100% found this document useful (2 votes)
2K views4 pages

Assessment 1 - Revised

The document discusses a kindergarten math class scenario where students struggle with addition concepts, emphasizing the importance of using manipulatives to facilitate concrete-to-abstract learning. It proposes a future lesson on subtraction using a collaborative, story-based activity with physical objects to enhance understanding and engagement. The approach aligns with learning theories by incorporating scaffolding and peer collaboration to support diverse learners.

Uploaded by

waylonstc
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (2 votes)
2K views4 pages

Assessment 1 - Revised

The document discusses a kindergarten math class scenario where students struggle with addition concepts, emphasizing the importance of using manipulatives to facilitate concrete-to-abstract learning. It proposes a future lesson on subtraction using a collaborative, story-based activity with physical objects to enhance understanding and engagement. The approach aligns with learning theories by incorporating scaffolding and peer collaboration to support diverse learners.

Uploaded by

waylonstc
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Task 1

RaVeann Rogers

WGU

Learner Development and the Science of Learning - D665

Prof. Bethani Studebaker

Dec 11, 2024


Scenario 1: Kindergarten Math Class Struggling with Addition Concepts

I chose the first scenario involving a kindergarten math class where students are

struggling to understand the concept of addition. This scenario is closely aligned with my

program, the Master of Arts in Teaching, Special Education, because it emphasizes the

importance of differentiated instruction and the use of scaffolding to meet the diverse needs

of students. One principle of learning science evident in this scenario is the concrete-to-

abstract learning progression, which posits that children learn more effectively when they

begin with tangible, hands-on experiences before moving to abstract concepts (Bruner, 1966).

In this scenario, manipulatives such as counting cubes or toy apples provide students with

tangible tools to physically group, combine, or separate objects, enabling them to "see" and

"do" addition rather than relying solely on abstract symbols like numerals. This progression

ensures students develop a strong foundational understanding of addition through experience

before advancing to symbolic representations.

The use of manipulatives positively impacts learning by supporting students as they

bridge the gap between concrete and abstract understanding. By physically manipulating

objects, students are able to see the real-world application of addition, which helps them

internalize the concept. For instance, combining three cubes and two cubes to form a total of

five provides a sensory-rich experience that reinforces the mathematical operation. This

approach also supports students with special needs, who may require additional scaffolding to

succeed. By allowing students to interact with math concepts in a multisensory way,

manipulatives create a foundation for later success when abstract symbols are introduced.

Research confirms that manipulative-based instruction enhances mathematical understanding,

improves retention, and increases engagement in early learners (Clements & Sarama, 2009).

This makes manipulatives a vital tool for teaching foundational math concepts in special

education settings.
A. 2. Explain how you could use the described principle of learning science in your

future classroom differently by writing a specific scenario in which you use it.

In my future classroom, I would adapt the concrete-to-abstract learning progression to

teach subtraction through a collaborative, story-based activity. For instance, I would design a

lesson where students work in small groups to solve subtraction problems using a real-world

context. I could present the class with a scenario like, “We have ten toy frogs sitting on a log,

and three frogs jump into the water. How many frogs are left on the log?” Each group would

receive ten toy frogs and a small log cutout to physically act out the scenario, removing three

frogs from the log to find the answer. This hands-on activity allows students to manipulate

objects and visualize subtraction as “taking away,” reinforcing the concept in a tangible,

engaging way.

As students gain confidence with physical manipulatives, I would introduce visual

aids such as drawings or number lines to represent subtraction problems. For example,

students could draw the log and cross out the frogs that “jumped” into the water. Finally, I

would transition students to using numerical equations, gradually removing the need for

concrete objects as they develop a deeper understanding of subtraction. This progression

aligns with Bruner’s theory by moving from concrete experiences to abstract representations,

while Vygotsky’s scaffolding theory ensures that students receive appropriate support at each

stage (Bruner, 1966; Vygotsky, 1978).

To further enhance learning, I would incorporate peer collaboration into this activity,

encouraging students to work together to solve problems and explain their reasoning.

Research suggests that social interaction can improve mathematical reasoning and problem-

solving skills, particularly for students with diverse learning needs (Webb, 2009). This

approach not only reinforces subtraction concepts but also builds students’ communication

and teamwork skills, fostering a collaborative and inclusive learning environment.


References

Bruner, J. S. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press.

Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2009). Learning and teaching early math: The learning

trajectories approach. Routledge.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.

Harvard University Press.

Webb, N. M. (2009). The teacher’s role in promoting collaborative dialogue in the classroom.

British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(1), 1-28.

You might also like