2023 CFA Program Curriculum Level I Volume 4 Corporate Issuers Equity Investments and Fixed Income 1st Edition Cfa Institute
2023 CFA Program Curriculum Level I Volume 4 Corporate Issuers Equity Investments and Fixed Income 1st Edition Cfa Institute
com
https://ebookmeta.com/product/2023-cfa-program-curriculum-
level-i-volume-4-corporate-issuers-equity-investments-and-
fixed-income-1st-edition-cfa-institute/
OR CLICK HERE
DOWLOAD EBOOK
CORPORATE ISSUERS,
EQUITY INVESTMENTS,
FIXED INCOME
©2022 by CFA Institute. All rights reserved. This copyright covers material written
expressly for this volume by the editor/s as well as the compilation itself. It does
not cover the individual selections herein that first appeared elsewhere. Permission
to reprint these has been obtained by CFA Institute for this edition only. Further
reproductions by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and
recording, or by any information storage or retrieval systems, must be arranged with
the individual copyright holders noted.
CFA®, Chartered Financial Analyst®, AIMR-PPS®, and GIPS® are just a few of the
trademarks owned by CFA Institute. To view a list of CFA Institute trademarks and the
Guide for Use of CFA Institute Marks, please visit our website at www.cfainstitute.org.
This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information
in regard to the subject matter covered. It is sold with the understanding that the
publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting, or other professional service.
If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent pro-
fessional should be sought.
All trademarks, service marks, registered trademarks, and registered service marks
are the property of their respective owners and are used herein for identification
purposes only.
ISBN 978-1-950157-99-0 (paper)
ISBN 978-1-953337-26-9 (ebook)
2022
© CFA Institute. For candidate use only. Not for distribution.
CONTENTS
Corporate Issuers
Equity Investments
Overconfidence 269
Information Cascades 269
Other Behavioral Biases 270
Behavioral Finance and Investors 270
Behavioral Finance and Efficient Markets 270
Summary 271
References 272
Practice Problems 274
Solutions 278
Fixed Income
ERRATA
The curriculum development process is rigorous and includes multiple rounds of
reviews by content experts. Despite our efforts to produce a curriculum that is free
of errors, there are instances where we must make corrections. Curriculum errata are
periodically updated and posted by exam level and test date online on the Curriculum
Errata webpage (www.cfainstitute.org/en/programs/submit-errata). If you believe you
have found an error in the curriculum, you can submit your concerns through our
curriculum errata reporting process found at the bottom of the Curriculum Errata
webpage.
applicable content and can demonstrate the knowledge, skills, and abilities described
by the LOS and the assigned reading. Use the LOS self-check to track your progress
and highlight areas of weakness for later review.
Successful candidates report an average of more than 300 hours preparing for each
exam. Your preparation time will vary based on your prior education and experience,
and you will likely spend more time on some study sessions than on others.
FEEDBACK
Please send any comments or feedback to [email protected], and we will review
your suggestions carefully.
© CFA Institute. For candidate use only. Not for distribution.
Corporate Issuers
© CFA Institute. For candidate use only. Not for distribution.
© CFA Institute. For candidate use only. Not for distribution.
LEARNING MODULE
1
Cost of Capital-Foundational Topics
by Yves Courtois, CMT, MRICS, CFA, Gene C. Lai, PhD, and Pamela
Peterson Drake, PhD, CFA.
Yves Courtois, CMT, MRICS, CFA, is at KPMG (Luxembourg). Gene C. Lai, PhD, is at the
University of North Carolina at Charlotte (USA). Pamela Peterson Drake, PhD, CFA, is at
James Madison University (USA).
LEARNING OUTCOME
Mastery The candidate should be able to:
INTRODUCTION
A company grows by making investments that are expected to increase revenues
1
and profits. It acquires the capital or funds necessary to make such investments by
borrowing (i.e., using debt financing) or by using funds from the owners (i.e., equity
financing). By applying this capital to investments with long-term benefits, the com-
pany is producing value today. How much value? The answer depends not only on the
investments’ expected future cash flows but also on the cost of the funds. Borrowing
is not costless, nor is using owners’ funds.
© CFA Institute. For candidate use only. Not for distribution.
4 Learning Module 1 Cost of Capital-Foundational Topics
2 COST OF CAPITAL
The cost of capital is the rate of return that the suppliers of capital—lenders and
owners—require as compensation for their contribution of capital. Another way of
looking at the cost of capital is that it is the opportunity cost of funds for the suppliers
of capital: A potential supplier of capital will not voluntarily invest in a company unless
its return meets or exceeds what the supplier could earn elsewhere in an investment of
comparable risk. In other words, to raise new capital, the issuer must price the security
to offer a level of expected return that is competitive with the expected returns being
offered by similarly risky securities.
A company typically has several alternatives for raising capital, including issuing
equity, debt, and hybrid instruments that share characteristics of both debt and equity,
such as preferred stock and convertible debt. Each source selected becomes a com-
ponent of the company’s funding and has a cost (required rate of return) that may be
called a component cost of capital. Because we are using the cost of capital in the
evaluation of investment opportunities, we are dealing with a marginal cost—what it
would cost to raise additional funds for the potential investment project. Therefore,
© CFA Institute. For candidate use only. Not for distribution.
Cost of Capital 5
the cost of capital that the investment analyst is concerned with is a marginal cost,
and the required return on a security is the issuer’s marginal cost for raising additional
capital of the same type.
The cost of capital of a company is the required rate of return that investors demand
for the average-risk investment of a company. A company with higher-than-average-risk
investments must pay investors a higher rate of return, competitive with other securi-
ties of similar risk, which corresponds to a higher cost of capital. Similarly, a company
with lower-than-average-risk investments will have lower rates of return demanded
by investors, resulting in a lower associated cost of capital. The most common way
to estimate this required rate of return is to calculate the marginal cost of each of the
various sources of capital and then calculate a weighted average of these costs. You
will notice that the debt and equity costs of capital and the tax rate are all understood
to be “marginal” rates: the cost or tax rate for additional capital.
The weighted average is referred to as the weighted average cost of capital
(WACC). The WACC is also referred to as the marginal cost of capital (MCC) because
it is the cost that a company incurs for additional capital. Further, this is the current
cost: what it would cost the company today.
The weights are the proportions of the various sources of capital that the company
uses to support its investment program. It is important to note that the weights should
represent the company’s target capital structure, not the current capital structure.
