Applying Mathematics: Immersion, Inference, Interpretation Otavio Bueno - The Latest Ebook Is Available, Download It Today
Applying Mathematics: Immersion, Inference, Interpretation Otavio Bueno - The Latest Ebook Is Available, Download It Today
https://ebookmass.com/product/individuation-process-and-scientific-
practices-otavio-bueno-editor/
https://ebookmass.com/product/oxford-mathematics-applications-and-
interpretation-higher-level-course-companion-first-edition-david-
harris/
https://ebookmass.com/product/mental-health-nursing-applying-theory-
to-practice-1st-edition-gylo-hercelinskyj/
Estimation and Inference in Econometrics 1st Edition
Russell Davidson
https://ebookmass.com/product/estimation-and-inference-in-
econometrics-1st-edition-russell-davidson/
https://ebookmass.com/product/exact-statistical-inference-for-
categorical-data-1st-edition-shan/
https://ebookmass.com/product/immersion-identification-and-the-iliad-
jonathan-l-ready/
https://ebookmass.com/product/advanced-driver-intention-inference-
theory-and-design-1st-edition-yang-xing/
https://ebookmass.com/product/immersion-identification-and-the-iliad-
prof-jonathan-l-ready/
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 28/4/2018, SPi
Applying Mathematics
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 28/4/2018, SPi
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 28/4/2018, SPi
Applying
Mathematics
Immersion, Inference, Interpretation
1
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 28/4/2018, SPi
3
Great Clarendon Street, Oxford, OX2 6DP,
United Kingdom
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford.
It furthers the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship,
and education by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of
Oxford University Press in the UK and in certain other countries
© Otavio Bueno and Steven French 2018
The moral rights of the authors have been asserted
First Edition published in 2018
Impression: 1
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in
a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the
prior permission in writing of Oxford University Press, or as expressly permitted
by law, by licence or under terms agreed with the appropriate reprographics
rights organization. Enquiries concerning reproduction outside the scope of the
above should be sent to the Rights Department, Oxford University Press, at the
address above
You must not circulate this work in any other form
and you must impose this same condition on any acquirer
Published in the United States of America by Oxford University Press
198 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016, United States of America
British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
Data available
Library of Congress Control Number: 2017959950
ISBN 978–0–19–881504–4
Printed and bound by
CPI Group (UK) Ltd, Croydon, CR0 4YY
Links to third party websites are provided by Oxford in good faith and
for information only. Oxford disclaims any responsibility for the materials
contained in any third party website referenced in this work.
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 28/4/2018, SPi
Preface
This book had a somewhat more prolonged gestation than most. Some of the work
on which it is based was undertaken in the mid-to-late 1990s and was shaped through
the discussions of a small reading group in the philosophy of mathematics at the
University of Leeds. And many of those discussions centred around the reaction to
Mark Steiner’s now very well-known book, The Applicability of Mathematics as a
Philosophical Problem (Steiner 1998). It seemed to us then that his analysis rendered
the applicability of mathematics mysterious, or at least, more mysterious than it
really is, and that close attention to the historical details would help to dispel that air
of mystery. It is to this claim, namely that we should look more carefully at how
mathematics has actually been applied in physics, that we returned in early 2010 in
Miami when the bones of the book were laid down. In the meantime, we had also
further developed the partial structures variant of the so-called Semantic Approach
as a philosophical device that could be deployed in the analysis of a number of issues
and views, from inter-theory and theory–data relations in general to forms of
structural empiricism and realism more specifically. Coupling that historical sensi-
tivity with the flexibility of this framework seemed to us to be an obvious way to
proceed in examining how mathematics is actually applied to science—specifically
quantum physics—in practice, rather than in the minds of philosophers.
Still, despite the clear road ahead of us, it took a further six years and an intense
few days in Leeds before we had something that we felt could be submitted to the
withering gaze of our colleagues! The book as a whole can be seen as a further
extended paean to the myriad virtues of the partial structures approach but even if
you, the reader, are sceptical about these, we hope you will find something interesting
in our historical and philosophical discussions.
It is set out as follows: Chapter 1 tackles Steiner’s claims and suggests that the
mystery that he sees in the applicability of mathematics can be dispelled by adopting
a kind of optimistic attitude with regard to the variety of mathematical structures that
are typically made available in any given context. This might suggest that applying
mathematics is simply a matter of finding a mathematical structure to fit the
phenomena in question. Nevertheless, a cautionary note can still be sounded, repre-
sented by Mark Wilson’s concern that this attitude does not in fact capture the
manner in which mathematics is applied, not least because mathematics is more
‘rigid’ than this form of optimism assumes. What has to happen for mathematics to
be brought into contact with physics is for certain ‘special circumstances’ to be in
place. We suggest a related approach that builds on the central role of idealizations in
enabling mathematics to be applied—it is via such idealizations that these circum-
stances are effectively constructed.
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 28/4/2018, SPi
viii PREFACE
Much of the rest of the book consists of a series of case studies illustrating that
approach and the manner of the construction of these special circumstances. We
think that it is important to present the details of such case studies, rather than toy
examples, in order to illustrate how mathematics was applied in the context of actual
scientific research rather than in its regimentation through textbooks. The case
studies also exemplify three different roles associated with the application of math-
ematics: a representational role, a unificatory role, and an (alleged) explanatory role.
Before we present these case studies, however, we need to set out the framework in
which these various moves and roles will be examined. Thus, in Chapter 2, we
consider, at one end of the spectrum, the structuralist account associated with Joseph
Sneed, Wolfgang Stegmüller, and others and, at the other, the models-focused
account of Ron Giere. The former, we claim, is heavy on formalism at the expense
of a consideration of practice, whereas the latter draws on a number of interesting
case studies but omits the crucial formal framework. We suggest that both these
extremes should be rejected in favour of an approach that is appropriately formal,
while retaining the ability to represent science as it is actually practised.
