 0%
52 September 4.7 4.9 2% 2% 9.6 9.9 3% 3% 14.7 14.9 1% 1% 11.3 10.6 -6% -6% 2.9 3.0 0% 0% 4.7 4.7 -1% -1%
52 October 5.5 5.2 -6% -6% 11.2 10.9 -3% -3% 16.8 16.2 -4% -4% 13.6 13.5 0% 0% 3.0 2.8 -4% -4% 5.3 5.2 -1% -1%
52 November 4.4 4.4 0% 0% 8.9 9.1 3% 3% 13.5 13.8 2% 2% 10.5 10.1 -4% -4% 2.6 2.6 1% 1% 4.4 4.4 2% 2%
52 December 3.9 3.8 -1% -1% 8.1 8.4 4% 4% 12.5 12.8 3% 3% 9.5 9.1 -5% -5% 2.4 2.4 1% 1% 4.0 4.3 8% 8%
53 January 3.4 3.4 -1% -1% 7.3 7.5 3% 3% 11.3 11.6 3% 3% 8.5 8.3 -3% -3% 2.2 2.2 1% 1% 3.7 3.8 5% 5%
53 February 2.8 3.1 11% 11% 6.0 7.0 16% 16% 9.3 10.8 16% 16% 7.1 7.7 9% 9% 2.0 2.0 1% 1% 3.4 3.7 8% 8%
53 March 2.8 2.8 0% 0% 6.2 6.3 2% 2% 9.5 9.9 4% 4% 7.0 7.1 0% 0% 1.9 1.9 1% 1% 3.2 3.3 3% 3%
53 April 9.9 9.5 -4% -4% 21.7 22.1 2% 2% 28.1 28.4 1% 1% 21.7 28.7 32% 32% 4.6 3.3 -28% -19% 11.2 11.3 1% 1%
53 May 65.5 65.4 0% 0% 143.8 144.1 0% 0% 172.8 172.1 0% 0% 117.6 120.2 2% 2% 44.8 39.1 -13% -13% 75.3 74.5 -1% -1%
53 June 32.5 32.6 0% 0% 68.5 71.0 4% 2% 86.0 88.4 3% 2% 63.2 65.9 4% 3% 20.7 18.5 -11% -5% 35.7 36.2 2% 1%
53 July 6.5 6.2 -4% -2% 13.3 13.4 1% 0% 19.7 19.4 -1% -1% 14.6 13.4 -8% -4% 3.6 3.6 1% 0% 6.3 6.7 6% 2%
53 August 5.5 5.4 -2% -2% 11.1 11.1 -1% -1% 16.8 16.3 -3% -3% 12.7 11.5 -9% -9% 3.2 3.3 1% 1% 5.3 5.3 0% 0%
53 September 4.8 4.8 0% 0% 9.7 10.0 2% 2% 14.8 14.9 0% 0% 11.5 10.9 -5% -5% 2.9 3.0 0% 0% 4.8 4.7 0% 0%
53 October 4.8 4.6 -5% -5% 9.7 9.5 -2% -2% 14.8 14.3 -3% -3% 11.7 11.0 -6% -6% 2.8 2.8 1% 1% 4.6 4.5 -1% -1%
53 November 4.1 4.1 -1% -1% 8.4 8.9 6% 6% 12.8 13.4 5% 5% 10.0 9.7 -2% -2% 2.5 2.5 1% 1% 4.1 4.5 9% 9%
53 December 3.7 3.7 -1% -1% 7.7 7.9 2% 2% 11.9 12.2 2% 2% 9.1 8.8 -4% -4% 2.3 2.3 1% 1% 3.8 4.0 5% 5%
54 January 3.3 3.3 0% 0% 7.0 7.5 8% 8% 10.8 11.5 7% 7% 8.3 8.1 -2% -2% 2.1 2.1 0% 0% 3.5 4.0 14% 14%
54 February 2.7 2.9 10% 10% 5.8 6.8 17% 17% 8.9 10.5 18% 18% 6.8 7.5 10% 10% 1.9 2.0 1% 1% 3.3 3.6 10% 10%
54 March 2.7 2.7 0% 0% 6.0 6.3 5% 5% 9.1 9.7 7% 7% 6.8 6.9 2% 2% 1.8 1.8 1% 1% 3.1 3.3 8% 8%
54 April 24.6 24.6 0% 0% 54.6 55.8 2% 2% 64.6 66.3 3% 3% 45.4 54.6 20% 20% 15.4 12.5 -19% -19% 29.3 28.8 -2% -2%
54 May 58.4 58.2 0% 0% 127.0 127.9 1% 1% 155.2 154.6 0% 0% 107.7 109.0 1% 1% 38.9 34.2 -12% -12% 65.9 65.9 0% 0%
54 June 72.6 74.9 3% 3% 155.3 161.4 4% 4% 194.4 201.4 4% 4% 142.6 145.8 2% 2% 48.9 43.1 -12% -12% 82.3 82.1 0% 0%
54 July 6.8 6.7 -2% -1% 13.7 14.4 5% 2% 20.7 20.7 0% 0% 15.6 14.0 -10% -5% 3.6 3.6 1% 0% 6.3 7.1 13% 4%
54 August 5.7 5.7 0% 0% 11.4 11.4 0% 0% 17.3 16.8 -3% -3% 13.2 11.9 -10% -10% 3.2 3.3 1% 1% 5.3 5.3 0% 0%
54 September 21.7 21.2 -2% -2% 46.2 46.9 1% 1% 58.1 58.4 1% 1% 44.2 48.3 9% 9% 13.0 11.3 -13% -13% 24.0 23.9 0% 0%
54 October 18.6 17.6 -5% -5% 38.9 38.6 -1% -1% 50.4 49.4 -2% -2% 37.3 37.7 1% 1% 10.8 9.8 -9% -9% 19.3 19.6 2% 2%
54 November 6.0 6.0 0% 0% 12.6 13.2 4% 4% 18.7 19.1 2% 2% 13.6 12.8 -6% -6% 3.8 3.8 1% 1% 6.3 6.6 5% 5%
54 December 5.3 5.3 -1% -1% 11.0 11.1 1% 1% 16.6 16.3 -2% -2% 12.2 11.1 -9% -9% 3.4 3.4 1% 1% 5.3 5.4 2% 2%
55 January 4.6 4.7 2% 2% 9.6 9.9 3% 3% 14.7 14.8 1% 1% 11.1 10.1 -9% -9% 3.0 3.0 1% 1% 4.7 4.9 4% 4%
55 February 3.9 4.2 8% 8% 8.0 9.0 12% 12% 12.4 13.7 10% 10% 9.5 9.4 -1% -1% 2.6 2.7 1% 1% 4.2 4.5 8% 8%
55 March 3.6 3.7 2% 2% 7.7 8.3 7% 7% 12.0 12.7 6% 6% 9.1 8.6 -5% -5% 2.4 2.4 1% 1% 3.8 4.3 11% 11%
55 April 21.2 21.2 0% 0% 46.8 47.7 2% 2% 56.5 57.6 2% 2% 40.8 47.8 17% 17% 13.4 11.2 -16% -16% 24.9 24.6 -1% -1%
55 May 54.5 54.1 -1% -1% 118.5 119.0 0% 0% 146.3 145.8 0% 0% 101.6 102.4 1% 1% 36.8 32.4 -12% -12% 61.5 61.4 0% 0%
55 June 29.8 29.9 0% 0% 62.9 64.7 3% 2% 80.0 82.1 3% 1% 59.0 61.3 4% 3% 19.0 17.1 -10% -4% 32.8 32.8 0% 0%
55 July 6.7 6.4 -4% -2% 13.8 13.9 1% 0% 20.4 20.1 -1% -1% 15.0 13.7 -8% -4% 3.8 3.9 1% 0% 6.6 6.9 5% 1%
55 August 5.5 5.5 -1% -1% 11.4 11.4 0% 0% 17.2 16.8 -2% -2% 12.9 11.7 -9% -9% 3.4 3.4 1% 1% 5.5 5.5 -1% -1%
55 September 4.7 4.8 3% 3% 9.7 10.0 3% 3% 14.7 15.0 2% 2% 11.3 10.6 -6% -6% 3.0 3.0 1% 1% 4.8 4.8 -1% -1%
55 October 5.4 5.1 -6% -6% 11.1 10.8 -3% -3% 16.5 16.0 -3% -3% 13.2 13.1 -1% -1% 3.0 2.9 -4% -4% 5.2 5.2 -1% -1%
55 November 4.4 4.4 0% 0% 8.9 9.6 8% 8% 13.4 14.3 7% 7% 10.5 10.1 -3% -3% 2.6 2.6 1% 1% 4.4 4.9 12% 12%
55 December 3.9 3.8 -1% -1% 8.1 8.1 1% 1% 12.4 12.6 2% 2% 9.4 9.0 -4% -4% 2.4 2.4 1% 1% 4.0 4.0 1% 1%
56 January 3.4 3.4 0% 0% 7.3 7.4 2% 2% 11.2 11.6 3% 3% 8.6 8.3 -3% -3% 2.2 2.2 1% 1% 3.7 3.7 1% 1%
56 February 2.8 3.1 12% 12% 6.1 7.2 19% 19% 9.3 11.1 20% 20% 7.0 7.7 10% 10% 2.0 2.1 1% 1% 3.5 3.9 13% 13%
56 March 2.8 2.8 0% 0% 6.2 6.7 7% 7% 9.4 10.3 9% 9% 7.0 7.1 1% 1% 1.9 1.9 1% 1% 3.2 3.6 12% 12%
56 April 14.4 14.0 -3% -3% 31.8 32.4 2% 2% 39.2 39.7 1% 1% 28.9 37.0 28% 28% 7.9 6.1 -23% -23% 16.7 16.7 0% 0%
56 May 72.3 72.5 0% 0% 158.0 159.0 1% 1% 191.2 191.7 0% 0% 131.7 133.3 1% 1% 49.2 43.1 -12% -12% 82.5 82.0 0% 0%
56 June 50.9 51.8 2% 2% 108.1 111.9 4% 3% 135.5 139.7 3% 3% 99.6 102.7 3% 3% 33.5 29.7 -11% -8% 56.8 57.0 0% 0%
56 July 6.7 6.5 -3% -2% 13.6 14.1 3% 1% 20.4 20.3 0% 0% 15.3 13.9 -9% -5% 3.7 3.7 1% 0% 6.4 7.0 10% 3%
56 August 5.7 5.6 -1% -1% 11.4 11.4 0% 0% 17.2 16.7 -3% -3% 13.1 11.8 -9% -9% 3.3 3.3 1% 1% 5.3 5.3 0% 0%
56 September 8.0 7.7 -3% -3% 16.4 16.5 1% 1% 23.0 22.7 -1% -1% 18.9 20.6 9% 9% 3.7 3.3 -11% -11% 8.0 7.9 -1% -1%
56 October 15.6 14.6 -6% -6% 32.9 32.3 -2% -2% 41.5 40.2 -3% -3% 31.9 33.6 5% 5% 8.6 7.6 -11% -11% 16.3 16.4 0% 0%
56 November 5.8 5.7 -1% -1% 12.0 12.7 6% 6% 17.6 18.2 4% 4% 12.9 12.2 -5% -5% 3.7 3.7 1% 1% 6.0 6.6 9% 9%
56 December 5.1 5.0 -2% -2% 10.6 10.8 2% 2% 15.8 15.9 1% 1% 11.6 10.7 -8% -8% 3.3 3.3 0% 0% 5.2 5.4 5% 5%
57 January 4.5 4.5 0% 0% 9.3 9.6 3% 3% 14.1 14.4 2% 2% 10.6 9.8 -8% -8% 2.9 3.0 0% 0% 4.6 4.8 4% 4%
57 February 3.6 4.0 10% 10% 7.6 8.7 15% 15% 11.5 13.2 15% 15% 8.7 9.0 4% 4% 2.6 2.6 1% 1% 4.2 4.5 7% 7%
57 March 3.5 3.5 0% 0% 7.5 7.8 4% 4% 11.6 12.1 4% 4% 8.7 8.3 -4% -4% 2.4 2.4 1% 1% 3.8 4.1 6% 6%
57 April 31.7 32.0 1% 1% 69.9 71.6 2% 2% 84.1 85.9 2% 2% 57.4 65.2 14% 14% 21.4 18.1 -15% -15% 37.6 36.9 -2% -2%
57 May 55.9 55.7 0% 0% 121.2 122.0 1% 1% 149.7 149.9 0% 0% 106.1 106.7 1% 1% 37.2 32.8 -12% -12% 62.8 62.8 0% 0%
57 June 35.7 36.0 1% 1% 75.6 77.9 3% 2% 95.8 98.4 3% 2% 70.6 73.5 4% 4% 23.1 20.7 -11% -5% 39.4 39.6 0% 0%
57 July 6.8 6.6 -3% -1% 13.9 14.1 1% 0% 20.7 20.4 -1% -1% 15.3 14.0 -9% -4% 3.8 3.9 1% 0% 6.6 7.0 5% 2%
57 August 5.6 5.6 0% 0% 11.6 11.6 0% 0% 17.4 17.0 -2% -2% 13.1 11.9 -9% -9% 3.4 3.4 1% 1% 5.6 5.5 0% 0%
57 September 4.8 4.9 2% 2% 9.8 10.0 3% 3% 14.9 15.1 1% 1% 11.4 10.7 -6% -6% 3.0 3.0 1% 1% 4.8 4.8 -1% -1%
57 October 35.0 34.1 -3% -3% 76.2 75.9 0% 0% 94.1 93.1 -1% -1% 67.5 70.9 5% 5% 22.5 19.4 -14% -14% 39.3 39.3 0% 0%
57 November 5.9 5.9 0% 0% 12.1 13.3 10% 10% 18.1 19.1 6% 6% 13.3 12.6 -5% -5% 3.4 3.4 1% 1% 5.9 6.9 16% 16%
57 December 5.2 5.2 -1% -1% 10.7 10.9 1% 1% 16.2 16.1 -1% -1% 12.1 11.0 -9% -9% 3.2 3.2 1% 1% 5.1 5.3 3% 3%
58 January 4.6 4.6 1% 1% 9.4 9.6 2% 2% 14.4 14.4 0% 0% 11.0 10.1 -9% -9% 2.8 2.8 1% 1% 4.5 4.6 2% 2%
58 February 4.1 4.4 6% 6% 8.4 9.5 13% 13% 12.8 14.3 12% 12% 10.0 10.5 5% 5% 2.7 2.7 1% 1% 4.4 4.8 8% 8%
58 March 4.0 3.9 -1% -1% 8.2 8.5 3% 3% 12.6 13.0 3% 3% 9.8 9.4 -4% -4% 2.4 2.5 1% 1% 4.0 4.3 6% 6%
58 April 13.2 12.9 -3% -3% 29.0 29.4 2% 2% 36.5 36.8 1% 1% 28.0 34.1 22% 22% 7.1 5.7 -19% -19% 15.2 15.1 0% 0%
58 May 66.8 66.7 0% 0% 145.7 146.3 0% 0% 177.8 178.1 0% 0% 123.6 124.8 1% 1% 45.6 40.1 -12% -12% 75.9 75.4 -1% -1%
58 June 61.2 62.7 3% 3% 130.6 135.8 4% 4% 164.1 170.0 4% 4% 120.3 127.0 6% 6% 41.0 36.3 -12% -10% 69.0 69.4 1% 1%
58 July 7.1 6.9 -3% -1% 14.4 14.8 3% 1% 21.4 21.3 0% 0% 16.0 14.6 -9% -5% 3.9 3.9 1% 0% 6.7 7.3 9% 3%
58 August 5.9 5.8 -1% -1% 11.9 11.9 0% 0% 17.9 17.5 -2% -2% 13.5 12.2 -9% -9% 3.5 3.5 1% 1% 5.7 5.7 0% 0%
58 September 5.0 5.1 2% 2% 10.1 10.3 3% 3% 15.3 15.4 1% 1% 11.9 11.1 -6% -6% 3.1 3.1 1% 1% 4.9 4.9 -1% -1%
58 October 5.3 5.1 -5% -5% 10.8 10.5 -2% -2% 16.3 15.7 -3% -3% 13.0 12.6 -3% -3% 3.0 2.9 -2% -2% 5.1 5.0 -1% -1%
58 November 4.5 4.5 1% 1% 9.1 9.6 6% 6% 13.8 14.4 4% 4% 10.8 10.4 -3% -3% 2.6 2.6 1% 1% 4.5 4.8 8% 8%
58 December 4.0 4.0 -2% -2% 8.3 8.3 0% 0% 12.8 12.8 0% 0% 9.7 9.3 -5% -5% 2.4 2.5 1% 1% 4.1 4.1 1% 1%
59 January 3.6 3.5 -1% -1% 7.5 8.0 7% 7% 11.6 12.3 6% 6% 8.8 8.5 -3% -3% 2.2 2.3 1% 1% 3.7 4.2 14% 14%
59 February 3.0 3.2 7% 7% 6.4 6.9 7% 7% 9.9 10.8 9% 9% 7.5 7.9 6% 6% 2.1 2.1 0% 0% 3.5 3.5 0% 0%
59 March 2.9 2.8 -1% -1% 6.3 6.7 6% 6% 9.8 10.4 7% 7% 7.3 7.3 0% 0% 1.9 1.9 1% 1% 3.3 3.6 11% 11%
59 April 4.9 4.6 -5% -4% 10.3 10.5 2% 1% 14.7 15.1 3% 2% 12.3 15.5 27% 21% 2.5 2.0 -19% -7% 5.1 5.2 1% 1%
59 May 42.8 41.8 -2% -2% 94.3 93.4 -1% -1% 112.2 110.9 -1% -1% 74.9 80.7 8% 8% 27.8 23.7 -15% -11% 49.3 48.4 -2% -2%
59 June 78.3 81.5 4% 4% 169.1 176.7 5% 5% 209.1 217.6 4% 4% 151.0 155.7 3% 3% 53.7 47.2 -12% -12% 90.4 90.4 0% 0%
59 July 6.7 6.5 -4% -2% 13.4 13.9 3% 1% 20.1 19.9 -1% -1% 15.0 13.7 -9% -5% 3.5 3.5 1% 0% 6.1 6.8 11% 3%
59 August 5.7 5.6 -2% -2% 11.4 11.3 -1% -1% 17.2 16.6 -4% -4% 13.0 11.9 -9% -9% 3.2 3.2 1% 1% 5.3 5.2 -1% -1%
59 September 4.9 5.0 2% 2% 9.7 10.0 3% 3% 14.9 14.9 0% 0% 11.7 11.0 -6% -6% 2.9 2.9 1% 1% 4.7 4.6 -1% -1%
59 October 4.4 4.4 -1% -1% 8.9 8.9 -1% -1% 13.8 13.5 -2% -2% 10.9 10.0 -8% -8% 2.5 2.6 1% 1% 4.2 4.1 -1% -1%
59 November 3.9 3.9 2% 2% 7.8 8.4 7% 7% 12.2 12.8 5% 5% 9.5 9.2 -3% -3% 2.3 2.4 1% 1% 3.9 4.2 9% 9%
59 December 3.6 3.5 -1% -1% 7.4 8.5 15% 15% 11.6 12.6 9% 9% 8.8 8.4 -4% -4% 2.1 2.2 2% 2% 3.6 4.7 30% 30%
60 January 3.1 3.1 -1% -1% 6.7 7.5 12% 12% 10.5 11.4 9% 9% 8.0 7.8 -2% -2% 2.0 2.0 0% 0% 3.4 4.1 24% 24%
60 February 2.5 2.8 10% 10% 5.5 6.2 13% 13% 8.7 9.9 14% 14% 6.6 7.3 10% 10% 1.8 1.9 1% 1% 3.1 3.2 3% 3%
60 March 2.6 2.6 0% 0% 5.7 5.7 1% 1% 8.8 9.2 4% 4% 6.5 6.7 2% 2% 1.7 1.7 1% 1% 3.0 2.9 -1% -1%
60 April 42.2 43.0 2% 2% 93.4 96.6 3% 3% 111.4 114.8 3% 3% 75.5 85.8 14% 14% 28.7 24.0 -16% -16% 50.4 50.1 -1% -1%
60 May 68.3 68.6 0% 0% 147.4 148.9 1% 1% 181.9 182.6 0% 0% 131.4 132.1 1% 1% 44.8 39.2 -12% -12% 76.0 76.1 0% 0%
60 June 94.6 97.8 3% 3% 201.7 209.9 4% 4% 253.5 262.0 3% 3% 187.0 195.9 5% 5% 63.6 55.9 -12% -12% 106.7 106.6 0% 0%
60 July 12.9 12.3 -5% -4% 25.9 26.1 1% 1% 35.5 34.7 -2% -2% 28.6 28.1 -2% -2% 6.2 5.7 -8% -3% 12.1 12.8 6% 3%
60 August 6.6 6.5 -2% -2% 13.4 13.3 0% 0% 19.9 19.3 -3% -3% 15.1 13.7 -9% -9% 3.8 3.8 1% 1% 6.3 6.3 0% 0%
60 September 6.7 6.6 -2% -2% 13.6 13.8 1% 1% 19.9 19.8 0% 0% 15.5 15.7 1% 1% 3.8 3.7 -2% -2% 6.7 6.6 -1% -1%
60 October 5.6 5.4 -4% -4% 11.3 11.1 -1% -1% 16.9 16.3 -3% -3% 12.9 11.8 -9% -9% 3.3 3.3 1% 1% 5.3 5.4 1% 1%
60 November 4.7 4.8 2% 2% 9.6 10.1 5% 5% 14.6 15.1 3% 3% 11.3 10.8 -5% -5% 3.0 3.0 0% 0% 4.7 4.9 4% 4%
60 December 4.3 4.2 -2% -2% 8.9 8.8 0% 0% 13.7 13.5 -1% -1% 10.5 9.8 -6% -6% 2.6 2.7 1% 1% 4.3 4.3 1% 1%
61 January 3.8 3.7 -2% -2% 8.0 8.4 5% 5% 12.4 12.8 3% 3% 9.4 8.9 -5% -5% 2.4 2.4 1% 1% 3.9 4.3 11% 11%
61 February 3.1 3.4 9% 9% 6.6 7.3 12% 12% 10.3 11.5 12% 12% 7.7 8.3 8% 8% 2.2 2.2 0% 0% 3.6 3.7 2% 2%
61 March 3.0 3.0 -1% -1% 6.6 6.9 5% 5% 10.4 10.8 4% 4% 7.8 7.7 -1% -1% 2.0 2.1 1% 1% 3.4 3.7 8% 8%
61 April 8.0 7.6 -5% -5% 17.0 16.9 0% 0% 23.0 22.9 0% 0% 19.0 24.5 29% 29% 3.3 2.2 -31% -15% 8.5 8.3 -3% -2%
61 May 35.6 34.5 -3% -3% 78.0 77.0 -1% -1% 93.0 91.5 -2% -1% 61.4 65.3 6% 6% 23.7 20.7 -13% -8% 40.5 39.9 -2% -1%
61 June 22.2 21.7 -2% -1% 46.9 47.8 2% 1% 58.5 58.7 0% 0% 41.8 44.2 6% 3% 13.8 12.5 -9% -3% 24.3 24.4 0% 0%
61 July 6.2 5.9 -5% -2% 12.9 12.9 -1% 0% 18.9 18.4 -3% -1% 13.8 12.7 -8% -4% 3.7 3.7 1% 0% 6.3 6.5 3% 1%
61 August 5.3 5.2 -2% -2% 10.9 10.8 0% 0% 16.2 15.8 -2% -2% 12.0 11.0 -8% -8% 3.3 3.3 1% 1% 5.3 5.3 0% 0%
61 September 4.4 4.6 5% 5% 9.2 9.6 4% 4% 13.8 14.3 3% 3% 10.6 10.1 -5% -5% 2.9 2.9 1% 1% 4.7 4.6 -1% -1%
61 October 5.3 5.1 -5% -5% 11.0 10.8 -2% -2% 16.0 15.8 -2% -2% 13.0 13.2 2% 2% 3.0 2.8 -4% -4% 5.3 5.2 -1% -1%
61 November 4.1 4.2 2% 2% 8.6 9.2 7% 7% 12.8 13.6 7% 7% 9.9 9.7 -2% -2% 2.6 2.6 1% 1% 4.4 4.7 7% 7%
61 December 3.6 3.7 2% 2% 7.8 8.2 5% 5% 11.7 12.3 6% 6% 9.0 8.7 -3% -3% 2.4 2.4 1% 1% 4.0 4.3 7% 7%
62 January 3.2 3.3 2% 2% 7.1 8.0 12% 12% 10.6 11.8 11% 11% 8.1 8.0 -2% -2% 2.2 2.2 1% 1% 3.7 4.4 20% 20%
62 February 2.7 3.0 12% 12% 5.9 6.8 14% 14% 8.9 10.4 17% 17% 6.7 7.4 12% 12% 2.0 2.1 1% 1% 3.4 3.5 3% 3%
62 March 2.7 2.7 1% 1% 6.1 6.5 5% 5% 9.1 9.8 8% 8% 6.7 6.8 3% 3% 1.9 1.9 1% 1% 3.3 3.5 8% 8%
62 April 6.4 6.1 -5% -5% 14.0 14.3 2% 1% 19.0 19.5 2% 2% 15.9 21.0 32% 32% 2.9 2.0 -29% -12% 7.2 7.2 1% 1%
62 May 58.0 57.6 -1% -1% 127.8 127.7 0% 0% 152.1 151.3 -1% -1% 101.2 105.5 4% 4% 39.3 34.0 -13% -13% 66.9 66.2 -1% -1%
62 June 82.4 85.4 4% 4% 176.9 184.5 4% 4% 219.6 228.1 4% 4% 160.0 164.2 3% 3% 56.1 49.3 -12% -12% 94.2 94.1 0% 0%
62 July 6.8 6.6 -3% -2% 13.6 14.1 4% 1% 20.3 20.1 -1% 0% 15.4 13.8 -10% -5% 3.6 3.6 1% 0% 6.2 6.9 12% 3%
62 August 5.7 5.7 -1% -1% 11.4 11.4 0% 0% 17.2 16.7 -3% -3% 13.2 11.9 -10% -10% 3.2 3.2 1% 1% 5.3 5.3 0% 0%
62 September 4.8 4.9 3% 3% 9.6 9.9 3% 3% 14.7 14.8 0% 0% 11.5 10.8 -7% -7% 2.9 2.9 1% 1% 4.6 4.6 -1% -1%
62 October 19.4 18.4 -5% -5% 41.8 41.1 -2% -2% 51.7 50.2 -3% -3% 39.8 43.3 9% 9% 11.0 9.4 -14% -14% 21.2 21.1 0% 0%
62 November 5.5 5.5 -1% -1% 11.3 11.9 6% 6% 16.9 17.4 3% 3% 12.5 11.8 -6% -6% 3.2 3.3 1% 1% 5.5 6.0 9% 9%
62 December 4.9 4.8 -1% -1% 10.0 10.3 3% 3% 15.2 15.2 0% 0% 11.3 10.3 -9% -9% 3.0 3.1 0% 0% 4.8 5.1 5% 5%
63 January 4.3 4.3 0% 0% 8.8 9.1 3% 3% 13.7 13.8 1% 1% 10.3 9.5 -8% -8% 2.7 2.7 1% 1% 4.3 4.5 5% 5%
63 February 3.6 3.8 6% 6% 7.4 8.5 14% 14% 11.5 12.9 12% 12% 8.7 8.7 0% 0% 2.4 2.4 1% 1% 3.9 4.4 13% 13%
63 March 3.8 3.6 -5% -5% 7.9 7.9 -1% -1% 12.2 12.2 0% 0% 9.4 9.1 -2% -2% 2.4 2.4 1% 1% 3.9 4.0 2% 2%
63 April 6.1 5.8 -5% -5% 12.6 12.6 0% 0% 17.9 18.0 0% 0% 15.0 17.9 19% 18% 2.9 2.4 -17% -7% 6.2 6.1 -2% -1%
63 May 47.0 46.0 -2% -2% 103.2 102.5 -1% -1% 124.0 122.4 -1% -1% 83.5 87.8 5% 5% 31.3 27.1 -13% -11% 53.9 53.2 -1% -1%
63 June 47.4 48.8 3% 3% 101.9 105.9 4% 3% 126.7 131.2 4% 3% 91.6 95.0 4% 4% 32.0 28.3 -11% -7% 54.1 54.1 0% 0%
63 July 6.7 6.4 -5% -2% 13.7 13.9 2% 1% 20.3 20.1 -1% -1% 15.0 13.8 -8% -4% 3.8 3.8 1% 0% 6.5 7.0 7% 2%
63 August 5.8 5.7 -3% -3% 11.9 11.7 -1% -1% 17.7 17.1 -3% -3% 13.3 12.2 -8% -8% 3.4 3.5 2% 2% 5.6 5.6 -1% -1%
63 September 9.7 9.4 -3% -3% 20.4 20.6 1% 1% 27.7 27.4 -1% -1% 22.9 25.3 11% 11% 4.6 4.0 -14% -14% 10.2 10.2 -1% -1%
63 October 12.2 11.4 -6% -6% 25.0 24.5 -2% -2% 32.5 31.5 -3% -3% 24.7 25.6 4% 4% 6.3 5.7 -9% -9% 12.0 12.1 1% 1%
63 November 5.8 5.7 -1% -1% 12.1 12.8 6% 6% 17.4 18.1 4% 4% 12.9 12.2 -5% -5% 3.8 3.9 1% 1% 6.1 6.6 9% 9%
63 December 5.2 5.1 -2% -2% 10.8 11.1 3% 3% 15.7 16.1 2% 2% 11.7 10.7 -8% -8% 3.5 3.5 1% 1% 5.3 5.7 7% 7%
64 January 4.5 4.5 0% 0% 9.5 10.5 10% 10% 14.0 15.2 8% 8% 10.6 9.8 -7% -7% 3.0 3.1 0% 0% 4.7 5.6 20% 20%
64 February 3.6 4.0 11% 11% 7.6 8.8 15% 15% 11.4 13.2 15% 15% 8.7 9.0 4% 4% 2.7 2.7 1% 1% 4.3 4.5 6% 6%
64 March 3.5 3.5 1% 1% 7.6 7.7 1% 1% 11.5 11.9 3% 3% 8.8 8.4 -4% -4% 2.4 2.5 1% 1% 3.9 3.9 0% 0%
64 April 37.5 38.0 1% 1% 82.8 85.0 3% 3% 99.6 101.9 2% 2% 67.0 75.2 12% 12% 25.9 22.1 -15% -15% 44.7 44.0 -2% -2%
64 May 74.9 75.2 0% 0% 162.1 163.5 1% 1% 200.6 201.7 1% 1% 144.1 144.1 0% 0% 50.0 44.0 -12% -12% 84.0 83.8 0% 0%
64 June 44.8 45.3 1% 1% 94.6 97.9 3% 3% 120.3 123.2 2% 2% 88.7 90.6 2% 2% 29.1 25.9 -11% -7% 49.5 49.8 1% 0%
64 July 7.0 6.9 -2% -1% 14.3 14.7 3% 1% 21.3 21.2 -1% 0% 15.9 14.4 -10% -5% 3.9 3.9 1% 0% 6.7 7.2 7% 2%
64 August 5.8 5.7 -1% -1% 11.9 11.8 0% 0% 17.8 17.4 -2% -2% 13.4 12.1 -9% -9% 3.5 3.5 1% 1% 5.6 5.7 0% 0%
64 September 5.3 5.3 0% 0% 10.6 10.8 2% 2% 16.1 16.1 0% 0% 12.5 11.9 -5% -5% 3.2 3.2 1% 1% 5.2 5.2 -1% -1%
64 October 7.5 7.0 -6% -6% 15.3 14.9 -3% -3% 21.8 20.9 -4% -4% 17.7 18.6 5% 5% 3.5 3.1 -10% -10% 7.3 7.2 -1% -1%
64 November 5.0 5.0 -1% -1% 10.2 10.5 3% 3% 15.2 15.5 2% 2% 11.7 11.2 -4% -4% 3.0 3.0 1% 1% 5.0 5.1 2% 2%
64 December 4.5 4.4 -2% -2% 9.3 9.5 3% 3% 14.0 14.2 2% 2% 10.6 10.0 -6% -6% 2.8 2.8 1% 1% 4.5 4.8 7% 7%
65 January 3.9 3.9 -1% -1% 8.3 9.4 14% 14% 12.6 13.9 10% 10% 9.5 9.1 -5% -5% 2.5 2.5 1% 1% 4.1 5.2 28% 28%
65 February 3.2 3.5 10% 10% 6.8 7.7 14% 14% 10.4 11.9 14% 14% 7.9 8.4 7% 7% 2.3 2.3 1% 1% 3.8 4.0 4% 4%
65 March 3.2 3.2 0% 0% 6.9 7.2 4% 4% 10.6 11.1 5% 5% 7.9 7.8 -1% -1% 2.1 2.2 1% 1% 3.6 3.8 7% 7%
65 April 6.0 5.7 -5% -5% 12.8 12.9 1% 1% 17.8 18.1 2% 1% 14.8 18.5 25% 24% 2.9 2.3 -20% -9% 6.4 6.4 0% 0%
65 May 73.8 74.0 0% 0% 162.7 163.4 0% 0% 196.0 196.1 0% 0% 134.0 138.3 3% 3% 50.4 43.6 -13% -13% 85.5 84.6 -1% -1%
65 June 98.9 102.4 4% 4% 211.4 220.4 4% 4% 264.3 274.2 4% 4% 193.4 200.8 4% 4% 66.9 58.8 -12% -12% 112.1 112.2 0% 0%
65 July 7.1 6.9 -3% -2% 14.0 14.9 6% 2% 21.2 21.2 0% 0% 16.0 14.5 -9% -5% 3.7 3.7 1% 0% 6.4 7.4 16% 5%
65 August 5.9 5.9 0% 0% 11.8 11.8 0% 0% 17.8 17.2 -3% -3% 13.6 12.4 -9% -9% 3.3 3.3 1% 1% 5.4 5.4 0% 0%
65 September 23.0 22.5 -2% -2% 48.8 49.6 2% 2% 61.4 61.7 0% 0% 46.6 50.6 9% 9% 13.8 12.0 -13% -13% 25.4 25.3 0% 0%
65 October 13.1 12.3 -6% -6% 27.1 26.8 -1% -1% 35.8 35.0 -2% -2% 27.7 27.9 1% 1% 6.9 6.3 -9% -9% 13.1 13.4 3% 3%
65 November 6.0 6.1 0% 0% 12.5 13.5 7% 7% 18.6 19.3 4% 4% 13.6 12.8 -6% -6% 3.9 3.9 1% 1% 6.3 6.9 10% 10%
65 December 5.3 5.3 -1% -1% 11.0 11.6 5% 5% 16.6 16.8 1% 1% 12.2 11.1 -9% -9% 3.5 3.5 1% 1% 5.4 5.9 10% 10%
66 January 4.7 4.7 0% 0% 9.7 10.5 8% 8% 14.8 15.5 4% 4% 11.1 10.2 -8% -8% 3.0 3.0 1% 1% 4.7 5.5 16% 16%
66 February 3.8 4.2 11% 11% 7.9 9.0 14% 14% 12.2 13.7 12% 12% 9.2 9.5 3% 3% 2.7 2.7 1% 1% 4.3 4.5 4% 4%
66 March 3.7 3.7 1% 1% 7.9 8.4 7% 7% 12.2 12.9 5% 5% 9.2 8.7 -5% -5% 2.4 2.5 1% 1% 3.9 4.4 12% 12%
66 April 13.6 13.2 -3% -3% 29.8 30.1 1% 1% 37.6 37.6 0% 0% 28.4 34.5 22% 22% 7.6 6.2 -18% -18% 15.7 15.4 -2% -2%
66 May 109.3 110.4 1% 1% 238.0 240.2 1% 1% 293.0 294.8 1% 1% 206.3 209.5 2% 2% 74.8 65.5 -12% -12% 124.1 123.3 -1% -1%
66 June 91.4 94.2 3% 3% 194.5 202.8 4% 4% 244.9 253.2 3% 3% 180.9 189.6 5% 5% 61.4 54.1 -12% -12% 102.7 103.3 1% 1%
66 July 7.5 7.3 -3% -1% 14.9 15.4 3% 1% 22.4 22.1 -1% -1% 17.0 15.4 -9% -5% 3.9 4.0 1% 0% 6.8 7.5 10% 3%
66 August 6.1 6.1 -1% -1% 12.3 12.3 0% 0% 18.5 18.0 -3% -3% 14.0 12.8 -9% -9% 3.5 3.5 1% 1% 5.8 5.7 0% 0%
66 September 5.2 5.3 2% 2% 10.3 10.6 3% 3% 15.7 15.8 1% 1% 12.2 11.4 -6% -6% 3.1 3.1 1% 1% 4.9 4.9 0% 0%
66 October 5.1 4.8 -5% -5% 10.2 9.9 -2% -2% 15.6 15.0 -4% -4% 12.3 11.4 -7% -7% 2.9 2.9 1% 1% 4.7 4.7 0% 0%
66 November 4.4 4.4 0% 0% 8.8 9.2 5% 5% 13.6 13.9 3% 3% 10.6 10.2 -3% -3% 2.6 2.6 1% 1% 4.3 4.5 5% 5%
66 December 4.0 3.9 -3% -3% 8.2 8.5 4% 4% 12.8 13.0 2% 2% 9.7 9.3 -5% -5% 2.4 2.4 1% 1% 3.9 4.3 10% 10%
67 January 3.6 3.5 -2% -2% 7.4 7.9 6% 6% 11.7 12.1 4% 4% 8.7 8.5 -3% -3% 2.2 2.2 1% 1% 3.7 4.1 13% 13%
67 February 2.9 3.1 5% 5% 6.3 7.2 14% 14% 10.0 11.2 12% 12% 7.5 7.9 6% 6% 2.0 2.0 0% 0% 3.4 3.9 12% 12%
67 March 2.8 2.8 -1% -1% 6.2 6.6 5% 5% 9.8 10.3 5% 5% 7.2 7.3 0% 0% 1.9 1.9 0% 0% 3.2 3.5 10% 10%
67 April 9.0 8.6 -4% -4% 19.4 19.8 2% 2% 25.8 26.1 1% 1% 20.6 27.2 32% 32% 3.8 2.6 -32% -18% 9.9 10.0 1% 1%
67 May 78.6 78.9 0% 0% 172.6 173.5 0% 0% 208.6 208.9 0% 0% 143.4 146.0 2% 2% 53.9 47.0 -13% -13% 90.4 89.6 -1% -1%
67 June 74.1 76.1 3% 3% 157.8 164.0 4% 4% 197.9 204.3 3% 3% 145.0 150.6 4% 4% 49.5 43.6 -12% -12% 83.4 83.4 0% 0%
67 July 6.9 6.7 -2% -1% 13.8 14.4 4% 2% 20.8 20.6 -1% 0% 15.8 14.2 -10% -5% 3.6 3.6 1% 0% 6.3 7.1 12% 3%
67 August 5.8 5.8 0% 0% 11.5 11.6 0% 0% 17.5 17.0 -3% -3% 13.3 12.0 -10% -10% 3.3 3.3 1% 1% 5.4 5.4 0% 0%
67 September 5.0 5.1 1% 1% 10.1 10.3 2% 2% 15.4 15.3 0% 0% 12.0 11.4 -6% -6% 3.0 3.0 1% 1% 4.8 4.8 0% 0%
67 October 4.8 4.7 -3% -3% 9.7 9.5 -2% -2% 14.9 14.4 -3% -3% 11.7 10.9 -7% -7% 2.7 2.8 1% 1% 4.5 4.5 -1% -1%
67 November 4.1 4.2 0% 0% 8.4 8.6 3% 3% 13.0 13.2 2% 2% 10.1 9.8 -3% -3% 2.4 2.5 1% 1% 4.1 4.1 2% 2%
67 December 3.8 3.7 -2% -2% 7.8 8.2 5% 5% 12.2 12.5 2% 2% 9.3 8.9 -4% -4% 2.3 2.3 1% 1% 3.8 4.2 11% 11%
68 January 3.4 3.3 -2% -2% 7.1 7.4 4% 4% 11.1 11.4 3% 3% 8.4 8.2 -2% -2% 2.1 2.1 1% 1% 3.5 3.8 9% 9%
68 February 2.7 3.0 10% 10% 5.9 6.5 11% 11% 9.2 10.3 12% 12% 6.9 7.6 10% 10% 1.9 2.0 1% 1% 3.3 3.3 0% 0%
68 March 2.7 2.7 0% 0% 6.0 6.1 2% 2% 9.4 9.7 3% 3% 7.0 7.0 1% 1% 1.8 1.8 1% 1% 3.1 3.2 3% 3%
68 April 8.0 7.6 -4% -4% 17.2 17.2 0% 0% 23.2 23.2 0% 0% 19.1 25.5 33% 33% 3.1 2.0 -35% -16% 8.8 8.5 -4% -3%
68 May 30.6 29.4 -4% -3% 66.8 65.7 -2% -1% 78.7 77.6 -1% -1% 52.6 56.7 8% 6% 19.7 17.1 -13% -7% 34.5 34.0 -1% -1%
68 June 20.0 19.6 -2% -1% 42.4 43.1 2% 1% 52.4 52.4 0% 0% 37.1 39.5 7% 3% 12.3 11.1 -10% -2% 22.0 22.0 0% 0%
68 July 6.0 5.7 -5% -2% 12.5 12.5 0% 0% 18.2 17.6 -3% -1% 13.1 12.1 -8% -4% 3.5 3.5 1% 0% 6.0 6.3 4% 1%
68 August 5.1 5.0 -2% -2% 10.6 10.5 0% 0% 15.6 15.3 -2% -2% 11.6 10.7 -8% -8% 3.2 3.2 1% 1% 5.1 5.1 0% 0%
68 September 6.2 6.1 -1% -1% 12.8 12.9 1% 1% 18.2 18.2 0% 0% 14.5 15.5 7% 7% 3.4 3.2 -6% -6% 6.4 6.2 -2% -2%
68 October 5.1 4.9 -5% -5% 10.6 10.5 -1% -1% 15.4 15.2 -1% -1% 11.9 11.3 -5% -5% 3.1 3.1 1% 1% 5.2 5.2 1% 1%
68 November 4.2 4.3 2% 2% 8.9 10.1 13% 13% 13.0 14.4 11% 11% 10.0 9.9 -2% -2% 2.8 2.8 1% 1% 4.6 5.4 19% 19%
68 December 3.8 3.8 1% 1% 8.1 8.6 6% 6% 12.0 12.7 6% 6% 9.2 8.9 -4% -4% 2.5 2.5 1% 1% 4.1 4.5 10% 10%
69 January 3.4 3.4 1% 1% 7.4 8.3 12% 12% 10.9 12.2 12% 12% 8.3 8.2 -2% -2% 2.3 2.3 1% 1% 3.8 4.7 22% 22%
69 February 2.8 3.1 12% 12% 6.2 7.2 17% 17% 9.1 10.8 19% 19% 6.9 7.6 11% 11% 2.1 2.2 1% 1% 3.6 3.8 8% 8%
69 March 3.2 3.0 -6% -6% 7.1 7.5 6% 6% 10.3 11.0 7% 7% 7.7 8.0 4% 4% 2.1 2.1 1% 1% 3.6 4.2 15% 15%
69 April 46.5 47.3 2% 2% 103.1 106.2 3% 3% 122.8 126.2 3% 3% 82.0 91.8 12% 12% 32.2 27.3 -15% -15% 55.8 55.3 -1% -1%
69 May 85.1 85.7 1% 1% 183.4 185.3 1% 1% 226.7 228.4 1% 1% 164.5 164.2 0% 0% 56.2 49.3 -12% -12% 94.7 94.6 0% 0%
69 June 122.1 126.7 4% 4% 260.3 271.2 4% 4% 326.8 338.1 3% 3% 242.3 249.1 3% 3% 82.4 72.4 -12% -12% 137.8 137.5 0% 0%
69 July 7.5 7.3 -2% -1% 14.7 15.8 8% 3% 22.1 22.3 1% 1% 16.8 15.3 -9% -5% 3.8 3.9 1% 0% 6.7 7.9 18% 5%
69 August 6.1 6.1 1% 1% 12.2 12.2 0% 0% 18.3 17.8 -3% -3% 14.0 12.6 -10% -10% 3.4 3.5 1% 1% 5.7 5.6 -1% -1%
69 September 5.2 5.2 1% 1% 10.3 10.6 3% 3% 15.6 15.7 0% 0% 12.2 11.4 -6% -6% 3.0 3.1 0% 0% 4.9 4.9 0% 0%
69 October 4.7 4.6 -1% -1% 9.3 9.3 0% 0% 14.5 14.1 -3% -3% 11.3 10.3 -8% -8% 2.7 2.7 1% 1% 4.4 4.3 -1% -1%
69 November 4.0 4.1 2% 2% 8.1 8.5 4% 4% 12.8 13.1 2% 2% 10.0 9.6 -4% -4% 2.4 2.4 1% 1% 4.0 4.1 2% 2%
69 December 3.8 3.7 -2% -2% 7.7 7.9 3% 3% 12.2 12.2 0% 0% 9.3 8.8 -5% -5% 2.2 2.3 1% 1% 3.7 3.9 6% 6%
70 January 3.3 3.3 -2% -2% 7.0 7.3 5% 5% 11.1 11.4 2% 2% 8.4 8.1 -3% -3% 2.0 2.1 1% 1% 3.5 3.8 10% 10%
70 February 2.7 2.9 9% 9% 5.8 6.8 19% 19% 9.2 10.7 16% 16% 6.9 7.5 9% 9% 1.9 1.9 1% 1% 3.3 3.7 14% 14%
70 March 2.7 2.7 0% 0% 5.9 6.2 5% 5% 9.4 9.8 4% 4% 6.9 6.9 0% 0% 1.8 1.8 0% 0% 3.1 3.3 8% 8%
70 April 4.8 4.5 -6% -5% 10.1 10.3 1% 1% 14.7 14.9 2% 1% 12.2 15.7 29% 22% 2.3 1.9 -20% -7% 5.1 5.1 2% 1%
70 May 37.6 36.7 -2% -2% 83.1 82.2 -1% -1% 98.8 97.5 -1% -1% 66.3 72.2 9% 9% 24.1 20.4 -15% -10% 43.4 42.6 -2% -1%
70 June 54.5 56.3 3% 3% 117.9 122.6 4% 4% 145.3 149.8 3% 3% 103.6 107.8 4% 4% 37.1 32.7 -12% -9% 63.0 62.8 0% 0%
70 July 6.4 6.1 -5% -2% 12.9 13.0 1% 0% 19.4 18.8 -3% -1% 14.3 13.2 -8% -4% 3.4 3.4 1% 0% 6.0 6.4 6% 2%
70 August 5.6 5.4 -3% -3% 11.2 11.0 -2% -2% 16.9 16.3 -4% -4% 12.9 11.8 -8% -8% 3.2 3.2 1% 1% 5.2 5.2 -1% -1%
70 September 4.7 4.8 2% 2% 9.5 9.7 3% 3% 14.5 14.6 1% 1% 11.2 10.6 -6% -6% 2.8 2.8 1% 1% 4.6 4.6 0% 0%
70 October 22.4 21.3 -5% -5% 48.4 47.8 -1% -1% 59.4 58.2 -2% -2% 44.3 48.0 8% 8% 13.2 11.3 -14% -14% 24.6 24.6 0% 0%
70 November 5.5 5.5 -1% -1% 11.3 12.1 7% 7% 16.8 17.5 4% 4% 12.5 11.8 -6% -6% 3.2 3.3 1% 1% 5.5 6.1 11% 11%
70 December 4.9 4.9 -1% -1% 10.1 10.3 3% 3% 15.2 15.3 1% 1% 11.3 10.3 -9% -9% 3.0 3.1 1% 1% 4.8 5.1 7% 7%
71 January 4.3 4.3 0% 0% 8.9 9.3 5% 5% 13.6 13.9 3% 3% 10.3 9.5 -8% -8% 2.7 2.7 1% 1% 4.3 4.6 8% 8%
71 February 3.5 3.8 8% 8% 7.4 8.3 12% 12% 11.4 12.7 11% 11% 8.8 8.8 0% 0% 2.4 2.4 1% 1% 3.9 4.2 8% 8%
71 March 3.3 3.4 1% 1% 7.2 7.5 4% 4% 11.1 11.6 5% 5% 8.5 8.1 -4% -4% 2.2 2.2 1% 1% 3.6 3.8 5% 5%
71 April 19.0 18.8 -1% -1% 41.8 42.5 2% 2% 50.5 51.1 1% 1% 36.9 44.0 19% 19% 11.6 9.5 -18% -18% 22.2 21.8 -2% -2%
71 May 60.0 59.8 0% 0% 130.7 131.2 0% 0% 160.0 159.9 0% 0% 110.8 111.8 1% 1% 40.7 35.8 -12% -12% 68.0 67.6 -1% -1%
71 June 38.9 39.4 1% 1% 82.5 85.4 4% 2% 103.9 107.3 3% 2% 76.4 78.8 3% 3% 25.4 22.6 -11% -6% 43.2 43.5 1% 0%
71 July 6.7 6.4 -3% -1% 13.6 13.7 1% 0% 20.3 20.0 -1% -1% 15.0 13.7 -9% -5% 3.7 3.8 1% 0% 6.5 6.8 5% 1%
71 August 5.5 5.5 -1% -1% 11.4 11.3 0% 0% 17.1 16.7 -3% -3% 12.9 11.7 -10% -10% 3.4 3.4 1% 1% 5.4 5.4 -1% -1%
71 September 4.8 4.9 1% 1% 9.7 10.0 2% 2% 14.8 15.0 1% 1% 11.4 10.8 -6% -6% 3.0 3.0 0% 0% 4.8 4.7 -1% -1%
71 October 4.4 4.3 -1% -1% 8.9 8.9 0% 0% 13.7 13.6 -1% -1% 10.7 9.9 -8% -8% 2.6 2.6 1% 1% 4.3 4.2 -1% -1%
71 November 3.8 3.9 2% 2% 7.8 8.0 3% 3% 12.1 12.5 3% 3% 9.4 9.1 -3% -3% 2.3 2.4 1% 1% 3.9 3.8 -1% -1%
71 December 3.5 3.5 0% 0% 7.3 7.3 0% 0% 11.4 11.5 1% 1% 8.7 8.3 -4% -4% 2.2 2.2 1% 1% 3.6 3.6 -1% -1%
72 January 3.1 3.1 0% 0% 6.6 6.7 1% 1% 10.3 10.6 2% 2% 7.9 7.8 -2% -2% 2.0 2.0 1% 1% 3.4 3.3 -1% -1%
72 February 2.5 2.8 11% 11% 5.5 6.1 11% 11% 8.6 9.8 14% 14% 6.5 7.1 10% 10% 1.9 1.9 1% 1% 3.2 3.1 -1% -1%
72 March 2.5 2.5 1% 1% 5.7 6.0 6% 6% 8.8 9.5 8% 8% 6.5 6.6 2% 2% 1.7 1.7 0% 0% 3.0 3.3 10% 10%
72 April 3.5 3.3 -6% -3% 7.7 7.6 -2% -1% 11.3 11.5 2% 1% 8.9 10.9 23% 13% 2.0 1.8 -12% -4% 4.0 3.8 -4% -1%
72 May 9.4 8.6 -8% -2% 20.4 19.6 -4% -1% 26.5 25.5 -4% -1% 20.5 26.3 28% 9% 3.8 2.7 -30% -3% 10.2 9.9 -3% -1%
72 June 4.0 3.7 -7% -1% 8.1 8.1 -1% 0% 11.5 11.6 1% 0% 8.5 8.6 1% 0% 2.0 2.0 1% 0% 4.0 4.0 1% 0%
72 July 3.7 3.6 -2% 0% 7.8 7.7 -1% 0% 10.9 11.0 1% 0% 8.0 7.7 -4% -1% 2.3 2.3 1% 0% 3.9 3.8 -2% 0%
72 August 3.3 3.3 0% 0% 7.1 7.1 0% 0% 10.0 10.3 2% 2% 7.4 7.2 -3% -3% 2.2 2.2 1% 1% 3.6 3.5 -2% -2%
72 September 13.4 13.0 -3% -3% 29.7 29.9 1% 1% 36.2 36.3 0% 0% 26.1 32.5 24% 24% 7.8 6.3 -19% -19% 15.7 15.5 -1% -1%
72 October 5.7 5.2 -10% -10% 12.0 11.7 -2% -2% 16.1 15.7 -2% -2% 12.1 12.2 1% 1% 3.1 3.0 -2% -2% 5.8 6.0 4% 4%
72 November 4.5 4.5 0% 0% 9.5 10.1 7% 7% 12.8 13.6 6% 6% 9.5 9.2 -3% -3% 3.0 3.0 1% 1% 4.8 5.3 9% 9%
72 December 4.0 4.0 0% 0% 8.5 9.2 7% 7% 11.8 12.6 7% 7% 8.8 8.2 -6% -6% 2.7 2.7 1% 1% 4.3 4.9 13% 13%
73 January 3.5 3.5 0% 0% 7.6 8.0 5% 5% 10.7 11.3 6% 6% 7.9 7.6 -4% -4% 2.4 2.5 1% 1% 3.9 4.2 8% 8%
73 February 2.9 3.2 12% 12% 6.3 7.3 16% 16% 8.9 10.5 18% 18% 6.5 7.0 9% 9% 2.2 2.2 0% 0% 3.6 3.9 8% 8%
73 March 4.0 3.7 -8% -8% 8.5 8.3 -3% -3% 11.9 11.9 0% 0% 9.1 10.0 10% 10% 2.4 2.3 -5% -5% 4.2 4.2 -1% -1%
73 April 24.5 24.3 -1% -1% 53.8 54.8 2% 2% 62.8 64.2 2% 2% 42.6 50.3 18% 18% 15.6 13.1 -16% -16% 28.7 28.3 -1% -1%
73 May 52.7 52.2 -1% -1% 114.4 114.7 0% 0% 138.9 137.5 -1% -1% 94.4 95.5 1% 1% 35.3 31.2 -12% -11% 59.3 59.2 0% 0%
73 June 46.7 47.7 2% 2% 99.7 103.2 4% 3% 124.3 128.2 3% 3% 91.0 93.7 3% 3% 31.1 27.6 -11% -7% 52.6 52.6 0% 0%
73 July 6.9 6.7 -4% -2% 14.2 14.3 1% 0% 20.7 20.3 -2% -1% 15.5 14.1 -9% -5% 3.9 3.9 1% 0% 6.7 7.0 5% 1%
73 August 5.7 5.7 -2% -2% 11.8 11.7 -1% -1% 17.5 17.0 -3% -3% 13.2 12.0 -10% -10% 3.5 3.5 1% 1% 5.6 5.6 -1% -1%
73 September 5.1 5.1 -1% -1% 10.4 10.5 1% 1% 15.6 15.5 -1% -1% 12.1 11.4 -5% -5% 3.1 3.2 1% 1% 5.1 5.0 -1% -1%
73 October 4.6 4.6 -1% -1% 9.4 9.4 0% 0% 14.4 14.1 -2% -2% 11.2 10.3 -8% -8% 2.8 2.8 1% 1% 4.5 4.5 -1% -1%
73 November 4.0 4.1 1% 1% 8.2 8.4 3% 3% 12.6 12.9 2% 2% 9.7 9.4 -3% -3% 2.5 2.5 1% 1% 4.1 4.1 0% 0%
73 December 3.7 3.7 -1% -1% 7.7 7.8 2% 2% 11.8 12.1 2% 2% 9.1 8.6 -5% -5% 2.3 2.3 1% 1% 3.8 3.9 4% 4%
74 January 3.2 3.2 0% 0% 6.9 7.1 2% 2% 10.8 11.0 2% 2% 8.2 8.0 -3% -3% 2.1 2.1 1% 1% 3.5 3.6 2% 2%
74 February 2.6 2.9 10% 10% 5.8 6.9 19% 19% 8.9 10.6 18% 18% 6.8 7.4 9% 9% 1.9 2.0 1% 1% 3.3 3.7 14% 14%
74 March 2.6 2.7 1% 1% 5.9 6.0 2% 2% 9.1 9.5 4% 4% 6.7 6.8 1% 1% 1.8 1.8 1% 1% 3.1 3.1 2% 2%
74 April 6.3 6.0 -5% -4% 13.6 14.1 3% 2% 18.8 19.3 3% 2% 16.2 21.3 32% 32% 2.8 1.9 -30% -13% 6.8 7.1 4% 2%
74 May 24.8 23.6 -5% -3% 54.0 52.9 -2% -1% 63.2 62.2 -2% -1% 43.0 47.9 11% 7% 14.9 12.7 -15% -6% 27.6 27.2 -2% -1%
74 June 15.5 15.1 -3% -1% 32.8 33.1 1% 0% 40.0 40.0 0% 0% 28.8 31.1 8% 3% 9.1 8.2 -10% -2% 16.8 16.8 0% 0%
74 July 5.7 5.4 -5% -2% 11.9 11.9 -1% 0% 17.1 16.5 -4% -1% 12.4 11.3 -9% -4% 3.4 3.5 2% 0% 5.8 5.9 3% 1%
74 August 4.8 4.9 1% 1% 10.1 10.2 1% 1% 14.7 14.6 -1% -1% 10.9 10.0 -9% -9% 3.1 3.2 1% 1% 4.9 4.9 0% 0%
74 September 4.3 4.3 1% 1% 8.8 9.0 2% 2% 13.0 13.3 2% 2% 9.7 9.2 -5% -5% 2.8 2.8 1% 1% 4.4 4.4 -1% -1%
74 October 8.2 7.7 -5% -5% 17.4 17.0 -2% -2% 23.4 22.8 -2% -2% 19.0 21.6 14% 14% 3.7 3.1 -18% -18% 8.5 8.4 -1% -1%
74 November 4.5 4.5 0% 0% 9.5 9.9 4% 4% 13.6 14.1 4% 4% 10.3 9.9 -4% -4% 2.9 2.9 1% 1% 4.9 5.1 3% 3%
74 December 4.0 4.0 0% 0% 8.7 8.9 2% 2% 12.4 12.8 3% 3% 9.3 8.6 -7% -7% 2.8 2.8 1% 1% 4.4 4.6 3% 3%
75 January 3.6 3.6 1% 1% 7.8 8.3 6% 6% 11.2 12.0 7% 7% 8.4 8.0 -5% -5% 2.5 2.5 1% 1% 4.0 4.4 11% 11%
75 February 3.0 3.2 8% 8% 6.6 7.4 13% 13% 9.6 11.0 14% 14% 7.1 7.4 4% 4% 2.3 2.3 0% 0% 3.7 4.0 7% 7%
75 March 2.9 2.9 1% 1% 6.5 6.9 5% 5% 9.5 10.2 7% 7% 6.9 6.8 -1% -1% 2.1 2.1 0% 0% 3.4 3.7 8% 8%
75 April 24.6 24.5 0% 0% 54.2 55.3 2% 2% 63.8 65.4 3% 3% 43.7 52.0 19% 19% 16.1 13.3 -17% -17% 29.0 28.5 -2% -2%
75 May 62.6 62.6 0% 0% 136.4 137.4 1% 1% 166.4 166.2 0% 0% 114.3 115.4 1% 1% 42.3 37.2 -12% -12% 71.0 70.9 0% 0%
75 June 36.4 36.6 1% 1% 76.9 79.4 3% 2% 96.5 99.4 3% 2% 71.1 73.3 3% 3% 23.4 20.9 -11% -5% 40.1 40.5 1% 1%
75 July 6.6 6.4 -3% -2% 13.5 13.6 1% 0% 20.0 19.7 -2% -1% 14.9 13.4 -10% -5% 3.7 3.7 1% 0% 6.4 6.7 5% 2%
75 August 5.5 5.5 -1% -1% 11.3 11.2 0% 0% 16.9 16.5 -3% -3% 12.8 11.5 -10% -10% 3.3 3.3 1% 1% 5.4 5.4 0% 0%
75 September 7.6 7.4 -2% -2% 15.6 15.8 1% 1% 22.1 21.8 -1% -1% 17.9 19.3 8% 8% 3.7 3.3 -10% -10% 7.7 7.6 -1% -1%
75 October 5.2 5.0 -4% -4% 10.7 10.6 -1% -1% 16.0 15.5 -3% -3% 12.2 11.1 -9% -9% 3.1 3.1 1% 1% 5.1 5.2 1% 1%
75 November 4.4 4.5 2% 2% 9.0 9.6 6% 6% 13.6 14.2 4% 4% 10.4 9.8 -6% -6% 2.8 2.9 1% 1% 4.6 4.8 5% 5%
75 December 4.0 4.0 -1% -1% 8.4 8.8 5% 5% 12.7 13.2 4% 4% 9.7 9.0 -7% -7% 2.5 2.6 1% 1% 4.1 4.5 11% 11%
76 January 3.5 3.5 0% 0% 7.5 7.6 1% 1% 11.5 11.7 2% 2% 8.7 8.3 -5% -5% 2.3 2.3 1% 1% 3.8 3.8 1% 1%
76 February 2.8 3.2 12% 12% 6.2 7.2 16% 16% 9.5 11.1 17% 17% 7.2 7.7 7% 7% 2.1 2.1 1% 1% 3.5 3.7 8% 8%
76 March 3.2 3.0 -6% -6% 7.0 6.9 -1% -1% 10.5 10.7 2% 2% 8.0 8.0 0% 0% 2.1 2.1 1% 1% 3.5 3.6 1% 1%
76 April 21.8 21.6 -1% -1% 48.3 49.0 2% 2% 57.5 58.5 2% 2% 40.6 49.0 21% 21% 13.6 11.1 -18% -18% 25.8 25.4 -2% -2%
76 May 55.6 55.2 -1% -1% 121.0 121.4 0% 0% 147.7 146.8 -1% -1% 101.5 102.7 1% 1% 37.3 32.8 -12% -12% 62.8 62.6 0% 0%
76 June 50.5 51.7 2% 2% 107.8 112.0 4% 4% 135.0 140.0 4% 4% 99.0 101.7 3% 3% 33.6 29.8 -11% -8% 56.9 57.2 0% 0%
76 July 6.8 6.6 -3% -2% 13.9 14.2 2% 1% 20.6 20.5 -1% 0% 15.4 13.9 -9% -5% 3.8 3.8 1% 0% 6.5 7.0 7% 2%
76 August 5.7 5.6 -2% -2% 11.6 11.5 -1% -1% 17.4 16.9 -3% -3% 13.2 11.8 -10% -10% 3.4 3.4 1% 1% 5.5 5.5 0% 0%
76 September 4.8 5.0 3% 3% 9.8 10.1 3% 3% 14.9 15.1 1% 1% 11.5 10.7 -7% -7% 3.0 3.0 0% 0% 4.8 4.7 -1% -1%
76 October 6.8 6.4 -6% -6% 14.0 13.6 -3% -3% 20.1 19.3 -4% -4% 16.4 17.1 5% 5% 3.3 2.9 -10% -10% 6.6 6.5 -1% -1%
76 November 5.0 4.8 -3% -3% 10.1 10.8 7% 7% 15.0 15.7 5% 5% 11.7 11.2 -4% -4% 2.9 2.9 1% 1% 4.9 5.6 13% 13%
76 December 4.4 4.3 -3% -3% 9.0 9.4 4% 4% 13.6 13.9 2% 2% 10.4 9.7 -7% -7% 2.6 2.7 1% 1% 4.4 4.8 9% 9%
77 January 3.8 3.8 -2% -2% 8.0 8.5 5% 5% 12.2 12.7 4% 4% 9.3 8.8 -5% -5% 2.4 2.5 1% 1% 4.0 4.4 11% 11%
77 February 3.1 3.4 10% 10% 6.6 7.9 19% 19% 10.0 11.9 19% 19% 7.6 8.1 7% 7% 2.2 2.3 1% 1% 3.7 4.2 14% 14%
77 March 3.0 3.1 0% 0% 6.7 7.1 6% 6% 10.2 10.8 6% 6% 7.7 7.5 -2% -2% 2.1 2.1 1% 1% 3.5 3.8 9% 9%
77 April 11.9 11.4 -4% -4% 26.2 26.6 2% 2% 33.1 33.4 1% 1% 25.0 32.0 28% 28% 6.2 4.7 -23% -21% 13.7 13.8 0% 0%
77 May 83.7 84.1 0% 0% 182.9 184.2 1% 1% 221.7 222.9 1% 1% 153.3 154.8 1% 1% 57.3 50.2 -12% -12% 95.6 95.0 -1% -1%
77 June 112.5 116.7 4% 4% 240.4 250.7 4% 4% 301.0 312.1 4% 4% 221.8 224.6 1% 1% 76.2 66.9 -12% -12% 127.4 127.5 0% 0%
77 July 10.2 9.5 -6% -4% 20.3 20.8 2% 1% 29.0 28.4 -2% -1% 23.3 22.4 -4% -3% 4.8 4.5 -5% -2% 9.5 10.4 10% 4%
77 August 6.7 6.6 -1% -1% 13.6 13.5 0% 0% 20.0 19.4 -3% -3% 15.2 13.7 -10% -10% 3.9 3.9 1% 1% 6.4 6.4 0% 0%
77 September 8.4 8.2 -3% -3% 17.4 17.6 1% 1% 24.4 24.0 -1% -1% 20.1 21.1 5% 5% 4.3 3.9 -9% -9% 8.6 8.5 -1% -1%
77 October 32.0 30.5 -5% -5% 67.4 66.7 -1% -1% 84.4 82.8 -2% -2% 60.5 61.8 2% 2% 19.8 17.6 -11% -11% 33.9 34.0 1% 1%
77 November 6.5 6.5 0% 0% 13.5 14.4 7% 7% 19.8 20.5 4% 4% 14.4 13.6 -6% -6% 4.1 4.1 1% 1% 6.8 7.4 9% 9%
77 December 5.6 5.6 -1% -1% 11.7 12.2 4% 4% 17.5 17.6 0% 0% 13.0 11.9 -8% -8% 3.6 3.6 0% 0% 5.7 6.2 8% 8%
78 January 4.9 4.9 0% 0% 10.2 10.6 3% 3% 15.5 15.6 1% 1% 11.7 10.7 -9% -9% 3.2 3.2 1% 1% 5.0 5.3 6% 6%
78 February 4.0 4.4 11% 11% 8.3 9.7 17% 17% 12.8 14.5 13% 13% 9.7 9.8 2% 2% 2.8 2.8 0% 0% 4.5 4.9 10% 10%
78 March 3.9 4.0 1% 1% 8.2 8.8 7% 7% 12.8 13.4 4% 4% 9.7 9.1 -6% -6% 2.5 2.5 1% 1% 4.1 4.5 12% 12%
78 April 6.9 6.7 -3% -3% 14.5 14.7 1% 1% 20.3 20.5 1% 1% 16.8 19.9 18% 18% 3.2 2.6 -18% -8% 7.2 7.2 -1% -1%
78 May 68.2 68.2 0% 0% 150.0 150.3 0% 0% 182.3 181.9 0% 0% 126.0 128.9 2% 2% 46.7 40.6 -13% -13% 78.6 77.7 -1% -1%
78 June 76.3 78.7 3% 3% 163.3 169.9 4% 4% 204.9 212.2 4% 4% 149.6 152.8 2% 2% 51.6 45.5 -12% -12% 86.6 86.6 0% 0%
78 July 19.0 18.0 -5% -5% 38.8 38.8 0% 0% 51.5 50.5 -2% -2% 39.3 38.7 -2% -2% 10.5 9.6 -9% -7% 18.9 19.4 3% 3%
78 August 6.9 6.8 -2% -2% 14.3 14.3 0% 0% 21.2 20.7 -2% -2% 15.8 14.3 -9% -9% 4.1 4.1 1% 1% 6.9 7.0 1% 1%
78 September 5.9 6.0 0% 0% 12.2 12.4 2% 2% 18.1 18.2 1% 1% 13.6 12.9 -5% -5% 3.7 3.7 1% 1% 6.0 6.0 -1% -1%
78 October 6.4 6.1 -5% -5% 13.1 12.8 -2% -2% 19.2 18.5 -3% -3% 14.9 14.5 -3% -3% 3.6 3.5 -1% -1% 6.2 6.2 -1% -1%
78 November 5.2 5.1 0% 0% 10.5 11.3 8% 8% 15.8 16.5 5% 5% 12.1 11.6 -4% -4% 3.2 3.2 0% 0% 5.2 5.8 11% 11%
78 December 4.6 4.6 -2% -2% 9.5 9.9 4% 4% 14.5 14.7 2% 2% 11.1 10.4 -6% -6% 2.8 2.8 1% 1% 4.6 5.0 8% 8%
79 January 4.1 4.1 -1% -1% 8.5 8.6 1% 1% 13.1 13.2 0% 0% 9.9 9.5 -5% -5% 2.5 2.6 1% 1% 4.2 4.2 2% 2%
79 February 3.4 3.6 6% 6% 7.3 8.0 10% 10% 11.2 12.3 10% 10% 8.4 8.7 4% 4% 2.4 2.4 1% 1% 3.9 4.1 5% 5%
79 March 3.3 3.3 0% 0% 7.1 7.5 5% 5% 11.0 11.6 5% 5% 8.3 8.1 -2% -2% 2.2 2.2 1% 1% 3.7 4.0 9% 9%
79 April 9.0 8.6 -5% -5% 19.3 19.4 1% 1% 25.6 25.7 0% 0% 20.5 26.2 28% 28% 3.9 2.8 -28% -16% 9.8 9.7 -1% -1%
79 May 69.3 69.3 0% 0% 152.2 153.1 1% 1% 183.9 184.0 0% 0% 125.6 128.3 2% 2% 47.6 41.6 -13% -13% 79.8 79.4 0% 0%
79 June 78.3 80.7 3% 3% 167.4 174.3 4% 4% 209.6 217.3 4% 4% 153.2 157.2 3% 3% 52.8 46.6 -12% -12% 88.7 88.9 0% 0%
79 July 11.8 11.1 -5% -4% 23.6 23.7 0% 0% 32.7 31.8 -3% -2% 26.1 25.5 -2% -2% 5.6 5.2 -6% -3% 11.1 11.7 5% 3%
79 August 6.8 6.6 -2% -2% 13.8 13.7 -1% -1% 20.3 19.7 -3% -3% 15.3 13.9 -9% -9% 4.0 4.0 1% 1% 6.6 6.6 0% 0%
79 September 7.0 6.9 -2% -2% 14.4 14.5 1% 1% 20.7 20.5 -1% -1% 16.1 16.4 1% 1% 4.0 3.9 -3% -3% 7.1 7.1 -1% -1%
79 October 9.3 8.6 -7% -7% 19.4 19.0 -2% -2% 26.7 25.5 -4% -4% 21.9 22.5 3% 3% 4.6 4.2 -9% -9% 9.4 9.5 1% 1%
79 November 5.8 5.8 -2% -2% 12.0 12.7 6% 6% 17.5 18.1 3% 3% 13.1 12.4 -5% -5% 3.7 3.8 1% 1% 6.0 6.5 9% 9%
79 December 5.2 5.2 -1% -1% 10.8 11.0 2% 2% 16.0 16.1 1% 1% 11.8 11.0 -7% -7% 3.4 3.4 0% 0% 5.3 5.5 4% 4%
80 January 4.6 4.6 -1% -1% 9.6 9.5 -1% -1% 14.4 14.3 -1% -1% 10.8 10.1 -6% -6% 3.0 3.0 1% 1% 4.7 4.7 -1% -1%
80 February 3.7 4.1 9% 9% 7.8 8.8 13% 13% 11.8 13.3 13% 13% 8.8 9.3 5% 5% 2.7 2.7 0% 0% 4.3 4.5 4% 4%
80 March 3.6 3.6 -1% -1% 7.9 8.0 2% 2% 11.9 12.3 3% 3% 8.9 8.6 -3% -3% 2.5 2.5 1% 1% 4.0 4.1 4% 4%
80 April 16.3 15.9 -2% -2% 35.7 35.9 1% 1% 43.8 43.7 0% 0% 31.8 38.8 22% 22% 9.6 7.9 -18% -18% 18.9 18.3 -3% -3%
80 May 35.0 33.9 -3% -3% 75.5 74.8 -1% -1% 92.0 90.8 -1% -1% 61.4 63.3 3% 3% 22.9 20.3 -11% -7% 38.7 38.5 -1% 0%
80 June 8.2 7.8 -5% -1% 17.3 17.4 1% 0% 23.9 23.7 -1% 0% 18.2 18.9 4% 1% 4.4 4.2 -4% 0% 8.7 8.8 1% 0%
80 July 6.0 5.8 -4% -1% 12.6 12.5 -1% 0% 18.2 17.7 -3% -1% 13.4 12.4 -8% -4% 3.8 3.8 1% 0% 6.2 6.2 0% 0%
80 August 5.2 5.1 -1% -1% 10.7 10.7 0% 0% 15.8 15.6 -1% -1% 11.8 10.9 -8% -8% 3.3 3.3 1% 1% 5.2 5.2 0% 0%
80 September 28.2 28.3 0% 0% 61.2 62.9 3% 3% 74.8 76.2 2% 2% 53.0 58.2 10% 10% 18.4 16.0 -13% -13% 32.5 32.4 0% 0%
80 October 12.7 12.0 -6% -6% 26.5 26.4 0% 0% 34.3 33.8 -2% -2% 26.3 26.7 2% 2% 6.8 6.2 -9% -9% 12.9 13.4 3% 3%
80 November 6.0 6.0 0% 0% 12.6 13.1 4% 4% 18.1 18.7 3% 3% 13.3 12.6 -5% -5% 3.9 3.9 1% 1% 6.4 6.7 4% 4%
80 December 5.2 5.2 0% 0% 11.0 11.2 1% 1% 16.2 16.3 1% 1% 12.0 11.1 -8% -8% 3.5 3.5 1% 1% 5.5 5.5 1% 1%
81 January 4.6 4.7 2% 2% 9.7 10.2 5% 5% 14.4 15.0 4% 4% 10.9 10.1 -7% -7% 3.1 3.1 1% 1% 4.9 5.2 7% 7%
81 February 3.7 4.1 13% 13% 7.9 9.6 22% 22% 11.7 14.2 21% 21% 9.0 9.4 4% 4% 2.7 2.8 1% 1% 4.4 5.2 18% 18%
81 March 16.2 15.4 -5% -5% 35.5 34.9 -2% -2% 43.5 42.6 -2% -2% 32.4 37.0 14% 14% 9.3 7.8 -16% -16% 18.2 18.0 -1% -1%
81 April 32.5 32.6 0% 0% 70.1 72.1 3% 3% 86.1 88.1 2% 2% 58.3 61.8 6% 6% 22.1 19.7 -11% -11% 37.2 37.2 0% 0%
81 May 56.3 56.2 0% 0% 122.1 122.6 0% 0% 151.7 152.4 0% 0% 109.3 109.0 0% 0% 37.8 33.5 -11% -11% 63.2 63.0 0% 0%
81 June 39.4 39.8 1% 1% 83.6 86.2 3% 2% 106.1 109.0 3% 2% 78.2 79.8 2% 2% 25.8 23.2 -10% -5% 43.8 43.9 0% 0%
81 July 7.2 7.0 -2% -1% 15.0 15.3 2% 1% 21.9 22.1 1% 0% 16.2 14.8 -9% -5% 4.2 4.3 1% 0% 7.3 7.7 6% 2%
81 August 6.0 5.9 -1% -1% 12.5 12.4 -1% -1% 18.5 18.1 -2% -2% 13.7 12.6 -9% -9% 3.7 3.7 1% 1% 6.1 6.0 -1% -1%
81 September 16.4 16.0 -2% -2% 35.1 35.6 1% 1% 44.3 44.7 1% 1% 34.8 38.0 9% 9% 9.4 8.2 -13% -13% 18.2 18.1 0% 0%
81 October 6.3 6.1 -4% -4% 13.1 13.1 0% 0% 19.2 18.9 -1% -1% 14.1 12.9 -8% -8% 3.8 3.9 1% 1% 6.4 6.6 3% 3%
81 November 5.2 5.3 3% 3% 10.8 11.3 5% 5% 16.0 16.6 4% 4% 11.8 11.2 -5% -5% 3.5 3.5 1% 1% 5.5 5.6 4% 4%
81 December 4.8 4.8 0% 0% 9.9 9.9 0% 0% 14.9 14.9 0% 0% 11.1 10.3 -8% -8% 3.1 3.1 1% 1% 4.8 4.8 -2% -2%
82 January 4.2 4.2 0% 0% 8.8 9.0 2% 2% 13.4 13.7 2% 2% 10.1 9.5 -7% -7% 2.7 2.7 0% 0% 4.4 4.5 3% 3%
82 February 3.4 3.8 12% 12% 7.2 8.1 14% 14% 11.0 12.6 14% 14% 8.3 8.7 6% 6% 2.4 2.5 1% 1% 4.0 4.1 3% 3%
82 March 3.3 3.4 2% 2% 7.3 7.6 4% 4% 11.2 11.7 5% 5% 8.4 8.1 -3% -3% 2.3 2.3 1% 1% 3.7 3.9 5% 5%
82 April 12.5 12.1 -3% -3% 27.5 27.4 0% 0% 34.7 34.5 0% 0% 26.2 32.8 25% 25% 6.7 5.3 -21% -21% 14.4 13.9 -4% -4%
82 May 22.8 21.7 -5% -3% 49.0 48.1 -2% -1% 58.7 57.8 -2% -1% 40.3 42.7 6% 4% 14.2 12.6 -11% -4% 24.9 24.7 -1% 0%
82 June 5.6 5.5 -2% 0% 11.7 12.0 2% 0% 16.8 17.0 1% 0% 12.0 11.5 -4% -1% 3.4 3.5 0% 0% 5.9 6.1 3% 0%
82 July 4.9 4.8 -1% 0% 10.2 10.2 0% 0% 14.9 14.9 0% 0% 10.9 10.1 -8% -3% 3.2 3.2 1% 0% 5.0 5.0 -1% 0%
82 August 4.2 4.3 2% 2% 9.0 9.1 1% 1% 13.3 13.5 2% 2% 10.0 9.2 -7% -7% 2.8 2.9 1% 1% 4.5 4.5 -1% -1%
82 September 3.6 3.8 4% 4% 7.7 8.1 4% 4% 11.5 12.2 6% 6% 8.8 8.5 -3% -3% 2.5 2.5 1% 1% 4.0 4.0 -1% -1%
82 October 3.3 3.4 2% 2% 7.3 7.3 1% 1% 10.9 11.2 3% 3% 8.2 7.9 -4% -4% 2.3 2.3 1% 1% 3.8 3.7 -2% -2%
82 November 2.9 3.1 5% 5% 6.5 6.8 5% 5% 9.7 10.4 7% 7% 7.2 7.4 2% 2% 2.1 2.1 1% 1% 3.5 3.5 0% 0%