A company’s target capital structure is its chosen (or targeted) proportions of debt
and equity, whereas its current capital structure is the company’s actual weighting
of debt and equity. For example, suppose the current capital structure is one-third
debt, one-third preferred stock, and one-third common stock. Now suppose the new
investment will be financed by issuing more debt so that capital structure changes to
one-half debt, one-fourth preferred stock, and one-fourth common stock. Those new
weights (i.e., the target weights) should be used to calculate the WACC.
Taking the sources of capital to be common stock, preferred stock, and debt and
allowing for the fact that in some jurisdictions, interest expense may be tax deductible,
the expression for WACC is
WACC = wdrd(1 – t) + wprp + were, (1)
where
wd = the target proportion of debt in the capital structure when the company
raises new funds
rd = the before-tax marginal cost of debt
wp = the target proportion of preferred stock in the capital structure when the
company raises new funds
we = the target proportion of common stock in the capital structure when the
company raises new funds
EXAMPLE 1
1. Assume that ABC Corporation has the following capital structure: 30% debt,
10% preferred stock, and 60% common stock, or equity. Also assume that
interest expense is tax deductible. ABC Corporation wishes to maintain
these proportions as it raises new funds. Its before-tax cost of debt is 8%, its
cost of preferred stock is 10%, and its cost of equity is 15%. If the company’s
marginal tax rate is 40%, what is ABC’s weighted average cost of capital?
Solution:
The weighted average cost of capital is
WACC = (0.3)(0.08)(1 – 0.40) + (0.1)(0.1) + (0.6)(0.15)
= 11.44%.
The cost for ABC Corporation to raise new funds while keeping its current
capital structure is 11.44%.
Self reflection:
Maintaining its current capital structure, what happens to ABC’s weighted
average cost of capital if component costs increase or decrease? What hap-
pens if the company’s marginal tax rate increases or decreases?
There are important points concerning the calculation of the WACC as shown
in Equation 1 that the analyst must be familiar with. The next section addresses the
key issue of taxes.
EXAMPLE 2
1. 30%?
2. 48%?
Note: There is no adjustment for taxes in the case of equity; the before-tax cost
of equity is equal to the after-tax cost of equity.
Each source of capital has a different cost because of the differences among the sources,
such as risk, seniority, contractual commitments, and potential value as a tax shield.
We focus on the costs of three primary sources of capital: debt, preferred stock, and
common equity.
Cost of Debt
The cost of debt is the cost of debt financing to a company when it issues a bond or
takes out a bank loan. That cost is equal to the risk-free rate plus a premium for risk.
A company that is perceived to be very risky would have a higher cost of debt than one
that presents little investment risk. Factors that might affect the level of investment
risk include profitability, stability of profits, and the degree of financial leverage. In
general, the cost of debt would be higher for companies that are unprofitable, whose
profits are not stable, or that are already using a lot of debt in their capital structure. We
discuss two methods to estimate the before-tax cost of debt, rd: the yield-to-maturity
approach and debt-rating approach.
© CFA Institute. For candidate use only. Not for distribution.
8 Learning Module 1 Cost of Capital-Foundational Topics
Yield-to-Maturity Approach
The before-tax required return on debt is typically estimated using the expected yield
to maturity (YTM) of the company’s debt based on current market values. YTM is
the annual return that an investor earns on a bond if the investor purchases the bond
today and holds it until maturity. In other words, it is the yield, rd, that equates the
present value of the bond’s promised payments to its market price:
[t=1(1 + _
2 )]
PM T1 PM Tn n PM Tt
P0 = _ _ _ _ + _
FV FV
rd + … + rd n + rd n = ∑ r t
rd n , (2)
(1 + 2 )
_ _ _
(1 + 2 ) (1 + 2 ) d _
(1 + 2 )
where
EXAMPLE 3
Solution:
The following are given:
PV = $1, 025.
FV = $1, 000.
PMT = 5 % of 1, 000 ÷ 2 = $25.
n = 10 × 2 = 20.
$1, 025 = [
t=1 1 + i ]
20 $1, 000
( $25) t + _
∑ _ ( .
1 + i)20
Before proceeding to solve the problem, we already know that the before-tax
cost of debt must be less than 5% because the present value of the bond is
greater than the face value. We can use a financial calculator to solve for
i, the six-month yield. Because i = 2.342%, the before-tax cost of debt is rd
= 2.342% × 2 = 4.684%, and Valence’s after-tax cost of debt is rd(1 − t) =
0.04684(1 − 0.35) = 0.03045, or 3.045%.
© CFA Institute. For candidate use only. Not for distribution.
Costs of the Various Sources of Capital 9
Debt-Rating Approach
When a reliable current market price for a company’s debt is not available, the
debt-rating approach can be used to estimate the before-tax cost of debt. Based on
a company’s debt rating, we estimate the before-tax cost of debt by using the yield
on comparably rated bonds for maturities that closely match that of the company’s
existing debt.
Suppose a company’s capital structure includes debt with an average maturity of
10 years and the company’s marginal tax rate is 35%. If the company’s rating is AAA
and the yield on debt with the same debt rating and similar maturity is 4%, the com-
pany’s after-tax cost of debt is
rd(1 – t) = 0.04(1 – 0.35) = 2.6%.
EXAMPLE 4
Solution:
Elttaz’s after-tax cost of debt is
rd(1 – t) = 0.061(1 – 0.18) = 5.0%.
A consideration when using this approach is that debt ratings are ratings of the
debt issue itself, with the issuer being only one of the considerations. Other factors,
such as debt seniority and security, also affect ratings and yields, so care must be
taken to consider the likely type of debt to be issued by the company in determining
the comparable debt rating and yield. The debt-rating approach is a simple example
of pricing on the basis of valuation-relevant characteristics, which in bond markets
has been known as evaluated pricing or matrix pricing.
Nonrated Debt
If a company does not have any debt outstanding or if the yields on the company’s
existing debt are not available, the analyst may not always be able to use the yield on
similarly rated debt securities. It may be the case that the company does not have rated
bonds. Although researchers offer approaches for estimating a company’s “synthetic”
debt rating based on financial ratios, these methods are imprecise because debt ratings
incorporate not only financial ratios but also information about the particular bond
issue and the issuer that are not captured in financial ratios. A further discussion of
these methods is outside the scope of this reading.
Leases
A lease is a contractual obligation that can substitute for other forms of borrowing.
