Acetone Production Process
Acetone Production Process
net/publication/368661065
CITATIONS READS
0 2,190
1 author:
Cavidan Zeynalov
Baku Higher Oil School
25 PUBLICATIONS 1 CITATION
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Cavidan Zeynalov on 20 February 2023.
Team number: 6
Yunis Garayev
Aytan Valiyeva
Naila Shakarova
Dzhavidan Zeinalov
Banovsha Mammadova
Contents
........................................................................................................................................ 1
Chemical Engineering Department.................................................................................. 1
Table of contents ............................................................................................................. 2
Introduction...................................................................................................................... 4
Description of the process ............................................................................................... 5
Mass Balance for the whole process ............................................................................... 6
Energy Balance for the whole process .......................................................................... 10
Health and Safety Precautions ...................................................................................... 12
References .................................................................................................................... 15
Introduction to the individual section ............................................................................. 47
Flow description ............................................................................................................ 47
Mass & Energy Balance ................................................................................................ 48
Pie and pump specification............................................................................................ 49
Heat exchanger design ................................................................................................. 55
HSE ............................................................................................................................... 67
References .................................................................................................................... 69
Material & Energy balance ............................................................................................ 71
Heat exchanger HE-103 design .................................................................................... 73
Heat exchanger safety ............................................................................................. 85
Pump P-105 design ....................................................................................................... 87
Step 1: Collecting physical parameter ................................................................... 87
Step 2: Pipe parameters .......................................................................................... 88
Step 3: Determination of flow parameters ............................................................. 89
Step 4: Suction side calculations ........................................................................... 90
Step 5: Discharge side calculations ....................................................................... 91
Step 6: Pump power, NPSH available calculation ................................................. 92
Pump safety .............................................................................................................. 93
Process description ....................................................................................................... 97
Material and Energy Balance ........................................................................................ 98
P-104 ............................................................................................................................. 99
HE-104 ........................................................................................................................ 107
References .................................................................................................................. 116
Heat Exchanger Design .............................................................................................. 126
Process description ..................................................................................................... 138
Material balance .......................................................................................................... 138
Energy balance ........................................................................................................... 140
Pump design ............................................................................................................... 141
Heat exchanger design ............................................................................................... 147
References .................................................................................................................. 160
Introduction
It comes off as no surprise that a favorable plant design dictates the project’s future
success rate. The efficacy of problem solving is increased via the high contest level for
the market, which supports the idea of initiative-taking, and assimilates the change in
processes. Thus, the possession of requisite knowledge, a sense of creativity, and a clear
purpose is a must to obtain a service product. The following report displays a plant’s
design, and its development for Acetone production via means of catalytic
dehydrogenation of Isopropyl Alcohol. The aim is to get slightly over 280000 tons of
Acetone product per year all the while keeping production costs and pollution levels low.
Currently, three methods are mainly utilized in Acetone production, and they are as
follows: The Isopropyl Alcohol’s dehydrogenation process, Polypropylene’s oxidation
process, and Cumene process. The last process is the most prevalent method. That said,
benzene, a by-product in Cumene Process, lowers Acetone’s purity level, and gives a
rise to production costs due to separation processes. When it comes to the second
process, the polypropylene’s oxidation’s conversion value is low for Acetone, whereas
the reactants’ purity value should be approximately 99%. In the last method, namely
Isopropyl Alcohol’s dehydrogenation, Acetone with a high level of purity is acquired.
Furthermore, it is probable to utilize the Isopropyl Alcohol’s aqueous solution, and
Acetone’s conversion rate is quite high while including no considerably harmful
substances. Aside from Acetone, the main product of the aforementioned method, a
secondary product is also obtained: Hydrogen. Hydrogen is utilized in an array of
industries, which makes utilizing this process for Acetone production all the more
favorable. These reasons altogether are precisely why the Isopropyl Alcohol’s
dehydrogenation process was opted for our project design.
First of all, it has to be mention that there are various methods for acetone production
such as co product of glycerine-H2O2 process, oxidation of propylene, butanol , or
isopropyl benzene, and catalytic dehydrogenation of isopropanol. The crucial reason why
the last one has been chosen is that this process is believed to be capable of obtaining
high-purity acetone which is of the importance in the biomedical sections, namely
approximately 99% pure product.
The main reaction has been conducted in the reactor the presence of zinc oxide
(ZNO):
(𝐶𝐻3 )2 𝐶𝐻𝑂𝐻 → (𝐶𝐻3 )3 𝐶𝑂 + 𝐻2 (1)
Giving comprehensive information about each step of the PFD, primarily, fresh
feed which is aqueous solution of isopropyl alcohol at the ambient temperature and
pressure has been heated to 320 K, before mixing with recycle stream which constituents
of mainly isopropanol and minor amount of water and acetone mixture (S4). As the
reaction mentioned above is endothermic, which means that reactor should be heated by
means of a solid catalyst; therefore, additional heater (H102) and vaporizer (V101) have
been utilized for reducing heat load on reactor by increasing the temperature of the fluid
from 320K to 389 and 415 K, respectively. After reactor, 3 heat exchanger have been
placed so as to cooling the products and unreacted reagents, namely H103 and H104
having cooled the gas mixture from 623 and to 550K, and to 470K, correspondingly.
However, H104.1 change their phase by decreasing their temperatures to 289K before
sending them to the flash tank (D101) where gas mixture which consists of mainly
hydrogen gas is planning to be separated from liquid mixture. The absorption column
(C201) provided with water which has been heated from ambient conditions to 320 K
before entering C201 separated mainly hydrogen from mixture. Since hydrogen is not
able to dissolved in the water, it is removed from the top of absorption column as a form
of gas with a few moles of other substances to the T103 hydrogen tanks; however,
another portion of the mixture which have been adsorbed by water have been connected
with the S14 which was the bottom product of the flash tank. After the combined mixture
has been pumped and heated from 325 to 352.25K, it is sent to the distillation column (or
acetone column) where the main product have been planned to be gathered. Adding more
information, from the top of the column most of the acetone, a few amount of the water
and remaining hydrogen gases at 360 K have been cooled to 295 K by means of HE107.
Consequently, certain part of it has been conveyed to the column itself for controlling
temperature inside by pretending overheating process which might damage the walls of
C202, whereas another proportion of it has been pumped to the shortage tank. The next
step is to remove isopropanol from mixture moved from the bottom of the C202 by means
of another distillation column where the temperature is higher than the C202 in order to
reach the boiling point of the isopropyl alcohol; therefore, before sending them to the
C203, mixture’s temperature should be raised to the 365-370K. By following these, gas
mixture which mainly constitutes of isopropanol have been cooled from 370K to 330K
before dividing into 2 parts, namely same procedures assuming this distillation column as
well. However, here the vital aim is to recycle that cooled mixture to the feed stream,
namely before reactor. Ultimately, water which has been separated in C203 has been
cooled and pumped to the shortage tanks.
It is an undeniable fact that material balance is considered as one of the most essential
and fundamental stages of chemical or physical processes as all subsequent steps are
done based on that. Generally, mass conservation is taken as the fundament on which
the mass balance is calculated. That mass is not created as well as not destroyed for
close systems is stated by the said law. For any component in the process, mass balance
equation’s general form is like below:
However, the process of production of acetone occurs under steady state conditions
which means accumulation of species is zero. In addition to this, the consumption and
production values will be equal to zero if no chemical reaction is to occur. In our process,
the chemical reaction occurs only between Streams number 6 and 7. So, the last form of
material balance equation except for this stage is like that:
Input = Output
The table below demonstrates material balance for the process between S-1 – S-9 which
covers the entrance of the reactants to the reactor and their exit.
S1/S2 S4
Mass Mass
Mole (kmols Co Mole (kmols Co
(kilograms per (kilograms per
per hour) mp. per hour) mp.
hour) hour)
isopro 0.6 0.6
609.231 36553.86 66.885 4013.1
panol 7 5
0.3 0.3
water 300.069 5401.24 35.943 646.97
3 493
hydrog
0 0 0 0 0 0
en
aceton 0.0
0 0 0 0.072 4.18
e 007
TOTA
909.3 1 41955.1 102.9 1 4664.25
L
S3/S5/S6 S7/S8/S9
Mole Mass Mole Comp Mass
(kmol/h) Comp. (kg/h) (kmol/h) . (kg/h)
isopropan 0.66796 0.041 4055.2090
ol 676.116 7 40566.96 67.58681 7 7
0.33196 0.207 6047.8046
water 336.012 2 6048.21 335.98914 3 1
0.375 1217.2110
hydrogen 0 0 0 608.60551 5 4
0.00007 0.375 35299.120
acetone 0.072 1 4.18 608.60551 5 1
TOTAL 1012.2 1 46619.35 1620.787 1 46619.3
As it was mentioned before, the reaction that takes place in the reactor is like that:
It is clearly seen from the reaction that the coefficients for both reactants and products
are equal to 1. This fact also verifies itself in material balance as the moles of isopropanol
that participates in reaction is equal to moles of acetone and hydrogen gas that leaves
the reactor.
After leaving reactor the materials enter C-202 column for separating pure acetone. The
mass balance for following streams are like below:
In the following stages, mixture which consists of mainly isopropanol and water is sent to
C-203 where isopropanol is recycled and transferred to the feed and water is pumped to
T-104 tank. The compositions and flowrates of these streams are provided below:
S27/S28/S29 S36/S37/S38
Mole Mass Mole Comp Mass
Comp.
(kmol/h) (kg/h) (kmol/h) . (kg/h)
isopropano 0.095
67.50198 4050.1188 0.606725 0.001 36.4035
l 1
0.904 11560.086
water 642.22704 606.118275 0.999 10910.129
8 7
hydrogen 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.000
acetone 0.07098 4.11684 0 0 0
1
15614.322 10946.532
TOTAL 709.8 1 606.725 1
4 5
What can be clearly seen from the tables is the flowrate of acetone product is 565.19
kmol/hour while 608.52919 kmol/hour isopropanol participates in reaction. It means
conversion of process is 93%. In addition, the purity of the product is 99.8%.
Energy changes are also balanced based on the conservation law as mass balance. It is
stated in this law that no energy can be generated or destroyed, it is only able to be
transferred from one form to another. Regarding to this law, the overall input and outputs
should be always the same, and in the subsequent equation energy conserving law for
open systems where both energy and mass transfer occurs is provided as 1st law of
thermodynamics:
heat transfer rate + shaft work- enthalpy change-kinetic energy change-
potential energy change=0
As it should be known, most parts of the chemical also physical processes have
association with the changes of enthalpies. Since the main aim of this project is focusing
on heat exchangers and pumps’ designs, and if thermodynamics’ first law is taken into
account for them, it will be observed that for heat exchangers there is not any shaft work
done by or on the system, and for pumps there is no exchange of heat, and for both
kinetic and potential energies are in negligible amounts, these equations are derived:
For HEs:
heat transfer rate + shaft work- enthalpy change-kinetic energy change - potential
energy change=0
heat transfer rate = enthalpy change
For pumps:
heat transfer rate + shaft work- enthalpy change-kinetic energy change - potential
energy change=0
shaft work= enthalpy change
So, at it is evidently seen now, the examination of enthalpies in streams is very crucial for
being able to be well- informed about energy consumptions in the plant. However, it is
not possible to estimate the enthalpy of chemical components at only given operation
temperature and that is why it is required to use reference temperature whose value will
be 298K in this project’s calculations.
𝑇
∆𝐻_ = 𝑛_̇ ∗ ∫ 𝐶𝑝𝑚 _ 𝑑𝑇
𝑇𝑟𝑒𝑓
If all parts are divided by the molar flow rate, molar enthalpy will be obtained which is
actually be shown in final energy balance table.
𝑇
∆ℎ_ = ∫ 𝐶𝑝𝑚 _ 𝑑𝑇
𝑇𝑟𝑒𝑓
Where ∆ℎ_ I s molar enthalpy change and 𝐶𝑝𝑚 _ is molar heat capacity. However, for
doing the required calculations, it is needed to find out molar heat capacity values. After
using Antonius equation and compare saturation and operations pressures, the phases
of components in each stream were determined. Following 2 tables show the molar heat
capacity constants for liquid and gas phase component, and as it is expected they have
different calculation equations.
𝑱
𝑪𝒑 [ ] = 𝑨 + 𝑩𝑻 + 𝑪𝑻𝟐 + 𝑫𝑻𝟑 + 𝐸𝑻𝟒
𝒎𝒐𝒍 ∗ 𝑲
Table 8. Molar heat capacity constants for liquid phase
𝑱
𝑪𝒑 [ ] = 𝑨 + 𝑩𝑻 + 𝑪𝑻𝟐 + 𝑫𝑻𝟑
𝒎𝒐𝒍 ∗ 𝑲
As final step, it is needed to multiply the corresponding molar heat capacity constants for
each component and to sum up them in order to obtain the constants of mixtures:
𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡𝑚𝑖𝑥𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 = ∑ 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 𝑜𝑓 𝑒𝑎𝑐ℎ ∗ 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑟 𝑓𝑟𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
Now, final results are tabulated within the following graph and some of the equipment’s
enthalpy changes will be also provided:
Table 9. Energy balance for all streams
Properties
Molar
Cp(J/mol*K)
enthalpy(J/mol)
Streams
S-1 152.78 0
S-2 157.12 3401.055
S-3 157.59 3411.499
S-4 159.01 4964.983
S-4.1 159.01 4964.983
S-5.1 157.59 3411.499
S-5 83.89 7064.131
S-6 109.76 27388.60
S-7 71.39 19784.23
S-8 91.94 1811.807
S-9 88.69 -444.954
S-10 88.69 -444.954
S-11 40.92 811.994
S-12 113.04 0
S-12.1 118.40 1142.877
S-13 114.67 -359.8234631
S-14
S-14.1 128.57 3387.951
S-15 111.16 5690.739
S-16 111.16 5690.739
S-19 99.48 -299.0220771
S-22 126.96 -381.670284
S-23 126.92 -381.5521058
S-24 126.92 -381.5521058
S-27 124.49 2916.34121
Figure 1. B2- During the early stages of design and development of the plant,
Flammable liquid,
chemical process route must be taken into account. At normal
D2B- Eye irritant
environmental considerations, acetone has been demonstrated to
have a low toxicity and does not cause a neurotoxic, carcinogenic and reproductive
hazard. Long-term skin contact can cause skin to dry, resulting in cracking, mild irritation
and burning sensation. In order to lessen its effects, skin should be washed immediately.
Besides that, dizziness, and nausea can happen during exposure to excessive level of
vapor concentrations. High level of vapor can also irritates eyes, resulting in tearing and
sore, red eyes. During eye contact eyes should be flushed with water. If acetone is
ingested, as a first aid measure vomiting must not be induced
since vomiting may be dangerous and medical help should be
implemented to avoid lung damage as soon as possible. While
working with acetone, it is needed to wear safety goggles and
protective clothes as a personal protective equipment for
respiratory and skin protection. It is important to mention that
acetone is highly flammable liquid, which can also ignite at room
temperature and in other certain circumstances due to static
discharge. Even acetone and water mixture may be also
flammable. Therefore, identifying the risk assessment for
acetone is very critical. Ignition of gas acetone can generate very toxic chemicals, namely
carbon dioxide, formaldehyde, carbon monoxide and acetic acid. In order to avoid any
potential risks and extinguish aforementioned chemicals quickly and effectively, suitable
media for extinguishing should be implemented. Coming to the environmental issues,
acetone is relatively non-toxic to aquatic organisms. [2], [3] Moreover, it is easily
biodegradable, and has a limited bioaccumulation potential. According to the criteria of
regulation, acetone production via isopropyl is not classified as hazardous to the
environment and ozone layer, and does not cause greenhouse effect.
Table 10. Hazards identification of acetone
[2] Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety, www.ccohs.ca/ [Accessed:
01.05.2022]
[4] “Material Safety Data Sheet,” Air Liquid company, 04.09.2018 [Accessed: 03.05.2022]
This section is going to examine the equipment and streams outlined within a blue frame.
As it has already be stated the process is
executed for obtaining world’s one of the
most important chemicals-acetone from the
dehydrogenation of isopropyl alcohol which
is the sole and only raw material in acetone
manufacturing process that requires
catalyst. First of all the water and
isopropanol mixture is taken from the T-101 feed tank with the initial temperature of 298K
and transferred to HE-101, whose operation pressure is 1atm, in order to be heated up
to 320 K before mixed with recycle stream. After recycle stream and S-2 streams are
mixed, the new mixture is subsequently pumped by P-101, which will increase the
pressure from 1.5atm to 2.6atm, to next heat exchanger for being heated more while
further heating will be done within the vaporizer (V-101) by molten salt as well.
As it has already been depicted in previous sections, material and energy balances
should be done in a correct way since further design stages have direct dependence from
them. While the balances have already been provided, now streams around the P-101
pump and HE-101 will be given.S-1 and S-2 streams are the inlet and outlet of HE-101
respectively, whereas S-3 and S-5.1 are input and output of P-101. In all of these streams
there are no hydrogen gas, and other 3components namely isopropanol, water and
acetone are in liquid phase.
S1/S2
Mole Mass
MW(kg/kmol) (kmol/h) Comp. (kg/h)
isopropanol 60 435.165 0.67 26109.9
water 18 214.335 0.33 3858.03
hydrogen 2 0 0 0
acetone 58 0 0 0
TOTAL - 129.9 1 29967.93
S3/S5.1
Mole Mass
(kmol/h) Comp. (kg/h)
isopropanol 482.94 0.667966805 28976.4
water 240.00855 0.331962033 4320.1539
hydrogen 0 0 0
acetone 0.05145 7.11618E-05 2.9841
TOTAL 723 1 33299.5
Additionally, by means of molar heat capacity constants taken from data book, heat
capacities and molar enthalpies are defined:
Before commencing on any kind of design calculation, the initial step is to figure out the
crucial and required physical fluid properties through the whole system including density
values, viscosities, and conductivities. The ways how to find out the properties of S-1
stream will be detailed in subsequent paragraphs and, as the calculations are similar for
other streams as well, for putting a stop to repetition they will not ne depicted and can be
observed from the correlating excel spreadsheet. It is undeniably true that there are
several types of methods for computations of those properties each of which has
individual and different precision and accuracy. The masses and moles for S-1 stream is
given below which will be actually very important and considered in further calculation
stages.
Viscosity ascertainment
Viscosity is one of the most important physical properties whose actual meaning is
resisting ability of fluid to shear stressing deformation or tensile stress which contributed
by layer motions’ intermolecular friction. Based on the book called Coulson and
Richardson, the ways for finding viscosities for gases and liquids are different, and as in
S-1 stream, there is no hydrogen-no gas, all components are in the liquid phase, only
subsequent equations will be applied, and constants have been taken from Appendix.
𝐵
log(𝜇) = 𝐴 + +𝐶𝑇 + 𝐷𝑇 2
𝑇
Where constants of A,B,C and D are for each component as well as unitless, whereas
the temperature is represented as T with Kelvin as its unit. After finding each chemical’s
viscosity, these formulae beneath should be used for ascertainment of that of mixture:
𝜇 indicates the value of dynamic viscosity with Pa*s as its unit and X indicates mass
fraction.