82 December 2.8 2.8 1% 1% 6.2 6.5 4% 4% 9.3 9.8 6% 6% 6.7 6.8 1% 1% 1.9 2.0 1% 1% 3.3 3.4 5% 5%
83 January 2.5 2.6 1% 1% 5.8 6.1 6% 6% 8.6 9.3 8% 8% 6.1 6.3 3% 3% 1.8 1.8 1% 1% 3.1 3.3 8% 8%
83 February 2.2 2.4 8% 8% 5.1 5.6 9% 9% 7.5 8.5 14% 14% 5.1 5.8 13% 13% 1.7 1.7 1% 1% 2.9 3.0 1% 1%
83 March 2.2 2.2 1% 1% 5.1 5.3 4% 4% 7.5 8.2 9% 9% 5.0 5.4 7% 7% 1.6 1.6 1% 1% 2.8 2.9 5% 5%
83 April 20.1 20.1 0% 0% 44.8 45.7 2% 2% 53.2 54.0 2% 2% 36.5 46.3 27% 27% 12.0 9.4 -22% -22% 23.9 23.5 -2% -2%
83 May 37.0 35.8 -3% -3% 79.9 79.4 -1% -1% 95.3 94.6 -1% -1% 63.4 65.7 4% 4% 23.8 20.9 -12% -8% 41.1 41.0 0% 0%
83 June 16.2 15.9 -2% -1% 33.9 34.6 2% 1% 42.3 42.0 -1% 0% 31.9 33.8 6% 2% 9.3 8.4 -10% -2% 17.3 17.5 1% 0%
83 July 5.9 5.6 -5% -2% 12.2 12.2 0% 0% 17.6 16.9 -4% -2% 13.2 12.1 -9% -4% 3.4 3.5 1% 0% 5.9 6.1 3% 1%
83 August 5.0 5.0 -1% -1% 10.3 10.3 0% 0% 15.2 14.9 -2% -2% 11.6 10.6 -9% -9% 3.1 3.1 1% 1% 5.0 5.0 1% 1%
83 September 4.2 4.4 4% 4% 8.8 9.1 4% 4% 13.2 13.6 3% 3% 10.2 9.7 -5% -5% 2.8 2.8 1% 1% 4.4 4.4 -1% -1%
83 October 3.9 4.0 2% 2% 8.1 8.2 1% 1% 12.2 12.4 1% 1% 9.6 8.9 -7% -7% 2.4 2.5 1% 1% 4.0 3.9 -1% -1%
83 November 3.3 3.5 7% 7% 7.0 7.9 13% 13% 10.7 11.9 11% 11% 8.4 8.2 -2% -2% 2.2 2.3 1% 1% 3.7 4.1 13% 13%
83 December 3.0 3.1 3% 3% 6.7 6.9 3% 3% 10.2 10.6 5% 5% 7.9 7.6 -3% -3% 2.1 2.1 -4% -4% 3.5 3.5 1% 1%
84 January 2.7 2.8 2% 2% 6.1 6.5 6% 6% 9.3 10.0 8% 8% 7.0 7.0 -1% -1% 1.9 1.9 1% 1% 3.2 3.5 9% 9%
84 February 2.3 2.6 13% 13% 5.1 5.8 14% 14% 7.8 9.1 17% 17% 5.7 6.5 12% 12% 1.8 1.8 1% 1% 3.0 3.1 2% 2%
84 March 2.3 2.3 1% 1% 5.3 5.8 10% 10% 8.0 8.9 11% 11% 5.7 5.9 4% 4% 1.7 1.7 1% 1% 2.9 3.3 16% 16%
84 April 26.3 26.5 1% 1% 58.1 60.0 3% 3% 68.5 71.0 4% 4% 47.5 57.1 20% 20% 16.9 13.7 -19% -19% 31.1 30.9 -1% -1%
84 May 45.9 45.2 -1% -1% 99.5 99.6 0% 0% 121.0 119.4 -1% -1% 82.9 84.6 2% 2% 30.1 26.4 -12% -10% 51.4 51.4 0% 0%
84 June 36.1 36.6 2% 1% 76.8 79.4 3% 2% 95.8 98.7 3% 2% 70.7 73.4 4% 3% 23.5 20.9 -11% -5% 40.4 40.4 0% 0%
84 July 6.3 6.1 -4% -2% 12.9 13.1 2% 1% 19.1 18.8 -1% 0% 14.2 13.0 -9% -4% 3.5 3.5 1% 0% 6.1 6.5 7% 2%
84 August 5.3 5.2 -2% -2% 10.8 10.7 -1% -1% 16.3 15.8 -3% -3% 12.4 11.1 -10% -10% 3.1 3.2 0% 0% 5.1 5.1 0% 0%
84 September 4.7 4.8 0% 0% 9.6 9.8 2% 2% 14.6 14.6 0% 0% 11.4 10.8 -5% -5% 2.9 2.9 1% 1% 4.7 4.7 -1% -1%
84 October 6.6 6.2 -6% -6% 13.6 13.3 -3% -3% 19.5 18.8 -4% -4% 16.1 16.9 5% 5% 3.2 2.9 -9% -9% 6.5 6.4 -2% -2%
84 November 4.6 4.6 0% 0% 9.3 9.7 4% 4% 13.9 14.3 3% 3% 10.8 10.3 -5% -5% 2.7 2.7 1% 1% 4.6 4.7 3% 3%
84 December 4.0 4.0 -2% -2% 8.4 8.3 -1% -1% 12.6 12.6 0% 0% 9.7 9.1 -6% -6% 2.5 2.5 1% 1% 4.1 4.0 -1% -1%
85 January 3.5 3.5 0% 0% 7.5 7.8 4% 4% 11.4 11.8 4% 4% 8.7 8.3 -5% -5% 2.3 2.3 1% 1% 3.8 4.0 8% 8%
85 February 2.8 3.1 11% 11% 6.2 7.1 15% 15% 9.4 10.9 17% 17% 7.2 7.7 8% 8% 2.1 2.1 1% 1% 3.5 3.7 7% 7%
85 March 3.0 2.9 -2% -2% 6.5 6.6 0% 0% 9.8 10.2 3% 3% 7.5 7.4 -1% -1% 2.0 2.0 1% 1% 3.4 3.4 1% 1%
85 April 22.6 22.5 -1% -1% 50.2 51.2 2% 2% 59.5 60.8 2% 2% 41.9 50.4 20% 20% 14.3 11.7 -18% -18% 26.9 26.5 -2% -2%
85 May 33.6 32.4 -3% -3% 72.2 71.9 -1% 0% 88.1 86.6 -2% -1% 59.5 61.3 3% 3% 21.6 19.1 -12% -7% 37.0 37.1 0% 0%
85 June 6.7 6.3 -5% -1% 13.9 14.0 1% 0% 19.7 19.4 -2% 0% 14.9 14.9 0% 0% 3.6 3.6 -1% 0% 6.9 7.0 3% 0%
85 July 5.6 5.4 -4% -2% 11.5 11.3 -1% 0% 16.7 16.2 -3% -1% 12.7 11.6 -8% -4% 3.3 3.4 1% 0% 5.5 5.5 0% 0%
85 August 4.8 4.8 0% 0% 9.8 9.8 0% 0% 14.6 14.4 -1% -1% 11.3 10.3 -8% -8% 3.0 3.0 0% 0% 4.8 4.7 -1% -1%
85 September 4.1 4.3 5% 5% 8.4 8.8 4% 4% 12.6 13.1 4% 4% 9.9 9.4 -4% -4% 2.6 2.7 1% 1% 4.3 4.2 -1% -1%
85 October 5.4 5.2 -4% -4% 11.1 10.9 -2% -2% 16.0 15.8 -1% -1% 13.3 14.1 6% 6% 2.9 2.6 -8% -8% 5.3 5.2 -2% -2%
85 November 3.9 4.0 2% 2% 8.3 8.6 4% 4% 12.1 12.8 5% 5% 9.4 9.3 -2% -2% 2.4 2.5 1% 1% 4.2 4.3 3% 3%
85 December 3.5 3.5 2% 2% 7.6 7.7 1% 1% 11.1 11.5 4% 4% 8.6 8.3 -3% -3% 2.3 2.3 1% 1% 3.9 3.9 0% 0%
86 January 3.1 3.2 1% 1% 6.9 7.1 3% 3% 10.2 10.7 5% 5% 7.7 7.6 -1% -1% 2.1 2.2 1% 1% 3.6 3.7 3% 3%
86 February 2.7 2.9 10% 10% 5.9 6.5 11% 11% 8.7 9.9 15% 15% 6.4 7.2 12% 12% 2.0 2.0 1% 1% 3.4 3.4 -1% -1%
86 March 2.7 2.7 0% 0% 6.0 6.4 5% 5% 8.9 9.5 8% 8% 6.4 6.6 2% 2% 1.9 1.9 1% 1% 3.2 3.5 8% 8%
86 April 7.9 7.5 -5% -5% 17.1 17.3 1% 1% 22.6 22.8 1% 1% 18.2 24.4 34% 34% 3.3 2.2 -32% -16% 8.7 8.7 -1% -1%
86 May 23.7 22.5 -5% -3% 51.6 50.7 -2% -1% 60.2 59.1 -2% -1% 40.1 44.2 10% 6% 14.8 12.8 -13% -5% 26.6 26.3 -1% 0%
86 June 16.1 15.7 -3% -1% 34.3 34.7 1% 0% 41.3 41.7 1% 0% 29.7 31.9 8% 3% 9.7 8.8 -9% -2% 17.7 17.7 0% 0%
86 July 5.8 5.5 -5% -2% 12.1 12.0 -1% 0% 17.1 16.5 -3% -1% 12.4 11.3 -9% -4% 3.5 3.6 1% 0% 5.9 6.0 2% 1%
86 August 4.9 4.8 -1% -1% 10.2 10.2 0% 0% 14.7 14.6 -1% -1% 10.9 9.9 -9% -9% 3.2 3.2 1% 1% 5.0 5.0 0% 0%
86 September 4.1 4.3 5% 5% 8.7 9.1 4% 4% 12.8 13.3 4% 4% 9.6 9.1 -6% -6% 2.8 2.9 1% 1% 4.5 4.4 -1% -1%
86 October 4.1 4.0 -3% -3% 8.6 8.5 -1% -1% 12.7 12.7 0% 0% 9.8 9.2 -5% -5% 2.7 2.7 1% 1% 4.3 4.3 -1% -1%
86 November 3.5 3.6 3% 3% 7.5 8.0 8% 8% 11.0 11.9 8% 8% 8.5 8.3 -1% -1% 2.4 2.4 1% 1% 3.9 4.2 8% 8%
86 December 3.2 3.2 1% 1% 7.0 7.2 2% 2% 10.4 10.8 4% 4% 7.8 7.6 -3% -3% 2.2 2.2 1% 1% 3.6 3.7 3% 3%
87 January 2.9 2.9 0% 0% 6.4 6.5 1% 1% 9.5 9.9 4% 4% 7.0 7.0 0% 0% 2.0 2.0 1% 1% 3.4 3.4 0% 0%
87 February 2.5 2.7 8% 8% 5.6 6.2 10% 10% 8.3 9.3 13% 13% 5.9 6.4 8% 8% 1.9 1.9 1% 1% 3.2 3.3 4% 4%
87 March 5.4 5.0 -8% -8% 11.6 11.2 -3% -3% 16.1 15.7 -2% -2% 13.4 16.8 25% 25% 2.6 2.0 -23% -23% 5.7 5.5 -3% -3%
87 April 19.3 18.7 -3% -3% 42.3 42.8 1% 1% 50.0 50.2 0% 0% 33.9 40.4 19% 19% 11.4 9.5 -17% -17% 22.5 22.3 -1% -1%
87 May 11.2 10.4 -7% -2% 23.4 22.7 -3% -1% 29.2 28.1 -4% -1% 21.3 22.7 6% 2% 5.7 5.1 -10% -2% 11.4 11.3 -1% 0%
87 June 6.1 5.8 -4% -1% 12.7 12.7 0% 0% 17.2 17.1 0% 0% 12.8 12.8 0% 0% 3.7 3.7 0% 0% 6.4 6.4 0% 0%
87 July 5.2 5.1 -3% -1% 10.9 10.8 -1% 0% 15.0 14.9 -1% 0% 11.3 10.4 -8% -3% 3.4 3.4 1% 0% 5.4 5.4 0% 0%
87 August 4.5 4.5 0% 0% 9.5 9.5 0% 0% 13.3 13.4 1% 1% 9.9 9.2 -8% -8% 3.0 3.1 0% 0% 4.8 4.7 -1% -1%
87 September 3.8 3.9 3% 3% 8.1 8.4 3% 3% 11.6 12.1 5% 5% 8.8 8.4 -4% -4% 2.7 2.7 1% 1% 4.3 4.2 -2% -2%
87 October 3.7 3.6 -2% -2% 8.0 7.9 -1% -1% 11.5 11.6 1% 1% 8.7 8.3 -4% -4% 2.5 2.5 1% 1% 4.1 4.0 -1% -1%
87 November 3.2 3.3 2% 2% 7.0 7.4 5% 5% 10.2 10.8 6% 6% 7.5 7.5 1% 1% 2.3 2.3 0% 0% 3.8 3.8 2% 2%
87 December 3.0 3.0 0% 0% 6.7 7.0 4% 4% 9.6 10.2 6% 6% 6.9 6.9 -1% -1% 2.1 2.1 1% 1% 3.5 3.7 7% 7%
88 January 2.7 2.7 0% 0% 6.2 6.6 6% 6% 9.0 9.6 7% 7% 6.2 6.3 1% 1% 1.9 2.0 1% 1% 3.3 3.6 11% 11%
88 February 2.3 2.6 11% 11% 5.3 6.0 14% 14% 7.6 8.9 18% 18% 5.2 5.8 13% 13% 1.8 1.9 1% 1% 3.1 3.2 4% 4%
88 March 4.0 3.6 -9% -9% 8.6 8.6 0% 0% 12.0 12.2 1% 1% 9.1 11.1 21% 21% 2.2 1.9 -13% -13% 4.3 4.5 5% 5%
88 April 19.5 19.2 -2% -2% 43.0 43.8 2% 2% 51.0 51.4 1% 1% 34.8 42.8 23% 23% 11.5 9.3 -19% -19% 22.9 22.7 -1% -1%
88 May 62.4 62.3 0% 0% 136.0 136.6 0% 0% 163.9 163.9 0% 0% 111.5 112.8 1% 1% 42.1 37.0 -12% -12% 70.8 70.4 -1% -1%
88 June 47.6 48.4 2% 2% 101.2 105.1 4% 3% 126.2 130.4 3% 3% 92.7 95.2 3% 3% 31.3 27.8 -11% -7% 53.3 53.7 1% 1%
88 July 6.8 6.6 -3% -1% 13.9 14.1 2% 1% 20.3 20.0 -1% -1% 15.3 13.8 -10% -5% 3.7 3.8 1% 0% 6.5 7.0 7% 2%
88 August 5.7 5.6 -2% -2% 11.6 11.5 -1% -1% 17.3 16.7 -4% -4% 13.1 11.8 -10% -10% 3.4 3.4 1% 1% 5.5 5.5 -1% -1%
88 September 4.8 4.9 2% 2% 9.8 10.1 3% 3% 14.9 14.9 0% 0% 11.5 10.6 -8% -8% 3.0 3.0 0% 0% 4.8 4.8 0% 0%
88 October 4.4 4.4 -1% -1% 9.0 8.9 0% 0% 13.8 13.5 -2% -2% 10.8 9.7 -10% -10% 2.6 2.7 1% 1% 4.3 4.2 -1% -1%
88 November 3.9 3.9 2% 2% 7.9 8.1 3% 3% 12.2 12.4 2% 2% 9.5 9.0 -5% -5% 2.4 2.4 1% 1% 3.9 3.9 -1% -1%
88 December 3.5 3.5 0% 0% 7.4 7.5 1% 1% 11.5 11.6 0% 0% 8.8 8.2 -6% -6% 2.2 2.2 1% 1% 3.6 3.7 2% 2%
89 January 3.1 3.1 0% 0% 6.7 6.9 2% 2% 10.5 10.7 2% 2% 8.0 7.6 -5% -5% 2.0 2.0 1% 1% 3.4 3.5 4% 4%
89 February 2.5 2.8 10% 10% 5.6 6.4 14% 14% 8.7 10.0 15% 15% 6.6 7.0 7% 7% 1.9 1.9 1% 1% 3.2 3.3 5% 5%
89 March 2.9 2.7 -7% -7% 6.4 6.2 -4% -4% 9.7 9.7 -1% -1% 7.3 7.4 1% 1% 1.9 1.9 1% 1% 3.3 3.2 -3% -3%
89 April 6.3 6.0 -5% -5% 13.6 13.7 1% 1% 18.8 18.9 1% 1% 16.1 21.0 31% 31% 2.8 2.0 -29% -12% 6.8 6.8 -1% 0%
89 May 13.1 11.9 -9% -3% 28.1 27.0 -4% -1% 34.7 33.1 -5% -1% 24.5 28.8 18% 6% 6.3 5.2 -18% -3% 14.0 13.7 -2% 0%
89 June 4.8 4.6 -4% 0% 9.9 10.0 1% 0% 13.6 13.8 1% 0% 10.1 9.8 -3% 0% 2.8 2.8 0% 0% 4.9 5.0 2% 0%
89 July 4.3 4.3 -1% 0% 9.2 9.1 0% 0% 12.6 12.7 0% 0% 9.4 8.6 -8% -3% 2.8 2.9 1% 0% 4.6 4.5 -1% 0%
89 August 3.8 3.8 1% 1% 8.1 8.2 0% 0% 11.5 11.7 2% 2% 8.7 8.0 -8% -8% 2.6 2.6 1% 1% 4.1 4.1 -1% -1%
89 September 3.3 3.4 5% 5% 7.1 7.4 4% 4% 10.2 10.8 6% 6% 7.6 7.4 -2% -2% 2.3 2.4 1% 1% 3.8 3.7 -1% -1%
89 October 4.7 4.4 -7% -7% 9.8 9.6 -2% -2% 13.7 13.6 -1% -1% 10.9 12.0 10% 10% 2.6 2.4 -9% -9% 4.8 4.8 0% 0%
89 November 3.4 3.4 -1% -1% 7.3 7.7 6% 6% 10.2 11.0 7% 7% 7.5 7.5 0% 0% 2.2 2.2 1% 1% 3.8 4.0 8% 8%
89 December 3.1 3.1 0% 0% 6.9 7.0 2% 2% 9.7 10.1 4% 4% 6.8 6.7 -2% -2% 2.1 2.1 -3% -3% 3.6 3.6 2% 2%
90 January 2.8 2.8 0% 0% 6.4 6.8 6% 6% 9.0 9.7 7% 7% 6.2 6.2 0% 0% 2.0 2.0 -3% -3% 3.4 3.7 10% 10%
90 February 3.2 3.3 2% 2% 7.0 7.7 10% 10% 9.8 11.0 13% 13% 7.2 8.9 24% 24% 2.1 2.0 -5% -5% 3.9 4.1 4% 4%
90 March 2.9 2.8 -4% -4% 6.3 6.8 8% 8% 8.9 9.7 9% 9% 6.1 6.2 2% 2% 1.9 1.9 1% 1% 3.3 3.8 16% 16%
90 April 17.9 17.5 -2% -2% 39.5 40.2 2% 2% 47.1 47.5 1% 1% 32.5 40.7 25% 25% 10.6 8.4 -20% -20% 21.0 20.8 -1% -1%
90 May 67.7 67.8 0% 0% 147.8 148.8 1% 1% 177.5 178.2 0% 0% 120.9 122.3 1% 1% 46.0 40.3 -12% -12% 77.1 76.7 0% 0%
90 June 65.3 67.1 3% 3% 139.4 145.0 4% 4% 173.8 179.8 3% 3% 127.3 130.1 2% 2% 43.7 38.6 -12% -10% 73.7 74.0 0% 0%
90 July 7.0 6.8 -4% -2% 14.1 14.5 3% 1% 20.9 20.4 -2% -1% 15.8 14.1 -11% -6% 3.7 3.8 1% 0% 6.5 7.1 9% 3%
90 August 5.8 5.8 -1% -1% 11.8 11.7 0% 0% 17.6 16.9 -4% -4% 13.4 11.9 -11% -11% 3.4 3.4 1% 1% 5.5 5.5 0% 0%
90 September 4.9 5.0 2% 2% 9.8 10.1 3% 3% 15.0 15.0 0% 0% 11.7 10.8 -8% -8% 3.0 3.0 0% 0% 4.8 4.8 0% 0%
90 October 7.4 7.0 -6% -6% 15.1 14.8 -2% -2% 21.5 20.5 -5% -5% 17.7 18.6 5% 5% 3.4 3.0 -11% -11% 7.2 7.1 -1% -1%
90 November 5.1 4.9 -4% -4% 10.3 10.8 5% 5% 15.3 15.6 2% 2% 11.8 11.1 -6% -6% 3.0 3.0 1% 1% 5.0 5.5 10% 10%
90 December 4.5 4.4 -2% -2% 9.2 9.6 4% 4% 13.9 14.0 1% 1% 10.5 9.6 -8% -8% 2.7 2.7 1% 1% 4.5 4.9 9% 9%
91 January 3.9 3.8 -2% -2% 8.2 8.5 4% 4% 12.4 12.7 3% 3% 9.4 8.8 -7% -7% 2.4 2.5 1% 1% 4.0 4.4 9% 9%
91 February 3.2 3.4 6% 6% 6.9 7.8 13% 13% 10.6 11.8 11% 11% 8.0 8.1 1% 1% 2.3 2.3 1% 1% 3.7 4.1 10% 10%
91 March 3.1 3.1 0% 0% 6.8 6.9 3% 3% 10.3 10.7 3% 3% 7.7 7.4 -4% -4% 2.1 2.1 -2% -2% 3.5 3.6 4% 4%
91 April 38.8 39.3 1% 1% 86.0 88.7 3% 3% 102.8 105.5 3% 3% 69.3 78.2 13% 13% 26.6 22.5 -15% -15% 46.5 46.2 -1% -1%
91 May 75.1 75.6 1% 1% 162.5 164.4 1% 1% 200.8 202.2 1% 1% 144.2 144.2 0% 0% 49.9 43.8 -12% -12% 84.1 84.3 0% 0%
91 June 61.3 62.7 2% 2% 130.1 134.9 4% 4% 164.5 169.0 3% 3% 121.2 123.3 2% 2% 40.5 35.9 -12% -10% 68.5 68.5 0% 0%
91 July 7.0 6.9 -2% -1% 14.1 14.5 3% 1% 21.2 21.0 -1% -1% 16.0 14.1 -11% -6% 3.7 3.8 1% 0% 6.5 7.1 8% 2%
91 August 5.8 5.7 -1% -1% 11.7 11.7 0% 0% 17.7 17.1 -3% -3% 13.4 11.9 -11% -11% 3.4 3.4 1% 1% 5.5 5.5 0% 0%
91 September 4.9 5.1 3% 3% 9.8 10.2 4% 4% 15.1 15.2 1% 1% 11.7 10.8 -8% -8% 2.9 3.0 1% 1% 4.7 4.7 0% 0%
91 October 6.6 6.3 -5% -5% 13.5 13.2 -3% -3% 19.7 18.9 -4% -4% 16.1 16.6 3% 3% 3.2 2.9 -9% -9% 6.4 6.3 -2% -2%
91 November 4.7 4.7 0% 0% 9.6 10.3 7% 7% 14.4 15.1 5% 5% 11.2 10.5 -6% -6% 2.8 2.8 0% 0% 4.7 5.2 11% 11%
91 December 4.2 4.1 -2% -2% 8.6 9.4 9% 9% 13.2 14.0 5% 5% 10.1 9.3 -8% -8% 2.5 2.5 1% 1% 4.2 5.0 20% 20%
92 January 3.7 3.6 -1% -1% 7.7 8.3 7% 7% 12.0 12.6 5% 5% 9.0 8.5 -6% -6% 2.3 2.3 1% 1% 3.8 4.4 14% 14%
92 February 3.0 3.3 10% 10% 6.4 7.2 13% 13% 9.9 11.2 14% 14% 7.5 7.9 5% 5% 2.1 2.2 1% 1% 3.6 3.6 3% 3%
92 March 3.0 2.9 -1% -1% 6.5 6.7 3% 3% 10.0 10.5 4% 4% 7.5 7.3 -3% -3% 2.0 2.0 1% 1% 3.3 3.5 6% 6%
92 April 16.3 15.9 -2% -2% 36.1 36.6 1% 1% 44.2 44.4 0% 0% 32.2 40.0 24% 24% 9.5 7.5 -21% -21% 19.2 18.9 -2% -2%
92 May 91.9 92.5 1% 1% 200.3 201.8 1% 1% 244.7 246.2 1% 1% 170.7 171.4 0% 0% 62.6 54.8 -12% -12% 104.4 103.7 -1% -1%
92 June 58.5 59.7 2% 2% 124.0 128.8 4% 4% 156.5 160.9 3% 3% 115.2 117.3 2% 2% 38.6 34.1 -12% -9% 65.2 65.6 1% 1%
92 July 6.9 6.7 -3% -1% 13.9 14.3 3% 1% 20.9 20.6 -2% -1% 15.8 14.0 -11% -6% 3.7 3.7 1% 0% 6.4 7.0 8% 2%
92 August 5.7 5.7 0% 0% 11.5 11.6 0% 0% 17.5 17.0 -3% -3% 13.3 11.8 -11% -11% 3.3 3.3 1% 1% 5.4 5.4 0% 0%
92 September 5.0 5.0 1% 1% 9.9 10.2 2% 2% 15.2 15.2 0% 0% 11.9 11.0 -7% -7% 3.0 3.0 1% 1% 4.8 4.8 -1% -1%
92 October 7.7 7.3 -6% -6% 15.9 15.5 -2% -2% 22.5 21.5 -4% -4% 18.6 19.8 7% 7% 3.4 3.0 -13% -13% 7.5 7.4 -1% -1%
92 November 4.9 4.8 -1% -1% 9.9 10.3 4% 4% 14.9 15.2 2% 2% 11.5 10.8 -6% -6% 2.9 2.9 1% 1% 4.9 5.1 5% 5%
92 December 4.4 4.3 -2% -2% 9.0 9.1 1% 1% 13.7 13.7 0% 0% 10.4 9.5 -8% -8% 2.7 2.7 1% 1% 4.4 4.4 2% 2%
93 January 3.9 3.8 -2% -2% 8.0 8.5 5% 5% 12.3 12.8 4% 4% 9.3 8.7 -7% -7% 2.4 2.5 1% 1% 4.0 4.4 11% 11%
93 February 3.1 3.4 9% 9% 6.6 7.5 14% 14% 10.2 11.6 14% 14% 7.7 8.1 5% 5% 2.2 2.3 1% 1% 3.7 3.9 6% 6%
93 March 3.1 3.0 0% 0% 6.7 6.9 3% 3% 10.3 10.7 4% 4% 7.7 7.5 -3% -3% 2.0 2.1 1% 1% 3.4 3.6 5% 5%
93 April 10.3 9.9 -4% -4% 22.6 22.7 0% 0% 29.2 29.2 0% 0% 22.3 28.7 29% 29% 5.2 3.9 -24% -18% 11.8 11.5 -2% -2%
93 May 55.8 55.3 -1% -1% 122.3 122.4 0% 0% 147.0 146.0 -1% -1% 99.1 101.5 2% 2% 38.1 33.4 -12% -12% 63.9 63.5 -1% -1%
93 June 39.5 40.3 2% 2% 84.3 87.6 4% 3% 105.3 109.2 4% 3% 76.9 79.7 4% 3% 26.1 23.2 -11% -6% 44.4 44.7 1% 0%
93 July 6.6 6.3 -4% -2% 13.5 13.5 1% 0% 20.0 19.6 -2% -1% 14.8 13.4 -9% -5% 3.7 3.7 1% 0% 6.4 6.7 5% 1%
93 August 5.5 5.5 -1% -1% 11.3 11.2 0% 0% 17.0 16.5 -3% -3% 12.8 11.5 -10% -10% 3.3 3.3 1% 1% 5.4 5.4 0% 0%
93 September 8.5 8.3 -3% -3% 17.8 17.9 1% 1% 24.6 24.3 -1% -1% 20.4 22.3 10% 10% 4.0 3.4 -13% -13% 8.9 8.8 -1% -1%
93 October 5.3 5.1 -4% -4% 11.0 11.0 0% 0% 16.3 16.0 -2% -2% 12.4 11.2 -10% -10% 3.3 3.3 1% 1% 5.3 5.4 2% 2%
93 November 4.5 4.6 2% 2% 9.4 10.2 9% 9% 14.0 14.9 7% 7% 10.6 9.9 -6% -6% 3.0 3.0 1% 1% 4.7 5.2 11% 11%
93 December 4.1 4.1 0% 0% 8.6 9.0 5% 5% 13.0 13.5 4% 4% 9.9 9.1 -8% -8% 2.6 2.7 1% 1% 4.2 4.6 9% 9%
94 January 3.6 3.6 0% 0% 7.7 8.1 5% 5% 11.7 12.3 5% 5% 8.9 8.3 -6% -6% 2.4 2.4 1% 1% 3.9 4.2 9% 9%
94 February 2.9 3.3 12% 12% 6.3 7.7 22% 22% 9.6 11.7 22% 22% 7.3 7.8 6% 6% 2.2 2.2 0% 0% 3.6 4.2 19% 19%
94 March 2.9 2.9 0% 0% 6.5 6.7 3% 3% 9.8 10.4 5% 5% 7.4 7.2 -3% -3% 2.0 2.0 1% 1% 3.4 3.5 4% 4%
94 April 3.7 3.6 -5% -3% 8.0 8.1 1% 0% 11.7 12.2 4% 2% 9.2 10.6 16% 9% 2.2 2.1 -8% -3% 4.1 4.1 0% 0%
94 May 55.9 55.4 -1% -1% 123.6 123.4 0% 0% 147.9 146.8 -1% -1% 99.5 105.6 6% 6% 37.6 32.2 -15% -15% 64.9 63.9 -1% -1%
94 June 90.6 94.2 4% 4% 194.6 203.2 4% 4% 241.6 251.8 4% 4% 175.9 180.6 3% 3% 61.6 54.1 -12% -12% 103.5 103.5 0% 0%
94 July 7.3 6.8 -7% -3% 14.3 14.5 1% 1% 21.4 20.9 -3% -1% 16.5 14.9 -9% -5% 3.6 3.7 1% 0% 6.4 7.1 10% 3%
94 August 6.0 5.9 -2% -2% 11.9 11.9 -1% -1% 17.9 17.3 -4% -4% 13.8 12.5 -10% -10% 3.3 3.3 1% 1% 5.5 5.5 0% 0%
94 September 5.0 5.1 1% 1% 10.0 10.3 3% 3% 15.2 15.2 0% 0% 12.0 11.2 -7% -7% 2.9 3.0 0% 0% 4.8 4.8 0% 0%
94 October 4.9 4.7 -4% -4% 9.7 9.5 -2% -2% 14.9 14.4 -4% -4% 11.8 10.9 -8% -8% 2.7 2.8 1% 1% 4.5 4.5 -1% -1%
94 November 4.6 4.4 -3% -3% 9.1 9.3 2% 2% 13.9 14.0 1% 1% 11.0 10.8 -2% -2% 2.6 2.6 1% 1% 4.4 4.5 4% 4%
94 December 4.1 3.9 -5% -5% 8.4 8.4 1% 1% 12.9 12.9 0% 0% 10.0 9.5 -5% -5% 2.4 2.4 0% 0% 4.0 4.2 5% 5%
95 January 3.6 3.5 -2% -2% 7.5 7.8 4% 4% 11.7 12.0 3% 3% 8.8 8.5 -3% -3% 2.2 2.2 1% 1% 3.7 4.0 10% 10%
95 February 3.0 3.1 5% 5% 6.4 7.2 12% 12% 10.0 11.1 11% 11% 7.5 7.9 5% 5% 2.0 2.1 1% 1% 3.5 3.8 10% 10%
95 March 2.9 2.8 -2% -2% 6.3 6.4 1% 1% 9.8 10.1 3% 3% 7.3 7.3 -1% -1% 1.9 1.9 1% 1% 3.3 3.3 3% 3%
95 April 25.2 25.3 0% 0% 55.9 56.8 2% 2% 66.5 67.8 2% 2% 46.9 55.9 19% 19% 15.8 12.9 -18% -18% 29.9 29.2 -2% -2%
95 May 42.3 41.5 -2% -2% 91.4 91.2 0% 0% 112.0 110.1 -2% -2% 77.1 78.6 2% 2% 27.5 24.2 -12% -9% 47.0 46.9 0% 0%
95 June 19.0 18.8 -1% 0% 39.7 40.6 2% 1% 50.6 51.5 2% 1% 38.0 39.9 5% 2% 11.2 10.2 -9% -2% 20.3 20.4 1% 0%
95 July 6.3 6.0 -4% -2% 13.1 13.0 0% 0% 19.3 18.8 -2% -1% 14.2 13.0 -9% -4% 3.7 3.7 1% 0% 6.3 6.5 3% 1%
95 August 5.4 5.3 -1% -1% 11.0 11.0 0% 0% 16.5 16.2 -2% -2% 12.4 11.2 -9% -9% 3.3 3.3 1% 1% 5.3 5.3 0% 0%
95 September 5.9 5.9 -1% -1% 12.2 12.3 1% 1% 17.8 17.8 0% 0% 14.1 14.5 3% 3% 3.4 3.2 -4% -4% 6.1 6.0 -2% -2%
95 October 11.5 10.7 -6% -6% 24.3 23.9 -2% -2% 31.8 30.7 -3% -3% 25.5 27.9 9% 9% 5.4 4.6 -15% -15% 12.0 12.0 0% 0%
95 November 5.4 5.4 -1% -1% 11.3 11.7 4% 4% 16.3 16.8 3% 3% 12.2 11.5 -5% -5% 3.5 3.5 1% 1% 5.7 5.9 4% 4%
95 December 4.8 4.8 0% 0% 10.1 10.3 1% 1% 14.7 15.0 2% 2% 11.0 10.1 -8% -8% 3.2 3.3 1% 1% 5.0 5.1 2% 2%
96 January 4.2 4.2 0% 0% 9.0 9.0 0% 0% 13.1 13.4 2% 2% 10.0 9.2 -8% -8% 2.9 2.9 1% 1% 4.5 4.5 0% 0%
96 February 3.3 3.8 13% 13% 7.2 8.1 12% 12% 10.7 12.3 15% 15% 8.2 8.5 4% 4% 2.6 2.6 1% 1% 4.1 4.1 0% 0%
96 March 3.6 3.5 -3% -3% 7.9 7.8 0% 0% 11.6 11.9 3% 3% 8.8 8.6 -3% -3% 2.5 2.5 1% 1% 4.0 4.0 1% 1%
96 April 8.5 8.1 -4% -4% 18.2 18.3 1% 1% 24.0 24.2 1% 1% 19.1 23.9 25% 25% 3.9 3.0 -23% -13% 9.3 9.1 -1% -1%
96 May 16.7 15.6 -6% -3% 36.1 35.1 -3% -1% 43.3 41.9 -3% -1% 30.0 33.1 10% 5% 10.0 8.8 -12% -3% 18.3 18.0 -2% -1%
96 June 6.0 5.6 -6% -1% 12.6 12.7 0% 0% 17.3 17.4 1% 0% 12.7 12.6 -1% 0% 3.8 3.8 0% 0% 6.4 6.5 2% 0%
96 July 5.2 5.1 -3% -1% 11.0 10.9 -1% 0% 15.3 15.3 0% 0% 11.3 10.5 -7% -3% 3.4 3.5 1% 0% 5.4 5.4 0% 0%
96 August 4.5 4.5 0% 0% 9.5 9.6 0% 0% 13.5 13.7 2% 2% 10.0 9.3 -7% -7% 3.1 3.1 1% 1% 4.8 4.8 -1% -1%
96 September 3.8 3.9 3% 3% 8.2 8.4 3% 3% 11.7 12.4 5% 5% 8.9 8.6 -3% -3% 2.7 2.7 1% 1% 4.3 4.2 -2% -2%
96 October 7.6 7.1 -7% -7% 16.0 15.6 -3% -3% 21.4 20.9 -2% -2% 17.1 19.8 16% 16% 3.4 2.8 -18% -18% 7.7 7.6 -1% -1%
96 November 4.7 4.5 -5% -5% 10.0 10.4 4% 4% 13.8 14.4 4% 4% 10.2 10.1 -1% -1% 3.0 3.0 1% 1% 5.1 5.5 7% 7%
96 December 4.2 4.1 -3% -3% 9.1 9.4 3% 3% 12.7 13.2 4% 4% 9.2 8.8 -5% -5% 2.9 2.9 1% 1% 4.7 5.0 8% 8%
97 January 3.7 3.7 0% 0% 8.1 8.4 4% 4% 11.4 12.0 5% 5% 8.2 8.0 -3% -3% 2.6 2.6 0% 0% 4.2 4.5 6% 6%
97 February 3.1 3.4 10% 10% 6.8 7.6 12% 12% 9.5 11.0 15% 15% 6.8 7.4 9% 9% 2.4 2.4 1% 1% 3.9 4.0 2% 2%
97 March 3.1 3.1 0% 0% 6.9 7.2 4% 4% 9.8 10.4 6% 6% 6.9 6.9 0% 0% 2.2 2.2 1% 1% 3.6 3.8 6% 6%
97 April 21.8 21.6 -1% -1% 48.2 49.1 2% 2% 56.8 57.8 2% 2% 38.5 46.7 21% 21% 13.9 11.5 -17% -17% 25.8 25.3 -2% -2%
97 May 34.9 33.8 -3% -3% 75.2 74.5 -1% -1% 90.7 89.4 -2% -1% 60.1 61.9 3% 3% 22.7 20.1 -11% -7% 38.6 38.4 -1% 0%
97 June 31.6 31.9 1% 1% 67.6 69.5 3% 2% 83.8 85.0 1% 1% 60.5 62.9 4% 3% 20.8 18.7 -10% -4% 35.6 35.5 -1% 0%
97 July 6.5 6.3 -4% -2% 13.6 13.8 1% 0% 19.6 19.3 -2% -1% 14.6 13.2 -9% -5% 3.8 3.8 1% 0% 6.6 7.0 5% 2%
97 August 5.5 5.4 -1% -1% 11.4 11.4 0% 0% 16.8 16.5 -2% -2% 12.6 11.3 -10% -10% 3.4 3.4 1% 1% 5.5 5.5 0% 0%
97 September 4.7 4.8 3% 3% 9.7 10.0 3% 3% 14.4 14.8 2% 2% 11.0 10.3 -7% -7% 3.0 3.0 1% 1% 4.8 4.8 0% 0%
97 October 4.3 4.3 0% 0% 8.9 8.9 0% 0% 13.4 13.4 0% 0% 10.4 9.5 -9% -9% 2.7 2.7 1% 1% 4.3 4.3 -1% -1%
97 November 3.7 3.9 4% 4% 7.8 8.1 5% 5% 11.8 12.4 5% 5% 9.2 8.8 -4% -4% 2.4 2.4 1% 1% 4.0 4.0 1% 1%
97 December 3.4 3.5 2% 2% 7.3 7.8 8% 8% 11.1 11.9 7% 7% 8.6 8.1 -5% -5% 2.2 2.3 2% 2% 3.7 4.1 12% 12%
98 January 3.0 3.1 2% 2% 6.6 7.1 8% 8% 10.1 10.9 8% 8% 7.8 7.5 -4% -4% 2.0 2.1 1% 1% 3.4 3.8 12% 12%
98 February 2.5 2.8 12% 12% 5.6 6.4 15% 15% 8.5 9.9 17% 17% 6.3 6.9 9% 9% 1.9 1.9 1% 1% 3.2 3.4 4% 4%
98 March 2.7 2.7 -3% -3% 6.1 6.5 6% 6% 9.2 9.9 7% 7% 6.8 6.9 2% 2% 1.8 1.9 1% 1% 3.2 3.6 12% 12%
98 April 28.6 28.8 1% 1% 63.4 65.1 3% 3% 75.0 77.2 3% 3% 51.5 60.9 18% 18% 18.5 15.2 -18% -18% 34.1 33.7 -1% -1%
98 May 66.0 66.1 0% 0% 143.5 144.6 1% 1% 175.5 175.6 0% 0% 123.1 124.1 1% 1% 44.0 38.6 -12% -12% 74.5 74.4 0% 0%
98 June 40.3 40.7 1% 1% 85.1 87.8 3% 2% 107.2 110.0 3% 2% 79.4 81.5 3% 3% 25.9 23.1 -11% -6% 44.4 44.5 0% 0%
98 July 6.7 6.5 -3% -1% 13.6 13.9 2% 1% 20.2 20.0 -1% 0% 15.1 13.6 -10% -5% 3.7 3.7 1% 0% 6.4 6.9 7% 2%
98 August 5.6 5.6 0% 0% 11.4 11.4 0% 0% 17.1 16.7 -3% -3% 13.0 11.6 -10% -10% 3.3 3.3 1% 1% 5.4 5.4 0% 0%
98 September 4.8 4.9 3% 3% 9.6 9.9 3% 3% 14.7 14.8 1% 1% 11.4 10.5 -7% -7% 2.9 2.9 1% 1% 4.7 4.7 0% 0%
98 October 4.4 4.3 -2% -2% 8.8 8.8 -1% -1% 13.7 13.4 -2% -2% 10.6 9.6 -9% -9% 2.6 2.6 1% 1% 4.2 4.1 -1% -1%
98 November 3.8 3.9 2% 2% 7.7 8.2 6% 6% 12.1 12.6 4% 4% 9.4 8.9 -5% -5% 2.3 2.4 1% 1% 3.8 4.0 5% 5%
98 December 3.5 3.5 0% 0% 7.3 7.6 5% 5% 11.4 11.8 4% 4% 8.7 8.1 -6% -6% 2.1 2.2 1% 1% 3.6 3.9 9% 9%
99 January 3.0 3.1 1% 1% 6.6 6.9 5% 5% 10.3 10.8 5% 5% 7.9 7.6 -4% -4% 2.0 2.0 1% 1% 3.3 3.6 9% 9%
99 February 2.6 2.7 7% 7% 5.7 6.3 11% 11% 8.9 9.9 12% 12% 6.7 7.0 4% 4% 1.8 1.9 1% 1% 3.1 3.3 6% 6%
99 March 9.2 8.5 -7% -7% 20.1 19.3 -4% -4% 26.5 25.5 -4% -4% 21.2 26.8 27% 27% 3.9 2.7 -31% -31% 10.0 9.6 -4% -4%
99 April 25.6 25.3 -1% -1% 55.7 56.7 2% 2% 65.6 66.9 2% 2% 44.8 49.7 11% 11% 16.7 14.6 -13% -13% 29.6 29.4 -1% -1%
99 May 53.6 53.3 -1% -1% 116.5 117.1 1% 1% 143.1 142.5 0% 0% 99.8 100.1 0% 0% 36.0 31.9 -12% -11% 60.4 60.5 0% 0%
99 June 12.4 12.0 -3% -1% 25.5 26.2 3% 1% 33.5 34.1 2% 0% 26.2 27.1 3% 1% 6.6 6.1 -8% -1% 12.7 13.1 3% 1%
99 July 6.3 6.1 -3% -1% 13.0 12.9 -1% 0% 19.1 18.6 -3% -1% 14.2 12.9 -10% -5% 3.8 3.8 0% 0% 6.3 6.3 1% 0%
99 August 5.4 5.3 -2% -2% 11.0 10.9 -1% -1% 16.5 16.1 -2% -2% 12.3 11.1 -10% -10% 3.4 3.4 1% 1% 5.3 5.3 -1% -1%
99 September 6.5 6.4 -2% -2% 13.5 13.6 1% 1% 19.3 19.2 0% 0% 15.4 16.2 5% 5% 3.5 3.3 -7% -7% 6.7 6.5 -2% -2%
99 October 6.5 6.1 -7% -7% 13.4 13.1 -3% -3% 19.1 18.5 -3% -3% 15.0 14.9 0% 0% 3.5 3.4 -4% -4% 6.5 6.5 0% 0%
99 November 4.8 4.9 0% 0% 10.1 10.4 3% 3% 14.7 15.2 3% 3% 11.2 10.7 -5% -5% 3.1 3.1 1% 1% 5.1 5.2 1% 1%
99 December 4.3 4.2 -1% -1% 9.0 9.2 2% 2% 13.3 13.7 3% 3% 10.2 9.4 -7% -7% 2.8 2.8 1% 1% 4.5 4.7 4% 4%
100 January 3.7 3.7 0% 0% 8.0 8.1 1% 1% 12.0 12.3 3% 3% 9.1 8.6 -6% -6% 2.5 2.5 1% 1% 4.1 4.1 2% 2%
100 February 3.0 3.4 11% 11% 6.6 7.3 10% 10% 9.9 11.3 14% 14% 7.5 8.0 6% 6% 2.3 2.4 1% 1% 3.8 3.7 -2% -2%
100 March 3.5 3.3 -6% -6% 7.5 7.6 1% 1% 11.0 11.4 4% 4% 8.3 8.3 0% 0% 2.3 2.3 1% 1% 3.8 4.0 7% 7%
100 April 10.5 10.0 -5% -5% 22.8 22.7 0% 0% 29.1 29.1 0% 0% 22.1 28.4 28% 28% 5.1 3.9 -24% -18% 11.8 11.5 -3% -3%
100 May 32.2 31.1 -3% -3% 69.9 69.2 -1% -1% 83.0 82.2 -1% -1% 55.3 58.4 6% 5% 21.1 18.6 -12% -7% 36.1 35.8 -1% 0%
100 June 14.6 14.1 -3% -1% 30.7 31.2 2% 0% 38.3 38.4 0% 0% 28.0 29.6 6% 2% 8.4 7.7 -9% -2% 15.7 15.9 1% 0%
100 July 6.1 5.8 -5% -2% 12.9 12.8 -1% 0% 18.4 17.9 -3% -1% 13.4 12.2 -9% -4% 3.8 3.8 1% 0% 6.3 6.5 2% 1%
100 August 5.3 5.2 -1% -1% 11.0 11.0 0% 0% 15.9 15.8 -1% -1% 11.9 10.8 -9% -9% 3.4 3.4 1% 1% 5.4 5.4 0% 0%
100 September 4.4 4.7 6% 6% 9.3 9.7 5% 5% 13.7 14.3 5% 5% 10.5 9.9 -6% -6% 3.0 3.0 1% 1% 4.8 4.7 -1% -1%
100 October 5.0 4.8 -5% -5% 10.5 10.3 -2% -2% 15.1 15.0 -1% -1% 12.1 12.0 -1% -1% 3.0 2.9 -2% -2% 5.1 5.1 -1% -1%
100 November 4.0 4.1 2% 2% 8.5 9.2 7% 7% 12.5 13.5 8% 8% 9.7 9.4 -3% -3% 2.6 2.6 0% 0% 4.4 4.8 8% 8%
100 December 3.6 3.6 0% 0% 7.9 8.4 7% 7% 11.6 12.4 7% 7% 8.8 8.4 -4% -4% 2.4 2.5 1% 1% 4.0 4.5 12% 12%
101 January 3.3 3.3 1% 1% 7.2 8.0 11% 11% 10.6 11.7 11% 11% 8.0 7.8 -2% -2% 2.2 2.3 1% 1% 3.7 4.4 18% 18%
101 February 2.7 3.0 12% 12% 6.0 6.9 14% 14% 8.9 10.4 17% 17% 6.5 7.2 10% 10% 2.1 2.1 1% 1% 3.5 3.6 4% 4%
101 March 2.7 2.8 0% 0% 6.2 6.6 5% 5% 9.1 9.8 8% 8% 6.6 6.6 1% 1% 1.9 2.0 1% 1% 3.3 3.6 9% 9%
101 April 52.2 53.6 3% 3% 115.9 119.9 4% 4% 138.2 142.5 3% 3% 92.1 102.2 11% 11% 36.4 30.8 -15% -15% 62.9 62.4 -1% -1%
101 May 85.4 85.9 1% 1% 183.5 185.5 1% 1% 227.1 229.0 1% 1% 165.1 164.6 0% 0% 56.1 49.2 -12% -12% 94.6 94.5 0% 0%
101 June 50.4 51.2 2% 2% 106.5 110.3 4% 3% 135.1 138.4 2% 2% 100.1 101.8 2% 2% 32.7 29.0 -11% -8% 55.7 56.0 1% 1%
101 July 7.0 6.9 -1% -1% 14.0 14.6 4% 2% 21.1 21.1 0% 0% 15.9 14.1 -11% -6% 3.7 3.7 1% 0% 6.5 7.1 10% 3%
101 August 5.8 5.7 -1% -1% 11.6 11.6 0% 0% 17.6 17.1 -3% -3% 13.3 11.9 -11% -11% 3.3 3.4 1% 1% 5.5 5.5 0% 0%
101 September 4.9 5.0 2% 2% 9.8 10.1 3% 3% 15.0 15.1 1% 1% 11.7 10.8 -8% -8% 2.9 3.0 1% 1% 4.7 4.7 0% 0%
101 October 4.7 4.6 -3% -3% 9.5 9.3 -1% -1% 14.7 14.2 -3% -3% 11.5 10.5 -8% -8% 2.7 2.7 1% 1% 4.5 4.4 -1% -1%
101 November 4.1 4.1 1% 1% 8.2 8.9 9% 9% 12.8 13.5 5% 5% 10.0 9.5 -5% -5% 2.4 2.5 1% 1% 4.0 4.5 12% 12%
101 December 3.7 3.7 -1% -1% 7.7 8.0 4% 4% 12.1 12.3 2% 2% 9.2 8.7 -6% -6% 2.2 2.3 1% 1% 3.7 4.0 7% 7%
102 January 3.3 3.3 -1% -1% 7.0 7.0 0% 0% 11.0 11.0 0% 0% 8.3 7.9 -4% -4% 2.1 2.1 -2% -2% 3.5 3.5 0% 0%
102 February 2.7 2.9 9% 9% 5.8 6.7 15% 15% 9.1 10.5 15% 15% 6.9 7.4 7% 7% 1.9 1.9 1% 1% 3.3 3.5 8% 8%
102 March 10.3 9.5 -7% -7% 22.5 21.7 -3% -3% 29.4 28.2 -4% -4% 22.9 28.6 25% 25% 4.5 3.3 -28% -28% 11.3 10.9 -3% -3%
102 April 24.3 23.9 -2% -2% 52.7 53.6 2% 2% 62.4 63.5 2% 2% 43.0 47.6 11% 11% 15.7 13.8 -12% -12% 27.9 27.8 -1% -1%
102 May 33.4 32.2 -3% -3% 71.7 71.0 -1% -1% 88.6 86.5 -2% -2% 61.1 61.7 1% 1% 21.6 19.3 -11% -6% 36.7 36.5 -1% 0%
102 June 7.0 6.7 -5% -1% 14.7 14.9 1% 0% 21.1 20.8 -1% 0% 15.8 15.6 -1% 0% 4.0 4.0 -1% 0% 7.4 7.6 3% 0%
102 July 5.9 5.6 -4% -2% 12.2 12.0 -1% 0% 17.8 17.2 -3% -1% 13.3 12.1 -9% -4% 3.6 3.6 1% 0% 5.9 5.9 0% 0%
102 August 5.0 5.0 -1% -1% 10.3 10.3 0% 0% 15.3 15.2 -1% -1% 11.7 10.6 -9% -9% 3.1 3.2 0% 0% 5.0 5.0 0% 0%
102 September 6.0 5.9 -1% -1% 12.4 12.5 1% 1% 17.7 17.9 1% 1% 14.2 15.1 6% 6% 3.3 3.1 -7% -7% 6.1 6.0 -2% -2%
102 October 13.1 12.3 -6% -6% 28.2 27.7 -2% -2% 35.7 34.8 -3% -3% 27.7 30.6 10% 10% 6.7 5.7 -15% -15% 14.2 14.1 0% 0%
102 November 5.5 5.4 -1% -1% 11.5 12.3 7% 7% 16.4 17.3 6% 6% 12.3 11.6 -5% -5% 3.6 3.6 1% 1% 5.8 6.4 10% 10%
102 December 4.8 4.8 0% 0% 10.3 10.7 4% 4% 14.7 15.3 4% 4% 11.0 10.1 -8% -8% 3.3 3.3 1% 1% 5.1 5.5 7% 7%
103 January 4.2 4.3 1% 1% 9.1 9.6 6% 6% 13.1 14.0 6% 6% 9.9 9.1 -8% -8% 2.9 3.0 0% 0% 4.6 5.0 10% 10%
103 February 3.5 3.8 8% 8% 7.6 8.5 12% 12% 11.1 12.6 14% 14% 8.4 8.4 0% 0% 2.6 2.6 1% 1% 4.2 4.4 7% 7%
103 March 3.4 3.4 1% 1% 7.4 7.6 3% 3% 10.9 11.5 6% 6% 8.2 7.9 -4% -4% 2.4 2.4 1% 1% 3.8 4.0 4% 4%
103 April 4.1 4.0 -3% -2% 8.8 8.9 1% 1% 12.6 13.1 4% 2% 9.9 11.1 12% 8% 2.5 2.4 -6% -2% 4.5 4.5 0% 0%
103 May 67.6 67.6 0% 0% 149.2 149.5 0% 0% 179.3 178.8 0% 0% 121.7 126.9 4% 4% 46.0 39.7 -14% -14% 78.4 77.3 -1% -1%
103 June 53.1 54.3 2% 2% 113.0 117.4 4% 4% 140.8 146.0 4% 4% 102.4 105.9 3% 3% 35.1 31.0 -12% -8% 59.6 59.8 0% 0%
103 July 6.8 6.5 -4% -2% 13.6 13.9 2% 1% 20.2 20.0 -1% 0% 15.2 13.7 -10% -5% 3.6 3.7 2% 1% 6.3 6.9 9% 2%
103 August 5.7 5.6 -1% -1% 11.5 11.5 0% 0% 17.3 16.8 -3% -3% 13.1 11.8 -10% -10% 3.3 3.3 1% 1% 5.4 5.4 0% 0%
103 September 4.9 5.0 2% 2% 9.8 10.0 3% 3% 14.9 14.9 0% 0% 11.5 10.8 -6% -6% 2.9 3.0 0% 0% 4.7 4.7 0% 0%
103 October 4.5 4.4 -1% -1% 9.0 8.9 0% 0% 13.9 13.6 -2% -2% 10.8 9.8 -9% -9% 2.6 2.6 1% 1% 4.3 4.2 -1% -1%
103 November 4.3 4.2 -2% -2% 8.6 8.9 3% 3% 13.2 13.5 2% 2% 10.4 10.1 -3% -3% 2.5 2.5 1% 1% 4.2 4.4 4% 4%
103 December 3.9 3.8 -3% -3% 7.9 8.2 3% 3% 12.3 12.5 2% 2% 9.5 9.0 -5% -5% 2.3 2.3 1% 1% 3.9 4.2 8% 8%
104 January 3.4 3.4 -1% -1% 7.2 7.3 2% 2% 11.1 11.4 2% 2% 8.4 8.1 -4% -4% 2.1 2.1 0% 0% 3.6 3.7 4% 4%
104 February 2.7 3.0 10% 10% 5.9 6.7 12% 12% 9.2 10.4 14% 14% 7.0 7.5 8% 8% 2.0 2.0 1% 1% 3.4 3.4 1% 1%
104 March 2.8 2.8 0% 0% 6.2 6.5 6% 6% 9.4 10.1 7% 7% 7.0 6.9 -1% -1% 1.8 1.9 1% 1% 3.2 3.5 11% 11%
104 April 15.7 15.4 -2% -2% 34.9 35.3 1% 1% 42.8 42.9 0% 0% 31.3 39.6 26% 26% 8.8 6.8 -23% -23% 18.5 18.1 -2% -2%
104 May 57.6 57.2 -1% -1% 125.6 125.9 0% 0% 151.5 151.2 0% 0% 103.5 105.3 2% 2% 38.7 34.0 -12% -12% 65.3 65.0 0% 0%
104 June 38.4 39.0 2% 1% 81.6 84.6 4% 3% 102.1 105.5 3% 2% 75.1 77.8 3% 3% 25.0 22.3 -11% -6% 42.8 43.1 1% 0%
104 July 6.6 6.3 -4% -2% 13.4 13.7 2% 1% 19.9 19.7 -1% 0% 14.8 13.4 -9% -5% 3.6 3.7 1% 0% 6.4 6.8 7% 2%
104 August 5.6 5.5 -1% -1% 11.3 11.2 0% 0% 17.0 16.5 -3% -3% 12.9 11.5 -10% -10% 3.3 3.3 1% 1% 5.4 5.3 -1% -1%
104 September 4.7 4.8 2% 2% 9.5 9.8 3% 3% 14.6 14.7 1% 1% 11.3 10.4 -8% -8% 2.9 2.9 1% 1% 4.7 4.7 0% 0%
104 October 12.3 11.6 -6% -6% 26.3 25.8 -2% -2% 34.3 33.0 -4% -4% 27.4 30.4 11% 11% 6.0 5.0 -17% -17% 13.1 13.0 0% 0%
104 November 5.2 5.2 -1% -1% 10.8 11.3 5% 5% 15.8 16.3 3% 3% 11.9 11.1 -7% -7% 3.2 3.2 1% 1% 5.3 5.7 7% 7%
104 December 4.7 4.6 -1% -1% 9.7 9.8 1% 1% 14.3 14.5 1% 1% 10.8 9.7 -10% -10% 3.0 3.0 1% 1% 4.7 4.8 2% 2%
105 January 4.2 4.1 -2% -2% 8.7 8.9 3% 3% 12.9 13.3 3% 3% 9.8 8.9 -9% -9% 2.7 2.7 1% 1% 4.3 4.5 6% 6%
105 February 3.3 3.6 12% 12% 6.9 7.8 12% 12% 10.5 12.0 14% 14% 8.0 8.2 3% 3% 2.4 2.4 1% 1% 3.9 3.9 1% 1%
105 March 3.4 3.3 -3% -3% 7.4 7.5 2% 2% 11.1 11.6 4% 4% 8.5 8.2 -4% -4% 2.3 2.3 2% 2% 3.8 3.9 4% 4%
105 April 13.8 13.8 0% 0% 30.4 31.7 4% 4% 37.7 39.1 4% 4% 28.0 35.8 28% 28% 7.8 6.3 -19% -19% 16.0 15.8 -2% -2%
105 May 38.3 36.1 -6% -6% 83.0 80.0 -4% -4% 100.0 96.0 -4% -3% 66.5 66.4 0% 0% 25.5 22.5 -12% -8% 42.8 42.8 0% 0%
105 June 68.5 73.4 7% 7% 148.2 160.0 8% 8% 183.6 197.3 7% 7% 132.7 141.0 6% 6% 47.3 41.8 -12% -11% 79.3 79.4 0% 0%
105 July 6.8 6.6 -3% -1% 13.9 14.5 4% 2% 20.7 20.8 1% 0% 15.3 13.8 -10% -5% 3.8 3.8 1% 0% 6.6 7.3 12% 3%
105 August 5.7 5.6 -2% -2% 11.7 11.6 -1% -1% 17.5 17.0 -3% -3% 13.2 11.9 -10% -10% 3.4 3.4 1% 1% 5.5 5.5 0% 0%
105 September 4.9 5.0 2% 2% 9.8 10.1 3% 3% 14.9 15.1 1% 1% 11.5 10.7 -7% -7% 3.0 3.0 1% 1% 4.8 4.8 0% 0%
105 October 7.2 6.8 -6% -6% 14.8 14.5 -3% -3% 21.1 20.3 -4% -4% 17.3 18.2 5% 5% 3.3 3.0 -11% -11% 7.1 6.9 -2% -2%
105 November 4.8 4.8 1% 1% 9.8 10.3 6% 6% 14.6 15.1 4% 4% 11.3 10.6 -6% -6% 2.9 2.9 1% 1% 4.8 5.1 6% 6%
105 December 4.3 4.2 -1% -1% 8.8 9.2 4% 4% 13.3 13.7 3% 3% 10.2 9.3 -8% -8% 2.6 2.7 1% 1% 4.3 4.7 9% 9%
106 January 3.7 3.7 -1% -1% 7.9 8.1 2% 2% 12.0 12.3 3% 3% 9.1 8.5 -6% -6% 2.4 2.4 1% 1% 3.9 4.1 5% 5%
106 February 3.0 3.3 11% 11% 6.5 7.3 13% 13% 9.9 11.3 14% 14% 7.5 7.9 5% 5% 2.2 2.2 0% 0% 3.6 3.7 2% 2%
106 March 3.0 3.0 0% 0% 6.6 7.1 8% 8% 10.0 10.8 8% 8% 7.6 7.3 -3% -3% 2.0 2.1 1% 1% 3.4 3.9 14% 14%
106 April 6.9 6.6 -5% -5% 14.9 15.1 2% 1% 20.3 20.6 2% 2% 17.0 21.7 28% 28% 3.0 2.2 -28% -12% 7.5 7.6 1% 0%
106 May 57.8 57.3 -1% -1% 127.3 127.2 0% 0% 152.2 151.1 -1% -1% 101.7 105.5 4% 4% 39.4 34.3 -13% -13% 66.7 66.1 -1% -1%
106 June 64.7 66.9 3% 3% 139.0 144.8 4% 4% 172.8 179.8 4% 4% 125.8 129.4 3% 3% 43.9 38.7 -12% -11% 73.8 74.0 0% 0%
106 July 6.8 6.5 -4% -2% 13.6 13.9 2% 1% 20.3 20.0 -1% -1% 15.2 13.6 -10% -5% 3.6 3.7 1% 0% 6.3 6.9 8% 2%
106 August 5.7 5.6 -1% -1% 11.4 11.4 0% 0% 17.2 16.7 -3% -3% 13.1 11.7 -10% -10% 3.3 3.3 1% 1% 5.3 5.3 0% 0%
106 September 4.8 4.9 2% 2% 9.6 9.9 3% 3% 14.7 14.8 1% 1% 11.4 10.6 -7% -7% 2.9 2.9 1% 1% 4.7 4.7 0% 0%
106 October 7.8 7.4 -6% -6% 16.1 15.7 -2% -2% 22.6 21.7 -4% -4% 18.8 20.2 8% 8% 3.4 2.9 -14% -14% 7.6 7.5 -1% -1%
106 November 4.8 4.8 -1% -1% 9.9 10.2 4% 4% 14.7 15.0 2% 2% 11.3 10.6 -6% -6% 2.9 2.9 1% 1% 4.8 5.1 5% 5%
106 December 4.3 4.3 -1% -1% 8.9 9.0 1% 1% 13.5 13.5 1% 1% 10.2 9.4 -8% -8% 2.7 2.7 1% 1% 4.3 4.4 2% 2%
107 January 3.8 3.7 -1% -1% 8.0 8.3 4% 4% 12.1 12.5 3% 3% 9.2 8.6 -7% -7% 2.4 2.5 1% 1% 4.0 4.3 9% 9%
107 February 3.1 3.4 7% 7% 6.7 7.4 9% 9% 10.3 11.4 10% 10% 7.8 7.9 1% 1% 2.2 2.2 1% 1% 3.7 3.8 3% 3%
107 March 3.2 3.1 -2% -2% 6.9 7.5 10% 10% 10.4 11.3 9% 9% 7.9 7.8 -2% -2% 2.1 2.1 1% 1% 3.5 4.2 20% 20%
107 April 42.4 43.0 1% 1% 94.1 96.7 3% 3% 112.5 115.2 2% 2% 75.6 84.7 12% 12% 29.4 24.9 -15% -15% 51.0 50.3 -1% -1%
107 May 60.6 60.8 0% 0% 130.7 132.1 1% 1% 161.5 162.4 1% 1% 116.3 116.9 0% 0% 39.8 35.0 -12% -12% 67.5 67.6 0% 0%
107 June 30.2 30.0 -1% 0% 63.2 64.8 3% 1% 80.7 82.1 2% 1% 60.1 61.7 3% 2% 18.8 16.9 -10% -4% 32.6 32.8 1% 0%
107 July 6.7 6.5 -3% -1% 13.7 13.8 1% 0% 20.4 20.1 -2% -1% 15.2 13.7 -10% -5% 3.7 3.8 1% 0% 6.5 6.8 4% 1%
107 August 5.6 5.5 0% 0% 11.4 11.4 0% 0% 17.2 16.8 -2% -2% 13.0 11.7 -10% -10% 3.4 3.4 1% 1% 5.5 5.5 0% 0%
107 September 4.8 4.9 2% 2% 9.7 9.9 3% 3% 14.8 14.9 1% 1% 11.3 10.5 -7% -7% 2.9 3.0 0% 0% 4.7 4.7 0% 0%
107 October 11.1 10.5 -6% -6% 23.7 23.2 -2% -2% 31.4 30.1 -4% -4% 25.5 28.3 11% 11% 5.2 4.3 -18% -18% 11.7 11.6 -1% -1%
107 November 5.4 5.3 -2% -2% 11.1 11.6 5% 5% 16.2 16.8 3% 3% 12.3 11.6 -6% -6% 3.2 3.3 1% 1% 5.4 5.9 8% 8%
107 December 4.8 4.7 -1% -1% 10.0 10.5 6% 6% 14.7 15.3 4% 4% 11.0 10.0 -9% -9% 3.1 3.1 1% 1% 4.9 5.5 12% 12%
108 January 4.2 4.2 -1% -1% 8.8 9.0 2% 2% 13.1 13.5 2% 2% 9.9 9.2 -8% -8% 2.7 2.8 1% 1% 4.4 4.5 4% 4%
108 February 3.3 3.7 11% 11% 7.1 7.9 11% 11% 10.7 12.1 13% 13% 8.1 8.4 4% 4% 2.5 2.5 1% 1% 4.0 3.9 0% 0%
108 March 3.6 3.5 -4% -4% 7.8 7.7 -1% -1% 11.7 11.8 1% 1% 8.9 8.6 -3% -3% 2.4 2.4 0% 0% 3.9 3.9 1% 1%
108 April 21.2 21.0 -1% -1% 46.7 47.5 2% 2% 55.8 56.8 2% 2% 39.7 47.1 19% 19% 13.3 11.1 -17% -17% 24.9 24.5 -1% -1%
108 May 44.0 43.0 -2% -2% 95.1 94.7 0% 0% 116.6 114.9 -2% -2% 79.2 80.5 2% 2% 29.2 25.8 -12% -9% 49.1 48.8 -1% 0%
108 June 27.3 27.4 0% 0% 57.9 59.6 3% 1% 72.8 75.0 3% 2% 53.7 55.8 4% 3% 17.5 15.8 -10% -4% 30.2 30.4 1% 0%
108 July 6.6 6.4 -4% -2% 13.8 13.9 1% 0% 20.2 20.0 -1% -1% 14.8 13.5 -9% -4% 3.9 3.9 1% 0% 6.7 7.0 5% 1%
108 August 5.5 5.5 -1% -1% 11.5 11.5 0% 0% 17.1 16.9 -1% -1% 12.8 11.6 -9% -9% 3.5 3.5 1% 1% 5.6 5.6 0% 0%
108 September 27.4 27.3 0% 0% 59.1 60.5 2% 2% 73.2 74.6 2% 2% 53.6 58.0 8% 8% 17.6 15.3 -13% -13% 31.2 31.1 0% 0%
108 October 6.3 6.0 -4% -4% 13.0 13.3 2% 2% 19.1 19.1 0% 0% 14.1 12.8 -9% -9% 3.7 3.7 1% 1% 6.3 6.7 6% 6%
108 November 5.2 5.3 2% 2% 10.7 11.2 4% 4% 16.0 16.4 3% 3% 11.8 11.1 -6% -6% 3.4 3.4 0% 0% 5.4 5.5 2% 2%
108 December 4.7 4.7 1% 1% 9.7 9.9 2% 2% 14.6 14.8 1% 1% 11.2 10.1 -9% -9% 3.0 3.0 1% 1% 4.7 4.8 2% 2%
109 January 4.1 4.2 1% 1% 8.6 8.8 2% 2% 13.1 13.4 2% 2% 10.1 9.3 -8% -8% 2.6 2.7 1% 1% 4.3 4.4 2% 2%
109 February 3.3 3.7 13% 13% 7.0 8.2 17% 17% 10.8 12.6 17% 17% 8.3 8.6 4% 4% 2.4 2.4 1% 1% 3.9 4.2 8% 8%
109 March 3.6 3.5 -2% -2% 7.8 8.3 7% 7% 11.7 12.5 6% 6% 9.2 8.9 -3% -3% 2.3 2.4 1% 1% 3.9 4.4 14% 14%
109 April 20.1 19.9 -1% -1% 44.3 44.9 1% 1% 53.2 54.0 2% 2% 38.6 45.9 19% 19% 12.3 10.1 -17% -17% 23.6 23.1 -2% -2%
109 May 46.3 45.5 -2% -2% 100.4 100.1 0% 0% 123.0 121.5 -1% -1% 84.4 85.7 1% 1% 30.9 27.2 -12% -10% 51.9 51.5 -1% -1%
109 June 19.5 19.3 -1% 0% 40.8 41.8 2% 1% 51.9 53.2 3% 1% 38.9 40.7 5% 2% 11.7 10.6 -9% -2% 20.9 21.1 1% 0%
109 July 6.5 6.2 -4% -2% 13.6 13.5 0% 0% 19.8 19.4 -2% -1% 14.6 13.4 -9% -4% 3.9 3.9 1% 0% 6.6 6.8 3% 1%
109 August 5.5 5.4 -1% -1% 11.4 11.4 0% 0% 16.9 16.6 -1% -1% 12.6 11.5 -9% -9% 3.5 3.5 1% 1% 5.5 5.5 0% 0%
109 September 4.7 4.8 3% 3% 9.7 10.0 3% 3% 14.5 14.9 3% 3% 11.1 10.4 -6% -6% 3.0 3.1 0% 0% 4.8 4.8 0% 0%
109 October 7.2 6.8 -5% -5% 14.9 14.6 -2% -2% 20.9 20.4 -3% -3% 17.0 18.2 7% 7% 3.4 3.0 -11% -11% 7.2 7.0 -2% -2%
109 November 4.7 4.7 1% 1% 9.7 10.4 8% 8% 14.2 15.2 6% 6% 11.0 10.4 -5% -5% 2.9 2.9 1% 1% 4.9 5.4 9% 9%
109 December 4.1 4.1 0% 0% 8.8 9.1 4% 4% 13.0 13.6 4% 4% 9.9 9.2 -7% -7% 2.7 2.7 1% 1% 4.4 4.7 7% 7%
110 January 3.6 3.7 1% 1% 7.8 8.0 3% 3% 11.7 12.2 5% 5% 9.0 8.5 -6% -6% 2.4 2.5 1% 1% 4.0 4.1 3% 3%
110 February 3.9 4.1 5% 5% 8.3 9.2 11% 11% 12.0 13.6 13% 13% 9.6 11.2 17% 17% 2.6 2.5 -5% -5% 4.5 4.7 3% 3%
110 March 11.3 10.4 -8% -8% 24.8 24.0 -3% -3% 31.4 30.4 -3% -3% 23.8 28.4 19% 19% 5.6 4.5 -20% -20% 12.6 12.3 -2% -2%
110 April 19.0 18.5 -3% -3% 40.8 41.4 1% 1% 48.5 49.1 1% 1% 34.0 37.6 10% 10% 12.1 10.8 -11% -11% 21.4 21.3 -1% -1%
110 May 35.4 34.2 -3% -3% 76.3 75.5 -1% -1% 93.5 91.9 -2% -1% 63.3 64.3 1% 1% 23.4 21.0 -11% -7% 39.2 38.9 -1% -1%
110 June 6.3 6.2 -2% 0% 13.3 13.7 3% 0% 19.0 19.2 1% 0% 13.9 13.2 -5% -1% 4.0 4.0 1% 0% 6.7 7.0 3% 0%
110 July 5.5 5.5 -1% 0% 11.6 11.5 0% 0% 16.8 16.6 -1% -1% 12.5 11.4 -9% -4% 3.6 3.6 1% 0% 5.7 5.7 -1% 0%
110 August 4.8 4.9 0% 0% 10.1 10.1 0% 0% 14.9 14.9 0% 0% 11.4 10.4 -9% -9% 3.1 3.1 1% 1% 4.9 4.9 0% 0%
110 September 5.1 5.1 -1% -1% 10.7 10.8 1% 1% 15.5 15.8 2% 2% 12.4 12.7 2% 2% 3.1 3.0 -3% -3% 5.3 5.3 -1% -1%
110 October 4.6 4.4 -3% -3% 9.6 9.4 -1% -1% 14.0 14.0 0% 0% 10.9 10.3 -6% -6% 2.8 2.8 1% 1% 4.7 4.7 -1% -1%
110 November 3.8 3.9 3% 3% 8.1 8.5 5% 5% 11.9 12.8 7% 7% 9.2 9.1 -1% -1% 2.5 2.5 1% 1% 4.2 4.4 3% 3%
110 December 3.5 3.5 1% 1% 7.6 8.3 9% 9% 11.2 12.3 10% 10% 8.6 8.4 -3% -3% 2.3 2.4 1% 1% 3.9 4.5 16% 16%
111 January 3.2 3.2 1% 1% 7.0 7.3 5% 5% 10.3 11.0 7% 7% 7.8 7.7 -1% -1% 2.2 2.2 1% 1% 3.6 3.9 7% 7%
111 February 2.7 2.9 8% 8% 6.1 6.7 10% 10% 9.0 10.2 14% 14% 6.6 7.1 8% 8% 2.0 2.0 0% 0% 3.4 3.5 4% 4%
111 March 3.9 3.6 -8% -8% 8.4 8.6 2% 2% 12.0 12.4 4% 4% 9.3 10.6 14% 14% 2.2 2.1 -7% -7% 4.2 4.6 9% 9%
111 April 58.8 60.5 3% 3% 130.2 134.5 3% 3% 155.4 159.8 3% 3% 104.8 114.6 9% 9% 40.9 34.9 -15% -15% 70.6 69.6 -1% -1%
111 May 48.3 47.8 -1% -1% 102.9 103.6 1% 1% 127.3 127.6 0% 0% 92.9 93.7 1% 1% 30.6 27.0 -12% -10% 52.4 52.7 1% 1%
111 June 16.6 16.2 -2% -1% 33.9 34.6 2% 1% 44.1 44.6 1% 0% 34.1 35.1 3% 1% 9.1 8.3 -9% -2% 17.0 17.2 2% 0%
111 July 6.6 6.4 -3% -1% 13.6 13.5 0% 0% 19.9 19.4 -3% -1% 14.9 13.6 -9% -4% 3.8 3.8 1% 0% 6.5 6.6 2% 1%
111 August 5.7 5.5 -2% -2% 11.6 11.5 -1% -1% 17.2 16.7 -3% -3% 12.9 11.7 -10% -10% 3.5 3.5 1% 1% 5.5 5.5 0% 0%
111 September 4.8 4.9 3% 3% 9.8 10.1 4% 4% 14.8 15.0 2% 2% 11.3 10.6 -7% -7% 3.0 3.1 1% 1% 4.8 4.8 0% 0%
111 October 17.2 16.3 -6% -6% 37.3 36.6 -2% -2% 46.5 44.9 -3% -3% 35.4 38.8 10% 10% 9.7 8.3 -14% -14% 18.9 18.8 -1% -1%
111 November 6.0 5.7 -4% -4% 12.3 12.7 3% 3% 17.9 18.1 2% 2% 13.2 12.6 -5% -5% 3.6 3.6 2% 2% 6.0 6.4 7% 7%
111 December 5.2 5.1 -2% -2% 10.7 11.0 3% 3% 15.9 16.1 1% 1% 11.8 10.8 -9% -9% 3.3 3.3 1% 1% 5.2 5.6 6% 6%
112 January 4.5 4.5 0% 0% 9.4 9.9 4% 4% 14.1 14.6 3% 3% 10.6 9.8 -8% -8% 2.9 2.9 1% 1% 4.7 5.0 8% 8%
112 February 3.6 4.0 11% 11% 7.6 9.3 22% 22% 11.5 13.7 19% 19% 8.7 9.0 3% 3% 2.6 2.6 1% 1% 4.2 5.0 20% 20%
112 March 18.5 17.6 -5% -5% 40.4 40.2 -1% -1% 49.1 48.5 -1% -1% 35.8 40.7 13% 13% 10.8 9.1 -16% -16% 20.6 20.9 1% 1%
112 April 38.1 38.3 1% 1% 82.2 84.8 3% 3% 101.2 103.4 2% 2% 68.7 72.1 5% 5% 26.1 23.1 -11% -11% 43.7 43.9 0% 0%
112 May 92.3 93.0 1% 1% 199.5 201.3 1% 1% 248.6 250.6 1% 1% 180.5 178.5 -1% -1% 61.9 54.5 -12% -12% 103.3 103.0 0% 0%
112 June 65.7 67.3 2% 2% 139.7 145.1 4% 4% 177.0 182.1 3% 3% 130.8 132.2 1% 1% 43.8 38.8 -11% -10% 73.6 73.9 0% 0%
112 July 7.5 7.4 -1% 0% 15.3 16.0 5% 2% 22.8 22.9 1% 0% 17.1 15.3 -11% -6% 4.2 4.2 1% 0% 7.2 8.0 10% 3%
112 August 6.2 6.2 0% 0% 12.7 12.7 0% 0% 18.9 18.5 -2% -2% 14.2 12.7 -10% -10% 3.7 3.7 0% 0% 6.1 6.0 -1% -1%
112 September 12.7 12.4 -3% -3% 26.6 26.9 1% 1% 35.0 34.7 -1% -1% 28.5 31.1 9% 9% 6.4 5.5 -13% -13% 13.4 13.3 -1% -1%
112 October 11.6 10.9 -6% -6% 24.0 23.6 -1% -1% 31.8 30.9 -3% -3% 24.5 24.7 1% 1% 6.1 5.6 -8% -8% 11.6 11.7 1% 1%
112 November 6.0 6.0 0% 0% 12.6 13.4 6% 6% 18.3 19.1 4% 4% 13.4 12.8 -5% -5% 4.0 4.0 0% 0% 6.3 6.9 9% 9%
112 December 5.3 5.3 -1% -1% 11.1 11.2 1% 1% 16.5 16.5 0% 0% 12.1 11.0 -9% -9% 3.6 3.6 1% 1% 5.5 5.6 1% 1%
 Month EFSFSR US of SC EFSFSR DS of MC SC US of EFSFSR EFSFSR US of MC MC US of EFSFSR MC-6
USGS Gage Basin Area
January 9.9 8.0 6.5 3.5 2.3 4.2 Gage ID Number Description Latitude Longitude (mi2)
Average Monthly Discarge

