Case 2017CV000018 Document 977 Scanned 08-07-2019 Page 1 of 4 STATE OF WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT For Official Use: ASHLAND COUNTY Kevin Evensen and Valerie Evensen, Plaintiffs, aR oR ASTRAND COTY WEN ¥ Heights Finance Corporation, Defendant. Case No. 17-CV-18 SPECIAL VERDICT L._Did Greg Kuklinski/Greg’s Towing and Repair commit a breach of the peace in taking possession of the 2007 Chrysler 300 autgfnobile? Yes No 28, _ Did Heights Finance Corporation ratify the conduct of Greg Kuklinski/Greg’s ‘Towing and Repair related to the repossession of the 2012 Palomino Puma? ‘Yes No 2b. _ Did Heights Finance Corporation ratify the conduct of Greg Kuklinski/Greg’s Towing and Repair related to the repossession of the 2007 Chrysler 300? Yes No 3. Was the conduct of Greg Kuklinski or Greg’s Towing and Repair a cause of injury to Mrs. or Mr. Evensen? J Yes No. Ifyou answered Question 3 “Yes,” answer Question 4, Ifyou answered Question 3 “No,” skip to answer Question 7. 4, Was Heights Finance negligent in the hiring, training, and/or supervision of Greg Kuklinski or Greg's Towing?Case 2017CV000018 Document 377 Scanned 08-07-2019 Page 2of 4 Yes No. Ifyou answered Question 4 “Yes,” answer Question S. If you answered Question 4 “No,” skip to answer Question 7. 5. Was the negligence of Heights Finance a cause of the conduct Greg Kuklinski and Greg's Towing and Repair on February 1 Ifyou answered Question 5 “Yes,” answer Question 6, If you answered Question 5 “No,” skip to answer Question 7. 6. ‘What sum of money will fairly and reasonably compensate Mrs. and Mrs. Evensen for damages sustained as a natural and probable consequence stemming from their negligent hiring of Mr. Kuklinski or Greg’s Towing and Repair: $ 4,G06 7. __ During the repossession of the 2007 Chrysler 300 did Greg Kuklinski or Greg's Towing and Repair make a claim, or attempt to threaten to enforce a right with knowledge or reason to know at that time that the right did nos exist? yes_V No Ifyou answered Question 7 “Yes,” answer Question 8. Ifyou answered Question 7 “No,” skip to answer Question 9. 8. You must decide if you are awarding “actual damages” or “statutory damages.” You may only award damages in ONE of the eategories. Actual damages in the amount of: $ Alternatively, statutory damages in the amount (from $100-$1,000) of 1,000 9. During the repossession of the 2007 Chrysler 300 did Greg Kuklinski or Greg's ‘Towing and Repair engage in conduct that reasonably could be expected to threaten or harass Mr. or Mrs. Evensen? f Yes NoCase 2017CV000018 Document 377 Scanned 08-07-2019 Paye Sof 4 Ifyou answered Question 9 “Yes,” answer Question 10. If you answered Question 9 “No,” skip to answer Question 11. 10. You must decide if you are awarding “actual dai es” or “statutory damages.” You may only award damages in ONE of the categories. Actual damages in the amount of: $2,500 Alternatively, statutory damages in the amount (from $100-$1,000) of: 11. Was Greg Kuklinski's driving the 1997 Dodge Ram pick-up truck an unreasonable intrusion upon the privacy of Mr. or Mrs. Evensen that was of a nature that would be highly offensive to a reasonable person, in e that a reasonable person would consider private? ‘Yes No Afyou answered Question 11 “Yes,” answer Question 12. If you answered Question 11 “No,” skip to answer Question 13, 12, What amount of damages do you award? § 5) 560 13. Did Mr. Kuklinski’s driving of the plaintiffs’ 1997 Dodge Ram pick-up truck constitute trespass?” Yes No Ifyou answered Question 13 “Yes,” answer Question 14. If you answered Question 14 “No,” skip to answer Question 15. 14, ‘What amount of damages do you award? $_ 5,500 15, If you awarded damages in eny category, should Mrs, and Mr. Evensen be awarded punitive damages? YES NO If your answer is “Yes,” in what amount? $ 200 000. ee Dated this] aay of gust 2019,Case 2017CV000018 Document $77 Scanned 08-07-2019 page got 4 DISSENTING JUROR(S): As to Question(s): As to Question(s): As to Question(s):