By applying those expressions and given mass fraction values within the Table 5. all
results are given within next Table:
The name of
10^ log (𝜇 )
the A B C D T Log (𝜇)
(centipoise)
component
- 8E-
isopropanol -0.7009 841.5 0.008607 06 320 0.02416286 1.057214
-1E-
water -10.2158 1792.5 0.01773 05 320 -0.2340519 0.583375
-2E- -
acetone -7.2126 903.05 0.018385 05 320 0.59151595 0.256144
As in the constant providing book, the unit of viscosity was given in centipoise, it is needed
to convert in to Pa×s by dividing 1000 :
1
𝜇(𝑚𝑖𝑥𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒) = = 0.000956 Pa×s
1045.821
Density ascertainment
Density is another physical feature of chemicals which shows the mass amount of
component per volume and has significantly important applications in industrial fields. As
the S-1 stream only consists of liquid phase components, the formulae taken from
Coulson and Richardson which is considered for liquid phase components must be
applied:
𝑇
−(1−𝑇 )𝑛
𝜌(𝑙𝑖𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑑_𝑝ℎ𝑎𝑠𝑒) =𝐴𝐵 𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙
𝑇(𝑐𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙) and T are critical and actual stream temperatures respectively in Kelvin
Thermal conductivity is a property which is defined as heat rate of conduction per unit
area whenever area and temperature are perpendicular to each other. To find out the
thermal conductivities of components and mixture, subsequent expressions should be
applied orderly:
𝑇 2
log10 𝑘𝑙𝑖𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑑 =A+B× (1 − )7 (for organic liquids-isopropanol,
𝐶
acetone)
P-101 pump design along with the design of pipeline will be provided in a detailed way in
this part of the report. Firstly, that in many of plants and platforms, approximately 25-50%
of general energy consumption is accounted by pumps is noteworthy; therefore, a correct
and proper design of pump systems is essential process. In real applications, pumps are
provided to the plants individually, but their operations become feasible when they are
started to operate as a part of system. Consequently, different considerations including
economic aspects, hydraulic and service issues must be taken into consideration
carefully. Energy and material expenses are estimated based on the pump design and
overall installation. Being able to design pumps and pipelines properly has utmost
essence in terms of guaranteeing maintenance for long period of time, to have possible
lowest amount of energy and cost of service.
In mechanical engineering fields, there is a term called Schedule number which is used
for description of wall thickness of pipes. When the Schedule numbers for pipes are
different but their nominal pipe diameters are the same, in that case wall thickness values
to
will be varies because of the changes of outside diameter respecting inside diameter.
In industrial applications, there a lot of types of the Schedule numbers each of which has
their individual characteristic features, however the most common and preferrable one is
Schedule number 40. In this process, austenitic stainless- stell pipe with 40 schedule
number is chosen to be used in order to decrease the possibility of risky situations to
minimum and as the desirable pressures are not too much. Moreover, the austenitic
stainless- stell material can deal with higher possess and flow rates , and corrosion
process which is anticipated as in the process water in high amount is present. This type
of pipeline does not require extra maintaining processes and expense, as well as their
lifetime can be till fifty years. Additionally, this material can be recycled, so eco-friendly
and cost-effective. Taking all these advantages into account, it was decided that
austenitic stainless- steel pipe with 40 schedule number is the best option for the process,
and for calculating optimum diameter of pipe, subsequent equation must be used:
Optimum diameter =260× 𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 0.52 × 𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑦 −0.37 =260× 12.950.52 × 792.84−0.37 =
83.301mm
In the equation above, mass flow rate should be expressed in kg/s whereas density
should be with the unit of kg/𝑚3 . The value for optimum diameter was calculated and
found out as 83.301mm which is actually does not exist in standard values table. So, in
order to choose the value from the table, the closest value of internal diameter to optimum
diameter must be opted to; however as the values in table is provided with inches, (
1in=2,54cm) , the optimum diameter should be converted to inch which is 3.28 inch and
taken from table like below:
As it is seen, the standard internal diameter of pipe which is relevant to optimum value,
is chosen as 3.548inch.
Picture 3. Inner appearance of cross of pipe
For finding other diameter, inner one should be summed with 2times thickness as it is
evident from provided illustration about diameters and thickness. All needed figures are
put in the next table:
Table 10. Length and diameter values for pipeline
mass Pipe
Optimum optimum Thickness Thickness
Density flow ID ID nominal Wt
diameter, diameter, OD(inch) OD(m) of of wall ,
(kg/m^3) rate (inch) (m) per ft
Pipeline mm inch wall(inch) (m) inch
(kg/s)
0.09
792.8 12.9 83.30 3.280 4 0.102 3.55 0.226 0.0057 3.5 9.2
Now, the design procedures can be started as diameters have already been estimated.
Initially, it is required to figure out cross sectional area:
2
𝜋𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝜋∗0.092
Pipe cross sectional area= = =0.00638 𝒎𝟐
4 4
If the S-1 stream’s mass flow rate is divided by its density , the volume flow is obtained
which stands at the value of 0.01633 𝑚3 /s and, the previously found value of cross section
and volume flow rate should be inserted in linear velocity equation like that:
𝑄 0.01633
𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑎𝑟= = =2.56m/s
𝐴 0.00638
Subsequent that by using already determined density, inner diameter and viscosity
values, as well as linear velocity, Re (Reynolds number) must be defined which will give
information about regime of the flow:
𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑎𝑟× 𝜌(𝑚𝑖𝑥𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒) ×𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙 2.56×792.8412×0.09
Reynolds number= = =191344
𝜇(𝑚𝑖𝑥𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒) 0.000956
The obtained value is greater than the critical value which is 2300 and indicates that the
flow of inside pipe is turbulent.
The next stage is relative roughness calculation which is equal to the division of absolute
roughness to internal diameter. To explain roughness, it actually shows any unevenness
of inner surface of pipe, and it directly related to the pressure drop of pipe section.
Actually, the values of absolute roughness depend on the material from which the pipe is
constructed, and those values are obtained experimentally; as it has already been stated
the material for this process case is austenitic stainless steel and its epsilon (absolute
roughness value) is 0,015mm. Now, relative roughness should be calculated:
𝜀
𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑔ℎ𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 = = 0.000166446
𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙
There are actually several techniques for finding friction factor, and one of them is using
friction factor calculators from which gives the result of 0.017, however for the sake of
being more exact and providing comparison of the conclusions obtained from calculator
and equation, the following Colebrook formulae ( can be used for the cases of turbulent
regime) has also been applied which gives the result as 0.0167 that is very close to
previously obtained result.
1 𝜀 2.51
=-2*log( +
√𝑓 3.7∗𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑅𝑒∗√𝑓
The next is the determination of pipe sections’ pressure losses stem from friction based
on the famous equation named as Darcy-Weisback equation (for the cases of mixture
transportation) :
2
𝐿 𝜌𝑚𝑖𝑥𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 ×𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑎𝑟
Δ𝑃_𝑓𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛_ =f× ( )×
𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙 2
In general, there are 2 possibilities for pressure losses; one of them is caused by friction
and is considered as major loss, whereas the second can be contributed by elbows,
bends ,fittings , valves and so on. The equation above is only take major losses into
account, however there are two methods which also consider minor losses namely-
equivalent length and velocity head loss. The equivalent length methods will be used, and
now equation above is expressed as below:
2
𝐿 ∑𝐿(𝑒𝑞) 𝜌𝑚𝑖𝑥𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 ×𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑎𝑟
Δ𝑃_𝑓𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛_ =f× ( + )×
𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑑 2
Before using this method, there is one important requirement here which is the indication
of fittings, entries, valves, exits and their dimensionless pipe diameters in suction and
discharge sections. The given below tables depict minor losses for suction and discharge
sections in turn:
Table11. Side fittings of the suction side Table12. Side fittings of the discharge side
Pipe
Pipe Pipe
Type of the Fitting’s diameters’ Pipe
diameter_ Type of the Fitting’s diameters’
fitting number total diameter
number fitting number total
number number
number
Sudden
reduction
(Outlet of the
tank) 1 25 25 Check valve
(100%open) 100 1 100
Ball valve 90 elbow
(100%open) 1 18 18 standard
radius 40 1 40
Temperature
control valve 1 19.5 19.5
Total L equivalent/d, m 62.5 Total L equivalent /d, m 140
After the determination fittings’ diameters for both inlet and outlet sides, pressure drops
for both sides can now be estimated . Before turning to that stage, it is needed to define
length of pipe on both parts. The assumption was made related to approximate length
value of pipe section and scale; it is assumed that the value of 1cm in process flow
diagram is the same as it was in ten meter in real applications. ( the ratio is 1:1000). It
has assumed that suction pipe is 12m long and discharge is 30m long. Now,
corresponding equations must be inserted and calculations should be done:
2
𝐿 ∑𝐿(𝑒𝑞) 𝜌𝑚𝑖𝑥𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 ×𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑎𝑟 12
Δ𝑃_𝑓𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛_𝑠𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 =f× ( + )× =0.0167× ( + 62.5) ×
𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑑 2 0.09
792.8412×2.562
= 8493.25Pa
2
2
𝐿 ∑𝐿(𝑒𝑞) 𝜌𝑚𝑖𝑥𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 ×𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑎𝑟 30
Δ𝑃_𝑓𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛_𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒 =f× ( + )× =0.0167× ( + 140) ×
𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑛𝑎𝑙 𝑑 2 0.09
792.8412×2.562
= 20527.7Pa
2
One more possible pressure loss is left which is needed to be expressed ; when larger
amount of fluid transports into the pipe , in that case liquid’s acceleration process can
cause certain pressure losses in entrance which must be defined.
2
𝜌𝑚𝑖𝑥𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 ×𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑎𝑟 792.8412×2.562
Δ𝑃_𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑦 = = =2599.33Pa
2 2
Exit losses are neglected during the calculations, and as there is not any sudden
compression or expansion on inlet and outlet section which would have effect on pressure
losses, possible drops because of sudden ( as well as gradual) compression and
expansion are also ignored.
The total head of pump ( this term can also be named as total dynamic head) has very
important place in pumping processes which is equal to the difference of discharge and
suction heads. Total pump head indicates the head which is needed to handle the
pressure drops and any variations which can be both vertical and horizontal through the
overall system. Firstly, for total suction head value calculation, it is important to know total
suction pressure equation as head is the distance which can be reached by applying the
pressure.
And if all the terms above are divided by 𝜌*g , corresponding heads of pressures and as
a consequence corresponding total suction head will be obtained:
Where ℎ𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑐_𝑠𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛_ is the inlet pressure of pump (static pressure), 𝑍𝑠 is total suction side
head which is 18m .After inserting values, the result is obtained:
It must be kept in mind that the proper operation of centrifugal pump is only possible when
there is an intersection between system and pump curves, and for showing this
intersection, pump selector app will be utilized for this purpose. Before that overall head
of pump should be stated:
There is a famous issue related to the pumps called cavitation which happens because
of the reduction of static pressure to vapor pressure contributing small vapor bubbles’
creation and can create shock waves which is undesirable for the safety of the process
and equipment. In order to control that whether there is a cavitation risk or not, net positive
suction head term is used whose unit is meter. There are 2 types of NPSH one of which
is called NPSH available and characterizes fluid proximity at given point to cavitation and
flashing. To be more exact, it depicts the head of absolute pressure which is able to be
obtained from application to suction part in which first cavitation is expected to happen.
There are different ways for NPSH available determination such as experimental testing
on actual hydraulic system or monitoring during the period of process and using analytical
equation. Now, analytical way is going to be given:
𝑃𝑠 −𝑃𝑠𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 𝑃𝑠𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑
NPSH available= =ℎ__𝑠𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛__𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 -
𝜌∗𝑔 𝜌∗𝑔
𝑃𝑠𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 term here ( is known as vapor or saturation pressure) indicates the pressure
under which the system has its max amount of water in vapor phase. One of the well-
known equations called Antoine equation is used for the determination of that term and
as the units for pressures obtained from Antonius are given in mmHg and should be
converted to kPa after calculation:
𝐵
log10 𝑃 𝑠𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 =A+ +C*log10 𝑇+D*T+E*T2
𝑇
In the equation the constants A,B,C,D, and E are specific for each component whereas
the system’s temperature is indicated as T. As it is clear, there are not just 1 pure and
single component in the system, however Antonius equation above is only needed for
pure components. Thus, for solving this issue and calculate the mixture saturation
pressure another famous law- Raoult’s law can be applied:
𝑠𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
𝑃𝑚𝑖𝑥𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 ∑𝑖=1 𝑥𝑖 ∗ 𝑃𝑖𝑠𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
Where, 𝑃𝑖𝑠𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 is the vapor pressure of each component (mmHg) and 𝑥𝑖 is the mole
fraction of each of them. All of the important computations are tabulated within the
subsequent table of pressures:
- - -3.474E-
isopropanol 0.667967 38.2363 3551.3 10.031 10 1.7367E-06 320 2.187 153.874
- - 2.4247E-
water 0.331962 29.8605 3152.2 7.3037 09 0.000001809 320 1.898 79.114
2.8025E-
acetone 7.12E-05 28.5884 -2469 -7.351 10 2.7361E-06 320 2.738 546.505
Total 1
After doing the calculations, the figure for saturated pressure is gotten as 17.21kPa and
now this value is going to be used for NPSH available estimation:
𝑃𝑠𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑 17.21∗1000
NPSH available= ℎ__𝑠𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛__𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 - = 36.12 - = 33.9m
𝜌∗𝑔 792.84∗9.81
As it was mentioned, cavitation happens whenever the suction heat decreases below of
vapor pressure and it generally takes place around the sections on impeller as the
minimum pressure is observed here as a result of which voids are rushed and shock
waves are generated by liquid which has very adverse influence on equipment and its
parts, especially impeller. The second type of NPSH is used for preventing that happened
which is called net positive suction head required. And in all processes of pumps, it is
demanded to have greater NPSH available than NPSH required. While NPSH available
can be calculated via equation, NPSH required should be provided by pump producer
companies’ characteristic curves.
Selection of Pump
There is a software called “Wilo Pump Selector” (results are depicted in below picture)
and it has been utilizing for the determination of required NPSH value which was shown
as 3.8m and as from calculations NPSH available was obtained as 33.9m , no cavitation
will occur since 33.9>3.8. And this selector app also found the value of efficiency which
stand for 82.8% and is considered very desirable value as 70-85% efficient pumps are
very common in industrial applications. Hence, it means that P-101 pump will do its duty
safely and the mixture will be expected to be successfully transported to next heat
exchanger.
Pump type was opted as centrifugal since this kind can easily be handle with higher
values of flow rates and high heads. Additionally, these pumps have simple design and
maintenance is also easy as there is not any moving components’ array.
As a final stage, the input pump power which is needed to be computed should be defined
by knowing efficiency and other certain physical properties:
𝑉 0.016
Input power= 𝜌 ∗ 𝑔 ∗ ℎ𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙𝑝𝑢𝑚𝑝 * =792.84*9.81*18.39* =2822.59W
𝜂 0.828
Table 14. Pump datasheet table (P-101)
In the subsequent section, the design report will be continued with the description of
design procedures related to heat exchanger, namely HE-101 whose purpose is to heat
up the mixture temperature from 298K to 320 K before mixing of the stream with recycle
stream. After investigation of types of heat transfer equipment in industrial fields, their
advantages, disadvantages and applications , it has been decided that the most proper
and relevant one to current process requirements is shell and tube heat exchanger, and
some of the preference reasons are outlined as follows:
It is more comfortable and easier to handle with the cleaning issues of this type.
STHEs occupy less space and give more efficiency.
The design is not very complicated and that is why maintenance is not hard and
does not require additional effort and cost.
Tube numbers can be higher.
Handling with leaked tubes is not tremendously hard.
There are also some more benefits of STHEs, however it is enough to mention the main
ones. As it was noted down, HE-101 will increase liquid mixture temperature and the
reason for that is related to the increment of viscosity value which makes transportation
process more comfortable by making mobility to be higher. The brackish water (in other
words sea water) will be used as heating agent whose temperature will decrease from
353K to 338K and put in the shell side. This heating agent was preferred due to its
availability and heat capacity’s higher value. The sea water is in the shell side due to its
corrosive nature while the mixture of organic and inorganic fluids is in the tube side. To
prevent any feasible wear or corrosion of tubes, austenitic stainless steel construction
material was chosen.
The famous method called Kern’s method is used for design procedures of HE-101.
Before starting certain benefits and drawbacks of Kern’s method must be explained in
order to have better understanding. Whereas in standard design stages this method
gives satisfactory and reasonable heat prediction transferring coefficient, easy to be
applied, preliminary precise design computations, pressure loss predictions are not that
much satisfying as within this method leakage and bypass streams are not taken into
account ( they are essential on pressure drops for heat transfer equipment).
In order to get highest possible heat transferring rate, keep comparatively stable
difference of temperatures, prevent higher temperature deviations, counter-current flow
arrangement was opted. Turning to the pitch selection, whereas there is a possibility to
have more pressure drop, as it is the best option for higher heating rate, triangular pitch
was selected , and it was set that the difference between centers of the tubes is 1.25
times greater than outer diameter whereas the number of passes is chosen as 6.
Since the calculation ways of density, viscosity and thermal conductivity and specific heat
capacity have already been elucidated in previous sections, there is no need to show
them again , and for that reason tube and shell sides’ physical properties are tabulated
within table provided below:
The mass flow rate value for liquid mixture which contains water and isopropanol is equal
to 11.65kg/s. By applying the values of specific heat capacities, temperature of both tube
and shell sides, and tube side’s mass, firstly duty of heat transfer equipment and secondly
mass flow of shell side liquid can easily be found out.
Q=mtube*cp,tube*(Tout,tube- T,in,tube)= 11.65*3357.89*(320-298)=860.915kW
After some additional research papers review ( Couper 1964), it was found that for having
more stable temperature difference in both sides, it would be better to have inlet and
outlet temperatures of water side as 353 and 338K in turn, then mass of sea water is
calculated and heat exchanger’s temperature profile is shown subsequent to that:
𝑄 860915
mshell= = =13.69kg/s
cp,shell∗(Tout,shell− T,in,shell) 4191∗(353−338)
330
320
310
300
290
1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
By means of the temperature plots above, LMTD which mean logarithmic mean
temperature difference between two sides can be determined , and it is noteworthy to
write that having greater LMTD is desirable, since in that case heat transfer rate will also
be higher.
However, the value of LMTD is not always as the same as true value of temperature
difference , especially in the cases of multi-passing and cross flows; thus correction factor
is used for compensation of calculated LMTD value to mean temperature difference. This
factor is mostly used when the arrangement is counter current , and if the input and output
temperature values are available, in that case it is easier to size heat exchanger by using
true difference of temperatures. Actually, the value of correction factor has dependency
from both tube and shell sides, as well as tube numbers and shell passes, but for
determination of its value from chart or equation, 2 unitless ratios are used :
𝑇1_𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑙 −𝑇2_𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑙
𝑅= =0.68
𝑡2_𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒 −𝑡1_𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒
𝑡2_𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒 −𝑡1_𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒
𝑆= =0.4
𝑇1_𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑙 −𝑡1_𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒
By using those coefficients and correction factor chart the correction factor value can be
found out if the R curves and S values on x axis are intersected with corresponding y
value which stands for 𝐹𝑡 and is found out as 0.96.
Moreover, there is one more way of finding correction factor which is analytical and
following equation should be applied:
1−𝑆
√𝑅2 ln
1−𝑅𝑆
𝐹𝑡 =
2−𝑆∗(𝑅+1−√𝑅2 +1)
(R−1)∗ln
2−𝑆∗(𝑅+1+√𝑅2 +1)
This equation gives the value for 𝐹𝑡 as 0.957 and this is very close to graphically obtained
one, thus:
The main and necessary stage in Kern method is having correct assumption of heat
transferring coefficient for successfully completing the design as it is needed. Since the
mixture within the tube side consists of water and 2 organic liquids, and shell side only
has sea water, the U value is assumed to be 400W/m2 °C.
Ascertainment of number of tubes and diameter of shell
𝑄 860915
𝑄̇ = 𝑈𝐴∆𝑇 A= = =61.8m2
𝑈∆𝑇 400∗34.82
It must be said here that the area for shell and tube heat exchanger selection should be
greater that 50 m2 and it is evident that this requirement is met by this value. Outer tube
diameter is taken as 45mm whereas the inner one is 36.6mm and tube length is 2.4 m
which can be varied between 2m and 10m. Following to that area for just 1 tube is to be
commenced:
Since total equipment area and area of 1 tube are known, by dividing the first one to the
second it has been found that there are totally 183 tubes of HE and , by considering the
fact that STHEs are able to accommodate approximately 10000 tubes, this figure is
sufficient and normal.
1
𝑁_ 𝑛
𝐷_𝑏𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑙𝑒_ = 𝑑_𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑒𝑟_ ∙ ( 𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒𝑠_) ! =1024.1mm
𝐾1
Triangular pitch with p=1.25 was preferred as fluid of shell side is relatively clean without
having impure components. When it comes to the selection reasons of split floating head,
having differential expansion (thermal expansion) among shell and tube sides, simple
cleaning and rational cost can be given as instances. Since shell diameter is the
summation of bundle diameter and space between shell inside and tube bundle, which is
considered as clearance, clearance value is needed to be known from the below chart:
Chart 2. Bundle diameter and clearance chart
So, clearance was taken as 74mm and shell diameter is calculated as 1098.1mm and
according to TEMA standards, this value is allowed to be till 1520mm.
𝑉
𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑎𝑟= = 0.4m/s
𝐴
There is one more term named as Colburn coefficient which is essential to be introduced
before going on with next stages of calculations. In general , transfer principles of mass
and heat, also momentum principles are the same in most of the cases and they can be
intercorrelated in certain circumstances. In this section of the design , the analogy called
Colburn-Chilton will be used based on what tube side HTC will be estimated:
1
𝑘𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒 ∙ 𝑗ℎ ∙ 𝑅𝑒 ∙ (Pr)3
ℎ𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒_𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 =
𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑟
Where k shows thermal conductivity of mixture, Re is Reynolds number for fluid regime
determination, Prandtl number is indicated as PR and Colburn factor is indicated as j.
Calculation of the value of Reynolds number is the next step:
The flow regime is turbulent since obtained value is greater than critical value.
Then, Pr number calculation is performed:
𝑐𝑝∗𝜇(𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒)
Pr_ 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 = =2.15
𝑘(𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒)
Now, there is just one unknown parameter -Colburn factor which must be taken from
corresponding chart:
At given value of Re number, heat transfer factor is nearly equal to 0.029 and, by inserting
all given in the equation for tube side HTC , following result will be obtained:
1 1
𝑘𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒 ∙𝑗ℎ ∙𝑅𝑒∙(Pr)3 0.198∙0.029∙99357∙(2.15)3
ℎ𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒_𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 = = =1901.83 W/k*m2
𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑟 0.0386
The primary step for shell HTC estimation is the determination of baffle spacing, and
baffles are very important parts of the heat exchangers as their duty is keeping the tubes
all together. The most preferred baffle spacings vary between 0.2 and 1 times of diameter
of shell. It must also be kept in mind that when the baffles are put closer to each other,
higher rate will be observed but at expense of greater pressure loss. In this design, baffle
spacing is accepted to be 0.5 times of shell diameter which gives the figure as 549mm.
𝑉
𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑎𝑟= = 0.116m/s
𝐴_𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑙_
And as it has done for tube side, the same calculations for Re and Pr numbers should be
executed:
𝑐𝑝∗𝜇(𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒)
Pr_ 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 = =2.459
𝑘(𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒)
Once again the factor proposed by Colburn must be used, however in comparison to tube
side, in shell side baffle cut must be chosen for intersecting with corresponding Re
number, and 25% baffle cut was chosen which is considered the most common and
optimum cut: Chart 4. Shell side heat transfer factor Colburn chart
Here it is also necessary to calculate equivalent diameter since in shell side calculations
it will be needed:
1.27
𝑑𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑡 = (𝑝𝑡2 − 0.785𝑑𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑒𝑟
2 )=0.032m
𝑑𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑒𝑟
Now by inserting all values in required places , shell side HTC is obtained:
1 1
𝑊
𝑘𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑙 ∙𝑗ℎ ∙𝑅𝑒∙(Pr)3 0.066 2 ∙0.006∙9321∙2.463
𝑚 𝐾
ℎ𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑙𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 = = =1562.672
𝑑𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑡 0.032
1
𝑘𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑒𝑙 ∙𝑗ℎ ∙𝑅𝑒∙(Pr)3
ℎ𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑙_𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 = =1562.6733 W/k*m2
𝑑𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑡
Pressure losses are other crucial properties that must be calculated, since they are
greater than allowable pressure drops, it would not be desirable. In this case, friction
factor charts will be applied for both sides, whereas the finding ways will be similar as in
Colburn charts. From the charts below, shell side friction factor coefficient is obtained as
0.05 while that for tube side is equal to 0.0029.
2
𝑙 𝐷𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑙 𝜌𝑢𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑙
∆𝑃𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑙_𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 = 8𝑗𝑓 ( 𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒) ( ) =8*0.05*4.37*34.37*6.6=396.944Pa
𝐿𝑏 𝑑𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑡 2
𝑙𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒
∆𝑃𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒_𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 = 𝑁𝑜𝑓_𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠 ∗ (8𝑗𝑓 ∗ + 2.5) ∗
𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑟
2
𝜌𝑢𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒
=6*(8*0.029*(2.4/0.0286+2.5)*(803.6*0.42)/2=1569.155Pa
2
Finally, Kern method’s most important part is reached which is dedicated to the
determination of overall HTC and comparison of it with initially assumed value. Taking
into account the constriction material which is stainless steel and deposits layers that are
also resistant to transferring of heat known as fouling factor, they all must be considered
during calculation. The fouling factors, thermal conductivity and shell and tube side HTCs
are tabulated below:
𝑑
1 1 1 𝑑𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑒𝑟 ln ( 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑒𝑟 ) 𝑑𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑑𝑜
𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑟
= + + + +
𝑈𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑙_ ℎ𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑙 ℎ𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑙𝑓𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔 2 ∙ 𝑘𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑙𝑒𝑠_𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑟 ℎ𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒 𝑑𝑖 ℎ𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒_𝑓𝑜𝑢𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔
1
𝑈𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑙𝑙_ = 0.045 = 362.306 𝑾/𝒎𝟐 ℃
1 1 0.045 ln(0.386) 0.045 0.045
+
1562.67 1000
+ 2∙16
+0.0386∗1901.83+0.0386∗4000
This is very close to the assumed value which was 400 𝑊/𝑚2 ℃ and there is just 9.42%
error which is allowable.
Table 18. HE-101 construction table
Equipment safety
While very detailed information has already been provided in safety section, safety issues
related to pumps and heat exchangers are going to be explained individually in this part
as well.
Pumps:
As it is obvious, there are several kinds of centrifugal pumps which would operate properly
if the selection is true, however there are certain possibilities which must be considered
in order to prevent possible failures contributing to cost, ecological and mechanical
damages. Three main problems can be arised from pumps and possible actions must
be executed are listed below:
1) Cavitation
As it has said, cavitation takes place whenever the pressure at the suction end (NPSH)
is not sufficient , and leads to bubbles to be formed. The formation of bubbles is not
desirable because cavitation itself and the issues relating to that can decrease length of
usage life of equipment 10 to years. For making cavitation not to be occurred, NPSH
available value should always be kept as greater than required figure of NPSH which
must be offered by manufacturer company of equipment.
2) Fouling
Whenever the pump's inner surface is adhered by particulated matter, intake or outflow
mostly occurs within the distribution lines. In result, the pump capacity and capacity of
flow is being decreased which is failure. Unfortunately this problem is unavoidable , and
maybe related to cleaning procedures.
3) Overheating
It is very serious issue as internal parts of pump can be damaged because of this.
Moreover the operators who are responsible for pumps can be also injured severely. For
avoiding it, it must always be checked that suction line and discharge line are in opening
positions at what times the operation goes on.
Heat exchangers:
As possible pump issues have been explained, the heat exchangers' ones should also
be looked more closely:
References
Introduction to the individual section
The recycling stream and the total combined stream of feed and recycled streams are
scrutinized thoroughly in this section of the report. A recycle stream, which is mainly
comprised of isopropanol and water, is pumped from the residues of the water product
stream to the feed stream. The feed stream, on the other hand, comes together with
recycle stream after going through H-101 which increases its temperature from 298 K to
320 K. The combined stream then enters the heat exchanger H-102 which raises its
temperature from 320K to 389 K. It is important to note that the recycle stream is at 330
K before combining with feed stream. The pump operates at 1.11 bar at its suction side
and 2.02 bar at its discharge side. On the other hand, the heat exchanger operates at
different pressure values for its tube and shell side. That is, the shell side has a stable
pressure of 2.63 bar for its inlet and outlet. The tube side has a stable pressure value as
well, at 3.5 bar for its inlet and outlet. The combined stream is directed to the unit V-101,
namely vaporizer, after going through the shell and tube heat exchanger H-102.
Flow description
Some parts of the overall flow diagram were skipped as the recycle stream goes from the
rightmost part of the diagram to the left part.
Mass & Energy Balance
The balances for mass and energy values are tabulated based on the flow diagram
demonstrated previously in this section of the report:
It is noteworthy that the components are written in kilo moles per day ratio below the
stream line names, with an exception of the bottom line which is the total number of
kilograms per day.
Reference
Temperature 25 degree Celsius
value in C HE duty in
Cp constant in kJ/mol
Temperature Enthalpy
Stream number J/mol*K of the
in Celsius in J/mol
mixture
S-3 47 3411.499 157.5916439
S-5.1 47 3411.499 157.5916439 -73.70345122
S-5 116 7064.131 83.88819268
S-4 57 4964.983 159.005503
S-4.1 57 4964.983 159.005503
S-6 325 27388.60 109.7557689
It comes as no surprise that pumps are one of the most commonly utilized items in a
plethora of industry applications. Transfer of fluids, or gases via creating a variance in
pressure is the working principle of pumps. This in turn helps to overcome the gravity and
friction’s impact on the system. There are mainly two pump types: positive displacement
and rotodynamic pumps. Though their purpose is the same, there is a difference in the
way these pumps operate. One of the most popular kinetic pumps is a centrifugal pump,
which operates bases on flow of fluid cause the pressure acquisition, as opposed to
positive displacement pumps where the substance is transferred via physical means. It
should also be mentioned that positive displacement pumps have an array of varieties in
comparison to rotodynamic pumps. Some other differences between the aforementioned
two types are as follows:
Due to the above mentioned reasons, it is no surprise that centrifugal are utilized widely
in many an industry such as water engineering, power generation, agriculture. In this kind
of pumps, namely rotary pumps, the flow transportation is viable via dynamic pressure.
When most of the fluid is rotated via utilization of external sources, flow is then expelled
from spin’s central axis, and head of centrifugal pump is causing the rise of the fluid to a
higher height. The stable supply of fluid at a higher elevation point can be done in case
more flow persists to stay at the rotation’s hub. The angular momentum change also
assists in the rise of the pressure of the fluid. That is to say, the energy is transferred from
asynchronous engine to the flow via rotary wheel which in turn causes the said rise in
pressure value. Moreover, as kinetic energy experiences an increase as well, the flow
velocity goes up simultaneously.
Selection of the most relevant and effective pump for a particular is not possible without
knowing some considerable factors such as Available value of Net Positive Suction Head,
efficiency, and pump head values. Another pump might be selected in case the current
flowrate, head, fluid characteristics will not conform to the chosen pump.
This pump connects the streams S-4 and S-4.1, which is also the recycle stream. First
things first, some values known beforehand are displayed below:
The first step should be calculation of the optimum diameter. In our case, this will be done
via the formula of economic pipe diameter:
It ought to be considered that the tube material is stainless steel due to high amount of
water which might cause corrosion. Needless to say, material selection also affects the
above equation’s constants as well as the overall price of the pump as this particular
material is quite high in cost. As the calculated value of optimum diameter, which is also
considered the inside diameter value, does not have a direct match with standard pipe
diameter values. Henceforth, the next closest pipe diameter value is selected from the
appropriate table. Therefore, the inner diameter value is taken as 35.052 mm.
Furthermore, the thickness value for the mentioned inner diameter value is 3.556 mm,
and the outer diameter is 42.164 (as Douter=Dinner + 2*thickness).
Following this, the stream’s velocity value is found as volumetric flowrate and area values
are now known:
𝑄 4 ∗ 0.0023795 𝑚
𝑣= = 2
= 2.4659
𝐴 𝜋 ∗ 0.035052 𝑠
That the fluid velocity range is between 1 and 3 meters per second as well as the value
above is in between these two values is noteworthy.
The next step is the calculation of Reynolds Number. This step is extremely crucial as it
allows the determination of the regime of the flow, which changes the way other values
are measured:
That the flow regime is turbulent is now obvious due to the number of Reynolds. The
determination of the value of friction factor should be the next reasonable step. For that,
initially, it is needed to first find the value of relative roughness. The stainless steel’s
absolute roughness value is 0.015 mm. Taking this into account:
𝑒 0.015
𝜀= = = 0.00042794
𝑑 35.052
The value of friction factor is determined via a graph called moody chart. The conditions
that make this possible are true, namely Re being between 5000 and 10^8, and relative
roughness being between 10^-2 and 10^-6.
1.325
𝑓′ = = 0.02059
1 𝑒 5.74 2
[ln( ∗ + ]
3.5 𝑑 𝑅𝑒 0.9
Now that these values needed for the last few calculations have been found out, the
pressure drop values for discharge and suction sides should be measured. Some values
that are known and are needed are as follows:
Suction side
Value of Static Pressure in Pa 111457.5
Level of Liquid Hs1 in m 0
Hs2 in m 15
The length of suction side in m 5
The value of equivalent length in m 70
The equivalent length is equal to 70 as there were two 90 degree elbows utilized in suction
side.
Discharge side
Value of Discharge Pressure in Pa 202650
Level of Liquid Hd1 in m 10
Hd2 in m 15
The length of discharge side in m 15
The value of equivalent length in m 142.5
The equivalent length is equal to 142.5 as in discharge side, one gate valve that is fully
open along with three elbows of 90 degree are present.
′
𝐿 𝑣2 5 2.4652
∆ℎ𝑠𝑓 = 𝑓 ∗ ( + 𝐿𝑒 ) ∗ = 0.02059 ∗ ( + 70) ∗ = 1.356917 𝑚
𝑑 2∗𝑔 0.035052 2 ∗ 9.81
𝑃𝑠 111457.5
∆ℎ𝑠 = + ℎ𝑠1 + ℎ𝑠2 − ℎ𝑠𝑓 = + 0 + 15 − 1.356917 = 28.73376 𝑚
𝜌∗𝑔 752.89 ∗ 9.81
′
𝐿 𝑣2 15 2.4652
∆ℎ𝑑𝑓 = 𝑓 ∗ ( + 𝐿𝑒 ) ∗ = 0.02059 ∗ ( + 142.5) ∗ = 3.640026 𝑚
𝑑 2∗𝑔 0.035052 2 ∗ 9.81
𝑃𝑑 202650
∆ℎ𝑑 = + ℎ𝑑1 + ℎ𝑑2 + ℎ𝑑𝑓 = + 10 + 15 + 3.640026 = 56.07762 𝑚
𝜌∗𝑔 752.89 ∗ 9.81
The computation of the difference between discharge side head and suction side head,
also known as the head value of the pump:
The next step is calculating the pump power value. However, it is crucial to first determine
the efficiency value of the pump. As per our case, this was determined at 72.30% via
utilizing pump head value and volumetric flowrate value, and selecting appropriate pump.
The power:
∆𝑃 ∗ 𝑄 201957.7 ∗ 0.0023795
𝑊= = = 664,672679 𝑊
𝜂 0.7230
Last, but not least, it is important to ensure that the available value for Net Positive Suction
Head is higher than that of the required value. The required NPSH value is provided from
the pump supplier and is a fixed number, whereas available NPSH changes depending
on the parameters of the flow. The saturated pressure value was calculated as 152084.7
Pa. The value of available Net Positive Suction Head is measured as follows:
𝑃𝑠𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 − 𝑃 𝑠𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑
𝑁𝑃𝑆𝐻𝑎𝑣𝑎𝑖𝑙𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 = + ℎ𝑠1 + ℎ𝑠2 − ℎ𝑠𝑓
𝜌∗𝑔
111457.7 − 152084.7
= + 0 + 15 − 1.356917 = 8.142406 𝑚
752.89 ∗ 9.81
The required value of the pump provided by the supplier is 0.54 m. As is seen, the
required NPSH value is less than that of available value.
Figure 2: Pump Curve
Transfer of energy between fluids via thermal means, that is, changing temperature
values by transmitting heat, is viable through a variety of units. One such unit utilized in
our process design is a heat exchanger. That there is no heat that is acquired from
external sources in heat exchangers is noteworthy. The aforementioned device is used
in a plethora of industries due to how essential the transmission of energy is in general.
Some prime examples to said industries are chemical processing plants, industry of
power generation, and oil and gas industry. Heat exchangers are able to both cool and
heat the requisite substances if so is required, for varying purposes such as transportation
of gases, altering fluid flow for a simpler transportation, changing values of temperature
for the reactions needed and many more. For the purpose of cooling as well as heating,
many fluid substances are used in the heat exchanger systems. Amonst many heat
exchanger types existing, the one that is going to be utilized in our project design is known
as heat exchanger of shell and tube type, which is quite a common heat exchanger
utilized across range of industries. Condensers, boilers, heaters are some ways heat
exchangers can be used as.