February 9.5 7.7 6.4 3.3 1.9 3.8 MC US of EFSFSR 13310850 Meadow Creek Near Stibnite, ID 44.88955 -115.36018 5.66
March 10.5 8.7 7.3 3.4 2.2 4.3 EFSFSR US of MC 13310800 EFSF Salmon Above Meadow Creek Near Stibnite, ID 44.90211 -115.32576 9.06
April 24.3 19.8 15.8 6.5 6.7 11.0 SC US of EFSFSR 13311450 Sugar Creek Near Stibnite, ID 44.93566 -115.3361 17.94
1929-2017

May 116.4 82.8 66.2 40.7 37.5 52.2 EFSFSR DS of MC 13311000 EFSF Salmon at Stibnite, ID 44.90578 -115.32962 19.28
June 138.9 116.8 80.6 48.2 48.8 70.9 EFSFSR US of SC 13311250 EFSF Salmon Above Sugar Creek Near Stibnite, ID 44.93476 -115.33668 24.07
July 42.6 38.7 29.9 14.8 13.9 22.0
August 17.3 15.4 12.5 7.3 4.1 7.7
September 13.1 11.9 9.0 5.7 3.0 5.9
October 12.6 11.5 8.3 5.3 3.1 5.8
November 12.8 10.8 8.3 4.6 3.4 5.8
December 11.0 9.0 7.2 3.7 2.8 4.8

For Vlookup Table Use Only

Month EFSFSR US of SC EFSFSR DS of MC SC US of EFSFSR EFSFSR US of MC MC US of EFSFSR MC-6
April 24.3 19.8 15.8 6.5 6.7 11.0
August 17.3 15.4 12.5 7.3 4.1 7.7
Average Monthly Discarge

December 11.0 9.0 7.2 3.7 2.8 4.8

February 9.5 7.7 6.4 3.3 1.9 3.8
1929-2017

January 9.9 8.0 6.5 3.5 2.3 4.2

July 42.6 38.7 29.9 14.8 13.9 22.0
June 138.9 116.8 80.6 48.2 48.8 70.9
March 10.5 8.7 7.3 3.4 2.2 4.3
May 116.4 82.8 66.2 40.7 37.5 52.2
November 12.8 10.8 8.3 4.6 3.4 5.8
October 12.6 11.5 8.3 5.3 3.1 5.8
September 13.1 11.9 9.0 5.7 3.0 5.9
 Appendix J-6: Chinook Salmon Critical Habitat Technical
Memorandum

This TM was developed and finalized for the Draft EIS in November 2019. There may be differences in the data
presented in the figures and tables as compared to the Draft EIS
This page intentionally left blank.
MIDAS GOLD STIBNITE PROJECT
CRITICAL HABITAT - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Technical Memorandum

APPENDIX J-6

CHINOOK SALMON
CRITICAL HABITAT
TECHNICAL
MEMORANDUM
Midas Gold Stibnite Project, Idaho

November 12, 2019

Ecosystem Sciences, LLC

Science . Planning . Design
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON CRITICAL HABITAT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Ecosystem Sciences
Science . Planning . Design

Ecosystem Sciences
202 N. 9th Street, Suite 400
Boise, ID 83702
T: 208.383.0226

Prepared for: AECOM

Project Title: Stibnite Gold Project

Technical Memorandum
Subject: Refining Chinook Salmon Critical Habitat

Date: November 12, 2019

To: AECOM

From: Ecosystem Sciences, LLC

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON CRITICAL HABITAT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 1
1.1 PURPOSE .............................................................................................................................. 1
1.2 APPROACH............................................................................................................................ 1
METHODS ....................................................................................................................................... 3
RESULTS ........................................................................................................................................ 5
DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................................. 10
LITERATURE CITED..................................................................................................................... 14

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Study Area and Cooney and Holzer (2006) Intrinsic Potential (IP) Model Results..................... 6
Figure 2: Reaches of the EFSFSR with known Occurrences of Chinook Salmon ..................................... 7
Figure 3: NHDPlus Flowlines used to Derive Passage (percent slope) Criteria for Chinook
Salmon in the EFSFSR Upstream of the YPP ............................................................................ 8
Figure 4: NHDPlus Flowlines Average Slope Distribution and Mean ........................................................ 9
Figure 5: Refined Chinook Salmon Critical Habitat in the Stibnite Gold Project Study Area ................... 11
Figure 6: Chinook Salmon Baseline IP with Chinook Salmon Observations (aquatic survey
locations) ................................................................................................................................... 12

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Data Used to Refine Chinook Salmon Critical Habitat in the EFSFSR Upstream of the
YPP ............................................................................................................................................. 3
Table 2: Chinook Salmon Habitat Preference Literature Review from NOAA Fisheries (via
Johnna Sandow) ......................................................................................................................... 5
Table 3: Stream Segment Chinook Salmon Critical Habitat Breakdown (miles per segment) ............... 13

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | i

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON CRITICAL HABITAT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

This page intentionally left blank

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | ii

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON CRITICAL HABITAT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

INTRODUCTION
Because the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Fisheries has not
mapped critical habitat for Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), and the current written
description, “all river reaches presently or historically accessible” does not provide a precise basis
for analysis, it became necessary to develop a method to define the spatial extent of accessible
habitat. This refinement also was necessary because the stream alterations associated with the
proposed Stibnite Gold Project (Project) are expected to change the extent of “all reaches
presently accessible” following completion of the site reclamation. This baseline was necessary
so that the habitat changes associated with the Project could be described.
This technical memorandum presents the methods used to refine the spatial extent of
spring/summer-run Chinook salmon critical habitat within the upper East Fork South Fork Salmon
River (EFSFSR; Project Study Area) and the results. The results identified refined critical habitat
for the EFSFSR above the Yellow Pine pit (YPP). Critical habitat was designated for portions of
the EFSFSR below the YPP and within the Sugar Creek drainage area (70 FR 52629).

1.1 PURPOSE
NOAA Fisheries (2019) defines critical habitat as:
• Specific areas within the geographical area occupied by the species at the time of listing
that contain physical or biological features essential to conservation of the species and
that may require special management considerations or protection; and
• Specific areas outside the geographical area occupied by the species if the agency
determines that the area itself is essential for conservation.
The focus on critical habitat upstream of the YPP is based on Cooney and Holzer’s (2006) Intrinsic
Potential (IP) modeling that indicates that the YPP is a passage barrier for Chinook salmon
upstream migration in the upper EFSFSR watershed. Although Chinook salmon have not been
able to utilize the habitat upstream of the YPP through volitional passage, they have been
released upstream of the YPP for many years and have utilized the streams for spawning. The
Project would ultimately include filling the YPP and restoring that section of the EFSFSR. Such
action would allow volitional Chinook salmon passage into the upper reaches of the EFSFSR
(Meadow Creek and upper EFSFSR upstream of Meadow Creek) (Figure 1). For these reasons,
refining the extent of critical habitat within the Study Area under existing conditions is necessary
so that changes in the quantity of this habitat as a result of the proposed Project could be
assessed.

1.2 APPROACH
The approach to refining critical habitat for Chinook salmon was discussed via email between the
United States Forest Service (Forest Service), NOAA Fisheries, and AECOM and through a
conference call between the Forest Service, NOAA Fisheries, AECOM, and Ecosystem Sciences
on May 13, 2019. The approach focuses on juvenile Chinook salmon upstream migration within
the EFSFSR. The agreed-upon approach would identify maximum gradient (percent slope) for
Chinook salmon upstream migration based on an existing occurrence dataset (Isaak et al. 2017a)
and use that gradient as the cut-off point for critical habitat (i.e., areas with steeper slopes would
not be classified as critical habitat). The ultimate purpose is to identify stream reaches within the

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE 1

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON CRITICAL HABITAT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

upper EFSFSR, most importantly above YPP, in which juvenile Chinook salmon could migrate
and to identify the upstream limits of juvenile migration. Once this gradient is established, stream
reaches that are downstream of the gradient break (maximum allowable slope) and are
contiguous to existing habitat (as defined by the Project IP modeling effort [Ecosystem Sciences
2019a]) would be identified as critical habitat for Chinook salmon.

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE 2

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON CRITICAL HABITAT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

METHODS
Refining critical habitat for Chinook salmon was a Geographic Information System (GIS) exercise
performed in ArcGIS Pro. Table 1 documents the data used. The following seven-step process
was employed to determine critical habitat for Chinook salmon above the YPP.
1. Join Isaak et al. (2017b) “Dryad Digital Repository” excel file to corresponding NHDPlus
flowline – In ArcGIS Pro, use the “join” tool to match COMID from the NHDPlus flowline
dataset to the corresponding COMID in the Dryad Digital Repository excel file.
2. Extract NHDPlus flowlines that document Chinook salmon occurrences within EFSFSR –
Select all records that are greater than or equal to 1 in the Dryad Digital Repository excel
file row named “Chinook.” These records indicate that Chinook salmon have been
observed in these stream reaches.
3. Select NHDPlus flowlines that Chinook salmon have migrated through – Manually select
flowlines within the EFSFSR that are downstream of the most upstream known Chinook
salmon occurrences documented in Step 2 above. Selection indicates that the species
has migrated through these areas to get to the location where they were observed.
4. Derive slope and stream gradient for all streamlines created in Step 3 – Derive stream
gradient per NHDplus flowline that is downstream of the most upstream Chinook salmon
occurrence. Derive slope using rise over run method ([start elev – end elev]/length of
segment). Derived slope was converted to percent slope (slope*100). The 10-meter Digital
Elevation Model (DEM) provided the elevation data.
5. Summarize slope for steam segments downstream of known Chinook salmon occupied
reaches – Derive distribution and statistics (min, mean, max) for stream segments that are
downstream of Chinook salmon occupied reaches.
6. Determine appropriate passage (percent slope) criteria for Chinook salmon – Compare
slope (gradient) results to Chinook salmon passage literature review (NOAA Fisheries,
2019) (Table 2).
7. Select stream reaches upstream of YPP that fit the slope criteria – Use analysis results
and literature review to select initial critical habitat. Baseline Habitat Occupancy Model
(OM) streamlines are used to determine critical habitat above YPP (Ecosystem Sciences
2019b). The OM streamline segments are equivalent to NHDPlus flowline stream
segments and thus slope calculations are similar.

Table 1: Data Used to Refine Chinook Salmon Critical Habitat in the EFSFSR Upstream of the YPP

Data Description Citation

National Hydrography Horizon System Corporation. 2019. NHDPlus
NHDPlus Flowlines Dataset (NHD) for the Version 2. http://www.horizon-
EFSFSR systems.com/NHDPlus/NHDPlusV2_home.php
Chinook salmon Isaak, D. J., Wenger, S. J., and Young, M. K. 2017b.
occurrence records Data from: Big biology meets microclimatology:
Dryad Digital Repository linked to NHD COMID Defining thermal niches of ectotherms at landscape
(database years 1900 – scales for conservation planning. Dryad Digital
2011) Repository. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.d0s7k

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE 3

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON CRITICAL HABITAT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Data Description Citation

U.S. Geological Survey, The National Map, 2017,
Digital Elevation Model 10-meter resolution (1/3 3DEP products and services: The National Map, 3D
(DEM) – 3DEP arc second) Elevation Program Web page.
https://nationalmap.gov/3DEP/3dep_prodserv.html
Ecosystem Sciences. 2019a. Baseline Intrinsic
Potential Model Chinook Salmon and Steelhead.
Stibnite Gold Project Streamlines derived for Technical Memorandum. Stibnite Gold Project,
Intrinsic Potential (IP) the Stibnite Gold Project Idaho.
Occupancy Model (OM) Chinook/steelhead IP Ecosystem Sciences. 2019b. Habitat Occupancy
Streamlines and OM analysis Model for Westslope Cutthroat Trout and Bull Trout.
Technical Memorandum. Stibnite Gold Project,
Idaho.

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE 4

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON CRITICAL HABITAT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

RESULTS
Steps 1 and 2, shown in Figure 2, depict the reaches of the EFSFSR with known occurrences of
Chinook salmon (Isaak et al. 2017b).
Step 3 of the GIS analysis of NHDPlus flowlines downstream from the most upstream known
Chinook salmon occurrences within the EFSFSR resulted in the identification of 77 stream
segments (Figure 3).
The gradient (percent slope) of these segments derived in Step 4 ranged from 0.4 percent to
17.6 percent, with a mean of 4.7 percent (Figure 4). The GIS analysis relied on NHDPlus flowlines
and a 10-meter resolution DEM. Some of the NHDPlus flowlines do not follow the exact river
course and instead traverse hillsides. This imprecision is common with the NHD dataset, as
alignment of the dataset to the available DEMs is not exact. Such inaccuracies can affect the
slope results per stream segment, often overestimating the metric (i.e., slopes are artificially high).
Steps 5 through 7 identified upstream stream reaches that meet appropriate passage criteria.
Seventy-one of the 77 stream segments that are downstream of Chinook salmon occupied
reaches had a percent slope of less than 12 percent (Figure 4). A slope of 12 percent was chosen
as the appropriate passage criteria for Chinook salmon. Using this criterion, and OM streamlines,
stream reaches upstream of the YPP were identified as refined critical habitat (Figure 5).

Table 2: Chinook Salmon Habitat Preference Literature Review from NOAA Fisheries
(via Johnna Sandow)

Findings Comment Reference

Steelhead and Chinook Jackson Creek, OR: 5th Roper, B. B., Scarnecchia, D. L., and LaMarr, T. J.
salmon juveniles order tributary to S. 1994. Summer distribution of and habitat use by
documented at average Umpqua R.; Reach 8 had chinook salmon and steelhead within a major basin
gradient of 6.4% slope of 6.4%; this was of the South Umpqua River, Oregon. Transactions
the upstream-most reach. of the American Fisheries Society 123:298–308.
Upper extent not
determined.
Juvenile steelhead & Documented presence; Burnett, K. M. 2001. Relationships among juvenile
Chinook upper extent not anadromous salmonids, their freshwater habitat,
Mean (SD) gradients 4.7% determined. and landscape characteristics over multiple years
(3.3%) and spatial scales in Elk River, Oregon. Ph.D.
Dissertation. Oregon State University, Corvallis,
Oregon, USA
Juvenile Chinook gradient Known presence (due to Brent, M., and Bradford, M. J. 2004. Importance of
ranges from 0.7-4.2% upstream migration by large woody debris for juvenile chinook salmon
juveniles) in various habitat in small boreal forest streams in the upper
tributaries to the Yukon Yukon River basin, Canada. Canadian Journal of
River. Forest Research. 34(9):1955-1966
Did not attempt to
document upstream
extent.
Juvenile Chinook Documented presence. Isaak, D. J., Wenger, S. J., and Young M. K.
documented in 12% 2017a. Big biology meets microclimatology:
Juvenile Steelhead Defining thermal niches of aquatic ectotherms at
documented in 15% landscape scales for conservation planning.
Ecological Applications. 27(3):977-990

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE 5

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON CRITICAL HABITAT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Yellow Pine Pit

Figure 1: Study Area and Cooney and Holzer (2006) Intrinsic Potential (IP) Model Results
Note: No IP habitat upstream of the Yellow Pine pit. CHINRATE is the Chinook salmon IP rating.

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE 6

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON CRITICAL HABITAT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Chinook salmon occurrences (Isaak et al. 2017)

Figure Source: Isaak et al. 2017b

Figure 2: Reaches of the EFSFSR with known Occurrences of Chinook Salmon

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE 7

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON CRITICAL HABITAT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 3: NHDPlus Flowlines used to Derive Passage (percent slope) Criteria for Chinook Salmon
in the EFSFSR Upstream of the YPP

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE 8

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON CRITICAL HABITAT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 4: NHDPlus Flowlines Average Slope Distribution and Mean

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE 9

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON CRITICAL HABITAT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DISCUSSION
NOAA Fisheries (via Johnna Sandow) provided the information presented in Table 2, which
documents Chinook salmon (and other anadromous fish species) habitat preferences regarding
stream gradient. The gradient (percent slope) values documented in Table 2 are very similar to
the results derived in the GIS analysis performed herein. For example, Burnett (2001) noted that
mean gradient for juvenile Chinook salmon in Red Cedar Creek, a tributary to the Elk River in
southwest Oregon, was 4.7 percent (Table 2), which is the same mean percent gradient derived
through this GIS analysis (Figure 4). Isaak et al. (2017a) noted that juvenile Chinook salmon
occurred in stream segments with a percent gradient of 12 percent (Table 2). Since 92 percent
(71 out of 77) of stream segments within the EFSFSR downstream of known Chinook salmon
occurrences had a percent slope of less than or equal to 12 percent, that value was chosen to be
the break point (allowable passage) for refining critical habitat for the species in the upper
EFSFSR upstream of the YPP (Figure 5).
Using these criteria, refined Chinook salmon critical habitat within the upper EFSFSR upstream
of the YPP was identified (Figure 5). As mentioned in the Section 2.0 Methods, the reaches
presented in Figure 5 are the OM model reaches. The OM model reaches are based on NHD
reaches, and their lengths and slope values are like the NHD reaches used to determine the
appropriate slope value for Chinook salmon passage. Figure 5 also includes observed Chinook
salmon locations within the Study Area (MWH 2017). The points in Figure 6 represent aquatic
survey locations in which Chinook salmon were observed during snorkel surveys (MWH 2017).
The Study Area includes Sugar Creek and a portion of the upper EFSFSR downstream of Sugar
Creek, as these areas match the Chinook salmon and steelhead IP modelling for the Project
(Ecosystem Sciences 2019a). The critical habitat results are broken down by stream segments
(Table 3). Stream segment 1 includes the upper EFSFSR and its tributaries from its confluence
with Sugar Creek upstream to its confluence with Meadow Creek. Stream segment 2 includes the
entirety of the Meadow Creek drainage. Stream segment 3 includes the upper EFSFSR and its
tributaries upstream of Meadow Creek. Stream segment 4 is the portion of the upper EFSFSR
within the Study Area that is downstream of its confluence with Sugar Creek. Stream segment 5
documents most of the mine-affected area (everything except West End Creek) and includes the
upper EFSFSR upstream of Sugar Creek. In summary, stream segment 5 is the summation of
stream segments 1, 2, and 3 (Table 3). Stream segment 6 includes Sugar Creek and its
tributaries.

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE 10

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON CRITICAL HABITAT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Refined Chinook salmon Critical Habitat

Figure 5: Refined Chinook Salmon Critical Habitat in the Stibnite Gold Project Study Area

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE 11

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON CRITICAL HABITAT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 6: Chinook Salmon Baseline IP with Chinook Salmon Observations

(aquatic survey locations)

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE 12

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON CRITICAL HABITAT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Within the Study Area, 28.6 miles of stream reaches were identified as refined juvenile Chinook
salmon critical habitat (Table 3, Figure 5). Stream segment 5, which includes stream reaches
within the upper EFSFSR upstream of Sugar Creek (i.e., Study Area results excluding Sugar
Creek), contains 17.2 miles of refined Chinook salmon critical habitat that was identified by the
GIS analysis, with 16.5 miles of critical habitat above the YPP (Figure 5). Like the baseline IP
modeling (Ecosystem Sciences 2019a), the majority of refined critical habitat for juvenile Chinook
salmon occurs in the main trunk streams of the area, including Meadow Creek (stream
segment 2), the upper EFSFSR upstream of Sugar Creek and downstream of Meadow Creek
(stream segment 1), and the upper EFSFSR upstream of Meadow Creek (stream segment 3)
(Table 3, Figure 6). The critical habitat extent includes all baseline fisheries sampling sites (MWH
2017) where Chinook salmon were detected and aligns well with the baseline IP model results
(Figure 6).

Table 3: Stream Segment Chinook Salmon Critical Habitat Breakdown (miles per segment)
Length
Mine Site Segments Description
(miles)
Stream Segment 1 Upper EFSFSR upstream of Sugar Creek and downstream of 3.1
Meadow Creek
Stream Segment 2 Meadow Creek 5.5
Stream Segment 3 Upper EFSFSR upstream of Meadow Creek 8.6
Stream Segment 5* “Mine Site Area” upper EFSFSR (includes segments 1,2, and 3) 17.2
Stream Segment 4 Upper EFSFSR downstream of Sugar Creek 0.7
Stream Segment 6 Sugar Creek 10.7
* Stream segment 5 is out of order as it is the summation of stream segments 1, 2, and 3.

The NHD data layer is known to have alignment issues with DEM datasets, causing inaccuracies
in slope measurements. This might explain the steepest reach values (over 17 percent). However,
the initial results and cutoff at 12 percent match well with the existing dataset and with the
available literature on the subject. Based on the literature values employed, a 12 percent cutoff is
conservative, as many of the other studies have observed lower maximum slope values (Table 2).