And such an approach of course is represented by the partial structures account
that we also present in Chapter 2. Before we do so, however, we highlight and
represent the heuristic role of surplus mathematical structure, as emphasized by
Michael Redhead. The exploitation of such structure is a crucial feature of scientific
practice that we shall return to again and again throughout the book and we maintain
that it is also nicely accommodated within the partial structures framework, extended
to include a variety of partial morphisms (such as partial isomorphism, partial
homomorphism, etc.).
In Chapter 3, we then show how this framework may be used to give an account
of how scientific models represent systems and in a way that pays due regard to the
relationship between the relevant mathematics and such models. In particular, the
open-ended nature of these developments can be accommodated within such a
framework and the use of partial homomorphisms holding between structures
allows us to capture the way in which relations may be transferred from one such
structure to another. Finally, the expansion of the framework to include partial
homomorphisms also allows us to accommodate the fact that typically not all of the
mathematics is used in a particular application, leaving surplus structure that can be
subsequently exploited.
The pay-off begins in Chapter 4, where we present the introduction of group
theory into quantum mechanics in the later 1920s and early 1930s. Here one can
make a somewhat arbitrary distinction between the ‘Weyl’ and ‘Wigner’ pro-
grammes, where the former is concerned with using group theory to set the emerging
quantum physics onto secure foundations and the latter has as its focus a more
practical use as a means of solving complex dynamical problems. Here we emphasize
that the application of the mathematics to the physics depended on certain structural
‘bridges’ within the mathematics itself and also that both this mathematics and the
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 28/4/2018, SPi
PREFACE ix
physics were in a state of flux at the time. Given that and the fact that what we had
was a partial importation of group theory into physics, we argue that the partial
structures approach offers a suitable framework for representing these developments.
More importantly, perhaps, we show how one can resist Steiner’s claim that it is the
mathematics that is doing all the work in these cases, creating a mystery as to how it
can thus capture the physical—rather, it is only because of prior idealizing moves on
the physics side that the mathematics can be brought into play to begin with. This
will be a recurrent theme throughout our work: granted the significance of the
mathematics, the crucial work is undertaken on the empirical side of things!
This analysis is then extended in Chapter 5 to include not only the ‘top-down’
application of group theory but also the ‘bottom-up’ construction of models of the
phenomena, with London’s explanation of the superfluid behaviour of liquid helium
in terms of Bose–Einstein statistics as our case study. Thus, here we have not only the
introduction of ‘high-level’ mathematics in the form of group theory but also a degree
of modelling at the phenomenological level. We claim that in moving from top to
bottom, from the mathematics to what is observed in the laboratory, the models
involved and the relationships between them can be accommodated by the partial
structures approach, coupled with an appreciation of the heuristic moves involved in
scientific work. Furthermore, as in the previous examples, this case fits with the
‘immersion, inference, and interpretation’ account of the application of mathematics
(the inferential conception), whereby immersion of the phenomena into the relevant
mathematics allows for the drawing-down of structure and the derivation of certain
results that can then be interpreted at the phenomenological level.
In Chapter 6, we turn to a different form of application where the aim was to unify
apparently unrelated domains, such as quantum states, probability assignments, and
logical inference. Here our case study is John von Neumann’s development of an
alternative to the Hilbert space formalism that he pioneered—one that is articulated
in terms of his theory of operators and what we now call von Neumann algebras. This
allowed him to accommodate probabilities in the context of systems with infinite
degrees of freedom and here too, as well as ‘top-down’ moves from the mathematics
to the physics, we also find ‘bottom-up’ developments from empirical features, to a
particular logic and thence to mathematical structures. Through a combination of
such moves, crucially involving exploration of the structural relations that hold
between the mathematical and the physical domains, von Neumann was able to
articulate the kind of unification across such domains that represents a further
important aspect of the application of mathematics.
In Chapter 7, we move on to consider whether, in bringing the mathematics into
application in this manner, there are grounds for taking the relevant mathematical
entities to be indispensable. Our case study here is Dirac’s use of the delta function
in quantum mechanics and we point out, first, that Dirac himself was very clear about
the function’s dispensability and, second, even if certain mathematical theories
were indispensable, this wouldn’t justify the commitment to the existence of
Visit https://ebookmass.com today to explore
a vast collection of ebooks across various
genres, available in popular formats like
PDF, EPUB, and MOBI, fully compatible with
all devices. Enjoy a seamless reading
experience and effortlessly download high-
quality materials in just a few simple steps.
Plus, don’t miss out on exciting offers that
let you access a wealth of knowledge at the
best prices!
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 28/4/2018, SPi
x PREFACE
mathematical entities. To illustrate this second point we use a further example, that
of Dirac’s prediction of the existence of antimatter via the exploitation of surplus
mathematical structure. We maintain here that the commitment to the existence of
certain objects requires the satisfaction of certain criteria of existence and it is unclear
whether mathematical entities meet these criteria. Let us be explicit: we agree that
mathematics is indispensable to science but this does not imply that we should be
committed to the existence of mathematical entities.
The putative explanatory role of mathematics is further pursued in Chapter 8,
again in the context of the so-called indispensability argument and the claim that
certain scientific features have a hybrid mathematico-physical nature. Our conclu-
sion here is that, with regard to the former, the possibility of mathematical entities
acquiring some explanatory role is not well motivated, even within the framework of
an account of explanation that might be sympathetic to such a role. Second, the
example of such a hybrid property that has been given is that of spin, but we argue
that the assertion of hybridity also lacks strong motivation and comes with associated
metaphysical costs.
