0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views16 pages

Trombosis Venosa Pregnancy

This illustrated review addresses venous thromboembolism (VTE) during pregnancy and postpartum, covering epidemiology, diagnostic considerations, and anticoagulation management. It highlights risk factors, the importance of prophylactic and therapeutic anticoagulation, and the safety of various anticoagulants in pregnant and breastfeeding individuals. The review emphasizes the need for further research in this area to improve outcomes for affected populations.

Uploaded by

Alejandro Abarca
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
21 views16 pages

Trombosis Venosa Pregnancy

This illustrated review addresses venous thromboembolism (VTE) during pregnancy and postpartum, covering epidemiology, diagnostic considerations, and anticoagulation management. It highlights risk factors, the importance of prophylactic and therapeutic anticoagulation, and the safety of various anticoagulants in pregnant and breastfeeding individuals. The review emphasizes the need for further research in this area to improve outcomes for affected populations.

Uploaded by

Alejandro Abarca
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 16

Received: 7 February 2024

- -Revised: 10 May 2024

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102446

ILLUSTRATED REVIEW
Accepted: 14 May 2024

Venous thromboembolism in pregnancy and postpartum: an


illustrated review

Annabel K. Frank1 | Bethany Samuelson Bannow2

1
Division of Hematology/Oncology,
Department of Medicine, University of Abstract
California, San Francisco, California, USA
The topic of this review is venous thromboembolism (VTE) during pregnancy and
2
Hemostasis and Thrombosis Center,
postpartum. The following topics will be addressed: epidemiology and pathophysiology
Oregon Health & Science University,
Portland, Oregon, USA of VTE in pregnancy and postpartum, diagnostic considerations for VTE in pregnancy,
indications for prophylactic and therapeutic anticoagulation in pregnancy and post-
Correspondence
Bethany T. Samuelson Bannow, Hemostasis partum, choice of anticoagulation in pregnancy and breastfeeding, anticoagulation
and Thrombosis Center, Oregon Health &
management during labor and delivery, and anticoagulation considerations for assisted
Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson
Park Rd, OC14HO, Portland, OR 97239, reproductive technology.
USA.
Email: [email protected]

Handling Editor: Michelle Sholzberg

-
© 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. This is an open access article under the CC BY-
NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2024;8:e102446 www.rpthjournal.org 1 of 16


https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102446
2 of 16
- FRANK AND SAMUELSON BANNOW
FRANK AND SAMUELSON BANNOW
- 3 of 16

VTE Risk Factors in Pregnancy and Postpartum

Prior VTE –
unprovoked or
Systemic lupus provoked (surgery
or estrogen-
erythematosus
related)
and
antiphospholipid
syndrome Heart disease
(valvular,
cardiomyopathy,
other)

Family history of Assisted


VTE (first degree reproductive
relative) technology

Obesity
May-Thurner:
Right iliac
artery Gestational
compresses diabetes
left iliac vein
or other
anatomic
anomalies
Labor & Delivery Risk Factors
- Preeclampsia and eclampsia
Sickle cell
- Preterm labor
disease8
- Placenta previa
- Placental abruption

Grand multipara (≥5 prior - Caesarean section


pregnancies) or first
pregnancy at ≥35 years of - Postpartum hemorrhage
age
4 of 16
- FRANK AND SAMUELSON BANNOW

Suspected PE in Pregnancy: Diagnostic Approach

Clinical Prediction Tool

Pregnancy-Adapted Geneva Score


Keep in mind:
How is this helpful?
1. Age ≥ 40 (+1) While this scoring system
HR increases in
pregnancy (normal
2. Surgery (under general anesthesia) or lower limb has not been validated as
physiology!) fracture in past month (+2) a method to determine
3. Prior VTE (+3) who needs a CT scan, it
4. Unilateral lower limb pain (+3) provides a pre-test
5. Hemoptysis (+2) probability that clinicians
6. Pain on lower limb palpation or unilateral edema (+4) may find useful in
7. HR > 100 bpm (+5) conjunction with clinical
gestalt and the YEARS
Prevalence PE diagnostic algorithm.
0-1 points: 2.3%
2-6 points: 11.6%
≥ 7 points 61.5%