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE 13

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
CHINOOK SALMON CRITICAL HABITAT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

LITERATURE CITED
Brent, M., and Bradford, M. J. 2004. Importance of large woody debris for juvenile chinook salmon
habitat in small boreal forest streams in the upper Yukon River basin, Canada. Canadian
Journal of Forest Research 34(9):1955-1966.
Burnett, K. M. 2001. Relationships among juvenile anadromous salmonids, their freshwater
habitat, and landscape characteristics over multiple years and spatial scales in Elk River,
Oregon. Ph.D. Dissertation. Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, USA
Cooney T., and Holzer, D. M. 2006. Appendix C: Interior Columbia Basin Stream Type Chinook
Salmon and Steelhead Populations: Habitat Intrinsic Potential Analysis. Preliminary draft of
the viability criterias for Interior Columbia domain.
Ecosystem Sciences. 2019a. Baseline Intrinsic Potential Model Chinook salmon and steelhead.
Technical Memorandum. Stibnite Gold Project, Idaho.
Ecosystem Sciences. 2019b. Habitat Occupancy Model for Westslope Cutthroat Trout and Bull
Trout. Technical Memorandum. Stibnite Gold Project, Idaho.
Isaak D. J., Wenger, S. J., and Young, M. K. 2017a. Big biology meets microclimatology: defining
thermal niches of ectotherms at landscape scales for conservation planning. Ecological
Applications 27(3): 977-990. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1501
Isaak D. J., Wenger, S. J., and Young, M. K. 2017b. Data from: Big biology meets
microclimatology: Defining thermal niches of ectotherms at landscape scales for
conservation planning. Dryad Digital Repository. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.d0s7k
Horizon System Corporation. 2019. NHDPlus Version 2. http://www.horizon-
systems.com/NHDPlus/NHDPlusV2_home.php.
MWH, Inc. (MWH). 2017. Fish Species Composition at Aquatic Survey Locations. Snorkel Survey
Sites (2012 to 2016).
NOAA Fisheries. (2019). Critical Habitat. https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/national/endangered-
species-conservation/critical-habitat
Roper, B. B., Scarnecchia, D. L., and LaMarr, T. J. 1994. Summer distribution of and habitat use
by chinook salmon and steelhead within a major basin of the South Umpqua River, Oregon.
Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 123:298–308.
U.S. Geological Survey. 2017. The National Map, 3DEP products and services: The National
Map, 3D Elevation Program Web page. https://nationalmap.gov/3DEP/3dep_prodserv.html.

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE 14

 Appendix J-7: Occupancy Modeling Technical Memoranda

This TM was developed and finalized for the Draft EIS in December 2019. There may be differences in the data
presented in the figures and tables as compared to the Draft EIS
This page intentionally left blank.
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PROPOSED ACTION INTRINSIC POTENTIAL MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL

WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT
AND
BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Technical Memorandum
Stibnite Gold Project, Idaho

December 2019

Ecosystem Sciences, LLC

Science . Planning . Design
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Ecosystem Sciences
Science . Planning . Design

Ecosystem Sciences
202 N. 9th Street, Suite 400
Boise, ID 83702
T: 208.383.0226

Prepared for: AECOM

Project Title: Stibnite Gold Project

Technical Memorandum
Subject: Habitat Occupancy Model Westslope Cutthroat Trou8t and Bull Trout Existing
Conditions
Date: November 22, 2019

To: AECOM

From: Ecosystem Sciences, LLC

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 1
1.1 CONSULTATION ..................................................................................................................... 1
2.0 STUDY AREA .................................................................................................................................. 2
3.0 EXISTING REGIONAL OCCUPANCY MODEL AND METHODOLOGY ....................................... 2
4.0 MINE SITE OCCUPANCY MODEL AND METHODOLOGY .......................................................... 7
4.1 ASSUMPTIONS ....................................................................................................................... 7
4.2 MODELING PROCEDURE ........................................................................................................ 7
4.3 DATA EMPLOYED ................................................................................................................... 9
4.4 STREAMLINES ..................................................................................................................... 10
4.5 STREAM FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT REACHES...................................................................... 10
4.6 STREAM TEMPERATURE....................................................................................................... 10
4.7 STREAM DISCHARGE ........................................................................................................... 11
4.8 CHANNEL SLOPE ................................................................................................................. 11
4.9 MODEL INPUT TRANSFORMATIONS ....................................................................................... 12
4.10 FISH ACCESS AND BARRIERS ............................................................................................... 12
5.0 RESULTS ...................................................................................................................................... 12
5.1 STREAM SEGMENT 5 ........................................................................................................... 12
5.1.1 Stream Segment 1 ............................................................................................... 16
5.1.2 Stream Segment 2 ............................................................................................... 19
5.1.3 Stream Segment 3 ............................................................................................... 22
5.2 SENSITIVITY ANALYSES........................................................................................................ 25
5.2.1 Stream Temperature ............................................................................................ 25
5.2.2 Stream Discharge ................................................................................................ 25
5.2.3 Channel Slope...................................................................................................... 26
5.3 STUDY AREA HABITAT AND OCCUPANCY .............................................................................. 26
6.0 SUMMARY/DISCUSSION ............................................................................................................. 29
7.0 LITERATURE CITED..................................................................................................................... 30

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | i

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A: Mine Site Stream Segmentation
Appendix B: Maps and summary statistics for Isaak et. al. 2017 presence/absence dataset
Appendix C: Mine Site OM Variables/Occupancy Probabilities (Back-transformed and standardized)
Appendix D: Mine Site OM Sensitivity Analysis

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Mine Site OM Study Area for Westslope Cutthroat Trout and Bull Trout .................................... 4
Figure 2. Existing Regional OM Workflow for Westslope Cutthroat Trout and Bull Trout .......................... 6
Figure 3. Mine Site OM Workflow for Westslope Cutthroat Trout and Bull Trout ....................................... 9
Figure 4. Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream Segment 5 ....................... 14
Figure 5. Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 5 .................................................. 15
Figure 6. Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream Segment 1 ....................... 17
Figure 7. Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 1 .................................................. 18
Figure 8. Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream Segment 2 ....................... 20
Figure 9. Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 2 .................................................. 21
Figure 10. Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream Segment 3 ....................... 23
Figure 11. Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout Stream Segment 3 ....................................................... 24
Figure 12. Length of Available (kilometers) for each Stream Segment...................................................... 27
Figure 13. Occupancy Probability Distributions for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for each Stream
Segment .................................................................................................................................... 28
Figure 14. Occupancy Probability Distributions for Bull Trout for each Stream Segment .......................... 29

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | ii

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Statistics for Presence/Absence Data used to Fit the Xxisting Regional OM for
Westslope Cutthroat Trout and Bull Trout ................................................................................... 5
Table 2. Parameter Estimates and Standard Errors (in parentheses) for the Multivariate
Models Predicting Occurrence of Westslope Cutthroat Trout and Bull Trout
(highlighting added) ..................................................................................................................... 5
Table 3. Mine Site OM Variable Metadata ............................................................................................. 10
Table 4. Statistics for Mine Site Occupancy Probability Model Variables ............................................... 12
Table 5. Descriptive Statistics for Occupancy Probabilities for Stream Segment 5 ................................ 13
Table 6. Descriptive Statistics for Occupancy Probabilities for Stream Segment 1 ................................ 16
Table 7. Descriptive Statistics for Occupancy Probabilities for Stream Segment 2 ................................ 19
Table 8. Descriptive Statistics for Occupancy Probabilities for Stream Segment 3 ................................ 22
Table 9. Changes in Occupancy Probability as a Result of Decreasing and Increasing Percent
Change in Stream Temperature ................................................................................................ 25
Table 10. Changes in Occupancy Probability as a Result of Decreasing and Increasing Percent
Change in Stream Discharge .................................................................................................... 26
Table 11. Changes in Occupancy Probability Resulting from Decreasing and Increasing
Percent Change in Channel Slope ............................................................................................ 26

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | iii

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Definitions
Channel Slope Stream gradient, expressed as a percentage.
DEM Digital Elevation Model.
ESA Endangered Species Act.
ESA group Organizations consistently involved in approximately monthly meetings during
the informal consultation process. The principal agencies were Forest Service,
USFWS, USACE, NOAA Fisheries, and Midas Gold. There were occasional
members and numerous consultants who all participated in the group.
EFSFSR East Fork of the South Fork of the Salmon River.
Existing Regional OM Either of the two example occupancy modeling papers published by the Rocky
Mountain Research Station; Isaak et. al. 2015 or Isaak et. al. 2017.
Forest Service United States Forest Service.
GIS Geographic Information System.
Occupancy Probability The probability that the species of interest would occur in a given stream reach
based on physical and geomorphic characteristics. For this report, habitat
occupancy is determined using methods by Isaak et. al. 2017.
Lidar Light detection and ranging.
Midas Gold Midas Gold Idaho, Inc.
Mine Site OM The occupancy model produced for the study area with mine site scale data
inputs for stream temperature, stream discharge, and channel slope.
Mine Site OM Reaches The final set of stream reaches, consisting of merged SFA and NHD Plus
Version 2 stream reaches, for which model variables were attributed and
occupancy probabilities were produced.
NHD National Hydrography Dataset.
OM Occupancy Model.
Rio ASE data Data collected by Rio ASE as part of the Stibnite Gold Project Stream Design
Report (Rio ASE 2018a).
RMRS Rocky Mountain Research Station, which is funded and under the management
of the U.S. Forest Service.
SPLNT stream and pit lake network temperature.
Streamlines The ESRI ArcMap shapefile that estimates the precise location of the stream
watercourses in the study area.
Stream Discharge Modeled or measured stream discharge associated with a given stream reach.
This variable unit of measure is cubic feet per second (CFS).
Stream Temperature Modeled or measured stream temperatures associated with a given stream
reach. This variables unit of measure is degrees Celsius.
Stream Functional Stream Functional Assessment. This term refers to the reaches.
Assessment (SFA) in the mine site area for which the SFA was performed, or for the ESRI
shapefile with the same name.
USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
USACE United States Army Corps of Engineers.
NOAA Fisheries National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries
Service.
USGS United States Geological Survey.
VIC Variable Infiltration Capacity.
YPP Yellow Pine pit.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | iv

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

This technical memorandum details the methods and results used to estimate occupancy
probabilities for native westslope cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkia lewisi) and bull trout
(Salvelinus confluentus) in the mine site study area (see Section 2 for details about the study
area). The goal of this report is to present and describe the model used to produce a baseline
metric (occupancy probability) that represents the likelihood that the two native trout species
occupy stream reaches in the study area. Occupancy probabilities for existing conditions can then
be used for comparison with the predicted occupancy probabilities associated with the proposed
actions of each alternative; both during and after the proposed life of the mine. This information
supports the analysis of impacts on westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout from the Stibnite Gold
Project as proposed in Midas Gold Idaho, Inc (Midas Gold) Plan of Restoration and Operations
(proposed action) or any action alternative. Occupancy probabilities are the output of an
occupancy model designed specifically for this project.
The model and methods described in this technical memorandum and used to develop the
occupancy probabilities originate from studies that were developed and published by the Rocky
Mountain Research Station (RMRS), a group of scientists funded by the United States
Department of Agriculture (Isaak et al. 2015, 2017). The models from these RMRS studies—
hereafter referred to as existing regional occupancy models or existing regional OM—were
adapted to the scale of the mine site study area, which used data that were collected at the mine
site. The resulting project-specific model is hereafter referred to as the mine site occupancy model
or mine site OM.
The mine site OM quantifies potential habitat for each stream reach by assigning probabilities that
each of the species would occur in a given stream reach. The model calculates occupancy
probabilities for each species based on a combination of three independent variables: stream
discharge, stream temperature, and channel slope. The resulting occupancy probabilities were
then run through a sensitivity analysis, which was used to determine the level of influence that
each of the independent variables has on the dependent variable (occupancy probability) in the
model. The continuous range of occupancy probabilities are represented in percentages, from 0
to 100 percent for each reach. The model and results support analysis of impacts to the two native
trout species and their habitat based on actions as presented in each alternative in the mine site
study area. This technical memo specifically describes the predicted baseline (existing) conditions
occupancy probabilities.
Section 1.1 details the stakeholders involved in the development of this model. Sections 2 and 3
provide detail about the mine site study area and the existing regional OM, respectively. Section 4
explains the methods that were used to produce mine site OM probabilities, and includes a review
of the model study area; the regression equation used; model variables and coefficients used;
data inputs and sources for each of the variables used in the model; and parameter
transformations that were performed. Section 5 presents the results from the mine site OM (i.e.,
the occupancy probabilities), and a sensitivity analysis of each model variable. The results are
discussed and summarized in Section 6.

1.1 CONSULTATION
This model is the result of an extensive consultation process involving members of the
Endangered Species Act (ESA) fish informal consultation group (ESA group 1) involved in the

1 The ESA group consisted of Forest Service, NOAA Fisheries, USFWS, Midas Gold, and USACE. These entities
constituted the core group of participants; however, other entities occasionally attended meetings.

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Stibnite Gold Project. The original concept and approach to adapt an existing occupancy model
for the region were presented to the ESA group by Ecosystem Sciences on February 7, 2018.
Over the course of the next year and half, the methods, data inputs, analysis, and initial baseline
results were discussed on numerous conference calls, in-person meetings, and via email
correspondence. Following months of consultation, it was determined that the model documented
in the publication “Big biology meets microclimatology: defining thermal niches of ecotherms at
landscape scales for conservation planning” (Isaak et al. 2017) was most suitable for application
to this project.
Ecosystem Sciences made numerous presentations at informal ESA consultation meetings
beginning in June 2018. Information presented at these meetings included, but was not limited to:
scale dependencies; general appropriateness and adaptability of Isaak et al. (2017); derivation
and refinement of the streamlines (the Geographic Information System [GIS] shapefile used to
represent the specific location of the streams in the mine site study area) to be used; stream
segmentation processes; derivation of model variables (stream discharge, stream temperature,
and channel slope); sensitivity analyses of model variables; and the utility of applying occupancy
probabilities. Numerous modeling decisions regarding scale, data inputs, and other related
subjects were made based on ESA group input. For example, the decision to model mine site OM
variables using the same methods that were used in the existing regional OM was based on
feedback from the ESA group.

The mine site OM study area (Figure 1) encompasses approximately 43 square miles at the
headwaters of the East Fork of the South Fork of the Salmon River (EFSFSR). The Headwaters
East Fork South Fork Salmon River (HUC 12 – 170602080201) contains the Stream Functional
Assessment (SFA) reaches. Sugar Creek (HUC 12 – 1706020803) is not in the mine site study
area. Occupancy probabilities are summarized for four mine site stream segments in the study
area. These include Stream Segment 1 (Upper EFSFSR and its tributaries from its confluence
with Sugar Creek upstream to its confluence with Meadow Creek); Stream Segment 2 (Meadow
Creek drainage area, including the East Fork Meadow Creek); Stream Segment 3 (Upper
EFSFSR and its tributaries upstream of its confluence with Meadow Creek); and Stream
Segment 5 (HUC 12 “Headwaters East Fork South Fork Salmon River,” or the summation of
Stream Segments 1, 2, and 3). In total, there are six mine site stream segments. Appendix A
defines each stream segment, and provides a map showing their respective spatial extent.

Following consultation with the ESA group, it was decided to build an occupancy model for the
mine site study area. The results of the model could provide information to support the analysis
of impacts on westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout, and other associated environmental
documentation and determinations, from the proposed action or other alternatives. After reviewing
the available literature, the methods and models developed in Isaak et al. 2015, 2017 emerged
as appropriate examples that could be adapted for use on the mine site study area. The methods
from the two investigations are similar; however, Isaak et al. (2017) was identified as the more
appropriate example due to its larger scale (399,000 square kilometers [km2] versus 506,000 km2)
and inclusion of stream discharge as a model variable.

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
The existing regional OM study areas are large stream networks in the Rocky Mountains/Pacific
Northwest in Idaho, Montana, and parts of Oregon, Washington, and other adjacent states. Using
both GIS-derived and empirical field observations, the existing regional OM studies incorporated
stream reach hydrologic, thermal, and topographic conditions (i.e., stream discharge, stream
temperature, and channel slope) to evaluate the ability of stream reaches to support populations
of native westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout. The stream reach conditions, as represented by
the model variables, were “fit” to westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout occurrence datasets
(dichotomous presence/absence data) to create parameter estimates that were used in a logistic
regression model to produce occupancy probabilities. Logistic regression is a predictive statistical
analysis used to describe the relationship between one binary dependent variable
(presence/absence of native trout species in sample locations in the dataset), and one or more
independent variables, as listed above. By fitting the data to a sigmoidal function and producing
the associated coefficients, logistic regression predicts probability of presence of a characteristic
of interest (in this case, the occupancy of native trout species).
The species occurrence dataset was compiled from four sources: 1) a previously constructed
database of salmonid occurrences for the U.S. Rocky Mountains (Wenger et al. 2011); 2) the
MFISH database developed by Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks (Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks,
n.d.); 3) the Beneficial Use Reconnaissance Program database provided by the Idaho Department
of Environmental Quality (Idaho Department of Environmental Quality n.d.); and 4) a dataset of
fish and herpetofauna surveys made from 2008 to 2011 in northern Idaho and western Montana
(Young et al. 2013). The aggregated database was then filtered by several criteria—for example,
only samples taken from 1985 to 2011 were included; and samples taken at sites where the
discharge was greater than 1,130 cfs were excluded (see Isaak et al. 2017, for full list of filters).
The final presence/absence dataset included 10,998 individual bull trout sampling events and
19,704 individual westslope cutthroat trout sampling events. Stream conditions at collection sites
ranged considerably in the following variables: mean August temperature (3.9 degrees Celsius
(°C) to 20.2°C); reach slope (0 to 30 percent), and summer flow in cubic feet per second (cfs)
(0 to to105 cfs). Most samples were collected from streams smaller than 3.28 cfs, which
constituted the majority of the network (Isaak et al. 2017). Table 1 reports statistics for the
presence/absence data for each of the two species of interest. Table 2 shows all of the parameter
estimates that were produced for cold-water species in Isaak et al. (2017). See Appendix B for
maps and summary statistics for westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout occurrences from the
presence/absence dataset that was used by Isaak et al. (2017). Figure 2 details the workflow
used by Isaak et al. (2017), to determine the occupancy probabilities per stream reach.

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 1. Mine Site OM Study Area for Westslope Cutthroat Trout and Bull Trout

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Table 1. Statistics for Presence/Absence Data used to Fit the Xxisting Regional OM
for Westslope Cutthroat Trout and Bull Trout

Bull Trout Westslope Cutthroat Trout

Sample Size
Presence Only 2,809 11,543
Presence and Absence 11,417 19,692
Percent of Presence 24.6% 58.6%
Presence and Absence
Stream Stream Stream Stream
Channel Slope Channel Slope
Temperature Flow Temperature Flow
(%) (%)
(°C) (cfs) (°C) (cfs)
Median 11.25 9.10 2.49 11.09 4.19 2.95
Standard Deviation 2.04 22.39 3.62 2.07 19.25 3.51
Minimum 5.63 0.00 0.00 3.90 0.00 0.00
Maximum 20.22 104.34 30.44 20.22 104.34 30.44
Presence Only
Stream Stream Stream Stream
Channel Slope Channel Slope
Temperature Flow Temperature Flow
(%) (%)
(°C) (cfs) (°C) (cfs)
Median 10.58 19.09 2.10 10.85 4.20 3.30
Standard Deviation 1.81 23.91 2.75 1.93 17.96 3.48
Minimum 5.63 0.00 0.00 4.58 0.00 0.00
Maximum 18.28 104.34 29.28 18.53 104.34 30.44
Table Source: Isaak et al. 2017

Table 2. Parameter Estimates and Standard Errors (in parentheses) for the Multivariate Models
Predicting Occurrence of Westslope Cutthroat Trout and Bull Trout
(highlighting added)

Table Source: Isaak et al. 2017

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure Source: Isaak et al. 2017

Figure 2. Existing Regional OM Workflow for Westslope Cutthroat Trout and Bull Trout

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

The mine site OM methodologies closely followed the existing regional OM methodologies from
Isaak et al. (2017). However, because the existing regional OM was applied at a much smaller
scale than the mine site study area, higher-resolution data inputs (a light detection and ranging
Lidar-derived digital elevation model [DEM], reach-based modeled stream and pit lake network
temperature [SPLNT], and stream discharge data from Brown and Caldwell 2018a) were used.
Two steps from Isaak et al. (2015), were also included—reaches with stream discharges below
0.2 cfs were trimmed from the mine site study area, and headwater reaches with channel slopes
above 15 percent were trimmed from the mine site study area. The workflow used in the mine site
OM model is detailed in Figure 3.
Sections 4.1 through 4.10 describe the process used to adapt the existing regional OM methods
to the mine site OM study area.

4.1 ASSUMPTIONS
The mine site OM uses key physical habitat variables (stream temperature, stream discharge,
and channel slope) to determine the potential of stream reaches to support populations of
westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout. Both stream temperature and stream discharge were
modeled for existing conditions, and supplied on a reach basis from Brown and Caldwell 2018a
and Rio ASE 2018b. Other assumptions included:
1. The existing regional OMs are appropriate model examples, given the physical
characteristics that were of concern to the ESA group.
2. The presence/absence dataset that was used to condition the logistic regression
equations used to calculate occupancy probabilities accurately reflects the
presence/absence of the native trout species of interest in the mine site study area.
3. Stream reaches with slopes greater than 15 percent and discharges less than 0.2 cfs are
uninhabitable by the native trout species of interest.

4.2 MODELING PROCEDURE

The mine site OM procedure was selected, developed, and run following the general approach
described below:
1. Reviewed literature sources for occupancy model examples in the western U.S.,
including Isaak et al. 2015, 2017. The methods from Isaak et al. (2017) were found to be
the best fit as described in Section 3.
2. Determined and confirmed the methods that Isaak et al. (2017) used to produce their
model variables and parameter estimates.
3. Created a subset of SFA reaches (perennial streams only) for the mine site OM study
area.
4. Added National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) Plus Version 2 reaches upstream of the
SFA mine site OM study area. A global naming structure was applied to the final mine
site OM study area (Horizon Systems Corporation 2019).
5. Calculated channel slopes for all stream reaches in the final mine site OM study area.

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
6. Gathered all variable inputs from existing condition reports. Stream temperatures and
stream discharges per SFA reach were modeled with the same time frames that were
used in Isaak et al. (2017).
7. Transformed all mine site OM model variables using methods in Gelman and Hill (2006).
8. Attributed mine site OM model variables to stream reaches in the final model study area,
and paired them with parameter estimates from Isaak et al. (2017) to calculate
preliminary occupancy probabilities for each stream reach in the final mine site OM study
area.
9. Trimmed headwater stream reaches with channel slopes greater than 15 percent and
stream discharges less than 0.2 cfs.
10. Performed Quality Checks on all data inputs and processes.
11. Performed sensitivity analysis to assess the influence of mine site OM variables on mine
site OM probabilities.
12. Finalized all OM modeling results and summarized them by each stream segment.

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 3. Mine Site OM Workflow for Westslope Cutthroat Trout and Bull Trout

4.3 DATA EMPLOYED

As detailed in Section 4.2, creating the mine site OM required several steps and inputs. Table 3
shows the input variables, along with their units of measurement, temporal and spatial resolutions,
and the sources of each dataset used in the mine site OM. Stream temperature inputs for the
mine site OM were created using the QUAL2K model (Tufts University 2015) and were based on
water temperature measurements collected at several sites by the U.S. Geological Survey
(USGS) and HDR Engineering, Inc. (HDR 2015). Empirical stream discharge measurements at
five gage locations in the study area were used to calibrate a basin-area-to-stream flow regression
equation (Rio ASE 2018a). The results provided the stream reach discharges that were used in
the mine site OM. Channel slope for each model reach was calculated in GIS by dividing the

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
elevation loss of each reach (top-of-reach elevation value less bottom-of-reach elevation value)
by reach length.

Table 3. Mine Site OM Variable Metadata

Stream Temperature Stream Flow Channel Slope

Mean Stream Mean Stream Discharge
Unit of Measurement Slope (%)
Temperature (°C) (cfs)
July 16-Sept. 30 (Period
Temporal Resolution August (Period of Record) Not Applicable
of Record)
Mine Site OM Reach Mine Site OM Reach Mine Site OM Reach
Spatial Resolution
Study area Scale Study area Scale Study area Scale
Final SGP SPLNT
Existing Conditions
Data Source RIO ASE (2018a) Ecosystem Sciences
Report (Brown and
Caldwell 2018a)

4.4 STREAMLINES
The RMRS employed segments derived from the NHD Plus Version 2 flow network to perform
the existing regional OM; however, the NHD dataset does not accurately reflect the drainage lines
in the mine site study area. Several streamline datasets existed for other analyses in the mine
site study area (e.g., Aquatic Resources Study Area streams [MWH 2017]; delineated streams
from wetland delineation [MWH 2017]; and Qual2K stream segmentation [Brown and Caldwell
2018a]). Ecosystem Sciences created a streamline file based on LiDAR data for the study area
using the ArcHydro application from ESRI (ESRI 2019). The LiDAR-based streamline and other
streamline datasets were merged and analyzed to create one layer that accurately represented
the stream courses in the study area. Ecosystem Sciences provided this revised stream layer to
the ESA group for review and edits. Midas Gold made edits based on their knowledge of the mine
site study area. Ecosystem Sciences then made the following changes to the streamline file:
1. Added line segments through culverts to create contiguous study-area–wide stream
segments.
2. Removed all but perennial streams from the streamline file. Where streams had multiple
channels, the main channel, or larger channel, was used in the model.

4.5 STREAM FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT REACHES

SFA reaches were provided to Ecosystem Sciences by Midas Gold from Rio ASE (2018a). The
SFA reach names were attributed to the finalized streamline file to create the existing conditions
SFA reach network used in the mine site OM. NHD Plus Version 2 stream segments were then
appended to the SFA reach network to include any headwater stream segments that were
unaccounted for in the SFA reach network. The existing SFA naming convention was extended
to the headwater reaches to create an all-inclusive final mine site OM stream network with a
consistent reach-naming structure.

4.6 STREAM TEMPERATURE

Stream temperatures for existing conditions were modeled using QUAL2K, and provided in the
SPLNT baseline report (Brown and Caldwell 2018a). These stream temperatures were originally

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
produced for a time period that did not match the low-flow period used by Isaak et al. 2017. A
dedicated model run was performed to output SPLNT reach temperatures that represented mean
August temperature in degrees Celsius. SPLNT reaches did not spatially match mine site OM
reaches, and a transfer of temperatures was necessary. A distance-weighted average method
was used for the transfer—for example, if more than one SPLNT reach occurred in one mine site
OM reach, then the temperature for each SPLNT reach was multiplied by its length as a proportion
of the entire mine site OM reach length. All temperatures were then added to produce the
distance-weighted average for that mine site OM reach. Any mine site OM reaches that occurred
upstream of the SPLNT study area were attributed with the stream temperature assigned to the
closest downstream SPLNT reach.
Stream temperatures in the mine site OM reach network ranged from 7.91°C to 11.77°C, with a
mean of 9.71°C (Table 4).

4.7 STREAM DISCHARGE

Stream discharge for existing conditions in the study area were originally modelled using
MODFLOW, a spatially distributed ground and surface water flow program created by the USGS
(Brown and Caldwell 2018b). However, the timeframe of stream discharge that was modeled
using the MODFLOW model was inconsistent with the timeframe used in the existing regional
OM. The existing regional OM used stream discharge values from the Variable Infiltration
Capacity (VIC) hydrologic model, which uses mean summer flow. Mean summer flow describes
the lowest-flow period that may be most limiting to fish, and may correlate to maximum water
temperature (Isaak et al. 2010). For the VIC model, the start of summer is defined as the first day
after June 1 when flows fall below the mean annual value, which ensures that summer starts after
the subsidence of the snowmelt flood; the end of summer is defined as September 30, regardless
of starting date (Wenger et al. 2010). For the mine site study area, July 16 was calculated to be
the start of summer (Rio ASE 2018b). Modelled flows for the July 16 through September 30
timeframe were supplied using a regression equation that links basin area to streamflow
measurements taken at various sites in the study area.
Isaak et al. (2015) trimmed reaches in their network that have discharges less than 0.2 cfs
because trout are rare in such small streams. The mine site OM used a 0.2-cfs restriction in the
headwater reaches of the mine site OM stream network. RIO ASE imposed the flow threshold
when outputting flows using their basin area-to-streamflow regression exercise (Rio ASE 2019b).
Stream discharge in the mine site OM reach network ranged from 0.24 to 18.87 cfs, with a mean
of 4.07 cfs (Table 4).

4.8 CHANNEL SLOPE

Channel slope for each mine site OM reach was delineated in ArcGIS 10.6 using a 1-meter Lidar
DEM. Elevation values associated with the stream network were extracted from the DEM and
added to the mine site OM reach stream network. The elevation in meters from the upstream and
downstream end of each mine site OM reach were extracted from the DEM, and the difference
divided by reach length.
Channel slopes in the mine site OM reach network ranged from 0.5 to 33.1 percent, with a mean
of 9.6 percent. Isaak et al. (2015) trimmed reaches in their network that were greater than
15 percent because trout are rare in such high-gradient stream reaches. The mine site OM used
a 15 percent restriction in the mine site OM stream reach network. In all, 21 of the 84 reaches
(25 percent) were trimmed from the mine site OM reach network—leaving 65 reaches in the mine
site OM study area. There were four reaches (EF3.2, MC0.8, HC1.4, and MN2) between in-

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
network lower gradient reaches that were also trimmed from the OM reach network; all other
trimmed reaches were in the headwaters of the network. Most of the potentially occupied habitat
for the two species in the study area is limited to the main trunk streams—EFSFSR, Meadow
Creek, and their immediate low-gradient tributaries.

Table 4. Statistics for Mine Site Occupancy Probability Model Variables

Stream Temperature (°C) Stream Discharge (cfs) Channel Slope

Min 7.91 0.31 0.45
Max 11.77 18.87 14.71
Median 9.98 1.66 6.03
Mean 9.83 4.96 6.33
SD 1.24 6.06 4.06

4.9 MODEL INPUT TRANSFORMATIONS

To produce occupancy probabilities for mine site OM reaches, the site-specific values for each
independent variable (stream temperature, stream discharge, and channel slope) had to be
matched with the model parameter estimates from Isaak et al. (2017). The parameter estimates
and model variables published in Isaak et al. (2017) were back-transformed or changed back to
their original scale or units of measurement. To use the parameter estimates from Isaak et al.
2017, they needed to be transformed into a standardized form (unitless). Similarly, all mine site
OM variables required standardization before they could be applied to the mine site OM.
Transformations to the parameter estimates were done by Seth Wenger, author and lead modeler
for Isaak et al. (2017) (personal communication, February and March 2019). The mine site OM
variables were transformed using a method employed by Gelman and Hill (2006). The results of
these standardized values, along with the values in their original scales, are reported in
Appendix C.

4.10 FISH ACCESS AND BARRIERS

For this model, only perennial streams were considered; SFA stream reaches labeled as
intermittent or non-perennial were trimmed from the final set of streams. Further restrictions
included maximum slope and minimum flow limitations. Any mine site OM reaches that had a
slope greater than 15 percent or a flow less than 0.2 cfs were trimmed from the final stream
network. The treatment of in-network barriers is addressed in a separate tech memo.

Section 5 details the results of the mine site OM. Results are summarized for four mine site stream
segments in the study area (Stream Segment 1, Stream Segment 2, Stream Segment 3, and
Stream Segment 5) for the existing condition. Stream Segment 4 was not within the model
domain.

5.1 STREAM SEGMENT 5

Stream Segment 5 provides habitat for westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout. After accounting
for maximum slope and minimum stream discharge criteria, Stream Segment 5 contained

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
41.7 kilometers of potential habitat for westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout. The occupancy
probabilities for westslope cutthroat trout range from 55.7 to 70.1 percent; while those for bull
trout range from 0.9 to 24.5 percent. A distance-weighted average method was used to represent
the average occupancy probability for each stream segment. To produce the distance-weighted
average, the occupancy probability of each mine site OM reach was multiplied by the proportion
of that reach’s stream length to the cumulative stream length of each stream segment. The
distance-weighted average occupancy probability for westslope cutthroat trout is 63.8 percent,
and 8.3 percent for bull trout for Stream Segment 5.
Occupancy probabilities are reported in quartiles (i.e., four classes of equal size)—the first quartile
representing the reaches with the lowest 25 percent of occupancy probabilities; and the fourth
quartile representing reaches with the highest 25 percent of occupancy probabilities. The values
used to delineate the quartiles for each stream segment were calculated from all occupancy
probabilities in Stream Segment 5. Table 5 details the number of reaches, total length of reaches,
percent of total Stream Segment 5, and distance-weighted average occupancy probabilities for
each quartile in the species’ respective range of occupancy probability values in Stream
Segment 5. Quartiles are reclassified as low, medium-low, medium-high, and high. Figures 4
and 5 display the occupancy probabilities for each mine site OM reach in the Stream Segment 5
for westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout, respectively.

Table 5. Descriptive Statistics for Occupancy Probabilities for Stream Segment 5

Length of
Number of Percent of Stream Distance-Weighted Average
Reaches
Reaches Segment 5 Occupancy Probability
(meters)
Westslope Cutthroat Trout
Low 17 12,184 29.22% 58.24%
Medium-Low 16 13,367 32.05% 62.75%
Medium-High 16 8,098 19.42% 67.20%
High 15 8,943 21.45% 69.43%
Total 63 41,700 100% 63.79%
Bull Trout
Low 16 11,327 27.16% 2.37%
Medium-Low 16 12,162 29.16% 4.57%
Medium-High 16 9,665 23.18% 10.86%
High 15 8,547 20.50% 18.64%
Total 63 41,700 100% 8.31%

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 4. Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream Segment 5

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 5. Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 5

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
5.1.1 Stream Segment 1
Stream Segment 1 contains 10.45 kilometers of potential habitat for westslope cutthroat trout and
bull trout. The distance-weighted average occupancy probability for westslope cutthroat trout is
63.7 percent; and 9.7 percent for bull trout. Table 6 details the number of reaches, total length of
reaches, percent of Stream Segment 1, and distance-weighted average occupancy probabilities
for each quartile within the species’ respective range of occupancy probability values in Stream
Segment 1. Figure 6 and Figure 7 display the occupancy probabilities for each mine site OM
reach in Stream Segment 1 for westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout, respectively.

Table 6. Descriptive Statistics for Occupancy Probabilities for Stream Segment 1

Length of
Number of Percent of Stream Distance Weighted Average
Reaches
Reaches Segment 1 Occupancy Probability
(meters)
Westslope Cutthroat Trout
Low 7 3,358 32.15% 58.18%
Medium-Low 5 2,875 27.52% 62.35%
Medium-High 6 1,120 10.72% 67.26%
High 4 3,092 29.60% 69.75%
Total 22 10,445 100% 63.73%
Bull Trout
Low 6 2,616 25.04% 2.02%
Medium-Low 5 2,891 27.67% 4.98%
Medium-High 3 863 8.26% 8.24%
High 8 4,076 39.03% 18.19%
Total 22 10,445 100% 9.66%

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 6. Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream Segment 1

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 7. Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 1

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
5.1.2 Stream Segment 2
Stream Segment 2 contains 15.1 kilometers of potential habitat for westslope cutthroat trout and
bull trout. The distance-weighted average occupancy probability for westslope cutthroat trout is
64.1 percent; for bull trout it is 6.3 percent. Table 7 details the number of reaches, total length of
reaches, percent of Stream Segment 2, and distance-weighted average occupancy probabilities
for each quartile within the species’ respective range of occupancy probability values in Stream
Segment 2. Figure 8 and Figure 9 display the occupancy probabilities for each mine site OM
reach in Stream Segment 2 for westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout, respectively.

Table 7. Descriptive Statistics for Occupancy Probabilities for Stream Segment 2

Length of
Number of Percent of Stream Distance Weighted Average
Reaches
Reaches Segment 2 Occupancy Probability
(meters)
Westslope Cutthroat Trout
Low 6 3,863 25.59% 58.13%
Medium-Low 6 5,009 33.18% 63.51%
Medium-High 6 3,287 21.78% 67.44%
High 6 2,937 19.46% 69.00%
Total 24 15,096 100% 64.06%
Bull Trout
Low 6 3,445 22.82% 2.09%
Medium-Low 8 6,130 40.61% 4.39%
Medium-High 10 5,521 36.58% 11.01%
High 0 0 0% 0%
Total 24 15,096 100% 6.29%

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 8. Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream Segment 2

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 9. Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 2

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
5.1.3 Stream Segment 3
Stream Segment 3 contains 16.16 meters of potential habitat for westslope cutthroat trout and
bull trout. The distance-weighted average occupancy probability for westslope cutthroat trout is
63.6 percent, and 9.3 percent for bull trout. Table 8 details the number of reaches, total length of
reaches, percent of Stream Segment 3, and distance-weighted average occupancy probabilities
for each quartile within the species’ respective range of occupancy probability values in Stream
Segment 3. Figures 10 and 11 display the occupancy probabilities for each mine site OM reach
in Stream Segment 3 for westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout, respectively.

Table 6. Descriptive Statistics for Occupancy Probabilities for Stream Segment 3

Length of
Number of Percent of Stream Distance Weighted Average
Reaches
Reaches Segment 3 Occupancy Probability
(meters)
Westslope Cutthroat Trout
Low 3 4,071 25.19% 58.07%
Medium-Low 5 5,483 33.93% 62.27%
Medium-High 4 3,690 22.84% 66.97%
High 5 2,914 18.04% 69.50%
Total 17 16,159 100% 63.59%
Bull Trout
Low 4 5,267 32.60% 2.72%
Medium-Low 3 3,141 19.44% 4.55%
Medium-High 3 3,281 20.30% 11.30%
High 7 4,470 27.66% 19.06%
Total 17 16,159 100% 9.34%

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 6. Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream Segment 3

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 7. Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout Stream Segment 3

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
5.2 SENSITIVITY ANALYSES
The occupancy probabilities that resulted from the mine site OM are a function of three
independent variables: stream temperature, stream discharge, and channel slope. This section
describes the analyses that were performed to quantify the importance of each variable in
producing the resulting occupancy probabilities.
Calculations were developed that link mine site OM probabilities for westslope cutthroat trout and
bull trout under existing conditions to their respective independent variables. A simple ‘one-at-a-
time’ sensitivity analysis was performed on the mine site OM probabilities and their associated
model variables. This type of sensitivity analysis is performed by repeatedly varying one variable
by a fixed increment, while holding all other independent variables to their sample means (Hamby
1994). Each variable was varied from its sample mean in both the positive and negative directions.
Sensitivity analysis runs were performed using two different scenarios: 1) means from all stream
reaches in the study area (i.e., basecase, flow = 4.9 cfs, temperature = 9.71°C and slope = 7.3
percent); and 2) modeled values associated with the MC5 reach (flow = 7.91 cfs, temperature =
11.77°C, slope = 1 percent). The basecase analysis provides a theoretical understanding of how
mine site OM probabilities change as each variable changes for the average mine site OM reach.
The MC5 analysis describes the relationship between mine site OM probabilities and variables
for a specific reach whose flow would be diverted under the project (MC5). Six graphical outputs
from the sensitivity analyses (three for the base-case and three for the MC5 reach-case) for each
species can be found in Appendix D. For each variable/species analyzed, one graph shows OM
probabilities plotted against the variable of interest. The other two graphs show how increases
and decreases in the variables affect mine site OM probabilities, and are in units of percent
change (%∆): for example, a 50 percent change in stream discharge results in a 20 percent
change in mine site OM probability. Below, the sensitivity of mine site OM probabilities to each
variable is discussed.

5.2.1 Stream Temperature

Stream temperature was varied by increments of 0.1°C for both westslope cutthroat trout and bull
trout, ranging from 5°C to 20°C. Table 9 shows the resulting change in occupancy probability from
a 50 percent increase or decrease in stream temperature for both native trout species, and the
two methods of analysis.

Table 7. Changes in Occupancy Probability as a Result of Decreasing and

Increasing Percent Change in Stream Temperature

Change in Occupancy Probability

Change in Stream
Bull Trout Cutthroat Trout
Temperature
Basecase MC5 Basecase MC5
50% Decrease 342% Increase 386% Increase 13% Decrease 2% Decrease
50% Increase 81% Decrease 84% Decrease 25% Decrease 53% Decrease

5.2.2 Stream Discharge

Stream discharge was varied by increments of 0.2 cfs for westslope cutthroat trout and 0.5 cfs for
bull trout, ranging from 0 cfs to 30 cfs. Table 10 shows the resulting change in occupancy

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
probability from a 50 percent increase or decrease in stream discharge for both native trout
species, and the two methods of analysis.

Table 8. Changes in Occupancy Probability as a Result of Decreasing and

Increasing Percent Change in Stream Discharge

Change in Occupancy Probability

Change in Stream
Bull Trout Cutthroat Trout
Discharge
Basecase MC5 Basecase MC5
50% Decrease 35% Decrease 35% Decrease 2% Decrease 2% Decrease
50% Increase 27% Increase 27% Increase 1% Decrease 1% Decrease

5.2.3 Channel Slope

Channel slope was varied by increments of 0.5 percent for both westslope cutthroat trout and bull
trout, ranging from 0 to 30 percent. Table 11 shows the resulting change in occupancy probability
from a 50 percent increase or decrease in channel slope for both native trout species, and the
two methods of analysis.

Table 9. Changes in Occupancy Probability Resulting from Decreasing and

Increasing Percent Change in Channel Slope

Change in Occupancy Probability

Change in Channel
Bull Trout Cutthroat Trout
Slope
Basecase MC5 Basecase MC5
50% Decrease 33% Increase 4% Increase 3% Increase 0.4% Increase
50% Increase 25% Decrease 4% Decrease 3% Decrease 0.4% Decrease

5.3 STUDY AREA HABITAT AND OCCUPANCY

Overall, the mine site OM study area (Stream Segment 5) supports 41.70 kilometers of stream
channel that is useable habitat for westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout. With just over
16.16 kilometers of stream channel, Stream Segment 3 contains the most available habitat for
both species (Figure 12).

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 8. Length of Available (kilometers) for each Stream Segment

The occupancy probability distributions for each stream segment are displayed below (Figure 13
and Figure 14). Of the three stream segments, Stream Segment 2 contains the highest distance-
weighted average occupancy percentage (64.06 percent) for westslope cutthroat trout. There is
little variability between the distributions of stream segments for westslope cutthroat trout.
Westslope cutthroat trout have a greater tolerance for fluctuations in each of the OM model
variables, and are more generalist in their occupancy of habitat in the mine site study area than
bull trout. For bull trout, Stream Segment 1 contains the highest distance-weighted average
occupancy percentage (9.66 percent) of the three nested stream segments. The weighted
average occupancy percentage Stream Segment 2 is notably lower than Stream Segment 1 or 3.
This is largely a function of stream temperature and stream discharge, because Stream
Segment 2 has a higher average stream temperature (10.36°C) and a lower average stream
discharge (2.96 cfs) than the average stream temperature and discharge of Stream Segment 5.

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 9. Occupancy Probability Distributions for Westslope Cutthroat Trout

for each Stream Segment

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 10. Occupancy Probability Distributions for Bull Trout for each Stream Segment

This technical memorandum explains the methods and results of the mine site OM, which models
the quantity and spatial distribution of westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout habitat for existing
conditions in the mine site study area. This information supports the analysis of impacts on
westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout from the Stibnite Gold Project or any action alternative, by
providing the baseline against which changes can be compared.
The mine site OM estimates the probability of the two species’ occurrence in the headwaters of
the EFSFSR watershed upstream from the confluence of Sugar Creek. The methods used to
determine the occupancy probability per stream reach follow the approaches that the existing
regional OM employed for watersheds in the Rocky Mountains of Idaho and western Montana, in
which the mine site study area is located. The mine site OM differs from the existing regional OM
methodology by employing site-scale data attributed to stream reaches that are meaningful in
terms of the mine site study area.
On average, westslope cutthroat trout are estimated to occupy 63.8 percent of all OM mine site
reaches; while bull trout are estimated to occupy 8.3 percent of all OM mine site reaches. The
mine site occupancy percentages in this technical memorandum provide a quantitative and spatial
measure of the two native trout species’ habitats in the mine site study area. There are different

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
ways to interpret the results. Rather than absolute percentages, an alternative interpretation uses
appropriate prevalence-dependent cut-offs for each species. For example, bull trout would be
expected to be present if the predicted probability is greater than 20 percent or 10 percent (rather
than the intuitive 50 percent) (Wenger, Personal Communication, January 18, 2019). This way of
reading the results would offer a practical rationale for the low-occupancy probability estimates
for bull trout in the mine site study area, given that their occurrence has been documented.
Recommendations/Limitations
The results from the existing conditions OM could be compared with a comprehensive mine-site–
specific presence/absence dataset to further place them in the context of actual westslope
cutthroat and bull trout occupancy in the mine site study area. Both species are known to occur
in the mine site study area, and their actual spatial distributions are a function of factors that were
not used as independent variables in the OM model. For example, adfluvial bull trout populations,
which have been observed residing in Yellow Pine Pit and migrating downstream of the lake and
then moving upstream to spawning areas (Hogen 2002), are not well-represented by the reaches
that were modeled in the mine site study area (less than 3 percent of the overall existing conditions
OM stream length is below Yellow Pine Pit). Although the best available presence/absence
dataset from Isaak et al. (2017) was used to condition the logistical regression equation in the
mine site OM model, this dataset is not specific to just the mine site study area.

Brown and Caldwell. 2018a. Final Stibnite Gold Project, Stream and Pit Lake Network
Temperature Model. Existing Conditions Report. Prepared for Midas Gold Idaho Inc.
Valley County, Idaho.
Brown and Caldwell. 2018b. Final Stibnite Gold Project Hydrologic Model Existing Conditions.
Existing Conditions Report. Prepared for Midas Gold Idaho Inc. Valley County, Idaho.
ESRI. 2019. ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10. Redlands, California: Environmental Systems
Research Institute.
Gelman, A. and J. Hill. 2006. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models.
Cambridge University Press.
Hamby, D.M. 1994. A review of techniques for parameter sensitivity analysis of environmental
models. Environmental Modeling and Assessment 32: 155-154.
HDR Inc. 2015. Surface water quality baseline report. Prepared for Midas Gold Idaho Inc. Valley
County, Idaho.
Hogen, D.M. 2002. Spatial and temporal distribution of bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) in the
upper East Fork South Fork Salmon River watershed, Idaho. Master of Science Thesis.
Moscow, Idaho: University of Idaho.
Horizon System Corporation. 2019. NHDPlus Version 2. Available: http://www.horizon-
systems.com/NHDPlus/NHDPlusV2_home.php.
Idaho Department of Environmental Quality. nd. Beneficial Use Reconaissance Program
database. Available: https://www.deq.idaho.gov/burp.
Isaak, D. J., C. H. Luce, B. E. Rieman, D. E. Nagel, E. E. Peterson, D. L. Horan, S. Parkes, and
G. L. Chandler. 2010. Effects of climate change and wildfire on stream temperatures and
salmonid thermal habitat in a mountain river network. Global Change Biology 20 (5):1350–
1371.

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
Isaak, D. J., Young, M. K., Nagel, D. E., Horan, D. L., and M. C. Groce. 2015. The cold-water
climate shield: delineating refugia for preserving salmonid fishes through the 21st century.
Global Change Biology 21 (7): 2465-2828.
Isaak, D. J., S. J. Wenger, and M. K. Young. 2017. Big biology meets microclimatology: defining
thermal niches of ectotherms at landscape scales for conservation planning. Ecological
Applications 27 (3):977–990.
Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks. nd. MFISH database. Available: http://fwp.mt.gov/fishing/mFish.
MWH, Americas Inc. 2017. Aquatic resources 2016 baseline report. Stibnite Gold Project Midas
Gold Idaho, Inc.
Rio ASE. 2018a. Draft Stream Design Report; Stibnite Gold Project Midas Gold Idaho, Inc.
Rio ASE. 2018b. Stream Functional Assessment OM Stream Discharges; Stibnite Gold Project
Midas Gold Idaho, Inc.
Tufts University. 2015. QUAL2K: Model framework for simulating river, stream, and lake water
quality. Available: http://www.qual2k.com/.
Wenger, S. J., C. H. Luce, A. F. Hamlet, D. J. Isaak, and H. M. Neville. 2010. Macroscale
hydrologic modeling of ecologically relevant flow metrics. Water Resources Research 46
(9).
Wenger, S. J., Daniel J. Isaak, Charles H. Luce, Helen M. Neville, Kurt D. Fausch, Jason B.
Dunham, Daniel C. Dauwalter, Michael K. Young, Marketa M. Elsner, Bruce E.
Rieman, Alan F. Hamlet, and Jack E. Williams. 2011. Flow regime, temperature and
biotic interactions drive differential declines of trout species under climate change.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 108:14175–14180.
Wenger, S.J., Personal Communication: phone and email. February through March 2019.
Young, M. K., K. S. McKelvey, K. L. Pilgrim, and M. K. Schwartz. 2013. DNA barcoding at
riverscape scales: assessing biodiversity among fishes of the genus Cottus (Teleostei) in
northern Rocky Mountain streams. Molecular Ecology Resources 13:583–595.

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

This page intentionally left blank

DECEMBER 2019
MIDAS GOLD STIBNITE PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

APPENDIX A: MINE SITE STREAM SEGMENTATION

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

This page intentionally left blank

DECEMBER 2019
MIDAS GOLD STIBNITE PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

The mine site study area, as displayed below, has been delineated into six different stream
segments as follows:
• Stream Segment 1: The Upper EFSFSR and its tributaries from its confluence with Sugar
Creek upstream to its confluence with Meadow Creek.
• Stream Segment 2: The entirety of the Meadow Creek drainage area, including East Fork
Meadow Creek.
• Stream Segment 3: The Upper EFSFSR and its tributaries upstream of its confluence
with Meadow Creek.
• Stream Segment 4: The modeled portion of the Upper EFSFSR downstream of its
confluence with Sugar Creek.
• Stream Segment 5: The entirety of the HUC 12 “Headwaters East Fork South Fork
Salmon River” (see figure below). Stream Segment 5 is the summation of Stream
Segments 1, 2, and 3.
• Stream Segment 6: The Sugar Creek drainage area, or the HUC 12 “Sugar Creek” (see
figure below).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-1

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-2

MIDAS GOLD STIBNITE PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

APPENDIX B: MAPS AND SUMMARY STATISTICS FOR ISAAK ET AL. 2017

PRESENCE/ABSENCE DATASET

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

This page intentionally left blank

DECEMBER 2019
MIDAS GOLD STIBNITE PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Map of Bull Trout Occurrences from Isaak et al. 2017

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | B-1

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Bull Trout Occurrences from Isaak et al. 2017 (2,809 Occurrences in 11,417 Surveys)

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | B-2

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Map of Cutthroat Trout Occurrences from Isaak et al. 2017

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | B-3

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Cutthroat Trout Occurrences from Isaak et al. 2017 (11,563 Occurrences in 19,692 Surveys

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | B-4

MIDAS GOLD STIBNITE PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

APPENDIX C: MINE SITE OM VARIABLES/OCCUPANCY PROBABILITIES (BACK-

TRANSFORMED AND STANDARDIZED)

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

This page intentionally left blank

DECEMBER 2019
MIDAS GOLD STIBNITE PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Back-transformed model variables.

Stream
Stream Stream Stream
Reach Temperature Slope (%)
Temperature2 Discharge (CFS) Discharge (LN)
(°C)
BC0.1 9.35 87.42 0.85 -0.16 4.49%
BC1 10.80 116.64 1.58 0.46 1.56%
BC2 10.80 116.64 1.77 0.57 13.05%
BC3 10.80 116.64 1.84 0.61 5.16%
BC4 10.80 116.64 1.84 0.61 3.01%
EF0.01 7.91 62.51 0.32 -1.13 7.23%
EF0.02 7.91 62.51 0.63 -0.46 8.60%
EF0.03 7.91 62.51 1.06 0.06 5.05%
EF0.04 7.91 62.57 1.66 0.51 3.22%
EF0.05 7.91 62.51 0.72 -0.33 10.79%
EF0.06 7.91 62.51 1.26 0.23 6.43%
EF0.07 7.91 62.51 2.51 0.92 5.05%
EF0.08 8.10 65.61 0.65 -0.44 13.59%
EF0.09 8.10 65.61 0.34 -1.09 11.40%
EF0.10 8.10 65.61 1.27 0.24 5.97%
EF0.11 8.10 65.61 1.70 0.53 2.19%
EF0.12 8.52 72.65 5.78 1.75 2.08%
EF0.14 9.06 82.08 6.17 1.82 3.45%
EF0.15 9.06 82.08 6.31 1.84 3.63%
EF0.17 9.24 85.38 6.89 1.93 4.47%
EF0.18 9.24 85.38 7.44 2.01 3.50%
EF1 9.24 85.38 7.55 2.02 6.44%
EF2.1 10.77 115.99 16.06 2.78 3.05%
EF2.2 10.96 120.12 16.57 2.81 2.71%
EF2.3 10.90 118.81 17.62 2.87 8.46%
EF2.4 10.91 118.92 17.64 2.87 6.03%
EF2.5 10.94 119.68 17.66 2.87 8.21%
EF3.1 10.94 119.68 17.66 2.87 6.64%
EF3.2 10.94 119.68 18.02 2.89 16.61%
EF3.3 11.72 137.36 18.12 2.90 1.96%
EF4.1 11.72 137.36 18.47 2.92 2.59%
EF4.2 11.72 137.36 18.81 2.93 4.23%
EF4.3 11.72 137.36 18.87 2.94 4.62%

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | C-1

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Stream
Stream Stream Stream
Reach Temperature Slope (%)
Temperature2 Discharge (CFS) Discharge (LN)
(°C)
FC0 8.57 73.44 1.08 0.08 11.42%
FC0.1 7.96 63.36 0.34 -1.07 9.68%
FC0.2 7.96 63.36 0.69 -0.37 6.22%
FC0.3 8.19 67.08 1.01 0.01 9.86%
FC1 8.57 73.44 1.25 0.22 12.91%
FC2 8.57 73.44 1.50 0.41 7.38%
FC3 8.57 73.44 1.60 0.47 13.84%
GC0 10.80 116.64 0.31 -1.18 10.40%
GC1 10.80 116.64 0.37 -1.00 9.61%
HC1.2 9.81 96.24 0.61 -0.49 7.08%
HC1.3 10.00 99.97 0.70 -0.35 12.13%
HC1.4 10.09 101.81 0.74 -0.30 30.09%
HL1 11.39 129.73 5.37 1.68 0.58%
HL2 11.77 138.53 7.42 2.00 0.54%
MC0.01 10.22 104.45 0.46 -0.77 12.97%
MC0.02 10.22 104.45 0.85 -0.16 6.33%
MC0.04 8.37 70.06 0.41 -0.89 8.52%
MC0.06 8.37 70.06 1.02 0.02 9.00%
MC0.1 10.22 104.45 1.03 0.03 4.56%
MC0.7 9.27 85.93 0.49 -0.71 14.71%
MC0.8 8.81 77.62 1.21 0.19 16.61%
MC1.1 10.72 114.92 1.50 0.40 6.85%
MC1.2 9.88 97.61 0.69 -0.37 10.18%
MC1.31 8.92 79.57 1.36 0.31 14.68%
MC1.4 10.46 109.37 3.03 1.11 2.65%
MC1.5 10.22 104.45 4.44 1.49 1.99%
MC2 10.71 114.70 4.94 1.60 0.60%
MC3 10.71 114.70 5.22 1.65 0.45%
MC4.1 11.39 129.73 5.35 1.68 1.96%
MC4.2 11.39 129.73 5.40 1.69 1.57%
MC5 11.77 138.53 7.91 2.07 0.95%
MC6 11.57 133.78 8.10 2.09 1.84%
MN1 9.98 99.60 0.64 -0.44 8.68%
MN2 9.98 99.60 0.66 -0.42 33.14%

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | C-2

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Standardized Model Variables

Stream
Stream Stream
Reach Temperature Slope (%)
Temperature2 Discharge (LN)
(°C)
BC0.1 0.0597 0.0036 0.3441 -0.1780
BC1 -0.6808 0.4635 -0.9389 2.0415
BC2 -0.3470 0.1204 -0.6481 0.9037
BC3 -0.4819 0.2322 -0.7512 1.5487
BC4 -0.6808 0.4635 -0.5311 0.7344
EF0.01 -0.1437 0.0206 -0.3533 0.1880
EF0.02 -0.1437 0.0206 -0.3525 -0.1181
EF0.03 -0.1437 0.0206 -0.3991 -0.3245
EF0.04 -0.4642 0.2155 -0.5857 0.0928
EF0.05 -0.7832 0.6135 -0.8778 0.4826
EF0.06 -0.1437 0.0206 -0.3562 0.6015
EF0.07 -0.1437 0.0206 -0.3639 1.3114
EF0.08 -0.7405 0.5483 -0.6685 1.3892
EF0.09 -0.7832 0.6135 -0.2590 0.1718
EF0.10 -0.7832 0.6135 -0.4668 0.3685
EF0.11 -0.7832 0.6135 -0.6351 0.9904
EF0.12 -0.5283 0.2791 0.0195 -0.0298
EF0.14 -0.4885 0.2386 0.0737 0.3710
EF0.15 -0.1503 0.0226 0.3019 -0.1123
EF0.17 -0.1127 0.0127 0.3305 0.6222
EF0.18 -0.1204 0.0145 0.3303 0.3115
EF1 -0.1127 0.0127 0.3306 0.3988
EF2.1 -0.6808 0.4635 -0.8070 0.6666
EF2.2 -0.0133 0.0002 -0.0304 -0.2676
EF2.3 -0.5592 0.3127 -0.4576 1.4719
EF2.4 -0.2193 0.0481 -0.2022 -0.1691
EF2.5 -0.1636 0.0268 -0.0545 -0.4616
EF3.1 -0.2719 0.0739 -0.0866 -0.2629
EF3.2 -0.1636 0.0268 -0.0377 -0.4823
EF3.3 -0.3249 0.1056 -0.8749 2.4096
EF4.1 -0.3249 0.1056 -0.7783 1.6298
EF4.2 -0.3249 0.1056 -0.7337 2.2829
EF4.3 -0.3249 0.1056 -0.6817 1.6533
FC0 -0.4885 0.2386 0.0462 0.0892

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | C-3

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Stream
Stream Stream
Reach Temperature Slope (%)
Temperature2 Discharge (LN)
(°C)
FC0.1 -0.7825 0.6123 -0.3838 -0.0884
FC0.2 -0.7832 0.6135 -0.5181 0.1717
FC0.3 -0.7405 0.5483 -0.4645 0.3028
FC1 -0.4885 0.2386 0.0694 -0.0489
FC2 -0.5283 0.2791 -0.9262 2.9118
FC3 -0.7405 0.5483 -0.9687 1.9218
GC0 -0.1614 0.0260 -0.4146 0.4294
GC1 -0.2719 0.0739 -0.5273 0.0620
HC1.2 0.0597 0.0036 0.3507 0.1105
HC1.3 -0.3625 0.1314 -0.7166 2.7658
HC1.4 -0.3625 0.1314 -0.7154 2.0832
HL1 -0.0133 0.0002 -0.0272 -0.3237
HL2 -0.3249 0.1056 -0.6708 0.6900
MC0.01 -0.3006 0.0904 -0.6261 3.7388
MC0.02 -0.3208 0.1029 -0.6436 1.1814
MC0.04 -0.7405 0.5483 -0.3758 -0.2355
MC0.06 -0.6469 0.4185 -0.0070 -0.2500
MC0.7 -0.1127 0.0127 0.3366 1.8195
MC0.8 -0.5283 0.2791 -0.7984 2.0357
MC1.1 -0.4819 0.2322 -0.9075 2.1565
MC1.2 -0.7205 0.5192 -0.5333 0.8574
MC1.4 0.0707 0.0050 0.0687 -0.4703
MC1.5 -0.3625 0.1314 -0.7141 1.8103
MC2 -0.2719 0.0739 -0.5843 0.3549
MC3 -0.2719 0.0739 -0.7687 1.3011
MC4.1 0.0257 0.0007 0.0953 -0.2856
MC4.2 0.0707 0.0050 0.0880 -0.4120
MC5 -0.3249 0.1056 -0.6639 4.1739
MC6 -0.3249 0.1056 -0.6919 1.7443
MN1 -0.6366 0.4053 -0.4690 1.2918
MN2 -0.4598 0.2114 -0.8274 2.8376

