0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views7 pages

Noi250002supp1 Prod 1740168425.57724

The supplemental online content provides additional data and figures related to the study on recurrent, nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) published in JAMA Neurology. It includes study flowcharts, Kaplan-Meier curves, logistic regression analyses, and baseline characteristics of patients with cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) versus non-CAA ICH. The document aims to enhance understanding of the study's findings and methodology.

Uploaded by

Pei-Hao Chen
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views7 pages

Noi250002supp1 Prod 1740168425.57724

The supplemental online content provides additional data and figures related to the study on recurrent, nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) published in JAMA Neurology. It includes study flowcharts, Kaplan-Meier curves, logistic regression analyses, and baseline characteristics of patients with cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) versus non-CAA ICH. The document aims to enhance understanding of the study's findings and methodology.

Uploaded by

Pei-Hao Chen
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 7

Supplemental Online Content

Goeldlin MB, Fandler-Höfler S, Pezzini A, et al; for the EURECA collaborators. Location and
timing of recurrent, nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage. JAMA Neurol. Published online
March 3, 2025. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.0026

eFigure 1. Study flowchart


eFigure 2. Kaplan-Meier curve displaying time to recurrence according to the number of
previous ICH events
eTable 1. Overview of included cohorts
eTable 2. Logistic regressions: association with ICH adjacent to a previous event
eTable 3. Baseline characteristics in patients with CAA vs non-CAA ICH

This supplemental material has been provided by the authors to give readers additional
information about their work.

© 2025 American Medical Association. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining,
AI training, and similar technologies.
Figure S1: Study flowchart

© 2025 American Medical Association. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining,
AI training, and similar technologies.
Figure S2: Kaplan-Meier curve displaying time to recurrence
according to the number of previous ICH

© 2025 American Medical Association. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining,
AI training, and similar technologies.
Table S1: Overview on included cohorts
Patients
ICH
Cohort Single- Recruitment with Patients
Country Centre patients
name /multicentre window recurrent included
in cohort
ICH
Bernese
Single
Stroke Switzerland 2014-2019 Bern 914 53 50
centre
Registry
United Single 01/2015-
SIGNaL UCL 490 30 30
Kingdom centre 10/2021
Charite Single Charité
Germany 2018-2021 383 25 25
CBF centre Berlin
Toulouse Single CHU
France 2010-2019 1351 35 31
cohort centre TOULOUSE
Graz Single
Austria 2008-2021 Graz 1303 90 90
cohort centre
Single
Brescia Italy 2021-2023 Brescia (IT) 133 6 6
centre
Southern
Denmark Multicentre 2009-2018 Odense 2655 124 123
Denmark
Single
Erlangen Germany 2006-2015 Erlangen 1380 83 83
centre
Tours
Single
recurrent France 2011-2023 Tours 9 9 9
centre
ICH
Akershus
Single
ICH Norway 2011-2023 Akershus 1160 69 60
centre
registry
La Spezia 15 2 2
Mantova 355 53 53
Milano (San
164 18 18
Raffaele?)
MUCH
Italy Multicentre 2002-2014 Perugia 50 6 6
Italy
Reggio
300 34 34
Emilia
Siena 72 8 8
BS (Brescia) 211 30 30
Basel
Single
Stroke Switzerland 2014-2019 Basel 1013 94 40
centre
Registry
Lille
Single
Stroke France 2004-2009 Lille 560 26 20
centre
Registry
Barcelona
Single
ICH Spain 2009-2021 Barcelona 911 43 15
centre
registry