In Chapter 9, we pursue these themes further by examining both the role of
idealization with specific regard to explanation, and the broad criteria of acceptability
that, we argue, any such explanatory account should meet. Our case study here is that
of the phenomenon of universality, and the role of the renormalization group, which
has been held up as another example of mathematics playing a significant explana-
tory role. Again, we press our argument that once we have a clear framework for
understanding representation, and an equally clear understanding of what is required
of any explanation, such claims simply do not hold up. Here the immersion,
inference, and interpretation framework comes to the fore once again and contrary
to Bob Batterman’s proposal we maintain that, on the one hand, this framework can
accommodate the relevant cases he presents but, on the other, the relevant mathem-
atics does not itself play an explanatory role. Nevertheless, we agree with Batterman
that his examples shed new light on the practice of science. By articulating the above
framework within the partial structures approach, we can account for the nature and
significance of the phenomena involved, and thereby offer an understanding of them
within a unitary account of scientific practice.
Our final chapter (Chapter 10) then considers two sets of criticisms of our overall
approach. The first is that there may be cases where the special circumstances
constructed via idealizations simply do not arise and thus our account cannot be
applied to them. We examine one such possible case, the discovery of the Ω- particle,
and conclude that it presents no particular obstacle to our approach. The second
concerns the role of the partial structures framework in capturing scientific practice,
and here we emphasize that we see it as a meta-level representational device that, we
argue, suits the purposes of philosophers of science when considering this practice.
In particular, when it comes to the various different aspects of the applicability of
mathematics, it does the job!
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 28/4/2018, SPi
Contents
Acknowledgements xv
List of Illustrations xvii
xii CONTENTS
CONTENTS xiii
References 235
Name Index 251
Subject Index 254
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 28/4/2018, SPi
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 28/4/2018, SPi
Acknowledgements
We owe a huge debt to many people, across many years and different countries. We
won’t be able to name all of them, but we would like in particular to highlight: Jody
Azzouni, Manuel Barrantes, Mark Colyvan, Newton da Costa, Sarah Kattau, Décio
Krause, James Ladyman, Peter Lewis, Kerry McKenzie, Joseph Melia, Chris Pincock,
Juha Saatsi, Scott Shalkowski, Harvey Siegel, Amie Thomasson, Bas van Fraassen,
and Pete Vickers, among so many friends and colleagues with whom we discussed
and corresponded about the issues examined in this work. To all of them, including
those not individually named above, our sincere thanks.
For extensive comments on the manuscript, we are grateful to Manuel Barrantes
and two anonymous reviewers for Oxford University Press (OUP). Their feedback
led to substantial improvements in the final version of the work. We’d also like to
thank Peter Momtchiloff at OUP for all his tireless support and patience throughout
the long gestation of this work. It has been a pleasure to work with him and his
colleagues at OUP.
Steven would also like to thank, as always, Dena, Morgan, and The Ruffian.
Otávio would like to thank Patrícia, Julia, and Olivia for showing him the world,
and for making life such a great adventure.
On a Sunday afternoon in June 2016, as we worked together on this project in
Leeds, Olivia (Otávio’s then 9-year-old daughter) called to ask what we were up to.
We told her that we were working on the book, and she promptly asked whether it
would be the biggest book in the world. We explained to her that it wouldn’t.
Unfazed, she then proclaimed: “Okay, then make it the best one!” Clearly, it won’t
be easy to live up to her expectations. But at least we did the best we could.
A few months later, as we were putting the final touches in the work, Julia
(Otávio’s then 11-year-old daughter) browsed through the manuscript and com-
plained that the titles weren’t colourful enough. If she had her way, this book would
be called The Awesomeness of Partial Structures!
Finally, we would like to thank Cambridge University Press, Chicago University
Press, Elsevier, Oxford University Press, and Springer, for permission to reproduce
material from the following papers: Bueno, O. (1999): “Empiricism, Conservative-
ness and Quasi-Truth”, Philosophy of Science 66: S474–S485. Bueno, O. (2000):
“Empiricism, Mathematical Change and Scientific Change”, Studies in History and
Philosophy of Science 31: 269–96. Bueno, O. (2005): “Dirac and the Dispensability of
Mathematics”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 36: 465–90.
Bueno, O. (2016): “Belief Systems and Partial Spaces”, Foundations of Science 21:
225–36. Bueno, O. (2017): “Von Neumann, Empiricism, and the Foundations of
Quantum Mechanics”, in Aerts, D., de Ronde, C., Freytes, H., and Giuntini, R. (eds.),
Probing the Meaning and Structure of Quantum Mechanics: Superpositions, Semantics,
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 28/4/2018, SPi
xvi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Dynamics and Identity (Singapore: World Scientific), pp. 192–230. Bueno, O., and
French, S. (1999): “Infestation or Pest Control: The Introduction of Group Theory
into Quantum Mechanics”, Manuscrito 22: 37–86. Bueno, O., and French, S. (2011):
“How Theories Represent”, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62: 857–94.
Bueno, O., and French, S. (2012): “Can Mathematics Explain Physical Phenomena?”,
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63: 85–113. Bueno, O., French, S.,
and Ladyman, J. (2002): “On Representing the Relationship between the Mathemat-
ical and the Empirical”, Philosophy of Science 69: 452–73. Bueno, O., French, S., and
Ladyman, J. (2012): “Empirical Factors and Structural Transference: Returning to the
London Account”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 43: 95–103.
French, S. (1999): “Models and Mathematics in Physics: The Role of Group Theory”,
in Butterfield, J., and Pagonis, C. (eds.), From Physics to Philosophy (Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press), pp. 187–207. French, S. (2000): “The Reasonable
Effectiveness of Mathematics: Partial Structures and the Application of Group
Theory to Physics”, Synthese 125: 103–20. French, S. (2015): “Between Weasels and
Hybrids: What Does the Applicability of Mathematics Tell Us about Ontology?”, in
Beziau, J.-Y., Krause, D., and Arenhart, J. (eds.), Conceptual Clarifications: Tributes to
Patrick Suppes (London: College Publications), pp. 63–86.
OUP CORRECTED PROOF – FINAL, 28/4/2018, SPi
List of Illustrations
1
Just How Unreasonable is the
Effectiveness of Mathematics?
1.1 Introduction
Eugene Wigner’s famous description of the ‘unreasonable effectiveness’ of mathe-
matics has, explicitly or implicitly, structured much of the discussion of applicability
in recent years (Wigner 1960). Those two simple words of his phrase have laid down
the parameters of the debate: on the one hand, mathematics is clearly effective as, at
the very least, the language of science, but on the other, given the apparently stark
differences between mathematics and science,¹ this effectiveness appears unreason-
able. Put bluntly, the question is: how can something apparently so different from
science be so useful in scientific practice? This question invites comparison of the
mathematical and scientific domains, and in order to effect such a comparison
one must choose a suitable mode of representation. It further invites us to pay
close attention to the elements of practice, in order to discern the intricate workings
of the mathematical in the domain of the physical.
Of course, certain notable philosophies of mathematics do present highly articu-
lated representational frameworks. However, they fail to appropriately consider the
practice itself. Looking in the other direction, as it were, one can identify several
attempts to redress the balance, to present the nitty-gritty of both mathematical and
scientific practice. Nevertheless, admirable as these attempts might be, they are
deficient when it comes to the other side of the coin: they fail to present these details
within an appropriate mode of representation. Even worse, in one notable case, the
details are presented in a reconstruction that is so artificial as to give the most
Whiggish of historians pause. In this opening chapter, we shall argue that this
detaching of practice from the relevant history actually perpetuates the mystery of
applicability.² In subsequent chapters we shall attempt to dispel the air of mystery by
offering what we consider to be a closer reading of the historical circumstances.
¹ These differences are both epistemic, in terms of the manner in which the respective truths in
mathematics and science are established, and ontological, in terms of the apparent causal efficacy of the
relevant objects.
² This sense of mystery was perpetuated by Wigner himself, who wrote, ‘ . . . the enormous usefulness of
mathematics in the natural sciences is something bordering on the mysterious and . . . there is no rational
explanation for it’ (1960, p. 2).
Visit https://ebookmass.com today to explore
a vast collection of ebooks across various
genres, available in popular formats like
PDF, EPUB, and MOBI, fully compatible with
all devices. Enjoy a seamless reading
experience and effortlessly download high-
quality materials in just a few simple steps.
Plus, don’t miss out on exciting offers that
let you access a wealth of knowledge at the
best prices!
Other documents randomly have
different content
“Losing? You don’t know creditor from debtor account. That comes
of education; it is never of use. Nothing like business for teaching a
man. I don’t believe in your book-learning.”
“I’ll come again to-morrow and go more carefully into the
accounts.”
“Oh, thank you, not necessary. It is clear to me you do not
understand my system--and mistake sides.” Pasco became red and
angry. “Look here, Mr. Schoolmaster, let me give you a word. You
don’t belong to the labourers--you won’t be able to make friends of
them. You don’t belong to the gentry; there are none here--so you
need not think of their society. You don’t belong to the middle class--
you are not a farmer, or a tradesman, or a merchant; so they will
have nothing to do with you. You make my accounts all right, and
the balance on the right side; give up your foolish book-keeping as
learned at college, and set my accounts right by common sense, and
I’ll see what I can do to get you taken up by some respectable
people. And, one thing more. Don’t go contradicting men of property,
and saying that there was no cock-fighting at Waterloo, because
there was; and people don’t like contradictions. When I broke open
the belfry door that the ringers might give Mr. Puddicombe a peal, I
let the world see I wasn’t going to be priest-ridden; and we are not
going to be schoolmaster-ridden neither, and told our accounts are
wrong, and that Waterloo, where the cock-fight was, is not in
England.”
CHAPTER XI
DISCORDS
U nwilling to return to his lodgings, where in vain the net was spread
in his sight, Bramber walked towards Coombe Cellars. There for
sixpence he could have his tea--cockles, winkles, and presumably
bread and butter.
There also would he see that pale-faced girl with the large violet-
blue eyes, which had been fixed on him with so much sympathy.
Disappointed in proportion to the sanguineness of his expectations,
Walter felt that he needed some relief from his discouragement, a
word from some one who could understand him. On that day he had
looked straight into many eyes, into beaming eyes, into irises that
were dull with no speech in them, into stupid eyes, into boastful, into
defiant, into insolent eyes.
Those of his landlady were clear as crystal, and he could see to
their bottom; but what he saw there was but the agglomeration of
common details of everyday life--so many loaves per week, a pint of
milk, a beefsteak or mutton chop for supper, coals at so much a
bushel, so much cleaning, so much washing. As in a revolving slide
in a magic lantern, the same figures, the same trees, the same
houses, reappear in endless iteration; so would it be with the eyes of
the landlady, week by week, year by year, till those eyes closed in
death; nought else would be revealed in their shadows but loaves
and milk, and coals and washing, over and over and over again.
There are eyes that are stony and have no depth in them; such were
those of Zerah. Others have profundity, but are treacherous; such
were those of Pasco. In the two glimpses into the eyes of the pale
girl, whose name he did not know, Bramber had seen depths that
seemed unfathomable; wells which had their sources in the heart,
deeps full of mystery and promise.
The evening might have been one in summer. A light east wind
was playing; the sky was clear. The sun had been hot all day. Marsh
marigolds blazed at the water brim, reflecting their golden faces in
the tide. The orchards were sheeted with daffodils. The evening sky
was blue shot with primrose, and every hue was mirrored in the
water.
Bramber asked to have his tea out of doors on the little platform
above the water, and Mrs. Pepperill bade Kate attend on the
schoolmaster, and remain on the terrace so as to be ready to bring
him anything he required; and, in the event of his desiring company,
to be present to converse with him. She herself was engaged, and
could not give him her attention.
The evening was so warm, so balmy, that it could do the
convalescent no harm to sit outside the house. Kate took her
needlework and planted herself on the low wall above the water, one
foot in a white stocking and neat shoe touching the gravel. She was
at some distance from the schoolmaster, who opened a book and
read whilst taking his tea. He did not, apparently, require her society,
and she had no thought of forcing herself on him.
Yet, occasionally, unobserved by her, Bramber looked her way.
Behind her was an orchard-sweep golden with daffodils, and the
slant setting sun, shooting down a gap in the hills, kindled the whole
multitude of flower-heads into a blaze of wavering sunfire. Kate sat,
a dark figure against this luminous background, but her plum-
coloured kerchief, bound round her throat and tied across her breast,
was wondrous in contrast with the brilliant flowers.
Occasionally, moreover, Kate, who long looked at the flower carpet
which by its radiance threw a golden light into her face, turned her
head to see if the schoolmaster needed more milk or butter; and
then her eyes rested on the book he held with much the same greed
with which a child fastens its eyes on sweets and a miser on gold.
The setting sun had fired glass windows on the opposite side of
the estuary, and it flashed in every ripple running in from the sea.
Kate wore a little bunch of celandines in her bosom, pinned into
the purple kerchief. The flowers were open through the warmth of
their position, and when she stooped and a streak of sunlight fell on
them and filled their cups, they sent a golden sheen over her chin.
The girl was looking dreamily with turned head at the sheet of
blazing daffodils, drinking in the beauty of the scene, and sighing,
she knew not why, when she was startled to hear a voice at her ear,
and, looking round, saw the schoolmaster.
“Are you admiring the daffodils?” he asked.
“Yes,” answered Kate, too shy, too surprised to say more.
“And I,” said he, “I also have been looking at them; and then I
turned to familiar lines in Wordsworth, the poet I am reading. Do
you know them?”
“About lent-lilies? I know nothing.”
“Listen.”
Then Bramber read--
“I wandered lonely as a cloud
That floats on high o’er vales and hills,
When all at once I saw a crowd,
A host of golden daffodils;
Beside the lake, beneath the trees,
Fluttering and dancing in the breeze.
Kate’s dark blue eyes were fixed with intensity on the reader’s
face. Then they became full to overflowing.
“Why,” exclaimed Bramber, “you are crying!”
“It is so true, it is so beautiful,” she said, and her voice shook; and
as she spoke the tears ran down her white cheeks. “How did he who
wrote that know about my illness, and that I was thinking about, and
troubled about, the daffodils when I was in my fever? It is all true”;
she put her hands to her bosom; “I feel it--I cannot bear it.”
Walter Bramber paused in surprise. He was himself a passionate
lover of nature, of flowers, and he was fond of the words of the poet
of nature--words that touched deep chords in his spirit. But here was
a pale, reserved girl, to whom the words of the poet appealed with
even greater force than to himself.
“Are you fond of poetry?” he asked.
She hesitated, and slightly coloured before answering.
“I do not know. Father sings a song or two. There are words, they
rhyme, and they are set to a tune, and sometimes a good tune helps
along bad words; but I never before heard words that had the music
in themselves and wanted nothing to carry them along as on the
wings of a bird. When you read that to me, it was just as though I
heard what I had felt in my heart over and over again, and had
never found how I could put it.”
“Do you know why these flowers are called daffodils?”
She turned her solemn eyes on him again.
“Because they are daffodils; why else?”
“I suppose,” said Bramber, “when the Normans came to England,
they brought these yellow flowers with them, and with the flowers
the name by which they had known them in Normandy--Fleurs
d’Avril, which means April flowers.”
“They do come in April, but also in March, and this year the
weather has been warm, and everything is advanced.”
“So,” continued Bramber, “when the English tried to pronounce the
French name, Fleurs d’Avril, they made daverils, and then slid away
into further difference, and settled down on daffodils. Do you know
about the Conquest by the Normans?”
Kate shook her head sadly.
“I know nothing--nothing at all.” Then, after a pause, she asked
timidly, “Will you be very good and kind, and repeat those verses,
and let me learn them by heart? Oh,” she gasped, and expanded,
and clasped her hands, “it would be such a joy to me! and I could
repeat them for ever and ever, and be happy.”
“I shall be delighted.”
Kate planted herself on one of the benches by the table, leaned
her chin in her hands, and listened to each line of the poem with
concentrated attention. One or two words she did not understand,
and Bramber explained their meaning to her. When the piece had
been read over slowly, she said--
“May I try? Do you mind? I think I know it.”
Then she recited the poem with perfect accuracy.
“You are quick at learning,” said Bramber. “I hope I may find my
pupils in the National School as eager to acquire and as ready to
apprehend.”
“I never heard words like these before,” said Kate.
“May I tell you what they are like to me?”
“Certainly.”
“They are like lightning on a still night, without rain, without
thunder. The heavens are open and there is light--that is all. Is there
more in that book?”
“A great deal,” answered the young man; and, pointing to the
celandines in Kate’s bosom, said, “The poet has something to say
about these flowers.”
“What, buttercups?”
“They are not buttercups. Take them out from where they are
pinned. I will teach you a lesson--how to distinguish sorts.”
As the girl removed the bunch and placed it on the table, he said,
“Do you see the petals? The golden leaves of the flower are called
petals. They are pointed. Now, remember, a buttercup has rounded
petals.”