Diagnostic Algorithm

Pregnancy-Adapted YEARS Algorithm

DVT missed in 0.21%


(1/477) PE SUSPECTED

No missed PEs

Order D-dimer
Lower extremity &
ultrasound Assess YEARS Criteria
DVT 1. Signs DVT
suspected 2. Hemoptysis
3. PE most likely dx
+ -

Anticoagulation

≥ 1 YEARS criteria present & D-dimer < 500 ng/ml ≥ 1 YEARS criteria present & D-dimer ≥ 500 ng/ml
OR OR
No YEARS criteria present & D-dimer <1000 ng/ml No YEARS criteria present & D-dimer ≥1000 ng/ml

PE ruled out CT Pulmonary Angiography


FRANK AND SAMUELSON BANNOW
- 5 of 16
6 of 16
- FRANK AND SAMUELSON BANNOW

Anticoagulant Safety in Pregnancy

Medication Considerations
Do not cross placenta; extensive observational
Heparins
safety data

Does not cross placenta and considered safe (can


Danaparoid
be used for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia)

Crosses placenta minimally; likely safe (limited


Fondaparinux
data)
Crosses placenta, teratogenic; highest risk 6-12
weeks gestation and dose >5mg/daily, though
Warfarin
toxicity outside this period and at lower doses
reported
Crosses placenta; unknown risk and safety
DOACs
concerns exist from limited human data

LMWH Safety Specifics

Bleeding
↑ risk bleeding peripartum including postpartum hemorrhage (PPH)
LMWH relative risk PPH: ~1.5; absolute risk of PPH varies by setting and
mode of delivery; baseline risk of severe PPH in the US is 0.03%

Skin reactions
Minor reactions are common, serious reactions rare
Switching LMWH agents can help

Osteoporosis
Negligible risk if used exclusively for pregnancy. A study of LMWH in
pregnancy found NO impact on bone mineral density
In contrast, unfractionated heparin (UFH) has a greater impact on bone
density loss, but this is primarily with long-term use

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)


Hep
Exceedingly rare
Ex
LMWH carries substantially lower risk of HIT compared to UFH
LM
Absolute risk: ~0.2% versus 2.6%
FRANK AND SAMUELSON BANNOW
- 7 of 16

Indications for Anticoagulation

A) Indications for Prophylactic Anticoagulation

1. History of estrogen-provoked VTE


2. Inherited thrombophilia (Conditional – See table)
3. Other high-risk individuals (See Note)

Thrombophilia Antepartum Postpartum

History of estrogen-provoked VTE; homozygous


YES YES
FVL; compound heterozygous FVL/PGM
Family history of VTE + homozygous PGM or
YES YES
antithrombin deficiency
Family history of VTE + protein C or S deficiency, or
No YES
homozygous PGM without family history
History of VTE with non-hormonal transient risk
factor (trauma, surgery), not on anticoagulation at No YES
baseline
Any other inherited “thrombophilia” (heterozygous
No No
FVL, heterozygous PGM, other)
Abbreviations: FVL – Factor V Leiden; PGM – Prothrombin Gene Mutation
Recommendations from American Society of Hematology 2018

Note:
Recurrent Miscarriage: prophylactic AC has NOT shown benefit for
individuals w/ inherited thrombophilia & recurrent miscarriage (ALIFE trial)
Antiphospholipid Antibodies: prophylactic AC & aspirin may benefit
pregnant patients who have antiphospholipid antibodies w/ history of recurrent
pregnancy loss, even without prior thrombosis

B) Indications for Therapeutic Anticoagulation

1. NEW VTE in pregnancy or postpartum


Æ Duration of therapy 3-6 months
Æ Minimum 6 weeks postpartum
2. CONTINUATION of therapy in patient on long-term
anticoagulation (including most patients taking
reduced-dose DOAC therapy)
8 of 16
- FRANK AND SAMUELSON BANNOW

Prophylactic Anticoagulation

When to start prophylactic AC?