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | C-4

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Occupancy Probabilities and Length for all Stream Reaches

within Mine Site OM Model Study Area

Westslope
Reach Bull Trout Length (m)
Cutthroat Trout
BC0.1 64.8% 4.9% 1782.8
BC1 66.6% 5.6% 641.4
BC2 58.1% 2.2% 1060.5
BC3 64.3% 4.5% 219.9
BC4 65.9% 5.4% 61.5
EF0.01 60.7% 2.5% 1196.4
EF0.02 61.0% 3.5% 2057.3
EF0.03 64.8% 6.6% 424.2
EF0.04 67.0% 10.2% 864.3
EF0.05 59.6% 3.1% 1730.1
EF0.06 64.1% 6.6% 659.4
EF0.07 65.9% 15.2% 971.5
EF0.08 56.7% 2.9% 760.1
EF0.09 57.1% 2.3% 1580.6
EF0.10 64.1% 8.8% 1146.2
EF0.11 67.4% 14.3% 1270.0
EF0.12 70.1% 24.5% 1054.1
EF0.14 69.4% 19.5% 210.0
EF0.15 69.3% 19.4% 288.0
EF0.17 68.9% 18.1% 1031.5
EF0.18 69.7% 20.3% 330.6
EF1 67.7% 16.4% 584.5
EF2.1 70.0% 19.9% 664.3
EF2.2 70.0% 19.6% 1788.9
EF2.3 66.1% 13.3% 38.7
EF2.4 67.9% 16.0% 231.4
EF2.5 66.2% 13.4% 97.0
EF3.1 67.4% 15.1% 221.5
EF3.3 69.0% 17.4% 480.0
EF4.1 68.6% 16.7% 158.6
EF4.2 67.4% 14.9% 157.7
EF4.3 67.1% 14.4% 373.7
FC0 59.9% 4.2% 53.3
FC0.1 58.3% 2.9% 684.2

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | C-5

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Westslope
Reach Bull Trout Length (m)
Cutthroat Trout
FC0.2 62.5% 6.2% 1059.3
FC0.3 60.7% 5.3% 366.2
FC1 59.0% 4.0% 1293.3
FC2 63.7% 7.3% 727.1
FC3 58.8% 4.3% 118.5
GC0 56.4% 0.9% 674.7
GC1 57.4% 1.0% 72.7
HC1.2 61.9% 2.6% 586.4
HC1.3 58.0% 1.7% 461.7
HL1 68.5% 10.6% 237.2
HL2 68.1% 11.4% 703.6
MC0.01 56.2% 1.1% 702.9
MC0.02 62.7% 3.0% 401.5
MC0.04 60.0% 3.1% 282.9
MC0.06 61.5% 5.3% 744.9
MC0.1 64.4% 4.0% 490.8
MC0.7 55.7% 1.4% 104.9
MC1.1 62.7% 3.5% 1368.7
MC1.2 59.7% 2.1% 891.9
MC1.31 57.9% 3.2% 820.2
MC1.4 67.6% 8.6% 1167.9
MC1.5 69.1% 12.4% 999.4
MC2 69.6% 12.6% 259.7
MC3 69.8% 13.2% 653.5
MC4.1 67.5% 9.4% 634.7
MC4.2 67.8% 9.8% 63.4
MC5 68.0% 11.5% 83.7
MC6 67.9% 11.6% 718.4
MN1 60.6% 2.2% 136.0

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | C-6

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM
APPENDIX D: MINE SITE OM SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

This page intentionally left blank

DECEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Occupancy Probability as a Function of Stream Temperature

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | D-1

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Occupancy Probability as a Function of Stream Discharge

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | D-2

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | D-3

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Occupancy Probability as a Function of Channel Slope

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | D-4

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | D-5

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
EXISTING CONDITIONS - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | D-6

PEBBLE PROJECT EIS
DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT

HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL

WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT
AND
BULL TROUT
Alternative 1

Technical Memorandum
Stibnite Gold Project, Idaho

November 22th, 2019

Ecosystem Sciences, LLC

Science . Planning . Design
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Technical Memorandum

Ecosystem Sciences
Science . Planning . Design

Ecosystem Sciences
202 N. 9th Street, Suite 400
Boise, ID 83702
T: 208.383.0226

Prepared for: AECOM

Project Title: Stibnite Gold Project

Technical Memorandum
Subject: Habitat Occupancy Model Westslope Cutthroat Trout and Bull Trout
Alternative 1

Date: December 2019

To: AECOM

From: Ecosystem Sciences

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 1
1.1 CONSULTATION ..................................................................................................................... 2
2.0 STUDY AREA .................................................................................................................................. 3
3.0 METHODS ....................................................................................................................................... 5
3.1 PROPOSED ACTION PERTINENT EVENTS ................................................................................ 6
3.2 DATA EMPLOYED .................................................................................................................. 8
3.3 STREAM FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT REACHES ....................................................................... 8
3.4 STREAM TEMPERATURE ........................................................................................................ 9
3.5 STREAM DISCHARGE ............................................................................................................. 9
3.6 CHANNEL SLOPE................................................................................................................. 10
3.7 MODEL INPUT TRANSFORMATIONS ....................................................................................... 11
3.8 FISH ACCESS AND BARRIERS .............................................................................................. 11
4.0 RESULTS ...................................................................................................................................... 12
4.1 EOY 6 RESULTS FOR STREAM SEGMENT 5 .......................................................................... 12
4.1.1 EOY 6 Results Stream Segment 1 ...................................................................... 15
4.1.2 EOY 6 Results for Stream Segment 2 ................................................................. 18
4.1.3 EOY 6 Results for Stream Segment 3 ................................................................. 21
4.2 EOY 12 RESULTS FOR STREAM SEGMENT 5 ........................................................................ 24
4.2.1 EOY 12 Results for Stream Segment 1 ............................................................... 27
4.2.2 EOY 12 Results for Stream Segment 2 ............................................................... 30
4.2.3 EOY 12 Results for Stream Segment 3 ............................................................... 33
4.3 EOY 18 RESULTS FOR STREAM SEGMENT 5 ........................................................................ 36
4.3.1 EOY 18 Results for Stream Segment 1 ............................................................... 39
4.3.2 EOY 18 Results for Stream Segment 2 ............................................................... 42
4.3.3 EOY 18 Results for Stream Segment 3 ............................................................... 45
4.4 EOY 112 RESULTS FOR STREAM SEGMENT 5 ...................................................................... 48
4.4.2 EOY 112 Results for Stream Segment 1 ................................................................. 51
4.4.1 EOY 112 Results for Stream Segment 2 ................................................................. 54
4.4.3 EOY 112 Results for Stream Segment 3 ................................................................. 57
5.0 DISCUSSION ................................................................................................................................. 60
5.1 CHANGE IN AVAILABLE HABITAT .......................................................................................... 60
5.2 CHANGE IN HABITAT OCCUPANCY ....................................................................................... 62
6.0 SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................... 67
7.0 LITERATURE CITED..................................................................................................................... 68

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | i

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

List of Appendices
Appendix A: Mine Site Stream Segmentation ............................................................................................. 69
Appendix B: Mine Site OM Variables and Occupancy Probabilities for each model year within the
Proposed Action ................................................................................................................................. 71

List of Figures
Figure 1. Proposed Action Mine Site OM Study Area for Westslope Cutthroat Trout and Bull
Trout .......................................................................................................................................... 4
Figure 2. Mine Site OM Workflow for Westslope Cutthroat Trout and Bull Trout ..................................... 6
Figure 3. EOY 6 Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream Segment 5 ......... 13
Figure 4. EOY 6 Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout Stream Segment 5 ......................................... 14
Figure 5. EOY 6 Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream Segment 1 ......... 16
Figure 6. EOY 6 Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 1 .................................... 17
Figure 7. EOY 6 Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream Segment 2 ......... 19
Figure 8. EOY 6 Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 2 .................................... 20
Figure 9. EOY 6 Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream Segment 3 ......... 22
Figure 10. EOY 6 Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 3 .................................... 23
Figure 11. EOY 12 Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream Segment
5 ............................................................................................................................................... 25
Figure 12. EOY 12 Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 5 .................................. 26
Figure 13. EOY 12 Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream Segment
1 ............................................................................................................................................... 28
Figure 14. EOY 12 Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 1 .................................. 29
Figure 15. EOY 12 Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream Segment
2 ............................................................................................................................................... 31
Figure 16. EOY 12 Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 2 .................................. 32
Figure 17. EOY 12 Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream Segment
3 ............................................................................................................................................... 34
Figure 18. EOY 12 Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 3 .................................. 35
Figure 19. EOY 18 Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream Segment
5 ............................................................................................................................................... 37
Figure 20. EOY 18 Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 5 .................................. 38
Figure 21. EOY 18 Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream Segment
1 ............................................................................................................................................... 40
Figure 22. EOY 18 Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 1 .................................. 41
Figure 23. EOY 18 Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream Segment
2 ............................................................................................................................................... 43
Figure 24. EOY 18 Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 2 .................................. 44
Figure 25. EOY 18 Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream Segment
3 ............................................................................................................................................... 46
Figure 26. EOY 18 Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 3 .................................. 47
Figure 27. EOY 112 Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream
Segment 5 ............................................................................................................................... 49
Figure 28. EOY 112 Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 5 ................................ 50
Figure 29. EOY 112 Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream
Segment 1 ............................................................................................................................... 52

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | ii

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 30. EOY 112 Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 1 ................................ 53
Figure 31. EOY 112 Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream
Segment 2 ............................................................................................................................... 55
Figure 32. EOY 112 Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 2 ................................ 56
Figure 33. EOY 112 Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream
Segment 3 ............................................................................................................................... 58
Figure 34. EOY 112 Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 3 ................................ 59
Figure 35. Length of Available Habitat for Bull Trout and Westslope Cutthroat Trout for each
Stream Segment for Existing Conditions and all Modeled Years............................................ 61
Figure 36. Percent Change in Length of Available Habitat for Stream Segment 5 for all
Modeled Years ........................................................................................................................ 62
Figure 37. Occupancy Probability Distributions for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream
Segment 5 for all Modeled Years. The Boxolots Represent Quartiles, the Median, and Outliers
within the Distributions............................................................................................................. 63
Figure 38. Percent Change in Distance Weighted Average Occupancy Probabilities between
Existing Conditions and each Model Year for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for each
Stream Segment ...................................................................................................................... 64
Figure 39. Occupancy Probability Distributions for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 5 for all
Modeled Years. ........... The Boxolots Represent Quartiles, the Median, and Outliers within the
Distributions ............................................................................................................................. 65
Figure 40. Percent Change in Distance Weighted Average Occupancy Probabilities between
Existing Conditions and each Model Year for Bull Trout for each Stream Segment............... 66

List of Tables
Table 1. Proposed Action Pertinent Events per Year that Affect SFA Stream Reach
Configurations. Adapted from SPLNT Report (Brown and Caldwell 2019). Proposed
Action OM Years are Bolded and underlined. ........................................................................... 7
Table 2. Mine Site OM Variable Metadata............................................................................................... 8
Table 3. Descriptive Statistics for Stream Temperature Distributions for each Proposed
Action Model Year and Existing Conditions .............................................................................. 9
Table 4. Descriptive Statistics for Stream Discharge Distributions for each Proposed Action
Model Year and Existing Conditions ....................................................................................... 10
Table 5. Descriptive Statistics for Channel Slope Distributions for each Proposed Action
Model Year and Existing Conditions ....................................................................................... 11
Table 6. Descriptive Statistics for EOY 6 Occupancy Probabilities for Stream Segment 5 .................. 12
Table 7. Descriptive Statistics for EOY 6 Occupancy Probabilities for Stream Segment 1 .................. 15
Table 8. Descriptive Statistics for EOY 6 Occupancy Probabilities for Stream Segment 2 .................. 18
Table 9. Descriptive Statistics for EOY 6 Occupancy Probabilities for Stream Segment 3 .................. 21
Table 10. Descriptive Statistics for EOY 12 Occupancy Probabilities for Stream Segment 5 ................ 24
Table 11. Descriptive Statistics for EOY 12 Occupancy Probabilities for Stream Segment 1 ................ 27
Table 12. Descriptive Statistics for EOY 12 Occupancy Probabilities for Stream Segment 2 ................ 30
Table 13. Descriptive Statistics for EOY 12 Occupancy Probabilities for Stream Segment 3 ................ 33
Table 14. Descriptive Statistics for EOY 18 Occupancy Probabilities for Stream Segment 5 ................ 36
Table 15. Descriptive Statistics for EOY 18 Occupancy Probabilities for Stream Segment 1 ................ 39
Table 16. Descriptive Statistics for EOY 18 Occupancy Probabilities for Stream Segment 2 ................ 42
Table 17. Descriptive Statistics for EOY 18 Occupancy Probabilities for Stream Segment 3 ................ 45

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | iii

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 18. Descriptive Statistics for EOY 112 Occupancy Probabilities for Stream Segment 5 .............. 48
Table 19. Descriptive Statistics for EOY 112 Occupancy Probabilities for Stream Segment 1 .............. 51
Table 20. Descriptive Statistics for EOY 112 Occupancy Probabilities for Stream Segment 2 .............. 54
Table 21. Descriptive Statistics for EOY 112 Occupancy Probabilities for Stream Segment 3 .............. 57
Table 22. Length of Available Habitat for Bull Trout and Westslope Cutthroat Trout for each
Stream Segment ...................................................................................................................... 61
Table 23. Percent Change in Length of Available Habitat from Existing Conditions to each
Model Year for Bull Trout and Westslope Cutthroat Trout for each Stream Segment ............ 62
Table 24. Distance weighted average occupancy probabilities for westslope cutthroat trout by
for each stream segment. ........................................................................................................ 63
Table 25. Percent Change in Distance Weighted Average Occupancy Probabilities between
Existing Conditions and each Model Year for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for each
Stream Segment ...................................................................................................................... 64
Table 26. Distance Weighted Average Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout for each Stream
Segment .................................................................................................................................. 65
Table 27. Percent Change in Distance Weighted Average Occupancy Probabilities between
Existing Conditions and each Model Year for Bull Trout for each Stream Segment............... 65

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | iv

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Definitions

Channel Slope Stream gradient, expressed as a percentage.

DEM Digital Elevation Model.
DRSF Development rock storage facility
ESA Endangered Species Act.
ESA group Organizations consistently involved in approximately monthly
meetings during the informal consultation process. The principal
agencies were USFS, USFWS, USACE, NOAA and Midas Gold.
There were occasional members and numerous consultants who
all participated in the group.
Existing Regional OM Either of the two example occupancy modeling papers published
by the Rocky Mountain Research Station; Isaak et al. 2015 or
Isaak et al. 2017.
GIS Geographic Information System.
Occupancy Probability The probability that the species of interest will occur in a given
stream reach based on physical and geomorphic characteristics.
For this report habitat occupancy is determined using methods by
Isaak et al. 2017.
Lidar Light detection and ranging.
Midas Gold Midas Gold Idaho, Inc.
Mine Life The timeframe that the mine is operational. For this study mine life
is defined by the Plan of Operations (Midas Gold 2016) and the
SPLNT model (Brown and Caldwell 2019). Mine life = years
negative 2 through year 20.
Mine Site OM The occupancy model produces for the study area with mine site-
scale date inputs for stream temperature, stream discharge, and
channel slope.
Mine Site OM Reaches The final set of stream reaches, consisting of merged SFA and
NHDPlus V2 stream reaches, for which model variables were
attributed and occupancy probabilities were produced.
NOAA Fisheries National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Fisheries.

Proposed Action (PA) Proposed action as defined by the PRO. Also referred to as
Alternative 1.
PRO Project plan as described in the Midas Gold Plan of Restoration
and Operations dated September 2016.
RMRS Rocky Mountain Research Station
SPLNT Report Stream and Pit Lake Network Temperature Model PA Report (Brown and
Caldwell 2019)
Streamlines The ESRI ArcMap shapefile that estimates the precise location of
the stream watercourses within the study area.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | v

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Stream Discharge Modeled or measured stream discharge associated with a given

stream reach. This variables unit of measure is cubic feet per
second (CFS).
Stream Temperature Modeled or measured stream temperatures associated with a
given stream reach. This variables unit of measure is degrees
Celsius.
Stream Functional Stream Functional Assessment. This term refers to the reaches
Assessment (SFA) within the mine site area for which the Stream Functional
Assessment was performed or for the ESRI shapefile with the
same name.
TSF Tailings storage facility
USFS United States Forest Service
USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
USACE United States Army Corps of Engineers

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | vi

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

This Technical Memorandum (TM) presents the methods and results of the Stibnite Gold Project
proposed action (Alternative 1) occupancy model (OM) for native westslope cutthroat trout
(Onchorhynchus clarkia lewisi) and bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) within the study area (as
defined in Section 2.0). The proposed action (PA) is defined by the Midas Gold Plan of Restoration
and Operations (PRO) dated September 2016 (Midas Gold 2016). The goal of this TM is to derive
occupancy probabilities, which represent the likelihood that the two native trout species will
occupy streams within the study area. The mine life in this context is defined as two years before
mining activities would commence (mine year -2) and lasting for the twenty years that mining
operations and reclamation are scheduled to occur. The proposed action timeframe consists of
22 years in total; the OM was run for three years that are representative of various conditions
throughout the life of the mine. The selected model runs are end of year (EOY) 6, EOY 12, and
EOY 18. One year was selected to represent the post mine period (EOY 112). Results from the
proposed action OM are compared to existing conditions OM results, as reported in a separate
TM titled, “Existing Conditions (Baseline) Occupancy Model Technical Memorandum” (Ecosystem
Sciences 2019).
The OM model provides occupancy probabilities for the two native trout species within the study
area reaches (Figure 1), which consists of the Upper East Fork South Fork Salmon River
(EFSFSR) from its confluence with Sugar Creek upstream to its headwaters (Hydrologic Unit
Code [HUC] 12—Headwaters East Fork South Fork Salmon River). This TM uses the same
methods and analyses that were presented in the Existing Conditions (Baseline) Occupancy
Model Technical Memorandum (Ecosystem Sciences 2019). These two memos combined
describe OM results for existing conditions and Alternative 1 through post mine life, including
representative model years from throughout the 22-year mine life.
The mine site occupancy model quantifies potential habitat for each stream reach by assigning
probabilities that each of the species will occur within a given stream reach. The study area for all
proposed action model years and the post mine model year is the same as the study area for
existing conditions, with the exception of reaches for which stream discharge would be diverted
into hillslope channels during proposed action model years or would be restored. Reaches that
would be dewatered during proposed action model years are not accounted for in the proposed
action modeling. This can be seen in the loss of available habitat from the existing conditions
model results to proposed action model results from EOY 6 and EOY 12.
The model calculates occupancy probabilities for each the two native trout species based on the
combination of three independent variables: stream discharge, stream temperature, and channel
slope. The resulting occupancy probabilities were run through a sensitivity analysis, which was
utilized to determine the level of influence that each of the model’s independent variables has on
the model’s dependent variable (occupancy probability). The continuous range of occupancy
probabilities are represented in percentages, from 0%-100% for each reach. This modeling effort
provides a quantitative measure from which to gauge how proposed project actions affect habitat
for native bull trout and westslope cutthroat trout within the mine site study area.
Section 1.1 of this document details the stakeholders involved in this analysis. Section 2.0
provides detail about the geographic extent of the study area. Section 3 explains the methods
that were used to produce the proposed action OM probabilities. The methods used and their
precedence are detailed in the Existing Conditions (Baseline) Habitat Occupancy Model Technical
Memorandum (Ecosystem Sciences 2019). Section 4 presents the resulting occupancy

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 1

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

probabilities from the mine site OM for years representing proposed action and post mine life.
Lastly, the results are discussed and summarized in sections 5 and 6.

1.1 CONSULTATION
This modeling effort is a result of an extensive consultation process involving members of the
Endangered Species Act (ESA) fish informal consultation group (ESA group 1) involved in the
Stibnite Gold Project. The original concept and approach to adapting the existing OM for the
region, which is documented in the publication “Big biology meets microclimatology: defining
thermal niches of ecotherms at landscape scales for conservation planning” (Isaak et al. 2017),
was initially presented to the ESA group on February 7, 2018. Over the course of the next year
and half, the methods, data inputs, analysis, and results were discussed on numerous conference
calls, in-person meetings, and via email correspondence. Numerous presentations were made at
informal ESA consultation meetings beginning in June 2018 and recurring, generally, monthly.
Information presented at these meetings included, but was not limited to—scale dependencies;
general appropriateness and adaptability of Isaak et al. 2017; derivation and refinement of the
streamlines (the GIS shapefile used to represent the specific location of the streams within the
mine site study area) to be used; stream segmentation process; derivation of model variables
(stream discharge, stream temperature, and channel slope); sensitivity analyses of model
variables, and; the utility of applying occupancy probabilities. Numerous modeling decisions
regarding scale, data inputs, etc. were made based on ESA group input. For example, the
decision to model mine site OM variables using the same methods that were used in the existing
regional OM was based on feedback from the ESA Group.

1
ESA group consisted of USFS, NOAA Fisheries, USFWS, Midas Gold, and USACE. Other entities
occasionally attended meetings, but these entities constituted the core group of participants.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 2

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

The mine site OM study area encompasses approximately 43 square miles at the headwaters of
the East Fork of the South Fork of the Salmon River (EFSFSR). Identical to the existing conditions
mine site OM study area, the study area for the proposed action and post mine life stages includes
all perennial stream courses within the Upper East Fork South Fork Salmon River watershed
(HUC 10 - 1706020802). The Headwaters East Fork South Fork Salmon River (HUC 12 -
170602080201) contains the SFA reaches or mine site impact areas, while Sugar Creek (HUC
12- 1706020803) is not within the model proposed action mine site OM study area (Figure 1).
Occupancy probabilities are summarized for four mine site stream segments within the study
area. These include: Stream Segment 1 (Upper EFSFSR and its tributaries from its confluence
with Sugar Creek upstream to its confluence with Meadow Creek), Stream Segment 2 (Meadow
Creek drainage area, including the East Fork Meadow Creek), Stream Segment 3 (Upper
EFSFSR and its tributaries upstream of its confluence with Meadow Creek), and Stream
Segment 5 (HUC 12 “Headwaters East Fork South Fork Salmon River” or the summation of
Stream Segments 1, 2 and 3). In total, there are six mine site stream segments (Appendix A
defines each stream segment and provides a map showing their respective spatial extent).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 3

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 1. Proposed Action Mine Site OM Study Area for Westslope Cutthroat Trout and Bull Trout

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 4

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Similar to the existing conditions OM (Ecosystem Sciences 2019), the proposed action OM
approach is based on the existing regional OM methodologies from Isaak et al. 2015 and 2017
(see Existing Conditions (Baseline) Occupancy Model TM). Methods from Isaak et al. 2017 were
adapted to the mine site study area through the use of higher resolution data inputs (a Lidar-
derived DEM and reach-based modeled stream temperature [SPLNT] and stream discharge
data). Stream Functional Assessment (SFA) reach configurations from EOY 6, EOY 12, EOY 18,
and EOY 112 were combined with unaffected headwater reaches and attributed with model
variable data. Rio ASE provided modeled stream discharge and slope data associated with
enhanced and restored reaches (Rio ASE, 2019a); Brown and Caldwell provided modeled stream
temperature data (Brown and Caldwell, 2019). Two steps from Isaak et. al 2015 were included—
reaches with stream discharges below 0.2 cfs and channel slopes above 15% were trimmed from
the proposed action OM model. The workflow of methods used in the proposed action mine site
OM model is detailed in Figure 2.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 5

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 2. Mine Site OM Workflow for Westslope Cutthroat Trout and Bull Trout

3.1 PROPOSED ACTION PERTINENT EVENTS

The stream configuration within the study area changes throughout the mine life as actions of the
project are implemented; some actions would be permanent while others would be temporary—
inactive during the mine life, only to be reactivated at a later time. Table 1 describes the pertinent
events occurring throughout the mine life and the SFA reaches (stream segments) that would be
affected. The mine life events and stream configuration (SFA reaches affected) changes shown
in Table 1 were obtained from the “Stibnite Gold Project Stream and Pit Lake Network
Temperature Model (SPLNT) Proposed Action and Proposed Action with Modifications Report”
(Brown and Caldwell 2019), herein referred to as the SPLNT report. The PRO (Midas Gold 2016)
also provided information on mine life actions. Section 10 of the SPLNT report provides map-
based, graphical representations of the year-to-year changes during mine life (Brown and

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 6

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Caldwell 2019). On each map in section 10 the following note appears, “Activities are depicted in
the earliest possible year of implementation. Actual implementation will be phased to
accommodate site construction activities, material availability (earth, rock and vegetation), lodging
for workforce, mine plan, and general leveling of contractor and internal resources” (Brown and
Caldwell 2019). Therefore, there may be changes to the schedule as the project progresses;
however, impacts to native trout occupancy within the study area would be consistent with the
event that causes those changes to occur. For example, the filling of Hangar Flats Lake may take
more or less time based on the magnitude of precipitation during the water years (i.e., low water
years or high-water years) that the pit is being filled. Regardless of how accurately the proposed
schedule of mine activities is, the modeled occupancy probabilities reflect the proposed actions
themselves.

Table 1. Proposed Action Pertinent Events per Year that Affect SFA Stream Reach Configurations.
Adapted from SPLNT Report (Brown and Caldwell 2019). Proposed Action OM Years are Bolded
and underlined.
Mine Year Proposed Action Events Impacting IP Streams SFA Reach/s Affected
Meadow Creek and tributaries diverted around both sides of TSF
MC0.7 to MC1.5, MC2, MC3,
Neg. 2 (-2) and Hangar Flats DRSF. EFSFSR tunnel construction begun but
MC4.1
no water diverted.
EFSFSR Tunnel completed water diversion initiated, Hennessy BC2, BC2.1, BC3, EF1, EF2.1
and Midnight Creek diverted into tunnel, EFSFSR and Meadow – EF2.4, EF3.2, EF3.3, EF4.1,
Neg. 1 (-1) Creek enhancement, Meadow Creek restored around Hangar Flats HL1 and HL2, MN0, MC4.2,
pit, EF Meadow Creek (Blowout Creek) engineered channel/rock MC 5, MC6, WE1, WE2, WE3,
drain, West End diversion completed. WL1
YPP dewatered (EFSFSR flow in tunnel), rapid infiltration basins
1
(Hangar Flats) initiated.
2 Fiddle Creek diverted around DRSF FC0, FC1, FC2
3 Same configuration as Mine Year 2
4 Same configuration as Mine Year 2
5 Same configuration as Mine Year 2
6 Same configuration as Mine Year 2
7 West End Creek restored atop DRSF WE1
8 Fiddle Creek restoration begun but no flow diverted
9 Initial flow diverted into restored Fiddle Creek channel FCO, FC1, FC2
10 All flow diverted into restored Fiddle Creek channel FCO, FC1, FC2
EFSFSR, Hennessy Creek and Midnight Creek restoration begun
11
but no flow diverted
EF2.5, EF3.1, EF3.2, EF3.3,
Portion of flow diverted into EFSFSR, Hennessy Creek and
12 EF4.1, HC1.1, HC1.2, MN0,
Midnight Creek restored channels
MN0.4, MN1, MN2
All flow diverted in EFSFSR, Hennessy Creek and Midnight Creek
EF2.5, EF3.1, EF3.2, EF3.3,
restored channels. Hangar Flats (HF) Lake begins to fill. Entrance
EF4.1, HC1.1, HC1.2, MN0,
and exit channels constructed connecting Meadow Creek and EF
13 MN0.4, MN1, MN2, BC1, BC2,
Meadow Creek (Blowout Creek) to HF lake. Restore EF Meadow
BC2.1, BC3, MC4.2, MC5,
Creek (blowout Creek) from upper meadow to confluence with
WE2, WE3
Meadow Creek. West End Rock chute constructed
14 Same configuration as Mine Year 13

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 7

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Mine Year Proposed Action Events Impacting IP Streams SFA Reach/s Affected
EFSFSR Tunnel decommissioned, HF lake continues to fill. Garnett
15 G1
Creek restored.
16 Same configuration as Mine Year 15
Meadow Creek constructed on TSF and DRSF. Portion of flow MC0.7, MC0.8, MC0.8, MC1.1
17
diverted intro restored channel. – MC1.5, MC2, MC3, MC4.1
All flow diverted into Meadow Creek restored channels on TSF MC0.7, MC0.8, MC0.8, MC1.1
18
and DRSF – MC1.5, MC2, MC3, MC4.1
19 Hanger Flats Lake is full. HL 1 and HL2 are now decommissioned. HL1, HL2, MC4.2, MC5, BC3
Same configuration as Mine Year 19 – Same channel configuration
20 as Post/Closure Restoration (Figure 3.3 SPLNT Model and
Proposed Action Report)
Same configuration as Mine Year 19 – Same channel
112 configuration as Post/Closure Restoration (Figure 3.3 SPLNT
Model and Proposed Action Report)

3.2 DATA EMPLOYED

The proposed action OM required several steps and model inputs. Table 2 shows the input
variables, their units of measurement, their temporal and spatial resolutions, and sources of each
dataset used in the mine site OM. Stream temperature inputs for the proposed action OM were
created using the QUAL2K model (Tufts University, 2015) and were based on water temperature
measurements collected at several sites by the USGS and HDR Engineering (HDR, 2015).
Empirical stream discharge measurements at five gage locations within the study area were used
to condition a basin area-to-stream flow regression equation created by Rio ASE (Rio ASE, 2018).
The results provided the stream reach discharges for the mine site OM. Channel slope for each
model reach was calculated in GIS by dividing the elevation loss of each reach (top of reach
elevation value less bottom of reach elevation value) by the reach length.

Table 2. Mine Site OM Variable Metadata

Stream Temperature Stream Flow Channel Slope
Mean Stream Mean Stream Discharge
Unit of Measurement Slope (%)
Temperature (°C) (cfs)
July 16-Sept. 30 (Period
Temporal Resolution August (Period of Record) N/A
of Record)
Mine Site OM Reach Mine Site OM Reach Mine Site OM Reach
Spatial Resolution
Domain Scale Domain Scale Domain Scale
Final SGP SPLNT
Existing Conditions
Data Source RIO ASE (Rio ASE, 2019) Ecosystem Sciences
Report (Brown and
Caldwell, 2019

3.3 STREAM FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT REACHES

Stream Functional Assessment reaches were provided to Ecosystem Sciences by Midas Gold
(Rio ASE, 2018). Refer to the Existing Conditions (Baseline) Occupancy Model TM for details on

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 8

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

the steps taken to create the final set of OM reaches. For each proposed action model year, only
perennial reaches that would contain stream flow during that year were selected. Reaches without
streamflow due to diversion were excluded from the analysis.

3.4 STREAM TEMPERATURE

Stream temperatures during and post-closure were provided by the SPLNT Proposed Action
Report (Brown and Caldwell, 2019) and modeled using QUAL2K. These stream temperatures
were originally produced for a time period that did not match the low flow period used by Isaak et
al. 2017; a dedicated model run was performed to output SPLNT reach temperatures that
represented mean August temperature in degrees Celsius for each of the proposed action model
years. SPLNT reaches did not spatially match mine site OM reaches, so a transfer of
temperatures was necessary for all selected proposed action model years. A distance weighted
average was used for the transfer—for example, if more than one SPLNT reach occurred within
one mine site OM reach, then the temperature for each SPLNT reach was multiplied by its length
as a proportion of the entire mine site OM reach length. All temperatures were then added to
produce the distance-weighted average for each mine site OM reach. Any mine site OM reaches
that occurred upstream of the SPLNT model domain were attributed with the stream temperature
assigned to the closest downstream SPLNT reach.
Descriptive statistics for stream temperature distributions associated with each of the proposed
action model years, as well as for existing conditions, are shown in Table 3.

Table 3. Descriptive Statistics for Stream Temperature Distributions for each Proposed Action
Model Year and Existing Conditions
Stream Temperature (°C)
Baseline EOY 6 EOY 12 EOY18 EOY 112
Min 7.91 7.99 7.99 8.00 7.99
Max 11.77 12.60 12.52 16.97 16.88
Median 9.98 9.32 9.78 10.32 10.29
Mean 9.84 9.80 10.15 10.91 10.47
SD 1.22 1.44 1.49 2.34 2.04

3.5 STREAM DISCHARGE

Stream discharge for proposed action model years were originally modelled using MODFLOW, a
spatially distributed ground and surface water flow program created by the USGS (Harbaugh,
2005). However, the timeframe of stream discharge that was modeled using the MODFLOW
model was inconsistent with the timeframe used in the existing regional OM. The existing regional
OM utilized stream discharge values from the Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC) hydrologic
model, which uses mean summer flow (MS). Mean summer flow describes the lowest-flow period
that may be most limiting to fish and may correlate to maximum water temperature (Isaak et al.
2010). For the VIC model, the start of summer is defined as the first day after June 1 when flows
fall below the mean annual value, which ensures that summer starts after the subsidence of the
snowmelt flood; the end of summer is defined as September 30, regardless of starting date
(Wenger et al., 2010). For the mine site study area, July 16 was calculated to be the start of
summer (Rio ASE, 2018). Modelled flows for the July 16-September 30 timeframe were supplied

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 9

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

using a regression equation that links basin area to streamflow measurements taken at various
sites within the study area.
Isaak et al. 2015 trimmed reaches within their network that have discharges less than 0.2 cfs
because trout are rare in such small streams. The mine site OM used a 0.2 cfs restriction within
the headwater reaches of the mine site OM stream network. RIO ASE imposed the flow threshold
when outputting flows using their basin area-to-streamflow regression exercise.
Descriptive statistics for stream discharge distributions associated with each of the proposed
action model years, as well as for existing conditions, are shown in Table 4.

Table 4. Descriptive Statistics for Stream Discharge Distributions for each Proposed Action Model
Year and Existing Conditions
Stream Discharge (CFS)
Baseline EOY 6 EOY 12 EOY18 EOY 112
Min 0.31 0.45 0.25 0.31 0.31
Max 18.87 17.74 17.91 18.11 19.87
Median 1.60 1.66 1.58 1.27 1.58
Mean 4.98 4.67 5.32 4.13 4.89
SD 6.15 5.61 6.34 5.41 6.14

3.6 CHANNEL SLOPE

Channel slope for each mine site OM reach was delineated in ArcGIS 10.6 using a one-meter
lidar DEM. Elevation values associated with the stream network were extracted from the DEM
and added to the mine site OM reach stream network. The elevation in meters (m) from the
upstream and downstream end of each mine site OM reach were extracted from the DEM and
the difference divided by reach length.
Isaak et al. 2015 trimmed reaches within their network that had a slope greater than 15 percent
because trout are rare in such high gradient stream reaches. The mine site OM used a 15 percent
restriction within the headwater reaches of the mine site OM stream network. Headwater reaches
above the 15 percent threshold were trimmed from the network. There were four reaches (EF3.2,
MC0.8, HC1.4, and MN2) located between in-network lower gradient reaches that were also
removed from the modeling effort. Most of the potentially occupied habitat for the two species
within the study area is limited to the main trunk streams—EFSFSR, Meadow Creek and their
immediate low-gradient tributaries.
Descriptive statistics for channel slope distributions associated with each of the proposed action
model years, as well as for existing conditions, are shown in Table 5.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 10

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 5. Descriptive Statistics for Channel Slope Distributions for each Proposed Action Model
Year and Existing Conditions
Channel Slope (%)
Baseline EOY 6 EOY 12 EOY18 EOY 112
Min 0.45 0.44 0.44 0.11 0.11
Max 33.14 13.84 32.49 32.49 32.49
Median 6.33 5.05 4.87 4.53 4.53
Mean 7.39 5.96 6.14 6.16 6.16
SD 6.08 3.69 5.08 5.78 5.78

3.7 MODEL INPUT TRANSFORMATIONS

For the purposes of producing occupancy probabilities for mine site OM reaches, the site-specific
values for each independent variable (stream temperature, stream discharge and channel slope)
had to be matched up with the model parameter estimates from Isaak et al. 2017. The parameter
estimates and model variables published in Isaak et al. 2017 were back transformed and so were
on their original scales (units of measurement). In order to use the parameter estimates from
Isaak et al. 2017, they needed to be re-transformed into a standardized form (unitless). Similarly,
all mine site OM variables required standardization before they could be applied to the mine site
OM. Transformations to the parameter estimates were done by Seth Wenger, author and lead
modeler for Isaak et al. 2017 (personal communication, February and March 2019 [Wenger pers.
com 2019]). The mine site OM variables were transformed using a method employed by Gelman
and Hill, 2006. The variable and occupancy probability values (in their original units of
measurement) for each modeled reach within each modeled year are reported in Appendix B.

3.8 FISH ACCESS AND BARRIERS

For this modelling effort, only perennial streams were considered; any SFA stream reaches
labeled as intermittent or non-perennial were trimmed from the final set of streams. Further
restrictions include maximum slope and minimum flow limitations. Any mine site OM reaches that
had a slope greater than 15 percent or a flow less than 0.2 cfs were trimmed from the final set or
streams. A separate TM provides detail on additional fish barriers.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 11

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Section 4 details the results of the mine site proposed action OM. Results are summarized for
four mine site stream segments within the study area (Stream Segment 1, Stream Segment 2,
Stream Segment 3, and Stream Segment 5) for EOY 6, EOY 12, EOY 18, and EOY 112.
To calculate the average occupancy probability for each stream segment, a distance weighted
average method was used. To produce the distance weighted average, the occupancy probability
of each mine site OM reach was multiplied by the proportion of that reach’s stream length to the
cumulative stream length of the geographic unit of interest. Occupancy probabilities for each area
are reported in quartile form (i.e., four classes of equal size)—the first quartile representing the
reaches with the lowest occupancy probabilities and the fourth quartile representing reaches with
the highest occupancy probabilities. The values used to delineate the quartiles for each
geographic extent in the proposed action modeling were calculated from all existing condition
reach occupancy probabilities for the study area.

4.1 EOY 6 RESULTS FOR STREAM SEGMENT 5

For EOY 6, it is estimated that the mine site OM study area (equivalent to Stream Segment 5)
would provide 28.9 km of potential habitat for westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout. The
occupancy probabilities for westslope cutthroat trout would range from 50.4 percent to
70.2 percent, while those for bull trout would range from 0.2 percent to 21.0 percent. The distance
weighted average occupancy probability would be 63.8 percent for westslope cutthroat trout and
8.4 percent for bull trout for the entire mine site OM study area (Stream Segment 5).
Table 6 details the number of reaches, total length of reaches, percent of total study area, and
distance weighted averaged occupancy probabilities for each quartile within the species’
respective range of occupancy probability values across the entire study area. Figures 3 and 4
display the occupancy probabilities for each mine site OM reach within the entire study area for
westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout, respectively.

Table 6. Descriptive Statistics for EOY 6 Occupancy Probabilities for Stream Segment 5
Westslope Cutthroat Trout
Number of Length of Percent of Stream Distance Weighted Average
Reaches Reaches (m) Segment 5 Occupancy Probability
Low 9 6,603 22.84% 57.72%
Medium Low 11 10,171 35.18% 62.71%
Medium High 13 6,188 21.40% 66.79%
High 8 5,950 20.58% 69.29%
Total 41 28,913 100% 63.80%
Bull Trout
Number of Length of Percent of Stream Distance Weighted Average
Reaches Reaches (m) Segment 5 Occupancy Probability
Low 10 7,799 26.98% 2.38%
Medium Low 11 8,090 27.98% 4.94%
Medium High 11 6,956 24.06% 10.58%
High 9 6,067 20.98% 18.35%
Total 41 28,913 100% 8.42%

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 12

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 3. EOY 6 Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream Segment 5

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 13

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 4. EOY 6 Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout Stream Segment 5

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 14

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

For bull trout, an important note is that the areas above the proposed TSFs and DRSFs in Meadow
and Fiddle Creeks (Figure 3) that meet the model definition of available habitat may not have bull
trout (but would be included in EOY 6 available habitat). Consequently, the restored habitat on
top of these storage facilities (in subsequent years) may not have a mechanism for recolonization.
For a more in-depth discussion of this factor, please refer to section 5.1. This applies to all of the
reach descriptions below that involve TSFs or DRSFs.

4.1.1 EOY 6 Results Stream Segment 1

For EOY 6, it is estimated that Stream Segment 1 would provide 6.2 km of potential habitat for
westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout. The occupancy probabilities for westslope cutthroat trout
would range from 50.4 percent to 69.7 percent, while those for bull trout would range from 0.2
percent to 19.2 percent. The distance weighted average occupancy probability for Stream
Segment 1 during EOY 6 would be 64.2 percent for westslope cutthroat trout and 10.6 percent
for bull trout. Table 7 details the number of reaches, total length of reaches, percent of total study
area, and distance weighted averaged occupancy probabilities for each quartile within the
species’ respective range of occupancy probability values within Stream Segment 1. Figures 5
and 6 display the occupancy probabilities for each mine site OM reach within Stream Segment 1
for westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout, respectively.

Table 7. Descriptive Statistics for EOY 6 Occupancy Probabilities for Stream Segment 1
Westslope Cutthroat Trout
Number of Length of Percent of Stream Distance Weighted Average
Reaches Reaches (m) Segment 1 Occupancy Probability
Low 4 1,546 25.15% 56.88%
Medium Low 3 1,464 23.81% 62.10%
Medium High 3 718 11.67% 67.23%
High 2 2,421 39.37% 69.30%
Total 12 6,150 100% 64.22%
Bull Trout
Number of Length of Percent of Stream Distance Weighted Average
Reaches Reaches (m) Segment 1 Occupancy Probability
Low 4 1,546 25.15% 1.71%
Medium Low 2 1,425 23.18% 5.93%
Medium High 3 601 9.78% 13.40%
High 3 2,577 41.90% 17.94%
Total 12 6,150 100% 10.63%

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 15

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 5. EOY 6 Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream Segment 1

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 16

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 6. EOY 6 Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 1

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 17

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

4.1.2 EOY 6 Results for Stream Segment 2

For EOY 6, it is estimated that Stream Segment 2 would provide 6.6 km of potential habitat for
westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout. The occupancy probabilities for westslope cutthroat trout
would range from 56.4 percent to 68.1 percent, while those for bull trout would range from 1.2
percent to 9.5 percent. The distance weighted average occupancy probability for Stream Segment
2 during EOY 6 would be 63.8 percent for westslope cutthroat trout and 5.7 percent for bull trout.
Table 7 details the number of reaches, total length of reaches, percent of total study area, and
distance weighted average occupancy probabilities for each quartile within the species’ respective
range of occupancy probability values within Stream Segment 2. Figures 7 and 8 display the
occupancy probabilities for each mine site OM reach within Stream Segment 2 for westslope
cutthroat trout and bull trout, respectively.

Table 8. Descriptive Statistics for EOY 6 Occupancy Probabilities for Stream Segment 2
Westslope Cutthroat Trout
Number of Length of Percent of Stream Distance Weighted Average
Reaches Reaches (m) Segment 2 Occupancy Probability
Low 2 986 14.91% 57.46%
Medium Low 4 3,648 55.16% 63.84%
Medium High 5 1,365 20.64% 66.19%
High 1 615 9.30% 68.08%
Total 12 6,613 100% 63.77%
Bull Trout
Number of Length of Percent of Stream Distance Weighted Average
Reaches Reaches (m) Segment 2 Occupancy Probability
Low 2 986 14.91% 1.74%
Medium Low 6 3,524 53.29% 4.92%
Medium High 4 2,103 31.80% 8.73%
High 0 0 0% NA
Total 12 6,613 100% 5.66%

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 18

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 7. EOY 6 Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream Segment 2

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 19

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 8. EOY 6 Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 2

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 20

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

4.1.3 EOY 6 Results for Stream Segment 3

For EOY 6, it is estimated that Stream Segment 3 would provide 16.2 km of potential habitat for
westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout. The occupancy probabilities for westslope cutthroat trout
would range from 56.7 percent to 70.2 percent, while those for bull trout would range from
2.3 percent to 21.0 percent. The distance weighted average occupancy probability for Stream
Segment 3 during EOY 6 would be 63.7 percent for westslope cutthroat trout and 8.7 percent for
bull trout. Table 9 details the number of reaches, total length of reaches, percent of total study
area, and distance weighted averaged occupancy probabilities for each quartile within the
species’ respective range of occupancy probability values within Stream Segment 3. Figures 9
and 10 display the occupancy probabilities for each mine site OM reach within Stream Segment
3 for westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout, respectively.

Table 9. Descriptive Statistics for EOY 6 Occupancy Probabilities for Stream Segment 3
Westslope Cutthroat Trout
Number of Length of Percent of Stream Distance Weighted Average
Reaches Reaches (m) Segment 3 Occupancy Probability
Low 3 4,071 25.21% 58.10%
Medium Low 4 5,059 31.33% 62.07%
Medium High 5 4,106 25.42% 66.91%
High 5 2,914 18.04% 69.54%
Total 17 16,150 100% 63.65%
Bull Trout
Number of Length of Percent of Stream Distance Weighted Average
Reaches Reaches (m) Segment 3 Occupancy Probability
Low 4 5,267 32.61% 2.70%
Medium Low 3 3,141 19.45% 4.51%
Medium High 4 4,252 26.33% 11.09%
High 6 3,490 21.61% 18.65%
Total 17 16,150 100% 8.71%

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 21

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 9. EOY 6 Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream Segment 3

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 22

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 10. EOY 6 Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 3

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 23

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

4.2 EOY 12 RESULTS FOR STREAM SEGMENT 5

For EOY 12, it is estimated that the mine site OM study area would provide 33.1 km of potential
habitat for westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout. The occupancy probabilities for westslope
cutthroat trout would range from 56.0 percent to 70.2 percent, while those for bull trout would
range from 0.7 percent to 20.5 percent. The distance weighted average occupancy probability
would be 63.8 percent for westslope cutthroat trout and 8.4 percent for bull trout for the entire
mine site OM study area (Stream Segment 5).
Table 10 details the number of reaches, total length of reaches, percent of total study area, and
distance weighted averaged occupancy probabilities for each quartile within the species’
respective range of occupancy probability values across the entire study area. Figures 11 and 12
display the occupancy probabilities for each mine site OM reach within the entire study area for
westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout, respectively.

Table 10. Descriptive Statistics for EOY 12 Occupancy Probabilities for Stream Segment 5
Westslope Cutthroat Trout
Number of Length of Percent of Stream Distance Weighted Average
Reaches Reaches (m) Segment 5 Occupancy Probability
Low 11 6,956 21.04% 57.94%
Medium Low 14 6,272 32.89% 62.72%
Medium High 17 6,689 28.08% 66.89%
High 8 6,929 17.99% 69.29%
Total 50 33,068 100% 64.07%
Bull Trout
Number of Length of Percent of Stream Distance Weighted Average
Reaches Reaches (m) Segment 5 Occupancy Probability
Low 13 8,512 25.74% 2.35%
Medium Low 13 10,594 32.04% 5.13%
Medium High 15 7,671 23.20% 11.01%
High 9 6,291 19.02% 17.78%
Total 50 33,068 100% 8.19%

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 24

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 11. EOY 12 Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream Segment 5

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 25

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 12. EOY 12 Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 5

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 26

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

4.2.1 EOY 12 Results for Stream Segment 1

For EOY 12, it is estimated that Stream Segment 1 would provide 10.3 km of potential habitat for
westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout. The occupancy probabilities for westslope cutthroat trout
would range from 56.0 percent to 69.7 percent, while those for bull trout would range from 0.7
percent to 18.9 percent. The distance weighted average occupancy probability for Stream
Segment 1 during EOY 12 would be 65.0 percent for westslope cutthroat trout and 9.5 percent
for bull trout. Table 11 details the number of reaches, total length of reaches, percent of total
study area, and distance weighted averaged occupancy probabilities for each quartile within the
species’ respective range of occupancy probability values within Stream Segment 1. Figures 13
and 14 display the occupancy probabilities for each mine site OM reach within Stream Segment 1
for westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout, respectively.

Table 11. Descriptive Statistics for EOY 12 Occupancy Probabilities for Stream Segment 1
Westslope Cutthroat Trout
Number of Length of Percent of Stream Distance Weighted Average
Reaches Reaches (m) Segment 1 Occupancy Probability
Low 6 1,900 18.43% 57.73%
Medium Low 5 1,918 18.61% 62.48%
Medium High 8 4,065 39.45% 67.06%
High 2 2,421 23.50% 69.33%
Total 21 10,304 100% 65.02%
Bull Trout
Number of Length of Percent of Stream Distance Weighted Average
Reaches Reaches (m) Segment 1 Occupancy Probability
Low 7 2,259 21.92% 1.81%
Medium Low 3 3,211 31.16% 6.09%
Medium High 8 2,034 19.74% 12.72%
High 3 2,800 27.18% 17.35%
Total 21 10,304 100% 9.52%

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 27

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 13. EOY 12 Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream Segment 1

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 28

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 14. EOY 12 Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 1

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 29

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

4.2.2 EOY 12 Results for Stream Segment 2

For EOY 12, it is estimated that Stream Segment 2 would provide 6.6 km of potential habitat for
westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout. The occupancy probabilities for westslope cutthroat trout
would range from 56.7 percent to 68.0 percent, while those for bull trout would range from 1.3
percent to 8.6 percent. The distance weighted average occupancy probability for Stream Segment
2 during EOY 12 would be 63.6 percent for westslope cutthroat trout and 5.2 percent for bull trout.
Table 12 details the number of reaches, total length of reaches, percent of total study area, and
distance weighted averaged occupancy probabilities for each quartile within the species’
respective range of occupancy probability values within Stream Segment 2. Figures 15 and 16
display the occupancy probabilities for each mine site OM reach Stream Segment 2 for westslope
cutthroat trout and bull trout, respectively.

Table 12. Descriptive Statistics for EOY 12 Occupancy Probabilities for Stream Segment 2
Westslope Cutthroat Trout
Number of Length of Percent of Stream Distance Weighted Average
Reaches Reaches (m) Segment 2 Occupancy Probability
Low 2 986 14.91% 57.62%
Medium Low 5 3,899 58.97% 63.68%
Medium High 4 1,113 16.83% 66.22%
High 1 615 9.30% 68.04%
Total 12 6,613 100% 63.61%
Bull Trout
Number of Length of Percent of Stream Distance Weighted Average
Reaches Reaches (m) Segment 2 Occupancy Probability
Low 2 986 14.91% 1.82%
Medium Low 7 4,242 64.15% 4.87%
Medium High 3 1,385 20.94% 8.46%
High 0 0 0% NA
Total 12 6,613 100% 5.17%

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 30

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 15. EOY 12 Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream Segment 2

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 31

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 16. EOY 12 Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 2

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 32

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

4.2.3 EOY 12 Results for Stream Segment 3

For EOY 12, it is estimated that Stream Segment 3 would provide 16.2 km of potential habitat for
westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout. The occupancy probabilities for westslope cutthroat trout
would range from 56.8 percent to 70.2 percent, while those for bull trout would range from
2.3 percent to 20.5 percent. The distance weighted average occupancy probability Stream
Segment 3 during EOY 12 would be 63.7 percent for westslope cutthroat trout and 8.6 percent
for bull trout. Table 13 details the number of reaches, total length of reaches, percent of total
study area, and distance weighted averaged occupancy probabilities for each quartile within the
species’ respective range of occupancy probability values within Stream Segment 3. Figures 17
and 18 display the occupancy probabilities for each mine site OM reach within Stream Segment
3 for westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout, respectively.

Table 13. Descriptive Statistics for EOY 12 Occupancy Probabilities for Stream Segment 3
Westslope Cutthroat Trout
Number of Length of Percent of Stream Distance Weighted Average
Reaches Reaches (m) Segment 3 Occupancy Probability
Low 3 4,071 25.21% 58.11%
Medium Low 4 5,059 31.33% 62.07%
Medium High 5 4,106 25.42% 66.91%
High 5 2,914 18.04% 69.53%
Total 17 16,150 100% 63.65%
Bull Trout
Number of Length of Percent of Stream Distance Weighted Average
Reaches Reaches (m) Segment 3 Occupancy Probability
Low 4 5,267 36.15% 2.68%
Medium Low 3 3,141 21.56% 4.50%
Medium High 4 4,252 29.18% 11.02%
High 6 3,490 23.96% 18.12%
Total 17 16,150 100% 8.57%

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 33

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 17. EOY 12 Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream Segment 3

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 34

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 18. EOY 12 Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 3

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 35

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

4.3 EOY 18 RESULTS FOR STREAM SEGMENT 5

For EOY 18, it is estimated that the mine site OM study area would provide 41.2 km of potential
habitat for westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout. The occupancy probabilities for westslope
cutthroat trout would range from 35.6 percent to 70.2 percent, while those for bull trout would
range from 0.9 percent to 21.1 percent. The distance weighted average occupancy probability
would be 62.4 percent for westslope cutthroat trout and 6.4 percent for bull trout for the entire
mine site OM study area.
Table 14 details the number of reaches, total length of reaches, percent of total study area, and
distance weighted averaged occupancy probabilities for each quartile within the species’
respective range of occupancy probability values across the entire study area. Figures 19 and 20
display the occupancy probabilities for each mine site OM reach within the entire study area for
westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout, respectively.

Table 14. Descriptive Statistics for EOY 18 Occupancy Probabilities for Stream Segment 5
Westslope Cutthroat Trout
Number of Length of Percent of Stream Distance Weighted Average
Reaches Reaches (m) Segment 5 Occupancy Probability
Low 19 9,966 24.20% 55.55%
Medium Low 27 16,466 39.98% 62.37%
Medium High 12 11,844 28.75% 66.45%
High 5 2,914 7.08% 69.54%
Total 63 41,190 100% 62.40%
Bull Trout
Number of Length of Percent of Stream Distance Weighted Average
Reaches Reaches (m) Segment 5 Occupancy Probability
Low 25 14,997 36.41% 2.35%
Medium Low 18 13,134 31.89% 5.06%
Medium High 14 9,569 23.23% 10.24%
High 6 3,490 8.47% 18.63%
Total 63 41,190 100% 6.43%

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 36

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 19. EOY 18 Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream Segment 5

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 37

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 20. EOY 18 Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 5

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 38

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

4.3.1 EOY 18 Results for Stream Segment 1

For EOY 18, it is estimated that Stream Segment 1 would provide 10.4 km of potential habitat for
westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout. The occupancy probabilities for westslope cutthroat trout
would range from 55.5 percent to 67.5 percent, while those for bull trout would range from 1.1
percent to 11.5 percent. The distance weighted average occupancy probability for Stream
Segment 1 during EOY 18 would be 63.3 percent for westslope cutthroat trout and 6.9 percent
for bull trout. Table 15 details the number of reaches, total length of reaches, percent of total
study area, and distance weighted averaged occupancy probabilities for each quartile within the
species’ respective range of occupancy probability values within Stream Segment 1. Figures 21
and 22 display the occupancy probabilities for each mine site OM reach within Stream Segment
1 for westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout, respectively.

Table 15. Descriptive Statistics for EOY 18 Occupancy Probabilities for Stream Segment 1
Westslope Cutthroat Trout
Number of Length of Percent of Stream Distance Weighted Average
Reaches Reaches (m) Segment 1 Occupancy Probability
Low 5 1,799 17.25% 58.00%
Medium Low 14 4,426 42.43% 62.52%
Medium High 3 4,207 40.33% 66.26%
High 0 0 0% NA
Total 22 10,432 100% 63.25%
Bull Trout
Number of Length of Percent of Stream Distance Weighted Average
Reaches Reaches (m) Segment 1 Occupancy Probability
Low 7 2,333 22.36% 2.10%
Medium Low 6 3,398 32.58% 5.98%
Medium High 9 4,701 45.06% 9.98%
High 0 0 0% NA
Total 22 10,432 100% 6.91%

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 39

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 21. EOY 18 Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream Segment 1

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 40

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 22. EOY 18 Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 1

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 41

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

4.3.2 EOY 18 Results for Stream Segment 2

For EOY 18, it is estimated that Stream Segment 2 provides 14.6 km of potential habitat for
westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout. The occupancy probabilities for westslope cutthroat trout
range from 35.6 percent to 67.8 percent, while those for bull trout range from 0.9 percent to 7.1
percent. The distance weighted average occupancy probability Stream Segment 2 during EOY
18 is 60.4 percent for westslope cutthroat trout and 3.6 percent for bull trout. Table 16 details the
number of reaches, total length of reaches, percent of total study area, and distance weighted
averaged occupancy probabilities for each quartile within the species’ respective range of
occupancy probability values within Stream Segment 2. Figures 23 and 24 display the occupancy
probabilities for each mine site OM reach within Stream Segment 2 for westslope cutthroat trout
and bull trout, respectively.

Table 16. Descriptive Statistics for EOY 18 Occupancy Probabilities for Stream Segment 2
Westslope Cutthroat Trout
Number of Length of Percent of Stream Distance Weighted Average
Reaches Reaches (m) Segment 2 Occupancy Probability
Low 11 4,096 28.04% 51.92%
Medium Low 9 6,981 47.79% 62.49%
Medium High 4 3,531 24.17% 66.15%
High 0 0 0% NA
Total 24 14,608 100% 60.41%
Bull Trout
Number of Length of Percent of Stream Distance Weighted Average
Reaches Reaches (m) Segment 2 Occupancy Probability
Low 14 7,398 50.64% 2.20%
Medium Low 9 6,595 45.14% 4.85%
Medium High 1 616 4.21% 7.12%
High 0 0 0% NA
Total 24 14,608 100% 3.61%

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 42

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 23. EOY 18 Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream Segment 2

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 43

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 24. EOY 18 Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 2

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 44

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

4.3.3 EOY 18 Results for Stream Segment 3

For EOY 18, it is estimated that the Stream Segment 3 would provide 16.2 km of potential habitat
for westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout. The occupancy probabilities for westslope cutthroat
trout would range from 56.8 percent to 70.2 percent, while those for bull trout would range from
2.3 percent to 21.1 percent. The distance weighted average occupancy probability for Stream
Segment 3 during EOY 18 would be 63.7 percent for westslope cutthroat trout and 8.7 percent
for bull trout. Table 17 details the number of reaches, total length of reaches, percent of total
study area, and distance weighted averaged occupancy probabilities for each quartile within the
species’ respective range of occupancy probability values within Stream Segment 3. Figures 25
and 26 display the occupancy probabilities for each mine site OM reach within Stream Segment 3
for westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout, respectively.

Table 17. Descriptive Statistics for EOY 18 Occupancy Probabilities for Stream Segment 3
Westslope Cutthroat Trout
Number of Length of Percent of Stream Distance Weighted Average
Reaches Reaches (m) Segment 3 Occupancy Probability
Low 3 4,071 25.21% 58.12%
Medium Low 4 5,059 31.33% 62.08%
Medium High 4 3,530 21.86% 66.81%
High 6 3,490 21.61% 69.21%
Total 17 16,150 100% 63.66%
Bull Trout
Number of Length of Percent of Stream Distance Weighted Average
Reaches Reaches (m) Segment 3 Occupancy Probability
Low 4 5,267 32.61% 2.68%
Medium Low 3 3,141 19.45% 4.51%
Medium High 4 4,252 26.33% 10.99%
High 6 3,490 21.61% 18.63%
Total 17 16,150 100% 8.67%

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 45

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 25. EOY 18 Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream Segment 3

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 46

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 26. EOY 18 Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 3

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 47

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

4.4 EOY 112 RESULTS FOR STREAM SEGMENT 5

For EOY 112, it is estimated that the mine site OM study area would provide 41.2 km of potential
habitat for westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout. The occupancy probabilities for westslope
cutthroat trout would range from 38.4 percent to 70.2 percent, while those for bull trout would
range from 1.0 percent to 21.4 percent. The distance weighted average occupancy probability
would be 63.6 percent for westslope cutthroat trout and 7.3 percent for bull trout for the entire
mine site OM study area.
Table 18 details the number of reaches, total length of reaches, percent of total study area, and
distance weighted averaged occupancy probabilities for each quartile within the species’
respective range of occupancy probability values across the entire study area. Figures 27 and 28
display the occupancy probabilities for each mine site OM reach within the entire study area for
westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout, respectively.