“You are right, and they come out later. They are more like little
drunkards.”
“Drunkards? What do you mean?”
“The large golden cups that grow by the water’s edge--these we
call drunkards, but they drink only water.”
“You mean the marsh marigold.”
“Perhaps so, but it is very different from the marigold of the
garden. The leaves”--
Bramber laughed. “Now you are going to teach me to distinguish.
You are quite right--that water-drinker is not a marigold at all. But
country people give it that name because it is the great golden
flower that blooms at or about Lady Day, and the lady is the Virgin
Mary. Now consider. The celandine has sharply-pointed petals. Do
you see the difference between them and those of the golden water-
drinker?”
“I see this clearly now.”
“He who wrote those verses about the daffodils has written three
poems on the celandine.”
“What! on these little flowers?”
Kate coloured with delight and surprise.
“Yes, and very beautiful they are. I will reserve them for another
day. You have enough to think about in the lines on the daffodils.”
“How did the man who wrote them know of my illness, and how I
dreamed and troubled about the daffodils?”
“He knew nothing of you.”
“He must have done so. He says he was lonely as a cloud, and I
am Kitty Alone.”
“Is that your name?”
“They call me so because I have no companions and no friends,
and because”--She checked herself and hung her head.
“But you have relatives.”
“Yes--my father and Aunt Zerah. But for all that I am alone. They
are grown big and old, and so of course cannot understand me--a
child. And at school I didn’t have friends. Then the man must have
been here, for he says--
That is true of the inward eye. You can see more with that than
with the real eye. The man was a prophet. He knew and wrote of
things that are not known or are not talked about in the world.”
“So they call you Kitty Alone. You did not give me the second
reason. What is that reason?”
The girl looked embarrassed.
“You will laugh at me.”
“Indeed I will not,” answered Bramber earnestly.
She still hesitated.
“You fear me? Surely you can trust me.”
“You are so good--indeed I can. You speak to me as does no one
else, and that is just why I do not wish to appear ridiculous in your
eyes.”
“That you never will.”
Then she said, blushing and hanging her head, “It is all along of a
song my father sings.”
“What song is that?”
“It is some silly nonsense about a frog that lived in a well--and the
burden is--‘Kitty Alone’--and then ‘Kitty Alone and I.'”
“Sing me the words.”
She did as requested.
“The air is pleasant and very quaint. It deserves better words. Will
you remain here whilst I run for my violin?”
“Yes, unless my aunt calls me within.”
Walter Bramber hastened to his lodgings, and brought away his
cherished instrument. He made the girl sing over a few verses of the
song, and then struck in with the violin.
He speedily caught the melody, and played it, then went off into
variations, returning anon to the pleasant theme, and Kate listened
in surprise and admiration. Never before had she thought that there
was much of air, or of grace and delicacy in the tune as sung by her
father, and cast jeeringly at her in scraps by the youths of Coombe-
in-Teignhead. Zerah looked out at the door and summoned her
niece.
Kate started as from a dream.
“My bunch of flowers,” she said.
Bramber had secured the celandines.
CHAPTER XIII
THE SPIRIT OF INQUIRY
K ate entered the house, at the summons of her aunt, and found
that John Pooke was within, standing with his hat in his hand, in
front of him, twirling it about and playing with the string that served
to contract the lining band.
“I am so glad to see that you are well, Kitty.”
Kate thanked him. She was not a little vexed at being called away
from conversation with the schoolmaster, whose talk was so unlike
that of any other man she had met. The rector she knew and loved,
but she was before him as a scholar to be instructed in spiritual
concerns, and their conversation never turned on such matters as
had been mooted between her and the schoolmaster. For a little
while she had been translated into a new sphere, and had heard
words of another order to those that had hitherto met her ears. Now
she was brought back into the world of commonplace, and could not
at once recover herself and accommodate herself to it. This made
her shy and silent. Pooke also was shy, but he was awkward to boot.
“Have you nothing to say to me, Kate?” he asked in suppliant
tone.
“Indeed, I thank you many times, Jan, for inquiring about me
when I was ill. Now, as you see, I am myself again.”
“I was the cause of your illness.”
“No indeed, no blame attaches to you. We will not talk of blame--
there is none.”
“Are you going to Ashburton Fair on Tuesday?”
“I do not know.”
“Yes, you do,” threw in Aunt Zerah; then to John Pooke, “She is
going to the moor to her father for a change. It is her father’s wish,
so that she may be soon strong again. He will meet her at Ashburton
at the fair, if we can get her so far.”
“I am going to the fair,” said Pooke eagerly. “That is to say, sister
Sue and I be going together there. The young man to whom she is
about to be married lives at Ashburton, and will have it that she
goes. There is room for a third in our trap. I should so much like to
take you--I mean, sister Sue would wish it, if you would favour me--I
mean sister Sue.”
“Thank you again, Jan, for another kindness,” said the girl, “but I
shall be driven to Ashburton by my uncle. I really had not considered
that the fair was on Tuesday.”
“Your uncle can spare you,” thrust in Zerah; “and if Jan Pooke is so
civil as to invite you to go in his conveyance, it is only proper you
should accept.”
“But, aunt,” said Kate, slightly colouring, “my father has settled
that I am to go with Uncle Pasco, and I do not like”--
“Oh, so long as you are got to Ashburton, it doesn’t matter who
takes you,” interrupted Zerah.
“If it does not matter,” said Kate, “then let me hold to my father’s
arrangement.”
“That is not kind to me--I mean to sister Sue,” said Pooke dolefully.
“I intend no unkindness,” answered the girl, “but when my father
has made a plan, I do not like to break it even in little matters.”