- First positive pregnancy test, or
- Ultrasound-confirmed pregnancy; no later than 8 weeks
When to stop prophylactic AC?
- 6 weeks postpartum is standard, consider extending in high-risk patients
Which medication? LMWH (Consider UFH in renal dysfunction)

What dose of prophylactic AC?


- Low-dose, based on *Highlow* trial
- Consider weight-adjusted intermediate dose for patients with a concerning
history (hemodynamically significant PE, limb-threatening DVT) as there was a
non-significant trend toward increased postpartum PE in low-dose arm

1110 pregnant women with history of 555 assigned to weight-adjusted


VTE randomly assigned intermediate dose LMWH
81% related to pregnancy,
postpartum, or hormone-associated;
others: minor or major transient risk 555 assigned to fixed low-dose
factor, unprovoked LMWH

Median follow-up: 247 days

Highlow Efficacy and Safety Outcomes


10.0%
Intermediate-dose (n=555)
Low-dose (n=555)
8.0%

6.0%

4.0%

2.0%

0.0%
Antepartum VTE Postpartum VTE Major Bleeding Minor Bleeding

LMWH Dosing. Low-dose options for thromboprophylaxis, based on *Highlow*

Nadroparin Enoxaparin Dalteparin Tinzaparin


<100 kg 2850 IU 4000 IU (40 mg) 5000 IU 3500 IU
≥100 kg 3800 IU 6000 IU (60 mg) 7500 IU 4500 IU
All doses are administered once daily. IU=international unit.
FRANK AND SAMUELSON BANNOW
- 9 of 16
10 of 16
- FRANK AND SAMUELSON BANNOW
FRANK AND SAMUELSON BANNOW
- 11 of 16
12 of 16
- FRANK AND SAMUELSON BANNOW
FRANK AND SAMUELSON BANNOW
- 13 of 16

Future Directions

High quality research is urgently needed for pregnant and postpartum


populations at risk for VTE and with a new diagnosis of VTE.
Most recommendations are conditional with low certaintyy in evidence.

Select topics warranting additional study:


1. Role of prophylactic anticoagulation
oagula for patients with sickle cell disease in
pregnancy and postpartum m
2. Safety and efficacy of once
c vers
ce versus
e su twice daily dosing for therapeutic LMWH
3. Role of anti-Xa monitoring
ng
4. Management of anticoagulant therapy around the time of delivery (planned
l t th
induction; timing of neuraxial anesthesia))
5. Safety of DOACS in pregnancy and breastfeeding

Current Ongoing Clinical Trials as of December 2023


Trial Design
Aspirin vs LMWH for postpartum VTE Single center pilot, randomized
prevention (LEAP) controlled trial assessing postpartum
prophylactic anticoagulation with 3
Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT05058924 weeks of LMWH followed by 3 weeks
of aspirin compared to standard of care
of prophylactic LMWH for 6 weeks

Postpartum aspirin to reduce VTE in A randomized trial of aspirin versus


selected high-risk patients (Pilot placebo for postpartum women at
PARTUM) modest risk of VTE (examples:
heterozygous factor V Leiden,
Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT04153760 immobilization, cesarean delivery and
obesity, and others).

Assessing Women's Preferences for This study is conducting interviews


Postpartum Thromboprophylaxis: the using the “standard-gamble” technique
PREFER-PostPartum (PREFER-PP) to determine threshold of risk of
postpartum venous thromboembolism
Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT05318547 at which women prefer the use of short-
term postpartum thromboprophylaxis
with LMWH over no treatment.
14 of 16
- FRANK AND SAMUELSON BANNOW