As it can be guessed, the hot stream’s fluid experiences cooling whereas cold stream
goes through heating process. Condensation and evaporation of the said fluids is also
probable. That said, control, crystallization, distillation, and a few other similar processes
are also viable and amongst applications of heat exchangers. The cold and hot fluid
streams are not mixed in heat exchangers of shell and tube type which constitutes the
fundament of the design of a heat exchanger. The aforementioned heat exchanger of
shell and tube type is one of the most common types, along with evaporators,
condensers, and preheaters. There is also another term pertinent to heat exchangers,
which is a sensible heat exchanger, and is used to refer to heat exchangers through which
there is no phase change of fluids happening.
There are various heat exchangers depending on a range of factors. Prime examples of
the said factor would be phases of the fluid, heat transfer’s working structure,
transportation method utilized and so on. Even though the heat exchanger’s fundamental
working principle is the same irrespective of the type of the heat exchanger, it is still
imperative to select the most relevant heat exchanger. Some key factors that are to be
deemed to choose the right HE type are as follows:
Taking all that was said into consideration, the heat exchanger of shell and tube
classification was chosen. These heat exchangers are simple, cost-effective, and
comparatively low-maintenance. The space they occupy is usually more than that of, say,
a heat exchanger of plate type with approximately the same thermal exchange capacity
value. That said, these heat exchangers still have a high value of heat transfer rate.
As the name suggests, these heat exchangers house a shell and a tube. A shell
encompasses tube series contained within a cylinder. The tube formation is also known
as a tube bundle. Each of these tubes move through tube sheets as well as baffles. The
thermal expansion via heating of heat exchanger is achieved via allowing one tube sheet
to move whereas the other stays constant. The fluid passing through the tubes is labelled
as medium of the tube side whereas the shell side fluid is the fluid moving through outside
the tubes. Both sides have one entrance point known as suction side and one exit side
known as discharge side.
Most commonly, the fluid having a higher-pressure value is chosen as the medium of the
tube side. This is because it is easier to withstand high pressure when fluid is divided into
small tubes each playing a role of a pressure vessel. Furthermore, the production cost of
a shell able to withstand high pressures is higher than that of tubes.
Additionally, the material for the heat exchangers must be chosen meticulously. Stainless
steel is usually preferred due to its resistance to corrosion as water is utilized in heat
exchangers. However, the selection should be done for each specific components as it
can have a considerable impact on the overall cost.
Last but not least, heat exchangers of shell and tube type are operating at the highest
efficiency values when compared to other heat exchangers.
Hot and cold fluid’s physical properties and rate of heat transfer
The calculations would be done while assuming that all of the heat given from hot fluid to
cold fluid is not lost:
𝑄ℎ𝑜𝑡 = 𝑄𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑑
Where,
The above equation can be further broken down to the next equation:
𝑐𝑝,ℎ𝑜𝑡 , 𝑐𝑝,𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑑 -> refers to specific heat capacity values of hot and cold fluid respectively
provided in kJ/kg K,
𝑚ℎ𝑜𝑡 , 𝑚𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑑 -> refers to hot and cold fluids’ mass flow values respectively provided in kg/s,
∆𝑇ℎ𝑜𝑡 , ∆𝑇𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑑 -> refers to difference value between hot and cold fluids’ temperature values
respectively provided in K.
The temperature differences for both fluids should be known beforehand, whereas
specific heat capacity have been found from the energy balance. The mole value for cold
fluid – a mix of isopropanol, water, and acetone in our case – is known. Thus, first the
rate of heat transfer is found as follows:
Now that the heat transfer rate value for cold fluid was found, which we know is equal to
the that of the hot fluid (the opposite sign is ignored for the sake of finding the right value),
the value of mass flow of hot fluid, namely water, is found as follows:
𝑄 2321.81205 𝑘𝐽/𝑠
𝑚ℎ𝑜𝑡 = = = 54.79458188 𝑘𝑔/𝑠
𝑐𝑝,ℎ𝑜𝑡 ∗ ∆𝑇ℎ𝑜𝑡 4237.5 ∗ (130 − 120)
Some values known beforehand about both hot and cold fluids are illustrated below:
For the sake of convenience, the temperature values for hot flow will be written remain
as a capital T, whereas that of cold fluid would be t.
Following this, the values of volumetric flowrate are found utilizing density values known
beforehand:
𝑚𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑑 12.95
𝑉𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑑 = = = 1.731822222 𝑚3 /𝑠
𝜌𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑑 383.2586
𝑚ℎ𝑜𝑡 54.79458188
𝑉ℎ𝑜𝑡 = = = 0.348611111 𝑚3 /𝑠
𝜌ℎ𝑜𝑡 926.4
The heat transfer in our case occurs not from energy received from an external source,
but from the exchange of heat. This, in turn, is driven via a difference in temperature
between hot and cold fluid. Two values needed for further calculations - ∆𝑇𝑚𝑖𝑛 and ∆𝑇𝑚𝑎𝑥 ,
namely minimum and maximum possible temperature difference values are found as
follows:
∆𝑇𝑚𝑖𝑛 = 𝑇1 − 𝑡2 = 14.15 𝐾
∆𝑇𝑚𝑎𝑥 = 𝑇2 − 𝑡1 = 73.15 𝐾
Heat transfer coefficient value cannot be determined as of now, which is why it will initially
be assumed from the table where some values are available depending on the nature of
the stream. As per our case, organic solvents of liquid phase constitute the cold fluid
whereas the hot fluid is water. Therefore:
𝑊
𝑈𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑑 = 1000
𝑚2 ∗℃
Even though we found logarithmic mean temperature difference, it cannot be utilized for
precise calculations. This is due to logarithmic mean temperature difference being for a
heat exchanger with 1 shell side pass and 1 tube pass. As per our case, there are 2 tube
passes. To ensure there is no inaccuracy, it is needed that we first find 𝐹𝑡 , also known as
Correction Factor. R and S values together constitute the function for the correction factor,
two dimensionless parameters, which are found as follows:
𝑇1 − 𝑇2
𝑅= = 0.144928
𝑡2 − 𝑡1
𝑡2 − 𝑡1
𝑆= = 0.829826
𝑇1 − 𝑡1
Now, there are two ways to find out the correction factor value, both utilizing the above R
and S parameters to do so.
The second method is to find the 𝐹𝑡 via a graph already available for 1 shell and 2 tube
pass heat exchanger.
As the next step, the duty’s requisite surface area value is calculated from 𝑄 = 𝑈 ∗ 𝐴 ∗
∆𝑇𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑛 :
𝑄 2321.81205
𝐴= = = 72.639 𝑚2
𝑈 ∗ ∆𝑇𝑚𝑒𝑎𝑛 1000 ∗ 31.841
To find the outer diameter and thickness values of our tubes, the T E M A standards were
utilized. The relevant values from available range, that is – from 16 mm to 50 mm, were
chosen.
𝑑𝑜 = 0.05 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟 ;
𝑡 = 0.0032 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟 .
As all the required values are known, the value of the surface area of 1 tube is calculated
as follows:
𝐴𝑡 = 𝜋 ∗ 𝑑𝑜 ∗ 𝑙 = 0.471238898 𝑚2
It is now needed to find the total number of tubes, which is found via utilizing 1 tube’s
surface area and the total area value which found using U assumption and temperature
difference along with heat transfer rate.
𝐴
𝑛= = 154.14 ≈ 156
𝐴𝑡
Due to the heat exchanger chosen having 2 tube passes, the tube number per pass is:
𝑛
𝑛𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠 = = 78
2
There are three ways the tubes can be arranged: square, rotated square, and triangular
forms. It was decided to choose triangular shape due to this particular pattern having
higher values of heat transfer rate. Taking this into consideration, the tube pitch value,
which is the value of distance between two closest tubes’ diameters, is found through the
following equation:
The next step is calculation the value of bundle diameter. Bundle diameter is comprised
of a circular formation of tubes inside the shell. The equation for this is as follows:
1 1
𝑛 𝑛1 156 2.207
𝐷𝑏 = 𝑑𝑜 ∗ ( ) = 0.05 ∗ ( ) = 0.925267599 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟
𝐾 0.249
The values of K and n1 are known beforehand as they are constants that were found
through a series of experiments. For our case, taking into account 2 tube passes and
triangular formation shape, the values are.
A split-ring floating head was opted for as the shell head for our heat exchanger. This was
chosen due to broad pressure as well as temperature value ranges and flexibility in
comparison to other heads.
Furthermore, another important part of heat exchangers is baffles which are utilized to
alter the direction of the flow for the shell side, to cause turbulence. The baffles are usually
placed in a way to be perpendicular to flow direction, which inhibits the moving flow to
some extent. This is called cut segment of baffles. In our case, this value was taken as
35%.
In order to find the shell’s diameter, it is needed to once more refer to T E M A standards,
where the clearance values – the value of the space between the shell itself and the
bundle – are provided. When it comes to our heat exchanger:
In order to find the actual heat transfer coefficient’s overall value, finding heat transfer
coefficients of shell and tube sides is required, which will later be utilized to find the actual
U value. Some values that are known beforehand and are going to be utilized a bit later
are as follows:
Table 9: Values for further calculations for the Heat Exchanger
𝜋 ∗ 𝑑𝑖2
𝐴𝑡 = = 0.00149301 𝑚2
4
𝑉𝑡
𝑣𝑡 = = 2.993531018 𝑚/𝑠
𝐴𝑡
𝑣∗𝜌∗𝑑
𝑅𝑒 = = 548352.9754
𝜇
𝑐𝑝 ∗ 𝜇
𝑃𝑟 = = 440.8812791
𝑘
Another value that needed in our calculations is called 𝑗ℎ - factor of heat transfer. This
value is found from the graph using the values of Reynolds Number. Internal diameter to
tube length ratio was also used to find the aforementioned value. That said, the said ratio
is not needed after Reynolds number gets higher than a certain value, as the heat transfer
factor changes values in a linear dependence. This value is found as 𝑗ℎ = 0.002.
Normally, the value of viscosity correction term is found as well, which is how the viscosity
value changes all the while fluid flow occurs. However, this value is negligible in our case.
Therefore, Nusselt Number value is:
ℎ𝑡 ∗𝑑𝑖
Interchanging the equation 𝑁𝑢 = , the value of heat transfer coefficient for tube-side
𝑘
is:
𝑘
ℎ𝑡 = 𝑁𝑢 ∗ = 128917.8365
𝑑𝑖
Then, shell diameter value is figured out. For this, shell clearance value is needed, which
is also found via an appropriate graph:
The value 𝑙𝑏 indicates the amount of distance between baffles. The lower the distance,
the higher the drop in pressure and heat transfer. This value is taken as 0.33 for our heat
exchanger leading to:
𝐷𝑠
𝑙𝑏 = = 0.498633799
2
When it comes to the value of cross flow area of the shell side, it is found out as follows:
(𝑝𝑡 − 𝑑𝑜 ) ∗ 𝐷𝑠 ∗ 𝑙𝑏
𝐴𝑆 = = 0.099454266 𝑚2
𝑝𝑡
Following this, the velocity value for the shell side is found:
𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤
𝑣𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑙 = = 17.4132522 𝑚/𝑠
𝜌∗𝐴
1.1
𝑑𝑒 = ∗ ((𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒 𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑐ℎ)2 − 0.917 ∗ (𝑑𝑜 )2 ) = 0.0355025 𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟
𝑑𝑜
𝜌 ∗ 𝑣𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑙 ∗ 𝑑𝑒
𝑅𝑒 = = 473563.8371
𝜇
𝑐𝑝 ∗ 𝜇
𝑃𝑟 = = 24.99434709
𝑘
As in the tube side, this time viscosity factor value is neglected as well. The value of the
cut for segmental baffles is taken as 35%, which allows finding heat transfer factor 𝑗ℎ from
the graph as 𝑗ℎ = 0.0018:
𝑁𝑢 = 𝑗ℎ ∗ 𝑅𝑒 ∗ 𝑃𝑟 0.33 = 2465.692015
Once again, heat transfer coefficient is found utilizing Nusselt Number value:
𝑁𝑢 ∗ 𝑘
ℎ𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑙 = = 9254.375355
𝑑𝑒
Before calculating the actual value of overall coefficient of heat transfer, taking reasonable
𝑊
values of fouling factors is required. For shell side, this said value is taken as 5000 ,
𝑚2 ℃
𝑊
whereas for tube side this value is taken as 4000 . The stainless steel’s conductivity
𝑚2 ℃
𝑊
value, which was selected as the material of the tube, is equal to 15 .
𝑚℃
𝑑
1 1 1 𝑑𝑜 ∗ ln( 𝑜 ) 𝑑 1 1
𝑑𝑖 𝑜
= + + + ∗( + )
𝑈 ℎ𝑠 ℎ𝑠 𝑓𝑜𝑢𝑙 2𝑘 𝑑𝑖 ℎ𝑡 ℎ𝑡 𝑓𝑜𝑢𝑙
0.05
1 1 1 0.05 ∗ ln(0.0436) 0.05 1 1
= + + + ∗( + )
𝑈 9254.375355 5000 2 ∗ 15 0.0436 128917.8365 4000
= 0.000938
1
𝑈= = 1902.02974
0.000831926
Having found the actual overall coefficient of heat transfer, the calculation of the
difference in percentage of actual and assumed values is probable.
𝑈𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑝𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 − 𝑈𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑
𝑃𝑒𝑟𝑐𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑓𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒 = | | ∗ 100% = 19.20 %
𝑈𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑝𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
The last touches are finding pressure drop for tube and shell sides, which will then be
summed to overall pressure drop value. The friction factor for both tube and shell sides
are found via appropriate graphs:
Tube side:
𝑙 𝜌𝑣 2
∆𝑃𝑡 = 2 (8 ∗ 𝜑 ∗ + 2.5) ∗ = 29893.66989 𝑃𝑎 = 0.298936699 𝑏𝑎𝑟
𝑑𝑖 2
Shell side:
𝐷𝑠 𝑙 𝜌 ∗ 𝑣2
∆𝑃𝑠 = 8 ∗ 𝜑 ∗ ∗ ∗ = 1806890.483 𝑃𝑎 = 18.06890483 𝑏𝑎𝑟
𝑑𝑒 𝑏𝑎𝑓𝑓𝑙𝑒 2
HEAT EXCHANGER
Equipment no HE-102
DATA SHEET
Function Heating of organic liquid mixture
Duty Specification
Overall U (𝑊/𝑚2
1000 Duty (kW) 2321.81205
℃)
Mean
Area (m2) 72.6389 31.963
temperature ( ̊C)
Operating conditions of the process
Tube Side Shell Side
IN OUT IN OUT
Temperatur Temperatur
403.15 393.15 320 389
e(K) e(K)
Type of fluid Water Type of fluid Organic mixture
Mass flow ( kg/s ) 54.794 Mass flow ( kg/s ) 12.949
Density
Density ( kg/m3 ) 926.4 383.25
( kg/m^3 )
Viscosity ( Pa*s ) 0.0002205 Viscosity ( Pa*s ) 0.000500325
Thermal Thermal
Conductivity 0.6872 Conductivity 0.13325
( W/m-K ) ( W/m-K )
Specific Heat Specific Heat
capacity ( kJ/kg- 4.2375 capacity ( kJ/kg- 2.5975
K) K)
Mechanical Layout
Tube Side Shell Side
Bundle Diameter
Number of Tubes 156 0.925267599
(m)
Tube Arrangement Triangular
Shell Diameter
Pitch ( m) 0.0625 0.9972675989
(m)
Internal Diameter ( m) 0.0436
Outside Diameter Baffle Spacing
0.05 0.498633799
( m) (m)
Length (m) 3 Shell Area (m2) 0.099454266
Fluid Velocity Shell Side
2.993531018 17.4132522
(m/s) Velocity (m/s)
Heat Transfer Heat Transfer
Coefficient 128917.8365 Coefficient 9254.375355
( W/m-C ) ( W/m-C )
Pressure Drop Pressure
0.298936699 18.068904
(bar) Drop(bar)
Materials of Construction
Tube material Stainless Steel
Chemical Engineering
Cost - Department of Baku
Higher Oil School
Design by Zeinalov Dzhavidan
HSE
Firstly, it should be paid attention to that the available NPSH value remains greater than
that of the required value. If the opposite were true, some harm to the pump as well as
cavitation is inevitable.
Secondly, any leakage must be avoided as much as possible. That said, if it is to occur,
the inlet flow of the fluid must first be shut down to avoid further losses. For this, some
measures must be prepared beforehand.
Thirdly, the units do require electric energy to operate, which means there is a danger of
ignition of electric sockets as well as a chance for a person to be harmed by an electrical
plug. The switching on and off of the plugs must be done meticulously and with utmost
care.
Maintenance and operation of a heat exchanger might cause additional safety risks to an
already critically functioning aspect of it. Henceforth, grasping the safety measures that
must be followed is imperative.
First things first, heat exchanger must be designed with taking into account the range of
the temperature and pressure values.
Secondly, the type of the gasket, thickness value as well as the material must all match,
as leakage might occur if the opposite was true.
Last but not least, easy maintenance of a heat exchanger must be taken into
consideration, as heat exchangers in need of frequent maintenance increase the chance
of tragic accidents occurring.
References
1. n.d. Accessed May 4, 2022. https://owlcation.com/stem/How-To-Read-a-Moody-
Chart.
2. Carl L., Yaws. 1999. Chemical properties handbook : physical, thermodynamic,
environmental, transport, safety, and health related properties for organic and
inorganic chemicals. McGraw-Hill.
3. 2013. Heat Exchanger Design Handbook.
4. 2012. Neutrium. October 5. Accessed May 4, 2022. https://neutrium.net/fluid-
flow/pressure-loss-from-fittings-equivalent-length-method/.
5. P.Sekulic, R. K. a. D. 2003. "Fundamentals of heat exchanger design. 1st edition."
New York: John Wiley & Sons, Incorporation.
6. Perry, Robert. n.d. Perry’s Chemical Engineers’ Handbook, the 8th edition.
7. n.d. "Physical Properties of Liquids and Gases." Accessed May 4, 2022.
https://www.mathscinotes.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Appendix_C.pdf.
8. Richardson, Coulson &. n.d. Coulson & Richardson’s Chemical Engineering
Design Volume 6, 4th edition.
9. Shahs., Ramesh K. 2003. "Fundamentals of Heat Exchanger Design, 1st edition."
Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Incorporation.
10. SINNOTT, R. K. 2005. "Coulson & Richardson’s Chemical Engineering Design 4th
edition." In Chemical Engineering Design, pages 194-340. Oxford.
11. n.d. Wermac. Accessed May 4, 2022.
https://www.wermac.org/equipment/pumps_centrifugal.html.
Individual section 3.
Aytan Valiyeva, CE 19’1
Material balance
Energy balance
References
Material & Energy balance
Heat exchanger H-103 is placed between stream 7 and stream 8, which is shown in the
figure 1. H-103 is applied for the sake of decreasing the gas mixture’s temperature value
from 623K to 550K. Besides that, P-105 operates at 322K, which raise the pressure of
liquid mixture from 150 kPa to 224 kPa. The pump is located between stream 28 and 29.
For further calculations, it is needed to determine the energy and mass balances of heat
exchanger and pump. In the following tables, material balance for pump and heat
exchanger are tabulated.
Stream 7 - 8
Stream 28 - 29
Components
Mole flow rate Mole Mass flow rate Mass
(kmol/h) friction (kg/h) friction
Isopropyl 67.50198 0.0951 4050.1188 0.259384859
Hydrogen 0 0 0 0
𝐴𝑚𝑖𝑥𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 = ∑ 𝑥𝑖 ∗ 𝐴𝑖
𝑖
𝑥𝑖 is a substance’s mole fraction whereas 𝐴𝑖 stands for that substance’s specific heat
capacity, due to which, equivalent value for mixture is obtained. Same procedures should
be done on other constants as well. Eventually, heat capacity of the mixture will be
calculated as follows:
After finding heat capacity, enthalpy changes have been determined by the formula given
below (𝑇𝑟𝑒𝑓 − 298𝐾):
𝑇
∆ℎ𝑚𝑖𝑥𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 = ∫ 𝐶𝑝𝑚𝑖𝑥𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑑𝑇
𝑇𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒
o Heat transfer area was higher than 50m^2, therefore shell and tube heat
exchanger has been chosen.
o 25% baffle cut was chosen for easy cleaning and better heat transfer rate
o 6 tube and 1 shell pass arrangement were applied
o Counter flow regime was provided in order to get more uniform difference in
temperatures of two fluids as well as more heat transfer rate.
o It was decided to put cold water in tube side while in shell side, gas mixture would
be placed for aforementioned reasons.
All physical properties are demonstrated in the following table, which were calculated
using Perry’s Physical Properties table. Since there is inlet and outlet, mathematical mean
of physical properties were defined.
Table 14. General Specifications
𝑘𝑚𝑜𝑙 𝑘𝑔 𝑘𝑔
𝑚𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑑 = 0.615 ∗ 18.0153 = 11.076
𝑠𝑒𝑐 𝑘𝑚𝑜𝑙 𝑠𝑒𝑐
After determining the molar flow rate, heat load should be calculated in to order to
evaluate the heat transfer area.
𝑘𝑚𝑜𝑙 𝐽
𝑄̇ = 0.451 ∗ 69.68 ∗ (623 − 550)𝐾 = 2290.1 𝑘𝑊
𝑠𝑒𝑐 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝐾
Temperature curve
700
600
temperature in kelvin
500
400
100
0
1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
Position
Temperature ratios of R and P are determined in order to get more accurate value:
𝑇1 − 𝑇2
𝑅= = 1.46
𝑡2 − 𝑡1
𝑡2 − 𝑡1
𝑃= = 0.152
𝑇1 − 𝑡1
Utilizing the below chart, it can be concluded that correction factor is approximately 1.
𝐹 = 1 −≫ ∆𝑇 = 1 ∗ ∆𝑇𝐿𝑀𝑐𝑜𝑢𝑛𝑡𝑒𝑟 = 268.34𝐾
Since log mean temperature is known, heat transfer area can be determined:
𝑄 2290.1 𝑘𝑊
A= = = 53.34 𝑚2
𝑈 ∗ ∆𝑇 160 W
∗ 268.34𝐾
𝑚2 𝐾
After that, value of one tube’s area can determined in pursuance of calculating the total
value of number of tubes in following steps.
𝐴
𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒𝑠 = = 142 𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒𝑠
𝐴1
It was mentioned that, triangular pitch was chosen. According to the Kern’s method, the
pitch of tube is calculated as below:
Tube specification
tube material stainless steel
outer diameter, mm 50
Thickness, mm 3.2
inner diameter, mm 43.6
tube length, m 2.4
tube pitch, mm 62.5
A_1 tube, m2 0.377
n tubes 142
1 1
𝑛 𝑛1 142 2.499
𝐷𝑏𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑙𝑒 = 𝑑𝑜 ∗ = 50𝑚𝑚 ∗ = 1026.57 𝑚𝑚
𝐾1 0.0743
Clearance between shell and bundle can be determined from the chart.
𝐶𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 = 74 𝑚𝑚
Diameter of the bundle is less than 1520mm, which is quite reasonable according to the
TEMA standards. Besides that, coming to the size of the baffle, maximum spacing is more
suitable for this heat exchanger:
𝜋 ∗ 𝑑𝑖𝑛 2
𝐴𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒𝑖𝑛 = = 0.0015 𝑚2
4
𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒 142
𝐴 = 𝐴𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒 ∗ = 0.0015 𝑚2 ∗ = 0.035 𝑚2
𝑛𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠 6
𝑄 0.011 𝑚
𝑣= = = 0.316
𝐴𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 0.035 𝑠𝑒𝑐
Inside coefficient for water is determined using equation below, which was suggested by
Eagle and Ferguson:
(20 + 70)℃
4200 ∗ (1.35 + 0.02𝑡)𝑣 0.8 4200& (1.35 + 0.02 ∗ 2 ) ∗ 0.3160.8
ℎ𝑖 = =
𝑑𝑖 0.2 43.60.2
𝑊
= 1769
𝑚2 ℃
There are some parameters which result in pressure drop in pipes and tubes of the heat
exchangers. Tube side’s flow is more streamlined than that of the shell side, resulting in
the minimal value of drop in pressure. It is needed to find Reynolds’ number to calculate
the tube side’s pressure drop value:
𝑘𝑔 𝑚
𝜌 ∗ 𝑣 ∗ 𝑑𝑖𝑛 994.18 𝑚3 ∗ 0.316 𝑠𝑒𝑐 ∗ 0.0436𝑚
𝑅𝑒 = = = 19653
𝜇 0.0007 𝑃𝑎 ∗ 𝑠𝑒𝑐
𝑗𝑓 is nearly equal to the 0.004, which is determined from the chart given below:
Taking minor losses into account, final pressure loss can be computed:
𝑙 𝜌 ∗ 𝑣2
∆𝑃𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒 = 𝑛 ∗ (8 ∗ 𝑗𝑓 ∗ (1 (𝑛
+ + 0.5) ∗ 𝑛 + − 1) ∗ 1.5) ∗
𝑑𝑖𝑛 2
Allowable pressure drop was 1 bar. As such it can be concluded that, pressure drop in
tube side is lower than 0.5 bar to an adequate degree.
contraction 0.5
k
values expansion 1
five flow reversal 1.5
Step 5: Calculation of the drop in pressure as well as heat transfer coefficient of
the shell side
First of all, cross-sectional area of the shell side should be found:
After finding flow area, velocity and volumetric flow rate can be determined:
𝑘𝑔
𝑚̇ 12.95 𝑠𝑒𝑐 𝑚3
𝑄= = = 5.458
𝜌 𝑘𝑔 𝑠𝑒𝑐
2.3725 3
𝑚
𝑚3
5.458 𝑠𝑒𝑐 𝑚
𝑣𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑙 = = 22.532
0.242 𝑚2 𝑠𝑒𝑐
The maximum velocity of gases in shell side of heat exchanger should be less than 30
m/sec, which indicates that above value is quite reasonable.
1.27 1.27
𝑑𝑒𝑞 = ∗ (𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑐ℎ2 − 0.785 ∗ 𝑑𝑜2 ) = ∗ (62.52 − 0.785 ∗ 502 ) = 49.371 𝑚𝑚
𝑑𝑜 50𝑚𝑚
𝑚 𝑘𝑔
22.532 ∗ 49.371𝑚𝑚 ∗ 2.3725 3
𝑠𝑒𝑐 𝑚 = 133326.1793
𝑅𝑒 =
0.000019795 𝑃𝑎 ∗ 𝑠𝑒𝑐
𝑗ℎ is approximately equal to 0.0012, which is found from figure 8 by taking baffle cut as
25%.
𝑘𝐽
𝜇 ∗ 𝑐𝑝 2.42 𝑘𝑔𝐶 ∗ 0.000019795 𝑃𝑎 ∗ 𝑠𝑒𝑐
𝑃𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑡𝑙 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 = = = 0.567
𝑘 𝑊
0.084405
𝑚𝐾
1
𝑘 ∗ 𝐽ℎ ∗ 𝑅𝑒 ∗ 𝑃𝑟 3 𝑊
ℎ𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑙 = = 226.425 2
𝑑𝑒𝑞 𝑚 ℃
Gases transfer the heat inefficiently to other medium, therefore heat transfer coefficient
in shell side is found to be relatively lower than that in tube side.
𝑗𝑓 is found from figure 7, which is equal to 0.0028. Since the allowable pressure drop was
0.2 bar, the pressure drop in shell side is quite reasonable.
𝑑
1 1 1 𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑜 𝑑𝑜 ∗ ln( 𝑜 )
𝑑𝑖
= + + + +
𝑈𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑒𝑟 ℎ𝑜 ℎ𝑜𝑑 𝑑𝑖 ∗ ℎ𝑖 𝑑𝑖 ∗ ℎ𝑖𝑑 2𝑘
Where,
𝑊
ℎ𝑖 − ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑡 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑓𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒 𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒, 1769.138
𝑚2 ℃
𝑊
ℎ𝑜 − ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑡 𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑓𝑒𝑟 𝑐𝑜𝑒𝑓𝑓𝑖𝑐𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑙 𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒, 226.425
𝑚2 ℃
𝑊
ℎ𝑖𝑑 − 𝑖𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑡 𝑠𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑒, 5500
𝑚2 ℃
𝑊
ℎ𝑜𝑑 − 𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑟𝑡 𝑠𝑐𝑎𝑙𝑒, 5000
𝑚2 ℃
𝑊
𝑈𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑒𝑟 = 175.833
𝑚2 ℃
𝑊
In the first step, the overall heat transfer coefficient was chosen as 160 . Relative error
𝑚2 𝐾
175.833 − 160
𝐸𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑟 𝑖𝑛 % = ∗ 100% = 9.8 %
160
Based on the relative error, which is less than 20%, it can be concluded that the assumed
value was convenient choice.
In many industrial applications, centrifugal pumps are more widely utilized due to its
advantages, including cost-
effectiveness, high efficiency,
simplicity and easy installation and
maintenance. It should be also
mentioned that centrifugal pumps can
operate at wide range of temperature
and pressure, which makes it more
flexible than other type of pumps.
Therefore, in this design project
centrifugal pumps are known to be
more suitable than other types of
pumps. In this process, in order to
Figure 13. Position of Pump P-105 on the PFD
transport the mixture of isopropyl,
water and acetone from the bottom of the distillation column C-202 to the top of C-203
column with the height of 5 meters, P-105 is utilized. This pump is located between stream
7 and 8. The pump raises the pressure of the fluid from 150kPa to 224kPa. The following
sections is going to discuss the sizing of the pump.
There are some physical parameters which will be needed in order to design centrifugal
pump.
Table 18. Physical properties
Properties Values
Temperature, K 322
The optimum diameter is 44.7 mm. According to the reference book, nominal size is taken
as 2 inch. (Figure 12)
𝜀 0.015 𝑚𝑚
𝑅𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑔ℎ𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 = = = 0.0002857
𝑑 52.5 𝑚𝑚
With the help of continuity equation, average velocity of the flow can be found:
𝑚3
𝑄 0.00473 𝑠𝑒𝑐 𝑚
𝑉= = = 2.186
𝐴 0.00216 𝑚2 𝑠𝑒𝑐
𝑑𝑖𝑛 𝑘𝑔 𝑚 𝑚
𝑅𝑒 = 𝜌 ∗ 𝑣 ∗ = 916.6 3 ∗ 2.186 ∗ 0.0525 = 148930
𝜇 𝑚 𝑠𝑒𝑐 0.0007063 𝑃𝑎𝑠
Since Reynolds’ number is higher than 4000, the flow regime is turbulent.
After determining the Reynolds’ number, friction factor can be found from Moody chart.
𝑓́ = 0.01824
Step 4:
Suction side
Temperature 322 K
Pressure 150 kPa
vertical length 2 m
horizontal length 10 m
equivalent diameter
gate valve (fully open) 7.5
90 elbow x1 35
equivalent d 2.23125 m
total length 12 m
After collecting all the required data, frictional heat loss and suction head can be
evaluated:
𝐿 + 𝐿𝐸 𝑣 2
∆ℎ𝑓 = 𝑓 ′ ∗ ∗ = 1.2 𝑚
𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 2𝑔
𝑃𝑠 150 𝑘𝑃𝐴
ℎ𝑠𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 = + 𝑧 − ℎ𝑓 = + 2𝑚 − 1.2𝑚 = 17.48 𝑚
𝜌𝑔 𝑘𝑔
916.6 3 ∗ 8.31
𝑚
𝑘𝑔
916.6 ∗ 9.81 ∗ 1.2𝑚
𝑃𝑓𝑠 = 𝑚3 = 10.8 𝑘𝑃𝑎
1000
equivalent diameters
sudden expansion 50
gate valve100% 7.5
90 elbow x2 35
equivalent length 6.69375 m
total length 8 m
𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ = 5𝑚 + 3𝑚 = 8𝑚
𝐿 + 𝐿𝐸 𝑣 2
∆ℎ𝑓 = 𝑓 ′ ∗ ∗ = 1.24 𝑚
𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 2𝑔
𝑃𝑑 224 𝑘𝑃𝐴
ℎ𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒 = + 𝑧 + ℎ𝑓 = + 5𝑚 + 1.24𝑚 = 31.15 𝑚
𝜌𝑔 𝑘𝑔
916.6 3 ∗ 8.31
𝑚
𝑘𝑔
916.6 ∗ 9.81 ∗ 1.24𝑚
𝑃𝑓𝑑 = 𝑚3 = 11.18 𝑘𝑃𝑎
1000
Where the saturation pressure is 0.127 bar, which is calculated with the help of Antoine
equation by taking constant values from reference hand book:
𝐵
𝑃 = 10^(𝐴 + + 𝐶𝑙𝑜𝑔10(𝑇) + 𝐷𝑇 + 𝐸𝑇 2
𝑇
NPSH_availbale is higher than the required net positive suction head which is 0.92m.
After sketching pump curve, it was determined that the efficiency of pump is 78%. The
typical pump curve is described by a plot, which includes its efficiency, power, NPSH
against volumetric flow rate. Eventually, pump power can be calculated with the help of
equation given below:
𝑘𝑔 0.0047𝑚3
𝜌𝑔ℎ𝑄 916.6 ∗ 9.81 ∗ 13.67𝑚 ∗
𝑊= = 𝑚3 𝑠𝑒𝑐
= 746.08 𝑊𝑡
𝜂 0.78
Figure 16. Pump Curve
Pump safety
o To begin with, the available net positive suction head should be always greater
than required value. If not, cavitation can occur, which can lead to deterioration,
mechanical damage in the configuration of pump.
o Secondly, leakage must be minimalized. If leakage occurs, the cause of it should
be determined.
o Overheating, operating against a closed valve should be avoided. If overheating
happens, pump should be stopped, and allowed to cool down.
o Since the units run on electricity, there is risk of electric sockets igniting, as well as
the possibility of a person being injured by an electrical plug.
Table 19. Data sheet for P-105
Pump № P-104
Type Centrifugal pump
P-104 Data Sheet Aim Send product to
distillation column
Liquid Liquid mixture
Suction part Discharge stage
Pressure 150 kPa Pressure 224 kPa
Temperature 322 𝐾 Temperature 322 𝐾
Flow parameters Liquid mixture properties
Mole flow 709.8 kmol/h Density 916.6 kg/m3
Mass flow 15614.322 kg/h Dynamic 0.000706 Pa*s
Viscosity
Volumetric 17.035 m^3/h Saturated 0.127 bar
flow rate Pressure
Stainless Steel Pipeline Fluid data
Specifications
Absolute 0.015 mm Average 2.19 m/s
Roughness Velocity
Outside 60.32 mm Reynolds 148930 -
diameter number
Inside 52.5 mm Relative 0,000706 -
diameter roughness
Thickness 3.91 mm Friction 0.01824 -
factor
Pump power figures Checking cavitation risk
Efficiency 78 % NPSH 0.92 meter
(required)
Power 746.08 W NPSH 16.06 meter
(available)
References
[1] J.M. Coulson, J, Richardson, Chemical Engineering Design. Volume 6 ed 1983
[4] APA. Cengel, Y. A, & Cimbala. Fluid Mechanic’s: Fundamentals and applications (4th
edition)
[7] Perry, R. H., Green, D.W. and Maloney, J.O. (1997) Perry’s Chemical Engineers
Handbook, 7th edition (McGraw-Hill)
[8] Ludwig, E.E. (2001) Applied Process Design for Chemical and Petroleum Plants, Vol.
3, 3rd edition
[10] Hall, S. M. (2018). Heat exchangers. In Rules of Thumb for Chemical Engineers (pp
197-230)
Individual section 4.
Naila Shakarova, CE 19’2
References
Process description
At this individual section, P-104 (pump) and H-104 (heat
exchanger) which have been described on the Figure_4.1 & 4.2 by
showing their exact places on process flow diagram are going to
designed and demonstrated in a detailed way.
S-8.1
Figure 4.1. H-104
Starting from P-104 which had been utilized so as to send the product which mostly
consists of acetone from the top of the distillation column (C-202) to the shortage tank (T-
105). As it is obvious, products commonly enter to tanks from their tops (not the way that
described in Figure 4.2); therefore, there is a need of pressure difference to conveying
that material. From the top of the C-202, almost all gases at high temperature are
separated, and then sent to the HE-107 for cooling. After that some portion of those
substances have been backed to the distillation column in order to balance the
temperature inside the column, while another part of them have been moved to the tank
as a ready product whose 99% constituents of acetone at the 1.1 bar. By means of P-
104, their pressure had been increased to the 1.5 bar so as to raise them to the top of the
tank at the 295 K, pump design having been considered as an isothermal process.
Regarding to the H-104 whose main aim is to cool the gas mixture by means of
cold water, this heat exchanger had been placed after reactor (R-101). Adding more
details about its place, after reactor, the substances which constituents of hydrogen,
acetone, isopropanol, and water as a gas form at the 623 K firstly enters H-103 where
their temperature have been decreased to the 550 K. By following these, those materials
had been sent to H-104 for cooling from 550K to 470K at 4 bar; during cooling process
their pressure have been stayed constant by having negligible pressure drop. Coming to
the importance of this cooling process, as it is clear that high temperature is believed to
have an adverse effect on the piping system by damaging their materials significantly;
moreover, heat exchangers are known to help to reach the desired temperature for the
next procedures of the whole process.
On the table 4.1 and 4.2, molar and mass flow rate of the streams with their
corresponding mole and mass fractions of substances have been demonstrated.