The young man twirled his hat about, and pulled out the string
from the band. He paused, looked ashamed, and said, “You don’t
choose to go with me, that is the long and the short of it. Your aunt
will excuse you from going with Pasco Pepperill.”
“Do not tease me, Jan,” pleaded Kate, confused and unhappy. She
was well aware that there had been village talk about her having
been in the boat with Jan, that her aunt was desirous of thrusting
her upon him. With maidenly reserve she shrank from his proposal,
lest by riding in the trap with him some colour might be given to the
suspicions entertained in the village, and some food should be
supplied to the gossips.
The lad went to the window, and looked out on the little platform
with moody eyes.
“Why,” said he, “there is that new schoolmaster there.” He stood
watching him. “He’s a noodle. What do’y think he is about? He has
got three or four faded buttercups, and he is putting them between
the leaves of his note-book, just as though there was something
wonderful in them; just as if they were the rarest flowers in the
world. I always thought he was a fool--now I know it.”
Kate winced.
“I say,” pursued Jan, “have you heard about him and Jackson’s
‘Tee-dum’? The landlord went to him civil-like, and invited him to join
the choir. He bragged about his violin as if he could play finer than
anyone hereabouts. But when the landlord told him our chaps could
play Jackson’s ‘Tee-dum,’ he ran away. I reckon Jackson’s ‘Tee-dum’
is a piece to find out the corners of a man. He daren’t face it. Kitty, if
you won’t come with me to the fair, I swear I’ll offer the odd seat to
Rose Ash.”
Then he left the house.
Kate attempted to fly, for she knew what was coming, but was
arrested by her aunt, who grasped her by the shoulders.
“You little fool!” she said. “Don’t you see what may come of this if
you manage well, or let me manage for you? Jan Tottle came here
every day to inquire when you were ill, and now you let him slip
between your fingers and into the hands of that designing Rose. He
is a ball that has come to you, and you toss it to her. Don’t think she
is fool enough to toss him back to you. When she has him she will
close her fingers on him. What is going to become of you, I’d like to
know, that you should act like this? Do not reckon on anything your
father will bring you; or on your uncle either. One is helping the
other down the road to ruin, and we may all be nearer the
poorhouse than you imagine.”
She let go her hand, for Bramber came in, and asked what he had
to pay.
“Sixpence,” answered Zerah, “and what you like to the little maid. I
reckon she’ll take a ha’penny.”
Kate’s head fell, covered with shame, and she thrust her hands
behind her back.
Walter paid Mrs. Pepperill, and said, without looking at Kate, “The
little maid and I understand each other, and the account between us
is settled.”
“Now look here,” said Zerah, allowing her niece to escape, and
laying hold of the young man, “I want a word with you, Mr.
Schoolmaster. My husband has let you go through his accounts. I
reckon he’d got that muddled himself, he didn’t know his way out,
and thought you’d have led him, as well as Jack-o’-lantern leads out
of a bog. The light is good enough, but when the mire is there, what
can the light do but show it? It can’t dry it up. If it weren’t for the
cockles and coffee as I get a few sixpences by, I reckon we’d have
been stogged (mired) long ago. But Pasco, he has the idea that he’s
a man of business and can manage a thousand affairs, and as ill-luck
will have it, that brother o’ mine feeds his fancies wi’ fresh meat.
Now I want you to tell me exactly what you found in his books.”
“I am not justified in speaking of Mr. Pepperill’s private affairs.”
“What! not to his wife?”
“Not to anyone. I was taken into confidence.”
“Bless you! he couldn’t help himself. Set a man as don’t know
nothing about machinery to manage an engine, and he’ll get it all to
pieces in no time. Pasco knows nothing about business, and there he
is trying to run coal stores, wool, timber--all kinds o’ things. I know
what it will come to, though you keep mum.”
To escape further questioning, Bramber left Coombe Cellars, and
walked towards the village.
The school was closed for a week. Some painting and plastering
had to be done in it before he could begin his duties. It was as well,
he thought; it allowed him time to find his bearings, to get to
understand something of the people amongst whom he was to be
settled, and whose children he was to instruct.
As Bramber walked in the dusk, he encountered the rector, Mr.
Fielding, who stopped him.
“Are you going indoors?” asked the parson; “or have you leisure
and inclination for a stroll?”
“You do me an honour, sir; I shall be proud.”
“Let us walk by the water-side. This is a beautiful hour--neither
night nor day--something of one, something of the other, like life.
And who can say of the twilight in which he walks whether it will
broaden into perfect day or deepen into utter night.”
The rector took the young man’s arm.
Mr. Fielding belonged to a type that has completely disappeared;
peculiar to its time and necessarily transitory. He belonged to that
school of Churchmen which had been founded by Newman and
Keble; of men cultured, scholarly, refined in thought, steeped in
idealism, unconsciously affected, aiming at what was impossible,--at
least, fully to achieve,--and not knowing practicable methods, not
able to distinguish proportion in what they sought after, ready to
contend to death equally for trifles as for principles.
Mr. Fielding wore tall white collars and a white tie, a black dress
coat and open black waistcoat. His hat was usually at the back of his
head, and he walked with his head bent forwards and his shoulder
against the wall--a trick caught and copied from Newman, caught
when first under his influence, and now unconsciously followed.
Mr. Fielding was unmarried, a quiet, studious man, courteous to
all, understood by none.
They walked together a little way, and talked on desultory matters.
Then Walter Bramber asked the rector, “Would you mind telling me,
sir, where my predecessor got into trouble? Mr. Pepperill says it was
at Waterloo.”
“Waterloo? dear me, no; it was at Wellington.”
“I knew it could not be at Waterloo, but he insisted on it, and that
it was in England.”
“There was, you see, a connection of ideas. There is always that,
in the worst blunders. Did you correct him?”
“Yes; I said Waterloo was not in England.”
