Page 1

1
2
3 Commonwealth Ombudsman 18-3-2025
4 [email protected]
5 phone on 1300 362 072
6
7 Cc: Office of the Australian Information Commissioner at www.oaic.gov.au
8
9 Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus Email [email protected],
10
11 Justin Bott Service Australian Community Information Service Officer
12 Centrelink Ref 301 602 799V
13 Reply Paid 7800, CANBERR ABC ACT 2610
14 serviceaustralia.gov.au
15
16 Sir/Madam,
17 as an age pensioner I fall within the legal principle embedded in the Commonwealth
18 of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK), [(xxiii) invalid and old-age pensions;] and was
19 granted the Age Pension more than a decade ago.
20 On 8 August 2024 my (now Late) wife Olga Hlavka-Schorel (age 91) died overnight at home
21 and that day I reported to Centrelink her passing. I also notified relevant authorities of the
22 passing of Olga and the police and ambulance service as well as an undertaker was involved in
23 the morning.
24 AT NO TIME was Olga able to contact Centrelink on 8 August 2024 considering she died well
25 before Centrelink officer opened for business. Yet, I received from Centrelink correspondence
26 that they had established on 8 August 2024 the values of Olga’s Estate involving alleged bank
27 holdings, shareholdings, etc. Also claiming what shareholding, bank holdings, etc, I allegedly
28 had, this even so I did not authorised Centrelink to access any of my private details.
29 I understand that Service Australia that also deals with Centrelink is actually registered in the
30 USA and this obviously is of concern in that my alleged details are now partly or in whole
31 accessible in the USA without being fully under control of the Commonwealth of Australia, this
32 as the USA has its own laws.
33
34 As neither Olga and/or myself authorised Centrelink to access any of pour private and
35 confidential details then this is a violation of our constitutional rights also!
36
37 Hansard 25-3-1897 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
38 Australasian Convention)
39 QUOTE Mr. WISE:
40 The power of the senate to deal with money bills is so clearly defined that I doubt if any
41 ingenuity could suggest the possibility of dispute arising between the two houses on that
42 question. That at once removes one of the most prolific sources of dispute between the two
43 chambers in the past. Then as to the second class of dispute arising from social differences,
44 all through this discussion, not, I admit, in this house but outside, the controversialists of

18-3-2025 Page 1 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 2

1 one party ignore, or seem to ignore, the limitations of federal government. They forget that
2 this commonwealth can only deal with those matters that are expressly remitted to its
3 jurisdiction; and excluded from its jurisdiction are all matters that affect civil rights, all
4 matters that affect property, all matters, in a word, affecting the two great objects which
5 stir the passions and affect the interests of mankind. I fail entirely and I shall be glad if
6 some alarmist will enlarge my views on this matter-to perceive in this bill any question on
7 which there is any possibility of a conflict between the states and the people, except, in one
8 respect, and I will define that in the largest possible way. In legislation affecting
9 commercial interests, or financial interests, it is possible to imagine that the states will be
10 brought into conflict as states with the concentrated majority of the populations of the two
11 large states over a question of trade. It is possible to imagine the same thing arising over a
12 question of commerce, or over a question of finance.
13 END QUOTE
14
15 It also ought to be understood that that a person cannot be forced to self-incriminate.
16
17 However, what the Commonwealth can do is to litigate against a person whom they have solid
18 evidence (beyond reasonable doubt) is defrauding the Commonwealth, where the court can
19 invoke jurisdiction that is. It is not for the Courts to go on some fishing expedition to try to torch
20 some innocent person as some torture chamber conduct to try to get an accused to confess
21 merely to suit the Commonwealth.
22
23 Centrelink having made allegations as to Olga and my own purported estate values then went
24 about to make clear I was entitled to continue with the Age Pension and adjusted payments as
25 such for being now a widower (single person) and adjusted payments as such.
26 It must therefore be very clear that Centrelink having violated both Olga’s and myself personal
27 confidential details used this as an assessment without consulting either of us for this. This I
28 consider being another ROBODEBT conduct as ROBODEBT 3, this as the ATO also is what I
29 view conducting a ROBODEBT 2 conduct.
30
31 Since Centrelink made its assessment that I was entitled to continue with the Age Pension it then
32 commenced to harass me at least 3 times to claim I needed to provide details as to my estate
33 holding. Obviously, where Centrelink already this its own unilateral assessment without
34 requesting my lawful authority then I view its abuse of then harassing me underlines its
35 ROBODEBT conduct.
36
37 I make it very clear that I have not made any claims as to the accurately of Centrelink 8 August
38 2024 claims about Olga’s and myself alleged estate values because to do so would or could be
39 implied (not that I seek to do so) that the details Centrelink claimed about either or both estates
40 were or were not accurate.
41
42 As other than Centrelink own unilateral assessment regarding the alleged 8 August 2024
43 Estate values, the only change made was by Centrelink itself as to change the married Age
44 Pension to a widower single person Age Pension.
45
46 Hansard 7-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian
47 Convention)
48 QUOTE
49 Mr. TRENWITH (Victoria).-This subject is one to which I have given a great deal of
50 thought, and one which I believe to be of very grave importance. I think it is imperatively
51 necessary that the Governments of the various civilized countries of the world shall in the
52 near future make some provision for the evening of the lives of those who have worn
18-3-2025 Page 2 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 3