FUND I NG [12] Seaman CD, Yabes J, Li J, Moore CG, Ragni MV. Venous thrombo-
B.S.B. receives research support from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver embolism in pregnant women with sickle cell disease: a retrospective
database analysis. Thromb Res. 2014;134:1249–52.
National Institute Of Child Health & Human Development of the
[13] Robert-Ebadi H, Elias A, Sanchez O, Le Moigne E, Schmidt J, Le Gall
National Institutes of Health under Award Number K12HD043488. C, et al. Assessing the clinical probability of pulmonary embolism
during pregnancy: the Pregnancy-Adapted Geneva (PAG) score.
AUTH OR CONT RIBUTIONS J Thromb Haemost. 2021;19:3044–50.
[14] van der Pol LM, Tromeur C, Bistervels IM, Ni Ainle F, van Bemmel T,
A.K.F. and B.S.B. made substantial contributions to this article through
Bertoletti L, et al. Pregnancy-Adapted YEARS Algorithm for diagnosis
conception and design, drafting and revising critically for important of suspected pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:1139–49.
intellectual content, and approval of the final version. [15] Pahade JK, Litmanovich D, Pedrosa I, Romero J, Bankier AA,
Boiselle PM. Imaging pregnant patients with suspected pulmonary
embolism: what the radiologist needs to know. RadioGraphics.
R EL AT I O NSH IP D I S CL O SUR E
2009;29:639–54.
No conflicts of interest, financial or other, exist. [16] Committee Opinion No. 723. Guidelines for diagnostic imaging
during pregnancy and lactation. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130:e210–6.
ORCID https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002355
[17] Maughan BC, Marin M, Han J, Gibbins KJ, Brixey AG, Caughey AB,
Bethany Samuelson Bannow https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9981-
et al. Venous thromboembolism during pregnancy and the post-
8990 partum period: risk factors, diagnostic testing, and treatment. Obstet
Gynecol Surv. 2022;77:433–44.
X [18] Torkzad MR, Bremme K, Hellgren M, Eriksson MJ, Hagman A,
Jörgensen T, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography
Annabel K. Frank @AnnabelFrankMD
in diagnosis of pelvic vein thrombosis during pregnancy. Thromb Res.
Bethany Samuelson Bannow @bsamuelson_md 2010;126:107–12.
[19] Tromeur C, van der Pol LM, Le Roux PY, Ende-Verhaar Y, Salaun PY,
R EF E REN CE S Leroyer C, et al. Computed tomography pulmonary angiography
versus ventilation-perfusion lung scanning for diagnosing pulmonary
[1] Kourlaba G, Relakis J, Kontodimas S, Holm MV, Maniadakis N.
embolism during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the epidemiology and
Haematologica. 2019;104:176–88.
burden of venous thromboembolism among pregnant women. Int J
[20] Burton KR, Park AL, Fralick M, Ray JG. Risk of early-onset breast
Gynecol Obstet. 2016;132:4–10.
cancer among women exposed to thoracic computed tomography in
[2] Parunov LA, Soshitova NP, Ovanesov MV, Panteleev MA,
pregnancy or early postpartum. J Thromb Haemost. 2018;16:876–85.
Serebriyskiy II. Epidemiology of venous thromboembolism (VTE)
[21] International Commission of Radiological Protection. Pregnancy and
associated with pregnancy. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today.
medical radiation: publication 84. Ann ICRP. 2000;30:1–44.
2015;105:167–84.
[22] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. How much radiation can
[3] Kamel H, Navi BB, Sriram N, Hovsepian DA, Devereux RB,
you get from air travel? https://www.cdc.gov/radiation-health/data-