S23/S24
Mass
Molar flow flow
rate rate Mass
MW(kg/kmol) (kmol/h) Mol fraction (kg/h) fraction
Isopropanol 60 0 0 0 0
Water 18 0,56486483 0,000999422 10,1676 0,000311
Hydrogen 2 0,22842173 0,000404149 0,45684 1,4E-05
Acetone 58 564,398088 0,998596428 32735,1 0,999676
TOTAL - 565,191375 1 32745,7 1
S8/S8.1
Molar Mass
flow rate Mol flow rate Mass
MW(kg/kmol) (kmol/h) fraction (kg/h) fraction
Isopropanol 60 67,58682 0,0417 4055,209 0,086986
Water 18 335,9891 0,2073 6047,805 0,129727
Hydrogen 2 608,6055 0,3755 1217,211 0,02611
Acetone 58 608,6055 0,3755 35299,12 0,757178
TOTAL - 1620,787 1 46619,34 1
In regard to the energy balance for those streams, it had been done based on the
first law of thermodynamics whose main aim is to explain that energy cannot be destroy
neither generated, it is always interchanged from one form t another form. Vital purpose
here is to determine specific heat capacities of each stream by means of A, B, C, D, and
E constant values for heat capacities of substances which might be taken from reference
books. As there are mixtures of gases and liquids, those constants values should be
calculated for mixtures by using their corresponding mole fractions:
𝐴𝑚𝑖𝑥𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 = ∑ 𝑥𝑖 ∗ 𝐴𝑖 (1)
𝑖
𝑥𝑖 is mole fraction of a substance, and 𝐴𝑖 is the constant value for heat capacity of
that substance, due to which, equivalent value for mixture is obtained. Same procedures
should be done other constants as well. By following these:
𝑇
∆ℎ𝑚𝑖𝑥𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 = ∫ 𝐶𝑝𝑚𝑖𝑥𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 𝑑𝑇 (3)
𝑇𝑟𝑒𝑓𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑛𝑐𝑒
P-104
Before starting the numerical values calculations for P-104, the type of the pump
should be determined by analyzing the physical properties of the streams, considering
working conditions such as temperature, pressure, and flow rates as well. Mainly there
are 2 types which are widely utilized in the industrial applications: positive displacement
and rotodynamic pumps. The main purpose is to convey fluids from one place to another
one; however, the essential difference between them is that positive displacement pumps
are known to send streams just physically, while the rotodynamic pumps is also able to
increase its pressure. Centrifugal pump is believed to be suitable for the fluid which have
high flow rate with low head, whereas an opposite pattern has been observed for positive
displacement pumps. If the viscosity of substances are highly great, then centrifugal pump
is not available, while another type is capable of dealing with this property. The range in
terms of pressure and temperature is wider for rotodynamic pumps in comparison with
positive displacement ones. Consequently, centrifugal pump has been chosen for P-104
based on the conditions and properties mentioned above.
Properties Values
Density 789.322454 kg/m3
Dynamic viscosity 0.000316828 Pa*s
Kinematic viscosity 4.01392E-07 m2/s
Saturated pressure 2.66E+01 kPa
Since our stream constituents of water and acetone, all values should be
determined by considering this mixture.
Density and viscosity of liquid mixture should be determined by taking into account
the molar (𝑥𝑖 ) and mass (𝑦𝑖 ) fractions of them, respectively:
𝜌𝑚𝑖𝑥𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 = ∑ 𝑥𝑖 𝜌𝑖 (1.1)
𝑖
1 1
= (1.2)
𝜇𝑚𝑖𝑥𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 ∑𝑖 𝑦𝑖 ∗ 𝜇𝑖
For saturated pressures, Antoine coefficients (A, B, C) have been utilized at the
given temperature:
𝐵
log10 (𝑃) = 𝐴 − (1.3)
𝐶+𝑇
T-temperature in Kelvin; P-saturated pressure in mm Hg.
All required constants’ values have been taken from Perry’s book, and they have
been compared with figures gathered from Aspen HYSYS software; eventually, there is
a negligible difference between those values.
𝑘𝑔
𝜌 is density of mixture in ;
𝑚3
D_optimum 78,2498184 mm
Material Carbon steel 40s
Nominal size 3,5 inch
Outside diameter 101,6 mm
Wall thickness 5,7 mm
Inside diameter 90,2 mm
Cross-sectional area 0,006390031 m2
Absolute roughness 0.0441 mm
2
𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒
𝐴𝑐 = 𝜋 ∗ = 0.0064 𝑚2 (2.2)
4
Next step is required to calculate the velocity of fluid by using volumetric flow rate
and cross-sectional area of tube. Before continuing the next steps, the gathered velocity
should be compared to the rules which requires that velocity of 1-3 m/s :
32745𝑘𝑔 789𝑘𝑔
𝑄̇ 𝑚̇⁄𝜌 ⁄
𝑣𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 = = =
𝑠 𝑚3 = 1.8𝑚 (2.3)
𝐴𝑐 𝐴𝑐 0.0064𝑚2 𝑠
Ultimately, there are all needed figures for determining Reynolds number:
𝐴𝑏𝑠𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑡𝑒 𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑔ℎ𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠
𝑅𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑔ℎ𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 = = 0.00049 (2.5)
𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟
j_friction=0.0182
At the suction part, 1 90° square elbow and 1 gate valve have been assumed to
be utilize, whereas there are 3 90° square elbow for discharge part. By considering both
tables displayed above, frictional head loss might be determined by using several
equations. First of all, equivalent length should be found for determining frictional head
loss (∆ℎ𝑓𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 ), then ℎ𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑦 is found for suction head:
2
′
𝐿𝑒𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑣𝑎𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝐿𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑣𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒
∆ℎ𝑓𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 =8∗𝑓 ∗( + )∗ = 0.92𝑚 (3.2)
𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 2𝑔
𝜌 ∗ 𝑢2 𝑢2
ℎ𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑦 = = = 0.1658𝑚 (3.3)
2 ∗ 𝜌 ∗ 𝑔 2𝑔
𝑃𝑠𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
ℎ𝑠𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 = + ℎ𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙.𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑔ℎ𝑡 − ℎ𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑦 − ∆ℎ𝑓𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 = 31.12𝑚 (3.5)
𝜌∗𝑔
Obtaining just 7.1 kPa from frictional head loss shows that the steps which have
done till this one is quite logical.
150000 Pa
Static pressure
Vertical length 20 m
Horizontal length 3 m
Gate valve (fully open) 7,5
90° square elbow 75
L (equivalent) 20,97 m
Total length 23 m
Frictional head loss 1,4689 m
Discharge head 40,841 m
Frictional pressure loss 11373,35 Pa
Almost the same procedures have been applied these parts. Firstly, equation 3.1,
3.2 and 3.4 (at the discharge part there is no need to estimate h_entry):
20.97 23 1.82
∆ℎ𝑓𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙 = 0.0182 ∗ ( + )∗ = 1.47𝑚
0.0902 0.0902 2 ∗ 9.81
Frictional head loss is again responsible for the sufficiently lower value, which is
the one of the primary aims while designing P-104.
789𝑘𝑔 9.81𝑚
∆𝑃𝑓𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙.𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑠 = ∗ ∗ 1.47𝑚 = 11.373𝑘𝑃𝑎
𝑚3 𝑠2
Finally, for discharge head:
𝑃𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒
ℎ𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒 = + ℎ𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙.𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑔ℎ𝑡 + ∆ℎ𝑓𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙.𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑠 = 40.841𝑚 (4.1)
𝜌𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 ∗ 𝑔
Step 5. Calculations related to the pump head, power and cavitation risk
Regarding to the pump head of the P-104, the difference between discharge and
suction parts should be found:
Using the chart displayed below, NPSH_required and efficiency are capable of
being determined, which means the power of pump might be defined here:
As it is clear that while designing any equipment some critical values should be
considered which are known to dangerous for both plant and instrument itself. After
finishing P-104 design, cavitation risk should be analyzed by comparing required (which
is taken from chart) and available Net Positive Suction Head. As it has been already
mentioned above that pumps have to be worked with liquid mixture since if there are gas
molecules inside liquid, then those molecules might able to create bubbles inside pump.
Despite the fact that their sizes are quite small, they are capable of wearing, erosion,
collapsing the impeller of the pump. Another reason for cavitation is the amount of the
saturated and suction pressure, as it is seen from equation 5.3, if P_saturated is less than
suction pressure, then the value for NPSH (available) will be decreased. Having higher
frictional head loss is also one of the critical reason for cavitation.
𝑃𝑠𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 −𝑃𝑠𝑎𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑑
𝑁𝑃𝑆𝐻𝑎 = + 𝐿𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑖𝑐𝑎𝑙.𝑠𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 − 𝐻𝑠𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛.𝑓𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑎𝑙.𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑠 = 27.85𝑚 (5.3)
𝜌𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 ∗𝑔
Another concern related fluids taking place on the shell and tube side. First and
foremost, corrosion factor should be realized and searched comprehensively, the most
corrosive one mostly placed on the tube part, since it is easy to maintenance when there
is a problem or any destruction on this side; however, if the shell side of the heat
exchanger has been damaged, then it is most likely to be usefulness for repairing since
buying new one looks more cheaper than this way. Moreover, the fluid whose flow rate is
lower than another one is mostly put on the shell side so as to save it and achieving the
lower cost HE. For considering all mentioned properties, cold water had been put on the
tube, whereas gas mixture had been on the shell side.
Consequently, before starting to analyze the formulas for design H-104, some
assumptions have to be mentioned in order to make straightforward them by reducing
further calculations:
There is no heat loss between cold and hot streams of H-104, namely heat transfer
between system and its surrounding have been neglected, heat gain by cold
stream having been equal to heat removed from hot fluid;
Countercurrent regime for fluid flow have been chosen so as to reached the
highest heat transfer rate by having higher mean temperature difference between
2 streams;
Pitch diameter have been taken 5/4 times outside diameter by preferring 25
percent cut for baffle;
Shell and Tube HE have been chosen as:
the heat transfer area is greater than 50- meter square;
this type of HEs are known to be more reliable due to thermal resistance to
the scale formations;
and pressure drop throughout the tube side is lower in comparison with
other types of HEs.
Those values have been calculated by means equation 1.1, 1.2, and Table_4.3;
however, here heat capacity, conductivity, and density should be taken average, because
there is a great variance between inlet and outlet temperature of both streams.
2nd stage. Heat load, molar flow rate for cold stream
As it has been already mentioned that, the magnitude of the gained and lost energy
or heat are same for both fluids as heat loss is not taking considerations:
̇
0.45𝑘𝑚𝑜𝑙 64.8𝐽
𝑛𝐻̇ ∗ 𝐶𝑝𝐻 ∗ (𝑇2 − 𝑇1 ) ∗ ∗ (470 − 550)𝐾 0.40732𝑘𝑚𝑜𝑙
𝑛𝐶𝑜𝑙𝑑.𝑤𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟 = = 𝑠 𝑚𝑜𝑙 𝐾 = (2.1)
𝐶𝑝𝐶𝑜𝑙𝑑.𝑤𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟 ∗ (𝑡1 − 𝑡2 ) 74.421𝐽 𝑠
∗ (293 − 370)𝐾
𝑚𝑜𝑙𝐾
𝑘𝑔
𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑢𝑙𝑎𝑟 𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 ( ) 𝑘𝑔
𝑘𝑚𝑜𝑙
𝑚𝐶𝑜𝑙𝑑.𝑤𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟
̇ = = 44.1913 (2.3)
𝑚𝑜𝑙𝑎𝑟 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑠
𝑚𝑜𝑙 64.8𝐽
𝑄̇ = 450 ∗ ∗ (550 − 470)𝐾 = 2334𝑘𝑊 (2.4)
𝑠 𝑚𝑜𝑙𝐾
Capital letters for temperatures means hot stream values, the lowercases are for
cold water at Kelvin.
3rd stage. Log Mean Temperature Difference
The fundamental
600
advantages of counter-
550
current flow regime have
500
been displayed on the
Temperatures, in K
450
Graph_4.1.The
400 Cold stream
temperature difference
Hot stream
through the whole process 350
arise. LMTD is calculated Graph_ 4.1. Temperature and its flow regime
based on this formula:
𝑄̇
𝐴ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑡.𝑡𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑓𝑒𝑟 = = 59.44𝑚2 (4.1)
𝑈𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑝𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 ∗ ∆𝑇𝐿𝑀
D_outer 0,05 m
D_inside 0,0436 m
Thickness 0,0032 m
Tube length 1,83 m
Tube pitch 0,0625 m
Figure 4.7. Standards for Tube sizing
Primarily, diameters should be selected from Figure_4.6, and its length is assumed
to be 1.83meter which is known one of the common figures for this type of HEs. Regarding
to the tube pitch, it is accepted as 1.25*D_outer. After that, area for 1 tube and number
of them might be calculated by means of below equations:
1 1
𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒𝑠 𝑛1 207 2.207
𝐵𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑙𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟 = 𝑑𝑜𝑢𝑡ℎ𝑒𝑟 ∗ ( ) = 50𝑚𝑚 ∗ ( )
𝐾1 0.215
= 1.12𝑚 (5.3)
Eventually, baffle spacing and shell diameter have been determined by means of
certain equations which are going to mention below. Nevertheless, there are some
allowable ranges for shell side diameter which should not be exceed from 1.5 m,
meanwhile baffle spacing has been required to be between 0.2 and 1.0 times of shell
diameter. Moreover, clearance in this design is taken from splitting-ring floating head.
𝑛𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒
𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒 𝑝𝑒𝑟 𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠 = 𝐴𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 ∗ = 0.309𝑚2 (6.1)
𝑛𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑠
𝑘𝑔
𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 44.19 𝑠 𝑚3
𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐 𝐹𝑙𝑜𝑤 𝑅𝑎𝑡𝑒 = = = 0.0451 (6.2)
𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑦 980.33𝑘𝑔 𝑠
𝑚 3
𝐿𝑏𝑎𝑓𝑓𝑙𝑒
𝑆ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑙_𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛_𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎 = (𝑝𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑐ℎ − 𝑑𝑜 ) ∗ 𝐷𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑙 ∗
𝑝𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑐ℎ
0.959𝑚
= (0.0625 − 0.05)𝑚 ∗ 1.2𝑚 ∗ = 0.23 𝑚2 (7.1)
0.0625𝑚
𝑚𝑎𝑠𝑠_𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤_𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒_𝑜𝑓_ℎ𝑜𝑡_𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑚 4.7357𝑚3
𝑉𝑜𝑙𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑟𝑖𝑐_𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤_𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 = = (7.2)
𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒_𝑑𝑒𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑦_𝑜𝑓_ℎ𝑜𝑡_𝑠𝑡𝑟𝑒𝑎𝑚 𝑠
𝑄𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑙.𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 4.7357𝑚3 /𝑠 20.5839𝑚
𝑉𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦_𝑜𝑓_𝑔𝑎𝑠_𝑚𝑖𝑥𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 = = = (7.3)
𝐴𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑙.𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 0.23𝑚2 𝑠
1.27 2 2
1.27
𝑑𝑒𝑞 = ∗ (𝑝𝑝𝑖𝑡𝑐ℎ − 0.785 ∗ 𝑑𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑒𝑟 )= ∗ (0.06252 − 0.785 ∗ 0.052 )
𝑑𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑒𝑟 0.05
= 0.049371𝑚 (7.4)
20.6𝑚 2.73𝑘𝑔
∗ 0.049371𝑚 ∗
𝑅𝑒 =
𝑠 𝑚3 = 1.6 ∗ 105 (7.5)
−5
1.72 ∗ 10 𝑃𝑎 ∗ 𝑠
Figure 4.8. Relation between heat transfer coefficient and Reynolds number
This high data for Re means that flow is turbulent whose main merit is to directly
affect to the heat transfer rate in a positive way. While taking data for heat transfer rate
from the corresponding chart (Figure 4.8), 25% baffle cut is chosen: 𝑗ℎ = 0.0016. By
following these, Prandtl number has been calculated so as to define shell side heat
transfer coefficient, equivalent diameter which have been found (7.4) above. At the end,
one of the crucial point is to check pressure drop at the shell side which is responsible for
the main streams by 0.1 bar allowable pressure loss. As a result, 0.0103 bar pressure
loss shows that till now all calculations comes smooth, and still there is no undesirable
parameter for H-104.
2253𝐽
𝐶𝑝.𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 ∗ 𝜇 ∗ 0.0000172𝑃𝑎 ∗ 𝑠
𝑘𝑔𝐾
𝑃𝑟 = = = 0.5282 (7.6)
𝑘𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 0.0733𝑊
𝑚2 𝐾
𝑘𝑔𝑎𝑠.𝑚𝑖𝑥𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑒 ∗ 𝑗ℎ ∗ 𝑅𝑒 ∗ 𝑃𝑟 0.333 0.07333 ∗ 0.0016 ∗ 1.6 ∗ 105 ∗ 0.52820.33
ℎ𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑙 = =
𝑑𝑒𝑞 0.04937
𝑊
= 310.4948 (7.7)
𝑚2 ℃
2
𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑔𝑡ℎ𝑡 𝐷𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑙 𝜌𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑢𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑙
𝑆ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑙_𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑟𝑒_𝑑𝑟𝑜𝑝 = 8 ∗ 𝑗𝑓𝑟𝑖𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 ∗ ( )∗( )∗ (7.8)
𝐿𝑏𝑎𝑓𝑓𝑙𝑒 𝑑𝑒𝑞 2
1.83 1.2𝑚 2.73 ∗ 20.62
∆𝑃𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑙 = 8 ∗ 0.0016 ∗ ( )∗( )∗ = 0.010307𝑏𝑎𝑟
0.959 0.049𝑚 2
𝑑
1 1 1 𝑑𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 ∗ ln ( 𝑜𝑢𝑡 ) 𝑑𝑜𝑢𝑡 𝑑𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒
𝑑𝑖𝑛
= + + + + (8.1)
𝑈𝑒𝑥𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑖𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑙 ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 ℎ𝑜𝑑 2 ∗ 𝑘𝑠𝑡𝑒𝑒𝑙 𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 ℎ𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑠𝑖𝑑𝑒 ℎ𝑖𝑑
50
1 1 0.05 ln ( ) 50 50 𝑚2 ℃
= + + 43.6 + + = 0.004357
310.495 5000 2 ∗ 45 43.6 ∗ 3369 43.6 ∗ 3000 𝑊
237𝑊
𝑈𝑜𝑢𝑡𝑒𝑟 = 2
𝑚 ℃
237 − 220
𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑟 𝑖𝑛 % = ∗ 100% = 7.7%
220
Construction of H-104
Shell and Tube
Type Utility
Cold water
Cooling gas mixture
Purpose Heat transfer area
59.44 m2
Carbon
Tube material
Number of passes Tube Shell steel
1 1 Number of tubes 207
Shell side Tube side
Properties
Inlet Outlet Inlet Outlet
Temperature (K) 550 470 293 370
Pressure (bar) 4 4 3 1
Mass flow rate (kg/s) 12.95 44.19
Allowable pressure drop
(bar) 0,1 0,5
Average Cp (J/mol K) 64.805 74.421
Average conductivity
(W/m K) 0,0733 0,638
Average density (kg/m3) 2.7345 980.33
Viscosity (Pa*s) 1.72E-05 6.485E-04
Tube parameters Shell parameters
Length (m) 1.83 Shell diameter (mm) 1199
Outer diameter (mm) 50 Bundle diameter (mm) 1124
Inner diameter (mm) 43.6 Clearance (mm) 75
Tube pitch (mm) 62.5 Effective d (mm) 49.37
Thickness (mm) 3.2 Baffle space (mm) 959.3
Velocity (m/s) 0.1459 Baffle cut (%) 25
Heat transfer specifications
Overall coefficient (W/m2
C) 237 Driving force (K) 178.4958
Counter-
Heat load (kW) 2334.113 Flow Regime current
References
[1] Maurice Stewart, Surface production operations, volume 4, ‘Pump and compressor
systems: Mechanical design and specification, 2019, Chapter 2, Pump fundamentals,
pages 7-59. Online version: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809895-0.00002-8 ,
{Accessed: 04.05.2022};
[2] Centrifugal pump handbook, 3rd edition, edited by: Sulzers Pumps, 2010, Chapter 2:
Behavior of centrifugal pumps in operation, pages 27-68. Online version:
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-7506-8612-9.00002-4 , {Accessed: 04.05.2022};
[3] Zohuri, B. (2016). Compact Heat Exchangers. Chapter 2, Heat Exchanger Types and
Classifications, page 19-56, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29835-1_2
{Accessed: 04.05.2022};
[4] Forsberg, C. H. (2021). Heat Transfer Principles and Applications, Chapter 8, Heat
exchangers, page 305-341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-802296-2.00008-1
{Accessed: 04.05.2022};
[All figures] Coulson and Richardson’s “Chemical Engineering Design”, 4th edition, 6th
volume, page 634-774;
[Constant values for physical properties of substances] Don W. Green and Marylee
Z. Southard, “Perry’s chemical engineers’ handbook”, 9th edition, 2nd chapter, page 36-
387.