1 themselves out in the service of their country. Because, I hold that it is utterly
2 unimportant where a man works, he is still working for his country. He may be a
3 soldier prepared to fight for his country, he may be a civil servant working in one of
4 the departments of the state, or he may be a navvy assisting to build a railway which
5 is to develop the country in which he lives-he may be anything, but, so long as he is
6 working in the country, be is serving the rest of the people of that country. When this
7 question was before the Convention previously, I voted against Mr. Howe's proposal to
8 give the Federal Parliament at the beginning the power to deal with old-age pensions. I
9 believed then, and believe now, that giving this power to the Federal Parliament will
10 have the effect of retarding rather than advancing this movement. I have, however,
11 since the matter was last before the Convention, consulted a large number of persons
12 whose opinion I value very highly, and I have arrived at the view that the inclusion of
13 this provision amongst the powers of the Parliament will very materially add to the
14 passage of the Bill when presented to the people for their vote. Having that thought in
15 mind, I have resolved on this occasion to vote for the inclusion of the provision in the
16 Constitution at this stage. It will be remembered that I urged and held then that ultimately,
17 before the matter could be effectively dealt with, it would require to be handed over to the
18 Federal Parliament. My view was that the states which undertook to legislate upon this
19 subject would find that, with a population so migratory as ours, the difficulty is too
20 great, and would have to ask the Federal Parliament to take the question up. I felt
21 then, and I feel now, that the fact of the states dealing with the [start page 1996] question,
22 and seeing its difficulty in actual operation, and calling upon the Federal Parliament to deal
23 with it, would conduce to the old-age pensions subject being legislated upon by the
24 Federal Parliament at a much earlier stage than would otherwise be the case. But in view
25 of the widespread feeling amongst the working classes that this question is so important,
26 and can be so much more effectively dealt with collectively than separately as regards the
27 states, I have resolved to vote for the amendment, and hope it will be included in the
28 Constitution, for the reason that it will be one other inducement to a large number of
29 persons to accept the Federal Constitution when it is submitted. I hope that my fears-
30 which I still hold-that the inclusion of the proposals now may possibly temporarily retard
31 the adoption by the states of this principle will be more than compensated for by the
32 effectiveness of it when it is dealt with by the Federal Parliament.
33 The CHAIRMAN.-I will put it that this proposed new sub-section be sub-section (24A)
34 in clause 52, instead of sub-section (23), because I think that divorce ought to come after
35 marriage.
36 Question-That the proposed new sub-section be inserted in the Bill-put.
37 The committee divided-
38 Ayes ... ... ... 26
39 Noes ... ... ... 4
40 END QUOTE
41
42 Clearly, the Commonwealth may legislate as to pensions, however, it cannot enforce its own
43 laws willy nilly, as it would require to involved the administration of justice to obtain court
44 orders where a person opposes any or all conduct of the Commonwealth. The separation of
45 powers is specifically so that any dispute involving the Commonwealth must be adjudicated
46 before the High Court of Australia holding original jurisdiction. Regretfully the Commonwealth
47 ignores this thousands and thousands of times. For example, when the Commonwealth alleges
48 that a person FAILED TO VOTE then it litigated against me in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka
49 regarding the 2001 and 2004 federal elections however the Commonwealth DPP sought to rely
50 upon “AVERMENT” which I successfully opposed representing myself (all along) regarding
51 both cases on 4 August 2005. However, on 17 November 2005 the Magistrates Court of Victoria
18-3-2025 Page 3 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 4