This is true whether the lease is an operating lease or a finance lease (also called
a capital lease). If the company uses leasing as a source of capital, the cost of these
leases should be included in the cost of capital. The cost of this form of borrowing is
similar to that of the company’s other long-term borrowing.
where
Dp
rp = _
P . (3)
p
Therefore, the cost of preferred stock is the preferred stock’s dividend per share
divided by the current preferred stock’s price per share. Unlike interest on debt, the
dividend on preferred stock is not tax-deductible by the company; therefore, there is
no adjustment to the cost for taxes.
A preferred stock may have a number of features that affect its yield and hence
its cost. These features include a call option, cumulative dividends, participating
dividends, adjustable-rate dividends, and convertibility into common stock. When
estimating a yield based on current yields of the company’s preferred stock, we must
make appropriate adjustments for the effects of these features on the yield of an issue.
For example, if the company has callable, convertible preferred stock outstanding yet
it is expected that the company will issue only noncallable, nonconvertible preferred
stock in the future, we would have to either use the current yields on comparable
companies’ noncallable, nonconvertible preferred stock or estimate the yield on pre-
ferred equity using methods outside the scope of this coverage.
EXAMPLE 5
1. Consider a company that has one issue of preferred stock outstanding with
a $3.75 cumulative dividend. If the price of this stock is $80, what is the
estimate of its cost of preferred stock?
Solution:
Cost of preferred stock = $3.75/$80 = 4.6875%.
EXAMPLE 6
■ The issue price of preferred stock was €3.5 million, and the preferred
dividend is 5%.
■ If the company issued new preferred stock today, the preferred divi-
dend yield would be 6.5%.
■ The company’s marginal tax rate is 30.5%.
Solution:
If De Gouden Tulip were to issue new preferred stock today, the divi-
dend yield would be close to 6.5%. The current terms thus prevail over the
past terms when evaluating the actual cost of preferred stock. The cost of
preferred stock for De Gouden Tulip is, therefore, 6.5%. Because preferred
© CFA Institute. For candidate use only. Not for distribution.
12 Learning Module 1 Cost of Capital-Foundational Topics
1. Valence Industries wants to know its cost of equity. Its chief financial officer
(CFO) believes the risk-free rate is 5%, the market risk premium is 7%, and
Valence’s equity beta is 1.5. What is Valence’s cost of equity using the CAPM
approach?
Solution:
The cost of equity for Valence is 5% + 1.5(7%) = 15.5%.
© CFA Institute. For candidate use only. Not for distribution.
Costs of the Various Sources of Capital 13
2. Exxon Mobil Corporation, BP p.l.c., and Total S.A. are three “super major”
integrated oil and gas companies headquartered, respectively, in the Unit-
ed States, the United Kingdom, and France. An analyst estimates that the
market risk premium in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the
eurozone are, respectively, 4.4%, 5.5%, and 5.9%. Other information is sum-
marized in Exhibit 1.
Estimated Market
Company Beta Risk Premium (%) Risk-Free Rate (%)
Using the capital asset pricing model, calculate the cost of equity for:
The expected market risk premium, or E(RM − RF), is the premium that investors
demand for investing in a market portfolio relative to the risk-free rate. When using
the CAPM to estimate the cost of equity, in practice we typically estimate beta relative
to an equity market index. In that case, the market premium estimate we are using is
actually an estimate of the equity risk premium (ERP). Therefore, we are using the
terms market risk premium and equity risk premium interchangeably.
An alternative to the CAPM to accommodate risks that may not be captured by
the market portfolio alone is a multifactor model that incorporates factors that may
be other sources of priced risk (risk for which investors demand compensation for
bearing), including macroeconomic factors and company-specific factors. In general,
E( Ri) = R ( Factor risk premium)1
F + β i1
+ βi2
( Factor risk premium)2+ … (5)
+ βij ( Factor risk premium)j,
where
There are several ways to estimate the equity risk premium, although there is no
general agreement as to the best approach. The two we discuss are the historical equity
risk premium approach and the survey approach.
The historical equity risk premium approach is a well-established approach
based on the assumption that the realized equity risk premium observed over a long
period of time is a good indicator of the expected equity risk premium. This approach
requires compiling historical data to find the average rate of return of a country’s mar-
ket portfolio and the average rate of return for the risk-free rate in that country. For
example, an analyst might use the historical returns to the TOPIX Index to estimate
the risk premium for Japanese equities. The exceptional bull market observed during
the second half of the 1990s and the bursting of the technology bubble that followed
during 2000–2002 remind us that the time period for such estimates should cover
complete market cycles.
Elroy Dimson, Paul Marsh, and Mike Staunton (2018) conducted an analysis of
the equity risk premiums observed in markets located in 21 countries, including the
United States, over the period 1900–2017. These researchers found that the annual-
ized US equity risk premium relative to US Treasury bills was 5.6% (geometric mean)
and 7.5% (arithmetic mean). They also found that the annualized US equity risk
premium relative to bonds was 4.4% (geometric mean) and 6.5% (arithmetic mean).
Jeremy Siegel (2005), covering the period from 1802 through 2004, observed an equity
return of 6.82% and an equity risk premium in the range of 3.31%–5.36%. Note that
the arithmetic mean is greater than the geometric mean as a result of the significant
volatility of the observed market rate of return and the observed risk-free rate. Under
the assumption of an unchanging distribution of returns over time, the arithmetic
mean is the unbiased estimate of the expected single-period equity risk premium, but
the geometric mean better reflects the growth rate over multiple periods. In Exhibit 2,
we provide historical estimates of the equity risk premium for a few of the developed
markets from Dimson et al. (2018).
Mean
Geometric Arithmetic
To illustrate the historical method as applied in the CAPM, suppose that we use the
historical geometric mean for US equity of 4.4% to value Apple Computer as of early
August 2018. According to Yahoo Finance, Apple had a beta of 1.14 at that time. Using
a 10-year US Treasury bond yield of 3.0% to represent the risk-free rate, the estimate
of the cost of equity for Apple Computer is 3.0% + 1.14(4.4%) = 8.02%.
In general, the equity risk premium can be written as
_ _
ERP = R M− R F,
_ _
where ERP is the equity risk premium, R Mis the mean return for equity, and R F
the risk-free rate.
The historical premium approach has several limitations. One limitation is that the
level of risk of the stock index may change over time. Another is that the risk aversion
of investors may change over time. A third limitation is that the estimates are sensitive
to the method of estimation and the historical period covered.