Elkind MSV. Risk of a thrombotic event after the 6-week postpartum
research/facts-stats/air-travel.html; 2024 [accessed May 25, 2024].
period. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1307–15.
[23] Bates SM, Rajasekhar A, Middeldorp S, McLintock C, Rodger MA,
[4] Hellgren M. Hemostasis during normal pregnancy and puerperium.
James AH, et al. American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines
Semin Thromb Hemost. 2003;29:125–30.
for management of venous thromboembolism: venous thrombo-
[5] Szecsi P, Jørgensen M, Klajnbard A, Andersen M, Colov N, Stender S.
embolism in the context of pregnancy. Blood Adv. 2018;2:
Haemostatic reference intervals in pregnancy. Thromb Haemost.
3317–59.
2010;103:718–27.
[24] Middeldorp S, Ganzevoort W. How I treat venous thromboembolism
[6] Sood SL, James AH, Ragni MV, Shapiro AD, Witmer C, Vega R, et al.
in pregnancy. Blood. 2020;136:2133–42.
A prospective study of von Willebrand factor levels and bleeding in
[25] Magnani HN. An analysis of clinical outcomes of 91 pregnancies in
pregnant women with type 1 von Willebrand disease. Haemophilia.
83 women treated with danaparoid (Orgaran®). Thromb Res.
2016;22:e562–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/hae.13086
2010;125:297–302.
[7] Dahlman T, Hellgren M, Blombäck M. Changes in blood coagulation
[26] Lindhoff-Last E, Kreutzenbeck HJ, Magnani H. Treatment of 51
and fibrinolysis in the normal puerperium. Gynecol Obstet Invest.
pregnancies with danaparoid because of heparin intolerance. Thromb
1985;20:37–44.
Haemost. 2005;93:63–9.
[8] Kjellberg U, Andersson NE, Rosén S, Tengborn L, Hellgren M. APC
[27] Mazzolai L, Hohlfeld P, Spertini F, Hayoz D, Schapira M,
resistance and other haemostatic variables during pregnancy and
Duchosal MA. Fondaparinux is a safe alternative in case of heparin
puerperium. Thromb Haemost. 1999;81:527–31.
intolerance during pregnancy. Blood. 2006;108:1569–70.
[9] Louden KA, Broughton Pipkin F, Heptinstall S, Fox SC, Mitchell JR,
[28] Iturbe-Alessio I, Fonseca MC, Mutchinik O, Santos MA, Zajarías A,
Symonds EM. A longitudinal study of platelet behaviour and
Salazar E. Risks of anticoagulant therapy in pregnant women with
thromboxane production in whole blood in normal pregnancy and
artificial heart valves. N Engl J Med. 1986;315:1390–3.
the puerperium. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1990;97:1108–14.
[29] Basu S, Aggarwal P, Kakani N, Kumar A. Low-dose maternal warfarin
[10] Liu S, Rouleau J, Joseph KS, Sauve R, Liston RM, Young D, et al.
intake resulting in fetal warfarin syndrome: In search for a safe
Epidemiology of pregnancy-associated venous thromboembolism: a
anticoagulant regimen during pregnancy. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol
population-based study in Canada. J Obstet Gynaecol Can.
Teratol. 2016;106:142–7.
2009;31:611–20.
[30] Stevenson E, Burton OM, Ferlauto GJ, Taylor HA. Hazards of oral
[11] Jacobsen AF, Skjeldestad FE, Sandset PM. Incidence and risk pat-
anticoagulants during pregnancy. JAMA. 1980;243:1549–51.
terns of venous thromboembolism in pregnancy and puerperium—a
[31] Areia AL, Mota-Pinto A. Experience with direct oral anticoagulants
register-based case-control study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;198:
in pregnancy – a systematic review. J Perinat Med. 2022;50:457–61.
233.e1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2007.08.041
FRANK AND SAMUELSON BANNOW
- 15 of 16