1 held that it could ignore previous orders that were in my favour and then convicted me regarding
2 both cases. I appealed this (again representing myself) and also relied upon my constitutional
3 rights and filed and served a NOTICE OF CONSTITUTIONAL MATTER which was served
4 also upon all 9 Attorney Generals. I further provided a 409 pages written submission named
5 ADDRESS TO THE COURT and on 19 July 2006 the Court upheld both appeals without the
6 Commonwealth DPP and/or any of the 9 Attorney Generals challenging any of my filed
7 documentation, and by this all conceded to my appeals to be upheld unchallenged. By this all
8 States, Territories and Commonwealth governments are bound by this court decision. I proved
9 therefore that on constitutional grounds “compelling” any one to vote is unconstitutional, that no
10 one can demand any person to state on what religious or non-religious ground the person objects.
11 As such, any person for example objecting against a vaccination cannot be denied exemption
12 unless a court adjudicate the issue in conflict ‘after hearing both sides”!
13
14 Regarding the “covid scam” the contract Scott Morrison PM entered into were beyond
15 constitutional powers to do so.
16 Regarding the States MANDATES they were all unconstitutional as I pointed out in my April
17 2020 email COMPLAINTS to the Victorian Ombudsman, Victorian Human rights
18 Commissioner, Victorian State government, Federal Government, IBAC, etc. Copies have been
19 posted at my blog https://www.scribd.com.au/inspectorrikati.
20 The so-called misinformation/disinformation legislation is unconstitutional.
21 My 7,401 pages complaint to the Australia Federal Police since 6 August 2021 remains without
22 response, while people are mass murdered, etc.
23
24 The Commonwealth changed ‘mygov’ to ‘myID’ and I understand it unconstitutionally passes
25 on Australian’s private (including medical) details to the WHO, UN and WEF, violating also
26 personal confidentiality, etc.
27
28 Despite the ruling in Sue v Hill (HCA)the Commonwealth of Australia is not some
29 “independent” nation and neither is “Australian citizenship” an “Australian nationality” as it is
30 no more but a meaning of place of abode, this as Australians are and remain to be “Subjects of
31 the British Crown”.
32
33 The State of Victoria has no valid State Constitution and the State Courts are not
34 “INDEPENDENT” where the 2 January 1901 Letters Patent requires the governor to provide for
35 an “impartial administration of justice”. Which means the Commonwealth cannot use any
36 purported State of Victoria Courts, etc.
37
38 As I proved in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka the purported 2001 Federal election never was valid this
39 because the proclamation was not published until 9 October 2001 whereas the writs were issued
40 on 8 October 2001, where the special Gazette officer was absent in the morning of 8 October
41 2001 and so no proclamation was published before 11.59am when it was to be invoked. Hence
42 one the 3 months period provided for in Section 64 John Howard not having in fact re-elected as
43 a Member of parliament (neither so any other of the House of Representatives) no longer was
44 PM after the 3 month period and as such was without any legal authority after the 3 months
45 period and was therefore a imposter to claim to be a PM and unconstitutionally authorised to
46 invade Iraq,
47 64 Ministers of State
48 QUOTE
49 After the first general election no Minister of State shall hold office
50 for a longer period than three months unless he is or becomes a
51 senator or a member of the House of Representatives.
52 END QUOTE
18-3-2025 Page 4 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 5