EXAMPLE 6
1. Suppose that the arithmetic average T-bond rate observed over the last 90
years is an unbiased estimator for the risk-free rate and is 4.88%. Likewise,
suppose the arithmetic average of return on the market observed over the
last 90 years is an unbiased estimator for the expected return for the market.
The average rate of return of the market was 9.65%. Calculate the equity risk
premium.
Solution:
_ _
ERP = R M− R F = 9.65 % − 4.88 % = 4.77 % .
Another approach to estimate the equity risk premium is quite direct: Ask a
panel of finance experts for their estimates, and take the mean response. This is the
survey approach. For example, a survey of US CFOs in December 2017 found that
the average expected US equity risk premium over the next 10 years was 4.42% and
the median was 3.63% (Graham and Harvey 2018).
Once we have an estimate of the equity risk premium, we fine-tune this estimate
for the particular company or project by adjusting it for the specific systematic risk
of the project. We adjust for the specific systematic risk by multiplying the market
risk premium by beta to arrive at the company’s or project’s risk premium, which we
then add to the risk-free rate to determine the cost of equity within the framework
of the CAPM.
The risk premium compensates for the additional risk of the equity issue compared
with the debt issue (recognizing that debt has a prior claim on the cash flows of the
company). This risk premium is not to be confused with the equity risk premium.
The equity risk premium is the difference between the cost of equity and the risk-free
rate of interest. The risk premium in the bond yield plus risk premium approach is
the difference between the cost of equity and the cost of debt of the company. Ideally,
this risk premium is forward looking, representing the additional risk associated with
the equity of the company as compared with the company’s debt. However, we often
estimate this premium using historical spreads between bond yields and stock yields.
In developed country markets, a typical risk premium added is in the range of 3%–5%.
Looking again at Apple Computer, as of early August 2018, the yield to maturity
of Apple’s 3.35% coupon bonds maturing in 2027 was approximately 3.56%. Adding
an arbitrary risk premium of 4.0% produces an estimate of the cost of equity of 3.56%
+ 4.0% = 7.56%. This estimate contrasts with the higher estimate of 8.026% from the
CAPM approach. Such disparities are not uncommon and reflect the difficulty of cost
of equity estimation.
4 ESTIMATING BETA
EXAMPLE 7
1. Betty Lau is an analyst trying to estimate the cost of equity for Singapore
Telecommunications Limited. She begins by running an ordinary least
squares regression to estimate the beta. Her estimated value is 0.4, which
she believes needs adjustment. What is the adjusted beta value she should
use in her analysis?
Solution:
Adjusted beta = (2/3)(0.4) + (1/3)(1.0) = 0.6.
[ 1 + (1 − t ) E ]
= βE _
βU 1
D ,
_ (8)
© CFA Institute. For candidate use only. Not for distribution.
18 Learning Module 1 Cost of Capital-Foundational Topics
where βU is the unlevered beta, t is the marginal tax rate of the peer company, and
D and E are the market values of debt and equity, respectively, of the peer company.
Now we can re-lever the unlevered beta by rearranging the equation to reflect the
capital structure of the thinly traded or nonpublic company in question:
[1 + (1 − t ) _
βE = β U E ].
D (9)
where βE is now the equity beta of the thinly traded or nonpublic company, t is
the marginal tax rate of the thinly traded or nonpublic company, and D and E are
the debt-to-equity values, respectively, of the thinly traded or nonpublic company.
EXAMPLE 8
1. Raffi Azadian wants to determine the cost of equity for Elucida Oncology,
a privately held company. Raffi realizes that he needs to estimate Elucida’s
beta before he can proceed. He determines that Merck & Co. is an appropri-
ate publicly traded peer company. Merck has a beta of 0.7, it is 40% funded
by debt, and its marginal tax rate is 21%. If Elucida is only 10% funded by
debt and its marginal tax rate is also 21%, what is Elucida’s beta?
Solution:
Now we re-lever the unlevered beta using Elucida’s tax rate and capital
structure:
The following table and figure show how Elucida’s beta increases as leverage
rises.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio Equity Beta Equity Beta
0.00 0.46
4.0
0.11 0.50 3.5
0.25 0.55 3.0
0.43 0.62 2.5
0.67 0.70 2.0
1.00 0.82 1.5
1.50 1.01 1.0
2.33 1.31 0.5
4.00 1.91 0
9.00 3.73 0 2 4 6 8 10
Debt-to-Equity Ratio
The beta estimate can then be used to determine the component cost of
equity and combined with the cost of debt in a weighted average to provide
an estimate of the cost of capital for the company.
© CFA Institute. For candidate use only. Not for distribution.
Estimating Beta 19
EXAMPLE 9
Solution:
To calculate the cost of equity, the first step is to “unlever” the betas of the
comparable companies and calculate an average for a company with busi-
ness risk similar to the average of these companies:
0.45 = [________________
1 + (1 − 0.303 ) (0.94) ]
0.75
Compagnie Petrochimique S.A.
© CFA Institute. For candidate use only. Not for distribution.
20 Learning Module 1 Cost of Capital-Foundational Topics
0.59 = [________________
1 + (1 − 0.305 ) (1.13) ]
1.05
Rotterdam Chemie N.V.
Average* 0.60
*An analyst must apply judgment and experience to determine a representative average for the com-
parable companies. This example uses a simple average, but in some situations a weighted average
based on some factor, such as market capitalization, may be more appropriate.
Levering the average unlevered beta for the peer group average, applying
Bayern Chemicals’ target debt-to-equity ratio and marginal tax rate, results
in a beta of 0.86:
βBayernChemicals
= 0.60{ 1 + [ ( 1 − 0.38)0.7]} = 0.86.
Using CAPM, the cost of equity of Bayern Chemicals (re) can be calculated
as follows:
re = 4.5% + (0.86)(5.7%) = 9.4%.
The weights for the cost of debt and cost of equity may be calculated as
follows:
wd = 0.41, and we = (1 – 0.41) = 0.59.
The before-tax cost of debt of Bayern Chemicals (rd) is 6.75%:
rd = 4.5% + 2.25% = 6.75%.
As a result, Bayern Chemicals’ WACC is 7.26%:
WACC = (0.41)(0.0675)(1 – 0.38) + (0.59)(0.094)
= 0.0726, or 7.26%.
5 FLOTATION COSTS
When a company raises new capital, it generally seeks the assistance of investment
bankers. Investment bankers charge the company a fee based on the size and type
of offering. This fee is referred to as the flotation cost. In general, flotation costs are
higher in percentage terms for equity issuances than they are for debt. They are also
higher for smaller issuance amounts or for issuances that are perceived to be riskier.
In the case of debt and preferred stock, we do not usually incorporate flotation costs
in the estimated cost of capital because the amount of these costs is quite small, often
less than 1% of the value of the offering.
However, with equity issuance, the flotation costs may be substantial, so we should
consider these when estimating the cost of external equity capital. Average flotation
costs for new equity have been estimated at 7.11% of the value of the offering in the
© CFA Institute. For candidate use only. Not for distribution.
Flotation Costs 21
United States,1 1.65% in Germany,2 5.78% in the United Kingdom,3 and 4.53% in
Switzerland.4 A large part of the differences in costs among these studies is likely
attributed to the type of offering; cash underwritten offers, typical in the United States,
are generally more expensive than rights offerings, which are common in Europe.
How should flotation costs be accounted for? There are two views on this topic.
One view, which you can find often in textbooks, is to directly incorporate the flo-
tation costs into the cost of capital. The other view is that flotation costs should be
incorporated into the valuation analysis as an additional cost. We will argue that the
second view is preferred.
Consistent with the first view, we can specify flotation costs in monetary terms as
an amount per share or as a percentage of the share price. With flotation costs specified
in monetary terms on a per share basis, the cost of external equity is
where
re = [
P0 (1 − f)]
D
_ 1
+ g, (11)
EXAMPLE 11
1. What is the cost of internally generated equity (i.e., stock is not issued and
flotation costs are not incurred)?
Solution:
1 Inmoo Lee, Scott Lochhead, Jay R. Ritter, and Quanshui Zhao, “The Costs of Raising Capital,” Journal
of Financial Research 19 (Spring 1996): 59–71.
2 Thomas Bühner and Christoph Kaserer, “External Financing Costs and Economies of Scale in Investment
Banking: The Case of Seasoned Equity Offerings in Germany,” European Financial Management 9 (June
2002): 249.
3 Seth Armitage, “The Direct Costs of UK Rights Issues and Open Offers,” European Financial Management
6 (2000): 57–68.
4 Christoph Kaserer and Fabian Steiner, “The Cost of Raising Capital—New Evidence from Seasoned Equity
Offerings in Switzerland,” working paper, Technische Universität München (February 2004).
© CFA Institute. For candidate use only. Not for distribution.
22 Learning Module 1 Cost of Capital-Foundational Topics
2. What is the cost of external equity (i.e., new shares are issued and flotation
costs are incurred) if the flotation costs are 4% of the issuance?
Solution:
re = [ _
$40(1 − 0.04) ]+ 0.05 = 0.05469 + 0.05 = 0.1047, or 10.47 % .
$2(1 + 0.05)
Many experts object to this methodology. Flotation costs are a cash flow that occurs
at issue and they affect the value of the project only by reducing the initial cash flow.
However, by adjusting the cost of capital for flotation costs, we apply a higher cost of
capital to determine the present value of the future cash flows. The result is that the
calculated net present value of a project is less than its true net present value. As a
result, otherwise profitable projects may get rejected when this methodology is used.
An alternative and preferred approach is to make the adjustment for flotation costs
to the cash flows in the valuation computation. For example, consider a project that
requires a €60,000 initial cash outlay and is expected to produce cash flows of €10,000
each year for 10 years. Suppose the company’s marginal tax rate is 40%, the before-tax
cost of debt is 5%, and the cost of equity is 10%. Assume the company will finance
the project with 40% debt and 60% equity. Exhibit 4 summarizes the information on
the component costs of capital.
Amount
Source of Capital Raised (€) Proportion Marginal After-Tax Cost
If the preferred method is to deduct the flotation costs as part of the net present
value calculation, why do many textbooks highlight the adjustment to the cost of capital?
One reason is that it is often difficult to identify specific financing associated with a
project. Making the adjustment for flotation costs to the cost of capital is most useful
if specific project financing cannot be identified. A second reason is that by adjusting
the cost of capital for the flotation costs, it is easier to demonstrate how the costs of
financing a company change as a company exhausts internally generated equity (i.e.,
retained earnings) and switches to externally generated equity (i.e., a new stock issue).
METHODS IN USE
We have introduced methods that may be used to estimate the cost of capital for a
6
company or a project, but which methods do companies actually use when making
investment decisions? John Graham and Campbell Harvey (2002) surveyed a large
number of CFOs to find out which methods they prefer. Their survey revealed the
following:
■ The most popular method for estimating the cost of equity is the capital
asset pricing model.
■ Few companies use the dividend discount model (which we did not cover) to
estimate the cost of equity.
■ Publicly traded companies are more likely to use the capital asset pricing
model than are private companies.
■ In evaluating projects, the majority of CFOs use a single company cost of
capital, but a large portion apply some type of risk adjustment for individual
projects.
Their survey also revealed that the single-factor capital asset pricing model is the
most popular method for estimating the cost of equity. The second and third most
popular methods, respectively, are average stock returns and multifactor return models.
The lack of popularity of the dividend discount model indicates that this approach,
although once favored, has lost its appeal in practice.
In a survey of publicly traded multinational European companies, Franck Bancel
and Usha Mittoo (2004) provided evidence consistent with the Graham and Harvey
(2002) survey. They found that over 70% of companies use the CAPM to determine
the cost of equity; this finding is similar to the 73.5% of US companies that use the
CAPM. In a survey of both publicly traded and private European companies, Dirk
Brounen, Abe de Jong, and Kees Koedijk (2004) confirmed the result of Graham and
Harvey that larger companies are more likely to use the more sophisticated methods,
such as CAPM, in estimating the cost of equity. Brounen, de Jong, and Koedijk found
that the use of the CAPM was less popular for their sample (ranging from 34% to
55.6%, depending on the country) than for the other two surveys, which may reflect
the inclusion of smaller, private companies in their sample.
We learn from the survey evidence that the CAPM is a popular method for
estimating the cost of equity capital and that it is used less often by smaller, private
companies. The latter result is not surprising, because of the difficulty in estimating
systematic risk in cases in which the company’s equity is not publicly traded.
© CFA Institute. For candidate use only. Not for distribution.
24 Learning Module 1 Cost of Capital-Foundational Topics
SUMMARY
In this reading, we provided an overview of the techniques used to calculate the cost
of capital for companies and projects. We examined the weighted average cost of
capital, discussing the methods commonly used to estimate the component costs of
capital and the weights applied to these components.
■ The weighted average cost of capital is a weighted average of the after-tax
marginal costs of each source of capital: WACC = wdrd(1 – t) + wprp + were.