Table 18. Descriptive Statistics for EOY 112 Occupancy Probabilities for Stream Segment 5
Westslope Cutthroat Trout
Number of Length of Percent of Steam Distance Weighted Average
Reaches Reaches (m) Segment 5 Occupancy Probability
Low 14 8,094 19.65% 55.97%
Medium Low 16 9,491 23.04% 62.22%
Medium High 26 18,698 45.40% 66.14%
High 7 4,907 19.91% 68.94%
Total 63 41,190 100% 63.57%
Bull Trout
Number of Length of Percent of Stream Distance Weighted Average
Reaches Reaches (m) Segment 5 Occupancy Probability
Low 18 10,200 24.76% 2.43%
Medium Low 16 13,495 32.76% 4.76%
Medium High 23 14,005 34.00% 10.27%
High 6 3,490 8.47% 19.10%
Total 63 41,190 100% 7.27%

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 48

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 27. EOY 112 Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream Segment 5

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 49

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 28. EOY 112 Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 5

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 50

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

4.4.2 EOY 112 Results for Stream Segment 1

For EOY 112, it is estimated that Stream Segment 1 would provide 10.4 km of potential habitat
for westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout. The occupancy probabilities for westslope cutthroat
trout would range from 57.1 percent to 68.0 percent, while those for bull trout would range from
1.0 percent to 13.7 percent. The distance weighted average occupancy probability for Stream
Segment 1 during EOY 112 would be 64.4 percent for westslope cutthroat trout and 8.4 percent
for bull trout. Table 19 details the number of reaches, total length of reaches, percent of total
study area, and distance weighted averaged occupancy probabilities for each quartile within the
species’ respective range of occupancy probability values within Stream Segment 1. Figures 29
and 30 display the occupancy probabilities for each mine site OM reach within Stream Segment
1 for westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout, respectively.

Table 19. Descriptive Statistics for EOY 112 Occupancy Probabilities for Stream Segment 1
Westslope Cutthroat Trout
Number of Length of Percent of Stream Distance Weighted Average
Reaches Reaches (m) Segment 1 Occupancy Probability
Low 5 1,893 18.15% 58.34%
Medium Low 6 1,831 17.56% 62.75%
Medium High 6 1,964 18.83% 65.22%
High 5 4,743 45.46% 67.12%
Total 22 10,432 100% 64.40%
Bull Trout
Number of Length of Percent of Stream Distance Weighted Average
Reaches Reaches (m) Segment 1 Occupancy Probability
Low 6 1,974 18.92% 2.14%
Medium Low 4 1,838 17.62% 5.48%
Medium High 12 6,620 63.46% 11.08%
High 0 0 0% NA
Total 22 10,432 100% 8.40%

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 51

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 29. EOY 112 Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream Segment 1

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 52

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 30. EOY 112 Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 1

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 53

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

4.4.1 EOY 112 Results for Stream Segment 2

For EOY 112, it is estimated that Stream Segment 2 would provide 14.6 km of potential habitat
for westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout. The occupancy probabilities for westslope cutthroat
trout would range from 35.4 percent to 68.3 percent, while those for bull trout would range from
1.0 percent to 8.0 percent. The distance weighted average occupancy probability for Stream
Segment 2 during EOY 112 would be 62.9 percent for westslope cutthroat trout and 4.8 percent
for bull trout. Table 20 details the number of reaches, total length of reaches, percent of total
study area, and distance weighted averaged occupancy probabilities for each quartile within the
species’ respective range of occupancy probability values within Stream Segment 2. Figures 31
and 32 display the occupancy probabilities for each mine site OM reach within Stream Segment 2
for westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout, respectively.

Table 20. Descriptive Statistics for EOY 112 Occupancy Probabilities for Stream Segment 2
Westslope Cutthroat Trout
Number of Length of Percent of Stream Distance Weighted Average
Reaches Reaches (m) Segment 2 Occupancy Probability
Low 7 2,496 17.09% 51.39%
Medium Low 5 2,234 15.29% 62.40%
Medium High 11 9,671 66.20% 65.87%
High 1 207 1.42% 68.33%
Total 24 14,608 100% 62.90%
Bull Trout
Number of Length of Percent of Stream Distance Weighted Average
Reaches Reaches (m) Segment 2 Occupancy Probability
Low 8 2,959 20.26% 2.14%
Medium Low 10 8,940 61.20% 4.78%
Medium High 6 2,708 18.54% 7.58%
High 0 0 0% NA
Total 24 14,608 100% 4.76%

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 54

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 31. EOY 112 Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream Segment 2

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 55

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 32. EOY 112 Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 2

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 56

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

4.4.3 EOY 112 Results for Stream Segment 3

For EOY 112, it is estimated that Stream Segment 3 would provide 16.2 km of potential habitat
for westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout. The occupancy probabilities for westslope cutthroat
trout would range from 56.7 percent to 70.2 percent, while those for bull trout would range from
2.3 percent to 21.4 percent. The distance weighted average occupancy probability for Stream
Segment 3 during EOY 18 would be 63.7 percent for westslope cutthroat trout and 8.8 percent
for bull trout. Table 21 details the number of reaches, total length of reaches, percent of total
study area, and distance weighted averaged occupancy probabilities for each quartile within the
species’ respective range of occupancy probability values within Stream Segment 3. Figures 33
and 34 display the occupancy probabilities for each mine site OM reach within Stream Segment 3
for westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout, respectively.

Table 21. Descriptive Statistics for EOY 112 Occupancy Probabilities for Stream Segment 3
Westslope Cutthroat Trout
Number of Length of Percent of Stream Distance Weighted Average
Reaches Reaches (m) Segment 3 Occupancy Probability
Low 3 4,071 25.21% 58.10%
Medium Low 4 5,059 31.33% 62.07%
Medium High 5 4,106 25.42% 66.91%
High 5 1,595 9.87% 69.55%
Total 17 16,150 100% 63.65%
Bull Trout
Number of Length of Percent of Stream Distance Weighted Average
Reaches Reaches (m) Segment 3 Occupancy Probability
Low 4 5,267 32.61% 2.70%
Medium Low 3 3,141 19.45% 4.53%
Medium High 4 4,252 26.33% 11.09%
High 6 3,490 21.61% 19.10%
Total 17 16,150 100% 8.81%

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 57

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 33. EOY 112 Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream Segment 3

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 58

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 34. EOY 112 Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 3

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 59

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

The impacts associated with the proposed action are shown through changes to two separate
metrics (habitat availability and habitat occupancy) throughout and beyond the life of the mine.
The losses in available stream habitat are not integrated into estimated occupancy probabilities
(e.g., diverted reaches during EOY 6 and EOY 18 are not given a 0 percent value). Length of
available habitat and distance weighted occupancy probability and their respective percent
changes from existing condition to each proposed action model year are discussed below.

5.1 CHANGE IN AVAILABLE HABITAT

The stream discharge and channel slope restrictions are identical for both species, so the length
of available habitat is reported as the same for both species. The length of available habitat would
decrease under Alternative 1. Lengths of available habitat are reported in kilometers for existing
conditions and each model year for each stream segment (Table 22 and Figure 35). Percent
change in length of available habitat from existing condition to each model year for each stream
segment is presented in Table 23 and Figure 36.
A notable distinction in the lengths of available habitat between the two species is as follows. Bull
trout are known to occupy Upper Meadow Creek within the footprint of the TSF/DRSF. They are
not known to exist above the TSF/DRSF footprint. Therefore, it is likely that if the reaches within
the footprint of the DRSF/TSF were to be dewatered and their flow directed into diversion
channels and the gradient barrier at the face of the DRSF introduced, there would be no
mechanism by which bull trout would be able to recolonize any future stream segments above
the DRSF. In EOY 6 and EOY 12, when flow in Meadow Creek is diverted around the TSF/DRSF
footprint, 2.13 km of stream are classified as available habitat for bull trout based on the model
parameters. Based on the discussion above, it is unlikely that bull trout will have access to these
areas. In EOY 18 and EOY 112, the OM classifies 9.14 km of stream above the TSF/DRSF
footprint as available habitat for bull trout; this area would also not likely be accessible to bull trout.
The same situation would occur in regard to the Fiddle Creek DRSF.
For existing conditions, the mine site OM study area provides just under 42 km of stream channel
that is available habitat for westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout. At EOY 6, the amount of
available habitat would decrease by approximately 30 percent to 28.91 km. By EOY 12, there
would be 33.07 km of available habitat. The amount of available habitat at EOY 18 and EOY 112
would be nearly back to the amount of habitat available during existing conditions (41.19 km). For
the proposed action, Stream Segment 3 would not lose native trout habitat; all habitat losses
would be attributed to the Stream Segments 1 and 2. For Stream Segment 1, the decrease in
available habitat would range from 41.15 percent during EOY 6 to 0.19 percent during the post-
closure model years. The decrease in available habitat in Stream Segment 2 would range from
56.23 percent during EOY 6 and EOY 12, to 3.25 percent during the post-closure model years.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 60

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 22. Length of Available Habitat for Bull Trout and Westslope Cutthroat Trout
for each Stream Segment

Length of Available Habitat (km)

Baseline EOY 6 EOY 12 EOY 18 EOY112
Stream Segment 1 10.45 6.15 10.30 10.43 10.43
Stream Segment 2 15.10 6.61 6.61 14.61 14.61
Stream Segment 3 16.15 16.15 16.15 16.15 16.15
Stream Segment 5 41.70 28.91 33.07 41.19 41.19

Figure 35. Length of Available Habitat for Bull Trout and Westslope Cutthroat Trout for each
Stream Segment for Existing Conditions and all Modeled Years

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 61

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 23. Percent Change in Length of Available Habitat from Existing Conditions to each Model
Year for Bull Trout and Westslope Cutthroat Trout for each Stream Segment

Percent Change in Length of Available Habitat (km)

EOY 6 EOY 12 EOY 18 EOY112
Stream Segment 1 -41.15% -1.44% -0.19% -0.19%
Stream Segment 2 -56.23% -56.23% -3.25% -3.25%
Stream Segment 3 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Stream Segment 5 -30.67% -20.70% -1.22% -1.22%

Figure 36. Percent Change in Length of Available Habitat for Stream Segment 5
for all Modeled Years

5.2 CHANGE IN HABITAT OCCUPANCY

The distributions of distance weighted occupancy probabilities for westslope cutthroat trout for
each stream segment for existing conditions and each of the proposed action model years are
shown in Table 24 and Figures 37. Percent change in distance weighted occupancy probabilities
for westslope cutthroat trout from existing condition to each proposed action model year for each
stream segment is shown in Table 25 and Figure 38.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 62

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 24. Distance weighted average occupancy probabilities for westslope cutthroat trout by for
each stream segment.

Westslope Cutthroat Trout Occupancy Probability

Baseline EOY 6 EOY 12 EOY 18 EOY112
Stream Segment 1 63.73% 64.22% 65.02% 63.25% 64.40%
Stream Segment 2 64.06% 63.77% 63.61% 60.41% 62.90%
Stream Segment 3 63.59% 63.65% 63.65% 63.66% 63.65%
Stream Segment 5 63.79% 63.80% 64.07% 62.40% 63.57%

Figure 37. Occupancy Probability Distributions for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream
Segment 5 for all Modeled Years. The Boxolots Represent Quartiles, the Median, and Outliers
within the Distributions

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 63

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 25. Percent Change in Distance Weighted Average Occupancy Probabilities between
Existing Conditions and each Model Year for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for each Stream Segment
Percent Change in Westslope Cutthroat Trout
Occupancy Probability
EOY 6 EOY 12 EOY 18 EOY112
Stream Segment 1 0.77% 2.02% -0.75% 1.05%
Stream Segment 2 -0.45% -0.70% -5.70% -1.81%
Stream Segment 3 0.09% 0.09% 0.11% 0.09%
Stream Segment 5 0.02% 0.44% -2.18% -0.34%

Figure 38. Percent Change in Distance Weighted Average Occupancy Probabilities between
Existing Conditions and each Model Year for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for each Stream Segment

The distributions of distance weighted occupancy probabilities for bull trout for each stream
segment for existing conditions and each of the proposed action model years are shown in
Table 26 and Figures 39. Percent change in distance weighted occupancy probabilities for bull
trout from existing condition to each proposed action model year for each stream segment is
shown in Table 27 and Figure 40.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 64

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 26. Distance Weighted Average Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout
for each Stream Segment

Bull Trout Occupancy Probability

Baseline EOY 6 EOY 12 EOY 18 EOY112
Stream Segment 1 9.66% 10.63% 9.52% 6.91% 8.40%
Stream Segment 2 6.29% 5.66% 5.17% 3.61% 4.76%
Stream Segment 3 9.34% 8.71% 8.57% 8.67% 8.81%
Steam Segment 5 8.31% 8.42% 8.19% 6.43% 7.27%

Figure 39. Occupancy Probability Distributions for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 5 for all
Modeled Years. The Boxolots Represent Quartiles, the Median, and Outliers within the
Distributions

Table 27. Percent Change in Distance Weighted Average Occupancy Probabilities between
Existing Conditions and each Model Year for Bull Trout for each Stream Segment

Percent Change in Bull Trout Occupancy Probability

EOY 6 EOY 12 EOY 18 EOY112
Stream Segment 1 10.04% -1.45% -28.47% -13.04%
Stream Segment 2 -10.02% -17.81% -42.61% -24.32%
Stream Segment 3 -6.75% -8.24% -7.17% -5.67%
Stream Segment 5 1.32% -1.44% -22.62% -12.52%

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 65

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 40. Percent Change in Distance Weighted Average Occupancy Probabilities between
Existing Conditions and each Model Year for Bull Trout for each Stream Segment

The proposed action OM model shows that the two species occupancy percentages would
respond to mining actions similarly. For westslope cutthroat trout overall, there would be slight
increases estimated in distance weighted occupancy probabilities from existing conditions
through EOY 6 to EOY 12, a decrease from EOY 12 to EOY 18, and an increase back to near
existing condition levels by EOY 112. Stream Segment 2 would account for most of the decreases
in westslope cutthroat trout occupancy, while there would be slight increases in occupancy within
Stream Segment 1. For bull trout overall, the model indicates that there would be a small increase
and decrease in distance weighted occupancy probabilities from existing conditions through EOY
6 to EOY 12, a decrease from EOY 12 to EOY 18, and an increase back toward existing condition
levels by EOY 112. The decrease in EOY 18 occupancy probabilities is primarily due to higher
estimated stream temperatures and discharges in that year (see Tables 3 and 4).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 66

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

This TM explains the methods and results of the mine site proposed action OM, which predicts
the quantity and spatial distribution of westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout habitat for EOY 6,
EOY 12, EOY 18, and EOY 112 within the mine site study area. The mine site OM also estimates
the probability of the two species’ occurrence within the headwaters of the EFSFSR watershed
upstream from the confluence of Sugar Creek. The methods used to determine the occupancy
probability per stream reach follow the approaches that the existing regional OM employed for
watersheds within the Rocky Mountains of Idaho and western Montana, in which the mine site
study area is located. The mine site OM differs from the existing regional OM methodology by
employing site-scale data attributed to stream reaches that are meaningful in terms of the mine
site study area.
Habitat availability is reported as the same for both native trout species within the OM. Although
some areas may not be accessible to bull trout following the proposed action. Throughout the
study area, there would be an estimated 30 percent decrease in available habitat from existing
conditions during EOY 6. During EOY 12, there would be a decrease of just over 20 percent of
available habitat from existing conditions. For both post-closure model years, there would be a
1.22 percent decrease of available habitat.
Although there are certain times/locations during mining operations for which the proposed action
OM results indicate slight increases in occupancy for the two native trout species, the results more
generally indicate reductions in both habitat availability and occupancy for both species during
and after mining.
Westslope Cutthroat Trout
The results indicate that there would be little change in projected westslope cutthroat trout
occupancy within the mine site study area during the life of the mine as compared to existing
conditions. During the post mine period, projected westslope cutthroat trout occupancy would
decrease slightly (2.18 percent and 0.34 percent for EOY 18 and EOY 112).
Bull Trout
Estimated bull trout occupancy would follow a similar trend, but with greater magnitudes. There
would be a slight increase in occupancy during EOY 6 and a slight decrease in occupancy during
EOY 12. Projected occupancy for bull trout during the post mine period would decrease by
22.62 percent and 12.52 percent (EOY 18 and EOY 112, respectively).

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 67

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Brown and Caldwell. 2019. Stibnite Gold Project Stream and Pit Lake Network Temperature
(SPLNT) Model Proposed Action and Proposed Action with Modifications Report.
Prepared for Midas Gold, Inc.
Ecosystem Sciences. 2019. Habitat occupancy model: Westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout.
Technical memorandum Stibnite Gold EIS, Idaho.
Gelman, A. and J. Hill. 2006. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models.
Cambridge University Press.
HDR Inc. 2015. Surface water quality baseline report. Prepared for Midas Gold Idaho Inc. Valley
County, Idaho.
Harbaugh, A.W., 2005, MODFLOW-2005, the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water
model -- the Ground-Water Flow Process: U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and
Methods 6-A16.
Isaak, D. J., C. H. Luce, B. E. Rieman, D. E. Nagel, E. E. Peterson, D. L. Horan, S. Parkes, and
G. L. Chandler. 2010. Effects of climate change and wildfire on stream temperatures and
salmonid thermal habitat in a mountain river network. Ecological Applications 20 (5):1350–
1371.
Isaak, D. J., S. J. Wenger, and M. K. Young. 2017. Big biology meets microclimatology: defining
thermal niches of ectotherms at landscape scales for conservation planning. Ecological
Applications 27 (3):977–990.
Isaak, D. J., Young, M. K., Nagel, D. E., Horan, D. L., and M. C. Groce. 2015. The cold-water
climate shield: delineating refugia for preserving salmonid fishes through the 21st century.
Global Change Biology 21 (7): 2465-2828.
Midas Gold. 2016. Stibnite Gold Project, Valley County, Idaho. Plan of Operations. Prepared by
Midas Gold Idaho, Inc. Donnelly, ID.
Rio ASE. 2019a. Stream functional assessment reaches; Stibnite Gold Project Midas Gold Idaho,
Inc.
Rio ASE. 2019b. Stream functional assessment OM stream discharges and slopes; Stibnite Gold
Project Midas Gold Idaho, Inc.
Tufts University. 2015. QUAL2K: Model framework for simulating river, stream, and lake water
quality. Downloadable from: http://www.qual2k.com/.
Wenger, S. J., C. H. Luce, A. F. Hamlet, D. J. Isaak, and H. M. Neville. 2010. Macroscale
hydrologic modeling of ecologically relevant flow metrics. Water Resources Research 46
(9).
Wenger, S.J., pers com: phone and email. February through March, 2019.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 68

Stibnite Gold EIS Technical Report:
DRAFT OCCUPANCY MODEL – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Appendix A: Mine Site Stream Segmentation

The mine site study area, as displayed below, has been delineated into six different stream
segments as follows:
• Stream Segment 1: The Upper EFSFSR and its tributaries from its confluence with Sugar Creek
upstream to its confluence with Meadow Creek.
• Stream Segment 2: The entirety of the Meadow Creek drainage area, including the East Fork
Meadow Creek.
• Stream Segment 3: The Upper EFSFSR and its tributaries upstream of its confluence with Meadow
Creek.
• Stream Segment 4: The modeled portion of the Upper EFSFSR downstream of its confluence with
Sugar Creek.
• Stream Segment 5: The entirety of the HUC 12 “Headwaters East Fork South Fork Salmon River”
(See figure below). Stream segment 5 is the summation of Stream Segments 1, 2 and 3.
• Stream Segment 6: The Sugar Creek drainage area, or the HUC 12 “Sugar Creek” (See figure
below).

69
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

70
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Appendix B: Mine Site OM Variables and Occupancy Probabilities for

each model year within the Proposed Action
EOY 6
Bull Trout Westslope
Stream Stream
Occupancy Cutthroat Trout Reach
Reach Temperature Discharge Slope (%)
Probability Occupancy Length (m)
(°C) (CFS)
(%) Probability (%)
BC0.1 9.49 0.85 4.49% 4.66% 64.73% 1782.76
BC1 9.49 1.58 1.56% 8.86% 68.08% 614.87
BC3 10.57 2.69 4.87% 6.36% 65.63% 251.87
EF0.01 8.80 0.32 7.23% 2.52% 60.73% 1196.36
EF0.02 8.80 0.63 8.60% 3.44% 61.04% 2057.33
EF0.03 8.80 1.06 5.05% 6.60% 64.84% 424.20
EF0.04 8.80 1.66 3.22% 10.14% 67.05% 864.34
EF0.05 8.80 0.72 10.79% 3.10% 59.62% 1730.11
EF0.06 8.80 1.26 6.43% 6.51% 64.14% 659.41
EF0.07 8.88 2.51 5.05% 10.86% 66.55% 971.46
EF0.08 8.14 0.65 13.59% 2.89% 56.73% 760.07
EF0.09 8.14 0.34 11.40% 2.30% 57.09% 1580.60
EF0.10 8.14 1.27 5.97% 8.67% 64.10% 1146.17
EF0.11 8.14 1.70 2.19% 14.10% 67.47% 1270.04
EF0.12 9.03 5.78 2.08% 20.96% 70.23% 1054.14
EF0.14 9.16 6.17 3.45% 18.86% 69.40% 210.02
EF0.15 9.16 6.31 3.63% 18.83% 69.32% 288.03
EF0.17 9.32 6.89 4.47% 17.64% 68.87% 1031.48
EF0.18 9.16 7.44 3.50% 20.79% 69.72% 330.65
EF1 9.59 7.77 6.44% 14.84% 67.58% 575.95
EF2.1 11.01 17.19 3.05% 19.22% 69.71% 667.92
EF2.2 11.42 17.74 2.71% 17.74% 69.14% 1753.33
EF2.3 11.61 17.29 8.46% 10.41% 64.44% 38.92
EF2.4 11.58 17.32 6.03% 12.83% 66.32% 224.14
EF4.2 11.40 15.33 4.23% 14.61% 67.84% 155.36
EF4.3 11.40 15.26 4.62% 14.13% 67.55% 338.07
FC0.1 7.99 0.34 9.68% 2.87% 58.33% 684.18
FC0.2 7.99 0.69 6.22% 6.13% 62.52% 1059.28
FC0.3 8.15 1.01 9.86% 5.35% 60.65% 366.19
FC3 10.21 0.04 13.84% 0.21% 50.40% 114.79

71
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Bull Trout Westslope

Stream Stream
Occupancy Cutthroat Trout Reach
Reach Temperature Discharge Slope (%)
Probability Occupancy Length (m)
(°C) (CFS)
(%) Probability (%)
GC0 10.79 0.31 10.40% 0.86% 56.44% 674.65
GC1 10.79 0.37 9.61% 1.05% 57.47% 72.70
HL1 12.26 3.80 1.11% 6.13% 64.94% 248.94
HL2 12.12 6.49 0.44% 9.48% 66.93% 693.79
MC0.01 10.01 0.46 12.97% 1.20% 56.45% 702.86
MC0.02 10.01 0.85 6.33% 3.28% 62.96% 401.53
MC0.04 8.36 0.41 8.52% 3.10% 59.99% 282.87
MC0.06 8.36 1.02 9.00% 5.36% 61.52% 744.87
MC4.2 12.31 4.05 1.11% 6.27% 64.89% 93.97
MC5 12.12 6.49 0.44% 9.48% 66.93% 76.20
MC6 12.60 7.44 1.84% 7.82% 64.51% 718.34

72
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

EOY 12
Bull Trout Westslope
Stream Stream
Occupancy Cutthroat Trout Reach
Reach Temperature Discharge Slope (%)
Probability Occupancy Length (m)
(°C) (CFS)
(%) Probability (%)
BC0.1 9.57 0.85 4.49% 4.52% 64.69% 1782.76
BC1 9.57 1.58 1.56% 8.61% 68.04% 614.87
BC3 10.61 0.91 4.87% 3.13% 63.40% 251.87
EF0.01 8.81 0.32 7.23% 2.51% 60.73% 1196.36
EF0.02 8.81 0.63 8.61% 3.43% 61.05% 2057.33
EF0.03 8.81 1.06 5.05% 6.57% 64.84% 424.20
EF0.04 8.81 1.66 3.22% 10.11% 67.06% 864.34
EF0.05 8.81 0.72 10.79% 3.08% 59.62% 1730.11
EF0.06 8.81 1.26 6.43% 6.49% 64.14% 659.41
EF0.07 8.90 2.51 5.05% 10.80% 66.55% 971.46
EF0.08 8.16 0.65 13.59% 2.86% 56.75% 760.07
EF0.09 8.16 0.34 11.40% 2.28% 57.11% 1580.60
EF0.10 8.16 1.27 5.97% 8.61% 64.12% 1146.17
EF0.11 8.16 1.70 2.19% 14.00% 67.49% 1270.04
EF0.12 9.10 5.78 2.08% 20.53% 70.23% 1054.14
EF0.14 9.20 6.17 3.45% 18.62% 69.40% 210.02
EF0.15 9.20 6.31 3.63% 18.59% 69.32% 288.03
EF0.17 9.41 6.89 4.47% 17.14% 68.84% 1031.48
EF0.18 9.41 7.44 3.50% 19.24% 69.66% 330.65
EF1 9.72 7.97 6.44% 14.43% 67.55% 575.95
EF2.1 10.93 15.92 3.05% 18.89% 69.72% 667.92
EF2.2 11.34 16.43 2.71% 17.42% 69.18% 1753.33
EF2.3 11.59 16.46 8.46% 10.16% 64.39% 38.92
EF2.4 11.59 16.48 6.03% 12.42% 66.20% 224.14
EF2.5 11.59 16.48 8.21% 10.38% 64.58% 94.62
EF3.1 11.72 16.48 3.76% 14.30% 67.50% 379.08
EF3.2 11.89 16.48 3.76% 13.56% 67.03% 446.33
EF3.3 12.09 17.03 3.76% 12.98% 66.49% 579.47
EF4.1 12.09 15.31 2.59% 13.40% 67.13% 156.65
EF4.2 12.09 17.91 4.23% 12.87% 66.24% 155.91
EF4.3 12.22 17.86 4.62% 11.95% 65.54% 338.07
FC0 10.04 1.08 11.42% 2.39% 59.46% 53.54
FC0.1 7.99 0.34 9.68% 2.87% 58.33% 684.18

73
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Bull Trout Westslope

Stream Stream
Occupancy Cutthroat Trout Reach
Reach Temperature Discharge Slope (%)
Probability Occupancy Length (m)
(°C) (CFS)
(%) Probability (%)
FC0.2 7.99 0.69 6.22% 6.13% 62.52% 1059.28
FC0.3 8.19 1.01 9.86% 5.27% 60.69% 366.19
FC1 10.04 1.08 0.65% 6.23% 67.61% 1785.76
GC0 10.75 0.31 10.40% 0.87% 56.52% 674.65
GC1 10.75 0.37 9.61% 1.06% 57.53% 72.70
HC1.2 10.49 0.55 3.76% 2.61% 63.42% 359.10
HL1 12.25 4.08 1.11% 6.43% 65.12% 248.94
HL2 12.02 4.99 0.44% 8.34% 66.73% 693.79
MC0.01 9.78 0.46 12.97% 1.31% 56.67% 702.86
MC0.02 9.78 0.85 6.33% 3.57% 63.17% 401.53
MC0.04 8.36 0.41 8.52% 3.10% 59.99% 282.87
MC0.06 8.36 1.02 9.00% 5.36% 61.52% 744.87
MC4.2 12.31 4.27 1.11% 6.48% 64.99% 93.97
MC5 12.02 4.99 0.44% 8.34% 66.73% 76.20
MC6 12.52 4.44 1.84% 5.82% 63.79% 718.34
MN1 11.42 0.25 8.55% 0.71% 56.03% 142.61
MN2 11.42 0.25 3.76% 1.10% 59.85% 271.85

74
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

EOY 18
Bull Trout Westslope
Stream Stream
Occupancy Cutthroat Trout Reach
Reach Temperature Discharge Slope (%)
Probability Occupancy Length (m)
(°C) (CFS)
(%) Probability (%)
BC0.1 9.00 0.85 4.49% 5.58% 64.83% 1782.76
BC1 10.31 1.77 1.56% 7.12% 67.59% 615.69
BC2 11.41 1.93 14.04% 1.67% 56.02% 468.29
BC2.1 11.41 2.11 8.06% 3.04% 60.96% 344.88
BC3 12.15 2.25 4.87% 3.26% 61.38% 251.87
EF0.01 8.80 0.32 7.23% 2.52% 60.73% 1196.36
EF0.02 8.80 0.63 8.61% 3.44% 61.04% 2057.33
EF0.03 8.80 1.06 5.05% 6.60% 64.84% 424.20
EF0.04 8.80 1.66 3.22% 10.14% 67.05% 864.34
EF0.05 8.80 0.72 10.79% 3.10% 59.62% 1730.11
EF0.06 8.80 1.26 6.43% 6.51% 64.14% 659.41
EF0.07 8.89 2.51 5.05% 10.82% 66.55% 971.46
EF0.08 8.18 0.65 13.59% 2.84% 56.77% 760.07
EF0.09 8.18 0.34 11.40% 2.26% 57.13% 1580.60
EF0.10 8.18 1.27 5.97% 8.54% 64.14% 1146.17
EF0.11 8.18 1.70 2.19% 13.91% 67.50% 1270.04
EF0.12 9.01 5.78 2.08% 21.09% 70.23% 1054.14
EF0.14 9.12 6.17 3.45% 19.10% 69.41% 210.02
EF0.15 9.12 6.31 3.63% 19.07% 69.32% 288.03
EF0.17 9.29 6.89 4.47% 17.81% 68.88% 1031.48
EF0.18 9.29 7.44 3.50% 19.97% 69.70% 330.65
EF1 9.62 7.56 6.44% 14.46% 67.51% 575.95
EF2.1 12.16 13.09 3.05% 11.51% 66.27% 667.92
EF2.2 12.63 13.51 2.71% 10.39% 64.96% 1753.33
EF2.3 12.70 14.55 8.46% 6.53% 60.43% 38.92
EF2.4 12.70 14.57 6.03% 8.05% 62.32% 224.14
EF2.5 12.81 14.58 8.21% 6.44% 60.18% 94.62
EF3.1 12.81 14.58 3.76% 9.41% 63.62% 379.08
EF3.2 12.95 15.50 3.76% 9.34% 63.17% 446.33
EF3.3 13.07 16.21 3.76% 9.24% 62.75% 579.47
EF4.1 13.07 16.77 2.59% 10.40% 63.71% 156.65
EF4.2 13.07 17.75 4.23% 9.39% 62.58% 155.91
EF4.3 13.18 18.11 4.62% 8.89% 61.84% 338.07

75
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Bull Trout Westslope

Stream Stream
Occupancy Cutthroat Trout Reach
Reach Temperature Discharge Slope (%)
Probability Occupancy Length (m)
(°C) (CFS)
(%) Probability (%)
FC0 8.20 1.08 11.42% 4.78% 59.62% 53.54
FC0.1 8.00 0.34 9.68% 2.86% 58.34% 684.18
FC0.2 8.00 0.69 6.22% 6.11% 62.53% 1059.28
FC0.3 8.20 1.01 9.86% 5.25% 60.70% 366.19
FC1 10.12 1.08 0.65% 6.06% 67.53% 1785.76
FC3 11.47 1.50 13.84% 1.41% 55.49% 114.79
GC0 10.04 0.31 10.40% 1.14% 57.60% 674.77
GC1 11.82 0.37 1.05% 1.57% 61.63% 85.39
HC1.2 10.52 0.69 3.76% 2.99% 63.83% 359.10
MC0.01 10.32 0.46 12.97% 1.07% 56.06% 702.86
MC0.02 10.32 0.85 6.33% 2.92% 62.59% 401.53
MC0.04 8.25 0.41 8.52% 3.23% 59.90% 282.87
MC0.06 8.25 1.02 9.00% 5.59% 61.43% 744.87
MC0.7 9.05 0.49 14.71% 1.53% 55.70% 104.93
MC0.9 10.32 1.03 4.56% 3.87% 64.32% 490.77
MC1.1 12.33 1.03 0.53% 2.72% 62.49% 1700.96
MC1.2 10.83 0.49 0.91% 2.75% 64.75% 862.27
MC1.3 10.31 1.21 0.88% 5.97% 67.36% 925.57
MC1.31 10.31 1.21 0.30% 6.27% 67.77% 206.87
MC1.4 12.87 1.52 0.18% 3.00% 61.49% 914.63
MC1.5 13.00 2.74 0.11% 4.23% 62.21% 1269.00
MC2 13.67 2.74 0.63% 3.22% 58.64% 640.04
MC4.1 14.35 0.74 1.58% 1.00% 51.22% 760.98
MC4.2 14.35 0.66 1.58% 0.92% 50.96% 93.97
MC4.2 14.35 0.66 1.58% 0.92% 50.96% 105.23
MC5 16.97 2.87 0.44% 1.17% 35.63% 76.20
MC5 16.97 2.87 0.44% 1.17% 35.63% 142.46
MC6 16.30 5.72 1.84% 2.00% 41.50% 718.34
MN1 9.49 0.68 8.55% 2.81% 61.18% 142.61
MN2 12.40 0.68 3.76% 1.50% 58.85% 271.85

76
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

EOY 112
Bull Trout Westslope
Stream Stream
Occupancy Cutthroat Trout Reach
Reach Temperature Discharge Slope (%)
Probability Occupancy Length (m)
(°C) (CFS)
(%) Probability (%)
BC0.1 9.10 0.85 4.49% 5.38% 64.83% 1782.76
BC1 10.26 1.78 1.56% 7.27% 67.66% 615.69
BC2 10.99 1.77 14.04% 1.84% 56.86% 468.29
BC2.1 10.99 1.69 8.06% 3.06% 61.49% 344.88
BC3 11.40 1.55 4.87% 3.33% 62.82% 251.87
EF0.01 8.79 0.32 7.23% 2.53% 60.73% 1196.36
EF0.02 8.79 0.63 8.61% 3.45% 61.04% 2057.33
EF0.03 8.79 1.06 5.05% 6.62% 64.83% 424.20
EF0.04 8.79 1.66 3.22% 10.18% 67.05% 864.34
EF0.05 8.79 0.72 10.79% 3.11% 59.62% 1730.11
EF0.06 8.79 1.26 6.43% 6.54% 64.14% 659.41
EF0.07 8.87 2.51 5.05% 10.91% 66.54% 971.46
EF0.08 8.15 0.65 13.59% 2.88% 56.74% 760.07
EF0.09 8.15 0.34 11.40% 2.29% 57.10% 1580.60
EF0.10 8.15 1.27 5.97% 8.64% 64.11% 1146.17
EF0.11 8.15 1.70 2.19% 14.05% 67.48% 1270.04
EF0.12 8.96 5.78 2.08% 21.44% 70.23% 1054.14
EF0.14 9.06 6.17 3.45% 19.46% 69.41% 210.02
EF0.15 9.06 6.31 3.63% 19.43% 69.33% 288.03
EF0.17 9.21 6.89 4.47% 18.27% 68.90% 1031.48
EF0.18 9.21 7.44 3.50% 20.47% 69.71% 330.65
EF1 9.47 7.59 6.44% 15.23% 67.60% 575.95
EF2.1 11.94 15.28 3.05% 13.52% 67.25% 667.92
EF2.2 12.28 15.77 2.71% 12.72% 66.50% 1753.33
EF2.3 12.20 16.82 8.46% 8.43% 62.59% 38.92
EF2.4 12.20 16.84 6.03% 10.34% 64.43% 224.14
EF2.5 12.28 16.86 8.21% 8.39% 62.51% 94.62
EF3.1 12.28 16.86 3.76% 12.15% 65.86% 379.08
EF3.2 12.34 17.51 3.76% 12.20% 65.73% 446.33
EF3.3 12.42 18.17 3.76% 12.16% 65.52% 579.47
EF4.1 12.42 18.88 2.59% 13.67% 66.46% 156.65
EF4.2 12.42 19.62 4.23% 12.25% 65.33% 155.91
EF4.3 12.52 19.87 4.62% 11.59% 64.71% 338.07

77
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT – TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Bull Trout Westslope

Stream Stream
Occupancy Cutthroat Trout Reach
Reach Temperature Discharge Slope (%)
Probability Occupancy Length (m)
(°C) (CFS)
(%) Probability (%)
FC0 8.19 1.08 11.42% 4.80% 59.61% 53.54
FC0.1 7.99 0.34 9.68% 2.87% 58.33% 684.18
FC0.2 7.99 0.69 6.22% 6.13% 62.52% 1059.28
FC0.3 8.19 1.01 9.86% 5.27% 60.69% 366.19
FC1 9.50 1.08 0.65% 7.56% 68.00% 1785.76
FC3 10.42 1.61 13.84% 2.17% 57.88% 114.79
GC0 10.46 0.31 10.40% 0.98% 57.06% 674.77
GC1 10.57 0.37 1.05% 2.46% 64.50% 85.39
HC1.2 9.85 0.71 3.76% 3.89% 64.69% 359.10
MC0.01 10.38 0.46 12.97% 1.04% 55.97% 702.86
MC0.02 10.38 0.85 6.33% 2.86% 62.50% 401.53
MC0.04 8.25 0.41 8.52% 3.23% 59.90% 282.87
MC0.06 8.25 1.02 9.00% 5.59% 61.43% 744.87
MC0.7 9.05 0.49 14.71% 1.53% 55.70% 104.93
MC0.9 10.38 1.03 4.56% 3.79% 64.23% 490.77
MC1.1 11.43 1.03 0.53% 3.73% 65.20% 1700.96
MC1.2 10.10 0.49 0.91% 3.59% 65.83% 862.27
MC1.3 9.65 1.17 0.88% 7.39% 67.92% 925.57
MC1.31 9.65 1.17 0.30% 7.76% 68.33% 206.87
MC1.4 11.53 1.52 0.18% 4.77% 65.97% 914.63
MC1.5 11.68 2.62 0.11% 6.43% 66.69% 1269.00
MC2 12.10 2.62 0.63% 5.32% 65.07% 640.04
MC4.1 12.39 6.65 1.58% 8.00% 65.25% 760.98
MC4.2 12.39 6.14 1.58% 7.62% 65.10% 93.97
MC4.2 12.39 6.14 1.58% 7.62% 65.10% 105.23
MC5 16.88 7.70 0.44% 2.31% 38.40% 76.20
MC5 16.88 7.70 0.44% 2.31% 38.40% 142.46
MC6 16.16 7.97 1.84% 2.60% 43.34% 718.34
MN1 9.15 0.64 8.55% 3.07% 61.15% 142.61
MN2 10.79 0.64 3.76% 2.57% 63.20% 271.85

78
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL FOR W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL

WESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT
AND
BULL TROUT
ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3

Technical Memorandum
Stibnite Gold Project, Idaho

December 2019

Ecosystem Sciences, LLC

Science . Planning . Design

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 0

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL FOR W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Technical Memorandum

Ecosystem Sciences
Science . Planning . Design

Ecosystem Sciences
202 N. 9th Street, Suite 400
Boise, ID 83702
T: 208.383.0226

Prepared for: AECOM

Project Title: Stibnite Gold Project

Technical Memorandum
Subject: Habitat Occupancy Model for Westslope Cutthroat Trout and Bull Trout
Alternatives 2 and 3

Date: November 25, 2019

To: AECOM

From: Ecosystem Sciences

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL FOR W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 1
2.0 STUDY AREA .................................................................................................................................. 1
3.0 METHODS ....................................................................................................................................... 4
4.0 RESULTS ........................................................................................................................................ 8
4.1 ALTERNATIVE 2 RESULTS....................................................................................................... 9
4.2 ALTERNATIVE 3 RESULTS..................................................................................................... 15
5.0 SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................... 21
6.0 LITERATURE CITED..................................................................................................................... 22

LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A: Mine Site Stream Segmentation

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Alternative 2 and Alternative 3 Mine Site OM Study Area (Stream Segment 5) for
Westslope Cutthroat Trout and Bull Trout ................................................................................... 3
Figure 2. Mine Site OM Workflow for Westslope Cutthroat Trout and Bull Trout ....................................... 5
Figure 3. Occupancy Probability Distributions for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream
Segment 5 for all Modeled Years for Alternative 2.................................................................... 10
Figure 4. Percent change in distance weighted average occupancy probabilities for westslope
cutthroat trout for each stream segment for all modeled years for Alternative 2. ..................... 11
Figure 5. Occupancy Probability Distributions for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 5 for all
Modeled Years for Alternative 2 ................................................................................................ 12
Figure 6. Percent Change in Distance Weighted Average Occupancy Probabilities for Bull
Trout for each Stream Segment for all Modeled Years for Alternative 2 .................................. 13
Figure 7. Length of Available Habitat for Bull Trout and Westslope Cutthroat Trout for each
Stream Segment for Existing Conditions and all Modeled Years for Alternative 2 ................... 14
Figure 8. Percent Change in Length of Available Habitat for each Stream Segment for all
Modeled Years for Alternative 2 ................................................................................................ 15
Figure 9. Occupancy Probability Distributions for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream
Segment 5 for all Modeled Years for Alternative 3.................................................................... 16
Figure 10. Percent Change in Distance-weighted Average Occupancy Probabilities for
Westslope Cutthroat Trout for each Stream Segment for all Modeled Years for
Alternative 3............................................................................................................................... 17
Figure 11. Occupancy Probability Distributions for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 5 for all
Modeled Years for Alternative 3 ................................................................................................ 18
Figure 12. Percent Change in Distance-weighted Average Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout
for each Stream Segment for all Modeled Years for Alternative 3 ............................................ 19
Figure 13. Length of Available Habitat for Bull Trout and Westslope Cutthroat Trout for each
Stream Segment for Existing Conditions and all Modeled Years for Alternative 3 ................... 20
Figure 14. Percent Change in Length of Available Habitat for each Stream Segment 5 for all
Modeled Years for Alternative 3 ................................................................................................ 21

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | i

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL FOR W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Mine Site OM Variable Metadata ................................................................................................ 6
Table 2. Distribution of Stream Temperature for Alternative 2 OM Reaches ............................................ 6
Table 3. Distribution of Stream Discharge for Alternative 2 OM Reaches ................................................ 6
Table 4. Distribution of Channel Slope for Alternative 2 OM Reaches ..................................................... 7
Table 5. Distribution of Stream Temperature for Alternative 3 OM Reaches ............................................ 7
Table 6. Distribution of Stream Discharge for Alternative 3 OM Reaches ................................................ 7
Table 7. Distribution of Channel Slope for Alternative 3 OM Reaches ..................................................... 8
Table 8. Distance-weighted Average Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout
for each Stream Segment for Alternative 2 ................................................................................. 9
Table 9. Percent Change in Distance-weighted Average Occupancy Probabilities between
Existing Conditions and each Model Year for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for each
Stream Segment for Alternative 2 ............................................................................................. 10
Table 10. Distance weighted average occupancy probabilities for bull trout for each stream
segment for Alternative 2. ......................................................................................................... 11
Table 11. Percent Change in Distance Weighted Average Occupancy Probabilities between
Existing Conditions and each Model Year for Bull Trout for each Stream Segment for
Alternative 2............................................................................................................................... 12
Table 12. Length of Available Habitat for Westslope Cutthroat Trout and Bull Trout for each
Stream Segment within the Mine Site Study Area for Alternative 2 .......................................... 14
Table 13. Percent Change in Length of Available Habitat from Existing Conditions to each
Model Year for Bull Trout and Westslope Cutthroat Trout for each Stream Segment
within the Mine Site Study Area for Alternative 2 ...................................................................... 15
Table 14. Distance-weighted average occupancy probabilities for westslope cutthroat trout for
each stream segment for Alternative 3. .................................................................................... 16
Table 15. Percent Change in Distance-weighted Average Occupancy Probabilities between
Existing Conditions and each Model Year for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for each
Stream Segment for Alternative 3 ............................................................................................. 17
Table 16. Distance-weighted Average Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout for each Stream
Segment for Alternative 3 .......................................................................................................... 18
Table 17. Percent Change in Distance-weighted Average Occupancy Probabilities between
Existing Conditions and each Model Year for Bull Trout for each Stream Segment for
Alternative 3............................................................................................................................... 19
Table 18. Length of Available Habitat for Westslope Cutthroat Trout and Bull Trout for each
Stream Segment for Alternative 3 ............................................................................................. 20
Table 19. Percent Change in Length of Available Habitat from Existing Conditions to each
Model Year for Bull Trout and Westslope Cutthroat Trout for each Stream Segment
for Alternative 3 ......................................................................................................................... 21
Table 20. Comparison of Occupancy and Available Habitat between Alternative 2 and
Alternative 3............................................................................................................................... 22

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | ii

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL FOR W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

1.0 INTRODUCTION
A habitat occupancy model for westslope cutthroat trout (Onchorhynchus clarkia lewisi) and bull
trout (Salvelinus confluentus) was developed for the Stibnite Gold mine site study area, located
in the headwaters of the Upper East Fork South Fork of the Salmon River (EFSFSR) watershed.
Following the same methodology and criteria used to develop the Existing Conditions (Baseline)
Occupancy Model (Ecosystem Sciences 2019a) and the Proposed Action (PA) Occupancy Model
(Ecosystem Sciences 2019b), the Alternative 2 (modified PRO) and Alternative 3 (Upper EFSFSR
Tailings Storage Facility [TSF]) occupancy models use physical characteristics of stream reaches
to estimate the probability that the two native trout species would occupy habitat in the study area
(as defined in Section 2) given the different actions that are proposed under Alternative 2 and
Alternative 3. Alternative 2 and Alternative 3 are defined by two separate reports dated June and
May 2019, respectively (Midas Gold 2019a,b).
The mine life is defined as 2 years before mining activities would commence (mine year -2) and
lasting for the 20 years that mining operations and reclamation are scheduled to occur. By
year 20, all streams are proposed to be re-created or enhanced in their permanent location. The
years that are modeled for Alternative 2 and Alternative 3 are identical to those years modeled in
the proposed action (Alternative 1). The Occupancy Model (OM) was run for 3 years that are
representative of various conditions throughout the life of the mine. The selected model runs are
end-of-year (EOY) 6, EOY 12, and EOY 18. One year was selected to represent the post-mine
period (EOY 112). Results from the Alternative 2 and Alternative 3 OM are compared to existing
conditions OM results, as reported in a separate technical memorandum titled, “Existing
Conditions (Baseline) Occupancy Model Technical Memorandum” (Ecosystem Sciences 2019).
The model calculates occupancy probabilities for each of the two native trout species based on
the combination of three independent variables—stream discharge, stream temperature, and
channel slope. The resulting occupancy probabilities were run through a sensitivity analysis,
which was utilized to determine the level of influence that each of the model’s independent
variables had on the model’s dependent variable (occupancy probability). See the Existing
Conditions (Baseline) Occupancy Model Technical Memorandum for details about and results
from the sensitivity analysis. The continuous range of occupancy probabilities are represented in
percentages, from 0 to 100 percent for each reach. This modeling effort provides a quantitative
measure from which to gauge how proposed actions from Alternative 2 and Alternative 3 affect
habitat for native bull trout and westslope cutthroat trout within the mine site study area.
Section 2 provides detail about the geographic extent of the study area. Section 3 of this document
explains the methods that were used to produce the Alternative 2 and 3 OM probabilities. Any
variations from the methods that were used in the Existing Conditions (Baseline) Habitat
Occupancy Model Technical Memorandum (Ecosystem Sciences 2019) are included in Section 3.
Section 4 presents the resulting occupancy probabilities and habitat availability from the
Alternative 2 and 3 OM for EOY 6, EOY 12, EOY 18, and EOY112. Lastly, the results are
summarized in Section 5.

2.0 STUDY AREA

The Alternative 2 and Alternative 3 OM study area matches the Baseline and Proposed Action
OM study areas. The mine site OM study area encompasses approximately 43 square miles of
the headwaters of the EFSFSR. The headwaters of the EFSFSR (HUC 12 - 170602080201)

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 1

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL FOR W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

contains the SFA reaches or mine site impact areas, while Sugar Creek (HUC 12- 1706020803)
is not in the OM study area (Figure 1). Occupancy probabilities are summarized for four mine site
stream segments in the study area. These include: Stream Segment 1 (Upper EFSFSR and its
tributaries from its confluence with Sugar Creek upstream to its confluence with Meadow Creek);
Stream Segment 2 (Meadow Creek drainage area, including the East Fork Meadow Creek);
Stream Segment 3 (Upper EFSFSR and its tributaries upstream of its confluence with Meadow
Creek); and Stream Segment 5 (HUC 12 “Headwaters East Fork South Fork Salmon River” or the
summation of Stream Segments 1, 2 and 3). In total, there are six mine site stream segments
(Appendix A defines each stream segment along with a map showing their respective spatial
extent).

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 2

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL FOR W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 1. Alternative 2 and Alternative 3 Mine Site OM Study Area (Stream Segment 5) for
Westslope Cutthroat Trout and Bull Trout

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 3

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL FOR W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

3.0 METHODS
Similar to the Existing Conditions and Proposed Action OM, the Alternative 2 and Alternative 3
OM approach is based on the existing regional OM methodologies from Isaak et al. 2015 and
Isaak et al. 2017 (see Existing Conditions [Baseline] Occupancy Model Technical Memorandum).
Methods from Isaak et. al. 2017 are adapted to the mine site study area through the use of higher
resolution data inputs (a LiDAR-derived Digital Elevation Model and reach-based modeled stream
temperature [SPLNT] and stream discharge data).
The data inputs were attributed to Alternative 2 and Alternative 3 stream reach configurations for
EOY 6, EOY 12, EOY 18, and EOY 112. Each configuration was a combination of reaches defined
by the Stream Functional Assessment (SFA) (Rio ASE 2019a) and NHD Plus Version 2
hydrography (Horizon Systems Corporation 2019) representing unaffected headwater reaches.
Rio ASE provided modeled stream discharge data and slope data associated with enhanced and
restored reaches (Rio ASE 2019b); Rio ASE also provided modeled stream temperature data for
most reaches (Rio ASE 2019b). Two steps from Isaak et al. 2015 were included—reaches with
stream discharges below 0.2 cubic feet per second (cfs) and channel slopes above 15 percent
were trimmed from the Alternative 2 and 3 OM model. Diversion channels were also eliminated
from the modeled stream network as they do not provide fish habitat. The workflow of methods
used in the Alternative 2 and Alternative 3 mine site OM model is detailed in Figure 2.

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 4

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL FOR W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 2. Mine Site OM Workflow for Westslope Cutthroat Trout and Bull Trout

The model input variables, their units of measurement, their temporal and spatial resolutions,
and the sources of each dataset used in the mine site OM are detailed in Table 1.

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 5

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL FOR W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 1. Mine Site OM Variable Metadata

Stream Temperature Stream Flow Channel Slope

Mean Stream Mean Stream Discharge
Unit of Measurement Slope (%)
Temperature (°C) (cfs)
July 16-Sept. 30 (Period
Temporal Resolution August (Period of Record) N/A
of Record)
Mine Site OM Reach Mine Site OM Reach Mine Site OM Reach
Spatial Resolution
Domain Scale Domain Scale Domain Scale
Ecosystem Sciences and
Rio ASE (Rio ASE, Rio ASE (Rio ASE,
Data Source Rio ASE (Rio ASE,
2019b) 2019b)
2019b)

Descriptive statistics about each of the OM variable datasets for EOY 6, EOY 12, EOY 18, and
EOY 112 (including existing conditions) for Alternative 2 and Alternative 3 are presented in
Table 2 through Table 7.

Table 2. Distribution of Stream Temperature for Alternative 2 OM Reaches

Stream Temperature (°C)

Baseline EOY 6 EOY 12 EOY18 EOY 112
Min 7.91 8.05 8.11 8.15 8.12
Max 11.77 11.36 12.04 14.23 13.46
Median 9.98 9.41 9.65 10.33 10.23
Mean 9.84 9.65 9.92 10.72 10.25
SD 1.22 1.08 1.24 1.82 2.44

Table 3. Distribution of Stream Discharge for Alternative 2 OM Reaches

Stream Discharge (CFS)

Baseline EOY 6 EOY 12 EOY18 EOY 112
Min 0.31 0.23 0.09 0.23 0.23
Max 18.87 10.45 12.94 14.08 14.13
Median 1.60 1.85 1.24 1.11 1.19
Mean 4.98 3.06 2.83 2.59 2.77
SD 6.15 2.85 2.76 3.11 3.11

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 6

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL FOR W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 4. Distribution of Channel Slope for Alternative 2 OM Reaches

Channel Slope (%)

Baseline EOY 6 EOY 12 EOY18 EOY 112
Min 0.45 0.44 0.44 0.11 0.11
Max 33.14 13.84 32.49 32.49 32.49
Median 6.33 4.87 4.48 3.76 3.76
Mean 7.39 5.71 5.82 5.76 5.76
SD 6.08 3.75 5.34 5.84 5.84

Table 5. Distribution of Stream Temperature for Alternative 3 OM Reaches

Stream Temperature (°C)

Baseline EOY 6 EOY 12 EOY18 EOY 112
Min 7.91 7.96 7.96 9.32 9.32
Max 11.77 12.34 12.31 11.47 11.48
Median 9.98 10.65 10.63 11.47 11.48
Mean 9.84 10.59 10.42 11.18 11.18
SD 1.22 1.16 1.29 0.47 0.48

Table 6. Distribution of Stream Discharge for Alternative 3 OM Reaches

Stream Discharge (CFS)

Baseline EOY 6 EOY 12 EOY18 EOY 112
Min 0.31 0.13 0.23 0.17 0.23
Max 18.87 12.27 11.76 13.95 14.01
Median 1.60 1.93 3.20 1.33 1.33
Mean 4.98 3.58 4.30 3.91 3.94
SD 6.15 3.84 4.50 4.78 4.82

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 7

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL FOR W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 7. Distribution of Channel Slope for Alternative 3 OM Reaches

Channel Slope (%)

Baseline EOY 6 EOY 12 EOY18 EOY 112
Min 0.45 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11
Max 33.14 23.99 32.49 32.49 32.49
Median 6.33 4.62 4.36 4.23 3.99
Mean 7.39 6.29 8.31 8.30 7.99
SD 6.08 5.61 15.30 5.84 5.84

There is a distinction between the methodologies used in the Alternative 2 and 3 OM and those
used in the Baseline and Proposed Action OM. For the Baseline and Proposed Action OM, stream
temperatures from each SPLNT reach were transferred to the final set of SFA reaches using a
distance weighted average method (Ecosystem Sciences 2019a). The SFA reach-level stream
temperature data inputs for the Alternative 2 and Alternative 3 OM were provided to Ecosystem
Sciences by Rio ASE. This difference should be noted when interpreting the Alternative 2 and 3
OM results in two ways: 1) there may be slight differences in the resulting occupancy probabilities,
given that the distance weighted averaging method was not used to transfer SPLNT stream
temperature reach data to SFA reaches for Alternative 2 and 3; and 2) some SFA reaches that
should have been included in the Alternative 2 and Alternative 3 OM may have been excluded
because model variable data for some reaches were not present in the files provided by Rio ASE.
Subsequent to the initial attribution of variable data to SFA reaches, a review of each model year
configuration was done to reveal which SFA reaches had been excluded due to this
methodological inconsistency. Any of the initially excluded reaches were then added using SPLNT
reach stream temperatures from the appropriate alternative model runs, or channel slopes from
either the existing condition or Alternative 1 modeling depending on the alternative and reaches
in question. For example, Alternative 2 reaches that were missing channel slopes in stream
segment 3 were attributed with data from the existing condition model because no changes were
proposed to be made for those reaches.
For additional details on the final OM SFA reach network, each model variable, and the
transformations performed on model variables see the Proposed Action (Alternative 1)
Occupancy Model Technical Memorandum (Ecosystem Sciences 2019b).

4.0 RESULTS
Section 4 details the results of Alternative 2 and 3 occupancy models, respectively. Results are
summarized for four mine site stream segments in the study area (Stream Segment 1, Stream
Segment 2, Stream Segment 3, and Stream Segment 5) for EOY 6, EOY 12, EOY 18, and
EOY 112.
A distance-weighted average occupancy probability was calculated for each stream segment.
Distance-weighted averaging accounts for stream length by weighting each occupancy
percentage proportionally to its reach length (i.e., longer reaches are weighted more than shorter
reaches). The distance-weighted averages are presented for each of the four mine years that
were modeled for westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout. The percent change in distance-
weighted average occupancy probabilities between baseline conditions and each modeled mine

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 8

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL FOR W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

year are provided for the two native trout species. Lastly, the length of available habitat and
percent change in length of available habitat for each model year for Alternative 2 and Alternative
3 are reported.
As described in the proposed action OM TM (Ecosystem Sciences 2019b), bull trout occupancy
percentages and available habitat were computed for stream sections reconstructed on top of the
TSF/DRSFs. However, based on the extent of known bull trout occupancy, bull trout may be
extirpated from the reaches above the TSF/DRSFs when the reaches in the footprint would be
dewatered and flow would be diverted into the diversions that route water around the facilities.
With no evidence that bull trout occur in small headwater streams above the storage facilities,
and the gradient barriers that would be created on the facility faces, there may be no mechanism
by which bull trout would be able to recolonize the reaches on top of the TSF/DRSFs. However,
these reaches meet the definitions of the OM modeling; therefore, their results are included below.

4.1 ALTERNATIVE 2 RESULTS

For Stream Segment 5, the OM estimates that occupancy probabilities for westslope cutthroat
trout would be below the baseline condition occupancy probabilities for each modeled year
(Table 8 and Figure 3). Relative to all other model years, the decrease from baseline to EOY 18
is greatest. (Table 9 and Figure 4). Occupancy probabilities for bull trout follow a similar trend—
all model years are below the baseline condition with the lowest percentage coming from EOY 18
(Tables 10 and 11; Figures 5 and 6). For westslope cutthroat trout, the highest occupancy
probabilities vary between each stream segment throughout the modeled years. For bull trout,
Stream Segments 1 and 3 contain the highest occupancy probabilities.

Table 8. Distance-weighted Average Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope Cutthroat Trout

for each Stream Segment for Alternative 2

Westslope Cutthroat Trout

Baseline EOY 6 EOY 12 EOY 18 EOY 112
Stream Segment 1 64.73% 63.71% 64.32% 62.50% 63.66%
Stream Segment 2 64.06% 64.21% 64.11% 61.39% 63.90%
Stream Segment 3 63.59% 63.04% 63.04% 63.05% 63.04%
Stream Segment 5 63.79% 63.45% 63.64% 62.32% 63.51%

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 9

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL FOR W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 3. Occupancy Probability Distributions for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for Stream
Segment 5 for all Modeled Years for Alternative 2

Table 9. Percent Change in Distance-weighted Average Occupancy Probabilities between

Existing Conditions and each Model Year for Westslope Cutthroat Trout
for each Stream Segment for Alternative 2

Westslope Cutthroat Trout

EOY 6 EOY 12 EOY 18 EOY112
Stream Segment 1 -0.03% 0.93% -1.93% -0.11%
Stream Segment 2 0.23% 0.08% -4.17% -0.25%
Stream Segment 3 -0.86% -0.86% -0.85% -0.86%
Stream Segment 5 -0.53% -0.24% -2.30% -0.44%

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 10

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL FOR W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 4. Percent change in distance weighted average occupancy probabilities for westslope
cutthroat trout for each stream segment for all modeled years for Alternative 2.

Table 10. Distance weighted average occupancy probabilities for bull trout for each stream
segment for Alternative 2.