1
2 The AEC wrongly doesn’t keep records of the “writs” this even so the writs showing the date of
3 the return of the writs are relevant as to when the next election by latest can be held considering
4 the completion of the election process must be finished before the 3 years of the last return of the
5 writs has been completed!
6
7 Hansard 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
8 QUOTE Mr. BARTON.-
9 Providing, as this Constitution does, for a free people to elect a free Parliament-giving that
10 people through their Parliament the power of the purse-laying at their mercy from day to
11 day the existence of any Ministry which dares by corruption, or drifts through ignorance
12 into, the commission of any act which is unfavorable to the people having this security, it
13 must in its very essence be a free Constitution. Whatever any one may say to the contrary
14 that is secured in the very way in which the freedom of the British Constitution is secured.
15 It is secured by vesting in the people, through their representatives, the power of the purse,
16 and I venture [start page 2477] to say there is no other way of securing absolute freedom to
17 a people than that, unless you make a different kind of Executive than that which we
18 contemplate, and then overload your Constitution with legislative provisions to protect the
19 citizen from interference. Under this Constitution he is saved from every kind of
20 interference. Under this Constitution he has his voice not only in the, daily
21 government of the country, but in the daily determination of the question of whom is
22 the Government to consist. There is the guarantee of freedom in this Constitution.
23 There is the guarantee which none of us have sought to remove, but every one has
24 sought to strengthen. How we or our work can be accused of not providing for the
25 popular liberty is something which I hope the critics will now venture to explain, and
26 I think I have made their work difficult for them. Having provided in that way for a
27 free Constitution, we have provided for an Executive which is charged with the duty
28 of maintaining the provisions of that Constitution; and, therefore, it can only act as
29 the agents of the people. We have provided for a Judiciary, which will determine
30 questions arising under this Constitution, and with all other questions which should
31 be dealt with by a Federal Judiciary and it will also be a High Court of Appeal for all
32 courts in the states that choose to resort to it. In doing these things, have we not
33 provided, first, that our Constitution shall be free: next, that its government shall be by the
34 will of the people, which is the just result of their freedom: thirdly, that the Constitution
35 shall not, nor shall any of its provisions, be twisted or perverted, inasmuch as a court
36 appointed by their own Executive, but acting independently, is to decide what is a
37 perversion of its provisions? We can have every faith in the constitution of that tribunal. It
38 is appointed as the arbiter of the Constitution. It is appointed not to be above the
39 Constitution, for no citizen is above it, but under it; but it is appointed for the purpose
40 of saying that those who are the instruments of the Constitution-the Government and
41 the Parliament of the day-shall not become the masters of those whom, as to the
42 Constitution, they are bound to serve. What I mean is this: That if you, after making
43 a Constitution of this kind, enable any Government or any Parliament to twist or
44 infringe its provisions, then by slow degrees you may have that Constitution-if not
45 altered in terms-so whittled away in operation that the guarantees of freedom which it
46 gives your people will not be maintained; and so, in the highest sense, the court you
47 are creating here, which is to be the final interpreter of that Constitution, will be such
48 a tribunal as will preserve the popular liberty in all these regards, and will prevent,
49 under any pretext of constitutional action, the Commonwealth from dominating the
50 states, or the states from usurping the sphere of the Commonwealth. Having provided
51 for all these things, I think this Convention has done well.
52 END QUOTE
18-3-2025 Page 5 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 6

1
2 State Land Taxation (including “council rates” are unconstitutional since 11 November 1910.
3 The States have no legislative, executive and/or administrative powers regarding man-kind
4 infectious diseases since 1908! Hence, all those and other unconstitutional taxes by the States
5 must be refunded to the relevant taxpayers and any left overs, etc, also be must be handed over to
6 the Commonwealth. Municipal/shire councils are also to GST, for so far the GST itself is
7 constitutionally valid (I do not hold it to be so!)
8
9 So much more but you should get the drift that we fail to operate governments within the legal
10 provisions embedded in the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK).
11
12 QUOTE 20250316-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus-Supplement 12
13 Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus 16-3-2025
14 Email [email protected],
15
16 Cc: Justin Bott Service Australian Community Information Service Officer
17 Centrelink Ref 301 602 799V
18 Reply Paid 7800, CANBERRABC ACT 2610
19 NOT RESTRICTED FOR PUBLICATION
20 Re Supplement 12
21 ROBODEBT 3
22 Sir,
23 I understand that Centrelink claimed certain estate ownership in regard of my late Wife Olga
24 Hlavka-Schorel and also of myself purportedly Centrelink having obtained the alleged details
25 after my late wife died on 8 August 2024. As the publication by Centrelink place in question the
26 truth and despite my various previous writings Centrelink (Service Australia) failed to as I
27 requested to clarify its conduct regarding its accessing our confidential accounts then where there
28 had no change in my financial position unknown to Centrelink then any obligation to provide
29 details to Centrelink is without legal justification in particular where as with Robodebt it is
30 based upon nonsense Centrelink cannot interfere with my lawful entitlement of the “age
31 pension” without a court order! Hence, any interference with my “age pension” would
32 immediately attract a $1 Billion common law rights compensation, and an addition double that
33 amount where it involved a conspiracy to do so, etc.
34 Consider the following:

35
18-3-2025 Page 6 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 7

1
18-3-2025 Page 7 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 8

2
3
4 Let’s consider the following also:
5

6
18-3-2025 Page 8 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 9

1
2 Its to me very clear that Centrelink (Service Australia) is using deceptive methods and access
3 bank account ignoring personal confidentiality, as they already proved to do 25 years ago! This,
4 as Centrelink simply demand from Banking institutions to provide copies of bank accounts and
5 then has them on its files where unchecked Centrelink employees then can access those bank
6 accounts. Don’t give me the nonsense this doesn’t happen as I some 25 years ago attended yto
7 Centrelink and discovered that without consent of the party I represented, had original printed
8 copies of bank statements and was informed then that Centrelink does this as it simply make
9 such demands and the bank institution then must comply. I also discovered in the folder lying on
10 a desk that it contained even Title documentation of strangers nothing to do with the person I
11 represented, and who never had any legal connection to such title. At the time Centrelink staff
12 claimed it had only files on the computer, however I then happen to notice on a desk a file with
13 the name of the party I represented and then Centrelink Staff opening the file showed me it
14 contained bank statement (obtained without the knowledge and consent of the party I
15 represented) and also the Title of a property never owned by the party I represented. As the file
16 was on a desk without anyone being at that desk and neither anyone else at any desk, as the
17 Centrelink staff assisting me was using access to the computer of the file on computer. Also,
18 documentation that were printed out did not show the actual date of each document when it was
19 originally created but rather the day I was there and requested it to be printed. It should be very
20 obvious that Centrelink would so to say open a can of worms (Pandora Box) if it were to
21 litigate against me, and so likewise if it interfered with my rights to obtain an “age pension”!
22 For the above also I demand that your 3 March 2025 correspondence is withdrawn and you
23 provide a written apology and provide an undertaking never to access any of my property
24 holdings without in each occasion first obtaining written consent from me or from a Court, albeit
25 in regard of any Court the Court must provide me reasonable and appropriate ability to oppose
26 any Centrelink (Service Australia) application, etc.
27 Also, Centrelink (Service Australia provide without further delay immediately the information as
28 to its claim as to my now late wife Olga Hlavka-Schorel and myself alleged estate holdings
29 which it claims to exist as of 8 August 2025 and also on what legal basis it obtained any such
30 confidential information, etc. Failing Centrelink (Service Australia) to provide lawful authority
31 to have access my late wife Olga Hlavka-Schorel’s confidential details and/or that of my self
32 allegedly on 8 August 2025 then for each person so harmed $1 Billion as common law
33 compensation will be applicable and in each case double of that added where it involved a
34 conspiracy, where 2 or more persons were involved as such.
35
36 This kind of Robodebt claims, etc, must be stopped and those working for the Federal
37 government must be held legally accountable so that never again such kind of conduct can be
38 used! Also, that public servants who participate in treasonous/terrorism will be held legally
39 accountable.
40
41 This document is not intended and neither must be perceived to address all relevant issues
42 and neither are issues referred to in any order of importance.
43
44 We need to return to the organics and legal principles embed in of our federal constitution!
45
46 This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.
47 Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)

48 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

49 (Our name is our motto!)
50 END QUOTE 20250316-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus-Supplement 12
18-3-2025 Page 9 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
 Page 10

1
2 While there may be people who would consider a $1 billion common-law compensation to be
3 absurd reality is that we need to take hold on stopping the ongoing abuse of powers and hold
4 public servants also legally accountable.
5
6 Here we had the medical/science profession and others violating Australians constitutional rights
7 and force/coerce them to be jabbed in violation to bioweapon legal provisions with a “gene
8 therapy” DEPOPULATION “bio weapon” fraudulently referred to as a “covid-19 vaccine”.
9
10 The Federal Government spending a reported $60 to the media to silence Australians in violation
11 of their constitutional rights of FREEDOM OF SPEECH, etc.
12
13 Hansard 9-4-1891 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
14 Australasian Convention)
15 QUOTE
16 Dr. COCKBURN: Local freedom and government by the people are inseparable.
17 END QUOTE
18
19 HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
20 Australasian Convention)
21 QUOTE Mr. DEAKIN.-
22 What a charter of liberty is embraced within this Bill-of political liberty and religious
23 liberty-the liberty and the means to achieve all to which men in these days can reasonably
24 aspire. A charter of liberty is enshrined in this Constitution, which is also a
25 charter of peace-of peace, order, and good government for the
26 whole of the peoples whom it will embrace and unite.
27 END QUOTE
28 And
29 HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
30 QUOTE
31 Mr. SYMON (South Australia).- We who are assembled in this Convention are about to
32 commit to the people of Australia a new charter of union and liberty; we are about to
33 commit this new Magna Charta for their acceptance and confirmation, and I can
34 conceive of nothing of greater magnitude in the whole history of the peoples of the
35 world than this question upon which we are about to invite the peoples of Australia to
36 vote. The Great Charter was wrung by the barons of England from a reluctant king. This
37 new charter is to be given by the people of Australia to themselves.
38 END QUOTE
39
40 This document is not intended and neither must be perceived to address all relevant issues
41 and neither are issues referred to in any order of importance.
42
43 We need to return to the organics and legal principles embed in of our federal constitution!
44
45 This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.
46 Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)

47 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

48 (Our name is our motto!)

18-3-2025 Page 10 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati