De Facto IAS
Essays for Judiciary
Women in Judiciary
Introduction
The participation of women in the judiciary is a crucial indicator of gender equality in a nation's
legal and judicial systems. In India, the journey of women in the judiciary has been marked by
significant milestones and formidable challenges.
The history of women in the Indian judiciary is relatively recent, with the first female judge, Anna
Chandy, appointed to the Kerala High Court in 1959. The Supreme Court of India saw its first
female judge, Justice Fathima Beevi, in 1989. These pioneering appointments marked the
beginning of women's formal entry into the higher echelons of the judiciary. However, their
presence remained sparse, reflecting broader societal norms and gender biases.
Current Status of Women in the Judiciary
Representation in Higher Judiciary
As of 2024, the representation of women in the higher judiciary, including the Supreme Court and
High Courts, remains alarmingly low. The Supreme Court has had only a handful of female judges
since its inception. The situation in the High Courts is slightly better but still far from satisfactory. As
of recent data, women constitute less than 15% of the total judges in the High Courts of India.
Representation in Lower Judiciary
The lower judiciary, comprising district and subordinate courts, reflects a slightly better gender
ratio. Women judges are more prevalent at this level, but they still face significant challenges in
terms of career progression and professional recognition. Despite a relatively higher presence, the
overall impact on the judicial process and decision-making remains limited.
Constitutional Provisions
Indian Constitution enshrines the principles of equality and non-discrimination. Article 14
guarantees equality before the law, while Article 15 prohibits discrimination on various grounds,
including sex. Furthermore, Article 39(a) and Article 39(d) of the Directive Principles of State Policy
emphasise the state's responsibility to ensure equal opportunities and pay for men and women.
Despite these constitutional provisions, specific laws or quotas to ensure women's representation
in the judiciary are absent. The judiciary relies primarily on merit-based appointments, overseen by
the collegium system for higher judiciary appointments, which has been criticised for its lack of
transparency and inclusivity.
Challenges Faced by Women in the Judiciary
Institutional Barriers
www.DeFactoJudiciary.in
Judiciary Preparation website of De Facto IAS
De Facto IAS
Essays for Judiciary
Institutional barriers pose a significant challenge to women in the judiciary. The lack of
gender-sensitive policies and practices within the judicial system hampers the entry and growth of
women. Recruitment processes, career advancement opportunities, and workplace environment
often do not favour women, leading to their underrepresentation.
Societal Norms and Expectations
Societal norms and expectations play a crucial role in shaping the career trajectories of women in
the judiciary. The traditional roles assigned to women as primary caregivers often clash with the
demanding nature of judicial work. This societal pressure restricts many capable women from
pursuing or excelling in a judicial career.
Work-Life Balance
Maintaining a work-life balance is particularly challenging for women judges. The demanding
nature of judicial responsibilities, coupled with societal expectations of managing household duties,
creates a dual burden. This often leads to early burnout or the decision to opt for less demanding
roles within the judiciary.
Important Links for Judiciary Free Resources
(Click on Each to Open Respective Pages)
Subject Wise Mains PYQ Solution Essay for Judiciary
Subject Wise Notes Legal Doctrines
Landmark Judgements GS Notes
Weekly Current Affair Subject Wise Prelims PYQ Solution
Free Answer Writing Course Judgement Writing
Telegram Link Youtube Link
Gender Bias and Discrimination
Gender bias and discrimination, both overt and subtle, are pervasive issues in the judiciary.
Women judges often face biases from their male counterparts, litigants, and even within the
institutional framework. This discrimination manifests in various forms, including lack of respect,
questioning of authority, and differential treatment in professional settings.
www.DeFactoJudiciary.in
Judiciary Preparation website of De Facto IAS
De Facto IAS
Essays for Judiciary
Way Forward
Policy Reforms
Implementing comprehensive policy reforms is imperative to enhance the representation of women
in the judiciary. Gender-sensitive recruitment processes, reservation policies, and targeted
mentorship programs can play a crucial role in bridging the gender gap. Additionally, ensuring
equal opportunities for career advancement and creating a supportive work environment are
essential steps.
Gender Sensitization
Gender sensitization programs aimed at changing the mindset of the judiciary and the legal
fraternity are crucial. These programs should focus on eliminating biases, promoting gender
equality, and fostering a respectful and inclusive workplace culture. Sensitising male judges and
lawyers about the challenges faced by their female counterparts can lead to a more supportive and
equitable professional environment.
Encouraging Legal Education
Promoting legal education among women and encouraging them to pursue judicial careers is
essential. Scholarships, mentorship programs, and awareness campaigns can motivate more
women to enter the legal profession. Law schools and universities should also focus on creating an
inclusive environment that supports the aspirations of female students.
Networking and Support Systems
Building strong networks and support systems for women in the judiciary can provide
much-needed professional and emotional support. Women's judicial associations, peer mentoring,
and networking events can help women judges share experiences, seek guidance, and build
solidarity. Such platforms can also advocate for policy changes and raise awareness about gender
issues within the judiciary.
Conclusion
The inclusion of women in the judiciary is imperative for fostering a balanced and equitable legal
system. Despite notable milestones, such as the appointments of Justice Fathima Beevi and Anna
Chandy, the overall representation of women in the Indian judiciary remains disappointingly low.
This underrepresentation is not merely a statistical concern but a reflection of broader societal and
institutional biases that need urgent addressing.
To truly realise the potential of a diverse judiciary, a comprehensive approach is required. Policy
reforms that ensure gender-sensitive recruitment and promotion practices are critical. These
reforms must be complemented by robust gender sensitization programs aimed at dismantling
deep-seated biases within the judicial system. Furthermore, encouraging more women to pursue
www.DeFactoJudiciary.in
Judiciary Preparation website of De Facto IAS
De Facto IAS
Essays for Judiciary
careers in law through scholarships, mentorship, and supportive educational environments is
essential for long-term change.
www.DeFactoJudiciary.in
Judiciary Preparation website of De Facto IAS