Bull Trout
Baseline EOY 6 EOY 12 EOY 18 EOY112
Stream Segment 1 9.51% 7.42% 6.59% 5.83% 6.56%
Stream Segment 2 6.27% 5.93% 5.66% 3.12% 4.37%
Stream Segment 3 9.34% 7.33% 7.31% 7.25% 7.40%
Stream Segment 5 8.31% 7.04% 6.76% 5.42% 6.11%

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 11

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL FOR W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 5. Occupancy Probability Distributions for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 5
for all Modeled Years for Alternative 2

Table 11. Percent Change in Distance Weighted Average Occupancy Probabilities

between Existing Conditions and each Model Year for Bull Trout
for each Stream Segment for Alternative 2

Bull Trout
EOY 6 EOY 12 EOY 18 EOY112
Stream Segment 1 -23.19% -31.78% -39.65% -32.09%
Stream Segment 2 -5.72% -10.02% -50.40% -30.52%
Stream Segment 3 -21.44% -21.65% -22.29% -20.69%
Stream Segment 5 -15.28% -18.65% -34.78% -26.47%

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 12

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL FOR W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 6. Percent Change in Distance Weighted Average Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout
for each Stream Segment for all Modeled Years for Alternative 2

The length of available habitat for westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout would change
throughout the mine life as channel configurations change and water is diverted into temporary
conveyances. Table 12 and Figure 7 provide the length of available habitat for the two species
for each modeled year for Alternative 2. Stream Segment 1 would lose 40.4 percent of its length
of available habitat from baseline through EOY 6, while Stream Segment 2 would lose
57.4 percent of its length of available habitat from baseline through EOY 12 (Table 13 and
Figure 8). The length of available habitat would increase to slightly above the baseline extent by
EOY 18 and beyond as reaches are re-created.
The stream discharge and channel slope restrictions are identical for both species, so the length
of available habitat is reported as the same for both species. However, bull trout are known to
occupy Upper Meadow Creek in the footprint of the TSF/DRSF. They are not known to exist above
the TSF/DRSF footprint. Therefore, when the stream reaches in the footprint of the DRSF/TSF
are dewatered and their flow directed into diversion channels, and then gradient barrier at the
face of the DRSF is introduced, there would be no mechanism by which bull trout would be able
to recolonize any future stream segments above the DRSF. In EOY 6 and EOY 12, when flow in
Meadow Creek is diverted around the TSF/DRSF footprint, 2.13 kilometers of stream are
classified as available habitat for bull trout based on the model parameters. Based on the
discussion above, it is unlikely that bull trout will have access to these areas. In EOY 18 and
EOY 112, the OM classifies 9.14 kilometers of stream above the TSF/DRSF footprint as available
habitat for bull trout; this area would also not likely be accessible to bull trout.

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 13

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL FOR W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 12. Length of Available Habitat for Westslope Cutthroat Trout and Bull Trout for each
Stream Segment within the Mine Site Study Area for Alternative 2

Length of Available Habitat (km)

Baseline EOY 6 EOY 12 EOY 18 EOY112
Stream Segment 1 10.45 6.23 10.00 10.92 10.92
Stream Segment 2 15.10 6.44 6.44 14.72 14.72
Stream Segment 3 16.16 16.16 16.16 16.16 16.16
Stream Segment 5 41.70 28.83 32.60 41.80 41.80

Figure 7. Length of Available Habitat for Bull Trout and Westslope Cutthroat Trout for each Stream
Segment for Existing Conditions and all Modeled Years for Alternative 2

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 14

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL FOR W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 13. Percent Change in Length of Available Habitat from Existing Conditions to each
Model Year for Bull Trout and Westslope Cutthroat Trout for each Stream Segment
within the Mine Site Study Area for Alternative 2

Percent Change in Length of Available Habitat (km)

EOY 6 EOY 12 EOY 18 EOY112
Stream Segment 1 -40.38% -4.31% 4.50% 4.50%
Stream Segment 2 -57.35% -57.35% -2.52% -2.52%
Stream Segment 3 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Stream Segment 5 -44.64% -27.91% 0.24% 0.24%

Figure 8. Percent Change in Length of Available Habitat for each Stream Segment
for all Modeled Years for Alternative 2

4.2 ALTERNATIVE 3 RESULTS

For Alternative 3, the OM estimates that occupancy probabilities for all model years are lower
than the baseline condition for both species (Tables 14 through 17 and Figures 9 through 12).
For westslope cutthroat trout, the highest occupancy probabilities occur in Stream Segment 2.
For bull trout, Stream Segment 1 contains the highest occupancy probabilities. There are notable
decreases in occupancy probabilities for westslope cutthroat trout from baseline to EOY 6 and
EOY 12, and for bull trout from baseline conditions and each model year in Stream Segment 3.
This is likely caused by the large decrease in available habitat from stream alterations—there are
few reaches that remain active (receive occupancy probabilities) during EOY 6 and EOY 12 in

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 15

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL FOR W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Stream Segment 3. Higher stream temperatures and lower stream discharges in Stream
Segment 3 reaches during EOY 18 and EOY 112 explain the lack of recovery in occupancy during
those model years for bull trout, which are more sensitive to the temperature/discharge
parameters.

Table 14. Distance-weighted average occupancy probabilities for westslope cutthroat trout for
each stream segment for Alternative 3.

Westslope Cutthroat Trout

Baseline EOY 6 EOY 12 EOY 18 EOY 112
Stream Segment 1 63.73% 61.27% 63.52% 63.34% 63.37%
Stream Segment 2 64.06% 64.22% 64.12% 64.64% 64.62%
Stream Segment 3 63.59% 59.61% 59.63% 62.78% 62.83%
Stream Segment 5 63.79% 62.24% 62.84% 63.54% 63.57%

Figure 9. Occupancy Probability Distributions for Westslope Cutthroat Trout for

Stream Segment 5 for all Modeled Years for Alternative 3

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 16

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL FOR W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 15. Percent Change in Distance-weighted Average Occupancy Probabilities between

Existing Conditions and each Model Year for Westslope Cutthroat Trout
for each Stream Segment for Alternative 3

Westslope Cutthroat Trout

EOY 6 EOY 12 EOY 18 EOY112
Stream Segment 1 -3.86% -0.33% -0.61% -0.56%
Stream Segment 2 0.25% 0.09% 0.91% 0.87%
Stream Segment 3 -6.26% -6.23% -1.27% -1.20%
Stream Segment 5 -2.43% -1.49% -0.39% -0.34%

Figure 10. Percent Change in Distance-weighted Average Occupancy Probabilities for Westslope
Cutthroat Trout for each Stream Segment for all Modeled Years for Alternative 3

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 17

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL FOR W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 16. Distance-weighted Average Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout

for each Stream Segment for Alternative 3

Bull Trout
Baseline EOY 6 EOY 12 EOY 18 EOY112
Stream Segment 1 9.51% 7.17% 9.04% 7.18% 7.16%
Stream Segment 2 6.27% 6.27% 6.09% 5.30% 5.22%
Stream Segment 3 9.34% 3.87% 3.97% 3.66% 3.77%
Stream Segment 5 8.27% 5.82% 6.52% 5.11% 5.13%

Figure 11. Occupancy Probability Distributions for Bull Trout for Stream Segment 5 for all
Modeled Years for Alternative 3

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 18

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL FOR W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 17. Percent Change in Distance-weighted Average Occupancy Probabilities

between Existing Conditions and each Model Year for Bull Trout
for each Stream Segment for Alternative 3

Bull Trout
EOY 6 EOY 12 EOY 18 EOY112
Stream Segment 1 -25.78% -6.42% -25.67% -25.88%
Stream Segment 2 -0.32% -3.18% -15.74% -17.01%
Stream Segment 3 -58.52% -57.45% -60.77% -59.59%
Stream Segment 5 -29.96% -21.54% -38.51% -38.27%

Figure 12. Percent Change in Distance-weighted Average Occupancy Probabilities for Bull Trout
for each Stream Segment for all Modeled Years for Alternative 3

The length of available habitat for westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout changes throughout the
mine life as channel configurations change and water is diverted into temporary conveyances.
Table 18 and Figure 13 provide the length of available habitat for the two species for each
modeled year. The stream discharge and channel slope restrictions are identical for both species;
therefore, the length of available habitat is the same for both species. Stream Segment 3 loses
51.5 percent of its available habitat from baseline through EOY 12 (Table 19 and Figure 14). The
length of available habitat increases to slightly above baseline conditions during EOY 18 and EOY
112 as reaches are re-created and sinuosity is increased. However, as noted above, bull trout
may not have a way to colonize the newly created sections on top of the storage facilities.

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 19

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL FOR W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 18. Length of Available Habitat for Westslope Cutthroat Trout and Bull Trout for each
Stream Segment for Alternative 3

Length of Available Habitat (km)

Baseline EOY 6 EOY 12 EOY 18 EOY112
Stream Segment 1 10.45 6.75 10.33 10.88 10.88
Stream Segment 2 15.10 13.77 13.77 13.79 13.86
Stream Segment 3 16.16 7.84 7.84 17.20 17.20
Stream Segment 5 41.70 28.37 31.95 41.87 41.94

Figure 13. Length of Available Habitat for Bull Trout and Westslope Cutthroat Trout for each
Stream Segment for Existing Conditions and all Modeled Years for Alternative 3

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 20

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL FOR W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 19. Percent Change in Length of Available Habitat from Existing Conditions to each Model
Year for Bull Trout and Westslope Cutthroat Trout for each Stream Segment for Alternative 3

Percent Change in Length of Available Habitat (km)

EOY 6 EOY 12 EOY 18 EOY112
Stream Segment 1 -35.41% -1.15% 4.11% 4.11%
Stream Segment 2 -8.81% -8.81% -8.68% -8.21%
Stream Segment 3 -51.49% -51.49% 6.44% 6.44%
Stream Segment 5 -31.97% -23.38% 0.41% 0.58%

Figure 14. Percent Change in Length of Available Habitat for each Stream Segment 5 for all
Modeled Years for Alternative 3

5.0 SUMMARY
Alternative 2 and Alternative 3 would both result in a reduction in occupancy probabilities when
compared to baseline conditions. The reductions fluctuate during the life of the mine and post-
mine life. There are large decreases in length of available habitat in certain stream segments
where stream diversions are proposed to occur, but by EOY 112 there are slight increases in
available habitat for Stream Segment 5. Overall, by the end of mine life—once all streams are in
their final location—Alternative 3 is estimated to provide slightly higher occupancy probabilities
for westslope cutthroat trout (0.06 percent), while Alternative 2 is estimated to provide higher

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 21

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL FOR W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

occupancy probabilities for bull trout (0.98 percent). Alternative 3 is estimated to provide
0.14 kilometer more habitat availability for westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout than Alternative
2 by the end of mine life (Table 20).

Table 20. Comparison of Occupancy and Available Habitat between

Alternative 2 and Alternative 3

Alt 2 Alt 3 Alt 2 – Alt 3

Baseline
EOY 112 EOY 112 Difference
Westslope Cutthroat Trout Occupancy 63.71% 63.51% 63.57% -0.06%
Bull Trout Occupancy 8.27% 6.11% 5.13% 0.98%
Length of Available Habitat 41.70 km 41.80 km 41.94 km -0.14 km

6.0 LITERATURE CITED

Ecosystem Sciences. 2019a. Existing Conditions (Baseline) Habitat occupancy model: Westslope
cutthroat trout and bull trout. Technical memorandum Stibnite Gold EIS, Idaho.
Ecosystem Sciences. 2019b. Proposed Action (Alternative 1) Habitat occupancy model:
Westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout. Technical memorandum Stibnite Gold EIS, Idaho.
Isaak, D. J., S. J. Wenger, and M. K. Young. 2017. Big biology meets microclimatology: defining
thermal niches of ectotherms at landscape scales for conservation planning. Ecological
Applications 27 (3):977–990.
Isaak, D. J., Young, M. K., Nagel, D. E., Horan, D. L., and M. C. Groce. 2015. The cold-water
climate shield: delineating refugia for preserving salmonid fishes through the 21st century.
Global Change Biology 21 (7): 2465-2828.
Horizon System Corporation. 2019. NHDPlus Version 2. Downloadable from: http://www.horizon-
systems.com/NHDPlus/NHDPlusV2_home.php.
Midas Gold. 2019a. Stibnite Gold Project Modified PRO Alternative Modeling Report. Stibnite
Gold Project, Valley County, Idaho. Prepared by Midas Gold Idaho, Inc. Donnelly, ID.
June, 2019.
Midas Gold. 2019b. East Fork South Fork Salmon River TSF/DRSF Alternative Modeling Report.
Stibnite Gold Project, Valley County, Idaho. Prepared by Midas Gold Idaho, Inc. Donnelly,
ID. May, 2019.
Rio ASE. 2019a. Stream functional assessment reaches; Stibnite Gold Project Midas Gold Idaho,
Inc.
Rio ASE. 2019b. OM Alternative 2 and Alternative 3 Stream functional assessment OM reach
stream temperature, stream discharge, and channel slope data. Stibnite Gold Project
Midas Gold Idaho, Inc.

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 22

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL FOR W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

APPENDIX A: MINE SITE STREAM SEGMENTATION

NOVEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL FOR W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

This page intentionally left blank

NOVEMBER 2019
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL FOR W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Mine Site Stream Segmentation

The mine site study area, as displayed below, has been delineated into six different stream
segments as follows:
• Stream Segment 1: The Upper EFSFSR and its tributaries from its confluence with Sugar
Creek upstream to its confluence with Meadow Creek.
• Stream Segment 2: The entirety of the Meadow Creek drainage area, including the East
Fork Meadow Creek.
• Stream Segment 3: The Upper EFSFSR and its tributaries upstream of its confluence
with Meadow Creek.
• Stream Segment 4: The modeled portion of the Upper EFSFSR downstream of its
confluence with Sugar Creek.
• Stream Segment 5: The entirety of the HUC 12 “Headwaters East Fork South Fork
Salmon River” (See figure below). Stream segment 5 is the summation of Stream
Segments 1, 2 and 3.
• Stream Segment 6: The Sugar Creek drainage area, or the HUC 12 “Sugar Creek” (See
figure below).

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-1

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
HABITAT OCCUPANCY MODEL FOR W ESTSLOPE CUTTHROAT TROUT AND BULL TROUT
ALTERNATIVES 2 AND 3 - TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | A-2

 Appendix J-8: PHABSIM Technical Memorandum

This TM was developed and finalized for the Draft EIS in December 2019. There may be differences in the data
presented in the figures and tables as compared to the Draft EIS
This page intentionally left blank.
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PHABISIM RESULTS TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

SUMMARY OF EXISTING
PHABSIM DATA TO INFORM
IMPACTS ON WESTSLOPE
CUTTHROAT TROUT AND
BULL TROUT

Technical Memorandum
Stibnite Gold Project, Idaho

December 2019

Ecosystem Sciences, LLC

Science . Planning . Design
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PHABISIM RESULTS TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Technical Memorandum

Ecosystem Sciences
Science . Planning . Design

Ecosystem Sciences
202 N. 9th Street, Suite 400
Boise, ID 83702
T: 208.383.0226

Prepared for: AECOM

Project Title: Midas Gold Stibnite Project

Technical Memorandum
Subject: Summary of Existing PHABSIM Data to Inform Impact Assessment for
Westslope Cutthroat Trout and Bull Trout Associated with Flow Modification During
Low-Flow Periods at the Stibnite Gold Project Site.

Date: December 2019

To: AECOM

From: Ecosystem Sciences, LLC

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PHABISIM RESULTS TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 1
METHODS ....................................................................................................................................... 3
2.1 INPUTS.................................................................................................................................. 3
2.2 DATA SUMMARY AND APPLICATION ......................................................................................... 3
RESULTS ........................................................................................................................................ 6
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................ 13
REFERENCES............................................................................................................................... 14

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Example of Output from Existing PHABSIM Modeling for Sugar Creek for Cutthroat
Trout ............................................................................................................................................ 2
Figure 2. Map of PHABSIM Sites and the USGS Gauge Sites used in the Analysis ................................. 4
Figure 3. Mean Monthly Discharge for EFSFSR Upstream of Sugar Creek near Stibnite, Idaho
Gauge .......................................................................................................................................... 5
Figure 4. Mean Monthly Flow at Quartz Creek from Forest Service Data ................................................. 5

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. Comparison between Existing PHABSIM Sites and Selected Project Locations for
Several Key Parameters ............................................................................................................. 7
Table 2. PHABSIM Habitat Results for the Three Stream Indexes and for Sugar Creek ......................... 9
Table 3. Percent Change in Flow for the Low-flow Period (defined as August-March) for
Selected Mine Years and Post-closure (defined as an average of mine years 21-118) ........... 10

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | i

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PHABISIM RESULTS TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

This page intentionally left blank

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | ii

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PHABISIM RESULTS TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

INTRODUCTION
The Physical Habitat Simulation System (PHABSIM) is a habitat suitability model developed by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service that has been one of the most widely used tools to quantify the
relationship between physical fish habitat and flow in streams and rivers (Bovee 1982; Bovee and
Milhous 1978; Reiser 1989). Many scientists have been critical of older PHABSIM study results
(e.g., Conder and Annear 1987; Shirvell 1986). However, existing PHABSIM modeling results
from the region represent available data from a widely accepted method of evaluating the effect
of flow modification on fish habitat.
PHABSIM is a specific model designed to calculate an index of the amount of microhabitat
available for target organisms and life stages at different flow levels, incorporating two major
analytical components: stream hydraulics and organism/life stage-specific habitat requirements.
The habitat parameters are water depth, water velocity and stream substrate, which are used to
quantify habitat for multiple fish life stages. The habitat output measure is Weighted Usable Area
(WUA).
A previous PHABSIM investigation was conducted at several stream locations in the Upper
Salmon River basin in the general vicinity of the Stibnite Gold Project location. Conducted in the
late 1980s and early 1990s, this investigation was performed as part of the Snake River
Adjudication, the process of which is detailed and cited in a 2006 U.S. Geological Survey
(USGS) report (Maret et al. 2006). The investigation generated PHABSIM modeling results for
several life stages of both bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) and cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus
clarkia lewisi) (a sample of results in provided in Figure 1). Data used for the analysis was
supplied by the U.S. Forest Service (Forest Service).
This document summarizes existing data based on the flow-habitat relationships depicted in the
existing PHABSIM dataset for westslope cutthroat trout and bull trout, to provide information on
possible impacts associated with project-related changes to low-flow period discharges at
selected locations in the Stibnite Gold Project mine site. Although the existing data are not from
the mine site, the sites are all less than 10 miles from the Stibnite Gage, located centrally in the
mine site (with the exception of Summit Creek). By comparing the hydrology, substrate, slope,
and geomorphic setting, one can judge the applicability of the results from historic PHABSIM effort
to the proposed project.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 1

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PHABISIM RESULTS TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

PA033 - Sugar Creek

Weighted Usable Area vs Flow - Cutthroat
14000
WUA (sq. ft./1000 linear ft.)

12000

10000

8000

6000

4000

2000

0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130 140
Discharge (cfs)
Adult Fry Juvenile Spawning

Figure Source: Data Courtesy of Forest Service

Figure 1. Example of Output from Existing PHABSIM Modeling for Sugar Creek for Cutthroat Trout

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 2

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PHABISIM RESULTS TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

METHODS

2.1 INPUTS
As noted previously, data were collected and modeling performed on several streams in the upper
East Fork of the South Fork Salmon River (upper EFSFSR) in the vicinity of the project in the late
1980s and early 1990s as part of the Snake River Adjudication (Maret et al. 2006). Results were
calculated for several life stages for both fish species. Data used for the analysis were supplied
by the Forest Service in Excel spreadsheet format, and copies of field notes were provided as
.pdf files.
In accordance with the PHABSIM methodology, cross-sectional profiles were measured at four to
five locations in several creeks in the vicinity of the study area. The creeks specifically examined
as part of this review were measured between 1986 and 1990 and included the upper EFSFSR,
Sugar Creek, Tamarack Creek, Profile Creek, Quartz Creek, and others (Figure 2 and Table 1).
In general, these streams were measured at sites located near the bottom of their respective
drainages just upstream of the confluence with a larger stream. Due to the proximity of these sites
to the study area, they have a similar climate. Therefore, the shapes of the annual hydrographs
are generally similar to the larger streams in the Stibnite Gold mine study area. Two example
hydrographs from a PHABSIM site and from the study area are provided in Figure 3 and Figure 4.

2.2 DATA SUMMARY AND APPLICATION

The PHABSIM sites were compared to selected mine site locations based on key site
characteristics, including hydrologic, geographic, and physical site parameters (Table 1). The
mine site USGS gauge locations and the PHABSIM data were separated into three stream
indexes of stream size based on basin size, mean discharge, and baseflow metrics. Due to limited
data availability at this time, only one Stream Index 1 and one Stream Index 3 PHABSIM site had
full datasets available. Five Stream Index 2 sites were available. Partial datasets for several
additional sites were acquired but are incomplete and therefore not included in the analysis at this
time. lf additional data become available, more sites may be used.
It should be noted that the differences in the site parameters influence habitat values. The
PHABSIM data are approximately 30 years old and were performed for another project. They
represent available data that provide reference information and should not be viewed as directly
transferable to the project site.
The PHABSIM habitat results were then summarized by stream index (1 being the smallest
streams, 2 intermediate size, and 3 the largest), species, and life stage (Table 2). Because the
project-associated flow impacts are focused on the low-flow period (for this analysis defined as
August-March), the PHABSIM results for the three lowest flows were used, as they most closely
represent reduction from baseflow, which is when the project would have its largest flow impacts
(based on percentage of flow). The percent change in modeled flows associated with project
alternatives 1 through 3 were then summarized for selected mine site locations (Table 3) based
on comparisons between modeled reductions in flow (based on project-specific flow modeling)
compared to the long-term average flows at the USGS gauge locations in the mine site.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 3

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PHABISIM RESULTS TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Figure 2. Map of PHABSIM Sites and the USGS Gauge Sites used in the Analysis

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 4

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PHABISIM RESULTS TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

EFSFSR above Sugar Creek near Stibnite, ID

Mean Monthly Discharge, 1927-2017
160.0
140.0
120.0
Discharge (cfs)

100.0
80.0
60.0
40.0
20.0
0.0
Jan Feb Mar April May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

Month

Figure Notes: * Data for EFSFSR above Sugar Creek from Rio-ASE spreadsheet Modflow_Alternatives_Summary_08192019.xls

Figure 3. Mean Monthly Discharge for EFSFSR Upstream of Sugar Creek near
Stibnite, Idaho Gauge

Figure Notes: * Data for Quartz Creek from Forest Service PA027QuartzCreek.xls

Figure 4. Mean Monthly Flow at Quartz Creek from Forest Service Data

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 5

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PHABISIM RESULTS TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

RESULTS
The purpose of this summary of relevant results from the Snake River Adjudication PHABSIM
study is to provide background information about the general relationship between flow and
habitat. The reader should consider the similarities and differences between sites displayed in
Table 1. The PHABSIM modeled habitat results (measured in WUA) are summarized in Table 2.
Sugar Creek is summarized by itself because flow data were available for Sugar Creek. The
results show that there is a relationship between the percent change in flow and the amount of
available habitat per species and life stage. In general, habitat declines with reduced flows below
baseflow levels. An exception to this trend is the increase for fry habitat at the EFSFSR site. The
Habitat Suitability Indexes (HSIs) used in the PHABSIM modeling were not examined, but the
predicted decline in habitat is likely due to the general habitat use observations generated from
PHABSIM studies that fry, because of their small size, prefer low velocities. Thus, the model
predicts more fry habitat as flow and velocity are reduced. The percent change in modeled flows
for the low-flow period (defined as August-March) for selected project locations in the mine site
are presented in Table 3 1.

1 Data calculated from Rio-ASE spreadsheet Modflow_Alternatives_Summary_08192019.xls. Spreasheet contains

mean monthly flow estimates for each site for mine years -2 to 112.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 6

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PHABISIM RESULTS TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 1. Comparison between Existing PHABSIM Sites and Selected Project Locations for Several Key Parameters (see the bottom of the table for a key headings)

Stream Index 3

Mean Date cross- Drought,

Creek Low flow Measured Rosgen
Distance Basin Size Annual Baseflow Bankfull Slope Wetted sections Substrate Average, or
Site Name Site Type Size wetted discharge Stream
(miles) (miles2) Discharge (cfs) width (ft) (%) width (ft) were type* High flow
Index width (ft) (cfs) Class
(cfs) measured year

EFSFSR below Very coarse

Project 2.2 42.9 55.8 23.4 3 31.7 25.3 1.21 25.3 ND ND B3 N/A
Sugar Creek gravel

EFSFSR PHABSIM 7.8 107.5 142 61.6 3 46.0 36.8 0.01 48.3 9/8/1986 98.23 Cobble C1 High

Stream Index 2

Date cross Drought,

Mean Creek Low flow Measured Rosgen
Distance Basin Size Baseflow Bankfull Slope Wetted sections Substrate Average, or
Site Name Site Type Discharge Size wetted discharge Stream
(miles) (miles2) (cfs) width (ft) (%) width (ft) were type* High flow
(cfs) Index width (ft) (cfs) Class
measured year*

EFSFSR above Very coarse

Project 1.9 24.0 32.6 12.5 2 25.0 20.0 0.05 20.3 ND ND B3 N/A
Sugar Creek gravel

Monumental
PHABSIM 8.4 19.6 32.6 9.6 2 23.0 18.4 0.48 13.2 10/4/1989 3.98 Gravel C2 Average
Creek*
Sugar Creek PHABSIM 2.2 18.0 33.4 9.7 2 22.2 17.8 3.28 17.3 7/30/1990 12.90 Cobble B3 Average
Tamarack Creek PHABSIM 5.0 18.3 36.4 9.9 2 22.4 17.9 0.01 21.7 7/30/1990 21.68 Cobble B3 Average
Quartz Creek PHABSIM 8.6 19.2 45.6 10.3 2 22.8 18.2 0.31 22.6 8/17/1988 10.74 Boulder A3 Average
Profile Creek PHABSIM 6.0 19.5 40.3 10.6 2 23.0 18.4 0.33 23.0 8/25/1988 13.10 Boulder B3 Average

Stream Index 1

Date cross Drought,

Mean Creek Low flow Measured Rosgen
Distance Basin Size Baseflow Bankfull Slope Wetted sections Substrate Average, or
Site Name Site Type Discharge Size wetted discharge Stream
(miles) (miles2) (cfs) width (ft) (%) width (ft) were type* High flow
(cfs) Index width (ft) (cfs) Class
measured year*

Very coarse
Meadow Creek Project 0.3 10.1 19.3 4.8 1 17.6 14.0 0.62 14.0 ND ND C4 N/A
gravel

Upper EFSFSR
Very coarse
upstream of Project 0.3 9.1 8.9 4.8 1 16.8 13.5 0.07 13.3 ND ND E4 N/A
gravel
Meadow Creek

Summit Creek PHABSIM 36.8 14.7 28.6 4.3 1 20.5 16.4 0.55 23.6 8/4/1986 15.64 Cobble C3/C4 Average
Table Notes:
*Data sources:
Distance was computed in ArcGIS from the Stibnite USGS Gauge centrally located at the Mine Site.
Basin Size, mean discharge and baseflow: Data calculated from Rio-ASE spreadsheet BankfullWidths_PHABSIM_fromStreamStats.xls; Data gathered from USGS StreamStats web page https://streamstats.usgs.gov/ss/;
All other categories: Data calculated from Rio-ASE spreadsheet BankfullWidths_PHABSIM_fromStreamStats.xls; Rio-ASE Stream Design Report; Baseline Studies data, MWH 2017; Forest Service PHABSIM spreadsheets (e.g. PA033SugarCreek.xlsx,etc.); Forest Service field notes PDFs (e.g. Sugar
Creek 033.pdf).
Notes: ND = no data. cfs = cubic feet per second

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 7

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PHABISIM RESULTS TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

This page intentionally left blank

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 8

 STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PHABISIM RESULTS TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 2. PHABSIM Habitat Results for the Three Stream Indexes and for Sugar Creek
(please note that Index 2 values in the third matrix are mean values from all five sites)
Stream Index
Discharge WUA
3: EFSFSR
% % % % %
Species CFS Adult Fry Juvenile Spawning
Change Change Change Change Change
25 -60.3 3195.6 -67.4 15272.7 14.4 12393.2 -23.6 0.0 N/A
Cutthroat trout 44 -30.0 6639.5 -32.2 14644.0 9.7 15253.5 -6.0 0.0 N/A
62.9 0.0 9787.7 0.0 13345.2 0.0 16219.9 0.0 0.0 N/A
25 -60.3 1108.4 -49.2 ND N/A 2690.4 -45.1 0.0 N/A
Bull trout 44 -30.0 1846.3 -15.4 ND N/A 4339.7 -11.4 0.0 N/A
62.9 0.0 2183.6 0.0 ND N/A 4900.4 0.0 0.0 N/A

Stream Index
2: Sugar Discharge WUA
Creek
% % % % %
Species Discharge Adult Fry Juvenile Spawning
change change change change change
1 -89.9 20.5 -98.8 3997.4 -45.5 1270.5 -78.3 428.2 -85.5
Cutthroat trout 5.4 -45.5 794.2 -52.9 6896.1 -6.0 4255.8 -27.2 2139.4 -27.7
9.9 0.0 1686.7 0.0 7338.3 0.0% 5849.3 0.0 2958.5 0.0
1 -89.9 144.3 -87.7 ND N/A 350.5 -87.1 65.7 -96.9
Bull trout 5.4 -45.5 745.7 -36.6 ND N/A 1810.9 -33.1 1442.5 -32.2
9.9 0.0 1176.4 0.0% ND N/A 2708.7 0.0 2126.7 0.0

Stream Index
Discharge WUA
2: Means
% % % % %
Species Discharge Adult Fry Juvenile Spawning
change change change change change
1 -91.1 7.9 -99.6 4829.0 -37.2 1087.7 -81.7 519.7 -85.0
Cutthroat trout 6.46 -45.6 548.9 -65.8 8036.2 -1.4 4547.3 -24.1 2845.2 -22.6
11.94 0.0 1509.8 0.0 8419.4 0.0 6029.1 0.0 3694.9 0.0
1 -91.1 76.1 -94.4 ND N/A 184.7 -94.1 48.3 -97.8
Bull trout 6.46 -45.6 643.7 -40.2 ND N/A 1563.2 -38.8 1599.8 -33.1
11.94 0.0 1058.9 0.0 ND N/A 2490.3 0.0 2544.3 0.0

Stream Index
Discharge WUA
1: Summit
% % % % %
Species Discharge Adult Fry Juvenile Spawning
change change change change change
1 -87.2 7.6 -99.6 7116.7 -50.3 1588.8 -82.5 0.0 N/A
Cutthroat trout 4.4 -43.6 891.9 -55.6 13111.3 -8.4 5988.9 -34.1 0.0 N/A
7.8 0.0 2007.6 0.0 14319.8 0.0 9084.2 0.0 0.0 N/A
1 -87.2 261.4 -89.6 ND N/A 634.9 -89.3 0.0 N/A
Bull trout 4.4 -43.6 1451.2 -42.1 ND N/A 3524.4 -40.7 0.0 N/A
7.8 0.0 2505.5 0.0 ND N/A 5939.8 0.0 0.0 N/A
Table Notes:
WUA= Weighted Usable Area. ND= No Data, N/A= Not Aplplicable..
* Data calculated from: Forest Service PHABSIM spreadsheets (e.g. PA033SugarCreek.xlsx,etc.)

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 9

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PHABISIM RESULTS TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 3. Percent Change in Flow for the Low-flow Period (defined as August-March) for Selected
Mine Years and Post-closure (defined as an average of mine years 21-118)
Alternative 1

EFSFSR above EFSFSR Above Meadow Creek

Sugar Creek
Sugar Creek Meadow Creek above EFSFSR

% Change in % Change in % Change in % Change in

Mine Year Period
Discharge Discharge Discharge Discharge

-1 low flow -7.5 1.1 -0.1 -23.0

1 low flow -16.9 3.3 1.3 -12.6
2 low flow -19.0 2.5 1.1 -9.6
3 low flow -26.9 3.7 1.3 -11.0
4 low flow -25.6 4.0 1.3 -10.0
5 low flow -24.2 3.6 1.8 -8.7
6 low flow -24.7 3.8 2.1 -8.3
7 low flow -19.4 3.7 4.7 -41.6
8 low flow -14.9 3.0 6.1 -52.3
9 low flow -23.1 3.9 5.1 -65.5
10 low flow -22.8 3.0 4.1 -66.3
11 low flow -20.1 3.7 4.1 -64.3
12 low flow -10.2 5.5 4.0 -49.7
13 low flow -45.6 -19.3 0.2 -83.9
14 low flow -39.3 -12.1 -0.1 -90.4
15 low flow -31.5 -9.0 -0.1 -71.7
16 low flow -30.4 -11.9 -0.1 -64.6
17 low flow -26.4 -11.0 -0.3 -53.1
18 low flow -19.3 -8.4 -0.7 -36.7
19 low flow -11.6 -6.3 0.0 -23.7
20 low flow -4.0 -8.8 0.0 4.6
Post Closure low flow -2.1 -0.4 -0.3 2.8
Table Notes:
* Data calculated from Rio-ASE spreadsheet Modflow_Alternatives_Summary_08192019.xls

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 10

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PHABISIM RESULTS TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Alternative 2
EFSFSR
above Sugar EFSFSR Above Meadow Creek
Creek Sugar Creek Meadow Creek above EFSFSR

% Change in % Change in % Change in % Change in

Mine Year Period Discharge Discharge Discharge Discharge
-2 low flow -0.4 1.6 1.8 -6.7
-1 low flow -5.2 2.9 2.2 -31.0
1 low flow -15.3 4.9 3.5 -26.3
2 low flow -16.7 4.4 3.3 -25.9
3 low flow -24.7 4.4 3.0 -24.8
4 low flow -23.0 5.3 3.5 -25.3
5 low flow -21.3 4.9 4.1 -23.4
6 low flow -21.7 5.2 4.4 -23.2
7 low flow -13.3 4.3 6.3 -28.4
8 low flow -9.7 4.1 7.4 -29.3
9 low flow -19.7 4.7 6.1 -36.6
10 low flow -19.0 2.9 5.2 -38.9
11 low flow -15.9 1.4 4.9 -37.8
12 low flow -6.8 1.9 5.4 -32.8
13 low flow -13.8 -17.6 2.4 -26.6
14 low flow -5.2 -10.2 2.1 -23.9
15 low flow 0.5 -7.5 1.7 -7.5
16 low flow 2.1 -10.1 2.0 1.4
17 low flow 2.8 -9.1 1.9 1.8
18 low flow 2.6 -6.5 1.4 1.3
19 low flow 3.7 -4.9 1.6 0.1
20 low flow 3.5 -6.8 2.2 3.0
Post-closure low flow 3.7 2.2 2.1 2.4
Table Notes:
* Data calculated from Rio-ASE spreadsheet Modflow_Alternatives_Summary_08192019.xls

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 11

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PHABISIM RESULTS TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Alternative 3
EFSFSR above EFSFSR Above Meadow Creek
Sugar Creek Sugar Creek Meadow Creek above EFSFSR

% Change in % Change in % Change in % Change in

Mine Year Period Discharge Discharge Discharge Discharge
-2 low flow -5.9 0.0 -18.4 0.2
-1 low flow -8.7 0.0 -18.9 -9.0
1 low flow -19.7 0.0 -21.6 1.2
2 low flow -21.1 0.0 -16.6 1.6
3 low flow -30.2 0.0 -21.4 1.6
4 low flow -28.8 0.0 -20.7 2.0
5 low flow -27.8 0.0 -21.3 3.4
6 low flow -28.2 0.0 -21.0 4.1
7 low flow -23.4 0.0 -17.9 -33.9
8 low flow -20.5 0.0 -15.4 -50.8
9 low flow -28.9 0.0 -16.6 -67.1
10 low flow -27.7 0.0 -15.5 -67.6
11 low flow -25.3 0.0 -17.3 -64.8
12 low flow -15.4 0.1 -17.1 -47.4
13 low flow -37.3 -17.6 0.2 -94.3
14 low flow -34.0 -10.2 2.2 -97.9
15 low flow -28.6 -7.4 0.0 -78.7
16 low flow -23.4 -10.0 0.2 -69.6
17 low flow -12.7 -9.0 1.1 -42.3
18 low flow 1.6 -6.4 -0.1 -0.1
19 low flow 4.0 -4.8 0.4 2.4
20 low flow 3.3 -6.7 0.1 5.0
Post-closure low flow 3.6 1.7 0.0 4.0
Table Notes:
* Data calculated from Rio-ASE spreadsheet Modflow_Alternatives_Summary_08192019.xls

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 12

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PHABISIM RESULTS TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

The existing PHABSIM study provides a functional relationship between stream discharge and
physical habitat for fish species of interest in the upper EFSFSR. The PHABSIM data indicate
that during low flow periods flow reductions decrease the amount of modeled habitat for multiple
life stages of the species of interest (with the exception of fry in certain cases). The project’s
influence on stream discharge during low-flow periods varies between sites and alternatives.
However, low-flow period reductions in discharge are the most common impact under each
alternative. The PHABSIM results represent how similar changes in low-flow discharge were
predicted to affect habitat on similar streams in the region.
For example, under Alternative 1, the largest impacts on low-flow discharge would be on Project
site at Meadow Creek between Year 7 and Year 19. Over this time, period flows are predicted to
decrease between 23.7 percent and 90.4 percent (Table 3) (mean = 58.7 percent, median =
64.3 percent). Since Meadow Creek is a small stream, it is in Stream Index 1. Summit Creek is
the only PHABSIM site in this stream index category. For Summit Creek, the PHABSIM results
indicated an 87.2 percent reduction in discharge from 7.8 cubic feet per second (cfs) to 1 cfs
would result in an 89.6 percent reduction in adult bull trout habitat and a 99.6 percent reduction
in cutthroat trout habitat (Table 3) (note: juvenile results were slightly lower, while effects on
cutthroat fry were about half as large). The predicted reduction in adult habitat at Summit Creek
associated with a reduction in flow from 7.8 cfs to 4.4 cfs (43.6 percent decrease) was predicted
to equate with a 42.1 percent decline adult bull trout habitat and a 55.6 percent decline in cutthroat
habitat. There were no PHABSIM results provided for smaller decreases in discharge at low flows
for this stream size. Although the results of the PHABSIM modeling are not definitively predictive
of habitat changes in Meadow Creek, they do provide a reference as to how the modeling
predicted similar reductions in flow could affect fish habitat in a creek of similar size in the
watershed.
For the EFSFSR above Sugar Creek site (Stream Index 2), the two years with the greatest
reductions in flow under Alternative 1 would be Year 13 and Year 14 (45.6 percent and
39.3 percent, respectively) (Table 3). The mean change in habitat predicted by the PHABSIM
model for all stream index 2 streams for a 45.6 percent reduction in flow was 65.8 percent
reduction for adult cutthroat, and a 40.2 percent reduction for adult bull trout (Table 2). The
PHABSIM model predicted little change for cutthroat fry (-1.4 percent). Juvenile habitat (-24.1
percent for cutthroat and -38.8 percent for bull trout) and spawning habitat (-33.1 percent for bull
trout) were predicted to be less affected than adults by the 45.6 percent flow reduction at Stream
Index 2 sites.
Although the PHABSIM results do not explicitly predict changes in habitat associated with
changes in flow related to the proposed project, they do provide data on how the model predicted
similar reductions in flow at similar-sized creeks in close proximity would affect habitat for species
of interest. As stated above, differences in the site parameters influence habitat values. The
PHABSIM data are approximately 30 years old and originated from another project, they
represent available data that provide reference information and should not be viewed as directly
transferable to the project site. However, PHABSIM is a habitat suitability model developed by
the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service that has been one of the most widely used tools to quantify fish
habitat.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 13

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
PHABISIM RESULTS TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

REFERENCES
Bovee, K. D. 1982. A guide to stream habitat analysis using the instream flow incremental
methodology. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Report FWS/OBS-82/26, Instream Flow
Information Paper 12, Washington, D.C.
Bovee, K. D. and R. Milhous. 1978. Hydraulic simulation in instream flow studies: theory and
techniques. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Report FWS/OBS-78/33, Instream Flow
Information Paper 5, Washington, D.C.
Conder, A. L. and T. C. Annear. 1987. Test of Weighted Usable Area estimates derived from a
PHABSIM model for instream flow studies on trout streams. North American Journal of
Fisheries Management, 7:339-350.
Maret, T. R., J. E. Hortness, and D. S. Ott. 2006. Instream flow characterization of upper Salmon
River Basin streams, central Idaho, 2005: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations
Report 2006-5230, 110 p.
Reiser, D. W., T. A. Wesche, and C. Estes. 1989. Status of instream flow legislation and practices
in North America. Fisheries 14(2):22–29.
Shirvell, C. S. 1986. Pitfalls of physical habitat simulation in the instream flow incremental
methodology. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Fisheries Research Branch Prince
Rupert, BC.

DECEMBER 2019 PAGE | 14

 J-9: Bull Trout Use of Lake Habitat Technical Memorandum

This TM was developed and finalized for the Draft EIS in November 2019. There may be differences in the data
presented in the figures and tables as compared to the Draft EIS
This page intentionally left blank.
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
BULL TROUT USE OF LAKE HABITAT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

APPENDIX J-9

BULL TROUT USE OF

LAKE HABITAT
TECHNICAL
MEMORANDUM
Stibnite Gold Project, Idaho

November 2019

Ecosystem Sciences, LLC

Science . Planning . Design
STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
BULL TROUT USE OF LAKE HABITAT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Technical Memorandum

Ecosystem Sciences
Science . Planning . Design

Ecosystem Sciences
202 N. 9th Street, Suite 400
Boise, ID 83702
T: 208.383.0226

Prepared for: AECOM

Project Title: Stibnite Gold Project

Technical Memorandum
Subject: Bull trout use of YPP lake and the impacts of the proposed project and its
alternatives on bull trout use of lakes within the mine site.

Date: November 6, 2019

To: AECOM

From: Ecosystem Sciences

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
BULL TROUT USE OF LAKE HABITAT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................................. 1
BULL TROUT USE OF LAKE HABITAT ........................................................................................ 2
BULL TROUT USE OF YPP LAKE................................................................................................. 4
BROWN AND CALDWELL 2018 YPP LAKE FISH SAMPLING SURVEY SUMMARY ................ 5
4.1 SAMPLING OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................ 5
4.2 BULL TROUT SIZE DISTRIBUTION ............................................................................................ 5
4.3 BULL TROUT MOVEMENT PATTERNS ...................................................................................... 5
BASELINE BULL TROUT HABITAT CONDITIONS AT YPP LAKE ............................................. 7
5.1 YPP LAKE TEMPERATURE PROFILE ........................................................................................ 7
ASSESSMENT OF CHANGES IN LAKE HABITAT FOR BULL TROUT UNDER EACH
ALTERNATIVE ................................................................................................................................ 8
6.1 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED MINE ACTIONS AS THEY RELATE TO BULL TROUT HABITAT ................ 8
6.2 PROPOSED ACTION (ALTERNATIVE 1) ..................................................................................... 8
6.3 MODIFIED PROPOSED ACTION (ALTERNATIVE 2) ..................................................................... 9
6.4 ALTERNATIVE 3 ................................................................................................................... 10
6.5 ALTERNATIVE 4 ................................................................................................................... 10
BULL TROUT USE OF OTHER LAKES ....................................................................................... 12
7.1 LOON LAKE IN THE SECESH RIVER SUBWATERSHED .............................................................. 12
7.2 REGIONAL EXAMPLES .......................................................................................................... 12
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION............................................................................................... 14
LITERATURE CITED..................................................................................................................... 15

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Bull Trout Temperature Thresholds ................................................................................................ 2
Table 2: Comparison of Habitat Conditions for Bull Trout at YPP Lake and Hangar Flats Pit Lake .......... 11

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | i

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
BULL TROUT USE OF LAKE HABITAT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

This page intentionally left blank

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | ii

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
BULL TROUT USE OF LAKE HABITAT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

INTRODUCTION
The proposed Stibnite Gold Project (Project) would change the availability (and type) of lake
habitat to bull trout in the mine site area due to filling of the Yellow Pine pit (YPP) lake and the
creation of the Hangar Flats pit lake (Midas Gold 2017). This technical memorandum summarizes
the existing data and literature describing bull trout use of lake habitat, including modified open
pit lakes such as the YPP lake; describes the results of a fish sampling survey conducted by
Brown and Caldwell at the YPP lake in 2018, and provides contextual examples of bull trout using
lakes throughout their known historical range. The goal of this technical memorandum is to
synthesize relevant information on bull trout use of lake habitat in order to evaluate how changes
in the availability of lake habitat related to the proposed mining activities would affect the South
Fork of the Salmon River (SFSR) bull trout population.
Bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) is a cold-water salmonid species that inhabits streams and
lakes throughout its range in the Rocky Mountains (Rieman and McIntyre 1993; McPhail and
Baxter 1996). Bull trout are listed as Threatened throughout the contiguous U.S. by the U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service (USFWS) under the Endangered Species Act. Bull trout populations have
been in decline throughout their historical range due to various environmental factors, including
habitat degradation, loss of connectivity between cold-water refugia, hybridization with nonnative
brook trout, food competition from introduced species, and warming stream temperatures. Bull
trout exist in streams and lakes in the SFSR watershed, in the Upper East Fork of the South Fork
(UEFSFSR) subwatershed, including the YPP lake (Brown and Caldwell 2019a; Hogen and
Scarnecchia 2006; Midas Gold 2019; MWH 2017). In 2010, the USFWS determined that the
SFSR watershed contains 758.4 miles of streams and 640 acres of lakes that are critical habitat
area for bull trout, including 32.5 miles of the East Fork of the South Fork of the Salmon River
(EFSFSR) from its confluence with SFSR to its headwaters, including the UEFSFSR and Meadow
Creek (USFWS 2010). The total critical habitat designation in the SFSR watershed includes a mix
of spawning and rearing habitat, as well as foraging, migrating, and overwintering habitat (USFWS
2010). The critical habitat does not include the YPP lake, but it does include a wetland area at the
base of the Spent Ore Disposal Area (SODA). 1

1 The reasons for inclusion of the wetland at the base of the SODA as critical habitat while YPP Lake not being classified as critical
habitat are unknown. If clarification is provided by the USFWS, this section will be updated.

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 1

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
BULL TROUT USE OF LAKE HABITAT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

BULL TROUT USE OF LAKE HABITAT

A distinguishing aspect of the bull trout’s life history is its intolerance to warmer water
temperatures, in both streams and lakes, relative to other species in the salmonid family. Juvenile
bull trout are rarely found where mean summer temperatures exceed 12 degrees Celsius (°C),
while adult bull trout sometimes occupy habitats as much as 5 to 10 degrees warmer (Isaak et al.
2015; McPhail and Baxter 1996; Reiman and McIntyre 1993). In their review of cutthroat trout and
bull trout habitats in the Rocky Mountains, Isaak et al. (2015) determined that bull trout were most
commonly found in stream reaches or lakes with a mean temperature of 9.05°C. The USFWS has
defined the critical habitat temperature range for adult bull trout to be between 2°C and 15°C
(USFWS 2010). The U.S. Forest Service (Forest Service) Watershed Condition Indicators (WCIs)
identify the 7-day maximum average temperature for rearing bull trout as between 4°C and 12°C
to be functioning appropriately, between 13°C and 15°C to be functioning at risk, and greater than
15°C to be functioning at unacceptable risk (Table 1; Forest Service 2003). Migrant bull trout are
likely able to tolerate temperatures greater than those thresholds as they pass from one body of
cold water to the next (Maret and Schultz 2013). Juvenile bull trout have a tighter thermal niche
and are more easily disturbed by temperature fluctuations than adult bull trout (Isaak et al. 2015).
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 10 identifies lethal temperatures for a
1-week exposure for juvenile rearing to be between 22°C and 23°C (EPA 2003).

Table 1: Bull Trout Temperature Thresholds

Juvenile Adult
Life Stage
Maximum 7-day Temperatures Maximum 7-day Temperatures

Threshold Level Adult

Juvenile incubation Juvenile rearing Adult spawning
(Source) migration

Functioning < 15°C (no

appropriately thermal
2-5°C 4-12°C 4-9°C
(Forest Service barriers
2003) present)
Functioning at risk
Sometimes
(Forest Service < 5-9°C < 4 or >12 to15°C >9-10°C
exceed 15°C
2003)
Regularly
Functioning at
exceed 15°C
unacceptable risk
> 10°C > 15°C > 15°C (thermal
(Forest Service
barriers
2003)
present)
Lethal threshold,
US EPA Region 22-23°C
10 (EPA 2003)
Critical Habitat
Range (USFWS 2-15°C
2010)

Bull trout utilize various life-history strategies. The resident fluvial form lives out its life in small
headwater streams and reaches sexual maturity at a small size (McPhail and Baxter 1996). The
migratory fluvial form lives as an adult in large rivers but spawns in small tributary streams and

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 2

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
BULL TROUT USE OF LAKE HABITAT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

migrates between spawning and living areas (McPhail and Baxter 1996). The lacustrine-adfluvial
form spawns in tributary stream reaches but lives in lakes as an adult. In any given watershed
where bull trout are found, groups of distinct, overlapping life history patterns may exist within a
bull trout population (Watry and Scarnecchia 2008). Bull trout require a complex array of habitats
to survive, particularly in the winter (Jakober et al. 1998). Researchers have found that bull trout
will use various depths of lakes to feed on prey, as long as the water temperatures that they feed
in do not exceed 15°C (McPhail and Baxter 1996). In lakes, bull trout have been found to feed at
depths less than 6.5 feet (Weigel et al. 2017), as well as at depths greater than 60 feet (Maret
and Schultz 2013; McPhail and Baxter 1996).
Typically, bull trout migrate upstream to spawn before returning to a larger body of water to
overwinter (Watry and Scarnecchia 2008). However, there are documented cases of bull trout
migrating downstream to access a preferred tributary before migrating back upstream to
overwinter in a lake (Hogen and Scarnecchia 2006). Bull trout have been shown to move more
frequently when bodies of water experience frequent periods of freezing and thawing in winter
(Jakober et al. 1998). Bull trout overwinter in deep or covered pools or lakes (McPhail and Baxter
1996; Rieman and McIntyre 1993). Incubating bull trout need to be in a substrate that prohibits
freezing, while juvenile and adult bull trout need to be in a body of water with a consistent water
temperature and cover to allow for minimal amounts of movement (McPhail and Baxter 1996;
Rieman and McIntyre 1993).
Section 7 of this document provides a more detailed review of bull trout use of lake habitat
throughout the region.

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 3

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
BULL TROUT USE OF LAKE HABITAT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

BULL TROUT USE OF YPP LAKE

The YPP lake is roughly 2 hectares (approximately 5 acres) in size, with steep unnatural
shorelines that were created by previous mining activity (Brown and Caldwell 2019a; Hogen and
Scarnecchia 2006). In 1999, the YPP lake had a maximum depth of 45 feet, with most of the lake
being deeper than 19.6 feet (Hogen and Scarnecchia 2006). Brown and Caldwell (2019a)
reported the lake as averaging about 30 feet in depth. The UEFSFSR flows into the YPP lake
along a long, steep riffle/cascade, with approximately a 30 percent gradient (Brown and Caldwell
2019a). The riffle/cascade located on the southwest end of the YPP lake prevents upstream fish
passage. The YPP lake supports the adfluvial and fluvial life history patterns of bull trout (Burns
et al. 2005; Hogen and Scarnecchia 2006; Brown and Caldwell 2019a). The results of the 2018
Brown and Caldwell (2019a) YPP fish sampling survey, pertaining to bull trout specifically, are
summarized in the next subsection.
Burns et al. (2005) noted in their review of existing bull trout populations within the Payette
National Forest that all bull trout life history strategies exist within the SFSR watershed. The
authors concluded that the watershed’s overall habitat connectivity and availability of suitable
spawning habitat contribute to its consideration as having high bull trout population viability. In
addition, Meyer et al. (2014) found that the SFSR watershed had a positive intrinsic rate of
change, meaning that the bull trout population in the SFSR watershed was increasing in 2014.
Hogen and Scarnecchia (2006) investigated the spatial and temporal movement patterns of 62
bull trout by capturing the fish in the Upper EFSFSR, implanting them with radio tags, and then
tracking them over 2 years. All of the bull trout in their study were migratory. The majority of the
radio-tagged fish overwintered in the larger rivers downstream of the EFSFSR. A minority of radio-
tagged bull trout overwintered in the YPP lake—specifically, 8.1 percent. The bull trout that
overwintered in the YPP lake displayed an adfluvial life history in which they migrated quickly
downstream from the YPP lake in June, entered a small tributary, spawned in the fall, and then
returned upriver to the YPP lake to overwinter. The authors of the study also noted that they
observed all of the bull trout in their study using large deep pools and runs and avoiding shallow
riffles in the winter.

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 4

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
BULL TROUT USE OF LAKE HABITAT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

BROWN AND CALDWELL 2018 YPP LAKE FISH SAMPLING

SURVEY SUMMARY 2

4.1 SAMPLING OVERVIEW

In May, July, and September of 2018, Brown and Caldwell conducted fish sampling surveys at
the YPP lake (Brown and Caldwell 2019a). The purpose of the fish sampling surveys, done in
three separate 2-day sampling events, was to collect, count, and tag fish in the YPP lake to allow
for population estimates to be made for the salmonid and char species found to be present. Brown
and Caldwell also sought to monitor the movement patterns of collected salmonid and char
species. Flows into and out of the YPP lake were high in May and remained high into the July
sampling event; by the September sampling event, flows had subsided, but there was still flow
through the lake (Brown and Caldwell 2019a). Large algae masses were noted to exist in the
bottom of the YPP lake during the July 2018 sampling event (Brown and Caldwell 2019a).
A total of 103 bull trout, 50 westslope cutthroat trout, 52 juvenile Chinook salmon, 5 rainbow trout,
and several hundred whitefish were captured using seine nets and hook-and-line angling methods
(Brown and Caldwell 2019a). Brown and Caldwell (2019a) determined that they were able to
successfully seine 1.5 percent or 2,340 cubic yards of the YPP lake; however, the authors noted
that large portions of the lake were unable to be seined because of steep shorelines. Hook and
line angling was used as an ancillary means of fish surveying in the study.

4.2 BULL TROUT SIZE DISTRIBUTION

A total of 75 bull trout were measured for their total length and weight between all three sampling
events in the 2018 Brown and Caldwell YPP lake fish sampling survey. The mean fork length of
the bull trout collected was 317 millimeters (mm). The weight of bull trout collected ranged from
less than 100 grams to over 3,000 grams, with the majority of weights falling between 1,000 and
100 grams. Brown and Caldwell noted that bull trout less than 300–450 mm (fork length) have
been classified as sub-adult. Three individual bull trout were collected that exceeded 575 mm in
fork length. The largest bull trout (>600 mm fork length) measured in the survey were captured
during the July sampling event. Brown and Caldwell (2019a) hypothesized that those fish were
migratory, fluvial bull trout that move into and out of the YPP lake during the summer. Bull trout
with a fork length greater than 600 mm were not collected during the May or September sampling
events. The mean fork length of bull trout across all sampling events was 317 mm. These data
indicate that juvenile, sub-adult, and adult fish all use the YPP lake.

4.3 BULL TROUT MOVEMENT PATTERNS

Based on population estimate modeling, Brown and Caldwell (2019a) determined that between
25 and 69 bull trout resided in the YPP lake. Brown and Caldwell (2019a) specifically used the
Chapman modification of the Lincoln-Petersen method to estimate the population of bull trout in
the YPP lake for each month’s sample. The May 2018 sampling event was the lowest population
estimate, at 25 individual adult fish, with a confidence interval of +/- 14 adult fish. The July 2018
sampling event resulted in the highest population estimate, at 69 individual adult fish, with a
confidence interval of +/- 71 adult fish. The September 2018 sampling resulted in a population
estimate of 40 adult fish, with a confidence interval of +/- 18 adult fish. Of the 103 total bull trout
collected in the fish sampling survey, Brown and Caldwell (2019a) determined that 39 individuals

2
This summary does not include the 2019 survey results. The section will be updated at a later time to show the additional data.

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 5

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
BULL TROUT USE OF LAKE HABITAT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

never left the YPP lake, 12 individuals left the YPP lake downstream and did not return, and 24
individuals left YPP lake downstream and then returned upstream to the YPP lake (Brown and
Caldwell 2019a). Bull trout exited the YPP lake and then returned from July through November
2018; 65 percent of bull trout movement upstream back to the YPP lake occurred in September
(Brown and Caldwell 2019a). In a similar survey of bull trout movement patterns within the
EFSFSR watershed, Hogen and Scarnecchia (2006) tracked one bull trout that left the YPP lake
in June and returned in mid-October.

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 6

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
BULL TROUT USE OF LAKE HABITAT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

BASELINE BULL TROUT HABITAT CONDITIONS AT YPP LAKE

The presence of a stream outlet to the YPP lake is a critical aspect of bull trout presence; their
adfluvial life history form is dependent on being able to migrate downstream to spawning areas in
small stream reaches before returning upstream to forage and overwinter in the YPP lake in the
fall. In addition, relatively cool water temperatures and documented ample prey availability
contribute to the bull trout’s use of the YPP lake. The baseflow discharge at the outlet of the YPP
in the late summer and fall period is approximately 12 cubic feet per second (cfs), and fish are
thought to be able to pass in and out of the lake at the outlet.

5.1 YPP LAKE TEMPERATURE PROFILE

In the 2018 Brown and Caldwell fish sampling survey of YPP Lake, water temperatures collected
during the daylight hours ranged from 5.8°C to 5.9°C in May, 11.4°C to 13°C in July , and 6.3°C
to 7.8°C in September (Brown and Caldwell 2019a). In 2019, Brown and Caldwell released a pit
lake network temperature proposed action report that describes thermal conditions in the vicinity
of the YPP lake. Under a “no action” scenario that replicates existing daily average summer
temperatures at the YPP lake, Brown and Caldwell determined that the stream reach immediately
upstream of the YPP lake was predicted to reach 13°C (Brown and Caldwell 2019b). Under the
same “no action” scenario for the stream reach immediately downstream of the YPP lake, Brown
and Caldwell determined that the daily average summer temperature was modelled to be between
13°C and 14°C (Brown and Caldwell 2019b). In comparison to the recorded YPP lake
temperatures during May, July, and September and the WCI temperature standards for bull trout
(Forest Service 2003), the YPP lake is functioning appropriately for adult migratory bull trout, adult
spawning bull trout in May and September, and rearing bull trout in May and September (Table 1).
The YPP lake is not functioning appropriately for the incubation life stage of bull trout across all
3 months, though there are no data that indicate bull trout are spawning in the YPP lake (Table 1).
The YPP lake is therefore likely not used by bull trout for spawning or egg incubation. However,
based on the 2018 Brown and Caldwell fish sampling survey, it is apparent that rearing bull trout
extensively use the lake, as the mean size of bull trout caught in the survey was classified as sub-
adult, with a mean fork length of 317 mm (Brown and Caldwell 2019a; Muhlfeld and Marotz 2005;
Ringel et al. 2014).

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 7

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
BULL TROUT USE OF LAKE HABITAT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

ASSESSMENT OF CHANGES IN LAKE HABITAT FOR BULL

TROUT UNDER EACH ALTERNATIVE

6.1 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED MINE ACTIONS AS THEY RELATE TO BULL TROUT

HABITAT
Based on Project documentation, the proposed action and alternatives would affect the amount
of lake habitat available to bull trout in the SFSR watershed. Under all the proposed action
alternatives, the existing bull trout habitat in the YPP lake would be lost, as the pit would be filled
in and the EFSFSR stream re-created. Under all alternatives, bull trout would have a temporal
loss of all lake habitat within the mine site for approximately 20 years, from mine year 1, when the
diversion through the EFSFSR tunnel begins, to mine year 20, when the Hangar Flats pit lake
would become accessible (this is an estimate of when the Hangar Flats pit would be filled). The
year at which the Hangar Flats pit would be filled is dependent on precipitation, temperature, etc.
and not precisely predicable. Under alternatives 1, 3, and 4, after 20 years of no available lake
habitat, lake habitat would be accessible for at least part of the year at the Hangar Flats pit, but
with physical, temperature, and forage conditions that would be different than at the YPP lake.
Under Alternative 2, Meadow Creek would not be routed through the Hangar Flats pit lake;
therefore, connected habitat would not be provided for bull trout. In alternatives 1, 3, and 4, the
depth of the Hangar Flats pit lake would be over 590 feet. At depths greater than 32 feet, the
temperature profile of the Hangar Flats pit lake in all alternatives would be cold enough to support
bull trout year-round, post-mine closure. The Hangar Flats Pit lake would be larger than the YPP
lake in surface area; as the YPP is about 5 acres, while Hangar Flats would be about 67.8 acres
of open water (Midas Gold 2017).