Individual section 5.
Yunis Garayev, CE 19’1
Material balance
Energy balance
References
Process Flow Diagram
HE-106 and P-102 which are the names of heat exchanger and pump, respectively that
will be described their design processes in the next aspects of the report.
S12/S-12.1
Mole (kmol/h) Comp. Mass (kg/h)
Isopropanol 0 0 0
Water 350 1 6300
Hydrogen 0 0 0
Acetone 0 0 0
Total 350 1 6300
S15/S16
Mole (kmol/h) Comp. Mass (kg/h)
Isopropanol 67.440 0.0529 4046.453
Water 642.792 0.5042 11570.26
Hydrogen 0.25498 0.0002 0.51
Acetone 564.387 0.4427 32734.46
Total 1274.875 1 48351.67
Stream Molar
name Cp (J/mol*K) enthalpy
S-12 113.037 0
S-12.1 118.398 1142.9
S-15 111.156 5690.7
S-16 111.156 5690.7
Energy balance
Pump Design
That phase of the project of design encompasses necessary knowledge and
computations which are associated with design of the pump. The essential function of
pump which is called P-102 is to carry acetone content and send them to distillation
column which is called C-202.
First and foremost, it is an obvious fact that physical properties of the stream
substances have to be described. Following this step, we should choose an appropriate
pump and, in that process, certain quantities such as pump head and power must be
considered in order to check that pump satisfies requirements or not. There is no doubt
that there are myriad types of pumps, but centrifugal pump will be utilized in this process.
It is widespread pump, because this type pump has various benefits such as saving of
the space, minimum expenditure and also flexibility. Coming to disadvantage, major flaw
of these pumps is inefficiency for larger head values.
To cite an example:
𝜌 = 𝐴′ + 𝐵′ ∗ 𝑇 + 𝐶′ ∗ 𝑇 2 + 𝐷′ ∗ 𝑇 3
𝐵′
𝜇 = exp(𝐴′ + + 𝐶′ ∗ 𝑙𝑛𝑇 + 𝐷′ ∗ 𝑇 𝐸 )
𝑇
Quantity Value Unit
Temperature 352.15 K
Mass Influx rate 1.919 kg/s
Density 781.241 kg/m3
Viscosity 0.0002369 Pa*s
Inlet pressure 303.975 kPa
Outlet pressure 607.95 kPa
It is obvious that we should measure optimal diameter of the pump, that is why material
of the pump has to be defined. Stainless steel will be an optimal choice compared to other
materials. That is because its price is very appropriate and also special treatment is not
needed for that material. Another key point to remember is that stainless steel has a
resistance to a corrosion.
unit of m is kg per s and unit of the density is kg per m3. Then optimum diameter will be:
d op = 1.22 inch
𝜋∗𝑑^2 𝜋∗(0.035052∗)^2
A= = = 0.000966 m2
4 4
̇ 𝑚̇ 1.919
𝑉̇ = = = 0.002456 m3 per second
𝜌 781.241
𝑉̇ 0.002456
𝑣= = = 2,545131 m per second
𝐴 0.000965
In those formulae:
Thick
mass optimu optimu Pipe
ness Thickne Wt
density(kg flow m m OD(i ID(in nomi
OD(m) ID(m) of ss of per
Pipel /m^3) rate(k diamete diamete nch) ch) nal
wall(i wall(m) ft
ine g/s) r,mm r,inch ,inch
nch)
781,24 1,91 31,03 1,6 0,04 1,3 0,035 0,003 1,2 2,2
1 9 2 1,222 6 216 8 052 0,14 556 5 73
Influx regime should be emphasized because of its importance. If we must find type of
the influx (turbulent or laminar), we have to utilize Reynolds Number:
𝜌∗𝑣∗𝑑𝑜𝑝𝑡 781.241∗2.545131∗35.052∗10−3
𝑅𝑒 = = = 294.174.2
𝜇 0.0002369
If the obtaining number is more than 4000, it will be turbulent influx and it is clear that
influx is turbulent in that process.
As mentioned above, we will take stainless steel as a pump material and absolute
roughness (𝜀) of it is 0.015 mm which will be utilized to compute relative roughness. Then,
it is the turn of the defining of the relative roughness:
𝜀 0.015 𝑚𝑚
𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑔ℎ𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 = = = 0.00042794
𝑑𝑜𝑝𝑡 35.052 𝑚𝑚
Following these stages, friction factor has to be determined with the help of diagram that
is called Moody and acquired values, namely Reynold Number and relative roughness.
So, friction factor which is acquired from chart that is called Moody is 0.0178.
During the process of the design of the pump, another key quantity to remember is drop
of the pressure. Whole pressure loss consists of friction and fittings associated pressure
drops. Firstly, drop of the pressure which is caused by friction has to be determined with
the help of equation shown below:
𝐿 𝜌𝑣 2
′
∆𝑃𝑓 = 𝑓 ∗ ∗
𝑑 2
In which,
∆𝑃𝑓 – drop of the pressure that is caused by friction
𝑓 ′ - moody friction
d- diameter (optimal)
90 elbow standart
radius 2 40 80
Total Leq/d, m 87,5
These are formulae which allow us to calculate (suction and discharge) entire drop of the
pressure.
𝐿 ∑ 𝐿𝑒 𝜌𝑣 2
′
20 (2.545131)2
∆𝑃𝑠𝑢𝑐 =𝑓 ( + ) = 0.0178 ∗ ( + 137.5) ∗ 781.241 ∗
𝑑 𝑑 2 35.052 ∗ 10−3 2
= 31891 𝑃 = 32𝑘𝑃𝑎
𝐿 ∑ 𝐿𝑒 𝜌𝑣 2
′
32 (2.545131)2
∆𝑃𝑑𝑖𝑠 =𝑓 ( + ) = 0.0178 ∗ ( + 87.5) ∗ 781.241 ∗
𝑑 𝑑 2 35.052 ∗ 10−3 2
= 45.059 𝑃𝑎 = 45𝑘𝑃𝑎
b) Discharge
ℎ𝑑 = ℎ𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑐(𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒) + 𝑍 + ℎ𝑓(𝑑𝑖𝑠𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒)
607950 45000
= + 12 + = 96.20501𝑚
781.241 ∗ 9.81 9.81 ∗ 781.241
Following that stage, we should determine pump head as a following:
∆ℎ𝑝 = ℎ𝑑𝑖𝑠 − ℎ𝑠𝑢𝑐 =96.20501-47.61219=49.59282 m
It is obvious from written formulae and results, 77 kPa indicates entire drop of the pressure
around P-102. As mentioned previously, main duty of P-102 is to send the stream to the
distillation column that is called C-202. As a result, it is clear that power is required in
order to overcome friction losses which are generated in certain places such as bends,
pipes and also pipelines. In addition, here is no doubt that power is needed to pass the
mixture from one place to another place. As emphasized previous section of the written
report, in let pressure indicates approximately 3 bar, whilst outlet pressure value shows
6 bar as a result of which differ is 3 bar. Equation that is written below allows us to define
minimum power value which is necessary to accomplish all mentioned tasks:
Pump efficiency will be 76.19%. Generally, that value fluctuates between 60-80%, that is
why our value is acceptable.
Winput= W * (100/effieciency)=933.466*(100/76.19)=1225.182 W
There is no doubt that one quantity must not be neglected which is called NPSH, in other
words, Net Positive Suction Head. It is an obvious fact that there are 2 main types of that
quantity, namely available and required NSPH. First one can be computed with formula
that is shown below:
𝑃(𝑠𝑎𝑡) 112301
𝐴𝑣𝑎𝑖𝑙𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒 𝑁𝑃𝑆𝐻 = ℎ(𝑠𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛) − ( ) = 47.61219 − ( ) = 32.96 𝑚
𝜌∗𝑔 781.241 ∗ 9.81
So, it is obvious that available value is higher compared to the required one.
Step 1:
Qduty must be defined with the help of the formula that is written below:
𝑄 = 𝐶𝑝 ∗ 𝑛 ∗ ∆𝑇
Stage 2:
There is no doubt that we have to find some quantities, namely thermal conductivity,
viscosity, power of the heat, and also density before the main processes. Tables that are
tabulated below contain data which represent appropriate values of the emphasized
quantities:
Stage 3:
This phase illustrates type and dimensions of the heat exchanger. It is an obvious fact
that there are certain kinds heat exchangers; however, shell and tube type of heat
exchanger will be utilized in that design process. Generally, this kind is widespread and
well-known. That is because it has a substantially larger heat transportation area while
taking up much less space. In addition to its benefits, immense pressure values can be
proceeded in these heat exchangers because of their designs. Another key point to
remember is that various liquids can be utilized due to washing ease. Generally, as a
reference point, 1 shell and 2 tube crossings are utilized.
As emphasized previously, shell and tube heat exchanger will control the process of the
heating because of its capacity and influxes are flowing in opposite directions. A quantity
which is known as temperature mean must be computed with the help of the equation
below:
∆𝑇𝑙𝑚 = 15.6℃
𝑇ℎ𝑖 − 𝑇ℎ𝑜
𝑅= = 2.44
𝑇𝑐𝑜 − 𝑇𝑐𝑖
𝑇𝑐𝑖 − 𝑇𝑐𝑜
𝑆= = 0.2813
𝑇ℎ𝑖 − 𝑇𝑐𝑜
𝐹𝑡 = 0.83
∆𝑇𝑙𝑚 = 𝐹𝑡 ∗ ∆𝑇𝑙𝑚 = 13.08
Stage 4:
𝑊
In this section, U value for water-water process is assumed as 900 based on the
𝑚2 ∗𝐾
information taken from reference book.
We have to find an area which transportation of the heat takes place. It can be defined
as:
|𝑄| 166.32 ∗ 1000𝑊
𝐴𝑜 = = = 14.12𝑚2
𝑈∆𝑇𝑙𝑚 900 𝑊 ∗ 13.08
𝑚2 ∗ 𝐾
Stage 5:
One of the most essential processes is stream distribution. Both cold and heat stream are
distributed equally in both section of the device, namely shell and all tube parts. It is and
obvious fact that there are certain main points that should be take into account. To cite
an example, immense temperature and pressure values, fooling or corrosion which show
why we prefer tube side are very important. Moreover, according to other key points such
as loss of the pressure, viscous liquids or lower influx rate, shell flank is preferred. It is
clear that shell flank has to be contain the water. In addition, negative impact may be
generated by high velocity value of water in the tube flank of the heat exchanger.
Coming to the material of tube flank of the heat exchanger, stainless steel will be utilized.
That is because it is an obvious fact that this type of material has a pressure resistance
and toughness of it is suitable.
Step 6:
We have to find out certain quantities and then one of the most basic properties which is
called tube segment liquid speed should be computed.
First and foremost, XSA must be found out as:
We also have to define the number of tubes that are located in shell flack of the heat
exchanger. It can be written as n:
𝐴𝑜 14.12
n= = = 79
𝐴 0.18
We should compute tube per pass (T.P):
𝑛(𝑎𝑐𝑞𝑢𝑖𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑚𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑦 𝑎𝑏𝑜𝑣𝑒) 79
T.P= = = 19
𝑁 4
N- number of pass
After gaining these values, area (cross-sectional) of a tube has to be computed:
𝜋∗𝑑𝑖𝑛 2 𝜋∗(12.8∗10−3 )2
𝐴𝑐𝑠 = = =0.0001287 m2
4 4
Following these stages, influx rate (volumetric) must be find out, because it is necessary
to determine speed:
𝑚̇ 4.279429
𝑉𝑐̇ = = = 0.0042
𝜌 1009
Finally, velocity can be defined as:
𝑉𝑐 0.0042
𝑢𝑐 = = = 1.68
𝐴𝑝𝑒𝑟−𝑝𝑎𝑠𝑠 0.002511
Stage 7:
Bundle lengths can be defined with the help of formula that is written below:
1
𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒𝑠 𝑛1
𝐷𝑏 = 𝑑𝑜𝑢𝑡 ( )
𝐾1
K1 and n1 values are acquired from certain sources.
1
78 2.285
𝐷𝑏 = 16 ∗ 10−3 ∗ ( ) = 231 𝑚𝑚
0.175
When the computation process of the bundle, clearance is not considered.
𝐷𝑠 = 𝐷𝑏 + 𝑐𝑙𝑒𝑎𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑐𝑒 = 231 + 52 = 283𝑚𝑚
Stage 8:
It is turn of computation of tube part heat transfer coefficient and some non-dimensional
denominations should be known. Besides tube part heat transfer coefficient, we have to
calculate Reynolds, Prandtl and Nusselt values. Reynolds and Prandtl denominations can
be find out as:
𝜌ℎ 𝑢ℎ 𝑑𝑖
𝑅𝑒 = = 23956.661
𝜇ℎ
𝐶𝑝𝑐 𝜇𝑐
𝑃𝑟 = = 6.5494508
𝑘𝑐
Transfer of the heat factor (tube flack) can be defined with the help of certain graph and
if we want to use that chart, we should know L/d value that has to be determined formula
that is written below:
𝐿 3.6𝑚
= = 281
𝑑𝑖 12.8 ∗ 10^ − 3𝑚
Stage 9
Another key point to remember is declivity of the pressure which is generally caused by
friction, rapid expanding and contraction. Specially, it takes place in opening and closing
section of the tube. Equation which is written below represents drop of pressure
computation in emphasized sections:
𝐿 𝜇 −𝑚 𝜌𝑢𝑐
Δ𝑃𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒 = 𝑁𝑝 [8𝑗𝑓 ( ) ( ) + 2.5]
𝑑𝑖 𝜇𝑤 2
Stage 9:
Baffle spacing of variable consists of merely multiplication of diameter of baffle and the
factor.
Baffle area= 0.2 * Ds=0.2 * 283=56.59
𝑚̇ℎ
𝑀̇ℎ = = 546.38
𝐴𝑠
𝑀̇ℎ
𝑢ℎ = = 0.55
𝜌
1.1
𝑑𝑒 = ∗ ((𝑃𝑡 )2 − 0.917 ∗ (𝑑𝑜 )2 ) = 11.36
𝑑𝑜
𝜌ℎ 𝑢ℎ 𝑑𝑒
𝑅𝑒 = = 8503
𝜇ℎ
𝐶𝑝ℎ 𝜇ℎ
𝑃𝑟 = = 5.04
𝑘ℎ
𝑘ℎ
ℎ𝑠 = ∗ 𝑗𝑠 ∗ 𝑅𝑒 ∗ 𝑃𝑟 0.33 = 6416.85
𝑑𝑒
𝐷𝑠 𝐿 𝜌𝑢ℎ 2 𝜇 −0.14
Δ𝑃𝑠ℎ𝑒𝑙𝑙 = 8𝑗𝑓 ( ) ( ) ( ) = 13.270 𝑘𝑃𝑎
𝑑𝑒 𝑙𝑏 2 𝜇𝑤
Stage 10:
Entire hate number of the transfer should be computed and, in this calculation, fooling
factor has to be applied. 0.0005 and 0.0002 are resistance (fooling) values, first one
indicates tube, whilst second one shows shell flack of the heat exchanger. In term of
conductivity (heat), it will indicate 16 W/m*K:
𝑑
1 1 1 𝑑𝑜 ln 𝑜 𝑑 1 𝑑𝑜 1
𝑑𝑖 𝑜
= + + + ∗ + ∗
𝑈𝑜 ℎ𝑜 ℎ𝑜𝑑 2𝐾𝑤 𝑑𝑖 ℎ𝑖𝑑 𝑑𝑖 ℎ𝑖
16
1 1 1 0.016 ln 16 1 16 1
= + + 12.8 + ∗ + ∗
𝑈𝑜 6676 4000 2 ∗ 45 12.8 6417 12.8 3000
U=952.913 W/m^2*K:
And this value is accepted as normal since the difference between it and assumed value
is merely 6%.
Heat exchanger data Equipment No HE-105
Duty specifications
Duty 166.32 KW U 900 W/m2*C
Contact area 14.1 m2 LMTD 13.08 C
Fluid properties
Shell side Tube side
Process fluid Inlet Outlet Cooling water Inlet Outlet
Temperature 25 ℃ 47 ℃ Temperature 24 15
Mass flow 6300 kg/hour Mass flow 15405 kg/hour
Molar flow 359 kmol/hour Molar flow 855.886 kmol/hour
Density 998 kg/m3 Density 1009 kg/m3
Viscosity 0.73 mPa*s Viscosity 0.9107 mPa*s
Thermal Thermal
0.625 W/m*℃ 0.6 W/m*℃
conductivity conductivity
Specific heat Specific heat
4316 J/kg*K 4315 J/kg*K
capacity capacity
Mechanical layout
Shell side Tube side
Mean temperature 36 ℃ Mean temperature 19.5 ℃
Bundle diameter 231 mm Outside diameter 16 mm
Shell diameter 283 mm Wall thickness 1.6 mm
Shell size 323.9 mm Inside diameter 12.8 mm
Equivalent One tube outside
11.3608 mm 0.18 m2
diameter area
Baffle spacing 56.59 mm Number of tubes 78
Tube pitch 20 mm Tube pass 4
Heat transfer Tube cross sectional
6416.85 W/℃ ∗m2 128.67 mm2
coefficient area
Mean wall
34 ℃ Inside coefficient 6676 W/m2
temperature
Cross flow area 0.0032 m2 Total flow area 0.0025 m2
Mass velocity 546.387 kg/s*m2 Mass velocity 1704 kg/s*m2
Linear velocity 0.54748 m/sec Linear velocity 1.69 m/sec
Reynolds number 8503 Reynolds number 23956
Prandtl number 5.04 Prandtl number 6.55
Heat transfer factor 0.008 Heat transfer factor 0.004
Friction factor 0.007 Friction factor 0.004
Pressure drop 13.270 kPa Pressure drop 66.224 kPa
Construction
Felder book
Ramesh K. Shah, Dusan P. Sekulic, “ Heat exchanger design handbook”,
available at
https://books.google.az/books?hl=en&lr=&id=beSXNAZblWQC&oi=fnd&pg=PA1
&dq=heat+exchanger+design&ots=NYMjqs91KQ&sig=p-
Tb3H4nsl4KCfGTdCVjkEP1FEs&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=heat%20exchange
r%20design&f=false
John Tuzson, “ Centrifugal pump design article. Available at
https://books.google.az/books?hl=en&lr=&id=OYxacAomY8wC&oi=fnd&pg=PA3
&dq=pump+design&ots=FjLRbPvPWQ&sig=vISfFtGDK8tBr6wJ9_qEAmMqokU&
redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=pump%20design&f=false
Irenka Kozlowska, Klimek Walczak , “ Acetone biochemistry, production and uses”,
pages 14-16
Individual section 6.