■ The before-tax cost of debt is generally estimated by either the
yield-to-maturity method or the bond rating method.
■ The yield-to-maturity method of estimating the before-tax cost of debt uses
the familiar bond valuation equation. Assuming semi-annual coupon pay-
ments, the equation is
[t=1(1 + _
2 )]
PM T1 PM Tn n PM Tt
P0 = _ _ _ _ + _
FV FV
rd + … + rd n + rd n = ∑ rd n .
(1 + 2 )
_ _ _ r t
(1 + 2 ) (1 + 2 ) _ d
(1 + 2 )
We solve for the six-month yield (rd/2) and then annualize it to arrive at the
before-tax cost of debt, rd.
■ Because interest payments are generally tax deductible, the after-tax cost is
the true, effective cost of debt to the company. If a yield to maturity or bond
rating is not available, such as in the case of a private company without
rated debt or a project, the estimate of the cost of debt becomes more
challenging.
■ The cost of preferred stock is the preferred stock dividend divided by the
current preferred stock price:
Dp
rp = _
P .
p
E( Ri) = R
F + β i[E( RM
)− RF ].
[ 1 + (1 − t ) E ]
= βE _
βU 1
D .
_
© CFA Institute. For candidate use only. Not for distribution.
Methods in Use 25
Then, we lever this beta to reflect the financial risk of the project or
company:
[1 + (1 − t ) _
βE = βU E ].
D
■ Flotation costs are costs incurred in the process of raising additional capital.
The preferred method of including these costs in the analysis is as an initial
cash flow in the valuation analysis.
■ Survey evidence tells us that the CAPM method is the most popular method
used by companies in estimating the cost of equity. The CAPM method
is more popular with larger, publicly traded companies, which is under-
standable considering the additional analyses and assumptions required in
estimating systematic risk for a private company or project.
© CFA Institute. For candidate use only. Not for distribution.
26 Learning Module 1 Cost of Capital-Foundational Topics
REFERENCES
Bancel, Franck, Usha Mittoo. 2004. “Cross-Country Determinants of Capital Structure Choice:
A Survey of European Firms.” Financial Management 33 (4): 103–32.
Blume, Marshall. 1971. “On the Assessment of Risk.” Journal of Finance 26 (1): 1–10.
Brounen, Dirk, Abe de Jong, Kees Koedijk. 2004. “Corporate Finance in Europe: Confronting
Theory with Practice.” Financial Management 33 (4): 71–101.
Dimson, E., P. Marsh, M. Staunton. 2018. “Credit Suisse Global Investment Returns Yearbook
2018” (February).
Fernandez, Pablo, Vitaly Pershin, Isabel Fernández Acin. 2018. “Market Risk Premium and
Risk-Free Rate Used for 59 Countries in 2018: A Survey.” Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/
abstract=3155709.
Graham, John R., Campbell R. Harvey. 2002. “How Do CFOs Make Capital Budgeting and
Capital Structure Decisions?” Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 15 (1): 8–23.
Graham, John R., Campbell R. Harvey. 2018. “The Equity Risk Premium in 2018.” Working paper
(27 March). Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=3151162.
Pinto, Jerald E., Thomas R. Robinson, John D. Stowe. 2019. “Equity Valuation: A Survey of
Professional Practice.” Review of Financial Economics 37 (2): 219–33.
Siegel, Jeremy J. 2005. “Perspectives on the Equity Risk Premium.” Financial Analysts Journal
61 (6): 61–73.
Discovering Diverse Content Through
Random Scribd Documents
'Never till I have held you to my breast and kissed you,' he said.
'That never, never!' she gasped. She got her hands on his breast
and forced his arms asunder behind her.
'Ha, ha! strong,' he laughed, 'but not strong as I.' He gripped
her wrists and bent her arms back. She threw herself on the ground,
he drew her up. She flung herself against the chair, crushing his
hand against the chimney-piece, so that he let go with it for an
instant. She groped about with her free hand, in the dark, for some
weapon, she grasped something. He cursed her for the pain she had
given him, and attempted again to seize her hand. In a moment she
had struck him—him the coward assailant, him the thief, him the
murderer—between the brows with the weapon her hand had taken.
It was a blow with her whole force. There followed a crash of glass,
then a sense as of her hand being plunged into fire. Then a shriek
loud, tearing through roof and wall, loud, agonised, as only a man or
a horse can utter in supreme moments of torture; and Rebow fell on
the floor, writhing like a worm, with his hands over his face and
eyes.
CHAPTER XXV.
IN THE DARKNESS.
Day by day Elijah Rebow lay, or sat, in the darkened oak parlour
with his eyes bandaged, a prey to wrath, pain, despair. The vitriol
from the broken vial had got into his eyes, and there was reason to
fear had blinded them.
He was obliged to have the burning balls kept from the light,
but he raged under the obligation. He wanted to see, he could not
be patient under restraint. He could ill understand that in all things
he might not have his way, even in such a matter as this. He chafed
also at having been conquered by Glory. That she should have defied
and beaten him, and beaten him in such a crushing manner, cut his
pride to the quick.
None knew how the accident had occurred save himself and
Mehalah. To the doctor he had merely said that in getting the vitriol
bottle from the shelf, it had fallen and broken on his forehead.
Mrs. Sharland remained in as complete ignorance of the truth as
the rest, and her lamentations and commiserations, poured on Elijah
and her daughter, angered him and humiliated her. Mehalah had
suffered in mind agonies equal in acuteness to those endured in
body by Elijah.
Horror and hatred of herself predominated. She had destroyed,
by one outburst of passion, the eyesight of a man, and wrecked his
life. What henceforth for thirty or forty years could life be to Rebow?
—to one who could not endure existence without activity? She had
rendered him in a moment helpless as a babe, and dependent on
herself for everything. She must attend to his every want, and
manage the farm and his business for him. By a stroke, their relative
positions were reversed. The wedding night had produced a
revolution in their places of which she could not have dreamed. She
felt at once the burden of the responsibilities that came upon her.
She was called upon by those on the farm to order and provide for
everything connected with it. She had to think for the farm, and
think for the master into whose position she had forced her way.
She hated herself for her rash act. She hated the man whom
she had mutilated, but more herself. If by what she had done she
had in one sense made herself master, in another she had cast
herself into bondage. By the terrible injury she had inflicted on
Rebow she had morally bound herself to him for life to repair that
injury by self-devotion. Had it been possible for her to love him,
even to like him, this would have been light to her, with her feminine
instinct, but as it was not possible, the slavery would be
inexpressibly painful.