[32] Sirico A, Saccone G, Maruotti GM, Grandone E, Sarno L, Berghella V, [49] Kjaergaard AB, Fuglsang J, Hvas AM. Anti-Xa monitoring of low-
et al. Low molecular weight heparin use during pregnancy and risk of molecular-weight heparin during pregnancy: a systematic review.
postpartum hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2021;47:824–42.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019;32:1893–900. [50] Anderson DR, Ginsberg JS, Burrows R, Brill-Edwards P. Subcutane-
[33] Greer IA, Nelson-Piercy C. Low-molecular-weight heparins for ous heparin therapy during pregnancy: a need for concern at the
thromboprophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism in time of delivery. Thromb Haemost. 1991;65:248–50.
pregnancy: a systematic review of safety and efficacy. Blood. [51] Rottenstreich A, Zacks N, Kleinstern G, Levin G, Sompolinsky Y,
2005;106:401–7. Mankuta D, et al. Planned induction versus spontaneous delivery
[34] Kramer MS, Berg C, Abenhaim H, Dahhou M, Rouleau J, among women using prophylactic anticoagulation therapy: a retro-
Mehrabadi A, et al. Incidence, risk factors, and temporal trends in spective study. BJOG. 2020;127:1241–8.
severe postpartum hemorrhage. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;209:449. [52] Knol HM, Schultinge L, Veeger NJGM, Kluin-Nelemans HC,
e1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2013.07.007 Erwich JJHM, Meijer K. The risk of postpartum hemorrhage in
[35] Rodger MA, Kahn SR, Cranney A, Hodsman A, Kovacs MJ, women using high dose of low-molecular-weight heparins during
Clement AM, et al. Long-term dalteparin in pregnancy not associated pregnancy. Thromb Res. 2012;130:334–8.
with a decrease in bone mineral density: substudy of a randomized [53] Roshani S, Cohn DM, Stehouwer AC, Wolf H, van der Post JA,
controlled trial. J Thromb Haemost. 2007;5:1600–6. Büller HR, et al. Incidence of postpartum haemorrhage in women
[36] Martel N, Lee J, Wells PS. Risk for heparin-induced thrombocyto- receiving therapeutic doses of low-molecular-weight heparin: results
penia with unfractionated and low-molecular-weight heparin of a retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open. 2011;1:e000257. https://
thromboprophylaxis: a meta-analysis. Blood. 2005;106:2710–5. doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000257
[37] Kaandorp SP, Goddijn M, van der Post JA, Hutten BA, Verhoeve HR, [54] Danilack VA, Dore DD, Triche EW, Muri JH, Phipps MG, Savitz DA.
Hamulyák K, et al. Aspirin plus heparin or aspirin alone in women The effect of labour induction on the risk of caesarean delivery:
with recurrent miscarriage. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1586–96. using propensity scores to control confounding by indication. BJOG.
[38] Empson M, Lassere M, Craig JC, Scott JR. Recurrent pregnancy loss 2016;123:1521–9.
with antiphospholipid antibody: a systematic review of therapeutic [55] Walker KF, Bugg GJ, Macpherson M, McCormick C, Grace N,
trials. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;99:135–44. Wildsmith C, et al. Randomized trial of labor induction in women 35
[39] Bao SH, Sheng SL, Liao H, Zhou Q, Frempong ST, Tu WY. Use of D- years of age or older. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:813–22.
dimer measurement to guide anticoagulant treatment in recurrent [56] Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM, Tita ATN, Silver RM, Mallett G,
pregnancy loss associated with antiphospholipid syndrome. Am J et al. Labor induction versus expectant management in low-risk
Reprod Immunol. 2017;78. https://doi.org/10.1111/aji.12770 nulliparous women. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:513–23.
[40] Hamulyák EN, Scheres LJ, Marijnen MC, Goddijn M, Middeldorp S. [57] Leffert L, Butwick A, Carvalho B, Arendt K, Bates SM, Friedman A,
Aspirin or heparin or both for improving pregnancy outcomes in et al. The Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology
women with persistent antiphospholipid antibodies and recurrent Consensus Statement on the anesthetic management of pregnant
pregnancy loss. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;5:CD012852. and postpartum women receiving thromboprophylaxis or higher
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012852.pub2 dose anticoagulants. Anesth Analg. 2018;126:928–44.
[41] Bistervels IM, Buchmüller A, Wiegers HMG, Ní Áinle F, Tardy B, [58] Bauer KA. Use of anticoagulants during pregnancy and postpartum.
Donnelly J, et al. Intermediate-dose versus low-dose low-molecular- In: UpToDate. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/search?search=