Shahin Huseynli, CE 19’1
Material balance
Energy balance
Pump design
References
Process description
Picture 1
In this stage of the process, the water product that leaves the distillation column is firstly
being cooled to the standard temperature passing through heat exchanger (HE-112), and
then sent to storage tank with the help of pump (P-108). As it is clearly seen from the
diagram, there is not any chemical reaction or additional consumption of materials in this
section which means the compositions of Streams 36, 37 and 38 will remain the same.
Although the stream was called water product in the beginning, it does not mean that
stream is 100% pure water. There is very little amount of Isopropanol passes through
pipes which constitutes 0.1% of overall material and the detailed information about this
composition will be provided in following parts.
The brief explanation of what happens in this part is that the fluid at the rate of
approximately 11 tons/hour enters the shell side of shell and tube heat exchanger at 370
K. The temperature of process fluid is decreased to the standard temperature of 298 K
here with the help of cooling water. Afterwards, our material passes through pipe and
moves into centrifugal pump at 1 bar pressure. The pressure of fluid is increased to 1.4
bar in the discharge side and finally product is immediately sent to storage tank.
Material balance
It can be intuitively argued that one of the most essential parts of industrial processes is
mass balance as determination of molar, mass, and volumetric flowrates of streams are
considered fundamental stage of calculations related to procedure. Overall, the mass
balance equation for any component in the process is written like below:
It should be noted that for a continuous process operating under steady-state conditions
the accumulation of species is equal to zero. In addition, as there is not any reaction
occurs in this stage, generation and consumption vales will also be zero. It means final
state of material balance equation should be like that: (Process Indutries C, 2016)
Input = Output
The table below demonstrates the values of molar flowrate in Streams 36, 37, and 38.
As it was mentioned before, the flowrate values are constant through all streams. When
it comes to mass and volumetric flowrate, and compositions, they are presented below:
Total 1 1 1
Table 22
Energy balance
It is evident that building energy balance also plays key role in chemical processes.
Although the detailed energy balance was provided before, the brief description of
enthalpies of Streams 36, 37, and 38 was described below. Firstly, heat capacities of
fluids than passes through each stream is noted:
S-36 2680.677
S-37 0
S-38 0
Table 24
The molar enthalpy of Streams 37 and 38 are zero as their temperature is equal to
reference temperature.
Pump design
As it was mentioned before, water is being sent to T-104 tank with the help of P-108
hydraulic pump. Generally, pumps are extensively utilized in different fields of industry,
including chemical plants. A pump is mechanical device that is installed for transferring
liquids with high
pressure. They are
usually used for lifting
fluids from low to high
locations with the help
of pressure energy.
The design of pump
consists of several
steps and in this Picture 2
Step 1
Inlet Outlet
Pressure (bar) 1 1.4
Temperature (Kelvin) 298 298
Table 26
Step 2
Physical properties. (Viscosity of water, n.d.)
(Density of liquid Water, n.d.)
Step 3
In this stage, the diameter of tubes is determined. For doing that, optimum diameter
should be calculated and then the nearest pipe size is chosen. The optimum diameter
formula for stainless steel pipe is like below: (Pipe size selection, n.d.)
𝑑𝑜𝑝𝑡𝑖𝑚𝑢𝑚 = 36.04 𝑚𝑚
In addition to this, the pipe length on suction side is equal to 8 m while on discharge side
total length is 14.5 m. (Pump sizes, n.d.)
Step 4
After that, u – velocity of flow and Reynolds number should be determined. Firstly, cross
sectional area of tube has to be calculated for doing that.
𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑛𝑒𝑟 2
𝐴= 𝜋∗ = 946.97 𝑚𝑚2
4
𝑉̇ 𝑚
𝑢= = 3.16
𝐴 𝑠𝑒𝑐
𝑢𝑑𝜌
𝑅𝑒 = = 123843 (𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑏𝑢𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤)
𝜇
Step 5
It is clear that there are some type of fittings installed in the process which increases
pressure drop in the flow. These are listed below:
Equivalent
Fitting Suction Discharge length
90 standard elbow 2 3 35
gate valve 75% 1 0 40
Tank inlet 0 1 50
Globe valve fully
open 0 1 450
Total 110 605
Table 28
Step 6
In this stage, suction and discharge head losses will be calculated using relevant
formulae.
𝜀
𝑅𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑟𝑜𝑢𝑔ℎ𝑛𝑒𝑠𝑠 = 0.00043
𝑑
𝐿 𝑢2
𝑆𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑑 𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑠 (ℎ𝑓𝑠 ) = 8𝑓 ∗ ( + ∑ 𝐾) ∗ = 3.36 𝑚
𝑑𝑖𝑛 2∗𝑔
𝐿 𝑢2
𝐷𝑖𝑠𝑐ℎ𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒 ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑑 𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑠 (ℎ𝑑𝑠 ) = 8𝑓 ∗ ( + ∑ 𝐾) ∗ = 10.12𝑚
𝑑𝑖𝑛 2∗𝑔
Step 7
In this stage, suction head, discharge head, and total pressure drop are going to be
calculated.
𝑃𝑠𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛
𝑆𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑐 ℎ𝑒𝑎𝑑 = = 10.23 𝑚
𝜌∗𝑔
𝑍( 𝑒𝑙𝑒𝑣𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛) = 6.5 𝑚
𝑢2
ℎ𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑟𝑦 = = 0.51 𝑚
2∗𝑔
Step 8
In this section, power of pump is calculated with the help of efficiency. Efficiency of P-108
pump is 74%.
10.99
∆𝑃 ∗ 𝑉̇ 136640 ∗ 3600
= = 564 𝑊
𝜂 0.74
Step 9
Determination of NPSH
𝑃𝑠𝑎𝑡
𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝑃𝑜𝑠𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑆𝑢𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝐻𝑒𝑎𝑑 (𝑁𝑃𝑆𝐻) = ℎ𝑠 −
𝜌𝑔
As it is seen from above, saturation pressure of the fluid should be calculated for
determining available NPSH. To do that, some constants should be known.
𝐵
log10 𝑃𝑠𝑎𝑡 = 𝐴 + + 𝐶 log10 𝑇 + 𝐷𝑇 + 𝐸𝑇 2
𝑇
𝑁𝑃𝑆𝐻 = 12.54 𝑚
Step 10
Finally, the possibility of cavitation has to be checked for concluding the design of pump.
Generally, cavitation is the phenomenon of formation of vapor bubbles within a liquid
where the pressure of liquid is less than its saturation pressure. The occurrence of
cavitation entails different type of negative results such as decrease in pump efficiency,
Table 29
loud noises, and vibration, etc. Simply if the available NPSH is higher than required
NPSH, it means cavitation is not likely to occur. For our pump, required NPSH is 0.82 m.
(Cavitation, n.d.)
In this stage of the process, a typical shell and tube heat exchanger is accommodated in
which cooling water enters the tubes as cold fluid while process water enters from shell
side as hot fluid. The main aim here is to cool down the process fluid from 370 K to 298
K.
Overall, the design process of a heat exchanger consists of several steps. These steps
have been displayed as follows:
1. The heat transfer rate is to be determined along with flowrates and temperature
values of the fluids.
2. Fluids physical properties at required temperatures are recorded down.
3. Type of heat exchanger that is going to be utilized is selected.
4. Assume the initial value of overall value of coefficient of heat transfer.
5. Find out LMTD (Logarithmic Mean Temperature Difference)
6. Find out the heat transfer area’s required value.
7. Calculate the number of tubes and shell diameter.
8. Determine drop in pressure for tube side
9. Drop in pressure for shell side
10. Determine the total value of coefficient of heat transfer.
11. Compare your obtained value with initial assumption. If the difference is significant,
start from beginning.
Step 1
Firstly, Q – duty have to be determined using the equation below:
𝑄 = 𝐶𝑝 ∗ 𝑛̇ ∗ ∆𝑇
Where Q is heat transfer rate, 𝑛̇ is molar flowrate, 𝐶𝑝 is molar heat capacity and ∆𝑇 is
temperature difference between inlet and outlet.
As the mole fraction of isopropanol in this stage is 0.001, we can assume that our stream
consists of 100% percent water. That’s why taking physical properties of water is
acceptable.
In addition, constants for calculating specific heat capacity of water (KJ/kmol*K) at any
temperature are like that:
A B C
Water 72.433 0.010393 1.497E -06
Table 31
𝐾𝑗
𝐶𝑃 ℎ𝑜𝑡 = 𝐴 + 𝐵 ∗ 𝑇 + 𝐶 ∗ 𝑇 2 = 76.07
𝑘𝑚𝑜𝑙 ∗ 𝐾
𝐾𝑗
𝐶𝑃 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑑 = 75.5
𝑘𝑚𝑜𝑙 ∗ 𝐾
606.725
𝑄 = 76.07 ∗ ( ) ∗ 72 = 923.087 𝐾𝑊
3600
𝒌𝒈
𝒎𝒂𝒔𝒔 𝒇𝒍𝒐𝒘𝒓𝒂𝒕𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝒄𝒐𝒍𝒅 𝒔𝒕𝒓𝒆𝒂𝒎 = 𝟔𝟔𝟎𝟐𝟐. 𝟏 = 𝟏𝟖. 𝟑𝟑𝟗𝒌𝒈/𝒔𝒆𝒄
𝒉𝒐𝒖𝒓
Step 2
Second step is to determine physical properties of fluids at average temperatures. The
values have been taken from Aspen HYSYS.
61°𝑪 24 °𝑪
Molar heat capacity 76.07 Kj/kmol*K 75.5 Kj/kmol*K
Mass heat capacity 4185 Kj/kg*K 4182 Kj/kg*K
Density 982 kg/m^3 997 kg/m^3
Thermal conductivity 0.65 W/m*C 0.607 W/m*C
Viscosity 0.466 mPa*s 0.9107 mPa*s
Table 32
Step 3
It is intuitively obvious that selecting the heat exchanger type is very essential stage of
the process. Heat exchangers are classified into different groups in terms of their working
principle, construction, and size. In this stage, typical heat exchanger of shell and tube
type will be utilized. The reason why this kind of exchangers are very frequently used in
the industry is that they have a lot of disadvantages in terms of cost and effectiveness.
Some of these advantages are listed below:
Step 4
Now, initial trial value for U – overall heat transfer coefficient has to be chosen.
Picture 5
In our heat exchanger cool water is used for decreasing the temperature of hot stream.
Hence, our process is water-water condition. (Typical Overall Heat transfer coefficients,
n.d.) In this case, what can be seen from the table above is that U value should be
between 800 and 1500 W/m2*C. My assumption is 900 W/m2*C.
Step 5
In this stage, Logarithmic Mean Temperature Difference LMTD has to be calculated. For
doing it correctly, firstly we need to determine the flow regime. According to different
studies and experiments, it has been concluded that counter flow pattern is more efficient
in shell and tube heat exchangers. Therefore, we will choose this regime. Now, the
temperature graph for the streams has to be plotted. (what is the difference between
parallel and counter flow, n.d.)
∆𝑇1 − ∆𝑇2
𝑇𝐿𝑀 =
∆𝑇
ln 1
∆𝑇2
𝑇𝐿𝑀 = 25.56 ℃
Graph 1
However, this temperature difference is not correct one. The point is that in shell and tube
heat exchangers there can be different regimes of flow in each part of the shell. So, there
is a need to modify the temperature difference value by including “correction factor” term.
Firstly, R and S values have to be determined for doing that.
𝑇1 − 𝑇2 𝑡2 − 𝑡1
𝑅= 𝑆=
𝑡2 − 𝑡1 𝑇1 − 𝑡1
Where T1 and T2 stands for hot stream temperatures while t1 and t2 represents cold
stream values.
R=6
S = 0.1519
Graph 2
Step 6
Now, heat transfer area should be calculated:
𝑄 923087
𝐴= = = 70.026 𝑚2
𝑈 ∗ 𝐿𝑀𝑇𝐷 900 ∗ 14.65
Step 7
After that, the number of tubes inside the heat exchanger and diameter of shell have to
be calculated. Therefore, we have to choose sizes of tubes.
Outside diameter – 20 mm
Inside diameter – 16 mm
Wall thickness – 2 mm
Tube length – 4.2 mm
𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑎𝑟𝑒𝑎
𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒𝑠 = = 265
𝐴𝑟𝑒𝑎 𝑜𝑓 𝑜𝑛𝑒 𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒
The next stage is to decide what type of pitch will be installed in the device. As we do
not deal with heavy liquid, triangular pitch with 4 tube passes can be chosen. (K1 and
n1 values, n.d.)
Picture 6
1⁄
𝑁𝑡 𝑛1
𝐵𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑙𝑒 𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑚𝑒𝑡𝑒𝑟 − 𝐷𝑏 = 𝑑𝑜𝑢𝑡 ( ) = 493 𝑚𝑚
𝐾1
From the graph, clearance is determined:
Clearance = 59 mm
Graph 3
Step 8
In this stage, pressure drop for tube side has to be calculated by following suitable steps.
𝜋𝑑2
𝐴𝑡𝑢𝑏𝑒 = = 201.0619 𝑚𝑚2
4
Then, mass, and linear velocity of water have to be defined. We need to know the density
of water at relevant temperature for doing that. From Table 13 it is seen the density is 997
kg/m2.
1374.955 𝑚
𝑊𝑎𝑡𝑒𝑟 𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑣𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 = = 1.379
997 𝑠𝑒𝑐
After that, Reynolds number, Prandtl number, and water inside coefficient are defined.
The appropriate values for water at 24 degrees Celsius is taken from Table 13.
𝑢𝑑𝜌
𝑅𝑒𝑦𝑛𝑜𝑙𝑑𝑠 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 = = 24156 (𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑏𝑢𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤)
𝜇
𝐶𝑝 ∗ 𝜇
𝑃𝑟𝑎𝑛𝑑𝑡𝑙 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 = = 6.27
𝑘𝑓
𝐿 4200
= = 262.5
𝑑 16
Graph 4
The last step is to calculate Pressure drop for tube side using the Equation below:
Step 9
In this stage, pressure drop for shell side is calculated.
As it was mentioned before, the mean temperature for cold stream is 61℃. So, required
fluid properties for this temperature are being taken from Table 13.
10946
𝑚̇ 𝑘𝑔
𝑀𝑎𝑠𝑠 𝑣𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 = = 3600 = 249.26
𝐴𝑠 0.012 𝑠 ∗ 𝑚2
249.26 𝑚
𝐿𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑎𝑟 𝑣𝑒𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 = = 0.25
982 𝑠𝑒𝑐
𝑅𝑒𝑦𝑛𝑜𝑙𝑑𝑠 𝑛𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 = 7596 (𝑡𝑢𝑟𝑏𝑢𝑙𝑒𝑛𝑡 𝑓𝑙𝑜𝑤)
Heat transfer factor is defined from Graph 6 by taking baffle cuts as 25 percent
𝑗𝑓 = 0.0057
𝐷𝑠 𝐿 𝜌𝑢2
∆𝑃𝑠 = 8𝑗𝑓 ( )( ) ∗ = 2.133 𝑘𝑃𝑎
𝑑𝑒 𝐿𝑠 2
Step 10
In this stage, overall heat transfer coefficient for the heat exchanger is calculated.
𝑑
1 1 1 𝑑𝑜 ln 𝑜 𝑑 1 𝑑𝑜 1
𝑑𝑖 𝑜
= + + + ∗ + ∗
𝑈𝑜 ℎ𝑜 ℎ𝑜𝑑 2𝐾𝑤 𝑑𝑖 ℎ𝑖𝑑 𝑑𝑖 ℎ𝑖
20
1 1 1 0.02 ln 16 20 1 20 1
= + + + ∗ + ∗
𝑈𝑜 3008.77 3000 2 ∗ 45 16 5500 16 5708.88
𝑾
𝑼𝒐 = 𝟖𝟔𝟎. 𝟗
𝒎𝟐 ∗ ℃
Step 11
The final stage is to compare the obtained U value with initial assumption.
𝑊
𝑈𝑎𝑠𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑒𝑑 = 900
𝑚2 ∗ ℃
𝑊
𝑈𝑜𝑏𝑡𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑒𝑑 = 860.9
𝑚2 ∗ ℃
900 − 860.9
𝑅𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑟 = ∗ 100% = 4.3%
900
Heat exchanger data Equipment No HE-112
Duty specifications
Duty 923 KW U 860.95 W/m2*C
Contact area 70.026 m2 LMTD 14.65 C
Fluid properties
Shell side Tube side
Process fluid Inlet Outlet Cooling water Inlet Outlet
Temperature 97 ℃ 25 ℃ Temperature 18 30
Mass flow 10946.53 kg/hour Mass flow 66022 kg/hour
Molar flow 606.725 kmol/hour Molar flow 3667.8943 kmol/hour
Density 982 kg/m3 Density 997 kg/m3
Viscosity 0.466 mPa*s Viscosity 0.9107 mPa*s
Thermal Thermal
0.65 W/m*℃ 0.6071 W/m*℃
conductivity conductivity
Specific heat Specific heat
4185 J/kg*K 4182 J/kg*K
capacity capacity
Mechanical layout
Shell side Tube side
Mean temperature 61 ℃ Mean temperature 24 ℃
Bundle diameter 493 mm Outside diameter 20 mm
Shell diameter 552 mm Wall thickness 2 mm
Shell size 558.8 mm Inside diameter 16 mm
Equivalent One tube outside
14.2 mm 0.2639 m2
diameter area
Baffle spacing 110.4 mm Number of tubes 265
Tube pitch 25 mm Tube pass 4
Heat transfer Tube cross sectional
3008.77 W/℃ ∗m2 201.06 mm2
coefficient area
Mean wall
50 ℃ Inside coefficient 5708.88 W/m2
temperature
Cross flow area 0.0122 m2 Total flow area 0.0133 m2
Mass velocity 249.26 kg/s*m2 Mass velocity 1374.96 kg/s*m2
Linear velocity 0.2538 m/sec Linear velocity 1.379 m/sec
Reynolds number 7596 Reynolds number 24156
Prandtl number 3.00 Prandtl number 6.27
Heat transfer factor 0.006 Heat transfer factor 0.0036
Friction factor 0.0057 Friction factor 0.0037
Pressure drop 2.133 kPa Pressure drop 38.947 kPa
Construction