Love will hallow and lighten the most repulsive labours, the
most extreme self-sacrifice, but when there is no love, only
abhorrence, labour and self-sacrifice crush mentally and morally. She
must bear the most fierce and insulting reproaches without an
attempt to escape them, she had in part deserved them. These she
could and would endure, but his caresses!—no! however deeply she
might have sinned against him, however overflowing her pity for his
helpless condition might be, she could not tolerate affection from the
man who by his own confession merited her profound loathing. He
had taken an unoffending man, and had imprisoned him and blinded
his reason by cruelty; it seemed to her as if Providence had used her
hand to exact a just retribution on Rebow by condemning him to an
equally miserable condition. The recompense was justly meted, but
would that it had been dealt by another hand!
In one particular she was blameless, and able to excuse herself.
She had acted without intent to do bodily harm, and in ignorance of
the weapon she had used. She had been carried away by the instinct
of self-preservation, and had taken up what was readiest at hand,
without a wish to do more than emancipate herself from the grasp
of the man she detested. He had brought the consequences on his
own eyes by his own act.
But though she quite recognised that he had done this, and that
he richly deserved the consequences, yet she could not relieve her
conscience from the gnawings of self-reproach, from the scalding
blush of shame at having executed a savage, unwomanly vengeance
on the man who had wronged her. Had her victim been a woman
and a rival, she would perhaps have gloried in her act; but the
female mind is perverse in its twists and complexion, and it will
tingle with pain for having hurt a man, however little that man may
be loved, when it would plume itself for having done the same to a
woman who has been a friend. A woman must think and act rightly
towards a man, but can do neither towards one of her own sex.
Mehalah's bosom was a prey to conflicting emotions. She pitied
Elijah, and she pitied George. Her deep pity for George forced her to
hate his torturer, and grudge him no suffering to expiate his offence.
When she thought of what George de Witt must have endured in the
vault, of his privations there, of the gradual darkening and
disturbance of his faculties, and then of how Elijah had stepped
between him and her, and spoiled their mutual dream of happiness,
and ruined both their lives, the hot blood boiled in her heart, and
she felt that she could deal Rebow the stroke again, deliberately,
knowing what the result must be, as a retributive act. But when she
heard him, as now, pacing the oak parlour, and in his blindness
striking against the walls, her pity for him mounted and overlapped
her wrath. Moreover, she was perplexed about the story of George's
imprisonment. There was something in it she could not reconcile
with what she knew. Elijah had confessed that on the night of
George's disappearance he had enticed the young man to Red Hall,
made him drunk or drugged him, and then chained him in the vault,
in the place of his own brother who had died. It was Rebow and not
De Witt who, that same night, had appeared at her window, driven
in the glass and flung the medal at her feet. But was this possible?
She knew at what hour George had left the Mussets' shop, and she
knew about the time when the medal had been cast on the floor
before her. It was almost incredible that so much had taken place in
the interval. It was no easy row between Red Hall and the Ray, to be
accomplished in half an hour.
Surely, also, had George De Witt been imprisoned below, he
could have found some means to make himself heard, to
communicate with the men about the farm, in the absence of
Rebow. Would a few months in that dark damp cell derange the
faculties of a sane man?
Mehalah lifted the trap and went down. The vault was a cellar
not below the soil, but with floor level with the marsh outside, or
only slightly beneath. It had a door fastened from within by a bolt,
but also provided with a lock; and there was the circular window
already described. The shutter had not been replaced, and the
sunlight entered, and made the den less gloomy and horrible than
Mehalah had conceived it to be. She found the staple to which the
chain had been attached, away from the door and the window. It
was obvious how the maniac had got loose. The chain had been
attached to the staple by a padlock. Elijah sometimes unlocked this,
when he was cleaning the straw from the cell and supplying fresh
litter. He had carelessly turned the key in the lock, and left it
unfastened. The madman had found this out after Rebow was gone,
and had taken advantage of the circumstance to break out at the
window. The chain and padlock, with the key in it, were now hung
over the fireplace in the hall, mocking the inscription below, 'When I
take hold, I hold fast.'
Mehalah seated herself in the window of the hall, and took up
some needlework. Elijah was still pacing the parlour and beating
against the opposite walls, muttering curses when he struck the oak
panels. Presently she heard him groping along the walls for the door,
and stumbling over chairs. He turned the handle and entered the
hall.
He stood before her in the doorway of the darkened chamber,
with extended quivering hands, his head bowed, his eyes covered
with a thick bandage. He wore his red plush waistcoat and long
brown coat. His dark hair was ruffled and stood up like rushes over a
choked drain. He turned his head aside and listened. Mehalah held
her breath.
'You are there,' he said. 'Although you try to hide from me, I
know you are there and watching me. I am in the dark but I can
see. I can see you always and everywhere, with your eyes—great
angry brown eyes—on me, and your hand lifted to strike me into
endless night.'
Mehalah did not speak. Why should she? She could say nothing
that could do either any good.
'Have you put the hot fire to your tongue and scorched it out as
you have put it to my eyes?' he asked. 'Can't you speak? Must I sit
alone in darkness, or tramp alone up and down in black hell, feeling
the flames dance in my eye-sockets, but not seeing them, and have
no one to speak to, no one to touch, no one to kick, and beat, and
curse? Go out and fetch me a dog that I may torture it to death and
laugh over the sport. I must do something. I cannot tramp, tramp,
and strike my head and shoulders against the walls till I am bruised
and cut, with no one to speak to, or speak to me. By heaven! it is
bad enough in Grimshoe with two in the shiphold mangling each
other, but there is excitement and sport in that. It is worse in that
wooden hold yonder, for there I am all alone.'
He stopped speaking, and began to feel round the room. He
came to the chimney and put his fingers into the letters of the
inscription. 'Ha!' he muttered, 'When I lay hold, I hold fast. I laid
hold of you, Mehalah, but I have not let go yet, though I have
burned my fingers.'
This was the first time he had called her by her Christian name.
She was surprised.