weight heparin in pregnant and post-partum women with a history anticoagulants%20during%20pregnancy&sp=0&searchType=PLAIN_
of venous thromboembolism (Highlow study): an open-label, multi- TEXT&source=USER_INPUT&searchControl=TOP_PULLDOWN&
centre, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2022;400:1777–87. autoComplete=false. [accessed May 25, 2024].
[42] Cohen H, Arachchillage DR, Middeldorp S, Beyer-Westendorf J, [59] Côté-Poirier G, Bettache N, Côté AM, Mahone M, Morin F, Cumyn A,
Abdul-Kadir R. Management of direct oral anticoagulants in women et al. Evaluation of complications in postpartum women receiving
of childbearing potential: guidance from the SSC of the ISTH. therapeutic anticoagulation. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;136:394–401.
J Thromb Haemost. 2016;14:1673–6. [60] Clark SL, Porter TF, West FG. Coumarin derivatives and breast-
[43] Makatsaria AD, Bitsadze VO, Dolgushina NV. Use of the low- feeding. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:938–40.
molecular-weight heparin nadroparin during pregnancy. a review. [61] Guillonneau M, de Crepy A, Aufrant C, Hurtaud-Roux MF, Jacqz-
Curr Med Res Opin. 2003;19:4–12. Aigrain E. [Breast-feeding is possible in case of maternal treatment
[44] Hornung P, Khairoun M, Dekker FW, Kaasjager KAH, Huisman A, with enoxaparin]. Arch Pediatr. 1996;3:513–4.
Jakulj L, et al. Dosage reduction of low weight heparin in patients [62] Saito J, Kaneko K, Yakuwa N, Kawasaki H, Yamatani A,
with renal dysfunction: Effects on anti-Xa levels and clinical out- Murashima A. Rivaroxaban concentration in breast milk during
comes. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0239222. https://doi.org/10.1371/jour- breastfeeding: a case study. Breastfeed Med. 2019;14:748–51.
nal.pone.0239222 [63] Muysson M, Marshall K, Datta P, Rewers-Felkins K, Baker T,
[45] Nadroparin calcium injection. Canada product monograph. https://pdf. Hale TW. Rivaroxaban treatment in two breastfeeding mothers: a
hres.ca/dpd_pm/00053484.PDF; 2019 [accessed December 20, 2023]. case series. Breastfeed Med. 2020;15:41–3.
[46] Smith MP, Norris LA, Steer PJ, Savidge GF, Bonnar J. Tinzaparin [64] Zhao Y, Arya R, Couchman L, Patel JP. Are apixaban and rivaroxaban
sodium for thrombosis treatment and prevention during pregnancy. distributed into human breast milk to clinically relevant concentra-
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:495–501. tions? Blood. 2020;136:1783–5.
[47] Voke J, Keidan J, Pavord S, Spencer NH, Hunt BJ, British Society for [65] Daei M, Khalili H, Heidari Z. Direct oral anticoagulant safety during
Haematology Obstetric Haematology Group. The management of breastfeeding: a narrative review. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2021;77:
antenatal venous thromboembolism in the UK and Ireland: a pro- 1465–71.
spective multicentre observational survey*. Br J Haematol. [66] Wiesen MHJ, Blaich C, Müller C, Streichert T, Pfister R, Michels G. The
2007;139:545–58. direct factor Xa inhibitor rivaroxaban passes into human breast milk.
[48] Jorgensen M, Nielsen JD. The low-molecular-weight-heparin, tinza- Chest. 2016;150:e1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2016.01.021
parin, is effective and safe in the treatment and prophylaxis of [67] Ayuk P, Kampouraki E, Truemann A, Sidgwick F, McDonald L,
venous thromboembolic disease during pregnancy. Blood. 2004;104: Bingham J, et al. Investigation of dabigatran secretion into breast
1774. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V104.11.1774.1774 milk: Implications for oral thromboprophylaxis in post-partum
16 of 16
- FRANK AND SAMUELSON BANNOW

women. Am J Hematol. 2020;95:E10–3. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh. [70] Xu X, Chlebowski RT, Shi J, Barac A, Haque R. Aromatase inhibitor
25652 and tamoxifen use and the risk of venous thromboembolism in
[68] Jain M, Singh M. Assisted reproductive technology (ART) techniques. breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2019;174:
In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2023. 785–94.
[69] Blondon M, Bodmer A, Thouvenin L, Lecompte T, Righini M, [71] Hugon-Rodin J, Fontana P, Poncet A, Streuli I, Casini A, Blondon M.
Fontana P, et al. Differential impact of tamoxifen and aromatase Longitudinal profile of estrogen-related thrombotic biomarkers after
inhibitors on thrombin generation: the prospective HEMOBREAST cessation of combined hormonal contraceptives. Blood. 2024;143:
cohort. Blood Adv. 2022;6:2884–92. 70–8.

You might also like