“You should have let it pass, till you knew how to enlighten him as
to where the place really was. Never show a man he is wrong till you
can show him how he can be right. Also, never let a man see you are
pulling him out of a ditch, always let him think he is scrambling out
of it himself. A man’s self-respect is his best governing motive, and
should not be wounded.”
They paced along together a little way.
“You are a young man,” said the rector, “and a young man is
sanguine.” He paused, and walked on without saying anything for a
minute, then he added, “I was sanguine once. That arises from
confidence in one’s self, and confidence in one’s cause, and
confidence in mankind. You have a noble cause--the priest and the
schoolmaster have the greatest of missions: to educate what is
highest in man, spirit and intellect. You have no reason to be shaken
by any doubt, to feel any hesitation in adhesion to the cause of
education. ‘Let there be light!’ was the first word God spake. There is
the keynote of creation, the moral law laid down for the whole
intelligent world. We walk in the twilight that we know is brightening
into day.”
He paused again; then after a dozen paces he proceeded, “You
have confidence in yourself. You have enthusiasm, you have ability,
you know what you have to teach, and you long to impart to others
what you value yourself. Is it not so?”
“It is so indeed.”
“Discouragement will come, and it is my duty to prepare you for it.
You have confidence in human nature. You think all will be as eager
to drink in instruction as you are eager to dispense it. You may be
mistaken, and will be disappointed. It has taken me some years, Mr.
Bramber, to learn a fact which I will communicate to you, as a
caution against losing heart. You will remember that when the sower
went forth to sow, though all his seed was good, yet only one-fourth
part came to anything. We must work for the work’s sake, and not
for results. In your patience possess ye your souls. That is one of the
hardest of lessons to acquire.”
“I will try not to expect too much.”
“Expect nothing. Look to the work, and the work only. One sows,
another reaps, a third grinds, a fourth bakes, but it is the fifth who
eats the loaf and tastes how good it is. Did you ever hear what Mme.
de Maintenon said of the carps, that had been transferred to the
marble basins of Marly, in which they died? ‘Ah!’ said she, ‘they are
like me, they regret their native mud.’ You will find that your pupils
do not want to be translated to purer fountains, that in them there is
a hankering after their native ignorance. That there will be little
receptiveness, no enthusiasm after the light, no hunger after the
bread of the Spirit--that is what you must be prepared to find. I have
found it so, and am now content with the smallest achievements--to
make them take a few crumbs from my palm, to accept the tiniest
ray let into their clouded minds. Be content to do your work, and do
not be asking for results. Do your duty, leave results to another day
and to the reapers. You and I are the humble sowers, enough for us
to know that, but for us, there would be no golden harvest which we
shall not see.”
The rector withdrew his hand from the arm of Bramber.
“There is a saying, ‘Except ye be as little children’--You know the
rest. What does that mean? Not the simplicity of children--simplicity
springs out of inexperience; not the innocence--which arises from
ignorance--but the inquisitiveness of the child, which is its
characteristic. The child asks questions, it wants to know everything,
often asking what it is inconvenient to answer. Mr. Bramber, unless
we have this spirit of inquiry, we cannot enter into any kingdom
above that of animal life. There is the intellectual kingdom, and
when there is eagerness to know, then there is advance into that
realm, and you will be the great prophet and mystagogue who will
lead the young of this village into that kingdom. Then, secondly,
there is the spiritual kingdom, but of that I will not now speak. I
hope you will find some pupils apt to learn, but the many will, I fear,
be listless.”
“A single swallow does not make a summer,” said the
schoolmaster; “but I have already met with one here who verily
hungers and thirsts after knowledge.”
“Ah!” Mr. Fielding looked round, and his face lightened. “You have
met--talked to Kitty.”
“Yes, sir; she is full of eagerness.”
“Oh that we had many other minds as active! Alas! alas! I fear in
that she is, as they call her, Kitty Alone.”
CHAPTER XIV
TO THE FAIR
W alter Bramber sprang from his seat beside Pasco, on the latter
drawing up outside the inn at Ashburton, and ran to the back of
the tax-cart that he might assist Kate to descend. There was no step
at the back. He held up his arms to receive her; she was standing
preparing to spring.
As he looked up, he exclaimed, “They are planets!”
“What are planets?”
“Those blue orbs--their light is so still and true.”
Then he caught her as she sprang, glad to cover her confusion. A
compliment was something to which Kate was wholly unaccustomed,
and one startled and shamed her.
“Now, whither?” he asked.
“To my father.”
“But where is he?”
“I do not know.”
“Come, come!” said Pepperill, who had consigned the reins to the
ostler. “I want you, schoolmaster; I cannot let you go fairing yet. I
have business on my hands and desire your presence. Afterwards, if
you will, and when we have got rid of Kate, I’ll find you some one
more agreeable with whom you can go and see the shows.”
“But, in the meanwhile, who is to take care of her?” asked
Bramber.
“I will do that,” said John Pooke, who came up, elbowing his way
through the crowd. “Here are several of us Coombe-in-Teignhead
folk: there is sister Sue, but she is off with her sweetheart; and here
is Rose Ash, and here is Noah Flood.”
Welcome to our website – the ideal destination for book lovers and
knowledge seekers. With a mission to inspire endlessly, we offer a
vast collection of books, ranging from classic literary works to
specialized publications, self-development books, and children's
literature. Each book is a new journey of discovery, expanding
knowledge and enriching the soul of the reade
Our website is not just a platform for buying books, but a bridge
connecting readers to the timeless values of culture and wisdom. With
an elegant, user-friendly interface and an intelligent search system,
we are committed to providing a quick and convenient shopping
experience. Additionally, our special promotions and home delivery
services ensure that you save time and fully enjoy the joy of reading.
ebookmass.com