6.2 PROPOSED ACTION (ALTERNATIVE 1)

Three open pits would be created—YPP, Hangar Flats pit, and West End pit. Hangar Flats would
be the only pit that would provide habitat for bull trout and provide connectivity to the EFSF
watershed. The YPP would be mined and then filled in. The EFSFSR would be routed around the
YPP in a tunnel during operations, with design for fish passage. During approximately the first
20 years of mine operation, a constructed channel around the Hangar Flats pit, with
enhancements for aquatic species and access to floodplains, would be available for use; however,
there would be no lake habitat within the mine site. The Hangar Flats channel would be lined with
a geosynthetic material to prevent loss of flow. The channel would be sinuous, with enhancements
for aquatic species and to create floodplains (Rio ASE 2018). Following pit closure and filling
(approximately 20 years after the filling of YPP), Meadow Creek would be routed through the
Hangar Flats pit. Under the final configuration at post-closure, Meadow Creek would flow into the
Hangar Flats pit lake, and the lake would discharge into lower Meadow Creek. Post-mine closure,
the EFSFSR channel would be re-established in a surface channel and routed through the filled
YPP.
Under this proposed action alternative, bull trout would not have access to the YPP lake habitat
at mine year 2. Based on filling estimates, bull trout would have access to the Hangar Flats pit
lake between mine years 17 or 18, when the pit fills (dependent on precipitation) (Midas Gold,
2017). Therefore, lake habitat would not be available for approximately a 20-year period, and bull
trout would need to seek other habitats for overwintering and holding needs. Once filled, the
Hangar Flats pit lake would provide lake habitat for bull trout. However, due to the size, depth,

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 8

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
BULL TROUT USE OF LAKE HABITAT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

temperature regime, and food resource differences between Hangar Flats and the YPP, the
function of the lake as bull trout habitat would differ from that of the YPP lake.
The Hangar Flats pit lake is projected to be much deeper than the YPP lake; Hangar Flats would
be as deep as 600 feet, while the YPP lake is around 45 feet deep. Based on temperature
modeling of pit lakes for the proposed action (Brown and Caldwell 2019b), the mean maximum
weekly summer temperature in the Hangar Flats pit lake post-mine closure would be 16.9°C
(Brown and Caldwell 2019b), which is higher than the USFWS and Forest Service WCI threshold.
The mean maximum weekly fall temperature in the Hangar Flats pit lake post-mine closure would
be 13.2°C. In post-closure mine years 2050-2053, at depths deeper than 32.8 feet, the
temperature profile at all times of the year in the Hangar Flats pit lake would hover around 4°C
(Brown and Caldwell 2019b). Therefore, at depths greater than 32.8 feet, the simulated
temperature profile of the Hangar Flats pit lake is projected to be suitable for bull trout.
Temperatures within the top 32.8 feet of the lake would be warmer than below 32.8 feet. Modeled
temperatures at the outflow location are predicted to be between 7.8°C and 21.9°C (mean of
16.9°C) during the summer period and between 6.4°C and 18.7°C (mean of 13.2°C) during the
fall modeling timeframe. These model results indicate that surface temperatures in the Hangar
Flat pit lake would exceed the temperature guidelines for bull trout during both periods, but also
would be below the guidelines at times during both periods as well. Diurnal and weekly variations
in temperature and flow are likely to vary inside and outside of the bull trout temperature guidelines
during both summer and fall modeled periods.
Post-closure discharges from the Hangar Flats pit lake would be between 0 and 1.9 cfs (mean
0.12 cfs) during the summer modeling period and between 0 cfs and 0.84 cfs (mean 0.13 cfs)
during the fall period (Brown and Caldwell 2019b).
The flow discharge magnitudes also would intermittently restrict migration into and out of the
Hanger Flats pit lake, unlike the YPP lake, as the EFSFSR has a higher discharge throughout the
year. Research on bull trout use of YPP indicates that they are highly migratory and move in and
out of the YPP during the summer and fall periods. If temperatures and flow rates restrict this
movement, the utilization of the Hangar Flats pit lake by adfluvial bull trout may be limited.
Adult bull trout are highly piscivorous, and the availability of suitable prey species affects the
quality of lake habitat to large adult bull trout. The YPP was found to have a large population of
whitefish (Brown and Caldwell 2019a), which are a likely prey fish for larger adult bull trout. Given
that 39 of 103 bull trout collected in the Brown and Caldwell survey in 2018 never left the YPP
lake, it could be assumed that there is enough of a food supply (whitefish, cutthroat trout, juvenile
chinook, and invertebrates) to support bull trout of various sizes in the YPP lake. Based on the
results of Occupancy Modeling (Ecosystem Sciences 2019a), there would be 6.21 miles of
available fish habitat upstream of the Hangar Flats pit lake for prey species of bull trout to reside
in. Some of these fish would presumably move down the face of the Tailings Storage Facility
(TSF) either voluntarily or involuntarily. The amount of habitat that would become available in this
proposed action compares to 24.53 miles of available fish habitat currently available to bull trout
prey species upstream of the YPP lake (Ecosystem Sciences 2019b). The amount of habitat
upstream of the two lakes is relevant, as it would affect the number of available potential prey
species available to adult bull trout.

6.3 MODIFIED PROPOSED ACTION (ALTERNATIVE 2)

Under Alternative 2, the Hangar Flats pit lake water depth would be reduced from 600 feet in
Alternative 1 to approximately 140 feet due to the filling of the pit with development rock (Brown

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 9

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
BULL TROUT USE OF LAKE HABITAT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

and Caldwell 2019c). Meadow Creek would not be routed through the Hangar Flats pit lake;
instead, the interim channel around the Hangar Flats pit would be retained as a reclaimed main
channel. Therefore, there would be no connection between Meadow Creek and the Hangar Flats
pit lake except as occasional outflow from the lake through a channel that would reconnect with
lower Meadow Creek downstream of the lake. To accelerate filling of the pit, at combined flows
above 5 cfs between Meadow Creek and Blowout Creek, water would be diverted to Hangar Flats
pit. It is assumed that there would be a fish exclusion diversion to eliminate fish from being
entrained.
The surface area of the Hangar Flats pit lake would be similar to Alternative 1, but the outflow and
temperature would vary under Alternative 2. The mean August discharge from the Hangar Flats
pit lake to Meadow Creek would be 1.09 cfs with an average daily temperature of 19.6°C, and
maximum weekly summer flow would be only slightly higher at 1.16 cfs at 21.1°C. A maximum
weekly fall flow would be 1.06 cfs at 14.2°C (Brown and Caldwell 2019c). Because the pit would
not be connected to Meadow Creek, except at the outlet, it is unclear if bull trout would move into
and out of the lake. Based on the flows described for Alternative 1, it is unlikely that there would
be sufficient flows to connect the pit lake to Meadow Creek and provide for passage of bull trout
for most of the year.

6.4 ALTERNATIVE 3
Alternative 3 would have very similar conditions for bull trout access to lakes as Alternative 1. The
movement of the TSF/Development Rock Storage Facility (DRSF) as the water balance of the
pits is primarily determined by the location of the pits and the dewatering activities, therefore the
relocation of the DRSF/TSF does not affect these factors (Brown and Caldwell 2019d). According
to the EFSFSR TSF/DRSF Modeling and Analysis Report (Brown and Caldwell 2019d), for the
summer period, the warmest 7-day period in each of the 92 model years was identified, and the
median temperature (19.3°C) was used for the discharge to lower Meadow Creek. For the fall
period, the median temperature of the first week of fall for each of the 92 model years (11.8°C)
was applied. The analysis of the impact on bull trout use of the Hangar Flats pit lake therefore
applies to Alternative 3. Based on the results of Occupancy Modeling (Ecosystem Sciences
2019c), there would be 5.95 miles of available fish habitat upstream of the Hangar Flats pit lake
for prey species of bull trout to reside in.

6.5 ALTERNATIVE 4
The changes associated with Alternative 4 would be similar to Alternatives 1 and 3.

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 10

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
BULL TROUT USE OF LAKE HABITAT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Table 2: Comparison of Habitat Conditions for Bull Trout at YPP Lake and Hangar Flats Pit Lake

Lake YPP Lake Hangar Flats Pit Lake

Habitat Conditions Proposed Actions and Alternatives

5.8 to Summer 16.9°C (mean max)
Spring1 Proposed Action (Alternative 1)2
5.9°C Fall 13.2°C (mean max)
11.4 to Summer 21.1°C (mean max) Modified Proposed Action
Summer1
Water 13°C Fall 14.2°C (mean max) (Alternative 2)3
Temperatu 19.3°C (median
Summer
re max)
6.3 to Alternative 34
Fall1 11.8°C (median
7.8°C Fall
max)
Assumed same as Alt 1 Alternative 4
67.8 acres5 Proposed Action (Alternative 1)
67.8 acres5 Modified Proposed Action
Surface
5 acres1 (Alternative 2)
Area
67.8 acres5 Alternative 3
67.8 acres5 Alternative 4
590 feet5 Proposed Action (Alternative 1)
Modified Proposed Action
Maximum 140 feet3
45 feet (Alternative 2)
Depth
590 feet5 Alternative 3
590 feet5 Alternative 4
6.21 miles7 Proposed Action (Alternative 1)
Upstream
Modified Proposed Action
Available 0 miles
24.53 miles6 (Alternative 2)
Fish
5.95 miles8 Alternative 3
Habitat
Same as Alt 1 Alternative 4
Periodic stream connectivity
for both inflow and outflow
(discharge estimates of 0-1.9 Proposed Action (Alternative 1)
cfs in summer and 0 and 0.84
cfs in fall)2
Connected at the outlet Periodic stream connectivity
Connectivi to EFSFSR year-round for outflow (max. discharge of Modified Proposed Action
ty to (late summer- fall base approx. 1 cfs in summer and (Alternative 2)
Streams flow +/- 12 cfs); no fall), no inflow connectivity3,9
upstream fish passage Periodic stream connectivity
for both inflow and outflow; Alternative 3
assumed similar to Alt 14
Periodic stream connectivity
for both inflow and outflow Alternative 4
(assumed)
Notes:
1
Brown and Caldwell 2019a
2
Brown and Caldwell 2019b
3
Brown and Caldwell 2019c
4
Brown and Caldwell 2019d
5
Midas Gold 2017
6
Ecosystem Sciences 2019b
7
Ecosystem Sciences 2019a
8
Ecosystem Sciences 2019c
9
The exact details of stream connectivity to Meadow Creek proposed in Alternative 2 are unclear.

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 11

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
BULL TROUT USE OF LAKE HABITAT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

BULL TROUT USE OF OTHER LAKES

7.1 LOON LAKE IN THE SECESH RIVER SUBWATERSHED

Another documented population of bull trout exhibiting the adfluvial life history form within the
SFSR watershed is known to occur at Loon Lake in the Secesh River subwatershed. Loon Lake
is an approximately 60-hectare lake located 1.86 miles upstream of the confluence of Loon Creek
and the Secesh River. In their study of bull trout within the Secesh River, Watry and Scarnecchia
(2008) described Loon Lake as providing sufficient habitat for the adfluvial life history form of bull
trout to persist in the subwatershed. The majority of bull trout in the study exhibited
nonconsecutive-year migrations. Of the 71 radio-tagged bull trout, 7 made consecutive year
migrations into the lake; in addition, six migrant bull trout exhibited consecutive year site fidelity
to overwinter in the lake. The most common migration pattern observed was migratory adfluvial.
Results of the study demonstrate that Loon Lake is a major contributor to the adfluvial and fluvial
life histories of bull trout in the Secesh River. The authors also note that bull trout in the Secesh
River have evolved with a persistent kokanee population in Loon Lake, which has provided a
reliable food source from which to base exploratory migrations.
While the adfluvial life history pattern of bull trout was a major component of the stock found in
the Secesh River subwatershed, it was a minor component of the bull trout stock found in the
EFSFSR subwatershed, even though both stocks overlap in their respective migration routes
along the lower SFSR (Hogen and Scarnecchia 2006; Watry and Scarnecchia 2008). The former
point denotes the significance of Loon Lake as a continued stronghold for bull trout habitat in the
Secesh River subwatershed, while the latter point indicates the resiliency of SFSR bull trout in
adapting to changing environmental conditions and using appropriate resources as they become
available—in this case, the creation of a new lake at the YPP.

7.2 REGIONAL EXAMPLES

Bull trout are known to inhabit lakes throughout their range in the Rocky Mountains. This section
describes nine studies of bull trout utilizing lakes within the region as support for the possible use
of the Hangar Flats pit lake by bull trout.
Downs et al. (2006) studied the migration patterns of an adfluvial bull trout population in Trestle
Creek, a tributary to Lake Pend Oreille in northern Idaho. Emigration of juveniles occurred in two
pulses, one in spring that was associated with snowmelt runoff and increasing water temperatures
and a second in fall as stream temperatures dropped and fall rains began (Downs et al. 2006).
Also, based on the results of their study, Downs et al. (2006) concluded that age-0 bull trout do
not appear to survive well in lake environments, as no age-0 bull trout were detected returning to
spawn in Trestle Creek during their multi-year study.
Barnett and Paige (2013) studied an adfluvial bull trout population in Chester Morse Lake,
Washington, a fairly large reservoir, between 2006 and 2011. Approximately 96 percent of the
bull trout made multiple trips between the lake and the upstream river during the spawning season
(Barnett and Paige 2013). Bull trout also were found to be eating in both the littoral zone (near
shore) and in deep water of the lake (Barnett and Paige 2013).
Fraley and Shephard (1989) studied adfluvial-lacustrine and fluvial bull trout in the Flathead Lake
and River system in Montana. The diet of these bull trout consisted almost entirely of fish and
included whitefish, kokanee, and nongame fish species as primary components (Fraley and

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 12

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
BULL TROUT USE OF LAKE HABITAT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Shephard 1989).In addition, the authors found that subadult bull trout used pools more frequently
than runs, riffles, or pocket water (Fraley and Shephard 1989).
Tennant et al. (2016) investigated a lacustrine-adfluvial bull trout population in the Quartz Lake
Drainage, near Glacier National Park, Montana. Bull trout in this drainage were shown to exhibit
short distance spawning migrations (Tennant et al. 2016). Bull trout were shown to spawn in
smaller tributaries during the fall in places with low stream velocity, mild (5-9 degree Celsius)
temperatures, and abundant gravel and cobble substrates (Tennant et al. 2016). Young bull trout
presence in the smaller tributaries was positively correlated with slow water and habitat unit and
negatively correlated with stream gradient and coarse substrate (Tennant et al. 2016).
Weigel et al. (2017) studied a bull trout population in Deadwood Reservoir, Idaho. The authors
found that bull trout typically utilized relatively shallow reservoir habitat (≤6.6 feet depth), and also
that their diet consisted mainly of cottus and cyprinid fishes, despite the presence of numerous
salmonid prey species present in the reservoir (Weigel et al. 2017). In general, bull trout utilized
Deadwood Reservoir longer when reservoir surface elevations were higher and water
temperatures were cooler (Weigel et al. 2017).
Maret and Schultz (2013) studied bull trout found in Arrowrock Reservoir in Idaho to determine
summertime movement and habitat use within the reservoir. The water surface temperature at
each fish detection location ranged from 6.0 to 16.2°C (Maret and Schultz 2013). Bull trout were
primarily detected in deep-water habitat, at an average depth of 59.4 feet (Maret and Schultz
2013). The last bull trout was detected in early June, suggesting that fish used little, if any,
summertime habitat within the reservoir (Maret and Schultz 2013). The authors noted that thermal
refuge during this study appeared to be limited based on scarcity of water that was 15°C and
cooler (Maret and Schultz 2013).
In another study of the bull trout population in and around Arrowrock Reservoir, Monnot et al.
(2008) found that the rate of migration of bull trout (large and small) was slowed by greater stream
discharge; the authors also determined that large bull trout were more likely than small bull trout
to migrate rapidly downstream to Arrowrock Reservoir.
Schiff et al. (2005) studied a bull trout population found in the North Fork of the Clearwater River
basin, mainly in Dworshak Reservoir, Idaho, over a period of 5 years. Most tagged adult bull trout
migrated out of the reservoir during May and June en route to the upper North Fork or Little North
Fork Clearwater Rivers or associated tributaries to spawn (Schiff et al. 2005). Mean upstream
migration distance, from tagging location, was 41.9 miles, with the farthest being 147.4 miles
(Schiff et al. 2005). Diet samples collected from bull trout during the spring and fall indicated that
bull trout switched their prey from rainbow trout, whitefish, and fish eggs during the spring to
kokanee during the fall (Schiff et al. 2005). The authors of the study found that the majority of
radio-tagged bull trout returned to the reservoir after spawning in the fall to overwinter in the
reservoir. The average distance that bull trout traveled within Dworshak Reservoir was 35.2 miles.

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 13

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
BULL TROUT USE OF LAKE HABITAT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Bull trout currently use the YPP, an artificial lake that is a legacy of past mining activities at the
mine site. Recent investigations indicate that adfluvial bull trout overwinter in the YPP lake and
migrate downstream to spawn in smaller tributaries (Hogen and Scarnecchia 2006). They
generally leave the lake in June and return after spawning in the fall to overwinter in the lake.
However, bull trout likely use the lake year-round, as they have been documented in the lake in
May, July, and September (Brown and Caldwell 2019a). The approximately 5-acre YPP has year-
round passage into and out of the lake at the outlet, but upstream passage is blocked by a
riffle/cascade that is a presumed fish barrier. Fish from upstream of the lake are presumed to
pass the cascade and enter the lake as potential prey fish for the highly piscivorous adult bull
trout in the lake. A population of whitefish presumably provides additional food base for larger bull
trout. The lake averages about 30 feet in depth and maintains temperatures that are functioning
appropriately based on Forest Service standards for most life stages, with the exception of
spawning and incubation, which are bull trout life stages that do not appear to occur in the lake.
The proposed action and all the alternatives would involve the filling of YPP and the permanent
loss of its habitat. The proposed project would create a new lake at Hangar Flats pit, which would
be filled with water approximately 20 years following the loss of YPP habitat. In alternatives 1,3
and 4, Meadow Creek and the East Fork of Meadow Creek would be routed through the Hangar
Flats pit lake. The Hangar Flats pit lake would be larger than the YPP, with a surface area of
67.8 acres and a depth of 590 feet. The size of the lake in comparison to the flow of Meadow
Creek is predicted to result in warmer surface temperatures and a stratification of the lake’s
temperature profile in the summer months. The result would be warmer temperatures in the
summer and fall at the outlet than current temperatures at the YPP outlet. Due to the seasonally
low discharges out of the Hangar Flats pit lake, fish passage into and out the lake would likely be
periodic during the low-flow seasons. Upstream of the lake, bull trout would have a short reach
below the TSF/DRSF that could be accessed, but the TSF face would be a barrier to upstream
movement. the Hangar Flats pit lake would have less available fish habitat upstream of it than the
current YPP, influencing the number of fish that could potentially move into the lake from
upstream. The mountain whitefish food base in YPP may not exist in the Hangar Flats pit lake,
based on whitefish life history. Under Alternative 2, Meadow Creek would only be connected to
the Hangar Flats pit lake during high-water events or high-flow periods. Under this alternative, the
lake would be the most isolated.

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 14

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
BULL TROUT USE OF LAKE HABITAT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

LITERATURE CITED
Barnett, H. K., and Paige, D. K. (2013). Movements by adfluvial bull trout during the spawning
season between lake and river habitats. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society,
142(3): 876-883.
Brown and Caldwell. (2019a). 2018 Yellow Pine Pit Lake Fish Sampling Summary Report.
Prepared for Midas Gold, Inc. (March 2019).
Brown and Caldwell. (2019b). Revised Draft Stibnite Gold Project Stream and Pit Lake Network
Temperature Model Proposed Action Report. Prepared for Midas Gold, Inc. (January
2019).
Brown and Caldwell. (2019c). Stibnite Gold Project Modified PRO Alternative Modeling Report.
Prepared for Midas Gold, Inc. (June 2019).
Brown and Caldwell. (2019d). East Fork South Fork Salmon River TSF/DRSF Alternative
Modeling Report. Prepared for Midas Gold, Inc. (May 2019).
Burns, D. C., Faurot, M., Hogen, D., McGee, M., Nelson, R., Olson, D., Wagoner, L., and Zurstadt,
C. (2005). Bull Trout Populations on the Payette National Forest. Unpublished report
EF.15.0043. McCall, ID: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Payette National
Forest. 97 p.
Downs, C. C., Horan, D., Morgan-Harris, E., and Jakubowski, R. (2006). Spawning demographics
and juvenile dispersal of an adfluvial bull trout population in Trestle Creek, Idaho. North
American Journal of Fisheries Management, 26(1): 190-200.
Ecosystem Sciences. (2019a). Habitat Occupancy Model: Westslope Cutthroat Trout and Bull
Trout. Proposed Action (Alternative I). Technical memorandum Stibnite Gold EIS, Idaho.
Ecosystem Sciences. (2019b). Habitat Occupancy Model: Westslope Cutthroat Trout and Bull
Trout. Existing Conditions. Technical memorandum, Stibnite Gold EIS, Idaho.
Ecosystem Sciences. (2019c). Habitat Occupancy Model: Westslope Cutthroat Trout and Bull
Trout. Modified Proposed Action (Alternative II) and Alternative III. Technical
memorandum, Stibnite Gold EIS, Idaho.
Fraley, J. J., and Shepard, B. B. (1989). Life history, ecology and population status of migratory
bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) in the Flathead Lake and River system. Northwest
Science, 63(4).
Hogen, D. M., and Scarnecchia, D. L. (2006). Distinct Fluvial and Adfluvial Migration Patterns of
a Relict Charr, Salvelinus confluentus, Stock in a Mountainous Watershed, Idaho, USA.
Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 15: 376–387.
Isaak, D. J., Young, M. K., Nagel, D. E., Horan, D. L., and Groce, M. C. (2015). The cold‐water
climate shield: delineating refugia for preserving salmonid fishes through the 21st century.
Global Change Biology, 21(7): 2540-2553.
Jakober, M. J., McMahon, T. E., Thurow, R. F., and Clancy, C. G. (1998). Role of stream ice on
fall and winter movements and habitat use by bull trout and cutthroat trout in Montana
headwater streams. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society, 127(2): 223-235.
MWH, Inc. (MWH). (2017). Aquatic Resources 2016 Baseline Study. Stibnite Gold Project,
Midas Gold Idaho, Inc. April 2017.

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 15

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
BULL TROUT USE OF LAKE HABITAT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Maret, T. R., and Schultz, J.E. (2013). Bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) movement in relation to
water temperature, season, and habitat features in Arrowrock Reservoir, Idaho, 2012: U.S.
Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report, 2013–5158, 28 pp.
McPhail, J. D., and Baxter, J. S. (1996). A review of bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) life-history
and habitat use in relation to compensation and improvement opportunities. Ministry of
Environment, Lands and Parks, Fisheries Management Report, 104, 35 pp.
Midas Gold, Inc. (2017). Plan of Restoration and Operations (September 2017).
Midas Gold, Inc. (2019). 2018 eDNA Results for the Burntlog Road Access Sites, 2017
Resampled Sites, and 2018 Tailings Storage Facility Site Locations.
Meyer, K., E. O. Garton, and D. J. Schill. (2014). Bull trout trends in abundance and probabilities
of persistence in Idaho. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 35: 202–214.
Monnot, L., Dunham, J. B., Hoem, T., and Koetsier, P. (2008). Influences of body size and
environmental factors on autumn downstream migration of bull trout in the Boise River,
Idaho. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 28(1): 231-240.
Muhlfeld, C. C., and Marotz, B. 2005, Seasonal movement and habitat use by subadult bull trout
in the Upper Flathead River system, Montana, North American Journal of Fisheries
Management, 25(3): 797-810.
Rieman, B. E., and Mclntyre, J. D. (1993). Demographic and habitat requirements for
conservation of bull trout. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-302. Ogden, UT: US Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, 38: 302.
Ringel, B. M. K., Neibauer, J., Fulmer, K., and Nelson, M. C. (2014). Migration patterns of adult
bull trout in the Wenatchee River, Washington 2000-2004, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Leavenworth, Washington, 81 pp with separate appendices.
Rio Ase, 2018. Stream Design Report. Stibnite Gold Project. Submitted to Midas Gold Idaho, Inc.
dated September, 2018. 480 pp.
Schiff, D., Schriever, E., and Peterson, J. (2005). Bull trout life history investigations in the North
Fork Clearwater River basin. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Annual Report. Idaho
Department of Fish and Game, 05: 17 (April 2005).
Tennant, L. B., Gresswell, R. E., Guy, C. S., and Meeuwig, M. H. (2016). Spawning and rearing
behavior of bull trout in a headwater lake ecosystem. Environmental Biology of Fishes,
99(1): 117-131.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). (2003). EPA Region 10 guidance for Pacific
Northwest state and tribal temperature water quality standards. EPA 910-B-03-002.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). (2010). Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants;
Revised Designation of Critical Habitat for Bull Trout in the Coterminous United States
Final Rule. Federal Register, 75:200 (18 October 2010): 63898-64070.
U.S. Forest Service (Forest Service). (2003). Appendix B–Watershed Indicators and Pathways in
the Payette National Forest. Amended 2010. U.S. Forest Service, Boise, Idaho.
Watry, C. B., and Scarnecchia, D. L. (2008). Adfluvial and fluvial life history variations and
migratory patterns of a relict charr, Salvelinus confluentus, stock in west‐central Idaho,
USA. Ecology of Freshwater Fish, 17(2): 231-243

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 16

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
BULL TROUT USE OF LAKE HABITAT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

Weigel, D. E., Vilhena, L. C., Woods, P., Tonina, D., Tranmer, A., Benjankar, R.,Marti, C. L., and
Goodwin, P. (2017). Aquatic habitat response to climate-driven hydrologic regimes and
water operations in a montane reservoir in the Pacific Northwest, USA. Aquatic Sciences,
79(4): 953-966.

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 17

STIBNITE GOLD PROJECT
BULL TROUT USE OF LAKE HABITAT TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM

This page intentionally left blank

NOVEMBER 2019 PAGE | 18

Appendix J-10: Fish Relative Species
Abundance and Density
This page intentionally left blank.
APPENDIX J-10 FISH RELATIVE SPECIES ABUNDANCE AND DENSITY

Table of Contents
J.10 Fish Relative Species Abundance and Density ............................................J-10-1
J.10.1 Methodology ..................................................................................J-10-2
J.10.1.1 Snorkel Surveys .......................................................... J-10-2
J.10.1.2 Mark-Recapture .......................................................... J-10-2
J.10.2 Results ..........................................................................................J-10-3
J.10.2.1 Snorkeling Comparison to Mark-Recapture in 2015 .... J-10-3
J.10.3 Fish Relative Species Abundance and Composition, 2012-2015 ...J-10-6
J.10.4 Fish Density, 2012-2015 ................................................................J-10-9
J.10.4.1 Stream Estimates ........................................................ J-10-9
J.10.4.2 Yellow Pine Pit Estimates .......................................... J-10-10
Literature Cited ......................................................................................................J-10-15

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-10-i

APPENDIX J-10 FISH RELATIVE SPECIES ABUNDANCE AND DENSITY

Tables
Table J.10-1 Salmonid Density Estimates by Location for the Mine Site Subwatersheds
for July 21-25, 2015 as Measured by Snorkel Surveys ............................... J-10-3
Table J.10-2 Total Fish Abundance and Density Estimates by Site for 2015 based on
Mark-Recapture Abundance Estimates ....................................................... J-10-4
Table J.10-3 Salmonid Abundance Estimates by Sampling Technique and Site.............. J-10-6
Table J.10-4 Adjusted Salmonid Species Relative Abundance and Percentage
Composition at Snorkel Survey Sites within and Adjacent to the Mine Site
Subwatersheds from 2012 to 2015 ............................................................. J-10-7
Table J.10-5 Adjusted Salmonid Species Areal and Linear Densities at Snorkel Survey
Sites within and Adjacent to the Mine Site Subwatersheds from 2012 to
2015.......................................................................................................... J-10-11
Table J.10-6 Salmonid Population Abundance Estimates for the Yellow Pine Pit in
2018.......................................................................................................... J-10-14
Table J.10-7 Salmonid Population Abundance Estimates for the Yellow Pine Pit in
2019.......................................................................................................... J-10-14

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-10-ii

APPENDIX J-10 FISH RELATIVE SPECIES ABUNDANCE AND DENSITY

J.10 FISH RELATIVE SPECIES ABUNDANCE AND

DENSITY
The four special status salmonids of management concern are widely distributed in the South
Fork Salmon River subbasin of the analysis area, including the mine site subwatersheds. The
Environmental Impact Statement analysis on these fish species focuses primarily, but not
exclusively, on the expected impacts that may occur at the mine site itself. The relative fish
community abundance of each species differs downstream of the Yellow Pine pit when
compared to upstream of the Yellow Pine pit due to habitat differences and altitude influences.
This section presents information on the relative abundance of the four salmonid species both
downstream and upstream of the Yellow Pine pit. Next, the section presents a quantitative
evaluation of the salmonid densities at monitoring locations both downstream and upstream of
the Yellow Pine pit. The density of fish, measured both as areal density (number of fish per
square meter of wetted streambed) or linear density (number of fish per meter of stream length)
provides a means of quantifying the potential impacts to these resources during the Stibnite
Gold Project (SGP) construction, operations, and closure and reclamation. Finally, this section
summarizes the salmonid abundance estimates for the Yellow Pine pit. The analysis results are
of particular importance when evaluating the species of fish and their abundance when stream
channels and the Yellow Pine pit are dewatered and fish salvage operations must be
implemented. How many fish are potentially impacted?

Some terminology definitions are useful in understanding the information that is presented.
Specifically:

• Relative species abundance is a component of biodiversity and refers to how common

or rare a species is relative to other species in a defined location or community. Different
fish populations in a community exist in relative proportions to one another.
• A fish population is defined as a group of individuals of the same species that are
spatially, genetically, or demographically separated from other groups. For example,
Section 3.12.4.3.4, Distribution, states that there are five major population groups for the
Snake River spring/summer Chinook salmon Evolutionarily Significant Unit, one of which
includes the South Fork Salmon River Major Population Group. This group contains four
independent populations, one of which is the East Fork South Fork Salmon River
(EFSFSR) population, which includes the SGP mine site subwatersheds.
• Fish density refers to the number of individuals per unit area (i.e., square meters) or
volume (cubic meters). In this document the term “linear density” also is discussed.
Linear density as used herein is the number of fish per linear length of stream, typically
per meter. Because the wetted area of streams varies with flow, it is useful to have a
metric that is non-flow dependent, (i.e., stream length). This concept is helpful when
estimating the number of fish that might be impacted by stream channel dewatering and
salvage operations.

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-10-1

APPENDIX J-10 FISH RELATIVE SPECIES ABUNDANCE AND DENSITY

J.10.1 Methodology
Fish abundance data collected during snorkel surveys in the mine site area in 2015 were used
in conjunction with fish mark-recapture survey data collected at the same sites at the same time
to develop fish relative abundance and density estimates. The objective of comparing snorkeling
abundance data to mark-recapture data was to develop a metric that could be applied to the
large number of snorkeling sites evaluated from 2012 to 2015, thereby improving the ability to
evaluate SGP impacts on the four salmonid species.

J.10.1.1 Snorkel Surveys

Fish snorkeling surveys have been conducted routinely within the mine site subwatersheds and
the adjacent downstream subwatershed (No Mans Creek-EFSFSR) over many years. These
surveys provide a general index to the relative abundance of the four special status fish at
various survey sites. MWH Americas, Inc. (MWH) (2017) reported the results of snorkeling fish
counts conducted between 2012 and 2015 at 11 sites downstream of the Yellow Pine pit and 16
sites upstream of the Yellow Pine pit within the three subwatersheds (No Mans Creek,
Headwaters EFSFSR, and Sugar Creek).

Snorkel surveys are not typically considered a preferred method for quantifying the number of
fish that are present in a stream. Snorkeling estimates of fish abundance typically underestimate
true fish abundance because they rely on diver observations. The ability to identify, count, and
estimate the size of fish while snorkeling depends on a wide range of factors including, among
many, the skill of the diver, size of the stream, behavior of each fish species, size of fish, water
clarity. In addition, there are factors that make it difficult to see fish, for example, large woody
debris, large rocks, and vegetation. Snorkeling abundance estimates can be improved if they
can be reasonably adjusted (or calibrated) to a more statistically robust abundance estimation
method. Fish mark-recapture abundance estimates provide that opportunity.

J.10.1.2 Mark-Recapture
Because three of the salmonid species are listed under the Endangered Species Act, it is
difficult to obtain regulatory permits that use more traditional, but more invasive, fish sampling
methods like electrofishing and mark-recapture. However, in 2015 the Payette National Forest
was able to conduct a limited program of electrofishing and mark-recapture at nine established
fish survey sites. As noted previously, if a metric could be developed to improve the utility of the
snorkel survey data, then the ability to evaluate SGP impacts would be enhanced.

During July 2015, nine sites in the two mine site subwatersheds (Headwaters EFSFSR and
Sugar Creek) were sampled using electrofishing techniques (GeoEngineers 2017). Captured
salmonids were marked with a fin clip and released. Approximately 24 hours later each site was
resampled during electrofishing and the number of recaptured marked fish recorded. All
captured salmonids were grouped together for purposes of estimating population size
regardless of fish size or species. Mark-recapture estimates of the snorkel site fish abundance
were calculated using the Chapman (Chapman 1951) estimator.

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-10-2

APPENDIX J-10 FISH RELATIVE SPECIES ABUNDANCE AND DENSITY

J.10.2 Results
The 2015 methods comparison program is summarized first, followed by the application of the
results to all of the snorkel survey sites and years of sampling.

J.10.2.1 Snorkeling Comparison to Mark-Recapture in 2015

J.10.2.1.1 S NORKEL S URVEYS

Table J.10-1 summarizes the results of the snorkel surveys at each of the nine sites evaluated.

Table J.10-1 Salmonid Density Estimates by Location for the Mine Site Subwatersheds
for July 21-25, 2015 as Measured by Snorkel Surveys
Observed Species Densities (number/m2)
Total (Percentage Species Composition at Site)
Site ID
Salmonid
(Downstream Stream Steelhead/ Westslope
Density Chinook Bull
to Upstream) Rainbow Cutthroat
(number/m2) Salmon Trout
Trout Trout

Downstream of the Yellow Pine Pit

MWH-019 Cinnabar 0.125 0 0 0.119 0.006
Creek (95) (5)
MWH-018 Sugar 0.110 0 0.005 0.084 0.021
Creek (4.8) (76.2) (19.1)
Upstream of the Yellow Pine Pit
MWH-011 EFSFSR 0.026 0 0 0 0.026
(100)
MWH-014 Meadow 0.030 0 0 0 0.030
Creek (100)
MWH-047 Meadow 0.018 0 0 0 0.018
Creek (100)
MWH-016 Meadow 0.086 0 0 0 0.086
Creek (100)
MWH-034 Meadow 0.082 0 0 0 0.082
Creek (100)
MWH-025 EFSFSR 0.216 0 0 0 0.216
(100)
MWH-026 EFSFSR 0.076 0 0 0 0.076
(100)
Table Source: GeoEngineers 2017; MWH 2017
Table Notes:
Sampling locations at each Site ID consisted of 100-meter-long reaches.
Gray shading for MWH-018 indicates estimate that may be subject to potential statistical bias due to low percentage of fish marked
relative to the abundance estimate, or due to the low number of recaptured fish.
m2 = meter squared
EFSFSR = East Fork South Fork Salmon River

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-10-3

APPENDIX J-10 FISH RELATIVE SPECIES ABUNDANCE AND DENSITY

Some observations on the results of the 2015 snorkel survey are important (Table J.10-1 and
MWH 2017: Appendix 6):

• No Chinook salmon were observed at any of the nine sites;

• Only one steelhead/rainbow trout was observed at site MWH-018 (Sugar Creek) making
a mark-recapture estimate impossible due to sample size;
• Bull trout were observed at two sites downstream of the Yellow Pine pit (MWH-018 and
MWH-019) where they were the predominate species numerically; and
• The only fish observed upstream of the Yellow Pine pit was the westslope cutthroat trout
where it occurred at all seven of the study sites (100% species composition).
The implication of the 2015 snorkel survey is that the mark-recapture estimates for fish
upstream of the Yellow Pine pit are all based on westslope cutthroat trout and that downstream
of the Yellow Pine pit the estimates are substantially based on bull trout with a minor cutthroat
trout component.

J.10.2.1.2 M ARK -R ECAPTURE E STIMATES

Table J.10-2 summarizes the total salmonid community abundance and densities for the 2015
study. Estimates for individual species were not determined.

Table J.10-2 Total Fish Abundance and Density Estimates by Site for 2015 based on
Mark-Recapture Abundance Estimates
Total Fish Estimated
Total Wetted
Site ID Abundance Estimated Fish Fish Linear
Surface Area
(Downstream to Stream Estimate of Density of Reach Density of
of Reach
Upstream) Reach (n fish/m2) Reach
(m2)
(n) (n fish/m)

Downstream of the Yellow Pine Pit

MWH-019 Cinnabar 35 280 0.125 0.350
Creek
MWH-018 Sugar Creek 65 590 0.110 0.650
Upstream of the Yellow Pine Pit
MWH-011 EFSFSR 15 570 0.026 0.150
MWH-014 Meadow 14 460 0.030 0.140
Creek
MWH-047 Meadow 8 440 0.018 0.080
Creek
MWH-016 Meadow 31 360 0.086 0.310
Creek

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-10-4

APPENDIX J-10 FISH RELATIVE SPECIES ABUNDANCE AND DENSITY

Total Fish Estimated

Total Wetted
Site ID Abundance Estimated Fish Fish Linear
Surface Area
(Downstream to Stream Estimate of Density of Reach Density of
of Reach
Upstream) Reach (n fish/m2) Reach
(m2)
(n) (n fish/m)

MWH-034 Meadow 27 330 0.082 0.270

Creek
MWH-025 EFSFSR 97 450 0.216 0.970
MWH-026 EFSFSR 26 340 0.076 0.260
Table Source: GeoEngineers 2017; MWH 2017
Table Notes:
Sampling locations at each Site ID consisted of 100-meter-long reaches.
Gray shading for MWH-018 indicates estimate that may be subject to potential statistical bias due to low percentage of fish marked
relative to the abundance estimate, or due to the low number of recaptured fish.
m2 = meter squared
EFSFSR = East Fork South Fork Salmon River

While limited to 2015, the results summarized in Table J.10-2 indicate the following:

• Abundance estimates for all fish species combined are small, especially upstream of the
Yellow Pine pit;
• The fish density estimates for MWH-011 and MWH-014 may overwhelmingly reflect
Chinook salmon densities if the snorkeling relative abundances are accurate;
• The fish density estimates for MWH-034, MWH-13, MWH-025, and MWH-026 may
overwhelmingly reflect westslope cutthroat trout densities if the snorkeling relative
abundances are accurate; and
• The abundance and density estimates appear to reflect low fish stream productivity at all
sites studied, with the exception of Chinook salmon upstream of the Yellow Pine pit
where translocations of spawning Chinook salmon from Johnson Creek periodically
occurs.
Because streamflows are variable over an annual hydrological cycle, fish densities also will
vary. For example, if it is assumed that the total salmonid community does not numerically
change during a period of time at a specific study site 100 meters in length, but streamflows do
change, then the fish densities also will change per square meter. Increased or reduced flow will
change the wetted area of the reach and, therefore, fish density. Linear densities, for example,
100 fish per 100 meters of reach length, provide a statistic that eliminates the bias of areal
densities that are changing due to flow variability.

J.10.2.1.3 S NORKEL S URVEY VERSUS M ARK -R ECAPTURE

Table J.10-3 compares the number of salmonids observed from snorkeling versus the mark-
recapture estimate at all nine sites.

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-10-5

APPENDIX J-10 FISH RELATIVE SPECIES ABUNDANCE AND DENSITY

Table J.10-3 Salmonid Abundance Estimates by Sampling Technique and Site

Fish Sampling Technique
Site ID Ratio
(Downstream to Stream Snorkeling Mark-Recapture (snorkeling/mark-
Upstream) (number fish (population estimate recapture)
observed in reach) for reach)

Downstream of the Yellow Pine Pit

MWH-019 Cinnabar Creek 20 35 0.57
MWH-018 Sugar Creek 21 65 0.32
Upstream of the Yellow Pine Pit
MWH-011 EFSFSR 4 15 0.27
MWH-014 Meadow Creek 6 14 0.43
MWH-047 Meadow Creek 3 8 0.38
MWH-016 Meadow Creek 7 31 0.23
MWH-034 Meadow Creek 9 27 0.33
MWH-025 EFSFSR 21 97 0.22
MWH-026 EFSFSR 10 26 0.38
Mean Ratio 0.35
Table Source: GeoEngineers 2017; MWH 2017
Table Notes:
Sampling locations at each Site ID consisted of 100-meter-long reaches.
EFSFSR = East Fork South Fork Salmon River

Snorkeling estimates of fish abundance were 22 to 57 percent lower than mark-recapture

estimates, with a mean value of 35 percent, largely influenced by westslope cutthroat trout
upstream of the Yellow Pine pit.

J.10.3 Fish Relative Species Abundance and

Composition, 2012-2015
A snorkeling adjustment value of 35 percent was applied to the unadjusted mean snorkeling
census data for 27 survey sites collected from 2012 to 2015 (Table J.10-4) to provide an
estimate of what the mark-recapture results may have been in estimating abundance
(MWH 2017: Appendix 6).

Table J.10-4 summarizes the adjusted relative fish abundance numbers and relative
percentage composition for the four special status species at 27 locations from 2012 to 2015. A
number of observations are apparent from the adjusted snorkeling survey results:

• Fish relative species abundance is highly variable at different sites during the same
sampling year depending on location, even within the same stream;

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-10-6

APPENDIX J-10 FISH RELATIVE SPECIES ABUNDANCE AND DENSITY

• Fish species composition is much more diverse downstream of Yellow Pine pit
compared to areas upstream, and all four salmonid species of management concern
were observed downstream of the Yellow Pine pit;
• In Sugar Creek, bull trout was the most abundant species observed and it was found in
large numbers throughout the creek and its tributaries;
• Chinook salmon and steelhead are more abundant in the EFSFSR than in the Sugar
Creek subwatershed;
• Chinook salmon and steelhead occur naturally downstream of the Yellow Pine pit;
however, Chinook salmon juveniles are likely to be supplemented by downstream out-
migrants from upstream of the Yellow Pine pit;
• Chinook salmon were not translocated upstream of the Yellow Pine pit in 2014
(Table J.10-4). No juvenile fish were observed in snorkel surveys upstream of the
Yellow Pine pit in 2015 (MWH 2017: Appendix 6).
• Chinook salmon would not currently occur upstream of the Yellow Pine pit without the
periodic translocations conducted by the Idaho Department of Fish and Game and the
Nez Perce Tribe;
• Westslope cutthroat trout would be the most widespread and numerically abundant
native trout species upstream of the Yellow Pine pit, if it were not for the periodic
translocations of Chinook salmon;
• Steelhead do not occur upstream of the Yellow Pine pit barrier; and
• Bull trout are not common upstream of the Yellow Pine pit and are only observed using
snorkeling surveys in the Meadow Creek drainage.

Table J.10-4 Adjusted Salmonid Species Relative Abundance and Percentage

Composition at Snorkel Survey Sites within and Adjacent to the Mine Site
Subwatersheds from 2012 to 2015
Adjusted Mean Site Abundance [n]
and (Mean Site Percentage Composition)
(daytime surveys only-all fish size classes
combined)
Site ID
Year(s)
(Downstream Stream Location
Sampled West-
to Upstream) Steelhead/
Chinook Bull slope
Rainbow
Salmon Trout Cutthroat
Trout
Trout

Downstream of the Yellow Pine Pit

MWH-033 EFSFSR Upstream of 2013 170.1 117.4 14.8 50.0
Johnson (48.3) (33.3) (4.2) (14.2)
Creek
MWH-032 EFSFSR Downstream 2013, 67.5 57.4 16.2 25.0
of Tamarack 2014 (40.6) (34.6) (9.8) (15.0)
Creek

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-10-7

APPENDIX J-10 FISH RELATIVE SPECIES ABUNDANCE AND DENSITY

Adjusted Mean Site Abundance [n]

and (Mean Site Percentage Composition)
(daytime surveys only-all fish size classes
combined)
Site ID
Year(s)
(Downstream Stream Location
Sampled West-
to Upstream) Steelhead/
Chinook Bull slope
Rainbow
Salmon Trout Cutthroat
Trout
Trout

MWH-017 Tamarack Confluence 2012- 9.4 18.9 3.2 21.2

Creek with 2014 (17.9) (35.9) (6.0) (40.2)
(control EFSFSR
site)
MWH-009 EFSFSR Downstream 2012, 47.2 39.8 17.6 11.5
of Sugar 2014 (40.7) (34.3) (15.1) (9.9)
Creek
MWH-029 Sugar Lower Reach 2012- 11.2 10.4 15.8 13.0
Creek 2014 (22.3) (20.5) (31.2) (25.9)
MWH-010 Sugar Middle 2012- 12.2 12.6 25.2 11.7
Creek Reach 2014 (19.7) (20.4) (40.9) (19.1)
MWH-018 Sugar Upper Reach 2012- 1.7 5.4 22.3 2.4
Creek 2015 (5.3) (17.0) (70.2) (7.4)
MWH-020 Sugar Upstream of 2012- 0.8 2.0 27.0 Not
Creek Cinnabar 2013 (2.3) (6.8) (90.9) Present
Creek
MWH-019 Cinnabar Lower Reach 2012- Not Not 21.9 1.4
Creek 2015 Present Present (94.2) (5.8)
MWH-021 Cane Lower Reach 2012- Not Not 17.6 Not
Creek 2013 Present Present (100) Present
MWH-030 EFSFSR Upstream of 2012- 54.4 38.2 9.0 12.2
Sugar Creek 2014 (47.8) (33.6) (7.9) (10.7)
Upstream of the Yellow Pine Pit
MWH-022 EFSFSR Upstream of 2012- 378.0 Not Not 5.8
Midnight 2014 (98.5) Present Present (1.5)
Creek
MWH-023 Fiddle Lower Reach 2012- Not Not Not 17.6
Creek 2014 Present Present Present (100)
MWH-024 Fiddle Middle 2012 Not Not Not 9.4
Creek Reach Present Present Present (100)
MWH-011 EFSFSR Near Mining 2012- 206.6 Not Not 13.8
Camp 2015 (93.7) Present Present (6.3)
MWH-031 Meadow Upstream of 2012 674.0 Not 1.4 24.3
Creek East Fork (96.3) Present (0.2) (3.5)
Confluence
MWH-014 Meadow Stibnite Mine 2013- 402.0 Not Not 9.0
Creek Site 2015 (97.8) Present Present (2.2)
MWH-028 EFMC Lower Reach 2012- 599.0 Not Not 9.4
2014 (98.4) Present Present (1.6)

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-10-8

APPENDIX J-10 FISH RELATIVE SPECIES ABUNDANCE AND DENSITY

Adjusted Mean Site Abundance [n]

and (Mean Site Percentage Composition)
(daytime surveys only-all fish size classes
combined)
Site ID
Year(s)
(Downstream Stream Location
Sampled West-
to Upstream) Steelhead/
Chinook Bull slope
Rainbow
Salmon Trout Cutthroat
Trout
Trout

MWH-27 EFMC Upper Reach 2012- Not Not Not 4.3

2014 Present Present Present (100)
MWH-015 Meadow Downstream 2012- 2.2 Not 2.7 16.2
Creek of DRSF 2014 (10.6) Present (12.8) (76.6)
MWH-047 Meadow Upper DRSF 2013- 7.2 Not 0.9 18.9
Creek 2015 (26.7) Present (3.3) (70.0)
MWH-016 Meadow Tailings 2012, Not Not 1.8 63.4
Creek Storage 2014- Present Present (2.8) (97.2)
Facility 2015
MWH-034 Meadow Upper Reach 2013, Not Not 1.4 23.6
Creek 2015 Present Present (5.5) (94.5)
MWH-013 EFSFSR Near Mining 2012- 5.8 Not Not 25.2
Camp 2014 (18.8) Present Present (81.2)
MWH-025 EFSFSR Middle 2012- 8.6 Not Not 40.5
Reach 2013, (17.4) Present Present (82.6)
2015
MWH-044 EFSFSR Stibnite 2013 Not Not Not 60.8
Lodge Present Present Present (100)
MWH-026 EFSFSR Stibnite 2012- Not Not Not 14.2
Lodge 2015 Present Present Present (100)
Table Source: MWH (2017: Appendix 6)
Table Notes:
Site IDs consisted of reaches ranging in length from 22 to 100 meters in length with most reaches set at 100 meters.
DRSF = Development Rock Storage Facility
EFSFSR = East Fork South Fork Salmon River
EFMC = East Fork Meadow Creek

J.10.4 Fish Density, 2012-2015

As stated previously, estimates of existing densities of the four special status fish of
management concern can be used to estimate the impacts from SGP construction, operation,
and closure.

J.10.4.1 Stream Estimates

Several approaches to estimating salmonid densities were applied to the mine site
subwatersheds and these approaches are described in detail in MWH 2017 and GeoEngineers
2017. In summary, it was determined that fish densities based on the mark-recapture method

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-10-9

APPENDIX J-10 FISH RELATIVE SPECIES ABUNDANCE AND DENSITY

represent fair to good estimates of the fish density for most stream reaches evaluated
(GeoEngineers 2017). Note that this analysis does not calculate the population size of the South
Fork Salmon River Major Population Group. Rather, it determines fish densities that can be
used to estimate the salmonid abundance at a specific stream reach at the time of sampling.

J.10.4.1.1 E STIMATED S TREAM F ISH T OTAL D ENSITIES

Table J.10-5 summarizes the results adjusting the salmonid species areal and linear densities
at snorkel survey sites within an adjacent to the mine site subwatersheds from 2012 to 2015.

In order to estimate the densities of each fish species for purposes of conducting impact
assessments (Section 4.12) the densities presented in Table J.10-5 are allocated among the
four special-status species of management concern.

J.10.4.2 Yellow Pine Pit Estimates

Mark-recapture studies were undertaken at the Yellow Pine pit in 2018 and 2019 to evaluate
movements of salmonids and to estimate population abundances (Brown and Caldwell 2019,
2020). Table J.10-6 summarizes the abundance estimate results. Detailed discussions are
included in Brown and Caldwell (2019, 2020).

To the degree that abundance estimates are accurate, the results indicate limited abundance of
these salmonids in the Yellow Pine pit. Brown and Caldwell (2019) notes that several hundred
whitefish also were captured suggesting that the lake can support a large number of fish given
suitable habitat.

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-10-10

APPENDIX J-10 FISH RELATIVE SPECIES ABUNDANCE AND DENSITY

Table J.10-5 Adjusted Salmonid Species Areal and Linear Densities at Snorkel Survey Sites within and Adjacent to the
Mine Site Subwatersheds from 2012 to 2015
Mean Fish Density - fish/m2) and (Mean Fish Linear Density -
Mean Site
fish/m) (daytime surveys only-all fish size classes combined)
Site ID Length (m)/
Year(s)
(Downstream to Stream Location Width (m) Steelhead/ Westslope
Sampled Chinook
Upstream) for Year(s) Rainbow Bull Trout Cutthroat
Sampled Salmon
Trout Trout

Downstream of the Yellow Pine pit

MWH-033 EFSFSR Upstream of 2013 100/14.1 0.121 0.084 0.011 0.036
Johnson Creek (1.701) (1.174) (0.148) (0.500)
MWH-032 EFSFSR Downstream of 2013, 2014 100/15.9 0.045 0.038 0.011 0.017
Tamarack Creek (0.675) (0.574) (0.162) (0.250)
MWH-017 Tamarack Confluence with 2012-2014 97/5.7 0.017 0.034 0.006 0.038
Creek EFSFSR (0.097) (0.195) (0.032) (0.218)
(control site)

MWH-009 EFSFSR Downstream of 2012, 2014 95.5/8.4 0.059 0.050 0.022 0.014
Sugar Creek (0.495) (0.417) (0.184) (0.120)
MWH-029 Sugar Creek Lower Reach 2012-2014 97/5.5 0.021 0.019 0.029 0.024
(0.116) (0.107) (0.162) (0.134)
MWH-010 Sugar Creek Middle Reach 2012-2014 97/5.5 0.023 0.024 0.048 0.022
(0.125) (0.130) (0.260) (0.121)
MWH-018 Sugar Creek Upper Reach 2012-2015 95.2/5.1 0.003 0.011 0.046 0.005
(0.018) (0.057) (0.234) (0.025)
MWH-020 Sugar Creek Upstream of 2012-2013 95.5/3.6 0.002 0.006 0.080 Not
Cinnabar Creek (0.007) (0.021) (0.283) Present
MWH-019 Cinnabar Lower Reach 2012-2015 93/2.8 Not Not 0.095 0.006
Creek Present Present (0.236) (0.014)
MWH-021 Cane Creek Lower Reach 2012-2013 55.5/3.0 Not Not 0.107 Not
Present Present (0.316) Present
MWH-030 EFSFSR Upstream of 2012-2014 97/6.4 0.088 0.062 0.015 0.020
Sugar Creek (0.561) (0.394) (0.093) (0.125)

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-10-11

APPENDIX J-10 FISH RELATIVE SPECIES ABUNDANCE AND DENSITY

Mean Fish Density - fish/m2) and (Mean Fish Linear Density -

Mean Site
fish/m) (daytime surveys only-all fish size classes combined)
Site ID Length (m)/
Year(s)
(Downstream to Stream Location Width (m) Steelhead/ Westslope
Sampled Chinook
Upstream) for Year(s) Rainbow Bull Trout Cutthroat
Sampled Salmon
Trout Trout

Upstream of the Yellow Pine pit

MWH-022 EFSFSR Upstream of 2012-2014 80.3/7.8 0.606 Not Not 0.009
Midnight Creek (4.707) Present Present (0.073)
MWH-023 Fiddle Creek Lower Reach 2012-2014 97/2.0 Not Not Not 0.089
Present Present Present (0.181)
MWH-024 Fiddle Creek Middle Reach 2012 22/2.0 Not Not Not 0.215
Present Present Present (0.430)
MWH-011 EFSFSR Near Mining 2012-2015 97.8/5.3 0.397 Not Not 0.027
Camp (2.113) Present Present (0.142)
MWH-031 Meadow Upstream of 2012 91/4.0 1.852 Not 0.004 0.067
Creek East Fork (7.407) Present (0.015) (0.267)
Confluence

MWH-014 Meadow Stibnite Mine 2013-2015 100/5.1 0.783 Not Not 0.018
Creek Site (4.020) Present Present (0.090)
MWH-028 EFMC Lower Reach 2012-2014 97/2.4 2.573 Not Not 0.041
(6.175) Present Present (0.097)
MWH-027 EFMC Upper Reach 2012-2014 97/1.6 Not Not Not 0.027
Present Present Present (0.044)
MWH-015 Meadow Downstream of 2012-2014 97/4.8 0.005 Not 0.006 0.035
Creek DRSF (0.023) Present (0.028) (0.167)

MWH-047 Meadow Upper DRSF 2013-2015 100/4.3 0.017 Not 0.002 0.044
Creek (0.072) Present (0.009) (0.189)
MWH-016 Meadow Tailings Storage 2012, 2014- 97/3.9 Not Not 0.005 0.168
Creek Facility 2015 Present Present (0.018) (0.654)
MWH-034 Meadow Upper Reach 2013, 2015 100/3.2 Not Not 0.004 0.075
Creek Present Present (0.013) (0.236)

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-10-12

APPENDIX J-10 FISH RELATIVE SPECIES ABUNDANCE AND DENSITY

Mean Fish Density - fish/m2) and (Mean Fish Linear Density -

Mean Site
fish/m) (daytime surveys only-all fish size classes combined)
Site ID Length (m)/
Year(s)
(Downstream to Stream Location Width (m) Steelhead/ Westslope
Sampled Chinook
Upstream) for Year(s) Rainbow Bull Trout Cutthroat
Sampled Salmon
Trout Trout

MWH-013 EFSFSR Near Mining 2012-2014 95.7/4.3 0.014 Not Not 0.061
Camp (0.061) Present Present (0.263)
MWH-025 EFSFSR Middle Reach 2012-2013, 97/4.4 0.020 Not Not 0.094
2015 (0.088) Present Present (0.418)
MWH-044 EFSFSR Stibnite Lodge 2013 100/3.0 Not Not Not 0.202
Present Present Present (0.608)
MWH-026 EFSFSR Stibnite Lodge 2012-2015 97.8/3.3 Not Not Not 0.044
Present Present Present (0.145)
Table Source: MWH (2017: Appendix 6)
Table Notes:
Site IDs consisted of reaches ranging in length from 22 to 100 meters in length with most reaches set at 100 meters.
DRSF = Development Rock Storage Facility
EFSFSR = East Fork South Fork Salmon River
EFMC = East Fork Meadow Creek

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-10-13

APPENDIX J-10 FISH RELATIVE SPECIES ABUNDANCE AND DENSITY

Table J.10-6 Salmonid Population Abundance Estimates for the Yellow Pine Pit in 2018
Abundance Estimate (n) by Month
Species
May July September

Bull Trout 57 104 82

Westslope Cutthroat Trout 48 48 33
Chinook Salmon No Tagged Juvenile Fish Returned
Table Source: Brown and Caldwell 2019
Table Notes:
Four rainbow trout were tagged but the sample size was too small for an abundance estimate.

During 2019, sampling was continued on Yellow Pine pit during July, August, and September.
The population estimates are provided in Table J.10-7 (Brown and Caldwell 2020).

Table J.10-7 Salmonid Population Abundance Estimates for the Yellow Pine Pit in 2019
Abundance Estimate (n) by Month
Species
July August September

Bull Trout 104 45 47

Westslope Cutthroat Trout 67 80 101
Chinook Salmon No Tagged Juvenile Fish Returned
Table Source: Brown and Caldwell 2020

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-10-14

APPENDIX J-10 FISH RELATIVE SPECIES ABUNDANCE AND DENSITY

LITERATURE CITED
Brown and Caldwell
2019 2018 Yellow Pine Pit Lake Fish Sampling Summary Report. Prepared for
Midas Gold Idaho, Inc., Valley County, Idaho. January 11, 2019.
2020 2019 Yellow Pine Pit Lake Fish Sampling Summary Report. Prepared for
Midas Gold Idaho, Inc., Valley County, Idaho. January 2020.

Chapman, D.G.
1951 Some properties of the hypergeometric distribution with applications to
zoological sample censuses. University of California Publications in Statistics.
Berkeley and Los Angeles, CAL University of California Press., 1(7): 1311-160.
Available at: https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=wu.89045844248&view=
2up&seq=4. [Copyright; PDF not available].

GeoEngineers, Inc.
2017 Aquatic Resources 2016 Baseline Study – Addendum Report.

MWH, Inc.
2017 Aquatic Resources 2016 Baseline Study. Stibnite Gold Project, Midas Gold
Idaho, Inc. April 2017.

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-10-15

APPENDIX J-10 FISH RELATIVE SPECIES ABUNDANCE AND DENSITY

This page intentionally left blank

Stibnite Gold Project Draft Environmental Impact Statement J-10-16