Scribd
Upload
27 views4 pages

ABA624 Week 3 Assignment

The document outlines the progress and data analysis for ABA 624 SAFMEDS Deck 2, highlighting an upward trend in correct card responses after implementing a study intervention. The author recorded baseline data and subsequent improvements, achieving a goal of 14 correct cards and zero incorrect cards by revising terms daily. Overall, the study methods were deemed effective with no necessary adjustments to the intervention plan.

Uploaded by

shanmugadhivya
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
27 views4 pages

ABA624 Week 3 Assignment

The document outlines the progress and data analysis for ABA 624 SAFMEDS Deck 2, highlighting an upward trend in correct card responses after implementing a study intervention. The author recorded baseline data and subsequent improvements, achieving a goal of 14 correct cards and zero incorrect cards by revising terms daily. Overall, the study methods were deemed effective with no necessary adjustments to the intervention plan.

Uploaded by

shanmugadhivya
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

‘

ABA624 Week 3 Assignment

Figure 1.1 Acquisition Deck2 Progress chart

Table 1:1 Acquisition Deck2 Best of the Day Data


Figure 1.2 ABA624 Acquisition Deck2 Knowledge Builder graph

Table 1.2 ABA624 Acquisition Deck Knowledge Builder Data


Figure 1.3 Fluency Deck 2 Progress Chart

Table 1.3 Fluency Deck 2 Best of the Day Data


Data Analysis
Figure 1.1 displays the acquisition data collected for the ABA 624 SAFMEDS deck 2 progress
chart with successive calendar days on the X-axis and the number of cards per minute on the Y-
axis. Table 1.1 represents the data for Acquisition Deck 2, which includes the baseline data on
December 9 without any intervention. My Baseline data is 5 correct cards and 2 incorrect cards.
Table 1.1 represents the best of the day data for deck 2 after intervention is applied. My
intervention for week 3 is to take notes on the terms in acquisition deck 2 in a Word document
from SAFMEDS study mode, and I revise the document twice a day to improve my knowledge
of the terms to reach the aim. Figure 1.2 represents the knowledge builder chart for acquisition
deck 2, which includes the baseline data and the intervention slice redline. Once intervention is
applied Figure 1.2 shows the upward trend in the Accel data with low variability from 7 correct
cards on Day1 to 14 correct cards on Day 5. Decel data has downward trend low variability,
from 3 incorrect cards to zero incorrect cards.
Figure 1.3 displays the progress chart of ABA624 Fluency Deck2 which shows upward trend in
Accel data with low variability. I ran 5x30 sec trials on fluency data for four days. Data path
shows upward trend with 11 cards on Day 1 to 16 correct cards on day 4. Decel data is 0
incorrect cards. Table 1.3 shows the best of the day for Fluency Deck 2.
Study Approach and Adjustments
Antecedent
My goal for week 3 of ABA 624 SAFMEDS acquisition deck2 was to produce an upward trend
in acquisition accel data and a downward trend in acquisition decel data. My aim for this week is
to reach 14 correct cards and zero incorrect cards. My reinforcer for reaching these goals was a
personal sense of accomplishment and pride in seeing improvement in my acquisition data, as I
am intrinsically motivated to do well in this course. My intervention for this week is studying
SAFMEDS deck 2 by creating a Word document with the terms. I spent 30 minutes daily in the
evening in SAFMEDS to revise the decks and understand the terms.
Behavior
On day one of this new SAFMEDS deck, I ran an initial 30-second acquisition deck timing
before any studying and entered the accel and decel data points to establish a baseline. Figure 1.2
shows my baseline data with five correct cards and two incorrect cards. Applied the intervention
using study mode in SAFMEDS and ran 30 seconds in timing mode. For the remainder of the
week, I ran five 30-second acquisition deck timings and graphed my best day in Knowledge
builder chart. Once the intervention is applied, my first best of the data is 7 correct cards and 1
incorrect cards. I continued my intervention plan throughout the week, which showed an upward
trend in my Accel data, with my highest best of the day data being 14 cards in 30 seconds and 0
incorrect cards and 0 skipped cards.
Consequence
After completing the five acquisition trials in the CR Institute/SAFMEDS app, I entered the best
data point recorded into knowledge builder chart everyday and examined the data progression.
After evaluating the data and observing an upward trend resulting in reaching aim, I concluded
that my current methods of studying were effective. I examined the data reflecting an upward
trend and determined no adjustments to my study methods were necessary.
Adjustments
Due to the acquisition of access data for deck 1 ending at medium levels, with AIM met in the
data collection period, there are no proposed changes to intervention at this time.

You might also like