Trombosis Venosa Pregnancy
Trombosis Venosa Pregnancy
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102446
ILLUSTRATED REVIEW
Accepted: 14 May 2024
1
Division of Hematology/Oncology,
Department of Medicine, University of Abstract
California, San Francisco, California, USA
The topic of this review is venous thromboembolism (VTE) during pregnancy and
2
Hemostasis and Thrombosis Center,
postpartum. The following topics will be addressed: epidemiology and pathophysiology
Oregon Health & Science University,
Portland, Oregon, USA of VTE in pregnancy and postpartum, diagnostic considerations for VTE in pregnancy,
indications for prophylactic and therapeutic anticoagulation in pregnancy and post-
Correspondence
Bethany T. Samuelson Bannow, Hemostasis partum, choice of anticoagulation in pregnancy and breastfeeding, anticoagulation
and Thrombosis Center, Oregon Health &
management during labor and delivery, and anticoagulation considerations for assisted
Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson
Park Rd, OC14HO, Portland, OR 97239, reproductive technology.
USA.
Email: [email protected]
-
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. This is an open access article under the CC BY-
NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Prior VTE –
unprovoked or
Systemic lupus provoked (surgery
or estrogen-
erythematosus
related)
and
antiphospholipid
syndrome Heart disease
(valvular,
cardiomyopathy,
other)
Obesity
May-Thurner:
Right iliac
artery Gestational
compresses diabetes
left iliac vein
or other
anatomic
anomalies
Labor & Delivery Risk Factors
- Preeclampsia and eclampsia
Sickle cell
- Preterm labor
disease8
- Placenta previa
- Placental abruption
Diagnostic Algorithm
No missed PEs
Order D-dimer
Lower extremity &
ultrasound Assess YEARS Criteria
DVT 1. Signs DVT
suspected 2. Hemoptysis
3. PE most likely dx
+ -
Anticoagulation
≥ 1 YEARS criteria present & D-dimer < 500 ng/ml ≥ 1 YEARS criteria present & D-dimer ≥ 500 ng/ml
OR OR
No YEARS criteria present & D-dimer <1000 ng/ml No YEARS criteria present & D-dimer ≥1000 ng/ml
Medication Considerations
Do not cross placenta; extensive observational
Heparins
safety data
Bleeding
↑ risk bleeding peripartum including postpartum hemorrhage (PPH)
LMWH relative risk PPH: ~1.5; absolute risk of PPH varies by setting and
mode of delivery; baseline risk of severe PPH in the US is 0.03%
Skin reactions
Minor reactions are common, serious reactions rare
Switching LMWH agents can help
Osteoporosis
Negligible risk if used exclusively for pregnancy. A study of LMWH in
pregnancy found NO impact on bone mineral density
In contrast, unfractionated heparin (UFH) has a greater impact on bone
density loss, but this is primarily with long-term use
Note:
Recurrent Miscarriage: prophylactic AC has NOT shown benefit for
individuals w/ inherited thrombophilia & recurrent miscarriage (ALIFE trial)
Antiphospholipid Antibodies: prophylactic AC & aspirin may benefit
pregnant patients who have antiphospholipid antibodies w/ history of recurrent
pregnancy loss, even without prior thrombosis
Prophylactic Anticoagulation
6.0%
4.0%
2.0%
0.0%
Antepartum VTE Postpartum VTE Major Bleeding Minor Bleeding
Future Directions
FUND I NG [12] Seaman CD, Yabes J, Li J, Moore CG, Ragni MV. Venous thrombo-
B.S.B. receives research support from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver embolism in pregnant women with sickle cell disease: a retrospective
database analysis. Thromb Res. 2014;134:1249–52.
National Institute Of Child Health & Human Development of the
[13] Robert-Ebadi H, Elias A, Sanchez O, Le Moigne E, Schmidt J, Le Gall
National Institutes of Health under Award Number K12HD043488. C, et al. Assessing the clinical probability of pulmonary embolism
during pregnancy: the Pregnancy-Adapted Geneva (PAG) score.
