0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views2 pages

Traditional & Virtual Architecture

The document compares the costs and resource utilization of traditional dedicated servers versus virtualized servers for a company considering an upgrade. Traditional servers require 5 units costing $25,000 with an annual cost of $26,576.80, while virtualized servers only need 3 units costing $18,000 with a total annual cost of $19,098.90, demonstrating better resource utilization through consolidation and flexibility.

Uploaded by

Min khant Kyaw
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
26 views2 pages

Traditional & Virtual Architecture

The document compares the costs and resource utilization of traditional dedicated servers versus virtualized servers for a company considering an upgrade. Traditional servers require 5 units costing $25,000 with an annual cost of $26,576.80, while virtualized servers only need 3 units costing $18,000 with a total annual cost of $19,098.90, demonstrating better resource utilization through consolidation and flexibility.

Uploaded by

Min khant Kyaw
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Let's assume a company is considering upgrading its server infrastructure.

They need to
choose between traditional dedicated servers and virtualized servers. We’ll calculate costs
and resource utilization based on the following assumptions:

- Traditional Server Architecture: 5 physical servers.


- Virtualized Server Architecture: Using VMware or Hyper-V to host multiple virtual
machines (VMs) on fewer physical servers.

1. Traditional Server Architecture

Assumptions:
- Each server has 8 GB of RAM and 4 CPUs.
- Servers run at 80% utilization.
- Servers cost $5,000 each (for hardware and software).
- Power consumption per server: 300W.
- Electricity cost: $0.12 per kWh.

Calculation:
Total Number of Servers = 5
Server Cost = $5,000 per server
Total Server Cost = 5 * $5,000 = $25,000
Power Consumption per Server = 300W
Total Power Consumption = 5 * 300W = 1500W (or 1.5kW)
Annual Power Consumption (in kWh) = 1.5kW * 24 hours/day * 365 days/year
= 13,140 kWh/year
Annual Electricity Cost = 13,140 kWh * $0.12/kWh = $1,576.80
Total Annual Cost for Traditional Servers = $25,000 (initial) + $1,576.80 (electricity) =
$26,576.80/year

2. Virtualized Server Architecture


Assumptions:
- Server Consolidation Ratio: Each physical server can host 4 virtual machines (VMs) using
virtualization technology.
- The company will use only 3 physical servers to host the same number of workloads.
- The total number of VMs required is 20 (same as 5 servers * 4 VMs per server).
- Servers cost $6,000 each due to more powerful hardware (e.g., better processors and higher
RAM).
- Power consumption per server: 350W (slightly higher due to the increased specs).

Calculation:
Total Number of Servers = 3
Server Cost = $6,000 per server
Total Server Cost = 3 * $6,000 = $18,000
Power Consumption per Server = 350W
Total Power Consumption = 3 * 350W = 1.05kW

Annual Power Consumption (in kWh) = 1.05kW * 24 hours/day * 365 days/year = 9,157.5
kWh/year

Annual Electricity Cost = 9,157.5 kWh * $0.12/kWh = $1,098.90

Total Annual Cost for Virtualized Servers = $18,000 (initial) + $1,098.90 (electricity)
=$19,098.90/year

Summary of Costs
| Architecture | Initial Cost | Annual Electricity Cost | Total Annual Cost |
|--------------------------|--------------|--------------------------|--------------------|
| Traditional Servers | $25,000 | $1,576.80 | $26,576.80 |
| Virtualized Servers | $18,000 | $1,098.90 | $19,098.90 |

Why Virtualization Leads to Better Resource Utilization:


1. Consolidation: Multiple workloads run on a single physical server, reducing idle time and
improving resource use.
2. Flexibility: Virtual machines can be dynamically allocated more resources if required and
can be moved to another physical server when necessary (e.g., in case of high load).
3. Overprovisioning: You can over-provision resources because not all VMs are likely to use
their full allocated resources at the same time.
4. Dynamic Scaling: You can scale VMs up or down based on workload demands, avoiding
overprovisioning of resources in the same way as traditional server setups.

You might also like