© 2025 American Medical Association. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining,
AI training, and similar technologies.
Table S2: Logistic regressions – association with ICH adjacent to a
previous one
Univariable OR Model A Model B
(95%-CI)
Hypertension 1.05 (0.75 – 1.46) 1.09 (0.61-1.95) 1.01 (0.56 –1.84)
Antihypertensives 1.10 (0.79 – 1.52) 2.85 (0.53-15.42) 3.58 (0.64 –19.94)
Index haematoma location
Lobar 2.44 (1.66 – 3.60) 2.08 (1.32 – 3.27)
Brainstem 0.43 (0.09-2.07) Omitted
Cerebellum 0.40 (0.15 – 1.12) 0.25 (0.07 – 0.89)
Isolated IVH 1 Omitted
Isolated cSAH 1.07 (0.44 – 2.58) 1.02 (0.41-2.56)
Uncertain location 0.97 (0.08-11.31) Omitted
Cortical subarachnoid extension 2.29 (0.35 – 15.03) 1.36 (0.92-2.00)
CAA at index ICH 2.27 (1.63 – 3.16) 2.21 (1.57 (3.11)
Interaction term 0.43 (0.07-2.62) 0.32 (0.05-1.95)
hypertension#antihypertensives
Legend: IVH, Intraventricular hemorrhage; cSAH, cortical subarachnoid hemorrhage; CAA, cerebral
amyloid angiopathy, ICH, Intracerebral hemorrhage.

© 2025 American Medical Association. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining,
AI training, and similar technologies.
Table S3: Baseline characteristics in patients with CAA vs. non-
CAA
Total Non-CAA ICH CAA-ICH p-value
N=730 N=321 N=409

Age 72.3 (65.3-79) 70 (62.8-78) 74 (68-80) <0.001


Total ICH events 2 (2-2) 2 (2-2) 2 (2-2) <0.001
Female sex 346 (47.4%) 142 (44.2%) 204 (49.9%) 0.13
CAA diagnosed at any
timepoint 409 (56.0%) 0 ( 0.0%) 409 (100.0%) <0.001
CAA present at index
ICH 278 (43.2%) 0 ( 0.0%) 278 (73.0%) <0.001

Hypertension 449 (66.2%) 202 (70.4%) 247 (63.2%) 0.050


Dyslipidaemia 218 (31.7%) 98 (33.4%) 120 (30.5%) 0.40
Diabetes 132 (19.0%) 53 (17.7%) 79 (19.9%) 0.46
Coronary artery disease 110 (15.8%) 42 (14.0%) 68 (17.1%) 0.25
Atrial fibrillation 94 (13.4%) 46 (15.1%) 48 (12.1%) 0.24
Antiplatelet therapy 219 (33.8%) 79 (29.8%) 140 (36.6%) 0.071
Anticoagulation 83 (11.9%) 42 (14.0%) 41 (10.4%) 0.15
Antihypertensives 346 (54.4%) 141 (55.3%) 205 (53.8%) 0.71
Antidiabetics 108 (15.8%) 40 (13.7%) 68 (17.4%) 0.19
Lipid-lowering drugs 180 (28.4%) 70 (27.6%) 110 (29.0%) 0.69
Haematoma epicentre Lobar 482 (67.3%) 130 (41.8%) 352 (86.9%) <0.001
Deep 159 (22.2%) 131 (42.1%) 28 ( 6.9%)
Brainstem 12 ( 1.7%) 9 ( 2.9%) 3 ( 0.7%)
Cerebellum 32 ( 4.5%) 24 ( 7.7%) 8 ( 2.0%)
Isolated IVH 1 ( 0.1%) 0 ( 0.0%) 1 ( 0.2%)
Isolated cSAH 27 ( 3.8%) 16 ( 5.1%) 11 ( 2.7%)
Uncertain
location 3 ( 0.4%) 1 ( 0.3%) 2 ( 0.5%)
Side of haematoma Right 318 (44.2%) 136 (43.2%) 182 (45.0%) 0.30
Left 383 (53.3%) 171 (54.3%) 212 (52.5%)
Midline/central 7 ( 1.0%) 5 ( 1.6%) 2 ( 0.5%)
Bilateral 11 ( 1.5%) 3 ( 1.0%) 8 ( 2.0%)
Intraventricular
haemorrhage 113 (17.4%) 63 (24.3%) 50 (12.8%) <0.001
Cortical subarachnoid
haemorrhage 215 (34.1%) 25 (10.2%) 190 (49.2%) <0.001

© 2025 American Medical Association. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining,
AI training, and similar technologies.
Legend: CAA, cerebral amyloid angiopathy, ICH, Intracerebral hemorrhage; IVH, Intraventricular
hemorrhage; cSAH, cortical subarachnoid hemorrhage;

© 2025 American Medical Association. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining,
AI training, and similar technologies.

You might also like