AUTH OR CONT RIBUTIONS J Thromb Haemost. 2021;19:3044–50.
[14] van der Pol LM, Tromeur C, Bistervels IM, Ni Ainle F, van Bemmel T,
A.K.F. and B.S.B. made substantial contributions to this article through
Bertoletti L, et al. Pregnancy-Adapted YEARS Algorithm for diagnosis
conception and design, drafting and revising critically for important of suspected pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:1139–49.
intellectual content, and approval of the final version. [15] Pahade JK, Litmanovich D, Pedrosa I, Romero J, Bankier AA,
Boiselle PM. Imaging pregnant patients with suspected pulmonary
embolism: what the radiologist needs to know. RadioGraphics.
R EL AT I O NSH IP D I S CL O SUR E
2009;29:639–54.
No conflicts of interest, financial or other, exist. [16] Committee Opinion No. 723. Guidelines for diagnostic imaging
during pregnancy and lactation. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130:e210–6.
ORCID https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002355
[17] Maughan BC, Marin M, Han J, Gibbins KJ, Brixey AG, Caughey AB,
Bethany Samuelson Bannow https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9981-
et al. Venous thromboembolism during pregnancy and the post-
8990 partum period: risk factors, diagnostic testing, and treatment. Obstet
Gynecol Surv. 2022;77:433–44.
X [18] Torkzad MR, Bremme K, Hellgren M, Eriksson MJ, Hagman A,
Jörgensen T, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography
Annabel K. Frank @AnnabelFrankMD
in diagnosis of pelvic vein thrombosis during pregnancy. Thromb Res.
Bethany Samuelson Bannow @bsamuelson_md 2010;126:107–12.
[19] Tromeur C, van der Pol LM, Le Roux PY, Ende-Verhaar Y, Salaun PY,
R EF E REN CE S Leroyer C, et al. Computed tomography pulmonary angiography
versus ventilation-perfusion lung scanning for diagnosing pulmonary
[1] Kourlaba G, Relakis J, Kontodimas S, Holm MV, Maniadakis N.
embolism during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the epidemiology and
Haematologica. 2019;104:176–88.
burden of venous thromboembolism among pregnant women. Int J
[20] Burton KR, Park AL, Fralick M, Ray JG. Risk of early-onset breast
Gynecol Obstet. 2016;132:4–10.
cancer among women exposed to thoracic computed tomography in
[2] Parunov LA, Soshitova NP, Ovanesov MV, Panteleev MA,
pregnancy or early postpartum. J Thromb Haemost. 2018;16:876–85.
Serebriyskiy II. Epidemiology of venous thromboembolism (VTE)
[21] International Commission of Radiological Protection. Pregnancy and
associated with pregnancy. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today.
medical radiation: publication 84. Ann ICRP. 2000;30:1–44.
2015;105:167–84.
[22] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. How much radiation can
[3] Kamel H, Navi BB, Sriram N, Hovsepian DA, Devereux RB,
you get from air travel? https://www.cdc.gov/radiation-health/data-
Elkind MSV. Risk of a thrombotic event after the 6-week postpartum
research/facts-stats/air-travel.html; 2024 [accessed May 25, 2024].
period. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1307–15.
[23] Bates SM, Rajasekhar A, Middeldorp S, McLintock C, Rodger MA,
[4] Hellgren M. Hemostasis during normal pregnancy and puerperium.
James AH, et al. American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines
Semin Thromb Hemost. 2003;29:125–30.
for management of venous thromboembolism: venous thrombo-
[5] Szecsi P, Jørgensen M, Klajnbard A, Andersen M, Colov N, Stender S.
embolism in the context of pregnancy. Blood Adv. 2018;2:
Haemostatic reference intervals in pregnancy. Thromb Haemost.
3317–59.
2010;103:718–27.
[24] Middeldorp S, Ganzevoort W. How I treat venous thromboembolism
[6] Sood SL, James AH, Ragni MV, Shapiro AD, Witmer C, Vega R, et al.
in pregnancy. Blood. 2020;136:2133–42.
A prospective study of von Willebrand factor levels and bleeding in
[25] Magnani HN. An analysis of clinical outcomes of 91 pregnancies in
pregnant women with type 1 von Willebrand disease. Haemophilia.
83 women treated with danaparoid (Orgaran®). Thromb Res.
2016;22:e562–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/hae.13086
2010;125:297–302.
[7] Dahlman T, Hellgren M, Blombäck M. Changes in blood coagulation
[26] Lindhoff-Last E, Kreutzenbeck HJ, Magnani H. Treatment of 51
and fibrinolysis in the normal puerperium. Gynecol Obstet Invest.
pregnancies with danaparoid because of heparin intolerance. Thromb
1985;20:37–44.
Haemost. 2005;93:63–9.
[8] Kjellberg U, Andersson NE, Rosén S, Tengborn L, Hellgren M. APC
[27] Mazzolai L, Hohlfeld P, Spertini F, Hayoz D, Schapira M,
resistance and other haemostatic variables during pregnancy and
Duchosal MA. Fondaparinux is a safe alternative in case of heparin
puerperium. Thromb Haemost. 1999;81:527–31.
intolerance during pregnancy. Blood. 2006;108:1569–70.
[9] Louden KA, Broughton Pipkin F, Heptinstall S, Fox SC, Mitchell JR,
[28] Iturbe-Alessio I, Fonseca MC, Mutchinik O, Santos MA, Zajarías A,
Symonds EM. A longitudinal study of platelet behaviour and
Salazar E. Risks of anticoagulant therapy in pregnant women with
thromboxane production in whole blood in normal pregnancy and
artificial heart valves. N Engl J Med. 1986;315:1390–3.
the puerperium. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990;97:1108–14.
[29] Basu S, Aggarwal P, Kakani N, Kumar A. Low-dose maternal warfarin
[10] Liu S, Rouleau J, Joseph KS, Sauve R, Liston RM, Young D, et al.
intake resulting in fetal warfarin syndrome: In search for a safe
Epidemiology of pregnancy-associated venous thromboembolism: a
anticoagulant regimen during pregnancy. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol
population-based study in Canada. J Obstet Gynaecol Can.
Teratol. 2016;106:142–7.
2009;31:611–20.
[30] Stevenson E, Burton OM, Ferlauto GJ, Taylor HA. Hazards of oral
[11] Jacobsen AF, Skjeldestad FE, Sandset PM. Incidence and risk pat-
anticoagulants during pregnancy. JAMA. 1980;243:1549–51.
terns of venous thromboembolism in pregnancy and puerperium—a
[31] Areia AL, Mota-Pinto A. Experience with direct oral anticoagulants
register-based case-control study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:
in pregnancy – a systematic review. J Perinat Med. 2022;50:457–61.
233.e1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2007.08.041
FRANK AND SAMUELSON BANNOW
- 15 of 16
[32] Sirico A, Saccone G, Maruotti GM, Grandone E, Sarno L, Berghella V, [49] Kjaergaard AB, Fuglsang J, Hvas AM. Anti-Xa monitoring of low-
et al. Low molecular weight heparin use during pregnancy and risk of molecular-weight heparin during pregnancy: a systematic review.
postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2021;47:824–42.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32:1893–900. [50] Anderson DR, Ginsberg JS, Burrows R, Brill-Edwards P. Subcutane-
[33] Greer IA, Nelson-Piercy C. Low-molecular-weight heparins for ous heparin therapy during pregnancy: a need for concern at the
thromboprophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism in time of delivery. Thromb Haemost. 1991;65:248–50.
pregnancy: a systematic review of safety and efficacy. Blood. [51] Rottenstreich A, Zacks N, Kleinstern G, Levin G, Sompolinsky Y,
2005;106:401–7. Mankuta D, et al. Planned induction versus spontaneous delivery
[34] Kramer MS, Berg C, Abenhaim H, Dahhou M, Rouleau J, among women using prophylactic anticoagulation therapy: a retro-
Mehrabadi A, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and temporal trends in spective study. BJOG. 2020;127:1241–8.
severe postpartum hemorrhage. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209:449. [52] Knol HM, Schultinge L, Veeger NJGM, Kluin-Nelemans HC,
e1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.07.007 Erwich JJHM, Meijer K. The risk of postpartum hemorrhage in
[35] Rodger MA, Kahn SR, Cranney A, Hodsman A, Kovacs MJ, women using high dose of low-molecular-weight heparins during
Clement AM, et al. Long-term dalteparin in pregnancy not associated pregnancy. Thromb Res. 2012;130:334–8.
with a decrease in bone mineral density: substudy of a randomized [53] Roshani S, Cohn DM, Stehouwer AC, Wolf H, van der Post JA,
controlled trial. J Thromb Haemost. 2007;5:1600–6. Büller HR, et al. Incidence of postpartum haemorrhage in women
[36] Martel N, Lee J, Wells PS. Risk for heparin-induced thrombocyto- receiving therapeutic doses of low-molecular-weight heparin: results
penia with unfractionated and low-molecular-weight heparin of a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2011;1:e000257. https://
thromboprophylaxis: a meta-analysis. Blood. 2005;106:2710–5. doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000257
[37] Kaandorp SP, Goddijn M, van der Post JA, Hutten BA, Verhoeve HR, [54] Danilack VA, Dore DD, Triche EW, Muri JH, Phipps MG, Savitz DA.
Hamulyák K, et al. Aspirin plus heparin or aspirin alone in women The effect of labour induction on the risk of caesarean delivery:
with recurrent miscarriage. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1586–96. using propensity scores to control confounding by indication. BJOG.
[38] Empson M, Lassere M, Craig JC, Scott JR. Recurrent pregnancy loss 2016;123:1521–9.
with antiphospholipid antibody: a systematic review of therapeutic [55] Walker KF, Bugg GJ, Macpherson M, McCormick C, Grace N,
trials. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99:135–44. Wildsmith C, et al. Randomized trial of labor induction in women 35
[39] Bao SH, Sheng SL, Liao H, Zhou Q, Frempong ST, Tu WY. Use of D- years of age or older. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:813–22.
dimer measurement to guide anticoagulant treatment in recurrent [56] Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, Tita ATN, Silver RM, Mallett G,
pregnancy loss associated with antiphospholipid syndrome. Am J et al. Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk
Reprod Immunol. 2017;78. https://doi.org/10.1111/aji.12770 nulliparous women. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:513–23.
[40] Hamulyák EN, Scheres LJ, Marijnen MC, Goddijn M, Middeldorp S. [57] Leffert L, Butwick A, Carvalho B, Arendt K, Bates SM, Friedman A,
Aspirin or heparin or both for improving pregnancy outcomes in et al. The Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology
women with persistent antiphospholipid antibodies and recurrent Consensus Statement on the anesthetic management of pregnant
pregnancy loss. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;5:CD012852. and postpartum women receiving thromboprophylaxis or higher
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012852.pub2 dose anticoagulants. Anesth Analg. 2018;126:928–44.
[41] Bistervels IM, Buchmüller A, Wiegers HMG, Ní Áinle F, Tardy B, [58] Bauer KA. Use of anticoagulants during pregnancy and postpartum.
Donnelly J, et al. Intermediate-dose versus low-dose low-molecular- In: UpToDate. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/search?search=
weight heparin in pregnant and post-partum women with a history anticoagulants%20during%20pregnancy&sp=0&searchType=PLAIN_
of venous thromboembolism (Highlow study): an open-label, multi- TEXT&source=USER_INPUT&searchControl=TOP_PULLDOWN&
centre, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2022;400:1777–87. autoComplete=false. [accessed May 25, 2024].
[42] Cohen H, Arachchillage DR, Middeldorp S, Beyer-Westendorf J, [59] Côté-Poirier G, Bettache N, Côté AM, Mahone M, Morin F, Cumyn A,
Abdul-Kadir R. Management of direct oral anticoagulants in women et al. Evaluation of complications in postpartum women receiving
of childbearing potential: guidance from the SSC of the ISTH. therapeutic anticoagulation. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;136:394–401.
J Thromb Haemost. 2016;14:1673–6. [60] Clark SL, Porter TF, West FG. Coumarin derivatives and breast-
[43] Makatsaria AD, Bitsadze VO, Dolgushina NV. Use of the low- feeding. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:938–40.
molecular-weight heparin nadroparin during pregnancy. a review. [61] Guillonneau M, de Crepy A, Aufrant C, Hurtaud-Roux MF, Jacqz-
Curr Med Res Opin. 2003;19:4–12. Aigrain E. [Breast-feeding is possible in case of maternal treatment
[44] Hornung P, Khairoun M, Dekker FW, Kaasjager KAH, Huisman A, with enoxaparin]. Arch Pediatr. 1996;3:513–4.
Jakulj L, et al. Dosage reduction of low weight heparin in patients [62] Saito J, Kaneko K, Yakuwa N, Kawasaki H, Yamatani A,
with renal dysfunction: Effects on anti-Xa levels and clinical out- Murashima A. Rivaroxaban concentration in breast milk during
comes. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0239222. https://doi.org/10.1371/jour- breastfeeding: a case study. Breastfeed Med. 2019;14:748–51.
nal.pone.0239222 [63] Muysson M, Marshall K, Datta P, Rewers-Felkins K, Baker T,
[45] Nadroparin calcium injection. Canada product monograph. https://pdf. Hale TW. Rivaroxaban treatment in two breastfeeding mothers: a
hres.ca/dpd_pm/00053484.PDF; 2019 [accessed December 20, 2023]. case series. Breastfeed Med. 2020;15:41–3.
[46] Smith MP, Norris LA, Steer PJ, Savidge GF, Bonnar J. Tinzaparin [64] Zhao Y, Arya R, Couchman L, Patel JP. Are apixaban and rivaroxaban
sodium for thrombosis treatment and prevention during pregnancy. distributed into human breast milk to clinically relevant concentra-
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:495–501. tions? Blood. 2020;136:1783–5.
[47] Voke J, Keidan J, Pavord S, Spencer NH, Hunt BJ, British Society for [65] Daei M, Khalili H, Heidari Z. Direct oral anticoagulant safety during
Haematology Obstetric Haematology Group. The management of breastfeeding: a narrative review. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2021;77:
antenatal venous thromboembolism in the UK and Ireland: a pro- 1465–71.
spective multicentre observational survey*. Br J Haematol. [66] Wiesen MHJ, Blaich C, Müller C, Streichert T, Pfister R, Michels G. The
2007;139:545–58. direct factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban passes into human breast milk.
[48] Jorgensen M, Nielsen JD. The low-molecular-weight-heparin, tinza- Chest. 2016;150:e1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2016.01.021
parin, is effective and safe in the treatment and prophylaxis of [67] Ayuk P, Kampouraki E, Truemann A, Sidgwick F, McDonald L,
venous thromboembolic disease during pregnancy. Blood. 2004;104: Bingham J, et al. Investigation of dabigatran secretion into breast
1774. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V104.11.1774.1774 milk: Implications for oral thromboprophylaxis in post-partum
16 of 16
- FRANK AND SAMUELSON BANNOW
women. Am J Hematol. 2020;95:E10–3. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh. [70] Xu X, Chlebowski RT, Shi J, Barac A, Haque R. Aromatase inhibitor
25652 and tamoxifen use and the risk of venous thromboembolism in
[68] Jain M, Singh M. Assisted reproductive technology (ART) techniques. breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;174:
In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2023. 785–94.
[69] Blondon M, Bodmer A, Thouvenin L, Lecompte T, Righini M, [71] Hugon-Rodin J, Fontana P, Poncet A, Streuli I, Casini A, Blondon M.
Fontana P, et al. Differential impact of tamoxifen and aromatase Longitudinal profile of estrogen-related thrombotic biomarkers after
inhibitors on thrombin generation: the prospective HEMOBREAST cessation of combined hormonal contraceptives. Blood. 2024;143:
cohort. Blood Adv. 2022;6:2884–92. 70–8.