'Mehalah!' he repeated, 'Mehalah!' and then laughed bitterly to
himself. 'You are no more my Glory. There is no Glory here for me;
unless, in pity for what a ruin you have made, you take me to your
heart and love me. If you will do that I will pardon all, I will not give
a thought to my eyes. I can still see you standing in the midst of the
fire, unhurt like a daughter of God. I do not care. I shall always see
you there, and when the fire goes out and only black ashes remain,
I shall see you there shining like a lamp in the night, always the
same. I do not care how many years may pass, how old you may
wax, whether you may become bent and broken with infirmities, I
shall always see my Glory with her rich black shining hair, her large
brown eyes, and form as elastic and straight as a pine-tree. I shall
see the blue jersey and the red cap and scarlet skirt.' He raised his
hands and wrung them in the air above his head: 'What do I care for
other sights? These long flat marshes have nothing beautiful in
them. The sea is not here what it is on other coasts, foaming,
colour-shifting like a peacock's neck; here it is of one tone and grey,
and never tosses in waves, but creeps in like a thief over the shallow
mud-flat, and babbles like a dotard over the mean shells and clots of
weed on our strand. There is nothing worth seeing here. I do not
heed being blinded, so long as I can see you, and that not you nor
all your vitriol can extinguish. Heat skewers white hot in the fire, and
drive them in at the eye-sockets through all obstruction into the
brain, and then, perhaps, you will blind me to that vision. Nothing
less can do it. Pity me and love me, and I forgive all.'
He crept past the chimney-piece and was close to the window.
He touched Mehalah with one hand, and in a moment had her fast
with both.
'I cannot love you,' she said, 'but I pity you from the depth of
my soul, and I shall never forgive myself for what I have done.'
'Look here!' he snatched his bandages away and cast them
down. 'This is what you have done. I have hold of you, but I cannot
see you with my eyes. I am looking into a bed of wadding, of white
fleeces with red ochre smears in them, rank dirty old fleeces
unsecured—that is all I see. I suppose it is the window and the
sunshine. I feel the heat of the rays; I cannot see them save as
streaks of wool.'
'Elijah!' exclaimed the girl, 'let me bandage your eyes again. You
were ordered to keep all light excluded.'
'Bah! I know well enough that my eyesight is gone. I know what
you have done for me. Do you think that a few days in darkness can
mend them? I know better. Vitriol will eat away iron, and the eyes
are softer than iron. You knew that when you poured it on them.'
'I never intended to do you the harm,' said Mehalah
passionately, and burst into tears. He listened to her sobbing with
pleasure.
'You are sorry for me?'
'I am more than sorry. I am crushed with shame and grief for
what I have done.'
'You will love me now, Mehalah.'
She shook her head and one of her tears fell on his hand; he
raised his hand and put it to his eyes; then sighed. 'I thought one
such drop would have restored them whole as before. It would, had
there been sweetness in it, but it was all bitter. There was only anger
with self and no love for me. I must bide on in blackness.' He put his
hands on each side of her head, twisted his thumbs resting on her
cheek-bones, and her unrestrained tears ran over them.
He stood quite still.
'This is the best medicine I could get,' he said; 'better nor all
doctor's messes. To listen to your heart flowing over, to feel your
warm tears trickle, does me good. In spite of everything, Glory! I
must love you, and yet, Mehalah! I have every cause to hate you. I
have made you, who were nothing, my wife, mistress of my house
and estate, with a property and position above everyone else in
Salcott and Virley, equal to any of the proud yeomen's wives on
Mersea Isle. I have made a home for your mother, and in return you
have plunged me in eternal night, and deny me your love.'
'Let us not recriminate,' said Mehalah through her tears, 'or I
should have enough to charge you with. I never sought to be your
wife. You drove me into the position in spite of my aversion to it; in
spite of all my efforts to escape. You have wounded me in a cruel
and cowardly manner past forgiveness. You have ruined my life and
all my prospects of happiness. George——'
He shook her furiously.
'I will not listen to that name,' he said through his teeth.
'You could bear to hold him in chains there below,' she
answered.
'You said, Let us not recriminate, and you pour a torrent of
recriminations over me,' he gasped. 'If I have wronged you, you
have redressed all with one vial of vitriol in the eyes, where man is
most sensitive. With that firejuice you purged away all the past
wrongs, I expiated in that liquid flame all the evil I had done you.
You don't know what I have suffered. You have had no such
experience of pain as to imagine the tortures I have undergone. If
the anguish were all, it would be enough atonement; but it is not all.
There is the future before me, a future of night. I shall have to trust
to someone to do everything for me, to be eyes, and hands, and
feet to me. Whom can I trust? How do I know that I shall not be
deserted, and left to die in my darkness, a prey to ravenous men? If
you loved me, then I could lean on you and be at peace. But you do
not love me, and you will leave me when it suits your pleasure.'
'No, Elijah,' said Mehalah sadly; 'that I never will do. I have
robbed you of your sight. I did it unwittingly, in self-defence,
perhaps also in anger at knowing how cruelly, wickedly, cowardly
you had behaved to me and to another whom I loved.'
'Whom you love still!' with a cry of rage.
'One whom I loved,' repeated Mehalah, sadly; 'and I must atone
for my mad act as far as lies in my power. I will stay by you. I will
never forsake you.'
'Listen to me, Mehalah,' said Elijah, with concentrated
vehemence; 'you know what was said—that the person you loved
went out in a boat and was lost. The body was never found. Should
the man turn up again.'
'That is impossible.'
'I don't care for impossibilities. I live now in a dream-world
where there is no line drawn between the possible and the
impossible. Should he reappear, what then?'
'Still I would remain at my post of duty,' said the girl, humouring
his fancy.
'The post of duty, not of love,' he muttered.
'I said duty,' she replied; 'I will never leave that.'
His thumbs twitched on her cheek-bones and worked their way
to the corners of her eyes; she sharply withdrew her head.
He laughed. 'You thought I was going to gouge your eyes out
with my thumbnails,' he said, 'that I was going to repay you in kind.
No, I was not; but should the dead return to life and reclaim you, I
may do it. You cannot, you shall not escape me. You and I, and I
and you, must sink or swim together. Say again, Mehalah, that you
will stand by me.'
'I promise it you, Elijah, I promise it you here solemnly, before
God.' She sank on her knees. 'I have brought you unwittingly into
darkness, and in that darkness I will hold to you and will cherish
you.'
'Ha!' he shouted. 'At the altar you refused to swear that. To
love, cherish, and obey is what the parson tried to make you say;
but all you swore to was to obey, you denied the other, and now you
take oath to cherish. The wheel of fate is turning, and you will come
in time to love where you began to obey and went on to cherish.'
CHAPTER XXVI.
THE FORGING OF THE RING.
CHAPTER XXVII.
THE RETURN OF THE LOST.